Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Comparative transcriptome analysis reveals candidate genes related to cadmium accumulation and tolerance in two almond mushroom (Agaricus brasiliensis) strains with contrasting cadmium tolerance

  • Peng-Hu Liu,

    Roles Data curation, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Institute of Plant Nutritional Physiology and Molecular Biology, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China, National Engineering Research Center of JUNCAO Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

  • Zai-Xing Huang,

    Roles Methodology, Software

    Affiliation National Engineering Research Center of JUNCAO Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

  • Xu-Hui Luo,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Agricultural Ecological Process in Red Soil Hilly Region, Agricultural Ecology Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

  • Hua Chen,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Agricultural Ecological Process in Red Soil Hilly Region, Agricultural Ecology Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

  • Bo-Qi Weng,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Agricultural Ecological Process in Red Soil Hilly Region, Agricultural Ecology Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

  • Yi-Xiang Wang,

    Roles Methodology, Software

    Affiliation Fujian Key Laboratory of Agricultural Ecological Process in Red Soil Hilly Region, Agricultural Ecology Institute, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

  • Li-Song Chen

    Roles Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    lisongchen@fafu.edu.cn

    Affiliation Institute of Plant Nutritional Physiology and Molecular Biology, College of Resources and Environment, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, Fujian, China

Abstract

Cadmium (Cd) is a toxic metal occurring in the environment naturally. Almond mushroom (Agaricus brasiliensis) is a well-known cultivated edible and medicinal mushroom. In the past few decades, Cd accumulation in A.brasiliensis has received increasing attention. However, the molecular mechanisms of Cd-accumulation in A. brasiliensis are still unclear. In this paper, a comparative transcriptome of two A.brasiliensis strains with contrasting Cd accumulation and tolerance was performed to identify Cd-responsive genes possibly responsible for low Cd-accumulation and high Cd-tolerance. Using low Cd-accumulating and Cd-tolerant (J77) and high Cd-accumulating and Cd-sensitive (J1) A.brasiliensis strains, we investigated 0, 2 and 5 mg L-1 Cd-effects on mycelium growth, Cd-accumulation and transcriptome revealed by RNA-Seq. A total of 57,884 unigenes were obtained. Far less Cd-responsive genes were identified in J77 mycelia than those in J1 mycelia (e.g., ABC transporters, ZIP Zn transporter, Glutathione S-transferase and Cation efflux (CE) family). The higher Cd-accumulation in J1 mycelia might be due to Cd-induced upregulation of ZIP Zn transporter. Cd impaired cell wall, cell cycle, DNA replication and repair, thus decreasing J1 mycelium growth. Cd-stimulated production of sulfur-containing compounds, polysaccharides, organic acids, trehalose, ATP and NADPH, and sequestration of Cd might be adaptive responses of J1 mycelia to the increased Cd-accumulation. DNA replication and repair had better stability under 2 mg L-1 Cd, but greater positive modifications under 5 mg L-1 Cd. Better stability of DNA replication and repair, better cell wall and cell cycle stability might account for the higher Cd-tolerance of J77 mycelia. Our findings provide a comprehensive set of DEGs influenced by Cd stress; and shed light on molecular mechanism of A.brasiliensis Cd accumulation and Cd tolerance.

Introduction

Almond mushroom (Agaricus brasiliensis), one of the important cultivated edible mushrooms and natural foods, has been produced on an industrial scale in Brazil, China and Japan [12]. Fruiting body and mycelia cultivated in liquid medium contains a variety of chemical compounds such as polysaccharides, β-glucans, agarol, phenolics, and sterols which have been proved to play a role in immunoregulation, antitumor, hepatoprotection, anti-diabetes, antioxidant and antimicrobial activities, and the prevention of hyperlipidemia and arteriosclerosis [39]. Cadmium (Cd), one of a nonessential and natural element, is potentially hazardous to animal and human health. High concentration of Cd, up to 100–300 mg kg-1 dry matter (DM) was observed in the genus Agaricus [10]. Cd concentrations in A. brasiliensis ranged from 3–30 mg kg-1 DM, which was higher than that in many edible mushroom species [11]. Therefore, Cd accumulation in A. brasiliensis could potentially affect food safety and eventually have a direct or indirect threat to human health [12]. Over the past decades, Cd-accumulation in A. brasiliensis has received increasing concerns.

Considerable effort has been invested into investigating Cd stress in A. brasiliensis, physiological response, Cd-induced genes, and so on. Xu et al. (2011) reported that Cd absorption coefficient of A. brasiliensis ranged from 65 to 108 indicated it had high absorption ability to Cd, and different strains showed contrasting Cd accumulation and tolerance [13]. Cd concentration in A. brasiliensis fruiting bodies decreased with increasing yield or fruiting body number, while increased with increasing substrate Cd (phosphorus) concentration or fruiting body size [11]. Using suppression subtractive hybridization combined with mirror orientation selection, Wang et al. [14] identified 39 Cd-induced genes from A. brasiliensis mycelia and 26 genes displayed significant similarity to known genes. These genes were related to (a) metabolism, (b) cell rescue, defense and virulence, (c) protein fate, (d) cellular transport, transport facilitation and transport routes, (e) transcription, and (f) the action of proteins with a binding function. However, knowledge regarding the physiological and molecular mechanisms of Cd-accumulation in A. brasiliensis remains very limited.

Screening and breeding low-Cd-accumulation cultivars is a low-cost and high-performance approach to reduce Cd uptake by human via food chain [15]. Recently, we bred and identified several strains of A. brasiliensis having different capacities of Cd-accumulation and Cd-tolerance, and obtaining a low Cd-accumulating strain (J77, Cd-tolerance) and a high Cd-accumulating strain (J1, Cd-sensitivity) in both fruit bodies and mycelia [16, 17]. Understanding the molecular mechanisms underlying low Cd-accumulation is crucial, not only to allow us to screen low-Cd-accumulation A. brasiliensis cultivars, but also to provide us opportunities to breed Cd pollution-safe A. brasiliensis cultivars. Recently, high-throughput RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) approach has become increasingly popular in transcriptomics studies. Gene expression profiles revealed by RNA-Seq allow us to discover and characterize genes, and identify and quantify known and/or novel genes massively and simultaneously. To date, comparative transcriptome based on RNA-Seq has been used to investigate the molecular mechanisms of Cd-accumulation and Cd-tolerance in some fungi including Paxillus involutus [18], Exophiala pisciphila [19], and Blastocladiella emersonii [20]. Using this method, many genes that are responsible for the Cd-accumulation and Cd-tolerance has been identified in the above fungi. To our knowledge, such data is very limited in A. brasiliensis.

In this study, a comparative transcriptome based on RNA-Seq was performed for the mycelia of a low Cd-accumulating and Cd-tolerant strain (J77) bred by irradiating J1 using 60Co-γ-ray and a high Cd-accumulating and Cd-sensitive A. brasiliensis strain (J1) cultured under Cd-stress. The objectives were to reveal the mechanisms underlying low Cd-accumulation and high Cd-tolerance in A. brasiliensis strain (J77) at the transcriptional level and to identify Cd-responsive genes possibly responsible for low Cd-accumulation and high Cd-tolerance in mycelia.

Materials and methods

Sources of A. brasiliensis strains and Cd treatments

Two A. brasiliensis strains (low Cd-accumulating, Cd-tolerant J77 and high Cd-accumulating, Cd-sensitive J1) were stored in National Engineering Research Center of JUNCAO Technology, Fujian Agriculture and Forestry University, Fuzhou, China. The two strains were routinely grown on potato dextrose agar in 1 L culture medium supplemented with 2 g KH2PO4, 0.5 g Mg2SO4·7H2O and 10 mg vitamin B1, and then transferred to new culture medium every three months. J77 and J1 mycelia were cultured in the above culture medium at a Cd2+ concentration of 0 (Cd0), 2 (Cd2) or 5 (Cd5) mg L-1by using CdCl2·2.5H2O for 25 days. There were three biological replicates per treatment. Thereafter, parts of mycelia from each treatment were collected, immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, and then stored at -80 °C until they were used for RNA-Seq and qRT-PCR analysis. The unsampled mycelia were used to assay Cd.

Determination of Cd concentration in mycelium

Mycelium Cd concentration was assayed using a flame atomic absorption spectrophotometer (FAAS, Hitachi Z-2300, Japan) after samples were dried to a constant weight at 70 °C. There were three replicates per treatment.

RNA extraction, cDNA library construction and Illumina sequencing

Total RNA were extracted from Cd0-, Cd2- and Cd5-treated mycelia of J77 and J1 strains using Recalcitrant Plant Total RNA Extraction Kit (Centrifugal column type, Bioteke, China) following the manufacturer’s instructions, and then treated with RNase-free DNAse I (TaKaRaBiotech Co., Ltd., Dalian, China) to remove residual DNA. There were three biological replicates per treatment. The integrity and quality of total RNA were checked by 1% (w/v) agarose gel electrophoresis and spectrophotometer at 260 and 280 nm. Only RNA samples that had a 260 nm/280 nm absorbance ratio of between 1.8 and 2.0 were used for subsequent analyses.

High-quality RNA samples were sent to Biomarker Technologies Corporation (Beijing, China) for cDNA library construction and sequencing. Magneticoligo (dT) beads were used to enrich the poly (A) mRNA tails of four independent RNA. The enriched mRNA was fragmented into small pieces, which were prepared as templates for cDNA synthesis. Double-stranded cDNA was synthesized using SuperScript II buffer, dNTPs, RNase H, and DNA polymerase I. The yielding cDNA was purified using a QiaQuick PCR extraction kit (Qiagen, Inc., Hilden, Germany) and was eluted with EB buffer. The short cDNA fragments were subjected to end repair, adapter ligation, and agarose gel electrophoresis filtration. Then, the suitable fragments were selected as templates for PCR amplification. 6 treatments, J1Cd0, J1Cd2, J1Cd5, J77Cd0, J77Cd2 and J77Cd5, every treatment had three biological replicates. In total, eighteen cDNA libraries were constructed and sequenced using the IlluminaHiSeq 2000 platform.

RNA-Seq data filtering, de novo assembly, gene functional annotation and classification

Clean reads were obtained by removing the adaptor sequences, duplicated sequences, ambiguous reads (N), and low-quality reads. Meantime, Q30 (sequencing error rates lower than 0.1%), GC-content and sequence duplication level of the clean data were calculated. All the downstream analyses were based on clean data with high quality. Transcriptomes of the eighteen datasets were separately assembled de novo using Trinity (http://trinityrnaseq.sourceforge.net/). Briefly, clean reads with a certain overlap length were initially combined to form long fragments without N that are called contigs. Related contigs were clustered using the TGICL software [21] to yield unigenes that cannot be extended on either end, and redundancies were removed to acquire non-redundant unigenes.

The assembled unigenes were searched using BLAST against the NCBI non-redundant protein sequences (NR), a manually annotated and reviewed protein sequence database (Swiss-Prot), Gene Ontology (GO), the database of Clusters of Orthologous Groups of proteins (COG), the database of Clusters of Protein homology (KOG), a database of orthologous groups of genes (eggNOG) and Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) database (E ≤ 1E -5). The amino acid sequence of unigenes were predicted, and then aligned to Protein family (Pfam) database using HMMER software (http://hmmer.org/). The program was performed with an E-value ≤ 1E -10.

Identification and analysis of differentially expressed genes (DEGs)

Gene expression levels were estimated by fragments per kilobase of transcript per million fragments mapped (FPKM) with Cufflink software [22]. First, the read counts for each sequenced library were adjusted by edgeR program package through one scaling normalized factor. Then, the mean of read-count of the gene from three replicate libraries was calculated as the readcount value of the gene to analyze the differences among six groups: J1Cd0 (J1Cd0-1, J1Cd0-2 and J1Cd0-3), J1Cd2 (J1Cd2-1, J1Cd2-2 and J1Cd2-3), J1Cd5 (J1Cd5-1, J1Cd5-2 and J1Cd5-3), J77Cd0 (J77Cd0-1, J77Cd0-2 and J77Cd0-3), J77Cd2 (J77Cd2-1, J77Cd2-2 and J77Cd2-3), and J77Cd5 (J77Cd5-1, J77Cd5-2 and J77Cd5-3). The DESeq R package (1.10.1) was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) between two groups according to the method described by Anders and Huber [23]. DESeq provide statistical routines for determining differential expression in digital gene expression data using a model based on the negative binomial distribution. The resulting P-values were adjusted using the Benjamini and Hochberg’s approach for controlling the false discovery rate (FDR). A unigene identified by DESeq with an adjusted P-value less than 0.05 was considered differentially expressed. DEGs were further annotated by KEGG pathway analysis. KEGG enrichment analysis was carried out in KOBAS software with a corrected P-value threshold of 0.05 [24].

qRT-PCR analysis

Expression levels of 21 DEGs identified in J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0, J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0, J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 and/or J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0 by RNA-Seq were validated using qRT-PCR analysis. Total RNA was isolated as described above. First strand cDNA fragments were synthesized using the TransScript One-Step gDNA Removal Kit (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China). The Forward and Reverse primers designed by Primer version 5.0 (Premier Biosoft International, CA, USA) were listed in S1 Table. qRT-PCR was performed on a CFX Connect TM Optics module (Bio-Rad, CA, USA) using a TransScript Tip Green qPCR SuperMix kit (Transgen Biotech, Beijing, China) in a 25 μL reaction mixture containing 1 μL of diluted cDNA, 0.5 μM forward and reverse primers, and 12.5 μL 2 × SYBR Green PCR Master Mix. The PCR reaction protocol was 95 °C for 30 s, 40 cycles of 95 °C for 5 s and 60 °C for 30 s. All reactions were run in three biological replicates with three technical replicates. The relative expression level of the selected DEGs was calculated based on ΔΔCt algorithm using glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (c31752.graph_c1) gene as the internal standard [25]. The gene expression level in Cd-free mycelia samples was set to 1.

Statistical analysis

Results represented as mean ± SE (n = 3). Significant differences among the six treatment combinations were analyzed by two strains × three Cd concentrations ANOVA, and followed by the Duncan’s new multiple range test.

Results

Effects of Cd on growth rate and Cd concentration of J1 and J77 mycelia

Mycelium growth rate of J1 decreased with increasing Cd concentrations. For J77, mycelium growth rate increased as Cd concentration increased at 2 mg L-1, and then decreased at 5 mg L-1(Fig 1a). Cd concentration increased with increasing Cd supply. Cd concentration was higher in J1 mycelia than that in J77 mycelia at each given Cd supply (Fig 1b).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Growth rate of mycelia (a) and Cd concentration in mycelia (b) in response to Cd.

Bars represent means ± SD (n = 3); Different letters above the bars indicate a significant difference at P < 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.g001

Illumina sequencing and transcriptome assembly

Eighteen libraries from different Cd concentration treated mycelia samples of J1 and J77 were constructed and sequenced. A total of 21027077 to 26856583 raw reads were generated from these libraries. The reads with low quality and adapters were removed, and the percentages of clean reads in all eighteen transcriptomes were above 99.18%. Q30 was more than 89% (S2 Table). Using the Trinity program, a total of 281843 putative transcripts were obtained, with an average length of 3715 bp and an N50 of 5790 bp, and transcripts with lengths of more than 500 bp accounted for 83.25% of all transcripts. The longest transcript for each locus was selected as the unigene after comparing the different transcripts representing one unigene. A total of 57884 unigenes were obtained as reference transcripts of A. brasiliensis. The mean length was 734 bp, and unigenes with lengths of more than 500 bp accounted for 28.94% of all unigenes (S3 Table).

Functional annotation and classification of non-redundant unigenes

A total of 25091 unigenes were annotated representing 43.35% of the assembled unigenes. The remaining unigenes (56.65%) cannot be annotated with known genes, which might be caused by the presence of short sequences (41.85% < 300). In Nr, Pfam, GO, KOG and KEGG databases, 24323, 15598, 11187, 14522 and 6904 unigenes were aligned, respectively (S4 Table).

GO assignments were used to classify the functions of all predicted unigenes based on the annotations from Nr and Pfam databases. A total of 11187 unigene sequences (44.59%) were categorized into 63 functional groups consisting of 22 biological process, 20 cellular components and 21 molecular function subcategories (S1 Fig).

The sequence similarity search was performed against KOG databases to obtain the functional annotations of assembled unigenes. A total of 16517 unigene sequences (65.83%) with significant homology were assigned to 25 KOG categories (S2 Fig). The five largest groups were general function prediction only (14.39%), signal transduction mechanisms (13.65%), post-translational modification, protein turnover, chaperones (9.73%), intracellular trafficking, secretion, and vesicular transport (5.41%) and translation, ribosomal structure and biogenesis (5.12%).

Identification and functional annotation of DEGs

A gene was regarded as differentially expressed when it had an absolute value of log2 ratio ≥ 1 and a FDR ≤ 0.05. As shown in Fig 2a, we identified 799 upregulated and 1024 downregulated, 886 upregulated and 1214 downregulated, 548 upregulated and 503 downregulated, 173 upregulated and 63 downregulated, and 653 upregulated and 502 downregulated genes in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0, J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, J77Cd0 vs J1Cd0, J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0, and J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0, respectively. Obviously, the alterations of gene expression profiles in J1 and J77 mycelia were greater at Cd5 than those at Cd2, and both Cd2 and Cd5 affected gene expression profiles more in J1 mycelia than those in J77 mycelia. In addition, more downregulated genes than upregulated genes were identified in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, but the reverse was the case for Cd-treated J77 mycelia. As shown in Fig 2b and S5 Table, 192, 498, 129, 10 and 414 DEGs were presented only in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0, J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, J77Cd0 vs J1Cd0, J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0, and J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0, respectively, only 35 DEGs were identified simultaneously in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0, J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, J77Cd0 vs J1Cd0, J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0, and J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0. Among the 35 DEGs, 13 DEGs displayed opposite expression trends in Cd-treated J1 and J77 mycelia. Thus, Cd-induced alterations of transcriptome differ greatly between J1 and J77 mycelia.

thumbnail
Fig 2. DEGs identified in Cd-treated mycelia of two A. brasiliensis strains (J1 and J77, a), and venn diagram analysis of Cd-responsive genes in J1 and J77 mycelia (b).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.g002

To further characterize gene functions in terms of biological system networks, the assembled unigenes were mapped against the KEGG database, the significantly enriched KEGG pathways were present in S6 Table. As DEGs detected in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0, no KEGG pathway was significantly enriched at a corrected P-value < 0.05. DEGs identified in J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, sulfur (S) metabolism (ko00920) was significantly enriched. For DEGs detected in J77Cd0 vs J1Cd0, steroid biosynthesis (ko00100) and β-alanine metabolism (ko00410) were significantly enriched. For DEGs identified in J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0, ribosome (ko03010), β-alanine metabolism (ko00410) and galactose metabolism (ko00052) were significantly enriched. For DEGs identified in J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0, β-alanine metabolism (ko00410), histidine metabolism (ko00340), glycerolipid metabolism (ko00561), ascorbate (ASC) and aldarate metabolism (ko00053), and pentose and glucuronate interconversions (ko00040) were significantly enriched. We identified more DEGs and significantly enriched KEGG pathway in Cd5-treated J1 and J77 mycelia than those in Cd2-treated ones. Although more DEGs in Cd2- and Cd5-treated J1 mycelia than those in Cd2- and Cd5-treated J77 mycelia were identified, while more significantly enriched KEGG pathways were obtained in the latter.

qRT-qPCR validation

To confirm the RNA-Seq expression data, we performed qRT-PCR validation for 21 DEGs selected from J17 and J77 strains. The expression profiles of all 28 data obtained from qRT-PCR are highly correlated with those from RNA-Seq (S3 Fig), demonstrating that the RNA-Seq data were reliable.

Discussion

J77 mycelia displayed less Cd-accumulation and higher Cd-tolerance than J1 mycelia under Cd-stress

We observed that the growth rate of J1 mycelia decreased as Cd concentration in culture media increased from 0 to 5 mg L-1, but the growth rate of J77 mycelia was not lower at 2 mg L-1 Cd than that at the absence of Cd (Fig 1a). Under Cd stress in 2 mg L-1, J1 and J77 showed opposite physiological phenotypes, which indicate that the two cultivars differed in the molecular mechanisms of Cd response. However, Cd in 5 mg L-1 has similar effect on growth rate of J1 and J77. In present study, in order to get more valuable gene information for understanding the molecular mechanism of Cd accumulation and resistance, J1 and J77 mycelia was treated by Cd in 0, 2 and 5 mg L-1. In addition, far less DEGs were identified in Cd-treated J77 mycelia than those in Cd-treated J1 mycelia (Fig 2a). Thus, J77 mycelia were more tolerant to Cd-stress than J1 mycelia. This might be related to the finding that Cd concentration was higher in J1 mycelia than that in J77 mycelia at each given Cd supply (Fig 1b). To conclude, J77 mycelia displayed less Cd-accumulation and higher Cd-tolerance than J1 mycelia.

DEGs related to cellular transport

Intracellular responses of fungi to Cd include influx systems, efflux systems, and chelation of Cd by reduced glutathione (GSH), metallothioneins (MTs), and phytochelatins (PCs), followed by the transporter-mediated export or intracellular compartmentalization of the resulting complexes [26]. Toxic metals enter cells either by diffusion or by transporters which may play a role in mediating Cd influx into fungal cells across plasma membrane [27]. ZIP (Zrt, Irt-like protein-type) family which can transport divalent metal cations (such as Zn2+, Cd2+, Fe2+, and Cu2+) has been discovered in many plants, animals, fungi, protists and bacteria [28, 29]. Defect of ZIP family Zn transporter ZRT1 promoted Cd-tolerance through reducing Cd influx and alleviating Cd-induced accumulation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and lipid in yeast (Saccharomyces cerevisiae) cells [30]. Here, we isolated one upregulated ZIP Zn transporter (c31048.graph_c0) in Cd2- and Cd5-treated J1 mycelia, but not in Cd-treated J77 mycelia (Table 1). Increased expression of ZIP Zn transporter gene might promote Cd uptake in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, hence enhancing Cd-accumulation in these mycelia.

thumbnail
Table 1. List of DEGs possibly involved in Cd-accumulation and Cd-tolerance of J1 and J77 mycelia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.t001

Manganese (Mn)-transporting ATPase 1 (SPF1, Sensitivity to Pichia farinosa killer toxin 1) gene which encodes a highly conserved, endoplasmic reticulum (ER) localized, putative P-type ATPase was induced by Cd in J1 mycelia, but not in J77 mycelia (Table 1). Cohen et al. [31] observed a reduction in the concentration of Mn2+ in the ER lumen of Δspf1 yeast cells and an increase following its overexpression, indicating that SPF1 was involved in the regulation of Mn transport into ER. SPF1 is one of the two yeast P5 ATPases, along with vacuolar P-type ATPase Ypk9 (the closest homologue of SPF1). Deletion of Ypk9p caused sensitivity against Cd, Mn, selenium (Se) and nickel (Ni) [32]. Thus, SPF1 might also be involved in Cd transport into ER. The upregulation of SPF1 might play a role in the Cd-tolerance of J1 mycelia by enhancing Cd sequestration in ER.

ATP-binding cassette (ABC) transporters, which catalyze the ATP-dependent transport of a broad range of compounds across biological membranes, are involved in Cd-tolerance in eukaryotic cells [33]. ATM1 is a GSH-dependent half-size ABC transporter that exports Fe-S clusters from mitochondrial matrix into cytosol [34]. Hanikenne et al. [35] found that a mitochondrial ATM-like transporter gene in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii was strongly induced when cells submitted to Cd-stress, and its deficient cells were hypersensitive to Fe and Cd-stress. They suggested that the mitochondrial ATM-like transporter played a key role in the Cd-tolerance of C. reinhardtii, possibly through the export of Cd outside the mitochondrial matrix, thus protecting the mitochondrial function from Cd-toxicity and/or the modification of Fe homeostasis in the algal cells. In this study, we observed that the expression level of ATM1 was upregulated in Cd2- and Cd5-treated J1 mycelia, but not in Cd-treated J77 mycelia (Table 1). The upregulation of ATM1 in Cd-treated J1 mycelia might be involved in Cd-tolerance by exporting Cd outside the mitochondrial matrix and/or modifying Fe homeostasis. ATM1 expression level was significantly higher in J77 mycelia than that in J1 mycelia at Cd0. This could explain why ATM1 expression was not significantly upregulated in Cd-treated J77 mycelia. In yeast, YCF1 is responsible for the transport of GSH-complexes from cytosol into vacuole. Its expression was induced by Cd [27]. Here, the expression level of YCF1 was elevated in Cd5-treated J1 mycelia (Table 1). This could be explained as more increased requirement for the removal of cytosol Cd into vacuole, since Cd concentration was higher in J1 mycelia than that in J77 mycelia when exposed to Cd (Fig 1b). Also, we identified several differentially expressed ABC transporter genes related to secondary metabolites biosynthesis, transport and catabolism in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 [viz. SNQ2, pmd1 (c29937.graph_c1), bfr1 and pmd1 (c32822.graph_c0)], J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0 [viz. SNQ2, bfr1, pmd1 (c32822.graph_c0), pmd1 (c29937.graph_c0) and pmd1 (c29937.graph_c1)], J77Cd0 vs J1Cd0 [viz. bfr1, pmd1 (c32822.graph_c0) and pmd1 (c29937.graph_c1)], J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0 [viz. pmd1 (c32822.graph_c0)] and J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0 (viz. SNQ2, pmd1 (c32822.graph_c0) and STE6] and related to lipid transport and metabolism in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 (viz. PXA2 and c32662.graph_c1), J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0 (viz. PXA2) and J77Cd0 vs J1Cd0 (viz. PXA2 and c32662.graph_c1). Therefore, ABC transporters might be involved in the Cd-tolerance of A. brasiliensis mycelia.

Cation efflux (CE) family, also known as the cation diffusion facilitator (CDF) family, can either sequester metal ions within cells or export metal ions out of cells in organisms. Macdiarmid et al. [36] observed that CDF family proteins Zrc1 and Cot1 might transport Cd, Co and Zn into vacuoles of yeast. Yeast mutants deficient in Zrc1 and Cot1 were hypersensitive to Cd and Zn, or Co and Ni [37]. Here, we isolated one upregulated CE family (c29916.graph_c0) gene in Cd2-treated J1 mycelia (Table 1), indicating that the sequestration of Cd into vacuoles might be increased in these mycelia.

DEGs related to S, cysteine, methionine and glutathione metabolisms

S-containing compounds biosynthesized in S metabolism, including H2S, cysteine (Cys), GSH, PCs, and MTs play key roles in the detoxification of Cd and other heavy metals and the alleviation of oxidative stress in organisms including fungi [3840]. Kennedy et al. [41] found that Schizosaccharomyces pombe strains mutated in genes involved in S assimilation [viz. sulfite reductase (SiR), siroheme synthase, 3'-phosphoadenylylsulfate reductase (PAPS reductase), uncharacterized FAD-binding protein C12C2.03c, sulfide-quinone oxidoreductase (SQR), adenylylsulfate kinase (APS kinase) and ATP sulfurylase (ATPS)], Cys (viz. Cys synthase) and PC (viz. PC synthase) biosynthesis, and glutathione metabolism (viz. glutamate-Cys ligase and zinc metalloprotease) were sensitive to Cd. H2S, as a messenger molecule, is involved in many physiological processes in organisms. For example, H2S can protect neurons against oxidative damage by increasing GSH production due to both enhanced activity of γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase and transport of Cys [42]. Escherichia coli overexpressed AtLCD and AtDCD from Arabidopsis thaliana involved in H2S biosynthesis had higher H2S production rate and resistance to Cd-toxicity, and less oxidative damage [43]. Sun et al. (2013) observed that H2S alleviated Cd toxicity via improving antioxidant system, decreasing Cd influx through the H2O2-activiated plasma membrane (PM) Ca channels, and increasing the sequestration of Cd in the vacuole presumably through the activation of tonoplast Cd2+/H+ antiporters Populus euphratica cells [44].

Cys is one of substrates for the elevated biosynthesis of Cd-sequestering compounds such as GSH, PCs and MTs in organisms [18, 27]. In fungi, Cys biosynthesis involves ATPS, APS kinase, PAPS reductase, SiR, O-acetylhomoserine sulfhydrylase, Cys synthase and cystathionine γ-lyase [45]. Also, Cys is one of the substrates for methionine (Met) biosynthesis. Cystathionine γ-synthase (CgS) catalyzes the first committed reaction of Met biosynthesis to form cystathionine from Cys. The yielding cystathionine is cleaved to produce homocysteine, which is then methylated by Met synthase (MS) to form Met. Met can serve as a precursor for protein and S-adenosylmethionine (SAM) biosynthesis. The biosynthesis of SAM from Met and ATP is catalyzed by SAM synthase (SAMS).

GSH, the most abundant nonprotein thiol component of eukaryotic cells and free radical scavenger, plays a role in the sequestration of heavy metals and detoxification of ROS and xenobiotics. GSH biosynthesis, starting from inorganic sulfate, requires both the S assimilation and the Cys biosynthetic pathways [45]. GSH biosynthesis is catalyzed by two ATP dependent enzymes γ-glutamylcysteine synthetase (GSH1) and glutathione synthetase (GSH2). In addition to GSH biosynthesis, GSH-mediated Cd sequestration also depends on a rapid formation of GSH conjugates with Cd2+, which can be catalyzed by glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) [46]. GSTs play important roles in protecting cells from Cd-induced oxidative stresses through scavenging reactive molecules with the addition of GSH. Many GSTs can function as glutathione peroxidases. Gomes et al. [47] reported that a yeast mutant deficient in the synthesis of GSH (gsh2) displayed enhanced Cd uptake, low level of intracellular oxidation, and normal growth up to 50 mg L-1 CdSO4. Adamis et al. [46] found that yeast cells mutated in GST I and II (GTT1 and GTT2) genes had twice as much Cd uptake than the control strain, but the three strains displayed normal growth at 48 μM CdSO4. Indeed, Δgtt2 cells had higher tolerance to Cd than controls. Further study showed that addition of GSH monoethyl ester (GME, a cell-permeable derivative of GSH) decreased Cd uptake in control and Δgtt1 strains, but not in Δgtt2 strains, indicating that GTT1 and GTT2 might be involved in the regulation of GSH homeostasis and the formation of the GSH-Cd complex, respectively. Here, we isolated one unregulated glutathione synthetase large chain gene (gsa1) in Cd5-treated J77 mycelia, but not in Cd-treated J1 mycelia; and four upregulated genes involved in GSH biosynthesis (viz. SPAC11D3.14c and icdA) and degradation (viz. dug1 and SPAC13A11.05) in Cd2- and/or Cd5-treated J1 mycelia, but not in Cd-treated J77 mycelia. Also, we identified more upregulated than downregulated GST genes in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, but more downregulated than upregulated GST genes in Cd-treated J77 mycelia (Table 1). Thus, the differences in Cd-induced alterations of GST genes and gsa1 between J77 and J1 mycelia might be responsible for the less Cd uptake and higher Cd-tolerance of J77 mycelia.

PCs can react with Cd by GST in cytosol and then they are sequestered into vacuole for degradation. Their biosynthesis is enhanced by Cd, and deletion mutants display hypersensitivity to Cd [27]. Weghe and Ow (1999) observed that HMT2 encoding a mitochondrial SQR responsible for sulfide oxidation played an important role in the detoxification of excess sulphide produced under Cd-stress and the biosynthesis of PCs in S. pombe [48].

MTs can protect cells against Cd-toxicity by binding Cd, then either export or compartmentalization in vacuole [26]. According to the arrangement of Cys residues, MTs can be subdivided into 3 classes: Class I MTs, which are mainly found in vertebrates, Class II MTs are mainly found in plants, fungi and invertebrates, and Class III MTs (viz. PCs) [49]. Courbot et al. [38] reported that the concentrations of GSH, γ-glutamylcysteine (the direct precursor for both GSH and PCs) and a 3-kDa molecular mass (most probably related to a MT) were increased in Cd-treated mycelia of ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus. Here, metallothionein 2 (MT2) was induced in Cd-treated J1 and J77 mycelia. Moreover, its expression level was higher in J77 mycelia than that in J1 mycelia at each given Cd supply (Table 1). Thus, MT2 might play an important role in Cd sequestration of A. brasiliensis, and contribute to the difference in Cd-tolerance between the two strains.

In conclusion, S, Cys, Met and glutathione metabolisms were upregulated in Cd-regulated J1 and J77 mycelia, especially in the former (Table 1 and Fig 3). This agreed with the more increased demand for the detoxification of Cd in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, because its concentration was higher in Cd-treated J1 mycelia than that in Cd-treated J77 mycelia. It is worth noting that the expression levels of quite a few genes involved in these metabolisms were higher in J77 mycelia than those in J1 mycelia at Cd0, and their expression was not induced by Cd. This might contribute to the higher Cd-tolerance of J77 mycelia.

thumbnail
Fig 3. DEGs involved in sulfur metabolism (ko00920), cysteine and methionine metabolism (ko00270) and glutathione metabolism (ko00480) in Cd2- and/or Cds-treated J1 and J77 mycelia.

Pink arrow: upregulation; Dark arrow: downregulation; ADI1: 1,2-dihydroxy-3-keto-5-methylthiopentene dioxygenase; AdoHcyase: S-adenosyl-L-homocysteine hydrolase; 5ꞌ-AMP: 5ꞌ-Adenosine monophosphate; APS: 5′-phosphosulfate; ATPS: sulfate adenylyltransferase; DK-MTP-1-P: 2,3-diketo-5-methylthiopentyl-1-phosphate; GSH: reduced glutathione; GSSG: oxidized glutathione; GST: glutathione S-transferase; L-γ-EC: L-γ-Glutamylcysteine; MTRuP: S-methyl-5-thio-D-ribulose-1-phosphate; PAPS: 3'-phosphoadenosine-5'-phosphosulfate; mtnB: methylthioribulose-1-phosphate dehydratase; SAM: S-adenosyl-L-methionine; SAH: S-adenosylhomocysteine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.g003

DEGs related to cell wall

Fungal cell wall mainly consists of chitin, chitosan (deacetylated chitin), glucan, and various mucopolysaccharides. Fungal cell wall polysaccharide binding to heavy metals is one of the important detoxification mechanisms in fungi. Bhanoori and Venkateswerlu [50] indicated that Cd-induced increase of chitin content in cell wall might be an adaptive strategy of Neurospora crassa to mitigate the toxic effects of Cd-accumulation through increased chitin-Cd complexation in cell wall. Also, fungal cell wall may be actively modified when exposed to Cd. Wang et al. [14] found that chitin deacetylase involved in chitosan biosynthesis was induced by Cd in A. brasiliensis. Zhao et al. [19] reported that chitinase involved in chitin degradation was inhibited in Cd-treated fungus Exophiala pisciphila. In present study, we isolated four upregulated chitin deacetylases (viz. CDA1, c31045.graph_c2, c14349.graph_c0 and c26747.graph_c0) and one upregulated mok13 involved in cell wall polysaccharide biosynthesis, and seven downregulated genes [viz. three chitinase (chit42, chi4 and chit37) and four glucanase (cel3, cel2, egl2 and c31161.graph_c0)] involved in cell wall polysaccharide degradation in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 and/or J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, but only one downregulated (c31045.graph_c2) and one upregulated (c30912.graph_c0) chitin deacetylase gene in J77Cd2 vs J77cd0 and J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0, respectively, and one downregulated chi4 and one upregulated chit42 in J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0 (Table 1). This implies that cell wall polysaccharide biosynthesis and degradation was increased and decreased in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, respectively, which could enhance the levels of cell wall polysaccharides; but was far less affected in Cd-treated J77 mycelia. This agreed with the more increased requirement for Cd chelation in the cell wall of Cd-treated J1 mycelia.

Hydrophobins are small, cell-wall-associated proteins rich in Cys and with low sequence similarity. Jacob et al. [18] observed that two hydrophobins were downregulated and one MT was induced by Cd in ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus, suggesting that hydrophobin biosynthesis might be decreased, thus redirecting S to the production of MTs. This could explain why more downregulated than upregulated hydrophobin genes identified in Cd-treated J1 mycelia. Interestingly, we identified six upregulated and two downregulated hydrophobin genes in J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0, but only three downregulated hydrophobin genes in J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0 (Table 1).

Melanins, which present mainly in cell wall, can bind Cd [51]. Tyrosinase is the rate-limiting enzyme for melanin biosynthesis, while many of the less specific polyphenol oxidases (PPOs) such as laccases may catalyze the formation of melanins [14, 27]. Blaudez et al. (2000) suggested that Cd-induced upregulation of tyrosinase in P. involutus mycelia was an adaptive mechanism by increasing Cd sequestration onto cell-wall pigments due to enhanced melanin biosynthesis [51]. Also Jacob et al. [18] observed that Cd-induced increases in laccase activity and production of malanins were involved in the Cd-tolerance of P. involutus mycelia. In this study, we isolated three downregulated PPO (common central domain of tyrosinase) genes and seven downregulated laccases from J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 and/or J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, but only one upregulated laccase from J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0. However, we isolated one downregulated PPO from J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0 and J77Cd5 vs J7Cd0, and two downregulated and four upregulated laccases from J77Cd5 vs J7Cd0 (Table 1). So, melanin biosynthesis might be decreased in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, but less affected in Cd-treated J77 mycelia which might be responsible for the higher Cd-tolerance of J77 mycelia.

UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase (UGDH) catalyzes UDP-glucose into UDP-glucuronic acid (UDP-GlcA), a constituent of complex glycosaminoglycans (acid mucopolysaccharides). UDP-GlcA decarboxylase (UXS), which catalyzes the decarboxylation of UDP-GlcA to UDP-xylose, is required for the biosynthesis of the core tetrasaccharide in glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis. Thus, the upregulation of UGDH and UXS (viz. c26880.graph_c0 and c30942.graph_c0) in Cd-treated J1 mycelia (Table 1) implied that glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis might be enhanced in these mycelia [52].

Cell wall integrity transcriptional regulator CAS5 acts with transcriptional adapter 2 to enhance cell wall integrity [53]. The upregulation of CAS5 in Cd5-treated J77 mycelia (Table 1) indicated that J77 mycelia might have higher capacity to maintain cell wall integrity, thus enhancing the Cd-tolerance.

Fungal cell wall not only plays a key role in the defense to withstand stressful environments, but also is vital for cell division, cell growth and development [53]. Here, the expression levels of many genes involved in cell wall metabolism were altered in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, but far less were affected in Cd-treated J77 mycelia. Therefore, Cd-induced alterations of cell wall might be responsible for the inhibited J1 mycelium growth.

DEGs related to carbohydrate metabolism

Many DEGs involved in starch and sucrose metabolism, pentose phosphate pathway (PPP), glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, citrate (tricarboxylic acid, TCA) cycle, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, pyruvate metabolism, fructose and mannose metabolism, galatose metabolism, and pentose and glucuronate interconversions were identified in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 and/or J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, but far less in J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0 and/or J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0 (Table 1 and Fig 4). Thus, carbohydrate metabolism might be involved in the responses of A. brasiliensis mycelia to Cd. Trehalose metabolism and PPP can help cells survive under cytotoxic stress, including Cd-toxicity, and that some stresses can route more carbohydrate flux to the two pathways [54]. PPP can provide NADPH for the regeneration of GSH and ASC, thus scavenging ROS [55], and trehalose is a PPP-related stress defender in organisms. In addition to acting as an energy and carbon reserve, trehalose can protect proteins and membranes from denaturation caused by stresses [56]. Guo et al. [54] observed that almost all enzymes involved in trehalose metabolism and PPP increased in Cd-treated cells, and thatincreases in protein abundances correlated with the transcriptional induction. They concluded that growth analysis showed that trehalose metabolism and PPP played a key role in the Cd-tolerance of yeast cells. In this work, they concluded that the regulation of carbohydrate metabolic flux to the two pathways might be a conserved mechanism of dealing with Cd-induced oxidative stress. In this work, we identified three upregulated (viz. SPAC22F8.05, fuy1 and tpp1) and one downregulated (viz. YD8119.07C) genes involved in trehalose biosynthesis and degradation, respectively, in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 and/or J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, and one upregulated fuy1 and one downregulated YD8119.07C in J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0 and/or J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0. Our results indicated that trehalose level might be elevated in Cd-treated J1 and J77 mycelia, especially in the former due to increased biosynthesis and decreased degradation. Similarly, we isolated two and three upregulated genes involved in PPP in Cd-treated J1 (viz. FBA1 and tal1) and J77 (viz. gpi1, SPAC4G9.12 and TKL1) mycelia, respectively. Thus, we concluded that trehalose metabolism and PPP were involved in the Cd-tolerance of A. brasiliensis mycelia. The only exception was that PFK2 involved in PPP and glycolysis/gluconeogenesis was inhibited in Cd2- and Cd5-treated J77 mycelia. The interconversion of fructose-6-phosphate (F6P) and fructose-1,6-bisphosphate (FBP) is catalyzed glycolytically by an ATP-dependent phosphofructokinase and gluconeogenically by a fructose-1,6-bisphosphatase (FBPase), or is catalyzed by a reversible pyrophosphate (PPi)-dependent phosphofructokinase (PPi-PFK). PPi-PFK catalyzed reaction might provide an adaptive pathway in organisms by using PPi in replace of ATP. The downregulation of PFK2 implied that the flux of carbohydrates via PPi-PFK might be increased, thus enhancing the Cd-tolerance of J77 mycelia.

thumbnail
Fig 4. DEGs involved in starch and sucrose metabolism (ko00500), pentose phosphate pathway (ko00030), glycolysis/gluconeogenesis (ko00010), TCA cycle (ko00020), glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism (ko00630), pyruvate metabolism (ko00620) in Cd2- and/or Cd5-treated J1 and J77 mycelia.

Pink arrow: upregulation; Dark arrow: downregulation; ACLY: probable ATP-citrate synthase subunit 1; ald: aldehyde dehydrogenase family; bgl1B: β-glucosidase 1B; 3-C-1-HThPP: 3-carboxy-1-hydroxypropyl-Thpp; DHL-E: dihydrolipoamide-E; E4P: D-erythrose-4P; GS: gutamine synthetase; HP: hydroxypyruvate; HTHPP: 2-hydroxyethyl-ThPP; lipoE: lipoamide-E; OSA: oxalosuccinate; NFD: N-formyl-derivatives; 2OG: 2-oxoglutarate; PEP: phosphoenolpyruvate; 3-PGA: 3-phospho-d-glycerate; SADHP-E: S-acetyldihydrolipoamide-E; SLipoE: S-succinyldihydrolipoamide-E; S-7-P: D-sedoheptulose-7P; UCG: UDP-glucuronate decarboxylase; UGDH: UDP-glucose 6-dehydrogenase.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.g004

Gene involved in glycogen biosynthesis (GLC3), glycosaminoglycan biosynthesis (UGDH and XUS), and glycogen biosynthetic and catabolic processes (GDB1) were induced in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 and J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, while genes involved in carbohydrate (polysaccharide) catabolic process [viz. LKA1, glaA, bglH, bglL (c32133.graph_c0), agdC and bxlB] were repressed in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 and/or J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0. The exceptions were that bglL (c31940.graph_c0) and β-glucosidase 1b (c31777.graph_c0) involved in polysaccharide catabolic process were induced in Cd-treated J1 mycelia. By contrast, gpi1 involved in gluconeogenesis and glycolytic process, GDB1, agdC and β-glucosidase 1B (c28258.graph_c0) were induced in J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0 and/or J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0, and that bglL (c32133.graph_c0) was inhibited in J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0 and J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0. Thus, the levels of polysaccharides might be enhanced in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, but less in Cd-treated J77 mycelia. This agreed with the more increased requirement for the chelation of Cd in cell wall polysaccharides in Cd-treated J1 mycelia than that in Cd-treated J77 mycelia.

The requirement for energy (ATP) may increase due to initiation of adaptation mechanisms when organisms exposed to Cd-toxicity [57]. The increased energy utilization for ATP-mediated Cd sequestration and export, and biosynthesis of S-containing compounds might be more in Cd-treated J1 mycelia than that in Cd-treated J77 mycelia, because more Cd needed to be sequestrated and exported in the former. Thus, the upregulation of genes involved in energy metabolism might be greater in Cd-treated J1 and J77 mycelia. As expected, we identified far more upregulated DEGs involved in ATP generation (glycolysis/gluconeogenesis, TCA cycle, glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism and pyruvate metabolism) in Cd-treated J1 mycelia than those in Cd-treated J77 mycelia (Fig 4 and Table 1). Therefore, Cd-induced upregulation of energy metabolism might be an adaptive response to meet increased demand for ATP.

Production and secretion of organic acids (OAs) and subsequent formation of relatively immobile heavy metal salts or chelates is an active defense mechanism that fungi mitigate the damage caused by excess heavy metals including Cd [58, 59]. Here, we identified 24 DEGs (22 upregulated and two downregulated genes) related to TCA cycle and glyoxylate and dicarboxylate metabolism, two main pathways involved in OA biosynthesis in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, but not related DEG was observed in Cd-treated J77 mycelia. Therefore, OA biosynthesis might be enhanced in Cd-treated J1 mycelia, thus increasing the secretion of OAs and the immobilization of Cd. This agreed with the more increased requirement for the immobilization of Cd in Cd-treated J1 mycelia.

DEGs related to cell cycle, DNA replication and repair

Cd is very deleterious to various cellular processes including cell-cycle, and DNA replication and repair. Several S. pombe mutants involved in cell cycle were sensitive to Cd-toxicity [41, 54]. Here, we isolated four downregulated [viz. apc2, DAM1, mad2 and CDC4 (c27963.graph_c0)] and nine upregulated [viz. CDC4 (c29933.graph_c0), slp1, cnd1, cnd2, cnd3, rco-1, cut1, TSD2 and mph1) genes involved in cell cycle in J1Cd2 vs Cd0 and/or J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, but only one downregulated (viz. mph1) and two upregulated (viz. slp1 and cnd2) genes in J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0. Also, the expression levels of slp1, cnd1 and mph1 were higher in J77 mycelia than those in J1 mycelia without Cd (Table 1). Obviously, cell cycle displayed more stability to Cd toxicity in J77 mycelia than that in J1 mycelia, which might contribute to the higher Cd tolerance of J77 mycelia.

Cd can repress all the three major DNA repair pathways (viz. mismatch repair, nucleotide excision repair, and base excision repair) [60, 61]. For several fungi, such as Exophiala pisciphila and yeast, positive modulation of DNA repair pathway can restore Cd-induced damage, thus conferring Cd-tolerance [19, 60]. DNA replication as well as DNA repair, is a target of Cd-toxicity. Cd-induced oxidative damage decreased DNA replication but increased repair DNA synthesis during the cell cycle [61]. Yeast mutants lacking RAD27 encoding Flap exo-endonuclease or DNAA2 encoding DNA replication ATP-dependent helicase/nuclease DNA2, two enzymes involved in DNA replication and repair, were Cd-hypersensitive [60]. In this study, we identified different genes that are commonly involved in DNA replication and repair in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0 and J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, respectively. These includes one downregulated (viz. RFC2), six upregulated (viz. ssb1, c30247.graph_c0, POL2, c28697.graph_c0, myh1 and rhp42), two downregulated (viz. c29386.graph_c0 and RFC2) and six upregulated (viz. ssb1, c30247.graph_c0, POL2, c28697.graph_c0, myh1 and rad15). By contrast, we identified one upregulated rad15 in J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0, and one downregulated (viz. apn2) and ten upregulated (viz. c29386.graph_c0, 24853.graph_c0, rfc3, c30247.graph_c0, rpb7, c31675.graph_c0, c19089.graph_c0, c28239.graph_c0, rad15 and rnh1) genes involved in DNA replication and repair in J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0. In addition, the expression levels of four DEGs (viz. c29386.graph_c0, c30247.graph_c0, POL2 and c31675.graph_c0) were higher in J77 mycelia than those in J1 mycelia at Cd0, but the reverse was the case for the expression level of RFC2 (Table 1). Obviously, DNA replication and repair pathway displayed more stability in J77 mycelia than in J1 mycelia at Cd2 and greater positive modifications at Cd5. In summary, our results indicated that cell cycle and DNA replication and repair might play a role in Cd-toxicity and Cd-tolerance of A. brasiliensis mycelia.

Conclusions

Cd-induced upregulation of ZIP might contribute to the higher Cd accumulation in Cd-treated J1 mycelia. Cd might impair cell wall, cell cycle, DNA replication and repair, thus inhibiting J1 mycelium growth. J1 mycelia displayed enhanced formation of S-containing compounds, polysaccharides, OAs, trehalose, ATP and NADPH, and sequestration of Cd to deal with the increased Cd accumulation. DNA replication and repair had better stability at Cd2 treatments; but greater positive modifications at Cd5 treatments; better DNA replication and repair as well as better cell wall and cell cycle stability might contribute to the higher Cd-tolerance of J77 mycelia. Our findings provide a comprehensive set of DEGs influenced by Cd stress; and shed light on molecular mechanism of A.brasiliensis Cd accumulation and Cd tolerance.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Gene Ontology (GO) classifications for assembled unigenes of A. brasiliensis transcriptome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Fig. Histogram presentation of eukaryotic ortholog groups (KOG) classifications for assembled unigenes of A. brasiliensis transcriptome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s002

(DOCX)

S3 Fig. Correlation between qRT-PCR and RNA-Seq results.

Points represent average values of three replicates.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s003

(DOCX)

S1 Table. The specific primer sequences for qRT-PCR analysis.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s004

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Summary of the RNA-Seq data collected from control and Cd-treated mycelia of two A. brasiliensis strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s005

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Length distribution of assembled transcripts and unigenes from two A. brasiliensis strains.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s006

(DOCX)

S4 Table. Summary of the functional annotation of assemble unigenes in A. brasiliensis mycelia.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s007

(DOCX)

S5 Table. DEGs were identified simultaneously in J1Cd2 vs J1Cd0, J1Cd5 vs J1Cd0, J77Cd0 vs J1Cd0, J77Cd2 vs J77Cd0 and J77Cd5 vs J77Cd0.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s008

(DOCX)

S6 Table. Significantly enriched KEGG pathway of DEGs from different groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0239617.s009

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Largeteau ML, Llarena-Hernández RC, Regnault-Roger C, Savoie JM. The medicinal Agaricus mushroom cultivated in Brazil: biology, cultivation and non-medicinal valorisation. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2011; 92(5): 897–907. pmid:22005742
  2. 2. Wisitrassameewong K, Karunarathna SC, Thongklang N, Zhao R, Callac P, Moukha S, et al. Agaricus subrufescens: a review. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2012; 19(2): 131–146. pmid:23961172
  3. 3. da Silva de Souza AC, Correa VG, Goncalves GA, Soares AA, Bracht A, Peralta RM. Agaricus blazei bioactive compounds and their effects on human health: benefits and controversies. Curr Pharm Des. 2017; 23(19):2807–2834. pmid:28103773
  4. 4. Jia SY, Li F, Liu Y, Ren H, Gong GL, Wang YY, et al. Effects of extractionmethods on the antioxidant activities of polysaccharides from Agaricus blazei Murrill. Int J Biol Macromol. 2013; 62: 66–69. pmid:23994789
  5. 5. Cui LR, Sun YX, Xu HY, Xu Y, Cong H, Liu JC. A polysaccharide isolated from Agaricus blazei Murill (ABP-AW1) as a potential Th1 immunity stimulating adjuvant. Oncol Lett. 2013; 6(4): 1039–1044. pmid:24137460
  6. 6. Ishii PL, Prado CK, de O Mauro M, Carreira CM, Mantovani MS, Ribeiro LR. Evaluation of Agaricus blazei in vivo for antigenotoxic, anticarcinogenic, phagocytic and immunomodulatory activities. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011; 59(3): 412–422. pmid:21295629
  7. 7. Al-Dbass AM, Al-Daihan SK, Bhat RS. Agaricus blazei Murill as an efficient hepatoprotective and antioxidant agent against CCl4-induced liver injury in rats. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2012; 19(3): 303–309. pmid:23961190
  8. 8. Oh TW, Kim YA, Jang WJ, Byeon JI, Ryu CH, Kim JO, et al. Semipurified fractions from the submerged-culture broth of Agaricus blazei Murill reduce blood glucose levels in streptozotocin-induced diabetic rats. J Agric Food Chem. 2010; 58(7): 4113–4119. pmid:20196600
  9. 9. Carneiro AA, Ferreira IC, Dueñas M, Barros L, da Silva R, Gomes E, et al. Chemical composition and antioxidant activity of dried powder formulations of Agaricus blazei and Lentinus edodes. Food Chem. 2013; 138(4): 2168–2173. pmid:23497872
  10. 10. Kalač P. Trace element contents in European species of wild growing edible mushrooms: a review for the period 2000–2009. Food Chem. 2010; 122: 2–15.
  11. 11. Huang JC, Li KB, Yu YR, Wu H, Liu DL. Cadmium accumulation in Agaricus blazei Murrill. J Sci Food Agri. 2008; 88(8): 1369–1375.
  12. 12. Sun LP, Liu GX, Yang MZ, Zhuang YL. Bioaccessibility of cadmium in fresh and cooked Agaricus blazei Murill assessed by in vitro biomimetic digestion system. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012; 50(5): 1729–1733. pmid:22406327
  13. 13. Xu LH, He SL, Wu YM, Ye CW, Zhang YZ, Wang GJ. Investigation of the law and control technique of cadmium absorption and accumulation of Agaricus Blazei Murrill. J Chin Inst Food Sci Tech. 2010; 10(4): 152–158.
  14. 14. Wang LL, Li HB, Wei HB, Wu XQ, Ke LQ. Identification of cadmium-induced Agaricus blazei genes through suppression subtractive hybridization. Food Chem Toxicol. 2014; 63: 84–90. pmid:24184195
  15. 15. Zhou Q, Guo JJ, He CT, Shen C. Comparative transcriptome analysis between low- and high-cadmium-accumulating genotypes of Pakchoi (Brassica chinensis L.) in response to cadmium stress. Environ Sci Technol. 2016; 50(12):6485–6494. pmid:27228483
  16. 16. Liu PH, Yuan J, Jiang ZH, Wang YX, Weng BQ, Li GX. A lower cadmium accumulating strain of Agaricus brasiliensis produced by 60Co-γ-irradiation. LWT-Food Sci Technol. 2019; 114: 108370.
  17. 17. Liu PH, Li B, Jiang ZH, Wang YX, Weng BQ. Comparison and physiological mechanisms of cadmium (Cd) accumulation by strain J1 and mutant J77 of Agaricus brasiliensis. J. Agro-Environ. Sci. 2017; 36: 863–868.
  18. 18. Jacob C, Courbot M, Martin F, Brun A, Chalot M. Transcriptomic responses to cadmium in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus. FEBS Lett. 2004; 576(3): 423–427. pmid:15498573
  19. 19. Zhao D, Li T, Shen M, Wang J, Zhao Z. Diverse strategies conferring extreme cadmium (Cd) tolerance in the dark septate endophyte (DSE), Exophiala pisciphila: evidence from RNA-seq data. Microbiol Res. 2015; 170: 27–35. pmid:25294257
  20. 20. Georg RC, Gomes SL. Transcriptome analysis in response to heat shock and cadmium in the aquatic fungus Blastocladiella emersonii. Eukaryotic Cell. 2007; 6(6):1053–1062. pmid:17449658
  21. 21. Pertea G, Huang XQ, Liang F, Antonescu V, Sultana R, Karamycheva S, et al. TIGR Gene Indices clustering tools (TGICL): a software system for fast clustering of large EST datasets. Bioinformatics. 2003; 19(5):651–652. pmid:12651724
  22. 22. Trapnell C, Williams BA, Pertea G, Mortazavi A, Kwan G, van Baren MJ, et al. Transcript assembly and quantification by RNA-Seq reveals unannotated transcripts and isoform switching during cell differentiation. Nat Biotechnol. 2010; 28(5): 511–515. pmid:20436464
  23. 23. Anders S, Huber W. Differential expression analysis for sequence count data. Genome Biol. 2010; 11(10): R106. pmid:20979621
  24. 24. Xie C, Mao XZ, Huang JJ, Ding Y, Wu JM, Dong S, et al. KOBAS 2.0: a web server for annotation and identification of enriched pathways and diseases. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011; 39(Web Server issue):W316–W322 pmid:21715386
  25. 25. Zhou CP, Qi YP, You X, Yang LT, Guo P, Ye X, et al. Leaf cDNA-AFLP analysis of two Citrus species differing in manganese tolerance in response to long-term manganese-toxicity. BMC Genomics. 2013; 14: 621. pmid:24034812
  26. 26. Wysocki R, Tamás MJ. How Saccharomyces cerevisiae copes with toxic metals and metalloids. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2010; 34(6): 925–951. pmid:20374295
  27. 27. Gube M. Fungal molecular response to heavy metal stress. In: Hoffmeister D. (eds) Biochemistry and Molecular Biology. Berlin: Springer, Cham; 2016. pp. 47–68.
  28. 28. Ajeesh Krishna TP, Maharajan T, Victor Roch G, Ignacimuthu S, Antony Ceasar S. Structure, function, regulation and phylogenetic relationship of ZIP family transporters of plants. Front Plant Sci. 2020; 11: 662. pmid:32536933
  29. 29. Kimura T, Kambe T. The functions of metallothionein and ZIP and ZnT transporters: an overview and perspective. Int J Mol Sci. 2016; 17(3): 336. pmid:26959009
  30. 30. Rajakumar S, Ravi C, Nachiappan V. Defect of zinc transporter ZRT1 ameliorates cadmium induced lipid accumulation in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Metallomics. 2016; 8(4): 453–460. pmid:26999708
  31. 31. Cohen Y, Megyeri M, Chen OC, Condomitti G, Riezman I, Loizides-Mangold U, et al. The yeast p5 type ATPase, spf1, regulates manganese transport into the endoplasmic reticulum. PLoS One. 2013; 8(12): e85519. pmid:24392018
  32. 32. Schmidt K, Wolfe DM, Stiller B. Pearce DA. Cd2+, Mn2+, Ni2+ and Se2+ toxicity to Saccharomyces cerevisiae lacking YPK9p the orthologue of human ATP13A2. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2009; 383(2): 198–202. pmid:19345671
  33. 33. Kovalchuk A, Driessen AJ. Phylogenetic analysis of fungal ABC transporters. BMC Genomics. 2010; 11: 177. pmid:20233411
  34. 34. Kispal G, Csere P, Guiard B. Lill R. The ABC transporter Atm1p is required for mitochondrial iron homeostasis. FEBS Lett. 1997; 418(3): 346–350. pmid:9428742
  35. 35. Hanikenne M, Motte P, Wu MCS, Wang T, Loppes R, Matagne RF. A mitochondrial half-size ABC transporter is involved in cadmium tolerance in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. Plant Cell Environ. 2005; 28(7): 863–873.
  36. 36. Macdiarmid CW, Milanick MA, Eide DJ. Biochemical properties of vacuolar zinc transport systems of Saccharomyces cerevisiae. J Biol Chem. 2002; 277(42): 39187–39194. pmid:12161436
  37. 37. Lang ML, Hao MY, Fan QW, Wang W, Mo SJ, Zhao WC, et al. Functional characterization of BjCET3 and BjCET4, two new cation-efflux transporters from Brassica juncea L. J Exp Bot. 2011; 62(13): 4467–4480. pmid:21652531
  38. 38. Courbot M, Diez L, Ruotolo R, Chalot M, Leroy P. Cadmium-responsive thiols in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70(12): 7413–7417. pmid:15574943
  39. 39. Guo G, Li Q, Qi YP, Yang LT, Ye X, Chen HH, et al. Sulfur-mediated-alleviation of aluminum-toxicity in Citrus grandis seedlings. Int J Mol Sci. 2017; 18(12): 2570. pmid:29207499
  40. 40. Guo P, Qi YP, Cai YT, Yang TY, Yang LT, Huang ZR, et al. Aluminum effects on photosynthesis, reactive oxygen species and methylglyoxal detoxification in two Citrus species differing in aluminum tolerance. Tree Physiol. 2018; 38(10): 1548–1565. pmid:29718474
  41. 41. Kennedy PJ, Vashisht AA, Hoe KL, Kim DU, Park HO, Hayles J, et al. A genome-wide screen of genes involved in cadmium tolerance in Schizosaccharomyces pombe. Toxicol Sci. 2008; 106(1): 124–139. pmid:18684775
  42. 42. Kimura Y, Kimura H. Hydrogen sulfide protects neurons from oxidative stress. FASEB J. 2004; 18(10): 1165–1167. pmid:15155563
  43. 43. Shen JJ, Qiao ZJ, Xing TJ, Zhang LP, Liang YL, Jin ZP, et al. Cadmium toxicity is alleviated by AtLCD and AtDCD in Escherichia coli. J Appl Microbiol. 2012; 113(5): 1130–1138. pmid:22816429
  44. 44. Sun J, Wang RG, Zhang X, Yu YC, Zhao R, Li ZY, et al. Hydrogen sulfide alleviates cadmium toxicity through regulations of cadmium transport across the plasma and vacuolar membranes in Populus euphratica cells. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2013; 65: 67–74. pmid:23416498
  45. 45. Mendoza-Cózatl D, Loza-Tavera H, Hernández-Navarro A, Moreno-Sánchez R. Sulfur assimilation and glutathione metabolism under cadmium stress in yeast, protists and plants. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2005; 29(4): 653–671. pmid:16102596
  46. 46. Adamis PD, Gomes DS, Pinto MLC, Panek AD, Eleutherio EC. The role of glutathione transferases in cadmium stress. Toxicol Lett. 2004; 154(1–2): 81–88. pmid:15475181
  47. 47. Gomes DS, Fragoso LC, Riger CJ, Panek AD, Eleutherio ECA. Regulation of cadmium uptake by Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2002; 1573(1): 21–25. pmid:12383937
  48. 48. Weghe JGV, Ow DW. A fission yeast gene for mitochondrial sulfide oxidation. J Biol Chem. 1999; 274(19): 13250–13257. pmid:10224084
  49. 49. Thirumoorthy N, Manisenthil Kumar KT, Shyam Sundar A, Panayappan L, Chatterjee M. Metallothionein: an overview. World J Gastroenterol. 2007; 13(7): 993–996. pmid:17373731
  50. 50. Bhanoori M, Venkateswerlu G. In vivo chitin-cadmium complexation in cell wall of Neurospora crassa. Biochim Biophys Acta-General Subjects. 2000; 1523(1): 21–28. pmid:11099854
  51. 51. Blaudez D, Botton B, Chalot M. Cadmium uptake and subcellular compartmentation in the ectomycorrhizal fungus Paxillus involutus. Microbiology. 2000; 146(Pt 5): 1109–1117. pmid:10832638
  52. 52. Kaji T, Ohkawara S, Inada M, Yamamoto C, Sakamoto M, Kozuka H. Cadmium stimulation of glycosaminoglycan synthesis by cultured vascular endothelial cells: comparison of various cell types. Biol Pharm Bull. 1994; 17(3): 454–457. pmid:8019517
  53. 53. Bruno VM, Kalachikov S, Subaran R, Nobile CJ, Kyratsous C, Mitchell AP. Control of the C. albicans cell wall damage response by transcriptional regulator Cas5. PLoS Pathog. 2006; 2(3): e21. pmid:16552442
  54. 54. Guo L, Ghassemian M, Komives EA, Russell P. Cadmium-induced proteome remodeling regulated by Spc1/Sty1 and Zip1 in fission yeast. Toxicol Sci. 2012; 129(1): 200–212. pmid:22610605
  55. 55. Guo P, Qi YP, Huang WL, Yang LT, Huang ZR, Lai NW, et al. Aluminum-responsive genes revealed by RNA-Seq and related physiological responses in leaves of two Citrus species with contrasting aluminum-tolerance. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2018; 158: 213–222. pmid:29704792
  56. 56. Elbein AD, Pan YT, Pastuszak I, Carroll D. New insights on trehalose: a multifunctional molecule. Glycobiology. 2003; 13(4): 17R–27R. pmid:12626396
  57. 57. Renella G, Mench M, Landi L, Nannipieri P. Microbial activity and hydrolase synthesis in long-term Cd-contaminated soils. Soil Biol Biochem. 2005; 37(1): 133–139.
  58. 58. Sazanova K, Osmolovskaya N, Schiparev S, Yakkonen K, Kuchaeva L, Vlasov D. Organic acids induce tolerance to zinc- and copper-exposed fungi under various growth conditions. Curr Microbiol. 2015; 70(4): 520–527. pmid:25502541
  59. 59. Gadd GM, Bahri-Esfahani J, Li Q, Rhee YJ, Wei Z, Fomina M, et al. Oxalate production by fungi: significance in geomycology, biodeterioration and bioremediation. Fungal Biol Rev. 2014; 28: 36–55.
  60. 60. Serero A, Lopes J, Nicolas A, Boiteux S. Yeast genes involved in cadmium tolerance: identification of DNA replication as a target of cadmium toxicity. DNA Repair. 2008; 7(8): 1262–1275. pmid:18514590
  61. 61. Banfalvi G, Littlefield N, Hass B, Mikhailova M, Csuka I, Szepessy E, et al. Effect of cadmium on the relationship between replicative and repair DNA synthesis in synchronized CHO cells. Eur J Biochem. 2000; 267(22): 6580–6585. pmid:11054109