http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8143-5513
Figures
Abstract
Purpose
Non-traumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a plausible complication in brain tumor patients. Frequent use of corticosteroid therapy, chemotherapy, and oxidative stress for managing brain tumors may be associated with the development of ONFH. However, there is little knowledge on the prevalence and risk factors of ONFH from brain tumor. This study aimed to investigate the prevalence and risk factors of ONFH in patients with primary brain tumors.
Methods
This retrospective cohort study included data from consecutive patients between December 2005 and August 2016 from a tertiary university hospital in South Korea. A total of 73 cases of ONFH were identified among 10,674 primary brain tumor patients. After excluding subjects (25 out of 73) with missing data, history of alcohol consumption or smoking, history of femoral bone trauma or surgery, comorbidities such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), sickle cell disease, cancer patients other than brain tumor, and previous diagnosis of contralateral ONFH, we performed a 1:2 propensity score-matched, case–control study (ONFH group, 48; control group, 96). Risk factors of ONFH in primary brain tumor were evaluated by univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses.
Results
The prevalence of ONFH in patients with surgical resection of primary brain tumor was 683.9 per 100,000 persons (73 of 10,674). In this cohort, 55 of 74 patients (74.3%) underwent THA for ONFH treatment. We found that diabetes was an independent factor associated with an increased risk of ONFH in primary brain tumor patients (OR = 7.201, 95% CI, 1.349–38.453, p = 0.021). There was a significant difference in univariate analysis, including panhypopituitarism (OR = 4.394, 95% CI, 1.794–11.008, p = 0.002), supratentorial location of brain tumor (OR = 2.616, 95% CI, 1.245–5.499, p = 0.011), and chemotherapy (OR = 2.867, 95% CI, 1.018–8.069, p = 0.046).
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that the prevalence of ONFH after surgical resection of primary brain tumor was 0.68%. Diabetes was an independent risk factor for developing ONFH, whereas corticosteroid dose was not. Routine screening for brain tumor-associated ONFH is not recommended; however, a high index of clinical suspicion in these patients at risk may allow for early intervention and preservation of the joints.
Citation: Lim S-J, Yeo I, Park C-W, Lee H, Park Y-S, Lee J-I (2020) Risk factors for osteonecrosis of the femoral head in brain tumor patients receiving corticosteroid after surgery. PLoS ONE 15(9): e0238368. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0238368
Editor: Stuart Barry Goodman, Stanford University, UNITED STATES
Received: May 15, 2020; Accepted: August 15, 2020; Published: September 3, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Lim et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: We agree with PLOS ONE policy that there are no restrictions in the data availability. All relevant data are included in Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: Youn-Soo Park is a paid consultant for DePuy Synthes and Corentec and has received royalties for Corentec products. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Introduction
Osteonecrosis of the femoral head (ONFH) is a debilitating complication associated with an interruption of the blood supply to a segment of the femoral head, which subsequently undergoes necrosis and collapse, irreversible destruction of the hip joint, and leading to total hip arthroplasty (THA) [1, 2]. Non-traumatic ONFH is thought to be a multifactorial disease. Although corticosteroid exposure and alcohol abuse are considered major risk factors, other factors such as sickle cell disease, systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), Caisson disease, HIV and smoking are also associated [3, 4]. The pathogenesis of ONFH remains unclear, however, several reports have suggested possible pathogenesis, such as abnormality of lipid metabolism, thrombosis, and oxidative stress [5–7]. Several cancer treatment regimens also have been reported to be associated with the development of osteonecrosis, including radiation therapy; corticosteroid medications; immunotherapy, including anti-angiogenic agents; and several chemotherapeutic agents [8, 9].
Non-traumatic ONFH is recognized as a potential complication in solid-tumor cancer patients receiving treatment with or without corticosteroids therapy [9–14]. Corticosteroids, a known risk factor for ONFH, are frequently used primarily to suppress peritumor edema and the mass effect in brain tumor patients [15]. For this, few observational studies evaluated the risk of ONFH in brain tumor patients receiving perioperative corticosteroid [16]. Furthermore, pituitary dysfunction, a devastating sequelae of brain tumor, has been reported to be associated with ONFH in brain tumor patients [17, 18]. Recently, Lim et al. reported favorable clinical results and high patient satisfaction in total hip arthroplasty (THA) performed on corticosteroid-induced ONFH after surgical removal of a primary brain tumor [19].
As the long-term survival of patients with solid tumors increases, the prevalence of brain tumor-related ONFH may also increase. Patients should be informed that ONFH is a potential complication of brain tumor treatment. Measures to reduce risk should be taken, and patients should be monitored for early symptoms. It also appears that patients at higher risk for ONFH are identifiable. However, the clinical relationship between ONFH and brain tumor has not been fully characterized. In this study, we investigated (1) the prevalence of ONFH in primary brain tumor patients to describe patient characteristics related to the development of ONFH, and (2) identified risk factors of ONFH in these patients.
Materials and methods
Study design
This was a retrospective comparative, propensity score-matched study using the medical records of Samsung Medical Center, a tertiary referral hospital in Korea. The first objective of this study was to estimate the prevalence of ONFH in primary brain tumor patients. All consecutive patients who underwent treatment for a brain tumor between December 2005 and August 2016 (n = 13,171) were included initially. Before evaluating the prevalence of ONFH from these population, we excluded patients who were diagnosed with metastatic brain tumors, and lost to regular outpatient follow-up (n = 2,497), resulting in final 10,674 primary brain tumor patients population. Among this population, we identified the number of patients with newly developed ONFH during the outpatient follow-up period after brain tumor treatment. Demographic information (age, sex, BMI), comorbidities, and the data on diagnosis and treatment of brain tumor and ONFH were collected from the hospital information or medical record system. We described characteristics of primary brain tumor patients with newly developed ONFH.
Our second objective of this study was to investigate risk factors of ONFH in primary brain tumor patients by comparing two groups using propensity score matched case-control study. Patients with newly developed ONFH were regarded as the ONFH group (case group), and patients without ONFH were regarded as the control group. To minimize factors other than those related to primary brain tumor itself and its treatment, we excluded cases (n = 25) with missing data, history of alcohol consumption, smoking, femoral bone trauma, or surgery, comorbidities such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), sickle cell disease, cancer patients other than brain tumor, and previous diagnosis of contralateral ONFH from initial case group (n = 73) before entering the propensity score matching process (Fig 1). The baseline characteristics of the brain tumor patients with and without ONFH were obtained from the latest hospital electronic chart.
ONFH, osteonecrosis of the femoral head.
Statistical analysis
Data are expressed as the mean and standard deviation for normally distributed continuous variables and as absolute numbers and percentages for categorical variables. Continuous variables were compared between the groups using the Student’s t-test or Wilcoxon rank-sum test. The chi-square or Fisher’s exact test was used to compare the distributions of categorical values between the groups. A 1:2 propensity score matching was performed to reduce potential bias between ONFH and control groups. A propensity score was generated for all patients using the logistic regression model. Variables used in this model included age, sex, body mass index (BMI), and follow-up period. We performed caliper matching on the propensity score (nearest available match). Pairs on the propensity score logit were matched within 0.2 standard deviation. Matching was performed by the minimal adjacent method of 1:2 pairing. Odds ratios (ORs) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses to determine risk factors of ONFH from primary brain tumor. The variables examined included the cumulative dose of corticosteroid (mg of corticosteroid as dexamethasone equivalents), comorbid conditions (diabetes and panhypopituitarism), location of the brain tumor (supratentorial or infratentorial), use of gamma knife surgery, brain radiotherapy, chemotherapy, and tumor removal surgery. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed by selecting variables that showed statistically significant difference through univariate logistic regression analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using SPSS Statistics, version 25.0 software (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY, USA). P-values <0.05 were considered significant.
Ethical approval
This study was conducted under the approval of the institutional review board (IRB) of Samsung Medical Center (IRB Number: 2019-08-017). Because this study was a non-interventional retrospective study and all data were analyzed anonymously, the IRB waived the need for individual informed consent.
Results
Prevalence of ONFH in primary brain tumor patients
The first objective of current study was to investigate the prevalence of ONFH in primary brain tumor patients. A total of 13,171 patients undergoing treatment for brain tumor between December 2005 and August 2016 were identified in our hospital. Patients who meet the initial exclusion criteria (n = 2,497) were excluded from this analysis; resulting in 10,674 patients with a primary brain tumor. Among them, we identified 73 patients (55 bilateral ONFHs in 73 patients) with newly developed ONFH during this study period (Fig 2), indicating that the prevalence of ONFH in primary brain tumor was 0.68%. The baseline characteristics of primary brain tumor patient with newly developed ONFH (n = 73) were as following: the mean age, BMI, and follow-up period after the brain tumor diagnosis were 42.11 (range, 16–59) years, 24.26 (range, 16–38) kg/m2, and 1,686.25 (range, 42–4,075) days, respectively. For the treatment of ONFH, 55 of 73 patients (75.3%) underwent THA on average 464.85 (range, 44–3522) days after the onset of hip pain.
(A, B) Brain magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of a 25-year old woman who had generalized tonic–clonic seizures, revealed a tumor in the left frontal lobe. She was diagnosed with pathology-confirmed diffuse astrocytoma by navigation-guided biopsy. She received a total of 105 mg dexamethasone and underwent brain radiotherapy. (C, D) The patient suffered from hip pain 2 years after the astrocytoma diagnosis. Anteroposterior hip radiograph and MRI show osteonecrosis of the femoral head involving both hips.
Risk factors related to ONFH in primary brain tumor patients
The second objective of this study was to determine risk factors of ONFH in primary brain tumor. The specific diagnoses of primary brain tumors are described in Table 1, and there was no statistically difference between two groups. Baseline characteristics such as age, sex, BMI, and follow-up period were similar between the two groups (P > 0.05). The baseline characteristics of the matched patient cohorts are summarized in Table 2.
For patients in the ONFH group, hip pain occurred after 766.77 (range, 43–2,331) days and ONFH was diagnosed after 935.08 (range, 86–2,556) days from the date of brain tumor diagnosis. In the ONFH group, the mean cumulative dose of corticosteroid (mg of corticosteroid as a dexamethasone equivalent) and the mean number of tumor removal surgeries were 309.49 mg (range, 0–1073 mg) and 1.15 (range, 0–2), respectively. Corticosteroids were administered within 24 hours after brain tumor surgery in 95.83% in the ONFH group and in 94.79% in the control group. In the ONFH group, the diagnosis of ONFH was made after 899.32 (range, 78–2,431) days from the date of brain tumor surgery. The proportions of the ONFH group with diabetes, panhypopituitarism, and supratentorial location of the tumor were 14.58%, 31.25%, and 43.75%, respectively. The proportions of the ONFH group who received gamma knife surgery, brain radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were 16.67%, 31.25%, and 10.42%, respectively. Specific chemotherapeutic agents in patients with chemotherapy after brain tumor surgery are listed in Table 3.
Regarding the risk factors of ONFH in primary brain tumor, there was a significant difference in univariate analysis, including in diabetes (OR = 8.024, 95% CI, 1.598–40.294, p = 0.011), panhypopituitarism (OR = 4.394, 95% CI, 1.794–11.008, p = 0.002), supratentorial location of brain tumor (OR = 2.616, 95% CI, 1.245–5.499, p = 0.011), and chemotherapy (OR = 2.867, 95% CI, 1.018–8.069, p = 0.046), while the cumulative dose of corticosteroid, the number of brain tumor surgeries, gamma knife surgery, and brain radiotherapy were not (Table 4). The multivariate logistic regression model revealed that diabetes (OR = 7.201, 95% CI: 1.349–38.453, p = 0.021) was an independent risk factors for ONFH in primary brain tumor patients (Table 5).
Discussion
ONFH is a devitalizing bone disease, characterized by collapse of the femoral head and subsequent loss of hip joint function [3, 4]. Numerous risk factors are associated with non-traumatic ONFH, including alcohol consumption and corticosteroid therapy [20, 21]. Additionally, fat cell hypertrophy, fat embolization, intravascular coagulation [1], and osteocyte apoptosis [22] have been suggested as important hypotheses for pathogenetic mechanism of ONFH. Several studies have investigated the association between ONFH and specific diseases to understand the pathogenesis of non-traumatic ONFH, in which bone cell death from compromised microvascular circulation is believed the result of trauma, corticosteroid, alcohol use, blood dyscrasias as well as other conditions such as Gaucher disease, Caisson disease, HIV, SLE, radiation treatment, pregnancy, inflammatory bowel disease, gout, smoking, and even malignant tumors [23–32]. Regarding the association with solid tumor, ONFH has been recognized as a complication of cancer chemotherapy for testicular, breast, ovarian, small-cell lung cancer and osteosarcoma, with prolonged and intensive steroid exposure usually implicated as the main risk factor [11–14, 33–35]. Despite chemotherapy and corticosteroid therapy frequently conducted for brain tumor treatment, insufficient studies have been performed to assess the association between ONFH and brain tumor. Only a few case reports and retrospective observational studies have been performed [16, 36–38], however, there is limited clinical information available regarding the relationship between ONFH and brain tumor. Although THA, a definitive surgical treatment for ONFH, can be a reliable one in brain tumor patients [19], ONFH occurring in brain tumor are still a grave concern for neurosurgeons as well as related professionals.
This study demonstrated a higher prevalence of ONFH in brain tumor patients (683.90 per 100,000) compared to those in previous studies conducted for general population with same ethnicity. Previous studies have reported ONFH prevalence per 100,000 persons among the general population as 28.91 in Korea (n = 14,103) and 8.92 in Japan (n = 11,400) [39–41]. Recent literature suggests that a sizable number of patients with a primary brain tumor suffer from corticosteroid-induced ONFH. Wong et al. [16] reported four cases of ONFH among 1,352 patients administered short-duration high-dose corticosteroid treatment. The risk of developing ONFH was 0.3%, with an incidence of 1 per 1,000 patient-years (4/total number of patients per year). Among the known risk factors of ONFH, the corticosteroid has been frequently used in brain tumor treatment for managing cerebral edema [21]. It is in this context that many neurosurgeons are concerned with corticosteroid-induced ONFH following in these patients. In terms of corticosteroid use, none of patients in this study meet the latest criteria of corticosteroid-induced ONFH [42], however, it has been recently emphasized that ONFH can occur even in those on low physiological corticosteroid replacement doses, most likely due to a combination of factors, including genetic susceptibility, corticosteroid dosage, and underlying condition [23, 25, 43]. In addition, oxidative stress, which has been suggested to play a role in the development of ONFH [44–46], might explain partly the association between ONFH and brain tumor. Brain is known to be particularly sensitive to oxidative injury due to the high content of polyunsaturated fatty acids, relatively low antioxidant capacity, low repair activity, the non-replicating nature of neuronal cells, a high rate of oxidative metabolic activity, and overproduction of reactive oxygen species (ROS) metabolites compared to other organs [47] In this study, the mean age of patients diagnosed with ONFH was relatively young, which is consistent with previous studies for the incidence of ONFH [48].
In our patients, hip pain appeared an average of 766.77 (range, 43–2,331) days after, and ONFH was diagnosed 935.08 (range, 86–2,556) days after, diagnosis of the brain tumor. Thus, a time lag occurred between the development of ONFH and its diagnosis. In younger patients, delaying progression with joint-preserving therapy (bisphosphonates, reduction of weight bearing) can reduce the need for multiple joint replacements. Indication for surgical versus non-surgical approach depends on the stage of disease, size of lesion, age and comorbidity of patients [49, 50]. Early detection and intervention are critical for joint-preserving therapy to increase chances of spontaneous resolution. Zhao et al. [51] reported that the median period from corticosteroid therapy to hip pain was 18 months in 269 patients with corticosteroid-induced ONFH and that 67% complained of hip symptoms within 24 months after commencing corticosteroid, which is comparable to our result. However, the time lag reported in this study was slightly longer than what has been reported for corticosteroid-associated ONFH by Koo et al. [52]. They reported that most ONFH occurred during the first 12 months after starting corticosteroid treatment with chemotherapy. The diagnosis of ONFH is often delayed because MRI is not always employed as part of the work-up when patients have pain. More importantly, a large number of ONFH patients remain asymptomatic during the early stage of ONFH. However, most patients who have large to moderate asymptomatic ONFH lesions frequently progress to requiring surgical treatment [53]. In this regard, the observed time from triggering event to hip pain and the diagnosis of ONFH in this study may be used as a practical reference for evaluating brain tumor patients.
In the present study, diabetes was associated with the occurrence of ONFH in primary brain tumor patients, with an OR of 7.201 in a multivariate logistic regression model. Although an insufficient number of studies have been conducted, Lai et al. [54] recently reported that Taiwanese patients with diabetes had a 1.16-fold increased risk for developing ONFH. Most risk factors for non-traumatic ONFH, such as steroid use, alcoholism, infection, marrow infiltrating diseases, coagulation defects, and some autoimmune diseases, are closely related to direct or indirect injuries to the bone vasculature [1, 55]. Microvascular and macrovascular insufficiency is a well-known complication caused by diabetes [56, 57], suggesting that vascular compromise of the femoral head related to diabetes may subsequently lead to ONFH in brain tumor patients [58]. Another potential hypothesis deals with oxidative stress associated with diabetes and brain tumors. Recent studies have implicated oxidative stress as a significant factor in the pathogenesis of vasculopathy and cancers and may have a role in the association between diabetes and ONFH in brain tumor patients. Several studies have supported a hypothesis regarding a role for in vivo oxidative stress in the pathogenesis of ONFH [7, 59, 60].
In contrast to previous studies, the cumulative dose of corticosteroid did not appear to affect the development of ONFH in brain tumor patients in the present study. Based on recently updated classification criteria for corticosteroid-induced ONFH, experts reached a consensus that patients should receive corticosteroid at a cumulative dose of ≥2 g over <3 months [42]. Considering that the corticosteroid doses as dexamethasone equivalents ranged from 0 to 1,073 mg (mean 309.49 mg) in the current study, ONFH that developed in this patient cohort would not meet the newly updated definition of corticosteroid-induced ONFH. However, regarding the role of corticosteroid in the pathogenesis of ONFH, contradictory results have been reported in the literature. Numerous studies have reported corticosteroid as a risk factor for ONFH [29, 61–63], and a few have shown that corticosteroid are not a risk factor for ONFH [64–66]. Although high-dose corticosteroid therapy was often associated with ONFH in patients with autoimmune diseases [40], mega-dose corticosteroid therapy did not induce ONFH in patients with a spinal cord injury [67]. Susceptibility to corticosteroid-induced ONFH may be dependent on multiple factors, including genetic background, the duration or amount of corticosteroid exposure, and underlying diseases [60].
The risk of the occurrence of corticosteroid-induced ONFH in brain tumor patients should not be underestimated. In univariate logistic regression, panhypopituitarism (OR = 4.394, 95% CI, 1.794–11.008, p = 0.002), supratentorial location of brain tumor (OR = 2.616, 95% CI, 1.245–5.499, p = 0.011) were associated with increased risk of ONFH. Our finding is supported by recent reports regarding the occurrence of ONFH in young patients following low-dose corticosteroid replacement therapy for panhypopituitarism secondary to surgery for brain tumors [17, 18]. The occurrence of ONFH with such a low dose of corticosteroid was surprising, however, Tokuhara et al. [68] observed that low levels of corticosteroid metabolising hepatic activity may increase responsiveness to corticosteroid and further risk of corticosteroid-induced osteonecrosis even with low corticosteroid dose in white rabbits.
In this study, chemotherapy was associated with the occurrence of ONFH in primary brain tumor patients (OR = 2.867, 95% CI, 1.018–8.069, p = 0.046). This finding is consistent with previous studies that have reported cytotoxic chemotherapy as a potential risk factor of ONFH in solid-tumor cancer patients [11–14]. Previously, meaningful amount of studies have reported the association between osteonecrosis and chemotherapy in testicular cancer, small cell cancer, breast cancer, ovarian cancer patients, which described the possible underlying pathophysiology and options available for its diagnosis, prevention and treatment [10, 11, 14]. The association between chemotherapeutic agents and osteonecrosis have been well demonstrated especially in pediatric cancer patients [69–71]. Moreover, several studies and case reports described osteonecrosis in a variety of cancers who underwent chemotherapy without receiving radiation or steroid therapy [69, 70, 72–75].
The results of the current study should be interpreted in light of several limitations. First, the retrospective study design risks introducing selection bias. In this study, sufficient data for matching was available in only 48 of the 73 brain tumor patients who were diagnosed with ONFH during the follow-up period among the 10,674 brain tumor patients, as our cohort was not a prospective one. However, we tried to reduce the effect of confounders by excluding cases with missing data, history of alcohol consumption or smoking, history of femoral bone trauma or surgery, comorbidities such as systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), sickle cell disease, cancer patients other than brain tumor, and previous diagnosis of contralateral ONFH. Besides, propensity score matching was conducted to minimize selection bias. Second, the mean age of 36.44 years (1859.95 days) was relatively younger than the peak age of brain tumor onset, which might introduce the negative effect of improper propensity score matching. This can be explained by the fact that ONFH frequently occurs in young and middle-aged people, and also might be partly explained by the limitations of this sort of observational research. In this regard, identified ONFH in this study was confirmed through additional tests such as CT or MRI in the case of newly occurring symptoms such as hip pain or inguinal pain during the observation period of brain tumor patients. Considering the possibility that older patients tended to underreport their symptoms, younger mean age of this study could be interpreted as a possible factor of underestimation of the prevalence of ONFH in brain tumor patients. This might also emphasize the importance of exploring the association of brain tumor and ONFH, the main objective of this study. Lastly, owing to the heterogeneity in brain tumors and limited number of cases with ONFH, it was not possible to conclude whether the type and grade of brain tumor were associated with a greater risk of ONFH. In addition, it was difficult to clarify whether chemotherapy performed with corticosteroid therapy increased or decreased the risk of ONFH in this study. However, this study represents the largest homogenous primary brain tumor cohort with non-traumatic ONFH to date. Only a few studies are available that examine the association between ONFH and brain tumors. The results of the current study are the first to provide risk factors of ONFH in brain tumor patients as well as practical information regarding the prevalence and the time interval between brain tumor treatment and the development of ONFH, as a complication.
Conclusions
This study demonstrated that the prevalence of ONFH in patients who underwent surgical resection of primary brain tumor was 0.68%. Diabetes was an independent risk factors for ONFH in these patients. Accompanying panhypopituitarism, supratentorial location of primary brain tumor, and chemotherapy were also associated in this study, whereas corticosteroid was not. In practice, prior to embarking on brain tumor treatment, counseling is required regarding the risk of developing ONFH and the orthopedic consequences. Vigilance is required by neurosurgeons and oncologists who must be aware of this complication.
References
- 1. Assouline-Dayan Y, Chang C, Greenspan A, Shoenfeld Y, Gershwin ME. Pathogenesis and natural history of osteonecrosis. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2002; 32:94–124. pmid:12430099
- 2. Guerado E, Caso E. The physiopathology of avascular necrosis of the femoral head: an update. Injury. 2016; 47 Suppl 6:S16–s26. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0020-1383(16)30835-x pmid:28040082
- 3. Abeles M, Urman JD, Rothfield NF. Aseptic necrosis of bone in systemic lupus erythematosus. Relationship to corticosteroid therapy. Arch Intern Med. 1978; 138:750–4. pmid:646538
- 4. Hirota Y, Hirohata T, Fukuda K, Mori M, Yanagawa H, Ohno Y, et al. Association of alcohol intake, cigarette smoking, and occupational status with the risk of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Am J Epidemiol. 1993; 137:530–8. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116706 pmid:8465804
- 5. Miyanishi K, Yamamoto T, Irisa T, Noguchi Y, Sugioka Y, Iwamoto Y. Increased level of apolipoprotein B/apolipoprotein A1 ratio as a potential risk for osteonecrosis. Ann Rheum Dis. 1999; 58:514–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.58.8.514 pmid:10419872
- 6. Glueck CJ, Freiberg RA, Wang P. Role of thrombosis in osteonecrosis. Curr Hematol Rep. 2003; 2:417–22. pmid:12932315
- 7. Ichiseki T, Ueda Y, Katsuda S, Kitamura K, Kaneuji A, Matsumoto T. Oxidative stress by glutathione depletion induces osteonecrosis in rats. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2006; 45:287–90. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/kei149 pmid:16303823
- 8. Rao SS, El Abiad JM, Puvanesarajah V, Levin AS, Jones LC, Morris CD. Osteonecrosis in pediatric cancer survivors: Epidemiology, risk factors, and treatment. Surg Oncol. 2019; 28:214–21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.suronc.2019.02.001 pmid:30851903
- 9. Shim K, MacKenzie MJ, Winquist E. Chemotherapy-associated osteonecrosis in cancer patients with solid tumours: a systematic review. Drug Saf. 2008; 31:359–71. https://doi.org/10.2165/00002018-200831050-00001 pmid:18422377
- 10. Winquist EW, Bauman GS, Balogh J. Nontraumatic osteonecrosis after chemotherapy for testicular cancer: a systematic review. Am J Clin Oncol. 2001; 24:603–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000421-200112000-00015 pmid:11801763
- 11. Jones DN. Multifocal osteonecrosis following chemotherapy and short-term corticosteroid therapy in a patient with small-cell bronchogenic carcinoma. J Nucl Med. 1994; 35:1347–50. pmid:8046492
- 12. Forrai G, Baki M, Bodrogi I. [Incidence of osteoporosis and aseptic femur head necrosis following complex therapy of germ cell testicular tumors]. Orv Hetil. 1994; 135:1695–700. pmid:8065748
- 13. Perloff M, Lesnick GJ. Avascular necrosis of the femoral head: association with adjuvant chemotherapy for breast carcinoma. Cancer Treat Rep. 1980; 64:361–2. pmid:7407772
- 14. Gogas H, Fennelly D. Avascular necrosis following extensive chemotherapy and dexamethasone treatment in a patient with advanced ovarian cancer: case report and review of the literature. Gynecol Oncol. 1996; 63:379–81. https://doi.org/10.1006/gyno.1996.0339 pmid:8946875
- 15. Deutsch MB, Panageas KS, Lassman AB, Deangelis LM. Steroid management in newly diagnosed glioblastoma. J Neurooncol. 2013; 113:111–6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11060-013-1096-4 pmid:23462855
- 16. Wong GK, Poon WS, Chiu KH. Steroid-induced avascular necrosis of the hip in neurosurgical patients: epidemiological study. ANZ J Surg. 2005; 75:409–10. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2005.03389.x pmid:15943727
- 17. Dharmshaktu P, Aggarwal A, Dutta D, Kulshreshtha B. Bilateral femoral head avascular necrosis with a very low dose of oral corticosteroid used for panhypopituitarism. BMJ Case Rep. 2016; 2016 https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2015-212803 pmid:26762348
- 18. Uppal J, Burbridge B, Arnason T. Bilateral osteonecrosis of the hip in panhypopituitarism. BMJ Case Rep. 2019; 12 https://doi.org/10.1136/bcr-2018-227471 pmid:30765453
- 19. Lim SJ, Park CW, Kim DU, Han K, Seo M, Moon YW, et al. Outcomes of Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head Following Surgical Treatment of Brain Tumors. J Clin Med. 2019; 8 https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm8101703 pmid:31623217
- 20. Zalavras CG, Lieberman JR. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: evaluation and treatment. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2014; 22:455–64. https://doi.org/10.5435/jaaos-22-07-455 pmid:24966252
- 21. Soucacos PN, Beris AE, Malizos K, Koropilias A, Zalavras H, Dailiana Z. Treatment of avascular necrosis of the femoral head with vascularized fibular transplant. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001:120–30. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200105000-00016 pmid:11347825
- 22. Calder JD, Buttery L, Revell PA, Pearse M, Polak JM. Apoptosis—a significant cause of bone cell death in osteonecrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2004; 86:1209–13. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.86b8.14834 pmid:15568539
- 23. Mont MA, Cherian JJ, Sierra RJ, Jones LC, Lieberman JR. Nontraumatic Osteonecrosis of the Femoral Head: Where Do We Stand Today? A Ten-Year Update. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2015; 97:1604–27. https://doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.O.00071 pmid:26446969
- 24. Choi HR, Steinberg ME, E YC. Osteonecrosis of the femoral head: diagnosis and classification systems. Curr Rev Musculoskelet Med. 2015; 8:210–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12178-015-9278-7 pmid:26088795
- 25. Seamon J, Keller T, Saleh J, Cui Q. The pathogenesis of nontraumatic osteonecrosis. Arthritis. 2012; 2012:601763. https://doi.org/10.1155/2012/601763 pmid:23243507
- 26. Sharareh B, Schwarzkopf R. Dysbaric osteonecrosis: a literature review of pathophysiology, clinical presentation, and management. Clin J Sport Med. 2015; 25:153–61. https://doi.org/10.1097/jsm.0000000000000093 pmid:24662571
- 27. Lehner CE, Adams WM, Dubielzig RR, Palta M, Lanphier EH. Dysbaric osteonecrosis in divers and caisson workers. An animal model. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1997:320–32. pmid:9372784
- 28. Borges AH, Hoy J, Florence E, Sedlacek D, Stellbrink HJ, Uzdaviniene V, et al. Antiretrovirals, Fractures, and Osteonecrosis in a Large International HIV Cohort. Clin Infect Dis. 2017; 64:1413–21. https://doi.org/10.1093/cid/cix167 pmid:28329090
- 29. Gladman DD, Urowitz MB, Chaudhry-Ahluwalia V, Hallet DC, Cook RJ. Predictive factors for symptomatic osteonecrosis in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 2001; 28:761–5. pmid:11327247
- 30. Kennedy JW, Khan W. Total Hip Arthroplasty in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Systematic Review. Int J Rheumatol. 2015; 2015:475489. https://doi.org/10.1155/2015/475489 pmid:26236340
- 31. Chen DQ, Cancienne JM, Werner BC, Cui Q. Is osteonecrosis due to systemic lupus erythematosus associated with increased risk of complications following total hip arthroplasty? Int Orthop. 2018; 42:1485–90. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-018-3871-5 pmid:29550912
- 32. Daoud AM, Hudson M, Magnus KG, Huang F, Danielson BL, Venner P, et al. Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head After Palliative Radiotherapy in Metastatic Prostate Cancer: Absence of a Dose Threshold? Cureus. 2016; 8:e521. https://doi.org/10.7759/cureus.521 pmid:27081582
- 33. Cook AM, Patterson H, Nicholls J, Huddart RA. Avascular necrosis in patients treated with BEP chemotherapy for testicular tumours. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 1999; 11:126–7. https://doi.org/10.1053/clon.1999.9027 pmid:10378640
- 34. Cook AM, Dzik-Jurasz AS, Padhani AR, Norman A, Huddart RA. The prevalence of avascular necrosis in patients treated with chemotherapy for testicular tumours. Br J Cancer. 2001; 85:1624–6. https://doi.org/10.1054/bjoc.2001.2155 pmid:11742478
- 35. Kaila R, Wolman RL. Groin pain in athletes: a consequence of femoral head avascular necrosis after testicular cancer chemotherapy. Clin J Sport Med. 2006; 16:175–6. https://doi.org/10.1097/00042752-200603000-00016 pmid:16603890
- 36. Fast A, Alon M, Weiss S, Zer-Aviv FR. Avascular necrosis of bone following short-term dexamethasone therapy for brain edema. Case report. J Neurosurg. 1984; 61:983–5. https://doi.org/10.3171/jns.1984.61.5.0983 pmid:6491744
- 37. Felson DT, Anderson JJ. Across-study evaluation of association between steroid dose and bolus steroids and avascular necrosis of bone. Lancet. 1987; 1:902–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(87)92870-4 pmid:2882300
- 38. McCluskey J, Gutteridge DH. Avascular necrosis of bone after high doses of dexamethasone during neurosurgery. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1982; 284:333–4. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.284.6312.333 pmid:6800452
- 39. Kang JS, Park S, Song JH, Jung YY, Cho MR, Rhyu KH. Prevalence of osteonecrosis of the femoral head: a nationwide epidemiologic analysis in Korea. J Arthroplasty. 2009; 24:1178–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2009.05.022 pmid:19640674
- 40. Fukushima W, Fujioka M, Kubo T, Tamakoshi A, Nagai M, Hirota Y. Nationwide epidemiologic survey of idiopathic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010; 468:2715–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11999-010-1292-x pmid:20224959
- 41. Yamaguchi R, Yamamoto T, Motomura G, Ikemura S, Iwamoto Y. Incidence of nontraumatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head in the Japanese population. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63:3169–73. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30484 pmid:21953089
- 42. Yoon BH, Jones LC, Chen CH, Cheng EY, Cui Q, Drescher W, et al. Etiologic Classification Criteria of ARCO on Femoral Head Osteonecrosis Part 1: Glucocorticoid-Associated Osteonecrosis. J Arthroplasty. 2019; 34:163-8.e1. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2018.09.005 pmid:30348552
- 43. Mont MA, Pivec R, Banerjee S, Issa K, Elmallah RK, Jones LC. High-Dose Corticosteroid Use and Risk of Hip Osteonecrosis: Meta-Analysis and Systematic Literature Review. J Arthroplasty. 2015; 30:1506-12.e5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.arth.2015.03.036 pmid:25900167
- 44. Ichiseki T, Kaneuji A, Ueda Y, Nakagawa S, Mikami T, Fukui K, et al. Osteonecrosis development in a novel rat model characterized by a single application of oxidative stress. Arthritis Rheum. 2011; 63:2138–41. https://doi.org/10.1002/art.30365 pmid:21437877
- 45. Mikami T, Ichiseki T, Kaneuji A, Ueda Y, Sugimori T, Fukui K, et al. Prevention of steroid-induced osteonecrosis by intravenous administration of vitamin E in a rabbit model. J Orthop Sci. 2010; 15:674–7. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-010-1516-7 pmid:20953930
- 46. Kuribayashi M, Fujioka M, Takahashi KA, Arai Y, Ishida M, Goto T, et al. Vitamin E prevents steroid-induced osteonecrosis in rabbits. Acta Orthop. 2010; 81:154–60. https://doi.org/10.3109/17453671003587101 pmid:20146637
- 47. Evans PH. Free radicals in brain metabolism and pathology. Br Med Bull. 1993; 49:577–87. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a072632 pmid:8221024
- 48. Mont MA, Hungerford DS. Non-traumatic avascular necrosis of the femoral head. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1995; 77:459–74. https://doi.org/10.2106/00004623-199503000-00018 pmid:7890797
- 49. Chan KL, Mok CC. Glucocorticoid-induced avascular bone necrosis: diagnosis and management. Open Orthop J. 2012; 6:449–57. https://doi.org/10.2174/1874325001206010449 pmid:23115605
- 50. Moya-Angeler J, Gianakos AL, Villa JC, Ni A, Lane JM. Current concepts on osteonecrosis of the femoral head. World J Orthop. 2015; 6:590–601. https://doi.org/10.5312/wjo.v6.i8.590 pmid:26396935
- 51. Zhao FC, Li ZR, Guo KJ. Clinical analysis of osteonecrosis of the femoral head induced by steroids. Orthop Surg. 2012; 4:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1757-7861.2011.00163.x pmid:22290816
- 52. Koo KH, Kim R, Kim YS, Ahn IO, Cho SH, Song HR, et al. Risk period for developing osteonecrosis of the femoral head in patients on steroid treatment. Clin Rheumatol. 2002; 21:299–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s100670200078 pmid:12189457
- 53. Kang JS, Moon KH, Kwon DG, Shin BK, Woo MS. The natural history of asymptomatic osteonecrosis of the femoral head. Int Orthop. 2013; 37:379–84. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00264-013-1775-y pmid:23340674
- 54. Lai SW, Lin CL, Liao KF. Real-World Database Examining the Association Between Avascular Necrosis of the Femoral Head and Diabetes in Taiwan. Diabetes Care. 2019; 42:39–43. https://doi.org/10.2337/dc18-1258 pmid:30487230
- 55. Mont MA, Glueck CJ, Pacheco IH, Wang P, Hungerford DS, Petri M. Risk factors for osteonecrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. J Rheumatol. 1997; 24:654–62. pmid:9101497
- 56. Khalil H. Diabetes microvascular complications-A clinical update. Diabetes Metab Syndr. 2017; 11 Suppl 1:S133–s9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2016.12.022 pmid:27993541
- 57. Huang D, Refaat M, Mohammedi K, Jayyousi A, Al Suwaidi J, Abi Khalil C. Macrovascular Complications in Patients with Diabetes and Prediabetes. Biomed Res Int. 2017; 2017:7839101. https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/7839101 pmid:29238721
- 58. Krentz AJ, Clough G, Byrne CD. Interactions between microvascular and macrovascular disease in diabetes: pathophysiology and therapeutic implications. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2007; 9:781–91. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1463-1326.2007.00670.x pmid:17924862
- 59. Ichiseki T, Matsumoto T, Nishino M, Kaneuji A, Katsuda S. Oxidative stress and vascular permeability in steroid-induced osteonecrosis model. J Orthop Sci. 2004; 9:509–15. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-004-0816-1 pmid:15449127
- 60. Kim TH, Hong JM, Oh B, Cho YS, Lee JY, Kim HL, et al. Genetic association study of polymorphisms in the catalase gene with the risk of osteonecrosis of the femoral head in the Korean population. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008; 16:1060–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joca.2008.02.004 pmid:18353692
- 61. Mok CC, Lau CS, Wong RW. Risk factors for avascular bone necrosis in systemic lupus erythematosus. Br J Rheumatol. 1998; 37:895–900. https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/37.8.895 pmid:9734682
- 62. Nagasawa K, Ishii Y, Mayumi T, Tada Y, Ueda A, Yamauchi Y, et al. Avascular necrosis of bone in systemic lupus erythematosus: possible role of haemostatic abnormalities. Ann Rheum Dis. 1989; 48:672–6. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.48.8.672 pmid:2506841
- 63. Alarcon GS, Calvo-Alen J, McGwin G Jr, Uribe AG, Toloza SM, Roseman JM, et al. Systemic lupus erythematosus in a multiethnic cohort: LUMINA XXXV. Predictive factors of high disease activity over time. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006; 65:1168–74. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.200X.046896 pmid:16905579
- 64. Uea-areewongsa P, Chaiamnuay S, Narongroeknawin P, Asavatanabodee P. Factors associated with osteonecrosis in Thai lupus patients: a case control study. J Clin Rheumatol. 2009; 15:345–9. https://doi.org/10.1097/RHU.0b013e3181ba3423 pmid:20009970
- 65. Mok MY, Farewell VT, Isenberg DA. Risk factors for avascular necrosis of bone in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus: is there a role for antiphospholipid antibodies? Ann Rheum Dis. 2000; 59:462–7. https://doi.org/10.1136/ard.59.6.462 pmid:10834864
- 66. Kunyakham W, Foocharoen C, Mahakkanukrauh A, Suwannaroj S, Nanagara R. Prevalence and risk factor for symptomatic avascular necrosis development in Thai systemic lupus erythematosus patients. Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol. 2012; 30:152–7. pmid:22830295
- 67. Wing PC, Nance P, Connell DG, Gagnon F. Risk of avascular necrosis following short term megadose methylprednisolone treatment. Spinal Cord. 1998; 36:633–6. https://doi.org/10.1038/sj.sc.3100647 pmid:9773448
- 68. Tokuhara Y, Wakitani S, Oda Y, Kaneshiro Y, Masada T, Kim M, et al. Low levels of steroid-metabolizing hepatic enzyme (cytochrome P450 3A) activity may elevate responsiveness to steroids and may increase risk of steroid-induced osteonecrosis even with low glucocorticoid dose. J Orthop Sci. 2009; 14:794–800. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00776-009-1400-5 pmid:19997828
- 69. Ishii E, Yoshida N, Miyazaki S. Avascular necrosis of bone in neuroblastoma treated with combination chemotherapy. Eur J Pediatr. 1984; 143:152–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00445806 pmid:6519114
- 70. Bernbeck B, Krauth KA, Scherer A, Engelbrecht V, Gobel U. Aseptic osteonecrosis in a child with nephroblastoma healed by hyperbaric oxygen therapy. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002; 39:47–8. https://doi.org/10.1002/mpo.1366 pmid:12116080
- 71. Newland AM, Lawson AP, Adams VR. Complications associated with treatment of malignancies: a focus on avascular necrosis of the bone. Orthopedics. 2010; 33:413–6. https://doi.org/10.3928/01477447-20100429-22 pmid:20806750
- 72. Harper PG, Trask C, Souhami RL. Avascular necrosis of bone caused by combination chemotherapy without corticosteroids. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1984; 288:267–8. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.288.6413.267 pmid:6198019
- 73. Marymont JV, Kaufman EE. Osteonecrosis of bone associated with combination chemotherapy without corticosteroids. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986:150–3. pmid:3006960
- 74. Goyal G, Bhatt VR. L-asparaginase and venous thromboembolism in acute lymphocytic leukemia. Future Oncol. 2015; 11:2459–70. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon.15.114 pmid:26274336
- 75. Hanada T, Horigome Y, Inudoh M, Takita H. Osteonecrosis of vertebrae in a child with acute lymphocytic leukaemia during L-asparaginase therapy. Eur J Pediatr. 1989; 149:162–3. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf01958270 pmid:2612502