Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Evaluating the impact of a community-based parent training programme for children with cerebral palsy in Ghana

  • Maria Zuurmond,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • David O’Banion,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation School of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, United States of America

  • Melissa Gladstone,

    Roles Methodology, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom

  • Sandra Carsamar,

    Roles Investigation, Project administration

    Affiliation Physiotherapy Department, Korle Bu Teaching Hospital, Accra, Ghana

  • Marko Kerac,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Marjolein Baltussen,

    Roles Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation CBM West Africa Regional Office, Accra, Ghana

  • Cally J. Tann,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom

  • Gifty Gyamah Nyante,

    Roles Methodology, Project administration

    Affiliation Department of Applied Health, University of Ghana, Accra, Ghana

  • Sarah Polack

    Roles Formal analysis, Software, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation International Centre for Evidence in Disability, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom



In low and middle-income settings, where access to support and rehabilitation services for children with disabilities are often lacking, the evidence base for community initiatives is limited. This study aimed to explore the impact of a community-based training programme for caregivers of children with cerebral palsy in Ghana.


A pre and post evaluation of an 11-month participatory training programme (“Getting to Know Cerebral Palsy”) offered through a parent group model, was conducted. Eight community groups, consisting of a total of 75 caregivers and their children with cerebral palsy (aged 18 months-12 years), were enrolled from 8 districts across Ghana. Caregivers were interviewed at baseline, and again at 2 months after the completion of the programme, to assess: quality of life (PedsQL Family Impact Module); knowledge about their child’s condition; child health indicators; feeding practices. Severity of cerebral palsy, reported illness, and anthropometric measurements were also assessed.


Of the child-caregiver pairs, 64 (84%) were included in final analysis. There were significant improvements in caregiver quality of life score (QoL) (median total QoL 12.5 at baseline to 51.4 at endline, P<0.001). Caregivers reported significant improvements in knowledge and confidence in caring for their child (p<0.001), in some aspects of child feeding practices (p<0.001) and in their child’s physical and emotional heath (p< 0.001). Actual frequency of reported serious illness over 12-months remained high (67%) among children, however, a small reduction in recent illness episodes (past 2 weeks) was seen (64% to 50% p < 0.05). Malnutrition was common at both time points; 63% and 65% of children were classified as underweight at baseline and endline respectively (p = 0.5).


Children with cerebral palsy have complex care and support needs which in low and middle-income settings need to be met by their family. This study demonstrates that a participatory training, delivered through the establishment of a local support group, with an emphasis on caregiver empowerment, resulted in improved caregiver QoL. Despite less effect on effect on child health and no clear effect on nutritional status, this alone is an important outcome. Whilst further development of these programmes would be helpful, and is underway, there is clear need for wider scale-up of an intervention which provides support to families.


There are an estimated 150 million children globally living with a disability [1]. The vast majority (80%) of these children live in resource poor settings, where the rehabilitative services available are extremely limited [2]. Cerebral palsy, is the most common cause of physical impairment in children [3]: the prevalence is estimated to be 2–3.5 cases per 1000 live births [4] but is likely to be higher in low and middle-income countries (LMIC) [5]. Children with cerebral palsy often have multiple co-morbidities—including visual, hearing, and intellectual impairment, and epilepsy—requiring a multi-disciplinary approach to care and support over their lifetime [4]. They are more likely to experience poor health [2, 6] and have diverse rehabilitation needs, yet they often face a range of barriers in accessing health and education services [7, 8]. This contravenes the rights of children with disabilities to health care, education and social participation enshrined in the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities [9]. Further, the Sustainable Development Goals emphasise the importance of ‘leaving no one behind’ [10] and the Global Strategy for Women Children and Adolescent’s health [11] demands a more transformative agenda, moving beyond just survival, for maternal child and adolescent health.

Evidence shows that caregivers of children with disabilities in low resource settings are more likely to experience stress, social isolation, emotional and physical impacts [1215]. The scarcity or complete absence of rehabilitation services in LMICs can result in families providing the bulk of care for their child, often with little or no access to training and support. Specifically in the Ghana context, medical rehabilitation services have been described as being minimal [3, 16], with only an estimated 150 registered physiotherapists for a population of 28.2 million, and the first cohort of nationally trained occupational therapists only graduating in 2017 [17]. While there have been calls for community and home-based programmes to improve care and support, emphasising the central role of families [18], these are currently lacking, and there is a dearth of studies evaluating their impact on children and their caregivers [1921].

In response to this recognised need for home and community-based interventions, the International Centre for Evidence in Disability (ICED) developed a participatory caregiver training package for children with cerebral palsy ‘Getting to know cerebral palsy’ (GTKCP) [22], adapted from a training resource called Hambisela [23]. GTKCP aims to empower caregivers and to improve care and support for children, within a rights-based framework. Using a participatory approach, a local parent support group was established, and they received monthly training sessions, consisting of 10 modules which are run over 11–12 sessions (Fig 1). The programme was developed through action research in Bangladesh [22] and has since been widely implemented across a variety of LMIC settings. However, empirical evidence is lacking on the impact of this programme on the children with cerebral palsy or their caregivers. Exploring this is important for identifying and informing improvements to the programme.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of the GTKCP parent training programme on children with cerebral palsy and their caregivers in Ghana. Specifically, we aimed to explore the impact on caregiver quality of life and knowledge and attitudes towards caring for the child, and on the child’s health and nutritional status.


This study was a pre/post mixed-methods impact evaluation of the GTKCP parent training programme in Ghana. This article reports on the quantitative component of the study.

Project location and study participants

Participants were recruited from across eight districts and four regions (Upper East, Greater Accra, Brong Ahafo, Ashanti) in Ghana. Sites were selected by the project implementation partner (The Presbyterian Church of Ghana) because of their existing primary health care or community-based programmes, which allowed for onward referral of children in the study to other services, such as accessing assistive devices. A total of 75 children and their caregivers were newly recruited through existing community screening programmes for cerebral palsy, hospital physiotherapy records of children diagnosed with cerebral palsy in the last six months, and from additional community screening in one site.

Cerebral palsy was diagnosed by a qualified clinician (developmental paediatrician or physiotherapist). Eligibility criteria were: a confirmed diagnosis of cerebral palsy (of any type) and age 18 months-12 years. Children may have had some previous physiotherapy, but caregivers were excluded if they were already a member of a parent support group.

Intervention: Parent training programme

Caregivers were invited to a newly established local support group and offered a total of eleven once-a-month group training sessions each approximately three hours, in a nearby community setting. There were 8–10 parents per group. Although sessions were led by the facilitators, there was an emphasis on problem solving and peer support, underpinned by adult learning theory and an emphasis on participatory approaches to facilitate empowerment of the caregivers. Support groups were maintained following this training programme intervention, led by expert mothers, but this evaluation was conducted on completion of the initial training input following establishment of the groups.

The modular topics covered a range of issues as shown in Fig 1. In addition, all families were visited once per month by one/or both facilitators, for an average of 45 minutes, in order to provide one to one follow up support to the primary caregiver, and to discuss the training material with other family members.

The GTKCP programme was delivered by a pair of facilitators: a physiotherapist or physiotherapist assistant together with one primary health worker. A total of 13 facilitators underwent a one-week training from a master trainer and delivered to eight groups.

The fidelity of the training approach was monitored using the following: one face to face visit to at least one training session, and a monthly phone call to each group facilitator by the project coordinator and/or an experienced physiotherapist. A ‘Whats App’ group was set up and used by facilitators for sharing their implementation experiences and enabled some monitoring of quality. Although intended as a community-based programme, in some of the more rural areas, the families were quite dispersed, and some had to travel up to one hour to attend the group sessions. Transport costs were covered by the project.

Data collection

Primary caregivers were interviewed at home at least one month prior to the intervention (baseline) using a structured questionnaire in June 2015. Caregiver data collected included: socio-demographics, quality of life and knowledge in caring for their child. Data on the child included demographics, severity of cerebral palsy, health status, anthropometry and reported feeding difficulties. Data were collected electronically using a tablet (Google Nexus 7) and Open data kit software. The same respondent (primary caregiver) was re-interviewed 13 months later, 1–2 months after completion of the last training session (endline). See Fig 2

Amongst caregivers, the PedsQL Family Impact measure [24], was used to quantitatively assess the impact of paediatric conditions on the quality of life of parents and the family. The PedsQL measures parents’ self-reported physical, emotional, social, and cognitive functioning, communication, and worry, as well as daily activities of the family, and family relationships, and has been validated and tested in different international settings [2527]. Linguistic validation of the PedsQL tools was conducted in three languages Twi, Gruni, and Kusaal) which included forward and back translations by linguistic experts and further modification following cognitive field testing in the three sites, in line with the translation guidelines [28]. Caregivers were asked about their level of knowledge and confidence in caring for their child with five possible response options from ‘none’ to ‘lots’ of knowledge or confidence, and additional questions to assess their experience of treatment and diagnosis.

Severity of cerebral palsy was assessed using the Gross Motor Function Classification System (GMFCS) [29], an internationally-recognised system, which classifies cerebral palsy according to five levels of physical functioning. Data on the child’s feeding were collected using structured questions adapted, with input from the author, from a previous study of children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh [30]. Eight questions were asked about frequency of difficulties with different aspects of eating and drinking, rated on a five-point scale from ‘never’ to ‘always [30]. Reported health of the child was measured with three questions taken from the Ghana DHS survey about whether their child has experienced diarrhoea, fever or cough in the last two weeks [31], and one question about experience of a serious health condition requiring hospital admission in the last 12 months.

Anthropometric measures were taken using standardised protocols for our population. Standing height was recorded to the nearest 0.1cm for children > 5 years. Recumbent lengths were taken for children <5 years, where possible, and knee height [32] (CLPR65 Anthropometric Caliper, MediForm, Oregon, USA) was recorded for all children to the nearest 0.1cm. Following WHO best-practice procedures [33], height and length measurements were obtained twice by two independent observers: the average was taken as the final measurement if they agreed to within <0.5cm, else both re-measured until agreement was achieved. Mid Upper Arm Circumference (MUAC) was recorded for all children (mm gradation MUAC tape, Teaching Aids at Low Cost. Weight was recorded to the nearest 0.1kg. Children unable to stand were held by their caregiver, then the caregiver was weighed separately to calculate the child’s weight.

Data analysis

Data were analysed using Stata 13 [34]. Total and summary scores from the PedsQL were calculated as the sum of all items divided by the number of items answered. These scores were converted into scores out of 100 with higher scores indicating better quality of life [24]. For the purposes of analysis, the 5 level GMFCS was reclassified into three groups: mild (levels 1 and II), moderate (levels III) and severe (levels IV and V). A composite feeding score comprised of the eight feeding/drinking questions was generated which ranged from 0 (extreme difficulties) to 100 (no difficulties). To assess the internal consistency of this composite scale we calculated Cronbach’s alpha coefficients, all which were >0.7 with item-total correlations >0.3 as per recommended guidelines for reliability [35]. Knee height was used as a proxy measure where standing height could not be performed [32]. The line of best fit on a scatter graph of the relationship between recumbent length and knee height was used to predict the heights of those children for whom data were unobtainable. This method was used because of a lack of validated published formula (for converting knee height to height) available for this specific study population. Z scores were calculated based on WHO growth standards using the Emergency Nutrition Assessment and WHO Anthroplus software [36] for weight-for-age (WAZ) (children <10years only), height-for-age (HAZ) and weight-for-height (WHZ) (children ≤5 years only) Children with WAZ/HAZ//WHZ scores between <2 and ≥3 were defined as stunted/wasted/underweight respectively and those with z scores <-3 were defined as severely. For MUAC, wasted was defined as 115mm to 124mm and severe wasting as <115mm. Children with extreme z-score values (greater than >5 or 6/less than -5 or -6, depending on the measure) were excluded from the analysis since they were more likely measurement errors than truly very large or small [37]. The prevalence of stunting, wasting and underweight was calculated, as well as the mean z-scores.

The standard mortality ratio was calculated with data from standard UN child model life tables for children 1–5 years [38] and those from Ghana for children of 1–12 years [39].

Outcomes at baseline and endline were compared using the McNemars tests for binary variables. Continuous variables were compared using the paired t-test (normally distributed data) or Wilcoxon sign rank test (if data were skewed). Analysis were restricted to respondents who were included at both baseline and endline.


Ethics approval was obtained from the London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine and from the Noguchi Memorial Institute for Medical Research (NMIMR), University of Ghana. Informed written consent was obtained from all participating caregivers, with a signature or thumbprint as appropriate. Children were referred to nutritional services and for assistive devices according to clinical need, and the CBM (international NGO) child protection policy was adhered to.


Training programme

The adherence by facilitators to the training approach was overall assessed to be ‘good’ by the project coordinator, who visited each group once during the project period. Attendance at the training sessions was high with 92% of caregivers completing all training sessions.

Study population

A total of 75 primary caregiver-child pairs were included at baseline and 64 (84%) and endline. Of those lost to follow up, eight died, and three did not complete the training programme (attended <3 sessions). Socio-demographic characteristics between study participants and those lost to follow-up were similar except girls were more likely to be lost than boys (p = 0.03) (see Table 1).

Table 1 describes the characteristics of the study population. The majority, (72%) of children were under 5 years with a mean age of 3.8 years (SD 2.69). Half of the children had severe cerebral palsy. Caregivers were mainly (98%) female and the majority were mothers (80%) or grandparents (16%); 67% were married, whilst only half of the biological fathers lived in the same house as their child and 43% of the children saw their father less than monthly. 89% described their profession as farming, trading, or a small business such as tailoring. Although, only 42% said they had been able to work in the last month. See Table 1 for details.

Impact of the programme on the caregiver

The average total caregiver QoL score was low (12.5, SD 18.6) at baseline and increased significantly to 51.4 (SD 23.6) at follow up (p<0.001). The improvement was significant across all three summary scales (parent, family, and combined) and across eight domains of physical, emotional, social, cognitive, communication functioning, worry, daily relationships and family relationships (p<0.0001). We assessed this change among caregivers of children with mild, moderate, and severe cerebral palsy separately and found significant improvements in QoL was evident within each severity group (p <0.001)Table 2.

Table 2. Baseline and endline caregiver QoL scores and mean change between the two-time points.

Knowledge and confidence in taking care of child

At baseline, only 13% of caregivers had heard of the condition ‘cerebral palsy’. Overall levels of diagnosis of cerebral palsy prior to this study were very poor: 49% of caregivers claimed they had never received a diagnosis, 15% had been told by a health professional it was ‘something related to the brain’ and 21% reported a diagnosis provided by a traditional healer. At baseline, the vast majority (94%) reported no or low levels of knowledge of their child’s condition (Table 3). At endline, there was a significant increase in the proportion reporting good/lots of knowledge: from 6% to 73% (p<0.001). In terms of confidence in how to care for their child, at baseline half (49%) of caregivers reported a low level or no confidence. At endline, the proportion who felt they had good or lots of confidence had increased significantly from 36% to 89% (P<0.001). See Table 3.

Table 3. Caregiver knowledge and confidence and child’s health and wellbeing at baseline and endline.

Feeding and drinking

At baseline, at least 45% of caregivers reported problems often/always with the eight different domains of feeding and drinking as shown in Fig 3. At endline, there was a significant reduction in the proportion of parents who reported problems often/always in four domains (child eating and drinking, self-feeding, needs help feeding and caregiver worry about child feeding). Responses to the other domains (choking, eating the same as others, being unhappy during mealtimes, whether the child is eating enough) remained similar between baseline and follow up. In terms of the composite feeding score, there was a significant improvement in the median score from 29.7 (SD 31.4) at baseline to 51.6 (29.8) at endline (p<0.001).

Fig 3. Proportion of caregivers reporting problems always/often with different aspects of child’s feeding at baseline and endline.

Child’s health and wellbeing

There were significant improvements in caregiver’s perception of their child’s physical and emotional health. The proportion of caregivers rating their child’s health as good, very good, or excellent increased from 34% (baseline) to 73% (endline, p<0.001) for physical health and from 36% to 64% for emotional health (p<0.001, Table 3). However, most children had experienced a serious health problem (i.e. a problem the caregiver felt required treatment) in the last 12 months at both baseline (70%) and endline (67%). Illness in the last two weeks was common with 64% of the population at baseline reporting illness in the past two weeks (at least one of: fever (38%), Cough/breathing difficulties (39%) diarrhoea (13%)). At endline, this was lower with 50% (p = 0.05) of caregivers reporting illness in the past two weeks: (fever: 25%, Cough/breathing difficulties: 25%; diarrhoea: 18%). See Table 3.


As shown in Table 3, the prevalence of malnutrition was high at both time points. At baseline, 63% of children were classified as underweight and this remained similar at endline (p = 0.5). The proportion of children classified as stunted was 53.8% at baseline and 64.1% at endline (p = 0.06). Wasting was evident in 60% of children (< 4 years only) at baseline with 45.2% at endline (p = 0.01). Using MUAC, 15.2% were classified as wasted at baseline and 21.7% at endline.

We compared the proportion of children who were underweight at baseline and endline for children with mild, moderate, and severe CP separately and found the trends within each severity level were similar to that for the full population combined. See Table 4.

Table 4. Prevalence of malnutrition among children at baseline and endline.

Child mortality

In total, eight children died over the 12-month study period; mainly in the early part of the programme, all with severe cerebral palsy, and classified as malnourished at baseline and referred to nutrition services. A confirmed diagnosis for death was not provided by caregivers except in one case where sepsis and acute malnutrition was diagnosed. The standard mortality ratio for children 1–5 years, showed that the study children were 14.61 times more likely to die than children in the standard population for developing countries (P < 0.05). For the wider age range of children (1–12 years) the standard mortality ratio was 5.88 (P < 0.05), meaning that with cerebral palsy of this age were 5.88 times likely to die than children in the standard Ghana population.


This study in Ghana found significant improvements in QoL among caregivers of children with cerebral palsy who participated in a parent training programme offered through the establishment of a support group in a nearby community. Significant improvements were also found in caregiver reported knowledge and confidence in caring for their child, and in some aspects of child feeding. Reported serious health conditions and levels of malnutrition in these children were high both before and after the intervention.

The initial low caregiver QoL scores reported at baseline in this study aligns with a previous study in Bangladesh using the same tool [27] and other studies in LMIC which have found high levels of anxiety, depression, stress and poorer quality of life among caregivers of children with disabilities [12, 14, 27, 4042]. The few studies which have included caregiver outcomes for home and community-based interventions, have generally focussed on one or two measures of improvements in maternal knowledge and stress, and parent satisfaction with services [43] [20] [4446]. In our study, the reported improvement in knowledge and confidence in caring for their child is encouraging; and arguably, more importantly, the emphasis on problem solving and caregiver empowerment, within a support group setting, has the potential to offer a more sustainable mechanism for improving long term outcomes for the child and family. There is a clear need for such an approach which also supports task-sharing for rehabilitation, given the limited number of therapist and rehabilitation services in the Ghana context. However, this intervention does not aim to replace specialist services, rather for referrals to be strengthened, and for empowered caregivers to be able to demand these services, within a rights-based framework. Follow- up research with the support groups is now required to understand how these groups have been developed and sustained.

Evidence of improvements in child outcomes was more mixed. Some aspects of mealtimes and feeding their child were improved. Other studies have similarly highlighted the particular challenges of feeding for children with disabilities, including children with cerebral palsy [30, 4750], and our baseline study showed feeding difficulties were also strongly associated with poorer caregiver QoL and child malnutrition [51]. Yet few studies have evaluated interventions aimed at improving nutritional outcomes for these children in low resource settings: we only found one study in Bangladesh study demonstrated improvements in nutritional outcomes through parental support and training, exclusively focussed on a feeding intervention [30].

Despite some positive changes in reported feeding experiences by the caregiver, levels of malnutrition remained high with some two-thirds of the population malnourished at both baseline and endline. This high level of malnutrition is mirrored in a study in Uganda [50] and is considerably higher than 2014 DHS estimates for the general population in Ghana where 11% of children under 5 years were underweight, 5% wasted and 19% stunted [31]. To some extent this reflects a vulnerable group whose growth potential—even in ideal environments—is below that of non-disabled children [52, 53]. However, unreached potential for growth clearly deserves further future attention. Whilst the training programme covers a range of topics, it is possible that: more emphasis on feeding and drinking practices would have improved anthropometry; more specific guidance on nutrient-dense feeds is required; further strengthening referrals pathways to nutrition programmes is needed. In addition, more attention should be given to the specific needs of younger children as they are weaned and transition to solids. There are also other documented complex challenges for inclusive child nutrition programmes including: the role that stigma and discrimination and poverty can play, the lack of inclusive nutritional services, and a need for stronger linkages in programming between nutrition and disability, poverty, and human rights [54].

The high mortality ratio highlights the extreme vulnerability of children of all ages, particularly for children aged 1–5 years who were almost 15 times likely to die than general child population of the same age. We were unable to identify other data on SMR among children with CP in LMIC. However, high rates of mortality have been noted in Bangladesh where 18% of 92 children with cerebral palsy died over a 3-year period; the most severely malnourished and severely disabled were most likely to die [55]. These findings underline the need to prioritise early intervention to prevent and manage serious malnourishment, and to establish closer linkages between disability and malnutrition.

In this study the child’s emotional and physical health was reported as improved by the caregiver but reported difficulties with breathing (25%) and diarrhoea (18%) were still very high in comparison with the national Ghana DHSS survey data of 12% of children that experience diarrhoea, and 4% with ARI, at 2 weeks previous to the survey [31]. Our findings are aligned with the small number of studies which demonstrate children with disabilities are more likely to experience poorer health [2, 6, 56, 57].

The absence of fathers in households of children with cerebral palsy highlighted in this study deserves attention. Overall there is little data from LMICs exploring this issue, despite the multi-fold implications, including impact on household income, on caregiving roles, the implications for any community and home -based intervention programme, and to ensure that any intervention does not further burden the gendered nature of caregiving. A detailed analysis of the intersectionality of gender and disability and caregiving is likely to be important to further strengthen this intervention.

Finally, the results show that a relatively simple intervention can improve outcomes for caregivers of children. There needs to be aspects of the training and approach which need strengthening, and this is underway. The model of establishing a support group, emphasising caregiver empowerment, potentially offers a more sustainable mechanism to address needs for a child with a disability who requires care over a lifetime. A longer-term re-assessment of caregivers and their children is recommended, also to better understand the sustainability of these support groups.

Study strengths and limitations

Ours is one of very few studies evaluating the impact of a community based, family focussed intervention for children with cerebral palsy in low income settings. It was conducted across eight different sites in Ghana, using standardised questionnaires, and clinical assessment of all participating children.

The participant numbers were not large, they were comparable to other studies conducted with children with cerebral palsy [20, 43, 44]. The target families were identified in areas supported by the Presbyterian Church of Ghana, who typically work in areas of greater deprivation, and so there may have been a selection bias, with our sample more likely to be poorer than the general population. This may limit the generalisability of the findings and might also mean that impact was more limited by poverty.

We did not include a control group of caregivers and children who did not receive the intervention against which to compare, because of ethical reasons. We cannot rule out the role of social desirability in the responses of caregivers in their rating of QoL, caring and ratings of child health. We did not assess children’s quality of life, due to the lack of suitable tools for younger children, without using parents to offer a proxy measure. This should be explored in future studies. Future studies should also explore longer term impact of the training and sustainability of the support groups.


There is a need for effective home and community-based programmes for children with disabilities, and their families. This study showed promising outcomes for improving the lives of the primary caregiver, following a relatively simple participatory training programme delivered through local support groups. With a focus on caregiver empowerment within a rights- based approach, the benefits are potentially more sustainable, with the right kind of ongoing support, and transformative for families. The results for the children were mixed and highlight an urgent need for more attention to be paid to nutrition and feeding, which are underway.


We would like to thank additional advisory board members including, Dr Norgrove Penny, Dr Eben Badoe, Jedidia Abanga, Dr Sarah Bernays, Dr Mel Adams, Dr Marko Kerac, and Maxwell Akandem. Most importantly, we would like to thank all the participating families, especially the caregivers and children who participated in the programme, and gave their valuable time for the researchers.


  1. 1. UNICEF. State of the World’s Children: children with disabilities New York: UNICEF, 2013.
  2. 2. World Health Organization, World Bank. World report on disability Geneva: WHO, 2011.
  3. 3. Donald KA, Kakooza AM, Wammanda RD, Mallewa M, Samia P, Babakir H, et al. Pediatric Cerebral Palsy in Africa Where Are We? Journal of child neurology. July 2015;30(8):963–71. pmid:25296926
  4. 4. Colver A, Fairhurst C, Pharoah PO. Cerebral palsy. Obstetrical & Gynecological Survey. 2014;69(8):447–9.
  5. 5. Gladstone M. A review of the incidence and prevalence, types and aetiology of childhood cerebral palsy in resource-poor settings. Annals of Tropical Paediatrics. 2010;30(3):181–96. pmid:20828451.
  6. 6. Kuper H, Monteath-van Dok A, Wing K, Danquah L, Evans J, Zuurmond M, et al. The Impact of Disability on the Lives of Children; Cross-Sectional Data Including 8,900 Children with Disabilities and 898,834 Children without Disabilities across 30 Countries. PloS one. 2014;9(9):e107300. pmid:25202999
  7. 7. Bedford J, Mackey S, Parvin A, Muhit M, Murthy G. Reasons for non-uptake of referral: children with disabilities identified through the Key Informant Method in Bangladesh. Disability & Rehabilitation. 2013;(0):1–7.
  8. 8. Nesbitt R, Mackey S, Kuper H, Muhit M, Murthy G. Predictors of referral uptake in children with disabilities in Bangladesh-Exploring barriers as a first step to improving referral provision. Disability and rehabilitation. 2012;34(13):1089–95. pmid:22136387
  9. 9. United Nations. The UN convention on the rights of persons with disabilities 2013 [cited 2017 4th September].
  10. 10. United Nations. Sustainable Development Goals 2015 [cited 2017 26/09].
  11. 11. World Health Organization. Global Strategy for Women’s, Children’s and Adolescents’ Health, 2016–2030 2016 [cited 2017 26/09].
  12. 12. Gona JK, Mung’ala-Odera V, Newton CR, Hartley S. Caring for children with disabilities in Kilifi, Kenya: what is the carer’s experience? Child Care Health Dev. 2011;37(2):175–83. Epub 2010/07/22. pmid:20645990
  13. 13. Hartley S, Ojwang VP, Bagawemu A, Ddamulira M, Chavuta A. How do carers of disabled children cope? The Uganda perspective. Child: Care, Health and Development. 31 2 167–180. 2005.
  14. 14. Mobarak R, Khan NZ, Munir S, Zaman SS, McConachie H. Predictors of stress in mothers of children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh. J Pediatr Psychol. 2000;25(6):427–33. Epub 2000/09/09. pmid:10980047.
  15. 15. Nakamanya S, Siu GE, Lassman R, Seeley J, Tann CJ. Maternal experiences of caring for an infant with neurological impairment after neonatal encephalopathy in Uganda: a qualitative study. Disability & Rehabilitation. 2014;(0):1–7.
  16. 16. Tinney M, Chiodo A, Haig A, Wiredu E. Medical rehabilitation in Ghana. Disability and rehabilitation. 2007;29(11–12):921–7. pmid:17577726
  17. 17. World Confederation of Physical Therapy (2017) Ghana Physiotherapy Association [Accessed 14/03/2018].
  18. 18. Rosenbaum P. Family and quality of life: key elements in intervention in children with cerebral palsy. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2011;53(s4):68–70.
  19. 19. Donald KA, Samia P, Kakooza-Mwesige A, Bearden D. Pediatric Cerebral Palsy in Africa: A Systematic Review. Seminars in pediatric neurology. 2014;21(1):30–5. pmid:24655402
  20. 20. Yousafzai AK, Lynch P, Gladstone M. Moving beyond prevalence studies: screening and interventions for children with disabilities in low-income and middle-income countries. Archives of disease in childhood. 2014:archdischild-2012-302066.
  21. 21. Donald KA, Kakooza AM, Wammanda RD, Mallewa M, Samia P, Babakir H, et al. Pediatric Cerebral Palsy in Africa Where Are We? Journal of Child Neurology. 2014;(Online First Version):
  22. 22. LSHTM, Hambisela. Getting to know Cerebral Palsy: working with parent groups- a training resource for facilitators, parents, caregivers and persons with cerebral palsy London2013 [cited 2016 23/09/].
  23. 23. Cerebral Palsy Association. Hambisela: Towards Excellence in Cerebral Palsy. A Training resource for facilitators, parents, caregivers and persons with cerebral palsy Port Elizabeth: Cerebral Palsy Association; 2008.
  24. 24. Varni JW, Sherman SA, Burwinkle TM, Dickinson PE, Dixon P. The PedsQL family impact module: preliminary reliability and validity. Health and quality of life outcomes. 2004;2(1):55.
  25. 25. Ab Rahman A, Mohamad N, Imran MK, Ibrahim WPW, Othman A, Aziz AA, et al. A preliminary study on the reliability of the Malay version of PedsQL Family Impact Module among caregivers of children with disabilities in Kelantan, Malaysia. The Malaysian journal of medical sciences: MJMS. 2011;18(4):63. pmid:22589674
  26. 26. Scarpelli AC, Paiva SM, Pordeus IA, Varni JW, Viegas CM, Allison PJ. The Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory(PedsQL) family impact module: reliability and validity of the Brazilian version. Health and Quality of Life Outcomes. 2008;6(1):35.
  27. 27. Zuurmond MA, Mahmud I, Polack S, Evans J. Understanding the Lives of Caregivers of Children with Cerebral Palsy in rural Bangladesh: Use of Mixed Methods. Disability, CBR & Inclusive Development. 2015;26(2):5–21.
  28. 28. Mapi Research Institute. PedsQL translations [cited 2016 13/03/2018].
  29. 29. Wood E, Rosenbaum P. The gross motor function classification system for cerebral palsy: a study of reliability and stability over time. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2000;42(05):292–6.
  30. 30. Adams M, Khan N, Begum S, Wirz S, Hesketh T, Pring T. Feeding difficulties in children with cerebral palsy: low cost caregiver training in Dhaka, Bangladesh. Child: care, health and development. 2011;38(6):878–88.
  31. 31. Ghana Statistical Service. Ghana Demographic and Health Survey 2014. Accra: Ghana Statistical Service, March 2015.
  32. 32. Froehlich-Grobe K, Nary DE, Van Sciver A, Lee J, Little TD. Measuring height without a stadiometer: empirical investigation of four height estimates among wheelchair users. American journal of physical medicine & rehabilitation/Association of Academic Physiatrists. 2011;90(8):658.
  33. 33. WHO child growth standards: length/height-for-age, weight-for-age, weight-for-length, weight-forheight and body mass index-for-age: methods and development. (Technical Report) [Accessed 15.3.2010].
  34. 34. Stata S. Release 13. Statistical software. StataCorp LP, College Station, TX. 2013.
  35. 35. Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. 1951;6:297–334.
  36. 36. World Health Organization, UNICEF. WHO child growth standards and the identification of severe acute malnutrition in infants and children: a joint statement by the World Health Organization and the United Nations Children’s Fund. Geneva: World Health Organization, 2009.
  37. 37. Crowe S, Seal A, Grijalva-Eternod C, Kerac M. Effect of nutrition survey ‘cleaning criteria’on estimates of malnutrition prevalence and disease burden: secondary data analysis. PeerJ. 2014;2:e380. pmid:24883244
  38. 38. United Nations. Model Life Tables for Developing Countries at 1982 [Accessed 2016 20/09/2016].
  39. 39. World Health Organisation. Global Health Observatory data repository 2017 [cited 29/09 2017].
  40. 40. Raina P, O’Donnell M, Rosenbaum P, Brehaut J, Walter SD, Russell D, et al. The health and well-being of caregivers of children with cerebral palsy. Pediatrics. 2005;115(6):e626–e36. pmid:15930188
  41. 41. Sandy PT, Kgole JC, Mavundla TR. Support needs of caregivers: case studies in South Africa. International nursing review. 2013;60(3):344–50. Epub 2013/08/22. pmid:23961796.
  42. 42. Dobhal M, Juneja M, Jain R, Sairam S, Thiagarajan D. Health-related quality of life in children with cerebral palsy and their families. Indian pediatrics. 2014;51(5):385–7. pmid:24953580
  43. 43. McConachie H, Huq S, Munir S, Ferdous S, Zaman S, Khan NZ. A randomized controlled trial of alternative modes of service provision to young children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh. The Journal of Pediatrics. 2000;137(6):769–76. pmid:11113832
  44. 44. Gona J, Newton C, Hartley S, Bunning K. A home‐based intervention using augmentative and alternative communication (AAC) techniques in rural Kenya: what are the caregivers’ experiences? Child: care, health and development. 2014;40(1):29–41.
  45. 45. Kelly A, Ghalaieny T, Devitt C. A pilot study of early intervention for families with children with or at risk of an intellectual disability in Northern Malawi. Journal of Policy and Practice in Intellectual Disabilities. 2012;9(3):195–205.
  46. 46. Sen R, Goldbart J. Partnership in Action: Introducing family‐based intervention for children with disability in urban slums of Kolkata, India. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education. 2005;52(4):275–311.
  47. 47. Sullivan P, Lambert B, Rose M, Ford-Adams M, Johnson A, Griffiths P. Prevalence and severity of feeding and nutritional problems in children with neurological impairment: Oxford Feeding Study. Developmental Medicine & Child Neurology. 2000;42(10):674–80.
  48. 48. Yousafzai AK, Filteau S, Wirz S. Feeding difficulties in disabled children leads to malnutrition: experience in an Indian slum. British Journal of Nutrition. 2003;90(06):1097–106.
  49. 49. Yousafzai AK, Pagedar S, Wirz S, Filteau S. Beliefs about feeding practices and nutrition for children with disabilities among families in Dharavi, Mumbai. International Journal of Rehabilitation Research. 2003;26(1):33.
  50. 50. Kakooza‐Mwesige A, Tumwine JK, Eliasson AC, Namusoke HK, Forssberg H. Malnutrition is common in Ugandan children with cerebral palsy, particularly those over the age of five and those who had neonatal complications. Acta Paediatrica. 2015;104(12):1259–68. pmid:26088908
  51. 51. Polack Sarah A M, O’Banion David, Marjolein/Sandra , Kerac Marko, Gladstone Melissa, Zuurmond Maria. Children with Cerebral Palsy in Ghana: malnutrition, feeding challenges and caregiver quality of life Journal of Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology (forthcoming).
  52. 52. Perenc L, Przysada G, Trzeciak J. Cerebral Palsy in Children as a Risk Factor for Malnutrition. Annals of Nutrition and Metabolism. 2015;66(4):224–32. pmid:26111638
  53. 53. Krick J, Murphy-Miller P, Zeger S, WEIGHT E. Pattern of growth in children with cerebral palsy. Journal of the American Dietetic Association. 1996;96(7):680–5. pmid:8675911
  54. 54. Groce NE, Kerac M, Farkas A, Schultink W, Bieler RB. Inclusive nutrition for children and adults with disabilities. The Lancet Global Health. 2013.
  55. 55. Khan NZ, Ferdous S, Munir S, Huq S, McConachie H. Mortality of urban and rural young children with cerebral palsy in Bangladesh. Developmental medicine & child neurology. 1998;40(11):749–53.
  56. 56. Gottlieb CA, Maenner MJ, Cappa C, Durkin MS. Child disability screening, nutrition, and early learning in 18 countries with low and middle incomes: data from the third round of UNICEF’s Multiple Indicator Cluster Survey (2005–06). The Lancet. 2009;374(9704):1831–9.
  57. 57. Kerac M. Improving the treatment of severe acute malnutrition in childhood: a randomized controlled trial of synbiotic-enhanced therapeutic food with long term follow-up of post-treatment mortality and morbidity: University College London; 2011.