Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Beyond megadrought and collapse in the Northern Levant: The chronology of Tell Tayinat and two historical inflection episodes, around 4.2ka BP, and following 3.2ka BP

  • Sturt W. Manning ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Cornell Tree-Ring Laboratory, Department of Classics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America

  • Brita Lorentzen,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Cornell Tree-Ring Laboratory, Department of Classics, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY, United States of America

  • Lynn Welton,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada, Department of Archaeology, Durham University, Dawson Building, Durham, United Kingdom

  • Stephen Batiuk,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada

  • Timothy P. Harrison

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Near and Middle Eastern Civilizations, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada


There has been considerable focus on the main, expansionary, and inter-regionally linked or ‘globalising’ periods in Old World pre- and proto-history, with a focus on identifying, analyzing and dating collapse at the close of these pivotal periods. The end of the Early Bronze Age in the late third millennium BCE and a subsequent ‘intermediate’ or transitional period before the Middle Bronze Age (~2200–1900 BCE), and the end of the Late Bronze Age in the late second millennium BCE and the ensuing period of transformation during the Early Iron Age (~1200–900 BCE), are key examples. Among other issues, climate change is regularly invoked as a cause or factor in both cases. Recent considerations of “collapse” have emphasized the unpredictability and variability of responses during such periods of reorganization and transformation. Yet, a gap in scholarly attention remains in documenting the responses observed at important sites during these ‘transformative’ periods in the Old World region. Tell Tayinat in southeastern Turkey, as a major archaeological site occupied during these two major ‘in between’ periods of transformation, offers a unique case for comparing and contrasting differing responses to change. To enable scholarly assessment of associations between the local trajectory of the site and broader regional narratives, an essential preliminary need is a secure, resolved timeframe for the site. Here we report a large set of radiocarbon data and incorporate the stratigraphic sequence using Bayesian chronological modelling to create a refined timeframe for Tell Tayinat and a secure basis for analysis of the site with respect to its broader regional context and climate history.


Much recent scholarship has focused on identifying apparent periodic episodes of substantial and longer-lasting drought–so-called megadroughts–which arguably appear to correlate, at least approximately in temporal terms, with episodes of major collapse, change, or reorientation in human civilization in various regions of the world [13]. Whether mere approximate contemporaneity is indicative of explanation is another question, and recent discussions of social responses to climatic change have highlighted the unpredictability and variability of possible outcomes, precluding a simplistic association between environmental change and societal collapse [411]. Nonetheless, chronological resolution is an essential component of consideration of any possible relationships between environmental change and social response [12], and the absence of an appropriate close temporal association undermines many purported causal connections (e.g. [9, 1315]). The potential importance of such historically relevant climate forcing episodes, both in explaining history, but also as laboratory of current and future relevance, should not be overlooked–and this general topic has been the subject of much recent research, as in other regions, in the Mediterranean-Near East (e.g. [13, 1623]), but also debate (e.g. [411, 24]). In several instances, the exact associations and causal connections between observed proxy evidence for climate change and human history have been demonstrated to be both complex and multi-faceted, and often not as clear in temporal or causal terms as sometimes stated by proponents of one or other specific viewpoint (e.g. [9, 14, 15]).

Two multi-century climate change episodes with special relevance to the Levant/East Mediterranean region are regularly cited and stated as occurring from (i) ca. 4200 BP/2200 BCE and (ii) 3200 BP/1200 BCE (BP here from 2000 CE) (e.g. [1623, 25, 26]). In each instance, there is purportedly a multi-century episode of collapse, then general hiatus and transformation before a subsequent return to ‘high’ civilization—the Middle Bronze Age (the Middle Kingdom in Egypt, the Old Babylonian period in Mesopotamia) from around 2000/1900 BCE for the first, and the Iron Age ‘renaissance’ from the 9-8th centuries BCE for the second (the latter perhaps linked to a major solar irradiance minimum and climate shift [3, 27, 28, ref. 29 pp. 112–115]).

The 2200 BCE episode in the later Early Bronze Age (hereafter EB) is well-dated, both in terms of some wider proxies indicating a shift to cooler and more arid conditions, and in terms of the demise and abandonment of the formerly primate site of Tell Leilan in northern Syria just before 2200 BCE [25, 30, 31]. However, the impact of this climate event is more difficult to reconstruct in the Levant and tightly resolved higher frequency records are sparse. Recent syntheses of radiocarbon (14C) evidence have decoupled the chronology of this event from the long-recognized decline in settlement during the EB IV in the southern Levant, which is now recognized to have begun several centuries earlier, ca. 2500 BCE [32, 33]. It is also increasingly evident that sites in the northern Levantine region, which were in less fragile dry-farming loci with significant access to reliable water resources in the form of karstic aquifers, were variably affected and not all collapsed [25, 34, 35]. Weiss indeed argues that the Euphrates and especially Orontes river valleys, and the area of ‘karstic’ springs, formed refugia during the 2200 BCE episode with growth supplemented by habitat-tracking out of other less resilient regions of northern Mesopotamia/Syria [25, 35]. He points to the take-off of Tell Tayinat as an example of this [35]. While the variable ecological context is undoubtedly relevant, other factors also appear to be in play, and not just survival in the face of climate crisis, including the re-orientation and transformation of interregional trade and local economies, and of the relevant trade routes. In particular, these processes saw Anatolia and the East Mediterranean (and so maritime connectivities, versus, or in addition to, land routes) become more important foci for the Levant in the later/late 3rd millennium BCE [36, 37]. In fact, contrary to the pattern observed in areas of northern Mesopotamia, the northern Levant witnesses a persistent tradition of urbanism continuing through and following the period at 2200 BCE [34, 38, 39]. As such, this region offers a key venue for observing alternative trajectories and responses to the 4.2k climate episode.

The 1200 BCE episode, around the close of the Late Bronze Age, involves a long-recognized widespread set of site abandonments, destructions and changes across the East Mediterranean and Levantine region, the collapse of the previous ‘palatial’ economies and inter-linked trading systems and an ensuing ‘dark age’ [11, 15, 24, 4042]. Associated proxy climate evidence indicates another shift around this period to cooler and more arid conditions [2023, 26, 43]. The widespread collapse of the internationalized political economies of the Late Bronze Age is real, and many sites do experience destruction, decline, or abandonment. But the collapse of the region is not total. It is increasingly clear that this episode is as much a reorientation and shift to differing social and economic models as simple collapse [11, 36], a reorganization that represents a key formative period that shapes the later developments of the Iron Age. The climate proxy data, while relatively consistent in indicating cooler, more arid conditions, are as yet poorly constrained in temporal terms in many cases, and exact associations with cultural and political developments therefore remain problematic [15].

In each of these cases there remains much to be investigated and learnt in order to be able to write a detailed history successfully and convincingly linking archaeology-history and climate. However, even more pressing is the question: what happened around and particularly after these apparent episodes of collapse/change, during the periods of ensuing transformation prior to the generally accepted return of ‘high’ civilization? Despite terms like megadrought and collapse, it is of course widely understood that archaeological and historical evidence continues through these episodes, at least in several areas. We consider here the northern Levantine Early Bronze Age IV as conventionally ca. 2500–2000 BCE (EB IVA ca. 2500–2300; EB IVB ca. 2300–2000 BCE) and the early Iron Age as the period during and after the 12th century BCE in the northern Levant (ca. 1200–900 BCE, Iron Age I). On the principle that both humans and nature abhor a vacuum, we may also assume a corollary if there is a climate association with the changes occurring ca. 2200 BCE and 1200 BCE (or even if there is simply a key structural change in social and economic systems). Thus, if such climate (or other) changes negatively affect one existing set of sites and their environmental and locational contexts, it is also likely that other loci may find an opportunity to fill this void and to offer ‘alternative’ trajectories and histories. These cases might involve societies centered on a different, more resilient, economic base–like pastoralism in the Levant [4, 44], societies constructed on differing socio-political scales (e.g. smaller units), based in less affected geographic contexts, or with access to alternative trade networks [36, 41]. In other words, we open perspective towards both resilience and alternatives to simple collapse, and more nuanced approaches that incorporate a heterogeneity of response and opportunity at local level in the face of regional-global climate processes.

The large and important site of Tell Tayinat in southeast Turkey offers one such alternative history [4551]. In this paper, we use radiocarbon dates and analysis of these to investigate and define the chronology of the site of Tell Tayinat, and demonstrate that its substantive history of occupation(s) includes the periods of response to the ‘megadrought’ eras associated with both the 2200 BCE and 1200 BCE episodes. The site is largely not occupied during the ‘high-civilization’ periods of the Middle and Late Bronze Age. Instead, the local regional occupation in these periods is at Tell Atchana (ancient Alalakh), and the switch to Atchana from Tayinat at the end of the Early Bronze Age, followed by a return to Tayinat at the end of the Late Bronze Age, forms a local version of the wider ‘alternative’ paradigm of interest [4551]. Tell Tayinat thus represents an alternative history and trajectory to the ‘palatial’ mainstream of the Levantine region, and a prime case study illustrating how change—whether forced by economics, climate, geography or other factors—is rarely universal. Instead, negative or positive factors affecting one set of circumstances may well have differing and even opposite effects elsewhere. The context and societal formations at Tell Tayinat—and the contrast, locally, with Tell Atchana, and more widely with the major Middle–Late Bronze Age primate sites across the east Mediterranean and Levant—offer us one rich window into a resilient and successful response, and alternative to collapse, in the face of regional megadrought in the Old World.

Tell Tayinat

Tell Tayinat, located in the Amuq Plain of southeastern Turkey and centrally positioned in the northern Levantine region, comprises a large, low-lying mound within the flood plain of the Orontes River. Tayinat sits on the northern bend of the Orontes, downstream of its entrance into the Amuq Plain, at the point where it turns westward toward Antakya (ancient Antioch) and the Mediterranean Sea (Fig 1). The site has long been a focus of excavation and study, starting with large-scale excavations conducted by the Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago between 1935 and 1938 [52, 53]. More recently, it has been the focus of work by the Tayinat Archaeological Project (TAP) based at the University of Toronto, which began with pedestrian and geomagnetic survey between 1999–2002 [54], further geomagnetic survey in 2003 (, followed by excavations and study from 2004 onwards [4551, 55, 56]. The earlier excavations demonstrated that the site was occupied during significant portions of the 3rd millennium BCE, from at least the EB III [52]. To date, the new excavations at the site have produced materials and contexts dating from the later part of the Early Bronze Age (EB IVA-B, late 3rd millennium BCE) and spanning the Iron Age, with significant attention paid to the monumental structures of the Iron II and Iron III levels [53, 57, 58].

Fig 1. Map showing the Orontes Valley of Northwest Syria and Southeast Anatolia and all the sites discussed in this study.

This map was produced in ArcGIS v 10.7.1 at the CRANE funded Archaeology Centre Digital Innovation Laboratory of the University of Toronto by compiling GIS Shapefiles and Digital Elevation Data built from publicly available sources including NASA/JPL/NIMA.

Historically, the site is also well-attested. The Early Bronze Age city is perhaps the location referred to as Alalaḫu in records preserved on clay tablets from the late 3rd millennium BCE archive found at the site of Ebla in Syria [49, 50, 59]. For the Iron Age, interpretation of inscriptional evidence has led to suggestions that by at least the 11th century BCE, early Iron Age Tell Tayinat represented the center of a kingdom named Palastin or Walastin, with one king being a certain Taita, “Hero and King of Palastin”, best known from inscriptions in the Aleppo Temple [6063]. Later historical records, dating to the 9th-early 8th centuries BCE, refer to the kingdom as Patina or Unqi [6466]. The Assyrians took control of the city in 738 BCE and the region became part of their province of Kinalia under an Assyrian governor [6569].

The end of the first primary period of occupation at Tell Tayinat in the late 3rd millennium BCE corresponds in general with the period of change and re-orientation across much of the Old World from around 4200 years BP or 2200 BCE [1619, 25]. In the northern Levant, this episode is in general associated with the EB IVB period. The overall dates for the wider period of societal change, commonly associated with a shift(s) in climate affecting especially the Old World region, are largely uncontested—although the exact timings, scale, extent, coherence and uniformity of the climate episode remains debated even in the Mediterranean-Levant region (e.g. [7073]). Correlating with the end of the Akkadian Empire and the First Intermediate Period in Egypt, a beginning for this period of change in the later 23rd century BCE and especially around 2200 BCE is largely agreed. It is generally accepted that there is a period(s) of apparently cooler and drier conditions in this region that lasts until around the 20th century BCE (ending broadly by around 1900 BCE) [1619, 25, 30, 31, 7074, 77, 78]. The area for debate is exactly whether, how, and how comprehensively, the latter causes the former [4, 78, 16, 19, 25, 31, 35, 75, 76]. The site of Tell Leilan in northeastern Syria offers a closely resolved date for the beginning of this period [30, 31], as do a variety of proxy climate indicators [25, 7074, 77, 78]. Its end is marked by the re-emergence of wider trade networks and state-polities (like the Middle Kingdom of Egypt, Old Babylonian Period in Mesopotamia) during the 20th century BCE.

The issue for Tell Tayinat is to position the site and its EB occupation in terms of this wider general timeframe. In contrast to regions such as northern Mesopotamia, whose chronologies have been more closely tied to the 4.2k event, and its apparent historical effects, northern Levantine chronologies generally have not accounted for this event. The general chronological framework for the northern Levant, largely based on sequences from Hama, Ebla and the early Amuq excavations [79], is generally agreed upon, with the EB IVB period conventionally dated to ca. 2300–2000 BCE. More recently, the creation of an EBA-MBA transitional subdivision, ca. 2100–2000 BCE, has been proposed [34, 80, 81]. This chronological framework, however, has been developed primarily from relative ceramic sequences and has not been anchored to 14C dates [34, 79, 82]. An independent and direct timeframe is thus lacking. More recently this situation has started to change. 14C dates pertaining to several late 3rd millennium BCE sites have been published, including Tell Mardikh/Ebla [83], Rawda [34, 84], Qatna [85] and Umm el-Marra [34]. The suggested date for the destruction of Palace G at Ebla, representing the local transition from the EB IVA to EB IVB, is suggested to date to 2367–2293 BCE, with ca. 54% probability [83], roughly in line with the conventional date for this transition, and placing the 4.2ka (2200 BCE) climate event firmly during the EB IVB period.

The Early Iron Age is more problematic. There has been a long-standing challenge resolving Iron Age chronology in the northern Levant in this period [51, 56, 86, 87]. The close of the Late Bronze Age is characterized by the collapse of the wide-reaching and literate trading systems of previous centuries [15, 4042, 8890]. We also lose the well-defined sequence of historical rulers from the unified New Kingdom of Egypt. The result is that archaeologists lack the confident ability to employ replicated material culture associations to tie object types, assemblages, and sites across the eastern Mediterranean to the historical chronology of Egypt. This situation has led to much scholarly uncertainty and debate over dates based on relatively scarce, ambiguous, or contradictory evidence (e.g. [56, 90]). The past couple of decades have, unsurprisingly, seen scholars trying to find alternative means to establish secure chronological timeframes for the early Iron Age in several areas of the East Mediterranean and Aegean, and have–almost inevitably–created controversy as previous hypotheses are challenged, usually by new radiocarbon evidence [86, 87, 9197].

In the northern Levant, especially, there has been lack of both data and scholarly focus. After the collapse and transformation of the well-known Late Bronze Age civilizations and their major, often ‘palatial’, centers around the close of the 13th century BCE and into the early 12th century BCE [11, 15, 42, 88, 89, 90], the social, political and economic processes of the subsequent earlier Iron Age are much less well understood [51]. This is particularly true in the period stretching from the late 12th through 10th centuries BCE, where historical documentation has been scarce. Although new inscriptional evidence is beginning to provide a historical framework for this period, the precise chronology of these historical developments remains fluid, uncertain, and largely based on paleographical grounds as newly emerging finds regularly require the revision of historical chronologies and king lists [6062, 98, 99]. In the 9th–8th centuries BCE, historical documentation becomes more frequent from Neo-Assyrian records, as a result of their increasing contacts with this region, and then their takeover and administrative control from the late 8th century BCE onward [6568, 100]. Following the conquest of Kunulua–the ancient name in this period for Tell Tayinat–by the Assyrian ruler Tiglath-pileser III in 738 BCE, Tayinat became the capital of the Assyrian province of Kinalia [58, 64, 65, 101]. The available textual evidence suggests that in the intervening period, the larger political structures of the Late Bronze Age had vanished and in their place was a collection of relatively small territorial states [45, 46, 51, 55, 100103]. The trajectories and chronologies of these profound changes and of the emergence of these new socio-political formations remains largely unclear. Hence establishing a defined and robust chronology for a key site like Tell Tayinat represents a critical step towards a more nuanced understanding of this time period.

In contrast to the southern Levant and a few other areas, where the widespread use of radiocarbon evidence to address issues of Iron Age chronology has led to the development of a large dataset of chronometric evidence (e.g. [87, 9197]), available radiocarbon data in the northern Levant is extremely scarce [15, 23, 51, 104]. This has led to the development of a series of relative regional chronologies, often employing widely varying chronological terminologies based on locally-defined or somewhat arbitrary subdivisions [86, 105108]. These are often based on linkages in material culture and styles within the Levant and with the Aegean and Cyprus [56, 109]. As a result, the issue of chronology has been problematic and largely based on circular reasoning and imprecise criteria.

One of the key discoveries during recent excavations at Tell Tayinat is the articulation of a sequence of early Iron Age remains, after a settlement hiatus during the Middle and Late Bronze Ages, that were unattested in the earlier excavations at the site [4547, 51, 55, 110]. With an area from ca. 12–20 hectares in extent, Tell Tayinat is one of the larger early Iron Age sites known in the eastern Mediterranean, and represents an important regional sequence for the early Iron Age in the northern Levant. As a result, we report work aimed at remedying the lack of chronological data for this region through establishing a high-resolution calendar timescale for early Iron Age Tell Tayinat. The use of data from Tell Tayinat for the development of a regional sequence is particularly appropriate, given the important role the site played in the early development of radiocarbon dating. A sample of charcoal from Tell Tayinat in fact appeared on Libby’s famous ‘curve of knowns’ as a measurement by the University of Chicago. Libby wrote:

“The next sample, which is marked “Tayinat,” is from a house in Asia Minor which was burned in 675 B.C. It was wood from the floor of a central room in a large hilani (“palace”) of the “Syro-Hittite” period in the city of Tayinat in northwest Persia. Its known age is 2625 ± 50 years” [111].

This statement is historic, but also both remarkable and (retrospectively) distressing. A charcoal sample of the scale required at this time for radiocarbon dating likely had a considerable number of tree-rings. Thus it could quite well today have offered a potentially important dendrochronological sample, or least a highly resolved dendro-14C-wiggle-match sample. Such a sample could have enabled precise dating (as undertaken at some other Anatolian Bronze and Iron Age cases [78, 112116]) of some considerable value, perhaps tied to a specific construction episode at the site (its context from the floor in a central room suggests a fallen roof beam). Sadly, no charcoal recovered so far in the recent Tayinat excavations has been of anywhere near such a scale for dendrochronological analysis, and the whereabouts of Libby’s original sample or any others that may have been collected in the 1930s remains unknown. The confidence expressed in the dating of the context and sample from the site is also striking, and almost certainly misplaced, given the complex history of the specific bīt-hilāni palace from which the sample was taken (Rooms I-J, 1st floor in Building I) (e.g., [53, 57, 117, 118]).

In view of these research opportunities and the current limitations in terms of dating, our project therefore seeks to integrate the archaeology with the radiocarbon evidence to achieve a secure timeframe for Tell Tayinat in both the late Early Bronze Age and the Early Iron Age. We use organic samples (identified wood charcoal and especially short-lived seed material) from well-defined archaeological contexts at Tell Tayinat for a program of radiocarbon dating. In particular, we have carefully selected sets of short-lived sample material where possible–offering ages contemporary with use–from stratigraphic sequences. These circumstances, where we have an archaeologically-ordered sequence of contexts and samples, allows in addition the application of Bayesian chronological modeling approaches [119123], where prior archaeological or historical knowledge can be integrated with the radiocarbon probabilities, in order to achieve more precise and more robust chronologies.

Materials and methods

Samples and 14C dates

We reviewed and identified the available organic sample materials from the Tell Tayinat Archaeological Project ( and its excavation program. The Tayinat landowners, in particular the Kuseyri family, permitted work on their land. All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations. The Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museums of Turkey granted the research permits necessary to conduct each of the Tell Tayinat excavation seasons. All fragments of wood charcoal chosen for examination that were larger than 2 mm were fractured by hand or with a steel razor blade to create fresh transverse, radial, and tangential planes, in order to examine the wood anatomical structure. After fracturing, samples were supported in a sand bath and examined under a Motic K-400P stereo microscope at x6 to x50 magnification and an Olympus BX51 polarizing microscope at x50 to x500 magnification. The micro-anatomical features of each section were documented, photographed, and compared with those from modern reference collection materials, standard reference texts [124, 125], and the InsideWood online database ( Seed and non-wood botanical remains were identified by comparing sample morphological characteristics with modern reference materials and reference seed atlases (e.g., [126, 127]). A LEO 1550 field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) was used for high magnification observation of plant micro-features and high-quality image capture.

Following identification, we selected a number of samples (both wood charcoal and short-lived seeds) for which reasonably secure archaeological associations are available (as is inevitable at a complicated multi-period tell site with such a multi-phase stratigraphic sequence, the work of this project has in fact led to the reassessment of a few contexts–see below). The general Tell Tayinat site stratigraphic sequence is set out in Table 1; further stratigraphic description and the discussion of associated material culture can be found in [48, 50, 51, 53, 110, 118]. The samples ultimately selected for 14C dating and any comments related to their archaeological contexts are listed in Table 2. These samples were then radiocarbon dated at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit. Acid-Base-Acid (ABA) sample pretreatment, target preparation, and Accelerator Mass Spectrometry (AMS) 14C dating were performed following methods described previously [128130]. Isotopic fractionation has been corrected for employing the δ13C values measured on the AMS–the quoted δ13C values were measured independently on a stable isotope mass spectrometer (±0.3‰ relative to VPDB). The 49 new 14C dates acquired are listed in Table 3.

Table 1. The Tell Tayinat general stratigraphic sequence indicating contexts of radiocarbon dated samples.

Descriptions of associated stratigraphy and material culture can be found in [48, 50, 51, 53, 110, 118]. The conventional dates for the associated periods are indicated following [105106] for the Iron Age and [34] for the Early Bronze Age, while previously published dates for the main Tayinat phases are indicated in parentheses and italics following [53].

Table 2. Samples for 14C dating from Tell Tayinat obtained by this project.

For comments on some of the sample contexts, see the notes below the table. Tayinat General Period Scheme refers to the General Site Phases as identified in Table 1. Local Field Phase refers to the individual phasing schemes devised independently for each excavation area, outlined in Table 1.

Bayesian chronological modeling

In order to best estimate and quantify the calendar age ranges for the Tayinat archaeological phases we employed Bayesian Chronological Modeling [119123, 131], employing OxCal 4.3.2 software [119, 121, 132] (, in order to integrate prior archaeological sequence information with the radiocarbon dating probabilities from the measured samples (Tables 13). OxCal terms such as “Sequence”, “Phase”, and “Boundary”, are capitalized in the text and figures below. We employ the current revised northern hemisphere radiocarbon calibration dataset, IntCal20 [133]. The results for the periods under investigation are only slightly different when compared with the previous IntCal13 dataset [134] and we compare the results for Model 2 below. We also briefly discuss the issue of the potential relevance of a small Mediterranean region growing-season offset for high-precision 14C age calibration (see below).

Where possible, we sought to employ short-lived (annual) samples for dating contexts, since these samples–if they are in their primary stratigraphic context related to human use–offer dates directly relevant to the contexts of discovery. Within OxCal, we tested the coherence of the short-lived samples with the model using the General Outlier model of OxCal [135]—labelled as “SL”, for short-lived, in the OxCal runfiles in the S1 File—in which a Posterior value is calculated for each dated element versus the acceptable Prior value of 5 (that is: a 5% probability of being an outlier). We also consider the OxCal Agreement value for each individual sample (the approximate satisfactory value is 60) and for the overall model (Amodel and Aoverall values–again the satisfactory level is about 60). It is important to stress that each run of complicated OxCal models achieves very slightly different results, although for well-constrained model elements within such models, results typically do not vary by more than zero to a couple of years. We quote typical examples where the model converged successfully for the dated elements (Convergence, C, values of 95 or greater).

We also included a number of wood charcoal samples. These introduce issues of in-built age, which we tried to minimize by selecting (when possible) samples from juvenile stems and branches, and shorter-lived species. The expectation is that from a random population, some dated wood will be older (even much older) than the find context, but many samples will only be a little older to around about the contemporary age (whether outer rings, young trees, or branches/twigs), but with a little noise. To try to allow for and to compensate for this, we employed the Charcoal Plus Outlier model in OxCal [136, 137], allowing us to better estimate the date at which groups of charcoal samples from a context were actually used by humans, especially when information from dates on short-lived samples could also be incorporated within the relevant phase grouping. (Note: to use the Charcoal Plus Outlier model, an OxCal.prior file must first be loaded–we list the relevant file for use as /IA.prior in S1 File.) For discussion and illustration of how the use of the Charcoal Plus Outlier model (or the standard Charcoal Outlier model in OxCal [135]) is key to achieving a plausible age model for Tell Tayinat, integrating both the terminus post quem (TPQ) information (with varying lengths of the “post” in the terminus post quem) from long-lived charcoal samples with the contemporary age information provided by dates on short-lived samples (where they are in the correct context associations), see S2 File (and compare shifts to more recent age ranges for the wood-charcoal samples shown in S1S3 Figs). We employ the Charcoal Plus Outlier model as more appropriate for the reasons outlined in the studies cited [136, 137], however, very similar results are obtained with the OxCal Charcoal Outlier model [135], as we illustrate in the case of our Model 2, see S3 File. Our stated calendar date ranges are thus estimates of the dated periods or episodes but, where a range of charcoal samples alone are involved, these likely still include some aspect of a terminus post quem (TPQ) range, and thus might be described as estimates of a close TPQ and/or the date range. Where the identical sample was dated twice we combined the two measurements into a single weighted average value [138].

Four samples require comment. Sample SA4205 (date OxA-30320) was recorded as from a Phase 6b (Iron Age I) context, but is clearly an intrusive Iron Age II sample as evident from the 14C age. After re-examination of the excavation records, it was determined to be intrusive from the immediately overlying foundations of a late Iron II building (Building II) that were cutting into these FP6b levels, and is therefore (re-)assigned to Phase 2 Late 2. This datum is shown in purple in the models below to show it was reassigned. Sample SA5311 (date OxA-32165) came from a Phase 2 Late 2 context, but its 14C age is a little older than the other Phase 2 Late 2 samples. However, based on examination of site records, we believe that, like SA4778 (OxA-30312), this sample in fact comes from earlier activity within Phase 2 Late overall—Phase 2 Late 1—versus the final use of this area in the subsequent Phase 2 Late 2 and so is residual material in terms of Phase 2 Late 2. We have thus reassigned the sample to Phase 2 Late 1. It is shown in purple in the models below to indicate that it was residual and reassigned. Sample SA5113 (date OxA-32139) yields a 14C age that is around 1000 years older than the other short-lived samples from its supposed Phase 6b context. This situation likely indicates that it is, unrecognized at the time of excavation, (highly) residual material, likely originating from underlying EB IVB layers. It is thus shown in orange in the models below. Finally, Sample SA5533 (date OxA-32140), which was assigned to FP6b, was identified as an outlier in this phase. Upon re-examination of the field records, it was determined that the area in which this sample was excavated was noted at the time of excavation as belonging to a later intrusive pit cutting FP6b levels, and which was assigned a new locus number the following day. This sample should therefore be considered to originate from pit locus 233/234, and has thus been re-assigned to FP5b for modelling purposes.

We built an initial model incorporating all the data available and the stratigraphic information summarized in the Tayinat General Period Scheme in Table 1: Model 1. We explicitly do not make historical assumptions. Thus we do not assume that the transition from Phase 2 to Phase 1 marks the Assyrian conquest in 738 BCE—rather, we run the models with the 14C data and stratigraphic knowledge we have independently, and then consider where an event like the Assyrian conquest likely occurred in terms of the site sequence. Without specific confirmatory evidence, it is dangerous (and often circular) in practice and in theory to assume an historical association with any particular destruction or stratigraphic change [139, 140]. Similarly, we also make no assumptions based on existing dates derived from assessments from relative chronologies. As noted above, these are largely based on flexible or circular reasoning. Even in recent historic periods, uncritical dating based on artefact presence/absence is fraught with problems around availability, consumer choice, curation, time-lags and the nature of disposal, and can easily end up being misleading (e.g. [141, 142]). We instead employ the stratigraphic sequence and then let the 14C data directly describe the temporal scale.

There are two exceptions to the preceding general statements. First, although we do not assume that the transition from Phase 2 to Phase 1 is coeval with the Assyrian conquest of 738 BCE, it is nonetheless historically attested knowledge that after 738 BCE the Assyrians ruled at Tayinat (Kunulua). Thus it is reasonable to regard some part of the final phase at Tayinat as dating after 738 BCE; hence we use an After command within Phase 1 (Iron III) where we have no 14C data. The second element of historical knowledge is that because of the presence of a text with Esarhaddon’s adê of 672 BCE inside a Phase 1 temple at Tayinat [65, 68, 143], we may regard the end of the Tayinat occupation sequence as at least after 672 BCE—again we employ an After command in the OxCal code. In reality, it is possible that occupation at Tayinat continued for some decades (or more) after 672 BCE, maybe towards ~600 BCE. However, we currently lack any 14C data or other secure historical date. Thus the dating model ends at present more or less immediately after 672 BCE for lack of any quantifiable information.

The available stratigraphic information pertains only to the level of the site Phases recognized (see Table 1 for current Tell Tayinat relative stratigraphic sequence). Within each Phase we adopt the conservative assumption that the samples are random samples from a uniform distribution, and so could come from any point within the Phase with equal probability: a uniform prior assumption. An obvious exception are the two dates on short-lived samples (olive pits) from the period 8a “destruction event”, which we might assume to lie at the close of Phase 8a. However, these are the only data for Phase 8a (so we lack a ‘distribution’)–hence we use the weighted average value of these two dates as the date of the 8a destruction event. One of the short-lived samples in our dataset, OxA-32139 (sample SA5113), noted above, stands out as a complete outlier with the General Outlier model in OxCal [135] with a Prior of (the maximum value) 100 > Posterior value of 5 (and an OxCal Agreement value, A, less than 6, well below the satisfactory threshold value of >60). This sample, found in a Phase 6b context, is (as noted above) approximately 1000 years older and would likely seem to be a residual sample from the known underlying Early Bronze IV strata in this excavation unit. Notably OxA-30320 and OxA-32140, which we re-assigned (see above), and the ‘problematic’ sample just noted (OxA-32139)—all unrecognized at the time of excavation—come from period 6b and from field square G4.56 in Area 1. One is clearly residual from earlier layers (OxA-32139), one is clearly intrusive from later levels (OxA-30320), and one was confirmed as intrusive from (somewhat later) FP5b levels based on excavation records (OxA-32140). This reflects the challenging nature of the excavation contexts in this excavation square, which displayed frequent pitting activities and some disturbance from the foundations of later Iron II constructions. Most interestingly, as regards associations with regional climate change history and environmental contexts, the Tell Tayinat occupation sequence, as currently represented by the TAP excavations, includes EB IVB levels, followed by reoccupation spanning the Iron Age I-III, with no intervening Middle or Late Bronze Age contexts (see above). Thus residual EBA material in an otherwise Iron Age context is possible, due to the absence of intervening strata. A few instances of somewhat later Iron Age materials occurring as intrusives into early Iron Age contexts are a predictable issue of concern in a multi-period excavation like Tell Tayinat, particularly in an area cut by the foundations of later Iron Age constructions. We exclude OxA-32139 from the remainder of our analyses. The revised model (minus OxA-32139), Model 2, was then employed for the site dating. OxCal runfiles for Model 1 and Model 2 are listed in S1 File.


We first considered Model 1, which employs all the data, and then the very slightly revised Model 2 removing the outlier, OxA-32139, as noted above. Model 1 does not quite achieve satisfactory OxCal Amodel and Aoverall values given the outlier just noted (typically ~59–60), with one very low individual OxCal Agreement value (<6) for OxA-32139. The Model 1 run values quoted in Table 4 and the model run shown in S1 and S2 Figs achieved satisfactory Convergence (C) values ≥95 for all elements. However, it should be noted that, especially without use of a high initial kIterations value, runs of Model 1 in a number of cases fail to achieve ≥95 Convergence values for some of the late elements in the model (Phase 2 Late 1 onwards). This problem usually does not occur once OxA-32139 is excluded in Model 2. Fig 2 shows the Phase 6 part of Model 1 and indicates the extreme outlier date of OxA-32139 on sample SA5113. For the full Model 1, see S1 File, S1 and S2 Figs. The placement of the Model 1 dated elements versus IntCal20 (and with the previous IntCal13 shown for comparison) is shown in S3 Fig.

Fig 2. The portion of Model 1 showing the period 6 data to illustrate the very large outlier OxA-32139 on sample SA5113 (see text).

This sample is excluded from the remainder of the modeling in our study. Data from OxCal 4.3.2 and IntCal20 with calibration curve resolution set at 1 year. The OxCal Agreement (A) values, the Posterior v. Prior values from the OxCal General Outlier model (O) for the short-lived samples, and the Convergence (C) values are all shown. The dates on wood charcoal samples with the Charcoal Outlier Plus model applied always have an outlier value of 100/100. The light-shaded red probability distributions for each dated sample are the non-modeled calibrated age probability distributions for each sample in isolation. The dark red probability distributions are the modeled (posterior density) calendar age probability distributions. The lines under each probability distribution indicate the modeled 68.2% and 95.4% highest posterior density (hpd) ranges. (Note: OxCal from version 4.4.1 uses 68.3% hpd ranges, however, since we employed OxCal 4.3.2 in this paper, we list 68.2% ranges following OxCal version 4.3.2.).

Table 4. Selected modeled calendar age ranges from the models and outputs shown in Figs 35.

TPQ refers to a date solely from a long-lived sample(s). Typical results shown; very small variations (often of around 1 year) occur between different model runs (we illustrate by giving results from a very similar but different model run in S3 File, where a number of start/end dates for some of the ranges are 1 year different). For comparison of the results for Model 2 with the previous IntCal13 [134], see below in Table 6. Whole ranges only are listed (compare with S3 File where sub-ranges are listed). The Time Span Phases 4&3 Date estimate combines the separate start (Phase 4) and end (Phase 3) Date estimates in the model.

Figs 3 and 4 show Model 2. This is a revision of Model 1 removing OxA-32139. Model 2 achieves acceptable OxCal agreement index values overall, with Amodel around 81 and Aoverall around 81, above the accepted threshold value of 60 (typical values based on several runs). Usually all elements now achieve satisfactory Convergence values ≥95. There are no outliers among the dates on short-lived samples above the 6% level. These are very minor discrepancies, and the outlier modeling slightly down-weights their influence. We thus employ this model as our best estimate for the Tell Tayinat chronology. The calendar age ranges for various of the elements from both Model 1 and Model 2 are detailed in Table 4. They are very similar.

Fig 3. Model 2 (excluding OxA-32139): Bayesian chronological model for Tell Tayinat Iron Age sequence, part 1.

The Amodel and Aoverall values are satisfactory versus the threshold value of 60 (Table 4). Data from OxCal 4.3.2 and IntCal20 with calibration curve resolution set at 1 year. The Individual OxCal Agreement values (A), the Posterior v. Prior values from the OxCal General Outlier model for the short-lived samples (O), and the Convergence (C) values are all shown. The wood charcoal samples with the Charcoal Plus Outlier model applied all have a Posterior/Prior value of 100/100. The light-shaded red probability distributions for each dated sample are the non-modeled calibrated age probability distributions for each sample in isolation. The dark red probability distributions are the modeled calendar age probability distributions. The line under each probability distribution indicates the modeled 95.4% highest posterior density (hpd) range. Cyan color indicates the start and end Boundaries of the model. Green color indicates the Boundaries calculated within the Tell Tayinat Sequence. Blue color indicates an OxCal Date estimate query for a Phase (this quantifies the time period within the start and end Boundary for the relevant Phase).

Fig 4. Model 2 (excluding OxA-32139): Bayesian chronological model for Tell Tayinat Iron Age sequence, part 2.

Otherwise, see caption to Fig 3.


The EB IV dates indicate that the terminal EB occupation at Tell Tayinat lies in the 23rd to 22nd centuries BCE. This suggests that the site was active as the 4.2 ka climate event began (23rd century BCE) and likely continued at least into the early part of the following century. We have relatively few data as yet from the more substantial earlier phases of occupation, including the construction of a major structure in FP8b [48, 50], for which only a terminus post quem can be provided. The destruction of this structure, however, appears to be dated somewhere between 2300–2200 BCE, relatively early in the EB IVB period. Furthermore, no dates have yet been obtained from the recently excavated preceding levels, most notably from another substantial construction that appears to have been destroyed by fire and has been tentatively dated to the EB IVA period (FP10). More data, however, pertains to the terminal phases of EB occupation, after the destruction of the FP8 structure. The final EB IV Phase 7, in particular, exhibits some spread in 14C ages (Figs 3 and 5) among the olive pits represented, with two (OxA-32138, OxA-32134) perhaps indicating a date range around/after 2100 BCE. Phase 7 appears to represent a relatively drawn out period of reducing circumstances at the site following the destruction of the more substantial architecture of Phase 8. We lack any constraint on the end of Phase 7, since there is then a gap in site occupation. The end Boundary could reach, in round terms, to ~2100 BCE at 68.2% hpd and ~2000 BCE at 95.4% hpd. The data to hand suggest that Tell Tayinat Phase 7 occupation likely ran at least well into the 22nd century BCE, and perhaps further.

Fig 5. The Tell Tayinat Phase 7 data from Model 2 in Fig 3 shown in more detail.

The lines under each probability distribution indicate the modeled 68.2% and 95.4% highest posterior density (hpd) ranges.

This phase is associated with the decline and eventual abandonment of the site at the end of the phase, representing the terminal EB occupation at the site, after which occupation shifts to the neighboring site of Tell Atchana (ancient Alalakh) for the Middle and Late Bronze Ages, beginning in the terminal phases of the EB. This abandonment thus appears to occupy a period around and shortly after the onset of the 4.2 ka cultural-climate episode. It has been increasingly recognized that this climate episode did not significantly impact sites in the northern Levant, and specifically sites in the Euphrates and Orontes river valleys, in the same manner as observed in northern Mesopotamia [34, 38]. This does not contradict the general climate shift to more arid conditions observed in a number of records, including directly from barley finds from archaeological sites in the region [144]. But it does highlight that such a general regional impact has very different effects locally, depending on a range of human, geographic/environmental and technological factors [144]. Even during the climate episodes around 4200 BP (~2200 BCE) and 3200 BP (~1200 BCE), barley grains from coastal sites, for example, show little substantive drought stress [144]. In the northern Levant, in particular, it has been proposed that the karstic geology of these regions and their resulting access to underground aquifers as more stable water sources in times of drought, positioned them as “refugia” for “habitat-tracking populations” in times of climate crisis [25, 145, see also ref. 35]. Favorable physiographic and edaphic features, or irrigation technology and low-risk, sustainable agricultural practices may also mitigate local impacts.

Such comparatively favorable conditions, as well as possible mitigation strategies, may be reflected in the archaeobotanical evidence from Tayinat. In both FP8 and FP7, barley and free-threshing wheat are well-represented, and emmer wheat is also present in significant quantities [48, 146, 147]. Although barley is the dominant cereal crop, the frequencies of (more water-demanding) wheat are notably higher compared to sites further east, which typically relied much more heavily on barley [148]. This suggests better water availability in the Amuq compared to other inland areas in the late 3rd millennium, but the frequency of emmer may simultaneously represent a strategy aimed at minimizing yield variation. Similarly, Tayinat displays very high ubiquities in FPs 8–7 for a range of water-demanding species such as olive and grape, particularly when compared to other inland sites [146, 147]. Notably, no significant shift in species representation appears between FP8 and FP7 [147]. Carbon isotope analysis of cereal grains in addition indicates no evidence of drought stress in either barley or wheat during either phase, and crops may in fact be slightly better watered in FP7 compared to FP8 [147].

On the other hand, the zooarchaeological assemblages associated with FP8 and FP7 show notable differences [48]. Sheep and goat have a greater focus in absolute numbers compared to pig and cattle in FP7 in comparison to FP8, although cattle appear to have contributed the most significant amount of meat to the diet in both phases. Kill-off patterns for sheep and goat suggest a mixed animal management strategy was employed in both phases, with meat, milk and wool all likely playing a significant role. Notably, hunting is frequent in FP8, but becomes much less common in FP7. Hunting in FP8 focused on red deer (Cervus elaphus), although roe deer (Capreolus capreolus), gazelle and hare/rabbit are also present. Similarly, fish is found in very high proportions in FP8, and although it remains high in FP7 it declines significantly. Similar patterns are seen in bird, turtle and amphibian remains, although these are all found in much lower numbers than fish.

The results suggest a much more varied subsistence strategy in FP8, relying on a combination of domestic livestock and significant supplementation from hunting, fishing and fowling. In FP7, in contrast, hunting and fishing decrease notably and reliance on livestock increases. This is particularly true of sheep, goat and cattle, although pig declines slightly in FP7. Despite the decline visible architecturally after the destruction of the major building at the end of FP8, these observations suggest that FP7’s subsistence economy became more intensively focused on domestic livestock than in the preceding period.

Overall, despite their approximate temporal coincidence, a direct causal relationship between Tayinat’s late EB decline and this climate episode is difficult to support, as it seems much more likely that the site failed to recover from its destruction during the preceding century (or more–since the length of Phase 7 is unclear). This destruction is positioned alongside evidence for similar destruction levels in the northern Levant, most notably at the major regional center of Tell Mardikh-Ebla, where the Palace G complex was destroyed ~2350–2300 BCE [83]. The agents responsible for such destructions remain debated [149151], but in the aftermath, Ebla was rapidly reconstructed and regained its status as a primary regional center, although perhaps on a more modest scale than observed in the preceding period [34, 39, 152]. Tayinat, in contrast, although re-occupied, does not seem to have recovered its primate position in the region, with the principal settlement shifting to nearby Tell Atchana, which then remained the central settlement throughout the Middle and Late Bronze Ages. This shift, in contrast to wider regional reconstructions of major climatic crisis, has often been postulated as the result of local factors, such as a decisive shift in the course of the Orontes River [153, 154]. Indeed, in light of the close proximity of Tell Tayinat and Tell Atchana, this change may be more reflective of a local political and spatial reorganization than a major break in settlement.

Our Iron Age data and modeling provide a refined and robust absolute timeframe for the early Iron Age at Tell Tayinat, independent of cultural and historical assumptions, running from around the 12th through mid-8th centuries BCE (Table 4, Figs 3 and 4). The site’s earliest Iron Age occupation thus lies squarely in the period following the collapse of the Late Bronze Age ca. 1200 BCE, and represents an alternative model and context for this period of transformation and climate challenge in the Old World [51]. Discussion here will focus primarily on the dates from the early Iron Age (i.e. Iron I-early Iron II, ca. 12th-9th centuries BCE, Table 4); further discussion of the late Iron II dates here will await a future publication about the Iron II-III transition at the site (i.e. 8th-7th centuries BCE) [155]. The dates calculated are consistent with the broad chronological sequence constructed based on linkages to Aegeanizing ceramics of the Late Helladic (LH) IIIC tradition [45, 46, 51, 55, 56]. The earliest levels (Field Phase [FP] 6c), which largely precede the widespread use of Aegeanizing LH IIIC-style ceramics at the site [51, 110], begin in the 12th century BCE. Aegeanizing influences begin to appear in the late 12th century (FP6b) and proliferate in the 11th century (FP6a-5), continuing in declining frequencies into the mid-10th century (FP4-3, 2 Early) [51, 56, 110]. These dates are consistent with a more or less conventional chronology and do not support recent suggestions for much earlier (or ‘higher’) dates for the end of the Late Bronze Age (and the LH IIIB to LH IIIC transition) [97]. We place Tell Tayinat Phase 6b-a and its assemblage and associations with the Late Helladic IIIC tradition [51, 56, 110] from the late 12th century BCE onwards, in line with other recent 14C based work in the Aegean and East Mediterranean [94, 96, 156158].

The original excavations at the site produced a monumental structure known as Building XIV that was assigned to Building Period 1 [53]. The current excavations have identified the foundations of this structure [4547, 118], but have not yet produced any datable contexts for radiocarbon analysis. The stratigraphic position of the foundational remains of Building XIV, however, allow the proposition of a narrow date range, based on the model presented here, in the mid-late 10th century BCE, contemporary with Phase 2 Middle A1. The latter phase is associated in Field 1 with the construction of a major ditch and sherd-paved street, located immediately to the south of Building XIV [118]. The material assemblage associated with this building and with the street contains Red-Slipped Burnished Ware, whose fluorescence is conventionally dated to the Iron Age II, although only small quantities were found [118]. Instead, the ceramic assemblage for phases 2 Middle A(1) and 2 Middle A(2) is dominated by plain wares, suggesting a date between Phases 2 Middle A and 2 Middle B (ca. 900 BCE) for the Iron I-II transition. Samples analyzed that post-date the Iron I-II transition at the site all originate from the Iron II occupation at Tell Tayinat, ending in Phase 2 Late 2. This appears likely to precede closely the 738 BCE date when the Assyrians conquered the site and assumed its control [65, 66, 118]. The modelled dates for Phase 2 Late (Table 4) are consistent with this assessment. The Date estimate is 772–753 BCE (68.2% hpd) and 791–735 BCE (95.4% hpd), indicating the period lies shortly before the Assyrian conquest. The Boundary estimate for the Phase 2 to 1 transition, 764–743 BCE (68.2% hpd), 771–721 BCE (95.4% hpd) is either just before, or at about the same time as, the Assyrian conquest. We currently lack any 14C data from Phase 1 to clarify the dating after Phase 2. It seems inherently likely that the Phase 2 to 1 transition probably is associated with the Assyrian conquest and associated changes following 738 BCE and this assumption appears compatible with the available 14C-based timeframe.

No Iron III context has yet been the subject of 14C dating, but the dates might thus be anticipated to fall in the period of Assyrian control following 738 BCE and must continue until after at least 672 BCE [66, 118, 143].

Our chronology allows comparison of some persons known from the epigraphic record and likely linked with names thought to refer to Tell Tayinat or its territory [47, 6062] (see Table 5). The Aleppo Citadel inscription of king Taita, hero and ruler of Palistin, is dated to the 11th century BCE on the basis of paleography and iconography [6062]. The currently proposed chronological scheme would link this ruler to Tayinat Phases 6a to 5. A putative second Taita, reconstructed from inscriptional evidence from Meharde and Sheizar, has been attributed on similar grounds to the (early?) 10th century BCE [62]. This ruler would thus most likely be associated with the later Iron I materials at the site (FPs 4–3). As such, contrary to earlier assumptions, the reigns of these rulers likely preceded the monumental constructions of Building Period 1 (Buildings XIII and XIV). This time period is designated Phase 2 Middle A(1). Dates are estimated within the model from the surrounding data and constraints, since there are no 14C data for this period, at about 955–911 BCE, 68.2% hpd, and 961–866 BCE, 95.4% hpd (Table 4). Any potential monumental constructions associated with the reigns of the earlier 10th century rulers remain to be discovered. Other possible 10th century rulers attested on the Arsuz stelae [62, 98], notably Suppiluliuma (I), who claims to have conducted a war in Cilicia, may be more plausibly related to the construction of the monumental structures associated with Building Period 1 in the mid-late 10th century BCE. These prominent figures also appear to be associated with a significant reconfiguration of urban space at the site, and an expansion of their kingdom’s territorial extent. By the 9th century BCE, Tell Tayinat had become the city of Kunulua, the apparent royal city of the Neo-Hittite kingdom of Patina (or Unqi) [47, 61, 159]. The ruler Suppiluliuma (II), attested in a monumental inscription recently discovered at Tell Tayinat, likely corresponds to the Sapalulme mentioned in the campaign records of Shalmaneser III [62, 63, 159, 160]. Qalparunda, a ruler of Patina, paid tribute to Shalmaneser III in both 857 and 853 BCE, and may correspond to the Halparuntiyas mentioned in Tayinat Inscription 1 [47, 159161]. These two rulers would likely correspond with the time of Phase 2 Middle B.

Table 5. Suggested correlations between Tayinat Phases, absolute dates as reconstructed here by Bayesian modelling of 14C dates, rulers attested in historical sources, and conventional northern Levantine Iron Age periodization.

For Iron I, alternating pale orange and white coloration denotes the four-period division as outlined in [51]; for Iron II-III, gray and white coloration denotes the separation between Tayinat Phases.

Here too, a direct association between various reconstructions of 13th-10th centuries BCE climatic crisis in the eastern Mediterranean and Near East (e.g. [3, 2023, 26, 43, 162164]) and the trajectory of development at the site of Tell Tayinat is difficult to discern. The decline of the Late Bronze Age settlement of Tell Atchana begins at least a century earlier than the proposed major crisis that occurs ca. 1200 BCE and afterwards, and the site’s occupation shrinks significantly during the 13th century BCE [165, 166]. In contrast, during the proposed Early Iron Age shift to more arid conditions, the site of Tell Tayinat appears to flourish [51, 110]. Historical records suggest the formation and expansion of a major political entity centered around the Amuq Plain and Tell Tayinat during the 11th-10th centuries BCE [6062], the height of the reconstructed climate crisis. Although monumental architecture contemporary to the earliest historically attested rulers has not yet been uncovered by the current excavations, the archaeological evidence suggests a prosperous settlement that remained tied into long-distance trade networks. Major monumental constructions and a significant reorganization of urban space are attested in contexts now dated to the late 10th century (Building Period 1, Phase 2 Middle A(1)), culminating in the formation of the major Neo-Hittite royal city of Kunulua in the 9th century BCE. In combination with the historical evidence, this suggests that the rise of Tayinat, and the foundations of the later Iron Age social and political institutions at the site, had their origins during a period frequently defined (elsewhere in the wider region) as one of crisis and collapse.

The archaeological evidence from Tayinat points toward a variety of mechanisms that may have contributed to this Iron Age fluorescence. The stability of the location of the central settlement in the Amuq in the south-central part of the plain throughout the Bronze and Iron Ages suggests that the short-distance shift in site location from Tell Atchana to Tayinat during the 12th century BCE could not have been a response to large-scale climatic degradation or to major shifts in economic networks. Rather, it seems likely to represent an adaptive response to locally changing conditions, which may have included a shift in the course of the Orontes River [153154]. An Orontes paleo-channel identified between the sites of Tayinat and Atchana has been suggested to date to the Iron Age, and the shift of the main settlement to the north bank of the river would have maximized the site’s access to agricultural land in the plain north of the river [154]. Furthermore, the site of Tayinat al-Saghir, a small mound artificially constructed between Tayinat and Atchana at some point during the Iron Age, may represent a quay that would have allowed the main settlement to control riverine traffic, cementing its economically strategic position [118].

Palaeobotanical evidence likewise provides additional detail to this complex picture. Crop isotope data from Tayinat suggest minimal evidence for drought stress during the early Iron Age, particularly for barley, and generally suggest improvement in crop water status over the course of the Iron I [147, 167]. Furthermore, continued cultivation of water-demanding species such as grape, olive and fig at Tayinat during the Iron I does not suggest that water availability was a significant issue [167]. These arboricultural taxa reach their highest ubiquities and frequencies in FP6 and generally decline somewhat thereafter [51]. Free-threshing wheat also remains the most frequent crop plant throughout the Iron I, although barley increases in ubiquity during FPs 6–5 [51]. This increased focus on free-threshing wheat has been suggested to represent a labor optimization strategy [167]. Emmer is notably more ubiquitous during the Iron I than in the preceding LBA or during the later parts of the Iron Age, which may represent a strategy employed to minimize the risk associated with fluctuations in yield [51]. The frequency of large-seeded vetches such as bitter vetch (Vicia) and grass pea (Lathyrus) are similarly interpreted as indicative of a risk-spreading strategy that prevents crop failures, stabilizes crop yields and maintains soil fertility [167]. In the Iron Age, the frequent co-occurrence in northern Levantine sites of a focus on free-threshing wheat and large vetches has been interpreted as an attempt to achieve balance between the water input and labor requirements of agricultural production [167].

The zooarchaeological evidence points to a reasonably consistent strategy of animal raising through the Iron I, although differences exist between FP6b-a and the later phases of the Iron I. Pig consumption is at its most frequent during FP6b-a, although cattle consistently represents the most significant contributor of meat to the diet [51]. Mortality curves for sheep and goat in the Iron I suggest strategies aimed at exploitation of secondary products (dairy and particularly wool/hair), and there is evidence for significant textile production beginning already in the late 12th century [51, 110]. Hunting evidence is found in very low frequencies in all phases, while fishing is noticeably more frequent in FP6b-a compared to later Iron I phases [51].

In addition to the political decline of Alalakh during the 13th century BCE, textual sources suggest that problems with grain production and/or distribution may have resulted in the diversion of local agricultural products to elsewhere within the Hittite Empire [15, 42, 168], as well as a concurrent decline in regional population within the Amuq as a result of Hittite deportations that preceded the climate crisis [168]. The frequencies of wild taxa associated with moist environments suggest a wetter environment at Tayinat during FP6 [51, 147]. The Amuq has historically experienced a fluctuating degree of marshiness [118, 153], and this may explain the increased appearance of fish in the zooarchaeological assemblage during the same period [51]. In contrast, FPs 5–3 are associated with wild plant taxa that may indicate an expansion in agricultural area during the late 11th-10th centuries BCE through the use of new arable fields that were likely left uncultivated during the 12th-early 11th centuries BCE [51]. This suggests an agricultural extensification strategy during this time that may be related to increasing population in the Amuq Plain (and stable political-economic circumstances), as identified from settlement data [51, 56, 169], and which may reflect increasing urbanization connected to the formation of the kingdom of Palistin. Indeed, comparison of the apparent lower town plans extant and accessible via geophysics at Tell Tayinat would suggest that Tayinat records long-term organic town growth through the course of the Iron Age, whereas the nearby site of Zincirli, in contrast, perhaps largely records a new post-Assyrian conquest layout [169]. This may indicate only limited post-Assyrian-conquest changes beyond the monumental constructions of the elite zone in the upper city at Tayinat [118].

As suggested for the late EB period (see above), the local environment (through a combination of the Orontes River and the karstic geology) may have provided a suitable context in this region for greater resilience despite the arguments and evidence for climate change (more arid conditions) following ~3200 BP (~1200 BCE). Crop isotope data from Tayinat mentioned above are consistent with broader regional patterns that suggest the Orontes and coastal regions were somewhat less affected by drought stress [144, 167]. Comparative studies would also indicate that the nature of the association between climate change and social change is, predictably, complex and contingent on the nature and history of the relevant societies and their specific vulnerabilities (e.g. evolved socio-environmental mis-matches [170]). In particular, climate change alone is often not the key element that overcomes societal resilience; rather, it is sharp, volatile, fluctuations with a duration of several years that seem the greater threat to established complex agrarian societies in the preindustrial period (e.g. [29, 171176]).

A final issue is the robustness of the 14C calibration record with respect to the Tell Tayinat samples. The new IntCal20 [133] 14C dataset is greatly enhanced (in terms of data for several periods, and quality) compared with IntCal13 [134]. However, for the periods of time relevant to Tell Tayinat and its dated elements, there are in fact only relatively small changes (see S3 Fig) and no major new underlying data contributions. Table 6 compares the results for Model 2 (in Table 4) with the same model run with IntCal13 (an example is cited with good OxCal Amodel and Aoverall values and all Convergence, C, values ≥95 –note that many runs do not achieve good Convergence in the final part of the model unless the kIterations value is increased, from about or after Phase 2 Late 1). There are few substantial differences; date ranges are largely similar.

Table 6. Comparison of the modeled calendar age ranges from Model 2 with IntCal20 [133] (Table 4) versus runs of Model 2 using the previous IntCal13 calibration curve [134] and the Hd GOR Mediterranean dataset [180].

Data from example runs with satisfactory Amodel and Aoverall values (>60) and with all dated elements with satisfactory Convergence values (≥95). Whole ranges listed. Phase 4 and 3 Date estimates combined as start Phase 4 to end Phase 3.

A potentially greater concern is recent work indicating the possible relevance at times of a modest/small Mediterranean growing season-related 14C offset for high-resolution calendar age determinations from the lower elevation Mediterranean region [177180]. There is an intra-annual (i.e. seasonal) atmospheric 14C cycle, with a winter low and a summer high. Thus plants growing (and photosynthesizing) in the Mediterranean region at lower elevations in the winter through spring period (and stopping growth by the summer) may yield a recognizably slightly different 14C history versus the IntCal record derived from trees from central and northern Europe and North America that grow primarily from later spring and right through the summer [179, 180]. However, the fact that the overwhelming majority of the short-lived samples in this Tayinat study are olive pits (~86% of such samples) likely partly mitigates this issue. Unlike many trees or cereals and other field crops in lower elevation eastern Mediterranean environments, olive fruit grow from later spring through the autumn and hence comprise a 14C record that is only partly (not largely) out of kilter with the IntCal record. Grapes also grow through, and are harvested late in the summer to start of autumn, and again, in contrast with field crops like cereals, thus minimize any likely growing season offset [179181] (in all, olive pits and a grape seed include 89% of the short-lived samples dated at Tayinat). Nonetheless, for interest, we compare the Model 2 results run against the Mediterranean-Anatolian Hd Gordion (GOR) dataset [180] in Table 6. This Hd GOR record is only a sketch for the Mediterranean—much more work is needed—and lacks data for the EB part of the Tayinat record and ends during the period of the late Tayinat samples. Thus it offers only a partial indication of possible differences. The Hd GOR record is largely similar to IntCal20 for most periods, and some of the changes in IntCal20, versus IntCal13, reduce what were previously further instances of differences when comparing the Hd GOR record versus IntCal13 [180], for example especially in the earlier 16th century BCE (see the region labelled 1 in S4 Fig). Nonetheless, within general similarity, there are some periods, notably at the times of reversals and plateaus in the radiocarbon record, where the Hd GOR record exhibits some offset. Two examples are indicated (labelled as 2, 3) in S4 Fig. A possible additional area of minor offset might also exist at the reversal/plateau covering the earlier to mid-9th century BCE labelled with the? in S4 Fig. The last two of these offsets could have minor relevance and effect on the Tayinat dates—but, noting that the types of short-lived samples dated likely minimize any effect (see above), this is likely insignificant.

As with the IntCal13 model, a number of model runs fail to achieve satisfactory Convergence values especially for the last part of the model from the Phase 2 Late 1 Date Estimate onwards unless the kIterations value is increased. Over multiple runs, there is also more noise in the late part of the model. The results in Table 6 are for a typical successful run with good Convergence. The results are generally similar to those from IntCal20 and IntCal13. However, in line with the observations of a small growing season offset issue and its possible consequences [177180], we notice some modest effects, and especially during periods of reversals and plateaus in the radiocarbon calibration curve [179, 180]. For the periods where the Hd GOR [180] dataset applies (thus only for Tayinat Phases 6 onwards), the date ranges for some of the Tayinat phases (from Phase 6c to Phase 2 Middle B) are a little later, variously by around a decade to several decades considering the 68.2% hpd ranges. Consistent with previous observations [179, 180], the largest shift indications (of ~12–47 years in the 68.2% hpd ranges) occur in the 10th and early to mid-9th centuries BCE when there are reversals in the 14C calibration curve [133, 134] (S4 Fig). In view of the comments above about olive fruit and grapes, the effective (i.e. real) offset for Tell Tayinat is likely a little smaller. Nevertheless, this exercise highlights an area of possible minor chronological variation. Where this offset does apply, the effect is to achieve slightly later (more recent) calendar age estimates (something of potential relevance to debates over Iron Age chronology in the southern Levant, for example [179]). The very substantial change in atmospheric radiocarbon levels (the steep slope in the calibration curve) from the late 9th through mid-8th centuries BCE (linked with a major change in radiocarbon production and thence changes in solar activity processes [182]) (S4 Fig) clarifies that, regardless of any minor variations, the Tayinat Phase 2 Late 2 data are mid-8th century BCE and thus likely represent the last pre-Assyrian conquest (738 BCE) phase at the site.


The absolute dating of the later Early Bronze Age and earlier Iron Age occupation periods at Tell Tayinat and associated northern Levantine sites has been the subject of debate and ambiguity for many years. The regional chronological frameworks for the northern Levant during both periods have never been adequately addressed in absolute chronological terms, but rather have been largely based on relative chronologies derived from regional ceramic sequences. The chronology of the early Iron Age, in particular, has been linked only approximately to material and stylistic associations and thence to debates in other areas, in both the Aegean and the wider East Mediterranean, concerning the centuries following the collapse of the 13th century BCE palace-era Late Bronze Age civilizations. Our chronology, based on the integration of the archaeological sequence at Tell Tayinat with radiocarbon dates, provides for the first time a directly relevant, refined, and robust timeframe for this important site and its region. The chronological framework thus developed places the two major occupation phases at Tell Tayinat firmly within temporal contexts relevant to ongoing debates about two periods of supposed climate crisis (around and following ca. 4200 BP/2200 BCE and around and following ca. 3200 BP/ 1200 BCE). The complex and contrasting responses observed at Tell Tayinat during these two transformative periods positions the site as a locus strategic to understanding the diverse ‘alternative’ developmental trajectories observed during these two intermediate eras.

Supporting information

S1 File. OxCal Runfiles for Model 1 and Model 2 and the.prior File for the Charcoal Plus Outlier model.


S2 File.

Comparison of a portion of Model 2 (from Phases 6c through 5a) run without the application of the Charcoal Plus Outlier model (A) versus a run with the Charcoal Plus Outlier model applied (B) to illustrate the effect and importance of the Charcoal Plus Outlier model in order to achieve a likely and appropriate age model for Tell Tayinat integrating both data on long-lived charcoal samples (offering various TPQ ranges) and data on short-lived samples which (if in correct context association) offer contemporary age estimates.


S3 File. Results for the selected elements of Model 2 as listed in Table 4 comparing the outcomes from a different model run (some results vary by typically around 1 year) with the Charcoal Plus Outlier model (as in the main text and Table 4) versus the same model run alternatively with the Charcoal Outlier model [135].

The Charcoal Plus Outlier version has just three elements with OxCal Agreement values <60 (e.g., typical example, OxA-30326 @56.5%, OxA-32141 @39.6%, OxA-32170 @41.4%), whereas the Charcoal Outlier version has four elements <60 (e.g., typical example, OxA-30326 @26.6%, OxA-32141 @36.1%, OxA-32170 @ 36.9%, and OxA-30315 @53.3%). The date ranges for the selected elements shown are nonetheless very similar. Whereas whole ranges are listed in Table 4, here sub-ranges are detailed where present.


S1 Fig. Model 1: Bayesian chronological model for Tell Tayinat Iron Age sequence, part 1.

Data from OxCal 4.3.2 [121, 132, 135] and IntCal20 [133] with calibration curve resolution set at 1 year. The Individual OxCal Agreement values (A), the Posterior v. Prior values from the OxCal General Outlier model for the short-lived samples (O), and Convergence values (C) are all shown. The wood charcoal samples with the Charcoal Plus Outlier model applied all have a Posterior/Prior value of 100/100. The light-shaded red probability distributions for each dated sample are the non-modeled calibrated age probability distributions for each sample in isolation. The dark red probability distributions are the modeled calendar age probability distributions. The lines under each probability distribution indicate the modeled 68.2% and 95.4% highest posterior density (hpd) ranges. Cyan color indicates the start and end Boundaries of the model. Green color indicates the Boundaries calculated within the Tell Tayinat Sequence. Blue color indicates an OxCal Date estimate for a Phase.


S2 Fig. Model 1: Bayesian chronological model for Tell Tayinat Iron Age sequence, part 2.

Otherwise, see captions to Fig 3, S1 Fig. The line under each probability distribution indicates the 95.4% hpd range.


S3 Fig. Model 1 14C dated elements (see S1 and S2 Figs) shown placed against the IntCal20 [133] calibration curve (and with the previous IntCal13 calibration curve [134] shown for comparison).


S4 Fig. The Heidelberg (Hd) Gordion (GOR) 14C dataset [180], 1σ, shown placed against IntCal20 [133] (to achieve satisfactory Amodel/Aoverall values for a wiggle-match against IntCal20 after removing the 14 largest outliers in the dataset).

The IntCal13 calibration curve [134] is shown for comparison. The labels indicate: 1. a region in the 16th century BCE where previously there was an offset between the Hd GOR dataset and IntCal13 [180] but which is now largely removed with the revised IntCal20 dataset; 2. and 3. two regions (reversals and/or plateaus in the calibration curve) where there appear to be positive offsets between the Hd GOR data and IntCal20; and? another reversal and plateau where there is perhaps a small difference between the Hd GOR dataset and IntCal20. A. shows overall comparison, B. shows detail for the mid-12th to 8th centuries BCE.



This work is a contribution from the CRANE project ( We thank all our excavation collaborators and the team at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit. We thank the Directorate of Cultural Heritage and Museums of Turkey, which has graciously awarded the research permits necessary to conduct each of the Tell Tayinat excavation seasons. We thank the ministry representatives who have supported the campaigns each season. We thank the directors and staff of the Antakya Museum, and the Tayinat landowners, in particular the Kuseyri family, who have generously permitted work on their land. All necessary permits were obtained for the described study, which complied with all relevant regulations. BL thanks the Cornell Center for Materials Research Shared Facilities for use of facilities for organic materials identification work.


  1. 1. Weiss H, editor. Megadrought and Collapse. From Early Agriculture to Angkor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017.
  2. 2. Cook ER, Seager R, Kushnir Y, Briffa KR, Büntgen U, Frank D, et al. Old World megadroughts and pluvials during the Common Era. Science Advances 2015; 1: e1500561. pmid:26601136
  3. 3. Sinha A, Kathayat G, Weiss H, Li H, Cheng H, Reuter J, et al. Role of climate in the rise and fall of the Neo-Assyrian Empire. Science Advances 2019; 5: eaax6656. pmid:31763452
  4. 4. Wossink A. Challenging Climate Change. Competition and Cooperation Among Pastoralists and Agriculturalists in Northern Mesopotamia (c. 3000–1600 BC). Leiden: Sidestone Press; 2009.
  5. 5. McAnany PA, Yoffee N. 2010. Why we question collapse and study human resilience, ecological vulnerability and the aftermath of empire. In McAnany PA, Yoffee N, editors. Questioning Collapse: Human Resilience, Ecological Vulnerability, and the Aftermath of Empire. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2010. pp. 1–17.
  6. 6. Butzer KW. Collapse, environment, and society. PNAS 2012; 109:3632–3639. pmid:22371579
  7. 7. Butzer KW, Endfield GH. Critical perspectives on historical collapse. PNAS 2012; 109:3628–3631. pmid:22371580
  8. 8. Ur J. Urban adaptations to climate change in Northern Mesopotamia. In Kerner S, Dann RJ, Bangsgaard P, editors. Climate and Ancient Societies. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen Press; 2015. pp. 69–95.
  9. 9. Kintigh KW, Ingram SE. Was the drought really responsible? Assessing statistical relationships between climate extremes and cultural transitions. Journal of Archaeological Science 2018; 89: 25–31.
  10. 10. Yoffee N, editor. The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2019.
  11. 11. Middleton GD, editor. Collapse and Transformation: The Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age in the Aegean. Oxford: Oxbow Books; 2020.
  12. 12. Roberts N. Holocene climate change and archaeological implications, with particular reference to the East Mediterranean region. In Kerner S, Dann RJ, Bangsgaard P, editors. Climate and Ancient Societies. Copenhagen: University of Copenhagen Press; 2015. pp. 27–39.
  13. 13. Armit I, Swindles GT, Becker K, Plunkett G, Blauauw M. Rapid climate change did not cause population collapse at the end of the European Bronze Age. PNAS 2014; 111: 17045–17049. pmid:25404290
  14. 14. Flohr P, Fleitmann D, Matthews R, Matthews W, Black S. Evidence of resilience to past climate change in Southwest Asia: Early farming communities and the 9.2 and 8.2 ka events. Quaternary Science Reviews 2016; 136:23–39.
  15. 15. Knapp AB, Manning SW. Crisis in Context: The end of the Late Bronze Age in the eastern Mediterranean. American Journal of Archaeology 2016; 120: 99–149.
  16. 16. Weiss H, Courty M-A, Wetterstrom W, Guichard F, Senior L, Meadow R, et al. The genesis and collapse of third millennium North Mesopotamian civilization. Science 1993; 261:995–1004. pmid:17739617
  17. 17. Dalfes HN, Kukla G, Weiss H, editors. Third Millennium BC climate change and the Old World Collapse. Proceedings of NATO ASI Series I. vol.49. Berlin: Springer Verlag; 1997.
  18. 18. Cullen HM, deMenocal PB, Hemming S, Hemming G, Brown FH, Guilderson T, et al. Climate change and the collapse of the Akkadian empire: evidence from the deep sea. Geology 2000; 28: 379–382.
  19. 19. Meller H, Arz HW, Jung R, Risch R, editors. 2200 BC—Ein Klimasturz als Ursache für den Zerfall der Alten Welt? 2200 BC—A climatic breakdown as a cause for the collapse of the old world? Landesamt für Denkmalpflege und Archäologie Sachsen-Anhalt, Landesmuseum für Vorgeschichte: Halle (Saale); 2015.
  20. 20. Kaniewski D, Van Campo E, Guiot J, Le Burel S, Otto T, Baeteman C. Environmental roots of the Late Bronze Age crisis. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(8): e71004. pmid:23967146
  21. 21. Langgut D, Finkelstein I, Litt T. Climate and the Late Bronze collapse: new evidence from the southern Levant. Tel Aviv 2013; 40: 149–175.
  22. 22. Finné M, Holmgren K, Shen C-C, Hu H-M, Boyd M, Stocker S. Late Bronze Age climate change and the destruction of the Mycenaean Palace of Nestor at Pylos. PLoS ONE 2017; 12(12): e0189447. pmid:29281669
  23. 23. Kaniewski D, Marriner N, Bretschneider J, Jans G, Morhange C, Cheddadi R, et al. 2019. 300-year drought frames Late Bronze Age to Early Iron Age transition in the Near East: new palaeoecological data from Cyprus and Syria. Regional Environmental Change,
  24. 24. Middleton G. Understanding Collapse: Ancient History and Modern Myths. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2017.
  25. 25. Weiss H. 4.2 ka BP Megadrought and the Akkadian Collapse. In Weiss H, editor. Megadrought and Collapse. From Early Agriculture to Angkor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. pp. 93–160.
  26. 26. Kaniewski D, Van Campo E. 3.2 ka BP Megadrought and the Late Bronze Age Collapse. In Weiss H, editor. Megadrought and Collapse. From Early Agriculture to Angkor. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2017. pp. 161–182.
  27. 27. van Geel B, Buurman J, Waterbolk HT. 1996. Archaeological and palaeoecological indications for an abrupt climate change in The Netherlands and evidence for climatological teleconnections around 2650 BP. Journal of Quaternary Science 1996; 11: 451–460.
  28. 28. van Geel B, Bokovenko NA, Burova ND, Chugunov KV, Dergachev VA, et al. Climate change and the expansion of the Scythian culture after 850 BC: a hypothesis. Journal of Archaeological Science 2004; 31: 1735–1742.
  29. 29. Manning SW. The Roman world and climate: context, relevance of climate change, and some issues. In Harris WV, editor, The Ancient Mediterranean Environment between Sciences and History; Leiden: Brill; 2013. pp. 103–170.
  30. 30. Weiss H, Manning SW, Ristvet L, Mori L, Besonen M, McCarthy A, et al. Tell Leilan Akkadian imperialization, collapse and short-lived reoccupation defined by high-resolution radiocarbon dating. In Weiss H, editor. Seven Generations Since the Fall of Akkad. Studia Chaburensia 3. Weisbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag; 2012. pp. 163–192.
  31. 31. Manning SW. Comments on climate, intra-regional variations, chronology, the 2200 B.C. horizon of change in the East Mediterranean region, and socio-political change on Crete. In Höflmayer F, editor. The Early/Middle Bronze Age Transition in the Ancient Near East: Chronology, C14, and Climate Change. Oriental Institute Seminars 11. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago; 2017. pp. 443–483.
  32. 32. Regev J, de Miroschedji P, Greenberg R, Braun E, Greenhut Z, Boaretto E. Chronology of the Early Bronze Age in the southern Levant: new analysis for a high chronology. Radiocarbon 2012; 54(3–4): 525–566.
  33. 33. Höflmayer F. Dating catastrophes and collapses in the ancient Near East: the end of the first urbanization in the southern Levant and the 4.2 ka B.P. event. In Nigro L, editor. Overcoming Catastrophes: Essays on Disastrous Agents Characterization and Resilience Strategies in Pre-classical Southern Levant. Rome “La Sapienza” Studies on the Archaeology of Palestine & Transjordan 11. Rome: Università di Roma “La Sapienza”. pp. 117–140.
  34. 34. Schwartz GM. Western Syria and third- to second-millennium B.C. transition. In Höflmayer F, editor. The Early/Middle Bronze Age Transition in the Ancient Near East: Chronology, C14, and Climate Change. Oriental Institute Seminars 11. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago; 2017. pp. 87–128.
  35. 35. Weiss H. The northern Levant during the Intermediate Bronze Age: altered trajectories. In Killebrew AE, Steiner M, editors. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: c.8000-332 BCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014; pp. 367–387.
  36. 36. Broodbank C. The Making of the Middle Sea: A History of the Mediterranean From the Beginning to the Emergence of the Classical World. London: Thames and Hudson; 2013. pmid:24091188
  37. 37. Knapp AB. Seafaring and Seafarers in the Bronze Age Eastern Mediterranean. Leiden: Sidestone Press; 2018.
  38. 38. Morandi Bonacossi D. The northern Levant (Syria) during the Middle Bronze Age. In Killebrew AE, Steiner M, editors. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000–332 BCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014; pp. 414–433.
  39. 39. Matthiae P. The IIIrd millennium in north-western Syria: stratigraphy and architecture. In Orthmann W, al-Maqdissi M, Matthiae P, editors. Archéologie et Histoire de la Syrie I: La Syrie de l’époque néolithique à l’âge du fer. Schriften zur vorderasiatischen Archäologie 1/1. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz; 2013. pp. 35–48.
  40. 40. Ward WA, Joukowsky MS. Editors. The Crisis Years: The 12th Century B.C.E. from Beyond the Danube to the Tigris. Dubuque, Ia.: Kendall-Hunt; 1992.
  41. 41. Drews R. The End of the Bronze Age: Changes in Warfare and the Catastrophe of ca. 1200 B.C.E. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press; 1993.
  42. 42. Cline EH. 1177 B.C.: The Year Civilization Collapsed. Princeton: Princeton University Press; 2014.
  43. 43. Neugebauer I, Brauer A, Schwab MJ, Dulski P, Frank U, Hadzhiivanova E, et al. 2015. Evidences for centennial dry periods at ~3300 and ~2800 cal. Yr BP from micro-facies analyses of the Dead Sea sediments. The Holocene 2015; 25: 1368–13711-14.
  44. 44. Wilkinson TJ, Philip G, Bradbury J, Dunford R, Donoghue D, Galiatsatos N, et al. Contextualizing early urbanization: settlement cores, early states and agro-pastoral strategies in the Fertile Crescent during the fourth and third millennia BC. Journal of World Prehistory 2014; 27(1): 43–109.
  45. 45. Harrison TP. Lifting the veil on a “Dark Age”: Ta‛yinat and the North Orontes Valley during the Early Iron Age. In Schloen D, editor. Exploring the Longue Durée: Essays in Honor of Lawrence E. Stager. Winona Lake, IN: Eisenbrauns; 2009. pp. 171–184.
  46. 46. Harrison TP. The Late Bronze/Early Iron Age transition in the northern Orontes Valley. In Venturi F, editor. Societies in Transition. Evolutionary Processes in the Northern Levant between Late Bronze Age II and Early Iron Age. Bologna: CLUEB; 2010. pp. 83–102.
  47. 47. Harrison TP. Tayinat in the Early Iron Age. In Yener KA, editor. Across the Border: Late Bronze-Iron Age Relations Between Syria and Anatolia. Amsterdam: Peeters Press; 2013. pp 61–87.
  48. 48. Welton L, Batiuk S, Harrison TP, Lipovitch DR, Capper M. Tell Tayinat in the late third millennium: recent investigations of the Tayinat Archaeological Project, 2008–2010. Anatolica 2011; 37: 147–185.
  49. 49. Welton L. The Amuq Plain and Tell Tayinat in the third millennium BCE: the historical and socio-political context. Journal of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies 2011; 6: 15–27.
  50. 50. Welton L. Revisiting the Amuq Sequence: A preliminary investigation of the EBIVB ceramic assemblage from Tell Tayinat. Levant 2014; 46: 339–370.
  51. 51. Welton L, Harrison T, Batiuk S, Ünlü E, Janeway B, Karakaya D, et al. 2019. Shifting networks and community identity at Tell Tayinat in the Iron I (ca. 12th to Mid 10th Century B.C.E.). American Journal of Archaeology 2019; 123: 291–333.
  52. 52. Braidwood RJ, Braidwood LS. Excavations in the Plain of Antioch: An Archaeological Survey. Oriental Institute Publications 48. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1960.
  53. 53. Haines RC. Excavations in the Plain of Antioch II: The Structural Remains of the Later Phases: Chatal Hoyuk, Tell al-Judaidah, and Tell Ta’yinat. Oriental Institute Publications 92. Chicago: University of Chicago Press; 1971.
  54. 54. Batiuk S, Harrison TP, Pavlish L. The Ta‛yinat Survey, 1999–2002. In Yener KA, editor. The Amuq Valley Regional Projects, Volume 1. Surveys in the Plain of Antioch and Orontes Delta, Turkey, 1995–2002. Chicago: Oriental Institute, University of Chicago; 2005. pp.171–192.
  55. 55. Harrison TP. Neo-Hittites in the “Land of Palistin”: renewed investigations at Tell Ta‛yinat on the Plain of Antioch. Near Eastern Archaeology 2009; 72(4): 174–189.
  56. 56. Janeway B. Sea Peoples of the Northern Levant? Aegean-Style Pottery from early Iron Age Tell Tayinat. Studies in the Archaeology and History of the Levant. Harvard Semitic Museum Publications. Winona Lake: Eisenbrauns; 2017.
  57. 57. Osborne JF. Communicating power in the Bīt-Ḫilāni palace. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 2012; 368: 29–66.
  58. 58. Harrison TP. The Neo-Assyrian governor’s residence at Tell Ta‘yinat. Bulletin of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies 2005; 40: 23–33.
  59. 59. Archi A. Alalah al tempo del regno di Ebla. In Morandi Bonacossi D, Rova E, Veronese F, Zanovello P, editors. Tra Oriente e Occidente: Studi in onore di Elena di Filippo Balestrazzi. Padova: SARGON Editrice e Libreria; 2006; pp. 2–5.
  60. 60. Hawkins JD. Cilicia, the Amuq and Aleppo: new light in a Dark Age. Near Eastern Archaeology 2009; 72(4): 164–173.
  61. 61. Hawkins JD. The inscriptions of the Aleppo Temple. Anatolian Studies 2011; 61: 35–54.
  62. 62. Weeden M. After the Hittites: The kingdoms of Karkamish and Palistin in northern Syria. Bulletin of the Institute of Classical Studies 2013; 56(2): 1–20.
  63. 63. Weeden M. The land of Walistin at Tell Tayinat. NABU 2015; 2015(2): 65–66.
  64. 64. Harrison TP. Tell Ta‛yinat and the kingdom of Unqi. In Daviau PMM, Wevers JW, Weigl M, editors. The World of the Arameans II: Studies in History and Archaeology in Honour of Paul-Eugène Dion. Journal for the Study of the Old Testament Supplement 325. Sheffield: Sheffield Academic Press; 2001. pp. 115–132.
  65. 65. Harrison TP, Osborne JF. Building XVI and the Neo-Assyrian sacred precinct at Tell Tayinat. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 2012; 64: 125–143.
  66. 66. Harrison TP. The Neo-Assyrian provincial administration at Tayinat (ancient Kunalia). In MacGinnis J, Wicke D, Greenfield T, editors. The Provincial Archaeology of the Assyrian Empire. McDonald Institute Monographs. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2016. pp.253–264.
  67. 67. Lauinger J. Some preliminary thoughts on the tablet collection in Building XVI from Tell Tayinat. Journal of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies 2011; 6: 5–14.
  68. 68. Lauinger J. Esarhaddon’s succession treaty at Tell Tayinat: text and commentary. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 2012; 64: 87–123.
  69. 69. Harrison TP. Articulating Neo-Assyrian imperialism at Tell Tayinat. In Rutz MT, Kersel MM, editors. Archaeologies of Text. Archaeology, Technology, and Ethics. Oxford: Oxbow; 2014. pp. 80–96.
  70. 70. Mayewski PA, Rohling EE, Stager JC, Karlén W, Maasch KA, Meeker LD, et al. Holocene climate variability. Quaternary Research 2004; 62: 243–255.
  71. 71. Bini M, Zanchetta G, Perşoiu A, Cartier R, Català A, Cacho I, et al. The 4.2 ka BP Event in the Mediterranean region: an overview. Climate of the Past 2019; 15: 555–577.
  72. 72. Kaniewski D, Marriner N, Cheddadi R, Guiot J, Van Campo E. The 4.2 ka BP event in the Levant. Climate of the Past 2018; 14: 1529–1542.
  73. 73. Carolin SA, Walker RT, Day CC, Ersek V, Sloan RA, Dee MW, et al. Precise timing of abrupt increase in dust activity in the Middle East coincident with 4.2 ka social change. PNAS 2019; 116: 67–72. pmid:30584111
  74. 74. Walker MJC, Berkelhammer M, Björck S, Cwynar LC, Fisher DA, Long AJ, et al. Formal subdivision of the Holocene Series/Epoch: a discussion paper by a working group of INTIMATE (Integration of ice-core, marine and terrestrial records) and the subcommission on Quaternary stratigraphy (International Commission on Stratigraphy). Journal of Quaternary Science 2012; 27: 649–649.
  75. 75. Moeller N. The First Intermediate Period: a time of famine and climate change? Ägypten und Levante 2015; 15: 153–167.
  76. 76. Morris E. Ancient Egyptian exceptionalism: fragility, flexibility and the art of not collapsing. In Yoffee N., editor. The Evolution of Fragility: Setting the Terms. Cambridge: McDonald Institute for Archaeological Research; 2019. pp. 61–87.
  77. 77. Salzer MW, Bunn AG, Graham NE, Hughes MK. Five millennia of paleotemperature from tree-rings in the Great Basin, USA. Climate Dynamics 2014; 42: 1517–1526.
  78. 78. Manning SW, Dee MW, Wild EM, Bronk Ramsey C, Bandy K, Creasman PP, et al. High-precision dendro-14C dating of two cedar wood sequences from First Intermediate Period and Middle Kingdom Egypt and a small regional climate-related 14C divergence. Journal of Archaeological Science 2014; 46: 401–416.
  79. 79. Cooper L. The northern Levant (Syria) during the Early Bronze Age. In Killebrew AE, Steiner M, editors. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: ca. 8000–332 BCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. pp. 278–291.
  80. 80. Dornemann R. Evidence from two transitional periods, Early Bronze IV and Iron I, at Tell Qarqur, Syria. In Kühne H, Czichon RM, Kreppner FJ, editors. Proceedings of the 4th International Congress on the Archaeology of the Ancient Near East, 29 March-3 April 2004, Freie Universität Berlin, Volume II: Social and Cultural Transformation: The Archaeology of Transitional Periods and Dark Ages. Excavation Reports. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz; 2008. pp. 81–96. pmid:18671196
  81. 81. Sconzo P. Ceramics. In Finkbeiner U, Novák M, Sakal F, Sconzo P, editors. Associated Regional Chronologies for the Ancient Near East and the Eastern Mediterranean, Volume IV: Middle Euphrates. Turnhout: Brepols; 2015. pp. 85–202.
  82. 82. Mazzoni S. The ancient Bronze Age pottery tradition in northwestern central Syria. In al-Maqdissi M, Matoïan V, Nicolle C, editors. Céramique de l’âge du bronze en Syrie, I: La Syrie du sud et la vallée de l’Oronte. Bibliothèque archéologique et historique 161. Beirut: Institut Français d’Archéologie du Proche-Orient; 2002. pp. 69–96.
  83. 83. Calcagnile L, Quarta G, D’Elia M. Just at That Time: 14C determinations and analysis from EBIVA layers. In Matthiae P, Marchetti N, editors. Ebla and Its Landscape: Early State Formation in the Ancient Near East. Walnut Creek: Left Coast Press; 2013. pp. 450–458.
  84. 84. Brochier JÉ. A cataclysm in the steppe? Environmental history of al-Rawda, an ephemeral town in the arid Syrian margins at the end of the third millennium. In Castel C, Meyer J-W, Quenet P, editors. Origins, Structure, Development and Sociology of Circular Cities of Early Bronze Age Syria. Subartu XLII. Begijnhof: Brepols; 2020.
  85. 85. Morandi Bonacossi D. Excavations on the acropolis of Mishrifeh, Operation J. A new Early Bronze Age III–Iron Age III sequence for central inner Syria, part 1: stratigraphy, chronology and architecture. Akkadica 2008; 129(1): 55–127.
  86. 86. Gilboa A, Sharon I. An archaeological contribution to the Early Iron Age chronological debate: alternative chronologies for Phoenicia and their effects on the Levant, Cyprus, and Greece. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 2003; 332: 7–80.
  87. 87. Levy TE, Higham T, editors. The Bible and Radiocarbon Dating: Archaeology, Text and Science. London: Equinox; 2005.
  88. 88. Liverani M. The collapse of the Near Eastern regional system at the end of the Bronze Age: the case of Syria. In Rowlands M, Larsen MT, Kristiansen K, editors. Centre and Periphery in the Ancient World. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 1987. pp. 66–73.
  89. 89. Liverani M. International Relations in the Ancient Near East, 1600–1100 BC. Houndsmills and New York: Palgrave; 2001.
  90. 90. Murray SC. The Collapse of the Mycenaean Economy. Imports, Trade, and Institutions 1300–700 BCE. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  91. 91. Sharon I, Gilboa A, Jull AJT, Boaretto E. Report on the first stage of the Iron Age dating project in Israel: supporting a Low Chronology. Radiocarbon 2007; 49: 1–46.
  92. 92. van der Plicht J, Bruins HJ, Nijboer AJ. The Iron Age around the Mediterranean: a high chronology perspective from the Groningen radiocarbon database. Radiocarbon 2009; 51: 213–242.
  93. 93. Bruins HJ, Nijboer AJ, van der Plicht H. Iron Age Mediterranean chronology: a reply. Radiocarbon 2011; 53: 199–220.
  94. 94. Fantalkin A, Finkelstein I, Piasetzky E. Iron Age Mediterranean chronology: a rejoinder. Radiocarbon 2011; 53: 179–198.
  95. 95. Rose CB, Darbyshire G, editors. The New Chronology of Iron Age Gordion. Gordion Special Studies VI. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology; 2011.
  96. 96. Toffolo MB, Fantalkin A, Lemos IS, Felsch RCS, Niemeier W-D, Sanders GDR et al. Towards an absolute chronology for the Aegean Iron Age: new radiocarbon dates from Lefkandi, Kalapodi and Corinth. PLoS ONE 2013; 8(12): e83117; pmid:24386150
  97. 97. Wardle K, Higham T, Kromer B. Dating the end of the Greek Bronze Age: a robust radiocarbon-based chronology from Assiros Toumba. PLoS ONE 2014; 9(9): e106672; pmid:25222862
  98. 98. Dinçol B, Dinçol A, Hawkins JD, Peker H, Öztan A, Çelik Ö. Two new inscribed Storm-god stelae from Arsuz (İskanderun): ARSUZ 1 and 2. Anatolian Studies 2015; 65:59–77.
  99. 99. Dinçol A, Dinçol B, Hawkins JD, Marchetti N, Peker H. A new stele from Karkemish: at the origins of the Suhi-Katuwa Dynasty. In Marchetti N, editor. Karkemish: An Ancient Capital on the Euphrates. Bologna: Ante Quem; 2014. pp. 127–137.
  100. 100. Röllig W. 2013. History of the Neohittite and Aramaean States and the Assyrian conquest. In Orthmann W, Matthiae P, al-Maqdissi M, editors. Archéologie et Histoire de la Syrie I: La Syrie de l’époque néolithique à l’âge du fer. Weisbaden: Harrassowitz Verlag; 2013. pp. 461–472.
  101. 101. Harrison TP. The evidence for Aramaean cultural expansion in the Amuq Plain. Bulletin of the Canadian Society for Mesopotamian Studies 2001; 36: 135–143.
  102. 102. Hawkins JD. 2002. Anatolia: the end of the Hittite Empire and after. In Braun-Holzinger EA, Matthäus H, editors. Die nahöstlichen Kulturen und Griechenland an der Wende vom 2. Zum 1. Jahrtausend v. Chr. Kontinuität und Wandel von Strukturen und Mechanismen kultureller Interaktion. Möhnesee: Bibliopolis; 2002. pp. 143–151.
  103. 103. Osborne JF. Sovereignty and territoriality in the city-state: a case study from the Amuq Valley, Turkey. Journal of Anthropological Archaeology 2013; 32: 774–790.
  104. 104. Kaniewski D, Paulissen E, Van Campo E, Weiss H, Otto T, Bretschneider J, et al. 2010. Late second–early first millennium B.C.E. abrupt climate changes in coastal Syria and their possible significance for the history of the eastern Mediterranean. Quaternary Research 2010; 74: 207–215.
  105. 105. Mazzoni S. Syria and the periodization of the Iron Age: a cross-cultural perspective. In Bunnens G, editor. Essays on Syria in the Iron Age. Ancient Near Eastern Studies Supplement 7. Louvain: Peeters; 2000. pp. 31–59.
  106. 106. Mazzoni S. Syria and the chronology of the Iron Age. In ISIMU: Revista sobre Oriente Próximo y Egipto en la antigüedad 3. Madrid: Universidad Autónoma de Madrid; 2000. pp. 121–137.
  107. 107. Sader H. The northern Levant during the Iron Age I period. In Killebrew AE, Steiner M, editors. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000–332 BCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. pp. 601–623.
  108. 108. Mazzoni S. The Aramaean states during the Iron Age II-III periods. In Killebrew AE, Steiner M, editors. The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of the Levant: c. 8000–332 BCE. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. pp. 683–705.
  109. 109. Lehmann G. Decorated pottery styles in the northern Levant during the Early Iron Age and their relationship with Cyprus and the Aegean. Ugarit Forschungen 2008; 39: 487–550.
  110. 110. Welton L. A new start or business as usual? Evidence from the earliest Iron Age I levels at Tell Tayinat. In Charaf H, Welton L, editors. The Iron Age I in the Levant. A View from the North: Part I. Archaeology & History in the Lebanon 2019; 50–51: 70–92.
  111. 111. Libby WF. Radiocarbon dating. Science 1961; 133: 621–629. pmid:13761865
  112. 112. Griggs CB, Manning SW. A reappraisal of the dendrochronology and dating of Tille Höyük (1993). Radiocarbon 2009; 51: 711–720.
  113. 113. Manning SW, Kromer B, Bronk Ramsey C, Pearson CL, Talamo S, Trano N et al. 14C record and wiggle-match placement for the Anatolian (Gordion area) juniper tree-ring chronology ~1729 to 751 cal BC, and typical Aegean/Anatolian (growing season related) regional 14C offset assessment. Radiocarbon 2010; 52: 1571–1597.
  114. 114. Manning SW, Kromer B. Radiocarbon dating Iron Age Gordion and the Early Phrygian destruction in particular. In: Rose CB, Darbyshire G, editors. The New Chronology of Iron Age Gordion. Gordion Special Studies VI. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Museum of Archaeology and Anthropology; 2011. pp. 123–153.
  115. 115. Manning SW, Griggs CB, Lorentzen B, Barjamovic G, Ramsey CB, Kromer B et al. Integrated tree-ring-radiocarbon high-resolution timeframe to resolve earlier second millennium BCE Mesopotamian chronology. PLoS ONE 2016; 11(7): e0157144. pmid:27409585
  116. 116. Czichon RM, Klinger J, Hnila P, Mielke DP, Böhm H, Forster C et al. Archäologische Forschungen am Oymaağaç Höyük/Nerik 2011–2015. Mitteilungen der Deutschen Orient-Gesellschaft zu Berlin 2016; 148: 5–141.
  117. 117. Pucci M. Functional Analysis of Space in Syro-Hittite Architecture. Oxford: BAR; 2008.
  118. 118. Osborne J, Harrison T, Batiuk S, Welton L, Dessel JP, Denel E, et al. Urban Built environments of the early First Millennium BCE: results of the Tayinat Archaeological Project, 2004–2016. Bulletin of the American Schools of Oriental Research 2019; 382: 261–312.
  119. 119. Bronk Ramsey C. Radiocarbon calibration and analysis of stratigraphy: the OxCal program. Radiocarbon 1995; 37: 425–430.
  120. 120. Bayliss A, Bronk Ramsey C. Pragmatic Bayesians: a decade of integrating radiocarbon dates into chronological models. In Buck CE, Millard AR, editors. Tools for Constructing Chronologies. London: Springer; 2004. pp 25–41.
  121. 121. Bronk Ramsey C. Bayesian analysis of radiocarbon dates. Radiocarbon 2009; 51: 337–360.
  122. 122. Bayliss A. Rolling out revolution: using radiocarbon dating in archaeology. Radiocarbon 2009; 51: 123–147.
  123. 123. Hamilton WD, Krus AM. The myths and realities of Bayesian chronological modeling revealed. American Antiquity 2018; 83: 187–203.
  124. 124. Akkemik Ü, Yaman B. Wood Anatomy of Eastern Mediterranean Species. Remagen- Oberwinter: Verlag Kessel; 2012.
  125. 125. Fahn A, Werker E, Baas P. Wood Anatomy and Identification of Trees and Shrubs from Israel and Adjacent Regions. Jerusalem: Israel Academy of Sciences and Humanities; 1986.
  126. 126. Davis PH, editor. The Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vols. 1–10. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 1965–1988.
  127. 127. Güner A, Özhatay N, Ekim T, Baser KHT, editors. The Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands. Vol. 11 (supplement 2). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press; 2000.
  128. 128. Brock F, Higham TFG, Ditchfield P, Bronk Ramsey C. Current pretreatment methods for AMS radiocarbon dating at the Oxford Radiocarbon Accelerator Unit (ORAU). Radiocarbon 2010; 52: 103–112.
  129. 129. Dee M, Bronk Ramsey C. Refinement of Graphite Target Production at ORAU, Proceedings of 8th AMS Conference Vienna, Elsevier Science Publishers. Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B 2000; 172: 449–453.
  130. 130. Bronk Ramsey C, Higham T, Leach P. Towards high-precision AMS: progress and limitations. Radiocarbon 2004; 46: 17–24.
  131. 131. Bayliss A. Quality in Bayesian chronological models in archaeology. World Archaeology 2015; 47: 677–700.
  132. 132. Bronk Ramsey C. Methods for summarizing radiocarbon datasets. Radiocarbon 2017; 59(2): 1809–1833.
  133. 133. Reimer PJ, Austin WEN, Bard E, Bayliss A, Blackwell PG, Bronk Ramsey C, et al. The IntCal20 Northern Hemisphere radiocarbon age calibration curve (0–55 kcal BP). Radiocarbon 2020; 62(4): 725–757.
  134. 134. Reimer PJ, Bard E, Bayliss A, Beck JW, Blackwell PG, Bronk Ramsey C, et al. IntCal13 and Marine13 radiocarbon age calibration curves 0–50,000 years cal BP. Radiocarbon 2013; 55: 1869–1887.
  135. 135. Bronk Ramsey C. Dealing with outliers and offsets in radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 2009; 51: 1023–1045.
  136. 136. Dee M, Wengrow D, Shortland A, Stevenson A, Brock F, Girdland Flink G, et al. An absolute chronology for early Egypt using radiocarbon dating and Bayesian statistical modeling. Proceedings of the Royal Society A 2013; 469: 20130395.
  137. 137. Dee M, Bronk Ramsey C. High-precision Bayesian modeling of samples susceptible to inbuilt age. Radiocarbon 2014; 56: 83–94.
  138. 138. Ward GK, Wilson SR. Procedures for comparing and combining radiocarbon age determinations: a critique. Archaeometry 1978; 20: 19–31.
  139. 139. Snodgrass A. Archaeology. In Crawford M, editor. Sources for Ancient History. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press 1983. pp 137–184.
  140. 140. Forsberg S. Near Eastern Destruction Datings as Sources for Greek and Near Eastern Iron Age Chronology: Archaeological and Historical Studies: the Cases of Samaria (722 BC) and Tarsus (696 BC). Boreas 19. Uppsala: Uppsala University; 1995.
  141. 141. Adams WH. Dating historical sites: the importance of understanding time lag in the acquisition, curation, use, and disposal of artifacts. Historical Archaeology 2003; 37: 38–64.
  142. 142. Manning SW, Birch J, Conger MA, Dee MW, Griggs C, Hadden CS, et al. Radiocarbon re-dating of contact-era Iroquoian history in northeastern North America. Science Advances 2018; 4: eaav0280. pmid:30525108
  143. 143. Fales FM. After Ta’yinat: the new status of Esarhaddon’s adê for Assyrian political history. Revue d’assyriologie et d’archéologie orientale 2012; 106: 133–158.
  144. 144. Riehl S, Pustovoytov KE, Weippert H, Klett S, Hole F. Drought stress variability in ancient Near Eastern agricultural systems evidenced by δ13C in barley grain. PNAS 2014; 111: 12348–12353. pmid:25114225
  145. 145. Weiss H. Global megadrought, societal collapse and resilience at 4.2–3.9 ka BP across the Mediterranean and west Asia. PAGES Magazine 2016; 24(2): 62–63.
  146. 146. Capper MM. Urban Subsistence in the Bronze and Iron Ages: The Palaeoethnobotany of Tell Tayinat, Turkey. MA Thesis, Simon Fraser University; 2012.
  147. 147. Karakaya D. Botanical Aspects of the Environment and Economy at Tell Tayinat from the Bronze to Iron Ages (ca. 2.200–600 BCE), in south-central Turkey. Ph.D. Dissertation, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen; 2019.
  148. 148. Riehl S. Archaeobotanical evidence for the interrelationship of agricultural decision-making and climate change in the ancient Near East. Quaternary International. 2009; 197: 93–114.
  149. 149. Archi A, Biga MG. A victory over Mari and the fall of Ebla. Journal of Cuneiform Studies 2003; 55: 1–44.
  150. 150. Matthiae P. Crisis and collapse: similarity and diversity in the three destructions of Ebla from EB IVA to MBII. Scienze dell’Antichità 2009; 15: 43–83.
  151. 151. Durand J-M. Sargon a-t-il détruit la ville de Mari? Revue d’Assyriologie et d’Archéologie Orientale 2012; 106: 117–132.
  152. 152. Dolce R. The archaeology of a long lasting power: the Ebla paradigm. A synthesis. Studi Micenei ed Egeo-Anatolici 2009; 51: 251–278.
  153. 153. Casana J, Wilkinson TJ. Settlements and landscapes in the Amuq Region. In Yener KA, editor. The Amuq Valley Regional Projects, Volume 1: Surveys in the Plain of Antioch and Orontes Delta, Turkey, 1995–2002. Oriental Institute Publications 131. Chicago: Oriental Institute; 2005; pp. 25–66.
  154. 154. Casana J, Gansell AR. Surface ceramics, off-site survey, and floodplain development at Tell Atchana (Alalakh). In Yener KA, editor. The Amuq Valley Regional Projects, Volume 1: Surveys in the Plain of Antioch and Orontes Delta, Turkey, 1995–2002. Oriental Institute Publications 131. Chicago: Oriental Institute; 2005; pp. 153–170.
  155. 155. Snow H, Batiuk S. The University of Chicago’s Excavations at Tell Ta’yinat, Amuq Plain, Southeastern Turkey. Chicago: The Oriental Institute of the University of Chicago Press; forthcoming.
  156. 156. Weninger B, Jung R. Absolute chronology of the end of the Aegean Bronze Age. In: Deger-Jalkotzy S, Bächle AE, editors. LH III C Chronology and Synchronisms III: LH III C Late and the Transition to the Early Iron Age. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften; 2009. pp. 373–416.
  157. 157. Toffolo MB, Arie E, Martin MAS, Boaretto E, Finkelstein I. Absolute chronology of Megiddo, Israel, in the Late Bronze and Iron Ages: high-resolution radiocarbon dating. Radiocarbon 2014; 56: 221–244.
  158. 158. Manning SW, Kearns C, Lorentzen B. Dating the end of the Late Bronze Age with radiocarbon: some observations, concerns, and revisiting the dating of Late Cypriot IIC to IIIA. In: Fischer PM, Bürge T, editors. “Sea Peoples” Up-to-Date. New Research on Transformation in the Eastern Mediterranean in the 13th-11th Centuries BCE. Vienna: Österreichischen Akademie der Wissenschaften; 2017. pp. 95–110.
  159. 159. Harrison TP. Recent discoveries at Tayinat (ancient Kunulua/Calno) and their Biblical implications. In Maier CM, editor. Congress Volume Munich 2013. Leiden: Brill; 2014. pp. 396–425.
  160. 160. Grayson AK. The Royal Inscriptions of Mesopotamia, Assyrian Periods, Volume 3: Assyrian Rulers of the Early First Millennium BC II (858–745 BC). Toronto: University of Toronto Press; 1996.
  161. 161. Hawkins JD. Corpus of Luwian Inscriptions 1: Inscriptions of the Iron Age (3 vols.). Berlin: de Gruyter; 2000.
  162. 162. Weiss B. The decline of Late Bronze Age civilization as a possible response to climatic change. Climatic Change 1982; 4: 173–198.
  163. 163. Neumann J, Parpola S. Climatic change and the eleventh-tenth-century eclipse of Assyria and Babylonia. Journal of Near Eastern Studies 1987; 46: 161–182.
  164. 164. Drake BL. The influence of climatic change on the Late Bronze Age Collapse and the Greek Dark Ages. Journal of Archaeological Science 2012; 39: 1862–1870.
  165. 165. Yener KA. New Excavations at Alalakh: The 14th– 12th centuries B.C. In Yener KA, editor. Across the Border: Late Bronze-Iron Age Relations between Syria and Anatolia. Leuven: Peeters; 2013. pp. 11–36.
  166. 166. Montesanto M, Pucci M. The Iron Age at Alalakh. In Charaf H, Welton L, editors. The Iron Age I in the Levant. A View from the North: Part I. Archaeology & History in the Lebanon 2019; 50–51: 93–135.
  167. 167. Karakaya D, Riehl S. Subsistence in post-collapse societies: patterns of agroproduction from the Late Bronze Age to the Iron Age of the Northern Levant and beyond. In Charaf H, Welton L, editors. The Iron Age I in the Levant. A View from the North: Part I. Archaeology & History in the Lebanon 2019; 50–51: 136–163.
  168. 168. Singer I. A political history of Ugarit. In: Watson WGE, Wyatt N, editors. Handbook of Ugaritic Studies. Handbuch der Orientalistik 1, Der Nahe und Mittlere Osten 39. Leiden: Brill; 1999. pp. 603–733.
  169. 169. Osborne JF. Exploring the lower settlements of Iron Age capitals in Anatolia and Syria. Antiquity 2017; 91: 90–107.
  170. 170. Marston J. Modeling resilience and sustainability in ancient agricultural systems. Journal of Ethnobiology 2015; 35: 585–605.
  171. 171. Buckley BM, Anchukaitis KJ, Penny D, Fletcher R, Cook ER, Sano M, et al. Climate as a contributing factor in the demise of Angkor, Cambodia. PNAS 2010; 107: 6748–6752. pmid:20351244
  172. 172. Büntgen U, Tegel W, Nicolussi K, McCormick M, Frank D, Trouet V, et al. 2500 years of European climate variability and human susceptibility. Science 2011; 331: 578–582. pmid:21233349
  173. 173. McCormick M, Büntgen U, Cane MA, Cook ER, Harper K, Huybers P, et al. Climate change during and after the Roman Empire: reconstructing the past from scientific and historical evidence. Journal of Interdisciplinary History 2012; 43(2): 169–220.
  174. 174. Kennett DJ, Marwan N. Climatic volatility, agricultural uncertainty, and the formation, consolidation and breakdown of preindustrial agrarian states. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A 2015; 373: 20140458.
  175. 175. Manning SW. Some perspectives on the frequency of significant, historically forcing drought and subsistence crises in Anatolia and region. In Holt E, editor. Water and Power in Past Societies. IEMA Proceedings, volume 7. Albany: State University of New York Press; 2018. pp. 279–295.
  176. 176. Weiberg E, Finné M. Resilience and persistence of ancient societies in the face of climate change: a case study from Late Bronze Age Peloponnese. World Archaeology 2018; 50: 584–602.
  177. 177. Dee MW, Brock F, Harris SA, Bronk Ramsey C, Shortland AJ, Higham TFG, et al. Investigating the likelihood of a reservoir offset in the radiocarbon record for ancient Egypt. Journal of Archaeological Science 2010; 37: 687–693.
  178. 178. Bronk Ramsey C, Dee MW, Rowland JM, Higham TFG, Harris SA, Brock F, et al. Radiocarbon-based chronology for Dynastic Egypt. Science 2010; 328: 1554–1557. pmid:20558717
  179. 179. Manning SW, Griggs C, Lorentzen B, Bronk Ramsey C, Chivall D, Jull AJT, et al. Fluctuating radiocarbon offsets observed in the southern Levant and implications for archaeological chronology debates. PNAS 2018; 115: 6141–6146. pmid:29844183
  180. 180. Manning SW, Kromer B, Cremaschi M, Dee MW, Friedrich R, Griggs C, et al. Mediterranean radiocarbon offsets and calendar dates for prehistory. Science Advances 2020; 6: eaaz1096. pmid:32206721
  181. 181. Eyre CJ. The agricultural cycle, farming, and water management in the ancient Near East. In Sasson JM, Baines J, Beckman G, Rubinson KS, editors. Civilizations of the ancient Near East. New York: Charles Scribner’s Sons; 1995. Vol. I pp. 175–189.
  182. 182. Jull AJT, Panyushkina I, Miyake F, Masuda K, Nakamura T, Mitsutani T, et al. More rapid 14C excursions in the tree-ring record: a record of different kind of solar activity at about 800 BC? Radiocarbon 2018; 60: 1237–1248.