To characterize the clinical pattern and evaluate real-life practices in the management of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) in Thailand.
In this multicenter, prospective, observational cohort, females (aged ≥18 years) with histologically and immunohistochemically confirmed TNBC were enrolled. Patient data was collected at four study visits–an inclusion visit (for enrollment), and three subsequent follow-up visits at 12±1, 24±1, and 36±1 months after completion of first day of any planned chemotherapy.
Of the 293 enrolled patients, 262 (89.4%) had early-stage TNBC (Stage I: 46 patients, Stage II: 151 patients, and Stage III: 65 patients) and 31 (10.6%) had metastatic TNBC (mTNBC). Chemotherapy was prescribed to 95.4% of the early-stage patients and to 100.0% of the mTNBC patients; most commonly as anthracycline-based in combination with cyclophosphamide and other agents. Patients’ performance status and consensus guidelines were the major factors affecting choice of treatment. In early-stage patients, median disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) had not been reached for Stage I and II patients, and were calculated to be 37.0 months and 40.0 months, respectively, in Stage III patients. In mTNBC patients, progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were found to be 10.0 months and 14.0 months, respectively. In Stage III patients, anthracycline-based regimens were found to be associated with increase in DFS (p = 0.0181) and OS (p = 0.0027) compared to non-anthracycline-based regimens. In mTNBC patients, non-taxane-based regimens were associated with an increase in PFS (p = 0.0025). The 3-year survival rates in early-stage and mTNBC patients were 85.0% and 21.0%, respectively.
Clinical management of TNBC in Thailand follows the general guidelines for treatment of TNBC. However, prognosis and survival outcomes are suboptimal, especially in progressive disease. This study is the first assessment in the existing practices in which the results could pave to way to improve the treatment outcome of TNBC in Thailand.
Citation: Srimuninnimit V, Pornpraserthsuk P, Chaiwerawattana A, Kongdan Y, Namkanisorn T, Somwangprasert A, et al. (2018) Real-life clinical pattern, management, and survival in Thai patients with early-stage or metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. PLoS ONE 13(12): e0209040. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0209040
Editor: Qing-Xiang Amy Sang, Florida State University, UNITED STATES
Received: July 12, 2018; Accepted: November 27, 2018; Published: December 19, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Srimuninnimit et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files. The de-identified minimal underlying data set is publicly accessible as a Supporting Information S1 to S3 Files. Qualified researchers may request access to additional patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi’s data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
Funding: This study was funded by Sanofi Aventis (Thailand) Ltd., grant reference DIREG_L_05501 to VS (http://www.sanofi.co.th/l/th/th/index.jsp). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and result analysis, decision to publish of the manuscript.
Competing interests: This study was funded by Sanofi Aventis (Thailand) Ltd. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a breast cancer phenotype characterized by an immunohistochemical absence of estrogen receptor (ER) and progesterone receptor (PR), as well as absence of amplification of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) gene . Due to tumor heterogeneity and presence of several subtypes, TNBC is of particular concern; it is clinically aggressive compared to other breast cancers, has poor prognosis on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS), lacks specific target for therapeutic intervention, and overlaps with BRCA1-associated breast cancers.  Approximately 10–20% of all breast cancers are TNBC [3–5] and the prevalence is high in Asians [6, 7]. Data on the prevalence of TNBC in Thailand is sparse but in a recent study on survival time in breast cancers of different molecular subtypes, >30.0% of study patients were found to have TNBC . There has been an increasing incidence of breast cancer in Thailand in recent years [9, 10] and this indicates that TNBC-related morbidity and mortality will certainly rise in the future.
Currently the mainstay of TNBC treatment is surgery with or without adjuvant chemotherapy  and the choice of therapeutic approach depends on the level of advancement of the disease. Early-stage TNBC is shown to have high sensitivity to adjuvant chemotherapy  and is associated with an improvement in DFS and OS . In these patients, depending on their performance status, anthracycline- and taxane-based regimens are the standard of care while docetaxel in combination with cyclophosphamide is considered as an acceptable non-anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy [13–15]. On the other hand, treatment of metastatic TNBC (mTNBC) follows the general principles for all metastatic breast cancers and is largely palliative instead of curative . The main goal of chemotherapy in mTNBC is to prolong progression-free survival (PFS) and OS as well as to improve patients’ quality of life. Currently, there is no first-line standard of care for treatment for mTNBC, and due to the lack of clinical success of targeted therapies, the most common approach involves the use of taxanes, anthracyclines, vinca alkaloids, and antimetabolites, either as a single-agent or multiple agents in combination or sequential manner [1, 17].
In order to implement evidence-based strategies in cancer medicine and introduce newer therapies and regimens, it is necessary to first assess the existing standard practices and identify any shortcomings in these. Hence, the primary objective of the study was to characterize clinical patterns of newly diagnosed TNBC patients in Thailand in real-life practice. Secondary objectives included identification of existing treatment patterns and assessment of 3-year survival rates in study patients.
Materials and methods
The reported study was a national, multicenter, non-interventional, prospective cohort analysis with a three-year follow-up.
The study included four patient visits over three years–an inclusion visit (V0) during which the patient was enrolled, and subsequent yearly visits (V1–V3) at 12 ± 1 months, 24 ± 1 months, and 36 ± 1 months after completion of first day of chemotherapy.
The study was performed in accordance with the principles laid down by the 18th World Medical Assembly (Helsinki 1964) and all subsequent amendments. Moreover, the study conduct was in compliance with the guidelines for good epidemiological practice, STROBE guidelines for reporting observational studies as well as national and local laws and regulations in Thailand. The study protocol has been approved by local Ethics Committees of 16 study sites (where some study site has shared the same Ethics Committees) including Siriraj Institutional Review Board; Human Research and Ethics Committee, Lopburi Cancer Hospital; Research Committee, National Cancer Institute; Committee on Human Rights Related to Research Involving Human Subjects, Ramathibodi Hospital; Ethics Committee, Prapokklao Hospital; Research Ethics Committee, Chiang Mai University; Ethics Committee For Researche Involving Human Subjects, the Bangkok Metropolitan Administration; Research Ethics Committee, Prince of Songkla University; Institution Review Board, Chulalongkorn University; Human Research Ethics Committee, Khon Kaen Hospital; Research Ethics Committee, Vajira Hospital; Human Research and Ethics Committee, Naval Medical Department; Institutional Review Board, Royal Thai Army Medical Department. All study patients had to provide a signed and dated informed consent.
Patient recruitment and data collection
Patient recruitment for the study began in July 2011 and the last patient finished their last follow-up visit in January 2016.
Study patients were females (aged ≥18 years) with histologically documented TNBC fulfilling the following criteria: 1) ER negative (ER–ve), and PR negative (PR–ve), defined by <1% tumor staining by immunohistochemistry (IHC), and 2) HER2 non-overexpression, defined by IHC score of (0,1) or fluorescence in situ hybridization-negative (FISH–ve), or silver in situ hybridization-negative (SISH–ve). In addition, study patients were not to have received prior chemotherapy for their TNBC (adjuvant or neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early-stage TNBC or chemotherapy for metastatic TNBC). Patients presenting with in situ breast carcinoma, or were non-TNBC, or had a concurrent history of other neoplasm (except curatively treated basal cell skin cancer or adequately treated in situ cervical carcinoma) were excluded from the study.
Data collected at baseline (V0) included patient demographics, relevant medical history, circumstances of detection, tumor characteristics, TNM staging (AJCC 7th Ed), treatments–prior and planned, factors influencing planned treatment (classified into tumor factor, subject factor, and center factor). Data collected at V1–V3 included performance status according to Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) scores, treatments received, treatments ongoing and reasons for change in planned treatment (only V1), date and pattern of recurrence, and patient survival status–OS, DFS, and PFS.
Calculation of sample size was made after taking in consideration the national incidence in 2010 in Thailand of 13,310 new breast cancer cases, of which 11% (1471 cases) were estimated to be TNBC. In order to enroll approximately 20% of the annual TNBC cases and allowing for a 10% annual dropout rate, a total of 300 TNBC patients were targeted as the sample size for enrolment into the study.
Study variables were analyzed using descriptive statistics–mean, standard deviation (SD), median, range, and 1st and 3rd quartiles for continuous parameters, and counts and percentages for categorical parameters. Survival curves were designed using Kaplan-Meier method and stratified by ECOG scores and tumor burden. Statistical significance between chemotherapy regimens was calculated using log-rank test. All analyses were performed with SAS version 9.4 (SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina).
Subgroup and post hoc analyses
Certain subgroup analyses were carried out to ascertain the effects of anthracycline and taxane regimens; specifically, taxane vs. non-taxane, and anthracycline vs. non-anthracycline. Moreover, post hoc analyses were carried out to assess the effect of taxane add-on to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy in Stage III patients. Data were analyzed for median follow-up period, median DFS and OS, as well as for survival probability at one, two, and three years following enrollment.
Patient disposition and characteristics
A total of 293 patients enrolled at 16 sites of whom 262 had early-stage TNBC and 31 had mTNBC. In the early-stage patients the Tumor-Node-Metastasis staging classified 46, 151, and 65 patients in Stage I, Stage II, and Stage III, respectively. A total of 198 (67.6%) patients completed the study while 61 (20.8%) patients died and 24 (8.2%) patients were lost to follow-up. Ten (3.4%) patients withdrew consent during the course of the study. Of the 198 patients who completed the study, 187 (94.4%) were alive without recurrent disease at the final visit.
Median ages of early-stage and mTNBC patients were 53.0 [inter-quartile range (IQR): 44.0–60.0] and 56.0 (IQR: 47.0–61.0) years, respectively Table 1, and 60.4% of patients were aged 41–60 years. At enrollment, 92.1% (n = 270) of patients had ECOG = 0. A total of 25 (8.5%) patients had a prior history of breast cancer, and this proportion was much higher in patients with mTNBC in comparison to patients with early-stage TNBC (48.4% [n/N = 15/31] vs. 3.8% [n/N = 10/262]). The proportion of patients with a family history of breast cancer and ovarian cancer was 8.2% (n = 24) and 1.4% (n = 4), respectively. Over half (n = 177, 60.4%) of the study patients were postmenopausal.
The commonly employed methods for breast cancer detection were core biopsy, excisional biopsy, and diagnostic mammogram, employed in 41.8% (n = 122), 31.5% (n = 92), and 18.8% (n = 55), of the patients, respectively.
All patients (N = 293) were diagnosed with ductal carcinoma. Overall, TNBC tumors were moderately to poorly differentiated Table 1. In early-stage patients, tumors were mostly poorly differentiated (49.6%, n/N = 130/262) or moderately differentiated (41.2%, n/N = 108/262). In patients with mTNBC, the majority of the tumors were either not assessable (45.2%, n/N = 14/31) or poorly differentiated (35.5%, n/N = 11/31).The most common sites of metastasis in patients with mTNBC were lungs (n = 13), liver (n = 6), and bones (n = 6).
Almost 90.0% (n/N = 262/293) of the patients had undergone breast surgery prior to enrollment, the majority (77.1%, n = 226) of which was total mastectomy Table 1. Mean number of nodes excised and nodes positive for malignancy were 16.5 (±8.1) and 2.8 (±5.6), respectively. Eight (25.2%) patients with mTNBC received radiation therapy prior to enrolment, either as curative or palliative. The most common site for radiation was the supraclavicular region (n = 6).
The mean (± standard deviation [SD]) size of the primary tumor in patients was 31.59 (±21.12) mm. Seven patients presented with a second tumor, with a mean (±SD) size of 20.00 (±10.03) mm. Only one patient presented with a third tumor (size: 8 mm) S1 Table.
Approximately half (51.9%, n/N = 136/262) of early-stage patients were assessed by the study investigator to have an intermediate risk of recurrence (tumor size > 1 cm., node negative) within the next three years. Moreover, 42.4% (n/N = 111/262) of the early-stage patients were judged to be at high risk of recurrence (node positive ≥ 1 node) in the same timeframe.
Chemotherapeutic treatment and factors governing choice of regimen
Chemotherapy was prescribed in 281 patients (250 [95.4%] early-stage and 31 [100.0%] mTNBC), most commonly in combination with either supportive care (39.1%; n/N = 110/281) or radiotherapy and supportive care (21.7%; n/N = 61/281) or radiotherapy (8.5%; n/N = 24/281). A total of 13.9% (n/N = 39/281) patients received chemotherapy alone.
In early-stage patients, chemotherapy was prescribed as either neoadjuvant (n = 17, 6.8%) or adjuvant therapy (n = 233, 93.2%) Table 2. The most favored adjuvant combination in early-stage TNBC patients was doxorubicin/epirubicin with cyclophosphamide (AC/EC: 23.6%, n/N = 59/250), followed by fluorouracil, doxorubicin/epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide [FAC/FEC/CAF/CEF; 22.4% (n = 56)]. The most favored adjuvant sequential chemotherapy was AC/EC prior to taxanes [AC/EC–≥ paclitaxel (12.4%, n = 31) and AC/EC–> docetaxel (8.4%, n = 21)]. Twelve (4.6%) of the early-stage patients did not receive any chemotherapy, because of non-specified reasons (n = 6), patient’s decision to not receive it (n = 5), and having completed chemotherapy prior to study inclusion (n = 1).
All patients with mTNBC received chemotherapy, either as a combination, or as a single agent, or in a sequential manner Table 3. The most commonly prescribed chemotherapeutic regimen in patients with metastatic TNBC was FAC/FEC/CAF/CEF (32.3%, n/N = 10/31), followed by AC/EC (22.6%, n = 7), and capecitabine (16.1%, n = 5).
The choice of chemotherapeutic regimen was categorized according to tumor factors, subject factors, and center factors. The top-ranking factors for each category in early-stage patients were performance status (46.9%, n/N = 123/262) S1 Fig, consensus guidelines in Thailand (44.3%, n/N = 116/262) S3 Fig, and nodal status (32.1%, n/N = 84/262) S2 Fig. Likewise, in case of patients with mTNBC, these were performance status (54.8%, n/N = 17/31), consensus guidelines in Thailand (45.2%, n/N = 14/31) and organ involvement (32.3%, n/N = 10/31), S1–S3 Figs.
Disease-free Survival (in early-stage patients)
At 3-years, 94% of stage I and 80% of stage II patients survived the study without disease, hence, the median DFS could not be computed for these two groups of patients. While for Stage III patients, the median DFS was found to be 37.0 months (Fig 1A).
(A) Disease-free survival (DFS) in early-stage patients and, (B) Progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with metastasis.
No statistically significant difference in DFS in early-stage patients was observed when analyzed by factoring in taxane versus non-taxane chemotherapy (p = 0.2931). This pattern was also repeated for sub-group analysis based on tumor staging.
Similarly, no statistically significant difference in DFS in early-stage patients was apparent when analyzed for anthracycline versus non-anthracycline–based chemotherapy (p = 0.9162). Furthermore, this lack of difference in DFS was repeated for Stage I and II patients when probed for anthracycline-based chemotherapy. However, in Stage III patients, median DFS was found to be longer in patients receiving anthracycline-based chemotherapy (DFS 37.0 months vs. 13.5 months in patients who received non-anthracycline-based treatment; p = 0.0181, S4 Fig.
Progression-free Survival (in patients with mTNBC)
The median PFS in patients with mTNBC was found to be 10.0 months (IQR: 7.0–13.0 months), Fig 1B.
The PFS was found to be longer in patients who received non-taxane-based chemotherapy in comparison to those who received a taxane-based chemotherapy (12.5 months vs. 8.0 months; p = 0.0025),S5 Fig. No statistically significant difference in PFS was observed in between patients who received anthracycline-based chemotherapy in comparison to those who were administered a non-anthracycline-based chemotherapy.
The 3-year survival rate in early-stage patients was calculated to be 85.0%. In contrast, this survival rate in patients with mTNBC was 21.0% (Table 4 and Fig 2). Median OS had not been attained in early-stage patients and was calculated as 14.0 months (IQR: 11.0–23.0 months) in mTNBC.
Among early-stage patients, Stage I and II patients had not reached a median OS; though at the end of the 3-year study period, the overall survival was 100.0% and 90.0%, respectively S6 Fig. Furthermore, subgroup analysis in these patients according to taxane- or anthracycline-based chemotherapy reiterated the general result, i.e., median OS could not be ascertained at study conclusion. In contrast to these patients, median OS in Stage III patients was calculated as 40.0 months S6 Fig. There was a trend of higher median OS in Stage III patients who received taxane-based chemotherapy than non-taxane-based regimen S7 Fig. Also, Stage III patients who received an anthracycline-based regimen were found to have longer OS in comparison to those who received a non-anthracycline-based regimen (40.0 months vs. 16.0 months, p = 0.0027), S8 Fig.
In patients with mTNBC, the median OS was shorter in taxane-based regimen than those who received non-taxane-based regimen (11.00 months vs. 15.50 months; p = 0.3042), although the difference is not statistically significant. In contrast, the median OS in patients with mTNBC who received anthracycline-based regimen was statistically non-significantly longer than that of a non-anthracycline-based regimen (15.00 months vs. 11.50 months; p = 0.7403).
Effects of taxane add-on to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy
A total of 14 Stage III patients received anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and of these, three patients were lost to follow-up or withdrew consent. A total of 30 patients received a taxane add-on sequential or combination to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy.
Median DFS and OS in Stage III patients who received only anthracycline-based chemotherapy was calculated as 20.0 months and 32.0 months, respectively (Fig 3). On the other hand, in Stage III patients who had received taxane add-on, median DFS and OS could not be reached since approximately 70% of the patients were alive at the end of study period.
To the best of our knowledge, the reported study is the first of its kind in Thailand to specifically characterize clinical pattern and real-life practices in management of early-stage and metastatic TNBC and assess 3-year survival. Of the 293 patients enrolled in our study, the majority (89.4%) presented early-stage TNBC, mostly Stage II disease. In patients presenting mTNBC, the most common site of metastasis was the lung. Slightly more than half of the early-stage patients were judged to be at a risk for recurrence in three years. Over 95.0% of the patients received adjuvant chemotherapy and anthracycline-based regimens were the adjuvant chemotherapy of choice. During the course of study, survival rate declined with disease progression and was approximately 21.0% in patients with mTNBC in comparison to 100.0% in Stage I patients. Anthracycline-based and non-taxane-based chemotherapeutic regimens were found to have a positive effect on DFS in early-stage TNBC and PFS in mTNBC, respectively.
The lack of receptors that are responsive to hormonal therapy or trastuzumab therapy is a major drawback for the treatment of TNBC . Therefore, currently available options range from surgery in locoregional disease and palliative chemotherapy for progressive TNBC . In our patients, prior surgery was widely reported as first line of treatment; in 91.6% of early-stage patients and 71.0% of patients with mTNBC. However, we could not discern at what stage the choice of surgical intervention in patients mTNBC was made i.e. if surgery was conducted prior to metastasis. Furthermore, total unilateral mastectomy, often without reconstruction, was reported as the commonly used surgical technique.
The current options for adjuvant therapy for early-stage TNBC are anthracycline- and/or taxane-based regimens, usually in combination with cyclophosphamide. Another classical combination that is reportedly active against TNBC is cyclophosphamide + methotrexate + fluorouracil (CMF) . Neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy against TNBC is shown to result in pathological complete response and improvement in survival . However, the superiority of anthracycline-based chemotherapy over CMF in an adjuvant scenario is somewhat contentious  since conflicting results have been published [21, 22]. In our study, prescription of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was negligible, and the majority of our patients received adjuvant chemotherapy. The most commonly prescribed chemotherapeutic regimens, in both early-stage patients and in patients with mTNBC, were anthracycline-based, either as a combination with cyclophosphamide and/or fluorouracil or as a sequential regimen with taxanes.
Survival rates in patients with TNBC are generally poorer in comparison to those with other breast cancers. Moreover, as in other cancers, a host of independent factors such as tumor stage, molecular composition of the tumor, locoregional advancement, metastatic progression, and choice of treatment govern survival outcomes in TNBC. Hence, it becomes tenuous to compare data gathered in different observational registries. However, any such academic endeavor does provide an overview on real-life outcomes of clinical practices elsewhere. In our study, the 3-year survival rate in early-stage TNBC patients was found to be 85.0%. In contrast, data from the substantially larger California Cancer Registry revealed a 5-year survival rate of 77.0% in patients with TNBC . However, these findings need to be put in perspective, largely because of the shorter time-span of our study and our inability to confirm whether the data from the California Cancer Registry were exclusively for early-stage TNBC patients or if they included mTNBC patients. Of particular interest in our study is the observation on DFS in early-stage TNBC patients: the Stage I and II patients had not achieved median DFS (>50.0% surviving without the disease) wherein median DFS of in Stage III patients was calculated to be 37.0 months. Since the highest probability of disease relapse in TNBC patients is within the first three years after primary treatment  and despite a substantial proportion of our early-stage patients were judged to be at high risk of recurrence at enrolment, the observed DFS values are encouraging. In case of patients with mTNBC, we reported an overall PFS of 10.0 months and this was slightly longer in patients who had received non-taxane-based regimens (PFS: 12.5 months). However, when we take into consideration the notable disparity in the numbers of patients who received taxanes or not, it is difficult to draw a conclusion regarding the effectiveness of one regimen over the other.
In our study, median OS in patients with mTNBC was calculated to be 14.0 months and this is comparable to the 9.0–13.3 months OS that has been previously reported [25, 26]. Though not statistically significant, we observed that median OS was longer in those patients with mTNBC who had received a non-taxane-based regimen in comparison to those who had received a taxane-based regimen; and in patients who had received an anthracycline-based regimen in comparison to those who had received a non-anthracycline-based regimen. The PFS was also found to be longer in patients with mTNBC who received non-taxane-based chemotherapy in comparison to those who received a taxane-based chemotherapy. However, our study was not powered enough, i.e. lacked enough patients in each subgroup to establish the validity of this observation. Moreover, patients with mTNBC tended to have received various chemotherapeutic regimens when the preceding one failed to elicit a satisfactory response and hence it is not possible to attribute the net effects to a single regimen.
The use of anthracycline-based chemotherapy with add-on taxanes in neoadjuvant settings has been shown to result in increased pathological complete response in patients with early-stage TNBC . However, the utility of this regimen in adjuvant settings against TNBC has not been convincingly proven. Certain reports have concluded that adjuvant docetaxel or paclitaxel improves DFS and OS [27, 28]. On the other hand, certain studies have failed to recapitulate any advantage to add-on taxanes [29, 30]. We conducted post hoc analyses on our study data to probe for any association between survival in Stage III TNBC patients and addition of taxanes to anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy. Our results show a notable improvement in DFS and OS in Stage III patients who had received a taxane sequential to anthracycline-based chemotherapy; median DFS and OS in patients who had received only anthracycline-based chemotherapy were 20.0 and 32.0 months, respectively, while in patients with taxane add-on median DFS and OS had not been reached at the time of study conclusion. These findings are interesting but must be interpreted with caution since the group size was small, therefore, the robustness of the analyses may be limited. Large-scale studies will be required to ascertain whether add-on taxanes to adjuvant chemotherapy have a decided beneficial effect on the treatment of TNBC in Thai settings.
Being an observational study, our investigation was limited in its scope. Survival outcomes in TNBC depend intrinsically on a number of factors including treatment strategy employed. In our study, we could analyze survival data only according to the class of chemotherapeutic agent i.e. taxane versus non-taxane and anthracycline versus non-anthracycline. Hence, we could not identify any particular regimen as more effective than others. Moreover, despite our observed improvements in survival outcomes in early-stage patients who had received anthracycline-based regimen, we advise caution in interpreting these results because of the large proportion of patients who received anthracycline-based treatments. Certain endpoints such as median DFS and OS were not attained for early-stage patients and hence further follow-up was required to identify the impact of current therapeutic practices on survival in Thai patients. However, despite these shortcomings, our study does provide a snapshot of the real-life management of TNBC in Thailand. Our findings highlight the need for further studies to evaluate the effectiveness of contemporary treatment practices in Thailand and could be useful in developing newer and more efficient strategies for treating Thai patients with TNBC.
S1 Fig. Subject factors influencing treatment selection.
S2 Fig. Tumor factors influencing treatment selection.
S3 Fig. Center factors affecting treatment selection.
S4 Fig. Disease-Free Survival of Stage III-subgroup by anthracycline based chemotherapy.
S5 Fig. Progression Free Survival-subgroup by taxane based chemotherapy.
S6 Fig. Overall Survival at 3 years-subgroup by early stage patients.
S7 Fig. Overall Survival of Stage III patients at 3 years-subgroup by Taxane-based chemotherapy.
S8 Fig. Overall Survival of stage III patients at 3 years-subgroup by Anthracycline based chemotherapy.
We acknowledge Rawin Ingsirorat of Udon Thani Cancer Center, Damnern Vachirodom of Srinagarind Hospital, Pongin Sarikapooti of Queen Sirikit Hospital, and Somchai Amornprapatchai of Fort Suranari Hospital for their contribution in data acquisition. Statistical analyses were conducted by BIOPHICS, Faculty of Tropical Medicine, Mahidol University. Editorial support in the preparation of this publication was provided by Satyen Shenoy of Describe Scientific Writing & Communications and sponsored by Sanofi. Editorial support in the preparation of this publication was also provided by Anahita Gouri and Rohan Mitra of Sanofi, India, Soamrutai Boonsuepsakul of Sanofi, Thailand. The authors individually and collectively are responsible for all content and editorial decisions and received no payment from Sanofi directly or indirectly (through a third party) related to the development/presentation of this publication.
The de-identified minimal underlying data set is publicly accessible as a Supporting Information Files 1 to 3. Qualified researchers may request access to additional patient level data and related study documents including the clinical study report, study protocol with any amendments, blank case report form, statistical analysis plan, and dataset specifications. Patient level data will be anonymized and study documents will be redacted to protect the privacy of trial participants. Further details on Sanofi’s data sharing criteria, eligible studies, and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.clinicalstudydatarequest.com
- 1. Khosravi-Shahi P, Cabezon-Gutierrez L, Custodio-Cabello S. Metastatic triple negative breast cancer: optimizing treatment options, new and emerging therapies. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2017. [Epub ahead of print] pmid:28815913
- 2. Wahba HA and El-Hadaad HA. Current approaches in treatment of triple-negative breast cancer. Cancer Biol Med. 2015;12:106–16. pmid:26175926
- 3. Anders CK, Carey LA. Biology, metastatic patterns, and treatment of patients with triple-negative breast cancer. Clin Breast Cancer. 2009;9: S73–81. pmid:19596646
- 4. Hudis CA, Gianni L. Triple-negative breast cancer: an unmet medical need. Oncologist. 2011;16:1–11.
- 5. Szekely B, Silber AL, Pusztai L. New therapeutic strategies for triple-negative breast cancer. Oncology (Williston Park). 2017;3:130–137.
- 6. Kwan ML, Kushi LH, Weltzien E, Maring B, Kutner SE, Fulton RS et al. Epidemiology of breast cancer subtypes in two prospective cohort studies of breast cancer survivors. Breast Cancer Res. 2009;11:R31. pmid:19463150
- 7. Telli ML, Chang ET, Kurian AW, Keegan TH, McClure LA, Lichtensztain D et al. Asian ethnicity and breast cancer subtypes: a study from the California Cancer Registry. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2011;127:471–478. pmid:20957431
- 8. Kongsiang A, Tangvoraphonkchai V, Jirapornkil C, Promthet S, Kamsa-Ard S, Suwanrungruang K et al. Survival time and molecular subtypes of breast cancer after radiotherapy in Thailand. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15:10505–10508. pmid:25556500
- 9. Youlden DR, Cramb SM, Yip CH, Baade PD. Incidence and mortality of female breast cancer in the Asia-Pacific region. Cancer Biol Med. 2014;11:101–115. pmid:25009752
- 10. Virani S, Bilheem S, Chansaard W, Chitapanarux I, Daoprasert K, Khuanchana S et al. National and subnational population-based incidence of cancer in Thailand: assessing cancers with the highest burdens. Cancers. 2017;9.pii:E108. pmid:28817104
- 11. Wang C, Kar S, Lai X, Cai W, Arfuso F, Sethi G et al. Triple negative breast cancer in Asia: An insider's view. Cancer Treat Rev. 2017;62:29–38. pmid:29154023
- 12. Foulkes WD, Smith IE, Reis-Filho JS. Triple-negative breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1938–1948. pmid:21067385
- 13. Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group. Effects of chemotherapy and hormonal therapy for early breast cancer on recurrence and 15-year survival: An overview of the randomised trials. Lancet. 2005;365:1687–1717. pmid:15894097
- 14. Denduluri N, Somerfield MR, Eisen A, Holloway JN, Hurria A, Kind TA et al. Selection of optimal adjuvant chemotherapy regimens for early breast cancer and adjuvant targeted therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-positive breast cancers: An American Society of Clinical Oncology Guideline Adaptation of the Cancer Care Ontario Clinical Practice Guideline. J Clin Oncol. 2016;34:2416–2427. pmid:27091714
- 15. Curigliano G, Burstein HJ, Winer EP, Gnant M, Dubsky P, Loibl S et al. De-escalating and escalating treatments for early-stage breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Expert Consensus Conference on the Primary Therapy of Early Breast Cancer 2017. Annals of Oncology. 2017;28:1700–1712. pmid:28838210
- 16. Zeichner SB, Terawaki H, Gogineni K. A review of systemic treatment in metastatic triple-negative breast cancer. Breast Cancer (Auckl.). 2016;10:25–36.
- 17. Gadi VK and Davidson NE. Practical approach to triple-negative breast cancer. J Oncol Pract. 2017;13:293–300. pmid:28489980
- 18. Colleoni M, Cole BF, Viale G, Regan MM, Price KN, Maiorano E et al. Classical cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil chemotherapy is more effective in triple-negative, node-negative breast cancer: results from two randomized trials of adjuvant chemoendocrine therapy for node-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28:2966–2973. pmid:20458051
- 19. Liedtke C, Mazouni C, Hess KR, André F, Tordai A, Mejia JA et al. Response to neoadjuvant therapy and long-term survival in patients with triple-negative breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2008;26:1275–1281. pmid:18250347
- 20. Joensuu h, Gligorov J. Adjuvant treatments for triple-negative breast cancers. Ann Oncol 2012;23:vi40–5. pmid:23012301
- 21. Cheang MC, Voduc KD, Tu D, Jiang S, Leung S, Chia SK et al. Responsiveness of intrinsic subtypes to adjuvant anthracycline substitution in the NCIC.CTG MA.5 randomized trial. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18:2402–2412. pmid:22351696
- 22. Rocca A, Bravaccini S, Scarpi E, Mangia A, Petroni S, Puccetti M et al. Benefit from anthracyclines in relation to biological profiles in early breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2014;144:307–318. pmid:24381054
- 23. Bauer KR, Brown M, Cress RD, Parise CA, Caggiano V. Descriptive analysis of estrogen receptor (ER)-negative, progesterone receptor (PR)-negative, and HER2-negative invasive breast cancer, the so-called triple-negative phenotype: a population-based study from the California Cancer Registry. Cancer. 2007;109:1721–1728. pmid:17387718
- 24. Pogoda K, Niwinska A, Murawska M, Pieńkowski T. Analysis of pattern, time and risk factors influencing recurrence in triple-negative breast cancer patients. Med Oncol. 2013;30:388. pmid:23292831
- 25. Kassam F, Enright K, Dent R, Dranitsaris G, Myers J, Flynn C et al. Survival outcomes for patients with metastatic triple-negative breast cancer: Implications for clinical practice and trial design. Clin Breast Cancer. 2009;9:29–33. pmid:19299237
- 26. Dent R, Trudeau M, Pritchard KI, Hanna WM, Kahn HK, Sawka CA et al. Triple-negative breast cancer: Clinical features and patterns of recurrence. Clin Cancer Res. 2007;13:4429–4434. pmid:17671126
- 27. Hayes DF, Thor AD, Dressler LG, Weaver D, Edgerton S, Cowan D et al. HER2 and response to paclitaxel in node-positive breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;357:1496–1506. pmid:17928597
- 28. Jacquin JP, Jones S, Magné N, Chapelle C, Ellis P, Janni W et al. Docetaxel-containing adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with early stage breast cancer. Consistency of effect independent of nodal and biomarker status: a meta-analysis of 14 randomized clinical trials. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2012;134:903–913. pmid:22270929
- 29. Ellis P, Barrett-Lee P, Johnson L, Cameron D, Wardley A, O’Reilly S et al. Sequential docetaxel as adjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer (TACT): an open-label, phase III, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2009;373:1681–1692. pmid:19447249
- 30. Lakshmaiah KC, Anand A, Babu KG, Dasappa L, Jacob LA, Babu MCS et al. Role of taxanes in triple-negative breast cancer: a study from tertiary cancer center in South India. World J Oncol. 2017;9:110–116.