Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Impact of successful treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents on health-related quality of life in chronic hepatitis C patients

  • Regina Juanbeltz ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    regina.juanbeltz.zurbano@navarra.es

    Affiliations Department of Pharmacy, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain, Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra—IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Pamplona, Spain

  • Iván Martínez-Baz,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra—IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Pamplona, Spain

  • Ramón San Miguel,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Pharmacy, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • Silvia Goñi-Esarte,

    Roles Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Gastroenterology, Complejo Hospitalario de Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • Juan Manuel Cabasés,

    Roles Methodology, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Economics, Public University of Navarra, Pamplona, Spain

  • Jesús Castilla

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Instituto de Salud Pública de Navarra—IdiSNA, Pamplona, Spain, CIBER Epidemiología y Salud Pública (CIBERESP), Pamplona, Spain

Impact of successful treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents on health-related quality of life in chronic hepatitis C patients

  • Regina Juanbeltz, 
  • Iván Martínez-Baz, 
  • Ramón San Miguel, 
  • Silvia Goñi-Esarte, 
  • Juan Manuel Cabasés, 
  • Jesús Castilla
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

Direct-acting antivirals (DAA) have demonstrated high efficacy to achieve sustained virological response (SVR) in chronic hepatitis C patients. We aim to assess the change in health-related quality of life (HRQoL) among patients successfully treated, and to identify predictors of this variation.

Methods

In a prospective observational study, patients with chronic hepatitis C who started DAA therapy between May 2016 and April 2017 completed the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire at baseline and 12 weeks after the end of therapy before knowing the virological result. Analysis included all patients with SVR.

Results

Median baseline EQ-5D-5L scores of the 206 enrolled patients were 0.857 utility and 70.0 visual analogue scale (VAS). Following SVR, a reduction occurred in the proportion of patients with mobility problems (35% vs 24%, p = 0.012), pain/discomfort (60% vs 42%, p<0.001) and anxiety/depression (57% vs 44%, p = 0.012), with an increase in utility (+0.053, p<0.001) and VAS (+10, p<0.001). Score improvements were also observed in cirrhotic (+0.048 utility, p = 0.027; +15 VAS, p<0.001) and HIV co-infected patients (+0.039 utility, p = 0.036; +5 VAS, p = 0.002). In multivariate analyses, middle age (45–64 years) and baseline anxiety/depression were associated to greater improvement in utility after SVR, and moderate-advanced liver fibrosis and cirrhosis to greater increase in VAS score. Low baseline values were associated to greater improvements in utility value and VAS score.

Conclusions

The cure of chronic hepatitis C infection with DAA has a short term positive impact on HRQoL with improvement in mobility, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, utility value and VAS score. Patients with poor baseline HRQoL were the most beneficed.

Introduction

Chronic hepatitis C constitutes a well-recognize global public health issue, mainly due to its worldwide high prevalence and the serious consequences of progression of disease. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) leads to cirrhosis in up to 20% of those chronically infected [1] and of these, 2–4% annually develop hepatocellular carcinoma [2]. Moreover, chronic HCV infection is the primary indication for liver transplantation in developed countries [3]. The economic burden is multiplied by the impact of HCV on health related quality of life (HRQoL), appreciable at any stage of severity [4,5]. Complications of advanced liver disease such as encephalopathy, variceal hemorrhage, and ascites have been reported to negatively affect HRQoL [6,7]. Extrahepatic manifestations related to HCV as fatigue, irritability, depression, muscle pain, joint pain and cognitive impairment may also influence the patient's psychological well-being and self-perceived health [8,9].

Measuring HRQoL has become important in clinical research, as it is considered the gold standard to report the patient´s experiences with illness and treatment [10,11]. Changes in HRQoL from the patient perspective before and after health care interventions can be monitorized with instruments like the EQ-5D [12], a standardized questionnaire that provides a simple, generic measure of health for clinical and economic appraisal [13]. EQ-5D provides health utilities, widely used in cost-effectiveness and decision analyses where different treatments are compared.

Antiviral therapies can eradicate the HCV resulting in improvements in liver histology, morbidity, mortality and enhancing HRQoL because of symptoms´ alleviation [14]. A combination of pegylated interferon (peg-IFN) and ribavirin (RBV) has long been the standard treatment for chronic hepatitis C, with limited efficacy and significant adverse effects [15]. The impact of peg-IFN on quality of life was studied in patients with and without HIV co-infection, showing negative patient experiences [1617]. However, patients who achieved HCV clearance experienced significant improvements in HRQoL compared to non-responders [1719].

New direct acting antiviral regimens (DAA) have changed the landscape of treatment of chronic hepatitis C. DAA provide important advantages, including higher efficacy, shorter duration of treatment and an optimal safety profile [2022]. However, there is little data regarding the effect of the new regimens on HRQoL and most of the evidence comes from clinical trials, in which certain subpopulations are underrepresented, such as psychiatric patients, those coinfected with HIV or those with addictive behaviours [23,24]. Assessment of HRQoL in real life from chronic hepatitis C patients is needed to evaluate the economic and health impact of these new therapies [25].

The main objective of this study was to assess short-term changes in HRQoL and health utilities among chronic hepatitis C patients receiving successful treatment with DAA. Secondary objectives were to analyse the influence of treatment in domains of EQ-5D-5L questionnaire, and to identify the predictors of change in HRQoL after HCV clearance.

Patients and methods

Design and study population

A prospective observational study was conducted in a regional reference hospital in northern Spain. Patients with chronic HCV infection who started interferon-free treatments with DAA between May 2016 and April 2017 were invited to participate. Exclusion criterion was inability to understand Spanish.

In accordance with the clinical practice guidelines and the centre's treatment protocol, patients started therapy with a variable duration of 8 to 24 weeks. Three interviews were conducted by the same investigator. The first was face-to-face, providing information to the patient and obtaining the written informed consent. Successive interviews were carried out by telephone in week 4 of treatment and 12 weeks after its completion (post-12), time when the sustained virologic response (SVR) is assessed, revealing the cure or not of the HCV infection. Patients were considered to have achieved SVR if they had undetectable HCV-RNA at post-12 week. The last interview was conducted before the follow-up medical visit, so that the patient and the interviewer were still unaware of the analytical data and treatment's outcome.

According to the main objective of the study, only those patients with the three questionnaires completed and who had achieved SVR were included in the analysis.

The study fulfilled all the ethical requirements and was approved by the Clinical Research Ethics Committee of Navarre.

Assessments

Sociodemographic variables of the patient were recorded at the baseline interview: sex, age, marital status, educational level and occupational status. Clinical variables were obtained from the electronic medical record: alcohol consumption and parenteral drug use history, smoking, body mass index and concomitant diseases, which were assessed using a simplified Charlson index [26] and the diagnosis count method [27]. In addition, the existence of HIV co-infection, hypertension, rheumatological disease, paralysis/hemiplegia, depression, anxiety or other psychiatric illness was specifically collected.

Finally, the variables related to chronic liver disease due to HCV were included: viral genotype, previous treatment experience (naïve, pre-treated with IFN or peg-IFN, pre-treated with DAA), degree of liver fibrosis based on Fibroscan test's values, categorized according to cut-off points F0-F1 (<7.5 kPa), F2 (7.5 to 9.4 kPa), F3 (9.5 to 12.4 kPa) and F4 (≥12.5 kPa), Child-Pugh score in the cirrhotic patient [28], current combination of DAA, and duration of treatment.

HRQoL questionnaire

All patients were asked to complete the Spanish version of the EQ-5D, an instrument previously used to assess HRQoL in patients with chronic hepatitis C [6,29]. Currently, there are two versions of the EQ-5D of the EuroQol Group, EQ-5D-3L and EQ-5D-5L. In this study the new version was used, the EQ-5D-5L, that has proven to be valid and more sensitive to changes in health status [30].

EQ-5D-5L provides a simple description of the patient's self-perceived health status covering five health dimensions: mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression, with five response options (no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems). Any response in the items “slight, moderate, severe or extreme” was considered as having “problems”, for each dimension. The questionnaire also provides a self-reported Visual Analogue Scale (VAS), which measures the patients' health on a scale from 0 to 100, where 0 reflects the worst imaginable health status and 100 the best imaginable health status. The patient response in the five dimensions results in a five-digit code, which can be transformed to a single measure called EQ-5D index or utility value. It ranges from 0 (reference value assigned to death) to 1 (perfect health), with the possibility of negative values for health states considered worse than death [31]. It is a health summary score used in the clinical and economic evaluation of healthcare as well as in population health surveys [32]. Although the EuroQol Group has already developed a methodology for eliciting value sets for the 5L version in some countries, no EQ-5D-5L value set was available in Spain at the moment of the study. Therefore, following the EuroQol recommendation, an interim mapping method or crosswalk to obtain 5L value sets from the existing 3L values for Spain was used in this study (available at https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/valuation-standard-value-sets/crosswalk-index-value-calculator/).

Statistical analysis

Frequencies and proportions were calculated for the categorical variables, and the mean and standard deviation for continuous variables. For each interview, the proportion of patients with problems in each of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire dimension was calculated, and the median of the utility and the VAS score was estimated. The differences in the medians of these indices were compared using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. The comparison was repeated in strata by age group, degree of liver fibrosis, HIV co-infection, simplified Charlson index, duration of treatment, RBV use, considering baseline utility and baseline VAS score above or below the median. Multivariable linear regression analyses were carried out to identify factors associated with change in HRQoL, with their β coefficients and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The differences between post-12 and baseline scores in utility value and in VAS score were respectively the outcome variables. A positive β coefficient indicated improvement and a negative coefficient decline in utility or VAS score after SVR. The adjusted models included sex, age groups (<45; 45–64 and ≥65 years), HIV co-infection, baseline limitation of mobility, baseline anxiety-depression disorders and degree of liver fibrosis (F0-F1, F2-F3 and F4) before hepatitis C treatment.

Results

Characteristics of patients

A total of 271 patients started treatment during the study period, 214 of those signing the informed consent (79%). Eight patients were excluded from the final analysis, 4 due to loss during the follow-up and another 4 due to not achieving SVR, leaving 206 patients cured of chronic HCV infection. The average age was 52.3 years (SD = 9.0) and 66% were males. HIV co-infected patients represented 32% of the population. The simplified Charlson score was ≥2 in 22 patients (11%) and 90% had at least one comorbidity, the most frequent being a psychiatric disorder (34%), hypertension (23%) and rheumatological diseases (12%). A total of 66% patients were smokers, 16% had a history of alcohol abuse and 52% had a history of parenteral drug use as probable mode of HCV transmission (Table 1).

thumbnail
Table 1. Socidemographic and clinical characteristics of the patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205277.t001

The most frequent HCV genotypes were 1a (39%), 1b (24%) and 3 (21%). Liver fibrosis degree was F0-F1 in 51 (25%) patients, F2-F3 in 97 (47%) and F4 in 58 (28%) patients. Among 95% of cirrhotic patients had compensated liver disease (Child-Pugh A).

DAA combinations used were ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir +/- dasabuvir (39%), sofosbuvir/ledipasvir (33%), sofosbuvir + daclatasvir (22%), grazoprevir/elbasvir (3%), sofosbuvir/velpatasvir (1.5%), sofosbuvir (1.5%) and sofosbuvir + grazoprevir/elbasvir (0.5%). The therapeutic regimen included RBV in 52% of the cases, and 72% of the treatments lasted 12 weeks. A majority of the patients (79%) had never received previous treatment for hepatitis C (Table 1).

EQ-5D-5L health dimensions

Prior to the start of treatment, the dimensions in which the patients showed a greater incidence of problems were pain/discomfort (60%), anxiety/depression (57%) and mobility (35%). The treatment started having a positive impact on these dimensions from week 4, and on all liver fibrosis subgroups (Fig 1). The baseline and post-12 comparison of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire’s dimensions showed a decrease in the proportion of patients with mobility problems (35% vs 24%, p = 0.012), pain/discomfort (60% vs 42%, p<0.001) and anxiety/depression (57% vs 44%, p = 0.012). A statistically non-significant deterioration was observed in the dimensions of self-care and daily activities (Fig 1, panel A). Patients F0-F1 did not experience changes statistically significant after treatment (panel B), but improvement on pain/discomfort happened in F2-F3 (p = 0.002; panel C). Cirrhotic patients reported more problems for all dimensions before treatment, but improvements after therapy occurred in pain/discomfort (72% vs 52%, p = 0.036) and in the anxiety/depression dimension (62% vs 45%, p = 0.063), although the latter did not reach statistical significance (panel D).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Percentage of patients reporting problem in any EQ-5D dimension by liver fibrosis stage and study visit.

P values are the comparison of the proportions from baseline and week 12 post-treatment and were calculated by Chi-square test. (A) Total of study population; (B) F0-F1 patients; (C) F2-F3 patients; (D) Cirrhotic patients.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205277.g001

Utilities (EQ-5D-5L Index) and VAS score

The median utility was not affected during treatment (0.857, p = 0.324), while the VAS score showed a 5-point increase, from 70 baseline points to 75 in week 4 (p = 0.049). Poor baseline scores were associated to significant increases (Table 2).

thumbnail
Table 2. Changes in health-related quality of life scores from the baseline to the week 4 of treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205277.t002

In comparison with the baseline value, the utility in post-12 week increased by 6% (+0.053, p<0.001), and the VAS increased 10 points (+14%, p<0.001). These improvements were statistically significant in cirrhotic patients (+0.048 utility, p = 0.027, +15 VAS points, p<0.001) and F2-F3 fibrosis subgroup (+0.053 utility, p = 0.002, +10 VAS points, p<0.001), but not in those F0-F1 (+0.039 utility, p = 0.061; +5 VAS points, p = 0.148). Analyses stratified by HIV co-infection, Charlson index and baseline scores showed important increases in the post-12 week utility or VAS score (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Changes in health-related quality of life scores from the baseline to the week 12 post-treatment with direct-acting antiviral agents.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205277.t003

Multivariable linear regression showed that age between 45–64 years (β = 0.07; 95%CI, 0.01 to 0.13) and suffering anxious or depressive disorders before starting treatment (β = 0.08; 95%CI, 0.03 to 0.12) were predictive factors of utility improvement after SVR and moderate-advanced liver fibrosis (β = 5.93; 95%CI, -0.01 to 11.86) and cirrhosis (β = 7.15; 95%CI, 0.64 to 13.65) favourable for increases in VAS score (Table 4).

thumbnail
Table 4. Effect of socio-demographic and clinical factors on post-12 health related quality of life improvement for sustained virological responders.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0205277.t004

Poor baseline values of the utility and VAS score, when baseline values were introduced in their respective models, were the more predictive factors of improvement in the post-12 week in patients with SVR (β = -0.297; 95%CI, -0.403 to -0.190 and β = -0.459; 95%CI, -0.572 to -0.347, respectively).

Discussion

Successful treatment with DAA on health-related quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis C was associated to significant improvement in the majority of HRQoL domains measured by the EQ-5D-5L instrument. Improvement of HRQoL started shortly after the initiation of therapy and enhanced after achieving SVR, including cirrhotic and HIV co-infected patients, classically considered “difficult to treat” populations. Main improvements occurred in mobility, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression dimensions, as well as in the health utility and VAS score. Although evidence from “real life” setting is lacking [23], patient reporting outcomes with DAA in clinical trials also suggest benefit after treatment [3336]. Relationship between SVR and HRQoL improvement has not been elucidated, but viral clearance has been suggested to result in cytokines and inflammatory biomarkers reduction in periphery and central nervous system, leading to a positively impact on patients’ experience [37, 38]. The improvement observed in the well-being of patients cured with DAA reinforces the idea that chronic HCV infection, far from being a purely hepatic disease, presents a clearly systemic component and impaires HRQoL [39,40]. According the Spanish National Health Survey 2011/12 [41], the general population aged 45–54 years referred a VAS score of 77.2 and utility value of 0.928, being higher figures than those referred by our patients before treatment, 70.0 and 0.875, respectively. Lower scores in our patients suggest a HRQoL impairment associated to chronic hepatitis C infection [7, 29].

In the first 4 weeks of treatment, the median VAS score increased 5 points and improved health dimensions that were negatively affected with interferon treatments [42]. This early improvement in HRQoL has been described for DAA [35], contrary to what happened with peg-IFN + RBV and triple therapy with boceprevir or telaprevir [10,17,43,44], which seems to relate HRQoL deterioration during treatment to interferon and not to second generation DAA. The use of RBV was not associated with significant disutility, a fact that suggests a lower impact of side effects such as anaemia and pruritus, when administered in combination with DAA compared to when administered with interferon. This aspect reinforces the idea of the good tolerability of DAA in real life conditions [45,46].

In clinical practice, patient reporting outcomes constitute useful tools in the evaluation and monitoring of health interventions, since they provide information on patient perception and needs [47]. Knowing the predictors of HRQoL improvement after the treatment of hepatitis C can help to strengthen patient adherence and motivation. Middle age, baseline anxiety-depression, advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis were found to be the most consistent predictors of HRQoL improvements after SVR. Precisely, those factors have been previously associated with impairment in HRQoL among chronic hepatitis C patients [4,29,48] and appear to be key determinants for HRQoL deterioration prior to therapy [14]. The high prevalence of depression and anxiety in HCV patients before treatment initiation [49] would reinforce the need for psychosocial screening, even more when considering that a greater HRQoL improvement may occurs in those patients after SVR. In our study, patients with worse baseline HRQoL score showed more significant improvements, a common finding in all types of clinical trials [50]. This result is consistent with the greater improvement in HRQoL in cirrhotic patients, with comorbidity or HIV co-infection, observed in the stratified analysis of the study.

This study provides useful information for cost-effectiveness analysis. Utility values allow to obtain quality adjusted life years, and to estimate incremental cost-utility ratios in pharmacoeconomic analysis. Since the advent of second-generation DAA, some cost-utility analyses have been published to assess their efficiency [5154], with more or less favourable incremental cost-utility ratios depending on the degrees of liver fibrosis, the cost of the drugs and the previous treatment experience. More favourable treatment efficiency in patients with a high degree of fibrosis is derived from the potential more imminent progression to severe stages, associated with greater disutility and greater consumption of health resources [51,52]. According to our results, the more significant HRQoL improvement in cirrhotic patients after the SVR reinforces this idea. In any case, a decline in the cost of drugs and the possibility of currently treating patients with a low degree of liver fibrosis with short 8-week regimens, would reduce the incremental cost-utility ratios and improve the efficiency of treatment in all patient subpopulations.

This real-life prospective study included hepatitis C patients who received treatment in a regional reference hospital in northern Spain. Although the epidemiology of HCV infection and the introduction of DAA have been relatively homogeneous in Spain, we can not rule out some geographical differences which would affect representativeness of our study. However, patients were infected by all HCV genotypes with a distribution similar to that of the population in our environment [55], in the different stages of the disease, treated with all available combinations of DAA and without excluding patients with comorbidity. The indication and choice of treatment was based on the same protocol, developed according to clinical and efficiency criteria. HRQoL was analysed including subpopulations of patients usually underrepresented in clinical trials, such as those with psychiatric disorders or persons co-infected with HIV [23], which represent one third of the population in this study. All the interviews were carried out by the same investigator, in order to minimize the potential bias of the interviewer. The timing of the interview may affect the results. The post-12 interview was conducted in our study before knowing the SVR result, in order to avoid the possible overestimation on patient’s HRQoL self-assessment secondary to the euphoria experienced at that moment [43,56]. However, when patients know HCV become negative after treatment, the worry about the complications of the disease probably decrease and an improvement in the anxiety dimension could be greater than that observed in our study. A long-term evaluation of HRQoL after SVR would contribute to understand the effect of timing on HRQoL results.

Two possible shortcomings of our study need to be considered. First, the population size, although similar or greater than that of other observational studies [35,14,57] was not large enough to obtain conclusive results in some subanalyses. In any case, the patients included accounted for 78% of the patients who received treatment successfully during the study period. Second, the EQ-5D-5L is a generic questionnaire. Although it has been used in many scenarios, including chronic hepatitis C and its treatment, its combination with a disease-specific questionnaire would have been desirable. Time-related limitations in terms of patient care in the consulting room and of personnel related to completing the interviews discouraged the use of other questionnaires. However, studies that use both types of tools for measurement of patient reporting outcomes in patients treated with DAA therapy obtained similar results and good correlation between the generic and HCV-specific questionnaires [10,35]. EQ-5D-5L version was used in this study, as it has demonstrated to be a valid extension of EQ-5D-3L, providing more precise measurement at both individual and group level [5861]. Since no 5L value sets were yet available in Spain, the crosswalk value set was used in this study, as the EuroQol recommended [31].

The new antivirals available recently seem to improve even more the treatment outcomes, being expected this same effect on quality of life.

Conclusions

In summary, this study shows a short-term positive impact of SVR on the HRQoL of patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with interferon-free DAA. The greatest impact was on health dimensions of mobility, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression, and in utility values and the VAS of the EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. The treatment did not produce disutility, nor did the use of RBV. Predictors of greater improvements in HRQoL with SVR may be baseline depression, anxiety, moderate-advanced fibrosis and cirrhosis; which may help to give priority to patients for treatment. The results obtained provide the patient's perspective in the assessment of DAA and information on patient reporting outcomes to be incorporated in cost-utility studies.

Supporting information

Acknowledgments

We are grateful to all the patients who participated in the study. We also thank the physicians and staff for their kind cooperation during the recruitment process.

References

  1. 1. Thein HH, Yi Q, Dore GJ, Krahn MD. Estimation of stage-specific fibrosis progression rates in chronic hepatitis C virus infection: a meta-analysis and meta-regression. Hepatology. 2008;48(2):418–31. pmid:18563841
  2. 2. El-Serag HB, Rudolph KL. Hepatocellular carcinoma: epidemiology and molecular carcinogenesis. Gastroenterology. 2007;132(7):2557–76. pmid:17570226
  3. 3. Lingala S, Ghany MG. Natural History of Hepatitis C. Gastroenterol Clin North Am. 2015;44(4):717–34. pmid:26600216
  4. 4. Spiegel BM, Younossi ZM, Hays RD, Revicki D, Robbins S, Kanwal F. Impact of hepatitis C on health related quality of life: a systematic review and quantitative assessment. Hepatology. 2005;41(4):790–800. pmid:15791608
  5. 5. Foster GR, Goldin RD, Thomas HC. Chronic hepatitis C virus infection causes a significant reduction in quality of life in the absence of cirrhosis. Hepatology. 1998;27(1):209–12. pmid:9425939
  6. 6. Chong CA, Gulamhussein A, Heathcote EJ, Lilly L, Sherman M, Naglie G, et al. Health-state utilities and quality of life in hepatitis C patients. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003;98(3):630–8. pmid:12650799
  7. 7. Córdoba J, Flavià M, Jacas C, Sauleda S, Esteban JI, Vargas V, et al. Quality of life and cognitive function in hepatitis C at different stages of liver disease. J Hepatol. 2003;39(2):231–8. pmid:12873820
  8. 8. Obhrai J, Hall Y, Anand BS. Assessment of fatigue and psychologic disturbances in patients with hepatitis C virus infection. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2001;32(5):413–7. pmid:11319313
  9. 9. Forton DM, Allsop JM, Cox IJ, Hamilton G, Wesnes K, Thomas HC, et al. A review of cognitive impairment and cerebral metabolite abnormalities in patients with hepatitis C infection. AIDS. 2005;19 Suppl 3:S53–63.
  10. 10. Younossi Z, Henry L. Systematic review: patient-reported outcomes in chronic hepatitis C—the impact of liver disease and new treatment regimens. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015;41(6):497–520. pmid:25616122
  11. 11. Anderson KL, Burckhardt CS. Conceptualization and measurement of quality of life as an outcome variable for health care intervention and research. J Adv Nurs. 1999;29(2):298–306. pmid:10197928
  12. 12. Devlin N, Parkin D, Browne J. Patient–reported outcome measures in the NHS: New methods for analyzing and reporting EQ-5D data. Health Economics. 2010;19: 886–905. pmid:20623685
  13. 13. Group EuroQol. EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life. Health Policy. 1990;16(3):199–208. pmid:10109801
  14. 14. Youssef NF, El Kassas M, Farag A, Shepherd A. Health-related quality of Life in patients with chronic hepatitis C receiving Sofosbuvir-based treatment, with and without Interferon: a prospective observational study in Egypt. BMC Gastroenterol. 2017;17(1):18. pmid:28109264
  15. 15. Fried MW. Side effects of therapy of hepatitis C and their management. Hepatology. 2002;36(5 Suppl 1):S237–44.
  16. 16. Bezemer G, Van Gool AR, Verheij-Hart E, Hansen BE, Lurie Y, Esteban JI, et al. Long-term effects of treatment and response in patients with chronic hepatitis C on quality of life. An international, multicenter, randomized, controlled study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2012;12:11. pmid:22292521
  17. 17. Kemmer N, Hua L, Andersen JW, Chung RT, Butt AA, Sherman KE. Health-related quality of life in subjects with HCV/HIV coinfection: results from ACTG 5178 study. J Viral Hepat. 2012;19(11):792–800. pmid:23043386
  18. 18. McHutchison JG, Ware JE, Bayliss MS, Pianko S, Albrecht JK, Cort S, et al. The effects of interferon alpha-2b in combination with ribavirin on health related quality of life and work productivity. J Hepatol. 2001;34(1):140–7. pmid:11211891
  19. 19. Arora S , O'Brien C, Zeuzem S, Shiffman ML, Diago M, Tran A, et al. Treatment of chronic hepatitis C patients with persistently normal alanine aminotransferase levels with the combination of peginterferon alpha-2a (40 kDa) plus ribavirin: impact on health-related quality of life. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2006;21(2):406–12. pmid:16509866
  20. 20. Leventer-Roberts M, Hammerman A, Brufman I, Hoshen M, Braun M, Ashur Y, et al. Effectiveness of dasabuvir/ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir for hepatitis C virus in clinical practice: A population-based observational study. PLoS One. 2017;12(7):e0176858. pmid:28686590
  21. 21. Juanbeltz R, Zozaya JM, Reparaz J, Castilla J, Sarobe MT, Uriz Otano JI, et al. [Effectiveness of second-generation direct-acting antivirals in chronic hepatitis C]. An Sist Sanit Navar. 2017;40(1):57–66. pmid:28534541
  22. 22. Juanbeltz R, Goñi Esarte S, Uriz-Otano JI, Martinez Echeverria A, Elizalde I, Zozaya JM, et al. Safety of oral direct acting antiviral regimens for chronic hepatitis C in real life conditions. Postgrad Med. 2017;129(4):476–83. pmid:28343408
  23. 23. Marcellin F, Roux P, Protopopescu C, Duracinsky M, Spire B, Carrieri MP. Patient-reported outcomes with direct-acting antivirals for the treatment of chronic hepatitis C: current knowledge and outstanding issues. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;11(3):259–68. pmid:28116926
  24. 24. Dusheiko G. The impact of antiviral therapy for hepatitis C on the quality of life: a perspective. Liver Int 2017;37 Suppl 1:7–12.
  25. 25. Buti M, Esteban R. Patient experience in HCV therapy: what really matters. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016;1(2):90–2 pmid:28404078
  26. 26. Berkman LF, Leo-Summers L, Horwitz RI. Emotional support and survival after myocardial infarction. A prospective, population-based study of the elderly. Ann Intern Med. 1992;117(12):1003–9. pmid:1443968
  27. 27. Rochon PA, Katz JN, Morrow LA, McGlinchey-Berroth R, Ahlquist MM, Sarkarati M, et al. Comorbid illness is associated with survival and length of hospital stay in patients with chronic disability. A prospective comparison of three comorbidity indices. Med Care. 1996;34(11):1093–101. pmid:8911426
  28. 28. Child CG, Turcotte JG. Surgery and portal hypertension. Major Probl Clin Surg. 1964;1:1–85. pmid:4950264
  29. 29. Bjornsson E, Verbaan H, Oksanen A, Fryden A, Johansson J, Friberg S, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with different stages of liver disease induced by hepatitis C. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2009;44(7):878–87. pmid:19437190
  30. 30. Herdman M, Gudex C, Lloyd A, Janssen M, Kind P, Parkin D, et al. Development and preliminary testing of the new five-level version of EQ-5D (EQ-5D-5L). Qual Life Res. 2011;20(10):1727–36. pmid:21479777
  31. 31. EuroQol Group [internet]. [cited 2018 Aug 29]. Available from: https://euroqol.org/eq-5d-instruments/eq-5d-5l-about/valuation-standard-value-sets/crosswalk-index-value-calculator/
  32. 32. Dolan P. Modeling valuations for EuroQol health states. Med Care. 1997;35(11):1095–108. pmid:9366889
  33. 33. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Feld J, Zeuzem S, Sulkowski M, Foster GR, et al. Sofosbuvir and Velpatasvir combination improves Patient-reported Outcomes for patients with HCV infection, without or with compensated or decompensated cirrhosis. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;15(3):421–30. pmid:27847279
  34. 34. Younossi Z, Stepanova M, Omata M, Mizokami M, Walters M, Hunt S. Health utilities using SF-6D scores in Japanese patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with sofosbuvir-based regimens in clinical trials. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2017;15(1):25. pmid:28143559
  35. 35. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Chan HL, Lee MH, Yu ML, Dan YY, et al. Patient-reported outcomes in Asian patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with Ledipasvir and Sofosbuvir. Medicine (Baltimore). 2016;95(9):e2702.
  36. 36. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Sulkowski M, Naggie S, Henry L, Hunt S. Sofosbuvir and ledipasvir improve patient-reported outcomes in patients co-infected with hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus. J Viral Hepat. 2016;23(11):857–865. pmid:27291391
  37. 37. Monaco S, Mariotto S, Ferrari S, Calabrese M, Zanusso G, Gajofatto A, et al. Hepatitis C virus-associated neurocognitive and neuropsychiatric disorders: Advances in 2015. World J Gastroenterol. 2015;21(42):11974–83. pmid:26576086
  38. 38. Mascia C, Vita S, Zuccala P, Marocco R, Tieghi T, Savinelli S, et al. Changes in inflammatory biomarkers in HCV-infected patients undergoing direct acting antiviral-containing regimens with or without interferon. PLoS One. 2017;12(6):e0179400. pmid:28636655
  39. 39. Degasperi E, Aghemo A, Colombo M. Treatment of extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C virus. Clin Liver Dis. 2017;21(3):631–43. pmid:28689598
  40. 40. Negro F, Forton D, Craxi A, Sulkowski MS, Feld JJ, Manns MP. Extrahepatic morbidity and mortality of chronic hepatitis C. Gastroenterology. 2015;149(6):1345–60. pmid:26319013
  41. 41. Ministerio de Sanidad, Servicios Sociales e Igualdad [internet]. Nov 25, 2016 [access August 28, 2018]. Available from: https://www.mscbs.gob.es/estadEstudios/estadisticas/encuestaNacional/encuesta2011.htm
  42. 42. Scott J, Rosa K, Fu M, Cerri K, Peeters M, Beumont M, et al. Fatigue during treatment for hepatitis C virus: results of self-reported fatigue severity in two Phase IIb studies of simeprevir treatment in patients with hepatitis C virus genotype 1 infection. BMC Infect Dis. 2014;14:465. pmid:25164700
  43. 43. Vera-Llonch M, Martin M, Aggarwal J, Donepudi M, Bayliss M, Goss T, et al. Health-related quality of life in genotype 1 treatment-naive chronic hepatitis C patients receiving telaprevir combination treatment in the ADVANCE study. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2013;38(2):124–33. pmid:23725204
  44. 44. Younossi ZM, Stepanova M, Henry L, Nader F, Hunt S. An in-depth analysis of patient-reported outcomes in patients with chronic hepatitis C treated with different anti-viral regimens. Am J Gastroenterol. 2016;111(6):808–16 pmid:27021197
  45. 45. Sogni P, Gilbert C, Lacombe K, Piroth L, Rosenthal E, Miailhes P, et al. All-oral direct-acting antiviral regimens in HIV/hepatitis C virus-coinfected patients with cirrhosis are efficient and safe: real-life results from the prospective ANRS CO13-HEPAVIH Cohort. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;63(6):763–70. pmid:27317796
  46. 46. Gheorghe L, Iacob S, Curescu M, Brisc C, Cijevschi C, Caruntu F, et al. Real-life use of 3 direct-acting antiviral regimen in a large cohort of patients with genotype-1b HCV compensated cirrhosis. J Gastrointestin Liver Dis. 2017;26(3):275–81. pmid:28922440
  47. 47. Appleby J, Devlin N, Parkin D. Using patient reported outcomes to improve health care. Chichester: Wiley; 2016.
  48. 48. Marchesini G, Bianchi G, Amodio P, Salerno F, Merli M, Panella C, et al. Factors associated with poor health-related quality of life of patients with cirrhosis. Gastroenterology. 2001;120(1):170–8. pmid:11208726
  49. 49. Younossi Z, Park H, Henry L, Adeyemi A, Stepanova M. Extrahepatic manifestations of hepatitis C: a meta-analysis of prevalence, quality of life, and economic burden. Gastroenterology. 2016;150(7):1599–608. pmid:26924097
  50. 50. Vickers AJ, Altman DG. Statistics notes: analyzing controlled trials with baseline and follow up measurements. BMJ. 2001;323:1123–4. pmid:11701584
  51. 51. San Miguel R, Gimeno-Ballester V, Blazquez A, Mar J. Cost-effectiveness analysis of sofosbuvir-based regimens for chronic hepatitis C. Gut. 2015;64(8):1277–88. pmid:25311032
  52. 52. Stahmeyer JT, Rossol S, Liersch S, Guerra I, Krauth C. Cost-Effectiveness of Treating Hepatitis C with Sofosbuvir/Ledipasvir in Germany. PLoS One. 2017;12(1):e0169401. pmid:28046099
  53. 53. Gimeno-Ballester V, Mar J, O´Leary A, Adams R, San Miguel R. Cost-effectiveness analysis of therapeutic options for chronic hepatitis C genotype 3 infected patients. Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;11(1):85–93. pmid:27500437
  54. 54. Virabhak S, Yasui K, Yamazaki K, Johnson S, Mitchell D, Yuen C, et al. Cost-effectiveness of direct-acting antiviral regimen ombitasvir/paritaprevir/ritonavir in treatment-naïve and treatment-experienced patients infected with chronic hepatitis C virus genotype 1b in Japan. J Med Econ. 2016;19(12):1144–1156. pmid:27348464
  55. 55. Acero Fernandez D, Ferri Iglesias MJ, Buxo Pujolras M, Lopez Nunez C, Serra Matamala I, Queralt Moles X, et al. Changes in the epidemiology and distribution of the hepatitis C virus genotypes in North-Eastern Spain over the last 35 years. Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;41(1):2–11. pmid:29150360
  56. 56. Bonkovsky HL, Snow KK, Malet PF, Back-Madruga C, Fontana RJ, Sterling RK, et al. Health-related quality of life in patients with chronic hepatitis C and advanced fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2007;46(3):420–31. pmid:17196293
  57. 57. Rei A, Rocha M, Pedroto I. Health-Related Quality of Life in Portuguese patients with chronic hepatitis C. GE Port J Gastroenterol. 2017;24(2):68–78. pmid:28848786
  58. 58. Devlin NJ, Brooks R. EQ-5D and the EuroQol Group: Past, Present and Future. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2017;15(2):127–37. pmid:28194657
  59. 59. Janssen MF, Pickard AS, Golicki D, Gudex C, Niewada M, Scalone L, et al. Measurement properties of the EQ-5D-5L compared to the EQ-5D-3L across eight patient groups: a multi-country study. Qual Life Res. 2013;22(7):1717–27. pmid:23184421
  60. 60. Pickard AS, De Leon MC, Kohlmann T, Cella D, Rosenbloom S. Psychometric comparison of the standard EQ-5D to a 5 level version in cancer patients. Med Care. 2007;45(3):259–63. pmid:17304084
  61. 61. Janssen MF, Bonsel GJ, Luo N. Is EQ-5D-5L Better Than EQ-5D-3L? A head-to-head comparison of descriptive systems and value sets from seven countries. Pharmacoeconomics. 2018;36(6):675–97. pmid:29470821