Figures
The affiliations for the 11th and 15th authors are incorrect. The correct affiliations are as follows: Barbara Saracino11, Massimiano Bucchi13
11 Department of Political and Social Sciences, University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy, 13 Department of Sociology, Università di Trento, Trento, Italy
Information is missing in the captions for Figs 1 and 2. Please see the correct Fig 1 and Fig 2 captions here.
Estimated average number of public events, traditional news media, and new media channels by research institutes, in the twelve months prior to the study. Diamonds represent the means and the light shaded bars the 95% CIs (confidence intervals) (N = 2,030).
Estimated average number of public events, traditional media, and social media channels by research institutes, in the twelve months prior to the study. Diamonds represent the means and the light shaded bars the 95% CIs (confidence intervals) (N = 2,030).
Reference
- 1. Entradas M, Bauer MW, O'Muircheartaigh C, Marcinkowski F, Okamura A, Pellegrini G, et al. (2020) Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility? PLoS ONE 15(7): e0235191. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0235191 pmid:32639974
Citation: Entradas M, Bauer MW, O'Muircheartaigh C, Marcinkowski F, Okamura A, Pellegrini G, et al. (2020) Correction: Public communication by research institutes compared across countries and sciences: Building capacity for engagement or competing for visibility? PLoS ONE 15(11): e0242950. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242950
Published: November 20, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Entradas et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.