Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Tandem gene duplication and recombination at the AT3 locus in the Solanaceae, a gene essential for capsaicinoid biosynthesis in Capsicum

  • Ashley N. Egan ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Ashley N. Egan, Shanna Moore, Giulia Marina Stellari

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Computational Biology Institute, George Washington University, Ashburn, Virginia, United States of America

  • Shanna Moore ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Ashley N. Egan, Shanna Moore, Giulia Marina Stellari

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Physics, Howard Hughes Medical Institute, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America

  • Giulia Marina Stellari ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Ashley N. Egan, Shanna Moore, Giulia Marina Stellari

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Validation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Plant Biology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York, United States of America

  • Byoung-Cheorl Kang,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Horticulture, Seoul National University, Seoul, Republic of Korea

  • Molly M. Jahn

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Agronomy, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USDA FPL, Madison, Wisconsin, United States of America

Tandem gene duplication and recombination at the AT3 locus in the Solanaceae, a gene essential for capsaicinoid biosynthesis in Capsicum

  • Ashley N. Egan, 
  • Shanna Moore, 
  • Giulia Marina Stellari, 
  • Byoung-Cheorl Kang, 
  • Molly M. Jahn


Capsaicinoids are compounds synthesized exclusively in the genus Capsicum and are responsible for the burning sensation experienced when consuming hot pepper fruits. To date, only one gene, AT3, a member of the BAHD family of acyltransferases, is currently known to have a measurable quantitative effect on capsaicinoid biosynthesis. Multiple AT3 paralogs exist in the Capsicum genome, but their evolutionary relationships have not been characterized well. Recessive alleles at this locus result in absence of capsaicinoids in pepper fruit. To explore the evolution of AT3 in Capsicum and the Solanaceae, we sequenced this gene from diverse Capsicum genotypes and species, along with a number of representative solanaceous taxa. Our results revealed that the coding region of AT3 is highly conserved throughout the family. Further, we uncovered a tandem duplication that predates the diversification of the Solanaceae taxa sampled in this study. This pair of tandem duplications were designated AT3-1 and AT3-2. Sequence alignments showed that the AT3-2 locus, a pseudogene, retains regions of amino acid conservation relative to AT3-1. Gene tree estimation demonstrated that AT3-1 and AT3-2 form well supported, distinct clades. In C. rhomboideum, a non-pungent basal Capsicum species, we describe a recombination event between AT3-1 and AT3-2 that modified the putative active site of AT3-1, also resulting in a frame-shift mutation in the second exon. Our data suggest that duplication of the original AT3 representative, in combination with divergence and pseudogene degeneration, may account for the patterns of sequence divergence and punctuated amino acid conservation observed in this study. Further, an early rearrangement in C. rhomboidium could account for the absence of pungency in this Capsicum species.


Capsaicinoids, the alkaloids that confer pungency, or ‘heat’, to pepper fruits are produced exclusively by species of the genus Capsicum L. (Solanaceae), presumably evolving to deter mammalian herbivory [1, 2]. Pungency is one of the most important characteristics of Capsicum fruit, and a reason the fruits are prized throughout the world. The best-known cultivated varieties are C. annuum L. (e.g. bell types and hot peppers such as jalapeno and cayenne), C. frutescens L. (Tabasco) and C. chinense Jacq. (Habanero). Capsaicinoids have also been utilized historically as an analgesic [3], and more recently to treat neurological disorders, bladder and digestive syndromes, and cancer [4]. The numerous uses and applications of capsaicinoids have inspired scientific and commercial research efforts to improve our understanding of capsaicinoid biosynthesis.

Efforts to clarify the biosynthesis of capsaicinoids have resulted in the cloning and characterization of the Pun1 locus. Pun1 (formerly known as C) was first documented in the early 1900s and, in its recessive form, is epistatic to all other pungency related loci [5, 6]. Pun1 has significant homology to the BAHD family of acyltransferases (named for the first four characterized members of the family BEAT, AHCT, HCBT, DAT) and thus was designated AT3 [6, 7]. Members of the BAHD family catalyze the transfer of the acyl moiety to a wide range of acceptor molecules and are essential in the biosynthesis of a large array of natural plant compounds such as lignin, phenolics, alkaloids, anthocyanins and volatile esters [8]. Specifically, AT3-1 lies within clade III of the BAHD family. Many of the representative genes in this clade can accept a diverse range of alcohol substrates, however most utilize acetyl-CoA as the major acyl donor. Given the importance of this pathway and the lengthy history of investigation, it is striking that the substrate, specificity, and enzymatic function of AT3 in the capsaicinoid biosynthetic pathway remains unknown, although all evidence to date indicates that AT3 is essential for capsaicinoid biosynthesis [911].

Our understanding of the essential nature of AT3 to capsaicinoid biosynthesis has largely been improved through studies of non-pungent peppers. Stewart et al. [6] demonstrated that in non-pungent variants of C. annuum, AT3 is present but includes a large 2.5 kb deletion in the 5’ end of the gene that resulted in the absence of any detectable transcript or protein. This state precisely correlated with absence of capsaicinoids and, ultimately, the loss of pungency in fruit. In a subsequent study, an additional and distinct truncated AT3 allele was reported in a cultivar of C. chinense, that also resulted in the loss of pungency [12]. While the evidence that AT3 is essential for capsaicinoid biosynthesis is compelling, and it is clear that major truncations in paralogues of this gene have been correlated with loss of pungency in at least two Capsicum species, many questions remain about the precise structure and function of this gene in the Solanaceae.

The pivotal, but still ambiguous, role of AT3 in capsaicinoid biosynthesis prompted the current study of the evolution of this gene family within the genus Capsicum in the context of a sampling of this gene and related gene family members across other genera in the Solanaceae. We sequenced AT3 from multiple pepper species and cultivars, with additional representative species from a diverse panel of solanaceous genera. Surprisingly, in this study, we found that AT3 shows a significant level of conservation throughout the Solanaceae, while also showing evidence of expansion via tandem gene duplication, a class of rearrangement well known in eukaryotes [13]. Ohno [14] posited that duplicated genes constituted the raw material for evolution of novel traits because relaxed selection on one of the copies could lead to the evolution of novel functions, or neo-functionalization. In the ensuing nearly fifty years, many different types of evolutionarily significant outcomes from gene duplication events have been described, including neofunctionalization, subfunctionalization, and sub-neofunctionalization, where initial preservation of gene function by partitioning of expression leads to subsequent acquisition of novel function [1517]. In addition, the proliferation of homologous gene copies via duplication provides increasing possibilities for recombination or gene conversion events, thus enabling diversification of homologs at the molecular level. The genus Capsicum presents a unique study system in the context of other solanaceous genera to investigate the evolutionary ramifications and impacts of gene duplication on the role of AT3 in capsaicinoid biosynthesis.

We present here the cloning and characterization of a gene duplicate of Pun1/AT3, and a paralogue that we have designated AT3-2. We demonstrate that these duplicated genes which we have designated AT3-1 and AT3-2 represent ancient paralogous gene lineages whose duplication predates the diversification of solanaceous taxa we sampled. Further, this paper reports for the first time a recombination event in C. rhomboideum (Dunal) Kuntze revealing a putative basis for non-pungency in what is often seen as a basal and non-pungent species of the Capsicum genus. This new information contributes to our understanding of the evolution of the characteristic of pungent fruits in the genus Capsicum, and provides an explanation for the uniform absence of pungency in a basal lineage, C. rhomboideum. Finally, the complexity of the structural rearrangements between AT3-1 and AT3-2 provide insight regarding the origin(s) of pungency in Capsicum and the nature of variants in generally pungent species that may lack pungency. More precise knowledge of the structure and function of AT3, its effects on phenotype, and variant alleles found in this globally treasured genus will further illuminate evolution of this famous plant trait and facilitate efforts to manipulate the capsaicinoid pathway for specific, and perhaps novel, capsaicinoids.

Materials and methods

Plant growth and tissue collection

Capsicum germplasm, consisting of a set of stable lines that have been previously characterized and reported, was selected from a broad collection to represent varieties/species with commercial and/or research importance [6, 7, 18, 19]. Remaining Solanaceae germplasm was previously reported [18, 20]. All accessions from the species Capsicum annuum, C. frutescens, C. chinense, C. chacoense Hunz., C. rhomboideum, Lycianthes dejecta (Fernald) Bitter, Solanum lycopersicum L., Solanum melongena L., Solanum pennellii Correll, Nicotiana benthamiana Domin, Datura stramonium L., and Petunia axillaris subsp. parodii (Steere) Cabrera were grown in a greenhouse in Ithaca, NY from single seed selections or obtained from collaborators with well established, uniform and stable species as described in the references above. Growing conditions were approximately 27°/18°C (day/night) with a daily fertilization with Excel solution (200 ppm; The Scotts Company, Marysville, Ohio). Green (21 days post-anthesis, dpa) and ripe fruit (50 dpa) were collected for all pepper varieties. Mature green (35 dpa) and ripe fruit (breaker plus 10 days) were collected for S. lycopersicum. Age-matched fruit were collected for Solanum pennellii as well as immature and mature fruit from S. melongena. Upon harvest, all fruits were acclimated for 4–8 h in the laboratory. Seeds were harvested and pericarp tissue was immediately frozen in liquid nitrogen, ground to a powder, and stored at –80°C.

RNA extraction & DNA isolation

RNA was extracted from all tissue types using Qiagen RNeasy (Qiagen, Valencia CA) per manufacturer’s instructions for isolation of plant and fungal RNA. For each extraction, approximately 50 ng of frozen, ground tissue was utilized and the final elution volume was 35 μl of RNase free water. RNA was denatured and visualized on an agarose gel. Quantity was assessed via spectrophotometer reading. Expanding leaf tissue was either used immediately for DNA extraction or frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80°C for later extraction. Genomic DNA was extracted as described previously [21].

Isolation and sequence analysis of AT3

Ten Bacterial Artificial Chromosomes (BACs) from a C. frutescens 2814 pBeloBACII DH10B library were identified as part of a previous study as positive for AT3-1 (K. Liu and M Jahn, unpublished results). These BACs were further screened for the presence of the additional AT3-2 intron fragment. Of those containing the additional AT3-2 intron fragment, one (159M5) was selected at random and a large-scale DNA prep was done using Qiagen Midi Prep Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) following the manufacturer’s instructions for very low copy plasmids.

AT3-2-unique primers were designed from the intron sequence (AT3-2 INTRON F 5’–AAGTAAACTGAATTTGTTTCAAAA-3’; AT3-2 INTRON R 5’ ATTTACCCTACATTATTATCGGTC– 3’, 364 bp product). These primers were used in conjunction with Bio S&T APAgene Gold Genome Walking Kit (BioS&T, Montreal, Canada), per manufacturer’s instructions, to isolate a full-length genomic sequence. Two separate sets of reactions were undertaken using either AT3-2 INTRON F or AT3-2 INTRON R as the GSPa primer.

Products were excised and gel purified using the Qiagen QIAquick Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The blunt end products were prepared for TA cloning as follows: 19.55 μl of gel purified PCR product, 1.5 μl 25 mM MgCl2, 1.25 μl 10mM dNTPs, 2.5 μl 10x Buffer, 0.2 μl Roche Taq (Roche, Indianapolis, IN). This was incubated at 72°C for 20 minutes and then ligated using the Invitrogen TOPO TA Cloning Kit (Invitrogen Corporation, Carlsbad, CA) for sequencing with the PCR4 vector and TOPO10 electro-competent cells. Ligations were performed as follows: 2 μl of gel purified PCR product, 3 μl water, 0.5 μl dilute salt (1:4 dilution of Salt Solution provided with kit), 0.5 μl TOPO vector; incubated at RT for 15 minutes and stored at -20°C. Two μl of ligation product was combined with TOPO10 cells, electroporated, combined with 500 μl 2xLB, incubated at 37°C for 30 minutes, then 300μl was plated on LB/agar/kanamyacin plates and incubated at 37°C overnight. Resulting colonies/plates were stored at 4°C.

Multiple clones from each ligation were selected into 3 mls of LB/kanamyacin and incubated with 200 rpm shaking at 37°C overnight. Plasmids were purified for sequencing using the QIAGEN QIAprep Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Sequencing was conducted by the Bioresources Center, Cornell University ( Reactions were submitted to the sequencing facility as follows: 3 μl of resulting miniprep DNA, 1 μl 10mM M13F or R, 14 μl of water.

Cloned sequences were trimmed of vector and aligned with other sequences from the same ligation reaction using Seqman II 6.1 of DNASTAR suite of analysis software to generate consensus sequences. Overlapping sequences from the 5’ and 3’ end of AT3-2 were assembled and aligned with existing AT3-1 sequence for comparison. Subsequent AT3-2 sequence was amplified utilizing two separate primer combinations to ensure amplification of AT3-2 and not AT3-1: AT3-2 F (5’–ATGGCTTTTGCATTGGTATCATCACCAT -3’) / AT3-2 INTRON F resulting in a 1.1 kb product and AT3-2 INTRON R/ AT3-2 R (5’- CGGTATACTCATTCTTACAGGTTT-3’) resulting in a 860 bp product. All amplifications were done in a 15 μl total volume (8.65 μl water, 1.5 μl 10x buffer, 1.0 μl 10mM dNTPs, 0.3 μl 10mM Primer F, 0.3 μl 10mM Primer R, 0.5 μl Stratagene Easy A Taq) and under the following conditions: 95°C for 5 minutes, 35 cycles of 95°C for 30 seconds, 65°C for 30 seconds 72°C for 1 minute, 72°C for 10 minutes, 4°C. Reactions were conducted using a PTC 225 Peltier Thermal Cycler (MJ Research, Watertown, MA).

AT3 expression analysis by northern blot and RT-PCR

To explore potential expression of AT3 within our plant accessions, 10 micrograms of total RNA for each of the following tissues were prepared, blotted and hybridized as described previously [20]: S. lycopersicum cv Ailsa Craig leaf, flower, 35 dpa fruit, 50 dpa fruit; C. chinense cv Habanero 21 dpa fruit; S. pennellii Leaf, flower, 35 dpa fruit, and 50 dpa fruit. Filters were hybridized to a 32-P labeled full length AT3-1 PCR product. We also used RT-PCR to examine whether a functional assay could differentiate between AT3-1 and AT3-2 expression. RT- PCR was done using primers that spanned the AT3-1/AT3-2 intron and the Superscript II one step RT-PCR system according to the manufacturers protocols (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Massachusetts, US). Resulting products were visualized on agarose gels and then, due to significant sequence homology, resulting products were digested using six different restriction enzymes (EcoRV, BfaI, Tsp5091, Fnu4HI, AccI, and MnII) according to enzyme manufacturer protocols (New England Biolabs, Massachusetts, US) and visualized on agarose gels in an attempt to discern between AT3-1 and AT3-2.

DNA sequence alignment for downstream analyses

The AT3 sequences produced as part of this work (GenBank accession numbers FJ687524-FJ687531, FJ755160-FJ755164, FJ755166-FJ755176, MF142764) were augmented with a number of other AT3 gene family members across the Solanaceae gathered via BLAST searches against NCBI carried out in April 2017. Capsicum annuum genes annotated as Pun1, BAHD, Catf1, and Catf2 were also included. A number of homologous genes from Nicotiana and Solanum and other genera that represent the broader AT3 gene family were included as outgroups, mostly designated as acylsugar acyltransferase and acylsugar acyltransferase-3like, assembled into a dataset incorporating 64 genes (Table 1). This coding dataset was aligned using MUSCLE [22] via the EMBL-EBI webserver [23] and honed to correct reading frame by eye using nucleotide and translated view within Ali-View [24]. Intronic regions within AT3-1 and AT3-2 were aligned separately for each paralog within Aliview using MUSCLE. The introns of AT3-1 and AT3-2 were initially excluded from the alignment, as they are non-homologous and caused a breakdown of the alignment of the flanking sequence when included. The introns of AT3-1 and AT3-2 were defined using the intron-exon boundary known from cloning the mRNA of AT3-1 from C. chinense ‘Habanero’ [6]. Intronic regions were analyzed for gene tree estimation separately due to non-homology.

Analysis of recombination

Given the unexpected association between C. rhomboideum AT3-1 with the AT3-2 clade during preliminary phylogenetic analyses, the alignment was tested for the presence of recombination events using the program RDP4 [25] with seven different methods under default settings: RDP [26], GENECONV [27], BootScan [28], MaxChi [29], Chimaera [30], SiScan [31], and 3Seq [32]. Only recombination signals detected by five or more methods were considered plausible. Statistical significance was assessed using a Bonferroni-corrected p-value threshold of P ≤ 0.05. The full-length alignment, containing the coding regions of AT3-1 and AT3-2 with exons 1 and 2 spliced together (designated ex1ex2) was scanned for recombinant sequences. Preliminary recombination analyses suggested that two sequences were acting as ‘wild card’ sequences: N_tomentosiformis_LOC104098383_XM_009605101 and Capsicum_frutescens_BAHD_FJ871985, which were removed from final recombination analyses and subsequent phylogenetic analyses. These sequences were disproportionately impacting recombination results and suggested by RDP4 to be products of “processes other than recombination.”

Phylogeny estimation

Gene trees were estimated using Randomized Axelerated Maximum Likelihood (RAxML v8) [33] either within the RDP4 program or on the RAxML Blackbox webserver [34] using GTRCAT model of evolution. Nodal support was estimated through 100 bootstrap replicates. Gene trees were estimated on the full coding dataset comprising 71 sequences with an aligned length of 1299 bp (designated ex1ex2), on a dataset with recombinant sequences segregated into recombinant portions (and thus the T70 recombinant sequence represented twice in the dataset), on a reduced dataset optimized for use synonymous substitution analyses wherein gaps or missing data were minimized, comprising 44 sequences and an aligned length of 1287 bp (see below for further details), and on intronic regions for AT3-1 and AT3-2 and one each of catf1 and catf2, comprising 35 sequences and an aligned length of 756 bp. Trees for the expanded dataset were rooted to the clade containing either the AT3 homolog in Phyllostachys edulis (Carriere) J.Houz. (FG395562) or to a distant AT3 homolog from Solanum lycopersicum L. (AC215475 gene start at position 46024) for the Ks dataset. Alternative phylogenetic trees were tested for statistical differences in topology using the Shimodaira-Hasegawa test (SH) [35] and the approximately unbiased test (AU) [36].

Ks estimation

Synonymous (Ks) and non-synonymous substitution rates calculated across protein-coding genes can provide insights into relative rates of evolution, sequence conservation, signatures of positive selection, and dates of divergence via assumption of a molecular clock. By estimating and comparing Ks between AT3-1 and AT3-2 and the regions affected by recombination, we may glean information about the relative selection pressures and timing of events across this pair of gene duplicates. Synonymous and non-synonymous substitution rates were estimated for all pairwise comparisons of sequences within a reduced sample set in PAML v4 [37] using the YN00 method [38]. During Ks estimation, PAML removes columns of aligned data with any missing (gapped) characters. To maximize Ks output, all sequences that had long ‘indels’ and several outgroup sequences with significant missing data were removed, resulting in datasets with 44 sequences (S1 File). However, each major lineage or clade recovered in the full dataset phylogenetic analyses was represented by at least one sequence in the alignment used for Ks estimation, thus enabling estimates across all major internal nodes. Ks estimates were calculated for the full coding alignment (ex1ex2br) and alignments broken at the recombination breakpoints (ex1br and ex2br).


Sequencing of AT3-1 and AT3-2

This work produced twelve AT3-1 sequences of approximately 1630 base pairs comprising the 5’ UTR, the single intron, and the near full-length coding region (Table 1). All sequences showed a high degree of conservation at both the nucleotide and amino acid levels, as well as conservation of the intron/exon boundary (Fig 1). Nicotiana benthamiana AT3-1 revealed a two-base pair insertion/deletion (indel) resulting in a frame-shift mutation that we predict would produce a truncated AT3-1 protein.

Fig 1. Diagram illustrating the recombination event between AT3-1 and AT3-2.

Upper plot shows a snapshot of a portion of aligned AT3-1 and AT3-2 showing the recombination breakpoint and exon1/exon2 splice boundary within the coding sequence alignment. The recombinant C. rhomboideum T70 sequence is in red lettering. The lower plot is a screen shot of the RDP4 pairwise similarity plot that depicts the pairwise identities among the recombinant and its putative parents. The black hash marks at the top of the plot indicate the positions of informative sites along the length of the alignment.

In the course of cloning and characterizing AT3-1 from Capsicum and other Solanaceae representatives, a novel intronic sequence was discovered that had no recognizable homology to AT3-1, yet shared the same intron-exon boundaries (Fig 1). This novel sequence was identified, together with AT3-1, in multiple clones of a Bacterial Artificial Chromosome (BAC) library made from C. frutescens BG2814-6. Using a single BAC, a genome walk across the intron out to the 5’ and 3’ ends of the gene revealed DNA sequence showing strong similarity to AT3-1. This tandem duplicate, which we have named AT3-2, was approximately 1600 base pairs in length and was subsequently cloned and sequenced from Capsicum, Nicotiana, Datura, Solanum and Lycianthes (Table 1).

Our study further revealed that this duplicated sequence, AT3-2, is also highly conserved throughout the Solanaceae. Numerous non-synonymous mutations relative to AT3-1 are shared among all AT3-2 sequences, consistent with the possibility that the duplication event that included the coding region of AT3-2 occurred before subsequent speciation of the taxa represented in our study. The alignment of the first exon between AT3-1 and AT3-2 also includes indels not in multiples of three that disturb the open reading frame of AT3-2 while maintaining punctuated regions of amino acid conservation relative to AT3-1. This observation is further consistent with the possibility that AT3-2 is a pseudogene of AT3-1.

AT3 expression assessed via northern blots and RT-PCR

In Capsicum, AT3 expression is confined to the developing pepper placenta, shown previously by RNA gel-blot [6] and through RNA-seq analysis [9]. Based on the extensive sequence homology we observed throughout the Solanaceae, we further examined expression in a sampling of tomato species, as they experience similar fleshy fruit production. Utilizing a full-length cDNA as a probe, AT3 expression was detected in 35 dpa fruit in S. pennellii (a wild tomato relative that does not ripen to red), but was not observed in age-matched S. lycopersicum (Fig 2). Habanero 21 dpa fruit was used as a positive control, as 21 dpa is when AT3-1 expression becomes visible. The S. pennellii AT3-1 expression was less than that seen in Habanero, as noted by the over-exposure of Habanero AT3-1. We then utilized RT-PCR to determine if a functional assay to differentiate between AT3-1 and AT3-2 was feasible. Unfortunately, despite using six different restriction enzymes, we were unable to conclusively determine, in any tissue examined, if AT3-2 was expressed—owing either to the lack of expression of AT3-2 or to significant sequence conservation that resulted in a very small potential size difference in any resulting fragments and the limited enzymes that might discern this potential difference. Given the sequence evidence for pseudogenization of AT3-2, a process that may preclude any expression, we ultimately concluded that any expression seen was very likely AT3-1.

Fig 2. Differential expression of AT3-1 in solanaceous species.

A full length AT3-1 probe was hybridized to RNA gel blots containing the following tissues: Lanes 1–4 Solanum lycopersicum cv Ailsa Craig 1. Leaf, 2. Flower, 3. Mature green fruit (21 days post anthesis), 4. Red ripe fruit (50 days post anthesis); 5 –Capsicum chinense cv Habanero fruit 21 days post anthesis; 6–9 Solanum pennellii 6. Leaf, 7. Flower, 8. Fruit 21 days post anthesis, 9. Fruit 50 days post anthesis.

Recombination analysis

Six recombination detection methods implemented in RDP4 detected a strongly supported (corrected binomial probability p-value = 1.395 E -18: RDP 5.365 X 10−18; GENECONV 2.857 x 10−13; BootScan 1.395 x 10−18; MaxChi 6.557 x 10−14; Chimaera 5.524 x 10−07; 3Seq 2.870 x 10−17) recombination event involving C. rhomboideum as the recombinant (designated here as T70), with Capsicum annuum AT3-2 FJ755161 as the major parent (sharing 92.6% similarity) and Lycianthes dejecta AT3-1 FJ755172 as the minor parent (sharing 99.5% similarity). The higher sequence similarity of the minor parent, an AT3-1 sequence, reflects the higher conservation of AT3-1 relative to the pseudogenized AT3-2 parent. The major and minor parents were localized to the AT3-2 and AT3-1 clades respectively. The above-designated parents showed the highest probability within the respective clades; however, other members of the clade may not show statistically significant differences in probability of parentage. The breakpoint regions are effectively at positions 1–618 and 619–1299 in the aligned coding ex1ex2 dataset. The relative association of C. rhomboideum AT3-1 with AT3-1 prior to the breakpoint, and with AT3-2 after the breakpoint can roughly be identified by eye, as is evident in Fig 1.

Phylogenetic analysis

Phylogenetic analysis of the entire coding sequence alignment (ex1ex2) without intronic sequences, also ignoring recombination, resolved two major clades representing AT3-1 and AT3-2 with strong support (BP = 99 for each; Fig 3). The C. rhomboideum recombinant sequence, T70, was resolved as sister to the AT3-1 clade, but with low support (BP = 43), a result not unexpected given the disparate and conflicting phylogenetic signals within its length. Both AT3-1 and AT3-2 showed high levels of conservation as evidenced by the short branch lengths therein (Fig 3). Each clade included Capsicum and other Solanaceae genera, suggesting that the paralogs represent an ancient duplication that predated divergence of the family.

Fig 3. Maximum likelihood gene tree estimated from complete coding sequence alignment (ex1ex2) ignoring recombination.

AT3-1 branches are colored blue, AT3-2 are red, the T70 C. rhomboideum recombinant is purple and designated with a star. Numbers above branches are bootstrap support values for corresponding nodes. Inset shows branch lengths.

Phylogenies constructed separately on each of the regions defined by the recombinant (effectively, positions 1–618 and 619–1299 in the ex1ex2 alignment) were found to be statistically different in their topologies (SH & AU tests with all p-values < 0.0001). Gene tree reconstruction on the coding dataset, with regions of the T70 C. rhomboideum recombinant sequence separated, clearly resolved separate AT3-1 and AT3-2 clades with 100% confidence. The T70 C. rhomboideum sequence portion derived from the AT3-1 parent (effectively bp 1–618) was nested strongly inside AT3-1. Catf2 is completely supported as sister to AT3-1. The portion of T70 likely derived from AT3-2 (effectively bp 619–1299) is resolved as sister to the clade comprising all Solanaceae AT3-2 sequences with complete support (Fig 4), analogous to the position of catf2 relative to AT3-1.

Fig 4. Maximum likelihood gene tree estimated from the complete coding sequence alignment (ex1ex2) with recombinant regions of C. rhomboideum separated.

AT3-1 branches are colored blue, AT3-2 are red, the T70 C. rhomboideum recombinant portions are purple and designated with a star. Numbers above branches are bootstrap support values for corresponding nodes. Inset shows branch lengths.

Phylogenetic analysis of the intronic regions of AT3-1 and AT3-2 across the taxa sampled strongly resolve the paralogs and support the placement of the T70 AT3-1 intron as sister to the AT3-2 clade (Fig 5). Gene tree estimation with recombinant regions of T70 C. rhomboideum separated significantly improved resolution along the backbone and improved nodal support across the tree (Fig 4) relative to the gene tree that was constructed disregarding recombination (Fig 3).

Fig 5. Gene tree estimate from intronic regions using RAxML with 100 bootstrap replicates.

Numbers above branches are bootstrap support values for corresponding nodes. Inset shows branch lengths.

Surprisingly, AT3-1 and AT3-2 are not resolved as sister clades, but AT3-2 is moderately supported (BP = 72) as sister to a clade comprised solely of Solanum acylsugar-3-like paralogs. Significant expansions of the acylsugar-3-like gene family within Nicotiana and Solanum are illustrated here, expansions that likely occurred after the relative establishment of these genera (Fig 4). Maximum likelihood phylogenies of the reduced datasets used for Ks estimation for the full coding (ex1ex2br), predominantly exon 1 (ex1br), and predominantly exon 2 (ex2br) data partitions (Figures A-C in S2 File, respectively) were consistent with phylogenies estimated based on the full sampling set (Fig 4).

Ks estimation

Synonymous substitution rates (Ks) were estimated for each pairwise comparison within a reduced dataset of 44 sequences (S3 File). Summary statistics for collective pairwise comparisons within and between key clades and by ex1br, ex2br, or ex1ex2br data partitions were computed (S3 File). For the full coding dataset, the average pairwise synonymous substitution rate between AT3 paralogs was statistically different, even without the T70 recombinant (Table 2). Seen graphically, however, the ranges of Ks estimates for AT3-1 and AT3-2 overlap (Fig 6). Tukey’s honestly significant difference (HSD) statistics across pairwise comparisons for the breakpoint-partitioned datasets (ex1br and ex2br) by AT3-1 and AT3-2 clades finds that means for all comparisons are strongly statistically significant, except: AT3-2 ex1br vs AT3-1 ex2br, which is barely significant with a p-value of 0.046; and AT3-2 ex1br vs AT3-2 ex2br which is not statistically different. The rates of evolution within ex1 and ex2 within AT3-1 are statistically different (Table 3).

Fig 6. Distribution of Ks estimates from pairwise comparisons sampling across AT3-1, AT3-2, the recombinant Capsicum rhomboideum and C. annuum acylsugar-3-like genes.

Estimates were calculated for the total gene alignment (ex1ex2br) and across each side of the estimated recombination breakpoints (ex1br and ex2br).

Table 2. ANOVA test of difference in means across pairwise estimates of Ks within AT3-1 and AT3-2 clades.

Table 3. Tukey honestly significant difference statistics for multiple pairwise comparisons across separate breakpoint means and AT3-1 and AT3-2 clades.

In assessing the range of pairwise Ks estimates within and between clades (Fig 6), two striking patterns are evident. First, when compared across datasets, the full coding dataset (ex1ex2br) is always intermediate between the range of estimates for the breakpoint partitions. Ks ranges afforded by ex1br are always on the higher end, with the exception of AT3-1/T70 and T70/catf2 comparisons. Second, the Ks rate is higher within ex1br for all clade comparisons, except the AT3-1/T70 comparison, than the Ks rate apportioned by ex2br. This provides further evidence for the role of AT3-1 in the recombination event (Fig 6), suggesting either an accelerated rate of neutral evolution in ex1br relative to ex2br in AT3-1, or that the ex1 construct within the gene is older than ex2.


Evolution of the AT3 gene family

The AT3 gene family was first linked with the Pun1 gene in Capsicum and shown to be an acyltransferase by Stewart et al. [6]. Since then, studies have discovered gene family expansion within AT3. Zhang et al. [11] outlined three main AT3 lineages incorporating 21 putatitve acyltransferases. Qin et al. [39] outlined three main lineages of tandemly duplicated AT3 paralogs along with homologous sequences in potato and tomato. Kim et al. [9] detailed seven tandemly duplicated paralogs with sequence similarity to the AT3 sequences reported in our study, however, this study designated AT3 as capsaicin synthase. Our sequence analysis and gene tree reconstruction clearly resolve a tandem gene duplication event in the Solanaceae involving the AT3 locus in the BAHD acyltransferase family, with subsequent pseudogenization of the second locus. Based on the results in this paper, we amend the designation of the functional AT3 locus previously reported in Capsicum to be AT3-1, now resolved from the second sequence, AT3-2. Without exception, the intron-exon boundary and intronic sequence of AT3-1 were conserved, an unusual finding for nuclear gene sequences from the Solanaceae [40, 41]. The tight monophyly of the respective AT3 clades, and their association with some other solanaceous genera including Datura, Petunia, and Nicotiana are consistent with the hypothesis that AT3-1 and AT3-2 are ancient paralogs whose duplication predates the speciation of taxa sampled in this study.

Within the AT3 clades, we determined that relationships are largely unresolved and poorly supported, consistent with a high degree of conservation within clades and across genera. Separate AT3-1 and AT3-2 clades were strongly supported by bootstrap analysis. Relationships within clades are less resolved. Lower levels of statistical support were observed within clades, with the exception of the AT3-1 clade containing the major cultivated Capsicum varieties plus Lycianthes. In contrast to the other clades, this grouping showed good bootstrap support of 91% (Fig 3). The present analysis supports previous studies that reported close association between the three major cultivated species of Capsicum: C. annuum, C. chinense and C. frutescens [40]. Our data also support the close relationship between Capsicum and Lycianthes [42]. The lack of resolution within clades, however, precludes a conclusive determination as to whether Capsicum is nested within a paraphyletic Lycianthes, a relationship supported by various phylogenetic studies, e.g. [4345], or sister to a monophyletic Lycianthes, a relationship mostly determined by chloroplast gene regions [45, 46]. However, resolution of one of these two relationships between Capsicum and Lycianthes are not always the case. In a phylotranscriptomic study of 5,545 genes across six transcriptomes of Capsicum and Lysianthes, over 26% of the genes resolved gene trees wherein the genera were polyphyletic or paraphyletic with respect to each other [45]. What we learn here is that complex gene family relationships can preclude strong resolution and/or congruence of phylogenies estimated therefrom.

Recombination as a driver of the evolution of pungency in Capsicum

A number of evolutionary processes contribute to gene family evolution, however two particularly powerful forces that underlie evolutionary diversification are gene duplication and genetic recombination. These dynamics both result in rearranged genome segments from non-reciprocal exchange between homologous DNA segments via meiotic crossing over. This study reveals genetic sequences consistent with both these effects in the evolution of AT3 in the Solanaceae. The fact that C. rhomboideum has a chromosome number of 2n = 2x = 26, whereas most other Capsicum species have 2n = 2x = 24 chromosomes [47], is direct evidence of such processes at work within Capsicum. Further, Scaldaferro et al. [47] discovered that C. rhomboideum had the lowest haploid karyotype length and a reduced amount of heterochromatin relative to other congeners. Heterochromatin has been shown to play an important role in maintaining genome integrity through repression of recombination [48]. Perhaps this notable difference of heterochromatin in C. rhomboideum could either have resulted from or predisposed this taxon to recombination. Further, AT3-1 is located on chromosome 2, at the end of the long chromosome arm [39]. This region has been shown to have high gene diversity as assessed by synonymous and non-synonymous substitution rates, as well as a region that includes a cluster of putatively positively selected genes [45], findings that further support the notion that recombination in this region would may not be uncommon.

In C. rhomboideum, our study uncovered a recombination event between paralogs AT3-1 and AT3-2, an event that, given the specific shifts in coding sequence, could account for what appears to be universal non-pungency in this species. Our evidence suggests that the recombination event is likely to have occurred exclusively in C. rhomboideum after the divergence of this species from other Capsicum taxa. The recombinant sequence, herein denoted T70, is composed of an exon 1 mostly derived from AT3-1 spliced to an intron and exon 2 derived from AT3-2. This recombination preserves the open reading frame and occurs before the putative active site of the enzyme, denoted by the sequence HXXXXL, which is changed from the canonical HTTTAL to HTMASL. Furthermore, the sequence of C. rhomboideum AT3-1 appears to be truncated by a two-base pair indel which causes a frameshift mutation leading to a stop codon in the second exon, suggesting that the C. rhomboideum AT3-1 transcript would lack the terminal 70 amino acids, and therefore would likely be non-functional. The indel identified in C. rhomboideum AT3-1, either alone, or in combination with the recombination event between AT3-1 and AT3-2, may be causal for loss of pungency in this accession, supporting the pivotal role of AT3-1 in capsaicin biosynthesis [6, 12].

Analyses of synonymous substitutions (Ks), coupled with gene trees derived from breakpoint-separated datasets, uncovered a patchwork quilt of sequences, built by various processes at work across the evolutionary history of Capsicum and the Solanaceae (Figs 4 and 6). The dual nature of the putative effects of the T70 recombinant suggests different phylogenetic and evolutionary signals within its length. From the perspective of pairwise computational comparisons across Ks estimates, exon 1 of T70 (ex1br) should be more similar to AT3-1 than AT3-2. In fact, the means for all pairwise comparisons within the T70/AT3-1 and AT3-1 (minus T70) clades are nearly identical (S3 File). This, coupled with the result of the AT3-1-derived portion of T70 nesting within AT3-1, provides solid evidence for AT3-1 acting as a major parent in the recombination event. Further, graphical analyses of Ks distributions by clade-comparisons supports the notion that the exon 1 derived from AT3-1 may be the more recently originated portion of the recombinant, and that the exon 1 of the former gene (whose relict comprises predominantly the intron and exon 2 of T70) was overwritten by AT3-1 (Fig 6).

Recombination detection methods suggested that the AT3-2 Lycianthes dejecta sequence was the best pick for minor parent of the T70 recombination event. Indeed, gene tree analyses place the portion of T70 derived from AT3-2 as sister to remaining AT3-2 sequences (Fig 4), in support of this conclusion. However, it is interesting to note the relative positions of T70 and Catf-2 genes within the gene trees: Catf-2 is sister to remaining AT3-1 sequences (plus Catf-1) whereas exon 2 from T70 is sister to the remaining AT3-2 sequences, a position analogous to that of Catf-2 relative to AT3-1 (Fig 4). Lang et al. [49] described two Capsicum acyl-transferase genes, Catf-1 and Catf-2, as key players in the developing placenta of Capsicum. This study reported that Catf-2 (sister to AT3-1 in our gene trees; see Fig 4) was expressed in both non-pungent and pungent lines, but that Catf-1 (nested within AT3-1, and likely synonymous to it) was only expressed in pungent lines. These analogous placements provide some evidence to suggest that AT3-2 may not be the minor parent, but that perhaps a defunct Catf analog–now extinct or overwritten within this recombination event–is. This idea is supported by the fact that Lycianthes was chosen as minor parent–not a Capsicum sequence–and Lycianthes is supposedly outside and basal to Capsicum in phylogenetic analyses (e.g. [42]). If this analogy holds, then we would expect the non-recombinant (original) portions of the T70 gene, represented by the ex2br data partition, to be nearly equal for AT3-1/Catf-2 (Ks = 0.1633) and AT3-2/T70 (Ks = 0.1425). Indeed this is what we observe (Fig 6 and S3 File). Visually, this can be seen in the relative branch lengths of the sister relationships of the AT3-1/Catf-2 and AT3-2/T70 clades (Fig 4). Taken together, this line of inquiry suggests that multiple, physically overlapping recombination events have impacted the diversification of the AT3 gene family and may have impacted pungency in C. rhomboideum and perhaps even the genus.

Unraveling the tangled web of recombination events through time and genic space is no trivial task. Case in point, our results do not preclude the possibility that AT3-1 is actually the more recently derived paralog—not AT3-2. The recombination event in C. rhomboideum may have paved the way for evolution of pungency through later changes within subclades of AT3-1. Careful consideration of the phylogenies computed on breakpoint datasets showed that not all of the sequences within the labeled AT3-1 clade are pungent: pungency is not known from Solanum, Datura, Nicotiana or Petunia, all of which are present in the AT3-1 clade (Figs 3 and 4). Clearly, not all of the AT3-1 subclades are pungent. It is interesting to note that when the C. rhomboideum recombinant is separated by breakpoint, the AT3-1-derived portion (ex1br) is nested with non-pungent Datura and Petunia, albeit in a poorly supported clade, not with its congeners of either known pungency or nonpungency. Our fine-scale recombination analyses of gene evolution involving AT3 tandem duplicates within the context of the larger BAHD gene family has enabled an improved understanding of the evolution of pungency within Capsicum. It has also illustrated the complex array of events that likely impacted the evolution of pungency and has shown us that further study is needed to fully explain its existence.

The role of recombination and gene duplication in AT3 evolution: Family wide and beyond

Gene family evolution is often spurred by tandem gene duplication, a process that results in gene family clusters within chromosomes. The BAHD superfamily has been shown to have expanded via tandem gene duplication in Populus and Arabidopsis [50]. If AT3-2 resulted from a tandem gene duplication of AT3-1 alone, we would expect their respective clades to be sister to each other in the gene tree analysis. Instead, we see AT3-2 sister to a clade comprised solely of Solanum sequences, likely representing the expansion of a gene family member following the divergence of Solanum. Qin et al. [39] found similar evidence, outlining three main AT3 lineages, alongside an expansion within Solanum (potato and tomato). This suggests that the origin and differentiation of AT3-2 did not arise from tandem gene duplication alone, but may have also involved a recombination event between older paralogs within the BAHD superfamily.

Kim et al. [9] outlined seven paralogs co-located within a 1-Mb region on an unspecified chromosome classified within two ancient lineages, α and β, that originated via a whole genome duplication in the pepper-tomato ancestor (estimated at a Ks of 0.3) [39, 51]. Unfortunately, Kim et al.’s seven CS paralogs were not available publicly for incorporation into our study. Because of this, we were not able to definitively determine how our AT3 lineages aligned with theirs. That said, if we were to suppose our duplication event was captured within Kim et al.’s seven paralogs, we might surmise that our AT3-1 and AT3-2 equates to their α and β lineages based on synonymous substitution rates; indeed, we find Ks = 0.32 for AT3-1/AT3-2, ignoring recombination (ex1ex2br). Assuming a synonymous substitution rate of 6.1 × 10 − 9 substitutions per synonymous site per year (s/s/year) [52]), this would suggest that these genes were duplicated ~26 mya. However, taking recombination into account tells a different story: in looking at all the clade comparisons that cross the AT3-1/AT3-2 node, Ks ranges from 0.48 to 0.59 for exon 1 and from 0.2 to 0.38 for exon 2 (Fig 6 and S3 File). Exon 1 is approximately twice as old as exon 2 based on Ks estimates. This data now compounds the complexity of gene duplication with whole genome duplication, and estimating the timing of whole genome duplications can be fraught with difficulties depending on whether it was allo- or autopolyploid [53]. Whole genome duplication is often followed by “genomic shock” in which widespread gene loss and homologous recombination takes place, e.g.[54]. One scenario that might explain our findings would involve an ancient tandem gene duplication event creating the α and β lineages about 39 to 48 mya (Ks = 0.48–0.59), the signal for which resides still in exon 1, followed by a whole genome duplication event happening between 31–48 mya, that subsequently went through genomic shock which spurred recombination between the ancient duplicates between 16–31 mya (Ks = 0.2–0.38 estimated by exon 2). This hypothesis of an ancient recombination event impacting AT3 expansion is also supported by the fact that AT3-1 and AT3-2 have non-homologous intronic regions.

Recently, the pepper genome v.1.55 was made publically available, detailing a chromosome level assembly for an F1 of a cross between a landrace, Criollos de Morales 334 (CM334) and a non-pungent pepper-breeding line [55]. A BLAST comparison of AT3-2 from C. annuum (GenBank number FJ687524) against the pepper genome v.1.55 aligns with 100% id to a region on chromosome 2 corresponding to gene model CA02g19300. In contrast, a BLAST comparison of AT3-1 from C. annuum (GenBank number FJ755173) hits with 98.78% identity to a region also on chromosome 2, but corresponding to gene model CA02g19260.

Few studies outside of model organisms have tracked the evolutionary history of a tandem gene duplication event in detail [56,57]. In contrast, most studies of gene duplication events have focused on related organisms for which whole genome sequence is available [58, 59]. Although functional pseudogenes have been identified in the past, evidence linking pseudogenes to their putative functions are still not extremely common [57, 60, 61]. The existence of AT3-2 was confirmed by screening the sequence against C. annuum cultivars on a Pepper Chip comprised of over 30,000 unigenes derived from expressed sequenced tags. Extractions of total genomic DNA from 40 C. annuum cultivars yielded nine unigenes that hybridized with the locus corresponding to Pun1 (AT3-1), two of which had 100% identity to AT3-2 [62]. In general, C. rhomboideum is considered non-pungent [45, 47]. The tandem gene duplication event described herein coupled with knowledge of pungency across Solanaceae are consistent with a critical role for AT3-1 in enabling capsaicinoid biosynthesis, the loss of which in C. rhomboideum through putative recombination with its tandem, pseudogenized gene duplicate AT3-2, likely contributed to non-pungency of this species and may have influenced the course of evolution with regard to pungency in other Capsicum species.

A call to consider complexity: Integrating fine-scale recombination analyses into gene evolution studies

Given the well-documented, quantitative role of AT3 in pungency, we had assumed sequences from non-pungent Solanaceae taxa would reveal significant differences that might ultimately inform our understanding of the origin of pungency and/or AT3 function. Instead, the high level of sequence conservation observed, coupled with variable expression patterns and layered with interweaving of phylogenetic signals within and between gene family sequences, has painted a highly complex picture of evolution within the AT3 gene family, and ultimately the BAHD superfamily. Our work clearly demonstrates the intricate genetic complexity surrounding the production of capsaicinoids and also clearly illustrates the need to incorporate fine-scale analyses of recombination when trying to elucidate gene family evolution. Had we not screened for recombination within our data, a step rarely performed prior to gene tree inferences, our understanding of the evolutionary history of AT3 evolution within Solanaceae would be far less than afforded by the present work. Further, estimates of Ks (and thereby ages of duplication events, be they tandem or whole genome) may be inaccurate when estimated on sequences that harbor unknown recombination events. As such, we sound a clarion call for researchers to incorporate recombination detection tools into their analyses of gene evolution. While doing so may initially reveal patterns that most resemble a crazy quilt of gene duplication and divergence, it will only be through this resolution that the broader patterns of tandem gene duplication, whole genome duplication, recombination, and the structural and functional divergence that underlie the evolution of the staggering array of plant metabolic diversity, including such novel metabolites as capsaicin, may be thoroughly revealed.

Supporting information

S1 File. Reduced alignments used for Ks estimation within PAML for 44 sequences parsed by exon 1 and exon 2 and presented in phylip format.


S2 File.

Supplementary figures, including: Figure A–RAxML maximum likelihood phylogeny of the 44-sample Ks ex1ex2 dataset; Figure B–RAxML maximum likelihood phylogeny of the 44-sample Ks ex1br dataset; Figure C–RAxML maximum likelihood phylogeny of the 44-sample Ks ex2br dataset.


S3 File. Tables of Ks estimates for all pairwise comparisons of the 44 individuals shown in the S1 File, inclusive of multiple sheets for Ks estimates from ex1ex2, ex1br, and ex2br.

Summary statistics (Sum_stats) are compiled for each data set (Ks_ex1br, Ks_ex2br, Ks_ex1ex2br) with cells in the raw estimates sheets relevant to each comparison color coded to match. The raw data are used to create Fig 6.



We thank the members of the Jahn Lab for their contributions to this work, especially Charles Stewart, Michael Mazourek, George Moriarty and Mary Kreitinger. Lynn Bohs provided C. rhomboideum and Lycianthes seeds, Sandy Knapp provided helpful critical review of the manuscript, and Will Mulhern and Liam Hutchison assisted with final manuscript preparation.


  1. 1. Tewksbury JJ, Nabhan GP. Seed dispersal. Directed deterrence by capsaicin in chilies. Nature. 2001;412: 403–404. pmid:11473305
  2. 2. Jordt SE, Julius D. Molecular basis for species-specific sensitivity to "hot" chili peppers. Cell. 2002;108: 421–430. pmid:11853675
  3. 3. Hayman M, Kam PC. Capsaicin: a review of its pharmacology and clinical applications. Curr Anaesth Crit Care. 2008;19(5): 338–343.
  4. 4. Chapa-Oliver AM, Mejia-Teniente L. Capsaicin: from plants to a cancer-suppressing agent. Molecules. 2016;21: 931.
  5. 5. Webber H. Preliminary notes on pepper hybrids. American Breeders Association Annual Report. 1911;7: 188–199.
  6. 6. Stewart C, Kang BC, Liu K, Mazourek M, Moore SL, Yoo EY, et al. The Pun1 gene for pungency in pepper encodes a putative acyltransferase. Plant J. 2005;42: 675–688. pmid:15918882
  7. 7. D'Auria JC, Chen F, Pichersky E. Characterization of an acyltransferase capable of synthesizing benzylbenzoate and other volatile esters in flowers and damaged leaves of Clarkia breweri. Plant Physiol. 2002;130: 466–476. pmid:12226525
  8. 8. D'Auria JC. Acyltransferases in plants: a good time to be BAHD. Curr Opin Plant Bio. 2006;9: 331–340.
  9. 9. Kim S, Park M, Yeom SI, Kim YM, Lee JM, Lee HA, et al. Genome sequence of the hot pepper provides insights into the evolution of pungency in Capsicum species. Nat Genet. 2014;46: 270–278. pmid:24441736
  10. 10. Ogawa K, Murota K, Shimura H, Furuya M, Togawa Y, Matsumura T, Masuta C. Evidence of capsaicin synthase activity of the Pun1-encoded protein and its role as a determinant of capsaicinoid accumulation in pepper. BMC Plant Biol. 2015;15: 93. pmid:25884984
  11. 11. Zhang ZX, Zhao SN, Liu GF, Huang ZM, Cao ZM, Cheng SH, Lin SS. Discovery of putative capsaicin biosynthetic genes by RNA-Seq and digital gene expression analysis of pepper. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 34121. pmid:27756914
  12. 12. Stewart C, Mazourek M, Stellari GM, O'Connell M, Jahn M. Genetic control of pungency in C. chinense via the Pun1 locus. J Exp Bot. 2007;58: 979–991. pmid:17339653
  13. 13. Taylor JS, Jeroen R. Duplication and divergence: the evolution of new genes and old ideas. Annu Rev Genet. 2004;38: 615–643. pmid:15568988
  14. 14. Ohno S. Evolution by Gene Duplication. Springer-Verlag, New York; 1970.
  15. 15. Lynch M, Force A. The probability of duplicate gene preservation by subfunctionalization. Genetics. 2000;154: 459–473. pmid:10629003
  16. 16. Zhang J. Evolution by gene duplication: an update. Trends Ecol Evol. 2003;18: 292–298.
  17. 17. He XL, Zhang JZ. Rapid subfunctionalization accompanied by prolonged and substantial neofunctionalization in duplicate gene evolution. Genetics. 2005;169: 1157–1164. pmid:15654095
  18. 18. Garces-Claver A, Moore-Fellman S, Gil-Ortega R, Jahn M, Arnedo-Andres MS. Identification, validation and survey of a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associated with pungency in Capsicum spp. Theor Appl Genet. 2007: 115:907–916. pmid:17882396
  19. 19. Stellari GM, Mazourek M, Jahn MM. Contrasting modes for loss of pungency between cultivated and wild species of Capsicum. Heredity. 2010;104(5): 460–471. pmid:19812612
  20. 20. Moore S, Payton P, Wright M, Tanksley SD, Giovannoni J. Utilization of tomato microarrays for comparative gene expression analysis in the Solanaceae. J Exp Bot. 2005;56: 2885–2895. pmid:16216847
  21. 21. Tanksley SD, Ganal MW, Prince JP, Vicente MC, de Bonierbale MW, Broun P, et al. High density molecular linkage maps of the tomato and potato genomes. Genetics. 1992;132: 1141–1160. pmid:1360934
  22. 22. Edgar RC. MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput. Nucleic Acids Res. 2004;32: 1792–1797. pmid:15034147
  23. 23. Li W, Cowley A, Uludag M, Gur T, McWilliam H, Squizzato S, et al. The EMBL-EBI bioinformatics web and programmatic tools framework. Nucleic acids Res. 2015;43(W): W580–W584.
  24. 24. Larsson A. AliView: a fast and lightweight alignment viewer and editor for large datasets. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(22): 3276–3278. pmid:25095880
  25. 25. Martin DP, Murrell B, Golden M, Khoosal A, Muhire B. RDP4: Detection and analysis of recombination patterns in virus genomes. Virus Evol. 2015;1(1): 1.
  26. 26. Martin D, Rybicki E. RDP: detection of recombination amongst aligned sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000;16(6): 562–563. pmid:10980155
  27. 27. Padidam M, Sawyer S, Fauquet CM. Possible emergence of new geminiviruses by frequent recombination. Virology. 1999;265: 218–225. pmid:10600594
  28. 28. Martin D, Posada D, Crandall K, Williamson C. A modified BOOTSCAN algorithm for automated identification of recombinant sequences and recombination breakpoints. AIDS Res Hum Retroviruses. 2005;21: 98–102. pmid:15665649
  29. 29. Smith JM. Analyzing the mosaic structure of genes. J Mol Evol. 1992;34: 126–129. pmid:1556748
  30. 30. Posada D, Crandall KA. Evaluation of methods for detecting recombination from DNA sequences: Computer simulations. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001;98: 13757–13762. pmid:11717435
  31. 31. Gibbs MJ, Armstrong JS, Gibbs AJ. Sister-scanning: a Monte Carlo procedure for assessing signals in recombinant sequences. Bioinformatics. 2000;16: 573–582. pmid:11038328
  32. 32. Boni MF, Posada D, Feldman MW. An exact nonparametric method for inferring mosaic structure in sequence triplets. Genetics. 2007;176: 1035–1047. pmid:17409078
  33. 33. Stamatakis A. RAxML version 8: a tool for phylogenetic analysis and post-analysis of large phylogenies. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(9): 1312–1313. pmid:24451623
  34. 34. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-servers. Syst Biol. 2008;75(5): 758–771.
  35. 35. Shimodaira H, Hasegawa M. Multiple comparisons of log-likelihoods with applications to phylogenetic inference. Mol Biol Evol. 1999;16: 1114–1116.
  36. 36. Shimodaira H. An approximately unbiased test of phylogenetic tree selection. Syst Biol. 2002;51: 492–508. pmid:12079646
  37. 37. Yang Z. PAML 4: phylogenetic analysis by maximum likelihood. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24: 1586–1591. pmid:17483113
  38. 38. Yang Z, Nielsen R. Estimating synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution rates under realistic evolutionary models. Mol Biol Evol. 2000;17: 32–43. pmid:10666704
  39. 39. Qin C, Yu C, Shen Y, Fan X, Chen L, Min J, et al. Whole-genome sequencing of cultivated and wild peppers provides insights into Capsicum domestication and specialization. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(14): 5135–5140. pmid:24591624
  40. 40. Walsh BM, Hoot SB. Phylogenetic relationships of Capsicum (Solanaceae) using DNA sequences from two noncoding regions: the chloroplast atpB-rbcL spacer region and nuclear waxy introns. Int J Plant Sci. 2001;162: 1409–1418.
  41. 41. Martins TR, Barkman TJ. Reconstruction of Solanaceae phylogeny using the nuclear gene SAMT. Syst Bot. 2005;30: 435–447.
  42. 42. Särkinen T, Bohs L, Olmstead RG, Knapp S. A phylogenetic framework for evolutionary study of the nightshades (Solanaceae): A dated 1000-tip tree. BMC Evol Biol. 2013;13(1): 214.
  43. 43. Bohs L, Olmstead RG. Phylogenetic relationships in Solanum (Solanaceae) based on ndhF sequences. Syst Bot. 1997;22: 5–17.
  44. 44. Olmstead RG, Bohs L, Migid HA, Santiago-Valentin E, Garcia VF, Collier SM. A molecular phylogeny of the Solanaceae. Taxon. 2008;57: 1159–1181.
  45. 45. Spalink D, Stoffel K, Walden GK, Hulse-Kemp AM, Hill TA, Van Deynze A, Bohs L. Comparative transcriptomics and genomic patterns of discordance in Capsiceae (Solanaceae). Mol Phylogenet Evol. 2018;126: 293–302. pmid:29702214
  46. 46. Carrizo García C, Barfuss MHJ, Sehr EM, Barboza GE, Samuel R, Moscone EA, Ehrendorfer F. Phylogenetic relationships, diversification and expansion of chili peppers (Capsicum, Solanaceae). Ann Bot. 2016;118: 35–51. pmid:27245634
  47. 47. Scaldaferro MA, Grabiele M, Moscone EA. Heterochromatin type, amount and distribution in wild species of chili peppers (Capsicum, Solanaceae). Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2013;60: 693–709.
  48. 48. Grewal SI, Jia S. Heterochromatin revisited. Nat Rev Genet. 2007;8: 35–46. pmid:17173056
  49. 49. Lang Y, Yanagawa S, Sasanuma T, Sasakuma T. A gene encoding a putative acyl-transferase involved in pungency of Capsicum. Breed Sci. 2006;56(1): 55–62.
  50. 50. Yu XH, Gou JY, Liu CJ. BAHD superfamily of acyl-CoA dependent acyltransferases in Populus and Arabidopsis: bioinformatics and gene expression. Plant Mol Biol. 2009;70: 421–42. pmid:19343509
  51. 51. Tomato Gene Consortium. The tomato genome sequence provides insights into fleshy fruit evolution. Nature. 2012;485: 635–641. pmid:22660326
  52. 52. Egan AN, Doyle J. A comparison of global, gene-specific, and relaxed clock methods in a comparative genomics framework: dating the polyploid history of soybean (Glycine max). Syst biol. 2010;59: 534–47. pmid:20705909
  53. 53. Doyle JJ, Egan AN. Dating the origins of polyploidy events. New Phytol. 2010; 186: 73–85. pmid:20028472
  54. 54. Gaeta RT, Pires JC, Iniguez-Luy F, Leon E, Osborn TC. Genomic changes in resynthesized Brassica napus and their effect on gene expression and phenotype. Plant Cell. 2007;19: 3403–17. pmid:18024568
  55. 55. Hulse-Kemp AM, Maheshwari S, Stoffel K, Hill TA, Jaffe D, Williams SR, Weisenfeld N, Ramakrishnan S, Kumar V, Shah P, Schatz MC. Reference quality assembly of the 3.5-Gb genome of Capsicum annuum from a single linked-read library. Hort. Res. 2018; 5(1):4.
  56. 56. Voelker TA, Staswick P, Chrispeels MJ. Molecular analysis of 2 phytohemagglutinin genes and their expression in the Phaesolus vulgaris cv Pinto, a lecithin deficient cultivar of the bean. EMBO J. 1986;5: 3075–3082. pmid:16453730
  57. 57. Gottlieb LD, Ford VS. A recently silenced, duplicate PgiC locus in Clarkia. Mol Biol Evol. 1997;14: 125–132. pmid:9029791
  58. 58. Johnson DA, Thomas MA. The monosaccharide transporter gene family in Arabidopsis and rice: A history of duplications, adaptive evolution, and functional divergence. Mol Biol Evol. 2007;24: 2412–2423. pmid:17827171
  59. 59. Tasma IM, Brendel V, Whitham SA, Bhattacharyya MK. Expression and evolution of the phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C gene family in Arabidopsis thaliana. Plant Physiol Biochem. 2008;46: 627–637. pmid:18534862
  60. 60. Balakirev ES, Ayala FJ. Pseudogenes: Are they "Junk" or functional DNA?. Annu Rev Genet. 2003; 37:123–151. pmid:14616058
  61. 61. Tam OH, Aravin AA, Stein P, Girard A, Murchison EP, Cheloufi S, et al. Pseudogene-derived small interfering RNAs regulate gene expression in mouse oocytes. Nature. 2008;453: 534–U538. pmid:18404147
  62. 62. Hill TA, Ashrafi H, Reyes-Chin-Wo S, Yao J, Stoffel K, Truco MJ, et al. Characterization of Capsicum annuum genetic diversity and population structure based on parallel polymorphism discovery with a 30K unigene Pepper GeneChip. PLoS One. 2013;8(2): e5620