To explore associations between exposures to medicines prescribed for asthma and their discontinuation in pregnancy and preterm birth [<37 or <32 weeks], SGA [<10th and <3rd centiles], and breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks.
Design. A population-based cohort study.
Setting. The Secure Anonymised Information Linkage [SAIL] databank in Wales, linking maternal primary care data with infant outcomes.
Population. 107,573, 105,331, and 38,725 infants born 2000–2010 with information on premature birth, SGA and breastfeeding respectively, after exclusions.
Exposures. maternal prescriptions for asthma medicines or their discontinuation in pregnancy.
Methods. Odds ratios for adverse pregnancy outcomes were calculated for the exposed versus the unexposed population, adjusted for smoking, parity, age and socio-economic status.
Prescriptions for asthma, whether continued or discontinued during pregnancy, were associated with birth at<32 weeks’ gestation, SGA <10th centile, and no breastfeeding (aOR 1.33 [1.10–1.61], 1.10 [1.03–1.18], 0.93 [0.87–1.01]). Discontinuation of asthma medicines in pregnancy was associated with birth at<37 weeks’ and <32 weeks’ gestation (aOR 1.22 [1.06–1.41], 1.53 [1.11–2.10]). All medicines examined, except ICS and SABA prescribed alone, were associated with SGA <10th centile.
Prescription of asthma medicines before or during pregnancy was associated with higher prevalence of adverse perinatal outcomes, particularly if prescriptions were discontinued during pregnancy. Women discontinuing medicines during pregnancy could be identified from prescription records. The impact of targeting close monitoring and breastfeeding support warrants exploration.
Citation: Davies G, Jordan S, Thayer D, Tucker D, Humphreys I (2020) Medicines prescribed for asthma, discontinuation and perinatal outcomes, including breastfeeding: A population cohort analysis. PLoS ONE 15(12): e0242489. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0242489
Editor: Calistus Wilunda, African Population and Health Research Center, KENYA
Received: February 14, 2020; Accepted: November 3, 2020; Published: December 9, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Davies et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files. Additional data are available in the EUROmediCAT report and its appendices (reference 27 - publicly available). The datasets generated and analysed during the current study are not publicly available, because the anonymized data, held by SAIL, can only be accessed within the SAIL secure remote access environment within the context of an approved project, following governance review. No patient level data are available under the terms of ethical and governance reviews. No participant consent is obtained for population level studies. Individual records for all databases were anonymised, and individual patient data cannot be publicly deposited or fully shared upon request. They are only available directly from the database providers. All interested parties are able to apply to obtain the data in the same way as the current investigators. Data used in the study can be accessed within the SAIL secure environment subject to approval by the SAIL Information Governance Review Panel. The URL for the SAIL databank is: https://saildatabank.com/, and the non-author contacts are Cynthia McNerney, Information Governance Manager, The SAIL Team, Swansea University: email@example.com and Charlotte Arkley, Administrator, SAIL Databank firstname.lastname@example.org. Dataset information (names of datasets and provenance) is provided under ’Methods, subsection Setting’. As indicated in the text, further details are in reference 27. The corresponding author will endeavour to meet requests for further data and information. We confirm that data that are not publicly available are not part of the minimal data set.
Funding: Funding This paper was developed from the EUROmediCAT project, and uses the cohort identified in that project. The analyses presented here were completed outside the funded period. Financial support for the EUROmediCAT study was provided by the European Union under the 7th Framework Program [grant agreement HEALTH-F5-2011-260598]. Start date: 1 March 2011. Duration: 48 months. Coordinator: Prof. Helen Dolk, University of Ulster. Further information can be found at www.euromedicat.eu. The paper is based on data in the all-Wales SAIL databank, which is supported by UK Research and Innovation funding to Swansea University through an Administrative Data Research Centre grant (2018-2021), project reference: ES/S007393/1, Principal Investigator: Professor David Ford. The funder played no part in the study or production of the paper.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
The prevalence of asthma in pregnancy has increased worldwide [1–3]. Approximately 9% of pregnant women in the UK are prescribed medicines for asthma, more than elsewhere in Europe . However, there is no consensus on the effect of asthma or prescription of asthma medicines on perinatal outcomes. While older  and smaller [6, 7] studies were reassuring, asthma [3, 8] accompanied by symptoms [5, 9] or suboptimal spirometry recordings  has been associated with growth restriction [small for gestational age [SGA]]. Premature birth is associated with asthma diagnosis in some studies [11, 12], but not others . Active management of asthma may reduce premature birth , and uncontrolled asthma increases the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes , but there is less information on medicines prescribed for asthma. Few RCTs have examined the impact of asthma medicines in pregnancy on perinatal outcomes, and no differences were seen in any of the small trials located . Short-Acting Beta Agonists [SABA] have not been associated with growth restriction or premature birth, although studies have relatively low numbers , and there is no consensus on the impact of Long-Acting Beta Agonists [LABA] [15–17]. There are few differences between medicines within each class . Up to 50% pregnant women discontinue asthma medicines, often without professional advice, frequently worsening asthma and outcomes [1, 9, 14].
Medicines prescribed for asthma cross the placenta and enter breastmilk [6, 13]. Prescription of asthma medicines in early pregnancy is associated with increased prevalence of congenital anomalies [aOR 1.20, 1.08–1.34], but the effects of asthma could not be separated from those of its treatment . Premature birth, SGA, and suboptimum breastfeeding threaten survival, developmental potential and ill-health from non-communicable disease in developed and developing countries , and the effects of medicines and their discontinuation on the range of pregnancy outcomes, including lactation, need to be considered together.
UK guidelines recommend that women prescribed asthma medicines breastfeed, and offer reassurance on oral corticosteroids . Few studies reporting medicines’ use and breastfeeding were located, all relatively small, and suggesting that breastfeeding rates were lower if medicines were prescribed. None considered medicines for asthma . Despite the known health and economic benefits of breastfeeding [22, 23], we were unable to locate reports of the impact of prescription medicines on the prevalence of breastfeeding amongst women with asthma.
To identify women likely to benefit from additional care, and target support, we aimed to explore any associations between prescriptions for asthma medicines during pregnancy, or their discontinuation, and the range of perinatal outcomes that matter to women [prematurity, SGA, and, for the first time, breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks, full or partial].
A population-based cohort was built from prospectively collected routine NHS data and analysed retrospectively . We explored association, rather than causality, as there was no randomisation.
The Secure Anonymised Information Linkage [SAIL] Databank Information Governance Review Panel [IGRP] approved the study on behalf of the National Research Ethics Service, Wales on 24th March 2011. Data were irrevocably anonymised and obtained with permission of the relevant Caldicott Guardian and Data Protection Officer.
Data were extracted from existing routinely collected data in SAIL, housed in Swansea University https://saildatabank.com/faq/ [25–27]. By 2014, ~40% of general practices had agreed to share data with SAIL, without payment. Women in the included population were slightly less deprived and older than the rest of Wales . Using unique personal identifiers, which remained undisclosed to researchers to ensure anonymity, we linked primary care records, including prescriptions, to: the Office of National Statistics (ONS) births and deaths register, the National Community Child Health Database [NCCHD] [http://www.publichealthwalesobservatory.wales.nhs.uk/ncchd], the Patient Episode Database for Wales [http://www.wales.nhs.uk/document/176173], and CARIS [Congenital Anomaly Register and Information Service for Wales] [http://www.caris.wales.nhs.uk/home]. Databases were linked by a trusted third party [NHS Wales Informatics Service [NWIS]] [http://www.wales.nhs.uk/sitesplus/956/home].
The study population included all births in Wales after 24 gestational weeks between 1st January 2000 and 31st December 2010, with linked maternal prescription data. Infants were included where the associated maternal ID could be linked with the primary care dataset (dependent on the general practice) and the record was complete . We included all infants where the woman was present in the linked database with primary care prescription information 91 days before LMP to birth. Information on start of pregnancy was obtained from ultrasound scan data recorded in the NCCHD for Wales . Infants with congenital anomalies were excluded, as associations with asthma prescriptions are reported elsewhere . The impact of antidepressants on breastfeeding, premature birth and SGA in this cohort has been reported .
Prescriptions reflect physicians’ assessment of asthma severity [5, 29], since prescribers adhere to guidelines  that direct monitoring and prescribing. Exposure to “any asthma medicines” was defined as the woman having been prescribed at least one asthma medicine [ATC code R03] in the 3 trimesters of pregnancy, defined as 1st day of LMP to birth . Exposure was grouped, based on 5-digit ATC codes  into 10 categories, listed in Table 1. Exposure to oral corticosteroids was restricted to those co-prescribed other asthma medicines.
Combined LABA and ICS preparations [R03AK] were added to the separate exposure categories, and not analysed as one group as this would preclude discussion of the disparate biological effects. We did not analyse exposure to systemic beta2 agonists, cromolyns, theophylline or anti-cholinergic medicines separately, due to very low prescription rates in this population (<40 pregnant women exposed to any of these 2004–10) .
Prematurity was defined as <37 completed weeks’ gestation, and ‘very premature’ as <32 completed weeks .
Growth centiles were calculated from WHO standards for the UK, and infants below the 10th and 3rd centiles were identified; the latter is defined as 2 standard deviations below the median or 50th centile .
Breastfeeding in this database is defined as ‘any breastfeeding’ (exclusive or combined, predominantly or partially, with other feeds, including formula milk) as routinely recorded by health visitors at birth and 6–8 weeks and entered into NCCHD . Data collection is more complete in some Health Board regions than others . Breastfeeding data were available from 2004. Breastfeeding at birth may represent intention to breastfeed, rather than actuality: a high proportion of dyads breastfeeding at birth have discontinued a week later. Therefore, this measure is downgraded as evidence of successful breastfeeding .
To minimise confounding by co-exposure, we restricted the dataset by excluding pregnancies known to be at risk of adverse outcomes . We achieved a relatively homogeneous population by excluding from the main analysis infants: 1) with major congenital anomalies;  2) from multiple pregnancies; 3) stillborn; 4) exposed in the quarter preceding pregnancy or trimester 1 to medicines more closely associated with adverse outcomes than asthma medicines: anti-epileptic drugs [AEDs] [NO3] ; coumarins [B01AA], mainly warfarin ; insulins [A10A]58;  and 5) whose mothers had any record of: heavy alcohol use and/or substance misuse , (many of these substances are powerful vasoconstrictors). Prevalences were checked before exclusion (tabulated in Jordan et al 2019, S3 Table).
We did not exclude moderate alcohol use as this is not known to affect perinatal outcomes , and may be inconsistently recorded. To minimize confounding by indication, we investigated both medicated and unmedicated asthma, as discontinuation of medication in pregnancy. We adjusted for socioeconomic status [SES], as Townsend fifths (S1 Table), parity, smoking [as ‘yes’ or ‘no’], year of birth, and maternal age, grouped .
We explored associations between prematurity, SGA and breastfeeding and prescription of asthma medicines 1 year before or during pregnancy, prescription discontinuation during pregnancy, and individual asthma medicines [Table 1]. For medicines with sufficient numbers of exposures, and where feasible, data were explored by logistic regression, backwards likelihood ratio , with covariates, SES , parity, smoking, age, and year of birth [S1 Table], using SPSS version 25 for windows . For each analysis we compared the exposed with the unexposed population. We compared outcomes for women with medicated and un-medicated asthma (S3 Table). Odds ratios, unadjusted and adjusted are reported together with 95% confidence / compatibility intervals. We explored demographic differences between women with and without breastfeeding data at 6–8 weeks.
We identified 117,717 pregnancies with complete primary care prescription data. We excluded 4401 infants with congenital anomalies [including 582 termination of pregnancy for foetal anomalies] and 2589 multiples, leaving 110,727 singletons, of whom 390 were stillborn [41 stillborn multiples].
When those exposed to insulin, AEDs or coumarins were excluded, numbers fell to 109,299, reducing to 107,573 available for analysis when those exposed to heavy drinking or substance misuse were excluded; 105,311 and 38,725 had data on centiles and breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks [Fig 1].
Stillbirth was more prevalent amongst women prescribed asthma medicines than the unexposed population [75/13,516, 0.55% vs.431/113,316, 0.38%, OR 1.56, 1.21–2.00], particularly if medicines had been discontinued throughout pregnancy [27/3850, 0.70%, OR1.91, 1.29–2.82]. Prevalence of deprivation, smoking, substance or alcohol misuse, prescription of insulin and AEDs was higher amongst women prescribed asthma medicines, with the exception of those prescribed ICS or ICS only. The prevalence of obesity [BMI>30] was higher amongst women with asthma, particularly those prescribed corticosteroids. Women discontinuing asthma medicines were younger, but not more deprived, than those continuing [S1 Table].
Asthma medicines were prescribed to 12,690/107,573 [11.8%] of the cohort before or during pregnancy; 3589/12690 [28.3%] received their last prescription before pregnancy, and were deemed to have ‘discontinued’ [S2 Table]. Most [8413, 92.4%] of the 9101 women prescribed asthma medicines in pregnancy received SABA, and 3820 [45.4%] of these 8413 received only SABA. Only 3875/ 9109 (42.6%) women received ICS, and 374 received ICS only. LABA were prescribed to 465 women and LKA to 89. OCS were prescribed to 519 women co-prescribed medicines for asthma. Women with breastfeeding data were older than those without [mean ages 28.48 [6.09] vs. 28.04 [6.04] years, mean difference 0.44 [0.36–0.51], t 11.36, df 79659, p<0.001], more deprived [mean Townsend score 0.40 [3.24] vs. 0.21 [3.12], mean difference 0.20 [0.16–0.24], t 9.65, df 77578, p<0.001], and less likely to be primiparous [16095/38725, 41.6% vs. 29388/68848, 42.7% OR 0.96 [0.93–0.98].
Premature birth at <37 or <32 weeks was more prevalent if asthma prescriptions had been discontinued before pregnancy, when compared with the whole population [aOR 1.22, 1.06–1.41, and aOR 1.53, 1.11–2.10,]. Any asthma medicine prescription before or during pregnancy was not associated with birth at <37 weeks, but was associated with extreme prematurity [aOR 1.33, 1.09–1.61]. Birth at <32 weeks was associated with OCS prescriptions [aOR 2.16, 1.07–4.37]. Birth at <37 and <32 weeks’ gestation was more prevalent if only SABA had been prescribed, but interval estimates included no difference [aOR 1.13, 0.98–1.30 and 1.37, 0.99–1.89]. ICS (any or only) was associated with reduced prevalence of birth at <37 weeks’, but interval estimates were compatible with no difference [aOR 0.87[0.74–1.02] and 0.64(0.36–1.15)] [Tables 2 and 3].
Birth weight <10th centile was associated with any asthma medication before or during pregnancy, SABA, ICS, LABA, LKA, and OCS. If prescriptions were discontinued or only ICS prescribed, odds ratios were similar, but interval estimates included no difference. Lower odds ratios were seen where SABA was prescribed alone. LABA and LKA were associated with birth weight <3rd centile, but numbers were low [Tables 4, 5].
Prevalence of breastfeeding at 6–8 weeks was some 3% lower following prescriptions before or during pregnancy or prescription discontinuation, but interval estimates in adjusted analyses included no difference. Association with any SABA or any ICS in unadjusted analyses diminished when smoking, maternal age and SES were accounted [Table 6].
In all analyses, smoking and SES were significant in the final models. Maternal age predicted breastfeeding, but not preterm delivery or SGA.
Prescription of asthma medicines during pregnancy or in the preceding year was associated with birth before 32 weeks’ gestation and at <10th centile, and exclusive formula feeding at 6–8 weeks. However, discontinuation of medicines was associated with premature birth [<37 and <32 weeks]; whilst exclusive formula feeding and SGA were more prevalent, interval estimates were compatible with no effect in adjusted models.
Adverse outcomes were more common amongst women treated with OCS, the most severely asthmatic, but the highest prevalence of premature birth and exclusive formula feeding was amongst those discontinuing prescriptions. ICS prescription appeared to offer some protection against prematurity. Although SABA-only indicates the least severe asthma [BTS5 stage 1], women prescribed ICS for more persistent symptoms [BTS stage 2] had better outcomes .
The association with premature birth reflects findings of a meta-analysis indicating increased risks for women diagnosed with asthma  or using OCS , contradicting earlier studies [6–8]. We did not confirm that increased risks are confined to those with more severe asthma [10, 11]. Rather, risks appeared to be increased by prescription discontinuation, which may worsen symptoms [48, 49]. Preterm birth appeared more likely where only SABA were prescribed, although interval estimates included no difference, supporting recent guidelines no longer recommending ‘SABA only’ regimens for any asthma .
Intrauterine growth restriction is associated with asthma [8, 9, 51, 52], particularly if severe [53–55], or symptomatic  or accompanied by reduced spirometry parameters , congruent with our findings that all asthma medicines, except ICS-only or SABA-only, were associated with increased prevalence of SGA (<10th centile). Prescription discontinuation increased the prevalence of SGA, but interval estimates included no difference . SGA is often secondary to placental insufficiency, subsequent to vasoconstriction of any aetiology, including pre-eclampsia, hypoxia [56, 57], smoking, cocaine , or, possibly, other sympathomimetics, such as beta2 agonists. Associations between LABA and birth weight <10th or <3rd centile and SABA with <10th centile may reflect vasoconstrictor properties [Tables 4, 5]. Associations with OCS, as elsewhere [7, 47], may reflect hypoxic asthma exacerbations or severity or the pharmacodynamics of corticosteroids. The associations between LABA and LKA and SGA <3rd centile may be confounded by asthma severity. These data might support a dose-response vasoconstriction hypothesis, only partly dependent on hypoxia: infants exposed to more than one medicine, likely associated with more severe asthma, were rather more vulnerable to SGA.
Many women (28.3%) discontinued their asthma medicines during pregnancy, unlike in Scandinavian cohorts [59, 60]. Un-medicated asthma was associated with premature birth, but the interval estimates for associations with SGA and exclusive formula feeding included no difference.
To meet the physiological demands of pregnancy, tidal volume and resting alveolar ventilation increase and expiratory reserve declines [61, 62]. In some women, pulmonary reserve may be insufficient to meet the increased demands for oxygen, accounting for increases in prescribing of SABA and ICS in trimester 2 . In women with severe asthma, symptoms of asthma, and attendant risks of hypoxia, may intensify late in trimester 2 or post-partum . In contrast, some women become symptom-free during pregnancy . However, even if asthma becomes asymptomatic, persistent airway remodelling [basement membrane thickening] and immunological changes, predictive of subclinical bronchial hyper-responsiveness, remain . Some women voluntarily suspend medication during pregnancy, opting to tolerate symptoms rather than risk harming their unborn children . Any uncontrolled asthma may cause chronic or intermittent hypoxia and inflammation, which adversely affect both mother and foetus [62, 63], and may impair foetal development, causing intrauterine growth restriction, foetal distress, pre-term birth and, occasionally, death: stillbirths were more prevalent amongst women discontinuing asthma prescriptions [0.70%] when compared with UK rates 2000–2010 [0.51–0.58%] , and women never prescribed asthma medicines [0.38%] [S1 Table].
Non-adherence to asthma therapies exacerbates symptoms [5, 66]. Absence of prescriptions for 9 months indicates withdrawal of therapy, as it is unlikely that stockpiled inhalers would be sufficient over this length of time. We do not know why women discontinued prescriptions or whether they experienced respiratory symptoms or they or their healthcare professionals attributed dyspnea to pregnancy  or they remained well themselves, while their foetuses suffered episodes of hypoxia. Hypoxia stimulates release of placental corticotrophin-releasing hormone [CRH] and inflammatory cytokines. Placental CRH increases maternal and foetal cortisol production, which augments placental CRH release via positive feedback mechanisms, amplifying signals that may culminate in premature birth in ~5% infants [54, 68]. The strongest predictors of premature birth were medicines discontinuation and OCS, supporting the hypoxic trigger hypothesis. The apparent protection against prematurity afforded by ICS suggests that ICS may have been controlling inflammation and asthma, thereby preventing hypoxia, and consequent CRH release, despite the potential to mimic endogenous corticosteroids. Only 374 women were using ICS alone, and, since they did not need SABA, their asthma was probably well controlled, suggesting little risk from hypoxia. Beta2 agonists were formerly prescribed as tocolytics, but here they did not protect against premature birth, indicating that other factors were over-riding their actions on myometrial receptors.
Breastfeeding rates were reduced if asthma medicines had been prescribed before or during pregnancy, and if prescriptions had been discontinued, but adjusted interval estimates included no difference [Table 6]. Assurances [5, 28] on the safety of SABA, ICS, most LABA, and OCS at <40mg per day may have contributed to the absence of a negative effect of prescriptions on breastfeeding. Manufacturers advise against breastfeeding while using LKA; [28, 69] however, it would appear these warnings were discounted.
Beta2 agonists are generally considered safe during lactation [28, 69], although high doses and oral administration can cause tachycardia and restlessness in the infant . Only small quantities of inhaled medicines reach the infant, and further work is needed to explore whether sympathomimetic effects cause sufficient restlessness  to impede latching, making early breastfeeding more difficult and painful or whether the sympathomimetic properties of beta2 agonists might hinder lacto genesis:  either might account for a reduced prevalence of breastfeeding, which was not seen here when SES, maternal age and smoking were accounted. Breastfeeding was not adversely affected by LKA and OCS, which are prescribed for severe asthma. Transfer of ICS to the infant is low , but too few women were prescribed only ICS to assess the impact on breastfeeding.
The breastfeeding rates at 6–8 weeks reported here reflect Wales’s current data (2131/6366, 33.47%) . Contemporary recruited cohorts elsewhere report higher breastfeeding rates amongst women with asthma, for example, 536/605, 88% at birth, 230/605 38% at 6 months . Increasing breastfeeding rates in the UK by 0.1% would offer considerable benefit: the associated small increase in infants’ average IQ gains >£27.8 million in economic productivity across each annual birth cohort , suggesting that the ~3% improvement identified here would be worthwhile. Breastfeeding support should not end at birth. Mild or moderate asthma may worsen post-partum: how this, and the associated loss of sleep, affects breastfeeding is unknown.
Supporting women with asthma
Premature birth, SGA and suboptimal breastfeeding are public health concerns . Extreme prematurity carries a 6.2% risk of cerebral palsy and a 40% risk of broncho-pulmonary dysplasia, whilst birth before 37 weeks carries a 1% risk of cerebral palsy and 40% risk of cognitive impairment . Birth weight below the 10th centile is linked to a range of conditions from neonatal asphyxia to mental health conditions in adulthood , changes in brain morphology  and beta cell function .
The associations between un-medicated asthma and premature birth support the consensus that uncontrolled asthma increases the risk of adverse perinatal outcomes subsequent to premature birth , but risks were not confined to severe asthma [5, 79]. Rather, we highlight the importance of identifying the 28% of women with asthma who completely discontinue medicines, often ICS , as being at increased risk of premature birth and exclusive formula feeding; these women were apparently without symptoms sufficiently severe to warrant prescriptions.
We confirmed associations with SES and smoking [58, 81], but asthma medicines before or during pregnancy or their discontinuation independently predicted adverse outcomes. Lower family income and education intensify the impact on families of behavioural and neurodevelopmental sequelae of premature birth [cerebral palsy, cognitive impairment, impaired hearing or vision] , and the concentration of adverse outcomes and asthma prescriptions amongst the most economically deprived in Wales  [S1 and S2 Tables] accentuates the importance of using these findings to target support.
Prescription patterns, regardless of diagnoses, particularly discontinuation in pregnancy, offer primary care practitioners a convenient marker to identify pregnancies at increased risk, analogous to ‘intention to treat’ analyses: pragmatic but of unproven biological certainty. Alternative markers, such as smoking or socioeconomic deprivation, would not identify women discontinuing prescriptions [S1 and S2 Tables]. Women with severe illness are usually actively managed in specialist clinics in secondary or tertiary care, minimizing risks reported here:  our findings on prescription discontinuation, SABA and ‘SABA-only’ support this. Although current UK guidelines do not recommend additional surveillance before or during pregnancy  or initiatives to target support to optimize prescription regimens and infant feeding, ‘at risk’ women [those discontinuing or using SABA or OCS] need extra help. Additional monitoring by specialist respiratory nurses, in parallel with midwifery care, can improve asthma control , but large studies are needed to assess impact on perinatal outcomes.
Strengths and limitations
The prevalence of asthma prescribing in our cohort reflects that across the UK and USA, but there is less confidence in generalisation to populations with lower prescription [3, 4], or higher breastfeeding rates. Coverage was limited to 40% of the population, due to suboptimal GP participation . Restrictions of our cohort were due to incomplete GP participation and data, due to practices’ technical failures or women moving to practices not covered by SAIL . The breastfeeding outcome was further restricted by variations in recording practices across the seven Health Boards, but there was no self-selection by participants. Had a volunteer bias been operating, we should have expected to see older, less deprived women over-represented ; this was not the case.
Restricting the dataset by excluding pregnancies exposed to AEDs, insulin, coumarins, heavy drinking or substance misuse and multiple pregnancies increased internal validity without introducing bias, at the cost of generalisation to these groups [37, 85]. The higher prevalence of these exposures amongst women prescribed asthma medicines (S1 Table) would have caused overestimation of harm attributed to asthma medicines. Rarer co-morbidities were not excluded. Co-morbid rheumatoid arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease were more likely amongst women prescribed oral corticosteroids, who would have received specialist care .
Detail in the database
We have no information as to whether premature births were spontaneous or induced: asthma is associated with conditions necessitating preterm induction of labour, such as pre-eclampsia [54, 86]. Neither population databases nor fieldwork fully capture symptoms, histories, spirometry, oxygen saturation, or psychosocial stressors. Maternal stress, short and long-term, increases the risk of pre-term birth [68, 81]. Substance misuse is notoriously difficult to capture, and may be under-reported; however, it is often persistent. We excluded the most vulnerable women [39–42]. The proportion of missing data [35.5% overall, 29.3% in women with asthma], precluded inclusion of BMI in regression analyses [S1 Table]. Any increased prevalence of these predictors of adverse outcomes amongst exposed women would lead to over-estimation of associations . Paternity and paternal sibships are not recorded, as in many databases , but impact on perinatal outcomes are believed to be modest . We considered each pregnancy separately, as exposures and covariates (e.g. smoking, deprivation) often vary between pregnancies. We acknowledge the genetic determinants of perinatal outcomes , but, without information on their association with asthma, are unable to predict how accounting for this would have affected this study. The database’s timeframe did not allow us to distinguish women receiving their first ever prescription during pregnancy.
No data were available on miscarriage and induced terminations. Confining analyses to otherwise healthy live-born infants introduces a survival / survivorship bias, leaving some harms unreported, and under-estimating overall harm . This was confirmed by the slightly higher rates of stillbirth (S1 Table). Congenital anomalies and stillbirths are associated with SGA and preterm birth , and the higher prevalence of congenital anomalies amongst women exposed to asthma medicines in this cohort is known ; therefore, affected infants were excluded.
We have no data on dispensing or hospital or private prescribing or internet purchasing. It is unlikely that anyone hospitalized with asthma or consulting privately would not be receiving prescriptions from primary care practitioners. Abolition of prescription charges in Wales in 2007 reduces the likelihood of private prescriptions and purchasing. Our data predate primary care prescription of monoclonal antibodies for severe eosinophilic asthma persisting despite oral corticosteroid therapy. Manufacturers advise avoiding these medicines in pregnancy ; therefore, population databases may be unable to describe their safety in pregnancy for some time. Too few women were prescribed LABA (465) or LKA (89) or ICS only (362) to draw conclusions relating to extreme prematurity or SGA, but findings are congruent with other studies .
We do not know whether any women had been over- or mis-diagnosed with asthma , or if any withdrawal symptoms arose [92–95] and remained un-medicated. Without data on medicines purchased without prescription, we could not explore the hypothesis that ‘asthma with hay fever’ is a stronger predictor of premature birth than non-atopic asthma . Similarly, paucity of testing for exhaled nitric oxide, known not to improve outcomes , made it impossible to ascribe eosinophilic or allergic aetiology to the diagnosis.
Adherence to prescribed regimens cannot be ascertained from prescription or dispensing data. 30–50% of patients prescribed long-term treatment do not take medicines as recommended , and we also have no information on inhaler techniques or any stockpiling or sharing of inhalers. (Excluding substance misusers reduces the latter possibility.) Non-adherence dilutes the impact of medicines on outcomes; however, since discontinuation was associated with harm, unreported discontinuation in those receiving prescriptions might lead to an over-estimation of harms attributed to prescriptions.
We acknowledge the hazards of multiple testing, without correction. Our independent (predictor) variables are highly correlated. This makes standard adjustments, such as the Bonferroni method, unduly conservative, risking false negatives . Observation studies are limited by unmeasured confounding, and the impossibility of including all contextual variables [97, 98]. Our findings are consistent with biological plausibility and the literature.
Confounding and effect mediation
For most adverse outcomes, retrospective analysis yields lower odds or risk ratios than prospective studies . However, this is not true of cohorts examining asthma in pregnancy. This might be interpreted as prospective cohort studies offering enhanced opportunities to control asthma, particularly to optimize prophylaxis with ICS , supported here by suggestions of improved outcomes with ICS prescriptions.
In evaluating the impact of medicines using population databases, it is rarely possible to avoid residual confounding by indication and severity of indication without randomisation [99, 100]. Prescriptions are sometimes taken as proxies for diagnoses , as diagnoses are not always recorded in healthcare databases, and these medicines have no other indications in the UK . Since the risks of poorly controlled asthma outweigh the risks of harm to the foetus, only the mildest maternal asthma is un-medicated on medical advice [5, 50], but we do not know whether continuing prescriptions indicated recurrent symptoms or a propensity to compliance. We acknowledge the difficulties of disentangling the effects of asthma from its management. Nevertheless, these findings should alert practitioners to the need for targeted care preconception, and during pregnancy and lactation.
Implications: Support before, during and after pregnancy
The clinical consequences of premature birth, including cerebral palsy and cognitive impairment , increase the importance of the modest [ORs <2] associations identified. Women discontinuing prescriptions were probably relatively unaffected by symptoms, whilst an additional ~1% of their infants were born preterm: discontinuation may have increased the risk of hypoxia [and hence premature birth]. Taken with lower breastfeeding rates, these findings identify unmet needs amongst women discontinuing prescriptions, and militate against medication reduction in pregnancy . Reduced risks with ICS suggest that increased monitoring, targeted support and active asthma management [3, 50] are needed before, during and after pregnancy. Programming primary care electronic records to alert professionals to contact women who leave >4 months between prescriptions for asthma medicines might make this feasible.
S1 Table. Demographic details of population, excluding congenital anomalies [n = 113316].
S2 Table. Demographic details of subjects included in the analysis [n = 107573].
This study uses anonymised data held in the Secure Anonymised Information Linkage [SAIL] system, which is part of the national e-health records research infrastructure for Wales. We should like to acknowledge all the data providers who make anonymised data available for research. Data held in SAIL databases are anonymised and aggregated and have been obtained with permission of relevant Data Protection Officers, as approved by the National Research Ethics Service, Wales. Permissions are conditional on non-disclosure of numbers <5 in any cell. The project was approved by the SAIL Information Governance Review Panel [IGFRP] on 24th March 2011. Since the project uses only anonymised data, ethical review was deemed unnecessary.
We should like to thank: Hildrum Sundseth from the European Institute of Women’s Health for advice as service user representative on EUROmediCAT, and Professor Helen Dolk for her role as lead of EUROmediCAT and continuing support.
- 1. Kwon HL, Triche EW, Belanger K, Bracken MB. The epidemiology of asthma during pregnancy: prevalence, diagnosis, and symptoms. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;26:29–62. Review. pmid:16443142.
- 2. Burr ML, Wat D, Evans C, Dunstan FD, Doull IJ; British Thoracic Society Research Committee. Asthma prevalence in 1973, 1988 and 2003. Thorax. 2006; 61:296–9 pmid:16396947
- 3. Murphy VE, Namazy JA, Powell H, Schatz M, Chambers C, Attia J, et al. A meta-analysis of adverse perinatal outcomes in women with asthma. BJOG. 2011 Oct;118:1314–23. pmid:21749633
- 4. Charlton RA, Pierini A, Klungsøyr K, Neville AJ, Jordan S, de Jong-van den Berg LT, et al. Asthma medication prescribing before, during and after pregnancy: a study in seven European regions. BMJ Open. 2016 Jan 19;6:e009237. pmid:26787250
- 5. BTS 2019. SIGN 158 British Guideline on the Management of Asthma: A national clinical guideline. First published 2003, revised 2019. Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network [SIGN]/ British Thoracic Society [BTS], Edinburgh, London available, accessed 1.12.19: https://www.sign.ac.uk/assets/sign158.pdf
- 6. Dombrowski MP, Schatz M, Wise R, Momirova V, Landon M, Mabie W, et al; National Institute of Child Health and Human Development Maternal-Fetal Medicine Units Network and the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute. Asthma during pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Jan;103:5–12. pmid:14704237.
- 7. Bracken MB, Triche EW, Belanger K, Saftlas A, Beckett WS, Leaderer BP. Asthma symptoms, severity, and drug therapy: a prospective study of effects on 2205 pregnancies. Obstet Gynecol. 2003 Oct;102:739–52. pmid:14551004.
- 8. Clifton VL, Engel P, Smith R, Gibson P, Brinsmead M, Giles WB. Maternal and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies complicated by asthma in an Australian population. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2009 Dec;49:619–26. pmid:20070710
- 9. Murphy VE, Clifton VL, Gibson PG. Asthma exacerbations during pregnancy: incidence and association with adverse pregnancy outcomes. Thorax. 2006 Feb;61:169–76. Review. pmid:16443708; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2104591.
- 10. Schatz M, Dombrowski MP, Wise R, Momirova V, Landon M, Mabie W, et al. Spirometry is related to perinatal outcomes in pregnant women with asthma. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2006 Jan;194:120–6. pmid:16389020.
- 11. Källén B, Rydhstroem H, Aberg A. Asthma during pregnancy—a population based study. Eur J Epidemiol. 2000 Feb;16:167–71. pmid:10845267.
- 12. Gage S, Kan P, Lee HC, Gould JB, Stevenson DK, Shaw GM, et al. Maternal Asthma, Preterm Birth, and Risk of Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia. J Pediatr. 2015 Oct;167:875–880.e1. pmid:26254835
- 13. Murphy VE, Wang G, Namazy JA, Powell H, Gibson PG, Chambers C, et al. The risk of congenital malformations, perinatal mortality and neonatal hospitalization among pregnant women with asthma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG 2014;121:812–22
- 14. Bain E, Pierides KL, Clifton VL, Hodyl NA, Stark MJ, Crowther CA, et al. Interventions for managing asthma in pregnancy. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2014, Issue 10. Art. No.: CD010660. pmid:25331331
- 15. Eltonsy S, Kettani FZ, Blais L. Beta2-agonists use during pregnancy and perinatal outcomes: a systematic review. Respir Med. 2014 Jan;108:9–33. Epub 2013 Dec 17. Review. pmid:24360293.
- 16. Gluck JC, Gluck PA. The effect of pregnancy on the course of asthma. Immunol Allergy Clin North Am. 2006 Feb;26:63–80. pmid:16443143
- 17. Cossette B, Forget A, Beauchesne MF, Rey É, Lemière C, Larivée P, et al. Impact of maternal use of asthma-controller therapy on perinatal outcomes. Thorax. 2013 Aug;68:724–30. Epub 2013 Apr 13. pmid:23585516.
- 18. Cossette B, Beauchesne MF, Forget A, Lemière C, Larivée P, Rey E, et al. Relative perinatal safety of salmeterol vs formoterol and fluticasone vs budesonide use during pregnancy. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2014 May;112:459–64. pmid:24656659
- 19. Garne E, Vinkel Hansen A, Morris J, Jordan S, Klungsøyr K, Engeland A, et al. Risk of congenital anomalies after exposure to asthma medication in the first trimester of pregnancy–a cohort linkage study. BJOG. 2016 Sep;123:1609–18. pmid:27172856
- 20. Lawn JE, Rohde J, Rifkin S, Were M, Paul VK, Chopra M. Alma-Ata 30 years on: revolutionary, relevant, and time to revitalise. Lancet. 2008 Sep 13;372:917–27. pmid:18790315.
- 21. Saha MR, Ryan K, Amir LH. Postpartum women's use of medicines and breastfeeding practices: a systematic review. Int Breastfeed J. 2015 Oct 28;10:28. pmid:26516340
- 22. Victora CG, Bahl R, Barros AJ, França GV, Horton S, Krasevec J, et al.; Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. Breastfeeding in the 21st century: epidemiology, mechanisms, and lifelong effect. Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387:475–90. pmid:26869575
- 23. Rollins NC, Bhandari N, Hajeebhoy N, Horton S, Lutter CK, Martines JC, et al; Lancet Breastfeeding Series Group. Why invest, and what it will take to improve breastfeeding practices? Lancet. 2016 Jan 30;387:491–504. pmid:26869576
- 24. Thygesen L.C. & Ersbøll A.K. When the entire population is the sample: strengths and limitations in register-based epidemiology Eur J Epidemiol (2014) 29: 551. pmid:24407880
- 25. Ford DV, Jones KH, Verplancke JP, Lyons RA, John G, Brown G, et al. The SAIL Databank: building a national architecture for e-health research and evaluation. BMC Health Services Research. 2009 9:157. pmid:19732426
- 26. Jones KH., Ford DV, Thompson S, Lyons RAD. A Profile of the SAIL Databank on the UK Secure Research Platform. International Journal of Population Data Science. Vol 4 No 2 (2019): IJPDS Special issue: Data Centre Profiles DOI https://doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v4i2.1134
- 27. EUROmediCAT. [EMC] Selective Serotonin Reuptake Inhibitor [SSRI] antidepressants in Pregnancy and Congenital Anomalies: population cohort study using linked electronic data in 3 countries V2. Deliverable number 21. 2015 –ISBN 978–0956746252 http://www.EUROmediCAT.eu/publicationsandpresentations/publications
- 28. BNF  British National Formulary no.78, British Medical Association and the Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, London.
- 29. Jordan S, Davies GI, Thayer DS, Tucker D, Humphreys I (2019) Antidepressant prescriptions, discontinuation, depression and perinatal outcomes, including breastfeeding: A population cohort analysis. PLOS ONE 14(11): e0225133. pmid:31738813
- 30. WHO Collaborating Centre for Drug Statistics Methodology, Guidelines for ATC classification and DDD assignment 2015. Oslo, 2015 available http://www.whocc.no/filearchive/publications/2016_guidelines_web.pdf 14.5.16
- 31. Price T., Humphreys C., Williams N., Heaven M., Holloway M., Davies G., et al. Asthma in Swansea, Public Health Service for Wales. 2009 Available: http://www.saildatabank.com/data-dictionary/publications/81.aspx
- 32. WHO Per-term Birth Fact Sheet. 2013 Available: http://www.who.int/en/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/preterm-birth accessed 10.9.18
- 33. Royal College of Paediatrics and Child Health. Early years—UK-WHO growth charts and resources. 2015 Available: https://www.rcpch.ac.uk/resources/uk-who-growth-charts-0-4-years accessed 10.9.18
- 34. NHS Wales Data Dictionary 2017 http://www.datadictionary.wales.nhs.uk/#!WordDocuments/infantfeedingdatarequirements.htm
- 35. Wales Statistics. Birth Statistics from the National Community Child Health Database [NCCHD] Quality Report. 2013. available: http://gov.wales/docs/statistics/2013/130730-births-in-wales-quality-report-en.pdf accessed 13.4.16
- 36. IFF Research. (2013). Infant Feeding Survey, 2010. [data collection]. 2nd Edition. UK Data Service. SN: 7281, http://doi.org/10.5255/UKDA-SN-7281-2
- 37. Schulz KF and Grimes DA 2006 The Lancet Handbook of Essential concepts in Clinical Research. Elsevier, Edinburgh.
- 38. EUROCAT. EUROCAT European surveillance of congenital anomalies. Guide 1.4. EUROCAT Central Registry, University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, Co Antrim, UK. 2013 Available: http://www.eurocatnetwork.eu/content/EUROCAT-Guide-1.4-Full-Guide.pdf [accessed 26.2.15]
- 39. Morrow J, Russell A, Guthrie E, et al. Malformation risks of antiepileptic drugs in pregnancy: a prospective study from the UK Epilepsy and Pregnancy Register. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 2006;77:193–8. pmid:16157661
- 40. Sillesen M, Hjortdal V, Vejlstrup N, Sørensen K. Pregnancy with prosthetic heart valves—30 years' nationwide experience in Denmark. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2011 Aug;40:448–54. pmid:21277217
- 41. Casson IF, Clarke CA, Howard CV, et al. Outcomes of pregnancy in insulin dependent diabetic women: results of a five year population cohort study. BMJ 1997;315:275–8. pmid:9274545
- 42. Cooper DL, Petherick ES, Wright J. The association between binge drinking and birth outcomes: results from the Born in Bradford cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2013 Oct;67:821–8. Epub 2013 May 31. pmid:23729326.
- 43. Jordan S., RA Charlton K Tingay, DS Thayer, GI Davies, M Morgan, et al. SSRI use in pregnancy: a study in 6 European databases. The Marce Society. Arch Womens Ment Health  18:269–408 P.368
- 44. Royston P, Moons KG, Altman DG, Vergouwe Y Prognosis and prognostic research. Developing a prognostic model. BMJ 2009 338: b604. pmid:19336487
- 45. Townsend P, Phillimore P, Beattie A: Health and Deprivation: Inequality and the North. London: Routledge; 1988.
- 46. Corp IBM. Released 2011. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 20.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.
- 47. Namazy JA, Murphy VE, Powell H, Gibson PG, Chambers C, Schatz M. Effects of asthma severity, exacerbations and oral corticosteroids on perinatal outcomes. Eur Respir J. 2013 May;41:1082–90. pmid:22903964
- 48. Bakhireva LN, Schatz M, Jones KL, Chambers CD; Organization of Teratology Information Specialists Collaborative Research Group. Asthma control during pregnancy and the risk of preterm delivery or impaired fetal growth. Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol. 2008 Aug;101:137–43. pmid:18727468
- 49. Kemppainen M, Lahesmaa-Korpinen AM, Kauppi P, et al. Maternal asthma is associated with increased risk of perinatal mortality. PLoS One. 2018;13:e0197593. Published 2018 May 18. pmid:29775476
- 50. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention. 2020, Available: https://ginasthma.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/GINA-2020-full-report_-final-_wms.pdf
- 51. Enriquez R, Griffin MR, Carroll KN, Wu P, Cooper WO, Gebretsadik T, et al. Effect of maternal asthma and asthma control on pregnancy and perinatal outcomes. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2007 Sep;120:625–30. pmid:17658591
- 52. Rejnö G, Lundholm C, Larsson K, Larsson H, Lichtenstein P, D'Onofrio BM, et al. Adverse Pregnancy Outcomes in Asthmatic Women: A Population-Based Family Design Study. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2018 May -Jun;6(3):916–922.e6. Epub 2017 Oct 4. pmid:28988783.
- 53. Wadhwa PD, Entringer S, Buss C, Lu MC. The contribution of maternal stress to preterm birth: issues and considerations. Clin Perinatol. 2011 Sep;38:351–84. pmid:21890014
- 54. Rejnö G, Lundholm C, Gong T, Larsson K, Saltvedt S, Almqvist C. Asthma during pregnancy in a population-based study—pregnancy complications and adverse perinatal outcomes. PLoS One. 2014 Aug 20;9(8):e104755. eCollection 2014. pmid:25141021; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4139314.
- 55. Herrera Emilio A., Krause Bernardo, Ebensperger German, Reyes Roberto V., Casanello Paola, Mauro Parra-Cordero, et al., The placental pursuit for an adequate oxidant balance between the mother and the fetus, Frontiers in Pharmacology, 10.3389/fphar.2014.00149, 5, (2014). pmid:25009498
- 56. Wareing M. Oxygen sensitivity, potassium channels, and regulation of placental vascular tone. Microcirculation. 2014;21(1):58‐66. pmid:23710683
- 57. Ali Z, Nilas L, Ulrik CS. Low risk of adverse obstetrical and perinatal outcome in pregnancies complicated by asthma: A case control study. Respir Med. 2016 Nov;120:124–130. Epub 2016 Oct 11. pmid:27817809.
- 58. Sharma D, Shastri S, Sharma P. Intrauterine Growth Restriction: Antenatal and Postnatal Aspects. Clinical Medicine Insights. Pediatrics. 2016;10:67–83. pmid:27441006
- 59. Malm H., Martikainen J., Klaukka T. et al. Prescription drugs during pregnancy and lactation—a Finnish register-based study. Eur J Clin Pharmacol 59, 127–133 (2003). pmid:12700878
- 60. Olesen C, Sørensen HT, de Jong-van den Berg L, Olsen J, Steffensen FH, The Euromap Group. Prescribing during pregnancy and lactation with reference to the Swedish classification system. A population-based study among Danish women. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 1999;78(8):686–692. pmid:10468060
- 61. Mehta N, Chen K, Hardy E, Powrie R. Respiratory disease in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2015 Jul;29:598–611. pmid:25997564
- 62. Rey E, Boulet LP. Asthma in pregnancy. BMJ; 2007 334:582–5. pmid:17363831
- 63. Broekema M, Timens W, Vonk JM, Volbeda F, Lodewijk ME, Hylkema MN, et al. Persisting remodeling and less airway wall eosinophil activation in complete remission of asthma. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2011 Feb 1;183:310–6. pmid:20813885
- 64. Zetstra-van der Woude AP., van Gelder MM., Wang H., Vroegop JH., de Jong-van den Berg LTW. A Study investigating the perceptions of women about the use of their asthma medication during pregnancy and the safety for their baby. Chapter 4.3 pp. 145–169 in: Zetstra-van der Woude AP Data Collection on Risk Factors in Pregnancy. Doctoral thesis, University of Groningen, Netherlands. 2016 ISBN: 978-90-367-8524-2
- 65. ONS 2018 https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/birthsdeathsandmarriages/deaths/datasets/childmortalitystatisticschildhoodinfantandperinatalchildhoodinfantandperinatalmortalityinenglandandwales
- 66. Mäkelä MJ, Backer V, Hedegaard M, Larsson K. Adherence to inhaled therapies, health outcomes and costs in patients with asthma and COPD. Respir Med. 2013 Oct;107:1481–90. pmid:23643487
- 67. Chamberlain C, Williamson GR, Knight B, Daly M, Halpin DM. Investigating Women's Experiences of Asthma Care in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Study. Open Nurs J. 2014;8:56–63. Published 2014 Dec 11. pmid:25538796
- 68. Wadhwa PD, Garite TJ, Porto M, Glynn L, Chicz-DeMet A, Dunkel-Schetter C, et al. Placental corticotropin-releasing hormone [CRH], spontaneous preterm birth, and fetal growth restriction: a prospective investigation. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191:1063–9. pmid:15507922
- 69. Hale T Medications and Mothers’ Milk: a manual of lactation pharmacology. 14th edition. Hale Publishing, Amarillo, Texas 2010
- 70. Merlob P. & Weber-Schondorfer C. Antiallergics, antiasthmatics and antitussives. In: Schaefer C., Peters P., Miller R. [eds] Drugs During Pregnancy and Lactation 2015 pp.671–6 3rd edition
- 71. Aljazaf K, Hale TW, Ilett KF, et al. Pseudoephedrine: effects on milk production in women and estimation of infant exposure via breastmilk. British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology. 2003;56:18–24. pmid:12848771
- 72. Stats Wales 2019 Breastfeeding, quarterly counts by age and LHB. accessed 18.5.19 https://statswales.gov.wales/Catalogue/Health-and-Social-Care/NHS-Primary-and-Community-Activity/Breastfeeding/breastfeedingquarterlycounts-by-age-lhb
- 73. Harvey SM, Murphy VE, Gibson PG, Collison A, Robinson P, Sly P, et al. Maternal asthma, breastfeeding, and respiratory outcomes in the first year of life. Pediatric Pulmonology. 2020; 1–7. https://doi.org/10.1002/ppul.24756
- 74. Renfrew MJ, Pokhrel S., Quigley M. McCormick F, Fox-Rushby J., Dodds R., et al. Preventing disease and saving resources: the potential contribution of increasing breastfeeding rates in the UK. Unicef UK, London. 2012 Available on: http://www.unicef.org.uk/Documents/Baby_Friendly/Research/Preventing_disease_saving_resources.pdf?epslanguage=en accessed 3.11.12
- 75. Lawn JE, Blencowe H, Oza S, You D, Lee AC, Waiswa P, et al. Every Newborn: progress, priorities, and potential beyond survival. Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384:189–205. Erratum in: Lancet. 2014 Jul 12;384:132. pmid:24853593.
- 76. Platt MJ. Outcomes in preterm infants. Public Health. 2014 May;128:399–403. Epub 2014 May 1. Review. pmid:24794180.
- 77. Østgård HF, Løhaugen GC, Bjuland KJ, Rimol LM, Brubakk AM, Martinussen M, et al. Brain morphometry and cognition in young adults born small for gestational age at term. J Pediatr. 2014 Nov;165:921–7.e1. pmid:25217202
- 78. Milovanovic I, Njuieyon F, Deghmoun S, Chevenne D, Levy-Marchal C, Beltrand J. SGA children with moderate catch-up growth are showing the impaired insulin secretion at the age of 4. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 30;9:e100337. eCollection 2014. Erratum in: PLoS One.2014;9:e108008. pmid:24979613
- 79. Belanger K, Hellenbrand ME, Holford TR, Bracken M. Effect of pregnancy on maternal asthma symptoms and medication use. Obstet Gynecol. 2010;115(3):559‐567. pmid:20177287
- 80. Robijn AL, Jensen ME, McLaughlin K, Gibson PG, Murphy VE. Inhaled corticosteroid use during pregnancy among women with asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Clin Exp Allergy. 2019;49(11):1403‐1417. pmid:31357230
- 81. Christiaens I, Hegadoren K, Olson DM. Adverse childhood experiences are associated with spontaneous preterm birth: a case-control study. BMC Med. 2015 Jun 11;13:124. pmid:26063042
- 82. Saigal S, Doyle LW. An overview of mortality and sequelae of preterm birth from infancy to adulthood. Lancet. 2008 Jan 19;371:261–9. Review. pmid:18207020.
- 83. Jordan S, Watkins A, Storey M, Allen SJ, Brooks CJ, Garaiova I, et al. Volunteer Bias in Recruitment, Retention, and Blood Sample Donation in a Randomised Controlled Trial Involving Mothers and Their Children at Six Months and Two Years: A Longitudinal Analysis. PLoS ONE 2013 : e67912. pmid:23874465
- 84. Grzeskowiak LE, Smith B, Roy A, Dekker GA, Clifton VL. An observational study of the impact of an antenatal asthma management service on asthma control during pregnancy. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2016 Feb;197:48–53. Epub 2015 Dec 2. pmid:26706835.
- 85. Jonathan AC Sterne, Miguel A Hernán, Alexandra McAleenan, Barnaby C Reeves, Julian PT Higgins Chapter 25 In:Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions version 6.0 (updated July 2019). Cochrane, 2019. Available from www.training.cochrane.org/handbook.
- 86. Gluck PA, Gluck JC. A review of pregnancy outcomes after exposure to orally inhaled or intranasal budesonide. Curr Med Res Opin. 2005 Jul;21:1075–84. pmid:16004676
- 87. Schnitzer ME, Blais L. Methods for the assessment of selection bias in drug safety during pregnancy studies using electronic medical data. Pharmacol Res Perspect. 2018;6(5):e00426. Published 2018 Sep 21. pmid:30258633
- 88. Miquel-Verges F, Mosley BS, Block AS, Hobbs CA. A spectrum project: preterm birth and small-for-gestational age among infants with birth defects. J Perinatol. 2015 Mar;35:198–203. Epub 2014 Oct 2. pmid:25275696.
- 89. Oldereid NB, Wennerholm UB, Pinborg A, et al. The effect of paternal factors on perinatal and paediatric outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(3):320–389. pmid:29471389
- 90. Liu X, Helenius D, Skotte L, et al. Variants in the fetal genome near pro-inflammatory cytokine genes on 2q13 associate with gestational duration. Nat Commun. 2019;10(1):3927. Published 2019 Sep 2. pmid:31477735
- 91. Heffler E, Pizzimenti S, Guida G, Bucca C, Rolla G. Prevalence of over-/misdiagnosis of asthma in patients referred to an allergy clinic. J Asthma. 2015;52:931–4. Epub 2015 Aug 18. pmid:26291138.
- 92. Nunes V, Neilson J, O’Flynn N, Calvert N, Kuntze S, Smithson H, et al. . Clinical Guidelines and Evidence Review for Medicines Adherence: involving patients in decisions about prescribed medicines and supporting adherence. London: National Collaborating Centre for Primary Care and Royal College of General Practitioners.
- 93. Martins AC, Giordani F, Rozenfeld S. Adverse drug events among adult inpatients: A meta-analysis of observational studies. J Clin Pharm Ther 2014 Dec;39:609–20 pmid:25219403
- 94. Mori K, Fujisawa T, Inui N, Hashimoto D, Enomoto N, Nakamura Y, et al. Step-down treatment from medium-dosage of budesonide/formoterol in controlled asthma. Respir Med. 2016 Oct;119:1–6. Epub 2016 Aug 15. pmid:27692128.
- 95. Brozek JL, Kraft M, Krishnan JA, et al. Long-Acting β2-Agonist Step-off in Patients With Controlled AsthmaSystematic Review With Meta-analysis. Arch Intern Med. 2012;172:1365–1375. pmid:22928176
- 96. Rothman K. J. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990 1, 43–6. pmid:2081237
- 97. Greenland S, Daniel R, Pearce N. Outcome modelling strategies in epidemiology: traditional methods and basic alternatives. Int J Epidemiol. 2016;45(2):565‐575. pmid:27097747
- 98. York R. Residualization is not the answer: Rethinking how to address multicollinearity. Soc Sci Res. 2012;41(6):1379‐1386. pmid:23017962
- 99. The European Network of Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance [ENCePP]. Guide on Methodological Standards in Pharmacoepidemiology [Revision 7]. EMA/95098/2010. http://www.encepp.eu/standards_and_guidances/documents/ENCePPGuideonMethStandardsinPE_Rev7.pdf 22.3.19
- 100. Fewell Zoe, George Davey Smith Jonathan A. C. Sterne, The Impact of Residual and Unmeasured Confounding in Epidemiologic Studies: A Simulation Study, American Journal of Epidemiology, Volume 166, Issue 6, 15 September 2007, Pages 646–655, pmid:17615092
- 101. Turkeltaub PC, Cheon J, Friedmann E, Lockey RF. The Influence of Asthma and/or Hay Fever on Pregnancy: Data from the 1995 National Survey of Family Growth. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2017 Nov—Dec;5:1679–1690. pmid:28550983.
- 102. McLaughlin K, Foureur M, Jensen ME, Murphy VE. Review and appraisal of guidelines for the management of asthma during pregnancy. Women Birth. 2018 Dec;31:e349–e357. Epub 2018 Feb 21. Review. pmid:29475603.