Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Correction

Correction: Understanding the prevalence of bear part consumption in Cambodia: A comparison of specialised questioning techniques

  • Elizabeth Oneita Davis,
  • Brian Crudge,
  • Thona Lim,
  • David O’Connor,
  • Vichet Roth,
  • Matt Hunt,
  • Jenny Anne Glikman
  • Article
  • Metrics
  • Comments
  • Media Coverage

In the ‘Specialised questioning techniques in Cambodia’ subsection of the Discussion, there is an error in the first sentence of the fourth paragraph. The correct sentence is: The standard error for NT overlapped with UCT in Phnom Penh (Fig 2). In both other sites the estimated prevalence estimates for NT were significantly higher than the other techniques.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. Prevalence estimates.

Prevalence estimates of bear part use obtained through specialised questioning techniques (SQTs) and direct questioning for all three field sites (Stung Treng (ST): n = 641; Cardamom Mountains (CM): n = 638; Phnom Penh (PP): n = 649.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233798.g001

There is also an error in the first sentence of the seventh paragraph of this subsection. The correct sentence is: By comparison, we found generally trustworthy results for UCT in two of our study sites of Stung Treng and Phnom Penh, barring the larger standard errors and by extension variability that characterizes UCT (e.g. [43]).

The second sentence of the eighth paragraph of this subsection does not appear. The second sentence is: Additionally, UCT’s high variability suggests that alternative techniques such as NT may be more useful in gaining precise estimates.

In Fig 2, the unmatched count technique (UCT) and standard error calculations are incorrect. Please see the correct Fig 2 here.

Reference

  1. 1. Davis EO, Crudge B, Lim T, O’Connor D, Roth V, Hunt M, et al. (2019) Understanding the prevalence of bear part consumption in Cambodia: A comparison of specialised questioning techniques. PLoS ONE 14(2): e0211544. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0211544 pmid:30785903

Citation: Davis EO, Crudge B, Lim T, O’Connor D, Roth V, Hunt M, et al. (2020) Correction: Understanding the prevalence of bear part consumption in Cambodia: A comparison of specialised questioning techniques. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0233798. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0233798

Published: May 20, 2020

Copyright: © 2020 Davis et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.