Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Nitrogenous compounds characterized in the deterrent skin extract of migratory adult sea lamprey from the Great Lakes region

  • Amila A. Dissanayake,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • C. Michael Wagner,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

  • Muraleedharan G. Nair

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    nairm@msu.edu

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan, United States of America

Nitrogenous compounds characterized in the deterrent skin extract of migratory adult sea lamprey from the Great Lakes region

  • Amila A. Dissanayake, 
  • C. Michael Wagner, 
  • Muraleedharan G. Nair
PLOS
x

Abstract

The sea lamprey (Petromzons marinus) is a devastating invasive species that represents a significant impediment to restoration of the Laurentian Great Lakes. There is substantial interest in developing environmentally benign control strategies for sea lamprey, and many other aquatic invasive species, that employ the manipulation of semiochemical information (pheromones and chemical cues) to guide the movements of invaders into control opportunities (e.g. traps, locations for safe pesticide application, etc.). A necessary precursor to the use of semiochemicals in conservation activities is the identification of the chemical constituents that compose the odors. Here, we characterize the major nitrogenous substances from the water-soluble fraction of a skin extract that contains the sea lamprey alarm cue, a powerful repellent that has proven effective in guiding the movements of migrating sea lamprey in rivers. Nitrogenous compounds are suspected components of fish alarm cues as the olfactory sensory neurons that mediate alarm responses transduce amino acids and related compounds. A laboratory assay confirmed the behavioral activity contained in the alarm cue resides in the water-soluble fraction of the skin extract. This water-soluble fraction consisted primarily of creatine (70%), heterocyclic nitrogenous compounds (4.3%) and free amino acids (18.4%), respectively. Among the free amino acids characterized in our study, essential amino acids constituted 13% of the water-soluble fraction. Free amino acids isolated from the water-soluble fraction composed of arginine, phenylalanine, threonine, and asparagine 3.9, 2.7, 2.6 and 2.4% of the water-soluble fraction, respectively. We discuss the implications of these findings for understanding the nature and use of the sea lamprey alarm cue in conservation activities.

Introduction

Parasitic feeding by the invasive sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) remains the most significant source of non-fishing mortality for many fishes of the Laurentian Great Lakes and represents one of the greatest impediments to restoration of the world’s largest freshwater ecosystem. The United States and Canada currently expend more than $20 million (US) each year to suppress the invasive population by killing riverine larvae with lampricides before they metamorphose into parasites, and by maintaining dams that prevent migrating adults from entering hundreds of rivers with high-quality spawning habitat [1]. Though effective, there is considerable societal interest in reducing pesticide applications to the environment and reconnecting the Great Lakes to its tributaries via dam removal and fish passage [2]. Thus, the development and testing of new environmentally benign tactics for reducing reproductive success of the sea lamprey is a significant conservation goal [3].

Behavioral manipulation refers to pest management techniques that rely on exploiting an animal’s innate responses to environmental information [4]. By manipulating the presentation of sensory information, an animal is deceived into making a fitness reducing decision, such as entering an unproductive habitat. Semiochemicals represent one such class of manipulative information—molecules released by animals into the environment that are used to communicate with another individual to complete important tasks (e.g. reproductive pheromones) or that inadvertently broadcast public information about the environment (cues). The sea lamprey relies extensively on semiochemicals during its reproductive migration into rivers. Overlapping generations of stream-resident larvae release a cue that labels areas of past reproductive success and guides migrants from offshore into streams likely to support future generations [57]. Following stream selection, nesting sexually mature males release a pheromone to attract ovulating females and complete the act of spawning [8,9]. Both odors are attractive and reveal the presence of opportunities to maximize fitness by facilitating mate search [10] and restricting reproduction to habitats suitable to support newly hatched offspring [57].

Sea lamprey also produce a natural repellent, putatively an alarm cue emitted from damaged skin and other tissues [1113]. By labeling the surrounding waters, alarm cues released from recently attacked or killed individuals operate as public information and notify conspecifics, and other taxa attuned to the cue, of the presence of predation risk [1416]. Prey that detect an alarm cue typically exhibit antipredator behaviors including flight, avoidance, reduced activity, or shelter seeking [1718]. During the transition from offshore waters to streams, migrating sea lampreys pass through an ecotone partly defined by a radically altered predator community. In rivers, these nocturnal migrants often move in close proximity to river shorelines to ensure entry into tributaries emitting larval odor [7,19]. Such movement tendencies may increase the likelihood of contact with mammalian shoreline predators, important nighttime consumers of diadromous fishes [20,21]. Migrating sea lamprey demonstrate a strong and consistent avoidance response to an alarm cue extracted from conspecifics [11,13,22] and will avoid areas of a natural stream activated with this substance [12,23,24]. The alarm cue has also proven effective in guiding sea lampreys towards trapping devices placed on a shoreline [25].

These findings have sparked considerable interest in the isolation and identification of the chemical compounds that compose the sea lamprey alarm cue for use as a repellent in conservation activities. The chemical nature of alarm substances contained in fish tissue is unresolved and has received sparse research activity [26,27], yet remains a high priority [28]. In the relatively well-studied Ostariophysan fishes, evidence has accrued to suggest these alarm substances include a variety of water soluble nitrogenous compounds including amino acids and oligopeptides [29,30], hypoxanthine-3-N-oxide and similar compounds containing the nitrogen-oxide functional group of purine-N-oxides [3133], histamine [34], protein, possibly as a carrier molecule [35], and glycosaminoglycan chondroitin [36]. Further, mixtures of odorants are expected to compose each alarm cue, as full behavioral reactivity appears species specific, with partial overlap observed among related species [37,38] including lampreys [39,40].

Examination of the olfactory sensory neurons (OSNs) in fishes also suggests the potential for nitrogenous compounds to serve as constituents in fish alarm cue mixtures. The olfactory organ of fishes is innervated by three primary OSN morphotypes that occupy distinct layers in the olfactory epithelium: ciliated cells, microvillous cells, and crypt cells [26]. Crypt cells are sparsely distributed in superficial layer of the olfactory organ, and express V1R-type receptors that rely on cAMP-activated signaling during odorant detection, indicating transduction of amino acids and related nitrogenous compounds [4144]. The crypt cell is the OSN that reacts to fish alarm cue extracts [36,45] and is unique to fishes, including elasmobranchs [46]. The sea lamprey olfactory system also contains three OSN morphotypes that are homologous to those observed in bony fishes and elasmobranchs [4749]. In particular, the ‘short’ lamprey OSN is sparsely distributed, displays the characteristic egg-shape, and occupies the most superficial layer of the olfactory epithelium, each consistent with the description of crypt cells in more derived fishes [46,50]. These findings led Laframboise et al. [49] to suggest evolutionary conservation of the crypt cell from the Agnatha to the Gnathostomata. Further, (Green et al. [51]) report a chemotactic map of neural activity in response to odorants in three bulbar regions of the sea lamprey olfactory bulb that receive axons from the sea lamprey main olfactory epithelium and the accessory olfactory organ, the latter a feature unique to lampreys [52]. Each region was reactive to amino acids.

Based on this evidence we hypothesize the sea lamprey alarm cue contains water soluble nitrogenous compounds that are emitted from damaged skin that induce anti-predator behavior in migrating sea lamprey. In this study, we characterize the nitrogenous compounds contained in a previously reported aqueous ethanolic Soxhlet extract from lamprey skin that contains the repellent molecules [12,13,53]. First, we separated the extract into chloroform-soluble and chloroform-insoluble fractions; the chloroform-soluble fraction exhibits no behavioral reactivity and contains cholesterol esters, tri- and di-glycerides, cholesterol, free fatty acids and minor amounts of environmental pollutants [53]. We report evidence that the alarm cue is contained in the water-soluble (chloroform-insoluble) fraction and proceeded to fractionate, purify, and chemically characterize the major nitrogenous compounds that compose this mixture.

Materials and methods

Collection and preparation of sub-adult migratory sea lamprey for extraction and behavioral assays

Migrating sea lamprey were obtained from the annual spring trapping operations of the US Fish and Wildlife Service and the Canadian Department of Fisheries and Oceans in tributaries to Lake Huron (Cheboygan and Ocqueoc Rivers, Michigan, USA). After capture, government staff transported the lampreys to the U.S. Geological Survey’s Hammond Bay Biological Station (Millersburg, Michigan, USA; 45.4976906°N, 84.0363127°W) and placed them into 800 L tanks receiving continuous water from Lake Huron water (5–18°C depending on date). Lampreys were held until use in the behavioral assays, or for the collection of skin. Prior to removal of the skin, each animal was euthanized via anesthetic overdose (Ethyl 3-aminobenzoate methanesulfonate aka tricaine methanesulfonate aka MS-222, CAS No. 886-86-2) by immersion in a bath at a concentration of 10 mg L-1 until respiration ceased for five minutes, followed by decapitation. After death, the carcass was rinsed in deionized water and the skin removed with a scalpel. Skins were stored at -20°C until use in the extraction procedures. All procedures for lamprey maintenance, euthanasia, and processing were approved by the Michigan State University Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (permit # AUF 01/14-007-00).

Extraction of the skin odorants

Frozen sea lamprey skins 2.14 Kg (220 skins) were extracted in a Soxhlet apparatus with 80% ethanol and 20% RO water as solvent (~100 g of skins in each extraction with 600 mL of 80% ethanol for 6 hours). We did not use special precautions for Soxhlet extraction of sea lamprey skin based on our earlier observation that heating did not impact the odorants. The combined extract, evaporated under vacuum to remove ethanol, was lyophilized to yield aqueous ethanolic extract as a powder (41.9 g). Solvent partitioning of the aqueous ethanolic extract (41.7 g) resulted in chloroform-soluble (21.4 g) and insoluble (water-soluble) (20.3 g) fractions. Skin extract and fractions were stored at -80°C until further use.

Confirmation of behavioral reactivity in the chloroform-insoluble fraction

To confirm the hypothesis that behavioral reactivity was confined to the chemical constituents captured in the chloroform-insoluble fraction, we examined the response of migratory-phase male sea lamprey to the extraction fractions using a standard laboratory space-use assay [12,13]. Specifically, we examined whether sea lampreys were repelled by the full skin extract (positive control) and the chloroform-insoluble fraction of the full skin extract, but were not repelled by the extraction solvent (negative control) or the chloroform-soluble fraction, as predicted. To accomplish this we observed the space-use of ten replicate groups of ten male sea lampreys (N = 10 for each stimulus odor) after exposure to the extraction fractions and the solvent control in a 5.0 m X 1.84 m section of a linear raceway at the Hammond Bay Biological Station (Millersburg, Michigan, USA; 45.4976906°N, 84.0363127°W). On a given night, five groups of ten male sea lampreys were stocked into the holding section of each raceway at 15:00 to acclimate the animals to the water. Males were chosen because (a) male and female sexually immature sea lamprey do not differ in their response to the extracted predator cue, and (b) the response does not attenuate in males at the onset of maturation, but does in females [13]. The first trial each of night began at ~22:00. A single trial lasted for 30 min and consisted of a 10 min pre-stimulus period (no odor) and a 20 min stimulus period when the odor was introduced into one half of the raceway. Prior to introducing the odor into the raceway, we mixed a stimulus odor into 400 ml of lake water collected from the raceway in a 500 mL Erlenmeyer flask that was continuously stirred with a 2 cm magnetic stir bar during release. We introduced the test odor/lake water mixture into one side of each raceway at the rate of necessary to achieve a 1:106 dilution (by volume when mixed into one half of the discharge) with a laboratory-grade peristaltic pump (MasterFlex model 7533–20). To ensure no cross-contamination of odors we used separate sets of pump tubing for each stimulus odor. We observed lamprey movements in an adjacent room on video monitors and recorded their activity onto digital media. To analyze lamprey distributions, we recorded the position of each subject every 30 sec after the start of a trial by replaying the video and assigning each lamprey to the stimulus or non-stimulus side of the experimental arena based on the position of its head. The data from the final 10 min of the stimulus period was used to obtain the proportion of animals on the stimulus side of the raceway for each trial. The predictions relative to the solvent control were analyzed with two-tailed t-tests (α = 0.05, assuming equal variance) where the proportion of animals on the stimulus side of the raceway was the dependent variable. Normality was confirmed with Shapiro-Wilks tests (all P > 0.12).

General procedures for chromatographic purification and spectroscopic analyses

Solvents used for isolation and purification steps were ACS reagent grade—Sigma-Aldrich Chemical Company (St. Louis, MO, USA). A CombiFlash MPLC purification system (Teledyne ISCO, Lincoln, NE, USA), equipped with C18 RediSep (86 g, C18 reverse phase) column, was used for the fractionation chloroform-insoluble fraction. Preparative HPLC (LC-20, Japan analytical industry Co., Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) equipped with XTerra Prep MS C-8 column (10 μm, 19 x 250 mm, Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA) was used for the purification of CombiFlash MPLC fractions. NMR spectra were recorded on 500 MHz (Varian Unity ±500, 1H NMR) and 125 MHz (Varian Unity ±500, 13C NMR) VRX instruments. Unless specified, D2O was used as the solvent for NMR experiments. HR-ESITOFMS spectra of pure isolates were recorded on a Waters Xevo G2-S QTOF LC mass spectrometer (Waters Corporation, Milford, MA, USA).

Optical rotation measurements

Optical rotations was determined on a PerkinElmer model 341 polarimeter at 20°C and 589 nm according to published procedure [54]. The specific rotations were calculated according to the equation [α]20D = (100α)/(l × c) where l is the path length in decimeters and c is the concentration in g/100 mL.

Chromatographic purification and isolation of pure compounds in sea lamprey skin ethanolic extract

An aliquot (20.1 g) of the chloroform-insoluble fraction was further fractionated by CombiFlash MPLC purification system by eluting with water:methanol step gradients (8:2, 1:1, 3:7 v/v) and finally with methanol (100%) gave fractions that were then combined based on similar UV profile. The resulting fractions were A (14.4 g), B (1.88 g) and C (3.74 g), respectively (Fig 1, Figure A in S1 File). An aliquot of the fraction A (1.4 g), further fractionated by HPLC and eluting with water:methanol 95:5 v/v, yielded three sub-fractions, A-1 (1.06 g), A-2 (172 mg) and A-3 (168 mg), respectively (Fig 1, Figure D in S1 File). Fraction A-1 (102 mg), crystallized from water:methanol twice, afforded creatine (94 mg, Fig 2, Figures A-D in S2 File) [55]. Similarly, an aliquot of fraction A-2 (104 mg), purified by crystallization from water:acetone, yielded another batch of creatine (56 mg) and arginine (47 mg, Fig 3, Figures E-H in S2 File) [5658]. Fractions A-3 was a complex mixture as indicated by HPLC profile and hence kept aside.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Fractionation and purification of components from the deterrent water-soluble fraction of sea lamprey skin extract.

*Details are in the experimental section.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Chemical structures of other nitrogenous compounds isolated from the deterrent water-soluble fraction of the sea lamprey skin extract: creatine, hypoxanthine, inosine, adenine, xanthine, and adenosine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.g002

thumbnail
Fig 3. Chemical structures of free amino acids isolated from the deterrent water-soluble fraction of the sea lamprey skin extract: arginine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, tyrosine, histidine, glutamic acid, phenylalanine, tryptophan, threonine, asparagine, methionine, cysteine, and glycine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.g003

An aliquot of fraction B (1.75 g), fractionated on CombiFlash MPLC purification system by eluting with water:methanol gradient (9:1, 8:2, 7:3, 6:4 and 1:1, v/v), yielded sub-fractions B-1 (520 mg), B-2 (420 mg) and B-3 (680 mg), respectively (Fig 1, Figure B in S1 File). The HPLC purification of fraction B-1 (400 mg) by elution with water:methanol (95:5 v/v) under isocratic conditions yielded sub-fractions B-1(a) (32 mg), B-1(b) (90 mg), B-1(c) (148 mg), B-1(d) (33 mg), B-1(e) (78 mg) and B-1(f) (25 mg), respectively (Fig 1, Figure E in S1 File). Fraction B-1(c) (65 mg), purified by crystallization from water:methanol, afforded another batch of creatine (48 mg) [55]. Purification of fraction B-1(e) (75 mg) by HPLC and elution with water:methanol (95:5 v/v) (4 mL/min) under isocratic conditions yielded valine (71 mg, Fig 3, Figures I-L in S2 File) [5658]. Fractions B-1(a), B-1(b), B-1(d) and B-1(f), complex mixtures as indicated by HPLC profile, were in minute quantities and hence kept aside. Similarly, fraction B-2 (370 mg) was further fractionated by HPLC by eluting with water:methanol 95:5 v/v (4 mL/min) under isocratic condition afforded fractions B-2(a`) (40 mg), B-2(a) (215 mg) and B-2(b) (115 mg), respectively (Fig 1, Figure F in S1 File). Fraction B-2(a`), a complex mixture as indicated by HPLC profile, was in small quantity and hence kept aside. An aliquot of fraction B-2(a) (190 mg), purified by HPLC by eluting with water:methanol 98:2 v/v, 2 mL/min under isocratic conditions yielded leucine (120 mg, 32 min, Fig 3, Figures M-P in S2 File) [5658] and isoleucine (54 mg, 38 min, Fig 3, Figures Q-T in S2 File) [5658]. Similarly, aliquot of fraction B-2(b) (100 mg), purified by HPLC and eluting with water:methanol 98:2 v/v (2 mL/min) under isocratic condition yielded isoleucine (35 mg) and 6 (tyrosine, 26 mg, 42 min, Fig 3, Figures U-X in S2 File) [5658]. An aliquot of fraction B-3 (400 mg), fractionated by HPLC by eluting with water:methanol 95:5 v/v (3 mL/min) under isocratic conditions yielded three fractions B-3(a`) (59 mg), B-3(a) (255 mg) and B-3(b) (80 mg), respectively (Fig 1, Figure G in S1 File). Fraction B-3(a`) was a complex mixture, as indicated by HPLC profile, and in very small quantity. Due to inadequate quantity, we did not analyze it further. Fraction B-3(a) (140 mg), purified by HPLC by eluting with water:methanol 98:2 v/v (3 mL/min) under isocratic conditions, yielded hypoxanthine (122 mg, 65 min, Fig 2, Figures A-D in S3 File) [59]. Purification of fraction B-3(c) (35 mg) under same conditions yielded inosine (22 mg, 82 min, Fig 2, Figures E-H in S3 File) [59].

Fraction C (2.1 g), fractionated on CombiFlash MPLC purification system by eluting with water:methanol (7:3, 6:4, 1:1 v/v and 100% methanol) yielded four fractions C-1 (130 mg), C-2 (235 mg), C-3 (630 mg) and C-4 (1.07 g), respectively (Fig 1, Figures C and H-N in S1 File). An aliquot of fraction C-1 (120 mg), purified by HPLC and eluting with water:methanol 85:15 v/v (3 mL/min) under isocratic conditions yielded adenine (38 mg, 55 min, Fig 2, Figures I-L in S3 File) [60] and xanthine (78 mg, 66 min, Fig 2, Figures M-P in S3 File) [60]. Fraction C-2 (160 mg), purified by HPLC (water:methanol 95:5 v/v, 4 mL/min) under isocratic conditions gave histidine (30 mg, 55 min, Fig 3, Figures Q-T in S3 File) [5658] and glutamic acid (15 mg, 74 min, Fig 3, Figures U-X in S3 File) [5658]. Purification of an aliquot of fraction C-3 (100 mg) by HPLC (water:methanol 95:5 v/v, 2.2 mL/min) under isocratic conditions afforded phenylalanine (48 mg, 51 min, Fig 3, Figures A-D in S4 File) [5658] and tryptophan (20 mg, 84 min, Fig 3, Figures E-H in S4 File) [5658]. Fraction C-4 (300 mg), fractionated by HPLC by eluting with water:methanol 80:20 v/v (3 mL/min) gave three fractions C-4(a) (159 mg), C-4(b) (87 mg) and C-4(c) (48 mg), respectively (Fig 1, Figures L-N in S1 File). Purification of C-4(a) (155 mg) by HPLC (water:methanol 90:10 v/v, 4 mL/min, isocratic) gave threonine (82 mg, 41 min, Fig 3, Figures I-L in S4 File) [5658] and asparagine (77 mg, 47 min, Fig 3, Figures M-P in S4 File) [5658]. Similarly, purification of C-4(b) (85 mg) under identical conditions yielded methionine (27 mg, 35 min, Fig 3, Figures Q-T in S4 File) [5658] and cysteine (55 mg, 42 min, Fig 3, Figures U-X in S4 File) [5658]. Similarly, fraction C-4(c) (45 mg), purified by HPLC (water:methanol 90:10 v/v, 3 mL/min, isocratic) yielded adenosine (32 mg, 46 min, Fig 2, Figures A-D in S5 File) [5658] and glycine (16 mg, 53 min, Fig 3, Figures E-H in S5 File) [5658].

Results

The lampreys exhibited no preference response to the solvent control (proportion on the stimulus side, mean ± 2 SE, 0.501 ± 0.07; Fig 4). As predicted, migratory-phase male sea lamprey were repelled by the full skin extract (vs. solvent control, t1,18 = 6.06, P < 0.0001), and the chloroform-insoluble fraction (vs. solvent control, t1,18 = 6.83, P < 0.0001). The lampreys were not significantly repelled by the chloroform-soluble fraction (vs. solvent control, t1,18 = 1.58, P = 0.13).

thumbnail
Fig 4.

The mean proportion (± 2 se) of migratory-phase sea lampreys on the side of a laboratory raceway receiving one of four stimulus odors: (a) a solvent control, (b) the full aqueous ethanolic extract from sea lamprey skin, (c) the chloroform-soluble fraction of the aqueous ethanolic skin extract, and (d) the chloroform-insoluble (water-soluble) fraction of the aqueous ethanolic skin extract (*** indicates P < 0.0001 in t-tests of the mean reaction vs. the solvent control).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.g004

Therefore, fractionation and purification of adult sea lamprey deterrent water-soluble fraction of skin extract, prepared by Soxhlet extraction of the skin with 80% aqueous ethanol for 6 hours [6], were carried out with medium pressure liquid chromatography (MPLC, CombiFlash) and preparative HPLC. The chemical identity of all pure isolates were determined by 1H- and 13C-NMR and HRESIMS experiments. The 1H- (500 MHz) and 13C- NMR (125 MHz) chemical shift values presented below for each pure isolate are expressed in ppm, based on the residual chemical shift values for D2O at 3.79 ppm, and for DMSO-d6 at 2.50 and 39.9 ppm, respectively. NMR (1H and 13C) spectral data of the isolated compounds are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 and HRESIMS and optical rotation data in Table 3. The spectral and optical rotation data of the isolates were identical to the spectral and optical rotation data for authentic samples of L-amino acids (Fig 3) and nitrogenous compounds (Fig 2) [5561].

thumbnail
Table 3. HRESIMS and optical rotation data of amino acids and nitrogenous compounds.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.t003

Discussion

Behavioral reactivity was confined to the chloroform-insoluble fraction of a Soxhlet skin extract, suggesting constituents of the sea lamprey alarm cue are water-soluble nitrogenous compounds, as confirmed by detailed NMR and MS experiments, consistent with the predictions arising from the sensory physiology of fishes, including lampreys, and prior reported work with individual compounds (e.g. hypoxanthine-3-N-oxide). The most abundant component of the water-soluble fraction was creatine (70%). Other major compounds in the water-soluble fraction were heterocyclic nitrogen compounds and free amino acids, 4.3 and 18.4% of the water-soluble fraction, respectively (Table 4). We have not yet identified compounds from minor fractions yielded from the purification of major compounds from the active water-soluble fraction of the sea lamprey skin extract. This was only because of the very small quantity of these fractions yielded from a large-scale extraction and purification steps. We anticipate to complete the characterization of minor compounds in these fractions since it requires large-scale extractions and availability of animals.

thumbnail
Table 4. Concentration of the nitrogenous compounds isolated from the adult migratory sea lamprey skin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.t004

Fourteen amino acids were identified from the behaviorally-reactive fraction, each of which have been previously identified from lamprey skin or cartilage excepting tryptophan which is reported in lamprey plasma and fibrinogen [6266]. Based on our results, adult migratory sea lamprey skin contained about 30% more free amino acids (12.4 μmol/g of wet weight) when compared to reported free amino acids in muscles (anterolateral trunk) (9.39 μmol/g of wet weight) extracted at 4°C in buffer. This is a four-fold increase in essential amino acids (9.82 μmol/g of wet weight) in the skin with respect to the muscles (2.362 μmol/g of wet weight) (Table 4) [64]. Among the essential amino acids, we observed a two-fold increase in arginine, fourteen-fold increase in phenylalanine and seven-fold increase in threonine levels in adult sea lamprey skin. Similarly, we also observed a thirteen- and three-fold decrease in non-essential amino acids such as glutamate and glycine levels in adult sea lamprey skin, respectively. Total distribution of free amino acids in plasma, liver and muscles during various migratory phases of the sea lampreys (ammocoete, parasitic and upstream adult migrant) has been previously reported [64,67]. Total free plasma amino acid and the essential amino acid concentrations were not significantly different among ammocoete, parasitic and upstream migrant sea lampreys [64].

Whether amino acids constitute odorants for lampreys is unresolved. In a single unpublished study, Li [68,69], reports electro-olfactogram (EOG) recordings of adult sea lamprey in response to 42 amino acids, concluding only L- and D-arginine elicit strong olfactory responses. However, it is important to note that the EOG recordings were taken from the main olfactory epithelium, which likely did not record responses from the accessory olfactory organ, where the suspected alarm cue OSNs (the ‘short’ OSN homolog to the teleost crypt cell) are principally distributed [51,52]. It is also notable that the L- and D- forms of aspartic acid, histidine, lysine, tyrosine, tryptophan, as well as L-OH-proline and L-tyrosine, elicited significant olfactory activity (compared to a water control), although at lower intensity than arginine. This finding contrasts significantly with teleost fishes, where the D- form of amino acids typically elicit no olfactory response [70]. More recently, Libants et al. [71] report genetic evidence for 28 trace amine-associated odorant receptor (TAAR) and four V1R odorant receptor genes from sea lamprey, the latter implicated in olfactory detection of amino acids [4144]. Finally, EOG is a useful screening tool. However, given the exquisite sensitivity of the sea lamprey olfactory apparatus, strong behavioral responses occur at concentrations below the ability of an EOG to measure in the olfactory epithelium. For example, the sea lamprey male sex pheromone component 3-keto-petromyzonol sulfate (3kPZS) elicits significant EOG activity at concentrations above 10−12 M [72], whereas behavioral responses in the field may occur at two orders of magnitude lower concentration [73].

To our knowledge, this is the first reporting of the nitrogenous heterocycles hypoxanthine, inosine and xanthine from sea lamprey skin. The presence of hypoxanthine in appreciable quantities in the skin is notable. The nitrogen oxide form of hypoxanthine has been implicated as an alarm cue component in a number of fishes from the superorder Ostariophysi [74], whereas similar molecules lacking the nitrogen oxide functional group, including hypoxanthine, often fail to elicit a behavioral response (e.g., white catfish Ictalurus catus, [30]). More recently, Brown and colleagues [32,33] conclude the nitrogen oxide functional group is important to elicit alarm responses in the Ostariophysi, and report examples from more ancestral lineages (convict cichlids, Acrchocentrus nigrofasciatus, Cichlidae, Acanthopterygii and rainbow trout, Oncorhynchus mykiss, Salmonidae, Protacanthopterygii) known to possess alarm cues that do not respond to hypoxanthine-3-N-oxide. Given the Agnatha is ancestral to all gnathostomes, and the lack of conservation of alarm cue chemistry at larger phylogenetic distances as evidenced by a lack of response to heterospecific cues from distant vs. close relatives [33,75,76]. The sea lamprey also exhibits declining behavioral response to alarm cues collected from confamilial species of Petromyzontide, but fail to respond to cues from more ancestral (Atlantic hagfish, Myxine glutinosa, Myxinidae, Agnatha) and derived (white sucker, Catastomus commersonii, Catastomidae, Actinopterygii) taxa [40]. Further, the process of Soxhlet extraction at high temperature (70–80°C) for multiple hours does not degrade the reactivity of the extract vs. that derived from grinding and freezing skin [13, Wagner et al., in review]. Thus, it is reasonable to anticipate the findings for fishes of the Teleostei may not be instructive as to the chemical composition of lamprey alarm cues. As with other alarm cues, it is very likely the cue is a mixture that encodes two informational aspects, risk and the identity of the wounded species.

The abundance of creatine in the skin was also notable. Because sea lamprey cease parasitic feeding prior to the onset of migration, energy is mobilized from the tissues to support the expenditures associated with long-distance swimming and reproduction [77] principally in the form of lipid metabolism [78]. However, creatine is a major component in arginine metabolism. The mechanism by which the conversion of adenosine triphosphate (ATP) to adenosine diphosphate (ADP) results in the transfer of one of the phosphate groups to creatine to form creatine phosphate [67]. Hence, accumulation of large amount of creatine, adenine and adenosine in the skin may support the metabolism of internal energy stores during the high-energy demand associated with the reproductive migration.

The sea lamprey alarm cue induces context-specific expression of predator avoidance behaviors in nature when applied to natural streams that may be utilized to achieve novel control measures. For example, when the odor is confined to a portion of the channel, migrants will swim on the opposite side [24]. However, if the river’s discharge is fully activated with the odor, the response becomes responsive to circumstance. Luhring and co-authors [23] demonstrated that individuals entering the river from a lake simply switch anti-predator tactics from spatial avoidance to exposure minimization by increasing swimming speed, whereas those already in the river delayed upstream movement (i.e. remained hidden before moving upstream). Together, these findings suggest development of control tactics based on the manipulation of movement paths, but not blockage, will prove viable. Approaches include trapping at dams and in open river channels, guiding migrating sea lamprey into streams targeted for future lampricide treatments, and the creation of selective fish passage devices that utilize the repellent to block sea lamprey from entering a fishway [11,12,25,79]. However, utilization of the alarm cue repellent, or any semiochemical discovered in sea lamprey, is subject to regulation by the U.S. EPA and Health-Canada. Specifically, the use of an odorant or mixture of odorants to manipulate the behavior of a pest species is classified as a biopesticide under the Federal Insecticide, Fungicide, and Rodenticide Act (FIFRA, USA). Thus, to meet the legal requirements for use as a biopesticide, the chemical structure of the active ingredients must be known and its application practices (concentration, duration) specified. As a practical matter, discovery of the chemical structure(s) of the components of the alarm cue is necessary to produce it in sufficient quantities for use throughout the basin.

In conclusion, we have isolated and chemically characterized the major nitrogenous compounds in the water-soluble fraction of a skin extract that contains the behavioral activity of an alarm cue from sea lamprey. The constituents identified are molecules common in nature and animal tissue. Further behavioral testing is underway to ascertain which of these induce avoidance behavior in sea lamprey, and to ensure that minor constituents of the extract awaiting characterization are not the principal alarm cue components. Among the isolates, creatine was the most abundant component in the water-soluble fraction. Based on our findings migratory sea lamprey skin contained 30% more free amino acids when compared to free amino acids reported in its muscles. Report of nitrogenous heterocycles hypoxanthine, inosine and xanthine from the sea lamprey skin is also for the first time.

Supporting information

S1 File. CombiFlash and HPLC profiles of the extract and its fractions.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.s001

(PDF)

S2 File. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) data for creatine, arginine, valine, leucine, isoleucine, and tyrosine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.s002

(PDF)

S3 File. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) data for hypoxanthine, inosine, adenine, xanthine histidine and glutamic acid.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.s003

(PDF)

S4 File. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) data for phenylalanine, tryptophan, threonine, asparagine, methionine and cysteine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.s004

(PDF)

S5 File. Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) and High Resolution Mass Spectrometry (HRMS) data for adenosine, and glycine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0217417.s005

(PDF)

Acknowledgments

This research is a contribution from MSU AgBioResearch and funded by the GLFC under the contract 2016-NAI-54051. The NMR data were collected on instrumentation that was purchased, in part, with the funds from NIH grant no. 1-S10-RR04750, NSF grant no. CHE-88-00770, and NSF grant no. CHE-92-13241. MS data were collected at the MSU Mass Spectrometry Facility, which is supported, in part, by a grant (DRR-00480) from the Biotechnology Research Technology Program, National Center for Research Resources, National Institutes of Health.

References

  1. 1. Christie GC, Goddard CI. Sea Lamprey International Symposium (SLIS II): advances in the integrated management of sea lamprey in the Great Lakes. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2003;29: 1–14.
  2. 2. Great Lakes Restoration Initiative-Action Plan II. 2014; Great Lakes Interagency Task Force, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington D.C, USA.
  3. 3. GLFC (Great Lakes Fishery Commission). 2017. A mid-decade review of progress under a Strategic Vision of the Great Lakes Fishery Commission 2011–2020 [online]. Available from: http://www.glfc.org/pubs/misc/SVReview2017-01.pdf.
  4. 4. Allan SA. Behavior-based control of insect crop pests. In: Cordoba-Aguilar A, Gonzales-Tokman D, Gonzalez-Santoyo I. editors. Insect Behavior. New York, NY: Oxford University Press Mexico. 2018; pp 309–331.
  5. 5. Sorensen PW, Fine JM, Dvornikovs V, Jeffrey CS, Shao F, Wang J, et al. Mixture of new sulfated steroids functions as a migratory pheromone in the sea lamprey. Nature Chemical Biology. 2005;1(6): 324–328. pmid:16408070.
  6. 6. Wagner CM, Jones ML, Twohey MB, Sorensen PW. A field test verifies that pheromones can be useful for sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) control in the Great Lakes. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2006;63: 475–479.
  7. 7. Wagner CM, Twohey MB, Fine JM. Conspecific cueing in the sea lamprey: do reproductive migrations consistently follow the most intense larval odour? Animal Behaviour. 2009;78(3): 593–599.
  8. 8. Li W, Scott AP, Siefkes MJ, Yan H, Liu Q, Yun SS, Gage DA. Bile acid secreted by male sea lamprey that acts as a sex pheromone. Science. 2002;296: 138–141. pmid:11935026
  9. 9. Johnson NS, Yun SS, Thompson HT, Brant CO, Li W. A synthesized pheromone induces upstream movement in female sea lamprey and summons them into traps. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2009;106: 1021–1026. pmid:19164592
  10. 10. Siefkes MJ, Winterstein SR, Li W. Evidence that 3-keto petromyzonol sulphate specifically attracts ovulating female sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Animal Behaviour. 2005;70: 1037–1045.
  11. 11. Imre I, Brown GE, Bergstedt RA, McDonald R. Use of chemosensory cues as repellents for sea lamprey: Potential directions for population management. Journal of Great Lakes Research. 2010;36: 790–793.
  12. 12. Wagner CM, Stroud EM, Meckley TD. A deathly odor suggests a new sustainable tool for controlling a costly invasive species. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences. 2011;68: 1157–1160.
  13. 13. Bals J, Wagner CM. Behavioral responses of sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) to a putative alarm cue derived from conspecific and heterospecific sources. Behaviour. 2012;149: 901–923.
  14. 14. Mirza RS, Chivers DP. Response of juvenile rainbow trout to varying concentrations of chemical alarm cue: response thresholds and survival during encounters with predators. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2003;81: 88–95.
  15. 15. Yao M, Rosenfeld J, Attridge SR, Sidhu S, Aksenov V, Rollo CD. The Ancient Chemistry of Avoiding Risks of Predation and Disease. Evolutionary Biology. 2009;36: 267–281.
  16. 16. Wagner RH, Danchin É. A taxonomy of biological information. Oikos. 2010;119: 203–209.
  17. 17. Chivers DP, Smith RJF. Chemical alarm signaling in aquatic predator–prey systems: a review and prospectus. Eco Science. 1998;5: 338–352.
  18. 18. Wisenden BD, Chivers DP. The role of public chemical information in antipredator behaviour. In: Ladich Friedrich; Collin Shaun P.; Moller Peter; Kapoor B.G. editors, Communication in fishes. Volume 1. Science Publishers, Enfield, Jersey & Plymouth. 2006. pp. 259–278.
  19. 19. Holbrook CM, Bergstedt R, Adams NS, Hatton TW, McLaughlin RL. Fine-scale pathways used by adult sea lampreys during riverine spawning migrations. Transactions of the American Fisheries Society. 2015;144: 549–562.
  20. 20. Willson MF, Halupka KC. Anadromous fish as keystone species in vertebrate communities. Conservation Biology. 1995;9: 489–497.
  21. 21. Cochran PA. Predation on lampreys. In: Brown LR, Chase SD, Mesa MG, Beamish RJ, Moyle PB, editors. Biology, Management, and Conservation of Lampreys in North America. American Fisheries Society Symposium 72, Bethesda, Maryland, USA. 2009. Pp 139–151.
  22. 22. Imre I, Di Rocco RT, Belanger CF, Brown GE, Johnson NS. The behavioural response of adult Petromyzon marinus to damage-released alarm and predator cues. Journal of Fish Biology 2014;84: 1490–1502. pmid:24773541
  23. 23. Luhring TM, Meckley TD, Johnson NS, Siefkes MJ, Hume JB, Wagner CM. A semelparous fish continues upstream migration when exposed to alarm cue, but adjusts movement speed and timing. Animal Behaviour. 2016;121: 41–51.
  24. 24. DiRocco RT, Johnson NS, Brege L, Imre I, Brown GE. Sea lamprey avoid areas scented with conspecific tissue extract in Michigan streams. Fisheries Management and Ecology. 2016;23(6): 548–560.
  25. 25. Hume J, Meckley TD, Johnson NS, Luhring TM, Siefkes MJ, Wagner CM. The application of an alarm cue in a push-pull configuration hastens arrival of invasive sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) at a trapping location. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Science. 2015;72(12): 1799–1806.
  26. 26. Døving KB, Lastein S. The alarm reaction in fishes—odorants, modulations of responses, neural pathways. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences. 2009;1170: 413–429. pmid:19686169
  27. 27. Wisenden BD. Chemical cues that indicate risk of predation. In: Sorensen PW, Wisenden BD, editors. Fish Pheromones and Related Cues, John Wiley & Sons, Ames, Iowa, USA. 2015. Pp 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118794739.ch6
  28. 28. Ferrari MCO, Wisenden BD, Chivers DP. Chemical ecology of predator–prey interactions in aquatic ecosystems: a review and prospectus. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 2010;88(7): 698–724,
  29. 29. Win T. Isolation and structural identification of an alarm pheromone from the giant danio Danio malabaricus (Cyprinidae, Ostariophysi, Pisces). PhD thesis, Universität Oldenburg. 2000. Available from: https://oops.uni-oldenburg.de/id/eprint/413.
  30. 30. Tucker D, Suzuki N. Olfactory responses to schreckstoff of catfish. In: Schneider D, editor. Olfaction and taste, Vol. IV. Stuttgart: Wissenschaftliche Verlagsgesellschaft. 1972. Pp 121–127.
  31. 31. Pfeiffer W, Riegelbauer G, Meier G, Scheibler B. Effect of hypoxanthine-3(N)-oxide and hypoxanthine-1 (N)-oxide on central nervous excitation of the black tetra Gymnocorymbus ternetzi (Characidae, Ostariophysi, Pisces) indicated by dorsal light response. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 1985;11: 507–523. pmid:24310073
  32. 32. Brown GE. Adrian JC Jr, Smyth E, Leet H, Brennan S. Ostariophysan alarm pheromones: laboratory and field tests of the functional significance of nitrogen oxides. Journal of Chemical Ecology 2000;26(1): 139–154.
  33. 33. Brown GE, Adrian JC Jr, Naderi NT, Harvey MC, Kelly JM. Nitrogen oxides elicit antipredator responses in juvenile channel catfish, but not in convict cichlids or rainbow trout: conservation of the ostariophysan alarmpheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2003;29: 1781–1796. pmid:12956507
  34. 34. Reed JR, Wieland W, Kimbrough TD. A study on the biochemistry of alarm substances in fish. In: Mitchell AL, editor. Proceedings of the Twenty-sixth Annual Conference, Southeastern Association of Game and Fish Commissioners; 1972. pp. 608–610.
  35. 35. Wisenden BD. Chemically mediated strategies to counter predation. In: Collin SP,Marshall NJ, editors. Sensory Processing in Aquatic Environments. Springer-Verlag. New York; 2003. pp 236–251.
  36. 36. Mathuru AS, Kibat C, Cheong WF, Shui G, Wenk MR, Friedrich RW, Jesuthasan S. Chondroitin Fragments Are Odorants that Trigger Fear Behavior in Fish. Current Biology. 2012;22(6): 538–544. pmid:22365850
  37. 37. Hazlett BA, McLay C. Responses of the crab Heterozius rotundifrons to heterospecific chemical alarm cues: Phylogeny vs. ecological overlap. Journal of Chemical Ecology. 2005;31(3): 671–677. pmid:15898508
  38. 38. Mitchell MD, Cowman PF, McCormick MI. Chemical alarm cues are conserved within the coral reef fish family Pomacentridae. PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47428. Epub 2012 Oct 18. pmid:23094047
  39. 39. Byford GJ, Hume JB, Moser ML, Wagner CM. Do native Pacific lamprey and invasive sea lamprey share an alarm cue? Implications for use of a natural repellent to guide imperiled Pacific lamprey into fishways. North American Journal of Fisheries Management. 2016;36(5): 1090–1096.
  40. 40. Hume JB, Wagner CM. A death in the family: sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) avoidance of confamilial alarm cues diminishes with phylogenetic distance. Ecology and Evolution. 2018;8(7): 3751–3762. pmid:29686855
  41. 41. Vielma A, Ardiles A, Delgado L, Schmachtenberg O. The elusive crypt olfactory receptor neuron: evidence for its stimulation by amino acids and cAMP pathway agonists. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2008:211: 2417–2422. pmid:18626075
  42. 42. Braubach OR, Fine A, Croll RP. Distribution and functional organization of glomeruli in the olfactory bulbs of zebrafish (Danio rerio). Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2012;520(11): 2317–2339. pmid:22581687
  43. 43. Oka Y, Saraiva LR, Korsching SI. Crypt Neurons Express a Single V1R-Related ora Gene. Chemical Senses. 2012;37(3): 219–227. pmid:22038944
  44. 44. Enjin A, Suh GS-B. Neural mechanisms of alarm pheromone signaling. Molecules and cell. 2013;35: 177–181. pmid:23471444
  45. 45. Hamdani EH, Døving KB. Specific projection of the sensory crypt cells in the olfactory system in crucian carp, Carassius carassius, Chemical Senses. 2006;31: 63–67. pmid:16306315
  46. 46. Ferrando S, Bottaro M, Gallus L, Girosi L, Vacchi M, Tagliafierro G. Observations of crypt neuron-like cells in the olfactory epithelium of a cartilaginous fish. Neuroscience Letters. 2006;403(3): 280–282. pmid:16716513
  47. 47. Thornhill RA. The ultrastructure of the olfactory epithelium of the lamprey Lampetra fluviatilis. Journal of Cell Science. 1967:2(4): 591–602.
  48. 48. VanDenbossche J, Seelye JG, Zielinski BS. The morphology of the olfactory epithelium in larval, juvenile and upstream migrant stages of the sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, Brain Behavior and Evolution. 1995;45: 19–24. pmid:7866768
  49. 49. Laframboise AJ, Ren X, Chang S, Dubuc R, Zielinski BS. Olfactory sensory neurons in the sea lamprey display polymorphisms. Neuroscience Letters. 2007;414(3): 277–281. pmid:17254708
  50. 50. Hansen A, Finger TE. Phyletic distribution of crypt-type olfactory receptor neurons in fishes. Brain, behavior and evolution. 2000;55(2):100–110. pmid:10838480
  51. 51. Green WW, Boyes K, McFadden C, Daghfous G, Auclair F2, Zhang H, Li W, Dubuc R, Zielinski BS. Odorant organization in the olfactory bulb of the sea lamprey. Journal of Experimental Biology. 2017:220: 1350–1359. pmid:28183864
  52. 52. Ren X, Chang S, Laframboise A, Green W, Dubuc R, Zielinski BS. Projections from the accessory olfactory organ into the medial region of the olfactory bulb in the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus): a novel vertebrate sensory structure?. The Journal of Comparative Neurology. 2009;516(2):105–116. pmid:19575448
  53. 53. Dissanayake AA, Wagner MC, Nair MG. Chemical characterization of lipophilic constituents in the skin of migratory adult sea lamprey from the great lakes region. PLOS ONE. December 19, 2016.
  54. 54. Dissanayake AA, Ameen BAH, Nair MG. Lipid Peroxidation and Cyclooxygenase Enzyme Inhibitory Compounds from Prangos haussknechtii. Journal of Natural Products. 2017;80(9): 2472–2477. pmid:28885836
  55. 55. Lundberg P, Vogel HJ, Ruderus H. Carbon-13 and proton NMR studies of post-mortem metabolism in bovine muscles. Meat Science. 1986;18(2): 133–160. pmid:22055567
  56. 56. Kusumaningrum I, Pranoto Y, Hadiwiyoto S. Extraction optimization and characterization of gelatine from fish dry skin of Spanish mackerel (Scomberromorus commersoni) Earth and Environmental Science. 2018;144: 012036.
  57. 57. Muralidharan N, Shakila RJ, Sukumar D, Jeyasekaran G. Skin, bone and muscle collagen extraction from the trash fish, leather jacket (Odonus niger) and their characterization. The Journal of Food Science and Technology. 2013;50(6): 1106–1113. pmid:24426022
  58. 58. Govindaraju V, Young K, Maudsley AA. Proton NMR chemical shifts and coupling constants for brain metabolites. 2000;13: 129–153
  59. 59. Ryder JM. Determination of adenosine triphosphate and its breakdown products in fish muscle by high-performance liquid chromatography. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry. 1985;33(4): 678–680.
  60. 60. Teijeira M, Santana L, Uriarte E. Assignment of the Spectra of some Adenine, 13C NMR Hypoxanthine and Guanine Carbonucleosides. Magnetic Resonance in Chemistry. 1997;35: 806–807.
  61. 61. Reitsma BH. Laser-based optical activity detection of amino acids and proteins. Ph.D. thesis, Iowa State University, 1987. Available from: https://lib.dr.iastate.edu/rtd/11721.
  62. 62. Doolittle RF, Cottrell BA, Riley M. Amino acid compositions of the subunit chains of lamprey fibrinogen: Evolutionary significance of some structural anomalies. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Protein Structure. 1976;453(2): 439–452.
  63. 63. Kimura S, Kamimura T, Takema Y, Kubota M. Lower vertebrate collagen. Evidence for type I-like collagen in the skin of lamprey and shark. Biochimica et Biophysica Acta (BBA)—Protein Structure. 1981;669(2): 251–257.
  64. 64. LeBlanc PL, Gillis TE, Gerrits MF, Ballantyne JS. Metabolic organization of liver and somatic muscle of landlocked sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus, during the spawning migration. Canadian Journal of Zoology. 1995; 73(5): 916–923.
  65. 65. Conlon JM, Sower SA. Isolation of a peptide structurally related to mammalian corticostatins from the lamprey Petromyzon marinus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology—Part B: Biochemistry & Molecular Biology. 1996;114B: 133–137.
  66. 66. Robson P, Wright GM, Youson JH, Keeley FW. A Family of Non–Collagen-Based Cartilages in the Skeleton of the Sea Lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology—Part B: Biochemistry & Molecular Biology. 1997;118B: 71–78.
  67. 67. Wilkie MP, Claude JF, Cockshutt A, Holmes JA, Wang YS, Youson JH, Walsh PJ. Shifting patterns of nitrogen excretion and amino acid catabolism capacity during the life cycle of the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Physiological and Biochemical Zoology. 2006; 79(5):885–898. pmid:16927235
  68. 68. Li, W. The olfactory sensitivity and specificity of the adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus) to amino acids. Ph.D. Dissertation. University of Minnesota, USA. 1994. pp. 88–122. In: The Olfactory Biology of Adult Sea Lamprey.
  69. 69. Li W, Sorensen PW. The olfactory sensitivity of sea lamprey is specifically restricted to arginine (abstract). Chemical Senses. 1992;17(5): 658.
  70. 70. Hara TJ. Effect of pH on the olfactory responses to amino acids in rainbow trout, Salmo gairdneri. Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology—Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology. 1976;54: 37–39.
  71. 71. Libants S, Carr K, Wu H, Teeter JH, Chung-Davidson YW, Zhang Z, Wilkerson C, Li W. The sea lamprey Petromyzon marinus genome reveals the early origin of several chemosensory receptor families in the vertebrate lineage. BMC Evolutionary Biology. 2009;9: 180. pmid:19646260
  72. 72. Siefkes MJ, Li W. Electrophysiological evidence for detection and discrimination of pheromonal bile acids by the olfactory epithelium of female sea lampreys (Petromyzon marinus). Journal of Comparative Physiology A. 2004;190(3): 193–199. pmid:14689221
  73. 73. Buchinger TJ, Siefkes MJ, Zielinski BS, Brant CO, Li W. Chemical cues and pheromones in the sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus). Frontiers in Zoology. 2015;12:32. pmid:26609313
  74. 74. Wisenden BD, Stumbo AD, Self PA, Snekser JL, Wisenden PA, Keenleyside MHA, McEwen DC, Itzkowitz M, Brisch E. Co-evolution of offspring anti-predator competence and parental brood defence in convict cichlids. Hydrobiologia 2015;748(1): 259–272.
  75. 75. Schutz F. Vergleichende Untersuchugen ¨uber die Schreckreaktion bei Fischen und deren Verbreitung. Zeitschrift für vergleichende Physiologie. 1956;38(1,2): 84–135.
  76. 76. Mitchell MD, Cowman PF, McCormick MI. Chemical alarm cues are conserved within the coral reef fish family Pomacentridae. PLoS ONE. 2012;7(10): e47428. pmid:23094047
  77. 77. Beamish FWH. Migration and spawning energetics of the anadromous sea lamprey, Petromyzon marinus. Environmental Biology of Fishes. 1979;4(1): 3–7.
  78. 78. Araújo MJ, Ozório ROA, Bessa RJB, Kijjoa A, Gonçalves JFM, Antunes C. Nutritional status of adult sea lamprey (Petromyzon marinus Linnaeus, 1758) during spawning migration in the Minho River, NW Iberian Peninsula. Journal of Applied Ichthyology. 2013;29(4): 808–814.
  79. 79. Sorensen PW, Johnson NS. Theory and Application of Semiochemicals in Nuisance Fish Control. Journal of Chemical Ecology.2016;42(7): 698–715. pmid:27417504