Genetic diversity and population structure of Haloxylon salicornicum moq. in Kuwait by ISSR markers

Fadila Al Salameen; Nazima Habibi; Vinod Kumar; Sami Al Amad; Jamal Dashti; Lina Talebi; Bashayer Al Doaij

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0207369

Abstract

Haloxylon salicornicum moq. Bunge ex Boiss (Rimth) is one of the native plants of Kuwait, extensively depleting through the anthropogenic activities. It is important to conserve Haloxylon community in Kuwait as it can tolerate extreme adverse conditions of drought and salinity to be potentially used in the desert and urban revegetation and greenery national programs. Therefore, a set of 16 inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers were used to assess genetic diversity and population structure of 108 genotypes from six locations in Kuwait. The ISSR primers produced 195 unambiguous and reproducible bands out of which 167 bands were polymorphic (86.5%) with a mean PIC value of 0.31. The overall average values of Nei’s gene diversity (h') and Shannon’s diversity index (I) were 0.254 and 0.375, respectively. Results of AMOVA revealed high genetic variations within populations (77.8%) and low among populations (22%). The values of Fixation index (F_ST = 0.22; P = 0.0), Genetic differentiation (G_{ST =} 0.262; G’_ST = 0.327; D = 0.335 and Gene flow (N_M = 0.880) were indicative of heterozygous populations. The results of STRUCTURE and split decomposition analysis suggested that the Rimth accessions of Kuwait can be grouped into five and six subpopulations, respectively. Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA) grouped them into three clusters. The pairwise Nei’s genetic distances (D_S) among populations demonstrated a narrow range from 0.047 to 0.187 (Scale-0.0 to 1.0). The Mantel’s test revealed a weak correlation (r²- 0.188; P-0.013) between the genetic distance and geographic distances. Our results suggest that the narrowly distributed Haloxylon community in Kuwait demonstrated a high genetic diversity within the populations however the overall population structure was weak.

Citation: Al Salameen F, Habibi N, Kumar V, Al Amad S, Dashti J, Talebi L, et al. (2018) Genetic diversity and population structure of Haloxylon salicornicum moq. in Kuwait by ISSR markers. PLoS ONE 13(11): e0207369. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369

Editor: Ruslan Kalendar, University of Helsinki, FINLAND

Received: July 3, 2018; Accepted: October 30, 2018; Published: November 21, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Al Salameen et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

Funding: The fund for this study was sourced by Dr. Fadila Al Salameen through Kuwait Foundation for Advancement of Sciences (KFAS; grant No.P214-42SL-02). The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Kuwait is an arid country with smallest land area. The native plants have a narrow distribution. The species that exist in the ecosystem are unique as they offer a valuable genetic pool for drought, heat and salt-tolerance [1]. In addition they have a potential for phyto-remediation, ornamented landscaping and erosion prevention. However, the size of the area containing plants is decreasing on account of environment degradation and climate change. Desertification is a world-wide problem, but intensified in arid zone as in case of Kuwait. Over 90% of the total land area suffers from desertification and 44% is very severely degraded. [2]. Human interventions such as off road driving, camping and impact of the Gulf war further pose a risk to the vegetative communities [3]. In order to conserve its native plant community, Kuwait became a signatory to the Convention on biological Diversity (CBD) [4] and has embarked on a major plan for restoration of several species.

Haloxylon salicornicum Moq. Bunge ex Boiss (Rimth) is one of the main structural elements in Eastern Arabian vegetation associations [1,5] belonging to the family Amaranthaceae. It is a perennial herb that is widely available in Egypt, Palestine, Jordan, Iraq, Iran, Pakistan and the northeastern part of Kuwait Bay and southern coastal areas [6,7]. The plant is utilized as food source for domestic stock and wildlife, stabilizes the soil surface besides providing suitable micro climate, camouflage and harbors various animals [1]. It is considered as one of the most promising species for revegetation and sand dune fixation [7]. H. salicornicum community is under threat from overgrazing leading to reduction in percentage of distribution from 22.7% to 2.2% in Kuwait [8,9]. The populations from Southern borders have retreated to a considerable extent and the existing populations can only be found along the North East borders. Studies on morphological diversity of Haloxylon communities demonstrated considerable variations due to wind erosion and land degradation [6]. Information on genetic diversity and population structure is therefore, desired for this community to aid the conservation and restoration programs being undertaken [10].

To formulate effective conservation and restoration strategies, the understanding of a population’s genetic diversity is imperative. A wide range of molecular methods are now being applied to measure the genetic diversity of a population. The long-term survival of a species is challenging particularly if it has reduced variability. These species suffer from homozygosity and inbreeding depression causing reduction in reproduction rates indirectly leading towards extinction [11]. A narrow population faces the risks of genetic drifts, complete gene migration resulting in fatal consequences. Assessment and preservation of biodiversity of small populations is therefore, crucially important to minimize the loss of initial genetic variation as a consequence of, inbreeding or genetic drifts [12]. In addition to this the information on genetic structure, genetic diversity and genetic differentiation provides information on selection of propagules for establishing new populations.

In recent years, PCR based molecular markers has allowed the use of DNA sequences in genetic analyses and has provided, a better understanding of the genetic diversity and differentiation of natural populations [13]. Molecular markers have been widely used as variability indicators by comparing the individual species at several polymorphic loci. The first use of ISSR primers began in the early 90s [14–16]. Microsatellites are distributed throughout the Eukaryotic genome as short repeats of 2 to 5 bp length. ISSRs are present between the repetitive microsatellites. Primers complementary to microsatellite regions randomly amplify the genomic DNA that can be used to evaluate genetic variation. ISSR is an extensively employed technique in the detection of genetic variations due to its many advantages such as quick performance, cost effectiveness, low quantity of template and no prior knowledge about the target sequences [17]. A good genetic marker is defined by its high rate of polymorphism and the ability to generate multi-locus data from the genome under study. The ISSR markers make use of microsatellite sequences that are inherently highly variable and ubiquitously distributed across the genome, at the same time achieving higher reproducibility as compared to other genetic markers [18,19]. ISSR DNA markers have been widely applied in genetic characterization of desert plant species [20–23]. ISSRs have also been used as a technique to establish conservation strategies for endangered plants such as Agave victoriae [24], Acacia raddiana [25] and Breonadia salicina [26].

In view of the aforementioned the aim of this study was to assess the genetic diversity and population structure of H. salicornicum. This would aid in defining conservation studies for the declining Haloxylon in Kuwait.

Materials and methods

Collection site and sample collection

Kuwait is a semi-arid country with the smallest area of 17,818 km². Located in the north eastern corner of the Arabian peninsula, it shares border with Iraq and Saudi Arabia. A survey was conducted to locate the populations of H. salicornicum through direct searching as the species is retreating from Kuwait. Consultations were done with botanical experts to pinpoint the habitats where healthy populations of the plants could be found. Six areas from the Central, Northern and Southern part of Kuwait such as Al-Subiya, Om-Qaser, Al-Ritqa, Al-Shagaya, Al-Abraq and Al-Abdally, were identified for collection (Fig 1). Field visits were done in the designated areas and special permissions (throuh the Ministry of Interior, Kuwait) availed to enter restricted areas such as Al-Shagaya and Al-Abraq. Samples of Rimth were collected from these locations in Kuwait from January to June, 2016–2017. A total of 108 samples were collected from plants that were at least 30 m apart, depending upon its availability (Table 1). A single specimen of H. salicornicum was found in Al-Kabd area, the location of which was marked on the map, however, it was not included in the ISSR analysis. GPS coordinates were recorded for each plant sample (S1 Table), and plotted on the Kuwaiti map using the ArcMap software v 10.4.1 (Esri, Redlands, CA). Young leaf samples and shoots were collected and immediately placed in polythene bags. They were transported on ice to the lab. Samples were appropriately labeled and kept at -80°C until further use.

Download:

Fig 1. Locations where H. salicornicum populations were sampled in Kuwait.

Locations were plotted on the Kuwaiti map based on the GPS coordinates for each specimen using the ArcMap software v 10.4.1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.g001

Download:

Table 1. Population, area and number of samples collected for H. salicornicum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.t001

DNA extraction

DNA isolation from leaf tissues was carried out using GenElute Plant Genomic DNA Miniprep Kit (Sigma, St. Louis, MO), as per the manufacturer’s instructions. One hundred mg of leaf tissue was weighed and ground to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen using a pre-chilled mortar and pestle. Cell lysis followed by protein precipitation and washing was carried out using the different reagents supplied in the kit. DNA purity (Absorbance ratio A260/A280) and quantity (Absorbance at 260 nm) were measured by the Nanodrop (Thermo Scientific, Carlsbad, CA) and Qubit fluorometer (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Carlsbad, CA). All the samples of H. salicornicum were run on 0.8% of agarose gel to check the intactness of the isolated DNA. The samples were normalized at 10 ng/μl for ISSR analysis following the Qubit concentrations.

PCR amplification

In the current study a total of 31 ISSR primers were screened with two random DNA samples initially. Sixteen primers that produced >5 polymorphic bands were chosen for subsequent analysis post optimization for the best annealing temperature (S2 Table). PCR was carried out with the 5x HOT FIREPol Blend Master Mix (Solis Biodyne, Estonia). A total reaction volume of 20 μl was prepared by adding 4 μl of master mix containing 5X buffer, 200-μM dNTPs, 1.5-mM MgCl₂ and HOT FIREPol DNA polymerase. Primers (2 μl) were added at a concentration of 10 μM to yield a final concentration of 1.5 μM in the final mix. Ten nanograms of DNA per microlitre was added to the PCR reaction mix. Reaction was carried out in Veriti Thermal Cyclers (Applied Biosystems, Grand Island, NY) at specific annealing temperatures depending on the melting temperature (Tm) of each primer. The steps for PCR reaction were, initial enzyme activation at 95°C for 12 min followed by 45 cycles of denaturation at 95°C for 45 s, annealing at 45–60°C for 45 s and extension at 72°C for 1.5 mins. Final extension step was carried out for 7 min at 72°C. DNA bands were visualized on 1.8% agarose gels (13 cm long and 15 cm wide) ran at 5V/cm for 2 h. Gel images were documented using the gel documentation system (Chemidoc MP, BioRad, USA). One Kb and 100 bp ladder were used as reference. ISSR primers that produced polymorphic bands were repeated twice independently with three technical replicates for each sample (Gel replicability score ~ 93%; S3 Table). All the technical replicates produced banding patterns resembling each other as observed on the agarose gels (S1 Fig).

Data scoring and analysis

All the samples were amplified and produced clear, reproducible bands (S2 Fig) which were scored as present (1) or absent (0), using the BioNumerics (v7.5; Applied Maths, Belgium) software. A binary matrix (1/0) was generated containing 195 loci which was used for subsequent data analysis for diversity and population structure (S4 Table).

The informativeness of ISSR markers was evaluated using the polymorphic information content (PIC) resolving power (RP), mean resolving power (MRP), marker index (MI) and Shannon’s index (H′). PIC is the probability in detecting polymorphism by a primer PIC = 1-Σ(pi)², where Pi is the frequency of the ith allele [27]; RP is the ability of each primer to detect level of variation between individuals and was calculated according to Prevost and Wilkinson [28]: RP = ΣIb where Ib (band informativeness) takes the values of 1–[2|0.5–p|], where p is the proportion of individuals containing the band. MI for each primer was calculated as a product of the polymorphic information content and effective multiplex ratio (MI = PIC × EMR [29]. Shannon’s index (H′) was calculated by the formula H′ = -pilnpi [30].

Genetic diversity within each population was estimated through percentage of polymorphic loci (P), mean effective number of alleles (Ne), mean expected heterozygosity (H_E), mean Shannon’s Information Index (I), Nei’s gene diversity (h'), and Nei’s pairwise genetic distances by using the GenAlEx 6.5 software [31,32]. The POPGene v 1.32 [33] software was used to calculate the overall Genetic differentiation (G_ST = H_T-H_S/H_T). The G_ST was corrected according to Hedrick [34] and Jost [35] to obtain the estimates for G’_ST and D, respectively. We also performed an analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) to examine the distribution of genetic variability within and among populations using the Arlequin software (version 3.5) [36] and estimated an overall F_ST (Fixation index). Based on the F_ST the Gene flow (N_M = 1(1/F_ST-1)/4 was also calculated [37]. The pairwise F_ST from the Arlequin software were used to derive the Slatkins relationship (F_ST/1-F_ST) to create an isolation by distance plot through the Mantel’s test employing 10,000 permutations [36].

Population structure was determined by the neighbour-net split decomposition network generated by SPLITS Tree v4.6 and bootstrapping runs of 1000 replicates [38], a PCoA analysis of pairwise F_ST between the populations [36] and Bayesian model-based clustering analysis using the software program STRUCTURE 2.3.3 [39]. The admixture model and correlated allele frequencies were used for each run with a burn-in period of 1,000 and 100,000 Markov chain Monte Carlo replications. The optimal K value, which indicates the number of genetically distinct clusters in the data, was determined from 10 replicate runs for each value of K [40]. The value of ΔK was based on the change in the log probability of the data between successive K values. Structure Harvester version 6.0 [41] was used to calculate parameters described by Evanno et al. [40]. The usepopinfo option of STRUCTURE was employed after K was determined by the Evanno’s method to estimate Q (proportion of membership of each pre-defined population in each of the clusters).

Results

ISSR polymorphism

For H. salicornicum, 16 primers produced 195 unambiguous and reproducible bands. Out of them167 were polymorphic (86.5%). Smeared and faint bands were not considered for analysis. The bands ranged from 135–1729 bp. Number of bands per primer ranged from minimum 8 (ISSR 8, 13, and 809) to maximum 21 (ISSR 826) with an average count of 10.5 bands per primer. All the primers had a high discriminating power as observed by their PIC (mean-0.31) values. Highest PIC was obtained with ISSR 7 (0.46) and the lowest (0.18) with ISSR 13 and 23 (Table 2). Other parameters such as MI, RP, MRP, and H' were also recorded for all the primers. Average RP of 3.76 (Max- 6.6, ISSR 5; Min-2.2, ISSR 809), MRP of 0.36 (Max-0.49, ISSR 3; Min-0.20 ISSR 7), MI of 3.39 (Max 8.0, ISSR 826; Min 1.4, ISSR 13), and H' of 0.326 (Max 0.504, ISSR 826; Min 0.221, ISSR 8) were observed. There was a positive correlation between the MI and PIC values (r² = 0.813, P<0.05) and PIC and RP (r² = 0.615, P<0.05).

Download:

Table 2. ISSR primer core sequences, number of bands and polymorphism content for H. salicornicum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.t002

Genetic diversity

In H. salicornicum, an average number of observed alleles (N_a) ranged from 1.144 (Al-Abdally) to 1.610 (Al-Subiya). Relatively higher levels of allelic diversity (N_e) were observed in the populations of Al-Subiya, Om Qaser and Al-Ritqa, while moderate levels were recorded in Al-Shagaya and Al-Abraq and a lower level in Al-Abdally (Table 3). Similar pattern was observed for Shannon’ diversity index (I) and Nei’s gene diversity (h') with highest values in Al-Subiya (h'-0.254; I-0.375) and lowest in Al-Abdally (h'-0.101; I-0.0.138). Al-Shagaya and Al-Ritqa showed I and h' values comparable to Al-Subiya and Om Qaser. The overall average values of h' and I were 0.200 and 0.303 respectively. The percentage values of polymorphic loci were ≥ 60% for Al-Subiya, Om Qaser, and Al-Ritqa; ≥ 45% for Al-Shagaya, and ≤ 27% in Al-Abraq with an average polymorphism above 50% in six populations of H. salicornicum. The populations within Al-Subiya, Om Qaser, Al-Ritqa, and Al-Shagaya showed relatively high values of H_e and uH_e (> 0.200) as compared to Al-Abraq and Al-Abdally (< 0.200). The genetic diversity was highest in the populations of Al-Subiya, followed by Om Qaser, Al-Ritqa, Al-Shagaya, Al-Abraq, and Al-Abdally.

Download:

Table 3. Measures of genetic diversity within the 6 populations of H. salicornicum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.t003

Genetic differentiation

The Analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA) test was applied to the binary matrix data file to obtain information on the variation within and among populations by the Arlequin software. The results of the AMOVA indicated that most (77.83%) genetic variation was within populations, with a lesser variation (22.17%) among the populations (Table 4). the Fixation index was high enough (F_ST = 0.221, P = 0.000) in H. salicornicum to prevent inbreeding.

Download:

Table 4. Summary of the AMOVA results for 108 specimens of H. salicornicum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.t004

The pairwise Nei’s genetic distances (D_S) among populations were low ranging from 0.047 between Al-Ritqa and Al-Shagaya to 0.187 between Al-Abdally and Al-Subiya populations of H. salicornicum (Table 5). The pairwise F_ST were 0.094 between Al-Ritqa and Om Qaser to 0.447 between Al-Abdally and Al-Abraq.

Values of genetic differentiation G_ST, G’_ST and D were estimated as 0.262, 0.327 and 0.335 respectively. Average gene flow (N_M) based on the fixation index (F_ST) among the populations was ~ 1 (0.88).

Download:

Table 5. Values of pairwise genetic distance (D, below the diagonal) and fixation index (F_ST above the diagonal) for six H. salicornicum populations in Kuwait.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.t005

Clustering and population structure

Clustering analysis was performed to study the population structure of H. salicornicum. The approaches used were the split decomposition analysis, the Bayesian clustering and the principal coordinate analysis (PCoA).

The neighbour-net based split decomposition returned a Split tree dividing the H. salicorncum populations into six weakly separate sub-populations (Fig 2). Group-A in the Split tree consisted of Al Subiya populations with two samples from Om Qaser. Al-Abdally formed a distinct collection farest from the rest with no overlapping specimens from any of the populations in Group-B. Group C was Om Qaser with samples from Al-Shagaya and Al Ritqa. Group D mainly comprised all the populations of Al Abraq and half of the specimens from Al Shagaya. The remaining half of Al Shagaya clustered with Al Ritqa in Group E. A closer look at Group E revealed it could be further distributed into three subgroups (E1-E3). The last group was F with remaining populations of Al Ritqa and Om Qaser. Bootstrapping run with 1000 replicates yielded 88% confidence.

Download:

Fig 2. The splits tree dendogram demonstrating the genetic relatedness among the six H. salicornicum populations in Kuwait.

Groups (A-F) showing extensive reticulation in consistency with high intrapopulation diversity.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.g002

To estimate the reliability of the likely cluster groups analyzed already, the genetic structure of the 6 populations was calculated using the STRUCTURE software. The number of genetic groups (K) showed a visible peak at 5 and a smaller peak at 8 (Fig 3) by Evanno’s method, indicating that 5 groups should be distributed across all the Haloxylon populations (Fig 4A). A detailed study of the clusters revealed that group-1 (green) contained the populations of Al Subiya (Q = 0.994) with trivial proportions of Om Qaser (Q = 0.013) and Al Shagaya (Q = 0.014), group II (yellow) was the biggest with larger populations of Om Qaser (Q = 0.846) and a small fraction of Al Shagaya (Q = 0.019), Group III (pink) had the major populations of Al Ritqa (Q = 0.953) overlapping with Om Qaser (Q = 0.135), Group IV (red) comprised of Al Shagaya (Q = 0.962) and Al Abraq (Q = 1.0) whereas the last group V (blue) had distinctly the populations of Al Abdally (Q = 0.991) populations. Another structure analysis was performed pertaining to an additional peak obtained at K = 8 through the Evanno’s method. The populations of Al Subiya and Om Qaser were distributed into four groups represented by different colors in Fig 4B. These results were in partial agreement with Splits tree diagram where group E could be subdivided into 3 sub clusters, yielding a total of 8 groups.

Download:

Fig 3. Relationship between ΔK and K as revealed by Structure Harvester.

Estimation of the number of subgroups for the K values ranging from 1 to 10, by delta K (ΔK) values.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.g003

Download:

Fig 4. Bayesian model clustering of H. salicornicum by STRUCTURE.

Numbers 1–6 represent one population (1-Subiya, 2-Om Qaser, 3-Ritqa, 4- Shagaya, 5-Abraq and 6-Abdally). Each colour represents one group. Number of groups (K) was set to 5 (a) and 8 (b) based on the Evanno’s method. The length of coloured segment denotes the proportion of each population in each group.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.g004

The percentage of variation along the first three axes in PCoA were, 43.61%, 26.61% and 15.08%. The PCoA clustered the six populations into three groups. Al Abdally formed a distinct cluster, however the populations of Om Qaser Al Ritqa and Al Subiya combined as one collection, whereas Al Shagaya and Al Abraq grouped together (Fig 5).

Download:

Fig 5. Scatter plot obtained from principal coordinate analysis of the pairwise F_ST matrix of six populations of H. salicornicum derived from 195 polymorphic microsatellite (ISSR) loci.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.g005

The isolation by distance analysis carried out through the Mantel’s correlation test demonstrated that H. salicornicum witnessed a weak correlation (r²- 0.188; P = 0.013) among the genetic and geographic distance (Fig 6). The significance at a confidence level of 95% (P≤0.05) was tested with 10,000 permutations.

Download:

Fig 6. IBD plots of the genetic distance and geographical distance.

The Y axis represents the genetic distance (F_ST/1-F_ST), and the X axis represents the geographical distance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.g006

Discussion

This study provides a first report on genetic variation and population structure of H. salicornicum distributed in Kuwait. Under the changing climatic conditions our findings will be crucial for effective management and developing conservation strategies for this native plant.

ISSR polymorphism

To understand the extent of genetic diversity, genetic structure and differentiation among H. salicornicum populations occurring in different geographic regions of Kuwait, the PCR-based ISSR markers, were selected based on their applicability in desert plants that were used for both inter- and intra-population analysis [20–23]. The markers were able to detect 86.5% of polymorphism in the current study. This level of polymorphism is suggestive of considerable levels of genetic variation in the populations of H. salicornicum grown in Kuwait. A higher percentage of polymorphic loci of 96% were recorded in the closely related H. ammodendron from China [42] and 98.5% in H. salicornicum distributed in the Indian Thar desert [23]. The high rate of polymorphism in Haloxylon communities would be attributed to its demographic features. Kuwait being an arid land with increased level of soil salinity and temperature fluctuations provides a stressful atmosphere for plant growth [42]. In past several studies have demonstrated a correlation between higher degrees of polymorphism as well as the level of environmental stress and heterogeneity [43–45]. The high discriminating power of 0.31 also indicates a balanced distribution of allele frequencies in H. salicornicum communities of Kuwait. In comparison to present study, the few other studies of population genetic diversity of long-lived desert perennials also revealed high levels of genetic polymorphism [24–25]. A significant factor in the stability of desert woody plants is their intraspecific polymorphism [46].

Genetic diversity

The level of genetic diversity is often correlated with its range of distribution. In the present study, H. salicornicum is narrowly distributed within an area of 17,818 km². We hypothesized that the genetic diversities of H. salicornicum populations would be low due to small sample size distributed in a small area. The values of uHe observed (0.213) under the current study was approximately twice of that of the rare plants. According to Cole’s observations, He (expected heterozygosity) for a rare plant was recorded as 0.113, whereas, for a common plant, it was 0.150 [47]. The number of effective alleles in Haloxylon populations refers to the occurrence of rare microsatellite alleles imparting much of the diversity in the species. Higher levels of expected observed and expected heterozygosities were recorded in H. aphyllum [46].

The level of heterozygosities obtained are indicative of more genetic variation and thus leaving behind a scope for population expansion. Consequently higher diversity indices (I = 0.330; h’ 0.200) among the Haloxylon populations were observed in our study. Similar findings were reported for Haloxylon distributed in China [21], India [22] and Saudi Arabia [48, 49]. This could be a result of many factors such as breeding system, seed dispersal, genetic drift, evolutionary history as well as life form. In the present scenario the plant propagates naturally through seeds dispersed by winds, run-off water and insects [50]. The seeds are viable upto 1 year [51]. Germination is severely inhibited above 30°C [52] and an increase in salinity [53]. The flowering season is between September and October. Mature fruits are produced during December- January. [7] The seeds of H. salicornicum are small grayish in color and attached to a perianth, which gives a wing-like appearance assisting in their long distance dispersal by wind [52,53]. The above mentioned factors contribute to the high genetic diversity in Haloxylon.

Gene differentiation and gene flow

In order to study the accumulation of differences in the allelic frequencies, partitioning of genetic differentiation were recorded in the current investigation. Reproductive biology is considered as the driving force behind the population differentiation [54]. Generally AMOVA partitioning demonstrates 10–20% of the genetic variation to be found among the populations in an out-crossing species, whereas for a selfing species this reaches upto 50%. Haloxylon salicornicum being an cross pollinated [50] species followed an analogous pattern of genetic differentiation. Our findings were in agreement with related species of Haloxylon distributed in other Asian countries [23, 48,49,55]. The proportion of variation within populations was as high as 89.4% whereas among population was approximately 10% as detected by eight ISSR markers on 195 scorable loci of H. ammodendron species in China [54]. Similar values (79% variation within and 21% among populations) were also obtained through different marker system of RAPD and ISJ which amplified 67 loci in H. salicornicum collected from six locations of Jaisalmer district in India [23]. The genetic variability of Haloxylon species revealed in this study is important with respect to the ecological conservation and restoration practice. A major proportion of the variability present within populations suggests that smaller numbers of populations will be required for effective conservation whereas, the high genetic homogeneity among populations of suggests that the exact population used as a source of material for restoration may be less important in this species.

Relative to the low genetic diversity among the populations the overall fixation index was high enough to prevent allele fixation or inbreeding. For plant populations values of F_ST greater than 15% fall under significant categories [56, 57]. This was in agreement with its closest analogue -G_ST (low -<0.15; medium—0.05–0.15; or high- >0.15). In addition, corrected G’_ST and Jost’s D between 0 to 1 further supported the fact that the Haloxylon populations under study were not completely homozygous and considerably differentiated genetically [34,35,37]. Comparable level of genetic differentiation have also been reported in closely related H. ammodendron in China [42,54].

Genetic differentiation is inversely proportional to the gene flow. Slatkin [58] posited N_M > 1 as an indicator of sound gene flow necessary to maintain genetic variation when population size is small. Overall gene flow ≤ 1 (0.880) was recorded in the present study. An increased geneflow is suggestive of decreased inbreeding. The gene flow (N_M) observed in the present investigation less than 1 is deemed to be sufficient to maintain genetic variation among the Rimth populations. Comparable levels of gene flow were also recorded in H. ammodendron in China [21].

Population structure

The correlation between the genetic and geographical distance (Mantels test r = 0.188 p< 0.05) revealed that the populations of Haloxylon in Kuwait were weakly isolated by distance. The clustering pattern revealed that the groupings were largely in agreement with the geographical distribution of the accessions. Al Abraq always clustered with Al Shagaya owing to their geographic proximity. The populations of Om Qaser, Al Ritqa and Al Shagaya formed overlapping clusters with each other in the Splits tree and the Structure Plot. This could be explained by the admixture events detected from the sampling of hybrid individuals as subpopulations come into contact via dispersal or from sharing a border [59]. The pairwise F_ST values were also recorded to be relatively lower among the populations in close vicinity. The PCoA was suggestive of interbreeding between the specimens of Al Abraq and Al Shagaya as well as the populations of Al Subiya, Al Ritqa and Om Qaser. Al Abdally was the farest and most distinct group in all the cases. This would be attributed to, an unknown sympatric speciation event occurring in the area restricting the gene flow with neighboring populations. However, more information on phenotypic variations needed to be gained for species in Al Abdally region.

We observed that the individual clusters were not far away from each other. The weak site differentiation among the clusters can be explained due to the low genetic distance among the populations [60]. From an evolutionary perspective, this indicates mixed ancestry of Haloxylon in Kuwait. Another explanation given for the weak population structure is the effectively maintained geneflow. In absence of any topographical barriers the genes among the populations effectively communicate with each other. In the present case the number of migrants among the populations almost equaled to 1 (N_M = 0.880). Migration is a common mechanism that erodes population structure [61]. The absence of relevant barriers resulted in low geographic and genetic distances and therefore facilitating the dispersal of seeds among the populations. Therefore we conclude that a weak population structure of Haloxylon species is observed in Kuwait. Sewell Wright [62] described that pairs of populations geographically close to each other will be more genetically similar because their individual critters, or their seeds, or pollen, or larvae easily travel short distances.

Conservation implications

From a conservation standpoint, the high genetic diversity maintained within H. salicornicum and the significant genetic differentiation within its populations are encouraging because these characteristics are advantageous for preserving genetic resources and broadening the genetic basis of these native plants. However, we detected a recent bottleneck event occurring in population structure, suggesting that individual populations may suffer from a dramatic decline in population size. Given the small number of existing populations and the low, genetic distances among the populations, these populations should be conserved as much as possible to maintain their current status, especially the populations with higher diversity, such as populations in Al-Subiya for Haloxylon, should be protected as a priority for in situ conservation.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. PCR with selected ISSR primers (23, 810 and 3) to check for reproducibility in H. salicornicum.

Lanes 1–3 represent 3 technical replicates in first set of PCR (Day 1), Lanes 4–6 represent 3 technical replicates in second set of PCR (Day 2); M—Marker (100bp + 1Kb ladder).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. PCR band profiles.

Generated by ISSR primer 2 in H. salicornicum samples, Marker (100bp + 1Kb ladder).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. GPS coordinates of the collected specimens of Haloxylon.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.s003

(DOCX)

S2 Table. ISSR primers and their optimum annealing temperatures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.s004

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Gel Replicability score for ISSR markers.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.s005

(XLSX)

S4 Table. Binary file of 108 samples of H. salicornicum collected from six locations of Kuwait.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0207369.s006

(XLSX)

References

1. Böer B, Sargeant D. Desert perennials as plant and soil indicators in Eastern Arabia. Plant Soil. 1998;199(2):261–266.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
2. Ghazanfar SA, Fisher M, editors. Vegetation of the Arabian peninsula. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.1–329.
3. Omar Asem S, Roy WY. Biodiversity and climate change in Kuwait. Int J Clim Chang Str. 2010;2(1):68–83.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
4. CBD—Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations Treaty Series 1993; 1760: 143–382.
5. Roshier DA, Böer BB, Osborne PE. Vegetation of Abu Dhabi and a preliminary classification of its plant associations. Desert Ecology of Abu Dhabi’.(Ed. Osborne PE.) pp. 1996:50–65.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
6. El-Wahab RH, Al-Rashed AR, Al-Hamad Y. Conservation condition of Haloxylon salicornicum (Moq.) Bunge ex Boiss. in degraded desert habitats of northern Kuwait. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014;3(10):310–325.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
7. Zaman S, Padmesh S, Bhat NR, Tawfiq H. Germination of some Kuwait’s native plants under saline conditions. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2006; 1:146–148.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
8. Halwagy R, Halwagy M. Ecological studies on the desert of Kuwait. II. The vegetation. Journal of the University of Kuwait (Science). 1974; 1:87–95.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
9. Omar SA, Misak R, King P, Shahid SA, Abo-Rizq H, Grealish G, et al. Mapping the vegetation of Kuwait through reconnaissance soil survey. J Arid Environ. 2001;48(3):341–355.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
10. Segarra‐Moragues JG, Palop‐Esteban M, González‐Candelas F, Catalán P. On the verge of extinction: genetics of the critically endangered Iberian plant species, Borderea chouardii (Dioscoreaceae) and implications for conservation management. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(4):969–982. pmid:15773929
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Glémin S, Bataillon T, Ronfort J, Mignot A, Olivieri I. Inbreeding depression in small populations of self-incompatible plants. Genetics. 2001;159(3):1217–1229. pmid:11729164
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Spigler RB, Theodorou K, Chang SM. Inbreeding depression and drift load in small populations at demographic disequilibrium. Evolution. 2017;71(1):81–94. pmid:27778313
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Mondini L, Noorani A, Pagnotta MA. Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity. 2009;1(1):19–35.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Meyer W, Mitchell TG, Freedman EZ, Vilgalys R. Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31(9):2274–2280. pmid:8408543
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Gupta M, Chyi YS, Romero-Severson J, Owen JL. Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes using single primers of simple-sequence repeats. Theor Appl Genet. 1994;89(7–8):998–1006. pmid:24178116
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics. 1994;20(2):176–183. pmid:8020964
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Ng WL, Tan SG. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: are we doing it right. ASM Sci J. 2015;9(1):30–39.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
18. Jabbarzadeh Z, Khosh-Khui M, Salehi H, Saberivand A. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers as reproducible and specific tools for genetic diversity analysis of rose species. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(37):6091–6095.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
19. Costa R, Pereira G, Garrido I, Tavares-de-Sousa MM, Espinosa F. Comparison of RAPD, ISSR, and AFLP molecular markers to reveal and classify orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) germplasm variations. PloS one. 2016;11(4):e0152972. pmid:27070939
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Ge XJ, Yu Y, Yuan YM, Huang HW, Yan C. Genetic diversity and geographic differentiation in endangered Ammopiptanthus (Leguminosae) populations in desert regions of northwest China as revealed by ISSR analysis. Ann Bot. 2005;95(5):843–851. pmid:15701663
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Sheng Y, Zheng WH, Pei KQ, Ma KP. Population genetic structure of a dominant desert tree, Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae), in the southeast Gurbantunggut desert detected by RAPD and ISSR markers. Acta Bot Sinica. 2004;46(6):675–681.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
22. Meghwal RR, Sharma AK, Singh JP, Kumar S, Sharma R. Morpho-chemical and molecular diversity estimation of Haloxylon spp.-A neglected industrial halophytic species in Thar Desert of Western Rajasthan (India). International J Seed Spices. 2014;4(1):46
- View Article
- Google Scholar
23. Goswami D, Dagla HR. Standardization of DNA extraction and genetic diversity analysis of Haloxylon salicornicum: An underutilized species of extreme arid environment. Plant Gene. 2017;12:66–71.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
24. Marti´ nez‐Palacios A, Eguiarte LE, Furnier GR. Genetic diversity of the endangered endemic Agave victoriae‐reginae (Agavaceae) in the Chihuahuan Desert. Am J Bot. 1999;86(8):1093–1098. pmid:10449387
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Shrestha MK, Golan-Goldhirsh A, Ward D. Population genetic structure and the conservation of isolated populations of Acacia raddiana in the Negev Desert. Biol Cons 2002;108(1):119–127.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
26. Gaafar AR, Al-Qurainy F, Khan S. Assessment of genetic diversity in the endangered populations of Breonadia salicina (Rubiaceae) growing in The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using inter-simple sequence repeat markers. BMC Genet. 2014;15(1):109.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
27. Sehgal D, Rajpal VR, Raina SN, Sasanuma T, Sasakuma T. Assaying polymorphism at DNA level for genetic diversity diagnostics of the safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) world germplasm resources. Genetica. 2009;135(3):457–470. pmid:18649115
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;98(1):107–12.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
29. Varshney RK, Chabane K, Hendre PS, Aggarwal RK, Graner A. Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated and elite barleys. Plant Sci. 2007;173(6):638–649.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
30. Shannon CE, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois. 1949;117.
31. Peakall RO, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6(1):288–295.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
32. Peakall R, Smouse, PE. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 2012; 28: 2537–2539. pmid:22820204
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Yeh FC. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belgian J Bot. 1997;129:157.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
34. Hedrick PW. A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution. 2005;59(8):1633–1638. pmid:16329237
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Jost LO. GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(18):4015–4026. pmid:19238703
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(3):564–567. pmid:21565059
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Nagylaki T. Fixation indices in subdivided populations. Genetics. 1998;148(3):1325–1332. pmid:9539445
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;23(2):254–267. pmid:16221896
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155: 945–959. pmid:10835412
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–2620. pmid:15969739
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Earl DA. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359–361.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
42. Zhang L, Zhao G, Yue M, Pan X. Genetic diversity and environmental associations of sacsaoul (Haloxylon ammodendron). In: Ecosystems Dynamics, Ecosystem-Society Interactions, and Remote Sensing Applications for Semi-Arid and Arid Land 2003 Jul 14 (Vol. 4890, pp. 453–461). International Society for Optics and Photonics. ; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.466682
- View Article
- Google Scholar
43. Hedrick PW, Ginevan ME, Ewing EP. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1976;7(1):1–32.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
44. Nevo EBA. Genetic parallelism of protein polymorphism in nature: ecological test of the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Biol J Linnean Soc. 1988;35(3):229–245.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
45. Nevo E. Evolution of genome–phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(11):6233–6240. pmid:11371642
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Shuyskaya EV, Gismatullina LG, Toderich KH, Voronin PY, Soldatova NV. Genetic differentiation of black saxaul, Haloxylon aphyllum (Chenopodiaceae), along a soil salinity gradient in the Kyzylkum Desert. Russ J Ecol. 2012;43(4):302–306.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
47. Cole CT. Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34(1):213–237.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
48. AlQurainy FH. Genetic distance within and between two Haloxylon salicornicum populations as revealed by RAPD markers. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2007;14(2):221–226.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Al-Sobeai SM, Alamer KH, Amer SA. A preliminary molecular variability within Haloxylon salicornium accessions growing in Saudi Arabia. Plant Omics. 2015;8(6):604.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
50. Kaul A. Haloxylon salicornicum, an arid land shrub: its ecology and potential. Ann Arid Zone. 1986; 25:31–44.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
51. Singh JP, Rathore VS, Roy MM. Notes about Haloxylon salicornicum (Moq.) Bunge ex Boiss., a promising shrub for arid regions. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2015;62(3):451–463.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
52. Brown G, Al-Mazrooei S. Germination ecology of Haloxylon salicornicum from Kuwait. Bot Jahrb Syst Pflanzengesch Pflanzengeogr. 2001;123:235–247.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
53. El-Keblawy A, Al-Shamsi N. Salinity, temperature and light affect seed germination of Haloxylon salicornicum, a common perennial shrub of the Arabian deserts. Seed Sci Technol. 2008;36(3):679–688.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
54. Hamrick JL. Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure in plant populations. In: Isozymes in plant biology 1989 (pp. 87–105). Springer, Dordrecht.
55. Sheng Y. Studies on Molecular Ecology of Haloxylon ammodendron Bunge (Chenopodiaceae), Doctoral Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China 2003
56. Wright S. The interpretation of population structure by F‐statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution. 1965;19(3):395–420.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
57. Frankham R, Briscoe DA, Ballou JD. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge university press; 2002.
58. Slatkin M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science. 1987;236(4803):787–792. pmid:3576198
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
59. Putman AI, Carbone I. Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies. Ecol Evol. 2014;4(22):4399–4428. pmid:25540699
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
60. Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978;89(3):583–590. pmid:17248844
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
61. Wright S. The genetical Structure of populations. Ann Eugenics. 1951 15: 323–354
- View Article
- Google Scholar
62. Wright S. Isolation by distance. Genetics, 1943; 28: 114–138. pmid:17247074
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Böer B, Sargeant D. Desert perennials as plant and soil indicators in Eastern Arabia. Plant Soil. 1998;199(2):261–266.
View Article
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Ghazanfar SA, Fisher M, editors. Vegetation of the Arabian peninsula. Springer Science & Business Media; 2013.1–329.

[ref3] 3. Omar Asem S, Roy WY. Biodiversity and climate change in Kuwait. Int J Clim Chang Str. 2010;2(1):68–83.
View Article
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. CBD—Convention on Biological Diversity. United Nations Treaty Series 1993; 1760: 143–382.

[ref5] 5. Roshier DA, Böer BB, Osborne PE. Vegetation of Abu Dhabi and a preliminary classification of its plant associations. Desert Ecology of Abu Dhabi’.(Ed. Osborne PE.) pp. 1996:50–65.
View Article
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. El-Wahab RH, Al-Rashed AR, Al-Hamad Y. Conservation condition of Haloxylon salicornicum (Moq.) Bunge ex Boiss. in degraded desert habitats of northern Kuwait. Int J Curr Microbiol App Sci. 2014;3(10):310–325.
View Article
Google Scholar

[13] View Article

[14] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Zaman S, Padmesh S, Bhat NR, Tawfiq H. Germination of some Kuwait’s native plants under saline conditions. Am Eurasian J Agric Environ Sci. 2006; 1:146–148.
View Article
Google Scholar

[16] View Article

[17] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Halwagy R, Halwagy M. Ecological studies on the desert of Kuwait. II. The vegetation. Journal of the University of Kuwait (Science). 1974; 1:87–95.
View Article
Google Scholar

[19] View Article

[20] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Omar SA, Misak R, King P, Shahid SA, Abo-Rizq H, Grealish G, et al. Mapping the vegetation of Kuwait through reconnaissance soil survey. J Arid Environ. 2001;48(3):341–355.
View Article
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Segarra‐Moragues JG, Palop‐Esteban M, González‐Candelas F, Catalán P. On the verge of extinction: genetics of the critically endangered Iberian plant species, Borderea chouardii (Dioscoreaceae) and implications for conservation management. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(4):969–982. pmid:15773929
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[25] View Article

[26] PubMed/NCBI

[27] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Glémin S, Bataillon T, Ronfort J, Mignot A, Olivieri I. Inbreeding depression in small populations of self-incompatible plants. Genetics. 2001;159(3):1217–1229. pmid:11729164
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[29] View Article

[30] PubMed/NCBI

[31] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Spigler RB, Theodorou K, Chang SM. Inbreeding depression and drift load in small populations at demographic disequilibrium. Evolution. 2017;71(1):81–94. pmid:27778313
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[33] View Article

[34] PubMed/NCBI

[35] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Mondini L, Noorani A, Pagnotta MA. Assessing plant genetic diversity by molecular tools. Diversity. 2009;1(1):19–35.
View Article
Google Scholar

[37] View Article

[38] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Meyer W, Mitchell TG, Freedman EZ, Vilgalys R. Hybridization probes for conventional DNA fingerprinting used as single primers in the polymerase chain reaction to distinguish strains of Cryptococcus neoformans. J Clin Microbiol. 1993;31(9):2274–2280. pmid:8408543
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[40] View Article

[41] PubMed/NCBI

[42] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Gupta M, Chyi YS, Romero-Severson J, Owen JL. Amplification of DNA markers from evolutionarily diverse genomes using single primers of simple-sequence repeats. Theor Appl Genet. 1994;89(7–8):998–1006. pmid:24178116
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[44] View Article

[45] PubMed/NCBI

[46] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Zietkiewicz E, Rafalski A, Labuda D. Genome fingerprinting by simple sequence repeat (SSR)-anchored polymerase chain reaction amplification. Genomics. 1994;20(2):176–183. pmid:8020964
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[48] View Article

[49] PubMed/NCBI

[50] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Ng WL, Tan SG. Inter-simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers: are we doing it right. ASM Sci J. 2015;9(1):30–39.
View Article
Google Scholar

[52] View Article

[53] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Jabbarzadeh Z, Khosh-Khui M, Salehi H, Saberivand A. Inter simple sequence repeat (ISSR) markers as reproducible and specific tools for genetic diversity analysis of rose species. Afr J Biotechnol. 2010;9(37):6091–6095.
View Article
Google Scholar

[55] View Article

[56] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Costa R, Pereira G, Garrido I, Tavares-de-Sousa MM, Espinosa F. Comparison of RAPD, ISSR, and AFLP molecular markers to reveal and classify orchardgrass (Dactylis glomerata L.) germplasm variations. PloS one. 2016;11(4):e0152972. pmid:27070939
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[58] View Article

[59] PubMed/NCBI

[60] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Ge XJ, Yu Y, Yuan YM, Huang HW, Yan C. Genetic diversity and geographic differentiation in endangered Ammopiptanthus (Leguminosae) populations in desert regions of northwest China as revealed by ISSR analysis. Ann Bot. 2005;95(5):843–851. pmid:15701663
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[62] View Article

[63] PubMed/NCBI

[64] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Sheng Y, Zheng WH, Pei KQ, Ma KP. Population genetic structure of a dominant desert tree, Haloxylon ammodendron (Chenopodiaceae), in the southeast Gurbantunggut desert detected by RAPD and ISSR markers. Acta Bot Sinica. 2004;46(6):675–681.
View Article
Google Scholar

[66] View Article

[67] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Meghwal RR, Sharma AK, Singh JP, Kumar S, Sharma R. Morpho-chemical and molecular diversity estimation of Haloxylon spp.-A neglected industrial halophytic species in Thar Desert of Western Rajasthan (India). International J Seed Spices. 2014;4(1):46
View Article
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Goswami D, Dagla HR. Standardization of DNA extraction and genetic diversity analysis of Haloxylon salicornicum: An underutilized species of extreme arid environment. Plant Gene. 2017;12:66–71.
View Article
Google Scholar

[72] View Article

[73] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Marti´ nez‐Palacios A, Eguiarte LE, Furnier GR. Genetic diversity of the endangered endemic Agave victoriae‐reginae (Agavaceae) in the Chihuahuan Desert. Am J Bot. 1999;86(8):1093–1098. pmid:10449387
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[75] View Article

[76] PubMed/NCBI

[77] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Shrestha MK, Golan-Goldhirsh A, Ward D. Population genetic structure and the conservation of isolated populations of Acacia raddiana in the Negev Desert. Biol Cons 2002;108(1):119–127.
View Article
Google Scholar

[79] View Article

[80] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. Gaafar AR, Al-Qurainy F, Khan S. Assessment of genetic diversity in the endangered populations of Breonadia salicina (Rubiaceae) growing in The Kingdom of Saudi Arabia using inter-simple sequence repeat markers. BMC Genet. 2014;15(1):109.
View Article
Google Scholar

[82] View Article

[83] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Sehgal D, Rajpal VR, Raina SN, Sasanuma T, Sasakuma T. Assaying polymorphism at DNA level for genetic diversity diagnostics of the safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) world germplasm resources. Genetica. 2009;135(3):457–470. pmid:18649115
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Prevost A, Wilkinson MJ. A new system of comparing PCR primers applied to ISSR fingerprinting of potato cultivars. Theor Appl Genet. 1999;98(1):107–12.
View Article
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] Google Scholar

[ref29] 29. Varshney RK, Chabane K, Hendre PS, Aggarwal RK, Graner A. Comparative assessment of EST-SSR, EST-SNP and AFLP markers for evaluation of genetic diversity and conservation of genetic resources using wild, cultivated and elite barleys. Plant Sci. 2007;173(6):638–649.
View Article
Google Scholar

[92] View Article

[93] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Shannon CE, Weaver W. The Mathematical Theory of Communication. Urbana, Illinois: University of Illinois. 1949;117.

[ref31] 31. Peakall RO, Smouse PE. GENALEX 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research. Mol Ecol Notes. 2006;6(1):288–295.
View Article
Google Scholar

[96] View Article

[97] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Peakall R, Smouse, PE. GenAlEx 6.5: Genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research—an update. Bioinformatics 2012; 28: 2537–2539. pmid:22820204
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[99] View Article

[100] PubMed/NCBI

[101] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Yeh FC. Population genetic analysis of co-dominant and dominant markers and quantitative traits. Belgian J Bot. 1997;129:157.
View Article
Google Scholar

[103] View Article

[104] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Hedrick PW. A standardized genetic differentiation measure. Evolution. 2005;59(8):1633–1638. pmid:16329237
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[106] View Article

[107] PubMed/NCBI

[108] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Jost LO. GST and its relatives do not measure differentiation. Mol Ecol. 2008;17(18):4015–4026. pmid:19238703
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Excoffier L, Lischer HE. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Mol Ecol Resour. 2010;10(3):564–567. pmid:21565059
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Nagylaki T. Fixation indices in subdivided populations. Genetics. 1998;148(3):1325–1332. pmid:9539445
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Huson DH, Bryant D. Application of phylogenetic networks in evolutionary studies. Mol Biol Evol. 2005;23(2):254–267. pmid:16221896
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000; 155: 945–959. pmid:10835412
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14(8):2611–2620. pmid:15969739
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Earl DA. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4(2):359–361.
View Article
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Zhang L, Zhao G, Yue M, Pan X. Genetic diversity and environmental associations of sacsaoul (Haloxylon ammodendron). In: Ecosystems Dynamics, Ecosystem-Society Interactions, and Remote Sensing Applications for Semi-Arid and Arid Land 2003 Jul 14 (Vol. 4890, pp. 453–461). International Society for Optics and Photonics. ; https://doi.org/10.1117/12.466682
View Article
Google Scholar

[137] View Article

[138] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Hedrick PW, Ginevan ME, Ewing EP. Genetic polymorphism in heterogeneous environments. Annu Rev Ecol Syst. 1976;7(1):1–32.
View Article
Google Scholar

[140] View Article

[141] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Nevo EBA. Genetic parallelism of protein polymorphism in nature: ecological test of the neutral theory of molecular evolution. Biol J Linnean Soc. 1988;35(3):229–245.
View Article
Google Scholar

[143] View Article

[144] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Nevo E. Evolution of genome–phenome diversity under environmental stress. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. 2001;98(11):6233–6240. pmid:11371642
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Shuyskaya EV, Gismatullina LG, Toderich KH, Voronin PY, Soldatova NV. Genetic differentiation of black saxaul, Haloxylon aphyllum (Chenopodiaceae), along a soil salinity gradient in the Kyzylkum Desert. Russ J Ecol. 2012;43(4):302–306.
View Article
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Cole CT. Genetic variation in rare and common plants. Annu Rev Ecol Evol Syst. 2003;34(1):213–237.
View Article
Google Scholar

[153] View Article

[154] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. AlQurainy FH. Genetic distance within and between two Haloxylon salicornicum populations as revealed by RAPD markers. Saudi J Biol Sci. 2007;14(2):221–226.
View Article
Google Scholar

[156] View Article

[157] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Al-Sobeai SM, Alamer KH, Amer SA. A preliminary molecular variability within Haloxylon salicornium accessions growing in Saudi Arabia. Plant Omics. 2015;8(6):604.
View Article
Google Scholar

[159] View Article

[160] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Kaul A. Haloxylon salicornicum, an arid land shrub: its ecology and potential. Ann Arid Zone. 1986; 25:31–44.
View Article
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Singh JP, Rathore VS, Roy MM. Notes about Haloxylon salicornicum (Moq.) Bunge ex Boiss., a promising shrub for arid regions. Genet Resour Crop Evol. 2015;62(3):451–463.
View Article
Google Scholar

[165] View Article

[166] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Brown G, Al-Mazrooei S. Germination ecology of Haloxylon salicornicum from Kuwait. Bot Jahrb Syst Pflanzengesch Pflanzengeogr. 2001;123:235–247.
View Article
Google Scholar

[168] View Article

[169] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. El-Keblawy A, Al-Shamsi N. Salinity, temperature and light affect seed germination of Haloxylon salicornicum, a common perennial shrub of the Arabian deserts. Seed Sci Technol. 2008;36(3):679–688.
View Article
Google Scholar

[171] View Article

[172] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Hamrick JL. Isozymes and the analysis of genetic structure in plant populations. In: Isozymes in plant biology 1989 (pp. 87–105). Springer, Dordrecht.

[ref55] 55. Sheng Y. Studies on Molecular Ecology of Haloxylon ammodendron Bunge (Chenopodiaceae), Doctoral Thesis, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, China 2003

[ref56] 56. Wright S. The interpretation of population structure by F‐statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evolution. 1965;19(3):395–420.
View Article
Google Scholar

[176] View Article

[177] Google Scholar

[ref57] 57. Frankham R, Briscoe DA, Ballou JD. Introduction to conservation genetics. Cambridge university press; 2002.

[ref58] 58. Slatkin M. Gene flow and the geographic structure of natural populations. Science. 1987;236(4803):787–792. pmid:3576198
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[180] View Article

[181] PubMed/NCBI

[182] Google Scholar

[ref59] 59. Putman AI, Carbone I. Challenges in analysis and interpretation of microsatellite data for population genetic studies. Ecol Evol. 2014;4(22):4399–4428. pmid:25540699
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[184] View Article

[185] PubMed/NCBI

[186] Google Scholar

[ref60] 60. Nei M. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics. 1978;89(3):583–590. pmid:17248844
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[188] View Article

[189] PubMed/NCBI

[190] Google Scholar

[ref61] 61. Wright S. The genetical Structure of populations. Ann Eugenics. 1951 15: 323–354
View Article
Google Scholar

[192] View Article

[193] Google Scholar

[ref62] 62. Wright S. Isolation by distance. Genetics, 1943; 28: 114–138. pmid:17247074
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[195] View Article

[196] PubMed/NCBI

[197] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Materials and methods

Collection site and sample collection

DNA extraction

PCR amplification

Data scoring and analysis

Results

ISSR polymorphism

Genetic diversity

Genetic differentiation

Clustering and population structure

Discussion

ISSR polymorphism

Genetic diversity

Gene differentiation and gene flow

Population structure

Conservation implications

Supporting information

S1 Fig. PCR with selected ISSR primers (23, 810 and 3) to check for reproducibility in H. salicornicum.

S2 Fig. PCR band profiles.

S1 Table. GPS coordinates of the collected specimens of Haloxylon.

S2 Table. ISSR primers and their optimum annealing temperatures.

S3 Table. Gel Replicability score for ISSR markers.

S4 Table. Binary file of 108 samples of H. salicornicum collected from six locations of Kuwait.

References