Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Both clinical and environmental Caulobacter species are virulent in the Galleria mellonella infection model

  • Gabriel M. Moore,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America

  • Zemer Gitai

    Roles Conceptualization, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Molecular Biology, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ, United States of America

Both clinical and environmental Caulobacter species are virulent in the Galleria mellonella infection model

  • Gabriel M. Moore, 
  • Zemer Gitai


The Caulobacter genus, including the widely-studied model organism Caulobacter crescentus, has been thought to be non-pathogenic and thus proposed as a bioengineering vector for various environmental remediation and medical purposes. However, Caulobacter species have been implicated as the causative agents of several hospital-acquired infections, raising the question of whether these clinical isolates represent an emerging pathogenic species or whether Caulobacters on whole possess previously-unappreciated virulence capability. Given the proposed environmental and medical applications for C. crescentus, understanding the potential pathogenicity of this bacterium is crucial. Consequently, we sequenced a clinical Caulobacter isolate to determine if it has acquired novel virulence determinants. We found that the clinical isolate represents a new species, Caulobacter mirare that, unlike C. crescentus, grows well in standard clinical culture conditions. C. mirare phylogenetically resembles both C. crescentus and the related C. segnis, which was also thought to be non-pathogenic. The similarity to other Caulobacters and lack of obvious pathogenesis markers suggested that C. mirare is not unique amongst Caulobacters and that consequently other Caulobacters may also have the potential to be virulent. We tested this hypothesis by characterizing the ability of Caulobacters to infect the model animal host Galleria mellonella. In this context, two different lab strains of C. crescentus proved to be as pathogenic as C. mirare, while lab strains of E. coli were non-pathogenic. Further characterization showed that Caulobacter pathogenesis in the Galleria model is mediated by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), and that differences in LPS chemical composition across species could explain their differential toxicity. Taken together, our findings suggest that many Caulobacter species can be virulent in specific contexts and highlight the importance of broadening our methods for identifying and characterizing potential pathogens.

Author summary

Bacterial species have historically been classified as either capable of causing disease in an animal (pathogenic) or not. Caulobacter species represent a class of bacteria that were thought to be non-pathogenic. Caulobacters have been widely studied and proposed to be used for various industrial and medical applications due to their presumed safety. However, recent reports of human Caulobacter infections raised the question of whether disease-causing Caulobacters have acquired special factors that help them cause disease or whether the ability to infect is a more general feature of most Caulobacters. By combining genomic sequencing and animal infection studies we show that a clinical Caulobacter strain is similar to lab Caulobacters and that all Caulobacters studied can cause disease in a model host. We explore the mechanism of this infectivity and show that it is due to the production of a toxic factor that is made by all Caulobacter cells. We also provide a possible explanation for why Caulobacters have not traditionally been isolated from human patients, owing to their inability to tolerate the salt levels used in most medical culturing systems.


The free-living, gram-negative genus Caulobacter was first described and classified as a group of rod-shaped, stalk possessing bacteria in 1935 [1, 2]. Since their identification, Caulobacter have been observed in rhizosphere, soil, and aqueous environments, including drinking water reservoirs [3, 4]. Historically, this genus has been considered non-pathogenic due to lack of presence in infection cases, no obvious pathogenicity islands, and increased bacterial mortality at human body temperatures [5]. However, the last two decades have seen several reports of symptomatic infections associated with Caulobacter species [610]. All reported cases of Caulobacter infections appear to be hospital-acquired by immunocompromised patients, suggesting that these infections are opportunistic. None of the Caulobacter isolates associated with human infection have been previously sequenced. Consequently, it remains unclear whether clinical isolates have acquired virulence mechanisms absent from other Caulobacters, or if Caulobacter species generally have the capacity for human disease in the right context.

Among Caulobacter species, Caulobacter crescentus is the best characterized and most widely studied in laboratory settings [11]. C. crescentus has been primarily used as a model organism for understanding bacterial cell-cycle progression due to its highly regulated asymmetrical division and dimorphic lifestyle [12, 13]. Because of its available molecular tools, ability to display proteins in its surface layer (S-layer), and assumed non-toxicity to humans, C. crescentus has been proposed to be a powerful vector for a wide range of bioengineering applications [14, 15]. For example, C. crescentus has been engineered as a biosensor for uranium [16], a bioremediation tool for heavy metals [17], an anti-tumor immunization technique [18], and an anti-viral microbicide in humans [19, 20]. Thus, understanding the potential pathogenicity of this bacterium is crucial before its industrial use.

Here we obtained and sequenced a Caulobacter isolate from a reported human infection [7] to determine if it contains conspicuous virulence determinants or is similar to previously-characterized Caulobacters. We found that the clinical isolate represents a new species with similarities to both C. crescentus and another environmental species Caulobacter segnis. The lack of pathogenicity islands and similarity to lab strains of C. crescentus suggested that the potential of this clinical isolate to be an opportunistic pathogen may be a general feature of Caulobacters. We confirmed this hypothesis by turning to the Galleria mellonella model animal host. The clinical Caulobacter isolate and lab strains of C. crescentus exhibited similar virulence, which were both significantly higher than non-pathogenic lab strains of E. coli or other members of the alphaproteobacteria class. Further characterization revealed that Caulobacter virulence in the G. mellonella model is mediated by toxicity induced by lipopolysaccharide (LPS), whose composition was previously shown to differ between Caulobacters and E. coli. Thus, our findings establish that Caulobacter species can act be virulent when able to sabotage their hosts in the right context.


Clinical Caulobacter sp. SSI4214 shares homology with soil- and freshwater-associated species of Caulobacter

To genomically characterize a clinical Cauloacter isolate, we obtained a clinical strain of Caulobacter species isolated from the dialysis fluid of a 64-year-old man in Denmark with peritonitis [7]. There was only one bacterial species that could be cultured from the peritoneal fluid using Danish blood agar medium, and the infection responded to gentamycin treatment suggesting that this species was the likely cause of the infection [7]. Imaging of the cultured bacteria revealed a crescent-shaped morphology similar to that of Caulobacter crescentus and 16S ribosomal profiling showed 99.5% homology between the clinical isolate (Caulobacter sp. SSI4214) to a common laboratory C. crescentus strain CB15 [7]. We performed next-generation Illumina sequencing on the Caulobacter sp. SSI4214 strain and created a draft genome assembly to understand the isolate’s relationship to other Caulobacter species. Analysis of the 16S rRNA gene obtained from Illumina sequencing confirmed the initial report, with 99.5% similarity to C. crescentus. However, phylogenetic reconstruction comparing the 16S sequences of all available whole-genome Caulobacter species revealed that Caulobacter sp. SSI4214 resides in its own separate clade within the Caulobacter genus, between Caulobacter crescentus and Caulobacter segnis (Fig 1A). SSI4214 was also similar to both C. crescentus and C. segnis with respect to overall GC content and two-way average nucleotide identity (Table 1).

Fig 1. Genomic comparison of Caulobacter mirare SSI4214 to related Caulobacter species.

(A) Phylogenetic tree containing SSI4214 along with closely related species. Numbers indicate bootstrapping confidence values for nodes after 100 replicates. Bar represents average nucleotide substitution/site (B) BLAST values of conserved and Caulobacter genus-specific genes.

Table 1. Genomic features of Caulobacter mirare draft genome assembly compared to C. crescentus and C. segnis.

Annotation of the SSI4214 genome allowed us to compare homology of its genes to those of C. crescentus and C. segnis, including both broadly-conserved and Caulobacter-specific genes [21]. Overall, SSI4214 is predicted to encode 4,329 protein-encoding genes. This number is similar to that of the C. segnis genome (4,330 genes), and larger than C. crescentus (3,819) (Table 1) [22, 23]. Among broadly-conserved genes, subunits of DNA polymerase, RNA polymerase, and ribosomes all exhibited at least 86% sequence similarity to both C. crescentus and C. segnis. SSI4214 also possesses clear homologs of many Caulobacter-specific genes including the cell-cycle regulator ctrA, the curvature determinant creS, the S-layer secretion protein rseE, and the holdfast attachment protein hfaA (Fig 1B). We note that C. segnis does not possess a majority of the holdfast synthesis genes, including hfaA (Fig 1B) [22].

Bacterial species are functionally defined as genomes with at least 95% average nucleotide identity [24]. To define the species to which SSI4214 belongs we thus performed an average nucleotide identify analysis with its two closest relatives, C. crescentus and C. segnis. SSI4214 exhibited only 83% identity to C. crescentus and 85% identity to C. segnis (Table 1), indicating that SSI4214 represents a distinct species in the Caulobacter genus. Following the convention of the International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes [25], we named this new species Caulobacter mirare, as mirare is the Latin root for mirage (by way of the French se mirer) (Table 1, S1 Fig). The observations that C. mirare is more similar to C. segnis with respect to gene number but more similar to C. crescentus with respect to holdfast gene content supports its placement as an independent clade in between the two related species. Importantly, like C. crescentus and C. segnis, no known annotated virulence factor homologues or pathogen-associated genes are predicted to be present in C. mirare [26]. Thus, genome sequencing suggests that the pathogenicity of C. mirare is not the result of acquisition of a significant pathogenicity island, and that this clinical isolate broadly resembles environmental Caulobacter isolates that were previously considered non-pathogenic. In other words, the seemingly higher pathogenicity of Caulobacter mirare could simply be a “mirage.”

Caulobacter mirare identification in infection made possible due to difference in culturability

Caulobacters are ubiquitously present in water systems and genomic analysis suggests that Caulobacter mirare may not possess novel mechanisms that grant greater infection potential than environmental isolates. This raises the question of why Caulobacters have not been more commonly associated with human infections. One possibility is that Caulobacter infections are more common than typically appreciated but that Caulobacters are not readily isolated by culturing-based clinical identification methods. Thus, we compared the culturing requirements of C. crescentus and C. mirare. C. mirare was isolated using Danish blood agar plates [7], and we confirmed that the SSI4214 strain indeed grows on sheep’s blood agar (Fig 2A). In contrast, CB15 C. crescentus was unable to grow on sheep’s blood agar (Fig 2A). To determine the root cause of this difference, we compared C. crescentus and C. mirare growth on several complex media. Both species grew robustly on peptone-yeast extract agar, the standard culturing medium for CB15, and nutrient agar. Media with higher salt concentrations, such as Luria broth and terrific broth, did not allow for growth of either Caulobacter species. Meanwhile, lower salt-containing media such as tryptic soy agar and super optimal broth, promoted the growth of C. mirare but not C. crescentus (Fig 2A).

Fig 2. Culturability of Caulobacter crescentus (CB15) and Caulobacter mirare (SSI4214).

(A-B) Three replicates each of 10−3-diluted overnight culture of CB15 (left) or SSI4214 (right) on various media. (A) PYE = peptone-yeast extract, NB = nutrient broth, LB = luria broth, TB = terrific broth, TSA = tryptic soy agar, TSA+SB = tryptic soy agar + 5% sheep blood, SOB = super optimal broth. (B) PYE-ns = PYE without added salts, +8.6mM NaCl = PYE-ns with addition of 8.6 mM NaCl, +86mM NaCl = PYE-ns with addition of 86 mM NaCl, +171 mM NaCl = PYE-ns with addition of 171 mM NaCl.

To directly determine if salt content is the relevant growth-determining difference in these media we plated both Caulobacter species on PYE in which we replaced the normal MgSO4 salt with varying amounts of NaCl. Both species still grew on modified PYE with no salt added (Fig 2B). We then increased the NaCl content of the modified PYE and found that while both Caulobacter species grew well at 8.6 mM NaCl, C. mirare continued to grow well at 86 mM and 171 mM NaCl, while C. crescentus grew poorly at 86 mM NaCl and failed to grow at all at 171 mM NaCl (Fig 2B). These data suggest that the increased salt tolerance of C. mirare may explain why this strain could be cultured from an infected patient.

Both C. mirare and C. crescentus decrease healthspan in Galleria mellonella

Given the genomic similarity between C. mirare and C. crescentus we sought to directly compare their pathogenic potential in an in vivo host model. Galleria mellonella, the greater wax moth, has emerged as a useful system for assessing infection potential due to its relatively short lifespan and ability to inject a defined inoculum of bacteria [27]. Additionally, Galleria produces melanin upon infection as part of its immune response, providing a robust visual readout for host health. The process of melanization is irreversible such that even if Galleria successfully eliminates the cause of infection, it maintains a dark coloration that corresponds to the degree of its immune response [28, 29].

To quantitatively assay bacterial virulence, we injected Galleria with similar numbers of exponentially growing bacteria and monitored melanization after 24 hours, which included fatal events (Fig 3A). As a negative control, we confirmed that mock injections of Galleria with water had no effect on melanization. Injection with a lab E. coli MG1655 strain also had no effect on Galleria melanization, indicating that not all bacteria are pathogenic towards Galleria (Fig 2B) [30]. In contrast, injection with C. mirare resulted in significant melanization within 24 hours (Fig 3B), suggesting that Galleria could be a useful model for studying C. mirare pathogenesis. Interestingly, injection with two different lab strains of C. crescentus, CB15 and NA1000, also resulted in significant Galleria melanization within 24 hours (Fig 3A) [31]. The extent of the pathogenesis of the lab C. crescentus strains towards Galleria was comparable to that of the clinical C. mirare strain.

Fig 3. Galleria mellonella healthspan decreases upon Caulobacter infection.

(A) Example images of phenotypes considered for scoring in healthspan assay. (B) Percentage of worms scored as healthy or melanated 24 hours post-inoculation. Error bars represent standard error for three biological replicates. (C) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis for C. crescentus strains CB15 and NA1000, E. coli strain MG1655 and C. mirare strain SSI4214. Survival curve shown is one representative cohort (n = 15) of three biological replicates (Mantel-Cox test for statistics, ***P < .001).

To follow the dynamics of virulence we performed a healthspan assay by monitoring melanization as a function of time after injecting E. coli (MG1655), C. mirare (SSI4214), and C. crescentus (CB15 and NA1000). Even five days post injection, no melanization was observed with E. coli, validating its use as a non-pathogenic control (Fig 3C). Meanwhile, significant melanization was observed within 1 day of injecting any of the Caulobacter strains and increased as a function of time (Fig 3C). Galleria injected with the clinical C. mirare and lab C. crescentus strains displayed similar healthspans (Fig 3C). Together these data suggest that C. mirare can be virulent towards at least some animal hosts, consistent with its clinical isolation and pathology. However, C. mirare virulence is not unique, but rather a feature it shares with environmental isolates of C. crescentus.

Melanization is induced by a dose-dependent, cell-associated factor that does not require live cells

Since C. crescentus infected Galleria as well as C. mirare but is more experimentally tractable, we focused our efforts on characterizing the mechanism of Caulobacter pathogenesis on C. crescentus. We first determined whether Galleria melanization requires C. crescentus growth within the host by heat-killing exponentially-growing bacterial cells prior to injection. Using the same starting number of bacterial cells, heat-killed C. crescentus induced similar melanization to living cells (Fig 4A). Thus, the melanization of Galleria by C. crescentus is not merely a secondary consequence of bacterial growth within the host or outcompeting the host for nutrients. We consequently hypothesized that symptomatic infection is induced via a toxic or immune stimulating factor. A hallmark of toxin-associated pathogenesis is quantitative dependence on bacterial load. To assess the bacterial load required to cause an infection phenotype, we injected Galleria with four-fold serial dilutions of overnight cultures of CB15 and MG1655 and performed healthspan assays. For both C. crescentus and E. coli, we observed the expected dose-dependence of infection, with increased melanization as a function of increased numbers of bacteria injected (Fig 4B). This experiment also reinforced the difference in pathogenic potential of the two bacterial species, as the lowest number of C. crescentus injected, (~103), caused more melanization than even the highest number of E. coli injected (~107).

Fig 4. Healthspan decreases in response to cell-associated factor LPS in a dose-dependent manner.

(A) Healthspan of Galleria upon injection of 5 μL of OD660 ~ 0.5 (exponentially-growing) live and heat-killed CB15 and MG1655 (B). Healthspan of Galleria upon injection with serial dilutions of overnight CB15 or MG1655. (C) Healthspan of Galleria upon injection of supernatant derived from overnight cultures of CB15, MG1655, or Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14. (D) Healthspan of Galleria upon injection of purified LPS from CB15, C. mirare, MG1655, O-antigen possessing wbbL+ E. coli MC4100, and A. tumefaciens A136. All survival curves are a representative cohort (n = 10–15) of three biological replicates (Mantel-Cox test for statistics, **P < 0.01, ***P < .001).

To determine whether the cytotoxicity of C. crescentus is due to a secreted or cell-associated factor, we injected Galleria with C. crescentus-conditioned media. Specifically, we centrifuged an overnight C. crescentus culture capable of inducing Galleria melanization at low speeds (5700 g) to remove bacterial cells and cell-associated factors and injected the supernatant that retains secreted factors. CB15 and MG1655 conditioned media did not induce Galleria melanization (Fig 4C). As a positive control to confirm that it is possible to induce melanization with secreted toxins we also isolated conditioned media from Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain PA14, which is known to secrete exotoxins (Fig 4C) [32]. We confirmed that PA14-conditioned media induced Galleria melanization, suggesting that the C. crescentus toxic factor is not secreted.

G. mellonella pathogenesis by Caulobacter is mediated by LPS

We next sought to identify specific factors associated with C. crescentus that could be impacting Galleria health and viability. The outermost surface layer of C. crescentus is the paracrystalline S-layer, which is made up of a polymer of the S-layer protein, RsaA [14]. Deletion of the S-layer protein (ΔrsaA) results in a similar healthspan profile to wild-type C. crescentus, indicating that RsaA is not required for toxicity (S2 Fig). The S-layer is anchored to the membrane via lipopolysaccharides (LPS), which have been demonstrated in other bacterial species to act as an immunostimulant in Galleria through upregulation of prophenoloxidase (PPO) [33, 34]. We isolated LPS from C. crescentus and injected it into Galleria at concentrations similar to those found in the number of bacteria sufficient to induce melanization. Interestingly, C. crescentus LPS alone was able to induce melanization. Furthermore, C. mirare LPS induced melanization to the same extent as that of C. crescentus (Fig 4D). Meanwhile, LPS purified from non-pathogenic E. coli MG1655 was unable to induce melanization (Fig 4D). These results suggest that LPS is sufficient to explain the toxicity of C. crescentus and C. mirare and that differences between Caulobacter and E. coli MG1655 LPS might explain their difference in virulence towards Galleria.

There are several known differences between the LPS of E. coli MG1655. For example, Caulobacter LPS is linked to O-antigen, and O-antigen is not present in MG1655 due to several well-characterized mutations [35]. To see if the O-antigen causes the melanization response, we obtained a derivative of MG1655 whose O-antigen production has been restored [36]. We observed that LPS purified from these bacteria failed to induce melanization when injected into Galleria, suggesting that the O-antigen is not sufficient to explain the toxicity of Caulobacter LPS (Fig 4D). C. crescentus and C. mirare are alpha-proteobacteria while E. coli belong to different bacterial class, gamma-proteobacteria. These classes of bacteria are known to possess different LPS composition, especially in terms of Lipid A backbone [37]. To see if the difference in LPS toxicity extends to more distantly related alpha-proteobacteria, we purified LPS from Agrobacterium tumefaciens [38]. A. tumefaciens is predominantly a plant pathogen but has also been associated with some human infection cases when patients are immunocompromised [39, 40]. LPS extracted from A. tumefaciens was capable of melanizing Galleria, but to a lesser extent than LPS from Caulobacter species. These results suggest that species-specific differences in the chemical composition of LPS could be sufficient to explain the differences in their ability to melanize Galleria (Fig 4D).


Our work demonstrates that both the clinical C. mirare and environmental Caulobacter species can be virulent towards Galleria with similar degrees of toxicity. Not all bacteria can perturb Galleria healthspan, as lab strains of E. coli proved non-pathogenic in this context (Fig 3). Furthermore, sequencing and analysis of the C. mirare genome indicated that this clinical isolate is similar to C. crescentus and related Caulobacters that were also considered to be non-pathogenic like C. segnis (Fig 1). C. mirare does not appear to have acquired any clear pathogenicity islands or virulence factors [26]. Coupled with its similar extent of virulence as C. crescentus, our findings thus suggest that C. mirare is not unique in its ability to cause disease but that the capacity for virulence may be a general feature of Caulobacters. All previous studies looking at the in vivo pathogenic potential of Caulobacter used murine cell lines or immunocompetent mouse models [20, 37]. In contrast, all clinical reports of human Caulobacter infections occurred in hospital settings with patients who are likely immunocompromised [710]. Since different bacteria may be virulent in different contexts, using a variety of host models may prove beneficial for understanding the contexts in which a bacterium can be toxic. For example, characterizing pathogenesis in Galleria enabled us to identify LPS as a causative agent of C. crescentus and C. mirare toxicity (Fig 4D). Since E. coli MG1655 also has LPS but is non-toxic, our studies further suggest that the relatively subtle chemical differences between largely conserved bacterial components can have significant implications for host interactions. In the future it will thus be important to directly determine if Caulobacter strains can cause disease in mammalian hosts in contexts that mimic clinically-relevant conditions such as immuno-suppressed states.

If Caulobacter species can be virulent towards Galleria and potentially even humans, why is the isolation of Caulobacters as human pathogens so rare? Typically, successful pathogens need to survive in the environment of their hosts [41]. Caulobacter is often described as an oligotroph since it is found in nutrient-poor environments such as fresh-water lakes and drinking water [4, 42]. However, our work shows that Caulobacter can also thrive in nutrient-rich culturing conditions (Fig 2). Metabolomic studies of the fluids from common infection sites such as peritoneal fluid, cerebral spinal fluid, and plasma show that these fluids contain metabolites and salt concentrations similar to those in media that support Caulobacter growth [4345]. Thus, it is possible that Caulobacter species can survive in human hosts and that the reason they are not often detected is that they are not readily culturable on the media commonly used for clinical microbiology [46, 47]. Consistent with this hypothesis, we showed that C. mirare can be cultured on TSA blood agar while C. crescentus cannot, likely due to the increased salt tolerance of C. mirare (Fig 2). Moving forward, culture-independent identification methods such as mass spectrometry and metagenomic sequencing will help determine the true frequency of Caulobacter infections in humans [48, 49].

The ability of a classically-defined “non-pathogen” like C. crescentus to cause disease in the Galleria animal model and other Caulobacter species in hospital-acquired infections raises the question of what defines a pathogen. Can any bacterial species be considered pathogenic if given the right environment? Combining our findings with previous work on C. crescentus suggests that Caulobacter can carry out many of the processes typical of other pathogens, including biofilm formation, antibiotic resistance, killing of non-self bacteria, and Galleria host killing [7, 10, 50, 51]. Unlike the patient-isolated C. mirare, the CB15 C. crescentus strain studied here is an environmental isolate from a freshwater lake [2]. The ability of this environmental isolate to retain pathogenesis towards an animal host suggests that Caulobacters can survive in multiple niches [3, 41]. Both C. crescentus and C. segnis lack obvious host invasion factors, suggesting that their pathogenesis requires a compromised host and explaining why they are opportunistic pathogens. Furthermore, the killing of Galleria by C. crescentus does not require these bacteria to grow in the host, suggesting that its mere presence in certain environments is sufficient for pathogenesis. A recent opinion article suggested that pathogenesis should be viewed as a spectrum and that most bacteria will be pathogenic if present at a sufficient concentration to be deleterious to a host [52]. Our study supports this perspective, suggesting that broadening how we identify and isolate pathogens in clinical settings will allow us to better understand the spectrum of pathogens that actually infect humans. Elucidating the pathogenic potential of more bacteria and the mechanisms by which they cause disease will thus ultimately help combat infection as it arises in many contexts.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and growth conditions

For this study, an overnight culture is defined as a single colony inoculated in 5 ml tubes and grown for 16 hours. Exponential phase cultures were obtained by a 20-fold back dilution of overnight culture in fresh media and grown to an OD660 of ~0.5. Caulobacter crescentus laboratory strains (CB15 and NA1000) were grown in shaking culture at 30°C in PYE media on platform shakers. Caulobacter mirare (SSI4214) and Agrobacterium tumefaciens (A136) was grown in nutrient broth (NB) or LB medium, respectively, at 30°C in shaking culture. E. coli (MG1655 and MC4100 wbbL+) and Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PA14) were grown at 37°C in LB medium either in shaking culture or roller drum, respectively. Components of organisms’ respective growth media as well as other medias for agar plating have been described previously [5354].

Genomic analysis and phylogeny construction

Paired-end 150 nt Illumina MiSeq sequencing was performed on all samples at Princeton University’s Genomics Core. Scaffolds were generated from reads using UniCycler default settings on “normal mode,” and assembly metrics were compiled using QUAST [55]. Annotation of the genome was accomplished via DFast with default settings [21]. For phylogenetic construction, an online pipeline ( was used with default settings. Alignment via MUSCLE was run on “full mode” and phylogeny was determined by bootstrapping with 100 runs. Visualization of the tree was created using TreeDyn [56].

Galleria mellonella healthspan assay

All Galleria mellonella larvae were Vita-Bugs© distributed through PetCo© (San Diego, CA) and kept in a 20°C chamber. Larvae were used for healthspan assays within three days of receipt of package. Worms which were not already melanized were assigned randomly to infection or control cohorts. All inoculums were administered using a sterile 1 ml syringe attached to a KD Scientific pump. Same volume injections (5 μL) were delivered at a rate of 250 μl/min to the fourth leg of the worm, which was sterilized with ethanol. Melanization phenotype was determined by observation of a solid black line along the dorsal midline of the larva (Fig 3A). Each figure graph is a representative cohort (n = 10–15 per treatment) from a biological triplicate, except for PA14 which was performed separately (Fig 4C). Mantel-cox statistics for the cohort were calculated using PRISM, and the pooled results are presented in the supplement (S3 Fig). For heat-killing experiments, exponentially growing bacteria were held at 100°C for 10 minutes. For serial dilution experiments, overnight cultures were diluted 4-fold in their respective medium. CFUs were determined by plating overnight cultures on agar plates. For conditioned media experiments, overnight cultures were centrifuged at 5700xg for 3 minutes and the resulting supernatant was injected into the worms. For LPS experiments, purified LPS was obtained as described previously and the final reaction mixture was injected into Galleria [57].

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Average Nucleotide Identity (ANI) plot between Caulobacter species.

Histogram represents reciprocal best hits (two-way ANI) between fragments of the specified genomes with box-and-whisker plot showing the distribution.


S2 Fig. ΔrsaA healthspan.

Galleria were injected with exponential growing (OD660 ~ 0.5) wild-type or S-layer deletion (ΔrsaA NA1000) mutants. Survival curve is a representative cohort (n = 12) of the experiment performed in biological triplicate. Pooled cohort data given with error bars representing standard error.


S3 Fig. Pooled cohort data for healthspan assay.

Each experiment was performed in biological triplicate. n represents number of animals per cohort and error bars represents standard error.



We would like to thank Ulrik Justesen (University of Southern Denmark) for sending clinical Caulobacter sp. SSI4214 for characterization, the Princeton University Genomics Core Facility for assistance with genome sequencing, and the Silhavy lab at Princeton University for the E. coli MC4100 wbbL+ strain. We also would like to thank Gitai lab members Ben Bratton and Robert Scheffler as well was Professor Mohamed Donia for reviewing of the manuscript prior to submission.


  1. 1. Henrici T, Johnson DE. Studies of Freshwater Bacteria. J Bacteriol. 1935;30(1):61–93.
  2. 2. Poindexter JS. Biological properties and classification of the Caulobacter group. Bacteriol Rev. 1964;28:231–95. pmid:14220656
  3. 3. Wilhelm RC. Following the terrestrial tracks of Caulobacter—redefining the ecology of a reputed aquatic oligotroph. The ISME journal. 2018;12(12):3025–37. pmid:30108303
  4. 4. Jin L, Lee H, Kim H, Ahn C, Oh H. Caulobacter daechungensis sp. nov., a stalked bacterium isolated from a eutrophic reservoir. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2013;63(7):2559–64.
  5. 5. Iyer-Biswas S, Wright CS, Henry JT, Lo K, Burov S, Lin Y, Crooks GE, Crosson S, Dinner AR, Scherer NF. Scaling laws governing stochastic growth and division of single bacterial cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(45):15912–7. pmid:25349411
  6. 6. Drancourt M, Bollet C, Carlioz A, Martelin R, Gayral JP, Raoult D. 16S ribosomal DNA sequence analysis of a large collection of environmental and clinical unidentifiable bacterial isolates. J Clin Microbiol. 2000;38(10):3623–30. pmid:11015374
  7. 7. Justesen US, Holt HM, Thiesson HC, Blom J, Nielsen XC, Dargis R, Kemp M, Christensen JJ. Report of the First Human Case of Caulobacter sp. Infection. Diabetic Medicine. 2007;45(4):14–5.
  8. 8. Penner F, Brossa S, Barbui AM, Ducati A, Cavallo R, Zenga F. Caulobacter spp: A Rare Pathogen Responsible for Paucisintomatic Persisitant Meningitis in a Glioblastoma Patient. World Neurosurg. 2016;96:611.e11–611.e13.
  9. 9. Bridger N, Walkty A, Crockett M, Fanella S, Nichol K, Karlowsky JA. Caulobacter species as a cause of postneurosurgical bacterial meningitis in a pediatric patient. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2012;23(1):10.
  10. 10. Rosado C, Manzanedo R, Ibáñez R, Felipe C, Sampedro A, Sánchez-Fonseca C, Vega MJ, Alaguero B, Fidalgo A. Recurrent Peritonitis Due to Caulobacter crescentus as a Rare Cause of Dialysis Technique Failure. Perit Dial Int. 2015;35(7):766–7. pmid:26703852
  11. 11. Lasker K, Schrader JM, Men Y, Marshik T, Dill DL, McAdams HH, Shapiro L. CauloBrowser: A systems biology resource for Caulobacter crescentus. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):640.
  12. 12. Skerker JM, Laub MT. Cell-cycle progression and the generation of asymmetry in Caulobacter crescentus. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2004;2(4):325–37. pmid:15031731
  13. 13. Curtis PD, Brun YV. Getting in the loop: regulation of development in Caulobacter crescentus. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev. 2010;74(1):13–41. pmid:20197497
  14. 14. Smit J, Agabian N. Cell surface patterning and morphogenesis: biogenesis of a periodic surface array during Caulobacter development. J Cell Biol. 1982;95(1):41–9. pmid:7142293
  15. 15. Bingle WH, Nomellini JF, Smit J. Cell-surface display of a Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain K pilin peptide within the paracrystalline S-layer of Caulobacter crescentus. Molecular microbiology. 1997;26(2):277–88. pmid:9383153
  16. 16. Hillson NJ, Hu P, Andersen GL, Shapiro L. Caulobacter crescentus as a whole-cell uranium biosensor. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2007;73(23):7615–21. pmid:17905881
  17. 17. Patel J, Zhang Q, McKay RML, Vincent R, Xu Z. Genetic engineering of Caulobacter crescentus for removal of cadmium from water. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010;160(1):232–43. pmid:19214794
  18. 18. Bhatnagar PK, Awasthi A, Nomellini JF, Smit J, Suresh MR. Anti-tumor effects of the bacterium Caulobacter crescentus in murine tumor models. Cancer Biol Ther. 2006;5(5):485–91. pmid:16582592
  19. 19. Farr CZ, Nomellini JF, Smit J, Horwitz MS. Generation of a Dual-Target, Safe, Inexpensive Microbicide that Protects Against HIV-1 and HSV-2 Disease. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):2786. pmid:29434285
  20. 20. Farr Zuend C, Nomellini JF, Smit J, Horwitz MS. A Caulobacter crescentus Microbicide Protects from Vaginal Infection with HIV-1JR-CSF in Humanized Bone Marrow-Liver-Thymus Mice. J Virol. 2019;93(18).
  21. 21. Tanizawa Y, Fujisawa T, Nakamura Y. DFAST: a flexible prokaryotic genome annotation pipeline for faster genome publication. Bioinformatics. 2018;34(6):1037–9. pmid:29106469
  22. 22. Patel S, Fletcher B, Scott DC, Ely B. Genome sequence and phenotypic characterization of Caulobacter segnis. Curr Microbiol. 2015;70(3):355–63. pmid:25398322
  23. 23. Nierman WC, Feldblyum TV, Laub MT, Paulsen IT, Nelson KE, Eisen JA, Heidelberg JF, Alley MR, Ohta N, Maddock JR, Potocka I, Nelson WC, Newton A, Stephens C, Phadke ND, Ely B, Deboy RT, Dodson RJ, Durkin AS, Gwinn ML, Haft DH, Kolonay JF, Smit J, Craven MB, Khouri H, Shetty J, Berry K, Utterback T, Tran K, Wolf A, Vamathevan J, Ermolaeva M, White O, Salzberg SL, Venter JC, Shapiro L, Fraser CM. Complete genome sequence of Caulobacter crescentus. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98(7):4136–41. pmid:11259647
  24. 24. Goris J, Konstantinidis KT, Klappenbach JA, Coenye T, Vandamme P, Tiedje JM. DNA-DNA hybridization values and their relationship to whole-genome sequence similarities. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2007;57(1):81–91.
  25. 25. International Code of Nomenclature of Prokaryotes. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol. 2019;69(1A):S1–S111. pmid:26596770
  26. 26. Bertelli C, Laird MR, Williams KP, Lau BY, Hoad G, Winsor GL, Brinkman FSL. IslandViewer 4: expanded prediction of genomic islands for larger-scale datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017 /07/03;45(W1):W30–5. pmid:28472413
  27. 27. Ramarao N, Nielsen-Leroux C, Lereclus D. The insect Galleria mellonella as a powerful infection model to investigate bacterial pathogenesis. J Vis Exp. 2012;70:e4392.
  28. 28. Loh JMS, Adenwalla N, Wiles S, Proft T. Galleria mellonella larvae as an infection model for group A streptococcus. Virulence. 2013;4(5):419–28. pmid:23652836
  29. 29. Tsai CJ, Loh JMS, Proft T. Galleria mellonella infection models for the study of bacterial diseases and for antimicrobial drug testing. Virulence. 2016;7(3):214–29. pmid:26730990
  30. 30. Jønsson R, Struve C, Jenssen H, Krogfelt KA. The wax moth Galleria mellonella as a novel model system to study Enteroaggregative Escherichia coli pathogenesis. Virulence. 2017;8(8):1894–9. pmid:27824518
  31. 31. Marks ME, Castro-Rojas CM, Teiling C, Du L, Kapatral V, Walunas TL, Crosson S. The genetic basis of laboratory adaptation in Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol. 2010;192(14):3678–88. pmid:20472802
  32. 32. Shafikhani SH, Morales C, Engel J. The Pseudomonas aeruginosa type III secreted toxin ExoT is necessary and sufficient to induce apoptosis in epithelial cells. Cell Microbiol. 2008;10(4):994–1007. pmid:18053004
  33. 33. Walker SG, Karunaratne DN, Ravenscroft N, Smit J. Characterization of mutants of Caulobacter crescentus defective in surface attachment of the paracrystalline surface layer. J Bacteriol. 1994;176(20):6312–23. pmid:7929003
  34. 34. Gillespie JP, Kanost MR, Trenczek T. Biological mediators of insect immunity. Annu Rev Entomol. 1997;42:611–43. pmid:9017902
  35. 35. Schmidt G. Genetical studies on the lipopolysaccharide structure of Escherichia coli K12. J Gen Microbiol. 1973;77(1):151–60. pmid:4579437
  36. 36. Grabowicz M, Andres D, Lebar MD, Malojčić G, Kahne D, Silhavy TJ. A mutant Escherichia coli that attaches peptidoglycan to lipopolysaccharide and displays cell wall on its surface. Elife. 2014;3:e05334. pmid:25551294
  37. 37. Smit J, Kaltashov IA, Kaltoshov IA, Cotter RJ, Vinogradov E, Perry MB, Haider H, Qureshi N. Structure of a novel lipid A obtained from the lipopolysaccharide of Caulobacter crescentus. Innate Immun. 2008;14(1):25–37. pmid:18387917
  38. 38. Silipo A, De Castro C, Lanzetta R, Molinaro A, Parrilli M. Full structural characterization of the lipid A components from the Agrobacterium tumefaciens strain C58 lipopolysaccharide fraction. Glycobiology. 2004;14(9):805–15. pmid:15159382
  39. 39. Nester EW. Agrobacterium: nature’s genetic engineer. Frontiers in Plant Science. 2015;5.
  40. 40. Hulse M, Johnson S, Ferrieri P. Agrobacterium infections in humans: experience at one hospital and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1993;16(1):112–7. pmid:8448285
  41. 41. Brown SA, Whiteley M, Palmer KL. Revisiting the host as a growth medium. Nature Reviews Microbiology. 2008;6(9):657–66. pmid:18679171
  42. 42. Hentchel KL, Reyes Ruiz LM, Curtis PD, Fiebig A, Coleman ML, Crosson S. Genome-scale fitness profile of Caulobacter crescentus grown in natural freshwater. ISME J. 2019;13(2):523–36. pmid:30297849
  43. 43. Wishart DS, Lewis MJ, Morrissey JA, Flegel MD, Jeroncic K, Xiong Y, Cheng D, Eisner R, Gautam B, Tzur D, Sawhney S, Bamforth F, Greiner R, Li L. The human cerebrospinal fluid metabolome. J Chromatogr B Analyt Technol Biomed Life Sci. 2008;871(2):164–73. pmid:18502700
  44. 44. Wiesenhofer FM, Herzog R, Boehm M, Wagner A, Unterwurzacher M, Kasper DC, Alper SL, Vychytil A, Aufricht C, Kratochwill K. Targeted Metabolomic Profiling of Peritoneal Dialysis Effluents Shows Anti-oxidative Capacity of Alanyl-Glutamine. Front Physiol. 2018;9:1961. pmid:30719009
  45. 45. Guo L, Milburn MV, Ryals JA, Lonergan SC, Mitchell MW, Wulff JE, Alexander DC, Evans AM, Bridgewater B, Miller L, Gonzalez-Garay ML, Caskey CT. Plasma metabolomic profiles enhance precision medicine for volunteers of normal health. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(35):E4901–10. pmid:26283345
  46. 46. Stewart EJ. Growing unculturable bacteria. J Bacteriol. 2012;194(16):4151–60. pmid:22661685
  47. 47. Lagier J, Edouard S, Pagnier I, Mediannikov O, Drancourt M, Raoult D. Current and Past Strategies for Bacterial Culture in Clinical Microbiology. Clinical microbiology reviews. 2015;28(1):208–36. pmid:25567228
  48. 48. Boyles TH, Wasserman . Diagnosis of bacterial infection. SAMJ: South African Medical Journal. 2015;105(5):419.
  49. 49. Ivy MI, Thoendel MJ, Jeraldo PR, Greenwood-Quaintance KE, Hanssen AD, Abdel MP, Chia N, Yao JZ, Tande AJ, Mandrekar JN, Patel R. Direct Detection and Identification of Prosthetic Joint Infection Pathogens in Synovial Fluid by Metagenomic Shotgun Sequencing. J Clin Microbiol. 2018;56(9).
  50. 50. Entcheva-Dimitrov P, Spormann AM. Dynamics and control of biofilms of the oligotrophic bacterium Caulobacter crescentus. J Bacteriol. 2004;186(24):8254–66. pmid:15576774
  51. 51. García-Bayona L, Guo MS, Laub MT. Contact-dependent killing by Caulobacter crescentus via cell surface-associated, glycine zipper proteins. Elife. 2017;6: e24869. pmid:28323618
  52. 52. Casadevall A. The Pathogenic Potential of a Microbe. mSphere. 2017;2(1): e00015–17. pmid:28251180
  53. 53. Hottes AK, Meewan M, Yang D, Arana N, Romero P, McAdams HH, et al. Transcriptional profiling of Caulobacter crescentus during growth on complex and minimal media. J Bacteriol. 2004 Mar;186(5):1448–61. pmid:14973021
  54. 54. Morton ER, Fuqua C. Laboratory Maintenance of Agrobacterium. Curr Protoc Microbiol. 2012;24(1): 3D.1.1–3D.1.16.
  55. 55. Wick RR, Judd LM, Gorrie CL, Holt KE. Unicycler: Resolving bacterial genome assemblies from short and long sequencing reads. PLoS computational biology. 2017;13(6):e1005595. pmid:28594827
  56. 56. Chevenet F, Brun C, Bañuls A, Jacq B, Christen R. TreeDyn: towards dynamic graphics and annotations for analyses of trees. BMC bioinformatics. 2006;7(1):439.
  57. 57. Davis J, Michael R., Goldberg JB. Purification and Visualization of Lipopolysaccharide from Gram-negative Bacteria by Hot Aqueous-phenol Extraction. J Vis Exp. 2012(63): 3916. pmid:22688346