Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Dose response association of objective physical activity with mental health in a representative national sample of adults: A cross-sectional study

  • Paquito Bernard ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Center, University Institute of Mental Health at Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

  • Isabelle Doré,

    Roles Conceptualization, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada, University of Toronto, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

  • Ahmed-Jérôme Romain,

    Roles Formal analysis, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Research Center, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal (CRCHUM), Montréal, Québec, Canada

  • Gabriel Hains-Monfette,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Center, University Institute of Mental Health at Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

  • Celia Kingsbury,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Physical Activity Sciences, Université du Québec à Montréal, Montréal, Québec, Canada, Research Center, University Institute of Mental Health at Montreal, Montréal, Québec, Canada

  • Catherine Sabiston

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation University of Toronto, Faculty of Kinesiology and Physical Education, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Dose response association of objective physical activity with mental health in a representative national sample of adults: A cross-sectional study

  • Paquito Bernard, 
  • Isabelle Doré, 
  • Ahmed-Jérôme Romain, 
  • Gabriel Hains-Monfette, 
  • Celia Kingsbury, 
  • Catherine Sabiston


Although higher physical activity (PA) levels are associated with better mental health, previous findings about the shape of the dose–response relationship between PA and mental health are inconsistent. Furthermore, this association may differ according to sedentary levels. We investigated the cross-sectional dose-response associations between objectively measured PA and mental health in a representative national sample of adults. We also examined whether sedentary time modified the PA—mental health associations. Based on 2007–2013 Canadian Health Measures Survey data, PA and sedentary time were measured using accelerometry among 8150 participants, aged 20 to 79 years. Generalized additive models with a smooth function were fitted to examine associations between minutes per day of moderate and vigorous PA (MVPA), light PA (LPA), daily steps (combined or not with sedentary time) and self-rated mental health. A significant curvilinear relationship between average daily minutes of MVPA and mental health was observed, with increasing benefits up to 50 minutes/day. For LPA, a more complex shape (monotonic and curvilinear) was found. For daily steps, inverted U-shaped curve suggested increasing benefits until a plateau between 5 000 and 16 000 steps. The MVPA-LPA combination was significantly associated with mental health but with a complex pattern (p < 0.0005E-06). The tested PA-sedentary time combinations showed that increasing sedentary time decreased the positive PA-mental health associations. Non-linear dose-response patterns between the PA modalities and self-reported mental health were observed. Optimal doses of daily minutes of MVPA, LPA, MVPA combined with LPA and daily steps are independently associated with better mental health in adults. The results also suggest that PA-mental health associations could be hampered by daily sedentary time.


The past decade has seen the rapid development of public mental health action plans by the World Health Organization [13]. Mental health has been included as one of the Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations [4]. Broadly defined, mental health is ‘‘a state of well-being in which every individual realises his/her potential, can cope with the normal stresses of life, can work productively and fruitfully, and is able to make a contribution to her or his community” [1]. A generally well-supported principle is that there is no health without mental health [57]. Hence, identifying factors that strengthen mental health and reduce the risk of mental illness and symptoms is a public health priority [8].

Physical activity (PA) is a health behavior consistently associated with mental health in adults [9,10]. Specifically, regular PA significantly decreases the risk of developing depression [11], and mental disorders in healthy adults [12] or adults with chronic disease [13] and decreases symptoms in individuals with psychiatric disorders [14]. The protective effects of PA has been demonstrated in cross-sectional [15] and longitudinal [16,17] study designs. In two different population-based representative samples, light [18] and moderate to vigorous [19], PA assessed objectively was associated with lower psychological distress. These findings demonstrate that PA is associated with both reduced symptoms and incidence of mental illness and improved positive mental health.

To inform public health interventions, the dose of PA providing mental health benefits needs to be identified. However, the dose–response relationships between PA and self-reported mental health, and the shape of this association remain unclear and debated [20]. Understanding this dose-response question would help to identify the minimum or maximum of PA that provides mental health benefits. In Stephen’s investigation [21], a quasi-linear dose–response relationship between recreational/household PA and well-being, positive affect and depression was revealed in nationally representative US and Canadian cohorts. A recent investigation suggested that an inverted U-shaped curve reflects the association between PA and mental health, with the best benefit from 2.5 to 7.5 hours of weekly PA [22]. Abu et al [23] demonstrated a linear and positive association between self-reported total PA volume (Metabolic Equivalent of Task/hour per week) and mental health using the Mental Health Inventory in European cohorts. In older adults, a S-shaped dose-response was found, suggesting that participants declaring more than 150 minutes of weekly PA had better self-reported mental health [24]. Hamer et al [25] suggested a linear inverse dose-response pattern between number of PA sessions per week and risk of psychological distress in a large cohort of women. Finally, a positive linear dose–response relationship between leisure PA and emotional well-being was reported in US adult cohort [26].

Inconsistencies in findings about the shape of the dose–response relationship between PA and mental health may be partly due to PA assessment [27]. One major limitation is the systematic use of self-reported PA measures (30). In fact, PA can vary by 20%-60% between objectively and self-reported PA measures [28]. Consequently, due to an over estimation of PA and especially for Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity (MVPA) [29], inaccurate PA doses could be recommended.

Also, the daily pattern of PA in adult populations includes large-bout(s) of Light Physical Activity (LPA) with short-bout(s) of MVPA [30,31]. As such, the different intensities of PA should be explored. When examining the dose response using objectively-assessed PA, Vallance et al [19] reported a linear inverse dose-response between quartiles of daily MVPA minutes and self-reported depressive symptoms. No linear association has been found between daily time spent in LPA and low psychological distress level (17). However, previous studies fail to examine the association between this MVPA-LPA combination and mental health. Furthermore, step counts can be used as an assessment of general PA and there is some evidence to suggest an inverse linear association between daily steps and self-reported depression level among older adults [32]. Finally, objective assessments of PA enable the assessment of sedentary time, whereby higher sedentary duration has been associated with poorer mental health in adults [16,3335]. The time spent in sedentary behaviors has also been identified as a potential moderator of PA-mental health association [34,36]. Hence, dose-response associations between PA and self-rated mental health may differ according to sedentary time levels.

Given the importance of understanding the cross-sectional dose-response relationships to inform PA guidelines, the study aims were to examine in adults:

  1. the shape of the associations between PA volume across intensity levels, daily steps and mental health
  2. whether combinations between PA and sedentary time are associated with mental health,
  3. whether sedentary time modifies the PA—mental health associations.

Materials and methods

Participants and study background

Data were drawn from the Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS) cycle 1 to 3 (2007–2013) conducted by Statistics Canada. The CHMS is a national survey representative of approximately 96% of the Canadian population, aged 6 to 79 years, living in private households at the time of the survey [37]. Data were collected in two stages. First, sociodemographic and general health information were collected during an interview at the participants' home. Then, weight and height measurements were collected during a subsequent visit to a mobile clinic. Residents of Indian Reserves, Crown lands, institutions and certain remote regions, and full-time members of the Canadian Forces were excluded [37]. This survey was approved by the Health Canada’s Research Ethics Board [38]. All respondents provided written informed consent. The present study included participants aged 18 to 79 years with complete data for mental health and physical activity. Pregnant women and participants with functional limitation were not included in analyses. More details about method and measures have been previously published [3739].

Measures of physical activity and sedentary time

Upon completion of a mobile examination centre visit, participants were asked to wear an Actical accelerometer (Phillips-Respironics, 17 grams, omnidirectional accelerometer) over their right hip on an elasticized belt during their waking hours for 7 consecutive days. The accelerometers started to collect data the day after the mobile examination centre appointment. The monitors were then posted to Statistics Canada. The data were validated by research assistants to determine if they were still within the manufacturer’s calibration specifications. The Actical measures and records time-stamped acceleration in all directions, thereby indicating the intensity of physical activity. The digitized values are summed over an interval of one minute. Accelerometer data were in a count value per minute (cpm) and also into steps accumulated per minute [40]. The Actical is a valid and reliable instrument to measure PA in adults [40]. All data are blind to respondents while they are wearing the device.

Consistent with common analytical procedures for accelerometry, a valid day was defined as 10 or more hours of wear time and respondents with 4 or more valid days were retained for analyses [39]. Accelerometer data were not included in the analyses if a participant had extreme counts (i.e., >20 000 cpm) [41]. The number of minutes per day spent in PA of different intensity levels was categorized using standard cpm for adults: moderate and vigorous (⩾ 1535 cpm), light (100 to 1534 cpm) and sedentary behavior (<100 cpm) [42]. The following variables were separately used in analyses: average minutes per day of MVPA and LPA, average steps per day, and average minutes per day of sedentary behavior.

Mental health

Self-reported mental health was measured using the following item: “In general, would you say your mental health is: Excellent (coded as “5”), Very Good, Good, Fair, Poor (coded as “1”)?”, which is a widely used item in national population health surveys in eleven countries, including Canada [43]. A previous study using data from the Canadian Community Health Survey suggested that high self-reported meatl health score was significantly associated with a lower health service utilisation and risk of mental health disorder [44]. Concurrent validity has been supported with various mental health indicators, including positive mental health scales (e.g., Well-being index) and depression (e.g., Geriatric Depression Scale) [45].


Sociodemographic covariates included age, sex, daily smoking (yes/no), household income (ranged from ≤15 000 to 100 000$) and education levels (ranged from ≤high school to university). Accelerometer wear time (daily minutes) and season of accelerometer assessment were also computed and included in analyses. Body mass index was computed by measuring an individual’s weight and height.

Statistical analysis

Generalized additive models (GAMs) were used to examine the shape of the association between mental health, PA and sedentary time. The GAM is an extension of the generalized linear model in that one or more predictors may be specified using a smooth function [46]. GAM is a nonparametric model that allows nonlinear relationships to be modeled with flexibility without specifying the nonlinear functional form. The GAM is estimated using a penalized maximum likelihood procedure—usually iteratively reweighted least squares. Predictions from GAM were plotted with 95% confidence intervals. GAMs can accommodate the combination of two predictors, in a way that is conceptually comparable to interactions in generalized linear models. The joint smooth function was specified for the following combinations: MVPA-LPA, MVPA-sedentary, LPA-sedentary and steps-sedentary. The results are presented in terms of 3-dimensional plots characterizing the associations between mental health and tested combinations. Covariates for all regression analyses included age, sex, education, season, income, body mass index and current smoking status. These covariables are commonly related to PA and sedentary behaviors in adults [4749]. The wear time (i.e., 24 hours minus nonweartime [> 60 minutes with 0 counts]) can also influence PA and sedentary variables [50], consequently they were included in models. To account for the complex, multistage probability sampling design, the weights provided by the CHMS were used in the analyses (i.e., activity monitor subsample weights combining cycle 1, 2 and 3). All analyses were performed using survey [51] and mgcv [46] packages in R version 3.3.


Sample characteristics

Accelerometer data from the three cycles were available from 8150 participants (rounded to the nearest 10 as per Statistics Canada confidentiality requirements) and were included in the current study, representing about 24 942 139 Canadian residents. The mean of self-reported mental health was 4.0 (Standard error [SE] = 0.1, Median [Mdn] = 3.9). The mean age was 44 years (SE = 0.4) and 50.3% were women. On average, participants spent 21.3 (SE = 0.4, Mdn = 15.4), 214.3 (SE = 1.5, Mdn = 204.6) and 508 (SE = 3.3, Mdn = 561.3) minutes per day of MVPA, LPA and sedentary time, respectively. Data from twelve outliers were excluded because of extreme accelerometer data. Table 1 shows weighted characteristics of participants included in the analyses. More descriptive results about PA are available in Supplementary file (S1 Table).

Shape of associations between mental health and physical activity

Fig 1 presents GAM results from adjusted models of mental health as a function of each daily MVPA, LPA duration, and number of steps. The lines show the smoothed function from GAM for PA variables, and the shaded area indicates the 95% confidence interval. Each model is adjusted for age, sex, education, wear time, season, income, and current smoking status. The three PA variables were significantly associated with self-rated mental health. A visual examination of the plots indicated nonlinear associations between all three PA modalities and self-reported mental heath. A significant curvilinear relationship between average daily minutes of MVPA and mental health (p < 0.0001, Adjusted R2 = 0.05) with upper limit (≈ 50 minutes) was found (Fig 1A). Higher MVPA dose (> 50 minutes) was associated with lower mental health level. For LPA, a significant association with self-reported mental health (p < 0.001, Adjusted R2 = 0.05) was observed with a more complex shape. The Fig 1B indicated a general monotonic form from 0 to 400 minutes of daily LPA, and above 400 minutes, there was a curvilinear form observed. A visual examination of the plot indicated that there was a better mental health for participants engaged in around 400 to 550 average minutes of daily LPA.

Fig 1. Associations between self-reported mental health and moderate-vigorous physical activity, light physical activity and daily steps.

Notes. MVPA = Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity, LPA = Light Physical Activity. Each model is weighted and adjusted for age, sex, education, wear time, season, income, body mass index, and current smoking status.

The significant association between daily steps and mental health (p < 0.0001, adjusted R2 = 0.06) was plotted as an inverted U-shaped curve suggesting an increase of benefits until a plateau between 5 000 and 16 000 steps (p < 0.0001, adjusted R2 = 0.06) (see Fig 1C). Highest mental health levels were observed between 5 000 and 16 000 average daily steps. MVPA-LPA combination was also significantly related with mental health (p < 0.0001, adjusted R2 = 0.06). Specifically, the associations between combinations of PA modalities with self-reported mental health are presented in Fig 2. Fig 2 shows a complex relationship between MVPA and LPA in association with mental health. Indeed, lower doses of LPA combined with higher doses MVPA, or inversely, were associated with better mental health (i.e., assessed as positive for participants). The combinations of high MVPA-low LPA doses, and low MVPA-high LPA doses, were associated with better mental health. However, LPA daily dose ranging from 200 to 350 minutes was associated with a low mental health level, regardless of MVPA dose. The extreme MVPA-LPA combined doses were associated with more moderate level of mental health scores.

Fig 2. Graphic representation of associations between self-reported mental health and MVPA-LPA combination.

Notes: Higher height of the surface indicates better level of a mental health. Fig 2 p = 0.0005E-05, Adjusted R2 = 0.06. MVPA = Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity, LPA = Light Physical Activity. The model is weighted and adjusted for age, sex, education, wear time, season, income, body mass index, and current smoking status.

Shape of associations between mental health and physical activity-sedentary time combination

The three PA modalities (i.e., MVPA, LPA, steps) combined with sedentary time were significantly associated with mental health. Fig 3A, 3B and 3C allow us to see how non-linear associations observed in Fig 1 were modified by average daily sedentary time. The plots show each individual PA variable on the x-axis, sedentary time on the y-axis and mental health on the vertical z-axis. Higher height of the surface indicates better level of a mental health (i.e., assessed as (very) good, or excellent). Regarding MVPA (Fig 3A), when sedentary time increased, a higher MVPA dose was necessary to obtain similar mental health level. Moreover, when sedentary time increased, benefits associated with MVPA on mental health persisted but indicate various magnitudes of mental health level. However, MVPA was associated with better mental health at any dose for lower time spent in sedentary behaviors.

Fig 3. Graphic representations of associations between self-reported mental health and tested combinations of physical activity modalities.

Notes: Higher height of the surface indicates better level of a mental health. (A) p = 0.0009E-03, Adjusted R2 = 0.06. (B) p = 0.0002E-01, Adjusted R2 = 0.06. (C) p = 0.0002E-08, Adjusted R2 = 0.06. MVPA = Moderate and Vigorous Physical Activity, LPA = Light Physical Activity.Each model is weighted and adjusted for age, sex, education, wear time, season, income, body mass index, and current smoking status.

For the LPA-sedentary combination (Fig 3B), when sedentary time decreased, LPA was related to higher self-reported mental health. For lower sedentary time, low dose of LPA was associated with high level of mental health. Regarding the number of daily steps-sedentary time combination, the inverted U-shaped association between daily steps and mental health level remained but became somewhat more pronounced while sedentary time increased (see Fig 3C). Four different perspectives of each graph in Fig 3 are available in Supplementary file (S1S4 Figs). The estimated regression coefficients for all models are reported in Supplementary file (S2 Table).


Main findings and comparison with previous literature

The present study demonstrated a non-linear dose-response pattern between the PA modalities (i.e., MVPA, LPA, MVPA-LPA combination and steps) and self-reported mental health. This study expanded on previous research by using objective PA measure to assess dose-response association with mental health. CHMS’s participants had similar sociodemographic characteristics and time spent in daily PA and sedentary activities compared to adults from US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) [19]. Increasing mental health levels were observed from the first MVPA minute until 50 minutes. The identified MVPA shape is consistent with findings obtained with self-reported PA data in a previous population study [52]. However, this finding differs from Vallance investigation’s [19] using objective data in NHANES.

Our findings related to LPA suggested that mental health levels were significantly higher after 400 minutes (≈6h30). The shape between LPA and mental health is consistent with evidence of no linear association between objectively assessed LPA and psychological distress [18]. Surprisingly, a zero association is noted for lower LPA duration. This finding may be explained, at least in part, since the LPA is both leisure and occupational activity and there is some proposition that the health benefits from leisure LPA can be hampered by occupational LPA [53]. Future research efforts are needed to better understand the health outcomes associated with different forms of LPA.

Benefits for mental health increased between 1 and 5 000 steps, with a plateau until 16 000 steps. Our findings differ from Ewald’s [32] that found a lower depression score with increased steps per day but with an inflection point at 8 000 steps. However, this investigation included urban-dwelling adults.

Findings combining PA variables and sedentary time suggest that, when the two behaviors coexist, more MPVA time in sedentary context is required to maintain a high mental health level. This complex significant association supports previous evidence showing that the associations between MVPA and psychological distress [35] or well-being differ according to sitting time [16,34]. A ‘hollow’ V-shaped curved was noticeable in Fig 2B. This rapid decrease of mental health could be artificial or confounded by job type [34]. This ‘hollow’ is equivalent to ≈450 minutes (approximately 7.5 hours); i.e., a workday for an office worker. The occupational type is a major determinant of objective sedentary time [54,55].

A visual examination of Fig 2C, suggests that LPA—mental health association is mainly related to sedentary time. The monotonic and curvilinear shape of LPA–mental health association was different in the context of lower sedentary behavior. Indeed, the highest level of positive mental health was related to the lowest dose of sedentary time and LPA. In other words, an inverse association between LPA and mental health could be found in the context of very low time spent in sedentary activities. This result is inconsistent with previous investigations showing that the sedentary and psychological distress association was apparent for longer time spent in sedentary activities [18,56].

Interpretation of main findings

These findings have important implications for public health, by highlighting that other PA modalities other than MVPA are important for psychological benefits. For instance, walking or self-paced running are well-accepted activities in general population [57] and clinical populations (18) and their effects on mental health were apparent as early as 5 000 steps per day. Consequently, finding from the present study provide support for PA as a mental health promotion tool that is valuable at light, moderate, vigorous intensities (combined or not). It is also important to advocate for immediate possible benefits from first steps of walking/running rather than specific dose to achieve because inactive adults are more likely to engage in lower duration of PA [5861].

LPA and MVPA were differentially associated with self-reported mental health. This finding supports indirect evidence that the complex PA-mental health association could not only be driven by physiological processes. Indeed, social, psychological and genetics factors have been identified as potential mediators [62], and parallel processes could be involved depending on PA modalities.

The results also suggest that the association between the LPA-MVPA combination and mental health could be hampered by daily sedentary time. The LPA-mental health association was the most variable in sedentary context. Thus, the “move more and sit less” public health strategy [61,63], arguing in favor of interventions targeting PA and sedentary behaviors could be also favorable for mental health. In research perspective, the PA sedentary time interactions with mental health outcomes should be more systematically investigated.

Strengths and limitations

This is the first time that data from representative national sample of adults has been used to explore the dose-response relationship between self-reported mental health and objectively measured PA. Thus, our findings are generalizable to the general Canadian population from early adulthood to older adults. It is also the first investigation to examine the contribution of sedentary time on PA-mental health association. Additionally, this study used a non-linear statistical modelling approach, which allowed the data to fully inform the shape of the PA-mental health associations. The major limitation of this study is the cross-sectional design that precludes inferences about cause-effect relationships. Indeed, PA could lead to better mental health, higher mental health level could induce one to engage in PA, or mental health and PA could also be to some third variable (e.g., social status). Furthermore, the explained variance in all adjusted models was low (<10%). Although, mental health was measured with a valid item [64], a comprehensive assessment of mental health including various dimensions of well-being might influence the dose-response relationships observed in this study. Although accelerometers have the benefit of measuring intensity of PA, no information were available on the PA domains or contexts; hence, we are unable to determine whether the association with these PA modalities varies according to social context or underlying motivation for PA [65,66]. It is important because PA domains has been shown to influence the magnitude of PA volume and mental health association [67]. Finally, daily PA means were used as the main independent variables because participants wore an accelerometer between 4 and 7 days. Consequently, the identified PA dose may be different because we could not control for the weekly PA accumulation. In other words, it may be inappropriate to design recommendations by multiplying daily PA doses.


These empirical findings make a unique contribution in the literature by providing a new understanding of PA-sedentary time interplay with mental health, using objective measures and population-level data. From a public mental health perspective, four messages can be drawn from this study: every daily MVPA minutes until 50 minutes are positively associated with mental health; every daily steps are positively associated with mental health and more than 5 000 are suggested for increased benefits; when LPA is combined with MVPA, greater benefits for mental health might be achieved and the “move more and sit less” strategy might also applied to mental health. Future prospective general population studies using objective measures of PA and sedentary time should investigate the protective effect of different PA doses on mental health.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Associations between self-reported mental health and MVPA-LPA combination.


S2 Fig. Associations between self-reported mental health and MVPA-Sedentary combination.


S3 Fig. Associations between self-reported mental health and LPA-Sedentary combination.


S4 Fig. Associations between self-reported mental health and Steps-Sedentary combination.


S1 Table. Descriptive data about physical activity and sedentary.


S2 Table. Weighted estimated regression coefficients for physical activity and mental health associations for each model.



The authors would like to thank the participants of the Canadian Health Measures Survey as well as all staff at Statistics Canada involved in the operations of the survey.


  1. 1. World Health Organization. The world health report. Mental health: new understanding, new hope. Geneva; 2001.
  2. 2. World Health Organization. mhGAP: mental health gap action programme: scaling up care for mental, neurological and substance use disorders. Geneva; 2008. pmid:26290926
  3. 3. World Health Organization. Investing in mental health: evidence for action. Geneva; 2013.
  4. 4. United Nations. Transforming our world: the 2030 agenda for sustainable development. New York; 2015.
  5. 5. World Health Organization. Mental health action plan 2013–2020. Geneva; 2013.
  6. 6. Smith A, Jones J, Houghton L, Duffell T. A political spectator sport or policy priority? A review of sport, physical activity and public mental health policy. Int J Sport Policy Polit. 2016;8: 593–607.
  7. 7. Prince M, Patel V, Saxena S, Maj M, Maselko J, Phillips MR, et al. No health without mental health. The Lancet. 2007;370: 859–877.
  8. 8. World Health Organization. Social determinants of mental health. Geneva; 2014.
  9. 9. Ekkekakis P, Cook DB, editors. Routledge handbook of physical activity and mental health. London; New York: Routledge; 2013.
  10. 10. Faulkner GEJ, Taylor AH, editors. Exercise, health and mental health: emerging relationships. London; New York: Routledge; 2005.
  11. 11. Mammen G, Faulkner G. Physical Activity and the Prevention of Depression. Am J Prev Med. 2013;45: 649–657. pmid:24139780
  12. 12. Bernard P, Ninot G, Bernard PL, Picot MC, Jaussent A, Tallon G, et al. Effects of a six-month walking intervention on depression in inactive post-menopausal women: a randomized controlled trial. Aging Ment Health. 2015;19: 485–492. pmid:25133492
  13. 13. Pedersen BK, Saltin B. Exercise as medicine—evidence for prescribing exercise as therapy in 26 different chronic diseases. Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2015;25 Suppl 3: 1–72. pmid:26606383
  14. 14. Rosenbaum S, Tiedemann A, Sherrington C, Curtis J, Ward PB. Physical Activity Interventions for People With Mental Illness: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Clin Psychiatry. 2014;75: 964–974. pmid:24813261
  15. 15. Marques A, Peralta M, Martins J, Catunda R, Matos MG de, Saboga Nunes L. Associations between physical activity and self-rated wellbeing in European adults: A population-based, cross-sectional study. Prev Med. 2016;91: 18–23. pmid:27471019
  16. 16. Ku P-W, Fox KR, Chen L-J. Leisure-Time Physical Activity, Sedentary Behaviors and Subjective Well-Being in Older Adults: An Eight-Year Longitudinal Research. Soc Indic Res. 2016;127: 1349–1361.
  17. 17. Pinto Pereira SM, Geoffroy M-C, Power C. Depressive Symptoms and Physical Activity During 3 Decades in Adult Life: Bidirectional Associations in a Prospective Cohort Study. JAMA Psychiatry. 2014;71: 1373. pmid:25321867
  18. 18. Hamer M, Coombs N, Stamatakis E. Associations between objectively assessed and self-reported sedentary time with mental health in adults: an analysis of data from the Health Survey for England. BMJ Open. 2014;4. pmid:24650807
  19. 19. Vallance JK, Winkler EAH, Gardiner PA, Healy GN, Lynch BM, Owen N. Associations of objectively-assessed physical activity and sedentary time with depression: NHANES (2005–2006). Prev Med. 2011;53: 284–288. pmid:21820466
  20. 20. Whitelaw S. The emergence of a ‘dose–response’ analogy in the health improvement domain of public health: a critical review. Crit Public Health. 2012;22: 427–440.
  21. 21. Stephens T. Physical activity and mental health in the United States and Canada: Evidence from four population surveys. Prev Med. 1988;17: 35–47. pmid:3258986
  22. 22. Kim YS, Park YS, Allegrante JP, Marks R, Ok H, Ok Cho K, et al. Relationship between physical activity and general mental health. Prev Med. 2012;55: 458–463. pmid:22981733
  23. 23. Abu-Omar K, Rütten A, Lehtinen V. Mental health and physical activity in the European Union. Soz Praventivmed. 2004;49: 301–309. pmid:15497649
  24. 24. Mummery K, Schofield G, Caperchione C. Physical activity dose-response effects on mental health status in older adults. Aust N Z J Public Health. 2004;28: 188–192. pmid:15233360
  25. 25. Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Steptoe A. Dose-response relationship between physical activity and mental health: the Scottish Health Survey. Br J Sports Med. 2009;43: 1111–1114. pmid:18403415
  26. 26. Galper DI, Trivedi MH, Barlow CE, Dunn AL, Kampert JB. Inverse association between physical inactivity and mental health in men and women. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2006;38: 173–178. pmid:16394971
  27. 27. Knowles G. Physical activity and mental health: commentary on Suetani et al. 2016: common mental disorders and recent physical activity status: findings from a National Community Survey. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol. 2017; pmid:28600651
  28. 28. Prince SA, Adamo KB, Hamel ME, Hardt J, Gorber SC, Tremblay M. A comparison of direct versus self-report measures for assessing physical activity in adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2008;5: 56. pmid:18990237
  29. 29. James P, Weissman J, Wolf J, Mumford K, Contant CK, Hwang W-T, et al. Comparing GPS, Log, Survey, and Accelerometry to Measure Physical Activity. Am J Health Behav. 2016;40: 123–131. pmid:26685821
  30. 30. Amagasa S, Fukushima N, Kikuchi H, Takamiya T, Oka K, Inoue S. Light and sporadic physical activity overlooked by current guidelines makes older women more active than older men. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2017;14: 59. pmid:28464833
  31. 31. Ranasinghe CD, Ranasinghe P, Jayawardena R, Misra A. Physical activity patterns among South-Asian adults: a systematic review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2013;10: 116. pmid:24119682
  32. 32. Ewald B, Attia J, McElduff P. How Many Steps Are Enough? Dose–Response Curves for Pedometer Steps and Multiple Health Markers in a Community-Based Sample of Older Australians. J Phys Act Health. 2014;11: 509–518. pmid:23493175
  33. 33. Hamer M, Stamatakis E, Mishra GD. Television- and screen-based activity and mental well-being in adults. Am J Prev Med. 2010;38: 375–380. pmid:20307805
  34. 34. Puig-Ribera A, Martínez-Lemos I, Giné-Garriga M, González-Suárez ÁM, Bort-Roig J, Fortuño J, et al. Self-reported sitting time and physical activity: interactive associations with mental well-being and productivity in office employees. BMC Public Health. 2015;15: 72. pmid:25886270
  35. 35. Asztalos M, Cardon G, De Bourdeaudhuij I, De Cocker K. Cross-Sectional Associations Between Sitting Time and Several Aspects of Mental Health in Belgian Adults. J Phys Act Health. 2015;12: 1112–1118. pmid:25329499
  36. 36. Nam JY, Kim J, Cho KH, Choi J, Shin J, Park E-C. The impact of sitting time and physical activity on major depressive disorder in South Korean adults: a cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry. 2017;17: 274. pmid:28754158
  37. 37. Tremblay MS, Connor GS. Canadian health measures survey: Brief overview. Can J Public Health. 2007;98: 453–56. pmid:19039881
  38. 38. Day B, Langlois R, Tremblay M, Knoppers B-M. Canadian Health Measures Survey: ethical, legal and social issues. Health Rep. 2007;18 Suppl: 37–51.
  39. 39. Colley RC, Garriguet D, Janssen I, Craig CL, Clarke J, Tremblay MS. Physical activity of Canadian adults: accelerometer results from the 2007 to 2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Health Rep. 2011;22: 7–14.
  40. 40. Esliger DW, Probert A, Connor Gorber S, Bryan S, Laviolette M, Tremblay MS. Validity of the Actical accelerometer step-count function. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2007;39: 1200–1204. pmid:17596790
  41. 41. Troiano RP, Berrigan D, Dodd KW, Mâsse LC, Tilert T, McDowell M. Physical activity in the United States measured by accelerometer. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2008;40: 181–188. pmid:18091006
  42. 42. Colley RC, Tremblay MS. Moderate and vigorous physical activity intensity cut-points for the Actical accelerometer. J Sports Sci. 2011;29: 783–789. pmid:21424979
  43. 43. Ahmad F, Jhajj AK, Stewart DE, Burghardt M, Bierman AS. Single item measures of self-rated mental health: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14. pmid:25231576
  44. 44. Bergeron E, Poirier L-R, Fournier L, Roberge P, Barrette G. Determinants of service use among young Canadians with mental disorders. Can J Psychiatry Rev Can Psychiatr. 2005;50: 629–636. pmid:16276854
  45. 45. Levinson D, Kaplan G. What does self rated mental health represent. J Public Health Res. 2014;3. pmid:25553310
  46. 46. Wood SN. Generalized additive models: an introduction with R. Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC; 2006.
  47. 47. Kirk MA, Rhodes RE. Occupation Correlates of Adults’ Participation in Leisure-Time Physical Activity. Am J Prev Med. 2011;40: 476–485. pmid:21406284
  48. 48. on behalf of the DEDIPAC consortium, O’Donoghue G, Perchoux C, Mensah K, Lakerveld J, van der Ploeg H, et al. A systematic review of correlates of sedentary behaviour in adults aged 18–65 years: a socio-ecological approach. BMC Public Health. 2016;16. pmid:26887323
  49. 49. Bauman AE, Reis RS, Sallis JF, Wells JC, Loos RJ, Martin BW. Correlates of physical activity: why are some people physically active and others not? The Lancet. 2012;380: 258–271.
  50. 50. Katapally TR, Muhajarine N. Towards uniform accelerometry analysis: a standardization methodology to minimize measurement bias due to systematic accelerometer wear-time variation. J Sports Sci Med. 2014;13: 379–386. pmid:24790493
  51. 51. Lumley T. Complex surveys: a guide to analysis using R. Hoboken, N.J: John Wiley; 2010.
  52. 52. Kim YS, Park YS, Allegrante JP, Marks R, Ok H, Ok Cho K, et al. Relationship between physical activity and general mental health. Prev Med. 2012;55: 458–463. pmid:22981733
  53. 53. Holtermann A, Hansen JV, Burr H, Søgaard K, Sjøgaard G. The health paradox of occupational and leisure-time physical activity. Br J Sports Med. 2012;46: 291–295. pmid:21459873
  54. 54. Kwak L, Berrigan D, Van Domelen D, Sjöström M, Hagströmer M. Examining differences in physical activity levels by employment status and/or job activity level: Gender-specific comparisons between the United States and Sweden. J Sci Med Sport. 2016;19: 482–487. pmid:26095371
  55. 55. Steeves JA, Tudor-Locke C, Murphy RA, King GA, Fitzhugh EC, Harris TB. Classification of occupational activity categories using accelerometry: NHANES 2003–2004. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12: 89. pmid:26122724
  56. 56. Gibson A-M, Muggeridge DJ, Hughes AR, Kelly L, Kirk A. An examination of objectively-measured sedentary behavior and mental well-being in adults across week days and weekends. PLOS ONE. 2017;12: e0185143. pmid:28934319
  57. 57. Gimour H. Physically active Canadians. 2007. Report No.: Statistics Canada Catalogue no. 82–003. pmid:17892251
  58. 58. Hupin D, Roche F, Edouard P. Physical Activity and Successful Aging: Even a Little Is Good. JAMA Intern Med. 2015;175: 1862–1863. pmid:26524741
  59. 59. Eijsvogels TMH, Thompson PD. Exercise Is Medicine: At Any Dose? JAMA. 2015;314: 1915–1916. pmid:26547459
  60. 60. Stubbs B, Firth J, Berry A, Schuch FB, Rosenbaum S, Gaughran F, et al. How much physical activity do people with schizophrenia engage in? A systematic review, comparative meta-analysis and meta-regression. Schizophr Res. 2016;176: 431–440. pmid:27261419
  61. 61. Warburton DER, Bredin SSD. Reflections on Physical Activity and Health: What Should We Recommend? Can J Cardiol. 2016;32: 495–504. pmid:26995692
  62. 62. Bernard , Ninot G, Moullec G, Guillaume S, Courtet P, Quantin X. Smoking cessation, depression, and exercise: empirical evidence, clinical needs, and mechanisms. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15: 1635–1650. pmid:23535556
  63. 63. Chevance G, Foucaut AM, Bernard P. [State of knowledge on sedentary behaviors]. Presse Médicale Paris Fr 1983. 2016;45: 313–318. pmid:26857080
  64. 64. Ahmad F, Jhajj AK, Stewart DE, Burghardt M, Bierman AS. Single item measures of self-rated mental health: a scoping review. BMC Health Serv Res. 2014;14. pmid:25231576
  65. 65. White RL, Babic MJ, Parker PD, Lubans DR, Astell-Burt T, Lonsdale C. Domain-Specific Physical Activity and Mental Health: A Meta-analysis. Am J Prev Med. 2017;52: 653–666. pmid:28153647
  66. 66. Mason P, Curl A, Kearns A. Domains and levels of physical activity are linked to adult mental health and wellbeing in deprived neighbourhoods: A cross-sectional study. Ment Health Phys Act. 2016;11: 19–28.
  67. 67. Cerin E, Leslie E, Sugiyama T, Owen N. Associations of multiple physical activity domains with mental well-being. Ment Health Phys Act. 2009;2: 55–64.