Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Identification and mapping of a new recessive dwarfing gene dw9 on the 6RL rye chromosome and its phenotypic effects

  • Agnieszka Grądzielewska,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Institute of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, University of Life Sciences, Lublin, Poland

  • Paweł Milczarski ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft

    pmilczarski@zut.edu.pl

    Affiliation Department of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland

  • Katarzyna Molik,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland

  • Edyta Pawłowska

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Plant Genetics, Breeding and Biotechnology, West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin, Poland

Abstract

The introduction of high-yielding semi-dwarf varieties of wheat into cultivation has led to a "green revolution." This has required intensive research into various sources of dwarfism in wheat. However, there has been very little advancement in research on dwarfing genes in rye in comparison to wheat or barley. So far, three dominant dwarfing genes (Ddw1, Ddw3, and Ddw4) and three recessive genes (ct1, ct2, and np) have been characterized and precisely mapped in rye. There is no complete catalog of dwarfing genes available in rye. This paper presents an identification of the source of dwarfism and preliminary characterization of the new recessive gene dw9 from the BK-1 line. The gene was mapped on the long arm of the 6R chromosome and belongs to the GA-insensitive group. The initial characterization of the influence of this gene on morphological traits shows that it significantly affects the decrease of yielding trait parameters. A full evaluation can be performed after detailed breeding studies.

Introduction

Rye (Secale cereale L.) is a crop species from the tribe Triticeae (Poaceae). It is an important crop, especially for the region referred to as “rye belt,” which stretches from Northern Germany to Central and Northern Russia. In Germany, Poland, Russia, and former Soviet Union countries, this national crop is used mainly for bread baking and feed production. Compared with wheat, barley, or triticale, rye is still a very tall crop. Rye populations cultivated in Poland reach up to 150–160 cm in height, and hybrids are only a little smaller at 130–140 cm.

Together with the plant’s morphology (slender culm with long internodes and long spike), the considerable height is undesirable because weather conditions such as strong wind, storms, and rain make rye very vulnerable to lodging. Lodging is a very unfavorable occurrence that decreases yield level and grain quality [1]. This problem is often resolved using chemical plant growth regulators (PGRs), but the high costs and the pollution of the soil and grain with chemicals have prompted a search for other solutions [1,2].

Progress in the understanding of crop genetics and the identification of dwarfing genes has allowed their transfer to cultivars, resulting in a decrease of plant height. As a result, in some crops like wheat or barley, the lodging problem has been resolved without chemical protection. In the case of rye, dwarfing genes that efficiently decrease height without losses of yield are unknown. Until now, only four dominant dwarfing genes have been identified in rye: Ddw1 [3], Ddw2 [4], and recently, Ddw 3 [5] and Ddw 4 [6]. Attempts at introducing dwarfing genes to cultivars were carried in only the case of Ddw1 [4,7]. Unfortunately, in rye, the Ddw1 gene decreases yield, so it is not used yet in breeding. Interestingly, Ddw1 was successfully introduced to triticale cultivars, and in Poland, it has been the main dwarfing gene used by triticale breeders.

There is much information about the dominant dwarfing genes of rye Ddw1 [8], Ddw3 [5] and Ddw4 [6], but little is known about recessive ones. Several recessive dwarfing genes have been identified in rye. Some of them have been assigned to chromosomes and were localized on all seven rye (R) chromosomes (1R-7R). Only three of these genes were assigned to chromosomes arms: ct1 (7RL) [9], ct2 (5RL) [10], and np (nana postratum) (4RL) [15]. In the case of other gene, closer localization is unknown.

The nomenclature of the recessive genes is inconsistent. About half of them were named as “dw,” and the small group of three genes was designated as “ct” (compactum) genes (ct1—ct3) because of their dense spike morphology [9,10] [15]. The others have different and inconsistent nomenclature. It is possible that some of the genes are identical, especially those from 4R or 5R, because as many as three and four genes have been assigned to these chromosomes, respectively. Their authentication would be possible only after conducting a wide range of allelic complementation tests, but it seems impossible because a significant majority of recessive dwarfing gene sources are unavailable.

One of the useful methods for classifying dwarfing genes is the evaluation of their reaction to exogenously applied gibberellic acid (GA). This test allows dwarfing genes to be divided into two groups: one with dwarf genotypes that regain their normal height after GA application (sensitive genes) and those that show no reaction or a reduced reaction (insensitive genes) [11]. All four dominant dwarfing genes of rye were shown to be GA-sensitive [5,6,12]. Among recessives, dw1 [13], dw2 [14], ct3 [15], np [16], and ds1 [17] were classified as GA-sensitive, and dw6 [18], ct1 [10], ct2 [9] and ds2 [17] were shown to be GA-insensitive.

The second method is to use marker techniques that enable precise chromosome localization of the dwarfing gene on the genetic map. One of the possible technologies is the DArTseq method. This platform uses genome complexity reduction and the next-generation sequencing (NGS) of short DNA fragments on the Illumina platform [19,20]. The DArTseq technique has been applied for genotyping by sequencing [2022], linkage mapping, QTL identification [23,24], GWAS (genome-wide association studies), MAS (marker-assisted selection), and GS (genomic selection) [2527].

The aim of this study was to identify the recessive dwarfing gene of rye in the BK-1 inbred line, which was derived from Bashirskaja karlikovaja Russian source. We assigned this gene to rye chromosome, determined its reaction to GA3 and present the basic characteristics of its phenotypic effect.

Materials and methods

Plant material

The maternal inbred line 541 was obtained in West Pomeranian University of Technology, Szczecin. This self-fertile line has a tall phenotype and has been reproduced by self-pollination for more than 20 years. The detailed characteristics of the line were described by Milczarski et al. [28]. Bashirskaja karlikovaja, a Russian source of a recessive dwarfing gene, was kindly provided by the N.I. Vavilov All-Russian Scientific Research Institute of Plant Industry, St. Petersburg, Russia. The paternal BK-1 line was derived in the University of Life Sciences in Lublin by two cycles of self-pollination. The BK-1 line is characterised by at least 2 times higher tillering capacity than cultivated varieties or lines and flexed, semi-erect stem with high number of short internodes. This specific, not upright growth form results from the fact that from a given node successive internodes grow at an angle to the previous one. The nodes are significantly thicker than the diameter of the stem. The spikes are short and flat, filled with very small grains of low weight. In addition, one stem may have supernumerary ears growing from a lower node. The leaves of the BK-1 line are proportionally shorter and narrower in comparison to other rye varieties and lines.

The two parental lines were hybridized in 2012, and in the next season, 2 tall F1 plants (code: BK2 and BK3) were self-pollinated. In 2013, F2 populations were sown in Czesławice in the Experimental Farm of the University of Life Sciences in Lublin. The height of 331 plants of these populations was measured to verify the expected 3:1 ratio of segregation. The distribution of dwarfism in the F2 population was confirmed by observation of the F3 progeny (7–20 plants per line). If the number of plants assessed in generation F3 was less than 7, such a genotype was not classified into any of the groups (dwarf, tall, segregating), unless both tall and dwarf plants were visible. The hypothesis of the monogenic inheritance of plant height in F2 and F3 progenies was verified using the χ2 test.

The parents and F2 population were assessed for their morphological traits: plant height, length, and thickness of the second internode from the bottom, main spike length, and number and weight of kernels in the main spike. The measurements of the parental plants were performed in 2014–2016. The BK-1 line was also crossed with Dańkowskie Amber (Danko Ltd.) to test the gene effect and introduce the dw9 to a modern population variety. A basic characterization of these newly developed plant materials was conducted to assess six morphological traits, including thousand-kernel weight (TKW). The statistical analyses of the mean values, standard deviation, correlation coefficients, and significant differences were conducted using Statistica 13.3 software (TIBCO Software Inc.).

Genetic mapping

Genomic DNA was extracted from young, healthy leaves of F2 plants and parental individuals using a GenElute Plant Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma). DNA from 94 randomly chosen F2 plants and parents was used for DArTSeq genotyping (Diversity Arrays Technique Pty Ltd). The results obtained from phenotype segregations and the DArTSeq scores were used to construct a genetic map of the rye chromosome carrying the new recessive dwarfing gene. DNA from the F2 mapping population and parents was used for DArTseq genotyping (Diversity Arrays Technique Pty Ltd). Linkage and localization of the identified markers with the dwarfing gene were performed with Kosambi mapping function using JoinMap 5.0 software [29].

In the final analysis, only a linkage group with dwarfing gene segregation was constructed with an LOD ratio of 17. The linkage groups were thereafter compared to the RIL-S (population 541 × 2020) consensus genetic map of rye [30]. An original map showing the relationships to the reference map was generated using MapChart 2.0 software [31]. The chromosome location was verified using data from the reference sequence of the Secale cereale Lo7_v2 database [32]. For this purpose, scaffolds with a description of the chromosome 6R were extracted from the Sc_Lo7_v2 library. DArTSeq sequences were mapped to reference scaffolds (Sc_Lo7_v2_6R) and filtered out, and the chromosome position has been verified. All scaffolds to which DArTSeq markers have been mapped were annotated as well using a custom "nt" library. The DArTseq sequence mapping to reference scaffolds and an annotation analysis of selected scaffolds were performed using CLC Genomic Workbench 11.0 (QIAGEN Ltd.).

GA3-seedling test

The GA3-seedling test was performed according to Worland [33] with minor modifications. Seeds of tall parental line 541 and the semi-dwarf BK-1 line were germinated on moistened filter paper. The seeds were kept at 4˚C for 48 h to synchronize germination and then kept at 20˚C for 3 days. Seedlings of both lines were then transferred into plastic boxes containing moistened perlite, and a standardized nutrient solution supplemented with 5 ppm of GA3 was applied every day until the seedlings reached the 2–3 leaf stage. The second group of plants of both lines was treated with a nutrient solution without GA3 (control group).

Plants were planted in three replications. At 14 days after the initiation of germination, the length of the seedlings was measured from the base to the top. Statistical analyses were performed to calculate significant differences between the means of groups using a t-Student’s test in Statistica 13.3 software (TIBCO Software Inc.).

Results

Genetic analysis of plant height in 541 × BK-1 crosses

The phenotyping of plants from two parental lines showed significant differences between the BK-1 dwarf line and the 541 line of normal height (Table 1, Fig 1, S1 Table). The mean height of the dwarf line was 96.9 cm, and the plant height reduction determined by the dwarf gene present in the BK-1 line was slightly above 28% compared to the 541 line. The dwarf line had a low inbreeding level (S2) and a very low reproduction rate. All morphological features other than the number of stem internodes were significantly lower in the BK-1 mutant than in the maternal line. Especially dramatic were the differences in the number (75%) and weight of kernels per spike (90%). Additionally, the number of internodes occurring in line 541 was significantly different (almost three times smaller than in line BK-1). This is a characteristic of the morphology of the BK-1 mutant, which has a large number of stem internodes.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Tall and dwarf plants from BK mapping population.

The tall phenotype corresponds to 541, and dwarf to BK-1 phenotype.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.g001

thumbnail
Table 1. Morphological traits of the mapping population parental lines (541 and BK-1).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.t001

The height of the F1 generation was 150 cm, which suggested total domination of the normal growth gene over the corresponding recessive BK-1 allele. The range of plant height (75–206 cm) in the F2 generation of 331 plants exceeded the range of the parental lines, which suggests environmental or genetic background effects, including transgression (Table 2, Fig 2, S1 Table). The height distribution of F2 progeny was bimodal, which shows that this generation consists of two subpopulations: a more numerous long straw subpopulation (132–206 cm) with an average height of 160.7 cm and a smaller one representing short straw plants (75–130 cm) with an average height of 109 cm.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Distribution of plant height in F2 population of the 541 × BK-1 cross.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.g002

thumbnail
Table 2. Segregation of dwarf vs. tall phenotypes among plants of F2 and F3 progeny.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.t002

The lowest height attributed to the phenotypes of high plants was 130 cm because no dwarf plants were observed in the F3 progeny with this value, and genotypes of this height were segregated. The analysis of F3 progeny allowed us to distinguish homozygotes from heterozygotes within the dwarf gene range. The coefficient of segregation of short and high stem phenotypes in F2 was confirmed by the observation of F3 offspring and was consistent with a ratio of 3:1. This suggests a monogenic inheritance of plant height in the 541 × BK-1 cross (Table 2, S1 Table).

Mapping of the dwarfing gene dw9

Out of 53,433 DArTseq markers, 10,979 were selected in the Mendelian model within the F2 mapping population for the 541 × BK-1 cross. The gene segregation of the dwarfism gene was added to the pool of genetic markers, and several linking groups were obtained. One group included 437 markers to which the dwarfing gene was linked. Using the data from the 541 × 2020 reference map, the selected markers located on chromosome 6R of the reference map were verified.

Precise map analysis allowed to place the dwarfing gene on the distal part of the long arm of the 6R chromosome in position 214.98 cM (Fig 3, S2 Table). A high-density map for this segment was obtained using 112 markers and compared with the position of common markers on the reference map of the 6R chromosome. The genetic distances between the markers of the linkage group containing the dwarfing gene have been recalculated to their respective positions on the reference map (population 541×2020). The markers order of the 541 x BK-1 mapping population is in good agreement with the reference map, although numerous but minor marker position rearrangements are also observed. The gene is located in a cluster of 67 markers surrounding it at a distance of +/- 1 cM, which can be used to mark it and make a marker-assisted selection. The DArTSeq markers with the numbers 5222191 and 3581173 flanking the dwarfing gene position are very strongly linked to it over distances of 0.05 and 0.06 cM respectively. It was observed that this difference is related to genotype B2, which during the analysis of dwarfism segregation was determined as recessive homozygot (dwarf genotype), while the same genotype analyzed with markers 5222191 and 3581173 shows a heterozygous type or one corresponding to homozygotes specific for tall plants.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Chromosomal localisation of dw9 gene.

The reference map of 6R chromosome (541 × 2020) comes from Milczarski et.al. [30].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.g003

This is the first time that a map of the dwarfing gene location has been presented here, so the new gene has been assigned the symbol dw9.

To validate the chromosome location, 112 DArTSeq markers were mapped to the reference library of the Sc_Lo7_v2_scaffolds rye genome sequence associated with only the 6R chromosome. From the total pool of all scaffolds in the library, the 81 491 scaffolds were filtered out, and the Sc_Lo7_v2_scaffolds_6R sublibrary was created. In this group, part of the scaffolds has a chromosome position (cM), and part is assigned to only the 6R chromosome (without position). Of the total pool of 112 markers DArTSeq, 54 had compatible sequences with 45 scaffolds of the Sc_Lo7_v2_scaffolds_6R library (S3 Table).

The data on the chromosome location of scaffolds revealed that those with marked chromosome positions were in the range of 150.47 to 179.34 cM (that is, precisely in the distal segment of the 6R chromosome). Scaffolds selected from the reference library were annotated to search for a potential candidate gene for a newly discovered dwarfing gene (S3 Table). The data analysis showed that none of the scaffolds contain sequences that may be functionally related to the dwarfism caused by the dw9 gene. One of the most strongly linked DArTSeq (3581173) markers with the dw9 gene showed 94% of sequence similarity to the corresponding scaffold sequence Lo7_v2_scaffold_617669. The further analysis revealed its annotation to the hypothetical proteins TRIUR3_29124 from Triticum urartu (Accession no. EMS51228), which does not show potential relationship with dwarfism.

Sensitivity of dw9 to GA3

The BK-1 line showed a very low degree of sensitivity to exogenous GA3 in the seedling phase (Table 3, S1 Table). The line reaction was statistically insignificant but much smaller than the one in line 541. Thus, it can be concluded that the dw9 gene in line BK-1 belongs to the group of GA-insensitive genes.

thumbnail
Table 3. Reaction of seedlings of parental lines to exogenously applied GA3.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.t003

Evaluation of the effect of dw9 on agronomic traits of rye

The noticeable, statistically significant differences between parental lines BK-1 and 541 in relation to the analyzed traits translated into the correlations between them observed in the F2 generation of the hybrid (Table 4). All six traits were positively and statistically significantly correlated with each other, and the smallest correlations were observed between the length of the second internode and the number and weight of kernels per spike (r <0.5). The number and weight of kernels per spike were most strongly correlated with each other (r = 0.94). Unfortunately, the highly significant correlations of plant height with spike length and the number and weight of kernels per spike found in the progeny of F2 suggest that these three traits may be adversely affected by the dwarfing gene dw9 (Table 4). This is a rather negative result for the use of the dw9 gene in breeding.

thumbnail
Table 4. Correlation coefficients between studied traits in 541 × BK-1 F2 mapping population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.t004

False positive or false negative interpretations may result from using only inbred lines to evaluate the effect of the dwarfism gene on rye genotypes and evaluating the effects based on only the analysis of correlations in the F2 population between such lines. To verify the effects of the dwarfing gene dw9, line BK-1 was crossed with the population variety Dańkowskie Amber. Table 5 shows preliminary and only one-year results illustrating the influence of dw9 on agronomic values of cv. Dańkowskie Amber. The F1 Dańkowskie Amber × BK-1 hybrid revealed significant heterosis of plant height (14%), 2 internode elongation (16%), and significant reduction of TKW (18.5%). Average values for other traits were nominally lower, but the differences were not statistically significant. However, the results confirmed the significant and negative influence of the dw9 gene on the most important yield-forming traits, especially on the weight of 1000 grains, observed in parental forms.

thumbnail
Table 5. Characteristics of morphological traits in cv. Dańkowskie Amber and F1 Dańkowskie Amber x BK-1 cross.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.t005

Discussion

The catalogue of known dwarfing genes in rye was presented previously by Börner et al. [11]. In the list of recessive dwarfing genes in rye, only one described by Melz [18] as dw7, was reported on the 6R chromosome. Apart from assigning 6R to the chromosome based on trisomic set analysis, there is no additional information allowing for the precise determination of its location. The reaction of this gene to exogenously applied GA3 is also unknown. Therefore, it is difficult to determine the relationship between the dw7 gene described by Melz [18] and the one characterized in this paper. Answering this question will be possible after crossing the BK-1 with the I-1006 line, the source of the dw7 gene.

The newly discovered dw9 gene was precisely located on the high-density genetic map of 6R chromosome in the distal region of the long arm of this chromosome. A comparison of the closely linked marker segment with the dwarfing gene showed that it corresponds to the 6RL location of the reference map 541 × 2020 population in position between 180.0 and 223.9 cM [30]. This position was also confirmed by the scaffold analysis of the reference rye genome base of known chromosome location [32]. This double verification leaves no doubt about the chromosome location of the dw9 gene especially as compatible positions of the population map markers 541 × BK-1 and scaffolds are observed. Additionally, there was an insignificant reaction of the dwarf line to exogenous GA3, which positions the gene as being insensitive to gibberellin. It can be concluded that this gene should represent GA signaling genes, but further research is needed to confirm this.

An additional annotation analysis was performed for the Sc_Lo7_v2_scaffolds_6R library scaffold sequences to which DArTSeq markers were mapped, which did not show that any of the scaffold sequences had functionally related dwarfism sequences. One of the scaffolds, Lo7_v2_scaffold_617669, whose fragment of the sequence is consistent with the 3581173 DArTSeq marker sequence, does not have a potential candidate gene for this type of dwarfism, but is a good source for searching for a marker associated with the dw9 gene.

There is also no clear evidence to determine whether the dw9 gene localized on 6RL rye can be matched by another dwarf gene of wheat or barley based on synteny. The genes Rht14, Rht16, and Rht18 [34] are located on 6BS of wheat. Nevertheless, their coincidence with the dw9 gene is currently difficult to prove.

Comparing the phenotypic expression of the dwarfing gene dw9 with the effects of other recessive genes: ct2, dw8 and 3 other unknown sources (Milczarski et al. unpublished), it can be concluded that dw9 dwarfism has a different type. This is mainly due to a mutation that significantly increases the number of internodes, causing the dwarf plant to be flexed and unfolded, rather than erected. Additional ears may appear on one stem, but they are very poorly filled with grain. It is not clear whether these disadvantages are only linked to the dwarfing gene or the pleiotropic effect of the gene. The use of this source directly in rye breeding is therefore impossible at this stage, mainly due to the negative effect of this type of dwarfism on yielding traits. Particularly, it is very difficult to maintain the BK-1 line in a vital state. Current backcrossing with Dańkowskie Amber varieties will allow us to answer the question of whether this source of dwarfism can be used in rye breeding in the future.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Biometrical analysis of parental lines, F2, F3 populations, gibberellin test and Dańkowskie Amber x BK-1 cross.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.s001

(XLSX)

S2 Table. Markers segregation in mapping population 541 x Bk-1 on 6R rye chromosome.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Alignment analysis of DArTSeq markers sequence to Sc_Lo7_v2_6R scaffolds and annotation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0229564.s003

(XLSX)

References

  1. 1. Baker CJ, Sterling M, Berry P. 2014. A generalised model of crop lodging. Journal of Theoretical Biology. 363:1–12. pmid:25109589
  2. 2. Berry PM, Berry ST. 2015. Understanding the genetic control of lodging-associated plant characters in winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Euphytica. 205 (3):671–689.
  3. 3. Kobyljanski VD. 1972. On the genetics of the dominant factor of short-strawed rye. Genetika. 8:12–17.
  4. 4. Kobylianski VD. 1975a. Genetic resources of worlds rye collection for solving of more important breeding problems. Hod Rośl Aklim Nas. 19 (5/6):439–446.
  5. 5. Stojałowski S, Myśków B, Hanek M. 2015. Phenotypic effect and chromosomal localization of Ddw3, the dominant dwarfing gene in rye (Secale cereale L.). Euphytica. 201 (1):43–52.
  6. 6. Kantarek Z., Masojć P, Bienias A, Milczarski P. (2018) Identification of a novel, dominant dwarfing gene (Ddw4) and its effect on morphological traits of rye. PLoS One. 13(6):e0199335. pmid:29912949
  7. 7. Kondratenko F.T., Goncharenko A.A. 1975. The breeding of dwarf winter rye varieties. Hod Rośl Aklim Nas 19 (5/6):527–530.
  8. 8. Braun E-M, Tsvetkova N, Rotter B, Siekmann D, Schwefel K, Krezdorn N, et al. 2019. Gene Expression Profiling and Fine Mapping Identifies a Gibberellin 2-Oxidase Gene Co-segregating With the Dominant Dwarfing Gene Ddw1 in Rye (Secale cereal L.). Front. Plant Sci. 10:857. pmid:31333700
  9. 9. Plaschke J., Korzun V., Koebner R.M.D., Börner A. 1995. Mapping of the GA3-insensitive dwarfing gene ct1on chromosome 7R in rye. Plant Breed. (114):113–116.
  10. 10. Plaschke J, Börner A, Xie DX, Koebner RM, Schlegel R, Gale MD. 1993. RFLP mapping of genes affecting plant height and growth habit in rye. TAG. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 85 (8):1049–1054. pmid:24196157
  11. 11. Börner A, Plaschke J, Korzun V, Worland AJ. 1996. The relationships between the dwarfing genes of wheat and rye. Euphytica. 89 (1):69–75.
  12. 12. Börner A., Melz G. 1988. Response of rye genotypes differing in plant height to exogenous gibberellic acid application. Arch. Züchtungsforsch. (18):71–74.
  13. 13. Sybenga J, Prakken R. 1962. Gene analysis in rye. Genetica. 33:95–105.
  14. 14. de Vries J. N., Sybenga J. 1984. Chromosomal location of 17 monogenically inherited morphological markers in rye (Secale cereale L.) using the translocation tester set. Z. Pflanzenzücht. 92:117–139.
  15. 15. Malyshev S, Korzun V, Voylokov A, Smirnov V, Börner A. 2001. Linkage mapping of mutant loci in rye (Secale cereale L.). TAG Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 103 (1):70–74.
  16. 16. Voylokov A. V., Korzun V., Börner A. 1998. Mapping of three self-fertility mutations in rye (Secale cereale L.) using RFLP, isozyme and morphological markers. Theoretical and Applied Genetics. 97 (1):147–153.
  17. 17. Kubicka H., Kubicki B. 1990. Two types of dwarfness in winter rye (Secale cereale L.). Genet. Pol. 31 (2):9–19.
  18. 18. Melz G. 1989. Beiträge zur Genetik des Roggens (Secale cereale L.). DSc thesis, AdL, Berlin, Germany: pp. 1–173.
  19. 19. Sansaloni C, Petroli C, Jaccoud D, Carling J, Detering F, Grattapaglia D, et al. 2011. Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) and next-generation sequencing combined: Genome-wide, high throughput, highly informative genotyping for molecular breeding of Eucalyptus. BMC Proceedings. 5 (Suppl 7):P54.
  20. 20. Kilian A, Wenzl P, Huttner E, Carling J, Xia L, Blois H, et al. 2012. Diversity arrays technology: A generic genome profiling technology on open platforms. In: Pompanon F., Bonin A. (eds) Data Production and Analysis in Population Genomics. Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.). 888:67–89.
  21. 21. Cruz VMV, Kilian A, Dierig DA. 2013. Development of DArT marker platforms and genetic diversity assessment of the U.S. collection of the new oilseed crop lesquerella and related species. PloS One. 8 (5):e64062. pmid:23724020
  22. 22. Baloch FS, Alsaleh A, Shahid MQ, Çiftçi V, E Sáenz de Miera L, Aasim M, et al. 2017. A Whole Genome DArTseq and SNP Analysis for Genetic Diversity Assessment in Durum Wheat from Central Fertile Crescent. PloS One. 12 (1):e0167821. pmid:28099442
  23. 23. Milczarski P, Masojć P, Krajewski P, Stochmal A, Kowalczyk M, Angelov M, et al. 2017. QTL mapping for benzoxazinoid content, preharvest sprouting, alpha-amylase activity, and leaf rust resistance in rye (Secale cereale L.). PLoS One. 12(12):e0189912. pmid:29267335
  24. 24. Myśków B, Stojałowski S, Łań A, Bolibok Brągoszewska H, Rakoczy- Trojanowska M, Kilian A. 2012. Detection of the quantitative trait loci for α-amylase activity on a high-density genetic map of rye and comparison of their localization to loci controlling preharvest sprouting and earliness. Mol Breed. 30(1): 367–376. pmid:22707913
  25. 25. Grzebelus D, Iorizzo M, Senalik D, Ellison S, Cavagnaro P, Macko-Podgorni A, et al. 2014. Diversity, genetic mapping, and signatures of domestication in the carrot (Daucus carota L.) genome, as revealed by Diversity Arrays Technology (DArT) markers. Molecular breeding: new strategies in plant improvement. 33:625–637.
  26. 26. Jighly A, Alagu M, Makdis F, Singh M, Singh S, Emebiri LC, et al. 2016. Genomic regions conferring resistance to multiple fungal pathogens in synthetic hexaploid wheat. Molecular breeding: new strategies in plant improvement 36 (9):1301.
  27. 27. Mwadzingeni L, Shimelis H, Rees DJG, Tsilo TJ. 2017. Genome-wide association analysis of agronomic traits in wheat under drought-stressed and non-stressed conditions. PloS One. 12 (2):e0171692. pmid:28234945
  28. 28. Milczarski P, Bolibok-Brągoszewska H, Myśków B, Stojałowski S, Heller-Uszyńska K, Góralska M, et al. 2011. A high density consensus map of rye (Secale cereale L.) based on DArT markers. PloS ONE. 2011;6(12):e28495. pmid:22163026
  29. 29. Van Ooijen J.W. 2011. Multipoint maximum likelihood mapping in a full-sib family of an outbreeding species. Genetics Research. 93, 5, 343–349. pmid:21878144
  30. 30. Milczarski P, Hanek M, Tyrka M, Stojałowski S. 2016. The application of GBS markers for extending the dense genetic map of rye (Secale cereale L.) and the localization of the Rfc1 gene restoring male fertility in plants with the C source of sterility-inducing cytoplasm. J Appl Genet. 2016;57: 439–451. pmid:27085345
  31. 31. Voorrips RE. 2002 MapChart: software for the graphical presentation of linkage maps and QTLs. J Hered. 93(1): 77–78. pmid:12011185
  32. 32. Bauer E., Schmutzer T., Barilar I., Mascher M., Gundlach H., Martis M. M., et al. 2017. Towards a whole-genome sequence for rye (Secale cereale L.). Plant J. 89, 853–869. pmid:27888547
  33. 33. Worland AJ. 1986. Gibberellic acid insensitive dwarfing genes in Southern European wheats. Euphytica. 35: 857–866.
  34. 34. Haque MA, Martinek P, Watanabe N, Kuboyama T. 2011. Genetic mapping of gibberellic acid-sensitive genes for semidwarfism in durum wheat. Cereal Res Commun. 39:171–178