Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Molecular typing of Cryptosporidium in Israel

  • Tamar Grossman ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Public Health Central Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Shifra Ken-Dror,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee district, Israel

  • Elsa Pavlotzky,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Clalit Health Services, Haifa and Western Galilee district, Israel

  • Julia Vainer,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Public Health Central Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Yael Glazer,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Division of Epidemiology, Ministry of Health, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Orli Sagi,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Soroka University Medical Center, Beer-Sheva, Israel

  • Avi Peretz,

    Roles Conceptualization, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Baruch Padeh Medical Center, Safed, Israel, Bar-Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel

  • Vered Agmon,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Public Health Central Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Esther Marva,

    Roles Investigation, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Public Health Central Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel

  • Lea Valinsky

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Public Health Central Laboratories, Jerusalem, Israel

Molecular typing of Cryptosporidium in Israel

  • Tamar Grossman, 
  • Shifra Ken-Dror, 
  • Elsa Pavlotzky, 
  • Julia Vainer, 
  • Yael Glazer, 
  • Orli Sagi, 
  • Avi Peretz, 
  • Vered Agmon, 
  • Esther Marva, 
  • Lea Valinsky


Cryptosporidium is a protozoan parasite associated with gastrointestinal illness. In immune-compromised individuals, the infection may become life-threatening. Cryptosporidiosis is a mandatory-reported disease but little was known about its prevalence and associated morbidity in Israel. Currently, laboratory diagnosis is based on microscopy or copro-antigen tests and the disease is underreported. Molecular assays, which are more sensitive and specific, are now increasingly used for identification and screening. Here, the molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis is explored for the first time. Samples from 33 patients infected during an outbreak of 146 laboratory confirmed cases that occurred in Haifa and Western Galilee in 2015 were genotyped, as well as samples from 36 patients sporadically infected during 2014–2018 in different regions. The results suggest that Cryptosporidium subtypes found in Israel are more similar to those reported in the neighboring countries Jordan and Egypt than in European countries. C. hominis was the predominant species in the center and the north of Israel, implicating human-to-human transmission. C. hominis IeA11G3T3 was the most prevalent subtype contributing to morbidity.


Cryptosporidium infection commonly causes self-limiting 2–3 week diarrhea. In the immune-compromised or malnourished, the infection may develop into a prolonged life-threatening disease [14]. Young children are also more frequently and severely affected. In sub-Saharan Africa and Southeast Asia, Cryptosporidium is the second cause (after rotavirus) of diarrheal disease and death in children under five.[47]. Several factors contribute to its ability to cause outbreaks: low infection dose, faecal-oral transmission, environmentally resistant oocysts, and auto-infective cycle that leads to a high parasite load in the host and many infective oocysts shed in stool that are not host specific [6, 8].

Cryptosporidiosis was added to the list of notifiable diseases in Israel in 2001. It was then decided to collect data regarding water-transmitted pathogens for the purpose of evaluating the need to filter water entering the national drinking water network. Practitioners are required to notify all new cases to the local health districts. The 15 regional health districts and the Army Health Branch report new cases to the Division of Epidemiology of the Ministry of Health on a daily basis. Each report includes age, gender, nationality, address, and the date of disease onset. Only laboratory confirmed cases are reported. Hospital and health-maintenance organization (HMO) laboratories perform routine testing of patient samples. They are also required to notify all new cases to the local health district. In addition, they are required to send all Cryptosporidium positive stool samples for confirmation and molecular genotyping to the Parasitology Reference Laboratory of the Ministry of Health. If an unexpected rise in the number of cases is identified in a timely manner, the local health district may further conduct an epidemiological outbreak investigation. In the case of the outbreak described below, such investigation was not conducted.

The Division of Epidemiology reported cryptosporidiosis rates varying from 0.1 to 1 per 100,000 (7 and 68 reported cases, respectively) for most years in the period 2001–2018, with two exceptions: 177 reported cases, corresponding to infection rate of 2.4 per 100,000, in 2008, and 110 cases, 1.3 per 100,000 in 2015 (Fig 1). At both peak incidence years, 2008 and 2015, most of the reported cases originated in Haifa / West-Galilee district (157 and 82 cases, respectively). The total number of cases reported between 2001 and 2018 was 737, of whom 589 (80%) were children under five. The manual reporting system described above, although mandatory, left out of record some of the identified cryptosporidiosis cases. Notably, only 82 of the 146 outbreak cases in 2015 described in this work were included in the national database. Moreover, the reported numbers underestimated cryptosporidiosis morbidity also because of other reasons, including a frequent failure of physicians to request specific tests and the challenge of laboratory detection (see below).

Fig 1. Reported Cryptosporidium cases in Israel and incidence rate 2001–2018.

The prevalence of cryptosporidiosis in Israel was investigated in the 1990’s. An epidemiological study conducted in the south of Israel over one year identified Cryptosporidium in the stools of 3.4% of children with diarrhea and 0.7% in a control group without diarrhea living in the same area. A peak overall detection rate of 8.3% was observed in the summer months [9]. Several studies in Bedouin infants, which live in nomadic or partly nomadic communities found Cryptosporidium in 3–4% of stool samples. In this population, the risk of infection by the age of two was close to 49%, this was observed by monitoring stools as well as sero-positivity, [10, 11]. A sero-prevalence survey in the north of Israel demonstrated the presence of Cryptosporidium-specific antibodies in half of the children under the age of 12 [12]. An outbreak involving zoonotic transmission was also identified [13]. Additional studies revealed morbidity caused by Cryptosporidium in hospitalized children. Cryptosporidiosis was found in children with diarrhea after solid organ transplantation at the Schneider Children’s Medical Center [14]. A recent study of children hospitalized at the Padeh-Poriya Medical Center, located in the north of Israel, found Cryptosporidium to be the second most common cause of gastrointestinal disease after Campylobacter [15]. Although the total number of positive specimens in this study was small, two Cryptosporidium species, Cryptosporidium hominis (C. hominis) and Cryptosporidium parvum (C. parvum), were identified [15].

Laboratory diagnosis of cryptosporidiosis is based primarily on stool samples. Currently, most clinical laboratories perform microscopic examination of ova and parasites. Microscopic examination, lacks sensitivity because Cryptosporidium oocysts are transparent and easily missed [16, 17]. Most clinical laboratories in Israel perform additional diagnostic tests only when these are specifically requested by the physician. These tests include mainly copro-antigen tests and/or modified Ziehl–Neelsen stain. In recent years, the application of molecular techniques with high sensitivity and specificity is gradually increasing. Quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) for detection of Cryptosporidium from stool samples is now used in the Parasitology Reference Laboratory of the Ministry of Health and is currently in stages of evaluation and implementation in other primary laboratories in Israel. The feasibility of using a molecular diagnostic approach was evaluated in a study performed in Haifa and West Galilee during November 2013 –April 2014 [18]. The performance of a commercial gastrointestinal panel (NanoCHIP1, Savyon Diagnostics, Ashdod, IL) was compared to that of conventional methods. This study found 100% agreement in identification of Cryptosporidium in faecal samples from symptomatic patients. It should be noted, though, that during that period only two samples out of 161 tested were positive.

Cryptosporidium has a worldwide distribution. Most infections are caused by two species, C. hominis, for which humans are largely the main host, and C. parvum, which is zoonotic and has a plethora of suitable host species. Together, these species account for 90% of human infection [19, 20]. The largest outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis in humans, involving tens to hundreds of thousands of people, have been caused by contamination of drinking water [8]. Species determination and subtyping has contributed to understanding of the epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in outbreaks as well as in sporadic infections [6, 1921].

Although reporting of cryptosporidiosis is mandatory in Israel, little is known about the prevalence and associated morbidity of the disease. An outbreak of 146 cases of cryptosporidiosis occurred in Haifa and West-Galilee in the summer of 2015 and the molecular typing of samples from 33 patients, along with 36 samples from sporadic infections, enabled us to explore the molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis in Israel for the first time.

Materials and methods

A flow diagram describing the algorithm for diagnosis and molecular genotyping of cryptosporidiosis is described in Fig 2.

Primary testing in hospital and HMO laboratories: Stool samples from patients with diarrhea were subjected to routine testing in hospital and HMO laboratories. All stools were subjected to microscopic examination of ova and parasites, consisting of direct examination of wet mounts as well as concentration method. Complementary tests specific for Cryptosporidium were conducted only upon specific requests from the physicians, or when microscopic examination in the laboratory raised suspicion. In most facilities, those tests included antigen detection (Cryptosporidium-Strip, Coris BioConcepts, Gembloux, Belgium) and/or modified acid fast staining. A new commercial multiplex qPCR gastro-intestinal parasite panel (Allplex, Seegene), including Cryptosporidium, has been evaluated at the central laboratory of Haifa and Western Galilee HMO. During the 2015 outbreak, 7554 stools from patients with gastrointestinal symptoms were tested at Haifa and Western Galilee HMO, of them 146 (1.9%) were found positive for Cryptosporidium. Thirty out of those were tested and identified using the evaluated molecular assay.

Post examination at the hospital and HMO laboratories: Faecal samples positive for Cryptosporidium left over from testing, were kept frozen until sent to the Parasitology Reference Laboratory for re-testing and genotyping.

Confirmation and genotyping in the Parasitology Reference Laboratory: DNA was extracted from 100 mg stool via NUCLISENS easyMAG platform (bioMérieux), according to the protocol published by Jeddi et al. [22]. Elution volume was 110 μl. qPCR tests were implemented for detection and genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. One qPCR assay amplifies a region of the 18S rRNA sequence common to most Cryptosporidium spp. and is used for the detection of Cryptosporidium spp. [23]. This assay was previously validated by the developers [23] as well as by others [24]. All samples (36 from the outbreak and 40 sporadic cases) were subjected to this assay.

qPCR reactions were prepared in a final volume of 50 μl containing 5 μl of genomic DNA, 0.5 μM of the primer set JVAF and JVAR, 0.25 μM of the probe JVAP18S (S1 Table) and 25 μl ABsolute Blue qPCR Low ROX Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Lithuania). The amplification protocol included an initial hold step of 15 min at 95 °C followed by 52 cycles of 15 s at 95 °C and 1 min at 60 °C and was carried out on a 750 Applied Biosystem qPCR system (Rhenium). Appropriate positive, negative, and inhibition controls were routinely included in each round of qPCR assays.

Another qPCR assay that is based on a different region of the 18S rRNA sequence and can specifically target C. hominis and C. parvum was used for genotyping [25]. This assay cannot differentiate C. hominis from the closely related but rare species C. cuniculus; differentiation necessitates sequencing of a region of the 18S rRNA gene or the 60kDa glycoprotein (gp60) gene [26, 27] (see below). All samples (36 from the outbreak and 40 sporadic cases) were subjected to this assay. The qPCR reactions were conducted in a monoplex format, each prepared in a final volume of 20 μl containing 2 μl of genomic DNA, 0.5 μM of the primer set Mary-F and Mary-R, 0.25 μM of one of the probes Pan-Crypto probe, C. hominis probe or C. parvum probe (S1 Table) and 25 μl ABsolute Blue qPCR Low ROX Mix (ThermoFisher Scientific, Lithuania). The amplification protocol was the same as for the Cryptosporidium spp. qPCR assay described above. Appropriate positive, negative, and inhibition controls were routinely included in each round of qPCR assays.

The qPCR test results were corroborated on two sequences from patients in the sporadic group by performing nested PCR and sequencing a 0.6 kb segment of the 18S rRNA gene according to Silva et al. [28]. PCR reactions were conducted with PCR-Ready High Specificity mix (Syntezza Bioscience Ltd., Israel) in a final volume of 25 μl consisting of 2μl of genomic DNA and 0.5μM of the primers pairs SHP1/SHP2 in the primary reaction and SHP3/SSU-R3 in the secondary reaction (S1 Table). Cycling parameters for the primary PCR reaction were an initial step of 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 39 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 56 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 70 s with a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. The same conditions were used in the secondary PCR.

Identified C. hominis or C. parvum single-infection samples were further subtyped by amplification and sequencing of both strands of an amplicon of about 0.9 kb of the gp60 gene, according to a nested PCR protocol by Feng et al. [29]. PCR reactions were conducted with PCR-Ready High Specificity mix (Syntezza Bioscience Ltd., Israel) in a final volume of 50 μl consisting of 5 μl of genomic DNA and 0.5 μM of the primers pairs LX0374/ LX0375 in the primary reaction and AL3534/AL3532 in the secondary reaction (S1 Table). Cycling parameters for the primary PCR reaction were an initial step of 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 39 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 52 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 70 s with a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. The same conditions were used in the secondary PCR. In a few cases where amplification failed, a smaller segment was amplified and sequenced according to Sulaiman et al. [30]. PCR reactions were conducted with PCR-Ready High Specificity mix (Syntezza Bioscience Ltd., Israel) in a final volume of 40 μl consisting of 2 μl of genomic DNA and 0.5 μM of the primers pairs AL3531/AL3533 in the primary reaction and LX0029/ AL3532 in the secondary reaction (S1 Table). The AL3532 primer is common to both gp60 assays. Cycling parameters for the primary PCR reaction were an initial step of 94 °C for 3 min, followed by 39 cycles of 94 °C for 45 s, 46 °C for 45 s, and 72 °C for 45 s with a final extension of 72 °C for 7 min. The same conditions were used in the secondary PCR. Amplification of the gp60 gene was successful in stool samples from 33 outbreak patients and 36 sporadic.

PCR products were sequenced using internal primer sets. Sequencing was performed at the Center for Genomic Technologies, Institute of Life Sciences, the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, using BigDye Terminator v1.1 chemistry (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, California, USA). Sequence assemblage to create consensus sequences and alignments, were performed using the BioNumerics v 7.6 software (Applied Maths, Kortijk, Belgium). The BLAST tool ( was used to compare nucleotide sequences with sequences deposited in the NCBI. Patient residence plotting was performed using Microreact [31].

All these procedures were part of routine health care and of reference lab duty code regulated (in general terms) by law (Public Health Ordinance, 1940). The study was approved by the Clalit Health Services Ethics Committee, which stipulated that the study did not need informed consent.


Between August and December 2015, the Haifa and West Galilee HMO identified an increase in Cryptosporidium infection rates (see Discussion), constituting an outbreak of 146 laboratory confirmed cases in the district (Fig 3). A majority were young children: 70% (104) were under the age of three and 88% (128) under five (Fig 4); 59% (86) were male. Stool samples from these patients were subjected to parasitological examination. They were identified positive for Cryptosporidium using microscopic and antigen detection (116 patients), or molecular tests (30 patients). In addition to Cryptosporidium, 21 (14%) had other parasitological infections: 10 had Dientamoeba fragilis (D. fragilis), 3 Blastocystis sp., 2 a mixed infection of D. fragilis and Blastocystis sp. and 6 had Giardia duodenalis.

Fig 3. Cryptosporidium cases in Haifa and West Galilee per month during 2015.

Fig 4. Age distribution of Cryptosporidium cases in Haifa and West Galilee during 2015.

Of the stool samples that were found positive for Cryptosporidium at the Haifa and West Galilee HMO lab, 36 samples from 34 patients had sufficient stool remaining and were sent to the Parasitology Reference Lab for genotyping. Those were re-tested for the presence of Cryptosporidium, in accordance to the reference lab work flow, and genotyped. Analysis of the 18S rRNA gene revealed that all positive samples contained Cryptosporidium of the species C. hominis. Further sequencing of the gp60 gene was successful in stools from 33 patients. Two subtypes of C. hominis were identified according to the scheme developed by [30], IeA11G3T3 in 23 patients, and IbA6G3 in 10. The geographic distribution of patient residence and subtypes in this outbreak is shown in Fig 5A.

Fig 5. The geographic distribution and genotypes of Cryptosporidium cases in Israel.

A. Residence of the 2015 outbreak patients (N = 146), ploted on Haifa and West Galilee geographic map. B. Residence of genotyped patients. Purple, identyfied at the HMO but not genotyped; Red, C. hominis IeA11G3T3; Green, C. hominis IbA6G3. Grey, C. hominis IdA16; Light Blue, C. hominis IbA10G2; Yellow, C. parvum IIdA20G; Orange, C. parvum IIaA15G2R1. Maps were generated using Microreact [31]; A dynamic version that includes the tested determinants can be found at Microreact and for Fig 5A and Fig 5B, respectively.

In addition to samples from the outbreak, 40 stool samples from 40 sporadic Cryptosporidium-positive patients collected in other regions throughout Israel between 2014 and 2018 were sent to the reference lab and analyzed as described above. Three were positive for C. hominis but further analysis of the gp60 subtype was not successful. Another patient with a mixed infection of C. hominis and C. parvum was also not further subtyped. Thirty-six patients were successfully subtyped. The Cryptosporidium subtype in 24 patients was C. hominis IeA11G3T3, 7 had C. hominis IdA16 and one was C. hominis IbA10G2. Four patients had C. parvum, two were subtype IIdA20G and two IIaA15G2R1. The geographic distribution of all cases with identified subtype is shown in Fig 5B. Cryptosporidium species and subtypes found in this study are summarized in Table 1. All sequencing results were deposited in the GenBank. Sequences of the gp60 gene from the outbreak and sporadic cases have accession numbers MK095273-MK095305 and MK095306-MK095341, respectively. The 18S rRNA sequences have accession numbers MK801120 and MK801121.


Early studies conducted until 2001 identified cryptosporidiosis as a significant cause of diarrhea in children in the south and north of Israel, especially in summer [9, 10, 12]. Cryptosporidium also caused morbidity after solid organ transplantation in a pediatric hospital [14]. A recent study reported Cryptosporidium to be the second most common cause of gastrointestinal disease after Campylobacter in hospitalized children. Both C. hominis and C. parvum were found in those patients [15]. Presence of C. hominis, C. parvum, C. andersoni and C. muris in wastewater effluents was reported previously [32]. The present study provides new information about prevalence, morbidity and species and subtype distribution.

Cryptosporidium infections are generally under-detected and underreported, especially in developing countries [8]. In Israel, most clinical laboratories of the HMOs and hospitals perform copro-antigen tests and microscopic detection tests for Cryptosporidium upon physician’s request or suspicion following initial examination of the sample, but these methods are not sensitive, often resulting in false negative identification. Molecular assays, highly sensitive and specific [17, 33], are now being evaluated and introduced into clinical laboratories Thus, a corresponding increase in detection rates is expected as well as improved surveillance.

Cryptosporidium causes outbreaks of gastrointestinal illness worldwide [5, 7, 21, 34, 35]. An outbreak of 146 laboratory-confirmed cases was identified between August and December 2015 in the Haifa and West Galilee district of Israel (Fig 3). Of those, 104 were 3 years old or younger, and a total of 127 (88%) were 5 or younger (Fig 4). Morbidity in children is typical for cryptosporidiosis since the pediatric group is generally more susceptible to infection and illness [2]. Adults tend to be less symptomatic and therefore do not often seek medical assistance and are less likely to be diagnosed. National data shows a previous peak of cryptosporidiosis in 2008 (Fig 1). As in 2015, most of those cases originated in Haifa and West Galilee district, together predicting recurrences in the future.

The main transmission pathways of C. hominis are food and water contamination as well as person to person. Outbreaks that originate from contaminated drinking water have the potential of causing morbidity in thousands of people. Until 2016 drinking water in Israel came from a main water body (Lake of Galilee), supplemented with water from small surface water springs and deep ground water. In 2007 drinking water begun to be centrally filtered. In 2016 a new system of desalination of Mediterranean sea water via reverse-osmosis was introduced and presently, most drinking water originates from this system. Regulations regarding raw water produced in surface water facilities mandate at least two orders of magnitude reduction in Cryptosporidium oocyst concentration (99% removal) by filtration. If high concentrations are suspected to exist, health authorities may request removal of more than 99% (public health regulations 2013). Drinking water originating in Lake Galilee, springs and ground water connected to springs are monitored for the presence of Cryptosporidium oocysts and other pathogens. Regulations regarding lake Galilee demand bi-monthly testing of both raw water and treated-water. Post-treatment Cryptosporidium concentrations of less than 1 oocyst/10 liters are considered adequate. Higher levels must be reported to the Ministry of Health, in parallel to repeating the monitoring continuously. Preventive actions are taken as necessary (Ministry of Health, regulations for testing and monitoring of drinking water, 2018). In accordance with the United States Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) method 1623.1, detection of Cryptosporidium oocysts in water consists of several sequential steps: filtration, immunomagnetic separation, and identification using fluorescence-conjugated antibodies and microscopy. Identification is completed with Dapi staining and Differential Interference Contrast (DIC) microscopy.

Between 2007 and now, low oocyst levels were consistently demonstrated, mostly with average concentration of less than 1 oocyst/10 liters (Israel National Water Surveillance Agency, personal communication), which is also in accordance with British standard [36]. In particular, sampling of drinking water supplied to the Haifa and West Galelee area between January and December 2015 did not demonstrate abnormal levels. None of the methods used to remove oocysts from public drinking water is however completely effective, besides, only a subset of drinking water are tested each year. Therefore, it is not possible to rule out a small, undetected breach in a filter.

A transmission pathway known to cause outbreaks in other countries, which also contributes to a seasonal increase in sporadic cryptosporidiosis during the summer months is the use of recreational waters [3739]. In outbreaks in England and Wales that occurred between 2009 and 2017, recreational waters were the leading cause, involved in 46% of the outbreaks [37]. The species C. hominis was found responsible for 88% out of those. The second cause was animal contact (42%), with the major species identified being C. parvum, responsible for 77% of those [37].

Unexpected peaks of Cryptosporidium cases have been described in several European countries. A simultaneous 2 to 5 fold increase of Cryptosporidium infections, compared to previous years, occurred in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany in the late summer season of 2012 [40]. In the UK, travel abroad was identified as a risk factor; in the Netherlands, there was an association to bottled water. However, no single source could fully explain the increase of cryptosporidiosis. A combination of multiple factors, like weather conditions and person-to-person transmission, may have contributed [40]. A seasonal autumn peak trend had been previously noted in the UK, with C. hominis found predominantly in individuals who used swimming pools [41]. In Spain a seasonal autochthonous summer peak and a smaller peak in autumn were identified in 2015, a trend that was not observed in the following year. In this case, as well, a common source was not identified [42]. Analysis of reported cases per month from the Haifa -West Galilee district during the years 2003–2018 showed a seasonal increase, in August through December (Fig 6). The outbreak in 2015 coincides with the seasonal pattern, but the number of cases was about 9 times higher than expected. With exception of 2008 and 2015, the total number of cases from Haifa and West Galilee HMO between 2001 and 2018 as reported to the national database was on average 9 cases per year, while in 2015, 82 cases were reported from the same area. With all this in mind, the 2015 outbreak could have involved transmission in swimming pools, which are very popular in summer and/or person to person contamination in kindergartens.

Fig 6. Cryptosporidium cases per month in Haifa and West Galilee HMO 2003–2018.

The number of cases per month in the years 2003–2018 are shown (national database).

A limitation of this study is that an epidemiological investigation including the testing of environmental and animal samples was not conducted. Consequently, the reason for the increment in cases remains unknown.

Samples from 33 (23%) patients out of the 146 diagnosed during the outbreak were available and successfully genotyped. All were found to be infected with C. hominis. Of these, 23 had subtype IeA11G3T3, and 10 had IbA6G3. C. hominis subtype IbA6G3 was found only in patients from this outbreak.

In addition to the outbreak cases, 36 of 40 stools of sporadic cases from different parts of Israel were successfully subtyped. In 24 C. hominis IeA11G3T3 was identified, indicating probable dominance of this type in Israel. Within the Ie-subtype family, IeA11G3T3 is the predominant subtype worldwide [43]. This subtype was detected in sporadic cryptosporidiosis, e.g. in Sao Tome and Principe (West Africa), Australia, India, Kuwait, Peru, Mexico and Spain but is not the major subtype in these countries [30, 4448]. If C. hominis IeA11G3T3 continues to be prevalent in Israel, multi-locus genotyping may be required for effective epidemiological surveillance [4, 49].

Subtype C. hominis IbA10G2 is highly prevalent worldwide, and in Europe it is predominant as a cause of cryptosporidiosis in humans [4, 49, 50]. This subtype has been identified in Israel only in one recent sample (in 2018) from a patient living in the West Galilee area. The Ib-subtype family is generally considered potentially more virulent [20, 51]; in this study, we identified another member of this family, C. hominis IbA6G3, in 10 outbreak patients. However, virulence assessment was not possible since information regarding the course of disease was lacking. Worldwide, C. hominis IbA6G3 has been rarely reported. To our knowledge, it has been observed so far in human isolates only in Jordan, Egypt and Australia [48, 52, 53].

Among sporadic cases there were 7 C. hominis IdA16, a subtype reported to have caused sporadic cryptosporidiosis in Australia, India and China [29, 45, 54].

Two isolates from the south of Israel were C. parvum, subtype IIdA20G. This subtype was found to have significant prevalence in several provinces in the north of Egypt in both humans and livestock [55]. Other two isolates were C. parvum, subtype IIaA15G2R1, a prevalent subtype in humans as well as in dairy cattle worldwide, including Egypt [53, 56].

In summary, our study shows that Cryptosporidium is endemic in Israel and is responsible for outbreaks as well as sporadic morbidity. Preliminary data suggest that C. hominis is the main species in central and north Israel, implicating human-to-human transmission. The genotypes of Cryptosporidium resemble those found in Israel’s neighboring countries Jordan and Egypt more than those found in Europe. Several C. hominis subtypes contribute to morbidity, with IeA11G3T3 being the most prevalent across the country. C. parvum was also detected.

This is the first report on the genetic and demographic characteristics of cryptosporidiosis in Israel. The combination of molecular-epidemiology analysis with the demographic metadata can reveal regional transmission routes and infection sources, prompting management of water systems and livestock. Implementing sensitive molecular assays into primary care are expected to increase the number of cases identified and create a larger base of molecular information. New genomic-based technologies to further investigate the molecular epidemiology of C. hominis IeA11G3T3, which appears to be the dominant strain in Israel, are essential.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Oligonucleotides used for the molecular identification and/or characterization.



We thank Amal Awad from Clalit Regional Lab, Jerusalem, Haim Ben-Zvi from Rabin Medical Center, Petah-Tikva, Shulamit Loewenthal from Clalit Atidim Laboratory, Tel-Aviv, and Orit Treygerman from Meuhedet Health Services, Lod, for ongoing collaboration and for collecting positive samples for this work.


  1. 1. Bouzid M, Hunter PR, Chalmers RM, Tyler KM. Cryptosporidium pathogenicity and virulence. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2013;26(1):115–34. Epub 2013/01/09. pmid:23297262
  2. 2. Chalmers RM, Davies AP. Minireview: clinical cryptosporidiosis. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):138–46. Epub 2009/06/24. pmid:19545516.
  3. 3. Dabas A, Shah D, Bhatnagar S, Lodha R. Epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in Pediatric Diarrheal Illnesses. Indian Pediatr. 2017;54(4):299–309. Epub 2017/05/06. pmid:28474590.
  4. 4. Khan A, Shaik JS, Grigg ME. Genomics and molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium species. Acta Trop. 2018;184:1–14. Epub 2017/11/08. pmid:29111140.
  5. 5. Liu J, Platts-Mills JA, Juma J, Kabir F, Nkeze J, Okoi C, et al. Use of quantitative molecular diagnostic methods to identify causes of diarrhoea in children: a reanalysis of the GEMS case-control study. Lancet. 2016;388(10051):1291–301. Epub 2016/09/28. pmid:27673470.
  6. 6. Ryan U, Hijjawi N. New developments in Cryptosporidium research. Int J Parasitol. 2015;45(6):367–73. Epub 2015/03/15. pmid:25769247.
  7. 7. Sow SO, Muhsen K, Nasrin D, Blackwelder WC, Wu Y, Farag TH, et al. The Burden of Cryptosporidium Diarrheal Disease among Children < 24 Months of Age in Moderate/High Mortality Regions of Sub-Saharan Africa and South Asia, Utilizing Data from the Global Enteric Multicenter Study (GEMS). PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2016;10(5):e0004729. Epub 2016/05/25. pmid:27219054
  8. 8. Efstratiou A, Ongerth JE, Karanis P. Waterborne transmission of protozoan parasites: Review of worldwide outbreaks—An update 2011–2016. Water Res. 2017;114:14–22. Epub 2017/02/20. pmid:28214721.
  9. 9. Dagan R, Bar-David Y, Kassis I, Sarov B, Greenberg D, Afflalo Y, et al. Cryptosporidium in Bedouin and Jewish infants and children in southern Israel. Israel journal of medical sciences. 1991;27(7):380–5. Epub 1991/07/01. pmid:2071374.
  10. 10. Fraser D, Dagan R, Naggan L, Greene V, El-On J, Abu-Rbiah Y, et al. Natural history of Giardia lamblia and Cryptosporidium infections in a cohort of Israeli Bedouin infants: a study of a population in transition. The American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene. 1997;57(5):544–9. Epub 1997/12/10. pmid:9392593.
  11. 11. Robin G, Fraser D, Orr N, Sela T, Slepon R, Ambar R, et al. Cryptosporidium infection in Bedouin infants assessed by prospective evaluation of anticryptosporidial antibodies and stool examination. American journal of epidemiology. 2001;153(2):194–201. Epub 2001/02/13. pmid:11159166.
  12. 12. Miron D, Colodner R, Kenes Y. Age-related seroprevalence of Cryptosporidium in northern Israel. The Israel Medical Association journal: IMAJ. 2000;2(5):343–5. Epub 2000/07/13. pmid:10892386.
  13. 13. Miron D, Kenes J, Dagan R. Calves as a source of an outbreak of cryptosporidiosis among young children in an agricultural closed community. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 1991;10(6):438–41. Epub 1991/06/01. pmid:1852540.
  14. 14. Krause I, Amir J, Cleper R, Dagan A, Behor J, Samra Z, et al. Cryptosporidiosis in children following solid organ transplantation. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2012;31(11):1135–8. Epub 2012/07/20. pmid:22810017.
  15. 15. Shaposhnik E, Abozaid S, Grossman T, Marva E, On A, Azrad M, et al. The prevalence of Cryptosporidium among children hospitalized due to gastrointestinal symptoms and the efficiency of diagnostic methods for Cryptosporidium. AJTMH. 2019. Epub accepted for publication.
  16. 16. van Lieshout L, Roestenberg M. Clinical consequences of new diagnostic tools for intestinal parasites. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2015;21(6):520–8. Epub 2015/04/07. pmid:25843505.
  17. 17. Verweij JJ, van Lieshout L. Intestinal parasitic infections in an industrialized country; a new focus on children with better DNA-based diagnostics. Parasitology. 2011;138(12):1492–8. Epub 2011/08/24. pmid:21859503.
  18. 18. Ken Dror S, Pavlotzky E, Barak M. Evaluation of the NanoCHIP(R) Gastrointestinal Panel (GIP) Test for Simultaneous Detection of Parasitic and Bacterial Enteric Pathogens in Fecal Specimens. PLoS One. 2016;11(7):e0159440. Epub 2016/07/23. pmid:27447173
  19. 19. Ryan U, Fayer R, Xiao L. Cryptosporidium species in humans and animals: current understanding and research needs. Parasitology. 2014;141(13):1667–85. Epub 2014/08/12. pmid:25111501.
  20. 20. Xiao L. Molecular epidemiology of cryptosporidiosis: an update. Exp Parasitol. 2010;124(1):80–9. Epub 2009/04/11. pmid:19358845.
  21. 21. Caccio SM, Chalmers RM. Human cryptosporidiosis in Europe. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(6):471–80. Epub 2016/05/14. pmid:27172805.
  22. 22. Jeddi F, Piarroux R, Mary C. Application of the NucliSENS easyMAG system for nucleic acid extraction: optimization of DNA extraction for molecular diagnosis of parasitic and fungal diseases. Parasite. 2013;20:52. Epub 2013/12/18. pmid:24331004
  23. 23. Jothikumar N, da Silva AJ, Moura I, Qvarnstrom Y, Hill VR. Detection and differentiation of Cryptosporidium hominis and Cryptosporidium parvum by dual TaqMan assays. J Med Microbiol. 2008;57(Pt 9):1099–105. Epub 2008/08/23. pmid:18719179.
  24. 24. Staggs SE, Beckman EM, Keely SP, Mackwan R, Ware MW, Moyer AP, et al. The Applicability of TaqMan-Based Quantitative Real-Time PCR Assays for Detecting and Enumerating Cryptosporidium spp. Oocysts in the Environment. PLoS One. 2013;8(6):e66562. Epub 2013/06/28. pmid:23805235
  25. 25. Mary C, Chapey E, Dutoit E, Guyot K, Hasseine L, Jeddi F, et al. Multicentric evaluation of a new real-time PCR assay for quantification of Cryptosporidium spp. and identification of Cryptosporidium parvum and Cryptosporidium hominis. J Clin Microbiol. 2013;51(8):2556–63. Epub 2013/05/31. pmid:23720792
  26. 26. Liu X, Zhou X, Zhong Z, Chen W, Deng J, Niu L, et al. New subtype of Cryptosporidium cuniculus isolated from rabbits by sequencing the Gp60 gene. The Journal of parasitology. 2014;100(4):532–6. Epub 2014/03/19. pmid:24628387.
  27. 27. Robinson G, Chalmers RM. The European rabbit (Oryctolagus cuniculus), a source of zoonotic cryptosporidiosis. Zoonoses and public health. 2010;57(7–8):e1–13. Epub 2010/01/01. pmid:20042061.
  28. 28. Silva SO, Richtzenhain LJ, Barros IN, Gomes AM, Silva AV, Kozerski ND, et al. A new set of primers directed to 18S rRNA gene for molecular identification of Cryptosporidium spp. and their performance in the detection and differentiation of oocysts shed by synanthropic rodents. Exp Parasitol. 2013;135(3):551–7. Epub 2013/09/17. pmid:24036321.
  29. 29. Feng Y, Li N, Duan L, Xiao L. Cryptosporidium genotype and subtype distribution in raw wastewater in Shanghai, China: evidence for possible unique Cryptosporidium hominis transmission. J Clin Microbiol. 2009;47(1):153–7. Epub 2008/11/14. pmid:19005143
  30. 30. Sulaiman IM, Hira PR, Zhou L, Al-Ali FM, Al-Shelahi FA, Shweiki HM, et al. Unique endemicity of cryptosporidiosis in children in Kuwait. J Clin Microbiol. 2005;43(6):2805–9. Epub 2005/06/16. pmid:15956401
  31. 31. Argimon S, Abudahab K, Goater RJ, Fedosejev A, Bhai J, Glasner C, et al. Microreact: visualizing and sharing data for genomic epidemiology and phylogeography. Microbial genomics. 2016;2(11):e000093. Epub 2017/03/30. pmid:28348833
  32. 32. Taran-Benshoshan M, Ofer N, Dalit VO, Aharoni A, Revhun M, Nitzan Y, et al. Cryptosporidium and Giardia removal by secondary and tertiary wastewater treatment. J Environ Sci Health A Tox Hazard Subst Environ Eng. 2015;50(12):1265–73. Epub 2015/08/25. pmid:26301853.
  33. 33. Laude A, Valot S, Desoubeaux G, Argy N, Nourrisson C, Pomares C, et al. Is real-time PCR-based diagnosis similar in performance to routine parasitological examination for the identification of Giardia intestinalis, Cryptosporidium parvum/Cryptosporidium hominis and Entamoeba histolytica from stool samples? Evaluation of a new commercial multiplex PCR assay and literature review. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2016;22(2):190 e1–8. Epub 2015/11/10. pmid:26548509.
  34. 34. Painter JE, Gargano JW, Yoder JS, Collier SA, Hlavsa MC. Evolving epidemiology of reported cryptosporidiosis cases in the United States, 1995–2012. Epidemiol Infect. 2016;144(8):1792–802. Epub 2016/04/30. pmid:27125575.
  35. 35. Kotloff KL, Nataro JP, Blackwelder WC, Nasrin D, Farag TH, Panchalingam S, et al. Burden and aetiology of diarrhoeal disease in infants and young children in developing countries (the Global Enteric Multicenter Study, GEMS): a prospective, case-control study. Lancet. 2013;382(9888):209–22. Epub 2013/05/18. pmid:23680352.
  36. 36. World_Health_Organization. Risk Assessment of Cryptosporidium in Drinking Water. retrieved from: https://wwwwhoint/water_sanitation_health/publications/cryptoRA/en/2009. p. WHO/HSE/WSH/09.4.
  37. 37. Chalmers RM, Robinson G, Elwin K, Elson R. Analysis of the Cryptosporidium spp. and gp60 subtypes linked to human outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis in England and Wales, 2009 to 2017. Parasit Vectors. 2019;12(1):95. Epub 2019/03/15. pmid:30867023
  38. 38. Roelfsema JH, Sprong H, Caccio SM, Takumi K, Kroes M, van Pelt W, et al. Molecular characterization of human Cryptosporidium spp. isolates after an unusual increase in late summer 2012. Parasit Vectors. 2016;9:138. Epub 2016/03/12. pmid:26965442
  39. 39. Ryan U, Lawler S, Reid S. Limiting swimming pool outbreaks of cryptosporidiosis—the roles of regulations, staff, patrons and research. J Water Health. 2017;15(1):1–16. Epub 2017/02/06. pmid:28151435.
  40. 40. Fournet N, Deege MP, Urbanus AT, Nichols G, Rosner BM, Chalmers RM, et al. Simultaneous increase of Cryptosporidium infections in the Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Germany in late summer season, 2012. Euro Surveill. 2013;18(2). Epub 2013/01/18. pmid:23324424.
  41. 41. Chalmers RM, Smith R, Elwin K, Clifton-Hadley FA, Giles M. Epidemiology of anthroponotic and zoonotic human cryptosporidiosis in England and Wales, 2004–2006. Epidemiol Infect. 2011;139(5):700–12. Epub 2010/07/14. pmid:20619076.
  42. 42. Azcona-Gutierrez JM, de Lucio A, Hernandez-de-Mingo M, Garcia-Garcia C, Soria-Blanco LM, Morales L, et al. Molecular diversity and frequency of the diarrheagenic enteric protozoan Giardia duodenalis and Cryptosporidium spp. in a hospital setting in Northern Spain. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0178575. Epub 2017/06/16. pmid:28617836
  43. 43. Jex AR, Gasser RB. Genetic richness and diversity in Cryptosporidium hominis and C. parvum reveals major knowledge gaps and a need for the application of "next generation" technologies—research review. Biotechnol Adv. 2010;28(1):17–26. Epub 2009/08/25. pmid:19699288.
  44. 44. de Lucio A, Merino FJ, Martinez-Ruiz R, Bailo B, Aguilera M, Fuentes I, et al. Molecular genotyping and sub-genotyping of Cryptosporidium spp. isolates from symptomatic individuals attending two major public hospitals in Madrid, Spain. Infect Genet Evol. 2016;37:49–56. Epub 2015/11/01. pmid:26518912.
  45. 45. Gatei W, Das P, Dutta P, Sen A, Cama V, Lal AA, et al. Multilocus sequence typing and genetic structure of Cryptosporidium hominis from children in Kolkata, India. Infect Genet Evol. 2007;7(2):197–205. Epub 2006/10/03. pmid:17010677.
  46. 46. Lobo ML, Augusto J, Antunes F, Ceita J, Xiao L, Codices V, et al. Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, Enterocytozoon bieneusi and other intestinal parasites in young children in Lobata province, Democratic Republic of Sao Tome and Principe. PLoS One. 2014;9(5):e97708. Epub 2014/05/23. pmid:24846205
  47. 47. Valenzuela O, Gonzalez-Diaz M, Garibay-Escobar A, Burgara-Estrella A, Cano M, Durazo M, et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. in children from Mexico. PLoS One. 2014;9(4):e96128. Epub 2014/04/24. pmid:24755606
  48. 48. Waldron LS, Dimeski B, Beggs PJ, Ferrari BC, Power ML. Molecular epidemiology, spatiotemporal analysis, and ecology of sporadic human cryptosporidiosis in Australia. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011;77(21):7757–65. Epub 2011/09/13. pmid:21908628
  49. 49. Chalmers RM, Caccio S. Towards a consensus on genotyping schemes for surveillance and outbreak investigations of Cryptosporidium, Berlin, June 2016. Euro Surveill. 2016;21(37). Epub 2016/09/30. pmid:27685759
  50. 50. Li N, Xiao L, Cama VA, Ortega Y, Gilman RH, Guo M, et al. Genetic recombination and Cryptosporidium hominis virulent subtype IbA10G2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2013;19(10):1573–82. Epub 2013/09/21. pmid:24050210
  51. 51. Guo Y, Tang K, Rowe LA, Li N, Roellig DM, Knipe K, et al. Comparative genomic analysis reveals occurrence of genetic recombination in virulent Cryptosporidium hominis subtypes and telomeric gene duplications in Cryptosporidium parvum. BMC Genomics. 2015;16:320. Epub 2015/04/24. pmid:25903370
  52. 52. Hijjawi N, Ng J, Yang R, Atoum MF, Ryan U. Identification of rare and novel Cryptosporidium GP60 subtypes in human isolates from Jordan. Exp Parasitol. 2010;125(2):161–4. Epub 2010/01/30. pmid:20109456.
  53. 53. Naguib D, El-Gohary AH, Roellig D, Mohamed AA, Arafat N, Wang Y, et al. Molecular characterization of Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia duodenalis in children in Egypt. Parasit Vectors. 2018;11(1):403. Epub 2018/07/13. pmid:29996903
  54. 54. Koehler AV, Whipp M, Hogg G, Haydon SR, Stevens MA, Jex AR, et al. First genetic analysis of Cryptosporidium from humans from Tasmania, and identification of a new genotype from a traveller to Bali. Electrophoresis. 2014;35(18):2600–7. Epub 2014/06/12. pmid:24916177.
  55. 55. Helmy YA, Krucken J, Nockler K, von Samson-Himmelstjerna G, Zessin KH. Molecular epidemiology of Cryptosporidium in livestock animals and humans in the Ismailia province of Egypt. Vet Parasitol. 2013;193(1–3):15–24. Epub 2013/01/12. pmid:23305974.
  56. 56. Feng Y, Torres E, Li N, Wang L, Bowman D, Xiao L. Population genetic characterisation of dominant Cryptosporidium parvum subtype IIaA15G2R1. Int J Parasitol. 2013;43(14):1141–7. Epub 2013/10/16. pmid:24126186.