Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

m6A minimally impacts the structure, dynamics, and Rev ARM binding properties of HIV-1 RRE stem IIB

  • Chia-Chieh Chu,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America

  • Bei Liu,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America

  • Raphael Plangger,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Validation

    Affiliation Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences CMBI, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

  • Christoph Kreutz,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Validation

    Affiliation Institute of Organic Chemistry and Center for Molecular Biosciences CMBI, Universität Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria

  • Hashim M. Al-Hashimi

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    hashim.al.hashimi@duke.edu

    Affiliations Department of Biochemistry, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC, United States of America, Department of Chemistry, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States of America

m6A minimally impacts the structure, dynamics, and Rev ARM binding properties of HIV-1 RRE stem IIB

  • Chia-Chieh Chu, 
  • Bei Liu, 
  • Raphael Plangger, 
  • Christoph Kreutz, 
  • Hashim M. Al-Hashimi
PLOS
x

Abstract

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is a ubiquitous RNA post-transcriptional modification found in coding as well as non-coding RNAs. m6A has also been found in viral RNAs where it is proposed to modulate host-pathogen interactions. Two m6A sites have been reported in the HIV-1 Rev response element (RRE) stem IIB, one of which was shown to enhance binding to the viral protein Rev and viral RNA export. However, because these m6A sites have not been observed in other studies mapping m6A in HIV-1 RNA, their significance remains to be firmly established. Here, using optical melting experiments, NMR spectroscopy, and in vitro binding assays, we show that m6A minimally impacts the stability, structure, and dynamics of RRE stem IIB as well as its binding affinity to the Rev arginine-rich-motif (ARM) in vitro. Our results indicate that if present in stem IIB, m6A is unlikely to substantially alter the conformational properties of the RNA. Our results add to a growing view that the impact of m6A on RNA depends on sequence context and Mg2+.

Introduction

N6-methyladenosine (m6A) is an abundant reversible epitranscriptomic modification found in coding and non-coding RNAs [14]. It plays important roles in RNA metabolism [58] and is implicated in a growing number of cellular processes [915]. m6A has also been found in viral RNAs where it is proposed to modulate host-pathogen interactions [1619].

A number of studies have reported m6A in the HIV-1 RNA genome [18, 20, 21]. One study examining HIV-1 infected human T cells [20] reported two m6A sites (A68 and A62, Fig 1) in the Rev response element (RRE) stem IIB. RRE is a ~350 nt cis-acting RNA element that is recognized by viral Rev protein to promote the export of unspliced or partially spliced viral RNA to express the structural proteins required for viral replication [2224]. The two m6A sites were found in stem IIB (RREIIB), which is the primary binding site for Rev [23, 2527]. Knocking down the methyltransferase complex (METTL3/METTL14) was shown to suppress Rev-RRE mediated RNA export and viral replication, and point substitution mutation of one of the two highly conserved adenines (A68) strongly suppressed viral replication (> 90%) [20]. It was proposed [20] that the methyl group of m6A68 may interact with Rev protein to stabilize Rev-RRE binding, and/or that m6A68 may alter the conformational properties of stem IIB to facilitate Rev recognition. Another different study employing distinct cell lines and mapping methods did not observe these m6A sites on RREIIB suggesting that m6A can enhance HIV-1 replication and mRNA expression through recruitment of the m6A reader proteins YTH-domain containing family (YTHDF) [21]. A third study found m6A in RRE but did not identify the specific site [18]. The study proposed that the YTHDF proteins inhibit HIV-1 replication and infection by blocking viral reverse transcription.

thumbnail
Fig 1. m6A has limited impact on the thermal stability of RREIIB stem loop.

(A) The secondary structure with the proposed N6-methyl modified A68 bulge (highlighted in red) of RREIIB native GS and two non-native ES1 and ES2. (B) Impact of m6A68 on the thermal stability of the RREIIB hairpins with and without 3 mM Mg2+. Shown are the free energy of annealing of the methylated and unmodified RREIIB with and without Mg2+. (C) RNA thermodynamic parameters from UV melting. Data are presented as the mean ± standard deviation of at least three independent measurements. Uncertainty in the calculated thermodynamic parameters were determined by error propagation as previously described [48].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224850.g001

Here, we asked whether methylation of RREIIB with m6A leads to changes in its conformational and Rev arginine rich motif (ARM) binding properties. We were driven to test this hypothesis because our recent studies showed that the internal loop region of RREIIB near the A68 bulge is highly flexible, and can adopt conformations with alternative secondary structures (Fig 1A) that have different export activities [28, 29]. By redistributing this dynamic ensemble of RREIIB, m6A could potentially impact the Rev-RRE interaction and RNA export. Prior studies have shown that m6A can reshape RNA-protein and RNA-RNA interactions by modulating RNA structure [30]. For example, a single m6A was shown to destabilize RNA duplexes by 0.5–1.7 kcal/mol [31, 32] thus enhancing the binding affinity of proteins to their single-stranded RNA targets [33]. The modification destabilizes A-U base pairs because hydrogen bonding requires that the N6-methyl group adopt the unfavorable anti conformation [34, 35]. m6A has also been shown to disrupt the non-canonical sheared G-A base pairs to block the assembly of the box C/D snoRNP complexes [36].

We find that modification of the A68 bulge has little effect on the stability, structure, dynamics, as well as the Rev-ARM binding properties of RREIIB. The results indicate that if RREIIB is m6A modified, it is unlikely to substantially change the conformational properties of RRE although we cannot rule out that small changes in the conformational properties could modulate Rev-RRE binding in vivo. The results also add to a growing view that the impact of m6A on RNA structure depends on sequence context and Mg2+ [31, 32, 36, 37]. For example, while m6A has been shown to destabilize canonical duplexes [31, 32], it can stabilize junctional A-U base pairs in a Mg2+ and secondary structure dependent manner [37] as well as in contexts in which the m6A is in a dangling end [32].

Materials and methods

Preparation of RNA samples for NMR studies

RREIIB and m6A modified RREIIB (RREIIBm6A68 and RREIIBm6A26m6A68) were chemically synthesized using an in-house oligo synthesizer (MerMade 6, BioAutomation) with solid-phase RNA synthesis using N-acetyl protected 2’-tBDSilyl-phosphoramidites (ChemGenes Corporation) and 1 μmol standard columns (1000 Å, BioAutomation) with 4,4’-dimethoxytrityl (DMT)-off synthesis followed by base and 2’-O deprotection (100 μmol DMSO, 125 μL TEA•3HF, heat at 65ºC for 2.5hrs), and ethanol precipitation[28]. A similar approach was used to synthesize site-labeled 15N3-U72-RREIIm6A68 three-way junction using 15N3-uridine phosphoramidites [38] and using DMT-off 2’-O deprotection to obtain cleaner NMR spectra.

All RNA samples were purified using 20% (w/v) denaturing polyacrylamide (29:1) gel within 8M urea, 20 mM Tris Borate and 1 mM ethylene-diaminetetraacetate (EDTA) TBE buffer followed by Elutrap electro-elution system (Whatmann, GE healthcare) with 40 mM Tris Acetate and 1 mM EDTA (TAE) buffer then ethanol precipitation. The RNA pellets were dissolved in water and annealed by heating at 95°C for 10 mins then rapidly cooling on ice. After measuring the concentration, the RNA samples were buffer-exchanged into NMR buffer (15 mM sodium phosphate, 25 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, with or without 3 mM MgCl2 at pH = 6.4) three times using 3kDa Amicon Ultra centrifugal filters (EMD Millipore). The final RNA concentrations were ~1.3 mM and ~0.4 mM for RREIIB and RREII, respectively.

NMR experiments

NMR experiments were performed on Bruker Avance III 600 MHz or 700 MHz NMR spectrometers equipped with 5 mm triple-resonance cryogenic probes at 25°C. 2D [1H,13C] (C2/C6/C8-H2/H6/H8) and 2D [1H,15N] (N1/N3-H1/H3) heteronuclear single quantum coherence (HSQC) spectra were recorded in the absence or presence of 3 mM Mg2+ at 25 oC in NMR buffer with 10% D2O. All NMR data were analyzed using NMRPipe [39] and SPARKY (T.D. Goddard and D.G. Kneller, SPARKY 3, University of California, San Francisco). Unless stated otherwise, all NMR spectra were collected in the presence of Mg2+. Resonance intensities were measured using 2D [1H–13C] HSQC experiments. The intensity for each type of C–H spin was normalized to a value of 0.1 using A52-C8H8, A52-C2H2 and U56-C6H6, respectively.

UV melting experiments

Thermal melting experiments were performed on m6A modified and unmodified RREIIB using a PerkinElmer Lambda 25 UV/VIS spectrometer equipped with an RTP 6 Peltier Temperature Programmer and a PCB 1500 Water Peltier System. All RNA samples were buffer exchanged into NMR buffer. RNA samples (concentration ~ 1 mM) were then diluted (with NMR buffer) to 3 μM prior to UV melting measurement, which were performed in triplicate (or more) using a sample volume of 400 μL in a Teflon-stoppered 1 cm path length quartz cell. The absorbance at 260 nm was monitored while the temperature was varied between 15 and 95°C at a rate of 1C/min. Thermodynamic parameters were obtained by fitting the UV melting curves using nonlinear model fitting in Mathematica 10.0 (Wolfram Research) as previously described [37].

Fluorescence polarization binding assays

Fluorescence polarization (A) was measured using a CLARIOstar plate reader (BMG LABTECH) using 480 nm excitation and a 540 nm emission filter [28, 40]. Fluorescence polarization binding assays were carried out using 3’-end fluorescein labeled Rev-ARM peptide (Rev-Fl, TRQARRNRRRRWRERQRAAAACK-FITC, LifeTein LLC). The serially diluted RNA in the reaction buffer (30 mM HEPES, pH = 7.0, 100 mM KCl, 10mM sodium phosphate, 10 mM ammonium acetate, 10 mM guanidinium chloride, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA, and 0.001% (v/v) Triton-X100) was incrementally added into a 384-well plate containing 10 nM Rev-Fl [40]. The binding curves were fitted to single-site binding equation using least-squares methods implemented in Mathematica 10.0 (Wolfram Research). where A is the measured fluorescence polarization; Afree is the polarization without Rev-Fl binding; Abound is the polarization with saturated Rev-Fl binding; RT is the total RNA concentration; LT is the total Rev-Fl concentration; Kd is the dissociation constant. The uncertainty in (A) was deduced based on the standard deviation over triplicate measurements.

Results

m6A68 does not alter the thermal stability of RREIIB

We first used optical melting experiments to examine whether methylation of A68 impacts the thermal stability of RREIIB. All experiments were performed in the presence of 3 mM Mg2+ unless stated otherwise. This is important given the impact of Mg2+ on RNA folding and dynamics [41] and also given recent studies showing that the impact of m6A on RNA structural dynamics and stability can depend on Mg2+ [37]. For these experiments, we used a stem IIB construct (Fig 1B) containing the wild-type sequence that was recently shown to recapitulate the conformation of stem IIB in the larger three-way junction context [28]. Prior X-ray [42, 43], NMR [44, 45], SAXS [46] as well as chemical probing data on larger fragments of the HIV genome (~350 nt) [47] indicate that RREII stem IIB adopts the predominant secondary structure shown in Fig 1A. In the dominant RREIIB ground state (GS) conformation, A68 adopts an unpaired bulged conformation. When located in bulged nucleotides, m6A has previously been shown to slightly destabilize RNA hairpins by 0.4–0.7 kcal/mol [37] most likely due to the disruption of stacking interactions in the flipped-in conformation. Based on the UV melting data, m6A68 had a negligible effect on RREIIB stability (Fig 1B and 1C). Interestingly, a small degree of destabilization (by ~0.4 kcal/mol) was observed in the absence of Mg2+, most likely because A68 adopts a partially flipped in conformation in the absence of Mg2+, and such a conformation could be more susceptible to destabilization by m6A [28]. Thus, the m6A effect is overridden by Mg2+. Indeed, Mg2+ stabilizes RREIIB by ~2 kcal/mol while m6A only destabilizes it by ~0.4 kcal/mol (Fig 1C).

m6A68 minimally affects structural and dynamic properties of the RREIIB ground state

We used NMR to examine whether methylation of A68 affects the conformation of RREIIB. A single resonance was observed for the N6-methyl group in 1D 1H NMR spectra of RREIIBm6A68, consistent with a single dominant conformation for m6A68 (Fig 2A). The 1D 1H imino spectrum of RREIIBm6A68 is virtually identical to its unmodified counterpart, indicating that the methylation does not alter the RREIIB secondary structure (Fig 2B). Very good agreement was also observed between the 2D [13C,1H] HSQC spectra of modified and unmodified RREIIB with only few residues in the internal loop region (A68, U66, G50, G46) showing minor chemical shift perturbations (Fig 2C). These results indicate that m6A68 modification does not substantially affect the structure of RREIIB GS.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The m6A modification has minor effects on RREIIB structure and dynamics.

(A) Secondary structure of RRE2Bm6A68, with the residues showing line-broadening with m6A, highlighted in red (with Mg2+) and blue (no Mg2+). Comparison of the 1D 1H NMR spectrum of RREIIBm6A68 with or without Mg2+ with the methyl peak indicated by arrows. The comparison of 1D imino spectra (B) and 2D [1H,13C]-HSQC spectra (C) of RREIIBm6A68 and RREIIB in the presence (red) and absence (blue) of 3 mM Mg2+. Resonances exhibiting shifting are indicated using arrows, and those with ambiguous assignments denoted using an asterisk. (D) Normalized resonance intensities in 2D [1H,13C]-HSQC spectra of RREIIBm6A68 and RREIIB in the presence (red) and absence (blue) of 3 mM Mg2+. A52-C8H8, A52-C2H2 and U56-C6H6 were used as a reference and normalized to 0.1. The sample conditions were 1.2–1.5 mM RREIIBm6A68 or RREIIB in 15 mM sodium phosphate, 25 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA, pH 6.4 with or without 3 mM MgCl2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224850.g002

Prior studies showed that m6A can impact RNA conformation in a Mg2+ dependent manner [37]. Interestingly, the modification had a larger impact on NMR spectra of RREIIB recorded in the absence of Mg2+. Multiple resonances are observed for the N6-methyl group, indicating the co-existence of multiple conformations (Fig 2A). The methylation also induced larger perturbations at A52-U66 base pair near the m6A68 bulge (Fig 2B). In 2D [1H, 13C] HSQC spectra, the modification induced severe line broadening [49] for resonances belonging to residues G47, G48, G50, A68, C69, G71 and U72 in the internal loop, consistent with enhanced dynamics at the micro-to-millisecond timescales, where only G50 resonance shows broadening in the presence of Mg2+ (Fig 2C and 2D). It is likely that the m6A induced line broadening in the absence of Mg2+ is due to a changes in ES kinetics or populations. The UV melting data showing that m6A68 destabilizes RREIIB GS in the absence of Mg2+ suggests that the enhanced ES dynamics could arise from destabilization of the GS in the absence of Mg2+. Similar NMR results were obtained for a double m6A modified RREIIB (RREIIBm6A62m6A68) (S1 Fig).

m6A68 minimally affects the structural and dynamic properties of the excited states in the more native RREII three-way junction

We recently showed that RREII transiently adopts two low-abundance alternative secondary structures (‘excited states’, ES) referred to as ES1 and ES2 (Fig 3A). A68 remains as a bulge in ES1 while forms a G50-A68 mismatch in ES2. The combined m6A effects to A68 bulge in ES1 and to the specific G(anti)-A(anti) mismatch in ES2 remain unknown. We therefore examined whether methylation of A68 impacts the dynamics between the GS and ESs in more native RREII three-way junction. This conformational exchange can in principle be measured quantitatively with the use of NMR R relaxation dispersion (RD) data [28, 5052]. However, in practice, severe line-broadening and resonance overlap in NMR spectra of the more native three-way junction (RREII) in the presence of Mg2+ complicates measurements [28]. We therefore turned to an alternative approach which we recently developed which uses site-specific stable isotope labeling to directly observe the low-populated ES that form under slow exchange kinetics [28]. With this approach, we were previously able to directly observe imino resonances belonging to ES1 and ES2 in RREII, which slows down the exchange kinetics relative to RREIIB (Fig 3A) [28]. In particular, by site-specifically labeling 15N3-U72, we observed the G48-U72 mismatch, which uniquely forms in both ES1 and ES2, based on the characteristic imino chemical shift of G-U mismatches (Fig 3A) [28].

thumbnail
Fig 3. Selective site-labeling strategy to probe conformational exchange in larger RREIIm6A68 three-way junction.

(A) Proposed secondary structure for ES1 and ES2 in RREII based on ESs observed in RREIIB. Nucleotides that experience exchange due to ES1 and ES2 are colored green and blue, respectively. (B) The comparison of 1D imino spectrum of RREIIm6A68 and RREII. (C) 2D [1H,15N]-HSQC spectra of site-specifically labeled 15N3-U72-RREIIm6A68 and 15N3-U72-RREII at 25°C showing a single imino resonance at the characteristic chemical shift region (~11.6 ppm) expected for a G-U in ESs. The sample conditions were 0.3–0.5 mM RNA in 15 mM sodium phosphate, 25 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA at pH 6.4 with 3 mM MgCl2.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224850.g003

We used the above strategy to examine how methylation of A68 impacts the GS-ES exchange in RREII. Samples of m6A68 modified and unmodified RREII were chemically synthesized with site-labeled 15N3-U72 (15N3-U72-RREIIm6A68 and 15N3-U72-RREII, respectively). The 1D 1H imino spectra of modified and unmodified RREII were very similar (Fig 3B) indicating that the modification minimally impacts the GS secondary structure even in the more native three-way junction context. The 2D [1H,15N] HSQC spectrum of RREIIm6A68 includes a resonance characteristic of the ES G48-U72 mismatch, and it shows excellent overlap with the corresponding resonance observed in unmodified RREII (Fig 3C). No other resonances were observed indicating that m6A does not lead to stabilization of alternative conformations in which U72 is base paired. Similar results were obtained in the absence of Mg2+ (S2 Fig). These results indicate that m6A68 does not significantly impact structural properties of the GS or the populations of the ESs in the native three-way junction both in the presence and absence of Mg2+. Note that we cannot entirely rule out that m6A destabilizes ES2 or ES1 and that the observed G48-U72 mismatch reflects either ES1 or ES2, respectively.

m6A68 has a negligible effect on Rev-RRM binding to RREIIB

We used a fluorescence polarization binding assay to examine whether methylation of A68 impacts binding of fluorescein labeled Rev-ARM peptide (Rev-Fl) to RREIIB (Fig 4) [28, 40]. Unmodified RREIIB binds to Rev-ARM peptide with apparent Kd = 30.6 ± 5.8 nM, in agreement with prior studies [44, 53]. The binding affinity decreased two-fold (Kd = 62.2 ± 23.8 nM) for the modified RREIIBm6A68, indicating that the binding affinity for m6A modified was only slightly weakened relative to unmodified RREIIB especially when considering the uncertainty.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Measurement of the binding affinity of Rev-ARM peptide to m6A modified or unmodified RREIIB using fluorescence polarization.

Normalized anisotropy values measured for RREIIBm6A68 and RREIIB fitted with one-site binding model (see ‘Materials and Methods‘ section). The anisotropy value observed in the absence of RNA was normalized to 0.1. Uncertainty reflects the standard deviation from three independent measurements. Buffer conditions: 30 mM HEPES, pH = 7.0, 100 mM KCl, 10mM sodium phosphate, 10 mM ammonium acetate, 10 mM guanidinium chloride, 2 mM MgCl2, 20 mM NaCl, 0.5 mM EDTA and 0.001% (v/v) Triton-X100. Concentration of Rev-Fl peptide was 10 nM.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224850.g004

Discussions

Methylation of RREIIB can promote Rev-RRE interaction by changing the RREIIB conformation so as to favorably bind to Rev or by promoting Rev-RRE binding through direct interaction involving the methyl group. Our results argue against a significant impact on RREIIB structure, as might be expected given placement of m6A68 in the bulge. In addition, the modification slightly weakened binding of the Rev-ARM, and this is consistent with prior NMR [54] and X-ray crystallography [55] studies showing that A68 bulge interacts with Rev protein through non-specific Van Der Waals contacts, and that deleting A68 has minor effects on Rev or Rev-ARM binding affinity to RRE stem IIB [26, 56]. Our data cannot rule out that the exposed and accessible m6A enhances binding in the context of full-length Rev and RRE or promotes RNA export through the recruitment of other host export factors, and that this in turn gives rise to the reported ~2–3 fold decrease in HIV viral RNA pull down using Rev when knocking down METTL3/METTL14 responsible for producing m6A [20]. It is also possible that the structural and dynamic properties of m6A modified RREIIB differ in vivo relative to in vitro. A recent study [29] showed that the key dynamic properties of unmodified RREIIB are similar in vitro and in cells. Further studies are needed to address these possibilities.

The modification had a greater effect on the stability and conformation of RREIIB in the absence of Mg2+. We previously showed that Mg2+ redistributes the RREIIB ensemble by stabilizing the GS and ES1 relative to ES2 [28]. Our results indicate that Mg2+ has a larger effect on the relative stability of these different conformations as compared to the methylation. This underscores the importance of studying the impact of m6A modifications in the presence of Mg2+ as in a more physiological conditions.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. The double m6A modifications have minor effects on RREIIB structure and dynamics in the presence of Mg2+.

(A) Secondary structure of RRE2Bm6A62,68. Resonances exhibiting line-broadening and perturbations in 2D [1H, 13C] aromatic HSQC spectra are shown in orange (with Mg2+) and green (no Mg2+), respectively. The comparison of 1D imino spectra (B) and 2D [1H,13C]-HSQC spectra (C) of RREIIBm6A62m6A68 and RREIIB in the presence (orange) and absence (green) of 3 mM Mg2+. Arrows indicate chemical shift perturbations while ambiguous assignments are denoted using an asterisk.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224850.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Selective site-labeling strategy to probe conformational exchange in larger 3-way junction RREIIm6A68 in the absence of Mg2+.

(A) The comparison of 1D imino spectrum of RREIIm6A68 and RREII without Mg2+. (B) 2D [1H,15N]-HSQC spectra of site-specifically labeled 15N3-U72-RREIIm6A68 and 15N3-U72-RREII without Mg2+ at 25°C showing a single imino resonance at the characteristic chemical shift region (~11.6 ppm) expected for a G-U bp in ES1 and ES2. The sample conditions were 0.3–0.5 mM RNA in 15 mM sodium phosphate, 25 mM NaCl, 0.1 mM EDTA at pH 6.4.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0224850.s002

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Atul Kaushik Rangadurai for critical comments and Dr. Richard Brennan in Duke University for providing the UV-Vis spectrophotometer. We acknowledge the Duke Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy Center for supporting NMR experiments, and thank Duke Center of RNA Biology for supporting fluorescence polarization measurements.

References

  1. 1. Meyer KD, Saletore Y, Zumbo P, Elemento O, Mason CE, Jaffrey SR. Comprehensive analysis of mRNA methylation reveals enrichment in 3' UTRs and near stop codons. Cell. 2012;149(7):1635–46. pmid:22608085; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3383396.
  2. 2. Dominissini D, Moshitch-Moshkovitz S, Schwartz S, Salmon-Divon M, Ungar L, Osenberg S, et al. Topology of the human and mouse m(6)A RNA methylomes revealed by m(6)A-seq. Nature. 2012;485(7397):201–U84. WOS:000303799800033. pmid:22575960
  3. 3. Desrosiers R, Friderici K, Rottman F. Identification of Methylated Nucleosides in Messenger-Rna from Novikoff Hepatoma-Cells. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1974;71(10):3971–5. WOS:A1974U614000040. pmid:4372599
  4. 4. Li X, Xiong X, Yi C. Epitranscriptome sequencing technologies: decoding RNA modifications. Nat Methods. 2016;14(1):23–31. pmid:28032622.
  5. 5. Wang X, Zhao BS, Roundtree IA, Lu ZK, Han DL, Ma HH, et al. N-6-methyladenosine Modulates Messenger RNA Translation Efficiency. Cell. 2015;161(6):1388–99. WOS:000355935000017. pmid:26046440
  6. 6. Wang X, Lu ZK, Gomez A, Hon GC, Yue YN, Han DL, et al. N-6-methyladenosine-dependent regulation of messenger RNA stability. Nature. 2014;505(7481):117–+. WOS:000329163300035. pmid:24284625
  7. 7. Zhao X, Yang Y, Sun BF, Shi Y, Yang X, Xiao W, et al. FTO-dependent demethylation of N6-methyladenosine regulates mRNA splicing and is required for adipogenesis. Cell Res. 2014;24(12):1403–19. WOS:000345894800006. pmid:25412662
  8. 8. Xiao W, Adhikari S, Dahal U, Chen YS, Hao YJ, Sun BF, et al. Nuclear m(6)A Reader YTHDC1 Regulates mRNA Splicing. Molecular cell. 2016;61(4):507–19. WOS:000372326300005. pmid:26876937
  9. 9. Zhao BXS, Roundtree IA, He C. Post-transcriptional gene regulation by mRNA modifications. Nat Rev Mol Cell Bio. 2017;18(1):31–42. WOS:000393267500008. pmid:27808276
  10. 10. Roundtree IA, Evans ME, Pan T, He C. Dynamic RNA Modifications in Gene Expression Regulation. Cell. 2017;169(7):1187–200. WOS:000403332400009. pmid:28622506
  11. 11. Meyer KD, Jaffrey SR. Rethinking m(6)A Readers, Writers, and Erasers. Annu Rev Cell Dev Bi. 2017;33:319–42. WOS:000413584700015. pmid:28759256
  12. 12. Deng XL, Su R, Feng XS, Wei MJ, Chen JJ. Role of N-6-methyladenosine modification in cancer. Curr Opin Genet Dev. 2018;48:1–7. WOS:000428232100002. pmid:29040886
  13. 13. Chen T, Hao Y-J, Zhang Y, Li M-M, Wang M, Han W, et al. m6A RNA Methylation Is Regulated by MicroRNAs and Promotes Reprogramming to Pluripotency. Cell stem cell. 2015;16(3):289–301. pmid:25683224
  14. 14. Weng Y-L, Wang X, An R, Cassin J, Vissers C, Liu Y, et al. Epitranscriptomic m6A Regulation of Axon Regeneration in the Adult Mammalian Nervous System. Neuron. 2018;97(2):313–25.e6. pmid:29346752
  15. 15. Gokhale NS, McIntyre ABR, McFadden MJ, Roder AE, Kennedy EM, Gandara JA, et al. N6-Methyladenosine in Flaviviridae Viral RNA Genomes Regulates Infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(5):654–65. Epub 2016/10/25. pmid:27773535; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5123813.
  16. 16. Gokhale NS, McIntyre ABR, McFadden MJ, Roder AE, Kennedy EM, Gandara JA, et al. N6-Methyladenosine in Flaviviridae Viral RNA Genomes Regulates Infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(5):654–65. WOS:000389472000014. pmid:27773535
  17. 17. Lichinchi G, Zhao BS, Wu YA, Lu ZK, Qin Y, He C, et al. Dynamics of Human and Viral RNA Methylation during Zika Virus Infection. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;20(5):666–73. WOS:000389472000015. pmid:27773536
  18. 18. Tirumuru N, Zhao BS, Lu WX, Lu ZK, He C, Wu L. N-6-methyladenosine of HIV-1 RNA regulates viral infection and HIV-1 Gag protein expression. eLife. 2016;5. ARTN e15528 10.7554/eLife.15528. WOS:000380858000001.
  19. 19. Hesser CR, Karijolich J, Dominissini D, He C, Glaunsinger BA. N-6-methyladenosine modification and the YTHDF2 reader protein play cell type specific roles in lytic viral gene expression during Kaposi's sarcoma-associated herpesvirus infection. Plos Pathog. 2018;14(4). ARTN e1006995 10.1371/journal.ppat.1006995. WOS:000431135400036.
  20. 20. Lichinchi G, Gao S, Saletore Y, Gonzalez GM, Bansal V, Wang Y, et al. Dynamics of the human and viral m6A RNA methylomes during HIV-1 infection of T cells. Nature Microbiology. 2016;1. pmid:27572442
  21. 21. Kennedy EM, Bogerd HP, Kornepati AVR, Kang D, Ghoshal D, Marshall JB, et al. Posttranscriptional m(6)A Editing of HIV-1 mRNAs Enhances Viral Gene Expression. Cell Host Microbe. 2016;19(5):675–85. WOS:000375595500017. pmid:27117054
  22. 22. Malim MH, Hauber J, Le SY, Maizel JV, Cullen BR. The HIV-1 rev trans-activator acts through a structured target sequence to activate nuclear export of unspliced viral mRNA. Nature. 1989;338(6212):254–7. pmid:2784194.
  23. 23. Malim MH, Tiley LS, McCarn DF, Rusche JR, Hauber J, Cullen BR. HIV-1 structural gene expression requires binding of the Rev trans-activator to its RNA target sequence. Cell. 1990;60(4):675–83. pmid:2406030.
  24. 24. Malim MH, Cullen BR. HIV-1 structural gene expression requires the binding of multiple Rev monomers to the viral RRE: implications for HIV-1 latency. Cell. 1991;65(2):241–8. pmid:2015625.
  25. 25. Bartel DP, Zapp ML, Green MR, Szostak JW. HIV-1 Rev regulation involves recognition of non-Watson-Crick base pairs in viral RNA. Cell. 1991;67(3):529–36. pmid:1934059.
  26. 26. Heaphy S, Finch JT, Gait MJ, Karn J, Singh M. Human immunodeficiency virus type 1 regulator of virion expression, rev, forms nucleoprotein filaments after binding to a purine-rich "bubble" located within the rev-responsive region of viral mRNAs. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 1991;88(16):7366–70. pmid:1871141; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC52296.
  27. 27. Huang XJ, Hope TJ, Bond BL, McDonald D, Grahl K, Parslow TG. Minimal Rev-response element for type 1 human immunodeficiency virus. Journal of virology. 1991;65(4):2131–4. pmid:2002556; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC240087.
  28. 28. Chu CC, Plangger R, Kreutz C, Al-Hashimi HM. Dynamic ensemble of HIV-1 RRE stem IIB reveals non-native conformations that disrupt the Rev-binding site. Nucleic acids research. 2019;47(13):7105–17. pmid:31199872; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6649712.
  29. 29. Ganser LR, Chu C-C, Bogerd HP, Kelly ML, Cullen BR, Al-Hashimi HM. Probing RNA conformational equilibria within the functional cellular context. bioRxiv. 2019:634576.
  30. 30. Spitale RC, Flynn RA, Zhang QC, Crisalli P, Lee B, Jung JW, et al. Structural imprints in vivo decode RNA regulatory mechanisms. Nature. 2015;519(7544):486–90. pmid:25799993; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4376618.
  31. 31. Kierzek E, Kierzek R. The thermodynamic stability of RNA duplexes and hairpins containing N6-alkyladenosines and 2-methylthio-N6-alkyladenosines. Nucleic acids research. 2003;31(15):4472–80. pmid:12888507; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC169893.
  32. 32. Roost C, Lynch SR, Batista PJ, Qu K, Chang HY, Kool ET. Structure and thermodynamics of N6-methyladenosine in RNA: a spring-loaded base modification. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2015;137(5):2107–15. pmid:25611135; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4405242.
  33. 33. Liu N, Dai Q, Zheng G, He C, Parisien M, Pan T. N6-methyladenosine-dependent RNA structural switches regulate RNA–protein interactions. Nature. 2015;518:560. pmid:25719671
  34. 34. Roost C, Lynch SR, Batista PJ, Qu K, Chang HY, Kool ET. Structure and Thermodynamics of N6-Methyladenosine in RNA: A Spring-Loaded Base Modification. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2015;137(5):2107–15. pmid:25611135
  35. 35. Kierzek E, Kierzek R. The thermodynamic stability of RNA duplexes and hairpins containing N-6-alkyladenosines and 2-methylthio-N-6-alkyladenosines. Nucleic acids research. 2003;31(15):4472–80. WOS:000184532900031. pmid:12888507
  36. 36. Huang L, Ashraf S, Wang J, Lilley DM. Control of box C/D snoRNP assembly by N(6)-methylation of adenine. EMBO Rep. 2017;18(9):1631–45. pmid:28623187; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC5579392.
  37. 37. Liu B, Merriman DK, Choi SH, Schumacher MA, Plangger R, Kreutz C, et al. A potentially abundant junctional RNA motif stabilized by m(6)A and Mg(2). Nat Commun. 2018;9(1):2761. pmid:30018356; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6050335.
  38. 38. Neuner S, Santner T, Kreutz C, Micura R. The "Speedy" Synthesis of Atom-Specific (15)N Imino/Amido-Labeled RNA. Chemistry. 2015;21(33):11634–43. pmid:26237536; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4946632.
  39. 39. Delaglio F, Grzesiek S, Vuister GW, Zhu G, Pfeifer J, Bax A. NMRPipe: a multidimensional spectral processing system based on UNIX pipes. Journal of biomolecular NMR. 1995;6(3):277–93. pmid:8520220.
  40. 40. Luedtke NW, Tor Y. Fluorescence-based methods for evaluating the RNA affinity and specificity of HIV-1 Rev-RRE inhibitors. Biopolymers. 2003;70(1):103–19. pmid:12925996.
  41. 41. Draper DE, Grilley D, Soto AM. Ions and RNA folding. Annu Rev Bioph Biom. 2005;34:221–43. WOS:000230099600010. pmid:15869389
  42. 42. Ippolito JA, Steitz TA. The structure of the HIV-1 RRE high affinity rev binding site at 1.6 A resolution. Journal of molecular biology. 2000;295(4):711–7. pmid:10656783.
  43. 43. Hung LW, Holbrook EL, Holbrook SR. The crystal structure of the Rev binding element of HIV-1 reveals novel base pairing and conformational variability. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2000;97(10):5107–12. pmid:10792052; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC25789.
  44. 44. Battiste JL, Tan R, Frankel AD, Williamson JR. Binding of an HIV Rev peptide to Rev responsive element RNA induces formation of purine-purine base pairs. Biochemistry. 1994;33(10):2741–7. pmid:8130185.
  45. 45. Peterson RD, Bartel DP, Szostak JW, Horvath SJ, Feigon J. 1H NMR studies of the high-affinity Rev binding site of the Rev responsive element of HIV-1 mRNA: base pairing in the core binding element. Biochemistry. 1994;33(18):5357–66. pmid:8180157.
  46. 46. Fang X, Wang J, O'Carroll IP, Mitchell M, Zuo X, Wang Y, et al. An unusual topological structure of the HIV-1 Rev response element. Cell. 2013;155(3):594–605. pmid:24243017; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3918456.
  47. 47. Bai Y, Tambe A, Zhou K, Doudna JA. RNA-guided assembly of Rev-RRE nuclear export complexes. eLife. 2014;3:e03656. pmid:25163983; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4142337.
  48. 48. Siegfried NA, Metzger SL, Bevilacqua PC. Folding cooperativity in RNA and DNA is dependent on position in the helix. Biochemistry. 2007;46(1):172–81. WOS:000243157300018. pmid:17198387
  49. 49. Getz MM, Andrews AJ, Fierke CA, Al-Hashimi HM. Structural plasticity and Mg2+ binding properties of RNase P P4 from combined analysis of NMR residual dipolar couplings and motionally decoupled spin relaxation. Rna. 2007;13(2):251–66. Epub 2006/12/30. pmid:17194721; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1781369.
  50. 50. Palmer AG 3rd, Massi F. Characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules using rotating-frame spin relaxation NMR spectroscopy. Chem Rev. 2006;106(5):1700–19. pmid:16683750.
  51. 51. Korzhnev DM, Orekhov VY, Kay LE. Off-resonance R(1rho) NMR studies of exchange dynamics in proteins with low spin-lock fields: an application to a Fyn SH3 domain. Journal of the American Chemical Society. 2005;127(2):713–21. pmid:15643897.
  52. 52. Rangadurai A, Szymaski ES, Kimsey IJ, Shi H, Al-Hashimi HM. Characterizing micro-to-millisecond chemical exchange in nucleic acids using off-resonance R1rho relaxation dispersion. Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc. 2019;112–113:55–102. Epub 2019/09/05. pmid:31481159; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC6727989.
  53. 53. Daugherty MD, D'Orso I, Frankel AD. A solution to limited genomic capacity: using adaptable binding surfaces to assemble the functional HIV Rev oligomer on RNA. Molecular cell. 2008;31(6):824–34. pmid:18922466; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2651398.
  54. 54. Battiste JL, Mao H, Rao NS, Tan R, Muhandiram DR, Kay LE, et al. Alpha helix-RNA major groove recognition in an HIV-1 rev peptide-RRE RNA complex. Science. 1996;273(5281):1547–51. pmid:8703216.
  55. 55. Jayaraman B, Crosby DC, Homer C, Ribeiro I, Mavor D, Frankel AD. RNA-directed remodeling of the HIV-1 protein Rev orchestrates assembly of the Rev-Rev response element complex. eLife. 2014;3:e04120. pmid:25486594; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC4360532.
  56. 56. Kjems J, Calnan BJ, Frankel AD, Sharp PA. Specific binding of a basic peptide from HIV-1 Rev. The EMBO journal. 1992;11(3):1119–29. pmid:1547776; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC556554.