Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Trophic structure and energy flow in a shallow-water hydrothermal vent: Insights from a stable isotope approach

  • Ni-Na Chang,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

  • Li-Hung Lin,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

  • Tzu-Hsuan Tu,

    Roles Investigation, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Geosciences, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC, Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

  • Ming-Shiou Jeng,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

  • Yoshito Chikaraishi,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Institute of Low Temperature Science, Hokkaido University, Kita-ku, Sapporo, Japan, Institute of Biogeosciences, Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology, Yokosuka, Japan

  • Pei-Ling Wang

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan, ROC

Trophic structure and energy flow in a shallow-water hydrothermal vent: Insights from a stable isotope approach

  • Ni-Na Chang, 
  • Li-Hung Lin, 
  • Tzu-Hsuan Tu, 
  • Ming-Shiou Jeng, 
  • Yoshito Chikaraishi, 
  • Pei-Ling Wang


Shallow-water hydrothermal vent ecosystems are distinct from the deep-sea counterparts, because they are in receipt of sustenance from both chemosynthetic and photosynthetic production and have a lack of symbiosis. The trophic linkage and energy flow in these ecosystems, however remain elusive, which allows us poor understanding of the whole spectrum of biological components distributed across such environmental gradients. In this study, a thorough isotopic survey was conducted on various biological specimens and suspended particulates collected along four transects across the venting features of a shallow-water hydrothermal field off Kueishan Island, Taiwan. The isotope data combined with a Bayesian-based mixing model indicate that the vent-associated particulate organic matter (vent POM), as primary contribution of chemoautotrophic populations, has a high δ13C value (−18.2 ± 1.1‰) and a low δ15N value (−1.7 ± 0.4‰). Zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans, as the fundamental consumers, exhibit δ13C and δ15N values ranging from −21.3 to −19.8‰ and +5.1 to +7.5‰, respectively, and can utilize the vent POM for 38–53% of their diets. The vent-obligate crab Xenograpsus testudinatus shows a large variation in δ13C (from −18.8 to −13.9‰) and δ15N values (from 1.1 to 9.8‰), although an omnivorous trophic level (2.5) is identified for it using δ15N values of amino acids, and it can utilize the vent POM for 6–87% of its diet. The consistently low (< 10.0‰) and overlapping δ15N values for most of the analyzed macroinvertebrates suggest extensive ingestion of chemosynthetic production complementing the photosynthetic production, a weak prey–predator relationship and low trophic complexity possibly imposed by the extreme environmental contexts of shallow-water hydrothermal ecosystems.


Studies of hydrothermal vent ecosystems distributed along mid-ocean ridges and back-arc spreading centers have greatly expanded our knowledge regarding the energy sources of marine communities. Unlike the vast majority of marine ecosystems sustained by photosynthetic primary production, benthic ecosystems associated with deep-sea hydrothermal vents are primarily driven by chemoautotrophic production that harvests metabolic energy from the oxidation of abundant reducing compounds (e.g., CH4, H2S, and NH4+) released from venting features [1,2]. The discharge of hot, reducing fluids into the cold, oxidized deep sea facilitates the generation of strong redox and temperature gradients, both of which favor the colonization of microbial communities possessing various physiological characteristics. These chemoautotrophic microbes efficiently sustain vent communities via bacteria–invertebrate symbioses or heterotrophic consumption, rendering deep-sea vent ecosystems analogous to oases in the desert [3]. Determining the energy flow would, therefore, provide an important basis to quantify the potential export of geothermal energy and chemical fluxes from vent ecosystems to the open ocean [4,5].

Distinct from their deep-sea counterparts, shallow-water hydrothermal vents occur in coastal euphotic zones. Therefore, photosynthesis could contribute to primary production at quantities comparable with or even exceeding chemosynthesis. Previous studies have demonstrated that 15–60% of the primary production in shallow-water hydrothermal fields could be accounted for by photosynthesis (Kraternaya Bight, [6]). Besides, shallow-water vent ecosystems are generally deprived of endosymbiont-containing and vent-obligate species commonly observed in deep-sea vents [2,4,7,8], and instead are composed of a reduced subset of the surrounding species [9,10]. The inherent differences in the functional nature of primary producers and species composition may potentially distinguish these two counterparts in various aspects, such as food utilization and trophic structures [6,11]. However, most of the studies of shallow-water vent ecosystems have not progressed much beyond the taxonomic description of species [12,13] and surveys of the community structure [1416]. The respective contributions of photosynthetic and chemoautotrophic primary production to benthic and even pelagic communities are poorly understood and a quantitative picture of energy transfer in such ecosystems is required.

The ecosystem near Kueishan Island (aka Kueishan Tao; KST) off northeastern Taiwan provides a model field for studying energy flow in shallow-water hydrothermal vents. It is unique and rare in that the vent-obligate crab, Xenograpsus testudinatus (Crustacea: Brachyura), dominates over other benthic community members [17]. In addition, non-obligate macroinvertebrates common in intertidal and coastal ecosystems constitute a significant fraction of the ecosystem [16]. The benthic fauna possesses various affinities for hydrothermal activities and drastic dietary preferences for different types of food products, thereby potentially forming an interwoven trophic structure. Nevertheless, how chemosynthetic and photosynthetic production is transferred between different compartments distributed at different horizontal and vertical scales is not well constrained.

This study aims to investigate a thorough spectrum of food source utilization, trophic structure, and energy flow in the KST ecosystem. Particulate organic matter (POM), fauna, and macroalgae were collected across the venting features and analyzed for their bulk carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions to quantitatively distinguish the respective contributions of chemosynthetic and photosynthetic production [18]. To better understand the energy utilization of the dominant species X. testudinatus, which is thought to occupy the highest trophic level in the KST hydrothermal ecosystem [19], the nitrogen isotopic compositions of amino acids were also analyzed to estimate the trophic position of these vent-obligate crabs without prior determination of the δ15N values of the primary producers. This isotopic survey identified potential food sources and consumers across both vertical and horizontal scales and established a general model of energy flow and benthic−pelagic coupling in shallow-water vent ecosystems.

Materials and methods

Study sites and field sampling

KST is located ca. 15 km off the northeastern coast of Taiwan and aligned with the southwestern extension of the Okinawa Trough. It is composed of andesitic rocks formed during the subduction of the Philippine Sea plate underneath the Eurasian continent and represents the most westward extension of volcanic activity within the Okinawa Trough [20] (Fig 1). The hydrothermal vent field with numerous venting features is located off the island to the east at a water depth of less than 30 m. The sites of venting features vary temporally, depending on whether the fracture channel is exposed at the seafloor. The emitted fluids are CO2-rich, extremely acidic (the lowest recorded pH in the world of 1.52 and 2.77 on average [20]) and hot (temperatures between 48°C and 116°C [17]). Helium isotope compositions (6 times the atmospheric ratio) indicate that these gases are magmatic in origin [21]. An extremely high density (> 360 ind/m2) of vent-obligate crabs, e.g., X. testudinatus, have been found to inhabit areas near the chimneys and rock crevices where gas bubbles emerge [17].

Fig 1. Sampling location of the Kueishan Island hydrothermal vent field.

Star symbol indicates the center of the sampled hydrothermal vent. Solid lines represent four sampling transects (NE, SW, NW, and SE).

No specific permission was required for the sampling as the location is not private-owned or protected under any regulation, and this study did not involve endangered or protected species. One of the vents (N24° 50.054', E121° 57.714'; water depth of ca. 10 m) with continuous discharge of whitish fluids and sulfur deposited at the venting peripheral was chosen as the center for our sampling campaign conducted in August and September of 2015. Sampling was conducted along four transects (100 m in length with the exception of the shoreward NW transect) extending from the vent center to the peripheral region (shallower than 25 m) in order to collect samples with sufficient biological diversity and to uncover the effects of venting on trophic structure. The horizontal intervals for sampling benthos and seawater were 10 m and 20–50 m, respectively. The vent-influenced area is usually milky blue in color and its range exhibits great spatiotemporal variation depending on the tides and currents.

Various samples, including suspended POM (presumably planktonic microorganisms and algae), zooplankton, benthic fauna, and macroalgae were retrieved from different compartments of the ecosystem to provide a full spectrum of biological diversity for trophic reconstruction. Seawater (4 to 8 L) was collected from the sea bottom by scuba divers and from the sea surface by towing a bucket at each sampling site. Venting fluids (ca. 4 L) were collected from the venting orifice using a titanium pipe connected with a Teflon pipe and a pre-vacuumed sterile bottle. An extra venting fluid sample was collected in a close but different vent in October 2016 to verify the composition of vent fluids. The collected fluids were filtered using pre-combusted (500°C, 8 h) glass fiber filters (pore size of 0.7 μm) to collect POM for isotopic analysis. Zooplankton was collected by obliquely towing a 200-μm mesh plankton net at the sea surface in both vent-influenced and non-vent locations. The sampled zooplankton were then separated into five size categories (> 2000, 1000–2000, 500–1000, 363–500, and 200–363 μm) for further isotopic analyses using stainless steel sieves. For small epibenthic crustaceans, a light trap equipped with a 5-L plastic bottle and a light source was deployed overnight on the seabed of both venting and non-vent areas. Benthic macrofauna, including the predominant vent crab (X. testudinatus) and sea anemones (Anthopleura sp.) species and other coexisting species including corals (Tubastraea sp.) and sea snails (Anachis misera and Ergalatax contractus), were collected along the transects by scuba divers. Red (Gelidiopsis sp.) and green (Cladophora catenata) macroalgae were plucked off the hard substrate. Species identification was mainly based on a previous survey [16].

Sample processing and isotopic measurements

Soft tissues were extracted from sea anemones and corals and muscle tissues were extracted from the crab’s chelae and the sea snail’s foot. All the tissue and POM samples were dried at 60°C for a minimum of 24 h and ground into powder for further analyses. A portion of the powders was subject to acid treatment (1 N HCl) to remove any carbonate minerals in the tissues or POM. The acid treatment did not yield appreciable changes in the δ15N composition (0.1–0.2‰; N = 5), therefore, the effect of acid treatment on the isotopic composition was considered negligible. To obtain sufficient sample amounts for isotopic analysis, several individuals of zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans, or muscle tissue from more than five individuals of sea snail A. misera at the same sites were pooled. However, the bottom POM from the NW transect was not sufficient for reliable nitrogen isotope determination and, therefore, is not reported.

Carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios were determined using an elemental analyzer (Thermo Flash EA) connected with a Thermo Finnigan MAT253 isotope ratio mass spectrometer at Institute of Oceanography, National Taiwan University. The analyzed results were reported in δ notation: (Eq 1) where X is 13C or 15N, R is 13C/12C or 15N/14N, and the standards for δ13C and δ15N are Vienna Pee Dee Belemnite and atmospheric N2 gas, respectively. The U.S. Geological Survey standard #40 (USGS40, L-glutamic acid with certified δ13C and δ15N values of −26.2 and −4.5‰, respectively), was used as the reference standard. The analytical error (1σ) derived from multiple analyses of the reference standards for both δ13C and δ15N is better than 0.2‰.

To precisely quantify the trophic position of the crab X. testudinatus, compound-specific nitrogen isotope analysis of amino acids was conducted for two individuals from the same site (SW0) with completely distinct δ13C (−13.9‰ versus −18.1‰) and δ15N values (+1.1‰ versus +9.0‰) to accurately estimate its trophic level (TL). The amino acid nitrogen isotope analysis was carried out at the Department of Biogeochemistry of the Japan Agency for Marine-Earth Science and Technology. The preparation of crab tissues for the amino acid isotope analysis mainly followed the procedures described by Chikaraishi et al. [22]. In brief, crab tissues were first hydrolyzed with 12 N HCl at 110°C for 24 h, followed by N-pivaloyl-isopropyl derivatization as suggested by Metges et al. [23]. The nitrogen isotope ratio of individual amino acids was determined by gas chromatography in line with a combustion oven and IRMS, and reported as the δ notation described previously. The analytical error (1σ) for the amino acid standards was better than 0.5‰.

Modeling of isotopic mixing

An isotopic mixing model based on the Bayesian framework was used to quantify the contributions of potential energy sources to vent consumers by applying the open source Stable Isotope Analysis in R (SIAR) package [18]. The SIAR model incorporates the isotopic variabilities in food source and consumer, trophic discrimination factors (TDFs), and elemental concentrations of sources. This model implements the Markov Chain Monte Carlo method to produce simulations of plausible values of the proportional contributions that are consistent with the observed data. A total of 500,000 iterations were run to produce a simulation of the probability distributions for the relative source contributions of individual food sources. Due to the large intra-species isotopic variation (e.g., in crabs), the estimation of dietary compositions was performed for each individual rather than the population. The TDFs of both carbon and nitrogen isotopes (△δ13C and △δ15N), which exhibit great variability among taxonomic classes and feeding guilds [24,25], play a critical role in the Bayesian mixing model [26]; thus, we applied guild-dependent feeding TDFs for the isotopic mixing modeling herein. Accordingly, the applied TDFs of δ13C and δ15N were −0.41 ± 1.14‰ and +2.52 ± 2.50‰ for herbivores, and +0.91 ± 1.04‰ and +3.23 ± 0.41‰ for carnivores, respectively [24]. Decisions about food source selection were also influential in the modeling results and a fundamental knowledge of the system is a prerequisite for implementing the mixing model and interpreting the output data [27]. Therefore, potential diet items for each consumer species selected for the mixing model computation were referred to the feeding habit revealed in our plot of δ13C and δ15N values and described in the literature, e.g., for E. contractus [28] and X. testudinatus [16,19]. For primary consumers inhabiting pelagic and epibenthic zones, the energy sources were mainly contributed by POM. Therefore, we calculated the proportional contributions of peripheral seawater POM and vent POM.

Estimation of the trophic level of X. testudinatus

While X. testudinatus was generally considered to occupy the top trophic rank in this ecosystem [19], two individuals with distinct, extreme bulk isotopic compositions were analyzed for the nitrogen isotope compositions of amino acids. The amino acid method has been used to estimate the trophic level of consumers without prior determination of the δ15N values of the primary producers [22,29]. By comparing the δ15N values of amino acids which exhibit a high degree of trophic enrichment (e.g., glutamic acid; aka trophic amino acids) with those showing little change in the δ15N values with trophic transfer (e.g., phenylalanine; aka source amino acids), the trophic level of one organism can be estimated based on the following equation [29]: (Eq 2) where x and y represent trophic and source amino acids, respectively, βx/y stands for the inherent isotopic difference between amino acids x and y in primary producers, and Δx and Δy indicate the 15N-enrichment factors for each trophic level for amino acids x and y, respectively. Among various amino acids, glutamic acid and phenylalanine have been widely accepted as the most useful pair to derive the precise estimation of trophic levels [29,30].


Species distribution

During our visual survey through scuba diving, the vent crab X. testudinatus constituted the majority of the faunal abundance, followed by the sea anemones Anthopleura sp. and sea snails A. misera. More than 150 and 130 individuals of X. testudinatus and Anthopleura sp. were collected, respectively. Both species were distributed along the survey transect from the vent center to peripheral sites (100 m from the vent). The abundance of vent crabs decreased beyond 50 m from the vent, whereas sea anemones became more dominant at the periphery. Coral colonies (Tubastraea sp.) were mainly distributed within 50 to 100 m from the vent center, except for one colony observed at a site 10 m from the vent center in the NW transect. The sea snails were generally present with patches of green macroalgae (C. catenata) with A. misera being more abundant than E. contractus. The coverage of green and red macroalgae (Gelidiopsis sp.) was generally observed beyond 30 m from the vent center.

Bulk carbon and nitrogen isotope compositions

The δ13C and δ15N values of POM associated with the vent fluid were −18.2 ± 1.1‰ and −1.7 ± 0.4‰, respectively, and appear to be the most 15N-depleted end-member having a heavier carbon isotope composition among all potential food sources (Table 1). The δ13C and δ15N values of POM filtered from peripheral seawater ranged from −24.6 to −21.9‰ and from +2.8 to +7.1‰, respectively (Table 1). The variations in the δ13C value for surface seawater POM decreased with distance from the vent center (Fig 2A). No obvious trend in the δ13C variation was observed for the bottom POM samples (Fig 2B). The δ15N values of both surface and bottom POM showed large variations (2 to 4.3‰) among sampling sites (Table 1; Fig 2C and 2D). While the δ15N variations for bottom POM decreased with the distance from the vent center, the δ15N variations for surface POM exhibited no systematic trend. The δ13C values of red macroalgae (Gelidiopsis sp.) ranged between −32.9 and −22.2‰ (the most 13C-depleted carbon source), whereas the δ15N values ranged between +1.7 and +4.0‰. The δ13C and δ15N values of green macroalgae (C. catenata) ranged from −22.8‰ to −17.3‰ and from +3.7‰ to +5.7‰, respectively. Both red and green macroalgae exhibited extremely large δ13C variations across sampling sites (Table 2), yet no obvious trend was observed among the transects.

Fig 2. Spatial variations in δ13C and δ15N values for POM from each transect.

(a, c) Isotopic compositions for surface water, (b, d) isotopic compositions for bottom water.

Table 1. Ranges (minimum and maximum) and mean values (± 1σ) of carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios for vent, surface, and bottom POM samples from all sampling transects.

Table 2. Taxonomic groups, trophic guilds, and mean (± 1σ) values of carbon and nitrogen isotope ratios for benthic flora and macrofauna.

The δ13C and δ15N values of zooplankton varied from −21.4 to −20.5‰ and from +4.2 to +7.6‰, respectively. Both the δ13C and δ15N values of zooplankton increased with size (Pearson’s r = 0.82 and 0.89, respectively, Table 3). The δ15N variations for small sized zooplankton (200–363 μm) were higher than those for large sized zooplankton from the same area. Zooplankton collected from venting areas possessed slightly but significantly higher mean δ13C values than those from non-venting areas (p < 0.01; Student’s t-test).

Table 3. Stable isotopic and dietary compositions of small epibenthic crustaceans and zooplankton from venting and non-venting areas.

The epibenthic crustaceans, which were mainly composed of amphipod, mysida, Euphausiacea, and unidentified species, had δ13C and δ15N values ranging from −20.0 to −19.8‰ and +5.6 to +6.5‰, respectively. Their δ13C values were slightly higher than those for zooplankton (Table 3). The mean δ13C values of zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans were higher than those for averaged seawater POM by 2.4 and 3.5‰, respectively. However, the difference in the mean δ15N value between these two primary consumers and seawater POM was only ca. 1‰ (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Plot of mean (± 1σ) δ13C versus δ15N values for major species.

Black diamond, grey circles, and white triangles represent primary producers, primary consumers, and higher order consumers, respectively. The * symbol indicates isotopic compositions of biofilm on X. testudinatus adopted from Wang et al. [19].

The tissue δ13C and δ15N values of benthic macroinvertebrates ranged from −21.4 to −13.9‰ and from +1.1 to +9.8‰, respectively (Table 2). The crab X. testudinatus, and sea snails A. misera and E. contractus identified as scavenger/detritivores shared similar mean δ13C and δ15N values of ca. −17 and +8‰, respectively. Detritivores revealed obviously large isotopic variations in terms of spatial scale. In particular, the variations in the δ13C and δ15N values of vent crabs even reached +4.9 and +8.7‰, respectively (S1 Table). Such a large variation arises from the fact that a small number of the vent crabs collected from the 0 to 10 m-sites were characterized by extremely high δ13C and low δ15N values that were distinct from the majority of the data (Fig 4). The two species of sea snail were similar in their isotopic characteristics and revealed relatively smaller conspecific isotopic variations than the vent crabs. Suspension feeders showed small isotopic variations across sampling sites. The δ13C and δ15N values of corals, Tubastraea sp., ranged from −21.1 to −19.9‰ and from +8.6 to +9.2‰, respectively. Sea anemones (Anthopleura sp.) exhibited slightly larger isotopic variations than corals with the δ13C and δ15N values varying from −20.7 to −18.7‰ and from +7.9 to +9.7‰, respectively. Corals and sea anemones, which are classified as carnivorous suspension feeders, exhibited comparable δ15N values yet obviously more depleted δ13C values (−19.9 to −20.3‰) than scavenger/detritivores. No clear spatial trend in the isotopic compositions was observed for most of the macroinvertebrate species, except for the vent crabs, whose isotopic compositions show a clear negative correlation (Fig 4).

Fig 4. Plots of δ13C versus δ15N values for crab (X. testudinatus), sea snails (A. misera and E. contractus), sea anemones (Anthopleura sp.), and coral (Tubastraea sp.) individuals.

Different grey levels indicate different distances from the vent center with black and white symbols representing samples from the vent center and 100 m, respectively.

Amino acid nitrogen isotopes and the trophic position of vent crabs

The averaged δ15N values of triplicate measurements of glutamic acid for two individuals were +8.9 ± 0.3‰ and +14.2 ± 0.3‰ (Table 4). The corresponding δ15N values of phenylalanine were −1.0 ± 0.4‰ and −5.9 ± 0.4‰. The calculated trophic positions were 2.5 for both of the analyzed individuals.

Table 4. Nitrogen isotope compositions of glutamic acid (Glu) and phenylalanine (Phe) based on triplicate analyses and the calculated trophic position (TP) for two vent crabs.

Dietary compositions of vent invertebrates from the mixing model

About half of the diet of epibenthic crustaceans was contributed by vent POM (52–53%) and seawater POM (47–48%) (Table 3). A total of 38–46% of the zooplankton’s diet was from vent POM. Different size zooplankton were not obviously different in their dietary composition (1σ = 0.02). Both epibenthic crustaceans and zooplankton showed little difference (less than 5%) in their dietary compositions between venting and non-venting areas. While zooplankton showed δ13C values distinct from those of crab (mean Δδ13C = 3.8‰, Fig 3), it contributed a proportion of 26 ± 9% to the crab’s diet on average (Fig 5). The epibenthic crustaceans, which had δ13C values more closely resembling those of the crabs than the zooplankton (Fig 3), constituted 50 ± 13% of the crab’s diet. Additionally, the extremely 13C-enriched and 15N-depleted values for some crabs (Fig 4) suggest the involvement of an additional pool with a distinct carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition. Of all the candidates, the vent POM characterized by the highest δ13C and lowest δ15N values appears to be the most plausible source. Overall, the computation yielded a contribution from vent POM to the crab’s total diet 6% to 87% (mean ± 1σ = 24 ± 20%) (S1 Table), with the largest dependence on vent POM for crabs collected from the 0–10 m sites (e.g., NE10 and SW0).

Fig 5. Mean diet compositions of vent crab (X. testudinatus) and sea anemones (Anthopleura sp.) from each sampling site (only one individual in each site of the NW transect).

EP crustaceans: epibenthic crustaceans.

Sea anemones exhibited δ13C values similar to epibenthic crustaceans (mean Δδ13C < 0.1‰) and zooplankton (mean Δδ13C = 1.1‰). Their computed dietary composition was highly consistent across all transects, with equal ingestion of zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans (ca. 50 ± 3%; Fig 5). The coral Tubastraea sp. showed an isotopic composition similar to sea anemones (Δδ13C = 0.4%; Δδ15N = 0.4%), and their diet compositions were not significantly different among coral colonies (54 ± 4% for zooplankton and 46 ± 4% for epibenthic crustaceans; Fig 6A). Both the sea snails A. misera and E. contractus, showed overlapping isotopic values with crabs. Their major food items were composed of green macroalgae (44 ± 6% for E. contractus and 32 ± 6% for A. misera), corpses of epibenthic crustaeans (35 ± 4% for E. contractus and 40 ± 3% for A. misera), and zooplankton (21 ± 2% for E. contractus and 27 ± 4% for A. misera) (Fig 6B and 6C). Both E. contractus and A. misera exhibited negligible spatial variation in dietary compositions.

Fig 6. Mean diet compositions of coral (Tubastraea sp.) and sea snails (A. misera and E. contractus) from each sampling site.

EP crustaceans: epibenthic crustaceans; G. macroalgae: green macroalgae.


Stable isotope characteristics of potential food sources

Our data revealed three major groups of isotopically distinct food sources in the KST vent field: vent POM, seawater POM, and green benthic macroalgae (Fig 3). The disparity in the isotopic compositions of these organic pools strongly reflected different metabolic pathways of energy production [31] and allowed us to evaluate their respective contributions to the food web. Although biofilms on the seafloor or biotic surfaces have been recognized as a common feature of hydrothermal vent ecosystems, they are usually composed of a range of constituents, such as diatoms, algae–bacteria, and bacteria, with various isotopic compositions [10]. The only isotopic data for biofilms in the KST vent field showed an extremely low δ15N value (−1.2‰) but a mid-ranged δ13C value (−21.4‰) [19], which suggested it had little contribution to benthic consumers (with high δ13C and δ15N values).

Among these food sources, the vent POM, which is primarily composed of chemoautotrophic microbial biomass [32,33], was particularly enriched in 13C and depleted in 15N (δ13C = −18.2 ± 1.1‰, δ15N = −1.7 ± 0.4‰). This distinct isotopic composition is rarely reported and is comparable with those speculated for free-living chemosynthetic bacteria in deep-sea hydrothermal vents [2,11,34,35]. The δ13C values of autotrophic organisms are strongly dependent on (1) isotopic fractionation during biosynthetic processes, and (2) the isotopic composition of inorganic carbon sources [31,36]. In the hydrothermal vent fields, the reductive tricarboxylic acid cycle (rTCA) used by chemoautotrophic bacteria, such as Epsilon-Proteobacteria, the thermophilic Aquificales order, and the archaeal Thermoproteaceae family, has been reported to be the predominant carbon fixation pathway [37,38]. The rTCA synthesizes acetyl-CoA from CO2 and tends to yield significantly less carbon isotopic fractionation (Δδ13Ccell ranged from −3.3 to −13.3‰) than the Calvin cycle (light-independent reaction of photosynthesis) and the reductive acetyl-CoA pathway [31,39], thus producing 13C-enriched organic carbon. In the bottom sediments of the KST vent area and crab tissues, 16S ribosomal RNA gene amplicon pyrosequencing demonstrated the predominance of Epsilon-Proteobacteria (Sulfurovum and Sulfurimonas) [4042], most of which have been proposed to use the rTCA cycle as the major carbon fixation pathway [38]. Apparently, the enrichment of 13C in vent POM could also be derived from dissolved inorganic carbon (DIC) with a higher δ13C value. However, the carbon isotopic compositions of CO2 gas released from venting fluids in the KST vent field, ranging from −8.2 to −5.5‰ [43], seems to preclude a source of 13C-enriched DIC for chemoautotrophs in the KST venting fluids. The distinct high δ13C value of vent POM obtained in this study has likely originated from the chemoautotrophic microbial populations using the rTCA cycle as the major biosynthetic pathway and exploiting vent DIC as the primary carbon source.

The vent POM is also extremely 15N-depleted. Bacterial mats in hydrothermal vent fields (sulfide oxidizing bacteria and other unidentified forms) have been widely and consistently characterized by low δ15N values (ca. −9.6 to +1.6‰) [2,19,44,45] compared to photosynthesis-based food sources (δ15N ≈ +4 to +8‰ [45,46]). Such a 15N-depleted isotope composition can likely be attributed to the pronounced bacterial NH4+ assimilation by autotrophic microorganisms [44], which can generate a nitrogen isotopic fractionation an order of magnitude larger than N2 fixation or NO3- assimilation (ca. 20‰ versus 0 to 5‰ [47,48]). In this way, the biomass formed through ammonium assimilation would be depleted in 15N. Overall, the interpretation of the origin of vent POM enriched in 13C and depleted in 15N is mutually coherent. We also note that only a few measurements might not adequately address the dynamic nature of hydrothermal environments. Thus, increasing efforts to repeatedly sample and analyze vent POM would facilitate the validation of temporal variations of chemosynthetic sources.

The isotopic compositions of seawater POM obtained in this study resembled those for marine planktonic phototrophs (δ13C values between −24.0 and −19.0‰ and δ15N values between +4.0 and +8.0‰ [46]). These isotopic values were also comparable with those for POM collected from adjacent areas (e.g., δ13C values between −23.0 and −19.9‰ and δ15N values between +3.7 and +4.3‰ for POM from the outer shelf of the East China Sea [49] and δ13C values between −24.8 and −21.1‰ and δ15N values between +3.0 and +4.5‰ for POM in sediment trap and sediments from the Okinawa Trough [50, 51]). The chemosynthetically-derived production characterized by the 13C-enriched and 15N-depleted isotopic signature was barely observed in the seawater POM, suggesting restricted influence of the vent fluid on the surrounding water mass. However, the high spatial variations in the δ13C value of POM at four 20-m sites (Fig 2A) suggest various degrees of mixing between seawater and buoyant vent fluid along different transects.

Both green and red macroalgae exhibited large variations in δ13C value (> 5.0‰). Their δ13C values still fell in an extremely large range reported for worldwide marine macroalgae (−3.0 to −35‰) [52,53]. Such a considerable isotopic variation was inferred to be attributed to the variable concentrations and forms of DIC used, in situ temperature, and taxonomy [53]. However, it is still difficult to thoroughly explain this variation [54].

Isotope characteristics and dietary compositions of vent consumers

Our isotopic evidence combined with the modeling results demonstrated a widespread contribution of vent POM to the food web. In particular, a large disparity of δ13C values between most benthic invertebrates and seawater POM was observed (Fig 3). For instance, the mean δ13C values of the sea anemones Anthopleura sp. and crab X. testudinatus were greater than seawater POM by 3.5 and 6.1‰, respectively. Even zooplankton, which is well acknowledged as the primary consumer, showed distinct δ13C values yet similar δ15N values compared to seawater POM. Such decoupled isotopic discrimination was unlikely to be solely attributed to the trophic enrichment. Instead, it strongly indicated a mixed diet of seawater POM and an end-member enriched in 13C and depleted in 15N, i.e., the vent POM for consumers in the ecosystem. We discuss the dietary compositions for the major macrofauna below.

Zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans.

Our data indicated that zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans acted as fundamental consumers mediating the transfer of both chemosynthetic and photosynthetic energy to the higher trophic levels. Epibenthic crustaceans, including mysids, amphipods, and krill, which have never been reported in other shallow-water vent ecosystems, had δ13C values closer to the vent POM than zooplankton had. This isotopic data combined with the mixing modeling indicated that vent POM constituted about half of the diet for epibenthic crustaceans, a magnitude greater than that for zooplankton (Table 3). The higher dietary consumption of vent POM for epibenthic crustaceans likely resulted from their greater access to the bacterial biomass associated with vent fluids.

In shallow-water vents, chemosynthesis takes place not only in the bottom water layer but also near the sea surface, and even spreads over the surface layer due to the warmth and buoyancy of hydrothermal fluids [6,10]. Although the extent of chemosynthesis in surface water is rarely quantified, our results indicating substantial contribution of vent POM to the zooplankton diet (38 to 46%) strongly suggests that even the pelagic consumers can feed on chemosynthetic production discharged to surface water. As an important component of shallow-water vents, zooplankton may accelerate the energy and material exchange between the pelagic and benthic subsystems via diel vertical migration (active transport) and passive sinking of detrital materials [10,55], thus enabling strong benthic−pelagic coupling in coastal shallow-water hydrothermal vents. Moreover, since zooplankton can be passively transported by currents and tides [56], lateral export of chemosynthetic energy from the venting area to the adjacent open ocean would be highly possible.

Benthic macrofauna.

Our study revealed distinct carbon isotope compositions among consumers affiliated with different feeding guilds. The disparity in δ13C values between suspension feeders and scavenger/detritivores reached ca. 3‰, yet the differences in the δ15N value were less than 1‰. Such discordance between different isotopes has also been observed for deep sea counterparts [2,19,57], reflecting the existence of multiple food sources with distinct isotopic characteristics and the diverse feeding selectivity of consumers in hydrothermal systems [2].

Carbon isotope compositions for carnivorous suspension feeders, Tubastraea sp. and Anthopleura sp., were close to those for zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans, whereas the difference in their nitrogen isotopic values approached 3‰. The isotopic pattern suggests a close prey–predator relationship between suspension feeders and these fundamental species. The mixing model further demonstrated almost equal dietary proportions from zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans across all the sampling sites for both corals and sea anemones (Figs 5 and 6A).

The vent crab X. testudinatus, which is categorized as an omnivorous generalist [18,19,58], exhibited large individual variations in both δ13C and δ15N values, resembling the pattern of Xenograpsus ngatama, which inhabits the shallow hydrothermal vents off the South Tonga Arc [35]. Based on gut content analysis and field observations, a previous study concluded that the major dietary source for vent crabs is sunken zooplankton toxified by large amounts of hydrogen sulfide released during a period of strong venting [18]. However, our isotopic data revealed that > 80% of crab individuals exhibited higher δ13C values than those of zooplankton by more than 3‰, a magnitude exceeding the conventional isotopic fractionation (ca. 1‰ [59]) associated with feeding solely on zooplankton (Fig 3 and S1 Table). Similarly, the differences in the δ15N values between 65% of crabs and zooplankton were less than 3.4‰ (conventionally representative of one trophic level [60]) (Fig 3 and S1 Table). Both carbon and nitrogen isotope compositions preclude zooplankton as the main dietary source of crabs. The highly variable or extreme isotopic compositions of crabs suggest their preference for incorporating a diet source with isotopic compositions that are enriched in 13C and depleted in 15N. Among all the investigated organisms or entities, vent POM appears to be the most plausible candidate to explain the isotopic variations of crab tissues (Figs 3 and 4).

Using vent POM as an end member, our modeling computation indicated that the vent POM could contribute 9−67% of crab’s diet on average for different sites (Fig 5). In particular, some crab individuals inhabiting areas near the vent even showed overwhelming use (up to 87%; SI Table) of chemosynthetically-derived organic carbon, suggesting the high palatability and availability of vent POM for vent-obligate species. In addition, this phenomenon verified the observation of access to vent primary production by species colonizing under harsher conditions [61]. A previous study demonstrated the predominance of the fatty acid MUFA (n-7) series in the crab’s midgut [58]. In addition, bacterial lipids speculatively derived from autotrophic sulfur-oxidizing bacteria have been proposed to be incorporated or utilized by a bivalve Solemya velum symbiosis in sulfide-rich sediments [62]. Aside from the ingestion of vent POM, the mixing model also indicated that epibenthic crustaceans play a vital role in the crab’s diet, coinciding with the existence of highly active chitinolytic enzymes in the crab’s midgut glands [58]. Our estimate of the crab’s trophic position based on amino acid nitrogen isotope compositions revealed a consistent TL of 2.5 for the vent crabs regardless of the large variations in δ15N values. This result further supports the observation of the crab’s mixed diet of fundamental consumers (TL = 2) and chemosynthetic primary production (TL = 1). Although the green macroalgae sampled from some sites also exhibited high δ13C values, a previous study revealed common yet very limited use of the green algae Ulvophyceae by X. testudinatus, based on its 18S ribosomal DNA libraries of stomach and gut content [63]. The fact that δ15N values for a portion of the crab individuals were even lower than those of the macroalgae verified the limited contribution of macroalgae to the crab’s diet.

The sea snails A. misera and E. contractus are common species distributed along the shallow coastal areas of Taiwan. In comparison with the vent crabs, A. misera and E. contractus had similar isotopic compositions (Table 2 and Fig 3). Unlike the vent crabs, sea snail individuals with highly 13C-enriched and 15N-depleted signatures were absent from all sites, and the isotopic variations were much smaller. Accordingly, the relatively enriched 13C signals of sea snails could be mostly attributed to the ingestion of the green macroalgae C. catenata. Our mixing modeling results demonstrated that green macroalgae, which acts as a palatable food and shelter for gastropods in a wide variety of aquatic habitats [64], contributed 28% to more than half of the sea snails’ diet. If the photosynthetic contributions in other diets (zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans) are also considered, sea snails acquire a total of 60–80% of their diet from photosynthetic production and less than 30% of their diet from chemosynthetic production (S1 Table).

Vent-associated species have been reported to possess distinctly lower δ15N values compared to non-vent species [1,2,4,34,65]. This δ15N signature could be indicative of a vent origin for dietary nitrogen and thus useful to identify vent-dependent fauna [1]. In comparison with other detritivorous decapods inhabiting the non-vent upper bathyal regions off KST (e.g., Hymenopenaeus equalis and Heterocarpus sibogae) [19], the δ15N values of the vent crabs X. testudinatus reached below ca. 2‰. Even the carnivorous sea anemones Anthopleura sp., which possessed the highest δ15N values among all species (mean δ15N = 9.2 ± 0.3‰), were characterized by δ15N values lower than its congeneric species, the algal symbiont-host Anthopleura xanthogrammica inhabiting Pacific intertidal areas [66]. The consistent depletion in 15N for consumers (< 10.0‰ for all individuals) in the KST vent system further supports the extensive consumption of chemosynthetic production as a complement to a photosynthesis-based diet in shallow-water hydrothermal vent ecosystems.

The stable isotope mixing model based on the Bayesian framework provided a quantitative insight into both chemosynthetic and photosynthetic contributions in a shallow-water hydrothermal food web. However, such a mixing model has been demonstrated to be sensitive to discrimination factors [26,27]. Variability in the discrimination factor may result in significantly different dietary proportions. In the present study, a set of TDFs that takes feeding guilds into account was introduced to the modeling. The approach reduces the possible bias in the estimate of diet composition. Besides, large differences between the isotope compositions of consumers and diets can further decrease the uncertainty introduced during the selection of specific TDFs [67]. With δ13C and δ15N values distinct from that of zooplankton, epibenthic crustaceans, and vent POM, the dietary compositions of the vent crabs should be reliable. Slightly greater uncertainty may arise in the diet determination for corals and sea anemones due to the relatively small difference in δ13C values between the consumers and food sources.

Since several vent crab individuals exhibited carbon isotope composition even heavier than that of the measured vent POM, a hypothetical vent POM with a δ13C value greater than that of the heaviest crab individual might be needed to account for the crab’s diet. With this potential diet source, the contribution of hypothetical vent POM to the diet of various consumers would decrease accordingly. To quantitatively constrain this source composition, we first consider a scenario where the trophic position of the crab with the heaviest carbon isotopic composition is 2.5 and the other food sources for this crab were a mixture of zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans. The simple mass balance generates δ13C and δ15N values of −8.0‰ and −9.9. for the hypothetical vent POM, respectively. Using these compositions, the SIAR simulation yielded that 15–22% of the diet for zooplankton and small epibenthic crustaceans, and 48% of the diet for the heaviest crab are derived from the hypothetical vent POM. Alternatively, if the peculiar crab with the greatest δ13C value relies completely on the hypothetical vent POM (trophic position is 2), the δ13C and δ15N values for the hypothetical vent POM would be −13.5‰ and −1.4‰, respectively. Using these compositions, the SIAR simulation yielded that 28–40% of the diet for zooplankton and small epibenthic crustaceans and 79% of the diet for the heaviest crab are derived from the hypothetical vent POM. Regardless of which scenario, the vent POM still contributes significantly to the diet of a fraction of crab individuals and other primary consumers. Apparently, an accurate estimation of the vent POM contribution relies on a fully evaluation of the isotopic composition of vent POM.

Trophic structure and energy flow

In deep-sea hydrothermal systems, the transfer of energy from plume-associated chemosynthetic production to higher trophic levels, particularly to the pelagic populations, was rarely observed due to the lack of sampling at a fine depth resolution [68] and biomarker evidence indicative of trophic or diet relationships [7]. With the isotopic approach described herein, this study clearly demonstrated various contributions of vent-derived chemosynthetic production to consumers inhabiting the KST hydrothermal field. In this system, species neither solely fed on photosynthetic production nor exclusively depended on chemosynthetic energy (except for a few crabs feeding on a high proportion of vent POM). All the sampled consumers exploited both chemosynthetic and photosynthetic carbon pools to varying degrees.

The prey–predator relationship among macrobenthic consumers was weak, as evidenced by the highly overlapping δ15N values (Table 2 and Fig 3). Such an isotopic pattern with a small range of δ15N values accompanied with a wide range of δ13C values for vent fauna indicates species partition of food resources between isotopically different carbon sources rather than prey–predator trophic relationships [61]. Previous studies widely recognized productivity as the most important factor affecting food web structure [69]. Particularly, food chain length (FCL) has been suggested to lengthen with increasing productivity [70,71]. Compared with the deep-sea hydrothermal vents, the shallow-water counterpart receives an extra input of photosynthetic production in addition to chemosynthetic production, thereby likely exhibiting a longer FCL. However, the KST hydrothermal ecosystem revealed an FCL (2–3 levels) shorter than or equal to those in deep-sea hydrothermal vents (e.g., 2–3 levels for the Mohns Ridge [44], 2.5–3.5 levels for the Marianas Trough and Hanging Gardens hydrothermal vents [34], and 4 levels for the Mid Atlantic Ridge [44]), suggesting that the productivity was likely not the determining factor. A previous study examined four vent assemblages from the Guaymas Basin and demonstrated that hydrothermal ecosystems subject to high fluid fluxes yielded strong environmental stress, facilitating the colonization of a few resistant taxa [72]. Under these circumstances, the dynamic and extreme environmental conditions offset and even overwhelm the beneficial effect of extra primary production to lengthen the FCL, instead leading to an overall reduction of food web complexity [44, 72]. Therefore, the weak prey–predator links observed for the shallow-water hydrothermal ecosystems could be attributed to the unique environmental context rather than productivity [61,73].


This study provides the first quantitative evaluation of chemosynthetic and photosynthetic contributions to the shallow-water hydrothermal vent food web via a thorough isotopic survey of potential food sources and vent-related species with knowledge-based numerical modeling of mixed diets. Our results indicated that the chemosynthetic and photosynthetic productions contributed nearly equally to the food web. Both zooplankton and epibenthic crustaceans acted as an important trophic mediator transferring basic food sources to the upper trophic levels. While vent-obligate crabs are omnivorous, acquiring energy from all available food sources, few of them exhibited the potential to proliferate exclusively on chemoautotrophic energy. Given that hydrothermal vents are characterized by highly temporal variations in habitat conditions [61] and isotopic compositions of local autotrophs [2,4], we recommend a longer-term observation of the isotopic variation of end members and consumers to provide more comprehensive insight into this distinctive trophic regime and the energy exported to adjacent ecosystems.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Carbon and nitrogen isotopic compositions and computed dietary compositions of biological samples at each sampling site.



This study was supported by grants from the Ministry of Science and Technology and the Ministry of Education, Taiwan (MOST 105-2116-M-002-018; MOST 106-2116-M-002-025; MOST 106-2119-M-002-029; NTU-107L901002). We are grateful to Dr. Yu-Shih Lin (Department of Oceanography, National Sun Yat-sen University), Mr. Yu-Hsing Liu and Mr. Hsin-Yu Lin (Biodiversity Research Center, Academia Sinica) for their collaborative effort in the field sampling and to the technical staff of Geochemistry & Geomicrobiology Lab. (National Taiwan University) for their help in the laboratory. We would also like to thank the editors for their effort and support during the review process and the reviewers for their constructive comments.


  1. 1. Fisher CR, Childress JJ, Macko SA, Brooks JM. Nutritional interactions in Galapagos Rift hydrothermal vent communities: inferences from stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analyses. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1994; 103: 45–55.
  2. 2. Van Dover CL, Fry B. Microorganisms as food resources at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Limnol Oceanogr. 1994; 39: 51–57.
  3. 3. Fisher CR, Takai K, Le Bris N. Hydrothermal vent ecosystems. Oceanography. 2007; 20: 14–23.
  4. 4. Bergquist DC, Eckner JT, Urcuyo IA, Cordes EE, Hourdez S, Macko SA, et al. Using stable isotopes and quantitative community characteristics to determine a local hydrothermal vent food web. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007; 330: 49–65.
  5. 5. Govenar B. Energy transfer through food webs at hydrothermal vents: Linking the lithosphere to the biosphere. Oceanography 2012; 246–255.
  6. 6. Tarasov VG, Gebruk AV, Shulkin VM, Kamenev GM, Fadeev VI, Kosmynin VN, Malakhov VV, Starynin DA, Obzhirov AI. Effect of shallow-water hydrothermal venting on the biota of Matupi Harbor (Rabaul Caldera, New Britain Island Papaua-New Guinea). Cont Shelf Res. 1999; 19: 79–116.
  7. 7. Van Dover CL. The ecology of deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000.
  8. 8. Govenar B, Le Bris N, Gollner S, Glanville J, Aperghis AB, Hourdez S, et al. Epifaunal community structure associated with Riftia pachyptila in chemically different hydrothermal vent habitats. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2005; 305: 67–77.
  9. 9. Sarrazin J, Juniper SK. Biological characteristics of a hydrothermal edifice mosaic community. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1999; 185: 1–19.
  10. 10. Tarasov VG, Gebruk AV, Mironov AN, Moskalev LI. Deep-sea and shallow-water hydrothermal vent communities: Two different phenomena? Chem Geo. 2005; 224: 5–39.
  11. 11. Van Dover CL. Trophic relationships among invertebrates at Kairei hydrothermal vent field (Central Indian Ridge). Mar Biol. 2002; 141: 761–772.
  12. 12. Takeda M, Takeuchi H, Suganuma H. Occurrence of Xenograpsus novaeinsularis Takeda et Kubata (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura) in the Tokara and Iwo Islands. Nat Environ Sci Res, Kawasaki. 1993: 59–64.
  13. 13. Ng NK, Huang JF, Ho PH. Description of a New Species of Hydrothermal Crab Xenograspus testudinatus (Crustacea: Decapoda: Brachyura: Grapsidae) from Taiwan. Natl Taiwan Mus Spec Publ. 2000; No. 10: 191–199.
  14. 14. Dando PR, Hughes JA, Thiermann F. Preliminary observations on biological communities at shallow hydrothermal vents in the Aegean Sea. In: Parson LM, Walker CL, Dixon DR(eds.) Hydrothermal Vents and Processes. Geological Society Special Publication, London. 1995; 87: pp. 303–317.
  15. 15. Thiermann F, Akoumianaki I, Hughes JA, Giere O. Benthic fauna of a shallow-water gaseohydrothermal vent area in the Aegean Sea (Milos, Greece). Mar Biol. 1997; 128: 149–159.
  16. 16. Chan BKK, Wang TW, Chen PC, Lin CW, Chan TY, Tsang LM. Community structure of macrobiota and environmental parameters in shallow water hydrothermal vents off Kueishan Island, Taiwan. PLoS ONE 2016; 11: e0148675. pmid:26849440
  17. 17. Jeng MS, Ng NK, Ng PKL. Feeding behaviour: Hydrothermal vent crabs feast on sea ‘snow’. Nature 2004; 432: 969. pmid:15616550
  18. 18. Parnell AC, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL. Source Partitioning Using Stable Isotopes: Coping with Too Much Variation. PLoS ONE 2010; 5: e9672. pmid:20300637
  19. 19. Wang TW, Chan TY, Chan BKK. Trophic relationships of hydrothermal vent and non‑vent communities in the upper sublittoral and upper bathyal zones off Kueishan Island, Taiwan: a combined morphological, gut content analysis and stable isotope approach. Mar Biol. 2014; 161: 2447–2463.
  20. 20. Chen CTA, Wang B, Huang TF, Lou J, Kuo F, Tu Y, Tsai H. Investigation into extremely acidic hydrothermal fluids off Kueishan Tao, Taiwan, China. Acta Oceanol Sin. 2005; 24: 125–133.
  21. 21. Yang TF, Lan TF, Lee HF, Fu CC, Chuang PC, Lo CH, et al. Gas compositions and helium isotopic ratios of fluid samples around Kueishantao, NE offshore Taiwan and its tectonic implications. Geochem J. 2005: 469–480.
  22. 22. Chikaraishi Y, Kashiyama Y, Ogawa NO, Kitazato H, Ohkouchi N. Metabolic control of nitrogen isotope composition of amino acids in macroalgae and gastropods: implications for aquatic food web studies. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2007; 342: 85–90.
  23. 23. Metges CC, Petzke KJ, Henning U. Gas chromatography/combustion/isotope ration mass spectrometric composition of N-acetyl and N-pivaloyl amino acid esters to measure 15N isotopic abundances in physiological samples: a pilot study on amino acid synthesis in the upper gastrointestinal tract of minipigs. J Mass Spectrom. 1996; 31: 367–376. pmid:8799283
  24. 24. Zanden M, Rasmussen JB. Variation in δ15N and δ13C trophic fractionation: Implications for aquatic food web studies. Limnol Oceanogr. 2001; 46: 2061–2066.
  25. 25. Caut S, Angulo E, Courchamp F. Variation in discrimination factors (△15N and △13C): the effect of diet isotopic values and applications for diet reconstruction. J Appl Ecol. 2009; 46: 443–453.
  26. 26. Bond AL, Diamond AW. Recent Bayesian stable-isotope mixing models are highly sensitive to variation in discrimination factors. Ecol Appl. 2011; 21: 1017–1023. pmid:21774408
  27. 27. Phillips DL, Inger R, Bearhop S, Jackson AL, Moore JW, Parnell AC, et al. Best practices for use of stable isotope mixing models in food-web studies. Can J Zool. 2014; 92: 823–835.
  28. 28. Morton B. Scavenging behaviour by Ergalatax contractus (Gastropoda: Muricidae) and interactions with Nassarius nodifer (Gastropoda: Nassariidae) in the Cape d’Aguilar Marine Reserve, Hong Kon. J Mar Biol Ass U.K. 2006; 86: 141–152.
  29. 29. Chikaraishi Y, Ogawa NO, Kashiyama Y, Takano Y, Suga H, Tomitani A, et al. Determination of aquatic food-web structure based on compound-specific nitrogen isotopic composition of amino acids. Limol Oceanogr Methods. 2009; 7: 740–750.
  30. 30. Choy CA, Davison PC, Drazen JC, Flynn A, Gier EJ, Hoffman JC, et al. Global trophic position comparison of two dominant mesopelagic fish families (Myctophidae, Stomiidae) using amino acid nitrogen isotopic analyses. PLoS One 2012; 7: e50133. pmid:23209656
  31. 31. House CH, Schopf JW, Stetter KO. Carbon isotopic fractionation by Archaeans and thermophilic prokaryotes. Org Geochem. 2003; 34: 345–356.
  32. 32. Winn CD, Karl DM, Massoth GJ. Microorganisms in deep-sea hydrothermal plumes. Nature 1986; 320: 774–776.
  33. 33. Karl DM, Wirsen CO, Jannasch HW. Deep-Sea Primary Production at the Galapagos Hydrothermal Vents. Science 1980; 207: 1345–1347.
  34. 34. Van Dover CL, Fry B. Stable isotopic compositions of hydrothermal vent organisms. Mar Biol. 1989; 102: 257–263.
  35. 35. Comeault A, Stevens CJ, Juniper SK. Mixed photosynthetic-chemosynthetic diets in vent obligate macroinvertebrates at shallow hydrothermal vents on Volcano 1, South Tonga Arc- evidence from stable isotope and fatty acid analyses. Cah Bio Mar. 2010; 51: 351–359.
  36. 36. Raven JA, Johnston AM, Newman JR, Scrim-Geour CM. Inorganic carbon acquisition by aquatic photo-lithotrophs of the Dighty Bum, Angus, U.K.: uses and limitations of natural abundance measurements of carbon isotopes. New Phytol. 1994; 127: 271–286.
  37. 37. Campbell BJ and Cary SC. Abundance of reverse tricarboxylic acid cycle genes in free-living microorganisms at deep-sea hydrothermal vents. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004; 70: 6282–6289. pmid:15466576
  38. 38. Hügler M, Sievert SM. Beyond the Calvin Cycle: autotrophic carbon fixation in the Ocean. Annu Rev Mar Sci. 2011; 3: 261–89.
  39. 39. Preuß A, Schauder R, Fuchs G, Stichler W. Carbon isotope fractionation by autotrophic bacteria with three different CO2 fixation pathways. Z. Naturforsch. 1989; 44c: 397–402.
  40. 40. Yang SH, Chiang PW, Hsu TC, Kao SJ, Tang SL. Bacterial community associated with organs of shallow hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus near Kuishan Island, Taiwan. PLoS One 2016; 11: e0150597. pmid:26934591
  41. 41. Wang L, Cheung MK, Kwan HS, Hwang JS, Wong CK. Microbial diversity in shallow‐water hydrothermal sediments of Kueishan Island, Taiwan as revealed by pyrosequencing. J Basic Microbiol. 2015; 55:1308–1318. pmid:26132902
  42. 42. Wang L, Cheung MK, Liu R, Wong CK, Kwan HS, Hwang JS. Diversity of Total Bacterial Communities and Chemoautotrophic Populations in Sulfur-Rich Sediments of Shallow-Water Hydrothermal Vents off Kueishan Island, Taiwan. Microb Ecol. 2017; 73: 571–582. pmid:27909749
  43. 43. Chen XG, Zhang HY, Li X, Chen CT, Yang TF, Ye Y. The chemical and isotopic compositions of gas discharge from shallow-water hydrothermal vents at Kueishantao, offshore northeast Taiwan. Geochem J. 2016; 50: 341–355.
  44. 44. Colaço A, Dehairs F, Desbruyères D. Nutritional relations of deep-sea hydrothermal fields at the Mid-Atlantic Ridge: a stable isotope approach. Deep Sea Res. Part I. 2002; 49: 395–412.
  45. 45. Sweetman AK, Levin LA, Rapp HT, Schander C. Faunal trophic structure at hydrothermal vents on the southern Mohn’s Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2013; 473: 115–131.
  46. 46. Fry B. Stable isotope ecology. New York: Springer; 2006.
  47. 47. Hoch MP, Fogel ML, Kirchman DL. Isotope fractionation associated with ammonium uptake by a marine bacterium. Limnol Oceanogr. 1992; 37: 1447–1459.
  48. 48. Sigman DM, Karsh KL, Casciotti KL. Ocean process tracers: nitrogen isotopes in the ocean. Encyclopedia of Ocean Science. 2nd edn. Elsevier; 2009.
  49. 49. Chang NN, Shiao JC, Gong GC, Kao SJ, Hsieh C-h. Stable isotope ratios reveal food source of benthic fish and crustaceans along a gradient of trophic status in the East China Sea. Cont Shelf Res. 2014; 84: 23–34.
  50. 50. Minagawa M, Kadota Y. Biogeochemistry of carbon and nitrogen in the East China Sea studied by natural 13C and 15N analyses of particulate matter and sediments. Proceedings of the 1994 Sapporo IGBP Symposium, 14–17 November 1994, Hokkaido University, Japan1994; pp. 199–206.
  51. 51. Kao SJ, Lin FJ, Liu KK. Organic carbon and nitrogen contents and their isotopic compositions in surficial sediments from the East China Sea shelf and the southern Okinawa Trough. Deep Sea Res. Part II. 2003; 50: 1203–1217.
  52. 52. France RL. Carbon-13 enrichment in benthic compared to planktonic algae: foodweb implications. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1995; 124: 307–312.
  53. 53. Raven JA, Johnston AM, Kübler JE, Korb R, McInroy SG, Handley LL, et al. Mechanistic interpretation of carbon isotope discrimination by marine macroalgae and seagrasses. Funct Plant Biol. 2002; 29: 355–378.
  54. 54. Carvalho MC, Hayashizaki K-I, Ogawa H. Short-term measurement of carbon stable isotope discrimination in photosynthesis and respiration by aquatic macrophytes, with marine macroalgal examples. J Phycol. 2009; 45: 761–770. pmid:27034051
  55. 55. Griffiths JR, Kadin M, Nascimento FJ, Tamelander T, Törnroos A, Bonaglia S, et al. The importance of benthic–pelagic coupling for marine ecosystem functioning in a changing world. Glob Chang Biol. 2017; 23: 2179–2196. pmid:28132408
  56. 56. Wiafe G, Frid CLJ. Short-term temporal variation in coastal zooplankton communities: the relative importance of physical and biological mechanisms. J Plankton Res. 1996; 1485–1501.
  57. 57. Bennett SA, Dover CV, Breier JA, Coleman M. Effect of depth and vent fluid composition on the carbon sources at two neighboring deep-sea hydrothermal vent fields (Mid-Cayman Rise). Deep-Sea ResⅠ. 2015; 104: 122–133.
  58. 58. Hu MYA, Hagen W, Jeng MS, Saborowski E. Metabolic energy demand and food utilization of the hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus (Crustacea: Brachyura). Aquat Biol. 2012; 15: 11–25.
  59. 59. Deniro MJ, Epstein S. Influence of diet on the distribution of carbon isotopes in animals. Geochim Cosmochim Ac. 1978; 42: 495–506.
  60. 60. Minagawa M, Wada E. Stepwise enrichment of 15N along food chains: further evidence and the relation between δ15N and animal age. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 1984; 48: 1135–1140.
  61. 61. Levesque C, Juniper SK, Limen H. Spatial organization of food webs along habit gradients at deep-sea hydrothermal vents on Axial Volcano, NE Pacific. Deep Sea Res. Part I. 2006; 53: 726–739.
  62. 62. Conway N, Capuzzo JM. Incorporation and utilization of bacterial lipids in the Solemya velum symbiosis. Mar Biol. 1991; 108: 277–292.
  63. 63. Ho TW, Hwang JS, Cheung MK, Kwan HS, Wong CK. Dietary analysis on the shallow-water hydrothermal vent crab Xenograpsus testudinatus using Illumina sequencing. Mar Biol. 2015; 162:1787–1798.
  64. 64. Dodds WK, Gudder DA. The ecology of Cladophora. J Phycol. 1992; 28: 415–427.
  65. 65. Vereshchaka AL, Vinogradov GM, Lein AY, Dalton S, Dehairs F. Carbon and nitrogen isotopic composition of the fauna from the Broken Spur hydrothermal vent field. Mar Biol. 2000; 136: 11–17.
  66. 66. Levine MR, Muller-Parker G. Distribution patterns and nutritional contributions of algal symbionts in the sea anemone Anthopleura xanthogrammica. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 2012; 453: 79–94.
  67. 67. Martinez del Rio C, Wolf N, Carleton SA, Gannes LZ. Isotopic ecology ten years after a call for more laboratory experiments. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2009; 84: 91–111. pmid:19046398
  68. 68. Phillips BT. Beyond the vent: New perspectives on hydrothermal plumes and pelagic biology. Deep Sea Res. Part Ⅱ. 2017; 137: 480–485.
  69. 69. Pimm SL, Lawton JH. Number of trophic levels in ecological communities. Nature 1977; 268: 329–331.
  70. 70. Persson L. Diehl S, Johansson L, Andersson G, Hamrin SF. Trophic interactions in temperate lake ecosystems: a test of food chain theory. Am Nat. 1992; 140: 59–84.
  71. 71. Kaunzinger CMK, Morin PJ. Productivity controls food-chain properties in microbial communities. Nature 1998; 395: 495–497.
  72. 72. Portail M, Olu K, Dubois SF, Escobar-Briones E, Gelinas Y, Menot L, Sarrazin J. Food-web complexity in Guaymas Basin hydrothermal vents and cold seeps. PloS one. 2016;11: e0162263. pmid:27683216
  73. 73. Sarrazin J, Juniper SK, Massoth G, Legendre P. Physical and chemical factors influencing species distributions on hydrothermal sulfide edifices of the Juan de Fuca Ridge, northeast Pacific. Mar Ecol Prog Ser. 1999; 190: 89–112.