https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9163-9605
Figures
Abstract
Background
Some patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) must be hospitalized because of heart failure (HF), including HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF). The association between IPF and HF has not been clarified. We retrospectively investigated the clinical features and outcomes of patients with IPF who required nonelective hospitalization because of HF.
Methods
We examined data from IPF patients who required nonelective hospitalization for HF at the Kindai University Hospital from January 2008 to December 2018. We divided the patients into 3 groups: those with HFpEF without elevated right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP), those with HFpEF and elevated RVSP, and those with HFrEF. The recurrence rates of HF after discharge and the 30- and 90-day mortality rates of the patients were evaluated.
Results
During the study period, 37 patients with IPF required hospitalization because of HF. Among the 34 patients included in the study, 17 (50.0%) were diagnosed with HFpEF without elevated RVSP, 11 (32.3%) with HFpEF and elevated RVSP, and 6 (17.6%) with HFrEF. Patients with HFrEF had significantly higher values for B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) and left ventricular (LV) end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters than patients with the 2 types of HFpEF (BNP: P = 0.01 and P = 0.0004, LV end-systolic diameter: P <0.0001 and P <0.0001, and LV end-diastolic diameter: P = 0.01 and P = 0.0004, respectively). Notably, the difference between the LVEFs of the patients with 2 types of HFpEF was not significant. The patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP had the lowest 30- and 90-day mortality rates (0%, P = 0.02 and 11.7%, P = 0.11, respectively).
Citation: Yamazaki R, Nishiyama O, Yoshikawa K, Saeki S, Sano H, Iwanaga T, et al. (2021) HFpEF without elevated right ventricular systolic pressure is a favorable prognostic indicator in patients with IPF requiring hospitalization for heart failure. PLoS ONE 16(1): e0245778. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0245778
Editor: Masataka Kuwana, Nippon Medical School, JAPAN
Received: September 14, 2020; Accepted: January 7, 2021; Published: January 22, 2021
Copyright: © 2021 Yamazaki et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is a specific form of chronic, progressive and fibrosing lung disease of unknown etiology and has a poor prognosis [1]. The natural course of IPF is highly variable [2]. Many patients with IPF require hospitalization related to respiratory and/or cardiovascular disease [3, 4].
Heart failure (HF) is an important health problem worldwide. The prevalence of HF is estimated to be 1%–2% of the adult population in developed countries [5]. About 50% of patients with HF have a normal or nearly normal left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) [6–8]. The prevalence of this type of HF, termed HF with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), is increased in older populations [9]. Because many patients with IPF are elderly, HFpEF may affect a high proportion of IPF patients with HF. Additionally, nonelective hospitalization, which is sometimes required for patients with IPF, has recently been recognized as an important clinical outcome [10, 11]. HF can account for some of the nonelective hospitalizations of patients with IPF.
The clinical features and outcomes of patients with IPF and HF, including the HF subgroups of HFpEF and HF with reduced EF (HFrEF), are unknown. This study aimed to clarify the details of the clinical features and outcomes of HF in patients with IPF who required hospitalization.
Methods
Patients
We retrospectively reviewed the clinical records of all patients with IPF who required nonelective hospitalization for HF at the Kindai University Hospital from January 2008 to December 2018. The diagnosis of IPF was based on the eligibility criteria adopted in the INPULSIS trial [12]. Briefly, patients who had a histologically confirmed usual interstitial pneumonia (UIP) pattern on a surgical lung biopsy (SLB) specimen were included. In the absence of a SLB specimen used for confirmation of UIP, a high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan showing honeycombing and/or a combination of reticular abnormalities and traction bronchiectasis without atypical features of UIP was required for study inclusion.
Approval for the use of these data and the analysis was provided by the ethics committee of the Faculty of Medicine, Kindai University (No. 31–272). The need for informed consent was waived because of the retrospective nature of the study.
Diagnosis of HF
The diagnosis of HF upon the hospitalization of each study patient was mainly based on the Framingham Study, as follows: 1) clinical evidence of HF such as dyspnea on exertion, paroxysmal nocturnal dyspnea or orthopnea, or peripheral edema; 2) chest radiography or HRCT revealing pulmonary venous congestion, cardiomegaly, or pleural effusion; 3) level of B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) ≥100 pg/mL recorded at admission; 4) deterioration not explained by other causes such as acute exacerbation of IPF, pulmonary infection, pulmonary embolism, mediastinal emphysema and/or pneumothorax, or anemia [13, 14]. The types of HF were as follows: HFpEF was defined as HF with a LVEF ≥50% and HFrEF as HF with a LVEF <50% on echocardiography. Furthermore, patients with an echocardiographic right ventricular systolic pressure (RVSP) ≥50 mm Hg were classified with HFpEF and high RVSP because the patients in this group might have had existing pulmonary hypertension (PH), including precapillary PH [15]. None of the study patients with HFrEF had a RVSP ≥50 mm Hg. Finally, we divided the IPF patients with HF into 3 groups, as follows: HFpEF without RVSP (LVEF ≥50% and RVSP <50 mm Hg), HFpEF with high RVSP (LVEF ≥50% and RVSP ≥50 mm Hg), and HFrEF (LVEF <50% and RVSP <50 mm Hg).
Pulmonary function tests
The pulmonary function tests that were performed within 1 year prior to the hospitalization were used for baseline pulmonary function. Spirometry and single-breath measurements of diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide were performed by the CHESTAC-8800 spirometer (Chest, Tokyo, Japan), according to current international best practices [16, 17]. Results were expressed as percentages of Japanese normal predicted values [18, 19].
Echocardiography
The LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters, and left atrial diameter were measured by M-mode echocardiography. LVEF was measured according to the modified Simpson method [20]. The RVSP was calculated from the estimated transtricuspid pressure gradient (TRPG) and right arterial pressure. The TRPG was estimated based on a Doppler assessment of the peak velocity of tricuspid regurgitation [15]. In our study, we used the data from the echocardiographic assessment performed at the time of admission.
Data collection
We reviewed and recorded the clinical characteristics of all the study patients, as follows: the findings on physical examination and results of standard laboratory tests upon admission, outpatient use of long-term oxygen therapy, and IPF treatment before admission.
Survival assessments
We evaluated the recurrence of HF and the 30- and 90-day mortality rates of the patients. Information on all the deaths was obtained from review of the hospital charts.
Recurrence of HF
Recurrence of HF in patients with IPF was reviewed. The time-to-recurrence was defined as the number of days from the date of hospitalization for the first episode of HF during the study period until the date of hospitalization for a recurrence of HF.
Statistical analysis
Continuous variables are presented as means ± standard deviation. Categorical variables are presented as frequencies. Comparisons between categorical variables were performed by the Fisher exact test. Comparisons between the parameters of the patients grouped according to types of HF (HFpEF without elevated RVSP, HFpEF with elevated RVSP, and HFrEF) were performed by one-way analysis of variance, followed by the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons. Univariate logistic regression analysis was used to identify the potential risk factors for recurrence and 30- and 90-day mortality. For all tests, P < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Analysis was performed by Statflex ver.6 software (Artech, Co., Ltd., Osaka, Osaka, Japan).
Results
Fig 1 shows the study inclusion flowchart. Of 200 patients with IPF who were first admitted nonelectively from January 2008 through December 2018, 37 (18.5%) were hospitalized because of HF. Three were excluded because they did not undergo echocardiography. Eventually, a total of 34 patients (17.0%) were included in this study. The study patients were classified as follows: HFpEF without elevated RVSP (n = 17 [50.0%]), HFpEFwith elevated RVSP (n = 11 [32.3%]), and HFrEF (n = 6 [17.6%]). The baseline characteristics of the patients before admission are shown in Table 1. The differences between the parameters of the characteristics of the 3 study groups were not significant, except for the numbers of patients receiving corticosteroid therapy for IPF. Regarding comorbidities associated with cardiovascular disease (CVD), the rates of coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia were highest in the patients with HFrEF; however, the rates of atrial fibrillation/flutter were highest in the patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP.
HF, heart failure; HFpEF, heart failure with preserved ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; IPF, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis; LVEF, left ventricular ejection fraction; RVSP, right ventricular systolic pressure.
The admission clinical data of patients are shown in Table 2. Significant differences were observed between the values for BNP, LV end-systolic diameter, LV end-diastolic diameter, LVEF, and RV end-systolic pressure (P = 0.01, P<0.0001, P = 0.0005, P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). Intergroup comparisons found that patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP had significantly lower BNP levels than patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP, and patients with HFrEF (P = 0.0004 and P = 0.01, respectively). Patients with HFrEF had significantly higher values for LV end-systolic and end-diastolic diameters than patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP (P<0.0001 and P = 0.01, respectively) and patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP (P<0.0001 and P = 0.0004, respectively). Patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP had significantly higher values for LV end-diastolic diameter than patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP (P = 0.01). Patients with HFrEF had significantly lower values for LVEF than patients with HFpEFs (P<0.0001 and P<0.0001, respectively). Patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP had significantly higher values for RV end-systolic pressure than patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP and patients with HFrEF (P<0.0001 and P = 0.0002, respectively).
The outcomes of patients during the first hospitalization are shown in Table 3. The 30-day mortality rates of patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP, patients with HFrEF, and patients with HFpEF and elevated RSVP were 0%, 16.6%, and 36.3%, respectively, with a significantly better survival for the patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP (P = 0.02). The 90-day mortality rates were 11.7%, 16.6%, and 45.4%, showing survival rates from best to worst for patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP, patients with HFrEF, and patients with HFpEF and elevated RSVP, respectively; although the differences were not significant. Logistic regression analysis demonstrated that HFpEF with elevated RVSP was the only predictor of 30-day mortality (odds ratio 12.5, 95% confidential interval 1.19–125; P = 0.03). There were no significant predictors for 90-day mortality. Differences between recurrence rates for the 3 patient groups were not significant. However, the recurrence rate of patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP was approximately 2- to 3-fold higher than the recurrence rates of the 2 other patient groups. However, no significant predictors for recurrence were identified.
Discussion
IPF is a progressive, fibrosing interstitial pneumonia that increases in prevalence with advanced age [1]. The median age for the diagnosis of IPF is about 70 years [21, 22]. Some patients with IPF require nonelective hospitalization for HF during the clinical course of their illness [3]. We classified the patients with HF into 3 groups, those with HFpEF without elevated RVSP, HFpEF with elevated RVSP, and those with HFrEF, and compared the groups. The largest proportion of study patients had HFpEF without elevated RVSP. This group of patients showed the most favorable survival, but also showed the highest recurrence rate.
Approximately 50% of patients with HF have been reported to have a normal or nearly normal LVEF [6–8]. Old age, female sex, hypertension, elevated body mass index, smoking, and diabetes have been reported to be risk factors for HFpEF [9, 23]. Patients with HFpEF also can have a respiratory comorbidity such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease [24, 25], which leads to increased risk of mortality [25]. Although only a few studies have reported on the relationship between interstitial lung disease and left HF, it has been suggested that some patients with IPF have HFpEF, or diastolic dysfunction [26–28]. Our study focused on LV function in patients with IPF who were hospitalized because of HF. We found that some patients with IPF had HFpEF when they were hospitalized.
The reason why patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP recurred at the highest rate is unknown. Atrial fibrillation/flutter were most frequent in the patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP. This may account for the highest recurrent rates of HFpEF without high RVSP among the IPF patients, because atrial fibrillation/flutter have been considered to be important risk factor of readmission for HF exacerbation [29, 30]. Some of these patients might have RV decompensation despite not having an elevated RVSP; and the decompensated right ventricle might have led to a decreased cardiac output, which ultimately resulted in reduction of the RVSP. However, this was a retrospective study in which only a few of our study patients underwent assessment of the systolic function of their right ventricle that included measurement of the systolic excursion of the tricuspid valve annular plane. Further studies are needed to clarify the relationship between RV decompensation and the recurrence of HFpEF in IPF patients. Patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP had a significantly higher LV end-diastolic diameter than patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP. However, the exact reason for this finding is unclear. The finding might be accounted for by chance or be the result of a decreased volume of blood reflux into the left ventricle of those patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP.
We defined the patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP as those patients with an RVSP ≥50 mm Hg on echocardiography. The patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP showed the highest mortality rate. We could not clarify whether or not the PH we identified was due to HF. Some patients with IPF and existing PH also need hospitalization. In those cases, the hospitalization may be associated with the existing PH and related right HF [10]. Patients who have IPF and chronically stable PH have a poor prognosis [31, 32]. This might account for the poor survival of our hospitalized patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP coinciding with IPF.
Comorbidities of CVD such as hypertension, arrhythmia, diabetes mellitus, hyperlipidemia, sleep apnea syndrome, and thyroid disease are major risk factors for the progression of HF. In this study, the differences between the CVD comorbidities of the 3 study groups were not significant. However, coronary artery disease, hypertension, diabetes mellitus, and dyslipidemia were most frequent in the patients with HFrEF, but atrial fibrillation/flutter were most frequent in the patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP. As for the relationship between CVD comorbidity and HF among IPF patients, left-sided heart disease with comorbidities of coronary artery disease or hypertension may cause HFrEF and influence its clinical course in the IPF patients with HFrEF. On the other hand, atrial fibrillation/flutter are germane to HFpEF without elevated RVSP [33]. Because atrial fibrillation/flutter is one of complications from decompensated RV of cor pulmonale [34], some IPF patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP might be in cor pulmonale. Patients with IPF and atrial fibrillation/flutter should be evaluated for HFpEF not only at a nonelective admission but also when they are stable.
Our study has several limitations. First, the study was conducted in a retrospective fashion. Second, the study was performed at a single center with a small number of patients. Third, both the underdiagnosis and overdiagnosis of HF might have occurred, although we diagnosed HF based on the criteria proposed in the Framingham study [13]. IPF and HF share a number of common signs/symptoms such as cough, dyspnea, fatigue, and reduced exercise tolerance in patients with chronically stable disease [35–37]. In the acute setting, an accurate diagnosis is even more difficult to obtain. Fourth, HFpEF with high RVSP (possible PH) was diagnosed by echocardiography, although right heart catheterization (RHC) is required for the definitive diagnosis of PH [15]. However, performing an RHC for every patient with suspected PH who requires hospitalization because of HF is impractical, because RHC is an invasive and inconvenient procedure. When a patient is not stable, an RVSP >50 mm Hg can be used as an indirect diagnostic marker of possible PH [38, 39]. Further studies are needed that focus on hospitalized patients with IPF and PH in order to determine an accurate classification. Finally, the values for LV function and RVSP of patients before hospitalization were unknown. We could not clarify if patients with HFpEF and high RVSP at hospitalization had HF or pre-existing PH. A prospective study is needed to clarify the times of onset.
In conclusion, HFpEF is the most common type of HF that requires nonelective hospitalization in patients with IPF. Patients with HFpEF without elevated RVSP survived longer than patients with HFpEF and elevated RVSP and patients with HFrEF.
References
- 1. Raghu G, Remy-Jardin M, Myers JL, Richeldi L, Ryerson CJ, Lederer DJ, et al. Diagnosis of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. An Official ATS/ERS/JRS/ALAT Clinical Practice Guideline. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2018;198:e44–68. pmid:30168753
- 2. Martinez FJ, Safrin S, Weycker D, Starko KM, Bradford WZ, King TE Jr, et al. The clinical course of patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Ann Intern Med 2005;142:963–967. pmid:15968010
- 3. Song JW, Hong SB, Lim CM, Koh Y, Kim DS. Acute exacerbation of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: incidence, risk factors and outcome. Eur Respir J 2011;37:356–363. pmid:20595144
- 4. Cottin V, Schmidt A, Catella L, Porte F, Fernandez-Montoya C, Le Lay K, et al. Burden of Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis Progression: A 5-Year Longitudinal Follow-Up Study. PLoS One 2017;12:e0166462. pmid:28099456
- 5. Ponikowski P, Voors AA, Anker SD, Bueno H, Cleland JGF, Coats AJS, et al. 2016 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure: The Task Force for the diagnosis and treatment of acute and chronic heart failure of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Developed with the special contribution of the Heart Failure Association (HFA) of the ESC. Eur Heart J 2016;37:2129–2200. pmid:27206819
- 6. Redfield MM, Jacobsen SJ, Burnett JC Jr, Mahoney DW, Bailey KR, Rodeheffer RJ. Burden of systolic and diastolic ventricular dysfunction in the community: appreciating the scope of the heart failure epidemic. JAMA 2003;289:194–202. pmid:12517230
- 7. Lam CS, Donal E, Kraigher-Krainer E, Vasan RS. Epidemiology and clinical course of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction. Eur J Heart Fail 2011;13:18–28. pmid:20685685
- 8. Tsutsui H, Tsuchihashi M, Takeshita A. Mortality and readmission of hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure and preserved versus depressed systolic function. Am J Cardiol 2001;88:530–533. pmid:11524063
- 9. Bhatia RS, Tu JV, Lee DS, Austin PC, Fang J, Haouzi A, et al. Outcome of heart failure with preserved ejection fraction in a population-based study. N Engl J Med 2006;355:260–269. pmid:16855266
- 10. Nishiyama O, Saeki S, Yamazaki R, Sano H, Iwanaga T, Kume H, et al. Characteristics and association with survival of respiratory-related hospitalization in Japanese idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis patients. Respir Investig 2019;57:415–421. pmid:31003952
- 11. Yamazaki R, Nishiyama O, Saeki S, Sano H, Iwanaga T, Tohda Y. Characteristics of patients with chronic idiopathic interstitial pneumonia undergoing repeated respiratory-related hospitalizations: A retrospective cohort study. PLoS One 2020;15:e0232212. pmid:32330195
- 12. Richeldi L, du Bois RM, Raghu G, Azuma A, Brown KK, Costabel U, et al. Efficacy and safety of nintedanib in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. N Engl J Med 2014;370:2071–2082. pmid:24836310
- 13. Mckee PA, Castelli WP, Mcnamara PM, Kannel WB. The natural history of congestive heart failure: the Framingham study. N Engl J Med 1971;285:1441–1446. pmid:5122894
- 14. McCullough PA, Nowak RM, McCord J, Hollander JE, Herrmann HC, Steg PG, et al. B-type natriuretic peptide and clinical judgment in emergency diagnosis of heart failure: analysis from breathing not properly (BNP) multinational study. Circulation 2002;106:416–422. pmid:12135939
- 15. Galiè N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, et al. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Heart J 2016;37:67–119. pmid:26320113
- 16. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, et al. Standardisation of spirometry. Eur Respir J 2005;26:319–338. pmid:16055882
- 17. Macintyre N, Crapo RO, Viegi G, Johnson DC, van der Grinten CP, Brusasco V, et al. Standardisation of the single-breath determination of carbon monoxide uptake in the lung. Eur Respir J 2005;26:720–735. pmid:16204605
- 18. Hanamoto S, Ohsuji T, Tsuyuguchi I, Kawabata S, Kimura K. Prediction formulas for pulmonary function tests expressed in linear and exponential form for healthy Japanese adults. Nihon Kyobu Shikkan Gakkai Zasshi 1992;30:2051–2060. pmid:1289624
- 19. Kubota M, Kobayashi H, Quanjer PH, Omori H, Tatsumi K, Kanazawa M. Reference values for spirometry, including vital capacity, in Japanese adults calculated with the LMS method and compared with previous values. Respir Investig 2014;52:242–250. pmid:24998371
- 20. Lang RM, Badano LP, Mor-Avi V, Afilalo J, Armstrong A, Ernande L, et al. Recommendations for cardiac chamber quantification by echocardiography in adults: an update from the American Society of Echocardiography and the European Association of Cardiovascular Imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr 2015;28:1–39. pmid:25559473
- 21. Natsuizaka M, Chiba H, Kuronuma K, Otsuka M, Kudo K, Mori M, et al. Epidemiologic survey of Japanese patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis and investigation of ethnic differences. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2014;190:773–779. pmid:25162152
- 22. Fernández Pérez ER, Daniels CE, Schroeder DR, St Sauver J, Hartman TE, Bartholmai BJ, et al. Incidence, prevalence, and clinical course of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a population-based study. Chest 2010;137:129–137. pmid:19749005
- 23. Mentz RJ, Kelly JP, von Lueder TG, Voors AA, Lam CS, Cowie MR, et al. Noncardiac Comorbidities in Heart Failure With Reduced Versus Preserved Ejection Fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2014;64:2281–2293. pmid:25456761
- 24. Hawkins NM, Petrie MC, Jhund PS, Chalmers GW, Dunn FG, McMurray JJ. Heart failure and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: diagnostic pitfalls and epidemiology. Eur J Heart Fail 2009;11:130–139. pmid:19168510
- 25. Ather S, Chan W, Bozkurt B, Aguilar D, Ramasubbu K, Zachariah AA, et al. Impact of noncardiac comorbidities on morbidity and mortality in a predominantly male population with heart failure and preserved versus reduced ejection fraction. J Am Coll Cardiol 2012;59:998–1005. pmid:22402071
- 26. Carter P, Lagan J, Fortune C, Bhatt DL, Vestbo J, et al. Association of Cardiovascular Disease With Respiratory Disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 2019;73:2166–2177. pmid:30846341
- 27. Papadopoulos CE, Pitsiou G, Karamitsos TD, Karvounis HI, Kontakiotis T, Giannakoulas G, et al. Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis: a tissue Doppler echocardiographic study. Eur Respir J 2008;31:701–706. pmid:18057055
- 28. Raghu G, Nathan SD, Behr J, Brown KK, Egan JJ, Kawut SM, et al. Pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis with mild-to-moderate restriction. Eur Respir J 2015;46:1370–1377. pmid:26250495
- 29. Koitabashi T, Inomata T, Niwano S, Nishii M, Takeuchi I, Nakano H, et al. Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation coincident with cardiac decompensation is a predictor of poor prognosis in chronic heart failure. Circ J 2005;69:823–830. pmid:15988108
- 30. Ahmed MI, White M, Ekundayo OJ, Love TE, Aban I, Liu B, et al. A history of atrial fibrillation and outcomes in chronic advanced systolic heart failure: a propensity-matched study. Eur Heart J 2009;30:2029–2037. pmid:19531579
- 31. Patel NM, Lederer DJ, Borczuk AC, Kawut SM. Pulmonary hypertension in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2007;132:998–1006. pmid:17873194
- 32. Rivera-Lebron BN, Forfia PR, Kreider M, Lee JC, Holmes JH, Kawut SM. Echocardiographic and hemodynamic predictors of mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Chest 2013;144:564–570. pmid:23450321
- 33. Reddy YNV, Obokata M, Gersh BJ, Borlaug BA. High prevalence of occult heart failure with preserved ejection fraction among patients with atrial fibrillation and dyspnea. Circulation 2018;137:534–535. pmid:29378762
- 34. Obokata M, Reddy YN, Melenovsky V, Pislaru S, Borlaug BA. Deterioration in right ventricular structure and function over time in patients with heart failure and preserved ejection fraction. Eur Heart J 2019;40:689–697. pmid:30544228
- 35. van Manen MJ, Birring SS, Vancheri C, Cottin V, Renzoni EA, Russell AM,vet al. Cough in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. Eur Respir Rev 2016;25:278–286. pmid:27581827
- 36. Albert N, Trochelman K, Li J, Lin S. Signs and symptoms of heart failure: are you asking the right questions? Am J Crit Care 2010;19:443–452. pmid:19940253
- 37. van Cleemput J, Sonaglioni A, Wuyts WA, Bengus M, Stauffer JL, Harari S. Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis for Cardiologists: Differential Diagnosis, Cardiovascular Comorbidities, and Patient Management. Adv Ther 2019;36:298–317. pmid:30554332
- 38. Goudie A, Elder D, Deshmukh H, Szwejkowski BR, Lang CC, George J. Effect of Warfarin on Survival in Patients With Concomitant Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction and Pulmonary Hypertension: A Population Cohort Study. Eur J Heart Fail 2015;17:90–97. pmid:25427720
- 39. Nathan SD, Shlobin OA, Barnett SD, Saggar R, Belperio JA, Ross DJ, et al. Right Ventricular Systolic Pressure by Echocardiography as a Predictor of Pulmonary Hypertension in Idiopathic Pulmonary Fibrosis. Respir Med 2008;102:1305–1310. pmid:18619825