Skip to main content
Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Trans,trans-farnesol, an antimicrobial natural compound, improves glass ionomer cement properties

  • Aline Rogéria Freire de Castilho,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Pedro Luiz Rosalen,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Physiological Sciences, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Isaac Jordão de Souza Araújo,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Igor Lebedenco Kitagawa,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Physics, School of Science, State University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Cecilia Atem Gonçalves de Araújo Costa,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Restorative Dentistry, Federal University of Ceará, Fortaleza, Ceará, Brazil

  • Malvin N. Janal,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, New York University College of Dentistry, New York, New York, United States of America

  • Marcelo Corrêa Alves,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Superior School of Agriculture "Luiz de Queiroz" Technical Section of Information Technology, University of São Paulo, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Simone Duarte,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Cariology, Operative Dentistry and Dental Public Health, Indiana University, Purdue University Indianapolis, School of Dentistry, Indianapolis, Indiana, United States of America

  • Paulo Noronha Lisboa Filho,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Physics, School of Science, State University of São Paulo, Bauru, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Rafael Nobrega Stipp,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Oral Diagnosis, Piracicaba Dental School, State University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

  • Regina Maria Puppin-Rontani

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    rmpuppin@unicamp.br

    Affiliations Department of Pediatric Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil, Department of Restorative Dentistry, Piracicaba Dental School, University of Campinas, Piracicaba, São Paulo, Brazil

Correction

28 Oct 2021: de Castilho ARF, Rosalen PL, de Souza Araújo IJ, Kitagawa IL, de Araújo Costa CAG, et al. (2021) Correction: Trans,trans-farnesol, an antimicrobial natural compound, improves glass ionomer cement properties. PLOS ONE 16(10): e0259549. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0259549 View correction

Abstract

A series of experiments were conducted to characterize a novel restorative material. We explored the effect on biological, physical and chemical properties of glass ionomer cement (GIC) adding-the naturally occurring tt-farnesol (900 mM). Two groups were accomplished for all assays: GIC+tt-farnesol and GIC (control). Biological assays: 1) agar diffusion against some cariogenic bacteria; 2) S. mutans biofilm formation and confocal laser scanning microscopy-CLSM. 3) gtfB, gtfC, gtfD, gbpB, vicR, and covR expression; 4) MTT and microscopic morphology. Physical properties assays: 1) roughness; 2) hardness; 3) compressive strength and 4) diametral tensile strength. Chemical assay: Raman spectroscopy. The adding of tt-farnesol to GIC led to larger zones of inhibition (p<0.05), biofilms with a short-term reduction in bacterial viability but similar biomass (p>0.05). Polysaccharides levels increased over time, similarly over groups (p>0.05). Viable and non-viable S. mutans were seen on the specimens’ surface by CLSM but their virulence was not modulated by tt-farnesol. The tt-farnesol increased the HaCaT cell viability without impact on compressive and diametral tensile strength and roughness although the hardness was positively affected (p<0.05). Raman confirmed the presence of tt-farnesol. The incorporation of tt-farnesol into GIC inhibited the growth of cariogenic bacteria but had a little effect on the composition, structure and physiology of the biofilm matrices. Also, the tt-farnesol increased the hardness and the biocompatibility of the GIC, not influencing negatively other physical properties of the restorative material.

Introduction

Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is one of the dental restorative materials options for replacing tooth tissue loss from caries lesion [1]. Clinically, the GIC exhibits acceptable mechanical, physical and biological properties as filling material, and also releases fluoride in oral cavity [1]. However, that fluoride release is efficient only for controlling the demineralization on the adjacent tooth surfaces, since their action on biofilm is still limited [2]. Improvement of antimicrobial properties without jeopardize the physical properties of the GIC’s is important as dental treatment must correlate the cost and the functionality of the material, the range of use as well as the possibility of indicating the material for public health services and people lack access to dental care [3].

Nowadays, dental researches have been focused on the discovery of novel natural therapies with pharmacological and biological activities [4], including anti-cariogenic effect [5]. In this context, natural products and their derivatives are the most successful strategy for the development of therapeutic agents. They have been widely used in pharmaceutical industries in the search for new secure and effective medicinal approaches [4]. Therefore, the combining of natural compounds with existing formulations may enhance the antimicrobial action of the dental material, effectively preventing and controlling the caries lesion and biofilm formation on the material surface. Furthermore, it is important to highlight that the incorporation of natural compounds to fluoride highly increase the inhibition of cariogenic microorganisms but without suppressing of local microbiota [6].

Although a range of microorganisms are involved in carious process [7], Streptococcus mutans is still considered the main contributor to the initiation of the lesion, providing the matrix of biofilm [8]. Basically, S. mutans is involved in a dynamic process mediated by sucrose [8] that includes the instability of molecular interaction of the tooth surface and microbial biofilm, resulting in hard tissue loss [9]. Overall, biofilms are three-dimensional structures made of a combination of microorganisms adhered to each other, to a surface and embedded within an extracellular polymeric substance (EPS) [10]. It is known that the production of the EPS increases in the presence of sucrose and glucosyltransferase (GTF) activity, building a physical barrier to macrophages, phagocytes as well as antimicrobial substances [9]. Thus, if the biofilm had been disorganized, the mineral loss on tooth surface would stop and the carious lesion would be arrested [11]. Theoretically, the use of formulations containing potent inhibitors of GTFs may also inhibit the polysaccharide production in dental biofilms [12].

Trans,trans-farnesol (tt-farnesol, 3,7,11-trimethyl-2,6,10-dodecatrien-1-ol) is a bioactive sesquiterpene alcohol naturally occurring in pine (Pinus), chamomile (Matricaria chamomilla L., Asteraceae), arnica (Arnica montana, Asteraceae) artemisia (Artemisia annua, Asteraceae), a bee resin called propolis, and citrus fruits [13]. Their use is mostly exploited in cosmetics and non-cosmetic products [13]. The potential anti-caries efficacy of that terpenoid is related to the inhibition of acid production and glucan synthesis by S. mutans [14] since tt-farnesol may increase the proton permeability of streptococcal membranes, thus, promoting the decrease of GTFs secretion [15].

Given the relevance of caries control, the aim of this study was to determine how the characterization of a GIC containing a natural product affects several material properties, attempting to elucidate their antimicrobial effect, cytotoxicity and physical performance. When adding the natural occurring product to the GIC we hypothesized that: (1) tt-farnesol would increase the antimicrobial activity of the GIC; (2) tt-farnesol would modify the composition, structure and physiology of S. mutans biofilm; (3) the experimental GIC is biologically compatible with human keratinocytes and; (4) the physical and chemical properties of the GIC would not be negatively modified by tt-farnesol incorporation.

Materials and methods

For this study, a conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC; Fuji IX GP, GC America, USA; Batch #1212051) was modified by adding 900 mM sesquiterpene tt-farnesol (Sigma–Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) to the liquid of the GIC while keeping original powder/liquid ratio (3.6 g: 1.0 g). Then, the powder and the liquid containing tt-farnesol were hand-mixed for 30 s using a plastic spatula and non-absorbent paper according to the manufacturer instructions. All procedures were carried out in a biosafety cabinet (Telstar, Terrassa, Spain). The control group was GIC with no natural product incorporation [1618].

Specimen preparation

Standard round-shaped specimens (5 mm x 2 mm) containing or not tt-farnesol were prepared by using silicon molds, at a temperature of 23 °C ± 1 °C, and a relative humidity of 50% ± 5%. After the setting reactions were completed, the specimens were polished using Sof-Lex discs (3M ESPE, St Paul, MN, USA), washed through sonication for 10 min, 1 min soaked in 70% ethanol for disinfection, dried and exposed to the UV radiation for physical sterilization before antimicrobial, cytotoxicity and physical tests.

Antimicrobial assays

Agar diffusion test.

Streptococcus mutans UA159, Lactobacillus acidophilus (ATCC IAL523), Lactobacillus casei (ATCC 193) and Actinomyces naeslundii (ATCC 12104) were cultured from frozen stock on brain–heart infusion broth (BHI; DIFCO Laboratories, Detroit, MI, USA) for 24 h at 37 °C in 5% CO2. After confirming the viability and the absence of contamination by plating in specific media and Gram techniques, cultures were again grown in BHI for 18–24 h at 37 °C and adjusted to a concentration of 1 x 108 cells/mL. Petri dishes containing a base layer of BHI agar mixed with each inoculum were prepared. Following, wells measuring 5 mm in diameter were made in each plate and completely filled with the GIC + tt-farnesol (experimental group) or GIC (control). Then, the 0.2% chlorhexidine digluconate was applied on sterile filter paper discs as a control of the experiment. After the period of incubation (24 h, at 37 °C), inhibition zones around the materials were measured using a digital caliper [16,17]. Agar diffusion test was performed in triplicate on at least three independent experiments.

Biofilm model and morphology analysis.

S. mutans biofilm model was based on previous methodology [19] with some modifications. Briefly, after being coated with sterile salivary pellicle, two samples of each experimental (GIC + tt-farnesol) and control group (GIC) were incubated with S. mutans UA 159 in BHI broth supplemented with 10% sucrose at 37 °C for 1, 3 and 5 days in a 5% supplemented CO2 environment. The medium pH was measured daily. Then, biofilm bacterial viability (colony forming unities-CFU/mg of biofilm), biomass (dry weight-DW), and biochemical composition (insoluble-ASP and water-soluble-WSP extracellular polysaccharides) was analyzed by colorimetric methods. Biofilm model was performed in duplicate on at least four independent experiments.

The morphology of live and dead bacteria on biofilm surface was analyzed by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM; Leica TCS SP1, Leica Lasertechnik GmbH, Heidelberg, Germany) using HCX APOL U-V-I 40X/0.8-numerical-aperture water immersion objective. Biofilms were stained with a live/dead BacLight bacterial viability kit (Molecular Probes. Invitrogen, Eugene, Oregon. USA) in accordance with the manufacturer. Afterwards, the samples were incubated at room temperature in the dark for 15 min and examined under a CLSM [19].

Gene expression (RT-qPCR).

Based on previous study [20], sixty-six specimens of GIC containing tt-farnesol were made for the gene expression analysis. Following the biofilm model described before, after 24 h of biofilm growth in BHI supplemented with 10% sucrose, the specimens were removed from culture plates and transferred to tubes with 2 ml of 0.9% NaCl. Tubes were then vortexed (2.800 rpm/10 s) in order to detach the cells. Following, the supernatant was transferred to 2 ml micro-tubes and were centrifuged (2 min, 4 °C, ≈16000 g) for cell pellet precipitation. The saline solution was then discarded and cell pellet was immediately stored at -80 °C until RNA purification. Cell pellet (n = 6) was obtained from biofilms formed over three specimens per group.

Subsequently, the RNA total purification was performed using ≈ 0.16 g of 0.1 mm diameter zirconia beads (Biospec, Bartlesville, USA), combined with 220 μL TE buffer on a Mini-bead beater apparatus (Biospec). RNeasy Mini Kit protocol (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) was used for total RNA purification. The RNA was then converted to cDNA using iScript Reverse Transcriptase (Bio-Rad Laboratories, Hércules, USA). Reverse transcriptase reactions were prepared according to manufacture recommendation using 60 ng of RNA from the sample and were incubated at 25 °C for 5 min, 42 °C for 30 min and 85 °C for 5 min. Furthermore, an additional reaction was prepared in the absence of iScript to assess the absence of genomic DNA contamination of each sample. The converted cDNA was stored at -20 °C for further analysis of gene expression.

The RT-qPCR reactions were performed using specific primers for the following genes: gtfB, gtfC, gtfD, gbpB, vicR, and covR [21] in a StepOne Real-Time PCR Systems (Applied Biosystems, UK). From each sample, 1 μL of cDNA was placed in a 48-plate well with 9 μL of a solution containing 3.4 μL water free RNase and DNase, 0.6 μL of primer and 5 μL of SYBR Green PCR Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Standard curves (300, 30, 3, 0.3, and 0.03) were performed for each primer pair assay. All analyzed genes were normalized and their expression was calculated using the 16s RNA as the reference gene.

Cell incubation and cytotoxicity of the materials.

HaCaT (Human adult low Calcium high Temperature Keratinocytes) cells were routinely cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’s Medium (DMEM; Sigma Chemical Co., St. Louis, MO, USA) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS; Gibco, Grand Island, NY, USA), with 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin (Vitrocell Embriolife, Campinas, SP, Brazil) in humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. Cells were seeded at a cell density of 5 x 104 cells/well and cell viability and proliferation were evaluated by MTT test.

For the MTT test, the cells were seeded on 24-well plate in DMEM with 10% FBS before exposure to specimens (experimental and control groups). Twenty-four hours later, 0.3 mg/mL MTT was added in each well, and cells were incubated for 3 h at 37 °C. Absorbance was measured with a micro spectrophotometer (ASYS UVM340, Biochrom Ltd., Cambridge, UK) at 570 nm. The MTT assay was performed in duplicate on three independent experiments [22].

Images of the live and dead cells (Live/Dead, Molecular Probes Life Technologies, USA) were carried out by means of a fluorescence microscope (Zeiss Axiovert 40 CFL, Germany) coupled to an ECM AxioCam camera (Carl Zeiss, Germany). Green labeled cells (live) were visualized using a filter in a wavelength range of 450–490 nm (Ex)/ 515–565 nm (Em). Red labeled cells (dead) were visualized in 528–546 nm (Ex) / 590–617 nm (Em) wavelength range. For each experimental condition, three images were taken at random areas of the slide in triplicate.

Physical properties.

Specimens (n = 10/group/test) were subjected to four different physical assays. The roughness (Ra-μm) of the specimen’s surface was quantified using a roughness-measuring instrument (Surfcorder SE1700, Kosaka Corp, Tokyo, Japan). A needle moved at a constant speed of 0.5 mm/sec with a load of 0.7 mN and a cut-off value at 0.25 mm. Hardness tests were carried out with a hardness tester (Shimatzu 2000, Tokyo, Japan), with a 25-g load applied by the a Knoop indenter for 15 s. Three readings (KHN) were taken on the top surface of the material at 100 μm distance from each other.

Instron universal test machine (4411, Instron Co., Canton, Mass, USA) was used for assessment of compressive strength and diametral tensile strength tests. Specimens were submitted to testing machine and the parameters for measurement of the assays were set at a crosshead speed of 1.0 mm/min for the compressive strength and at 0.5 mm/min crosshead speed for the diametral tensile strength. To convert the data recorded in kgf/cm2 into MPa, values of compressive strength were calculated by dividing the load of failure over the cross-sectional area, while diametral tensile strength was calculated using the equation: (2 × Load)/(3.14 × Diameter × Thickness) [17,18, 22].

Raman spectroscopy.

For confirmation of the tt-farnesol incorporation, the spectra of the specimens were conducted using a Renishaw micro-Raman system model inVia equipped with Leica microscope which allows the acquisition of a spectrum in a point with spatial resolution of about 1 μm2 using a 50 x objective lens and CCD detector with a collection time of 10 s. The laser line at 514.5 nm was used with 1800 lines/mm grating resulting in a spectral resolution of about 4 cm-1 [23].

Statistical analysis.

The effect of GIC containing tt-farnesol on mean measures of the S. mutans biofilm viability and weight, and also measures of ASP and WSP were compared between groups (n = 4 per group) after 1, 3 and 5 days of formation and for MTT using a 2-way mixed model ANOVA. Homogeneity of variances was confirmed prior to statistical analysis (Levene’s test). Group differences on the agar diffusion test, physical properties and gene expression were evaluated with 1-way-ANOVA. When appropriate, statistical relations were observed using Shapiro-Wilk, Tukey and Tukey-Kramer post-hoc analyses. The level of significance was set at 5% in all tests (SAS Institute Inc. The SAS System, release 9.4, SAS Institute Inc., Cary:NC, 2012)(S1S13 Texts).

Results

Antimicrobial assays

Agar diffusion test.

The mean values and standard deviation of the inhibition zones for experimental and control groups for each microbe are shown in Table 1. GIC showed no zone of inhibition for the growth of L. acidophilus, L. casei and A. naeslundii. The tt-farnesol group exhibited the larger zones of inhibition than GIC or chlorhexidine, indicating antimicrobial activity against S. mutans, L. acidophilus, L. casei and A. naeslundii (p < 0.05).

thumbnail
Table 1. Antibacterial activity of GIC containing or not tt-farnesol on cariogenic bacteria (mean ± standard deviation).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.t001

Biofilm model and morphology analysis

Biofilm bacterial viability (CFU/mg of biofilm). The viability of the S. mutans was assessed by determination of CFU/mg of biofilm. Fig 1 demonstrates the mean bacterial counts after biofilm assays over time and between treatment groups. A slight increase of CFU was noted in control group over time but means hovered in a similar range of 109 (p>0.05). By contrast, the experimental group started at 109, decreased to 108 after 3 days (p<0.05) and then returned to baseline at day 5, possibly indicating a short-term antibacterial effect on GIC containing tt-farnesol, even though there is no statistical difference.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Effect of GIC containing tt-farnesol on viability of biofilm of S. mutans expressed as average values for log10 of the numbers of CFU/milliliter versus day of treatment. T–GIC + tt-farnesol; C- GIC (control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.g001

Biomass (dry weight). The dry weight of the S. mutans biofilm for each group and time point is shown Fig 2. Mean dry weight varied between 1 and 2 mg throughout and analysis failed to show differences as a function of treatment or time.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Means (±SD) of dry weight in S. mutans biofilms according to treatments after 1, 3 and 5 days of formation. T–GIC + tt-farnesol; C- GIC (control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.g002

Biochemical composition (ASP/WSP). The biochemical composition of the S. mutans biofilm for each group and time point is shown in Figs 3 and 4. Mean ASP and WSP concentrations increased after 3 and 5 days for both groups (p<0.05). There were no statistical differences between the experimental and control group at any time point (p>0.05).

thumbnail
Fig 3. Means (±SD) of alkali soluble polysacchrides (ASP) concentration (μg/mg dry weight) in S. mutans biofilms according to treatments after 1, 3 and 5 days of formation.

T–GIC + tt-farnesol; C- GIC (control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.g003

thumbnail
Fig 4. Means (±SD) of water soluble polysaccharides (WSP) concentration (g) in S. mutans biofilms according to treatments after 1, 3 and 5 days of formation.

T–GIC + tt-farnesol; C- GIC (control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.g004

Biofilm morphology analysis. CLSM images showed S. mutans biofilm on the GIC specimen surface with viable and non-viable colonies (green and red, respectively) and non-stained (black) bubble-like structures within the biofilm architecture (Fig 5, S1S4 Figs). Non-viable bacteria (red colonies) were seen on the lower regions of the biofilm (specimen surface) after treatments, although in lower number and without a gradual increase of them over the days. Both experimental and control groups demonstrated predominant viable bacteria at day 5, evidenced by almost all colonies remained green, indicating that S. mutans were viable during the period evaluated.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Representative images of S. mutans biofilms viability after treatment with GIC containing (T) or not (C) tt-farnesol visualized by confocal laser scanning microscopy (CLSM).

Viable bacteria are stained green and non-viable bacteria are stained red color. It can be noted that both treatment and control slightly affected the biofilm formation but T was more effective on viability of bacteria.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.g005

Gene expression (RT-qPCR). Gene analysis revealed low variation on their expression after 24 h of biofilm formation without significant difference between treatments (p<0.05), showing that the tt-farnesol did not modulate the S. mutans virulence (Fig 6).

thumbnail
Fig 6. Means (±SD) of the gene expression values in transcript levels (ng) after 24 h of biofilm formation. T–GIC + tt-farnesol; C- GIC (control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.g006

MTT test

Considering the negative control as 100% of cell viability, the percentage of cell viability observed for experimental and control groups was 90% (±7.3) and 61% (±10.4), respectively. After 24 h of treatments, only GIC reduced considerably the cell viability of HaCat cells (p < 0.05).

Morphological characteristics of normal keratinocytes were observed for both groups, in which the intense green tone predominates, displaying cell viability after treatments. GIC showed more red fluorescence than GIC + tt-farnesol, evidencing that the control group was more cytotoxic than the experimental group (Fig 7).

thumbnail
Fig 7. Illustrative images of HaCaT cells exposed for 24 h to GIC containing (A) or not (B) tt-farnesol analyzed by using Live/Dead assay. Green cells correspond to live cells whereas dead cells are stained in red.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.g007

Physical properties

The means and standard deviations of the values obtained for physical testing are shown in Table 2. GIC samples containing tt-farnesol were harder than controls, but no differences were observed between the groups for compressive strength, diametral tensile strength or roughness (p>0.05).

thumbnail
Table 2. Roughness, hardness, compressive and diametral tensile strength of GIC containing or not tt-farnesol (mean ± standard deviation).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.t002

Raman spectroscopy

The Raman spectra of tt-farnesol in GIC and GIC control are shown in Fig 8. Fluorescence in the spectrum of the tt-farnesol in the GIC sample is observed in the region of 150 to 1000 cm-1. In the mentioned region of this sample it is still possible to identify some bands besides evidencing the appearance of a peak in 1673 cm-1 all this indicating a change in the chemical environment of the GIC when the compound is present (Fig 8).

thumbnail
Fig 8. Raman spectra of tt-farnesol in the 150 to 1000 cm−1 range. T–GIC + tt-farnesol; C- GIC (control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.g008

Discussion

Considering that dental caries is still one of the most frequent worldwide conditions [24], it is reasonable to improve the existing therapies for the treatment and prevention of cavity lesions. The selection of a dental material involves their physical, mechanical and biological properties as well as their clinical application. As GIC is the material of first choice for high caries activity patients [25], the improvement of their antimicrobial property is supported by the great potential for clinical indication besides other advantageous properties performance [1]. Likewise, since natural products have been in vogue due to their pharmacological and biological activities [4], the idea of incorporating a natural compound to GIC was backed up by the possibility to characterize a safe and also more effective restorative material.

Developing a novel dental material has long been a challenge due to countless assays required prior clinical use [5]. As S. mutans has a key role in the process of dental caries [8], several studies have focused the attention on that pathogen, exploring initial antimicrobial assays.

One of the hypotheses preceding the beginning of this study was that S. mutans biofilm formation would be disturbed by the presence of natural compound added to the restorative material. The tt-farnesol is known as an effective natural antimicrobial against planktonic and biofilm-associated S. mutans cells [26]. Our study also demonstrated that the incorporation of tt-farnesol to the GIC had the best antibacterial activity against free-floating planktonic bacteria (S. mutans, L. casei, L. acidophilus and A. naeslundii). Thus, the first hypothesis of this study was accepted. However, we found here that there were important differences in the antimicrobial response of planktonic and biofilm cells. Herein, the viability of the biofilms was affected only 3 days after treatment although the reduction of bacteria was irrelevant in the end of a week. This suggests that the antimicrobial activity of GIC containing tt-farnesol is effective on planktonic cells after 24 h and it also has progressive increasing up to 3 days of treatment. That is an interesting observation as the experimental material could establish an anticariogenic environment around restorations in early stages of caries formation and thus, would somehow disturb the microorganism adhesion to the surface and also avoid the development of new carious lesions on the tooth-restoration interface [2].

Despite the progressive increasing of the antimicrobial activity over the days, probably the tt-farnesol activity was restricted to the GIC surface, without substantial impact on mature biofilm. It is known that bacterial biofilms are complex communities of microorganisms embedded within an extra-cellular matrix [27]. Regarding the complexity of the biofilm, in this study, one of the possible reasons for the lack of activity of the treatment on mature biofilm could be the bacterial virulence. Since S. mutans is an acidogenic and aciduric species [28] the low-pH environment arouses the ability to form biofilm [27]. Therefore, it is clear that the pathogenesis of dental caries is dependable of the production of organic acids on dental biofilm, mainly lactic acid, by bacteria with acidogenic and aciduric potentials like the S. mutans [8]. As the medium pH in this study was 4.5, the therapy for oral biofilm control was useless.

Another evidence of the existing but surface-limited antimicrobial effect of the experimental material is shown by cell morphology. As expected, CSLM reveal some non-viable cells after 5 days of treatment. Those cells probably were sub-populations of bacteria on the surface of material that were directly exposed to the treatment. Interestingly, similar results were found by Hu et al. [29] that evaluated the association of the same conventional GIC with the flavonoid epigallocatechin-3-gallate (EGCG). Those authors observed a significantly decreased of planktonic cells after 24 h of treatment, without inhibition zones for GIC [29].

Based on cellular findings and considering that the virulence of S. mutans depends on the environmental conditions of the biofilm [27], we expanded the current study for the molecular level. In particular, as the incorporation of tt-farnesol into GIC affected only planktonic cells but not mature biofilm or the S. mutans expression profile we strongly believe that the compound was inactivated after the setting time of material. Setting of GIC occurs in two steps, including the initial setting that takes about 10 min and the second step, which is slow and continues up to 24 h. This process could perhaps be responsible for the antimicrobial effect of material in the first hours as well as the absence of inhibition after 24 h of treatment [1]. The anti-caries activity and the capacity to modulate the S. mutans virulence of that terpene were already broadly disclosed [14, 15, 30] as their antimicrobial spectra after incorporation into other dental material [31]. However, it seems that the association of tt-farnesol with other compounds [14] or materials as GIC promote a synergic effect on their biological properties; thus, a little or absent inhibitory activity is shown on the composition, structure and physiology of the biofilm matrices, rejecting then, our second hypothesis. Undoubtedly, in this biofilm model, the use of natural compounds associated with a dental material resulted in no apparent reduction in total biomass and absence of variation of the biochemical composition of the biofilm as well as a lack of modulation on S. mutans gene expression. Till date, some studies have been undertaken to assess the biological and physical properties of antimicrobial-containing GIC. However, no other study had been performed in order to evaluate the anti-caries potential of the incorporation of natural products to that GIC. Due to the lack of literature background, we cannot compare our results with other studies.

The idea of incorporating a natural product into GIC focused on the improvement of their antimicrobial activity. Furthermore, the incorporation of a bioactive can affect the physical properties of the GIC, herein we demonstrated that is possible to modify their composition without jeopardize important physical properties. Whereas the compressive strength is a basic material property that reproduces the resistance of the material to masticatory force, the diametral tensile strength intend to simulate the resistance to axial forces in opposite directions [2]. Likewise, the surface characteristics are also a determinant factor for clinical recommendation of a dental material as they can influence on polishing, scratching as well as the resistance to load application [2]. While the Knoop hardness is a sensitive surface parameter that assesses the resistance to plastic deformation [2], the roughness of the material influences straight on the bacterial adhesion [32]. Herein all physical properties of GICs but hardness, remained unchanged after the incorporating of the tt-farnesol. Those are interesting findings that could indicate the success of the GIC containing tt-farnesol in oral environment if we consider their toughness to forces, tension, deformation, wear as well as the control of early adhesion of bacteria on surface. Taking all together, those findings suggest no significant modifications in the powder/liquid ratios by adding a bioactive.

Corroborating with the physical findings, the Raman spectral features characterized the chemical change of GIC after the incorporation of the bioactive. Raman spectroscopy is a well-established simple and nondestructive analysis, which gives details about the chemical and structural composition of the material [23]. However, it seems that the association between tt-farnesol and some GIC component might affects totally or partially the chemical bonds as no greater peak was observed in the Raman spectral. Although the exact mechanism of that bioactive compound interaction needs further explanation to support whether occurs their decomposition or inactivation, the results herein reinforce the premise that the chemical variation occurred but it was not enough to modify all physical properties or biofilm structure.

As the importance of physical and chemical properties, the understanding of the biological safety of an experimental material cannot be neglect during a characterization. Surprisingly, MTT assay showed that the most biocompatible material was the GIC containing tt-farnesol, with a little effect on cell metabolism, evidencing a protective effect on keratinocytes. This finding was unexpected and shows that the incorporation of a bioactive into GIC might decrease their toxicity. These results are in agreement with previous studies, which observed that the incorporation of different antimicrobial substances could be safe and useful in Dentistry [16,17,22] and were confirmed by Live/Dead assay as well, which demonstrated a high number of viable cells after 24h of treatments. Therefore, the third and forth hypotheses of the current study were accepted.

The main findings of the current study were the upgrading of antimicrobial activity of GIC, keeping their basic properties. While the inhibitory effect was shown by contact not affecting the biofilm matrix and physiology, the experimental GIC could still be clinically acceptable considering the material weaknesses, since their hardness was increased by the incorporation of the bioactive, as well as their greater biocompatibility to human cells.

Even though the incorporation of tt-farnesol didn’t interfere negatively either with the physical properties or the toxicity, further studies need to be done with higher doses or different mechanisms of incorporation to improve the material antibiofilm activity.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Biofilm (dead cells) after treatment with GIC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s001

(AVI)

S2 Fig. Biofilm (live cells) after treatment with GIC.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s002

(AVI)

S3 Fig. Biofilm (dead cells) after treatment with GIC + tt-farnesol.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s003

(AVI)

S4 Fig. Biofilm (live cells) after treatment with GIC + tt-farnesol.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s004

(AVI)

S1 Text. Statistical analysis (agar diffusion test).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s005

(PDF)

S2 Text. Statistical analysis (covR gene).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s006

(PDF)

S3 Text. Statistical analysis (gtfB gene).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s007

(PDF)

S4 Text. Statistical analysis (gtfC gene).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s008

(PDF)

S5 Text. Statistical analysis (gtfD gene).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s009

(PDF)

S6 Text. Statistical analysis (gbpD gene).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s010

(PDF)

S7 Text. Statistical analysis (vicR gene).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s011

(PDF)

S8 Text. Statistical analysis (MTT assay).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s012

(PDF)

S9 Text. Statistical analysis (Physical properties).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s013

(PDF)

S10 Text. Statistical analysis (ASP analysis).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s014

(PDF)

S11 Text. Statistical analysis (CFU analysis).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s015

(PDF)

S12 Text. Statistical analysis (DW analysis).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s016

(PDF)

S13 Text. Statistical analysis (WSP analysis).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0220718.s017

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

We thank Yan Deng, NYU Langone’s Microscopy Laboratory, for confocal scanning laser microscope images.

References

  1. 1. Sidhu SK, Nicholson JW. A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry. J Funct Biomater. 2016; 7: 16.
  2. 2. Wang SP, Ge Y, Zhou XD, Xu HHK, Weir MD, Zhang KK, et al. Effect of anti-biofilm glass–ionomer cement on Streptococcus mutans biofilms. Int J Oral Sci. 2016; 8: 76–83. pmid:27357319
  3. 3. American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry. Pediatric Restorative Dentistry. Reference Manual. 2016; 40: 18–19. https://www.aapd.org/research/oral-health-policies—recommendations/pediatric-restorative-dentistry/
  4. 4. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs from 1981 to 2014. J Nat Prod. 2016; 79: 629–661. pmid:26852623
  5. 5. Freires IA, Rosalen PL. How Natural Product Research has Contributed to Oral Care Product Development? A Critical View. Pharm Res. 2016; 33: 1311–1317.
  6. 6. Koo K. Strategies to enhance the biological effects of fluoride on dental biofilms. Adv Dent Res. 2008; 20: 17–21. pmid:18694872
  7. 7. Faustova MO, Ananieva MM, Basarab YO, Dobrobolska OV, Vovk IM, Loban’ GA. Bacterial factors of cariogenicity (literature review). Wiad Lek. 2018; 71: 378–382. pmid:29786589
  8. 8. Bowen WH, Burne RA, Wu H, Koo H. Oral Biofilms: Pathogens, Matrix, and Polymicrobial Interactions in Microenvironments. Trends Microbiol. 2018; 26: 229–242. pmid:29097091
  9. 9. Pitts NB, Zero DT, Marsh PD, Ekstrand K, Weintraub JA, Ramos-Gomez F, et al. Dental caries. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2017; 25: 17030.
  10. 10. Weber K, Delben J, Bromage TG, Duarte S. Comparison of SEM and VPSEM imaging techniques with respect to Streptococcus mutans biofilm topography. FEMS Microbiol Lett 2014; 350: 175–179. pmid:24261820
  11. 11. Neel EAA, Aljabo A, Strange A, Ibrahim A, Coathup M, Young AM, et al. Demineralization-remineralization dynamics in teeth and bone. Int J Nanomedicine. 2016; 11: 4743–4763. pmid:27695330
  12. 12. Pedraza MCC, Novais TF, Faustoferri RC, Quivey RG Jr., Terekhov A, Hamaker BR, et al. Extracellular DNA and lipoteichoic acids interact with exopolysaccharides in the extracellular matrix of Streptococcus mutans biofilms Biofouling. 2017; 33: 722–740. pmid:28946780
  13. 13. Abbasi AJ, Mohammadi F, Bayat M, Gema SM, Ghadirian H, Seifi H, et al. Applications of Propolis in Dentistry: A Review. Ethiop J Health Sci. 2018; 28: 505–512. pmid:30607063
  14. 14. Rocha GR, Florez Salamanca EJ, de Barros AL, Lobo CIV, Klein MI. Effect of tt-farnesol and myricetin on in vitro biofilm formed by Streptococcus mutans and Candida albicans. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2018; 18: 61. pmid:29444673
  15. 15. Jeon JG, Klein MI, Xiao J, Gregoire S, Rosalen PL, Koo H. Influences of naturally occurring agents in combination with fluoride on gene expression and structural organization of Streptococcus mutans in biofilms. BMC Microbiol. 2009; 9: 228. pmid:19863808
  16. 16. de Castilho AR, Duque C, Negrini TC, Sacono NT, de Paula AB, de Souza Costa CA, et al. In vitro and in vivo investigation of the biological and mechanical behaviour of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine. J Dent. 2013; 41: 155–163.
  17. 17. de Castilho AR, Duque C, Negrini TC, Sacono NT, de Paula AB, Sacramento PA, et al. Mechanical and biological characterization of resin-modified glass-ionomer cement containing doxycycline hyclate. Arch Oral Biol. 2012; 57: 131–138. pmid:21920494
  18. 18. de Castilho AR, Duque C, Kreling PF, Pereira JA, Paula AB, Sinhoreti MAC, et al. Doxycycline-containing glass ionomer cement for arresting residual caries: an in vitro study and a pilot trial. J Appl Oral Sci. 2018; 26: e20170116. pmid:29742263
  19. 19. de Sousa DL, Lima RA, Zanin IC, Klein MI, Janal MN, Duarte S. Effect of Twice-Daily Blue Light Treatment on Matrix-Rich BiofilmDevelopment. PLoS One. 2015; 10: e0131941. pmid:26230333
  20. 20. de Souza Araújo IJ, de Paula AB, Bruschi Alonso RC, Taparelli JR, Innocentini Mei LH, Stipp RN, et al. A novel Triclosan Methacrylate-based composite reduces the virulence of Streptococcus mutans biofilm. PLoS One. 2018; 13: e0195244. pmid:29608622
  21. 21. Stipp RN, Boisvert H, Smith DJ, Höfling JF, Duncan MJ, Mattos-Graner RO. CovR and VicRK regulate cell surface biogenesis genes required for biofilm formation in Streptococcus mutans. PLoS One. 2013; 8: e58271. pmid:23554881
  22. 22. Duque C, Aida KL, Pereira JA, Teixeira GS, Caldo-Teixeira AS, Perrone LR, et al. In vitro and in vivo evaluations of glass-ionomer cement containing chlorhexidine for Atraumatic Restorative Treatment. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017; 25: 541–550. pmid:29069152
  23. 23. Dainezi VB, Iwamoto AS, Martin AA, Soares LE, Hosoya Y, Pascon FM, et al. Molecular and morphological surface analysis: effect of filling pastes and cleaning agents on root dentin. J Appl Oral Sci. 2017; 25: 101–111. pmid:28198982
  24. 24. Lagerweij MD, van Loveren C. Declining Caries Trends: Are We Satisfied? Curr Oral Health Rep. 2015; 2: 212–217. pmid:26523247
  25. 25. Troca VBPB, Fernandes KBP, Terrile AE, Marcucci MC, de Andrade FB, Wang L. Effect of green propolis addition to physicalmechanical properties of glass ionomer cements. J Appl Oral Sci. 2011; 19: 100–105. pmid:21552709
  26. 26. Libério SA, Pereira AL, Araújo MJ, Dutra RP, Nascimento FR, Monteiro-Neto V, et al. The potential use of propolis as a cariostatic agent and its actions on mutans group streptococci. J Ethnopharmacol. 2009; 125: 1–9. pmid:19422903
  27. 27. Krzyściak W, Jurczak A, Kościelniak D, Bystrowska B, Skalniak A. The virulence of Streptococcus mutans and the ability to form biofilms. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2014; 33: 499–515. pmid:24154653
  28. 28. Takahashi N, Nyvad B. The role of bacteria in the caries process: ecological perspectives. J Dent Res. 2011; 90: 294–303. pmid:20924061
  29. 29. Hu J, Du X, Huang C, Fu D, Ouyang X, Wang Y. Antibacterial and physical properties of EGCG-containing glass ionomer cements. J Dent. 2013; 41: 927–934. pmid:23911600
  30. 30. Cao L, Zhang ZZ, Xu SB, Ma M, Wei X. Farnesol inhibits development of caries by augmenting oxygen sensitivity and suppressing virulence-associated gene expression in Streptococcus mutans. J Biomed Res. 2017; 31: 333–343. pmid:28808205
  31. 31. André CB, Rosalen PL, Galvão LCC, Fronza BM, Ambrosano GMB, Ferracane JL, et al. Modulation of Streptococcus mutans virulence by dental adhesives containing anti-caries agents. Dent Mater. 2017; 33: 1084–1092. pmid:28774430
  32. 32. Bayrak GD, Sandalli N, Selvi-Kuvvetli S, Topcuoglu N, Kulekci G. Effect of two different polishing systems on fluoride release, surfaceroughness and bacterial adhesion of newly developed restorative materials. J Esthet Restor Dent. 2017; 12: 424–434.