Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Genetic variants in genes related to inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer risk

  • Johanna M. Schuetz,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

  • Anne Grundy,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations CRCHUM (Centre de recherche du Centre hospitalier de l’Université de Montréal), Montreal, QC, Canada, Department of Social and Preventive Medicine, Université de Montréal, Montreal, QC, Canada

  • Derrick G. Lee,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada, Department of Mathematics, Statistics, and Computer Science, St. Francis Xavier University, Antigonish, NS, Canada

  • Agnes S. Lai,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Lindsay C. Kobayashi,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health, Cambridge, MA, United States of America, Department of Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC, United States of America

  • Harriet Richardson,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

  • Jirong Long,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vanderbilt Epidemiology Centre, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America

  • Wei Zheng,

    Roles Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Vanderbilt Epidemiology Centre, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, United States of America

  • Kristan J. Aronson,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada, Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Cancer Research Institute, Queen’s University, Kingston, ON, Canada

  • John J. Spinelli,

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Cancer Control Research, British Columbia Cancer Agency, Vancouver, BC, Canada, School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

  • Angela R. Brooks-Wilson

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer Agency, Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, Department of Biomedical Physiology and Kinesiology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, BC, Canada

Genetic variants in genes related to inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy in breast cancer risk

  • Johanna M. Schuetz, 
  • Anne Grundy, 
  • Derrick G. Lee, 
  • Agnes S. Lai, 
  • Lindsay C. Kobayashi, 
  • Harriet Richardson, 
  • Jirong Long, 
  • Wei Zheng, 
  • Kristan J. Aronson, 
  • John J. Spinelli



Inflammation contributes to breast cancer development through its effects on cell damage. This damage is usually dealt with by key genes involved in apoptosis and autophagy pathways.


We tested 206 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) in 54 genes related to inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy in a population-based breast cancer study of women of European (658 cases and 795 controls) and East Asian (262 cases and 127 controls) descent. Logistic regression was used to estimate odds ratios for breast cancer risk, and case-only analysis to compare breast cancer subtypes (defined by ER/PR/HER2 status), with adjustment for confounders. We assessed statistical interactions between the SNPs and lifestyle factors (smoking status, physical activity and body mass index).

Results and conclusion

Although no SNP was associated with breast cancer risk among women of European descent, we found evidence for an association among East Asians for rs1800925 (IL-13) and breast cancer risk (OR = 2.08; 95% CI: 1.32–3.28; p = 0.000779), which remained statistically significant after multiple testing correction (padj = 0.0350). This association was replicated in a meta-analysis of 4305 cases and 4194 controls in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Genetics Study (OR 1.12, 95% CI: 1.03–1.21, p = 0.011). Further, we found evidence of an interaction between rs7874234 (TSC1) and physical activity among women of East Asian descent.


Chronic inflammation has been linked to cancer development [1], and can influence breast cancer through many mechanisms [2]. One way that chronic inflammation can contribute to cancer is through persistent damage to cells and their components such as DNA. Apoptosis and autophagy are two of the main processes that respond to the consequences of damage caused by inflammation. Proteins involved in inflammation and apoptosis are associated with the invasiveness of breast cancer lines [3] and the maintenance of stem cell properties [4].

Lifestyle factors such as smoking introduce sources of inflammation to breast tissue. Several studies suggest a causal association between lifestyle factors and breast cancer susceptibility or progression. For example, in premenopausal women, obesity can affect hormone-independent breast cancer through chronic inflammation of the breast adipose tissue [5]. In addition, inherited factors could aggravate chronic damage from inflammation, or alternately offset damage and thus protect tissues from inflammation. Genes involved in inflammation and apoptosis have previously been associated with cancer prognosis, [6,7] as well as susceptibility [810].

Breast cancers may be classified by pathologists using hormone receptor status (the estrogen receptor [ER] and progesterone receptor [PR]), or HER2 growth receptor status. Some associations of different genes to risk are limited to only certain tumour subtypes [7,11], which hint at etiological and biological differences between subtypes and suggest a benefit in examining the subtypes separately when enough samples and information are available.

The objective of this study was to replicate previously reported associations of polymorphisms in genes related to inflammation, apoptosis and autophagy with risk of breast cancer in women of European and East Asian descent. Within these three gene categories, we included additional genes previously shown to have an effect on cancer. We also tested for statistical interactions of these genes with lifestyle factors that could affect inflammation, including body mass index (BMI), physical activity and smoking status. Finally, we carried out case-only analyses to examine whether these SNPs may have breast tumour subtype specific effects.

Materials and methods

Samples and SNPs

This study was approved by the joint Clinical Research Ethics Board of the University of British Columbia and BC Cancer. All participants gave written informed consent.

In brief, the Canadian Breast Cancer Study, a population-based case-control study, invited women with in situ or invasive breast cancer, diagnosed from April 2005 to May 2009 [12]. Women were aged 20 to 80 and lived in Metro Vancouver, British Columbia (BC) or Kingston, Ontario regions of Canada. In Vancouver, women were recruited through the BC Cancer Registry, and age-frequency matched controls were recruited through the Screening Mammography Program of BC. In Kingston, cases and controls were recruited from the Hotel Dieu Breast Assessment Program. DNA was obtained through a blood (91%) or saliva sample (9%). Additional information (including menopausal status, ethnicity, and lifestyle characteristics) was obtained through a questionnaire, either by computer assisted telephone interview (22.2%) or self-administered (77.8%).

Fifty-two genes related to apoptosis, autophagy and inflammation were studied (Table 1), eight of which had previously identified tagSNPs [13]. Thirty-eight genes were tagged using Tagger [14] in Haploview [15] with HapMap CEU population data (Table 1). Additional SNPs were selected for replication of findings from other studies; this resulted in addition of SNPs for 10 candidate genes, and 7 genes with only replication SNPs (Table 1). Genotyping was done as part of an Illumina Golden Gate Assay (San Diego, CA, USA) at the Genome Quebec / McGill University Innovation Centre.

Quality control was performed by the authors as described in [12], using Illumina Genome Studio v2011.1 (San Diego, CA, USA), PLINK v1.07 [16], GRR [17] and Microsoft Excel 2007 (Redmond, WA, USA). Of the 221 SNPs selected, 15 (7%) failed quality control for the following reasons: failure in Illumina’s built-in controls (n = 6), GenTrain Score<0.4 (n = 2), poor clusters (n = 4), monoallelic (n = 2), and call rate <0.95 (n = 1) (S1 Table).

For this analysis, only individuals of European and East Asian descent were included (Table 2). Hormone receptor status (ER, PR and HER2 status) was determined using immunohistochemistry and fluorescence in situ hybridization, as previously described [18], and tumour marker status was dichotomized as “present” or “absent”, as opposed to the cut-off levels of staining used for clinical purposes.

Table 2. Characteristics of participants whose samples passed quality control.

Statistical analysis

Statistical analyses were carried out in SVS (Golden Helix, Inc., Bozeman, MT, USA) and R (version 3, R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria) [19]. Logistic regression was carried out in European and East Asian women separately, with the inclusion of terms for age group, region of collection, menopausal status, and two interaction terms: menopausal status—age group, and menopausal status–region of collection. Multiple testing correction was applied using the false discovery rate method (FDR) [20] in two stages, as described previously [21]. Briefly, FDR was applied within each gene first, to give a corrected p-value for each test. The lowest p-value was taken to represent each gene, and finally another round of FDR was applied to yield corrected p-values across all the genes tested. This allows correction for the different number of SNPs in each gene, as well as the number of genes tested. FDR-corrected p-values of less than 0.05 were taken to indicate an association of the SNP with breast cancer.

SNPs that had p<0.05 before multiple testing correction were tested for interaction with being overweight/obese at the time of diagnosis (defined as BMI≥25), smoking status (non-smokers vs. pack-years>0) and total lifetime physical activity. Total lifetime physical activity measurements were measured as previously described [22,23] and included leisure-time, household, and occupational activities of moderate-to-vigorous intensity, summarized using metabolic equivalent (MET) scores (which are the ratio of the calculated metabolic rate for a specific activity compared to resting metabolic rate). In interaction analyses described here and previous work [24], active women were those >89.6 MET hrs/wk (the mean value among controls, which can be approximated by running at a fast pace for a bit under an hour per day). If there was a significant interaction, odds ratios for that SNP were computed within each stratum. Interaction analyses were done separately for Europeans and East Asians. Additional analysis to compare the effect of rs7874234 with regards to lifetime physical activity (in East Asian women) was conducted using StatPlus:mac (AnalystSoft Inc., Walnut, CA, USA).

Finally, logistic regression using only the cases was utilized to examine heterogeneity by hormone (ER/PR) receptor status and HER2 status using the categories indicated in Table 2. Analysis was only done for SNPs with p<0.05 before multiple testing correction. We did not have samples in each genotype category for the HER2 status case-only analysis in East Asian samples, as the minor allele frequencies were too low. Multiple-testing correction was applied to all SNPs that underwent case-only analysis. Additional analysis to compare the effect of rs7236090 in different hormone receptor status groups in East Asian women was also done using StatPlus:mac.

Replication analysis

Participants in the Shanghai Breast Cancer Genetics Study (SBCGS) are from four population-based studies: the Shanghai Breast Cancer Study (SBCS), the Shanghai Women's Health Study (SWHS), the Shanghai Breast Cancer Survival Study (SBCSS) and the Shanghai Endometrial Cancer Study (SECS, controls only). Detailed descriptions of these studies have been published elsewhere [25]. Briefly, the SBCS included two recruitment phases, SBCS-I (1996–1998) and SBCS-II (2002–2005). Breast cancer cases were identified through a rapid case ascertainment system and the Shanghai Cancer Registry. Controls were randomly selected from the general female population using the Shanghai Resident Registry and were frequency matched to cases by age. The SBCSS included newly diagnosed breast cancer cases ascertained via the Shanghai Cancer Registry between 2002–2006. The SECS was conducted from 1997–2003; only community controls from the SECS were included in the SBCGS. The SWHS is a prospective cohort study recruited from 1996–2000. The cohort has been followed by a combination of record linkage and active follow-ups to identify cause-specific mortality and cancer incidence by site. These studies are conducted among Chinese women in Shanghai using very similar protocols for data and sample collection: 2,511 breast cancer cases and 2,135 controls were genotyped using an Affymetrix 6.0 array; another 1,794 cases and 2,059 controls were genotyped using the Illumina Multi-Ethnic Genotyping Array. Data quality control procedures were carried out as previously described [25], followed by imputation with 1000 Genomes Project Phase 3 as reference. Logistic regression was performed under an additive model, with adjustment for age and the top five principal components. Data for SNPs rs1800925 and rs7874234 were extracted.


Characteristics of the cases and controls are summarized in Table 2. Briefly, quality control measures resulted in data for 922 controls and 920 cases for 206 SNPs (S1 Table). Following logistic regression analysis in Europeans (658 cases and 795 controls), 3 SNPs had p<0.05 before FDR correction and none had p<0.05 after multiple testing correction (S2 Table): (i) rs6676805 (RFWD2) (OR = 0.730 (95% CI: 0.600–0.889) p = 0.00158 and after correction padj = 0.213), (ii) rs617078 (RFWD2) (OR = 0.799 (95% CI: 0.681–0.938) p = 0.00585) and (iii) rs8063461 (TSC2) (OR = 0.823 (95% CI 0.711–0.963) p = 0.00139 and after correction padj = 0.960). There was no evidence for an interaction of any of the three SNPs with excess weight, smoking status, or exercise (S2 Table). There was also no evidence for differential effects depending on the tumour subtype as determined by hormone receptor status (S2 Table).

Among East Asian women (262 cases and 127 controls), 7 SNPs had p<0.05 before multiple testing correction (Table 3). Following FDR correction, the SNP rs1800925 (IL-13) was associated with breast cancer risk (OR = 2.08 (95% CI: 1.32–3.28) p = 0.000779; after correction padj = 0.0350).

Table 3. Logistic regression and interaction analysis results for East Asian samples for SNPs with p<0.05 before FDR.

Among East Asian women, SNP rs7874234 (TSC1) (OR = 1.81 (95% CI: 1.00–3.28) p = 0.0418; after correction padj = 1.00) interacted with physical activity (p = 0.0281). When separating cases by physical activity totals, the association between rs7874234 and breast cancer risk was only seen in women with an average lifetime weekly exercise of <89.6 MET hrs (OR = 1.24 (95% CI: 1.05–1.46) p = 0.00909), with no association for women with >89.6 MET hrs.

Finally, rs7236090 (BCL2) (OR = 0.713 (95% CI:0.515–0.986) p = 0.0396) was differentially associated in the hormone receptor (ER/PR) classified tumour subtypes in East Asian women (p = 0.00612; after correction padj = 0.0429), with the strongest association seen for hormone receptor positive tumours.

We tested the IL-13 and TSC1 SNPs for replication of main effects by conducting lookups in genome-wide association study (GWAS) data from the Shanghai Breast Cancer Genetics Study (SBCGS) [25]. Rs1800925 in IL-13 was significantly associated with breast cancer in one of two data sets tested, as well as in an overall meta-analysis of the SBCGS data (4305 cases and 4194 controls; OR 1.12, (95% CI: 1.03–1.21) p = 0.011) (Table 4), with the same direction of association as in the Canadian data. Because exercise data was not available for the SBCGS, we were not able to test rs7874234 in TSC1 for interaction with exercise in the replication study. No main effect for association with breast cancer risk was observed for this SNP in the SBCGS (Table 4).

Table 4. Replication results in the Shanghai breast cancer genetics study.


We report an association between rs1800925 (IL-13) and breast cancer risk among East Asian women, which was not heterogeneous across breast cancer subtypes. IL-13 was associated with breast cancer risk in New Mexico [26]. A previous GWAS in the SBCGS did not report this SNP as associated with breast cancer at a genome-wide significance level [25,27], nor was it associated with breast cancer survival in Chinese women [28]. In a replication by data lookup in the SBCGS GWAS data, we found that the p-value and direction of association were consistent with association of this SNP with breast cancer in East Asian women. The odds ratio for association in the larger study was smaller, 1.12 rather than 2.08, which likely means that the true effect size is quite small. Alternatively, it is possible that the effect size is larger among East Asian women in Canada, potentially because they are not identical in ethnicity to women in Shanghai, or because of different environmental contexts. Observation of this association in two studies of East Asian women may mean that the association may be real (i.e., not a false positive), although it did not reach genome-wide significance in the original GWAS in the SBCGS. This SNP has also been associated with a shorter time to recurrence among those with early stage breast cancer [29].

In the literature, the evidence for associations with the other genes we tested was inconclusive. We were unable to replicate associations with (i) IL-6, as previously found in 6292 cases and 8135 controls from Germany [30], 2325 cases and 2525 controls from North America [31], and 305 cases and 200 controls from Tunisia [32]; or (ii) FAS, as previously found in a meta-analysis of Asian populations [33] and in a study of 1053 cases and 1102 controls from New York, USA [34]. This may be due to insufficient power in our study because of smaller numbers (922 controls and 920 cases compared to other studies [30,31,34]), or because the tagSNP approach did not examine the SNP for which the association was reported [30,31]. Alternatively, for SNPs such as rs1800795 [32], which was tested with sufficient power in women of European ancestry, the difference could be attributed to population-specific genetic differences, or to a true failure to replicate a previous false positive. Consistent with our findings, other studies also found no role for the same genes we tested in studies where populations enrolled were not enriched for positive cancer family history (for example, TNF-a [35] or MDM2 [36]).

The association of CASP8 with breast cancer depended on BRCA1/BRCA2 mutation carrier status in some studies [37], but not others [38,39]. TP53 variants are associated with breast cancer only in BRCA2 carriers [40], not in the general population [41]. Pre-miR-27a polymorphisms were associated with familial, but not sporadic, breast cancer [42]. As we do not have information for the BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation status of the women in our study, and such women would likely be a minority of those in our study, we are unlikely to detect associations that only apply to mutation carriers.

We found evidence that, in East Asian women, breast cancer risk conferred by rs7874234 (TSC1) could be attenuated by physical activity, as women with high total physical activity scores (>89.6 MET hrs/wk) no longer had significant association for breast cancer risk. Although obesity and smoking are known to contribute to inflammation, we did not find evidence for an interaction between these factors and genetic influencers of inflammation.

Finally, we observed heterogeneity by tumour subtype for the BCL2 SNP rs7236090, for which the minor allele was protective of breast cancer. BCL2 has been described as a favourable prognostic marker for all types of early-stage breast cancer [43]. In our dataset among East Asian women, the protective effect was strongest in women with ER/PR positive tumours, a lower risk subgroup of breast cancer.

Overall, we found evidence for associations with breast cancer risk with single SNPs in 2 genes (RFWD2 and TSC2) among women of European descent, but neither remained statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. We found one SNP in IL-13 associated with breast cancer among women of East Asian descent that remained statistically significant after multiple testing correction, and this was replicated in the SBCGS. Six other SNPs had evidence for an association in East Asian women before multiple testing correction; of these, one in TSC1 appears to interact with physical activity.

It is important not to over-interpret the apparent negative results for many genes. We did not fully tag these genes, on average using 5 SNPs per gene and an r2 cutoff of 0.8, so there may be some unrepresented genetic variation. Even if many genes have an apparent null association with breast cancer risk, these pathways could still be important. For example, polymorphisms in microRNA binding sites, but not in the microRNAs themselves, have been associated with breast cancer [44]. Recent genome-wide association studies of breast cancer have revealed a strong enrichment for SNPs in distal transcription factor binding sites [45], which our study did not capture. Further, our relatively small sample size limited our power to detect individual SNPs with very small effects.

In conclusion, we replicated an association of SNP rs1800925 in IL-13 with breast cancer risk among women of East Asian descent, and not among women of European descent. We also provide evidence that the TSC1 SNP rs7874234 may interact with physical activity to influence breast cancer risk. Finally, we find that rs7236090 in BCL2 has the strongest protective effect associated with hormone receptor positive breast cancer subtype among women of East Asian descent. These findings support the importance of considering potential environmental interactions in genetic susceptibility models, while finding an approach that balances the increased number of statistical tests conducted.

Supporting information

S1 Table. SNPs for which genotyping was attempted and whether they passed Q/C.


S2 Table. Logistic regression and interaction analysis results for European samples for SNPs with p<0.05 before FDR.



We thank all participants of the Canadian Breast Cancer Study and the Shanghai Breast Cancer Genetics Study. We also thank staff at the BC Cancer Registry, the Screening Mammographic Program of BC and the Hotel Dieu Breast Assessment Program in Kingston for assistance with patient recruiting. We are grateful to the Genome Quebec / McGill University Innovation Centre for high quality genotyping.


  1. 1. Shacter E, Weitzman SA. Chronic inflammation and cancer. Oncol (willist Park NY) [Internet]. 2002;16(2):217–26, 229; discussion 230–2. Available from: papers3://publication/uuid/3F492291-1D16-43CA-9DB3-4EF2578B9A08
  2. 2. Rose DP, Gracheck PJ, Vona-Davis L. The Interactions of Obesity, Inflammation and Insulin Resistance in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) [Internet]. 2015 Oct 26 [cited 2016 Oct 21];7(4):2147–68. Available from:
  3. 3. Zhu X, Mulcahy LA, Mohammed RAA, Lee AHS, Franks HA, Kilpatrick L, et al. IL-17 expression by breast-cancer-associated macrophages: IL-17 promotes invasiveness of breast cancer cell lines. Breast Cancer Res [Internet]. 2008 [cited 2016 Oct 21];10(6):R95. Available from: pmid:19014637
  4. 4. Kim S-H, Singh S V. The role of polycomb group protein Bmi-1 and Notch4 in breast cancer stem cell inhibition by benzyl isothiocyanate. Breast Cancer Res Treat [Internet]. 2015 Feb [cited 2016 Oct 21];149(3):681–92. Available from: pmid:25663545
  5. 5. Rose DP, Vona-Davis L. Biochemical and molecular mechanisms for the association between obesity, chronic inflammation, and breast cancer. Biofactors [Internet]. [cited 2016 Oct 21];40(1):1–12. Available from:
  6. 6. Gerger A, Renner W, Langsenlehner T, Hofmann G, Knechtel G, Szkandera J, et al. Association of interleukin-10 gene variation with breast cancer prognosis. Breast Cancer Res Treat [Internet]. 2010 Feb [cited 2016 Oct 21];119(3):701–5. Available from: pmid:19437115
  7. 7. Tang H, Sebti S, Titone R, Zhou Y, Isidoro C, Ross TS, et al. Decreased BECN1 mRNA Expression in Human Breast Cancer is Associated with Estrogen Receptor-Negative Subtypes and Poor Prognosis. EBioMedicine [Internet]. 2015 Mar [cited 2016 Oct 21];2(3):255–63. Available from: pmid:25825707
  8. 8. Kaarvatn MH, Vrbanec J, Kulic A, Knezevic J, Petricevic B, Balen S, et al. Single nucleotide polymorphism in the interleukin 12B gene is associated with risk for breast cancer development. Scand J Immunol [Internet]. 2012 Sep [cited 2016 Oct 21];76(3):329–35. Available from: pmid:22702905
  9. 9. Han W, Kang SY, Kang D, Park SK, Lee J-Y, Kim H, et al. Multiplex genotyping of 1107 SNPs from 232 candidate genes identified an association between IL1A polymorphism and breast cancer risk. Oncol Rep [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2016 Oct 21];23(3):763–9. Available from: pmid:20127018
  10. 10. Wang L, Jiang Y, Zhang Y, Wang Y, Huang S, Wang Z, et al. Association analysis of IL-17A and IL-17F polymorphisms in Chinese Han women with breast cancer. PLoS One [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Oct 21];7(3):e34400. Available from: pmid:22461912
  11. 11. Milne RL, Kuchenbaecker KB, Michailidou K, Beesley J, Kar S, Lindström S, et al. Identification of ten variants associated with risk of estrogen-receptor-negative breast cancer. Nat Genet [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 2017 Oct 23 [cited 2017 Nov 14];ng.3785. Available from:
  12. 12. Grundy A, Schuetz JM, Lai AS, Janoo-Gilani R, Leach S, Burstyn I, et al. Shift work, circadian gene variants and risk of breast cancer. Cancer Epidemiol [Internet]. 2013 Oct [cited 2016 Oct 21];37(5):606–12. Available from: pmid:23725643
  13. 13. Loza MJ, McCall CE, Li L, Isaacs WB, Xu J, Chang B-L. Assembly of inflammation-related genes for pathway-focused genetic analysis. PLoS One [Internet]. 2007 Oct 17 [cited 2016 Oct 21];2(10):e1035. Available from: pmid:17940599
  14. 14. de Bakker PIW, Yelensky R, Pe’er I, Gabriel SB, Daly MJ, Altshuler D. Efficiency and power in genetic association studies. Nat Genet [Internet]. Nature Publishing Group; 2005 Nov 23 [cited 2016 Oct 21];37(11):1217–23. Available from: pmid:16244653
  15. 15. Barrett JC, Fry B, Maller J, Daly MJ. Haploview: analysis and visualization of LD and haplotype maps. Bioinformatics [Internet]. Oxford University Press; 2005 Jan 15 [cited 2016 Oct 21];21(2):263–5. Available from: pmid:15297300
  16. 16. Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, Bender D, et al. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet [Internet]. 2007 Sep [cited 2016 Oct 21];81(3):559–75. Available from: pmid:17701901
  17. 17. Abecasis GR, Cherny SS, Cookson WO, Cardon LR. GRR: graphical representation of relationship errors. Bioinformatics [Internet]. 2001 Aug [cited 2016 Oct 21];17(8):742–3. Available from: pmid:11524377
  18. 18. Shi J, Grundy A, Richardson H, Burstyn I, Schuetz JM, Lohrisch CA, et al. Genetic variation in vitamin D-related genes and risk of breast cancer among women of European and East Asian descent. Tumour Biol [Internet]. 2016 May 2 [cited 2017 Oct 24];37(5):6379–87. Available from: pmid:26631034
  19. 19. R Development Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. [Internet]. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. 2014. Available from:
  20. 20. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Benjamini Y, Hochberg Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J R Stat Soc B [Internet]. 1995;57(1):289–300. Available from:
  21. 21. Schuetz JM, Daley D, Leach S, Conde L, Berry BR, Gallagher RP, et al. Non-Hodgkin lymphoma risk and variants in genes controlling lymphocyte development. PLoS One [Internet]. 2013 [cited 2016 Oct 21];8(9):e75170. Available from: pmid:24098683
  22. 22. Kobayashi LC, Janssen I, Richardson H, Lai AS, Spinelli JJ, Aronson KJ. Moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity across the life course and risk of pre- and post-menopausal breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat [Internet]. 2013 Jun 15 [cited 2017 Nov 15];139(3):851–61. Available from: pmid:23771716
  23. 23. Shi J, Kobayashi LC, Grundy A, Richardson H, SenGupta SK, Lohrisch CA, et al. Lifetime moderate-to-vigorous physical activity and ER/PR/HER-defined post-menopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat [Internet]. 2017 Aug 6 [cited 2017 Oct 24];165(1):201–13. Available from: pmid:28589367
  24. 24. Grundy A, Richardson H, Schuetz JM, Burstyn I, Spinelli JJ, Brooks-Wilson A, et al. DNA repair variants and breast cancer risk. Environ Mol Mutagen [Internet]. 2016 May [cited 2017 Nov 15];57(4):269–81. Available from: pmid:27060854
  25. 25. Zheng W, Long J, Gao Y-T, Li C, Zheng Y, Xiang Y-B, et al. Genome-wide association study identifies a new breast cancer susceptibility locus at 6q25.1. Nat Genet [Internet]. 2009 Mar 15 [cited 2018 Nov 26];41(3):324–8. Available from: pmid:19219042
  26. 26. Erdei E, Kang H, Meisner A, White K, Pickett G, Baca C, et al. Polymorphisms in cytokine genes and serum cytokine levels among New Mexican women with and without breast cancer. Cytokine [Internet]. 2010 Jul [cited 2016 Oct 21];51(1):18–24. Available from: pmid:20418110
  27. 27. Cai Q, Zhang B, Sung H, Low S-K, Kweon S-S, Lu W, et al. Genome-wide association analysis in East Asians identifies breast cancer susceptibility loci at 1q32.1, 5q14.3 and 15q26.1. Nat Genet [Internet]. NIH Public Access; 2014 Aug [cited 2018 Nov 26];46(8):886–90. Available from: pmid:25038754
  28. 28. Dorjgochoo T, Zheng Y, Gao YT, Ma X, Long J, Bao P, et al. No association between genetic variants in angiogenesis and inflammation pathway genes and breast cancer survival among Chinese women. Cancer Epidemiol. 2013;37(5):619–24. pmid:23850146
  29. 29. Murray JL, Thompson P, Yoo SY, Do K-A, Pande M, Zhou R, et al. Prognostic value of single nucleotide polymorphisms of candidate genes associated with inflammation in early stage breast cancer. Breast Cancer Res Treat [Internet]. 2013 Apr [cited 2016 Oct 21];138(3):917–24. Available from: pmid:23529385
  30. 30. Dossus L, Kaaks R, Canzian F, Albanes D, Berndt SI, Boeing H, et al. PTGS2 and IL6 genetic variation and risk of breast and prostate cancer: results from the Breast and Prostate Cancer Cohort Consortium (BPC3). Carcinogenesis [Internet]. 2010 Mar [cited 2016 Oct 21];31(3):455–61. Available from: pmid:19965896
  31. 31. Slattery ML, Curtin K, Baumgartner R, Sweeney C, Byers T, Giuliano AR, et al. IL6, aspirin, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and breast cancer risk in women living in the southwestern United States. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev [Internet]. 2007 Apr [cited 2016 Oct 21];16(4):747–55. Available from: pmid:17416766
  32. 32. Snoussi K, Strosberg AD, Bouaouina N, Ben Ahmed S, Chouchane L. Genetic variation in pro-inflammatory cytokines (interleukin-1beta, interleukin-1alpha and interleukin-6) associated with the aggressive forms, survival, and relapse prediction of breast carcinoma. Eur Cytokine Netw [Internet]. 2005 Dec [cited 2016 Oct 21];16(4):253–60. Available from: pmid:16464738
  33. 33. Xu Y, He B, Li R, Pan Y, Gao T, Deng Q, et al. Association of the polymorphisms in the Fas/FasL promoter regions with cancer susceptibility: a systematic review and meta-analysis of 52 studies. PLoS One [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 21];9(3):e90090. Available from: pmid:24598538
  34. 34. Crew KD, Gammon MD, Terry MB, Zhang FF, Agrawal M, Eng SM, et al. Genetic polymorphisms in the apoptosis-associated genes FAS and FASL and breast cancer risk. Carcinogenesis [Internet]. 2007 Dec [cited 2016 Oct 21];28(12):2548–51. Available from: pmid:17962219
  35. 35. Jin G, Zhao Y, Sun S, Kang H. Association between the tumor necrosis factor alpha gene -308G&gt; A polymorphism and the risk of breast cancer: a meta-analysis. Tumour Biol [Internet]. 2014 Dec [cited 2016 Oct 21];35(12):12091–8. Available from: pmid:25149156
  36. 36. Knappskog S, Gansmo LB, Romundstad P, Bjørnslett M, Trovik J, Sommerfelt-Pettersen J, et al. MDM2 promoter SNP344T&gt;A (rs1196333) status does not affect cancer risk. PLoS One [Internet]. 2012 [cited 2016 Oct 21];7(4):e36263. Available from: pmid:22558411
  37. 37. Engel C, Versmold B, Wappenschmidt B, Simard J, Easton DF, Peock S, et al. Association of the variants CASP8 D302H and CASP10 V410I with breast and ovarian cancer risk in BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutation carriers. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev [Internet]. 2010 Nov [cited 2016 Oct 21];19(11):2859–68. Available from: pmid:20978178
  38. 38. Sergentanis TN, Economopoulos KP. Association of two CASP8 polymorphisms with breast cancer risk: a meta-analysis. Breast Cancer Res Treat [Internet]. 2010 Feb [cited 2016 Oct 21];120(1):229–34. Available from: pmid:19629679
  39. 39. Lin W- Y, Camp NJ, Ghoussaini M, Beesley J, Michailidou K, Hopper JL, et al. Identification and characterization of novel associations in the CASP8/ALS2CR12 region on chromosome 2 with breast cancer risk. Hum Mol Genet [Internet]. 2015 Jan 1 [cited 2016 Oct 21];24(1):285–98. Available from: pmid:25168388
  40. 40. Osorio A, Martínez-Delgado B, Pollán M, Cuadros M, Urioste M, Torrenteras C, et al. A haplotype containing the p53 polymorphisms Ins16bp and Arg72Pro modifies cancer risk in BRCA2 mutation carriers. Hum Mutat [Internet]. 2006 Mar [cited 2016 Oct 21];27(3):242–8. Available from: pmid:16419081
  41. 41. Ebner F, Schremmer-Danninger E, Rehbock J. The role of TP53 and p21 gene polymorphisms in breast cancer biology in a well specified and characterized German cohort. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol [Internet]. 2010 Sep [cited 2016 Oct 21];136(9):1369–75. Available from: pmid:20127253
  42. 42. Yang R, Schlehe B, Hemminki K, Sutter C, Bugert P, Wappenschmidt B, et al. A genetic variant in the pre-miR-27a oncogene is associated with a reduced familial breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat [Internet]. 2010 Jun [cited 2016 Oct 21];121(3):693–702. Available from: pmid:19921425
  43. 43. Dawson S-J, Makretsov N, Blows FM, Driver KE, Provenzano E, Le Quesne J, et al. BCL2 in breast cancer: a favourable prognostic marker across molecular subtypes and independent of adjuvant therapy received. Br J Cancer [Internet]. 2010 Aug 24 [cited 2016 Oct 21];103(5):668–75. Available from: pmid:20664598
  44. 44. Khan S, Greco D, Michailidou K, Milne RL, Muranen TA, Heikkinen T, et al. MicroRNA related polymorphisms and breast cancer risk. PLoS One [Internet]. 2014 [cited 2016 Oct 21];9(11):e109973. Available from: pmid:25390939
  45. 45. Michailidou K, Lindström S, Dennis J, Beesley J, Hui S, Kar S, et al. Association analysis identifies 65 new breast cancer risk loci. Nature [Internet]. 2017 Oct 23 [cited 2017 Nov 14];551(7678):92–4. Available from: pmid:29059683