Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. (Araneae: Araneidae), a novel spider species from an Andean páramo in Colombia


Herein we describe Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. (Araneae: Araneidae), a new orb-weaving spider species from a Colombian páramo, which was formerly inaccessible for scientific studies due to decades long armed conflicts. Both, phenotypic and molecular data are used to confirm genus affiliation, and the new species is placed into phylogenetic context with other araneid spiders. Morphological characteristics and ecological notes of Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. are reported together with the sequence of the barcoding region of cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) to provide a comprehensive description of the spider, facilitating future identification beyond taxonomic experts. With this study we contribute to the taxonomic knowledge that is required to inventory the hyper diverse yet threatened ecosystem of the Colombian páramos.


Biodiversity hotspots, priorities for conservation efforts due to their high number of endemic species, are thought to harbour most of undescribed organisms [1, 2]. Colombia is distinguished by accommodating two hotspots, Tumbes-Chocó-Magdalena and Tropical Andes, the latter being recognized for hosting the highest species richness and most endemics worldwide [1]. Yet, many areas remain unexplored due to a decades-long armed conflict, which has diminished only recently. Concerns are growing that these formally inaccessible territories are now more vulnerable to rapid human-induced change [3, 4], turning taxonomic inventories, monitoring and conservation initiatives into an urgent matter.

Located in the Tropical Andes are the Colombian páramos, neotropical alpine grassland ecosystems situated between the timberline and permanent snow fields. Characterized by swamps and wet grassland, conspicuous frailejones (Espeletia) and small shrub and forest patches, they are often referred to as ‘grassland isles within a sea of cloud forests’ [57]. This natural isolation and fragmentation has generated their high biodiversity and endemism, which, in combination with the páramos’ key role in Colombia’s hydrological system and growing disturbance through human activities, gives them particular significance and warrants special conservation efforts [6, 7].

Araneae (spiders) are a group of extremely diverse and abundant key predators, present in every terrestrial ecosystem [810]. They have been suggested as good ecological indicators, i.e. suitable to monitor functional changes in an ecosystem, as they respond readily to alterations in their biotic and abiotic environment [11]. Their utility depends on a profound knowledge on the identity of present species.

The family Araneidae Clerck, 1757 [12] is one of the most diverse spider families, currently including more than 3000 species in 178 genera [13]. Although Neotropical araneids are considered to be well-studied from a taxonomic perspective, as provided by H.W. Levi’s monographic revisions (see the complete list of Levi’s publications in [14]), several recent publications have revealed undescribed species across different genera [1520]. In the quest to understand and protect biodiversity, uncovering species’ identities is a requisite, but it is a task that is rarely encouraged in our current times [21, 22]. Additionally, molecular and phenotypic data are seldom reported together, neglecting the potential of such a combined approach [23].

Here, we describe a new spider of the genus Ocrepeira Marx, 1883 [24] (Araneidae: Araneinae), and provide notes concerning its ecology from the Páramo Las Hermosas (Colombia), an area formerly inaccessible due to armed conflicts. To date, this orb-weaving genus includes 67 recognized species [13], which are found exclusively in the Americas and prevailingly inhabit high mountain environments, where the geographic isolation causes a high degree of endemism [25]. In providing the so far third ever sequence of the barcoding gene cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI) from the genus Ocrepeira [26, 27], and exploring the phylogenetic position of the new species, we complement the morphological description with molecular data.

Materials & methods

Study area & sampling

Spider sampling was conducted in an alpine grassland ecosystem in Valle del Cauca Colombia, the Páramo Las Hermosas, La Nevera locality (03°31'54.8'' N, 76°04'40.1'' W, elevation 3650 meters above sea level) in November of 2018 (Fig 1). Climatically, the area belongs to the montane, per-humid Holdridge life zone [28, 29], with a mean annual temperature of 7.4°C (calculated according to [30]) and mean annual total precipitations of 2400 mm (based on IMERG multi-satellite precipitation estimates [31] from the years 2014 to 2019). The study area is dominated by tussock grasses, dwarf shrubs and Espeletia, with few bush and tree patches (S1 Fig) [6]. We sampled the spiders through visual search and with a sweeping net, stored them individually in 95% alcohol and transferred them to a freezer (-20°C). The collection of specimens was performed under the permit #0526 granted by the Autoridad Nacional de Licencias Ambientales (ANLA) to the Universidad Icesi.

Fig 1. Sampling locality in Valle del Cauca (Colombia).

This map is made with QGIS software v.3.10.4 based on the digital elevation model provided by the International Centre of Tropical Agriculture [32] and the data provided by the Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística [33].

Morphological analysis

Taxonomic description follows the format used by Cabra-García & Brescovit [34]. Specimens were examined using a Nikon C-PS stereomicroscope and a Nikon Eclipse Ci compound microscope. In order to visualize female internal genitalia, non-chitinous tissue was digested with pancreatin following the protocol described by Álvarez-Padilla & Hormiga [35]. We took the photos of preserved specimens and genitalia using a Nikon SMZ-1500 stereomicroscope equipped with a Nikon DS-Ri1 U3 camera and a Nikon Eclipse Ci compound microscope equipped with a Canon T5i camera of the in-house Laboratorio de Imágenes at Universidad del Valle (Cali, Colombia). Extended focal range images were composed using NIS-Elements Basic Research Software version 4.20.03. Morphological measurements were performed using the integrated ruler of a Nikon C-PS stereomicroscope with 13.4 x to 100 x magnification. All morphological measurements are in millimetres. Vouchers were deposited in the arachnological collection of the Museo de Entomología de la Universidad del Valle (MUSENUV) and the Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Universidad Nacional de Colombia (ICN).

Nomenclatural acts

The electronic edition of this article conforms to the requirements of the amended International Code of Zoological Nomenclature, and hence the new species name contained herein is available under that Code from the electronic edition of this article. This published work and the contained nomenclatural acts have been registered in ZooBank, the online registration system for the ICZN. The ZooBank LSIDs (Life Science Identifiers) can be resolved and the associated information viewed through any standard web browser by appending the LSID to the prefix "". The LSID for this publication is: The electronic edition of this work was published in a journal with the eISSN: 1932-6203, has been archived and is available from the following digital repositories: PubMed Central, LOCKSS.

Phylogenetic placement

Total DNA was extracted from one male and one female specimen of O. klamt sp. n. (MUSENUV-Ar 2092, DNA Vouchers A310 and A311). Thereby, for each specimen four legs were frozen with liquid nitrogen and ground up; the remainder of the spider was kept as a voucher. Subsequently, extractions including a negative control were carried out using the DNeasy Blood & Tissue Kit (Qiagen) including a RNAse (Promega) treatment (40 μg/ml, for 15 min at 37°C). DNA amplification of the COI locus was performed using existing invertebrate primers [36] adapted for the use with Araneomorphae spiders (HCO2198_spider TAWACYTCDGGRTGHCCAAAAAATCA; LCO1490_spider ATTCWACWAAYCAYAAGGATATTGG). Polymerase chain reactions (PCR) were performed in a 50 μl volume with 0.02 U/μl Taq DNA Polymerase, 1x ThermoPol buffer and 0.2 mM each dNTP (NEB), using 0.2 μM of each primer and between 30 and 50 ng of template DNA. A “touchdown” PCR profile was employed: Denaturation at 95°C for 30 s was followed by the first cycle set (6 repeats) with 20 s denaturation at 95°C, 60 s annealing at 48°C (-1°C per cycle) and 60 s extension at 68°C. The second cycle set (39 repeats) consisted of 20 s denaturation at 95°C, 60 s annealing at 43°C and 60 s extension at 68°C, followed by a final extension step of 5 min at 68°C. PCR products were purified using the Wizard® SV Gel and PCR Clean-Up System (Promega) and Sanger-sequenced (Eurofins Genomics). Contiguous sequences were assembled using the package consed/phred/phrap [3740]. Once assembled, contigs were queried against the online NCBI BLAST database to check for possible contamination from external sources.

The taxon sampling for this study was guided by the most taxon-rich Araneidae phylogenetic analysis to date [26]. The sample includes all the members of the “Micrathenines” clade and representatives of Phonognathinae, Nephilinae, the “Caerostrines” clade and Araneus necopinus (Keyserling, 1887) [41]. Zygiella x-notata (Clerck, 1757) [12] (Araneidae: Phonognathinae) was used as the root. The higher Linnean ranks follow [42], for an alternative view see [43]. Phylogenetic relationships of the new species were inferred by concatenating the available nuclear 28S rRNA and mitochondrial COI sequences (Table 1). Similarity alignments sensu [44] were completed using MAFFT v.7.299b [45]. The COI gene was aligned using the L-INS-i method (command line: mafft—localpair—maxiterate 1000). After alignment, sequences were translated and checked for stop codons using Aliview v.1.18 [46]. The ribosomal gene was aligned using the E-INS-i method (command line: mafft—genafpair—maxiterate 1000) after [47].

The best tree was inferred in a maximum likelihood framework as implemented in IQTREE v.2.0 [48]. ModelFinder [49] was used to select the optimal partition scheme and substitution models (Table 2). Ten independent runs, including the calculation of the ultrafast Bootstrap [50] and the Shimodaira–Hasegawa approximate likelihood-ratio test (SH aLRT) [51], were conducted with the following command line: iqtree -s concat.nex -spp partition.nex.best_scheme.nex -B 1000 -alrt 1000 -pers 0.2 -nstop 1000.

Table 2. Best partition scheme and best-fit models selected by ModelFinder for the IQ-TREE analysis.

Species boundaries

Ocrepeira klamt was foremost delimited from other species of the genus by comparing its morphological characters of the genitalia with the available literature [25, 52]. In addition, genetic distances were used to test for species boundaries within our Ocrepeira sample. The uncorrected intra- and inter-specific COI divergence among the available Ocrepeira species was calculated using MEGA X [53]. Species boundaries were tested using the Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) method [54]. ABGD analyses were carried out with the command-line version of the program, employing the simple distance metric (i.e. p-distance). The data were analysed using two different values for the parameters Pmin (0.0001 and 0.001), Pmax (0.1 and 0.2), and relative gap width (0.1 and 0.4), with the other parameters maintained at default values.


Species description

Ocrepeira klamt Hopfe, Ospina-Jara, Scheibel & Cabra-García sp. n.


Male holotype from Vereda La Nevera, Páramo Las Hermosas, Valle del Cauca, Colombia, 3°31'54.8'' N, 76°04'40.1'' W, elev. 3650 m, 11.XI.2018, C. Hopfe leg., deposited in MUSENUV-Ar 2090; Paratypes: 1♀ deposited in MUSENUV-Ar 2091; 8♀ 1♂ deposited in MUSENUV-Ar 2092, 1♂ deposited in ICN-Ar 12417, all the latter with the same data as the holotype.


The specific epithet, a noun in apposition, honours the German teacher Ulrike Klamt.


Males of O. klamt sp. n. resemble those of O. valderramai Levi, 1993 [25] by the presence of a triangular offset in the base of the median apophysis (Fig 2A and 2C). They are distinguished from the latter by the folded embolus lamella (Fig 2A) and the sharpened apical portion of the paramedian apophysis (Fig 2A and 2C). Females can be easily distinguished from all other Ocrepeira species by the three apical lobes of the median plate (Fig 3B).

Fig 2. Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. holotype left palp (MUSENUV-Ar 2090).

A: mesal; B: ectal; C: ventral. Scale bars: 100μm. Abbreviations: C, conductor; E, embolus; EL, embolus lamella; MA, median apophysis; P, paracymbium; PM, paramedian apophysis; R, radix; TA, terminal apophysis; STA, subterminal apophysis.

Fig 3. Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. A-C. Epigynum (MUSENUV-Ar 2092).

A: ventral; B: posterior; C: lateral. D-F. Spermathecae and ducts (MUSENUV-Ar 2092). D: ventral, asterisk on CD basal enlargement; E: posteroventral, asterisk on CD basal enlargement. F: lateral. Scale bars: 100μm. Abbreviations: CD, copulatory duct; Co, copulatory opening; FD, fertilization duct; LP, lateral plate; MP, median plate; Sc, scape; S, spermathecae.


Male (holotype). Fig 4A–4C. The carapace of the holotype is of khaki coloration, with a taupe brown cephalic region and dusky irregular areas in the thoracic region projecting to the lateral surface. Chelicerae black with the apical portion brown. Labium taupe brown with an anterior greenish rim. Endites walnut brown with greenish rims on their anterolateral margins. Sternum with a taupe brown fringe and a light greenish centre. Legs are taupe brown with buff brown and greenish patches, light coloured rings on the basal portion of femora, tibia, metatarsi and tarsi. The abdomen has two anterolateral and an anterior median hump; coloration of dorsum grey with a robin egg blue tint and a V-shaped beaver brown central pattern, delimited by black markings; anterior hump with Robin egg blue patch; venter with two white lines, black in the centre, sides taupe brown. Eight eyes in two transverse rows, recurved. Leg formula 1,2,4,3. For body measurements see Tables 35. Palp as in Fig 2A–2C. Median apophysis with two sub equal prongs (lower prong slightly shorter); without bulge on the lower edge; base with a triangular offset. Conductor with its basal portion sclerotized and with a membranous distal fold beneath the embolus. Paramedian apophysis spine-like, connected to the conductor. Radix without median outgrowth. Embolus pointed, with a basal sclerotized sharp projection. Embolus lamella folded apically. Subterminal apophysis rounded apically. Terminal apophysis spine-like.

Fig 4. Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. habitus.

A-C. Holotype (MUSENUV-Ar 2090). D-F. Paratype (MUSENUV-Ar 2091). A, D: dorsal view; B, E: ventral view; C, F: lateral view. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Table 3. Eye diameters and distances for holotype and paratype of Ocrepeira klamt sp. n.

Table 4. Leg measurements of Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. holotype and paratype.

Table 5. Body measurements of Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. holotype and paratype.

Female (paratype). Fig 4D–4F. The female has a chocolate brown carapace, with similarly coloured chelicerae, labium and endites (the latter two having an anterior white rim). Sternum black. Legs chocolate to taupe brown, with lighter patches in the basal portion of femora, tibia, metatarsi and tarsi. The abdomen has two lateral humps and a small anterior median hump, and is longer than wide; the central part of the dorsum has a V-shaped chocolate brown pattern, the sides are dirty white and the anterior part of the abdomen shows a median white spot tinted grey-greenish; the venter is chocolate brown in the middle, bordered by two thin white lines, sides are taupe brown. Leg formula 1,2,4,3. For body measurements see Tables 35. Epigynum wider than long, sclerotized (Fig 3A–3C). Scape set off from base, longer than wide (Fig 3A and 3C). Median plate as wide as the maximum width of the lateral plates. The median plate with an undulated anterior rim with three lobes. Rounded spermathecae (Fig 3D–3F). Fertilization ducts shorter than copulatory ducts (Fig 3E and 3F). Copulatory ducts with a basal enlargement (Fig 3D and 3E).


Male. Coloration of paratypes lighter than in holotype, carapace dominated by shades of yellow. Tint of dorsum of abdomen can be green, and V-shaped pattern might be indistinct (Fig 5). White lines on the abdomen venter can be absent. Total length varies from 4.60 mm to 4.96 mm, carapace length from 2.75 mm to 3.18 mm (n = 3).

Fig 5. Colour variation of Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. males.

Specimens preserved in alcohol. Scale bars: 1 mm.

Female. Coloration of females varies from light (shades of yellows) to dark (shades of brown) (Fig 6). Seldom carapace with ruby red tint. Dorsum of abdomen very variable, colorations include: grey, walnut or taupe brown, ruby red, pink or green tint, grey-brown patterned. Venter with or without white lines or spots. Total length from 5.47 mm to 7.11 mm, carapace 2.85 mm to 3.55 mm (n = 9). On average females are 23% larger than males.

Fig 6. Colour variation of Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. females.

A-G: variation of specimens preserved in alcohol; H: individual shortly after capture. Scale bars: 1 mm.


Known only from the type locality.

Ecological notes.

As typical for Ocrepeira, O. klamt sp. n. builds orb webs. In shape they range from elliptical to round, and maximum heights and widths of around 26 cm x 21 cm, as well as minimum heights and widths of approximately 18 cm x 13 cm were observed in the field (Fig 7). They usually show a disorderly filled hub region. Webs were found in open, as well as slightly protected habitats (i.e. with nearby vegetation blocking e.g. strong winds) at heights between 0.4 m and 1.6 m above the ground. Spiders were spotted in their webs exclusively at night time, typically sitting in the hub, whereas during the day they could be collected sweeping the vegetation.

Fig 7. Representative web shapes of Ocrepeira klamt sp. n.

Minimum and maximum measurements are given for both height and width of webs found in La Nevera.

Phylogenetic placement and species boundaries

COI sequences were generated for one male (voucher: A310, NCBI accession number: MN991226) and one female (voucher: A311, NCBI accession number: MN991227) Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. individual, with a length of 647 bp and 660 bp respectively.

Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. is nested within the “Micrathenines” clade (Fig 8). Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. was recovered as the sister group of the clade O. darlingtoni (Bryant, 1945) [60] + O. ectypa (Walckenaer, 1841) [59], albeit with low support (Fig 8). The two specimens of O. klamt sp. n. yielded the same COI haplotype. The average intraspecific and interspecific distance among Ocrepeira species was 4.6% and 16.26%, respectively (Table 6). The ABGD analyses yielded three Ocrepeira species under each parameter setting (S1 Table).

Fig 8. IQ-TREE optimal tree (log likelihood = -9629.087).

Circles at nodes indicate the ultrafast bootstrap (left) and the Shimodaira–Hasegawa approximate likelihood-ratio test (right). Where applicable, voucher numbers are provided.

Table 6. Percent uncorrected pairwise distances between COI sequences of Ocrepeira species.


Species identity and phylogenetic placement

Genus identification.

The genus Ocrepeira was first mentioned by Marx [24], but it was Levi [25] who authored a comprehensive monograph for the genus, providing an updated diagnosis and a detailed morphological description. Levi [63] also proposed a key to the genera of araneids of the Americas, which allows to set apart Ocrepeira from similar genera considering female and male somatic and genital characters. Based thereupon we placed the new species in the genus Ocrepeira by confirming the presence of the following combination of characters in the examined specimens: carapace wide in the eye region, posterior median eyes facing dorsolaterally, clypeus height equal to one or at most two diameters of the anterior median eyes, abdomen with two anterior humps, pedicel attachment at the anterior half of the abdomen, and straight paramedian apophysis, all of them considered by Levi [25] as useful characters to differentiate Ocrepeira from putatively related genera such as Acacesia Simon, 1895 [64], Wixia O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1882 [65], Wagneriana O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1904 [66], Parawixia O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1904 [66] and Pozonia Schenkel, 1953 [67].

Additionally, we consider the phylogenetic placement in the DNA-based tree (Fig 8), where O. klamt sp. n. clusters together with O. ectypa and O. darlingtoni, albeit with low support. We acknowledge that due to the low support, our genus placement may be considered contentious. Nevertheless, an unequivocal placement would only be feasible after testing Ocrepeira monophyly using a comprehensive taxon sampling and molecular and morphological characters, a task beyond the scope of this paper.


A recently published comprehensive phylogeny of araneid spiders, which was based on nuclear and mitochondrial genes, placed the species Ocrepeira ectypa as sister to Acacesia hamata (Hentz, 1847) [55] in the Micrathenines clade [26]. Similarly, the phylogenetic tree constructed from 28S and COI sequences recovers the Micrathenines clade and places A. hamata as the closest relative to O. ectypa, O. darlingtoni and O. klamt sp. n. with moderate (79% ultrafast bootstrap) to high (92% SH aLRT) node support (Fig 8). Other splits, however, differ between the two phylogenetic trees. Specifically, nodes that yielded ultrafast bootstrap values below 70% are inconsistent with results produced by [26]. A combined effect of few molecular markers and terminals in the present study may explain these inconsistencies.

Species delimitation.

At species level, differences in genitalia structures are generally considered key for alpha-taxonomy due to their rapid evolutionary divergence [68]. When compared to the available scientific literature (i.e. [13, 25, 52]), both male and female O. klamt sp. n., exhibit a unique set of characters of the reproductive organs, setting them unequivocally apart from other Ocrepeira species (Figs 2 and 3). It is noteworthy that female internal genitalia across Ocrepeira species remain highly understudied. Nevertheless, a comparison of the available data (i.e. dissections of O. darlingtoni in [27]) with our cleared view (Fig 3D–3F) suggests that the morphology of the copulatory ducts could be highly informative to distinguish species.

The ABGD analyses among the available Ocrepeira sequences also suggested O. klamt sp. n. as a separate species. It is worth mentioning that while the low number of sequences per species available for the ABGD method may compromise its performance [54, 69, 70] have found that this method can yield similar results to other species delimitation tests, despite the low number of sequences per species.

Matching of the sexes and utility of COI.

The matching of male and female individuals of an undescribed spider species is often problematic due to considerable sexual dimorphism. As one female O. klamt sp. n. individual was found in its web together with a male, a common species identity can however be inferred. Additional evidence comes from female and male COI sequences, which are identical (Table 6). COI, the so-called barcoding gene, is a useful tool to distinguish species, even those that are difficult to identify in most phyla with morphological taxonomic methods [71]. In the species-rich order Araneae, COI might be particularly helpful, making identification accessible to non-specialists and facilitating the identification of the more abundant juveniles, which cannot be distinguished phenotypically [72]. The utility of COI has been tested and confirmed for different spider families [7375], and has been shown to yield an identification accuracy of 90% in Araneidae [75]. The here reported COI sequence from O. klamt sp. n. thus provides a valuable character to be used in conjunction with morphology for species identification. Being the third ever reported sequence from the genus Ocrepeira [26, 27], it adds to the growing reference database of COI sequences for spiders [72, 76].

Ecological notes

Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. is a typical representative of the genus, producing vertical orb webs with a filled hub region (e.g. similar to O. saladito Levi, 1993 [25]) and being nocturnal [25]. Although other species of this genus, like O. jamora Levi, 1993 [25], O. valderramai, O. cuy Levi, 1993 [25], O. abiseo Levi, 1993 [25] and O. tinajillas Levi, 1993 [25], can likewise be found at high altitudes, the specimens collected at an elevation of 3650 m make Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. the highest recorded species of its genus (compare to [25, 52, 77]). So far, O. klamt sp. n. is solely known from the type locality, and the island characteristic of páramo ecosystems suggests that the species has a small distribution range, similarly to that of other known Ocrepeira species [6, 25].


The discovery of Ocrepeira klamt sp. n. contributes to a steady stream of new floral and faunal descriptions from the Colombian páramos [7880] that is increasing since the diminution of the armed conflict. Due to extremely high speciation rates even in comparison with other ultra-diverse ecosystems of the Tropical Andes, the páramos can be considered a ‘hotspot within a hotspot’ [81], making them a number one priority for monitoring and conservation efforts. With the description of a novel araneid species from the Páramo Las Hermosas, a region with previously unexplored spider fauna due to its inaccessibility caused by armed conflict, we contribute to the taxonomic knowledge required to inventory, monitor and ultimately protect this important ecosystem. Thereby, the combination of molecular with morphological data facilitates the accurate association between male and female individuals, provides two independent sources of support for genus affiliation and expands the utility of the data.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Vegetation in Páramo Las Hermosas at La Nevera locality.


S1 Table. Results of the Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery (ABGD) analyses.



We thank Luis Melo and his wife Eri for hosting and guiding us in the Páramo Las Hermosas. Also, we thank the Universidad del Valle Postgraduate Biology Program and Juan Felipe Ortega for giving us access and support to the facilities of Laboratorio de Imágenes. We owe special thanks to the biologist Diego Fernando Morales for his invaluable support in the field. Finally, we thank Robert J. Kallal and the Academic Editor Matjaž Kuntner for their constructive comments on the manuscript.


  1. 1. Myers N, Mittermeier RA, Mittermeier CG, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J. Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature. 2000;403(6772): 853–8. pmid:10706275
  2. 2. Scheffers BR, Joppa LN, Pimm SL, Laurance WF. What we know and don’t know about Earth's missing biodiversity. Trends in ecology & evolution. 2012;27(9): 501–10.
  3. 3. Salazar A, Sanchez A, Villegas JC, Salazar JF, Ruiz Carrascal D, Sitch S, et al. The ecology of peace: preparing Colombia for new political and planetary climates. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2018;16(9): 525–31.
  4. 4. Armenteras D, Schneider L, Dávalos LM. Fires in protected areas reveal unforeseen costs of Colombian peace. Nature ecology & evolution. 2019;3(1): 20–3.
  5. 5. Rangel JO. Colombia diversidad biótica III: La región de vida paramuna. 1st ed. Bogotá: Universidad Nacional de Colombia; 2000.
  6. 6. Buytaert W, Célleri R, De Bièvre B, Cisneros F, Wyseure G, Deckers J, et al. Human impact on the hydrology of the Andean páramos. Earth-Science Reviews. 2006;79(1–2): 53–72.
  7. 7. Londoño C, Cleef A, Madriñán S. Angiosperm flora and biogeography of the páramo region of Colombia, Northern Andes. Flora-Morphology, Distribution, Functional Ecology of Plants. 2014;209(2): 81–7.
  8. 8. Churchill TB. Spiders as ecological indicators: an overview for Australia. Memoirs of the Museum of Victoria. 1997;56(2): 331–7.
  9. 9. Nyffeler M, Birkhofer K. An estimated 400–800 million tons of prey are annually killed by the global spider community. The Science of Nature. 2017;104(3–4): 30. pmid:28289774
  10. 10. Mammola S, Michalik P, Hebets EA, Isaia M. Record breaking achievements by spiders and the scientists who study them. PeerJ. 2017;5: e3972. pmid:29104823
  11. 11. Pearce JL, Venier LA. The use of ground beetles (Coleoptera: Carabidae) and spiders (Araneae) as bioindicators of sustainable forest management: a review. Ecological indicators. 2006;6(4): 780–93.
  12. 12. Clerck CA. Svenska spindlar, uti sina hufvud-slågter indelte samt under några och sextio särskildte arter beskrefne och med illuminerade figurer uplyste. Stockholmiae: Literis Laurentii Salvii; 1757.
  13. 13. World Spider Catalog. World Spider Catalog, version 21.0. Natural History Museum, Bern. 2020 [cited 2020 17 March 2020]. Available from:
  14. 14. Leibensperger LB. Herbert Walter Levi (1921–2014) and Lorna Levi (1928–2014). Breviora. 2016;551(1): 1–37.
  15. 15. Corronca JA, Rodriguez-Artigas SM. Presence of Gea heptagon (Hentz) and New Records of Argiope from Argentina with the Description of a New Species Argiope kaingang (Araneae: Araneidae). 2015;47(1): 147–52.
  16. 16. Estrada-Álvarez JC. Nueva especie de Pozonia Schenkel (Araneae: Araneidae) de México. Revista Ibérica de Aracnología. 2015;27: 51–4.
  17. 17. Lise AA, Kesster CC, Da EL. Revision of the orb-weaving spider genus Verrucosa McCook, 1888 (Araneae, Araneidae). Zootaxa. 2015;3921: 1–105. pmid:25781566
  18. 18. Magalhaes ILF, Martins PH, Nogueira AA, Santos AJ. Finding hot singles: matching males to females in dimorphic spiders (Araneidae: Micrathena) using phylogenetic placement and DNA barcoding. Invertebrate Systematics. 2017;31(1): 8–36.
  19. 19. Ott R, Lopes Rodrigues EN. Two new species of orb-weaving spiders of the genus Larinia (Araneae, Araneidae) in meridional Brazil. Zootaxa. 2017;4247(1): 89–93. pmid:28610094
  20. 20. Baptista RLC, De Souza Castanheira P, Prado AWD. Notes on the orb-weaving spider genus Alpaida (Araneae, Araneidae) with description of four new species from Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Zootaxa. 2018;4407(3): 321–45. pmid:29690180
  21. 21. de Carvalho MR, Ebach MC, Williams DM, Nihei SS, Trefaut Rodrigues M, Grant T, et al. Does counting species count as taxonomy? On misrepresenting systematics, yet again. Cladistics. 2014;30(3): 322–9.
  22. 22. Gómez Daglio L, Dawson MN. Integrative taxonomy: ghosts of past, present and future. Journal of the Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom. 2019;99(6): 1237–46.
  23. 23. Boero F. The study of species in the era of biodiversity: a tale of stupidity. Diversity. 2010;2(1): 115–26.
  24. 24. Marx G. Araneina. In: Howard LO, editor. A list of the invertebrate fauna of South Carolina. Charleston: State Board of Agriculture of South Carolina; 1883. pp. 21–26.
  25. 25. Levi HW. The Neotropical orb-weaving spiders of the genera Wixia, Pozonia, and Ocrepeira (Araneae: Araneidae). Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. 1993;153(2): 47–141.
  26. 26. Scharff N, Coddington JA, Blackledge TA, Agnarsson I, Framenau VW, Szűts T, et al. Phylogeny of the orb‐weaving spider family Araneidae (Araneae: Araneoidea). Cladistics. 2020;36(1): 1–21.
  27. 27. Cabra-García J, Hormiga G. Exploring the impact of morphology, multiple sequence alignment and choice of optimality criteria in phylogenetic inference: a case study with the Neotropical orb-weaving spider genus Wagneriana (Araneae: Araneidae). Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society. 2020;188(4): 976–1151.
  28. 28. Holdridge LR. Determination of world plant formations from simple climatic data. Science. 1947;105(2727): 367–8. pmid:17800882
  29. 29. Medina Bermudez AE, Calero Aguado A, Montoya Colonia AM, Rosero Narvaez J, Calero Benitez D, Banguero Sanchez C, et al. Aunar esfuerzos técnicos y económicos para realizar el análisis preliminar de la representatividad ecosistémica, a través de la recopilación, clasificación y ajuste de información primaria y secundaria con rectificaciones de campo del mapa de ecosistemas de Colombia, para la jurisdicción del Valle del Cauca. Santiago de Cali: Coporación Autónoma del Valle del Cauca, Fundacion Agua Viva; 2010 June 21. 243 p. Report No.: Informe Final Convenio 256 de 2.010.
  30. 30. Montoya-Colonia AM. Conformación del mapa de ecosistemas del Valle del Cauca empleando Sistemas de Información Geográfica. Ventana Informática. 2010;22: 11–38.
  31. 31. Huffman G, Bolvin D, Braithwaite D, Hsu K, Joyce R, Xie P; 2014 [cited 20 March 2020]. Integrated Multi-satellite Retrievals for GPM (IMERG), version 4.4; NASA´s Precipitation Processing Center [Internet]. Available from
  32. 32. Jarvis A, Reuter HI, Nelson A, Guevara E; 2008 [cited 20 March 2020]. Hole-filled seamless SRTM data V4; International Centre for Tropical Agriculture (CIAT) [Internet]. Available from
  33. 33. Perfetti del Corral M, Prada Lombo CF, Cardenas Fonseca ML, Cárdenas Contreras MA, Rubiano Fontecha AC, Freire Delgado EE, et al.; 2018 [cited 20 March 2020]. Marco Geoestadístico Nacional; Departamento Administrativo Nacional de Estadística (DANE) [Internet]. Available from
  34. 34. Cabra-Garcia J, Brescovit AD. Revision and phylogenetic analysis of the orb-weaving spider genus Glenognatha Simon, 1887 (Araneae, Tetragnathidae). Zootaxa. 2016;4069(1): 1–183. pmid:27395905
  35. 35. Álvarez-Padilla F, Hormiga G. A protocol for digesting internal soft tissues and mounting spiders for scanning electron microscopy. The Journal of Arachnology. 2007;35(3): 538–42.
  36. 36. Folmer O, Black M, Hoeh W, Lutz R, Vrijenhoek R. DNA primers for amplification of mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I from diverse metazoan invertebrates. Molecular marine biology and biotechnology. 1994;3(5): 294–9. pmid:7881515
  37. 37. Gordon D, Desmarais C, Green P. Automated finishing with autofinish. Genome Research. 2001;11(4): 614–25. pmid:11282977
  38. 38. Gordon D, Abajian C, Green P. Consed: A graphical tool for sequence finishing. Genome research. 1998;8(3): 195–202. pmid:9521923
  39. 39. Ewing B, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces using phred. II. Error probabilities. Genome research. 1998;8(3): 186–94. pmid:9521922
  40. 40. Ewing B, Hillier L, Wendl MC, Green P. Base-calling of automated sequencer traces usingPhred. I. Accuracy assessment. Genome research. 1998;8(3): 175–85. pmid:9521921
  41. 41. Keyserling E. Die Arachniden Australiens, nach der Natur beschrieben und abgebildet. Zweiter Theil. Nürnberg: Bauer & Raspe; 1887.
  42. 42. Kallal RJ, Dimitrov D, Arnedo MA, Giribet G, and Hormiga G. Monophyly, taxon sampling, and the nature of ranks in the classification of orb-weaving spiders (Araneae: Araneoidea). Systematic biology. 2020;69: 401–411. pmid:31165170
  43. 43. Kuntner M, Hamilton CA, Cheng R-C, Gregorič M, Lupše N, Lokovšek T, et al. Golden orbweavers ignore biological rules: phylogenomic and comparative analyses unravel a complex evolution of sexual size dimorphism. Systematic biology. 2019;68: 555–572. pmid:30517732
  44. 44. Wheeler WC. Systematics: A Course of Lectures. 1st ed. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell; 2012.
  45. 45. Katoh K, Standley DM. MAFFT multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Molecular biology and evolution. 2013;30(4): 772–80. pmid:23329690
  46. 46. Larsson A. AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(22): 3276–8. pmid:25095880
  47. 47. Wheeler WC, Coddington JA, Crowley LM, Dimitrov D, Goloboff PA, Griswold CE, et al. The spider tree of life: phylogeny of Araneae based on target‐gene analyses from an extensive taxon sampling. Cladistics. 2017;33(6): 574–616.
  48. 48. Nguyen L-T, Schmidt HA, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ. IQ-TREE: a fast and effective stochastic algorithm for estimating maximum-likelihood phylogenies. Molecular biology and evolution. 2015;32(1): 268–74. pmid:25371430
  49. 49. Kalyaanamoorthy S, Minh BQ, Wong TK, von Haeseler A, Jermiin LS. ModelFinder: fast model selection for accurate phylogenetic estimates. Nature methods. 2017;14(6): 587–9. pmid:28481363
  50. 50. Hoang DT, Chernomor O, von Haeseler A, Minh BQ, Vinh LS. UFBoot2: improving the ultrafast bootstrap approximation. Molecular biology and evolution. 2018;35(2): 518–22. pmid:29077904
  51. 51. Guindon S, Dufayard J-F, Lefort V, Anisimova M, Hordijk W, Gascuel O. New algorithms and methods to estimate maximum-likelihood phylogenies: assessing the performance of PhyML 3.0. Systematic biology. 2010;59(3): 307–21. pmid:20525638
  52. 52. Dierkens M. Contribution à l'étude des Araneidae de Guyane française. V-Les genres Alpaida et Ocrepeira. Bulletin ensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon. 2014;83(1–2): 14–30.
  53. 53. Kumar S, Stecher G, Li M, Knyaz C, Tamura K. MEGA X: Molecular evolutionary genetics analysis across computing platforms. Molecular biology and evolution. 2018;35(6): 1547–9. pmid:29722887
  54. 54. Puillandre N, Lambert A, Brouillet S, and Achaz G. ABGD, Automatic Barcode Gap Discovery for primary species delimitation. Molecular ecology. 2012;21: 1864–1877. pmid:21883587
  55. 55. Hentz NM. Descriptions and figures of the araneides of the United States. Boston Journal of Natural History. 1847;5: 443–478.
  56. 56. Nicolet H. Aracnidos. In: Gay Ceditor. Historia física y política de Chile. Zoología 3. Santiago: Museo Natural de Santiago; 1849. pp. 319–543.
  57. 57. Walckenaer CA. Tableau des aranéides ou caractères essentiels des tribus, genres, familles et races que renferme le genre Aranea de Linné, avec la désignation des espèces comprises dans chacune de ces divisions. Paris: Dentu; 1805.
  58. 58. Fabricius JC. Systema entomologiae, sistens insectorum classes, ordines, genera, species, adiectis, synonymis, locis descriptionibus observationibus. Flensburg and Lipsiae: Libreria Kortii; 1775.
  59. 59. Walckenaer CA. Histoire naturelle des Insects. Aptères. Tome deuxième. Paris: Rotet; 1841.
  60. 60. Bryant EB. The Argiopidae of Hispaniola. Bulletin of the Museum of Comparative Zoology. 1945;95: 357–422.
  61. 61. Taczanowski L. Les aranéides du Pérou central (suite). Horae Societatis Entomologicae Rossicae. 1879;15: 102–136.
  62. 62. Linnaeus C. Systema naturae per regna tria naturae, secundum classes, ordines, genera, species, cum characteribus differentiis, synonymis, locis. 12th ed. Holmiae: Laurentii Salvii; 1767.
  63. 63. Levi HW. Keys to the genera of araneid orbweavers (Araneae, Araneidae) of the Americas. Journal of Arachnology. 2002; 527–562.
  64. 64. Simon E. Histoire naturelle des araignées. 10th ed. Paris: Roret; 1895.
  65. 65. Pickard-Cambridge FO. On new genera and species of Araneidea. Proceedings of the Zoological Society of London. 1882;50(3): 423–442.
  66. 66. Pickard-Cambridge FO. Arachnida—Araneida and Opiliones. In: Pickard-Cambridge O, editor. Biologia Centrali-Americana. London: Zoology; 1904. pp. 465–560.
  67. 67. Schenkel E. Bericht über einige Spinnentiere aus Venezuela. Verhandlungen der Naturforschenden Gesellschaft in Basel. 1953;64(1): 1–57.
  68. 68. Eberhard WG. Rapid divergent evolution of sexual morphology: comparative tests of antagonistic coevolution and traditional female choice. Evolution. 2004;58(9): 1947–1970. pmid:15521454
  69. 69. Kekkonen M, Hebert PD. DNA barcode‐based delineation of putative species: efficient start for taxonomic workflows. Molecular ecology resources. 2014;14: 706–715. pmid:24479435
  70. 70. Kekkonen M, Mutanen M, Kaila L, Nieminen M, and Hebert PD. Delineating species with DNA barcodes: a case of taxon dependent method performance in moths. PloS one. 2015;10(4): e0122481. pmid:25849083
  71. 71. Hebert PD, Ratnasingham S, De Waard JR. Barcoding animal life: cytochrome c oxidase subunit 1 divergences among closely related species. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London Series B: Biological Sciences. 2003;270(suppl_1): S96–S9.
  72. 72. Astrin JJ, Höfer H, Spelda J, Holstein J, Bayer S, Hendrich L, et al. Towards a DNA Barcode Reference Database for spiders and harvestmen of Germany. PloS one. 2016;11(9): e0162624. pmid:27681175
  73. 73. Barrett RD, Hebert PD. Identifying spiders through DNA barcodes. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2005;83(3): 481–91.
  74. 74. Robinson EA, Blagoev GA, Hebert PD, Adamowicz SJ. Prospects for using DNA barcoding to identify spiders in species-rich genera. ZooKeys. 2009;16(27): 27–46.
  75. 75. Čandek K, Kuntner M. DNA barcoding gap: reliable species identification over morphological and geographical scales. Molecular ecology resources. 2015;15(2): 268–77. pmid:25042335
  76. 76. Blagoev GA, deWaard JR, Ratnasingham S, deWaard SL, Lu L, Robertson J, et al. Untangling taxonomy: a DNA barcode reference library for Canadian spiders. Molecular Ecology Resources. 2016;16(1): 325–41. pmid:26175299
  77. 77. Dierkens M. Contribution à l'étude de divers genres d'Araneidae (Araneae) de Guyane française. Bulletin mensuel de la Société Linnéenne de Lyon. 2012;81(1–2): 23–33.
  78. 78. Hurtado-Gómez JP, Arredondo JC, Sales Nunes PM, Daza JM. A New Species of Pholidobolus (Squamata: Gymnophthalmidae) from the Paramo Ecosystem in the Northern Andes of Colombia. South American Journal of Herpetology. 2018;13(3): 271–86.
  79. 79. Diazgranados M, Barber JC. Geography shapes the phylogeny of frailejones (Espeletiinae Cuatrec., Asteraceae): a remarkable example of recent rapid radiation in sky islands. PeerJ. 2017;5: e2968. pmid:28168124
  80. 80. Montoya AL, Ricarte A, Wolff M. Two new species of Quichuana Knab (Diptera: Syrphidae) from the paramo ecosystems in Colombia. Zootaxa. 2017;4244(3): 390–402. pmid:28610113
  81. 81. Madriñán S, Cortés AJ, Richardson JE. Páramo is the world's fastest evolving and coolest biodiversity hotspot. Frontiers in genetics. 2013;4: 192. pmid:24130570