http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4807-5672
Figures
Abstract
Fungus-cultivating termites are successful herbivores largely rely on the external symbiotic fungus-combs to decompose plant polysaccharides. The comb harbors both fungi and bacteria. However, the complementary roles and functions of the bacteria are out of the box. To this purpose, we look into different decomposition stages of fungus-combs using high-throughput sequencing of the 16S rRNA gene to examine bacterial community structure. We also explored the bacterial response to physicochemical indexes (such as moisture, ash content and organic matter) and plant substrates (leaves or branches or mix food). Some specific families such as Lachnospiraceae, Ruminococcaceae, and Peptostreptococcaceae may be involved in lignocellulose degradation, whereas Burkholderiaceae may be associated with aromatic compounds degradation. We observed that as the comb mature there is a shift of community composition which may be an adjustment of specific bacteria to deal with different lignocellulosic material. Our results indicated that threshold amount of physicochemical indexes are beneficial for bacterial diversity but too high moisture, low organic matter and high ash content may reduce their diversity. Furthermore, the average highest bacterial diversity was recorded from the comb built by branches followed by mix food and leaves. Besides, this study could help in the use of bacteria from the comb of fungus-cultivating termites in forestry and agricultural residues making them easier to digest as fodder.
Citation: Liang S, Wang C, Ahmad F, Yin X, Hu Y, Mo J (2020) Exploring the effect of plant substrates on bacterial community structure in termite fungus-combs. PLoS ONE 15(5): e0232329. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232329
Editor: Kandasamy Ulaganathan, Osmania University, INDIA
Received: August 15, 2019; Accepted: April 14, 2020; Published: May 1, 2020
Copyright: © 2020 Liang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All sequencing files are available from NCBI (accession numbers SAMN14001158, SAMN14001159, SAMN14001298, SAMN14001301, SAMN14001316, SAMN14001317, SAMN14001318, SAMN14001321, SAMN14001323). All other relevant data are within the manuscript.
Funding: JM Grant numbers: 31770686 National Natural Science Foundation of China http://www.nsfc.gov.cn/ The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: No authors have competing interests
Introduction
Herbivorous insects obtain energy and nutrients from their host plants. However, lignocellulose in plants biomass is highly recalcitrant to enzymes attack. To overcome this barrier, these insects have evolved specific feeding tactics [1] or digestive capacities such as masticating organs, gut structures, digestive enzymes, and symbiotic systems [2]. Another challenge is a wide variety of constitutive, or induced defense compounds. These chemical defenses can act as repellents, or antinutritives, or toxics, or attract predators [1, 3–5]. The herbivores have also adapted some strategies against these compounds. For example, the desensitization of insect proteins targeted by plant defenses or the modification of ingested plant chemicals [3]. The capacity of herbivores to break these two obstacles shape them to be specialists or generalists.
Fungus-cultivating termites (Blattodea, Termitidae, Macrotermitinae) are successful herbivores, feed on various plant materials such as dry grass, leaf litter, root and ruminant dung [6, 7]. They contribute to more than 90% of plant biomass in arid tropics [8] through the efficient degradation of highly recalcitrant lignocellulosic materials. To this purpose, they cultivate special basidiomycete fungi (Agaricomycetes, Lyophyllaceae, Termitomyces) in their nests as an external “digestive” system called fungus-combs. The food processing in Macrotermitinae presents a complex age polyethism involving two gut passages [9–11] (Fig 1).
Food forage: old workers collect the food from outside environment and pile in the colony; First gut passage: young workers ingest the foraged material along with nodules (conidia) from middle-aged fungus-comb and excrete primary feces on the top surface of the comb to establish fresh comb; Comb fermentation: fungus grows on the fresh comb, degrade it efficiently to convert it into middle-aged comb, where new nodules are produced [12, 13]. The comb turns to mature in 45 days [12]; Second gut passage: old workers ingest mature comb and excrete final feces. YW, young worker; OW, old worker.
The termite comb not only harbor fungus but also bacteria [14–16]. The lignocellulolytic potential of Termitomyces has been demonstrated by enzyme activity assays of culture in vitro [17, 18], RNAseq in situ [19], and genome sequencing [10]. However, the functions of the bacteria in comb are unclear. In wood-feeding termite, Fibrobacteres, Firmicutes, Bacteroidetes, the TG3 phylum, Elusimicrobia, Spirochaetes are the fiber associated lignocellulolytic bacteria [20–23]. Some studies indicated that bacteria in fungus comb have antimicrobial, polycyclic-degrading and cellulose-degrading activity [24–27]. Otani et al. [15] and Long et al. [16] described the presence of bacterial community in field-collected fungus-combs, but their studies are unable to clarify what kind of community composition are active at different decomposition stages of comb and how do they respond to different plant substrates?
Therefore, we fed fungus-cultivating termite (Odontotermes formosanus) with three different kinds of lignocellulose diets such as leaves, branches, and mix food respectively in laboratory and sampled the fungus-combs at different stages of decomposition or ages. Further, we also explored the impact of three physicochemical indexes (moisture, ash content and organic matter) on bacterial diversity in fungus-combs.
Materials and methods
Termite colonies feeding and sample collection
Three colonies of O. formosanus (height ≈ 6–8 cm; diameter ≈ 12–15 cm) harboring king(s) and queen(s) were collected from a forested area in Sanming, Fujian Province, China (117.90° E, 25.53° N). The private land owner gave permission for this collection. The colonies along with fungus-combs were wrapped in plastic film separately and transported to the lab within 12 h of excavation. All colonies were placed separately in plastic chambers (45 × 45 ×30 cm, length × width × depth) containing clay soil obtained from the area where the colonies were collected. The rearing systems were maintained in complete darkness at 26 ± 1°C and > 90% relative humidity. After the colonies became stable in a laboratory, they were allowed to feed on one of the three different kinds of food, including i) leaves or ii) branches of Quercus palustris, or iii) mix food collected from Laohe Mountain, Hangzhou, Zhejiang Province, China. All colonies were successful in building new fungus-combs. We divided the whole comb into three layers i) top or fresh comb, ii) middle or middle-aged comb, and iii) bottom or mature comb (Fig 1). The fungus-combs constructed by individual food were collected as described previously by Li et al. [9]. Briefly, dark brown color for fresh, yellowish-brown for middle-aged and gray for mature. For every sample, 3 g was used to measure the physicochemical indexes immediately, and 0.5 g was stored at—80°C for subsequent microbial diversity analysis.
Measurement of physicochemical indexes
The moisture, ash content and organic matter were measured from each sample. For moisture content measurement, a weighing bottle was washed, dried in the oven and weighed (m1). Approximately 0.5 g fungus-comb was put into the bottle and re-weighed (m2), dried in an oven at 105°C for 6 hours, and re-weighed (m3) [28]. In case of ash content, a ceramic crucible was washed and dried in a muffle furnace at 550°C for 4 hours and weighed (m4). Approximately 0.5 g of totally dried fungus-comb was put into the crucible and re-weighed (m5), re-dried at 550°C for 4 hours, and re-weighed (m6) [29]. The moisture, ash and organic matter content were determined as follows:
DNA extraction
Approximately, 0.15 g of each sample was ground in a 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube with 800 μl Tris-EDTA (100 mM Tris base, 50 mM EDTA, PH 8.0). The mixture was transferred to a 2 ml screw-cap tube and homogenized by bead-beating [30]. After that, the homogenate was mixed with 100 μl 5 mg/ml lysozyme and incubated at 37°C for 20 min. Next, 60 μl 32 mg/ml protease k and 40 μl 25% SDS, were added and incubated at 37°C for 40 min. Then, the lysate was mixed with 167 μl 5 M NaCl and 133 μl 10% CTAB, and incubated at 65°C for 10 min [31]. After the extraction by phenol-chloroform-isoamyl alcohol (25: 24: 1, v: v: v) from the lysate, the crude DNA was purified using a Qiagen DNeasy column following the protocol as described by the company. The purified DNA in the column was eluted by 100 μl AE buffer (Qiagen).
Illumina sequencing
The bacterial communities in fungus-combs were analyzed using 454 Illumina sequencing. The primer pair 338F (ACT CCT ACG GGA GGC AGC AG) and 806R (GGA CTA CHV GGG TWT CTA AT) [32] were used to amplify the V3—V4 region of bacterial 16S rRNA genes in the respective DNA samples. The amplified products were purified by the AxyPrep DNA kit (AXYGEN, China). The amplicons were sequenced on Illumina MiSeq by Shanghai Personal Biotechnology Inc., China.
Data analysis
The physicochemical indexes were analyzed through Duncan's new multiple range method using SPSS, v.22.0 (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) at α = 0.05. Raw sequences were quality filtered using the QIIME release 1.8.0 software [33] under the stringent conditions (reads ≥ 150 bp, no ambiguous bases, bases mismatched by 5’ primer ≤ 1 and a maximum number of homopolymers ≤ 8). Subsequent removal of chimeras was carried out through UCHIME [34] by uchime3_denovo. After reducing the redundancy of sequences and demarcating OTU (Operational Taxonomic Unit) with a similarity threshold of 97% using UCLUST [35], sequences with the highest abundance of each OTU were selected as the representative sequences of corresponding OTU. Representative sequences of each OTU were aligned and taxonomically classified in the reference database, SILVA [36] using MOTHUR [37]. A subsequent assignment to the termite-specific reference database (DictDb) [38] was performed with a confidence threshold of 60%. OTUs were simplified by removing the OTUs whose abundance was lower than 0.001% of total sequences [39]. QIIME was used to calculate and map the rarefaction curves based on 97% sequence similarity cutoff and calculate diversity indexes of each sample by uclust. The relative abundance of bacteria at different levels were calculated and mapped through R software (http://www.r-project.org). LEfSe (linear discriminant analysis effect size) analysis was performed to identify discriminatory taxa through the online platform, Galaxy (http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/galaxy/). Heatmap of selected bacterial lineages, the constrained corresponding analysis (CCA) of the bacterial community and variation partition analysis for physicochemical indexes were implemented in R software (packages pheatmap and vegan). The high-quality sequences of the samples have been submitted to the NCBI Sequence Read Archive (BioProject PRJNA604886); for accession numbers, see S5 Table.
Results
Effect of diets and fungus-comb ages on the physicochemical indexes
The physicochemical indexes including moisture, ash content and organic matter from the fungus-combs built by leaves, branches, and mix food respectively, are summarized in Table 1 and Fig 2. The moisture content at different decomposition stages of the combs i.e., top, middle and bottom was significantly different (d.f = 8, F = 99.927, p<0.001), (d.f = 8, F = 62.247, p<0.001) and (d.f = 8, F = 9.595, p<0.014) among leaves, branches and mixed food, respectively (Table 1). Moreover, comparatively higher moisture was recorded from the comb constructed by leaves followed by mix food and branches.
The bar indicates mean±SD (n = 9), bar labeled by different letters of the same index are significantly different as determined by Duncan's new multiple range test (P < 0.05).
The bacterial community structure among different fungus-combs
The whole comb of mix food, branches and leaves occupied 496, 760 and 266 OTUs, respectively, however, 721 OUTs is common among all (Fig 3A). In case of comb parts, the OTU cluster analysis clearly divided the bacterial community into two groups (Fig 3B). The groups are formed top and middle (group 1) and bottom of all combs (group 2), with bacterial community similarity. The bacterial communities showed similarities at top and middle comb but they were entirely different from bottom combs, irrespective of food (Fig 3B and 3C).
(A) Common bacteria OTU Venn diagram of fungus-combs built from different foods (OTUs whose abundance lower than 0.001% of total sequences were removed). (B) Community similarities based on weighted Unifrac metric; (C) The constrained corresponding analysis (CCA) of the bacterial community and variation partition analysis for three physicochemical indexes. Whereas TL, ML, BL, TB, MB, BB, TM, MM, and BM described in Table 1. The Denoising stats of OTUs are listed in S6 Table.
The microbial diversity indexes (Simpson [40] and Shannon [41]), estimated community richness (ACE [42] and Chao1 [43]) (Table 2) described that the average highest diversity was recorded from branches followed by mix food and leaves (Table 2). For comb parts, it increased in the middle and dropped in the bottom comb (Table 2).
At the phyla level, the most prominent first five out of seven bacterial groups comprised the members of Bacteroidetes, Proteobacteria, Firmicutes, Spirochaetae, Actinobacteria, Planctomycetes, and Acidobacteria (Fig 4A, for details, see S1 Table) were recorded in the top and middle of all combs. However, the relative abundances of Bacteroidetes, Planctomycetes, and Spirochaetes were reduced or even eliminated at the bottom of the combs, while Proteobacteria, Acidobacteria, and Actinobacteria were increased. The Firmicutes remained stable in all stages of the combs. At the family level, the abundances between the top and middle were similar but they were different from the bottom combs. There were also strong differences in the relative abundances of lineages among all fungus-combs across ages and food types (Figs 4B and 5). For example, Rhodospirillaceae and Burkholderiaceae preferred the bottom comb of oak leaves (BL), while Comaonadaceae preferred the bottom comb of oak branches and mix food (BB and BM). LEfSe analysis of fungus-combs across different decomposition stages indicated that specific bacterial groups may contribute to specific decomposition stage of the comb (S1 and S2 Figs). For instance, Alistipes was the most discriminatory genus in fresh combs, while Burkholderia-Paraburkholderia was the most discriminatory genus in mature combs. Meanwhile, a detailed taxonomic classification is attached to supplementary material (S2 Table).
(A) The bacterial community structure at the phyla level. (B) The community composition at the family level.
There are four groups of bacterial lineages: A, enriched (RA > 5%) in fresh comb of three food treatments; B, enriched (RA > 5%) in mature comb of three food treatments; C, showed preference in fresh comb of specific food treatment(s); D, showed preference in mature comb of specific food treatment(s). T, M, and B described in Table 1.
Effect of physicochemical indexes on bacterial community structure
To link the bacterial community with physicochemical indexes in combs, the constrained corresponding analysis (CCA) was performed (Fig 3C). The length of the lines with arrows represent the contribution of the corresponding factors to the variation in the bacterial community structure. The moisture content contributed the most followed by the organic matter and ash content. In case of diets, there was a positive interaction between bacterial diversity and organic matter (Tables 1 and 2, Fig 3C). Contrary to this, moisture and ash contents have a negative relation with the bacterial community. For example, moisture and ash contents were highest in leaves comb followed by mix food and branches. Opposite to this, organic matter and bacterial community were higher in branches followed by mix food and leaves. For comb stages, the organic matter had a strong positive interaction with bacterial diversity followed by moisture and ash contents. For example, among all combs, we generally recorded the highest bacterial diversity in the middle combs where organic matter was also high, but moisture and ash contents were not too high as compared to the bottom. On the basis of these results, we suggested that too high moisture and ash content, and low organic matter negatively affect the bacteria diversity.
Discussion
Bacteria and the ectosymbiotic fungus (Termitomyces) share the habitat, fungus-comb [14–16]. Termitomyces produce various enzymes to degrade the plant material [10, 17, 19], while bacteria may contribute to decompose the biomass of fungus-comb in different pattern. Similar to termites, the leaf-cutting ants maintained fungus garden in their nests [44]. The biologists suggested that the functions of bacteria in the fungus garden of leaf-cutting ants are lignocellulose degradation, nitrogen fixation, nutrient supplementation, and antibiotic production [45–49], but whether these bacteria play similar roles in fungus-comb of termite, remains unclear. We present the detailed comparison of bacterial communities and physicochemical indexes among different decomposition stages in fungus-combs of termite (O. formosanus). We found that communities were similar among all combs but there were marked shifts in bacterial composition across comb ages over time. Moreover, the compositions of physicochemical indexes were different among all combs, as well as among all comb stages. Besides, bacterial diversity had a strong relationship with physicochemical indexes. Below, we discuss the consequences of these findings.
The shift of dominant bacterial groups across the age-groups of combs
The dominant phyla and families were very similar at the same decomposition stages of all combs (S1 Table and Figs 4 and 5), may have a basic function of maintaining fungus-comb. To assign the role of bacteria in comb, we assumed that bacteria lineages enriched in the top comb may be shifted from termite gut and have complementary or similar roles in the comb as well as in the gut [15], while the community composition in the bottom comb may have a significant role only in a comb.
The dominant phyla in fungus-comb (see for details, S1 Table) are inconsistent with the previous studies on fungus cultivating termite combs and guts [15, 16, 50]. These phyla are important for carbohydrate metabolism, reductive acetogenesis, fungal cell wall degradation [10, 51, 52] and cello-oligomer degradation [53], which may help termite to get protein and fungal enzymes to cleave lignin [10]. As shown in S4 Table and Fig 5, the genera which were dominant in the “comb-age specific” bacterial families (Group A and B) and in “food-type specific” bacterial families (Group C and D) showed similar preferences with the corresponsive families for the same combs. For example, Rikenellaceae and its dominant genus, Alistipes both preferred the top combs. According to LEfSe analysis (S1 and S2 Figs), these genera were included all discriminatory genera across different aged combs by, except Nitrospirillum of Rhodospirillaceae which was not a discriminatory genus and it was only dominant in the bottom comb of leaf diet.
Porphyromonadaceae and Rikenellaceae are the most dominant families of Bacteroidetes in top comb, metabolize carbohydrates and produce organic acids like acetate, succinate, and butyrate [54, 55], to create an acidic environment for Termitomyces growth and better utilization of cellulose. Alistipes and BCf9-17, the members of Rikenellaceae, were the discriminatory genera in the top combs. These are gut‑specific bacterial lineages in fungus-cultivating termite [38, 50]. Furthermore, Alistipes has a positive correlation with protein diets [38, 50, 56], whereas, the functions of BCf9-17 are poorly understood.
Spirochaetae and Planctomycetes were abundant both in top and middle comb, but they were scarce in bottom comb (S1 Table and Fig 4A). The traditional Planctomycetes are chemoorganoheterotrophs [57]. The discriminatory genus in top combs is an uncultured bacterium belong to an uncultivated group, vadinHA49 (S1 and S2 Figs), enriched in fungus-cultivating termite gut [58]. The specific functions of these microbes are out of the box. Treponema belonging to Spirochaetae was the discriminatory genus in the top combs (S2 Table). These bacteria are important for acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 and nitrogen fixation in fungus-comb, however, it has been suggested that the abundance of nitrogen fixation bacteria is high in termite gut [59–64]. The potential of nitrogen fixation in fungus-comb requires further detailed investigation.
Proteobacteria and Actinobacteria were enriched in bottom comb, which is comparable with the previous works on fungus cultivating termite combs and guts [15, 65]. It has been suggested that Proteobacteria might assist in detoxification or food digestion [66–70], while Actinobacteria play a key role of defense through inhibiting the invasive fungus, Pseudoxylaria in fungus-cultivating termites [71]. The enrichment of Actinobacteria in mature comb might be from the surrounding soil by termites [65]. But, it is yet to be investigated that how are these bacteria regulated by termites? The genera Nitrobacter, Ochrobactrum, and Burkholderia-Paraburkholderia are the dominant members of Bradyrhizobiaceae, Brucellaceae, and Burkholderiaceae, respectively, belonging to Proteobacteria phyla, were discriminatory in bottom comb. It has been suggested previously that Nitrobacter are nitrite-oxidizing bacteria [72, 73]. Ochrobactrum microbes have lignolytic potential as well as these bacteria, also play a significant role in nitrite-oxidization [74–77]. Burkholderia-Paraburkholderia bacteria are capable to degrade aromatics [78].
Preference of bacterial lineages to different diets
Bacterial lineages across different diets were compared at the family level (Fig 5). Rikenellaceae (Bacteroidetes) were high in the comb of leaves followed by branches and mix food combs. It has been suggested that Rikenellaceae metabolize carbohydrate actively [79]. BCf9-17 genera of Rikenellaceae was abundantly higher in top comb of leaves compared to top combs of branches and mix food i.e., 10.40%, 0.70%, and 1.60% respectively (S4 Table). This genus is termite-specific, but its functions are poorly studied [65].
The specific family of Firmicutes showed its preference to specific diet. For example, Ruminococcaceae and Lachnospiraceae are important for cellulose degradation [80, 81], showed their preferences to different diets. Ruminococcaceae were relatively lower in leaves comb as compared to branches and mix food. While Lachnospiraceae were high in leaves and mix food comb. This is might be due to that Ruminococcaceae mainly degrade lignin rich in branch and mix food diets, while Lachnospiraceae utilize cellulose more accessible in leaves. Moreover, Peptostreptococcaceae of Firmicutes has potential to degrade hydrocarbons [82, 83], and these bacteria showed less preference to the comb of leaves (Fig 5). This is consistent with Schauer et al. [84] who described that a high-fiber diet caused shifts in the diversity of dominant gut bacteria in cockroach. Furthermore, the discriminatory genus in Peptostreptococcaceae, Peptoclostridium, has the ability to breakdown and utilize plant fibers [85, 86]. In bottom combs, the families of Proteobacteria also presented different preferences to different diets. Burkholderiaceae and Rhodospirillaceae were in favor of leaves, while Bradyrhizobiaceae, Brucellaceae, and Comamonadaceae preferred branches and mix food (Fig 5). Considering the capacity of Burkholderiaceae to degrade aromatic compounds [25, 87–90], their enrichment in leaves comb might deal with a higher content of aromatic compounds [61, 91, 92]. Burkholderia-Paraburkholderia, was the most enriched genus of Burkholderiaceae, has aromatics-degrading potential as we mentioned before [78]. Species of Rhodospirillaceae diverse in saline environment [93–95], may have the potential of halotolerance. The Nitrospirillum was contributed almost all abundance of Rhodospirillaceae and has a vital role in nitrification [96]. Recent research suggested that Comamonadaceae in forest soils can degrade lignin substrate [97]. Delftia was the most abundant genus of Comamonadaceae, and it has the capacity to degrade lignin-derived aromatic compounds [98]. Brucellaceae and Bradyrhizobiaceae are most important for nitrogen-fixation [99, 100]. Ochrobactrum and Nitrobacter were the most enriched genera of these families respectively, and their nitrite-oxidizing potential has been discussed before.
The relationship of bacterial community and physicochemical indexes in the comb
The moisture content contributed the most to the variation in the bacterial community structure, followed by the organic matter and the ash content (Fig 3C). We recommend that specific amount of physicochemical indexes are required for better growth of bacterial diversity but excess moisture and ash contents, and low organic matter may harm their diversity (Fig 2 and Table 2). These findings are in the agreement with previous studies in soil [101–103]. Excess ash contents indicated the high salinity which can limit water availability [104] and it can also be toxic to metabolic activities [105]. Moisture can affect microbial activity by dissolving substrates [106]. Brockett et al. [107] reported that soil moisture and the potential lignocellulose-degrading activities of enzymes have a negative correlation. Thus, excess moisture could reduce the activities of the enzymes and lead to low nutrition availability in the comb. Soil organic matter content is often considered as a dominating factor of soil bacterial diversity [108, 109] because most soil micro-organisms rely on organic matter decomposition to obtain energy [110, 111]. Similarly, the effect of organic matter in comb can be explained by the availability of energy that most micro-organisms may obtain energy from organic matter in comb, and the low organic matter directly restricts the bacterial diversity and abundance.
Conclusion
The current study gives a brief account of how bacterial community structure at different decomposition stages of fungus-comb respond to various lignocellulosic plant materials and physicochemical indexes. The shift of bacterial community across the fungus-comb over time indicated the adjustment of bacterial structure in the comb to deal with different kinds of diets (S3 Table, seeing the indicated functions). In addition, physicochemical indexes had been changed at different decomposition stages of comb and these also had a strong relationship with bacterial diversity. The extremely high moisture, low organic matter, and high ash content may reduce bacterial diversity. Furthermore, ruminants can only consume less lignified herbaceous plants such as soft grass [2]. Functional bacteria from the fungus-cultivating termites comb can be applied in the pretreatment of forestry and agricultural residues to improve their palatability and digestibility for ruminant animals.
Supporting information
S1 Table. Bacterial community structure at phyla-level across age-groups of different fungus-combs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232329.s001
(XLSX)
S2 Table. A detailed taxonomic classification of bacteria groups.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232329.s002
(XLSX)
S3 Table. Indicated functions of predominant bacteria in fungus-combs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232329.s003
(XLSX)
S4 Table. Selected bacterial lineages at different decomposition stages of different fungus-combs.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232329.s004
(XLSX)
S1 Fig. LDA scores observed for individual taxa that passed the LefSe significance threshold.
Threshold on the logarithmic LDA score for discriminative features was 4.0.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232329.s007
(TIF)
S2 Fig. Taxonomic cladogram of bacteria groups based on LDA scores.
Only discriminant groups are presented. All datasets were submitted to the Sequence Read Archive of NCBI (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov; BioProject PRJNA604886).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0232329.s008
(TIF)
Acknowledgments
We thank Zhengsen Chen for his assistance in collecting the termite colonies of O. formosanus and Mengyi Yang (Xiaoshan Institute of Termite Control) for the advice about rearing the colonies under lab conditions.
References
- 1. Howe GA, Jander G. Plant immunity to insect herbivores. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2008;59: 41–66. pmid:18031220
- 2. Watanabe H, Tokuda G. Cellulolytic systems in insects. Annu Rev Entomol. 2010;55: 609–632. pmid:19754245
- 3. Mithoefer A, Boland W. Plant defense against herbivores: chemical aspects. Annu Rev Plant Biol. 2012;63: 431–450. pmid:22404468
- 4. Chen H, Wilkerson CG, Kuchar JA, Phinney BS, Howe GA. Jasmonate-inducible plant enzymes degrade essential amino acids in the herbivore midgut. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(52): 19237–19242. pmid:16357201
- 5. Aharoni A, Jongsma MA, Bouwmeester HJ. Volatile science? Metabolic engineering of terpenoids in plants. Trends Plant Sci. 2005;10(12): 594–602. pmid:16290212
- 6. da Costa RR, Hu H, Li H, Poulsen M. Symbiotic plant biomass decomposition in fungus-growing termites. Insects. 2019;10(4): 87. pmid:30925664
- 7. Birnbaum SSL, Abbot P. Insect adaptations toward plant toxins in milkweed-herbivores systems—a review. Entomol Exp Appl. 2018;166(5): 357–366.
- 8. Hyodo F, Tayasu I, Inoue T, Azuma JI, Kudo T, Abe T. Differential role of symbiotic fungi in lignin degradation and food provision for fungus-growing termites (Macrotermitinae: Isoptera). Funct. Ecol. 2003;17(2): 186–193.
- 9. Li H, Yang M, Chen Y, Zhu N, Lee C, Wei J, et al. Investigation of age polyethism in food processing of the fungus-growing termite Odontotermes formosanus (Blattodea: Termitidae) using a laboratory artificial rearing system. J. Econ Entomol. 2015;108(1): 266–273. pmid:26470129
- 10. Poulsen M, Hu H, Li C, Chen Z, Xu L, Otani S, et al. Complementary symbiont contributions to plant decomposition in a fungus-farming termite. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(40): 14500–14505. pmid:25246537
- 11. Buxton RD. Termites and the turnover of dead wood in an arid tropical environment. Oecologia. 1981;51(3): 379–384. pmid:28310023
- 12. Li H, Yelle DJ, Li C, Yang M, Ke J, Zhang R, et al. Lignocellulose pretreatment in a fungus-cultivating termite. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2017;114(18): 4709–4714. pmid:28424249
- 13. Nobre T, Aanen DK. Fungiculture or termite husbandry? The ruminant hypothesis. Insects. 2012;3(1): 307–323. pmid:26467962
- 14. Li H, Dietrich C, Zhu N, Mikaelyan A, Ma B, Pi R, et al. Age polyethism drives community structure of the bacterial gut microbiota in the fungus-cultivating termite Odontotermes formosanus. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18(5): 1440–1451. pmid:26346907
- 15. Otani S, Hansen LH, Sørensen SJ, Poulsen M. Bacterial communities in termite fungus combs are comprised of consistent gut deposits and contributions from the environment. Microb Ecol. 2016;71(1): 207–220. pmid:26518432
- 16. Long YH, Xie L, Liu N, Yan X, Li MH, Fan MZ, et al. Comparison of gut-associated and nest-associated microbial communities of a fungus-growing termite (Odontotermes yunnanensis). Insect Sci. 2010;17(3): 265–276.
- 17. Taprab Y, Johjima T, Maeda Y, Moriya S, Trakulnaleamsai S, Noparatnaraporn N, et al. Symbiotic fungi produce laccases potentially involved in phenol degradation in fungus combs of fungus-growing termites in Thailand. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2005;71(12): 7696–7704. pmid:16332742
- 18. Mukherjee S, Khowala S. Secretion of cellobiase is mediated via vacuoles in Termitomyces clypeatus. Biotechnol Prog. 2002;18(6): 1195–1200. pmid:12467451
- 19. da Costa RR, Hu H, Pilgaard B, Vreeburg SME, Schückel J, Pedersen KSK, et al. Enzyme activities at different stages of plant biomass decomposition in three species of fungus-growing termites. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2018;84(5): UNSP e01815-17. pmid:29269491
- 20. Mikaelyan A, Strassert JFH, Tokuda G, Brune A. The fibre-associated cellulolytic bacterial community in the hindgut of wood-feeding higher termites (Nasutitermes spp.). Environ. Microbiol. 2014;16(9): 2711–2722.
- 21. Su LJ, Liu YQ, Liu H, Wang Y, Li Y, Lin HM, et al. Linking lignocellulosic dietary patterns with gut microbial Enterotypes of Tsaitermes ampliceps and comparison with Mironasutitermes shangchengensis. Genet. Mol. Res. 2015;14(4): 13954–13967. pmid:26535711
- 22. Su LJ, Yang LL, Huang S, Su XQ, Li Y, Wang FQ, et al. Comparative gut microbiomes of four species representing the higher and the lower termites. J. Insect Sci. 2016;16: 97. pmid:27638955
- 23. Huang XF, Bakker MG, Judd TM, Reardon KF, Vivanco JM. Variations in diversity and richness of gut bacterial communities of termites (Reticulitermes flavipes) fed with grassy and woody plant substrates. Microb. Ecol. 2013;65(3): 531–536. pmid:23529653
- 24. Benndorf R, Guo HJ, Sommerwerk E, Weigel C, Garcia-Altares M, Martin K, et al. Natural products from Actinobacteria associated with fungus-growing termites. Antibiotics (Basel, Switz.). 2018;7(3): 83. pmid:30217010
- 25. Mohd Radzi NAS, Tay KS, Abu Bakar NK, Uche Emenike C, Krishnan S, Shahul Hamid F, et al. Degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (pyrene and fluoranthene) by bacterial consortium isolated from contaminated road side soil and soil termite fungal comb. Environ. Earth Sci. 2015;74(6): 5383–5391.
- 26. Bastien G, Arnal G, Bozonnet S, Laguerre S, Ferreira F, Faure R, et al. Mining for hemicellulases in the fungus-growing termite Pseudacanthotermes militaris using functional metagenomics. Biotechnol. Biofuels. 2013;6: 78. pmid:23672637
- 27. Bakhtiari AR, Zakaria MP, Ramin M, Yaziz MI, Lajis MNH, Bi X. Characterization of perylene in tropical environment: comparison of new and old fungus comb for identifying perylene precursor in Macrotermes gilvus termite nests of Peninsular Malaysia. EnvironmentAsia. 2010;3(1): 13–19.
- 28. Duarte S, Taylor AM, Lloyd JD, Duarte M, Nunes L. Optimization of termite in-ground monitoring stations: an evaluation trial. Maderas-Cienc Tecnol. 2016;18(1): 191–206.
- 29.
ASTM D2974-14. Standard test methods for moisture, ash, and organic matter of peat and other organic soils. ASTM International, West Conshohocken, PA, 2014. https://doi.org/10.1520/D2974-14
- 30. Henckel T, Friedrich M, Conrad R. Molecular analyses of the methane-oxidizing microbial community in rice field soil by targeting the genes of the 16S rRNA, particulate methane monooxygenase, and methanol dehydrogenase. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999;65(5): 1980–1990 pmid:10223989
- 31. Hongoh Y, Ekpornprasit L, Inoue T, Moriya S, Trakulnaleamsai S, Ohkuma M, et al. Intracolony variation of bacterial gut microbiota among castes and ages in the fungus-growing termite Macrotermes gilvus. Mol Ecol. 2006;15(2): 505–516. pmid:16448416
- 32. Chen C, Zhang JN, Lu M, Qin C, Chen YH, Yang L, et al. Microbial communities of an arable soil treated for 8 years with organic and inorganic fertilizers. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 2016;52(4): 455–467.
- 33. Caporaso JG, Kuczynski J, Stombaugh J, Bittinger K, Bushman FD, Costello EK, et al. QIIME allows analysis of high-throughput community sequencing data. Nat Methods. 2010;7(5): 335–336. pmid:20383131
- 34. Edgar RC, Haas BJ, Clemente JC, Quince C, Knight R. UCHIME improves sensitivity and speed of chimera detection. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(16): 2194–2200. pmid:21700674
- 35. Edgar RC. Search and clustering orders of magnitude faster than BLAST. Bioinformatics. 2010;26(19): 2460–2461. pmid:20709691
- 36. Quast C, Pruesse E, Yilmaz P, Gerken J, Schweer T, Yarza P, et al. The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucleic Acids Res. 2013;41(D1): D590–D596. pmid:23193283
- 37. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T, Hall JR, Hartmann M, Hollister EB, et al. Introducing mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009;75(23): 7537–7541. pmid:19801464
- 38. Mikaelyan A, Köhler T, Lampert N, Rohland J, Boga H, Meuser K, et al. Classifying the bacterial gut microbiota of termites and cockroaches: a curated phylogenetic reference database (DictDb). Syst Appl Microbiol. 2015;38(7): 472–482. pmid:26283320
- 39. Bokulich NA, Subramanian S, Faith JJ, Gevers D, Gordon JI, Knight R, et al. Quality-filtering vastly improves diversity estimates from Illumina amplicon sequencing. Nat Methods. 2013;10(1): 57–59. pmid:23202435
- 40. Simpson EH. Measurement of diversity. Nature. 1949;163(4148): 688–688.
- 41. Shannon CE. A mathematical theory of communication. Bell Syst Tech J. 1948;27(3): 379–423.
- 42. Chao A, Ma MC and Yang M. Stopping rules and estimation for recapture debugging with unequal failure rates. Biometrika. 1993;80(1): 193–201.
- 43. Chao A. Nonparametric estimation of the number of classes in a population. Scan J Stat. 1984;11(4): 265–270.
- 44. De Fine Licht HH, Schiøtta M, Rogowska-Wrzesinskab A, Nygaarda S, Roepstorffb P, Boomsma JJ. Laccase detoxification mediates the nutritional alliance between leaf-cutting ants and fungus-garden symbionts. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2013;110(2): 583–587. pmid:23267060
- 45. Moreira-Soto RD, Sanchez E, Currie CR, Pinto-Tomás AA. Ultrastructural and microbial analyses of cellulose degradation in leaf-cutter ant colonies. Microbiology-(UK). 2017;163(11): 1578–1589. pmid:29034862
- 46. Aylward FO, Burnum KE, Scott JJ, Suen G, Tringe SG, Adams SM, et al. Metagenomic and metaproteomic insights into bacterial communities in leaf-cutter ant fungus gardens. ISME J. 2012;6(9): 1688–1701. pmid:22378535
- 47. Suen G, Scott JJ, Aylward FO, Adams SM, Tringe SG, Pinto-Tomás AA, et al. An insect herbivore microbiome with high plant biomass-degrading capacity. PLoS Genet. 2010;6(9): e1001129. pmid:20885794
- 48. Haeder S, Wirth R, Herz H, Spiteller D. Candicidin-producing Streptomyces support leaf-cutting ants to protect their fungus garden against the pathogenic fungus Escovopsis. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106(12): 4742–4746. pmid:19270078
- 49. Pinto-Tomás AA, Anderson MA, Suen G, Stevenson DM, Chu FST, Cleland WW, et al. Symbiotic nitrogen fixation in the fungus gardens of leaf-cutter ants. Science. 2009;326: 1120–1123. pmid:19965433
- 50. Otani S, Mikaelyan A, Nobre T, Hansen LH, Kone NA, Sorensen SJ, et al. Identifying the core microbial community in the gut of fungus-growing termites. Mol. Ecol. 2014;23(18): 4631–4644. pmid:25066007
- 51. Brune A. Symbiotic digestion of lignocellulose in termite guts. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2014;12: 168–180. pmid:24487819
- 52. Liu N, Zhang L, Zhou H, Zhang M, Yan X, Wang Q, et al. Metagenomic insights into metabolic capacities of the gut microbiota in a fungus-cultivating termite (Odontotermes yunnanensis). PLoS One. 2013;8(7): e69184. pmid:23874908
- 53. Zhang M, Liu N, Qian C, Wang Q, Wang Q, Long Y, et al. Phylogenetic and functional analysis of gut microbiota of a fungus-growing higher termite: bacteroidetes from higher termites are a rich source of β-glucosidase genes. Microb Ecol. 2014;68(2): 416–425. pmid:24584416
- 54.
Sakamoto M. The family Porphyromonadaceae. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong E, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F, editors. The prokaryotes. Berlin: Springer;2014. p. 811–824. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38954-2_132
- 55.
Graf J. The Family Rikenellaceae. In: Rosenberg E, DeLong E, Lory S, Stackebrandt E, Thompson F, editors. The prokaryotes. Berlin: Springer;2014. p. 857–859. dio: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-38954-2_134
- 56. David LA, Maurice CF, Carmody RN, Gootenberg DB, Button JE, Wolfe BE, et al. Diet rapidly and reproducibly alters the human gut microbiome. Nature. 2014;505(7484): 559–563. pmid:24336217
- 57. Fuerst JA, Sagulenko E. Beyond the bacterium: planctomycetes challenge our concepts of microbial structure and function. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2011;9(6): 403–413. pmid:21572457
- 58. Mikaelyan A. Microhabitat-specificity of the hindgut microbiota in higher termites, D. Sc. Thesis, The Max Planck institute for terrestrial microbiology. 2013. Available from: https://d-nb.info/1052995004/34
- 59. Sapountzis P, Verges JD, Rousk K, Cilliers M, Vorster BJ, Poulsen M. Potential for nitrogen fixation in the fungus-growing termite symbiosis. Front Microbiol. 2016;7: 1993. pmid:28018322
- 60. Ohkuma M, Noda S, Hattori S, Iida T, Yuki M, Starns D, et al. Acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 and nitrogen fixation by an endosymbiotic spirochete of a termite-gut cellulolytic protist. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(33): 10224–10230. pmid:25979941
- 61. Namuli A, Abdullah N, Sieo CC, Zuhainis SW, Oskoueian E. Phytochemical compounds and antibacterial activity of Jatropha curcas Linn. extracts. J. Med. Plants Res. 2011;5(16): 3982–3990.
- 62. Graber JR, Breznak JA. Physiology and nutrition of Treponema primitia, an H2/CO2-acetogenic spirochete from termite hindguts. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(3): 1307–1314. pmid:15006747
- 63. Lilburn TC, Kim KS, Ostrom NE, Byzek KR, Leadbetter JR, Breznak JA. Nitrogen fixation by symbiotic and free-living spirochetes. Science. 2001;292(5526): 2495–2498. pmid:11431569
- 64. Leadbetter JR, Schmidt TM, Graber JR, Breznak JA. Acetogenesis from H2 plus CO2 by spirochetes from termite guts. Science. 1999;283: 686–689. pmid:9924028
- 65. Makonde HM, Mwirichia R, Osiemo Z, Boga HI, Klenk HP. 454 Pyrosequencing-based assessment of bacterial diversity and community structure in termite guts, mounds and surrounding soils. SpringerPlus. 2015;4: 471. pmid:26355944
- 66. Dill-McFarland KA, Weimer PJ, Pauli JN, Peery MZ, Suen G. Diet specialization selects for an unusual and simplified gut microbiota in two- and three-toed sloths. Environ. Microbiol. 2016;18(5): 1391–1402. pmid:26271635
- 67. El Khalloufi F, Oufdou K, Bertrand M, Lahrouni M, Oudra B, Ortet P, et al. Microbiote shift in the Medicago sativa rhizosphere in response to cyanotoxins extract exposure. Sci Total Environ. 2016;539: 135–142. pmid:26356186
- 68. Jiang Y, Wei L, Zhang H, Yang K, Wang H. Removal performance and microbial communities in a sequencing batch reactor treating hypersaline phenol-laden wastewater. Bioresour Technol. 2016;218: 146–152. pmid:27359064
- 69. Edwards C, Lawton LA. Bioremediation of cyanotoxins. Adv Appl Microbiol. 2009;67: 109–129. pmid:19245938
- 70. Jiang HL, Tay JH, Maszenan AM, Tay STL. Bacterial diversity and function of aerobic granules engineered in a sequencing batch reactor for phenol degradation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70(11): 6767–6775. pmid:15528543
- 71. Visser AA, Nobre T, Currie CR, Aanen DK, Poulsen M. Exploring the potential for Actinobacteria as defensive symbionts in fungus-growing termites. Microb Ecol. 2012;63(4): 975–985. pmid:22173371
- 72. Pachiadaki MG, Sintes E, Bergauer K, Brown JM, Record NR, Swan BK, et al. Major role of nitrite-oxidizing bacteria in dark ocean carbon fixation. Science. 2017;358(6366): 1046–1050. pmid:29170234
- 73. Babic I, Fischer-Le Saux M, Giraud E, Boemare N. Occurrence of natural dixenic associations between the symbiont Photorhabdus luminescens and bacteria related to Ochrobactrum spp. in tropical entomopathogenic Heterorhabditis spp. (Nematoda, Rhabditida). Microbiology-(UK). 2000;146(3): 709–718. pmid:10746775
- 74. Yang CX, Wang T, Gao LN, Yin HJ, Lü X. Isolation, identification and characterization of lignin-degrading bacteria from Qinling, China. J. Appl. Microbiol. 2017;123(6): 1447–1460. pmid:28801977
- 75. Tsegaye B, Balomajumder C, Roy P. Biodelignification and hydrolysis of rice straw by novel bacteria isolated from wood feeding termite. 3 Biotech. 2018;8(10): 447. pmid:30333949
- 76. Kuhnigk T, Konig H. Degradation of dimeric lignin model compounds by aerobic bacteria isolated from the hindgut of xylophagous termites. J. Basic Microbiol. 1997;205–211. pmid:9265743
- 77. Azizi A, Maia MRG, Fonseca AJM, Sharifi A, Fazaeli H, Cabrita ARJ. Rumen fermentation of lignocellulosic biomass from wheat straw and date leaf inoculated with bacteria isolated from termite gut. J. Anim. Feed Sci. 2018;27(3): 211–218.
- 78. Cui JQ, Chen H, Sun MB, Wen JP. Comparison of bacterial community structure and function under different petroleum hydrocarbon degradation conditions. Bioprocess. Biosyst. Eng. 2020;43(2): 303–313. pmid:31605206
- 79. Qin J, Li Y, Cai Z, Li S, Zhu J, Zhang F, et al. A metagenome-wide association study of gut microbiota in type 2 diabetes. Nature. 2012;490(7418): 55–60. pmid:23023125
- 80. Xu Q, Yuan X, Gu T, Li Y, Dai W, Shen X, et al. Comparative characterization of bacterial communities in geese fed all-grass or high-grain diets. PLoS One. 2017;12(10): e0185590. pmid:28972993
- 81. Escobar JS, Klotz B, Valdes BE, Agudelo GM. The gut microbiota of Colombians differs from that of Americans, Europeans and Asians. BMC Microbiol. 2014;14: 311. pmid:25495462
- 82. Sherry A, Gray ND, Ditchfield AK, Aitken CM, Jones DM, Röling WFM, et al. Anaerobic biodegradation of crude oil under sulphate-reducing conditions leads to only modest enrichment of recognized sulphate-reducing taxa. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad. 2013;81(SI): 105–113.
- 83. Wu YR, He J. Characterization of anaerobic consortia coupled lignin depolymerization with biomethane generation. Bioresour Technol. 2013;139: 5–12. pmid:23639408
- 84. Schauer C, Thompson C, Brune A. Pyrotag sequencing of the gut microbiota of the cockroach Shelfordella lateralis reveals a highly dynamic core but only limited effects of diet on community structure. PLoS One. 2014;9(1): e85861. pmid:24454939
- 85. Ahasan MS, Kinobe R, Elliott L, Owens L, Scott J, Picard J. Bacteriophage versus antibiotic therapy on gut bacterial communities of juvenile green turtle, Chelonia mydas. Environ. Microbiol. 2019;21(8): 2871–2885. pmid:31037801
- 86. Uffen RL. Xylan degradation: a glimpse at microbial diversity. J. Ind. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997;19(1): 1–16.
- 87. Chen K, Zhu Q, Qian Y, Song Y, Yao J, Choi MMF. Microcalorimetric investigation of the effect of non-ionic surfactant on biodegradation of pyrene by PAH-degrading bacteria Burkholderia cepacia. Ecotox Environ Safe. 2013;98: 361–367. pmid:24011930
- 88. Seo JS, Keum YS, Hu Y, Lee SE, Li QX. Degradation of phenanthrene by Burkholderia sp. C3: initial 1, 2- and 3, 4-dioxygenation and meta- and ortho-cleavage of naphthalene-1, 2-diol. Biodegradation. 2007;18(1): 123–131. pmid:16491303
- 89. Tillmann S, Strömpl C, Timmis KN, Abraham WR. Stable isotope probing reveals the dominant role of Burkholderia species in aerobic degradation of PCBs. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2005;52(2): 207–217. pmid:16329907
- 90. Kim TJ, Lee EY, Kim YJ, Cho K, Ryu HW. Degradation of polyaromatic hydrocarbons by Burkholderia cepacia 2A-12. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2003;19(4): 411–417.
- 91. Yin YN, Zhang WH. Correlation between auality of tannin extract of Quercus variabilis and the main ecological factors. Sci. Silvae Sin. 2014;50(8): 30–38.
- 92. Scalbert A, Monties B, Favre JM. Polyphenols of Quercus robur: adult tree and invitro grown calli and shoots. Phytochemistry. 1988;27(11): 3483–3488.
- 93. Chen S, Xu Y, Zheng C, Ke L. Marivibrio halodurans gen. nov., sp. nov., a marine bacterium in the family Rhodospirillaceae isolated from underground rock salt. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2017;67(10): 4266–4271. pmid:28920842
- 94. Amoozegar MA, Makhdoumi-Kakhki A, Ramezani M, Nikou MM, Fazeli SAS, Schumann P, et al. Limimonas halophila gen. nov., sp. nov., an extremely halophilic bacterium in the family Rhodospirillaceae. Int J Syst Evol Micrbiol. 2013;63(4): 1562–1567.
- 95. Pfennig N, Lunsdorf H, Suling J, Imhoff JF. Rhodospira trueperi gen. nov., spec. nov., a new phototrophic Proteobacterium of the alpha group. Arch Microbiol. 1997;168(1): 39–45. pmid:9211712
- 96. Li XL, Zhang J, Zhang XY, Li J, Liu FC, Chen YM. Start-up and nitrogen removal performance of CANON and SNAD processes in a pilot-scale oxidation ditch reactor. Process Biochem. 2019;84: 134–142.
- 97. Wilhelm RC, Singh R, Eltis LD, Mohn WW. Bacterial contributions to delignification and lignocellulose degradation in forest soils with metagenomic and quantitative stable isotope probing. ISME J. 2019;13(2): 413–429. pmid:30258172
- 98. Tomizawa S, Chuah JA, Matsumoto K, Doi Y, Numata K. Understanding the limitations in the biosynthesis of polyhydroxyalkanoate (PHA) from lignin Derivatives. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014;2(5): 1106–1113.
- 99. Korshunova TY, Mukhamatdyarova SR, Loginov ON. Molecular genetic and chemotaxonomic identification of the bacterium of the genus Ochrobactrum possessing oil-oxidizing and nitrogen-fixing activity. Biol Bull. 2017;44(5): 493–500.
- 100. Itakura M, Saeki K, Omori H, Yokoyama T, Kaneko T, Tabata S, et al. Genomic comparison of Bradyrhizobium japonicum strains with different symbiotic nitrogen-fixing capabilities and other Bradyrhizobiaceae members. ISME J. 2009;3(3): 326–339. pmid:18971963
- 101. Bang-Andreasen T, Nielsen JT, Voriskova J, Heise J, Rønn R, Kjøller R, et al. Wood ash induced pH changes strongly affect soil bacterial numbers and community composition. Front Microbiol. 2017;8: 1400. pmid:28804476
- 102. Supramaniam Y, Chong C, Silvaraj S, Tan IKP. Effect of short term variation in temperature and water content on the bacterial community in a tropical soil. Appl Soil Ecol. 2016;107: 279–289.
- 103. Gomez E, Ferreras L, Toresani S. Soil bacterial functional diversity as influenced by organic amendment application. Bioresour Technol. 2006;97(13): 1484–1489. pmid:16168637
- 104. Van Horn DJ, Okie JG, Buelow HN, Gooseff MN, Barrett JE, Takacs-Vesbach CD. Soil microbial responses to increased moisture and organic resources along a salinity gradient in a polar desert. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 2014;80(10): 3034–3043. pmid:24610850
- 105. Zahran HH. Diversity, adaptation and activity of the bacterial flora in saline environments. Biol. Fertil. Soils. 1997;25(3): 211–223.
- 106. Cleveland CC, Wieder WR, Reed SC, Townsend AR. Experimental drought in a tropical rain forest increases soil carbon dioxide losses to the atmosphere. Ecology. 2010;91(8): 2313–2323. pmid:20836453
- 107. Brockett BFT, Prescott CE, Grayston SJ. Soil moisture is the major factor influencing microbial community structure and enzyme activities across seven biogeoclimatic zones in western Canada. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2012;44(1): 9–20.
- 108. Fierer N, Schimel JP, Holden PA. Variations in microbial community composition through two soil depth profiles. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2003;35(1): 167–176.
- 109. Hu YJ, Xiang D, Veresoglou SD, Chen FL, Chen YL, Hao ZP, et al. Soil organic carbon and soil structure are driving microbial abundance and community composition across the arid and semi-arid grasslands in northern China. Soil Biol. Biochem. 2014;77: 51–57.
- 110. Trivedi P, Anderson IC, Singh BK. Microbial modulators of soil carbon storage: integrating genomic and metabolic knowledge for global prediction. Trends Microbiol. 2013;21(12): 641–651. pmid:24139848
- 111. Allison SD, Wallenstein MD, Bradford MA. Soil-carbon response to warming dependent on microbial physiology. Nat. Geosci. 2010;3(5): 336–340.