Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Mapping 15 years of crayfish plague in the Iberian Peninsula: The impact of two invasive species on the endangered native crayfish

  • Laura Martín-Torrijos,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Mycology, Real Jardín Botánico (RJB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain

  • Harri Kokko,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Suomi-Finland

  • Jenny Makkonen,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Suomi-Finland

  • Japo Jussila,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Environmental and Biological Sciences, University of Eastern Finland, Kuopio, Suomi-Finland

  • Javier Diéguez-Uribeondo

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Mycology, Real Jardín Botánico (RJB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain


Crayfish plague, caused by the pathogen Aphanomyces astaci, is one of the main factors responsible for the decimation of the native European crayfish species Austropotamobius pallipes. In Spain, two North American freshwater crayfish species, Procambarus clarkii and Pacifastacus leniusculus, were intentionally introduced during the 1970s for aquaculture and fishery purposes. Since then, incidences of crayfish plague have been continually reported. In this work, we evaluated more than 50 diagnosed cases of crayfish plague that have occurred in the Iberian Peninsula since 2004 by performing a microscopic examination of infected specimens and by molecularly identifying and haplotyping the pathogen. Our results showed that (i) the pathogen A. astaci has been active 45 years since the first introductions of the invasive North American crayfish species in the Iberian Peninsula, and (ii) P. clarkii and P. leniusculus are chronic reservoirs of the crayfish plague pathogen. Moreover, our data confirmed a correspondence between pathogen origin and spread and the specific haplotypes carried by the North American invasive crayfish located in the vicinity of each outbreak. We generated a crayfish plague incidence map of the Iberian Peninsula that shows (i) a northern area, mainly inhabited by alien P. leniusculus, where crayfish plague cases are associated with the b-haplotype specific to P. leniusculus, and (ii) southern, central and eastern areas that are basically inhabited by alien P. clarkii, where crayfish plague cases are associated with the d1- and d2-haplotypes specific to P. clarkii. The results presented here are evidence of the long standing and negative impact of the two invasive crayfish species on the native species, indicating the need for more extensive control measures.


Biological invasions have increased in magnitude and frequency, particularly due to a rise in global human connectivity [1], and invasive alien species (IAS) are one of the main reasons for local species extinctions [1, 2]. In Europe, more than 12,000 species have been classified as alien, of which 15% are considered IAS [3]. Invasive alien species exert a greater negative effect on aquatic freshwater ecosystems than terrestrial ones [4] and, therefore, constitute one of the main threats to freshwater biodiversity.

Additionally, IAS often act as vectors of pathogens, compounding their effect on ecosystems. Many of the pathogens carried by IAS, such as Aphanomyces astaci Schikora, 1906, are especially virulent in new hosts and ecosystems [1], particularly freshwater ones. Aphanomyces astaci, which is chronically carried by North American freshwater crayfish species, is responsible for the crayfish plague disease that has decimated native crayfish populations throughout Europe since 1859 [5, 6]. Although A. astaci and its natural hosts have a balanced relationship as a result of their evolutionary history [7], Australasian, European and South American freshwater crayfishes are more easily infected and more likely to die as a consequence of the infection caused by these virulent form of pathogen [7, 8]. However, this balanced host-pathogen relationship seem to be altered in some naturalized North American crayfish populations in Europe that have become more susceptible to A. astaci [913].

In Spain, two North American freshwater crayfish, the red swamp crayfish Procambarus clarkii Girard, 1852, and the signal crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus Dana, 1852, were intentionally introduced during the 1970s for aquaculture and fishery purposes [14]. Procambarus clarkii was first introduced into Guadalquivir marshlands (Fig 1), and surrounding areas, between 1973 and 1974 [15, 16]. Although the species initially occupied areas of central and southern Spain, and also Douro and Ebro river catchments [15, 16], by the end of the 1970s, its popularization had led to its rapid translocation throughout the Iberian Peninsula.

Fig 1. Map showing the location of analyzed crayfish plague outbreaks across the Iberian Peninsula according to mtDNA haplotype.

The crayfish plague outbreaks that were haplotyped, including the four isolates, are represented by colored dots and RJB sample numbers: blue dots indicate localities with the b-haplotype (the star indicates an acute case of crayfish plague in a P. leniusculus population), orange dots indicate localities with the d1-haplotype and the red dot indicates a locality with the d2-haplotype. The geographical location of the principal rivers in Spain appear in blue and the first P. clarkii and P. leniusculus introductions are signaled with black arrows.

Pacifastacus leniusculus was first introduced in Spain between 1974 and 1975 (Fig 1) [15]. The spread of this species followed a different pattern than that of P. clarkii. Its first introductions took place in hatcheries in the upper catchments of the Douro and Tagus rivers, followed by translocations to nearby areas. In the late 1980s, P. leniusculus was introduced in northern Spain as a consequence of fishery stocking programs carried out by local administrations in the provinces of Castile and León, Navarre and the Basque Country [14]. In the 1990s, increased demand for crayfishing of P. leniusculus populations prompted the spread of the species to new catchment areas in central and southern Spain.

Soon after these introductions, the number of populations of the native white-clawed crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes Lereboullet, 1858, started to decrease abruptly as a consequence of the pathogen A. astaci carried by these IAS [17]. By the end of the 1970s, up to one third of the initial native crayfish populations were estimated to have been lost [14]. In the following decades, the steady decline of the native crayfish was characterized by an estimated trend of regression that ranged up to 50% every five years [14]. Remaining A. pallipes populations are still critically endangered and survive only in isolated habitats, often thriving in upper catchments that are physically separated from main river basins within their original habitat range [18].

Since 2004, more than 100 crayfish plague outbreaks have been detected and identified in the Iberian Peninsula with the use of microscopy, strain-isolations and molecular analyses with specific diagnostic primers [19, 20]. For instance, the origin of several outbreaks in northern Spain were identified molecularly through the analysis of random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) and amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers [21, 22]. These studies showed that P. clarkii and P. leniusculus were responsible for outbreaks in northern regions of Burgos and in the Pyrenees, respectively. However, these types of analyses require the isolation of the pathogen in a pure culture, which can be challenging as fresh samples are often difficult to obtain and tissues are usually preserved in 70% ethanol. More recently, a microsatellite method was designed to differentiate genetic groups directly from clinical samples [23]. However, this technique is costly, and potential cross amplifications of other infectious species may lead to misleading results [24].

The reliable and accurate identification of A. astaci genetic groups requires an efficient analytic tool that provides a means to track the detected pathogen back to its original host. The most common North American freshwater crayfishes, P. clarkii, P. leniusculus and Faxonius limosus Rafinesque, 1817, chronically carry a specific A. astaci RAPD group (B-, D- and E, respectively) [21, 25, 26]. These genetic RAPD groups were recently assigned to distinctive haplotypes and hosts using a novel haplotyping method based on mitochondrial ribosomal small (rnnS) and large (rnnL) subunit sequences [27]. This technique has provided accurate data regarding the haplotypes present in a number of clinical samples of crayfish plague [27, 28]. Each haplotype seems to correspond to only one of the North American crayfish species, e.g., the b-haplotype corresponds to P. leniusculus, and the d1-, d2- and d3-haplotypes correspond to P. clarkii. Currently, six A. astaci haplotypes have been identified: a, b, d1, d2, d3 and e. Thus, the haplotyping technique is a tool that can provide key information on the epidemiology, prevalence and virulence of the disease in freshwater ecosystems. Furthermore, the results derived from such studies will allow us to better determine how this pathogen is reaching threatened populations.

In this study, we assessed the impact of A. astaci strains carried by two rapidly spreading IAS, P. clarkii and P. leniusculus, on native A. pallipes populations in the Iberian Peninsula. Specifically, we used a novel haplotyping technique based on mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) [27] to molecularly analyze crayfish plague outbreaks detected in the Iberian Peninsula since 2004. We also analyzed the correspondence between the A. astaci haplotype detected and the distribution of the two IAS carriers.

Material and methods

Ethical statement

All experimental procedures and animal manipulations, as well as field sampling, were performed in accordance with current EU and Spanish legislation. All analyses were carried out according to the regulations of the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO). Under Spanish law, no additional permits or ethical approvals were required for laboratory studies with arthropod invertebrates. Moreover, this study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations and protocols established in previous studies.

Crayfish sampling

A total of 64 A. pallipes samples collected from crayfish plague events detected since 2004 in Spain were selected from the Crayfish Collection of the Real Jardín Botánico–CSIC (RJB–CSIC), as were 10 samples of either P. clarkii or P. leniusculus that had been collected from different populations (Table 1). In this collection, specimens from the same crayfish plague event or IAS population are all stored in the same container. All samples are preserved in 70% ethanol and labeled with the location and date of the outbreak. Selected crayfish specimens were manipulated individually, and tools were sterilized before and after each manipulation to avoid cross contamination between samples.

Table 1. Location and collection number of the analyzed crayfish species.

Host species of each of the analyzed populations, i.e., Austropotamobius pallipes, Procambarus clarkii and Pacifastacus leniusculus sampled from the Real Jardín Botánico crayfish collection, including corresponding collection codes and year. The location of the host species and the nearest invasive alien species (IAS) is indicated (the (X) indicates IAS were not checked in the surroundings). Result of the microscopy analysis and diagnostic PCR with A. astaci primers 42 and 640 are also provided: (+) indicates visible signs of disease were observed or the PCR fragment was successfully amplified and the (-) indicates no signs of disease were observed or (--) the PCR was not amplified in the respective analyses. The mitochondrial haplotype of some of the analyzed specimens is also provided (in bold).

Microscopic examination of infected crayfish and the molecular identification of the A. astaci pathogen

For the microscopic analyses, the subabdominal cuticles were carefully removed and handled individually due to the fragility of the older samples. Cuticles were observed for visual signs of the presence of the pathogen, specifically non-melanized or melanized hyphae, on an inverted Olympus CKX41SF microscope (Olympus Optical, Tokyo, Japan).

For the molecular analyses, various tissues were collected from each individual including a subabdominal cuticle, the walking legs and a fragment of the telson and the joint of the chelae, and stored in 70% ethanol until further processing. Prior to DNA isolation, the tissue samples were rehydrated in TE buffer (TRIS 10 mM/ EDTA 1 mM, pH 8) by rinsing each sample up to three times with TE and then leaving it overnight in the buffer. Samples were transferred into 2-ml tubes that were previously frozen at -80 °C prior to being lyophilized in a VirTis BenchTop K freeze dryer for 24 hours (≤-50 °C; ≤ 20 mTorr). Samples were subsequently homogenized using a TissueLyser (Qiagen, Germany). The E.Z.N.A. Insect DNA Kit (Omega Bio-tek, Norcross, Atlanta, USA) was used to isolate genomic DNA. To molecularly test for the presence of the A. astaci pathogen, a fragment of the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) region was amplified using the diagnostic primers 42 [19] and 640 [20] (which amplify ITS1, the 5.8S rDNA and ITS2) in a single round of PCR according to the assay described by Oidtmann et al. 2006 [19]. DNA extracted from a pure culture of A. astaci strain AP03, whose genome has been sequenced, was used as the positive control [29]; distilled Milli-Q water was used as the negative control. Amplified products (3 μL of each reaction) were analyzed by electrophoresis in 1% agarose TAE gels stained with SYBR Safe (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, Massachusetts, USA). Sequencing of both strands of positive products was performed using an automated sequencer (Applied Biosystems 3730xl DNA Analyzer, Macrogen, Netherlands). Sequences were aligned and edited using the program Geneious 10.0.2 [30]. A BLAST search was performed to verify the identity of each sequence.

Sequencing, phylogenetics and haplotyping

To characterize the phylogenetic relationships and haplotypes of the A. astaci isolates, the mitochondrial ribosomal small (rnnS) and large (rnnL) subunits were amplified using the primer pairs AphSSUF/AphSSUR and AphLSUF/AphLSUR, respectively, as described by Makkonen et al. 2018 [27]. Genomic DNA that tested positive for the presence of A. astaci with diagnostic primers 42 [19] and 640 [20] were used as templates in these amplifications. Four A. astaci single spore isolates, Isolate Málaga 5 (SAP-0879), Isolate Pamplona 1 (SAP-2656), Isolate Girona 1/AP03 (SAP-0471) and Isolate Girona 2/Girona 66 (SAP-XXXX), were also sequenced and included in our phylogenetic analyses. Positive and negative controls (A. astaci strain AP03 [29] and distilled Milli-Q water, respectively) were included. Amplified products were analyzed by electrophoresis as described above and then purified using a QIAquick PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany). Sequencing and sequence alignment and editing were performed as described above.

Phylogenetic approximations based on Bayesian inference (BI) and maximum likelihood (ML) were used to reconstruct relationships. The BI analysis was performed in MrBayes v.3.2.6 [31] using the MCMC method with 10 million generations, three runs (8 chains per run) with a burn-in of 25% and a standard deviation of split frequencies <0.01. Nodes with posterior probability (pp) values ≥0.95 were considered supported. The ML analysis was performed using RAxML v.8, [32] as implemented in raxmlGUI v1.5b1 [33], with 100 independent replicates and 1000 rapid bootstraps. Nodes with bootstrap values ≥75 were considered supported. The resulting trees from the BI and ML analyses were visualized with FigTree v1.4.2 [34]. Sequences of the mtDNA regions rnnS and rnnL of isolates analyzed in previous studies [27, 28], available in GenBank were also included in our analyses. Aphanomyces frigidophilus was used as the outgroup in both phylogenetic approximations. Analyses were performed with rnnS and rnnL individually, as well as with a concatenated rnnS and rnnL dataset, using the same parameters described above.

Mutational changes between sequences in the most parsimonious haplotype network were estimated using TCS v.1.21 [35], and the genealogical relationships were visualized with PopArt v1.7.2 [36].

Correspondence of A. astaci haplotypes associated with crayfish plague outbreaks in the Iberian Peninsula with the nearest IAS

For most of the crayfish plague outbreak events, a putative nearest IAS was assigned based on information provided by the local conservation authorities monitoring crayfish populations in each province (Table 1). Haplotyping data obtained in our analyses were used to corroborate this information and to generate a crayfish plague map of the Iberian Peninsula.


Microscopic examination of infected crayfish and the molecular identification of the A. astaci pathogen

Microscopic examination of the subabdominal cuticles revealed the presence of abundant growth of non-melanized hyphae on all 64 A. pallipes samples (Table 1). The growth was characteristic of an A. astaci infection: round hyphal tips, all having approximately the same diameter (ca 10 μm). Melanized hyphae, characteristic of chronic infections, were not observed on the P. clarkii and P. leniusculus samples, except for P. leniusculus sample RJB-AST058 (Table 1), which presented a few melanized but abundant non-melanized hyphae, characteristic of an acute crayfish plague infection [37].

Using the diagnostic primers described above [19, 20], the presence of A. astaci was confirmed molecularly in 40 of the 64 crayfish plague cases. A GenBank BLAST search of the obtained sequences showed 100% similarity to A. astaci isolates SAP0877 (accession number KX555484), AC14-025 (accession number KU159681), PL_Ve1-T42m (accession number JX272193) and SAP302 (accession number FM999249).

Sequencing, phylogenetics and haplotyping

Amplification of mitochondrial rnnS and rnnL fragments was successful for 16 of the 40 A. astaci-positive samples, corresponding to 15 cases of crayfish plague in A. pallipes and one mass mortality event in a P. leniusculus population. Mitochondrial rnnS and rnnL sequences were also successful obtained for the four A. astaci single spore isolates. Amplicon sizes for rnnS and rnnL were 475 base-pairs (bp) and 355 bp, respectively (GenBank accession number for rnnS MK872961-MK872980 and for rnnL MK872981-MK873000). Similar and congruent topologies were recovered in the BI and ML independent analyses of rnnS and rnnL (S1 Fig). Analyses revealed that the sequences from the diagnosed crayfish plague events correspond to two different haplotypes and haplogroups: the b-haplotype within the B-haplogroup and the d1-haplotype within the D-haplogroup (Table 1, Fig 2). The four A. astaci isolates correspond to three different haplotypes within two haplogroups: the b-haplotype within the B-haplogroup and the d1- and d2-haplotypes within the D-haplogroup.

Fig 2. Phylogenetic analyses of A. astaci mitochondrial regions.

Bayesian inference analyses based on concatenated dataset of A. astaci rnnS + rnnL sequences obtained from clinical samples originating from the native crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes (arrows), or the invasive North American crayfishes Procambarus clarkii (arrows) and Pacifastacus leniusculus (arrows), that were collected in the Iberian Peninsula and housed in the RJB Crayfish Collection. Values above branches represent Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.95) and maximum likelihood bootstrap supports (>75), respectively. Scales bar for phylogenetic analysis indicates substitutions per site. The original strains used as references and identified in previous studies by RAPD-PCR [14, 22, 23] are indicated in bold and with an asterisk (*), and correspond to RAPD group A: L1*, RAPD group B: Pl*, RAPD group C: Kv1*, RAPD group D: AP03* and RAPD group E: Li10*. Abbreviations: Ht, haplotypes; Hp, haplogroups and L, lineages.

The haplotype diversity found in the rnnS and rnnL regions supports the results of the phylogenetic analyses (S1 Fig). The concatenated rnnS and rnnL dataset showed a total of 11 segregating sites, confirming the presence of three of the six known haplotypes (S1 Fig).

Correspondence of A. astaci haplotypes associated with crayfish plague outbreaks in the Iberian Peninsula with the nearest IAS

Mapping of the mtDNA haplotypes obtained in our analyses validates the information provided by local authorities on the proximity of the closest IAS to the different crayfish plague events (Fig 1, Table 1). Crayfish plague events RJB-AST007, 017, 021, 029, 058, and 084, all designated with the b-haplotype, occurred in localities where P. leniusculus is known in the vicinity. Crayfish plague events RJB-AST016, 019, 028, 080, 085 and 132, all designated with the d1-haplotype, occurred in localities where P. clarkii is known in the vicinity. Moreover, in four of the cases without an assigned nearest IAS (i.e., RJB-AST010,018, 045 and 075), the haplotype found suggests which of the two invasive species was responsible for spreading the pathogen.


The decimation of the Iberian crayfish populations started in the 1970s and continues to the present day. This decline represents one of the most extreme examples of the biodiversity crisis ever described for freshwater ecosystems [38]. It has been estimated that more than 80% of the native populations in the Iberian Peninsula have disappeared [14]. As a result of this emergent pathogen, annual crayfish industry catches of A. pallipes in Spain dropped from about 2,000 tons/year in 1972 to zero in less than a decade [14]. Since the introduction of this pathogen through the invasive North American crayfish species, native crayfish populations have been in continuous decline. Meanwhile, these IAS have rapidly naturalized and spread throughout the Iberian Peninsula, the impact of which has not yet been evaluated for the region as a whole, in spite of the high extinction risk of the A. pallipes in most regions of Spain and the near extinction of this species in Portugal [14, 39].

Monitoring the spread of the crayfish plague and accurately estimating the impact of the causative pathogen is difficult, particularly given the limited financial resources of the regional governments. Moreover, the scarce remaining A. pallipes populations in the Iberian Peninsula only thrive in difficult to access mountainous regions and upstream brooks. This and the fact that outbreaks occur rapidly, often leaving no visible signs of the disease, further complicate the detection of crayfish plague outbreaks among native populations.

Analyses of past crayfish plague outbreaks from diverse locations in Spain has been made possible due to the establishment of a crayfish collection at the RJB–CSIC, and its maintenance of samples from outbreaks since 2004. In this study, we analyzed 64 samples collected from such events reported in Spain over the last 15 years. The results of our analyses show that, 45 years after the introductions of the invasive North American crayfish species, the pathogen A. astaci is still actively affecting the endangered A. pallipes in Spain. Although other factors, including drought, poaching, channelization, habitat destruction and water pollution [18], have been cited as responsible for the decline of the A. pallipes, our data emphasize the constant impact of this disease on native populations. Our data also support previous studies that have shown the damaging effect of A. astaci from P. clarkii and P. leniusculus hosts on A. pallipes populations, particularly in the Pyrenees. For instance, in the western Pyrenees, it was estimated that P. leniusculus was responsible for at least 70% decline of A. pallipes in Navarre within five years [40]. In the eastern Pyrenees, where P. clarkii is responsible for the main crayfish plague outbreaks among native A. pallipes populations, a similar level of decline has been reported [22].

Populations of either P. clarkii or P. leniusculus are known from local authorities to be present in the near vicinity of most of the analyzed A. pallipes populations. By analyzing two mitochondrial DNA regions of A. astaci in clinical samples, we have been able to detect the presence of the pathogen, identify its haplotype and confirm a correlation between pathogen origin and the specific haplotypes of the invasive North American crayfishes located in the vicinity of each outbreak. The A. astaci b-haplotype, specific to P. leniusculus, that was sequenced from A. pallipes samples is identical to the b-haplotypes identified in other regions of the world [27, 28] and also to those obtained from clinical samples of P. leniusculus, e.g., RJB-AST058, sequenced in this study, which constitutes the first detected crayfish plague outbreak on a P. leniusculus population in Spain. On the other hand, the alteration of the balance relationship between North American P. leniusculus and A. astaci have been reported among populations in Fennoscandia [913]. In addition, in our analyses, we detected haplotypes d1 and d2, two of the three known P. clarkii specific haplotypes [28]. Of the crayfish plague events characterized by d-haplotypes, only one corresponds to the d2-haplotype (Isolate Girona 1); all others correspond to the d1-haplotype. On the other hand, for those 40 A. astaci cases determined with the diagnostic primers, 25 were not suitable for haplotype characterization due to samples low agent levels. Thus, diversity and the distribution of A. astaci haplotypes are still unknown, therefore further studies based on the analysis of rnnS and rnnL regions will certainly provide a better understanding of the spread of the haplotypes and their host.

We generated a haplotype specific map of crayfish plague epidemics in Spain which distinguishes two main areas: (i) a northern area, where P. leniusculus is mainly distributed and where crayfish plague outbreaks in A. pallipes are associated with its specific b-haplotype, and (ii) an area covering southern, central and eastern regions of Spain, where P. clarkii is mainly found and where crayfish plague outbreaks are associated with its specific d1- and d2-haplotypes.

The North American crayfish species seem to carry a specific haplotype that is associated with different environmental requirements. For instance, A. astaci haplotypes specific to P. clarkii are better adapted to warmer environments than those of P. leniusculus [21, 22], adding to the great concern for the conservation of the A. pallipes, especially under a global warming scenario. Our results confirm once more P. clarkii and P. leniusculus as chronic reservoirs of the crayfish plague pathogen that are able to transmit A. astaci and infect remaining A. pallipes populations. Wildlife trade and fishery activities have favored the translocations of these chronic carrier species, resulting in an increase in their distribution and thus in the persistence of the pathogen within Iberian freshwater ecosystems over the last 45 years.

Aphanomyces astaci is listed among the 100’s world worst invasive species [41]. Five of its chronic carriers hosts, F. limosus, Faxonius virilis Hagen, 1870, P. leniusculus, P. clarkii and Procambarus virginalis Lyko, 2017, all of which were introduced to Europe, are included in the European Union (EU) list of Invasive Alien Species of Union concern, which currently consists of 37 species [42]. Therefore, conservation strategies that aim to protect A. pallipes populations should also address the prevention of IAS introductions and translocations following Spanish legislation [43] and EU regulations [42, 44]. Furthermore, environmental programs whose main focus is to protect the native freshwater crayfish, and to identify and control IAS, should be implemented to help in the conservation of this highly endangered freshwater crustacean species.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Phylogenetic analyses of A. astaci mitochondrial regions.

Bayesian inference analyses based on A. astaci rnnS, rnnL, and concatenated rnnS + rnnL sequences obtained from clinical samples originating from the native crayfish Austropotamobius pallipes (arrows), or the invasive North American crayfishes Procambarus clarkii (arrows) and Pacifastacus leniusculus (arrows), that were collected in the Iberian Peninsula and housed in the RJB Crayfish Collection. (A) Bayesian inference analysis based on rnnS sequences. (B) Bayesian inference analysis based on rnnL sequences. (C) Bayesian inference analysis based on concatenated rnnS + rnnL sequences. Values above branches represent Bayesian posterior probabilities (>0.95) and maximum likelihood bootstrap supports (> 75), respectively. Scales bar for phylogenetic analysis indicates substitutions per site. Abbreviations: Ht, haplotypes; Hp, haplogroups and L, lineages.



This research was partially supported by a grant from the Spanish Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (CGL2016-80526-R). We also like to thank the assistance in providing us with crayfish plague samples and information to Jokin Larumbe (Gobierno de Navarra); Fernando Alonso and Javier Valenciano (Junta de Comunidades de Castilla-La Mancha), Sara Lapesa (Gobierno de Aragón), Joan Motserrat (Parque Natural La Garrotxa, Catalunya), Lluis Benejam (CEBCAT-La Balca S.L.) Antonio Pradillo (CCEDCV—EL PALMAR, Generatlitat Valenciana), Juan Maria Herrero (Juanta de Castilla y León), Jon Zulaika (Diputación de Gipuzkoa, País Vasco), Borja Nebot (Junta de Andalucia) and Javier Galindo (Agencia Medio Ambiente y Agua Andalucía). We also thank Jeffry Lintsen, from the University of Eastern Finland, Nina Keller from the University of Koblenz-Landau and Emilio Cano and Marta Higuera from the RJB–CSIC for their technical assistance.


  1. 1. Crowl TA, Crist TO, Parmenter RR, Belovsky G, Lugo AE. The spread of invasive species and infectious disease as drivers of ecosystem change. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment. 2008;6(5):238–46.
  2. 2. Ricciardi A, Macisaac HJ. Impacts of Biological Invasions on Freshwater Ecosystems. Fifty Years of Invasion Ecology: Wiley-Blackwell; 2010. p. 211–24.
  3. 3. Environment: New EU Action to protect biodiversity against problematic invasive species [Internet]. Brussels; 2013; [2]
  4. 4. Moorhouse TP, Macdonald DW. Are invasives worse in freshwater than terrestrial ecosystems? Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Water. 2015;2(1):1–8.
  5. 5. Cornalia E. Sulla malattia dei gamberi. Atti della Società italiana di scienze naturali. 1860;2:334–6.
  6. 6. Alderman DJ. History of the spread of crayfish plague in Europe, in Crustaceans: bacterial and fungal diseases. OIE, Scientific and Technical Review. 1997;15:15–23.
  7. 7. Unestam T. Resistance to the crayfish plague in some American, Japanese and European crayfishes. Information från Sötvattenslaboratoriet, Drottningholm: 1969.
  8. 8. Peiró DF, Almerão MP, Delaunay C, Jussila J, Makkonen J, Bouchon D, et al. First detection of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci in South America: a high potential risk to native crayfish. Hydrobiologia. 2016;781(1):181–90.
  9. 9. Aydin H, Kokko H, Makkonen J, Kortet R, Kukkonen H, Jussila J. The signal crayfish is vulnerable to both the As and the PsI-isolates of the crayfish plague. Knowledge and Management of Aquatic Ecosystems. 2014; 413,03.
  10. 10. Jussila J, Makkonen J, Kokko H, Mäkinen P. Numerous population crashes of wild signal crayfish (Pacifastacus leniusculus) in Southern Finland. Freshw Crayfish. 2014;20:73–79.
  11. 11. Sandström A, Andersson M, Asp A, Bohman P, Edsman L, Engdahl F, Nyström P, Stenberg M, Hertonsson P, Vrålstad T, Granèli W. Population collapses in introduced non-indigenous crayfish. Biological invasions. 2014;16(9):1961–1977.
  12. 12. Edsman L, Nyström P, Sandström A, Stenberg M, Kokko H, Tiitinen V, Makkonen J, Jussila J. Eroded swimmeret syndrome in female crayfish Pacifastacus leniusculus associated with Aphanomyces astaci and Fusarium spp. infections. Diseases of aquatic organisms. 2015;112(3):219–228. pmid:25590772
  13. 13. Jussila J, Tiitinen V, Edsman L, Kokko H, Fotedar R. Signal crayfish in Lake Saimaa could be maladapted to the local conditions due to Aphanomyces astaci infection: A seven-year study. Freshwater Crayfish. 2016;22(1):53–60
  14. 14. Alonso F, Temiño C, Diéguez-Uribeondo J. Status of the white-clawed crayfish, Austropotamobius pallipes (Lereboullet, 1858), in Spain: distribution and legislation. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture. 2000;356:31–53.
  15. 15. Habsburgo Lorena AS. Present situation of exotic species of crayfish introduced into Spanish continental waters. Freshwater crayfish. 1979;4(1):175–84.
  16. 16. Habsburgo-Lorena AS. The status of the Procambarus clarkii population in Spain. Freshwater Crayfish. 1986;6(1):131–3.
  17. 17. Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Temiño C, Múzquiz JL. The crayfish plague fungus (Aphanomyces astaci) in Spain. Bull Fr Pêche Piscic. 1997;(347):753–63.
  18. 18. Alonso F. Austropotamobius pallipes. In: AA VV., editor. Bases ecológicas preliminares para la conservación de las especies de interés comunitario en España: Invertebrados. Madrid: Ministerio de Agricultura, Alimentación y Medio Ambiente; 2012.
  19. 19. Oidtmann B, Geiger S, Steinbauer P, Culas A, Hoffmann RW. Detection of Aphanomyces astaci in North American crayfish by polymerase chain reaction. Dis Aquat Organ. 2006;72(1):53–64. pmid:17067073
  20. 20. Oidtmann B, Schaefers N, Cerenius L, Söderhäll K, Hoffmann RW. Detection of genomic DNA of the crayfish plague fungus Aphanomyces astaci (Oomycete) in clinical samples by PCR. Vet Microbiol. 2004;100(3–4):269–82. pmid:15145505.
  21. 21. Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Huang T-S, Cerenius L, Söderhäll K. Physiological adaptation of an Aphanomyces astaci strain isolated from the freshwater crayfish Procambarus clarkii. Mycological Research. 1995;99(5):574–8.
  22. 22. Rezinciuc S, Galindo J, Montserrat J, Dieguez-Uribeondo J. AFLP-PCR and RAPD-PCR evidences of the transmission of the pathogen Aphanomyces astaci (Oomycetes) to wild populations of European crayfish from the invasive crayfish species, Procambarus clarkii. Fungal Biol. 2014;118(7):612–20. pmid:25088075.
  23. 23. Grandjean F, Vrålstad T, Diéguez-Uribeondo J, Jelić M, Mangombi J, Delaunay C, et al. Microsatellite markers for direct genotyping of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci (Oomycetes) from infected host tissues. Veterinary Microbiology. 2014;170(3–4):317–24. pmid:24631110
  24. 24. Maguire I, Jelic M, Klobucar G, Delpy M, Delaunay C, Grandjean F. Prevalence of the pathogen Aphanomyces astaci in freshwater crayfish populations in Croatia. Dis Aquat Organ. 2016;118(1):45–53. Epub 2016/02/13. pmid:26865234.
  25. 25. Huang T-s, Cerenius L, Söderhäll K. Analysis of genetic diversity in the crayfish plague fungus, Aphanomyces astaci, by random amplification of polymorphic DNA. Aquaculture. 1994;126(1):1–9.
  26. 26. Kozubikova E, Viljamaa-Dirks S, Heinikainen S, Petrusek A. Spiny-cheek crayfish Orconectes limosus carry a novel genotype of the crayfish plague pathogen Aphanomyces astaci. J Invertebr Pathol. 2011;108(3):214–6. pmid:21856310.
  27. 27. Makkonen J, Jussila J, Panteleit J, Keller NS, Schrimpf A, Theissinger K, et al. MtDNA allows the sensitive detection and haplotyping of the crayfish plague disease agent Aphanomyces astaci showing clues about its origin and migration. Parasitology. 2018:1–9. Epub 2018/02/26. pmid:29478421
  28. 28. Martin-Torrijos L, Kawai T, Makkonen J, Jussila J, Kokko H, Diéguez-Uribeondo J. Crayfish plague in Japan: A real threat to the endemic Cambaroides japonicus. PLoS One. 2018;13(4):e0195353. Epub 2018/04/05. pmid:29617418.
  29. 29. Makkonen J, Vesterbacka A, Martin F, Jussila J, Dieguez-Uribeondo J, Kortet R, et al. Mitochondrial genomes and comparative genomics of Aphanomyces astaci and Aphanomyces invadans. Sci Rep. 2016;6:36089. pmid:27808238
  30. 30. Kearse M, Moir R, Wilson A, Stones-Havas S, Cheung M, Sturrock S, et al. Geneious Basic: an integrated and extendable desktop software platform for the organization and analysis of sequence data. Bioinformatics. 2012;28(12):1647–9. pmid:22543367
  31. 31. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A, Hohna S, et al. MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biol. 2012;61(3):539–42. Epub 2012/02/24. pmid:22357727
  32. 32. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9):1312–3. Epub 2014/01/24. pmid:24451623
  33. 33. Silvestro D, Michalak I. raxmlGUI: a graphical front-end for RAxML. Organisms Diversity & Evolution. 2011;12(4):335–7.
  34. 34. Rambaut A. FigTree_v1.4.0 2012. Available from:
  35. 35. Clement M, Snell Q, Walker P, Posada D, Crandall K. TCS: Estimating gene genealogies. Parallel and Distributed Processing Symposium, International Proceedings. 2002;2:184.
  36. 36. Leigh JW, Bryant D. POPART: full-feature software for haplotype network construction. Methods in Ecology and Evolution. 2015;6(9):1110–6.
  37. 37. Cerenius L, Söderhäll K, Persson M, Ajaxon R. The crayfish plague fungus Aphanomyces astaci—diagnosis, isolation, and pathology. Freshwater Crayfish. 1988;7:131–44.
  38. 38. Richman NI, Bohm M, Adams SB, Alvarez F, Bergey EA, Bunn JJ, et al. Multiple drivers of decline in the global status of freshwater crayfish (Decapoda: Astacidea). Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2015;370(1662):20140060. pmid:25561679
  39. 39. Gutiérrez-Yurrita PJ, Martinez JM, Ilhéu M, Bravo-Utrera MA, Bernardo JM, Montes C. The status of crayfish populations in Spain and Portugal. In: Gherardi F, Holdich DM, editors. Crayfish in Europe as Alien Species. How to Make the Best of a Bad Situation? A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam. 1999 p. 161–192.
  40. 40. Diéguez-Uribeondo J. Dispersion of the Aphanomyces astaci-carrier Pacifastacus leniusculus by humans represents the main cause of disappearance of the indigenous crayfish of Navarra. Bulletin Français de la Pêche et de la Pisciculture. 2006;380–381:1303–12.
  41. 41. Lowe S, Browne M, Boudjelas S, De Poorter M. 100 of the World’s Worst Invasive Alien Species A selection from the Global Invasive Species Database.: The Invasive Species Specialist Group (ISSG) a specialist group of the Species Survival Commission (SSC) of the World Conservation Union (IUCN). 2000. p. 12.
  42. 42. A list of invasive alien species of Union concern pursuant to Regulation (EU), 1143/2014 (2016).
  43. 43. Real Decreto 630/2013, de 2 de agosto, por el que se regula el Catálogo español de especies exóticas invasoras., BOE-A-2013-8565 (2013).
  44. 44. On the prevention and management of the introduction and spread of invasive alien species, 1143/2014 (2014).