Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Beyond sequence homology: Cellular biology limits the potential of XIST to act as a miRNA sponge

  • Erin A. Marshall ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Erin A. Marshall, Greg L. Stewart

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada, Interdisciplinary Oncology Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Greg L. Stewart ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Erin A. Marshall, Greg L. Stewart

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada, Interdisciplinary Oncology Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Adam P. Sage,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada, Interdisciplinary Oncology Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Wan L. Lam,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada, Interdisciplinary Oncology Program, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada

  • Carolyn J. Brown

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Integrative Oncology, BC Cancer Research Centre, Vancouver, Canada, Department of Medical Genetics, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada



The sponging of microRNAs by a long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) away from their coding gene targets is a conceptually-simple, yet biologically-complex method of lncRNA-mediated gene regulation. Currently, predictions of genes that participate in sponge-based regulation are largely based on sequence homology alone, which may not adequately reflect the cellular environment in which lncRNA:miRNA pairs interact. The vast number of potential interactions generated by these predictions impedes the identification of functional gene regulatory relationships, which necessitates an approach that considers biological context. XIST, the female-specific lncRNA canonically involved in silencing the X chromosome, has been suggested by many studies to act as a miRNA sponge. The sex-specificity of XIST provides the opportunity to study the biological feasibility of proposed XIST-miRNA interactions. Here we take a comprehensive approach by considering factors that affect possible regulation through XIST-miRNA sponging.


To identify the most feasible candidates in a particular tissue (lung adenocarcinomas), we considered protein-coding genes that (1) were positively correlated with XIST expression within sexes, (2) were targeted by miRNAs shared with XIST, and (3) expressed in lung adenocarcinoma. This revealed a robust set of 124 genes potentially positively regulated by XIST through the sequestration of 804 shared miRNAs. We then used the basic sex-specific nature of XIST to compare the changes in miRNA-target gene relationships in endogenously high-XIST and low-XIST systems to discover a high-confidence set of only 13 miRNA-gene pairs. As XIST is expressed exclusively in the nucleus, we validated the nuclear presence of several of these high-confidence miRNAs using RT-qPCR, confirming the co-localization required for XIST to interact with these species.


We use a biology-driven approach to identify genes defended from miRNA-based inhibition by the lncRNA XIST. Importantly, we identify that only a small subset of miRNAs predicted by sequence homology alone have the capacity to mediate the XIST-target gene axis, as they are enriched in the nucleus and able to co-localize with XIST for sponging. Our results reinforce the necessary consideration of biological features in future studies of lncRNA:miRNA interactions.


Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs; >200nt) are recognized as crucial mediators of gene expression [13]. With the rapidly increasing number of lncRNAs identified, diverse mechanisms-of-action are being discovered. A type of non-coding RNA mediated regulation known as “miRNA sponging” has been cited in over 600 publications in the last year, a number that has been exponentially increasing over the past decade and has come to dominate lncRNA literature (Fig 1, S1 Fig). MiRNAs are small (~22 nt), non-coding transcripts that negatively regulate gene expression through direct base-pairing with coding mRNAs in regions of as little as six nucleotides [4,5]. However, a miRNA may interact with multiple target genes irrespective of their coding capability [6]. In theory, a lncRNA sponge acts as a decoy in the cell, positively regulating coding mRNAs that harbour the same miRNA target sequence by binding with the shared inhibitory miRNAs, thereby decreasing the abundance of the miRNA species [79]. Correspondingly, most RNA transcripts, particularly lncRNA sponges, harbour multiple miRNA target sites, and thus have the potential to be regulated by multiple miRNA rather than simply a single species, with interactions governed by biological context [10].

Fig 1. Literature concerning XIST biology is dominated by miRNA associations.

Number of PMC results per year using “XIST” (blue) or “XIST AND miRNA” (red) as search terms.

XIST was one of the first functionally-characterized lncRNAs, and is canonically involved in cis-silencing of an X chromosome in females, a mechanism of dosage compensation that prevents an imbalance in X-linked gene expression between males and females [1113]. There has been growing recognition of a potential role for the XIST-coated inactivated X chromosome in cancer [10,14]; however, the proposed oncogenic mechanism of XIST remains contentious, a problem exacerbated by conflicting mechanistic reports that differ depending on the cancer type and cancer-associated phenotype probed. In recent years, a significant fraction of the literature on XIST has been devoted to the implication of its function as a miRNA sponge (Fig 1). Many of these studies contemplated the involvement of XIST in protecting cancer-related genes from miRNA-mediated negative regulation. While intriguing, these studies often focus on the interaction of XIST with one miRNA shared with one target gene; however, the number of binding sites on the >17 kb mature human XIST RNA suggests a more complex potential landscape of shared miRNAs and target genes. Further, while many current ex vivo assays can confirm miRNA binding, they do not reflect the intricacies of a biological system with multiple target genes, highlighting the need for an investigation to determine which mRNAs are most efficiently regulated by XIST in this manner.

Here, we take a comprehensive, biologically-relevant approach by considering factors that affect preferential regulation by miRNA sponging, revealing a significantly-reduced yet robust set of genes potentially positively regulated by XIST through the sequestration of miRNAs (for brevity, we call these target genes defended from miRNA by XIST, DMX genes). Using XIST, we explore features that need to be taken into account when studying the effects of miRNA sponging.



While XIST expression is expected in all female somatic cells, we chose to interrogate lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). LUAD occurs in both sexes, and thus allows for the assessment of high-XIST (female, n = 304) and low-XIST (male, n = 264) systems. Additionally, normal lung tissues present with a large range range of XIST expression in females, allowing for increased power and observed strength of correlation (red arrow, S2 Fig) [15].

Idenification of genes defended from miRNA by XIST (DMX genes) in female lung adenocarcinomas

A summary of the analysis pipeline is shown in Fig 2A. Unsurprisingly, in lung adenocarcinoma sequencing data, XIST was observed to be expressed at higher levels in female tumours when compared to male tumours (n = 235) (Student’s t-test, p<0.0001; Fig 2B). As miRNA sponges positively regulate their target genes, we first sought to identify genes that could be affected by changes in XIST expression. In female LUAD, expression of all Ensembl-annotated genes was compared with XIST expression to identify positive correlations. In total, 543 candidate genes met our minimum threshold (Spearman’s Rho>0.4, B-H p≤0.05) for association with XIST expression. This initial query was strictly performed in females, as females present with a normal range of XIST trancript expression, and assessment in a mixed sex sample would conflate unrelated sex differences with potential sponging effects. In the same manner, this relationship was assessed in male LUAD samples. In males compared to females, these same 543 relationships were significantly decreased to below our detection threshold (Fig 2C).

Fig 2. XIST is increased in females and regulates DMX genes.

A) Flow chart for the identification of DMX genes and biologically-relevant sponged miRNAs. B) Expression of XIST is significantly elevated in females (purple) compared to males (green). C) XIST-DMX gene expression relationships are decreased in males compared to females (Spearman’s Rho, B-H p≤0.05 in females). D) Proportion of DMX genes (n = 118) significantly differentially expressed between sexes (Student’s t-test, p≤0.05).

To assess the potential of miRNAs to bind both their target genes and XIST (as the proposed sponge), the 3’ untranslated regions (3’ UTR) of these 543 candidate DMX genes were retrieved from the UCSC Genome Browser, and all annotated miRNAs were assessed for binding against these DMX genes using the miRanda binding algorithm (ΔG≥-20kCal/mol, score>150). A total of 10,654 miRNA/DMX gene pairs were predicted, which includes 2,052 unique miRNA targeting 124 unique DMX genes. This algorithm was run in an unbiased manner against the complete (unspliced) XIST sequence and all annotated miRNAs with the same energy and score thresholds. In total, 864 miRNAs were predicted to bind XIST (S2 Table), while 804 unique miRNAs were predicted to target both XIST and at least one of 124 unique DMX genes (S3 Table). In order to be sponged by a lncRNA, these miRNAs must be expressed in the same tissue. As miRNAs are often tissue specific, we confirmed the expression of candidate miRNAs in lung tumour tissue. Of the 124 DMX genes, 11.86% were significantly more expressed in female compared to male-derived tumours (Student’s t-test, p<0.05), suggesting a potential sex-specific mechanism of XIST-mediated gene regulation in lung tumours (Fig 2D, S4 Table).

miRNAs targeting XIST exonic regions display stronger DMX relationships

We aimed to determine whether the region of miRNA binding on the XIST transcript, and thus splicing, had an affect on their ability to bind DMX genes. Positional information of the 804 miRNAs predicted to bind XIST and candidate DMX genes was aligned to the XIST transcript and mapped relative to the transcript exonic boundaries (S3 Fig and S5 Table). While there was no particular enrichment for number of binding sites in intronic or exonic regions overall (Student’s t-test, p = n.s., Fig 3A), exon 5 exhibited a marked enrichment in number of miRNA binding sites relative to its size (15 sites within 163 nucleotides; Fig 3B). Interestingly, miRNAs binding in only exonic regions of XIST exhibited stronger magnitudes of correlation with their corresponding DMX genes than those binding in intronic regions (Fig 3C). Similarly, a greater number of miRNA-DMX gene relationships reached the threshold of significance when the miRNAs targeted only exonic regions (Fig 3D). These findings are particularly relevant in biological contexts as the fully-spliced XIST transcript is the highest-abundance XIST transcript in normal lung tissues, and canonically functions in the nucleus [15] (S4 Fig). Together, our results suggest that exonic regions of XIST may be the most available for miRNA binding and thus sponge-based gene regulation.

Fig 3. miRNAs exonically-bound to XIST exhibit increased relationships with DMX genes.

A) The number of miRNA binding sites on XIST is not enriched when introns and exons are compared. B) Number of miRNA binding sites on the introns and exons of XIST; exon 5 has the greatest concentration of miRNA binding sites. C) miRNAs bound to XIST exclusively on exons exhibit stronger miRNA-DMX Spearman’s correlation values. D) Similarly, a larger proportion of correlations between miRNA-DMX pairs are significant when the miRNA binds to an exonic (vs. intronic) region of XIST. In this Fig, exons are depected in red, while introns are depicted in blue.

Transcriptome-wide, XIST is not enriched in number of miRNA binding sites compared to other lncRNAs by length (S5A Fig). Similarly, MALAT1 and NEAT1, other commonly-studied lncRNAs frequently reported to act as miRNA sponges in cancer, are similarly not enriched in number of binding sites. When we examined the number of target sites for each miRNA on the XIST transcript, many had multiple binding sites, similar to the requirements of artificial sponging optimization [7,16] (S5B and S5C Fig). Interestingly, DMX genes with a greater number of shared miRNA binding sites with XIST exhibit stronger XIST-DMX relationships, suggesting that this regulatory axis is likely mediated by a pool of miRNAs rather than a single species (S5D and S5E Fig). Interestingly, while XIST:DMX correlations generally get stronger in samples with increasing miRNA expression, samples with the highest miRNA expression levels show a decrease in correlation. This may suggest that, in some cases, high miRNA expression levels may be able to quench XIST, reducing its ability to effectively sponge miRNAs. Ranked lists of miRNAs predicting binding of both putative sponge and target can be generated for other candidate lncRNA sponges; however, the sex-specific nature of XIST allows another step towards examining the biological feasibility of the sponge interaction.

Systems with high-XIST reveal nuclear-enriched subset of miRNAs that mediate the XIST-DMX axis

As we expected that sponging interactions would be specific to females (as they express the XIST transcript), we first assessed which miRNA-DMX gene relationships were most significantly altered in high-XIST compared to low-XIST tumours. As some males exhibited higher-than-expected XIST expression, we separated the male LUAD cohort into low-XIST (mean expression ± 2 standard deviations) from those that had expression that exceeded this range (high-XIST males). To rule out mis-classified female cases, Y-gene expression was confirmed in both high and low-XIST male samples. We observed that the average number of reads from the Y chromosome from the Low XIST and High XIST males were equivalent (p = n.s.) and significantly greater than those from the female patients (p<0.0001) (Student’s t-test, S6A Fig). The high-XIST male-derived tumours exhibited female-level XIST expression (Student’s t-test, p = n.s., Fig 4A), and both male and female high-XIST systems had greater expression of XIST than low-XIST males (Student’s t-test, p<0.0001; Fig 4A). The miRNA-DMX gene relationships in high-XIST systems (both male and female) were compared to those in the low-XIST systems, and the strength of significant correlations in the high-XIST systems was assessed relative to the low-XIST system. While we would expect miRNA-DMX expression association to approach zero through canonical miRNA degradation mechanisms, we find that in the presence of XIST, miRNA and DMX genes display positive relationships, indicating that the action of the miRNA is inhibited (Fig 4B and 4C). Furthermore, while both high-XIST systems have miRNA-DMX relationships that decrease when compared to the low-XIST tumours, the miRNA-DMX relationships are stronger in males with elevated XIST (n = 12) than in females with comparable XIST expression (Fig 4D). To ensure that the uneven sample size was not artifically selecting for an unrepresentative subset of interactions, we compared miRNA-DMX relationships that met the threshold of significance in Low XIST and High XIST male cohorts and found that they had equivalent correlations in females (Student’s t-test, p = n.s., S6B Fig).

Fig 4. Males with High-XIST display female-like patterns.

A) A subset of males have XIST expression equivalent to female expression levels (High-XIST males). B) When compared to Low-XIST males, High-XIST males show significantly stronger relationships between the candidate miRNA and DMX gene. C) Similarly, females display significantly stronger relationships between the candidate miRNA and corresponding DMX gene than Low-XIST males (change in Spearman’s coefficient of 0.1 or greater shown). D) When miRNA-DMX releationships are compared in High-XIST systems, males had significantly stronger correlation coefficients than females with equivalent levels of XIST.

To determine which miRNAs may indeed be affected by the presence of XIST, we set a threshold of change in miRNA-DMX correlation value (ΔRho) between the high-XIST and low-XIST systems of at least -0.1. This threshold produced 13 miRNA-DMX gene pairs (Table 1). Of the 13 gene pairs identified, 5 contained miRNAs with known nuclear localization, a relatively rare phenomenon for miRNAs but common for lncRNAs such as XIST. Interestingly, none of the miRNAs contained the 3’ hexanucleotide sequence present on miR-29b known to result in localization of processed small RNA molecules to the nucleus (S7 Fig).

Table 1. miRNA and DMX relationships altered in the presence of XIST.

miRNA and corresponding predicted target genes with accompanying Spearman’s Rho correlation coefficient and Benjimini-Hochberg p-values.

To confirm that the miRNAs produced from this pipeline were indeed nuclear, allowing for their interaction with the spliced XIST transcript, we validated their presence in the nucleus of female-derived lung cancer cell lines with wild-type X chromosomes. To confirm subcellular fractionation, protein lysates were harvested from the cytoplasmic and nuclear fractions of each cell line. Western blots for the cytoplasmic GAPDH and nuclear H3 verified the purity of each fraction (Representative image shown in Fig 5A). Furthermore, RT-qPCR revealed XIST was only present in the nucleus (and not the cytoplasm) of three LUAD cell lines, necessitating the presence of the proposed miRNAs in the nucleus if they were to interact with XIST (Fig 5B). We then validated the presence of 3 of 9 miRNAs in the LUAD cell line nuclear fractions by RT-qPCR. miR-29b (a known nuclear miRNA) was present at an average of 67.5%, while miRNA-106a and miR-1254 were present at 37.3% and 73.7% of the cytoplasmic fraction, respectively (Fig 5C). Given the nuclear localization of XIST, this pattern of miRNA subcellular localization strengthens the potential of these interactions, and increases the feasibility of sponging.

Fig 5. Analysis of XIST-expressing systems reveals XIST-miRNA-DMX gene axes enriched in nuclear miRNA.

A) LUAD cell lines were fractionated by subcellular compartment, and the nuclear and cytoplasmic protein fractions showed strong enrichment of H3 and GAPDH, respectively (nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins). B) RT-qPCR of nuclear and cytoplasmic RNA from LUAD cell lines confirms that XIST is present only in the nuclear fraction. C) Similarly, the ratio of miRNA expression in the nuclear and cytoplasmic cell line fractions shows that miR-106a and miR-1254 are enriched in the nucleus at a similar level as miR-29b, a miRNA with a known nuclear localization sequence. This enrichment is not seen in miR-29a, a miRNA with known cytoplasmic localization in its mature form.


In this study, we aimed to determine XIST-miRNA-DMX relationships that are consistent with XIST biology. Beyond sequence homology and expression correlations with coding genes, we set out to consider relevant biological factors specific to the expression of XIST that may affect its sponging capacity. Using the sex-specific expression of XIST we have determined that putative miRNA binding sites in exons rather than introns show greater DMX:XIST correlations, and that the best candidates share nuclear localization with XIST.

Using sequence-based target prediction, we find that 804 of the 862 miRNAs that bind XIST are shared with DMX genes. These DMX genes are also highly correlated with XIST expression, and suggest that DMX gene expression could be positively regulated by XIST through a mechanism biologically consistent with miRNA sponging. Additionally, we observed that a subset of these DMX genes are upregulated in females, while none are upregulated in males, suggesting the importance of lncRNA sponging of miRNAs as a method of sex-specific genome regulation. The number of binding sites per miRNA on the XIST transcript is relevant to miRNA sponging efficiency. Optimization studies of long RNA transcripts as sponges in an experimental setting have determined that sponges with 4–10 binding sites per miRNA have the greatest effect on target gene expression, of which 10% of our candidate miRNAs fall within this range. Interestingly 5 of our 9 high confidence miRNAs had 2 or more binding sites on XIST [17]. Further, miRNAs with more binding sites on their target gene exhibit stronger correlations, suggesting that a pool of miRNAs may be acting as intermediaties in this axis.

XIST has numerous splice isoforms, and we sought to explore whether splicing had an effect on XIST-mediated miRNA sponging to determine if the stable nuclear-functioning spliced transcript may be acting as a sponge. The Spearman’s Correlation Rho and p values indicate that the spliced transcript has a stronger effect on DMX gene expression and interestingly, the fully-spliced transcript is the most abundant isoform in lung tissue (Fig 3B and 3C, S4A Fig) [15]. Thus, the spliced transcript is likely the primary contributor to the miRNA sponging observed in cells.

Importantly, in cellular systems that lack XIST, the relationship between miRNA and DMX gene expression is decreased in magnitude (Fig 4B and 4C), consistent with XIST acting as a miRNA sponge in the XIST-containing systems. When XIST is present, the sequestration of miRNAs limits degradation of the target gene and a more positive correlation between DMX and miRNA is observed. In the systems with low levels of XIST, the free miRNAs are able to exert a negative regulatory effect by binding to DMX genes and we observe that the correlation with miRNA levels is reduced. If DMX genes are regulated by XIST, the shared miRNAs and XIST must be present in the same cellular compartment, in order to interact. By considering relevant biological features, we found that only 1% of the miRNAs predicted by sequence homology alone (9 of the 864 we predict to interact with XIST) are likely affected by endogenous XIST expression. The presence of mature miRNA in the nucleus is a relatively rare observation in miRNA biology, but we were encouraged to find that these species are found in a cellular location necessary for interaction with the sponge to occur. Although XIST localization is known to be exclusively nuclear [11], it is possible that XIST may be briefly accessible to non-nuclear miRNAs for sponging during cell division, although this has not been shown. Thus, any miRNA that has the potential to be sponged by XIST must exist at high concentrations in the nucleus. Beyond subcellular localization, our analyses reveal the substantial effects of features such as sex- and tissue-specific expression as well as splicing isoforms on the feasibility of lncRNA:miRNA sponging interactions.

Of particular interest was the increase in miRNA-DMX relationship magnitude when comparing the two high-XIST systems which had equivalent average Rho values (Fig 4D, S6B Fig). We hypothesize that this increase may be due to abberant XIST expression from the active male X chromosome, and thus the transcript lacks the opportunity to perform its canonical X-inactivation function in males. This increase in available transcripts may allow for an elevated number of miRNAs to be sponged, resulting in a greater effect on DMX gene expression.

We then sought to confirm the presence of the best miRNA sponging candidates in the nucleus for species where literature on their cellular location did not exist. We validated the presence of miR-29b, a miRNA known to be translocated after complete processing to the nucleus because of a 3’ hexanucleotide sequence in its mature form [18]. While this nucleotide pattern is not enriched in this subset of miRNAs (S7 Fig), miR-106a and miR-1254 were both observed to be in the nucleus of the three LUAD cell lines tested (Fig 5). This may suggest that, although these miRNA lack a known nuclear localization sequence, there may be a secondary method of localization that is causing the distribution of these species back to the nucleus. Recent studies have shown preferential shuttling of partially-processed pre-miRNA complexed with RISC, however further research will be needed to determine if this mechanism is involved in miRNA sponging [19].

While XIST has been proposed to function as a miRNA sponge in many studies, we did not observe any of these previously described XIST-miRNA interactions in our high-confidence miRNA-DMX pairs. One reason for this discrepancy may be differences in tissue specific expression. We performed our analysis in LUAD, but as miRNA expression patterns are known to be tissue-specific, unique miRNA expression profiles will likely result in unique sets of miRNA-DMX pairs with tissue-relevant biological implications [17,20,21]. Similarly, it is worth noting that even in scenarios where miRNA and XIST expression levels are constant across tissues, the interactions most important to cellular biology will likely change due to the tissue-specific gene expression patterns of coding-gene targets. Another important consideration is the size and complexity of miRNA-sponging networks. MiRNAs target hundreds of genes, and mRNA targets often contain many miRNA binding sites. Adding to this complexity is the fact that many lncRNAs are targeted by hundreds of miRNAs (for example, we predicted 864 miRNAs to interact with XIST by sequence homology alone), potentially leading to sponging networks with thousands of interactions. Additionally, proving the effect of these proposed complex interactions is difficult: assays confirming a miRNA can bind to both sponge and target (for example, luciferase assays) are important, but function in simplified systems that do not approximate normal cell processes. The network of genes that interact with a single miRNA is complex, and when considering sponges that bind multiple microRNA, this complexity is further amplified. These networks suggest that it is unlikely that one miRNA is being prefentially sequestered and affecting one target gene to mediate a cancer phenotype. Finally, when changing the endogenous expression of a sponge or miRNA in cell models, one must consider the potential for off-target affects due to the vast number of predicted targets that are present in any sponging network.

As a sex-specific lncRNA, XIST presents the opportunity to study human cancer cells from tumours with dichotomous XIST expression and determine how the presence of this transcript in the system could be causing downstream gene expression changes. Of the 864 miRNA predicted to bind XIST by sequence homology, our results suggest that less than 2% of these show promise to be biologically-involved in lncRNA sponging of miRNAs in lung cancer. Thus, our study calls for caution when examining potential miRNA-lncRNA sponging interaction networks. While sequence homology alone is not enough to predict function, the feasibility of these complex gene expression networks is strengthened by considering the context in which these interactions take place. Our study of XIST:miRNA:DMX genes in lung cancer provide the groundwork to identify the most biologically-relevant lncRNA sponge targets, an approach that is applicable to other lncRNAs in other pathologies.


An increasing number of studies have suggested that XIST may function as an oncogene through a purported role as a miRNA sponge. While miRNA-XIST interaction can occur under engineered and predicted conditions, a true XIST-miRNA-DMX scenario will be highly dependent on biological context.

Here, we take a biology-driven approach to identify genes defended from miRNA-based inhibition by the lncRNA XIST in lung adenocarcinoma. In the case of XIST, we find that important biological considerations include: differences in sex based expression, transcript localization, and tissue specific expression. Additionally, our results suggest that target mRNAs may be mediated through effects of multiple miRNAs rather than one specific miRNA-coding-gene interaction, and that miRNAs that bind to exonic regions of XIST exhibit stronger correlations with DMX genes. Furthermore, we predict a set of 124 genes that share 804 miRNAs with XIST. We then use the biological properties of XIST to identify 13 high-confidence miRNA-DMX pairs. We find that several of these miRNAs preferentially localize to the nucleus (where XIST is exclusively located), allowing for the sponging of these species.

Although the sex-specific nature of XIST expression provided us with the opportunity to address sponging ability, consideration of biological features such as tissue-specific expression and co-localization should be considered in all lncRNA:miRNA studies. While questions remain as to how widespread the miRNA sponging phenomenon occurs, our study delineates this mechanism in lung adenocarcinoma with regards to XIST.


Data processing

RNA sequencing data. RNA sequencing data from 568 LUAD and non-malignant samples (304 female and 264 male) were downloaded from CancerBrowser (Illumina HiSeq, Raw sequencing reads were aligned to the hg19 build of the human genome and quantified against the Ensembl reference gene annotations (Release 75).

Small RNA sequencing data. Small RNA sequencing data for the same LUAD samples analyzed above were downloaded from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Raw sequencing reads were aligned to the hg19 build of the human genome and quantified relative to miRBase v22 ( MiRNAs with >1 RPKM across 10% of LUAD samples (malignant or non-malignant) were considered for further analysis.

Data analysis

Candidate DMX gene identification. Gene expression analysis was performed in female (n = 274) and male (n = 235) LUAD tumours separately. Spearman’s correlations (Rho) of all Ensembl-annotated genes were performed against XIST. P-values were corrected using the Benjimini-Hochberg (B-H) method, and candidate DMX genes were identified as those with Rho>0.4 and B-H p<0.05 in female LUAD tumours (n = 543 genes).

miRNA binding prediction algorithm. 3’UTR sequences of all candidate DMX genes were run through the miRanda binding prediction algorithm [22]. Briefly, miRanda uses sequence homology of miRNA and 3’UTR sequences, in addition to binding energies, to predict strength of miRNA binding. Candidate miRNA were selected if they exhibited a net binding energy (ΔG) of at least -20 kCal/mol and a minimum binding score of 150 in both XIST and at least one DMX gene 3’UTR. This score and energy threshold was optimized to include perfect complementarily between miRNA and target gene, but be dominated by imperfectly-bound gene pairs. From these candidates, miRNAs were selected as sponging targets if they exhibited a change in correlation (ΔRho) of 0.1 or greater between the male and female cohorts (n = 9 miRNA). All identified candidates were expressed in lung tissue (RPKM>1 in 10% of samples).

Subcellular fractionation in lung cancer cell lines

Cell culture. Cell lines (H1395, H2009, and H2122) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC, Manassas, VA, USA) and maintained in RPMI 1640 supplemented with 10% FBS according to ATCC guidelines (Gibco–ThermoFisher, Waltham, MA, USA). Cells were grown in a humidified incubator at 37ᵒC and 5% CO2. Cytoplasmic and nuclear fractionation was performed according to published protocols (Abcam, Briefly, cells were suspended in fractionation buffer (20 mM HEPES, pH 7.4; 10 mM KCl, 2mM MgCl2, 1 mM EDTA, 1 mM EGTA). Cells were passed through a 27-gauge needle 12 times for cellular membrane lysis and incubated on ice for 10 minutes. Nuclei were pelleted out of solution, and the remaining pellet was washed with PBS. The nuclear pellet was then resuspended in fractionation buffer, passed through a 25-gauge needle 12 times, and centrifuged for 10 minutes. The remaining nuclear pellet and cytoplasmic fractions were resuspended and split into 2 aliquots for protein and RNA lysate harvesting.

Western blotting. Protein was extracted from fractions by resuspeding pellet in RIPA lysis buffer on ice (20 mM Tris-HCl, pH 7.5; 150 mM NaCl; 0.5% DOC, 1% NP-40 and 0.1% SDS), supplemented with protease inhibitors (Complete protease inhibitor cocktail, Roche Diagnostics, Laval, QC, Canada). Protein concentrations were quantified by BCA assay (Pierce, Rockford, IL, USA) according to recommended protocols. Equivalent amounts of total protein were prepared and run on an SDS gel and transferred to a PVDF membrane (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Mississauga, ON, Canada). Membranes were then probed for nuclear and cytoplasmic proteins, Histone H3 (Cell Signaling 9715L) and GAPDH (Cell Signaling 2118L), respectively. Membranes were then probed for HRP-conjugated secondary anti-Rabbit (Cell Signaling 7074S).

Transcript quantification by RT-qPCR. RNA was harvested from suspended nuclear and cytoplasmic fractions by resuspending the lysate in 1mL Trizol Reagant. RNA was extracted according to standard Trizol protocols and resuspended in DEPC-treated H2O. Relative expression of mRNA and miRNA were quantified using appropriate RT-qPCR systems (TaqMan—Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). XIST (Hs00300535_s1) levels were quantified relative to 18S as an endogenous control (Hs99999901_s1). miRNAs 29b (assay ID 000413), 29a (assay ID 002112), 106a (assay ID 002170), and 1254 (assay ID 002818) were quantified relative to the ratio between the sum of mature and immature miR-29b ratios in both fractions (Cat# 4427975). Custom primers for the immature (pre-miRNA and pri-miRNA) miR-29b, 29a, 106a, and 1254 sequences were designed using the TaqMan system (S6 Table). To differentiate signals from mature and immature miRNA transcripts, the amplification cycle of primers specific to only the pre- and pri-miRNA transcripts were substracted from those from the mature miRNA sequence.

Supporting information

S1 Fig.

A) Peer-reviewed publications per year from 2012–2017 on miRNA and XIST, as well as two other well-studied lncRNAs; MALAT1, and NEAT1, exhibit a near exponential increase in number (XIST: y = 11.8e0.328x, R2 = 0.952; MALAT1: y = 7.1e0.553x, R2 = 0.998; NEAT1: y = 2.2e0.614x, R2 = 0.989).


S2 Fig. XIST exhibits a wide range of expression in normal lung tissue.

Data source: dbGaP Accession phs000424.v7.p2 (ENSG00000229807.5). Expression is presented in transcripts per million (TPM).


S3 Fig. miRNA binding sites are distributed throughout introns and exons on the XIST transcript.


S4 Fig. Expression of XIST splice isoforms across normal tissues.

Fully-spliced XIST isoform is displayed in red. Data source: dbGaP Accession phs000424.v7.p2. Expression is shown in transcripts per million (TPM).


S5 Fig. Characterization of miRNA binding to XIST.

A) XIST (red) is not enriched in the frequency of miRNA binding sites compared to all other annotated lncRNAs. B) Each predicted miRNA has between 1 and 18 predicted binding sites on the XIST transcript. C) Representative images of select candidate DMX genes and their Spearman`s correlation to XIST expression. D) Spearman’s correlations between XIST and DMX geens are affected by the number of shared miRNA E) DMX genes with more miRNA binding sites are correlated more strongly with XIST expression in LUAD females (Top and bottom 15% of total miRNA bindings sites on DMX). Student’s t-test, p = 0.0046).


S6 Fig. Gene expression from the Y chromosome is equivalent in High XIST and Low XIST males.

A) Comparison of average normalized reads (RPKM) per patients from the Y chromosome between females, High XIST males, and Low XIST males. B). Female miRNA-DMX relationships corresponding to the same genes observed in Low and High XIST males are equivalent. Student’s t-test, ****: p<0.0001.


S7 Fig. Logo of hexanucleotide localization sequence of proposed miRNA enriched in the nucleus.

The established miRNA-29b logo (grey) compared to the nucleotide enrichment of the 13 miRNA species proposed to be enriched in the nucleus. miRNAs did not show enrichment of the established sequence at any base.


S1 Table. Search terms input into PubMed Central used to generate S1A Fig.


S2 Table. miRNA binding position on XIST transcript (miRanda binding prediction).


S3 Table. miRNA binding prediction to DMX genes and XIST.


S4 Table. Results from Students T-Test of DMX gene expression between male and female LUAD.


S5 Table. Exonic and intronic boundaries on XIST transcript.


S6 Table. Sequences of custom TaqMan small RNA primers.



  1. 1. Long Y, Wang X, Youmans DT, Cech TR (2017) How do lncRNAs regulate transcription? Sci Adv 3: eaao2110. pmid:28959731
  2. 2. Quinodoz S, Guttman M (2014) Long noncoding RNAs: an emerging link between gene regulation and nuclear organization. Trends Cell Biol 24: 651–663. pmid:25441720
  3. 3. Huarte M (2015) The emerging role of lncRNAs in cancer. Nat Med 21: 1253–1261. pmid:26540387
  4. 4. Brennecke J, Stark A, Russell RB, Cohen SM (2005) Principles of microRNA-target recognition. PLoS Biol 3: e85. pmid:15723116
  5. 5. Zeng Y, Yi R, Cullen BR (2003) MicroRNAs and small interfering RNAs can inhibit mRNA expression by similar mechanisms. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100: 9779–9784. pmid:12902540
  6. 6. Luck ME, Muljo SA, Collins CB (2015) Prospects for Therapeutic Targeting of MicroRNAs in Human Immunological Diseases. J Immunol 194: 5047–5052. pmid:25980029
  7. 7. Bak RO, Mikkelsen JG (2014) miRNA sponges: soaking up miRNAs for regulation of gene expression. Wiley Interdiscip Rev RNA 5: 317–333. pmid:24375960
  8. 8. Poliseno L, Salmena L, Zhang J, Carver B, Haveman WJ, Pandolfi PP (2010) A coding-independent function of gene and pseudogene mRNAs regulates tumour biology. Nature 465: 1033–1038. pmid:20577206
  9. 9. Salmena L, Poliseno L, Tay Y, Kats L, Pandolfi PP (2011) A ceRNA hypothesis: the Rosetta Stone of a hidden RNA language? Cell 146: 353–358. pmid:21802130
  10. 10. Detassis S, Grasso M, Del Vescovo V, Denti MA (2017) microRNAs Make the Call in Cancer Personalized Medicine. Front Cell Dev Biol 5: 86. pmid:29018797
  11. 11. Brown CJ, Hendrich BD, Rupert JL, Lafreniere RG, Xing Y, Lawrence J, et al. (1992) The human XIST gene: analysis of a 17 kb inactive X-specific RNA that contains conserved repeats and is highly localized within the nucleus. Cell 71: 527–542. pmid:1423611
  12. 12. Disteche CM, Berletch JB (2015) X-chromosome inactivation and escape. J Genet 94: 591–599. pmid:26690513
  13. 13. Brown CJ, Ballabio A, Rupert JL, Lafreniere RG, Grompe M, Tonlorenzi R, et al. (1991) A gene from the region of the human X inactivation centre is expressed exclusively from the inactive X chromosome. Nature 349: 38–44. pmid:1985261
  14. 14. Chow JC, Hall LL, Baldry SE, Thorogood NP, Lawrence JB, Brown CJ (2007) Inducible XIST-dependent X-chromosome inactivation in human somatic cells is reversible. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 104: 10104–10109. pmid:17537922
  15. 15. Consortium GT (2013) The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) project. Nat Genet 45: 580–585. pmid:23715323
  16. 16. Ebert MS, Neilson JR, Sharp PA (2007) MicroRNA sponges: competitive inhibitors of small RNAs in mammalian cells. Nat Methods 4: 721–726. pmid:17694064
  17. 17. Lagana A, Shasha D, Croce CM (2014) Synthetic RNAs for Gene Regulation: Design Principles and Computational Tools. Front Bioeng Biotechnol 2: 65. pmid:25566532
  18. 18. Hwang HW, Wentzel EA, Mendell JT (2007) A hexanucleotide element directs microRNA nuclear import. Science 315: 97–100. pmid:17204650
  19. 19. Leung AKL (2015) The Whereabouts of microRNA Actions: Cytoplasm and Beyond. Trends Cell Biol 25: 601–610. pmid:26410406
  20. 20. Minatel BC, Martinez VD, Ng KW, Sage AP, Tokar T, Marshall EA, et al. (2018) Large-scale discovery of previously undetected microRNAs specific to human liver. Hum Genomics 12: 16. pmid:29587854
  21. 21. Marshall EA, Sage AP, Ng KW, Martinez VD, Firmino NS, Bennewith KL, et al. (2017) Small non-coding RNA transcriptome of the NCI-60 cell line panel. Sci Data 4: 170157. pmid:29064465
  22. 22. John B, Enright AJ, Aravin A, Tuschl T, Sander C, Marks DS (2004) Human MicroRNA targets. PLoS Biol 2: e363. pmid:15502875