Extended treatment is preconized in a significant proportion of patients with unprovoked venous thromboembolism (VTE). However, limited direct/indirect comparisons are available to appropriately weight the benefit/risk ratio of the diverse treatments available. We aimed to compare the rate of symptomatic recurrent VTE and major bleeding (MB), the net clinical benefit (VTE+MB) and death on vitamin-K antagonist (VKA), direct oral anticoagulants (DOAC) and antiplatelet drugs for extended anticoagulation.
A systematic literature search through September 2018 identified randomized trials studying these pharmacologic therapies for extended anticoagulation following VTE. Treatment effects were calculated using network meta-analysis with frequentist fixed-effects model.
18 trials (18,221 patients) were included in the analysis. All treatments reduced the risk of recurrence compared to placebo/observation. Nonetheless, VKA (RR 0.22; 95%CI 0.13–0.39) and DOAC (RRs ranging from 0.25–0.32; 95%CI ranging from 0.13–0.52) were more effective than aspirin, whereas low-dose VKA was less effective than standard-dose VKA (RR 2.47; 95%CI 1.34–4.55). The efficacy of DOAC was globally comparable to standard-adjusted dose VKA. Low- (RR 3.13; 95%CI 1.37–7.16) and standard-dose (RR 3.23; 95%CI 1.16–8.99) VKA also increased the risk of MB, which was not the case for any DOAC. Low-dose VKA and low-dose DOAC had similar effects on MB compared to standard-doses. Although there was a trend for reduced MB and enhanced net clinical benefit for DOAC compared to VKA, this was not statistically significant. The specific anticoagulant therapies had no significant effects on deaths.
Citation: Mai V, Bertoletti L, Cucherat M, Jardel S, Grange C, Provencher S, et al. (2019) Extended anticoagulation for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events: An updated network meta-analysis. PLoS ONE 14(4): e0214134. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0214134
Editor: Sofia Dias, University of York, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: September 14, 2018; Accepted: March 7, 2019; Published: April 1, 2019
Copyright: © 2019 Mai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the manuscript and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: The authors received no specific funding for this work.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Pulmonary embolism (PE) and deep venous thrombosis (DVT), collectively referred as venous thromboembolism (VTE), are a leading causes of death and disability worldwide, affecting 10 millions of individuals annually . PE is also the third cause of mortality from cardiovascular disease, after stroke and coronary artery disease . In patients with acute VTE, anticoagulant therapy markedly decreases the risk of recurrence, at the cost of an increased incidence of bleeding. This risk is varying according to the presence of underlying risk factors and thus, should obviously be balanced with the increased risk of recurrence once anticoagulant therapy is discontinued. While time-limited therapy is recommended for patients with a provoked episode of VTE, extended therapy (no scheduled stop date) is recommended after a second episode of unprovoked VTE . In contrast, recent guidelines recommend a tailored anticoagulation duration according to the risk of bleeding for patients with an intermediate risk of recurrence, such as after a first episode of unprovoked VTE for which the 5-year risk of recurrence is up to 30% without anticoagulation [4, 5].
Until recently, the main option for long-term anticoagulant therapy was vitamin-K antagonists (VKA) with a standard-adjusted dose (targeting an international normalized ratio (INR) between 2 and 3) . In order to decrease the risk of treatment-related bleeding, studies evaluated a lower-intensity of anticoagulant therapy with VKA (INR between 1.5 and 2), but with disappointing results both in terms of efficacy and safety [7, 8]. Other studies confirmed that aspirin (ASA) in secondary prevention of VTE may be safer, but was associated with an increased risk of recurrence [9, 10]. More recently, the development of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) deeply modified the landscape of anticoagulant therapy for VTE. These compounds were shown to be non-inferior in preventing recurrent VTE, with potential improvement in safety compared to standard-dose VKA during the initial phase of anticoagulation [11–13]. Their pharmacological properties also allow fixed dosages without the need for biological monitoring. Similar to VKA, reduced dosages of apixaban and rivaroxaban were recently evaluated in the extended treatment of VTE with the aim of further improving their risk/benefit ratio [13, 14].
Unfortunately, there are limited direct comparisons between treatments, and many regimens were not evaluated using the same comparator. For example, low-dose apixaban was compared to placebo , whereas low-dose rivaroxaban was compared to ASA . The absence of direct comparisons between the various treatment regimens thus limits the clinicians’ capability to appropriately weight the risk/benefit ratio of the diverse treatments for extended anticoagulation following an acute VTE, especially for patients at intermediate risk of recurrence. We thus aimed to compare strategies based on anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs in a network meta-analysis of trials evaluating extended anticoagulant therapy for VTE.
This systematic review was conducted in accordance with the methodological guidelines for systematic reviews of randomized controlled trials from «Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions» . No ethics approval was needed.
The primary efficacy and safety objectives of the study were to compare the effects of VKA, DOAC (apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban) and antiplatelet drugs for the secondary prevention of VTE on the rate of symptomatic recurrent VTE and major bleeding (MB), respectively. Secondary objectives were to assess their effects on the net clinical benefit, a composite endpoint defined as recurrent VTE or MB, as well as on fatal VTE and fatal MB.
Data sources and searches
We updated the systematic review of Castellucci et al. , searching Pubmed and EMBASE using a modified search strategy up to September 30th 2018 (see online supplement) using a filter for randomized controlled trials. Publications from potentially relevant journals were also searched by hand. There were no restrictions on language.
The primary efficacy and safety outcome measures were recurrent VTE and MB episodes, respectively. Recurrent VTE was defined as an objectively confirmed occurrence of new DVT on ultrasound imaging, on venography or on the impedance plethysmography test, as well as a new PE suggested by a new high probability on ventilation/perfusion scanning, or a new filling defect on computed tomography or pulmonary angiography. A MB episode was defined according to International Society on Thrombosis and Haemostasis definition  and included fatal bleeding, bleeding in a critical area or organ, bleeding causing a fall in hemoglobin level of 20g/L or more, or leading to transfusion of two or more units of whole blood red cells. Secondary outcome measures included the net clinical benefit, as well as fatal recurrent VTE and MB episodes, defined as recurrent VTE or MB leading to death.
Study selection, quality assessment and data extraction
Studies were independently selected and data were extracted by two reviewers (V.M. and S.J.) using a standardized data abstraction form. Studies were included in the systematic review if they met inclusion criteria defined a priori: 1) prospective enrolment of consecutive patients previously treated for a minimum of three months with anticoagulant treatment for an objectively confirmed, symptomatic DVT or PE; 2) patients randomized to receive an antiplatelet drug, a VKA or a DOAC versus placebo or observation; 3) report one of the outcomes of interest of the present systematic review. Studies recruiting patients with asymptomatic VTE were excluded. Studies’ methodological quality was assessed using the risk of bias assessment tool from the Cochrane Handbook for randomized trials . The reviewers assigned a low, high or unknown risk of bias for each category. A study was considered to have a high risk of bias or an unknown risk of bias if at least one category was with a high risk or an unknown risk of bias, respectively. Primary analyses were made on all retrieved studies. The two reviewers independently extracted information from all studies retained in the meta-analysis, including 1) the study design, 2) patient characteristics, 3) mean treatment effect on VTE and MB. Two by two tables were constructed based on treatment received and available data for the primary and secondary outcomes. Only outcomes occurring during the time period that patients were receiving study drugs, placebo, or observation were included in the analysis. Disagreements were resolved by consensus.
Frequentist network meta-analysis and direct pairwise meta-analysis were conducted for all outcomes to compute relative risk (RR) and their 95% confidence interval (95%CI). Network meta-analysis combine direct (pairwise) and indirect comparisons for the same outcome, allowing estimation of the relative effectiveness among all interventions and rank ordering of the interventions. For a given comparison (e.g. VKA versus placebo), direct evidence is provided by trials that compare these drugs directly. Indirect evidence for VKA versus placebo can be provided by synthetizing studies that compared VKA versus aspirin and placebo versus aspirin. Network meta-analysis combines both direct and indirect evidence across a network of studies into a single effect size for a given medical condition. This method is similar to electrical network, where variance corresponds to resistance, treatment to voltage, and weighted treatment effects to current flows . We assessed available studies and patient characteristics to ensure similarity and to investigate the potential effect of heterogeneity on effect estimates. Placebo and observation were combined within the evidence network . We used adjusted continuity corrections of 0.5 to studies with no event . Comparisons with zero events in each study arms were not considered in network meta-analysis. I2 statistic was used to assess between study heterogeneity and was considered high at I2>50%. Fixed-effect model was used in regard to negligible or moderate heterogeneity (i.e. I2 <50% for all outcomes, range 0–24%). We then calculated the probability that each drug had the most efficacious regimen by the p-score, which can be considered as a frequentist analogue of the surface under the cumulative ranking curve for Bayesian approach .
We systematically tested the presence of significant interaction between the estimate of treatment effects derived from direct and indirect meta-analysis. A sensitivity analysis was planned a priori, adding drugs are not commercialized for the treatment of VTE (ximelagatran, idraparinux and sulodexide) from the evidence network. The pooled prevalence of events and its 95%CI was estimated using the arcsine transformation. All analyses were performed using R (netmeta package version 0.9–5 for treatment comparison, meta package version 4.8–2 for pooled prevalence, R Language and Environment for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria).
Study selection and characteristics of included randomized controlled trials
The primary reviewers included 18 independent trials that contributed to 17 separate publications [7–9, 11–14, 22–31], representing 18,221 patients (median sample size of 678). The reasons for excluding studies appear in Fig 1. Patients and study characteristics are shown in Table 1. Number of events for each main outcome are reported in S1 Table. Ten studies recruited patients with unprovoked VTE only [7–9, 22, 23, 25–27, 30, 31], whereas the proportion of unprovoked VTE was 64±4% (range 41–92%) and unknown in seven [11–14, 24, 29] and in one  study, respectively. Acute PE represented 33±31% (range 0 to 100%) of index events. Underlying cancers were unusual. Trials assessed the effects of VKA (n = 8) [7, 8, 22–27], DOAC (n = 6) [11–14, 28], ASA (n = 2) [9, 30], idraparinux (n = 1)  and sulodexide (n = 1)  against standard treatments (VKA or ASA) or placebo/observation (Fig 2). The mean follow-up duration was 24±11 months. Overall, included trials were generally at low risk of bias (S2 Table). Although independent, blinded outcome assessments were described for all trials, lack of blinding was noted for four trials of them [23, 24, 26, 27], whereas allocation concealment also was not reported in one study .
The width of lines for each connection in the evidence network are proportional to the number of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing each pair of treatments. Multiarm trials are represented in dotted lines. The size of each treatment node is proportional to the number of randomized participants (sample size). Direct oral anticoagulants for the main analysis included apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban, whereas unmarketed drugs (shaded in gray) (idraparinux, sulodexide and ximelagatran) were used for sensitivity analyses only (see online supplement). ASA: aspirin; RCT: randomized controlled trial; VKA: vitamin K antagonist.
Recurrent venous thromboembolic events
The analysis of VTE recurrence encompassed 17 trials (17,895 patients) that contributed to 16 publications [7–9, 11–14, 22, 23, 25–31], allowing 21 comparisons. The rate of recurrent VTE was 2.8% (95%CI 1.9–3.9%, I2 = 91%) and 11.2% (95%CI 8.6–14.2%, I2 = 89%) in patients with and without active anticoagulation, respectively (overall rate of 5.4%, 95%CI 5.4–7.1%, I2 = 95%). The estimates of the treatment-effect derived from the direct and indirect meta-analysis were not different. Overall, all treatments reduced the risk of recurrence compared to placebo or observation (Fig 3A). In multiple pairwise comparisons (Table 2), however, VKA and DOAC were more effective than ASA and standard-dose VKA was more effective than low-dose VKA. Standard- and low-dose DOAC also tended to be more effective than low-dose VKA, whereas their efficacy was globally comparable to standard-dose VKA. Sensitivity analysis including unmarketed drugs (idraparinux, sulodexide and ximelagatran) yielded similar results (S3 Table). Frequentist network meta-analyses suggested that standard-dose VKA was associated with the highest probability of being the best treatment for VTE reduction (82%) (Table 3). Data providing estimates for unmarketed drugs are detailed in S4 Table.
Relative risks (95% confidence interval) for (A) recurrent venous thromboembolic events and (B) major bleeding in network meta-analysis versus observation or placebo. ASA: aspirin; INR: international normalized ratio; VKA: vitamin k antagonist.
Risk of major bleeding
The analysis of MB also included 17 trials (17,604 patients) that contributed to 16 separate publications [7–9, 11–14, 22–30], allowing 21 comparisons. One study was excluded from the analysis in the absence of MB in both study arms . The overall rate of MB was 0.8% (95%CI 0.5–1.2%, I2 = 78%) and 0.3% (95%CI 0.1–0.6%, I2 = 68%) in patients with and without active anticoagulation, respectively (overall rate 0.6%; 95%CI 0.4–0.9%, I2 = 77%). Overall, low- and standard-dose VKA and idraparinux significantly increased the risk of MB compared to placebo or observation (Fig 3B). DOAC tended to be associated with a decreased risk of MB compared to VKA (Table 2). This was statistically significant for apixaban 5mg only. Apixaban 5 mg (89%) and 2.5 mg (79%) were associated with the highest probability of being the best treatments in terms of MB risk (Table 3).
Net clinical benefit and risk of fatal outcomes
The analysis of net clinical benefit included 17,895 patients from 17 independent trials that contributed to 16 separate publications [7–9, 11–14, 22, 23, 25–31], allowing 21 comparisons. All therapies were associated with significant net clinical benefit compared to placebo, except for idraparinux (Fig 4A). However, results from the network meta-analysis showed that standard-dose VKA and DOAC were associated with significantly higher net clinical benefit than ASA and low-dose VKA (Table 4, see S5 Table for estimates of unmarketed drugs). Apixaban 5mg (84%) and 2.5mg (81%) were also associated with the highest probability of being the best treatments for the net clinical benefit (Table 3). Conversely, none of the treatment was associated with a reduction in fatal outcome due to recurrent VTE or MB (Fig 4B) within the 13 trials (16,569 patients) [7–9, 11–14, 22–24, 28, 29], allowing 17 comparisons. In multiple pairwise comparisons, only apixaban 2.5 mg twice daily compared to ASA was associated with reduced fatal events (Table 4). This analysis was limited by the overall low mortality due to fatal VTE (0.18%; 95%CI 0.10–0.29%) and MB (0.02%; 95%CI 0.00–0.04%).
Relative risks (95% confidence interval) for net clinical benefit (A) and death related to fatal recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding (B) in network meta-analysis versus observation or placebo. ASA: aspirin; INR: international normalized ratio; VKA: vitamin k antagonist.
The present network meta-analysis confirmed that extended anticoagulation significantly reduced the rate of recurrent VTE following an acute DVT or PE. This effect was mostly apparent for standard-dose VKA and DOAC, which were associated with a ≈80% and ≈75% relative risk reduction compared to placebo and aspirin, respectively. Consistently, individual pairwise comparisons confirmed that VKA and DOAC were more effective than ASA, whereas standard-dose VKA prevented more effectively recurrent VTE than low-dose VKA. DOAC also tended to be more effective than low-dose VKA. On the other hand, DOAC tended to be associated with a lower risk of MB. Consequently, standard-dose VKA and DOAC were associated with the highest net clinical benefit in the secondary prevention of VTE. Conversely, low-dose apixaban and rivaroxaban were not associated with differences in VTE recurrence, MB or net clinical benefit compared to full-dose DOAC.
Following the initial three months of anticoagulation for acute VTE, both physicians and patients face the important question of whether long-term anticoagulation should be maintained to prevent recurrent VTE. With the exception of patients with cancer and antiphospholipid syndrome, the risk for recurrent VTE after discontinuation of anticoagulation is mostly related to the characteristics of the index event, the recurrence rate averaging 2.5% and 4.5% per year after provoked and unprovoked VTE, respectively [24, 32]. This risk appears to be more important during the first year after anticoagulant discontinuation or in patients with recurrent episodes. Therefore, treatment for longer than 3 months is generally not recommended following a VTE provoked by a major transient risk factor, whereas indefinite anticoagulation is recommended for patients with recurrent events [4, 5]. However, the assessment of the risk of recurrence in patients with a first episode of unprovoked VTE is more complex. The risk of PE recurrence after a first unprovoked PE reaches 20% at 5 years [25, 33], with age and presence of antiphospholipid syndrome being associated with an increased risk of recurrence . As a result, the American College of Chest Physician (ACCP) and European guidelines suggest that extended (no scheduled stop date) oral anticoagulation should be preconized  or considered  for patients with a first episode of unprovoked PE and low-to-moderate  or low  bleeding risk. Interestingly, while the ACCP guidelines suggests the use of DOAC over standard-adjusted dose VKA for extended treatment of VTE , the European guidelines rather suggest DOAC as an alternative option to VKA only . This European recommendation is likely based on the fact that the risk of bleeding with DOAC, and particularly intracranial bleeding, was less than with VKA therapy in the acute management of VTE [35, 36] and atrial fibrillation [37, 38]. It is noteworthy, however, that limited direct or indirect comparisons were made between VKA and DOAC in the extended phase of anticoagulation for VTE.
In this regard, the present results add to the current literature by providing more specific estimates of VTE recurrence and MB with the diverse treatment strategies for the long-term management of VTE. Intriguingly, the present meta-analysis did not provide evidence of differences in efficacy and bleeding during extended anticoagulation between treatments, either as drug class (i.e. standard-dose VKA versus DOAC), dosage (standard- versus low-dose DOAC) or as individual agents, except for ASA that was associated with an increased risk of recurrence. These results differ from previous phase 3 trials comparing DOAC to low molecular weight heparins/VKA for the acute management of VTE that reported a decreased risk of bleeding associated with edoxaban, rivaroxaban and apixaban [39–42]. Whether a difference in patient characteristics may explain this discrepancy remains unknown. Indeed, while the absolute rates of MB in the included trials were similar to trials exploring acute treatment of VTE, the exclusion of patients with previous bleeding or recurrence in the acute phase of treatment may have led to a selection bias toward patients at lower risk of bleeding or recurrence. In addition, individual phase 3 trials that reported a reduction in bleeding risk with apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban generally included more than 4,000 patients and used a composite of MB and non-major clinically relevant bleeding [12, 13, 43], increasing the absolute number of events. The current meta-analysis may thus have lacked sufficient power to detect a potential difference in MB, reflected by the large confidence intervals of the estimates. However, the clinical relevance of non-major clinically relevant bleeding is still under debate .
More recently, the net clinical benefit of anticoagulation therapy, a composite endpoint defined as recurrent VTE or MB, was proposed as an attempt to fully capture the overall effects of anticoagulation in the secondary prevention of VTE . The net clinical benefit is considered as a global appraisal of treatment effects, helping clinicians and patients weighting the advantages and the harms of therapy and personalizing the choice of treatment in a shared-decision process. Consistent with previous findings, the analysis of the net clinical benefit in our meta-analysis favored the use of DOAC or standard-adjusted dose VKA over ASA, low-dose VKA or observation alone (except for standard-dose rivaroxaban compared to low-dose VKA). Similarly, the frequentist network meta-analysis methods suggested that apixaban (2.5 and 5mg), and to a lesser extent dabigatran 150mg and rivaroxaban 10mg, were associated with the highest probability of being the best treatments in terms of net clinical benefit. It is noteworthy, however, that these results should be interpreted with great caution given that such analyses preclude the appropriate calculation of the confidence intervals of these probability estimates. In addition, despite the fact that VKA and DOAC were associated with a trend for reduced mortality, none of the antithrombotic drugs were associated with a reduction in fatal events, with the possible exception of apixaban versus ASA. It remains unknown if this result reflects a similar efficacy in preventing mortality or a lack of power due to the low number of recurrent fatal PE and fatal bleeding.
Contrary to two previous network meta-analyses [16, 46], the current study did not observe any significant difference in MB between VKA and the diverse DOAC. This discrepancy is likely related to the precision gained by the inclusion of 3 recent trials testing rivaroxaban 10 and 20 mg, standard dose VKA, and sulodexide [14, 25, 31]. Indeed, in the studies of Castelluci et al. and Sterne et al. [16, 46], the higher risk of MB with rivaroxaban was mainly derived from one trial  in which no MB occurred in the placebo arm whereas 4 (0.7%) occurred in the rivaroxaban one, yielding to statistically significant although uncertain increased risk of MB. Conversely, the effects of the diverse treatments on VTE recurrence were similar in both meta-analysis. Thus, with the inclusion of additional trials, as well as the description of the net clinical benefit of the diverse therapeutic strategies, the present meta-analysis likely provides a more precise estimate of the specific treatment effects of antithrombotic drugs for extended treatment of VTE.
Taken together, the present meta-analysis supports current guidelines suggesting that standard-dose VKA (INR 2 to 3) and DOAC are appropriate treatment strategies to prevent VTE recurrence. While apixaban, edoxaban, and rivaroxaban have a better safety profile over VKA for the acute management [39–42], DOAC were only associated with trends for reduced MB and their net clinical benefit were similar during extended anticoagulation compared to VKA. Pharmacoeconomic studies also suggested that apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban were cost-effective alternatives to VKA for extended anticoagulation following acute VTE in Canada, United Kingdom, and United States of America [47–51], although these studies were funded by pharmaceutical companies. Ultimately, the choice of treatment for extended anticoagulation thus likely relies on patients’ preference and individual risk factors for adverse events with VKA and DOAC. Although considered as more convenient, DOAC are also associated with variable pharmacodynamic in case of specific medical conditions and drug-drug interactions . In some situations, their efficacy and safety is still unknown . Hence, our results may be reassuring for some patients well equilibrated under VKA for extended therapy.
Conversely, the place of ASA appears to be limited, being associated with a lower reduction of recurrent VTE compared to VKA or DOAC without a significant reduction in MB. ASA should thus be reserved to the minority of patients refusing to take or not tolerating any form of anticoagulants. It is noteworthy, however, that in the absence of direct effects on mortality, extended anticoagulation aims to mitigating the risk of non-fatal complications such as recurrent VTE, or post-thrombotic syndrome . Unfortunately, the effects of anticoagulation on these outcomes were not reported in the trials. The decision on extended anticoagulation should therefore be based on the periodical re-assessment of risk/benefit ratio in a shared decision-making process, as currently recommended.
Limitations of the study
There are several limitations to this study that should be considered. Firstly, the magnitude of treatment effect may be affected by the design of the included trials. Overall, the risk of bias was considered low, although length of follow-up that varied widely from one study to the other. However, this variation did not modify the treatment effect of VTE prevention using a Bayesian approach . Secondly, characteristics of patients, such as index events (PE versus DVT), patient’s age, body mass index and comorbidities may modify the treatment effect of anticoagulation. In absence of patient level data, their influences cannot be explored. Thirdly, non-major clinically relevant bleeding were not taken into account and data about other relevant outcomes (myocardial infarction, stroke) were sparse or unavailable in the majority of trials, precluding specific analyses. Fourthly, patients recruited in most trials were not naïve to VKA. Patients at risk of bleeding could have been excluded, as the incidence of MB is highest in the initial months of treatment. Similarly, patients with a low time in therapeutic range were generally excluded, favouring the benefit of VKA. The design of randomized trials studying the extended anticoagulation may thus have overestimated the treatment effects of VKA . Fifthly, the confidence intervals generated by the present meta-analysis were large despite the power gain related to network meta-analysis. It may be explained by the fact that the estimates were based on only one trial for several drugs. Thus, the absence of difference between treatment effects did not imply their equivalence. This pitfall was partially related to the low rate of events, especially for fatal events. Finally, most of the comparisons were only indirect and subject to artefacts caused by study designs, patient populations and other co-variables. These results should therefore be interpreted with extreme caution in the absence of head-to-head clinical trials. Network meta-analysis requires studies to be sufficiently similar in terms of treatment effect modifiers in order to verify the transitivity assumption to pool their results . However, the frequentist approach and the relatively small number of included trials did not permit performing analysis according to covariables and to explore the transitivity assumption such as trial duration or patient characteristics. In the Bayesian meta-analysis of Castellucci et al., durations of trials were explored by metaregression. The authors did not conclude a relation between duration of the trials and the treatment effect.
In conclusion, standard dose VKA and DOAC shared similar effects on VTE recurrence and MB, whereas ASA and low-dose VKA were associated with the worst risk/benefit ratio. While DOAC were associated with a trend for reduced risk of MB compared to VKA, this effect remained non-significant during extended anticoagulant therapy. Conversely, low-dose apixaban and rivaroxaban were also associated with a similar risk of MB compared to standard-dose, as previously documented for low-dose VKA.
S1 Text. Data sources and searches.
Medline and embase search strategies.
S1 Table. Number of events for each main outcome reported by 17 randomized trials for the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic events.
S3 Table. Sensitivity analysis describing the relative risk (95% confidence interval) from network meta-analysis for recurrent thromboembolism events and major bleeding for all pairwise comparisons including marketed and unmarketed (idraparinux, sulodexide, ximelagatran) drugs.
S4 Table. Probability of being the best treatment according to the p-score computing using frequentist network meta-analysis for marketed and unmarketed drugs.
S5 Table. Relative risk (95% confidence interval) from network meta-analysis for net clinical benefit and fatal recurrent venous thromboembolism and major bleeding for all pairwise comparisons for marketed and unmarketed drugs.
- 1. Jha AK, Larizgoitia I, Audera-Lopez C, Prasopa-Plaizier N, Waters H, Bates DW. The global burden of unsafe medical care: analytic modelling of observational studies. BMJ Quality & Safety. 2013;22(10):809–15. pmid:24048616
- 2. Goldhaber SZ, Bounameaux H. Pulmonary embolism and deep vein thrombosis. The Lancet. 2012;379(9828):1835–46.
- 3. Kearon C, Akl EA. Duration of anticoagulant therapy for deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism. Blood. 2014;123(12):1794–801. pmid:24497538
- 4. Kearon C, Akl EA, Ornelas J, Blaivas A, Jimenez D, Bounameaux H, et al. Antithrombotic Therapy for VTE Disease. CHEST. 2016;149(2):315–52. pmid:26867832
- 5. Committee for Practice Guidelines ESC, Zamorano JL, Achenbach S, Baumgartner H, Bax JJ, Bueno H, et al. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolismThe Task Force for the Diagnosis and Management of Acute Pulmonary Embolism of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC)Endorsed by the European Respiratory Society (ERS). European Heart Journal. 2014;35(43):3033–73. pmid:25173341
- 6. Holbrook A, Schulman S, Witt DM, Vandvik PO, Fish J, Kovacs MJ, et al. Evidence-Based Management of Anticoagulant Therapy. CHEST. 2012;141(2):e152S–e84S. pmid:22315259
- 7. Kearon C, Ginsberg JS, Kovacs MJ, Anderson DR, Wells P, Julian JA, et al. Comparison of low-intensity warfarin therapy with conventional-intensity warfarin therapy for long-term prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(7):631–9. Epub 2003/08/15. pmid:12917299.
- 8. Ridker PM, Goldhaber SZ, Danielson E, Rosenberg Y, Eby CS, Deitcher SR, et al. Long-term, low-intensity warfarin therapy for the prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2003;348(15):1425–34. Epub 2003/02/26. pmid:12601075.
- 9. Brighton TA, Eikelboom JW, Mann K, Mister R, Gallus A, Ockelford P, et al. Low-dose aspirin for preventing recurrent venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(21):1979–87. Epub 2012/11/06. pmid:23121403.
- 10. Sobieraj DM, Coleman CI, Pasupuleti V, Deshpande A, Kaw R, Hernandez AV. Comparative efficacy and safety of anticoagulants and aspirin for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism: A network meta-analysis. Thromb Res. 2015;135(5):888–96. Epub 2015/03/22. pmid:25795564.
- 11. Schulman S, Kearon C, Kakkar AK, Schellong S, Eriksson H, Baanstra D, et al. Extended use of dabigatran, warfarin, or placebo in venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(8):709–18. Epub 2013/02/22. pmid:23425163.
- 12. Einstein Investigators, Bauersachs R , Berkowitz SD, Brenner B, Buller HR, Decousus H, et al. Oral rivaroxaban for symptomatic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2010;363(26):2499–510. Epub 2010/12/07. pmid:21128814.
- 13. Agnelli G, Buller HR, Cohen A, Curto M, Gallus AS, Johnson M, et al. Apixaban for extended treatment of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(8):699–708. Epub 2012/12/12. pmid:23216615.
- 14. Weitz JI, Lensing AWA, Prins MH, Bauersachs R, Beyer-Westendorf J, Bounameaux H, et al. Rivaroxaban or Aspirin for Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2017;376(13):1211–22. Epub 2017/03/21. pmid:28316279.
- 15. Higgins JPT, Green S, Cochrane Collaboration. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions. Cochrane book series. 2008:xxi, 649 p. PubMed PMID: 15305846.
- 16. Castellucci LA, Cameron C, Le Gal G, Rodger MA, Coyle D, Wells PS, et al. Efficacy and safety outcomes of oral anticoagulants and antiplatelet drugs in the secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism: systematic review and network meta-analysis. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2013;347:f5133. pmid:23996149
- 17. Kaatz S, Ahmad D, Spyropoulos AC, Schulman S. Definition of clinically relevant non‐major bleeding in studies of anticoagulants in atrial fibrillation and venous thromboembolic disease in non‐surgical patients: communication from the SSC of the ISTH. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2015;13(11):2119–26. pmid:26764429
- 18. Higgins JPT. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. Cochrane Collab. 2011.
- 19. Rucker G. Network meta-analysis, electrical networks and graph theory. Research synthesis methods. 2012;3(4):312–24. Epub 2012/12/01. pmid:26053424.
- 20. Sweeting MJ, Sutton AJ, Lambert PC. What to add to nothing? Use and avoidance of continuity corrections in meta-analysis of sparse data. Statistics in medicine. 2004;23(9):1351–75. Epub 2004/04/30. pmid:15116347.
- 21. Rücker G, Schwarzer G. Ranking treatments in frequentist network meta-analysis works without resampling methods. BMC Medical Research Methodology. 2015;15(1):58. pmid:26227148
- 22. Kearon C, Gent M, Hirsh J, Weitz J, Kovacs MJ, Anderson DR, et al. A comparison of three months of anticoagulation with extended anticoagulation for a first episode of idiopathic venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 1999;340(12):901–7. Epub 1999/03/25. pmid:10089183.
- 23. Agnelli G, Prandoni P, Santamaria MG, Bagatella P, Iorio A, Bazzan M, et al. Three months versus one year of oral anticoagulant therapy for idiopathic deep venous thrombosis. Warfarin Optimal Duration Italian Trial Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2001;345(3):165–9. Epub 2001/07/21. pmid:11463010.
- 24. Agnelli G, Prandoni P, Becattini C, Silingardi M, Taliani MR, Miccio M, et al. Extended oral anticoagulant therapy after a first episode of pulmonary embolism. Ann Intern Med. 2003;139(1):19–25. Epub 2003/07/02. pmid:12834314.
- 25. Couturaud F, Sanchez O, Pernod G, Mismetti P, Jego P, Duhamel E, et al. Six Months vs Extended Oral Anticoagulation After a First Episode of Pulmonary Embolism: The PADIS-PE Randomized Clinical Trial. Jama. 2015;314(1):31–40. Epub 2015/07/08. pmid:26151264.
- 26. Eischer L, Gartner V, Schulman S, Kyrle PA, Eichinger S. 6 versus 30 months anticoagulation for recurrent venous thrombosis in patients with high factor VIII. Annals of hematology. 2009;88(5):485–90. Epub 2008/10/22. pmid:18931845
- 27. Palareti G, Cosmi B, Legnani C, Tosetto A, Brusi C, Iorio A, et al. D-dimer testing to determine the duration of anticoagulation therapy. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(17):1780–9. Epub 2006/10/27. pmid:17065639.
- 28. Schulman S, Wahlander K, Lundstrom T, Clason SB, Eriksson H, Investigators TI. Secondary prevention of venous thromboembolism with the oral direct thrombin inhibitor ximelagatran. N Engl J Med. 2003;349(18):1713–21. Epub 2003/10/31. pmid:14585939.
- 29. van Gogh I, Buller HR, Cohen AT, Davidson B, Decousus H, Gallus AS, et al. Extended prophylaxis of venous thromboembolism with idraparinux. N Engl J Med. 2007;357(11):1105–12. Epub 2007/09/15. pmid:17855671.
- 30. Becattini C, Agnelli G, Schenone A, Eichinger S, Bucherini E, Silingardi M, et al. Aspirin for preventing the recurrence of venous thromboembolism. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(21):1959–67. Epub 2012/05/25. pmid:22621626.
- 31. Andreozzi GM, Bignamini AA, Davi G, Palareti G, Matuska J, Holy M, et al. Sulodexide for the Prevention of Recurrent Venous Thromboembolism: The Sulodexide in Secondary Prevention of Recurrent Deep Vein Thrombosis (SURVET) Study: A Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial. Circulation. 2015;132(20):1891–7. Epub 2015/09/27. pmid:26408273; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4643750.
- 32. Schulman S, Granqvist S, Holmstrom M, Carlsson A, Lindmarker P, Nicol P, et al. The duration of oral anticoagulant therapy after a second episode of venous thromboembolism. The Duration of Anticoagulation Trial Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1997;336(6):393–8. Epub 1997/02/06. pmid:9010144.
- 33. Agnelli G, Gitt AK, Bauersachs R, Fronk EM, Laeis P, Mismetti P, et al. The management of acute venous thromboembolism in clinical practice—study rationale and protocol of the European PREFER in VTE Registry. Thrombosis journal. 2015;13(1).
- 34. Tromeur C, Sanchez O, Presles E, Pernod G, Bertoletti L, Jego P, et al. Risk factors for recurrent venous thromboembolism after unprovoked pulmonary embolism: the PADIS-PE randomised trial. Eur Respir J. 2018;51(1). pmid:29301920.
- 35. van Es N, Coppens M, Schulman S, Middeldorp S, Buller HR. Direct oral anticoagulants compared with vitamin K antagonists for acute venous thromboembolism: evidence from phase 3 trials. Blood. 2014;124(12):1968–75. Epub 2014/06/26. pmid:24963045.
- 36. Castellucci LA, Cameron C, Le Gal G, et al. Clinical and safety outcomes associated with treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: A systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2014;312(11):1122–35. pmid:25226478
- 37. Chai-Adisaksopha C, Crowther M, Isayama T, Lim W. The impact of bleeding complications in patients receiving target-specific oral anticoagulants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Blood. 2014;124(15):2450–8. pmid:25150296
- 38. Abraham NS, Singh S, Alexander GC, Heien H, Haas LR, Crown W, et al. Comparative risk of gastrointestinal bleeding with dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and warfarin: population based cohort study. BMJ: British Medical Journal. 2015;350:h1857. pmid:25910928
- 39. Cohen A, Fowler H, Hamilton M, Phatak H, Mitchell SA, Liu XC, et al. Comparison of apixaban, dabigatran and rivaroxaban in the acute treatment and prevention of venous thromboembolism: Systematic review and network meta-analysis. European Heart Journal. 2014;35:1064.
- 40. Cohen AT, Hamilton M, Mitchell SA, Phatak H, Liu X, Bird A, et al. Comparison of the Novel Oral Anticoagulants Apixaban, Dabigatran, Edoxaban, and Rivaroxaban in the Initial and Long-Term Treatment and Prevention of Venous Thromboembolism: Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2015;10(12):e0144856. PMC4696796. pmid:26716830
- 41. Fox BD, Kahn SR, Langleben D, Eisenberg MJ, Shimony A. Efficacy and safety of novel oral anticoagulants for treatment of acute venous thromboembolism: direct and adjusted indirect meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials. Bmj. 2012;345:e7498. Epub 2012/11/15. pmid:23150473; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3496553.
- 42. Gómez-Outes A, Lecumberri R, Suárez-Gea ML, Terleira-Fernández A-I, Monreal M, Vargas-Castrillón E. Case Fatality Rates of Recurrent Thromboembolism and Bleeding in Patients Receiving Direct Oral Anticoagulants for the Initial and Extended Treatment of Venous Thromboembolism:A Systematic Review. Journal of Cardiovascular Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 2015;20(5):490–500. pmid:25802423.
- 43. The Hokusai-VTE Investigators. Edoxaban versus Warfarin for the Treatment of Symptomatic Venous Thromboembolism. New England Journal of Medicine. 2013;369(15):1406–15. pmid:23991658.
- 44. Laporte S, Chapelle C, Bertoletti L, Ollier E, Zufferey P, Lega JC, et al. Assessment of clinically relevant bleeding as a surrogate outcome for major bleeding: validation by meta‐analysis of randomized controlled trials. Journal of Thrombosis and Haemostasis. 2017;15(8):1547–58. pmid:28544422
- 45. Raskob GE, van Es N, Verhamme P, Carrier M, Di Nisio M, Garcia D, et al. Edoxaban for the Treatment of Cancer-Associated Venous Thromboembolism. New England Journal of Medicine. 2018;378(7):615–24. pmid:29231094.
- 46. Sterne JA, Bodalia PN, Bryden PA, Davies PA, Lopez-Lopez JA, Okoli GN, et al. Oral anticoagulants for primary prevention, treatment and secondary prevention of venous thromboembolic disease, and for prevention of stroke in atrial fibrillation: systematic review, network meta-analysis and cost-effectiveness analysis. Health Technol Assess. 2017;21(9):1–386. Epub 2017/03/11. pmid:28279251; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5366855.
- 47. Jugrin AV, Hosel V, Ustyugova A, De Francesco M, Lamotte M, Sunderland T. Indirect comparison and cost-utility of dabigatran etexilate and rivaroxaban in the treatment and extended anticoagulation of venous thromboembolism in a UK setting. J Med Econ. 2016;19(1):1–10. Epub 2015/09/22. pmid:26390231.
- 48. Quon P, Le HH, Raymond V, Mtibaa M, Moshyk A. Clinical and economic benefits of extended treatment with apixaban for the treatment and prevention of recurrent venous thromboembolism in Canada. J Med Econ. 2016;19(6):557–67. Epub 2016/01/14. pmid:26761644.
- 49. Diken AI, Yalcinkaya A, Hanedan MO, Erol ME, Ercen Diken O. Rivaroxaban vs. warfarin on extended deep venous thromboembolism treatment: A cost analysis. Phlebology. 2018;33(1):53–9. Epub 2017/01/07. pmid:28056701.
- 50. Wells PS, Lensing AWA, Haskell L, Levitan B, Laliberte F, Durkin M, et al. Cost comparison of continued anticoagulation with rivaroxaban versus placebo based on the 1-year EINSTEIN-Extension trial efficacy and safety results. J Med Econ. 2018;21(6):587–94. Epub 2018/02/23. pmid:29469638.
- 51. Jugrin AV, Ustyugova A, Urbich M, Lamotte M, Sunderland T. The cost-utility of dabigatran etexilate compared with warfarin in treatment and extended anticoagulation of acute VTE in the UK. Thromb Haemost. 2015;114(4):778–92. Epub 2015/08/15. pmid:26272227.
- 52. Steffel J, Verhamme P, Potpara TS, Albaladejo P, Antz M, Desteghe L, et al. The 2018 European Heart Rhythm Association Practical Guide on the use of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants in patients with atrial fibrillation. European Heart Journal. 2018;39(16):1330–93. pmid:29562325
- 53. Bertoletti L, Benhamou Y, Béjot Y, Marechaux S, Cheggour S, Aleil B, et al. Direct oral anticoagulant use in patients with thrombophilia, antiphospholipid syndrome or venous thrombosis of unusual sites: A narrative review. Blood Reviews. 2018;32(4):272–9. pmid:29402471
- 54. Jansen JP, Fleurence R, Devine B, Itzler R, Barrett A, Hawkins N, et al. Interpreting Indirect Treatment Comparisons and Network Meta-Analysis for Health-Care Decision Making: Report of the ISPOR Task Force on Indirect Treatment Comparisons Good Research Practices: Part 1. Value in Health. 2011;14(4):417–28. pmid:21669366