http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5486-2680
Figures
Abstract
A robust Genotyping-By-Sequencing (GBS) pipeline platform was examined to provide accurate discovery of Single Nucleotide Polymorphisms (SNPs) in a cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) and related taxa germplasm collection. A total of 176 accessions representing, wild, weedy, and commercial cultivars as well as related taxa from the Colombian germplasm bank and other world repositories were screened using GBS. The pipeline parameters mnLCov of 0.5 and a mnScov of 0.7, tomato and potato genomes, and cape gooseberry transcriptome for read alignments, were selected to better assess diversity and population structure in cape gooseberry and related taxa. A total of 7,425 SNPs, derived from P. peruviana common tags (unique 64 bp sequences shared between selected species), were used. Within P. peruviana, five subpopulations with a high genetic diversity and allele fixation (HE: 0.35 to 0.36 and FIS: -0.11 to -0.01, respectively) were detected. Conversely, low genetic differentiation (FST: 0.01 to 0.05) was also observed, indicating a high gene flow among subpopulations. These results contribute to the establishment of adequate conservation and breeding strategies for Cape gooseberry and closely related Physalis species.
Citation: Enciso-Rodríguez FE, Osorio-Guarín JA, Garzón-Martínez GA, Delgadillo-Duran P, Barrero LS (2020) Optimization of the genotyping‐by‐sequencing SNP calling for diversity analysis in cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) and related taxa. PLoS ONE 15(8): e0238383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238383
Editor: Shailendra Goel, University of Delhi, INDIA
Received: April 23, 2020; Accepted: August 14, 2020; Published: August 26, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Enciso-Rodríguez et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All the supporting data are included as additional files (Additional file 1: S1 Table, S2 Table and S3 Table). Raw data of the cape gooseberry transcriptome is available at NCBI Bioproject ID No. PRJNA67621.
Funding: This research was funded by the Colombian Ministry of Agriculture Contract No. 054/08072-2008 and there was no additional external funding received for this study.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Introduction
Cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) is an herbaceous Solanaceae species, native to the Andean region, with enormous potential for biomedical research and commercial purposes [1]. The mating system of cape gooseberry is mostly outcrossed that, along with the occurrence of mixed-ploidy, indicates a transitioning state from wild to cultivated [2, 3], possibly due to a lack of a domestication process as has occurred in major crops of the Solanaceae family such as tomato or potato [4, 5]. Globally, this berry-bearing species is known for its nutritional value, possessing high contents of vitamins and minerals, as well as anti-inflammatory, antioxidant and disease control (diabetes and hypertension) properties [6–10]. These characteristics have enabled its distribution as a crop to other parts of the world, including Africa, Asia, and Oceania [11, 12]. Colombia is the world’s leading producer of this exotic fruit, with roughly 16,109 metric tons produced in 2018 [13], followed by Ecuador, Zimbabwe, Malaysia, China, Kenya, and South Africa [14].
Cape gooseberry production in the Andean region has been diminished due to important phytosanitary problems caused mainly by bacterial (Xanthomonas sp., and Ralstonia solanacearum), Oomycete (Phytium sp.), and fungal pathogens (Alternaria sp., Cladosporium sp., Cercospora sp., Phoma sp., Sclerotinia sclerotiorum, Fusarium oxysporum, among others) [14, 15]. Among them, F. oxysporum sp. physali (Foph) [16], represents one of the most damaging diseases. Therefore, leveraging favorable allelic combinations from wild, weedy, landraces and related taxa into cultivated cape gooseberry populations will contribute to reducing production losses and environmental impacts; since, to date, the only way to manage these pathogens is through chemical control.
The available genetic diversity of cultivated and wild related taxa has helped to establish appropriate conservation, management, and sustainable utilization strategies of different crops [17]. In particular, for cape gooseberry and related taxa, the proper characterization of available germplasm collections will contribute to the identification of resistant or tolerant sources to biotic and abiotic stresses. Not only will this help with battling pathogens, but will increasingly assist with future challenges due to climate change [18].
Molecular markers have become valuable tools to assess genetic variation of worldwide plant repositories. Population studies, marker assisted selection, mapping and association studies, among other applications, have been used for this purpose [19]. To date, some studies have been conducted to characterize the genetic diversity of cape gooseberry. Random amplified microsatellites (RAM) markers have been used by two independent studies on panels of 43 and 18 accessions respectively. They detected a low differentiation and high heterozygosity levels among the majority of the accessions [20, 21]. Other studies used more informative markers, such as simple sequences repeats (SSRs), conserved ortholog sequences II (COSII), immunity related genes (IRGs) and single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) to analyze the diversity levels and population structure in natural and breeding P. peruviana populations [22–26]. However, these low-throughput platforms provide a limited ability to estimate the extent of cape gooseberry genetic variability, since they focus on limited genomic regions.
Recently, next generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have accelerated the screening of germplasm collections, identifying thousands of SNP markers in a cost effective and timely way [27, 28]. Notably, genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS), a highly multiplexed method based on the reduction of genome complexity through methylation-sensitive restriction enzymes [29], has become a popular approach for detecting genome-wide variation in plants [30]. Previous studies in cape gooseberry have identified about 50,000 SNPs using GBS in 100 accessions from the Colombian germplasm collection, for association studies related to fruit quality and Foph resistance [31, 32].
Although these previous advances in genetic diversity and association mapping have contributed to the exploration of cape gooseberry genetic resources, the species still lacks a more comprehensive GBS-SNP pipeline platform for SNP discovery. This study mainly seeks to provide a robust GBS-SNP calling pipeline for this species and related taxa by obtaining common genomic regions between tomato, potato, and cape gooseberry using the previously developed TasselPipelineGBS [33]. Moreover, it aims to provide an extensive study of a larger germplasm collection using GBS, which comprises 158 accessions of P. peruviana and 18 wild related species from the Physalis genus, including 95 technical replicates, to leverage the genetic diversity and population structure of this Andean crop towards conservation and sustainable utilization strategies.
Materials and methods
Plant material and DNA isolation
One hundred and fifty-eight cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) and 18 related taxa accessions, containing one to seven individuals each, for a total of 644 individuals, were used in this study (Table 1). This germplasm collection is maintained by the Colombian Corporation for Agricultural Research (AGROSAVIA). These accessions, collected mainly across the Colombian Andean mountains, were selected based largely on geographic distribution and state of cultivation (S1 Table).
The genomic DNA was isolated from young leaves using the DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (QIAGEN, Germany) following the manufacturer's procedure. DNA quantity was determined using NanoDrop (Thermo Scientific® ND 2000) and λ DNA/HindIII Ladder (Promega, Madison, USA). DNA quality was assessed using EcoRI restriction enzyme digestions (New England Biolabs, Beverly, MA) and visualized on 1% (w/v) agarose gels stained with ethidium bromide (0.5 μg/mL).
Genotyping and read alignment
GBS library generation and Illumina sequencing were conducted at the Institute for Genomic Diversity (IGD) from Cornell University (Ithaca, New York, USA). An additional 95 individuals previously sequenced [31] were included as technical replicates in this study (S1 Table). FASTQ files containing 739 individuals (644 plus 95 technical replicates) were processed using the GBS pipeline implemented on Tassel standalone V4.3.5 [34]. Since cape gooseberry does not have a reference genome, we used the closely related sequenced species tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) and potato (Solanum tuberosum) [35, 36] as well as the cape gooseberry leaf transcriptome (SRA: SRP005904) [37] for reads alignment and later SNP discovery.
Parameter selection for SNP calling
Different GBS parameters in the DiscoverySNPCaller and GBSHapMapFilters plugins were used for SNP calling and hapmap filtering, respectively (Table 2), using a minimum read depth of 5. Additionally, homologue genomic regions among tomato and potato genomes, and cape gooseberry transcriptome were used. This was done to avoid possible bias caused by copy number variations and ploidy complexity during SNP calling. This approach was performed by selecting common tags (a unique sequence of 64 bp in length, excluding the barcode and shared among the selected species) using the TagsOnPhysicalMap (TOPM) file. Finally, to further reduce marker redundancy, the high linkage disequilibrium filter was implemented.
Cluster and principal component analyses
The clustering patterns of the 739 individuals were compared through genetic distances generated by Tassel V4.3.5 in order to verify which parameters were correctly assessed. The parameter selection was based on genetic trees in which most of the technical replicates clustered together with their corresponding counterpart and those which better grouped the accessions according to their passport data (S1 Table). A total of 54 different genetic trees were generated based on the neighbor-joining (NJ) method [38], using filtered SNPs derived from datasets with or without common tags. From the selected SNP data set, a principal component analysis (PCA) was performed, in which each SNP marker was scored with 0 for the homozygous allele aa, 1 for the heterozygous allele Aa and 2 for the homozygous allele AA, based on the allele counting for each marker. The newly generated matrices were subsequently analyzed using the gdsfmt and SNPRelate packages implemented on the statistical software R [39].
Population structure and genetic diversity analyses
The population structure and genetic diversity analyses were carried out only for P. peruviana accessions using the best GBS parameter combinations selected from the NJ analysis. The software ADMIXTURE V.1.23 [40], was used to estimate the individual’s genetic ancestry, calculating the optimum subpopulation (K) number, by the use of cross-validation tests ranging from K = 1 to K = 10.
Genetic diversity, referred to as expected heterozygosity (HE), was calculated as , where pi is the frequency of the ith allele for k alleles. Observed heterozygosity (HO) and HE for each locus were estimated using Genepop version 4.7.5 [41]. Finally, to estimate the overall genetic divergence among subpopulations within the cape gooseberry germplasm collection, the genetic differentiation (FST) and fixation (FIS) indices were calculated using the software mentioned above.
Results
SNP calling and dataset selection
Two major categories were used for SNP calling, using independent assemblies with the tomato and potato genomes, and the cape gooseberry transcriptome, based on whether or not common tags were used. For those SNP calls derived without common tags, around 9 million tags were generated. Between 91,692 and 6,189 SNPs within each reference genome/transcriptome were identified (Table 3) with an average depth of 6.3. As expected, with less stringent parameters (mnLCov = 0.1, and mnScov = 0.1), the percentage of missing data was higher, ranging from 44.31 to 48.27%. With more stringent parameters (mnLCov = 0.7, and mnScov = 0.7), the percentage of missing data was reduced by a factor of 10 (4.36 to 4.47%, Table 3). Conversely, the number of heterozygous SNPs was lower, ranging from 16.13% (low parameter values) to 45.57% (high parameter values, Table 3).
Two reference genomes (tomato, potato) and a transcriptome (cape gooseberry) were used for SNP calling.
With common tags, low tag numbers were obtained between tomato, potato and cape gooseberry (379,762), after the Illumina reads alignment (Fig 1). These common tags were later used for SNP calling using the GBS pipeline with the parameters described herein. The SNPs identified with common tags, ranged from 2,285 to 16,986, for high and low parameter values respectively. The percentage of missing data ranged between 4.45 and 43.2%, and an observed heterozygosity between 17.7 and 44.27% (Table 3), for high and low parameter values, respectively.
A common tag refers to a 64 bp read-length that is shared among the three selected species.
Cluster and PCA analyses for cape gooseberry and related taxa
A total of 54 genetic trees were generated, corresponding to each parameter and whether or not common tags were evaluated (Table 3), using the 95 technical replicates and their counterparts within the initial 644 selected individuals. The parameter arrangement with a mnLCov of 0.5 and a mnScov of 0.7 showed the closest genetic distance of all the trees generated, with approximately 70% of the technical replicates grouping in the same cluster as their counterparts. From this parameter combination, a total of 7,425 high quality SNPs (resulting from common tags for P. peruviana transcriptome) were selected to evaluate the clustering pattern in cape gooseberry and related taxa.
The best NJ tree includes six clusters in which clear patterns emerged for the population under study (Fig 2). Cluster A includes two sub-groups comprised of all related taxa. Specifically, group A1 harbors all P. philadelphica accessions and one accession from P. ixocarpa, and A2 harbors two accessions from both P. angulata, and P. floridana, and one accession from both P. pruinosa and P. viscosa. We also observed three P. peruviana accessions (09U207, 09U289 and 09U291) in group A2. Furthermore, most cape gooseberry accessions (including cultivated, weedy, and wild), clustered in five different groups. Clusters B, C, D and E concentrated most accessions from the cape gooseberry producing regions, while cluster F harbors a high number of wild accessions from the Antioquia and Nariño departments of Colombia.
Groups A1 and A2 represent related taxa clusters, and B-F represent five sub-populations within the P. peruviana population. Each branch represents an individual plant.
Moreover, the PCA revealed that the first three principal components explained 29% of the total variance, in which the first component contributed for almost all the variance observed, with 21.5%, followed by the second and third component with 4.7% and 2.8%, respectively (Fig 3).
The first three components uncovered four clusters. Most P. peruviana accessions grouped in two clusters at the main centroid (B and C, black dots), and the related taxa were located in two separate clusters (A1 and A2, red dots).
In Fig 3, each cluster represents a distinctive cape gooseberry and related taxa grouping pattern. Clusters B and C include most of the cultivated accessions coming from the main cape gooseberry producing regions in Colombia (Boyacá, Cundinamarca, Antioquia and Nariño departments). In contrast, clusters A1 and A2 contain mostly related taxa. Specifically, group A1 harbors all P. philadelphica accessions and one accession from P. ixocarpa, while Group A2 includes P. angulata, P. floridana, P. pruinosa and P. viscosa as well as three P. peruviana accessions (09U207, 09U289 and 09U291, S1 Table) as observed in the NJ tree.
Population structure and genetic diversity in cape gooseberry
To further analyze the population structure and genetic diversity within P peruviana, the related taxa and P. peruviana accessions clustering in sub-groups A1 and A2 in the NJ and PCA analyses were removed. The cross-validation procedure implemented in ADMIXTURE enabled the identification of five subpopulations within P. peruviana (K = 5, Fig 4), in accordance to the number of clusters shown in the NJ tree for this species (Fig 2). In Fig 5, subpopulations B and D include accessions mostly from the Colombian departments with the largest cape gooseberry production (Cundinamarca and Boyacá), while group E includes most accessions from southern Colombia (Nariño and Valle) and international repositories (Ecuador, New Zeeland, India and Nepal). Groups C and F combine accessions from all over Colombia, with slightly high accession numbers coming from Boyacá and Nariño in group C. Regarding the state of cultivation, groups B and C gather mostly cultivated accessions; group C contains a moderate number of weedy accessions. However, there were a high number of accessions with neither geographical origin (subpopulation C and F) nor state of cultivation (all subpopulations) information, preventing the full categorization of each subpopulation according to their passport data.
The smallest cross validation error value was observed when K = 5.
Five subpopulations were classified based on ancestry values.
The genetic diversity estimated here as the average HE per locus was relatively high within P. peruviana subpopulations, ranging from 0.35 to 0.36 (Table 4). In contrast, the FIS values were low, ranging from -0.11 to -0.01 (Table 4). These results indicate an excess of heterozygosity within P. peruviana in agreement with the mixed mating system characteristic of the species. The HO values ranged from 0.37 to 0.41 (Table 4). These values did not differ substantially from the HE values reported, suggesting that P. peruviana could be close to a Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium due to the lack of distinct groups and high allele sharing.
These results were further supported by the genetic differentiation between the five subpopulations detected by ADMIXTURE. The FST correlation values among subpopulations uncovered a low genetic differentiation within P. peruviana, with FST values ranging from 0.01 to 0.05 (Table 5), revealing a high gene flow within the species. Similar diversity and population differentiation results were also observed when the P. peruviana was grouped according to geographic origin (S2 and S3 Tables).
Discussion
Molecular markers have allowed the detailed study of germplasm collections, revealing the history of crop domestication, discovering novel genetic diversity [42], and improving the efficiency of conventional plant breeding schemes through marker-assisted and genomic selection [43–45]. Markers such as COSIIs, IRGs, and SSRs have been used for genetic diversity studies in Colombian cape gooseberry populations, due to their highly polymorphic nature [22, 46]. However, the use of SNP markers is now more common to characterize the genetic diversity of germplasm collections, considering its abundance, reproducibility, discriminative power, and cost-effectiveness [47]. In this study, a standardized GBS pipeline was chosen to identify a new set of SNP markers, in order to evaluate a large Colombian germplasm collection of cape gooseberry.
GBS represents an innovative method for large scale SNP detection and genotyping of genetic resources [29]. In an orphan species such as cape gooseberry, molecular markers derived from high throughput sequencing technologies like GBS have allowed, in a cost-effective and time-efficient way, access to its genetic diversity and population structure [31, 32]. It has also permitted the identification of genes related to the resistance response to Foph [31] and quality-related traits [32] through genome-wide association studies (GWAS) in a small P. peruviana germplasm collection.
Intermediate call SNP rates, technical replicates and passport data allowed for the selection of SNP datasets
In NGS and GBS studies, one of the most important applications is the ability to accurately and comprehensively identify genetic variation. Obtaining unbiased results usually requires a complex multi-step processing pipeline that includes pre-processing, read alignment, and variant calling. Each of these steps uses its own set of modifiable parameters, creating a significant amount of possible distinct pipelines, which vary significantly in the resulting called variants [48]. Therefore, evaluating the performance of calling methods is not straightforward and particular metrics and data sets can introduce bias into the performance test. Although previous studies in cape gooseberry obtained a high number of markers [31, 32], there is a need to optimize the SNP calling pipeline by increasing population size, as well as ensuring technical replicates to test for appropriate parameter algorithms. Here, we proposed the use of the available P. peruviana transcriptome assembly [49], for reads alignment, due to the absence of a high-quality genome for this species. Furthermore, we leveraged the common tags (64 bp reads) among well annotated genomes from the Solanaceae genus (S. lycopersicum and S. tuberosum) and P. peruviana to reduce the bias caused by the large amount of repetitive sequences, structural variations, and complex polyploid genomes present in plants [50]. In particular, cape gooseberry represents a mixed-ploidy genome as has been shown by classic cytogenetic analyses [2, 51]. In addition, the use of intermediate stringent parameters (mnLCov: 0.5 and mnScov: 0.7) was useful to decrease the missing data and the underestimation of diversity because of the presence-absence variations [52, 53]. As a consequence, the selected intermediate strict parameters had a reliable effect on population clustering, as was verified by the grouping of the 95 technical replicates with high genetic distance congruence (70%).
These parameters were selected based upon their ability to call SNPs in terms of read and taxon coverage, using additional values below and above to those reported in previous studies for cape gooseberry [31, 32]. Similarly, given the nature of the germplasm collection, in which related taxa were also included, the use of the aforementioned parameters and stringent mnMAF value (5%), could contribute to reduced false SNP calling and error rates, as well as homozygosity overestimation.
Moreover, the use of reference genomes to identify additional sources of diversity that went undetected when using a single reference, as has been previously used in similar species like tomato [54], was an advantage in this study. Considering the lack of reference genome in cape gooseberry, the strategy of combining related reference genomes and the use of common tags, based on the well-known synteny between the Solanaceae species (Table 1) [55], has been valuable.
The standardized GBS pipeline allowed to differentiate the Physalis species in the germplasm under study
The NJ tree and PCA analyses enabled the identification of two main groups, containing P. peruviana and related taxa, as reported in previous studies [22, 31]. However, unlike those studies, the NJ tree and PCA allowed the differentiation of the related taxa into two subgroups, separating P. philadelphica and P. ixocarpa accessions from the others (Figs 2 and 3).
The Physalis genus, a member of the plant family Solanaceae, includes more than 90 commercial and ornamental species with high morphological diversity [56]. For this reason, different morphological and molecular studies have been carried out in order to resolve the relationships between the Physalis species. In concordance with the present study, Hu et al. [57] reported a closer phylogenetic relationship between P. floridana and P. peruviana than between P. peruviana with P. philadelphica using chloroplast markers. Similarly, a recent study that used complete chloroplast genomes conducted by Fen et al. [58] identified a close similarity between P. angulata and P. peruviana genomes. Both results were found in the NJ and PCA analyses reported in this study (Figs 2 and 3). Finally, the results of this study are further supported by the research conducted by Beest et al. [59]. Based on 22 morphological traits, it was found that P. philadelphica was close to P. ixocarpa, clustering apart from P. pruinose and P. viscosa, which were grouped with P. peruviana.
In particular, P. peruviana and P. philadelphica are considered the species with the most significant advances in their cultivation within the Physalis genus [26, 60]. However, the former has a center of diversification in the Andean Mountains of South America [61, 62], while the latter has a center of diversification located in North America and Central America [56, 60, 63], which is supported by this study where the two species were separated into different clusters. Overall, the results of this study demonstrated the usefulness of the common tags-derived SNPs to assess the genetic relationships in the Physalis genus.
The PCA revealed a grouping pattern in which most cape gooseberry cultivated accessions clustered together. However, the NJ tree uncovered additional subgroups (subpopulations B-F) within P. peruviana. Three P. peruviana accessions grouped with the related taxa subgroup A2, in both PCA and NJ analyses. These accessions are from the Nariño (09U207) and Tolima (09U291) departments of Colombia, and Poland (09U289). In another study based on orthologous genes Wei et al. [23], found that three P. peruviana accessions cluster together with related taxa (such as P. philadelphica and P. angulata). One of these accessions corresponds to the 09U289 (PI28570597GI) from Poland, supporting the grouping pattern obtained in this study. Additionally, one possible explanation of finding P. peruviana accessions grouping together with related taxa could be associated to misclassifications within the cape gooseberry germplasm collection as previously reported [22, 31]. For this reason, the above-mentioned accessions were removed for the P. peruviana population structure and diversity analyses.
Cape gooseberry exhibits high genetic diversity with low population differentiation
The population structure analyses using ADMIXTURE did not show a clear separation among P. peruviana accessions neither by geographical origin nor by state of cultivation, as observed in other studies [22, 31, 32]. Likewise, the HE values indicates a high diversity within this species, possibly as the sum of multiple factors including mixed ploidy, heterozygosity, mating system, and marker informativeness. The HE values in this study agree with those found for the same species using SNP, SSR and COSII markers [23, 26]. However, depending on the molecular marker nature, marker number, and population size, different genetic diversity values have been reported for P. peruviana germplasm collections. For instance, low HE values (0.22–0.25) have been uncovered in a small cape gooseberry population using random amplified polymorphic DNA and SSRs markers [20, 26], in which the dominant nature and population size, respectively, could underestimate the real genetic diversity. Furthermore, the seed movement of cultivated material between the different production regions may contribute to obtaining low FST values (0.01 to 0.05, Table 5) in this study, leading consequently to high homogenous but heterozygous cape gooseberry materials across production regions as revealed by the FIS and FST values (Tables 4 and 5) and the HO/HE values. Based on the diversity and genetic differentiation analyses using subpopulations derived from ADMIXTURE as well as geographical origin (S2 and S3 Tables), we obtained very similar findings, regardless of the clustering strategy. These results provide evidence of high allele sharing amongst subpopulations given the similar allele frequencies. Therefore, we inferred that the P. peruviana population could be behaving close to HWE, in accordance with its outcrossing nature and the fact that it has not undergone a domestication process [2, 3].
Implications for cape gooseberry conservation and breeding
Characterizing plant genetic diversity is an important challenge, considering that diversity is a source of novel allele combinations that can be crucial for addressing climate and health challenges, ensuring food security, and improving nutrition of future generations. As a fruit crop, cape gooseberry possesses a remarkable gene pool that could be leveraged for germplasm conservation, human nutrition, and biotechnology applications. In this study, we characterize a large primary P. peruviana and related Physalis species germplasm collection that potentially represent secondary or tertiary gene pools that could increase the genetic variability needed to address future challenges for cape gooseberry production and value-chain.
As a member of the Solanaceae family, P. peruviana was proven in this study to be a representative example of the high diversity present in this family. The NJ and PCA analyses discriminate a germplasm collection with two main groups (related taxa and P. peruviana, Figs 2 and 3) and within P. peruviana five different subpopulations (Fig 4) with high genetic diversity (Table 4). Similarly, the FST pairwise revealed a relatively high gene flow between P. peruviana subpopulations regardless of the grouping method (i.e. ancestry or geographical origin, Table 5, S2 and S3 Tables) as has been found in previous studies [22].
Likewise, the results support a common origin in cultivated P. peruviana, given the distribution of the accessions within the different subpopulations as revealed by the FIS values (Table 4). This statement is also supported by the inability to clearly classify these accessions according to their passport data as observed in ADMIXTURE given the similar allele frequencies within the P. peruviana subpopulations.
The study also reinforces previous inferences about the transition of cape gooseberry from wild/landrace to a cultivated state by farmer selection [2, 3]. For instance, the Nariño department (with accessions grouped in subpopulation E), considered to be the entry point of cape gooseberry from its center of origin into Colombia [3], presented a mix of wild and cultivated ancestries. These unique combinations, along with the related species diversity, could contain genetic variability that can be used for breeding to increase production, quality, and tolerance against biotic or abiotic factors.
Moreover, this study has implications for proper conservation and classification of cape gooseberry germplasm banks. Thus, the SNP dataset used in the study allowed the identification of potentially misclassified accessions within the cape gooseberry (i.e, cluster A2 in Figs 2 and 3) [22, 31]. Despite the fact that some accessions have poor or missing passport data, the common tags-derived SNPs were sufficient to capture the genetic variability of the population under study. This assessment will contribute to the establishment of core collections based on the GBS-SNP pipeline approximation, for conserving the species variability and diversity for its safeguard and sustainable use.
Conclusions
The results of this study provide a comprehensive insight into the genetic diversity and population structure of a relatively large cape gooseberry repository in Colombia. The population structure and genetic diversity of cape gooseberry was assessed employing a standardizing GBS pipeline, using sequenced genomes from closely related species, as well as transcriptomic information from the same species. Through different SNP-calling parameters, technical replicates and passport data, the selected SNP dataset enabled the separation of P. peruviana from related taxa accessions using the NJ and PCA grouping methods. High genetic diversity but low subpopulation differentiation was observed for P. peruviana. The selection of SNPs derived from common homologue regions between closely annotated related species and cape gooseberry will allow the accurate inference of gene function in future GWAS and genomic selection studies.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Summary of the accessions of the P. peruviana and related taxa collection used in this study.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238383.s001
(XLS)
S2 Table. Average observed heterozigocity (HO), expected heterozigocity (HE) and inbreeding coefficient (FIS) per five P. peruviana subpopulations grouped according to their geographical regions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238383.s002
(XLS)
S3 Table. Pairwise FST estimates among the five P. peruviana subpopulations grouped according to their geographical regions.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238383.s003
(XLS)
Acknowledgments
The authors acknowledge Edgar Jimenez for his support in the in vitro propagation and maintenance of the germplasm collection. The authors thank Ivania Cerón for assistance in revising the final version of the manuscript.
References
- 1. Ramadan MF. Bioactive phytochemicals, nutritional value, and functional properties of cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana): An overview. Food Res Int. 2011;44: 1830–1836.
- 2. Liberato SA, Sánchez-Betancourt E, Argüelles JH, González C, Núñez VM, Barrero LS. Citogenética de genotipos de uchuva, Physalis peruviana L., y Physalis floridana Rydb., con respuesta diferencial a Fusarium oxysporum. Cienc Tecnol Agropecuaria. 2015;15: 51–61.
- 3. Lagos T. Biología reproductiva, citogenética, diversidad genética y heterosis en parentales de uvilla o uchuva Physalis peruviana L. Universidad Nacional de Colombia. Palmira, Colombia. 2006.
- 4. Hardigan MA, Laimbeer FPE, Newton L, Crisovan E, Hamilton JP, Vaillancourt B, et al. Genome diversity of tuber-bearing Solanum uncovers complex evolutionary history and targets of domestication in the cultivated potato. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114: E9999 LP–E10008. pmid:29087343
- 5. Giovannoni J. Tomato multiomics reveals consequences of crop domestication and improvement. Cell. 2018;172: 6–8. pmid:29328921
- 6. Wu S-J, Ng L-T, Huang Y-M, Lin D-L, Wang S-S, Huang S-N, et al. Antioxidant activities of Physalis peruviana. Biol Pharm Bull. 2005;28: 963–966. pmid:15930727
- 7. Deng K, Zang L, Lan X, Zhong Z, Xiong B, Zhang Y, et al. Antioxidant components from cape gooseberry. J Food Process Pres. 2016;40: 893–898.
- 8. Ballesteros-Vivas D, Alvarez-Rivera G, León C, Morantes SJ, Ibánez E, Parada-Alfonso F, et al. Anti-proliferative bioactivity against HT-29 colon cancer cells of a withanolides-rich extract from golden berry (Physalis peruviana L.) calyx investigated by Foodomics. J Funct. 2019;63: 103567.
- 9.
Puente L, Nocetti D, Espinosa A. Physalis peruviana Linnaeus, an update on its functional properties and beneficial effects in human health. In: Mariod AA, editor. Wild Fruits: Composition, Nutritional Value and Products. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2019. pp. 447–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-31885-7_34
- 10. Rodrigues E, Rockenbach II, Cataneo C, Gonzaga LV, Chaves ES, Fett R. Minerals and essential fatty acids of the exotic fruit Physalis peruviana L. Ciênc Tecnol Aliment. 2009;29: 642–645.
- 11. Menzel MY. The Cytotaxonomy and genetics of Physalis. Proc Am Philos Soc. 1951;95: 132–183. Available: www.jstor.org/stable/3143331
- 12.
National Research Council. Goldenberry (Cape Gooseberry). Popenoe H, King S, León J, Kalinowski L, editors. Lost crops of the Incas: little-known plants of the Andes with promise for worldwide cultivation. Washington, DC: National Academy Press; 1989. https://doi.org/10.17226/1398
- 13. Agronet. Reportes estadísticos [Internet]. 2020.
- 14. Fischer G, Almanza-Merchan PJ, Miranda D. Importancia y cultivo de la uchuva (Physalis peruviana L.). Rev Bras Frutic. 2014;36: 1–15.
- 15.
Smith A. Reconocimiento de las enfermedades y plagas en el cultivo de la uchuva. In: Diaz A, Smith A, Zapata J, Mesa P, editors. Avances en el manejo y control de Fusarium oxysporum en el cultivo de uchuva (Physalis peruviana). Bogota, Colombia: Produmedios; 2012. pp. 9–12.
- 16. Simbaqueba J, Catanzariti A-M, González C, Jones DA. Evidence for horizontal gene transfer and separation of effector recognition from effector function revealed by analysis of effector genes shared between cape gooseberry and tomato-infecting formae speciales of Fusarium oxysporum. Mol Plant Pathol. 2018;19: 2302–2318. pmid:29786161
- 17. Odong TL, van Heerwaarden J, Jansen J, van Hintum TJL, van Eeuwijk F a. Determination of genetic structure of germplasm collections: are traditional hierarchical clustering methods appropriate for molecular marker data? Theor Appl Genet. 2011;123: 195–205. pmid:21472410
- 18. Henry RJ. Genomics strategies for germplasm characterization and the development of climate resilient crops. Front Plant Sci. 2014;5: 68. pmid:24616732
- 19. Nadeem MA, Nawaz MA, Shahid MQ, Doğan Y, Comertpay G, Yıldız M, et al. DNA molecular markers in plant breeding: current status and recent advancements in genomic selection and genome editing. Biotechnol Biotechnol Equip. 2018;32: 261–285.
- 20. Bonilla M, Piedrahíta K, Posso A, Vásquez H, Muñoz J. Caracterización molecular de 43 accesiones de uchuva de seis departamentos de Colombia. Acta Agron. 2008;57: 109–116.
- 21. Morillo AT, Villota DE, Lagos TC, Ordóñez HR. Morphological and molecular characterization of 18 introductions of cape gooseberry Physalis peruviana L. collection of the University of Nariño. Rev Fac Nac Agron Medellín. 2011;64: 6043–6053.
- 22. Garzón-Martínez GA, Osorio-Guarín JA, Delgadillo-Durán P, Mayorga F, Enciso-Rodríguez FE, Landsman D, et al. Genetic diversity and population structure in Physalis peruviana and related taxa based on InDels and SNPs derived from COSII and IRG markers. Plant Gene. 2015;4: 29–37. pmid:26550601
- 23. Wei J, Hu X, Yang J, Yang W. Identification of single-Copy orthologous genes between Physalis and Solanum lycopersicum and analysis of genetic diversity in Physalis using molecular markers. PLoS One. 2012;7: E50164. pmid:23166835
- 24. Spindel J, Wright M, Chen C, Cobb J, Gage J, Harrington S, et al. Bridging the genotyping gap: using genotyping by sequencing (GBS) to add high-density SNP markers and new value to traditional bi-parental mapping and breeding populations. Theor Appl Genet. 2013;126: 2699–2716. pmid:23918062
- 25. Berdugo J, Enciso-Rodríguez F, González C, Barrero M. LS. Variabilidad genética de parentales y poblaciones F1 inter e intraespecíficas de Physalis peruviana L. y P. floridana Rydb. Rev Bras Frutic. 2015;37: 179–192.
- 26. Chacón MI, Sánchez Y del P, Barrero LS. Genetic structure of a Colombian cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.) collection by means of microsatellite markers. Agron Colomb. 2016;34: 5–16.
- 27. Kilian B, Graner A. NGS technologies for analyzing germplasm diversity in genebanks. Brief Funct Genomics. 2012;11: 38–50. pmid:22257472
- 28. Yadav P, Vaidya E, Rani R, Yadav NK, Singh BK, Rai PK, et al. Recent perspective of next generation sequencing: applications in molecular plant biology and crop improvement. Proc Natl Acad Sci, India, Sect B Biol Sci. 2018;88: 435–449.
- 29. Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland J a, Kawamoto K, Buckler ES, et al. A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS One. 2011;6: e19379. pmid:21573248
- 30. Scheben A, Batley J, Edwards D. Genotyping-by-sequencing approaches to characterize crop genomes: choosing the right tool for the right application. Plant Biotechnol J. 2017;15: 149–161. pmid:27696619
- 31. Osorio-Guarín JA, Enciso-Rodríguez FE, González C, Fernández-Pozo N, Mueller LA, Barrero LS. Association analysis for disease resistance to Fusarium oxysporum in cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L). BMC Genomics. 2016;17: 248. pmid:26988219
- 32. García-Arias FL, Osorio-Guarín JA, Núñez Zarantes VM. Association study reveals novel genes related to yield and quality of fruit in cape gooseberry (Physalis peruviana L.). Front Plant Sci. 2018. p. 362. pmid:29616069
- 33. Glaubitz JC, Casstevens TM, Lu F, Harriman J, Elshire RJ, Sun Q, et al. TASSEL-GBS: A High Capacity Genotyping by Sequencing Analysis Pipeline. PLoS One. 2014;9: e90346. Available: pmid:24587335
- 34. Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y, Buckler ES. TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics. 2007;23: 2633–2635. pmid:17586829
- 35. Sato S, Tabata S, Hirakawa H, Asamizu E, Shirasawa K, Isobe S. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature. 2012;485. pmid:22660326
- 36. Xu X, Pan S, Cheng S, Zhang B, Mu D, Ni P, et al. Genome sequence and analysis of the tuber crop potato. Nature. 2011;475: 189–195. pmid:21743474
- 37. Garzón-Martínez GA, Zhu ZI, Landsman D, Barrero LS, Mariño-Ramírez L. The Physalis peruviana leaf transcriptome: assembly, annotation and gene model prediction. BMC genomics. 2012;13: 151. pmid:22533342
- 38. Saitou N, Nei M. The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987;4: 406–425. pmid:3447015
- 39.
R Core Team. R: A Language and environment for statistical computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria; 2015. Available: https://www.r-project.org
- 40. Alexander DH, Novembre J, Lange K. Fast model-based estimation of ancestry in unrelated individuals. Genome Res. 2009;19: 1655–64. pmid:19648217
- 41. Rousset F. Genepop’007: a complete re-implementation of the genepop software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008;8: 103–106. pmid:21585727
- 42. Bevan MW, Uauy C, Wulff BBH, Zhou J, Krasileva K, Clark MD. Genomic innovation for crop improvement. Nature. 2017;543: 346–354. pmid:28300107
- 43. de los Campos G, Hickey JM, Pong-Wong R, Daetwyler HD, Calus MPL. Whole-genome regression and prediction methods applied to plant and animal breeding. Genetics. 2013;193: 327 LP– 345. pmid:22745228
- 44. Crossa J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Cuevas J, Montesinos-López O, Jarquín D, de los Campos G, et al. Genomic selection in plant breeding: methods, models, and perspectives. Trends Plant Sci. 2017;22: 961–975. pmid:28965742
- 45.
Kamaluddin Khan MA, Kiran U, Ali A, Abdin MZ, Zargar MY, et al. Molecular markers and marker-assisted selection in crop plants. In: Abdin MZ, Kiran U, Kamaluddin , Ali A, editors. Plant Biotechnology: Principles and Applications. Singapore: Springer Singapore; 2017. pp. 295–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-2961-5_12
- 46. Simbaqueba J, Sanchez P, Sanchez E, Nunez Zarantes VM, Chacon MI, Barrero LS, et al. Development and characterization of microsatellite markers for the Cape gooseberry Physalis peruviana. PloS One. 2011;6: 26719. pmid:22039540
- 47. Chang L-Y, Toghiani S, Ling A, Aggrey SE, Rekaya R. High density marker panels, SNPs prioritizing and accuracy of genomic selection. BMC Genetics. 2018;19: 4. pmid:29304753
- 48. Pabinger S, Dander A, Fischer M, Snajder R, Sperk M, Efremova M, et al. A survey of tools for variant analysis of next-generation genome sequencing data. Briefings in bioinformatics. 2013/01/21. Oxford University Press; 2014;15: 256–278. pmid:23341494
- 49. Garzon G, Zhu I, Landsman D, Barrero L, Marino-Ramirez L. The Physalis peruviana leaf transcriptome: assembly, annotation and gene model prediction. BMC genomics. 2012;13. pmid:22533342
- 50. Schatz MC, Witkowski J, McCombie WR. Current challenges in de novo plant genome sequencing and assembly. Genome Biol. 2012;13: 243. pmid:22546054
- 51. Trevisani N, Melo RC de, Pierre PMO, Colli MP, Coimbra JLM, Guidolin AF. Ploidy and DNA content of cape gooseberry populations grown in southern Brazil. Caryologia. 2018;71: 414–419.
- 52. Gabur I, Chawla HS, Lopisso DT, von Tiedemann A, Snowdon RJ, Obermeier C. Gene presence-absence variation associates with quantitative Verticillium longisporum disease resistance in Brassica napus. Sci Rep. 2020;10: 4131. pmid:32139810
- 53. Zhang L, Luo H, Liu Z-Q, Yi Z, Luo J-C, Hao D-Y, et al. Genome-wide patterns of large-size presence/absence variants in sorghum. J Integr Plant Biol. 2014;56: 24–37. pmid:24428208
- 54. Wu X, Heffelfinger C, Zhao H, Dellaporta SL. Benchmarking variant identification tools for plant diversity discovery. BMC Genomics. 2019;20: 701. pmid:31500583
- 55.
Frary A, Doganlar S, Frary A. Synteny Among Solanaceae Genomes BT—The Tomato Genome. In: Causse M, Giovannoni J, Bouzayen M, Zouine M, editors. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg; 2016. pp. 217–243. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-53389-5_12
- 56. Vargas-Ponce O, Pérez-Álvarez LF, Zamora-Tavares P, Rodríguez A. Assessing genetic diversity in Mexican husk tomato species. Plant Molecular Biology Reporter. 2011;29: 733–738.
- 57. Hu J, Saedler H. Evolution of the Inflated Calyx Syndrome in Solanaceae. Molecular biology and evolution. 2007;24: 2443–2453. pmid:17827172
- 58. Feng S, Zheng K, Jiao K, Cai Y, Chen C, Mao Y, et al. Complete chloroplast genomes of four Physalis species (Solanaceae): lights into genome structure, comparative analysis, and phylogenetic relationships. BMC Plant Biology. 2020;20: 242. pmid:32466748
- 59.
Beest M, Berg , Berg R, Brandenburg W. A taxonomic analysis of the species of Physalis L. (Solanaceae) based on morphological characters. In: Biodiversity, taxonomy and conservation of flowering plants: Calicut, Kerala, India, 1998 / Sivadasan, M and P Mathew—Calicut, Kerala, India: Mentor Books, 1999. 1999.
- 60. Zamora P, Vargas-Ponce O, Sánchez-Martínez J, Cabrera-Toledo D. Diversity and genetic structure of the husk tomato (Physalis philadelphica Lam.) in Western Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2014;62: 141–153.
- 61. Arenas P, Kamienkowski N. Ethnobotany of the Genus Physalis L. (Solanaceae) in the South American Gran Chaco. Candollea. 2013;68.
- 62. Legge AP. Notes on the history, cultivation and uses of Physalis peruviana L. Journal of the Royal Horticultural Society. 1974;99: 310–314.
- 63. Vargas-Ponce O, Sánchez Martínez J, Zamora Tavares M del P, Valdivia Mares LE. Traditional management of a small-scale crop of Physalis angulata in Western Mexico. Genetic Resources and Crop Evolution. 2016;63: 1383–1395.