Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Characterization of Vibrio cholerae isolates from freshwater sources in northwest Ohio

  • Judy Daboul ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Judy Daboul, Logan Weghorst

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America

  • Logan Weghorst ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Judy Daboul, Logan Weghorst

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America

  • Cara DeAngelis,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Laboratory of Bacteriology, Rocky Mountain Laboratories, National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, National Institutes of Health, Hamilton, Montana, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America

  • Sarah C. Plecha,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Division of Integrated Biomedical Sciences, University of Detroit Mercy School of Dentistry, Detroit, Michigan, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America

  • Jessica Saul-McBeth,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Current address: Department of Biological Sciences, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America

  • Jyl S. Matson

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Medical Microbiology and Immunology, University of Toledo, Toledo, Ohio, United States of America

Characterization of Vibrio cholerae isolates from freshwater sources in northwest Ohio

  • Judy Daboul, 
  • Logan Weghorst, 
  • Cara DeAngelis, 
  • Sarah C. Plecha, 
  • Jessica Saul-McBeth, 
  • Jyl S. Matson


Vibrio cholerae is a natural inhabitant of aquatic ecosystems worldwide, typically residing in coastal or brackish water. While more than 200 serogroups have been identified, only serogroups O1 and O139 have been associated with epidemic cholera. However, infections other than cholera can be caused by nonepidemic, non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae strains, including gastroenteritis and extraintestinal infections. While V. cholerae can also survive in freshwater, that is typically only observed in regions of the world where cholera is endemic. We recently isolated V. cholerae from several locations in lakes and rivers in northwest Ohio. These isolates were all found to be non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae strains, that would not cause cholera. However, these isolates contained a variety of virulence genes, including ctxA, rtxA, rtxC, hlyA, and ompU. Therefore, it is possible that some of these isolates have the potential to cause gastroenteritis or other infections in humans. We also investigated the relative motility of the isolates and their ability to form biofilms as this is important for V. cholerae survival in the environment. We identified one isolate that forms very robust biofilms, up to 4x that of our laboratory strains. Finally, we investigated the susceptibility of these isolates to a panel of antibiotics. We found that many of the isolates showed decreased susceptibility to some of the antibiotics tested, which could be of concern. While we do not know if these isolates are pathogenic to humans, increased surveillance to better understand the public health risk to the local community should be considered.


Vibrio cholerae is the bacterium responsible for the epidemic diarrheal disease cholera, but it is also a natural inhabitant of aquatic environments in many regions of the world [1]. Due to their widespread existence in the environment, Vibrio species encounter a wide range of unfavorable conditions to which they have to sense and respond appropriately, by upregulating or downregulating specific gene expression [2]. These conditions are also constantly changing due to natural and manmade events. Despite these challenges, due to its unique ability to adapt to and thrive in diverse and changing environments, V. cholerae has been a very successful marine organism and human pathogen. In turn, V. cholerae causes outbreaks of disease that are not always linked to predictable water sources. Therefore, it is critical that we better understand the varied locations where V. cholerae can survive worldwide in order to develop measures to limit human exposure to these ubiquitous aquatic bacteria.

V. cholerae strains are divided into more than 200 different serogroups based on O antigen structure. Historically, the O1 serogroup has been primarily responsible for causing epidemic cholera, and in 1992 another epidemic serogroup, O139, emerged [3]. Pathogenic (toxigenic) V. cholerae strains encode two major virulence factors: cholera toxin (CT) and the toxin-coregulated pilus (TCP), the expression of which leads to the severe diarrhea associated with cholera disease [4]. CT and TCP are encoded by a lysogenic bacteriophage (CTXφ) and a pathogenicity island, respectively [5, 6]. The remaining V. cholerae strains are generally referred to as “non-O1, non-O139” strains and do not cause cholera epidemics. These strains are also often referred to as “non-toxigenic” as they rarely carry the genes for CT and TCP. However, many of these non-O1/non-O139 strains encode other virulence genes, and have caused numerous diseases ranging from gastroenteritis to extraintestinal infections in humans [79]. These accessory virulence factors include the RTX toxin [10, 11], outer membrane proteins (including OmpU) [12, 13], and hemolysins [14, 15]. In V. cholerae, the rtx gene cluster encodes a multifunctional-autoprocessing RTX (repeats in toxin) toxin that is involved in evasion of the host immune response [16]. OmpU is a porin that is required for bacterial resistance to antimicrobial peptides, among other roles [13]. Hemolysins, including HlyA, are pore-forming toxins that lyse eukaryotic cells [17]. The presence of these virulence factors in non-O1/non-O139 strains are assumed to play some role in their survival in the natural environment [14, 18]. However, due to their likely role in the pathogenesis of non-O1/non-O139 strains, the presence of these accessory virulence factors is often monitored when characterizing V. cholerae strains isolated from environmental and food sources [14, 15, 19, 20].

V. cholerae is typically found in estuarine or coastal environments, with most toxigenic strains residing in subtropical climates such as southeast Asia. V. cholerae is one of the only Vibrio species that can tolerate the absence of salt, and transmission of cholera from freshwater sources occurs, but typically in regions of the world where pathogenic strains are endemic [21]. In the United States, V. cholerae can be isolated from coastal environments, such as the Chesapeake Bay [22]. Typically, these North American strains are non-toxigenic, but studies have shown that there is a high degree of genetic diversity in the isolates and they contain a random assortment of virulence genes that may warrant increased surveillance [7].

In this study, we report that there are environmental V. cholerae strains present in freshwater lakes and rivers around the area of Toledo, Ohio. As most vibrios prefer at least a small amount of salt in their habitat and are typically found in warmer climates, this is unexpected [23]. We have isolated V. cholerae from multiple locations over multiple dates in the Maumee river and along the shores of Lake Erie (Fig 1). These locations are all easily accessed by the local population and commonly used for fishing and recreational purposes. Many of these isolates were found in river water that should not be a part of shipping routes, so these strains are unlikely to have been recently introduced by expelled ballast water from large ships. Initial characterization showed that all of the isolates collected to date are from non-O1/non-O139 serogroups. The isolates were further examined for the presence of virulence genes, antibiotic resistance, motility, hemolysis activity, and biofilm formation. Based on the fact that we identified V. cholerae in water collected from most of these sampling locations, and that the isolates contain diverse phenotypic and genotypic traits, we hypothesize that V. cholerae is a natural inhabitant of the regional aquatic microbiota and it has been present in the area for some time.

Fig 1. Water collection sites in the Toledo, Ohio area.

The green markers indicate locations where V. cholerae was isolated from water samples. The red marker indicates a location that was negative for V. cholerae. Locations UP, D, and IV were sampled in both 2017 and 2018. Map data courtesy of USGS National Map Viewer.

Materials and methods

Sample collection and isolation of Vibrio cholerae

Water was collected during the summers of 2017 and 2018 from various public access locations on the Maumee River and the shore of Lake Erie (Fig 1, S1 Table). V. cholerae was isolated using alkaline peptone water enrichment according to standard protocols [24]. Samples of water (~250 mL) were collected in sterile containers and filtered using 0.22 μm pore size membrane filters. The membranes were then incubated statically in 100 mL alkaline peptone water (1% peptone, 1% NaCl, pH 8.6) overnight at 30°C. 100 μL of the culture (taken from the surface) was streaked onto thiosulfate citrate bile sucrose (TCBS) agar (BD Difco, USA) and incubated overnight at 37°C. Yellow colonies were isolated for species identification using PCR for the V. cholerae species-specific ompW gene [25]. Antiserum kits for O1 and O139 V. cholerae (Hardy diagnostics, Santa Maria, CA) were used to determine serotype by slide agglutination, according to the manufacturer’s instructions.

Growth and motility

Strains were routinely cultivated in LB medium at 37°C. Bacteria were also grown in M9 media to assess biofilm formation in minimal media. Bacterial isolates were maintained at -80°C in LB containing 20% glycerol. Hemolysis activity was investigated by growth of the isolates on Trypticase Soy Agar (TSA) with 5% sheep blood (BD). Motility assays were performed on LB media containing 0.3% agar, with total area of bacterial spread measured after 24 h of incubation at 37°C. Statistical significance compared to strain C6706 was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test.

PCR genotyping

Genomic DNA was extracted using the boiled template method [26]. PCR was performed in a 25 μL reaction mixture using Radiant HiFi Ultra polymerase (Alkali Scientific Inc.). Gene targets and oligonucleotide sequences are listed in S2 Table. PCR conditions and oligonucleotide sequences were obtained from numerous previous studies that identified virulence factors in V. cholerae strains [8, 19, 25, 27]. V. cholerae O1 reference strains C6706 (El Tor) and O395 (Classical) were included as controls.

Biofilm formation

Biofilm formation was measured using the crystal violet staining assay [28]. Briefly, overnight cultures of the V. cholerae isolates were subcultured and grown statically in 24-well plates for the times indicated in either LB or M9 minimal media. After incubation, the culture media was removed and the wells were washed 3x with PBS. The wells were then stained with 1% crystal violet in 25% ethanol for 15 minutes and washed 3x with distilled water. The remaining crystal violet in the wells was solubilized using 33% acetic acid and the OD570 was measured. Biofilm quantity is represented as the OD570 divided by the OD600 of a duplicate culture. Statistical significance compared to strain C6706 was determined using a one-way ANOVA with Tukey's post-hoc test.

Antibiotic susceptibility

Antibiotic susceptibility was determined by disk diffusion on Mueller-Hinton agar (BD, USA) according to the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute guidelines for V. cholerae [29]. The zone standards for Enterobacteriaceae were used when there were no established breakpoint interpretive criteria for V. cholerae. V. cholerae reference strains C6706 and O395 were included as controls. All strains were tested for susceptibility to tetracycline, 30 μg; trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, 1.25/23.75 μg; chloramphenicol, 30 μg; ciprofloxacin, 5 μg; erythromycin, 15 μg; nalidixic acid 30 μg; streptomycin, 10 μg; gentamicin 10 μg.


Detection and isolation of V. cholerae

V. cholerae is a naturally occurring component of marine and estuarine costal microbiota in North America. However, there has been little investigation as to whether or not it is present in non-coastal areas in this part of the world. Most Vibrio species require salt for growth, with V. cholerae being an exception [23]. Therefore, it is possible that V. cholerae could be present in freshwater lakes and rivers, although it is generally assumed to reside in more tropical climates. In order to determine if V. cholerae could be isolated from freshwater sources in northwest Ohio, we collected water samples during the summers of 2017 and 2018. Water was obtained from several locations in the Maumee River and along the shores of Lake Erie (Fig 1, S1 Table). The locations were accessible from the shoreline or boat docks in areas used for boating, fishing, or other recreational activities. V. cholerae was isolated using alkaline peptone water enrichment [24], and all isolates were confirmed using PCR for the V. cholerae species-specific ompW gene [25]. We obtained V. cholerae isolates from 5 of the 6 sampling locations in 2017. Three of these locations were again sampled in 2018, and all three yielded V. cholerae in the second year as well. A total of 13 different V. cholerae isolates have been identified from these locations to date. In order to determine whether any of the isolates belonged to the epidemic O1 or O139 serogroups, we performed agglutination assays using O1- and O139-specific antisera. All of the isolates were found to be non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae (Table 1).

Table 1. Phenotypes and genotypes of environmental V. cholerae isolates.

Distribution of virulence genes in regional V. cholerae isolates

Clinically significant infections other than cholera can be caused by non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae, which are continually reported worldwide [79]. Although non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae strains typically do not produce the cholera toxin, they often contain other virulence genes that contribute to their pathogenicity [14, 15, 19, 20]. In order to determine the virulence potential of these isolates, we used PCR to identify the presence of known virulence genes. Genes that are usually associated with toxigenic V. cholerae strains include those encoding the cholera toxin (ctxA, ctxB) and genes of the CTX element (ace, zot). In addition, we also looked for the presence of genes encoding the toxin-coregulated pilus (tcpA, tcpI) in these isolates. As might be expected, we did not identify most of these virulence genes in our non-O1/non-O139 isolates (Table 1). However, two of our isolates were positive for ctxA, which was unexpected. As these strains were negative for ctxB, they would likely not produce a functional cholera toxin.

These isolates were also tested for the presence of accessory virulence factors, including the RTX toxin (rtxA, rtxC), outer membrane protein, ompU, and hemolysin, hlyA. All but two of the isolates were positive for both of the RTX genes, indicating the potential that most of our isolates could produce a functional RTX toxin (Table 1). The gene encoding the outer membrane protein OmpU was found in 7 of the 13 isolates. The presence of both the Classical and El Tor versions of the hlyA hemolysin gene in these isolates was also tested [15]. The sequence of the hlyA gene has been used to differentiate between the two biotypes of V. cholerae O1 [30]. The sequence of the Classical biotype has an 11 base pair deletion within the hlyA gene, compared to the El Tor biotype. Eight of the 13 strains were positive for both variants of the hlyA gene. Based on these genotyping results, we can conclude that we have isolated a number of unique V. cholerae strains so far, and that they contain different combinations of potential virulence factors.

Phenotypic assays

In order to further characterize these environmental V. cholerae isolates, we performed other phenotypic assays. We examined the motility of the strains by inoculating each of them onto LB motility media and measuring the area of bacterial spread after 24 h of incubation. While there were no observable growth differences of the isolates in liquid media, there was a dramatic range of bacterial motility observed for the isolates (Fig 2). Six of the isolates were significantly more motile than our laboratory strains. None of the strains showed reduced motility compared to O395 and C6706. The wide range of motility demonstrated by the individual isolates suggests that we have isolated a number of unique V. cholerae strains and not simply a clonal population that is present in a number of locations.

Fig 2. Motility of the V. cholerae isolates.

A single colony of each isolate was inoculated into motility agar and incubated for 24 h. After incubation, the total area of bacterial spread was measured. The assay was performed in triplicate. Significance was compared to strain C6706, where * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01, *** = p<0.005.

We also examined the hemolytic patterns of each isolate by inoculation on 5% sheep blood nutrient agar plates and growing at 37°C overnight. All of the isolates demonstrated beta-hemolysis (Table 1). This was somewhat unexpected, as 5 of the isolates were negative by PCR for the presence of both the Classical and El Tor versions of the hlyA gene (Table 1). This suggests that many of our isolates encode and express another hemolysin other than the tested versions of hlyA.

Isolate D1 produces elevated amounts of biofilm

When some of our isolates were cultured in liquid media (overnight, with shaking), we noticed differences in pellicle formation and/or sedimentation of the cultures (Fig 3A). Therefore, we hypothesized that there may be increased biofilm formation in some of the isolates as compared to our standard laboratory strains. Biofilm formation plays a critical role in V. cholerae pathogenesis and disease transmission [31]. To examine biofilm formation in these three isolates that routinely showed unusual growth characteristics, we performed crystal violet biofilm assays to determine the relative amounts of biofilm formed as compared to laboratory control strains. We first examined biofilm formation in LB media grown statically in polystyrene plates at two timepoints, after 18 and 24 h of growth. The El Tor strain C6706 forms significantly more biofilm compared to the Classical strain O395 at both timepoints (Fig 3B and 3C). When we compared the amount of biofilm formation in these three isolates to strain C6706, isolates IV-1 and D1 formed significantly increased amounts of biofilm at both timepoints, while isolate UP-2 formed less. Isolate D1 showed the most dramatic biofilm formation, producing approximately 4 times the amount of C6706 after 24 h of growth (Fig 3C). We also examined biofilm formation of these isolates when grown in minimal M9 media in order to determine if the elevated biofilm formation was dependent on the abundance of nutrients found in rich media. All strains show decreased growth in minimal media, resulting in the overall smaller ratios in OD570/OD600 (Fig 3D and 3E). However, despite this overall decreased growth, again isolate D1 formed significantly increased biofilms compared to strain C6706 at both timepoints. Due to the unusually high biofilm formation demonstrated by this strain, we had the genome sequenced [32]. Sequence information can be found at DDBJ/ENA/GenBank (accession number QZCU00000000). Sequencing verified the presence of the virulence genes identified by PCR in this isolate, however, the mechanism for increased biofilm production has not been determined.

Fig 3. Biofilm formation of the environmental V. cholerae isolates.

(A) Pellicle formation of selected environmental isolates compared to laboratory V. cholerae strains. The crystal violet assay was performed to determine biofilm formation after 18 h (B) or 24 h (C) of static growth in LB medium, and after 18 h (D) or 24 h (E) of static growth in M9 minimal medium. The assay was performed in triplicate. Significance was compared to strain C6706, where * = p<0.05, ** = p<0.01, *** = p<0.005.

Antibiotic resistance profiles of the environmental isolates

A major concern for any bacterial strains that may have public health consequences is the potential of resistance to commonly used antibiotics. Therefore, we performed antimicrobial susceptibility testing on our environmental isolates using a disk diffusion assay for 8 antibiotics. All strains were uniformly susceptible to chloramphenicol, tetracycline, trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole, ciprofloxacin, and gentamicin (Table 2). Three of the isolates were found to be resistant to erythromycin. In addition, three isolates showed intermediate resistance to nalidixic acid and 6 others showed intermediate resistance to streptomycin (the laboratory strains have been selected for streptomycin resistance). Overall, while the isolates were sensitive to the majority of the antibiotics tested, it is worth noting that only 3 of the 13 isolates were fully susceptible to this relatively small panel of antibiotics (Table 2). Therefore, increased antimicrobial susceptibility testing may be warranted for these, and any future isolates collected from the area.


The goal of this present study was to understand the presence, virulence, and antibiotic resistance profiles of V. cholerae in northwest Ohio. Although our sampling to date is relatively limited, it is clear that these bacteria are widely distributed in the local aquatic environment, being found in water from both lakes and rivers. While we have not estimated total abundance of vibrios in any given location at this time, V. cholerae has been readily isolated from relatively small samples of water in most of the locations sampled, suggesting it may be present in significant quantities. We have only identified non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae to date, however these strains are more readily isolated in culture. V. cholerae O1 strains are known to be difficult to isolate, even in areas where cholera is endemic [33]. Future studies will investigate the possibility that O1/O139 strains are also present in northwest Ohio using non-culture-based methods, such as the direct fluorescent antibody assay [34]. This technique has been used to successfully detect O1 isolates in the Chesapeake Bay and other locations [19].

Previous studies have reported the presence of V. cholerae in freshwater samples in areas of the world that are not considered to be endemic for cholera. For example, in some lakes in Germany and Austria, pathogenic non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae are present and occasionally cause human infections [8, 35]. Only recently have researchers started exploring the possibility that V. cholerae may be present in non-coastal regions of North America. In addition to our studies, V. cholerae has been recently isolated from a freshwater lake in southwestern Pennsylvania [36]. No studies to date have determined if V. cholerae isolated from these freshwater sources have demonstrated increased resistance to low temperatures or low salinities compared to isolates found in other regions of the world. Even if some of these strains show adaptation to cold weather, global climate change is expected to increase the surface water temperatures of lakes and rivers worldwide. This may lead to increased levels of vibrios in any water sources they are introduced, and thus, increased human infections [37]. Therefore, it may be of public health benefit to institute increased monitoring programs for V. cholerae in these regions and inform clinicians to the possibility of screening for vibriosis, which may be overlooked as a possible cause of disease in local patients.

This study revealed that the freshwater non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae isolated in northwest Ohio contain potential virulence genes. While ctxA was present in two of our isolates, the ctxB gene was not found in these strains. Based on the absence of ctxB and the fact that environmental non-O1/non-O139 isolates generally do not produce cholera toxin, we assume that these isolates would also not be able to produce a functional cholera toxin. However, vibriophages have been demonstrated to transfer toxin genes from CTXΦ-positive strains to environmental non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae isolates [38]. Again, future studies will involve more rigorous screening for O1 strains that could serve as a source of the ctxA gene found in some of our isolates.

Similar to numerous other studies examining non-O1/non-O139 V. cholerae in environmental, clinical, and seafood samples, we found that these isolates frequently contained genes encoding accessory virulence factors, including the RTX toxin, OmpU, and hemolysin. In V. cholerae, the rtx gene cluster encodes a multifunctional-autoprocessing RTX toxin (MARTX) [16]. This subgroup of RTX toxins are typically very large proteins (3500 to 5300 amino acids in length) that have multiple activities [39]. The primary role of this toxin is evasion of the innate immune defenses during intestinal infection. The RTX toxin works in concert with HlyA, a hemolysin that was also detected in the majority of our isolates. Purified HlyA induces fluid accumulation and histological changes in the mucosa when injected into rabbit ileal loops [40]. HlyA has also been shown to induce cell vacuolation and apoptosis in cultured mammalian cells [41, 42]. V. cholerae strains deleted for both rtxA and hlyA are avirulent and unable to colonize mice [43]. These toxins act together to inhibit clearance of the infecting bacteria from the small intestine by neutrophils, which is thought to explain their requirement for bacterial colonization [44]. OmpU, one of the most abundant outer membrane proteins of V. cholerae, is required for bacterial resistance to antimicrobial peptides and induces IL-8 expression in intestinal epithelial cells, thus playing an important role in innate immunity [13, 45]. The combined action of these virulence factors in these isolates of V. cholerae may enable these bacteria to induce gastroenteritis, or other infections, if ingested by a human.

In summary, we have found V. cholerae in freshwater lakes and rivers around Toledo, Ohio. While we do not have any evidence that these bacteria can cause human disease, we did identify several potential virulence genes in most of the isolates. In addition, several of the isolates showed some degree of antibiotic resistance. Therefore, increased monitoring for V. cholerae in the region, as well as increased characterization of the isolates, is warranted. Future studies aim to further characterize the relative resistance of these isolates to cold temperature and low salinity. We also would like to determine if these bacteria can be found in the intestines of local fish populations, as V. cholerae is known to colonize several fish species. This would be important information for regional commercial and recreational fishers. In addition, we also aim to sequence additional V. cholerae isolates from the area in order to identify other unexpected virulence factors and to determine the relationship of these isolates to sequenced environmental strains from other parts of the world.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Geographic coordinates of sampling locations.



The authors would like to thank Laura Stanbery, Michael Nejedlik, and Travis Taylor for assistance in sample collection. This manuscript has been released as a pre-print at BioRxiv [46].


  1. 1. Faruque SM, Albert MJ, Mekalanos JJ. Epidemiology, genetics, and ecology of toxigenic Vibrio cholerae. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 1998;62(4):1301–14. pmid:9841673
  2. 2. Lutz C, Erken M, Noorian P, Sun S, McDougald D. Environmental reservoirs and mechanisms of persistence of Vibrio cholerae. Front Microbiol. 2013;4:375. pmid:24379807
  3. 3. Faruque SM, Sack DA, Sack RB, Colwell RR, Takeda Y, Nair GB. Emergence and evolution of Vibrio cholerae O139. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100(3):1304–9. pmid:12538850
  4. 4. Herrington DA, Hall RH, Losonsky G, Mekalanos JJ, Taylor RK, Levine MM. Toxin, toxin-coregulated pili, and the toxR regulon are essential for Vibrio cholerae pathogenesis in humans. J Exp Med. 1988;168(4):1487–92. pmid:2902187
  5. 5. Faruque SM, Mekalanos JJ. Pathogenicity islands and phages in Vibrio cholerae evolution. Trends Microbiol. 2003;11(11):505–10. pmid:14607067
  6. 6. Waldor MK, Mekalanos JJ. Lysogenic conversion by a filamentous phage encoding cholera toxin. Science. 1996;272(5270):1910–4. pmid:8658163
  7. 7. Dalsgaard A, Albert MJ, Taylor DN, Shimada T, Meza R, Serichantalergs O, et al. Characterization of Vibrio cgolerae non-O1 serogroups obtained from an outbreak of diarrhea in Lima, Peru. J Clin Microbiol. 1995;33(10):2715–22. pmid:8567912
  8. 8. Schirmeister F, Dieckmann R, Bechlars S, Bier N, Faruque SM, Strauch E. Genetic and phenotypic analysis of Vibrio cholerae non-O1, non-O139 isolated from German and Austrian patients. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014;33(5):767–78. pmid:24213848
  9. 9. Trubiano JA, Lee JY, Valcanis M, Gregory J, Sutton BA, Holmes NE. Non-O1, non-O139 Vibrio cholerae bacteraemia in an Australian population. Intern Med J. 2014;44(5):508–11. pmid:24816311
  10. 10. Chow KH, Ng TK, Yuen KY, Yam WC. Detection of RTX toxin gene in Vibrio cholerae by PCR. J Clin Microbiol. 2001;39(7):2594–7. pmid:11427575
  11. 11. Satchell KJ. MARTX, multifunctional autoprocessing repeats-in-toxin toxins. Infect Immun. 2007;75(11):5079–84. pmid:17646359
  12. 12. Mathur J, Davis BM, Waldor MK. Antimicrobial peptides activate the Vibrio cholerae sigmaE regulon through an OmpU-dependent signalling pathway. Mol Microbiol. 2007;63(3):848–58. pmid:17181782
  13. 13. Mathur J, Waldor MK. The Vibrio cholerae ToxR-regulated porin OmpU confers resistance to antimicrobial peptides. Infect Immun. 2004;72(6):3577–83. pmid:15155667
  14. 14. Rahman MH, Biswas K, Hossain MA, Sack RB, Mekalanos JJ, Faruque SM. Distribution of genes for virulence and ecological fitness among diverse Vibrio cholerae population in a cholera endemic area: tracking the evolution of pathogenic strains. DNA Cell Biol. 2008;27(7):347–55. pmid:18462070
  15. 15. Rivera IN, Chun J, Huq A, Sack RB, Colwell RR. Genotypes associated with virulence in environmental isolates of Vibrio cholerae. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(6):2421–9. pmid:11375146
  16. 16. Lin W, Fullner KJ, Clayton R, Sexton JA, Rogers MB, Calia KE, et al. Identification of a vibrio cholerae RTX toxin gene cluster that is tightly linked to the cholera toxin prophage. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1999;96(3):1071–6. pmid:9927695
  17. 17. Figueroa-Arredondo P, Heuser JE, Akopyants NS, Morisaki JH, Giono-Cerezo S, Enriquez-Rincon F, et al. Cell vacuolation caused by Vibrio cholerae hemolysin. Infect Immun. 2001;69(3):1613–24. pmid:11179335
  18. 18. Sakib SN, Reddi G, Almagro-Moreno S. Environmental role of pathogenic traits in Vibrio cholerae. J Bacteriol. 2018;200(15):e00795–17. pmid:29581410
  19. 19. Ceccarelli D, Chen A, Hasan NA, Rashed SM, Huq A, Colwell RR. Non-O1/non-O139 Vibrio cholerae carrying multiple virulence factors and V. cholerae O1 in the Chesapeake Bay, Maryland. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2015;81(6):1909–18. pmid:25556194
  20. 20. Hossain ZZ, Farhana I, Tulsiani SM, Begum A, Jensen PKM. Transmission and Toxigenic Potential of Vibrio cholerae in Hilsha Fish (Tenualosa ilisha) for Human Consumption in Bangladesh. Front Microbiol. 2018;9:222. pmid:29515532
  21. 21. Nair GB, Sarkar BL, De SP, Chakrabarti MK, Bhadra RK, Pal SC. Ecology ofVibrio cholerae in the freshwater environs of Calcutta, India. Microb Ecol. 1988;15(2):203–15. pmid:24203001
  22. 22. Jiang SC, Louis V, Choopun N, Sharma A, Huq A, Colwell RR. Genetic diversity of Vibrio cholerae in Chesapeake Bay determined by amplified fragment length polymorphism fingerprinting. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2000;66(1):140–7. pmid:10618215
  23. 23. Kaysner CA, DePaola J, A., Jones J. Vibrio. Bacteriological Analytical Manual (BAM). 8 ed: U. S. Food and Drug Administration; 2004.
  24. 24. Huq A, Haley BJ, Taviani E, Chen A, Hasan NA, Colwell RR. Detection, isolation, and identification of Vibrio cholerae from the environment. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2012;Chapter 6:Unit6A 5.
  25. 25. Nandi B, Nandy RK, Mukhopadhyay S, Nair GB, Shimada T, Ghose AC. Rapid method for species-specific identification of Vibrio cholerae using primers targeted to the gene of outer membrane protein OmpW. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(11):4145–51. pmid:11060082
  26. 26. Hossain ZZ, Ferdous J, Tulsiani SM, Jensen PM, Begum A. Quantitative Analysis of Nucleic Acid Extraction Methods for Vibrio cholerae Using Real-time PCR and Conventional PCR. Mymensingh Med J. 2018;27(2):327–35. pmid:29769498
  27. 27. Singh DV, Matte MH, Matte GR, Jiang S, Sabeena F, Shukla BN, et al. Molecular analysis of Vibrio cholerae O1, O139, non-O1, and non-O139 strains: clonal relationships between clinical and environmental isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2001;67(2):910–21. pmid:11157262
  28. 28. Durham-Colleran MW, Verhoeven AB, van Hoek ML. Francisella novicida forms in vitro biofilms mediated by an orphan response regulator. Microb Ecol. 2010;59(3):457–65. pmid:19763680
  29. 29. Institute. CaLS. Methods for antimicrobial dilution and disk susceptibility testing of infrequently isolated or fastidious bacteria; approved guideline, 3rd ed. CLSI document M45. Wayne, PA2015.
  30. 30. Rader AE, Murphy JR. Nucleotide sequences and comparison of the hemolysin determinants of Vibrio cholerae El Tor RV79(Hly+) and RV79(Hly-) and classical 569B(Hly-). Infect Immun. 1988;56(6):1414–9. pmid:2453464
  31. 31. Silva AJ, Benitez JA. Vibrio cholerae Biofilms and Cholera Pathogenesis. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(2):e0004330. pmid:26845681
  32. 32. Matson JS. Genome Sequence of Vibrio cholerae Strain D1, Isolated from the Maumee River in Toledo, Ohio. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2018;7(16).
  33. 33. Alam M, Sultana M, Nair GB, Sack RB, Sack DA, Siddique AK, et al. Toxigenic Vibrio cholerae in the aquatic environment of Mathbaria, Bangladesh. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72(4):2849–55. pmid:16597991
  34. 34. Goel AK, Tamrakar AK, Kamboj DV, Singh L. Direct immunofluorescence assay for rapid environmental detection of Vibrio cholerae O1. Folia Microbiol (Praha). 2005;50(5):448–52.
  35. 35. Huhulescu S, Indra A, Feierl G, Stoeger A, Ruppitsch W, Sarkar B, et al. Occurrence of Vibrio cholerae serogroups other than O1 and O139 in Austria. Wien Klin Wochenschr. 2007;119(7–8):235–41. pmid:17492351
  36. 36. Bina RF, Bina JE, Weng Y. Genome Sequence of Vibrio cholerae Strain RFB16, Isolated from North Park Lake in Allegheny County, Pennsylvania. Microbiol Resour Announc. 2020;9(10).
  37. 37. Baker-Austin C, Oliver JD, Alam M, Ali A, Waldor MK, Qadri F, et al. Vibrio spp. infections. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018;4(1):8. pmid:30002421
  38. 38. Choi S, Dunams D, Jiang SC. Transfer of cholera toxin genes from O1 to non-O1/O139 strains by vibriophages from California coastal waters. J Appl Microbiol. 2010;108(3):1015–22. pmid:19735324
  39. 39. Satchell KJF. Multifunctional-autoprocessing repeats-in-toxin (MARTX) Toxins of Vibrios. Microbiol Spectr. 2015;3(3).
  40. 40. Ichinose Y, Yamamoto K, Nakasone N, Tanabe MJ, Takeda T, Miwatani T, et al. Enterotoxicity of El Tor-like hemolysin of non-O1 Vibrio cholerae. Infect Immun. 1987;55(5):1090–3. pmid:3570456
  41. 41. Chakraborty DC, Mukherjee G, Banerjee P, Banerjee KK, Biswas T. Hemolysin induces Toll-like receptor (TLR)-independent apoptosis and multiple TLR-associated parallel activation of macrophages. J Biol Chem. 2011;286(40):34542–51. pmid:21846723
  42. 42. Coelho A, Andrade JR, Vicente AC, Dirita VJ. Cytotoxic cell vacuolating activity from Vibrio cholerae hemolysin. Infect Immun. 2000;68(3):1700–5. pmid:10678992
  43. 43. Olivier V, Haines GK 3rd, Tan Y, Satchell KJ. Hemolysin and the multifunctional autoprocessing RTX toxin are virulence factors during intestinal infection of mice with Vibrio cholerae El Tor O1 strains. Infect Immun. 2007;75(10):5035–42. pmid:17698573
  44. 44. Queen J, Satchell KJ. Neutrophils are essential for containment of Vibrio cholerae to the intestine during the proinflammatory phase of infection. Infect Immun. 2012;80(8):2905–13. pmid:22615254
  45. 45. Yang JS, Jeon JH, Jang MS, Kang SS, Ahn KB, Song M, et al. Vibrio cholerae OmpU induces IL-8 expression in human intestinal epithelial cells. Mol Immunol. 2018;93:47–54. pmid:29145158
  46. 46. Daboul J, Weghorst L, DeAngelis C, Plecha SC, Saul-McBeth J, Matson JS. Characterization of Vibrio cholerae isolates from freshwater sources in northwest Ohio. bioRxiv. 2020:2020.04.30.070565.