The hazard ratio is incorrect throughout the article.
There is an error in the sixth sentence of the Abstract. The correct sentence is: Hazard ratios suggest lethal intervention was associated with an insignificant 27% lower risk of recurrence of events at trapping sites, but offset by an insignificant 78% increase in risk of recurrence at sites up to 5.42 km distant in the same year, compared to the non-lethal treatment.
There is an error in sixth sentence under the ‘Township Scale’ heading of the Results Section. The correct sentence is: Lethal intervention increased risk (hastening recurrence) by 78%, but this was not statistically significant (treatment HR = 1.78, P = 0.458).
There are errors in the fourth sentence of the Discussion Section. The correct sentence is: A small (27%), statistically insignificant reduction in the risk of depredation at the section level was more than offset by a 2.9 times larger (78%) yet also statistically insignificant increase in the risk of depredation at the township scale which is about half the size of a wolfpack territory, and then another statistically insignificant decrease (28%) in risk at the scale of neighborhood of townships, which is four times larger than the average wolfpack territory .
- 1. Santiago-Avila FJ, Cornman AM, Treves A (2018) Killing wolves to prevent predation on livestock may protect one farm but harm neighbors. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0189729. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0189729 pmid:29320512
Citation: Santiago-Avila FJ, Cornman AM, Treves A (2018) Correction: Killing wolves to prevent predation on livestock may protect one farm but harm neighbors. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0209716. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209716
Published: December 19, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Santiago-Avila et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.