25(OH)D3 and 1.25(OH)2D3 inhibits TNF-α expression in human monocyte derived macrophages

Aisha Rafique; Lars Rejnmark; Lene Heickendorff; Holger Jon Møller

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0215383

Abstract

Purpose

We wanted to investigate effects of vitamin D₃ (25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃) on inflammatory cytokine expression in both activated and non-activated Mφ.

Materials and methods

Mononuclear cells, isolated from healthy donor buffy coats were cultured for a 6-day differentiation-period. Fully differentiated Mφ were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ for (4, 12 or 24 hours) +/-LPS challenge for 4 hours_. Gene expression analyses of VDR, Cyp27b1 and pro-inflammatory markers TNF-α, IL-6, NF-κB, MCP-1, was performed using RT-quantitative PCR. TNF-α protein levels from Mφ culture media were analysed by ELISA.

Results

Both 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ significantly inhibited TNF-α expression in both LPS-stimulated and unstimulated Mφ. Also, NF-κB, and to a lesser extend IL-6 and MCP-1 were inhibited. LPS up-regulated Cyp27b1 gene expression which was partly reverted by 1.25(OH)₂D₃.

Conclusion

These data show anti-inflammatory effects of vitamin D₃ (25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃) in human macrophages, and support, that means for targeting high dose vitamin D₃ to the immune system may have beneficial clinical effect in inflammatory conditions.

Citation: Rafique A, Rejnmark L, Heickendorff L, Møller HJ (2019) 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ inhibits TNF-α expression in human monocyte derived macrophages. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0215383. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383

Editor: Partha Mukhopadhyay, National Institutes of Health, UNITED STATES

Received: October 7, 2018; Accepted: February 22, 2019; Published: April 12, 2019

Copyright: © 2019 Rafique et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript, Supporting Information files, and here: https://www.dropbox.com/s/oxzgt7ke3nd2fa1/data%20for%20PLOS%20one.xlsx?dl=0.

Funding: This work was supported by the Danish Council for Strategic Research (Innovation fund Denmark), TRAIN 092797 (https://innovationsfonden.dk/da) to HJM and Vilhelm Bangs Fund (https://tvbf.dk/) to AR and Lily Benthine Lunds Fund of 1.6.1978 (https://www.legatbogen.dk/th--maigaards-eftf--fru-lily-benthine-lunds-fond-af-1-6--1978) to AR. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Vitamin D₃ is a lipid-soluble steroid hormone and the active metabolite 1.25(OH)₂D₃ is crucial for calcium/phosphate homeostasis and bone metabolism [1]. Pre-vitamin D₃ is produced in the skin through rapid isomerization of 7-dehydrocholesterol after exposure to sunlight and is transported by vitamin D binding protein (DBP) to the liver following conversion into 25(OH)D₃ by 25-hydroxylase (Cyp27a1)[2]. The DBP-25(OH)D₃ complex is taken up by megalin and cubilin in the kidney and converted by 1α-hydroxylase (Cyp27b1) into 1.25(OH)₂D₃ [3, 4]. Besides the classical role, 1.25(OH)₂D₃ has broad immunoregulatory effects on innate and adaptive immune responses. [5]. The nuclear vitamin D receptor (VDR) and Cyp27b1 are expressed in most immune cells e.g. T and B lymphocytes, monocytes, Mφ, natural killer cells and dendritic cells [6, 7]. Through interaction between VDR and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ and heterodimerization with retinoic X receptor (RXR), this complex binds to the Vitamin D responsive element (VDRE) in the promoter region of specific genes enabling gene transcription responsible for cell regulation and differentiation [7, 8]. Mφ are plastic, heterogenic immune cells that are able to polarise into specific phenotypes during inflammatory conditions, whether low-grade, autoimmune or infectious [9, 10]. The effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ on Mφ polarisation have been examined in cell lines e.g. human THP-1 and murine RAW 264.7, however data are not consistent and detailed knowledge about the effects of vitamin D₃ on human Mφ is lacking, although current evidence suggests anti-inflammatory effects [11–13]. Supra-physiological concentrations of 1.25(OH)₂D₃ carry the risk of hypercalcemia, restricting high dose anti-inflammatory treatment. However, technologies for specific targeting of 1.25(OH)₂D₃ to Mφ may circumvent these obstacles [12, 13]. In this study, we have therefore investigated the anti-inflammatory effects of both physiological and supra-physiological concentrations of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ in Mφ.

Materials and methods

Purification of human mononuclear cells from buffy coats

Human buffy coats were collected anonymized during routine blood donations from volunteer donors at the Blood Bank of Aarhus University Hospital. According to Danish law, collection of buffy coats does not require separate ethical approval. 50 mL buffy coats were diluted 1:1 with 0.9% NaCl and 25 mL were carefully layered to 15 mL Histopaque-1077 (Sigma-Aldrich, Soeborg, Denmark) and centrifuged at 400 g at RT for 30 minutes. The opaque interface containing mononuclear cells was transferred to new tubes, added D-PSB/2%FCS/1mM EDTA and centrifuged at 200g for 10 minutes at RT following repeated wash/centrifuge step. Monocytes were purified by plastic adherence or CD14 positive selection. For plastic adherence 2 x 10⁶ cells/mL were incubated in T75 flasks with in RPMI 1640/PS/10% human serum (Gibco, ThermoFisher Scientific, Hvidovre, Denmark) for 1h. Non-adherent cells were removed and adherent monocytes received fresh medium containing 100 ng/mL M-CSF and 10 ng/mL GM-CSF (both from PeproTech, Stockholm, Sweden) for Mφ differentiation. For CD14 positive selection, EasySep Human CD14 Positive Enrichment kit (Cat. #18058, Stemcell Technologies, Cambridge, England) was applied. Mononuclear cell suspension was prepared at a concentration of 5x10⁷ cells/mL in D-PBS/2%FCS/1mM EDTA. EasySep protocol for CD14 positive selection was applied for the remaining purification of monocytes. Monocytes received fresh medium every second day and matured to fully differentiated Mφ after 6-days incubation period.

Stimulation of Mφ with 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃

Differentiated Mφ were collected, counted and tested for viability (Nucleo-Counter NC-250, ChemoMetec, Alleroed, Denmark). Two mL 1x10^{^6} MD-Mφs/mL were seeded per well (in six-well plates) and incubated in fresh medium (RPMI/PS/10%FCS/100ng/mL M-CSF/10 ng/mL GM-CSF) for 24 hours to adhere at 37°C in 5% CO₂/95% air. After 24 h, culture medium was removed and plates were washed with D-PBS. Mφ were stimulated with 25(OH)D₃ (100 and 500 nM), 1.25(OH)₂D³ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) (Cayman Chemical, Biomol, Hamburg, Germany) or 10 μM Dexamethasone in RPMI/PS/10% Charcoal Stripped FCS (CS-FCS) (Gibco, ThermoFisher Scientific) for 4, 12 and 24 hours. After wash in D-PBS, cells were stimulated with +/- LPS (1μg/mL from Escherichia coli 0111:B4 (Sigma Aldrich, Soeborg, Denmark)) for 4 hours. All culture medium was collected and Mφ were harvested and resuspended in 350 μL buffer RLT with β-mercaptoethanol (Qiagen, Sollentuna, Sweden) and stored at -80°C for RT-PCR.

RNA extraction and gene expression analysis by real-time quantitative PCR

Total RNA was extracted using micro- to mini-RNeasy kits (Qiagen, Sollentuna, Sweden) according to the manufacturer’s specifications and protocols. 100 ng of total RNA and in total of 40 μL reaction mixtures of 1x PCR buffer, 6.25 mM MgCL₂, 2.5 μM Oligo(dT), 1 mM dNTP, 2.5 units/μL RT, 1 unit/μL RNase inhibitor (ThermoFisher, Hvidovre, Denmark) and ddH₂O were synthesised to cDNA by GeneAmp PCR System 9600 thermal cycler. All reactions were performed in duplicates in a total reaction volume of 10 μL containing SYBR Green I Master mix (Roche, Amsterdam, Holland), ddH₂O and 5 pmol/μL of each target forward and reverse primer, under the following conditions: pre-incubation at 95° for 10 min followed by cycled amplification at 95° for 10 s, annealing for 20 s, and 72° for 5 s for 50 cycles. All reactions were carried out on LightCycler 480 platform (Roche, Indiana, USA). Target genes were normalised to expression levels of stabile housekeeping gene GAPDH, calculated by Normfinder software [14]. mRNA ratios of target gene/house-keeping gene were normalized to untreated control. Table 1 contains forward/reverse primers and primer specific annealing temperatures (Table 1).

Download:

Table 1. Forward and reverse primers and annealing temperatures for RT-qPCR.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.t001

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for TNF-α and IL-6

For measurements of TNF-α and IL-6 in Mφ culture supernatants, Human TNF-α DuoSet ELISA kits (DY210-05) and Human IL-6 DuoSet ELISA kits (DY206-05) (R&D systems Bio-techne, Abingdon, United Kingdom) were applied and manufacture’s standard protocol was followed.

Statistical analysis

Graph Pad Prism 7 software (La Jolla, USA) was applied to prepare graphs and statistical analyses. For statistical analyses, we used a one-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group. All error bars are represented as standard error mean (SEM) and significance is indicated as *p = <0.05, **p = <0.01, ***p = <0.001 and ****p = < 0.0001. We also performed a repeated measures one-way ANOVA test of trend to analyse dose dependent response and all p-values are giving in the figures.

Results

High dose vitamin D₃ inhibits constitutively expressed pro-inflammatory markers in unstimulated Mφ

First, we studied the effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ on VDR and Cyp27b1 mRNA expression. Four hours of treatment with 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ did not affect VDR and Cyp27b1 gene expression (S1A and S1B Fig), but 12 hours treatment with high dose 1.25(OH)₂D₃ downregulated both VDR and Cyp27b1 expression (Fig 1A and 1B). A slight Cyp27b1 inhibition was observed by 25(OH)D₃ (but not with 1.25(OH)2D₃) after 24 hours, whereas dexamethasone inhibited Cyp27b1 gene expression at all three time points (S2B Fig). We then investigated gene expression of pro-inflammatory markers TNF-α, MCP-1, NF-κB and IL-6 in Mφ treated with 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃. The Mφ expressed low, yet detectable gene expressions of the pro-inflammatory markers, however TNF-α expression could be significantly inhibited by high dose 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ at all time points (Fig 1C, S1 Fig and S2 Fig). The effects were comparable to the inhibitory effects of dexamethasone. Also, MCP-1 and NF-κB mRNA gene expression was considerably inhibited by high dose 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25OH₂D₃ compared to untreated control Mφ at all timepoints (Fig 1D and 1E, S1 Fig and S2 Fig) comparable to the inhibitory effects of dexamethasone. High dose 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25OH₂D₃ also inhibited IL-6 gene expression, however the effect was not as pronounced as seen with dexamethasone (Fig 1F, S1 Fig and S2 Fig).

Download:

Fig 1. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in non-stimulated Mφ.

Mφ (n = 6) were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ (100 nM and 500 nM) or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) for 12 hours. ∇ Symbolises an outlier, which was removed from the analysis. Following targets ((a) VDR, (b) Cyp27b1, (c) TNF-α, (d) MCP-1, (e) NF-κB and (f) IL-6 were analysed by RT-qPCR. Target mRNA gene expression was divided with reference gene expression GAPDH and the results were normalised to control Mφ given the value 1. Repeated measures One-way ANOVA Test of trend was performed to evaluate dose-dependent response of either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃. P-value numbers are stated over the specific groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was also performed to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group and significance in illustrated as *. (b) ** significant difference between dexamethasone and CTRL (c) * Statistically significant difference between CTRL Mφ and Mφ treated with 500 nM 25(OH)D₃.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.g001

High dose vitamin D₃ inhibits TNF-α and NF-κB in LPS stimulated Mφ

LPS strongly inhibited VDR gene expression but clearly up-regulated Cyp27b1 gene expression in Mφ similarly as reported previously [15]. Pre-treatment with 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ did not affect VDR gene downregulation, but 1.25(OH)₂D₃ partly reverted Cyp27b1 gene upregulation (Fig 2A and 2B, S3 Fig and S4 Fig). As, expected, LPS strongly induced gene expressions of pro-inflammatory markers TNF-α, NF-κB and IL-6 (20, 3 and 9-fold respectively at 12 hours), whereas there was no effect on MCP-1 expression (Fig 2C, 2E and 2F).

Download:

Fig 2. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers LPS-induced Mφ.

Mφ (n = 6) were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ (100 nM and 500 nM) or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) for 12 hours following LPS challenge (1 μg/mL) for 4 hours. Following targets ((a) VDR, (b) Cyp27b1, (c) TNF-α, (d) MCP-1, (e) NF-κB and (f) IL-6) were analysed by RT-qPCR. Target mRNA gene expression was divided with reference gene GAPDH and ratios were normalised to control Mφ given the value 1. Repeated measures One-way ANOVA Test of trend was performed to evaluate dose-dependent response of either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃. P-value numbers are stated over the specific groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was also performed to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group and significance in illustrated as *. (c) * Statistically significant difference between LPS-induced Mφ and Mφ pre-treated with 500 nM 25(OH)D₃ and ** with 10 nM 1.25(OH)₂D₃.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.g002

Both 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ significantly attenuated LPS induced TNF-α gene expression at 12 and 24 hours (Fig 2C, S3 Fig and S4 Fig). Also, attenuation of NF-κB was observed by both 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ at 12 hours (Fig 2E), whereas no significant effect on induced MCP-1 or IL-6 expression was observed (Fig 2D–2F, S3 Fig and S4 Fig).

High dose vitamin D₃ inhibits TNF-α protein release in LPS stimulated Mφ

We then examined TNF-α protein secretion to culture media by ELISA. These findings confirmed the attenuation of TNF-α gene expression, showing a significant reduction in TNF-α release in LPS stimulated Mφ. In LPS stimulated Mφ, a significant reduction was seen already after 12 hours and maintained at 24 h (Fig 3A and 3B), whereas no significant change was observed in unstimulated Mφ after 12 hours, although a tendency was seen at 24 hours (Fig 3C and 3D). In addition, we also observed that high dose 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ moderately inhibited IL-6 protein release in both un-stimulated and LPS-induced Mφ (S5 Fig).

Download:

Fig 3. TNF-α protein secretion from LPS-induced Mφ and non-stimulated Mφ pre-treated with 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ for T = 12 h and T = 24h.

Mφ (n = 6) were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ (100 nM and 500 nM) or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) for (a) 12 hours followed by LPS challenge (1 μg/mL) for 4 hours or (b) 24 hours followed by LPS challenge (1 μg/mL) for 4 hours. (c) for 12 hours and (d) for 24 hours. TNF-α protein levels (pg/mL) were measured in Mφ culture medium by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Repeated measures One-way ANOVA Test of trend was performed to evaluate dose-dependent response of either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃. P-value numbers are stated over the specific groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was also performed to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group and significance in illustrated as *. (a) * Significant difference between LPS-induced Mφ and Mφ pre-treated with 10 nM 1.25(OH)₂D₃. (b) ** Significant difference between LPS-induced Mφ and Mφ pre-treated with 500 nM 25(OH)D₃ and 10 nM 1.25(OH)₂D₃. (d) * Significant difference between control Mφ and Mφ pre-treated with 500 nM 25(OH)D₃.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.g003

Discussion

The main finding of this study was to show a significant inhibition of TNF-α expression in fully differentiated human monocyte-derived Mφ by vitamin D₃ both during normal and pro-inflammatory conditions. It has previously been shown that 1.25(OH)₂D₃ was able to suppress TNF-α expression in murine cell lines [16] [17] and LPS induced TNF-α gene expression in human monocytes [18]. Di Rosa et al demonstrated, that 1.25(OH)₂D₃ exerts diverse effects on the inflammatory response in the intermediate phases of monocyte and Mφ differentiation, including TNF-α gene suppression in TNF-α stimulated Mφ [1]. It has been suggested, that 1.25(OH)₂D₃ induces a switch from an “M1” Mφ phenotype, expressing iNOS, TNF-α and IL-12, to the “M2” Mφ phenotype with higher expression of CD206, Arg-1 and IL-10 and down-regulation of pro-inflammatory markers, via the VDR-PPAR-γ signalling pathway in the mouse [16]. This general shift was supported in our study by a decrease in NF-κB expression and to a lesser extend attenuated MCP-1 and IL-6 expression by both 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃. Attenuation of NF-κB by 1.25(OH)₂D₃ has in mice been shown to be mediated via reduced degradation of IκBα in co-transfected HEK-293 cells [19]. Suppression of MCP-1 by 1.25(OH)₂D₃ has previously been reported in THP-1 monocytes and PMA induced, LPS-stimulated THP-1 Mφ [20]. Interestingly, we observed similar effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ in suppression of pro-inflammatory cytokines in LPS induced Mφ. This emphasises the importance and efficiency of Cyp27b1 in the Mφ for conversion into the active metabolite. In line with this, we show a significant up-regulation of Cyp27b1 in Mφ by LPS, which was partly reverted by 1.25(OH)₂D₃, but not by 25(OH)D₃. Mφ are known for their plasticity and polarisation in accordance to the surrounding microenvironment [21–23] and are known to play important roles in the development and sustaining of chronic inflammatory diseases by the production of pro-inflammatory cytokines. Of notice, TNF-α is a key mediator of inflammation evidenced by the clinical effect of TNF-α blocking biological drugs. It is therefore compelling to explore the use of high-dose vitamin D for anti-inflammatory treatment in e.g. inflammatory liver disease [24] [25] and metabolic low-grade inflammatory conditions related to insulin resistance and type 2 diabetes, where these pro-inflammatory markers are also involved [26–28]. The use of supra-physiological concentrations of 1.25(OH)₂D₃ as an anti-inflammatory agent, however, carries the risk of inducing hypercalcemia. To circumvent this, strategies to directly target 1.25(OH)₂D₃ or 25(OH)D₃ to macrophages may be applied [25]. In summary, we have shown that 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ supress TNF-α in fully differentiated human Mφ, both in resting/non-stimulated cells, and cells challenged by LPS. Our data support further attempts to develop systems for targeted delivery of Vitamin D to Mφ in vivo.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ treatment for 4 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in non-treated Mφ.

Mφ (n = 6) were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ (100 nM and 500 nM) or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) for 4 hours. Following targets ((a) VDR, (b) Cyp27b1, (c) TNF-α, (d) MCP-1, (e) NF-κB and (f) IL-6) were analysed by RT-qPCR. Target mRNA gene expression was divided with stable reference gene GAPDH and ratios were normalised to control Mφ given the value 1. Repeated measures One-way ANOVA Test of trend was performed to evaluate dose-dependent response of either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃. P-value numbers are stated over the specific groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was also performed to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group and significance in illustrated as *. (c) * significant difference between CTRL Mφ and Mφ treated with 0.05 nM 1.25(OH)₂D₃.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.s001

(EPS)

S2 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ treatment for 24 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in non-treated Mφ.

Mφ (n = 6) were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ (100 nM and 500 nM) or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) for 24 hours. Following targets ((a) VDR, (b) Cyp27b1, (c) TNF-α, (d) MCP-1, (e) NF-κB and (f) IL-6) were analysed by RT-qPCR. Target mRNA gene expression was divided with stable reference gene GAPDH and ratios were normalised to control Mφ given the value 1. Repeated measures One-way ANOVA Test of trend was performed to evaluate dose-dependent response of either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃. P-value numbers are stated over the specific groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was also performed to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group and significance in illustrated as *. (e) * significant difference between CTRL Mφ and Mφ treated with either 100 nM or 500 nM 25(OH)D₃ or 0.05 nM 1.25(OH)₂D₃.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.s002

(EPS)

S3 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ treatment for 4 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in LPS-induced Mφ.

Mφ (n = 6) were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ (100 nM and 500 nM) or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) for 4 hours following LPS challenge (1 μg/mL) for 4 hours. Following targets ((a) VDR, (b) Cyp27b1, (c) TNF-α, (d) MCP-1, (e) NF-κB and (f) IL-6) were analysed by RT-qPCR. Target mRNA gene expression was divided with reference gene GAPDH and ratios were normalised to control Mφ given the value 1. Repeated measures One-way ANOVA Test of trend was performed to evaluate dose-dependent response of either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃. P-value numbers are stated over the specific groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was also performed to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group and significance in illustrated as *.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.s003

(EPS)

S4 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ treatment for 24 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in LPS-induced Mφ.

Mφ (n = 6) were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ (100 nM and 500 nM) or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) for 24 hours following LPS challenge (1 μg/mL) for 4 hours. Following targets were analysed by RT-qPCR ((a) VDR, (b) Cyp27b1, (c) TNF-α, (d) MCP-1, (e) NF-κB and (f) IL-6). Target mRNA gene expression was divided with reference gene GAPDH and ratios were normalised to control Mφ given the value 1. Repeated measures One-way ANOVA Test of trend was performed to evaluate dose-dependent response of either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃. P-value numbers are stated over the specific groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was also performed to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group and significance in illustrated as *.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.s004

(EPS)

S5 Fig. IL-6 protein secretion from LPS-induced Mφ and non-stimulated Mφ pre-treated with 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ for T = 12 h.

Mφ (n = 6) were pre-treated with either 25(OH)D₃ (100 nM and 500 nM) or 1.25(OH)₂D₃ (0.05 nM and 10 nM) (a) for 12 hours (b) for 12 hours followed by LPS challenge (1 μg/mL) for 4 hours. IL-6 protein levels (pg/mL) were measured in Mφ culture medium by Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Repeated measures One-way ANOVA Test of trend was performed to evaluate dose-dependent response of either 25(OH)D₃ or 1.25(OH)₂D₃. P-value numbers are stated over the specific groups. One-way ANOVA analysis and Dunnett’s multiple comparisons test was also performed to compare the means of control group with each stimulation group and significance in illustrated as *. (a) *** Significant difference between control Mφ and Mφ treated with dexamethasone.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0215383.s005

(EPS)

Acknowledgments

Lab technicians Lene Sylvest and Christina Strande Sønderskov are acknowledged for their excellent technical assistance.

References

1. Di Rosa M, Malaguarnera G, De Gregorio C, Palumbo M, Nunnari G, Malaguarnera L. Immuno-modulatory effects of vitamin D3 in human monocyte and macrophages. Cellular immunology. 2012;280(1):36–43. pmid:23261827
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Holick MF, MacLaughlin JA, Clark MB, Holick SA, Potts JT Jr., Anderson RR, et al. Photosynthesis of previtamin D3 in human skin and the physiologic consequences. Science. 1980;210(4466):203–5. pmid:6251551
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Nykjaer A, Dragun D, Walther D, Vorum H, Jacobsen C, Herz J, et al. An endocytic pathway essential for renal uptake and activation of the steroid 25-(OH) vitamin D3. Cell. 1999;96(4):507–15. pmid:10052453
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Nykjaer A, Fyfe JC, Kozyraki R, Leheste JR, Jacobsen C, Nielsen MS, et al. Cubilin dysfunction causes abnormal metabolism of the steroid hormone 25(OH) vitamin D(3). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(24):13895–900. pmid:11717447
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Neve A, Corrado A, Cantatore FP. Immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D in peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical and experimental medicine. 2014;14(3):275–83. pmid:23824148
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Jeffery LE, Wood AM, Qureshi OS, Hou TZ, Gardner D, Briggs Z, et al. Availability of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) to APCs controls the balance between regulatory and inflammatory T cell responses. Journal of immunology. 2012;189(11):5155–64.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Maruotti N, Cantatore FP. Vitamin D and the immune system. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(3):491–5. pmid:20080911
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Baeke F, Korf H, Overbergh L, van Etten E, Verstuyf A, Gysemans C, et al. Human T lymphocytes are direct targets of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the immune system. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology. 2010;121(1–2):221–7. pmid:20302932
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Porcheray F, Viaud S, Rimaniol AC, Leone C, Samah B, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, et al. Macrophage activation switching: an asset for the resolution of inflammation. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2005;142(3):481–9. pmid:16297160
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Das A, Sinha M, Datta S, Abas M, Chaffee S, Sen CK, et al. Monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regeneration. The American journal of pathology. 2015;185(10):2596–606. pmid:26118749
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Ragab D, Soliman D, Samaha D, Yassin A. Vitamin D status and its modulatory effect on interferon gamma and interleukin-10 production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in culture. Cytokine. 2016;85:5–10. pmid:27269178
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Maradana MR, Yekollu SK, Zeng B, Ellis J, Clouston A, Miller G, et al. Immunomodulatory liposomes targeting liver macrophages arrest progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Metabolism. 2018;78:80–94. pmid:28941597
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Dirks NF, Ackermans MT, Lips P, de Jongh RT, Vervloet MG, de Jonge R, et al. The When, What & How of Measuring Vitamin D Metabolism in Clinical Medicine. Nutrients. 2018;10(4).
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer research. 2004;64(15):5245–50. pmid:15289330
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Adams JS, Ren S, Liu PT, Chun RF, Lagishetty V, Gombart AF, et al. Vitamin d-directed rheostatic regulation of monocyte antibacterial responses. Journal of immunology. 2009;182(7):4289–95.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
16. Zhang X, Zhou M, Guo Y, Song Z, Liu B. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) Promotes High Glucose-Induced M1 Macrophage Switching to M2 via the VDR-PPARgamma Signaling Pathway. BioMed research international. 2015;2015:157834. pmid:25961000
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Han X, Li L, Yang J, King G, Xiao Z, Quarles LD. Counter-regulatory paracrine actions of FGF-23 and 1,25(OH)2 D in macrophages. FEBS Lett. 2016;590(1):53–67. pmid:26762170
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Zhang Y, Leung DY, Richers BN, Liu Y, Remigio LK, Riches DW, et al. Vitamin D inhibits monocyte/macrophage proinflammatory cytokine production by targeting MAPK phosphatase-1. Journal of immunology. 2012;188(5):2127–35.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Chen Y, Zhang J, Ge X, Du J, Deb DK, Li YC. Vitamin D Receptor Inhibits Nuclear Factor kappaB Activation by Interacting with IkappaB Kinase beta Protein. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288(27):19450–8. pmid:23671281
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Wang YC, Hsieh CC, Kuo HF, Tsai MK, Yang SN, Kuo CH, et al. Effect of Vitamin D3 on Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 Production in Monocytes and Macrophages. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014;30(2):144–50. pmid:27122781
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Tacke F, Zimmermann HW. Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis. Journal of hepatology. 2014;60(5):1090–6. pmid:24412603
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Beyer M, Mallmann MR, Xue J, Staratschek-Jox A, Vorholt D, Krebs W, et al. High-resolution transcriptome of human macrophages. PloS one. 2012;7(9):e45466. pmid:23029029
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Charles D. Mills, Thomas AC, Lenz LL, Munder M. Macrophage: SHIP of Immunity. Frontiers in immunology. 2014;5.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Tacke F. Targeting hepatic macrophages to treat liver diseases. Journal of hepatology. 2017;66(6):1300–12. pmid:28267621
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Svendsen P, Graversen JH, Etzerodt A, Hager H, Roge R, Gronbaek H, et al. Antibody-Directed Glucocorticoid Targeting to CD163 in M2-type Macrophages Attenuates Fructose-Induced Liver Inflammatory Changes. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2017;4:50–61. pmid:28344991
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. Schmidt-Arras D, Rose-John S. IL-6 pathway in the liver: From physiopathology to therapy. Journal of hepatology. 2016;64(6):1403–15. pmid:26867490
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Beilfuss J, Berg V, Sneve M, Jorde R, Kamycheva E. Effects of a 1-year supplementation with cholecalciferol on interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and insulin resistance in overweight and obese subjects. Cytokine. 2012;60(3):870–4. pmid:22925537
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Giulietti A, van Etten E, Overbergh L, Stoffels K, Bouillon R, Mathieu C. Monocytes from type 2 diabetic patients have a pro-inflammatory profile. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) works as anti-inflammatory. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2007;77(1):47–57. pmid:17112620
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Di Rosa M, Malaguarnera G, De Gregorio C, Palumbo M, Nunnari G, Malaguarnera L. Immuno-modulatory effects of vitamin D3 in human monocyte and macrophages. Cellular immunology. 2012;280(1):36–43. pmid:23261827
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Holick MF, MacLaughlin JA, Clark MB, Holick SA, Potts JT Jr., Anderson RR, et al. Photosynthesis of previtamin D3 in human skin and the physiologic consequences. Science. 1980;210(4466):203–5. pmid:6251551
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Nykjaer A, Dragun D, Walther D, Vorum H, Jacobsen C, Herz J, et al. An endocytic pathway essential for renal uptake and activation of the steroid 25-(OH) vitamin D3. Cell. 1999;96(4):507–15. pmid:10052453
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Nykjaer A, Fyfe JC, Kozyraki R, Leheste JR, Jacobsen C, Nielsen MS, et al. Cubilin dysfunction causes abnormal metabolism of the steroid hormone 25(OH) vitamin D(3). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2001;98(24):13895–900. pmid:11717447
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Neve A, Corrado A, Cantatore FP. Immunomodulatory effects of vitamin D in peripheral blood monocyte-derived macrophages from patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Clinical and experimental medicine. 2014;14(3):275–83. pmid:23824148
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Jeffery LE, Wood AM, Qureshi OS, Hou TZ, Gardner D, Briggs Z, et al. Availability of 25-hydroxyvitamin D(3) to APCs controls the balance between regulatory and inflammatory T cell responses. Journal of immunology. 2012;189(11):5155–64.
View Article
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Maruotti N, Cantatore FP. Vitamin D and the immune system. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(3):491–5. pmid:20080911
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Baeke F, Korf H, Overbergh L, van Etten E, Verstuyf A, Gysemans C, et al. Human T lymphocytes are direct targets of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 in the immune system. The Journal of steroid biochemistry and molecular biology. 2010;121(1–2):221–7. pmid:20302932
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Porcheray F, Viaud S, Rimaniol AC, Leone C, Samah B, Dereuddre-Bosquet N, et al. Macrophage activation switching: an asset for the resolution of inflammation. Clinical and experimental immunology. 2005;142(3):481–9. pmid:16297160
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Das A, Sinha M, Datta S, Abas M, Chaffee S, Sen CK, et al. Monocyte and macrophage plasticity in tissue repair and regeneration. The American journal of pathology. 2015;185(10):2596–606. pmid:26118749
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] PubMed/NCBI

[39] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Ragab D, Soliman D, Samaha D, Yassin A. Vitamin D status and its modulatory effect on interferon gamma and interleukin-10 production by peripheral blood mononuclear cells in culture. Cytokine. 2016;85:5–10. pmid:27269178
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[41] View Article

[42] PubMed/NCBI

[43] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Maradana MR, Yekollu SK, Zeng B, Ellis J, Clouston A, Miller G, et al. Immunomodulatory liposomes targeting liver macrophages arrest progression of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis. Metabolism. 2018;78:80–94. pmid:28941597
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[45] View Article

[46] PubMed/NCBI

[47] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Dirks NF, Ackermans MT, Lips P, de Jongh RT, Vervloet MG, de Jonge R, et al. The When, What & How of Measuring Vitamin D Metabolism in Clinical Medicine. Nutrients. 2018;10(4).
View Article
Google Scholar

[49] View Article

[50] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Andersen CL, Jensen JL, Orntoft TF. Normalization of real-time quantitative reverse transcription-PCR data: a model-based variance estimation approach to identify genes suited for normalization, applied to bladder and colon cancer data sets. Cancer research. 2004;64(15):5245–50. pmid:15289330
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] PubMed/NCBI

[54] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Adams JS, Ren S, Liu PT, Chun RF, Lagishetty V, Gombart AF, et al. Vitamin d-directed rheostatic regulation of monocyte antibacterial responses. Journal of immunology. 2009;182(7):4289–95.
View Article
Google Scholar

[56] View Article

[57] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Zhang X, Zhou M, Guo Y, Song Z, Liu B. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) Promotes High Glucose-Induced M1 Macrophage Switching to M2 via the VDR-PPARgamma Signaling Pathway. BioMed research international. 2015;2015:157834. pmid:25961000
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[59] View Article

[60] PubMed/NCBI

[61] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Han X, Li L, Yang J, King G, Xiao Z, Quarles LD. Counter-regulatory paracrine actions of FGF-23 and 1,25(OH)2 D in macrophages. FEBS Lett. 2016;590(1):53–67. pmid:26762170
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[63] View Article

[64] PubMed/NCBI

[65] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Zhang Y, Leung DY, Richers BN, Liu Y, Remigio LK, Riches DW, et al. Vitamin D inhibits monocyte/macrophage proinflammatory cytokine production by targeting MAPK phosphatase-1. Journal of immunology. 2012;188(5):2127–35.
View Article
Google Scholar

[67] View Article

[68] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Chen Y, Zhang J, Ge X, Du J, Deb DK, Li YC. Vitamin D Receptor Inhibits Nuclear Factor kappaB Activation by Interacting with IkappaB Kinase beta Protein. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2013;288(27):19450–8. pmid:23671281
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[70] View Article

[71] PubMed/NCBI

[72] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Wang YC, Hsieh CC, Kuo HF, Tsai MK, Yang SN, Kuo CH, et al. Effect of Vitamin D3 on Monocyte Chemoattractant Protein 1 Production in Monocytes and Macrophages. Acta Cardiol Sin. 2014;30(2):144–50. pmid:27122781
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[74] View Article

[75] PubMed/NCBI

[76] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Tacke F, Zimmermann HW. Macrophage heterogeneity in liver injury and fibrosis. Journal of hepatology. 2014;60(5):1090–6. pmid:24412603
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[78] View Article

[79] PubMed/NCBI

[80] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Beyer M, Mallmann MR, Xue J, Staratschek-Jox A, Vorholt D, Krebs W, et al. High-resolution transcriptome of human macrophages. PloS one. 2012;7(9):e45466. pmid:23029029
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] PubMed/NCBI

[84] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Charles D. Mills, Thomas AC, Lenz LL, Munder M. Macrophage: SHIP of Immunity. Frontiers in immunology. 2014;5.
View Article
Google Scholar

[86] View Article

[87] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Tacke F. Targeting hepatic macrophages to treat liver diseases. Journal of hepatology. 2017;66(6):1300–12. pmid:28267621
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Svendsen P, Graversen JH, Etzerodt A, Hager H, Roge R, Gronbaek H, et al. Antibody-Directed Glucocorticoid Targeting to CD163 in M2-type Macrophages Attenuates Fructose-Induced Liver Inflammatory Changes. Mol Ther Methods Clin Dev. 2017;4:50–61. pmid:28344991
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Schmidt-Arras D, Rose-John S. IL-6 pathway in the liver: From physiopathology to therapy. Journal of hepatology. 2016;64(6):1403–15. pmid:26867490
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Beilfuss J, Berg V, Sneve M, Jorde R, Kamycheva E. Effects of a 1-year supplementation with cholecalciferol on interleukin-6, tumor necrosis factor-alpha and insulin resistance in overweight and obese subjects. Cytokine. 2012;60(3):870–4. pmid:22925537
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Giulietti A, van Etten E, Overbergh L, Stoffels K, Bouillon R, Mathieu C. Monocytes from type 2 diabetic patients have a pro-inflammatory profile. 1,25-Dihydroxyvitamin D(3) works as anti-inflammatory. Diabetes research and clinical practice. 2007;77(1):47–57. pmid:17112620
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Purpose

Materials and methods

Results

Conclusion

Introduction

Materials and methods

Purification of human mononuclear cells from buffy coats

Stimulation of Mφ with 25(OH)D3 and 1.25(OH)2D3

RNA extraction and gene expression analysis by real-time quantitative PCR

Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) for TNF-α and IL-6

Statistical analysis

Results

High dose vitamin D3 inhibits constitutively expressed pro-inflammatory markers in unstimulated Mφ

High dose vitamin D3 inhibits TNF-α and NF-κB in LPS stimulated Mφ

High dose vitamin D3 inhibits TNF-α protein release in LPS stimulated Mφ

Discussion

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D3 and 1.25(OH)2D3 treatment for 4 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in non-treated Mφ.

S2 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D3 and 1.25(OH)2D3 treatment for 24 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in non-treated Mφ.

S3 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D3 and 1.25(OH)2D3 treatment for 4 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in LPS-induced Mφ.

S4 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D3 and 1.25(OH)2D3 treatment for 24 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in LPS-induced Mφ.

S5 Fig. IL-6 protein secretion from LPS-induced Mφ and non-stimulated Mφ pre-treated with 25(OH)D3 and 1.25(OH)2D3 for T = 12 h.

Acknowledgments

References

Stimulation of Mφ with 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃

High dose vitamin D₃ inhibits constitutively expressed pro-inflammatory markers in unstimulated Mφ

High dose vitamin D₃ inhibits TNF-α and NF-κB in LPS stimulated Mφ

High dose vitamin D₃ inhibits TNF-α protein release in LPS stimulated Mφ

S1 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ treatment for 4 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in non-treated Mφ.

S2 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ treatment for 24 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in non-treated Mφ.

S3 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ treatment for 4 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in LPS-induced Mφ.

S4 Fig. Effects of 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ treatment for 24 hours on mRNA gene expression of VDR, 1-α hydroxylase and pro-inflammatory markers in LPS-induced Mφ.

S5 Fig. IL-6 protein secretion from LPS-induced Mφ and non-stimulated Mφ pre-treated with 25(OH)D₃ and 1.25(OH)₂D₃ for T = 12 h.