The Supporting Information files S1 and S2 Text and S1, S2 and S3 Tables incorrectly contain tracked changes. Please view the corrected files below.
Supporting information
S1 Text. Overview and critique of the Universal Moral Grammar model.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206750.s001
(DOCX)
S2 Text. Overview and critique of the Moral Foundations Theory.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206750.s002
(DOCX)
S1 Table. T-tests for the manipulation checks for low- and high-stakes vignettes.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206750.s003
(DOCX)
S2 Table. Correlation coefficients between self-identifications with moral theories and Preferences for Precepts Implied in Moral Theories (PPIMT).
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206750.s004
(DOCX)
S3 Table. Summary of the findings of the ADC-components.
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206750.s005
(DOCX)
Reference
- 1. Dubljević V, Sattler S, Racine E (2018) Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0204631. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0204631 pmid:30273370
Citation: Dubljević V, Sattler S, Racine E (2018) Correction: Deciphering moral intuition: How agents, deeds, and consequences influence moral judgment. PLoS ONE 13(10): e0206750. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0206750
Published: October 25, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Dubljević et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.