Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Natural biocide cocktails: Combinatorial antibiotic effects of prodigiosin and biosurfactants

  • Jennifer Hage-Hülsmann,

    Roles Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

  • Alexander Grünberger,

    Roles Investigation, Validation

    Affiliations IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany, Multiscale Bioengineering, Bielefeld University, Bielefeld, Germany

  • Stephan Thies,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

  • Beatrix Santiago-Schübel,

    Roles Methodology, Resources

    Affiliation Central Division of Analytical Chemistry ZEA-3: Analytik/Biospec, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany

  • Andreas Sebastian Klein,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

  • Jörg Pietruszka,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliations IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany, Institute of Bioorganic Chemistry, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

  • Dennis Binder,

    Roles Conceptualization, Validation

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

  • Fabienne Hilgers,

    Roles Investigation

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

  • Andreas Domröse,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

  • Thomas Drepper,

    Roles Conceptualization

    Affiliation Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

  • Dietrich Kohlheyer,

    Roles Resources

    Affiliations IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany, Aachener Verfahrenstechnik (AVT.MSB), RWTH Aachen University, Aachen, Germany

  • Karl-Erich Jaeger,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, IBG-1: Biotechnology, Forschungszentrum Jülich GmbH, Jülich, Germany

  • Anita Loeschcke

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    a.loeschcke@fz-juelich.de

    Affiliations Institute of Molecular Enzyme Technology, Heinrich Heine University Düsseldorf, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany, Bioeconomy Science Center (BioSC), Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich, Germany

Natural biocide cocktails: Combinatorial antibiotic effects of prodigiosin and biosurfactants

  • Jennifer Hage-Hülsmann, 
  • Alexander Grünberger, 
  • Stephan Thies, 
  • Beatrix Santiago-Schübel, 
  • Andreas Sebastian Klein, 
  • Jörg Pietruszka, 
  • Dennis Binder, 
  • Fabienne Hilgers, 
  • Andreas Domröse, 
  • Thomas Drepper
PLOS
x

Abstract

Bacterial secondary metabolites are naturally produced to prevail amongst competitors in a shared habitat and thus represent a valuable source for antibiotic discovery. The transformation of newly discovered antibiotic compounds into effective drugs often requires additional surfactant components for drug formulation. Nature may also provide blueprints in this respect: A cocktail of two compounds consisting of the antibacterial red pigment prodigiosin and the biosurfactant serrawettin W1 is naturally produced by the bacterium Serratia marcescens, which occurs in highly competitive habitats including soil. We show here a combinatorial antibacterial effect of these compounds, but also of prodigiosin mixed with other (bio)surfactants, against the soil-dwelling bacterium Corynebacterium glutamicum taken as a model target bacterium. Prodigiosin exerted a combinatorial inhibitory effect with all tested surfactants in a disk diffusion assay which was especially pronounced in combination with N-myristoyltyrosine. Minimal inhibitory and bactericidal concentrations (MIC and MBC) of the individual compounds were 2.56 μg/mL prodigiosin and 32 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, and the MIC of prodigiosin was decreased by 3 orders of magnitude to 0.005 μg/mL in the presence of 16 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, indicative of synergistic interaction. Investigation of bacterial survival revealed similar combinatorial effects; moreover, antagonistic effects were observed at higher compound concentrations. Finally, the investigation of microcolony formation under combined application of concentrations just below the MBC revealed heterogeneity of responses with cell death or delayed growth. In summary, this study describes the combinatorial antibacterial effects of microbial biomolecules, which may have ecological relevance by inhibiting cohabiting species, but shall furthermore inspire drug development in the combat of infectious disease.

Introduction

Bacterial chemical defense mechanisms—developed to prevail amongst competitors in a shared habitat—have provided an ample source of effective antibiotics for clinical use [1], and continue to offer new promising drug candidates [2,3]. For many antimicrobial compounds, additional surfactant components are required in the formulation of an effective drug; their major function in pharmaceuticals is to improve the solubility of drugs, and enable penetration across biological interfaces [4,5]. Since the application of synthetic surfactants for pharmaceutical formulations evoked discussions regarding potentially toxic byproducts or issues regarding lack of biodegradability [6,7], novel bio-based solutions appear attractive. In nature, some bacteria living in highly competitive environments produce mixtures of antimicrobial and surface active compounds. Here, it may be suspected that the surface active compound likewise enhances effectivity of the antibiotic by improving delivery to the target. For instance, pigmented strains of the ubiquitous bacterium Serratia marcescens produce an antibiotic-surfactant mixture consisting of the red pigment prodigiosin and the antimicrobial biosurfactant serrawettin W1.

Prodigiosin is a bright red tripyrrole that belongs to the family of prodiginines. In S. marcescens, the prodigiosin biosynthetic pathway is encoded in a 21 kb gene cluster consisting of 14 pig genes [8]. Prodigiosin, which is produced from the precursors 2-octenal and proline in a complex bifurcated pathway, has several relevant properties such as immunosuppressive and anticancer activities toward different types of human cancer cells [911], as well as antimicrobial effects against Gram-positive and Gram-negative bacteria [1215]. Several molecular mechanisms causing the antibiotic effects of prodigiosin are currently discussed, e.g., membrane potential alteration via anion symport [16], membrane damage [15], phototoxicity [17], and formation of reactive oxygen species (ROS) [18].

The symmetrical lipopeptide serrawettin W1, initially referred to as serratamolide, is composed of serine and β-hydroxyl fatty acids as the biosynthetic product of a non-ribosomal-peptide synthetase and produced by most of the colored S. marcescens strains [1921]. Serrawettin W1 exhibits besides several interesting bioactivities, such as decreasing the viability of cancer cells [22,23], activity against oomycetes [24], and antimicrobial activity predominantly against Gram-positive bacteria [25,26] surfactant and wetting agent activity [27]. These activities appear typical for surface active bacterial metabolites such as surfactin, rhamnolipids and N-acyl amino acids [28,29].

The production of prodigiosin and serrawettin W1 in S. marcescens is described to be dependent to the same extent on several different factors like temperature, medium and growth phase [19,26,30]. Moreover, studies on the molecular level revealed a complex regulation network governing the concerted production of both metabolites [3134]. This may suggest combinatorial effects of both compounds produced by S. marcescens.

Here, we report on the characterization of the combined antibacterial effects of isolated prodigiosin and serrawettin W1. We used the Gram-positive soil-dwelling Corynebacterium glutamicum as an exemplary target bacterium enabling demonstration of the compounds’ effects in a simple non-pathogenic showcase, which is moreover related to clinically concerning Corynebacterium diphtheria [35] and Mycobacterium tuberculosis [36]. Our results indicate enhanced combinatorial effects dependent on the ratio of prodigiosin and serrawettin W1. We further used this as a starting point to characterize mixtures of prodigiosin with other surface active compounds, including soil bacterial rhamnolipids and N-myristoyltyrosine, and observed enhanced combinatorial effects in all cases. The strong combinatorial effect of prodigiosin together with the less characterized N-myristoyltyrosine was further described focusing on the verge of bacteriostatic and bactericidal concentration ranges. Our findings suggest that naturally evolved compound cocktails may provide a suitable source for inspiring effective antibiotic development.

Materials and methods

Bacterial strains and cultivation conditions

Pseudomonas putida strains KT2440 [37], and pig-r2 [38], were cultivated in LB medium (Carl Roth®, Karlsruhe, Germany) [39] at 30°C, if not stated otherwise. Escherichia coli strain Tuner(DE3) (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) was cultivated in LB medium at 37°C. Corynebacterium glutamicum (ATCC® 13032™) [40,41] was cultivated in LB medium at 30°C. Serratia marcescens DSM12481 was cultivated in LB medium at 30°C. Liquid cultures were incubated under continuous shaking at 130 rpm in a Multitron Standard incubation shaker (Infors AG, Bottmingen, Switzerland) in the dark. Antibiotics were added where appropriate in the following concentrations: Gentamycin, 25 μg/mL (P. putida), Kanamycin, 50 μg/mL (P. putida and E. coli).

Applied antibiotic and surface active compounds

Prodigiosin.

Heterologous production of prodigiosin was established based on previously developed protocols using P. putida strain pig-r2 as production host for the expression of prodigiosin biosynthesis genes (pig) from S. marcescens [38]. Cells were grown in TB medium (Terrific-Broth modified; Carl Roth®, Karlsruhe, Germany) at 25°C and prodigiosin was recovered from the cultivation broth using polyurethane (PU) foam cubes. Prodigiosin was extracted from PU via Soxhlet extraction with diethyl ether and purified by two-fold flash column chromatography using dichlormethane and methanol (gradient: 0-1% (v/v) on silica gel 60 (particle size 0.040-0.063 mm, 230-240 mesh), yielding 65 mg prodigiosin per 1 L culture with a purity of 97% as determined by spectrophotometric analysis and application of previously determined extinction coefficient at 535 nm [38]. See Fig 1 for mass calculation by Fourier transform ion cyclotron resonance mass spectrometry (FTICR-ESI-MS) analysis (LTQFT UltraTM, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Bremen, Germany).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Mass spectrometry analysis of prodigiosin, serrawettin W1 and N-myristoyltyrosine.

(A) FTICR-ESI-MS analysis of prodigiosin (M+H+)+ which was obtained by heterologous production in P. putida. The purified compound was solubilized in H2O/acetonitrile/formic acid (50/50/0.1%) and analyzed via infusion by FTICR-ESI-MS in the positive mode. (B) HPLC-ESI-MS analysis of serrawettin W1 which was obtained by heterologous production in P. putida. The extracted compound was analyzed by HPLC-ESI-MS. Detected nominal molecular masses (M+H+)+ of different serrawettin W1 species (congeners with different fatty acids varying in length and number of double bonds) are indicated in Da in overlayed extracted ion chromatograms (EICs) of m/z 547 with C10+C11+H2O (red), m/z 515 with C10+C10 (green), m/z 573 with C10+C13:1+H2O (blue), m/z 575 with C10+C13+H2O (violet), m/z 541 with C10+C12:1 (pink) and m/z 543 with C10+C12 (turquoise). (C) FTICR-ESI-MS analysis of N-myristoyltyrosine. Chemically synthesized N-myristoyltyrosine was solubilized in H2O/acetonitrile/formic acid (50/50/0.1%) and analyzed via infusion by FTICR-ESI-MS in the positive mode. Deviations of measured masses from monoisotopic masses of compounds (indicated in headlines) are given in ppm for FTICR-ESI-MS analyses.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.g001

Serrawettin W1.

Serrawettin W1 was produced by heterologous biosynthesis via expression of the swrW gene from S. marcescens, essentially as described before [42], here using P. putida KT2440 as a production host. P. putida cells transformed with vector pVLT-swrW by electroporation [43] were used to inoculate LB medium and incubated at 30°C. Production was induced at an OD580 nm of 0.5 with 0.4 mM IPTG and PU foam cubes were added for simultaneous product adsorption. After incubation for 18 h, PU foam was recovered, washed with water and extracted with ethanol. Dried extracts were re-dissolved and extracted with ethyl acetate and water, to remove polar components. Ethyl acetate extracts were pooled and dried to yield a crude light yellow-whitish serrawettin W1 extract, with a yield of 33.7 mg per 100 mL culture. A corresponding empty vector extract was produced analogously, yielding 1 mg of extract mass per 100 mL culture (about 3% of the weight of the serrawettin W1 extract). This may suggest that the serrawettin W1 extract contains about 97% of the compound. The mass difference between both extracts was thus considered when preparing appropriate samples of the empty vector control extract corresponding to the serrawettin W1 extract. HPLC-ESI-MS analysis was performed as described before [42] (Fig 1).

N-myristoyltyrosine.

N-myristoyltyrosine was obtained by chemical synthesis, as described before [44]. The product was analyzed by FTICR-ESI-MS (Fig 1).

Rhamnolipids.

A mixture of mono- and di-rhamnolipids was obtained as extract (90%) of Pseudomonas aeruginosa from Sigma-Aldrich®.

Synthetic surfactants.

Tween 20, Triton X-100, and SDS were purchased from Carl Roth® (Karlsruhe, Germany).

For use in antibacterial assays, all compounds were dissolved in ethanol (p.a.).

Disk diffusion assay

Based on previously established protocols [45], C. glutamicum or S. marcescens were cultivated in 10 mL LB without any antibiotics in 100 mL unbaffled Erlenmeyer flasks for 18 h at 30°C and constant shaking at 130 rpm. These freshly grown cells were used to prepare 1 mL saline solution (0.9% NaCl) with cells at an OD580 nm of 0.3. A lawn of bacteria was generated on 120x120x15.8 mm LB plates (containing 1.5% (w/v) agar) by spreading using glass beads. For disk diffusion assays in a combination matrix, solutions of surfactants and prodigiosin (in ethanol, p.a.) were loaded on 0.75 mm thick round cellulose disks with 6 mm diameter (Carl Roth®, Karlsruhe, Germany) in 10 μL steps, followed by 5–10 min drying to reach 10, 25 or 50 μg of each compound per disk, alone and in combination. Pure ethanol without compounds was used at concentration = 0. Streptomycin which was used as a positive control was dissolved in water for application on disks. Dry loaded disks were transferred to agar plates with plated bacteria. Disk diffusion plates were incubated for 20 h at 30°C for lawn formation and photo-documented. For evaluation of C. glutamicum growth inhibition in compound combination matrices, inhibition zones were determined as clear areas in the lawn, and measured as diameter with subtracted disk size based on image files using the size of the disks (6 mm diameter) as a reference. For disk diffusion assays with S. marcescens, the pigment phenotype of bacteria in proximity to applied surfactants was photo-documented.

Checkerboard growth inhibition and survival assay

Overnight cultures of C. glutamicum were inoculated in 10 mL LB in 100 mL unbaffled Erlenmeyer flasks and incubated at 30°C under agitation at 130 rpm. These were used to inoculate test cultures with an initial OD580 nm of 0.05 in LB medium in Round Well Plates (m2p-labs, Baesweiler, Germany). Each well was filled with 776 μL bacterial culture and 24 μL antibiotic solution (i.e., 12 μL prodigiosin- plus 12 μL N-myristoyltyrosine-solution, both solved in ethanol) before cultivation. Control wells were supplemented with 24 μL pure ethanol. Two-fold serial dilutions of each compound, starting with 20.48 μg/mL prodigiosin and 32 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine were employed in a checkerboard matrix. Streptomycin was used as a positive control for reference. This antibiotic was added from stock solutions prepared in LB medium to cell suspensions in LB medium additionally supplemented with 3% ethanol to create the same setup as for prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine. Round Well Plates were sealed with sterile breathable rayon film seals (VWR, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA) and incubated for 20 h at 30°C and 600 rpm in an Eppendorf Thermomixer® (Eppendorf AG, Hamburg, Germany).

Determination of cell growth.

Optical densities of washed cell cultures (see below) were measured using the microplate reader TECAN Infinite® M1000 PRO (Tecan Deutschland GmbH, Crailsheim, Germany) by turbidity measurements of samples in sterile 96-wells-F VWR® Tissue Culture Plates. To ensure linear correlation of turbidity measurements with cell density and avoid interference of the pigment prodigiosin, the wavelength of 650 nm was used which is beyond the absorption maximum of prodigiosin. Employing calibration, obtained values were converted to optical cell densities as measured in a standard spectral photometer with 1 cm path length. Bacterial growth was indicated by OD650 nm values over 0.06. The minimal inhibitory concentrations (MICs) were determined as the lowest antibiotic concentration at which no growth was detected. Above this threshold, growth was further categorized as strongly (up to OD650 nm = 1.00) or moderately impaired (up to OD650 nm = 4.10) and indistinguishable from control (OD650 nm ≥ 4.10). Based on MIC values, fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index values were determined for the classification in additive, synergistic or antagonistic effects. FIC index (FICI) is the sum of FIC values, which describe the relation of the required amount of a compound when combined with another to the required amount of a compound alone to inhibit bacterial growth: FICI = FIC prodigiosin [MIC (prodigiosin in combination) / MIC (prodigiosin)] + FIC N-myristoyltyrosine [MIC (N-myristoyltyrosine in combination) / MIC (N-myristoyltyrosine)].

Assessment of cell survival.

Cells were washed by centrifugation and re-suspension in 800 μL fresh medium without antibiotics. After dilution (1:100), 3 μL samples were spotted onto LB agar plates which were incubated at 30°C for 20 h, and photo-documented. Untreated cells (0 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine and 0 μg/mL prodigiosin) were treated likewise as a control but further diluted (up to 10−7) and plated as 100 μL samples for CFU (colony forming unit) determination. Here, 1 mL C. glutamicum culture with OD580 nm = 1 was found to correlate with 5.9 x 108 CFUs. Minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) were determined as the first antibiotic concentration at which 99.9% of bacteria (in relation to the untreated control) were killed, i.e., up to 55 colonies from 3 μL samples. Above this threshold, cell survival was further categorized as strongly impaired (just above 55 colonies, not countable), moderately impaired (scattered spots), and indistinguishable from control (fully grown spots).

Microfluidic single-cell cultivation

For microfluidic single-cell cultivation, LB medium was filtrated using a sterile syringe polyethersulfone membrane filter with 0.2 μm pore size (VWR, Radnor, Pennsylvania, USA) to remove disturbing micro-particles. Experimental workflow including microfluidic chip fabrication [46,47] and microscopic live cell imaging setup and operation [48] was performed as previously described. To obtain fresh cell samples in a defined growth state, C. glutamicum was pre-cultured in 10 mL LB in 100 mL unbaffled Erlenmeyer flasks and incubated for 18 h at 30°C shaking at 130 rpm. Main cultures were inoculated from pre-cultures with an initial OD580 nm between 0.02 and 0.04 and incubated under the same conditions. When cultures reached an OD580 nm between 0.25 and 0.50, they were used for microchip inoculation, i.e., flushing of microchips with culture broth, aiming at capturing of single cells in monolayer growth chambers (see [49]). During the first phase of cultivation, cells were supplied with fresh LB at a constant perfusion rate of 200 nL/min and were allowed to adapt and perform one to two cell divisions during a 3 h period at 30°C. Afterwards, supplementation of LB containing prodigiosin (1 μg/mL) and N-myristoyltyrosine (15 μg/mL)–alone or in combination–was started. Compounds were dissolved in ethanol (p.a.) and added to the LB medium with a total volume of 3%. Thus, LB medium with 3% ethanol was used as a control. During this supplementation process, the perfusion rate was increased to 900 nL/min for 15 min until total exchange of medium. Thereafter, medium flow was stopped for the rest of the experiment. A minimum of 20 chambers was selected by random sampling for each condition (control, prodigiosin, N-myristoyltyrosine, and combination) to be monitored by time-lapse microscopy at 10 min intervals. Cultivation and imaging were performed for 20 h. Microcolony cell areas were determined using a tailor-made ImageJ plugin and plotted over time as a measure of growth [48]. Images of selected time points were extracted to depict cell growth of selected microcolonies.

Results

Combined effects of prodigiosin and surfactants

S. marcescens naturally produces the hydrophobic pigment prodigiosin in a mixture with a second antibiotic substance, namely the lipopeptide surfactant serrawettin W1. Here, we aimed to evaluate combinatorial effects of the two compounds in vitro, and investigate the effects of prodigiosin with other surface active substances. To this end, the antibacterial activities of compound mixtures were compared to the effects of single compounds on growth of the soil bacterium C. glutamicum, which constitutes a model system for Corynebacteriales [50,51], using a disk diffusion assay which represents an established method for initial straightforward determination of antibacterial effects [52].

As a first step, the effect of the naturally occurring mixture of S. marcescens, i.e., prodigiosin and serrawettin W1 (Fig 2A), was characterized. Both compounds were purified separately after heterologous production in P. putida, employing previously established protocols [38], and analyzed by mass spectrometry (Fig 1A, Fig 1B). Heterologously produced serrawettin W1 was found to be a mixture of congeners differing in the hydroxyl fatty acids, thus resembling the naturally occurring composition produced by S. marcescens [42,53]. To assess combinatorial effects, prodigiosin and serrawettin W1 were applied in a disk diffusion assay as a compound combination matrix using 0, 10, 25 and 50 μg of each compound per disk (Fig 2B). For reference, the anti-mycobacterial antibiotic streptomycin was used as a positive control.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Combined effects of prodigiosin with different soil-bacterial surface active compounds on lawn-formation of C. glutamicum.

(A) Compounds applied were the red pigment prodigiosin and the biosurfactant serrawettin W1, both produced by S. marcescens; rhamnolipid biosurfactants from P. aeruginosa; the biosurfactant N-myristoyltyrosine from an unknown enviromental bacterium. Combination matrices were implemented in disk diffusion assays on a lawn of C. glutamicum with compound combinations in series of 0, 10, 25, and 50 μg/disk: (B) Combination of naturally co-produced prodigiosin and serrawettin W1, (C) combination of prodigiosin and biosurfactant rhamnolipids, (D) combination of prodigiosin and biosurfactant N-myristoyltyrosine. Streptomycin was used as a positive control for reference. Shown photographed results are representative of duplicate experiments. Reach of inhibition zones from filter disks are indicated [mm].

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.g002

The presence of the biosurfactant serrawettin W1 alone did not result in the formation of inhibition zones. In contrast, the antibacterial hydrophobic pigment prodigiosin evoked minor zones of inhibition with constant sizes (< 1 mm) at all concentrations tested. The combination of prodigiosin and serrawettin W1 generated a larger inhibition zone of 3.7 mm at the lowest amount of prodigiosin (10 μg/disk) together with the highest amount of serrawettin W1 (50 μg/disk). Any other combination of prodigiosin and serrawettin W1 only yielded minor inhibition zones (with maximal 1.3 mm reach), resembling inhibition zones generated by the single compound prodigiosin. To exclude that non-serrawettin W1 components of the extract affect the combinatorial effect, prodigiosin was combined in the same assay with extracts from P. putida cultures harboring the empty expression vector pVLT33 as a control. Here, no enhancement of prodigiosin-dependent inhibition zones could be observed (S1 Fig). The combination of prodigiosin and serrawettin W1 inhibited the growth of C. glutamicum in a concentration-dependent manner. This observation prompted us to test the effects of prodigiosin in combination with additional surfactants.

To investigate whether combinatorially enhanced effects of prodigiosin and serrawettin W1 are associated with the surface activity of serrawettin W1, prodigiosin was combined in the same disk diffusion assay with the frequently used synthetic surfactants Triton X-100 (octyl phenol ethoxylate), SDS (sodium dodecyl sulfate), and Tween 20 (polysorbate 20). Indeed, an enhanced combinatorial effect was observed in all cases (S2 Fig). Specifically, application of neither Triton X-100 nor Tween 20 alone resulted in the formation of inhibition zones, while higher amounts of SDS caused the formation of significant inhibition zones. When combined with low amounts of prodigiosin, Triton X-100 and, even more so, SDS evoked large inhibition zones. As observed with serrawettin W1, this effect was decreased with increasing amounts of prodigiosin. The application of Tween 20 similarly enhanced the inhibition compared to individual application of prodigiosin, but proved independent from the relative concentrations. These results cannot be related to physicochemical differences between the surfactants (cf. S1 Table). However, the common enhanced combinatorial effects with prodigiosin appear to be linked to the surface activity of the structurally different surfactant compounds.

To evaluate the potential of bio-based surfactants, which often exhibit advantageous biocompatibility and biodegradability [54], we investigated the effects of prodigiosin in combination with selected surface active compounds from other soil bacteria starting with rhamnolipids from Pseudomonas aeruginosa (Fig 2A). This bacterium synthesizes glycolipids consisting of L-rhamnose and β-hydroxyl fatty acids as a mixture of mono- and di-rhamnolipids [55]. These biosurfactants with antibacterial properties [56] are considered as an alternative to synthetic surfactants in diverse applications because of their favorable physicochemical properties and stability, as well as good biodegradability and low toxicity [57]. The compounds were applied in the disk diffusion assay combination matrix using 0, 10, 25 and 50 μg/disk prodigiosin and commercially obtained rhamnolipids (Fig 2C).

Here, a very similar result as obtained with serrawettin W1 was observed. Rhamnolipids only had a minor effect when applied alone (at 25 and 50 μg/disk) but the combination of prodigiosin and rhamnolipids produced a significantly enlarged inhibition zone of 5.2 mm at the lowest amount of prodigiosin (10 μg/disk) together with the highest amount of rhamnolipids (50 μg/disk). All other combinations generated inhibition zones resembling those evoked by the single compound prodigiosin.

The biosynthesis of surface active N-acylated amino acids was regularly found by metagenomic analysis of microorganisms in soil and other habitats [29,44,58]. Next, we tested N-myristoyltyrosine (Fig 2A) which we had previously identified, characterized and heterologously produced using E. coli as host [44], in combination with prodigiosin in the disk diffusion assay (Fig 2D).

Individually employed, the biosurfactant N-myristoyltyrosine produced small inhibition zones with increasing amounts from 10 μg/disk (1.3 mm) to 50 μg/disk (2.0 mm). Prodigiosin evoked minor zones of inhibition (< 1 mm) at all applied amounts as observed before (cf. Fig 2B, Fig 2C). In combination, these individual effects were altered remarkably. Any amount of N-myristoyltyrosine together with 10 μg/disk prodigiosin evoked significantly increased inhibition zones (5.7 to 6.9 mm), with strongest effects toward high amounts of N-myristoyltyrosine at 25 and 50 μg/disk. At 25 μg/disk prodigiosin, increased inhibition zones (3.8 to 5.0 mm) were only observed together with high amounts of N-myristoyltyrosine at 25 and 50 μg/disk. At 50 μg/disk prodigiosin in any combination with N-myristoyltyrosine, only minor inhibition zones (around 1 mm) were produced, representing a decrease as compared to the individual application of the biosurfactant.

Therefore, a combinatorial growth inhibition effect on C. glutamicum, highly dependent on the concentrations of the two compounds prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine, could be determined. Similar to observations of the pigment’s activity in combination with serrawettin W1 or rhamnolipids, the combined effect appears to depend on the ratio of the two compounds, with lower amounts of prodigiosin in combination with high amounts of N-myristoyltyrosine evoking strongly enhanced effects, while higher amounts of prodigiosin diminished this effect or even showed antagonistic results. It is worth mentioning that in comparison to effects evoked by streptomycin, which was used as positive control, observed inhibition zones were relatively small.

In summary, our initial experiments with disk diffusion assays revealed combinatorial antibacterial effects of prodigiosin and surfactants and showed that the combination of the pigment with N-myristoyltyrosine yielded most pronounced effects among the biosurfactants which was thus defined as the most interesting combination for further characterization. Further, the disk diffusion assay entails some limitations as the readout is dependent on the effective diffusion of compounds out of the disks into the agar, which is hampered in case of hydrophobic compounds in comparison to more polar compounds like streptomycin. Therefore, it remains unclear whether the surfactants promote enhanced inhibitory effects by facilitating the distribution of the hydrophobic prodigiosin on the surface of the agar plate or by acting directly on C. glutamicum cells, which, in concert with prodigiosin-mediated effects, may lead to stronger inhibitory effects. Consequently, we analyzed the combinatorial effects of prodigiosin and the biosurfactant N-myristoyltyrosine in more detail with further methods.

Growth inhibition and survival of C. glutamicum exposed to prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine

The minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) constitutes a commonly applied parameter for the description of antibacterial effects. Thus, MICs were determined for prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine, individually and in combination, which allowed the determination of the corresponding fractional inhibitory concentration (FIC) index to assess combinatorial effects.

C. glutamicum was cultivated in the presence of different concentrations of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine in a small volume (800 μL). The antimicrobial pigment and surfactant were supplemented in a checkerboard matrix individually and in combination in two-fold dilutions starting from 20.48 μg/mL and 32 μg/mL, respectively, to 0.005 μg/mL and 2 μg/mL. MICs were determined as the minimal compound concentration required to inhibit bacterial growth under the here applied experimental setup. Bacterial growth was evaluated via turbidity measurements after 20 h of cultivation (Fig 3A). Bacterial growth was indicated by OD650 nm values between 0.06 and 4.40 (Fig 3A, different shades of blue), while values up to 0.06 indicated no growth (Fig 3A, grey). Streptomycin was employed as a positive control for reference.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Growth and survival of C. glutamicum under combined exposure to prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine.

Liquid cultures (volume 800 μL) of C. glutamicum were supplemented with antibiotic compounds in a checkerboard matrix individually and in combinations in two-fold dilutions. The antibiotic streptomycin was individually applied for reference. (A) Turbidities of cultures were measured at 650 nm after incubation for 20 h at 30°C and constant agitation. Grey: Turbidities up to 0.06, defined as no growth. Different shades of blue: Strongly impaired growth with turbidities from 0.06 to 1.00, moderately impaired growth with turbidities from 1.00 to 4.10, and unimpaired growth with turbidities above 4.10. Values represent mean results from three independent measurements and the respective standard deviation. (B) Grown cells were washed and diluted samples spotted onto solid medium without antibiotics for incubation at 30°C for 20 h. Colony formation was evaluated by assignment of categories according to cell survival: killed (grey, empty circle), strongly impaired (light-blue, filled diamond), moderately impaired (blue, filled circle), and fully grown like the control (dark-blue, filled squares). Symbols in the table represent respective results from three independent experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.g003

When applied individually, both compounds were inhibitory and MIC values of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine were thus defined as 2.56 mg/mL and 32 mg/mL, respectively. These values are in a similar range as the MIC of the positive control streptomycin which exerted strong inhibition at ≥ 1.28 μg/mL and completely inhibited bacterial growth at 10.24 μg/mL. In combination, MIC values of both compounds declined significantly, namely to 0.005 μg/mL prodigiosin with 16 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, or to 1.28 μg/mL prodigiosin with 8 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine. Moreover, in presence of prodigiosin in the sub-MIC concentration range of 0.32 to 1.28 μg/mL, bacterial growth was apparently possible but clearly inhibited with optical densities between 0.09 and 0.69. The occurrence of such an intermediate response at certain concentrations is not unexpected but typically observed in similar checkerboard experiments with other antibiotics [59]. Together with 2 to 8 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, this range was enlarged to lower prodigiosin concentrations of 0.16 or 0.08 μg/mL prodigiosin. Interestingly, the combined application of both compounds at high concentrations (5.12 to 20.48 μg/mL prodigiosin and 8 to 32 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine) appeared to favor slight bacterial growth with optical densities between 0.06 and 0.15. Therefore, both an increase and a decrease of antibiotic effects were observed depending on the respective concentrations.

In order to classify the combinatorial effects regarding synergy, additivity or antagonism, we determined FIC values (fractional inhibitory concentration) via division of MIC values at combined application by MIC values of individually applied compounds. The FIC thus describes the relation of the amount of a compound when combined with another, to the amount of a compound alone that is required to inhibit bacterial growth. The decisive FIC index (also FICI) was calculated as the sum of individual FIC values (Table 1). Following the most common categorization [60,61], a synergistic effect exists at a FIC index ≤ 0.5, indifference is defined by 0.5 < FICI ≤ 4, and an antagonistic effect is classified by a FICI value > 4. This categorization is based on the concept that a mean 4-fold enhancement of the antibiotic effect of both compounds is considered as significant synergism, and a mean 4-fold reduction of their effect as true antagonism. However, diverse studies argue that FIC index values up to 1 (corresponding to a mean 2-fold enhancement) are indicative of synergy, and values above 1.25 (corresponding to a mean 1.6-fold reduction) indicate antagonism [62]. Here, two FIC indices could be determined at lowered combined MICs. Results revealed individual FIC indices of 0.002 and 0.5 for one specific combination of 0.005 μg/mL prodigiosin and 16 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, respectively, and a resulting FIC index of 0.502, which points toward a synergistic effect of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine. Another combination of 1.28 μg/mL prodigiosin and 8 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine was characterized by individual FIC indices of 0.5 and 0.25 of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine, respectively, and a corresponding FIC index of 0.75. Therefore, a clear tendency toward a synergistic interaction of the two compounds could be determined at the named concentrations. Moreover, observations of minimal growth at higher compound concentrations might indicate additional antagonistic effects, here not captured by FIC index determination.

thumbnail
Table 1. MICs and FIC indices describing the combined effects of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine on C. glutamicum.

Individual MICs of compounds, as well as MICs at two combinations (combi I: 0.005 μg/mL prodigiosin and 16 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, combi II: 1.28 μg/mL prodigiosin and 8 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine), which exhibited enhanced inhibitory effects, were used to calculate FIC and FIC index values.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.t001

In order to evaluate not only growth inhibition but also bactericidal effects of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine, C. glutamicum cells were washed after incubation in media with different antibiotic concentrations and combinations, sampled for incubation on agar plates in the absence of antibiotics, and subsequently viability was determined documenting colony formation (Fig 3B). Bacterial survival was indicated by significant colony formation (Fig 3B, different shades of blue and filled symbols), while bactericidal concentrations were defined as killing ≥ 99.9% of bacteria (Fig 3B, grey and empty circles).

Minimal bactericidal concentrations (MBCs) of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine were found to be 2.56 μg/mL and 32 μg/mL, respectively, corresponding to previously determined MICs. Likewise, prodigiosin alone significantly reduced cell survival at 0.32 to 1.28 μg/mL, and, when combined with 2 to 8 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, this effect was extended to even lower prodigiosin concentrations of 0.08 or 0.16 μg/mL prodigiosin (Fig 3B, light-blue). Streptomycin-exposed cells, which were used as a positive control, were unable to survive at 1.28 μg/mL. The observation of a lower MBC than MIC for the antibiotic seems coherent with its mechanism of action as streptomycin interferes with ribosomal protein biosynthesis which leads to errors during translation, synthesis of defective proteins, inhibition of protein synthesis and ultimately cell death. Apparently, initial cell divisions can be completed and become apparent as turbidity in the MIC determination, but these cells seem to have entered a lethal state of impairment.

Combined with 16 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, prodigiosin showed enhanced bactericidal effects from 0.005 to 0.32 μg/mL, although here, fluctuating results were obtained over the concentration range as depicted by different symbols indicating the results from triplicate experiments. At the same time, under the influence of N-myristoyltyrosine at concentrations of 4 to 16 μg/mL, also a tendency to slight bacterial growth at prodigiosin concentrations from 0.64 to 10.24 μg/mL, notably both below and above its individual MBC was observed, again pointing to possible antagonistic combinatorial effects. Finally, very high concentrations of 20.48 μg/mL prodigiosin and 32 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, which previously resulted in slightly increased cell densities during the investigation of MICs, were shown to fully kill bacteria (Fig 3B). Under these conditions, bacteria are apparently able to perform initial cell divisions that are, however, limited to only few events and cannot support survival.

Combined effects of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine at the single cell level

To gain further insights into antibiotic effects at the single cell level, C. glutamicum was subjected to microfluidic single cell cultivation [48,63] in the presence of prodigiosin, N-myristoyltyrosine and their combination. Live cell imaging was used to analyze if the observed impaired growth resulted from homogeneous effects exerted on all cells or represents a result averaged from differentially responding single cells. To this end, prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine were applied at concentrations of 1 μg/mL and 15 μg/mL, respectively, which were previously determined to exhibit inhibitory effects on cell growth without effective killing. After inoculation and 3 h incubation allowing cells to adapt and perform initial divisions, cells were perfused with medium supplemented with antibiotics for 15 min. Thereafter, the flow was stopped until the end of the experiment, creating a batch cultivation comparable to previously published experiments [64]. Since compounds were dissolved in ethanol, LB medium supplemented with 3% ethanol served as a control. Image data were extracted from selected time points to display microcolony development over the course of the experiment (Fig 4A). Time point “0 h” represents cells after their inoculation in the microfluidic cultivation system. Between 12.5 and 15 h, control chambers were filled with C. glutamicum cells due to continuous cell division. Microcolonies developing in the presence of prodigiosin or N-myristoyltyrosine were only slightly impaired in growth, whereas those supplemented with the compound cocktail of 1 μg/mL prodigiosin and 15 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine were strongly inhibited. Here, chambers were not filled at the end of the experiment, i.e., cell growth had ceased. Individual cells underwent phenotypic changes forming unusual cell shapes and even appeared to loose cell integrity and burst during online monitored microcultivation (see S1 Video, S3 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Microcolony formation by C. glutamicum in the presence of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine.

Growth chambers were inoculated with bacteria at time point “0 h”. After 3 h, cells were exposed to medium supplemented with antibiotics, individually or in combination, and the control was supplemented with 3% ethanol. Microcolony formation was documented by time-lapse microscopy over 20 h with 10 min intervals. (A) Cell growth is depicted for individual microcolonies in images extracted from selected time points (see image series). (B) The development of colony area over time is shown as a measure of bacterial growth for different microcolonies. Data was collected in three independent experiments, monitoring a total of 60 microcolonies per condition. For conditions evoking a uniform response, three representative microcolonies were selected; for exposure to both compounds, five microcolonies were selected to represent differential response. Curves marked with colored arrows correspond to depicted image data.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.g004

However, inspection of all monitored chamber showed that cell behavior in the presence of two antibiotic compounds varied between different microcolonies. In order to more broadly depict bacterial responses to antibiotic exposure accordingly, the colony area was monitored as a measure of growth over time in several chambers at each condition (Fig 4B). In the control experiment, microcolonies exhibited constant, fast growth. Under exposure to individual compounds, likewise constant results were obtained, with microcolony growth showing a prolonged lag phase (by about 2.5 h) before starting growth with similar kinetics as the control. However, treated with the cocktail of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine at the chosen concentrations, microcolonies showed highly differential behavior, ranging from growth after a significantly prolonged lag phase to complete growth arrest, which occurred in about 55% of monitored chambers.

Growth of a subpopulation of cells might be the result of resistance caused by an early mutation, possibly induced by the applied compounds, e.g., by ROS formation [65], or attributed to non-heritable physiological adaptions [66]. To distinguish between both phenomena, a re-exposition assay was conducted. To this end, C. glutamicum was treated with a combination of 1 μg/mL prodigiosin and 15 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine in small scale liquid cultivation as described for checkerboard experiments, and surviving clones obtained in subsequent cultivation on agar plates without antibiotics were re-subjected to exposure in liquid cultivation with individual antibiotics at MBC concentrations. Assessment of survival of these cells in the absence of antibiotics on agar plates revealed that cells were effectively killed, thus showing unchanged susceptibility toward bactericidal concentrations of the compounds (S4 Fig). Therefore, the occurrence of mutations conveying complete resistance is unlikely; instead, physiological adaptions in individual cells seem to be more reasonable.

In summary, a strong combined antibacterial effect of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine could be demonstrated also at the single cell level. Moreover, a differential development of individual microcolonies was observed in presence of concentrations that were previously determined as impairing growth but not fully killing. This points toward a heterogeneity in cellular response and indicates that the presence of a few pre-adapted cells may have a significant influence on the overall growth behavior of the population, which is typically evaluated in MIC determination. The phenomenon may further account for the observed fluctuating numbers and scattered occurrence of surviving cells in viability assays.

The combination of methods and compounds used here for the analysis of antimicrobial effects on C. glutamicum resulted in the following emerging picture: For the natural combination of prodigiosin and serrawettin W1, as well as the deduced artificial cocktails including prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine, combinatorial impairment of bacterial growth was clearly detectable in disk diffusion assays although inhibition zones were rather small at relatively high compound dosage. For the latter combination, we used liquid medium-based checkerboard assays for further characterization and determined MICs and MBCs of both compounds alone in the μg/mL range and in combination in the μg to ng/mL range, finding synergistic features in growth inhibition and both synergistic and antagonistic features in bacterial killing. In addition, analysis on single-cell level indicated that killing efficacy at intermediate concentrations may be prone to cell heterogeneity among the populations. The differential responses of single cells during exposure and scattered appearance of surviving cells after exposure, without acquisition of resistance, suggest individual adaptation processes in C. glutamicum in this concentration range.

Discussion

This study demonstrated that isolated prodigiosin and serrawettin W1, two antimicrobial compounds concertedly produced by S. marcescens, exert combinatorial enhanced effects in vitro against C. glutamicum in a concentration-dependent manner. Even more pronounced concentration-dependent effects were observed for a combination of prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine.

Synergistic activities of combinations of diverse antibiotics with surface active antimicrobial compounds have been reported various times [6773]. The ecological function of the simultaneous production of combinations of bioactive metabolite by a single microbe may be an increase in effectiveness [7480]. If not to kill competitors completely, the function of antibiotic biosynthesis may be to create colonization advantages for the producing organisms by inhibiting or delaying the growth of competing microorganisms. It is interesting to note that especially in the soil niche, a number of bacteria were found to be genetically equipped for the production of several bioactive substances (e.g., Streptomyces, Pseudomonas and Serratia species [77,81,82]), including the producers of the here investigated serrawettin W1 and prodigiosin (S. marcescens) [83,84], or rhamnolipids (P. aeruginosa) [67,85]. The soil habitat, as a complex and highly competitive environment, may provide a particularly pronounced evolutionary pressure toward the development of a versatile arsenal of chemical defense mechanisms. Our results prompt consideration of two specific hypotheses regarding prodigiosin co-functioning with surfactants:

Possibly, the combination of prodigiosin with a surface active metabolite represents a general natural scheme for enhanced bioactivity as it appears to have developed several times with structurally different surfactant components. First, the present study shows that the mixture of isolated prodigiosin and the lipopeptide serrawettin W1, as it occurs in S. marcescens DSM12481, exhibits increased antibiotic activity. Furthermore, a previous study suggested that prodigiosin produced by Serratia sp. ATCC 39006 exerts antibiotic activity only in combination with a biosurfactant produced by this strain [70]. There, the biosurfactant was assumed to be a 3-(3-hydroxyalkanoyloxy)alkanoic acid (HAA)-related compound, which was deduced from the homology of a protein associated with surfactant production to P. aeruginosa RhlA, which catalyzes the formation of HAA as the first step in rhamnolipid biosynthesis. Serrawettin W1 biosynthesis does probably not occur in this particular strain because by analysis of the available sequence data and associated protein sequences with BLAST P and antiSmash [86,87] we were unable to identify a protein resembling serrawettin synthase [88]. It may further be assumed that glycolipids similar to rhamnolipid or rubiwettin might be produced by the strain since its genome also contains a homolog to rhamnosyl transferase RhlB from P. aeruginosa (see S5 Fig). Finally, a prodigiosin synthesizing strain was recently described to be unable to produce serrawettin W1, but remarkably could produce serrawettin W2, a structurally divergent, more complex cyclic lipopeptide [89]. Here, first hints suggest a co-regulation of biosynthesis pathways [90], but future research is needed to elucidate if combinatorial effects can also be found in this case.

Furthermore, in densely populated habitats like soil, combinatorial effects of compounds not only secreted by a single bacterial strain, but also of different cellular origin may occur. This way, inhabitants may benefit from the presence of compounds produced by other microbes. Interestingly, prodigiosin biosynthesis in its natural producer S. marcescens is known to be enhanced by the presence of surfactants, in particular by SDS [91]. Intriguingly, all surfactants tested in this study– with the exception of Tween 20 –not only inhibited C. glutamicum growth when combined with prodigiosin, but also appear to induce enhanced prodigiosin biosynthesis in the natural producer S. marcescens (S6 Fig). It is unknown whether this might be due to physicochemical processes, like an in situ extraction of the compound from S. marcescens membranes into surfactant micelles influencing the biosynthetic reaction equilibrium toward increased production as previously suggested [92], or due to regulatory processes increasing prodigiosin production in response to a surfactant. Nevertheless, it may be speculated that S. marcescens might benefit from the presence of other surfactants in soil by their combinatorial antibacterial effects together with S. marcescens-derived prodigiosin.

A prerequisite for clinical application is the understanding of the antibiotic mechanisms of compounds or compound combinations. The enhanced antibacterial activity of prodigiosin together with surface active compounds could be a result of different underlying mechanisms. The antibacterial activity of prodigiosin has been described several times, with reported MICs in the concentration range of 1 to 8 μg/mL against different Staphylococcus aureus and Bacillus subtilis strains [12,13], generally matching the MIC of 2.56 μg/mL against Gram-positive C. glutamicum as determined in this study. We furthermore show here that in combination with 16 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, 0.005 μg/mL prodigiosin fully inhibits growth of C. glutamicum. Diverse mechanisms inducing bacterial programmed cell death, including DNA intercalation, have been assigned to the pigment’s antibiotic activity [18]. For activity against Bacillus spec. in particular, the disturbance of membrane integrity and induction of bacterial autolysis, as a result of proton/Cl- symport via the cell membrane was reported [13]. In line with that, we corroborate here bactericidal activity of prodigiosin and observed that C. glutamicum cells treated with prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine displayed compromised cell integrity.

In contrast, the antibacterial activities of here employed biosurfactants have not been discussed on a detailed mechanistic level. Serrawettin W1 and N-myristoyltyrosine especially affect Gram-positive bacteria [25,26,44], a surfactant-typical phenomenon assigned to the specific architectures of the cell envelopes. Since we show here that a range of structurally very diverse surfactants evokes enhanced inhibition of C. glutamicum together with prodigiosin, as compared to individual application, the common surface active properties appear central for this function as discussed above. Via their surface active properties they presumably destabilize bacterial lipid membranes and may enhance solubility, and therefore, the bioavailability, i.e., entrance into the cell membrane or cell interior, of hydrophobic prodigiosin. The here observed different combinatorial effects dependent on the ratio of surfactant to prodigiosin may be explained by concentration-dependent differences in the mode of surfactant assembly (e.g., in monolayers, bilayers, micelles, vesicles), and may be modulated by different concentrations of prodigiosin. In addition to surface activity, further differential activities of the surfactants cannot be excluded. Notably, it is known that surfactants can function highly specifically for a given organism, from inhibiting to enabling developmental processes, regardless of their shared ability to reduce surface tension [93]. In the context of drug development and clinical application, surfactants should not be mistaken as additives merely relevant for the manufacturing process of antibiotics. They should be appreciated also as bioactive compounds with valuable functions i.e., exhibiting innate antimicrobial properties and enhancing antibiotic effectivity [94,95]. Examples for the latter include improving e.g. antibiotic-based biofilm disruption relevant for wound treatment [96] or antibiotic delivery and bioavailability in otherwise difficult-to-target areas [97,98]. Interestingly, here investigated N-myristoyltyrosine promoted an enhanced effect of the anti-mycobacterial antibiotic streptomycin against C. glutamicum in an initial evaluation (S7 Fig).

Besides dependency on the applied compounds and their concentrations, the response of C. glutamicum also appeared to be prone to cell-to-cell heterogeneity. At intermediate antibiotic cocktail concentrations below the MBC, a fraction of bacteria was not killed but survived exposure, notably without developing heritable resistance to bactericidal concentrations. The development of phenotypically distinct subpopulations is a known phenomenon in mycobacteria [99]. Moreover, the bacterial cell envelope, which represents at least one of the targets of here investigated antibiotics, is a highly dynamic structure [100,101], and a known (myco)bacterial resistance determinant [102,103]. Therefore, stochastically differential cell architecture might cause individual bacterial susceptibility. A potential clinical relevance of this observation needs to be elucidated using mycobacterial infection models in future studies, as well as an evaluation of potential toxicity of compound combinations.

In summary, our study provides an initial characterization of a natural compound cocktail with antibacterial activity, exemplarily demonstrating the potential nature and especially the microbial world continues to offer in the context of antibiotic discovery and drug development. The here immanent potential can be translated into diverse promising solutions to combat infectious diseases. These include combinatorial therapy with two antibiotic compounds [104] where both, synergistic as well as antagonistic effects are discussed as advantageous in the provision of effective and fast treatment of an acute severe infection or the prevention of resistance development [105,106]. Therefore, an in-depth investigation of microbes in competitive ecological niches such as soil should be especially promising for future exploration of novel antibiotic compounds [107] and naturally evolved cocktails including surface active compounds.

Conclusions

At present, the development of effective antibiotics represents one of the most challenging problems including the identification of novel compounds and formulation. Nature provides not only a rich source of bioactive molecules but also gives hints to promising combinations. To this end, understanding of the ecological contextual function of naturally co-produced antimicrobial secondary metabolites and adoption of or inspiration from these may be a useful strategy for future research on novel antibiotics and antibiotic formulations.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Disk diffusion assay showing combined effect of prodigiosin together with a control extract from P. putida with empty expression vector on C. glutamicum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s001

(PDF)

S2 Fig. Disk diffusion assay showing combined effects of prodigiosin and synthetic surfactants on C. glutamicum.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s002

(PDF)

S3 Fig. Direct comparison of C. glutamicum cell morphology during antibiotic exposure at similar growth stages in microfluidic cultivation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s003

(PDF)

S4 Fig. Influence of combinatorial treatment with prodigiosin and N-myristoyltyrosine on susceptibility of C. glutamicum after treatment.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s004

(PDF)

S5 Fig. Sequence alignment of Serratia sp. ATCC 39006 putative glycosyltransferase with two putative homologs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s005

(PDF)

S6 Fig. Increased prodigiosin production by S. marcescens in the presence of surfactants in disk diffusion assay.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s006

(PDF)

S7 Fig. Growth of C. glutamicum under combined exposure to N-myristoyltyrosine and streptomycin.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s007

(PDF)

S1 Table. Physicochemical properties and inhibitory effects of surfactants applied in this study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s008

(PDF)

S1 Video. C. glutamicum microcolony development in the presence of prodigiosin, N-myristoyltyrosine and their combination.

From left to right: Control, 1 μg/mL prodigiosin, 15 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine, combination of 1 μg/mL prodigiosin and 15 μg/mL N-myristoyltyrosine.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200940.s009

(WMV)

References

  1. 1. Katz L, Baltz RH. Natural product discovery: past, present, and future. J Ind Microbiol Biotechnol. 2016;43: 155–176. pmid:26739136
  2. 2. Ling LL, Schneider T, Peoples AJ, Spoering AL, Engels I, Conlon BP, et al. A new antibiotic kills pathogens without detectable resistance. Nature. 2015;517: 455–459. pmid:25561178
  3. 3. Clardy J, Fischbach MA, Walsh CT. New antibiotics from bacterial natural products. Nat Biotechnol. 2006;24: 1541–1550. pmid:17160060
  4. 4. Bnyan R, Khan I, Ehtezazi T, Saleem I, Gordon S, O’Neill F, et al. Surfactant Effects on Lipid-Based Vesicles Properties. J Pharm Sci. 2018; pmid:29336980
  5. 5. Bhadoriya SS, Madoriya N. Biosurfactants: A New Pharmaceutical Additive for Solubility Enhancement and Pharmaceutical Development. Biochem Pharmacol Open Access. 2013;2: 113.
  6. 6. Wilbur S, Jones D, Risher JF, Crawford J, Tencza B, Llados F, et al. Toxicological Profile for 1,4-Dioxane. Toxicological Profile for 1,4-Dioxane. Agency for Toxic Substances and Disease Registry (US); 2012. pmid:23946965
  7. 7. Abu-Ghunmi L, Badawi M, Fayyad M. Fate of Triton X-100 Applications on Water and Soil Environments: A Review. J Surfactants Deterg. 2014;17: 833–838.
  8. 8. Harris AKP, Williamson NR, Slater H, Cox A, Abbasi S, Foulds I, et al. The Serratia gene cluster encoding biosynthesis of the red antibiotic, prodigiosin, shows species- and strain-dependent genome context variation. Microbiology. 2004;150: 3547–3560. pmid:15528645
  9. 9. Williamson NR, Fineran PC, Gristwood T, Chawrai SR, Leeper FJ, Salmond GPC. Anticancer and immunosuppressive properties of bacterial prodiginines. Future Microbiol. 2007;2: 605–618. pmid:18041902
  10. 10. Pérez-Tomás R, Viñas M. New insights on the antitumoral properties of prodiginines. Curr Med Chem. 2010;17: 2222–2231. pmid:20459382
  11. 11. Klein AS, Domröse A, Bongen P, Brass HUC, Classen T, Loeschcke A, et al. New Prodigiosin Derivatives Obtained by Mutasynthesis in Pseudomonas putida. ACS Synth Biol. 2017;6: 1757–1765. pmid:28505410
  12. 12. Lapenda JC, Silva PA, Vicalvi MC, Sena KXFR, Nascimento SC. Antimicrobial activity of prodigiosin isolated from Serratia marcescens UFPEDA 398. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015;31: 399–406. pmid:25549906
  13. 13. Danevčič T, Borić Vezjak M, Tabor M, Zorec M, Stopar D. Prodigiosin Induces Autolysins in Actively Grown Bacillus subtilis Cells. Front Microbiol. 2016;7: 27. pmid:26858704
  14. 14. Danevčič T, Borić Vezjak M, Zorec M, Stopar D. Prodigiosin—A Multifaceted Escherichia coli Antimicrobial Agent. Rybenkov V V, editor. PLoS One. 2016;11: e0162412. pmid:27612193
  15. 15. Suryawanshi RK, Patil CD, Koli SH, Hallsworth JE, Patil S V. Antimicrobial activity of prodigiosin is attributable to plasma-membrane damage. Nat Prod Res. 2017;31: 572–577. pmid:27353356
  16. 16. Busschaert N, Gale PA. Small-molecule lipid-bilayer anion transporters for biological applications. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. 2013;52: 1374–1382. pmid:23283851
  17. 17. Wang F, Luo H, Song G, Liu C, Wang J, Xu J, et al. Prodigiosin found in Serratia marcescens y2 initiates phototoxicity in the cytomembrane. Electron J Biotechnol. 2013;16: 7.
  18. 18. Darshan N, Manonmani HK. Prodigiosin inhibits motility and activates bacterial cell death revealing molecular biomarkers of programmed cell death. AMB Express. 2016;6: 50. pmid:27460563
  19. 19. Matsuyama T, Tanikawa T, Nakagawa Y. Serrawettins and Other Surfactants Produced by Serratia. In: Soberón-Chávez G, editor. Biosurfactants. Springer Berlin / Heidelberg; 2011. pp. 93–120. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-14490-5_4
  20. 20. Wasserman HH, Keggi JJ, McKeon JE. The Structure of Serratamolide. J Am Chem Soc. 1962;84: 2978–2982.
  21. 21. Bar-Ness R, Avrahamy N, Matsuyama T, Rosenberg M. Increased cell surface hydrophobicity of a Serratia marcescens NS 38 mutant lacking wetting activity. J Bacteriol. 1988;170: 4361–4364. pmid:3045093
  22. 22. Soto-Cerrato V, Montaner B, Martinell M, Vilaseca M, Giralt E, Pérez-Tomás R. Cell cycle arrest and proapoptotic effects of the anticancer cyclodepsipeptide serratamolide (AT514) are independent of p53 status in breast cancer cells. Biochem Pharmacol. 2005;71: 32–41. pmid:16298346
  23. 23. Escobar-Díaz E, López-Martín EM, Hernández del Cerro M, Puig-Kroger A, Soto-Cerrato V, Montaner B, et al. AT514, a cyclic depsipeptide from Serratia marcescens, induces apoptosis of B-chronic lymphocytic leukemia cells: interference with the Akt/NF-kappaB survival pathway. Leukemia. 2005;19: 572–579. pmid:15744353
  24. 24. Strobel GA, Morrison SL, Cassella M. Protecting plants from oomycete pathogens by treatment with compositions containing serratamolide and oocydin a from Serratia marcescens. USA; Patent US6926892, 2005.
  25. 25. Shemyakin MM, Vinogradova EI, Feigina MY, Aldanova NA, Loginova NF, Ryabova ID, et al. The structure-antimicrobial relation for valinomycin depsipeptides. Experientia. 1965;21: 548–552. pmid:4959379
  26. 26. Kadouri DE, Shanks RMQ. Identification of a methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus inhibitory compound isolated from Serratia marcescens. Res Microbiol. 2013;164: 821–826. pmid:23791620
  27. 27. Matsuyama T, Fujita M, Yano I. Wetting agent produced by Serratia marcescens. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 1985;28: 125–129.
  28. 28. Cameotra SS, Makkar RS. Recent applications of biosurfactants as biological and immunological molecules. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2004;7: 262–266. pmid:15196493
  29. 29. Brady SF, Clardy J. Long-chain N-acyl amino acid antibiotics isolated from heterologously expressed environmental DNA. J Am Chem Soc. 2000;122: 12903–12904.
  30. 30. Khanafari A, Assadi MM, Fakhr FA. Review of Prodigiosin, Pigmentation in Serratia marcescens. Online J Biol Sci. 2006;6: 1–13.
  31. 31. Tanikawa T, Nakagawa Y, Matsuyama T. Transcriptional downregulator hexS controlling prodigiosin and serrawettin W1 biosynthesis in Serratia marcescens. Microbiol Immunol. 2006;50: 587–596. pmid:16924143
  32. 32. Shanks RMQ, Lahr RM, Stella NA, Arena KE, Brothers KM, Kwak DH, et al. A Serratia marcescens PigP Homolog Controls Prodigiosin Biosynthesis, Swarming Motility and Hemolysis and Is Regulated by cAMP-CRP and HexS. PLoS One. 2013;8: e57634. pmid:23469212
  33. 33. Stella NA, Lahr RM, Brothers KM, Kalivoda EJ, Hunt KM, Kwak DH, et al. Serratia marcescens Cyclic AMP Receptor Protein Controls Transcription of EepR, a Novel Regulator of Antimicrobial Secondary Metabolites. J Bacteriol. 2015;197: 2468–2478. pmid:25897029
  34. 34. Brothers KM, Stella NA, Romanowski EG, Kowalski RP, Shanks RMQ. EepR Mediates Secreted-Protein Production, Desiccation Survival, and Proliferation in a Corneal Infection Model. Infect Immun. 2015;83: 4373–4382. pmid:26324535
  35. 35. Barraud O, Badell E, Denis F, Guiso N, Ploy M-C. Antimicrobial drug resistance in Corynebacterium diphtheriae mitis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2011;17: 2078–2080. pmid:22099107
  36. 36. Miotto P, Cirillo DM, Migliori GB. Drug resistance in Mycobacterium tuberculosis: molecular mechanisms challenging fluoroquinolones and pyrazinamide effectiveness. Chest. 2015;147: 1135–1143. pmid:25846529
  37. 37. Belda E, van Heck RGA, José Lopez-Sanchez M, Cruveiller S, Barbe V, Fraser C, et al. The revisited genome of Pseudomonas putida KT2440 enlightens its value as a robust metabolic chassis. Environ Microbiol. 2016;18: 3403–3424. pmid:26913973
  38. 38. Domröse A, Klein AS, Hage-Hülsmann J, Thies S, Svensson V, Classen T, et al. Efficient recombinant production of prodigiosin in Pseudomonas putida. Front Microbiol. 2015;6: 972. pmid:26441905
  39. 39. Sambrook J, Russell DW. Molecular cloning: a laboratory manual. 3rd ed. Cold Spring Harbor: Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; 2001.
  40. 40. Abe S, Takayama K-I, Kinoshita S. Taxonomical studies on glutamic acid-producing bacteria. J Gen Appl Microbiol. 1967;13: 279–301.
  41. 41. Kalinowski J, Bathe B, Bartels D, Bischoff N, Bott M, Burkovski A, et al. The complete Corynebacterium glutamicum ATCC 13032 genome sequence and its impact on the production of L-aspartate-derived amino acids and vitamins. J Biotechnol. 2003;104: 5–25. pmid:12948626
  42. 42. Thies S, Santiago-Schübel B, Kovačić F, Rosenau F, Hausmann R, Jaeger K-E. Heterologous production of the lipopeptide biosurfactant serrawettin W1 in Escherichia coli. J Biotechnol. 2014;181: 27–30. pmid:24732103
  43. 43. Troeschel SC, Drepper T, Leggewie C, Streit WR, Jaeger K-E. Novel tools for the functional expression of metagenomic DNA. Methods Mol Biol. 2010;668: 117–139. pmid:20830560
  44. 44. Thies S, Rausch SC, Kovacic F, Schmidt-Thaler A, Wilhelm S, Rosenau F, et al. Metagenomic discovery of novel enzymes and biosurfactants in a slaughterhouse biofilm microbial community. Sci Rep. 2016;6: 27035. pmid:27271534
  45. 45. Bauer AW, Kirby WM, Sherris JC, Turck M. Antibiotic susceptibility testing by a standardized single disk method. Am J Clin Pathol. 1966;45: 493–496. pmid:5325707
  46. 46. Grünberger A, Paczia N, Probst C, Schendzielorz G, Eggeling L, Noack S, et al. A disposable picolitre bioreactor for cultivation and investigation of industrially relevant bacteria on the single cell level. Lab Chip. 2012;12: 2060–2068. pmid:22511122
  47. 47. Gruenberger A, Probst C, Heyer A, Wiechert W, Frunzke J, Kohlheyer D. Microfluidic picoliter bioreactor for microbial single-cell analysis: fabrication, system setup, and operation. J Vis Exp. 2013; 50560. pmid:24336165
  48. 48. Grünberger A, Probst C, Helfrich S, Nanda A, Stute B, Wiechert W, et al. Spatiotemporal microbial single-cell analysis using a high-throughput microfluidics cultivation platform. Cytometry A. 2015;87: 1101–1115. pmid:26348020
  49. 49. Probst C, Grünberger A, Braun N, Helfrich S, Nöh K, Wiechert W, et al. Rapid inoculation of single bacteria into parallel picoliter fermentation chambers. Anal Methods. 2015;7: 91–98.
  50. 50. Burkovski A. Ammonium assimilation and nitrogen control in Corynebacterium glutamicum and its relatives: an example for new regulatory mechanisms in actinomycetes. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2003;27: 617–628. pmid:14638415
  51. 51. Baumgart M, Schubert K, Bramkamp M, Frunzke J. Impact of LytR-CpsA-Psr Proteins on Cell Wall Biosynthesis in Corynebacterium glutamicum. J Bacteriol. 2016;198: 3045–3059. pmid:27551018
  52. 52. Jorgensen JH, Ferraro MJ. Antimicrobial susceptibility testing: a review of general principles and contemporary practices. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49: 1749–1755. pmid:19857164
  53. 53. Dwivedi D, Jansen R, Molinari G, Nimtz M, Johri BN, Wray V. Antimycobacterial serratamolides and diacyl peptoglucosamine derivatives from Serratia sp. J Nat Prod. 2008;71: 637–641. pmid:18303848
  54. 54. Fracchia L, Ceresa C, Franzetti A, Cavallo M, Gandolfi I, Hamme J Van, et al. Industrial Applications of Biosurfactants. In: Kosaric N, Varder-Sukan F, editors. Biosurfactants: Production and Utilization—Processes, Technologies, and Economics. Boca Raton: CRC Press Taylor & Francis Group; 2014. pp. 245–268. https://doi.org/10.1201/b17599-6
  55. 55. Déziel E, Lépine F, Milot S, Villemur R. Mass spectrometry monitoring of rhamnolipids from a growing culture of Pseudomonas aeruginosa strain 57RP. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2000;1485: 145–152. pmid:10832095
  56. 56. Abdel-Mawgoud AM, Lépine F, Déziel E. Rhamnolipids: diversity of structures, microbial origins and roles. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2010;86: 1323–1336. pmid:20336292
  57. 57. Tiso T, Thies S, Müller M, Tsvetanova L, Carraresi L, Bröring S, et al. Rhamnolipids: Production, Performance, and Application. Consequences Microb Interact with Hydrocarb Oils, Lipids Prod Fuels Chem. Cham: Springer International Publishing; 2017; 1–37. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31421-1_388–1
  58. 58. Brady SF, Chao CJ, Clardy J. Long-chain N-acyltyrosine synthases from environmental DNA. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2004;70: 6865–6870. pmid:15528554
  59. 59. Stokes JM, MacNair CR, Ilyas B, French S, Côté J-P, Bouwman C, et al. Pentamidine sensitizes Gram-negative pathogens to antibiotics and overcomes acquired colistin resistance. Nat Microbiol. 2017;2: 17028. pmid:28263303
  60. 60. Horrevorts AM, Michel MF, Kerrebijn KF. Antibiotic interaction: interpretation of fractional inhibitory and fractional bactericidal concentration indices. Eur J Clin Microbiol. 1987;6: 502–503. pmid:3665908
  61. 61. Odds FC. Synergy, antagonism, and what the chequerboard puts between them. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003;52: 1. pmid:12805255
  62. 62. Meletiadis J, Pournaras S, Roilides E, Walsh TJ. Defining fractional inhibitory concentration index cutoffs for additive interactions based on self-drug additive combinations, Monte Carlo simulation analysis, and in vitro-in vivo correlation data for antifungal drug combinations against Aspergillus fumi. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2010;54: 602–609. pmid:19995928
  63. 63. Grünberger A, Wiechert W, Kohlheyer D. Single-cell microfluidics: opportunity for bioprocess development. Curr Opin Biotechnol. 2014;29: 15–23. pmid:24642389
  64. 64. Binder D, Grünberger A, Loeschcke A, Probst C, Bier C, Pietruszka J, et al. Light-responsive control of bacterial gene expression: precise triggering of the lac promoter activity using photocaged IPTG. Integr Biol (Camb). 2014;6: 755–765. pmid:24894989
  65. 65. Kohanski MA, DePristo MA, Collins JJ. Sublethal Antibiotic Treatment Leads to Multidrug Resistance via Radical-Induced Mutagenesis. Mol Cell. 2010;37: 311–320. pmid:20159551
  66. 66. Wakamoto Y, Dhar N, Chait R, Schneider K, Signorino-Gelo F, Leibler S, et al. Dynamic persistence of antibiotic-stressed mycobacteria. Science. 2013;339: 91–95. pmid:23288538
  67. 67. Perneel M, D’Hondt L, De Maeyer K, Adiobo A, Rabaey K, Höfte M. Phenazines and biosurfactants interact in the biological control of soil-borne diseases caused by Pythium spp. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10: 778–788. pmid:18237310
  68. 68. D’aes J, De Maeyer K, Pauwelyn E, Höfte M. Biosurfactants in plant-Pseudomonas interactions and their importance to biocontrol. Environ Microbiol Rep. 2010;2: 359–372. pmid:23766108
  69. 69. Rossi CC, Santos-Gandelman JF, Barros EM, Alvarez VM, Laport MS, Giambiagi-deMarval M. Staphylococcus haemolyticus as a potential producer of biosurfactants with antimicrobial, anti-adhesive and synergistic properties. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2016; 63: 215–221. pmid:27377762
  70. 70. Williamson NR, Fineran PC, Ogawa W, Woodley LR, Salmond GPC. Integrated regulation involving quorum sensing, a two-component system, a GGDEF/EAL domain protein and a post-transcriptional regulator controls swarming and RhlA-dependent surfactant biosynthesis in Serratia. Environ Microbiol. 2008;10: 1202–1217. pmid:18294208
  71. 71. Ben Khedher S, Boukedi H, Dammak M, Kilani-Feki O, Sellami-Boudawara T, Abdelkefi-Mesrati L, et al. Combinatorial effect of Bacillus amyloliquefaciens AG1 biosurfactant and Bacillus thuringiensis Vip3Aa16 toxin on Spodoptera littoralis larvae. J Invertebr Pathol. 2017;144: 11–17. pmid:28093209
  72. 72. Yin X. Formulations combining ramoplanin and rhamnolipids for combating bacterial infection. USA; Patent US20140294925, 2014.
  73. 73. Sotirova A, Avramova T, Stoitsova S, Lazarkevich I, Lubenets V, Karpenko E, et al. The importance of rhamnolipid-biosurfactant-induced changes in bacterial membrane lipids of Bacillus subtilis for the antimicrobial activity of thiosulfonates. Curr Microbiol. 2012;65: 534–541. pmid:22810959
  74. 74. Challis GL, Hopwood D. Synergy and contingency as driving forces for the evolution of multiple secondary metabolite production by Streptomyces species. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003;100: 14555–14561. pmid:12970466
  75. 75. Jousset A, Lara E, Wall LG, Valverde C. Secondary metabolites help biocontrol strain Pseudomonas fluorescens CHA0 to escape protozoan grazing. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2006;72: 7083–7090. pmid:17088380
  76. 76. Majik MS, Shirodkar D, Rodrigues C, D’Souza L, Tilvi S. Evaluation of single and joint effect of metabolites isolated from marine sponges, Fasciospongia cavernosa and Axinella donnani on antimicrobial properties. Bioorg Med Chem Lett. 2014;24: 2863–2866. pmid:24825299
  77. 77. Van Der Voort M, Meijer HJG, Schmidt Y, Watrous J, Dekkers E, Mendes R, et al. Genome mining and metabolic profiling of the rhizosphere bacterium Pseudomonas sp. SH-C52 for antimicrobial compounds. Front Microbiol. 2015;6: 693. pmid:26217324
  78. 78. Guo X, Liu X, Pan J, Yang H. Synergistic algicidal effect and mechanism of two diketopiperazines produced by Chryseobacterium sp. strain GLY-1106 on the harmful bloom-forming Microcystis aeruginosa. Sci Rep. 2015;5: 14720. pmid:26423356
  79. 79. Leão PN, Pereira AR, Liu W-T, Ng J, Pevzner PA, Dorrestein PC, et al. Synergistic allelochemicals from a freshwater cyanobacterium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107: 11183–11188. pmid:20534563
  80. 80. Fischbach MA. Antibiotics from microbes: converging to kill. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2009;12: 520–527. pmid:19695947
  81. 81. Rodríguez H, Rico S, Díaz M, Santamaría RI. Two-component systems in Streptomyces: key regulators of antibiotic complex pathways. Microb Cell Fact. 2013;12: 127. pmid:24354561
  82. 82. Müller H, Westendorf C, Leitner E, Chernin L, Riedel K, Schmidt S, et al. Quorum-sensing effects in the antagonistic rhizosphere bacterium Serratia plymuthica HRO-C48. FEMS Microbiol Ecol. 2009;67: 468–478. pmid:19220861
  83. 83. Roberts DP, McKenna LF, Lakshman DK, Meyer SLF, Kong H, de Souza JT, et al. Suppression of damping-off of cucumber caused by Pythium ultimum with live cells and extracts of Serratia marcescens N4-5. Soil Biol Biochem. 2007;39: 2275–2288.
  84. 84. Giri A V, Anandkumar N, Muthukumaran G, Pennathur G. A novel medium for the enhanced cell growth and production of prodigiosin from Serratia marcescens isolated from soil. BMC Microbiol. 2004;4: 11. pmid:15113456
  85. 85. Voget S, Knapp A, Poehlein A, Vollstedt C, Streit W, Daniel R, et al. Complete genome sequence of the lipase producing strain Burkholderia glumae PG1. J Biotechnol. 2015;204: 3–4. pmid:25848987
  86. 86. Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schäffer AA, Zhang J, Zhang Z, Miller W, et al. Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res. 1997;25: 3389–3402. pmid:9254694
  87. 87. Weber T, Blin K, Duddela S, Krug D, Kim HU, Bruccoleri R, et al. antiSMASH 3.0—a comprehensive resource for the genome mining of biosynthetic gene clusters. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43: W237–W243. pmid:25948579
  88. 88. Li H, Tanikawa T, Sato Y, Nakagawa Y, Matsuyama T. Serratia marcescens gene required for surfactant serrawettin W1 production encodes putative aminolipid synthetase belonging to nonribosomal peptide synthetase family. Microbiol Immunol. 2005;49: 303–310. pmid:15840955
  89. 89. Su C, Xiang Z, Liu Y, Zhao X, Sun Y, Li Z, et al. Analysis of the genomic sequences and metabolites of Serratia surfactantfaciens sp. nov. YD25T that simultaneously produces prodigiosin and serrawettin W2. BMC Genomics. 2016;17: 865. pmid:27809759
  90. 90. Su C, Liu Y, Sun Y, Li Z. Complete genome sequence of Serratia sp. YD25 (KCTC 42987) presenting strong antagonistic activities to various pathogenic fungi and bacteria. J Biotechnol. 2017;245: 9–13. pmid:28153766
  91. 91. Feng JS, Webb JW, Tsang JC. Enhancement by Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate of Pigment Formation in Serratia marcescens O8. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1982;43: 850–853. Available: http://aem.asm.org/content/43/4/850.short pmid:16345993
  92. 92. Wang X, Tao J, Wei D, Shen Y, Tong W. Development of an adsorption procedure for the direct separation and purification of prodigiosin from culture broth. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2004;40: 277–280. pmid:15018616
  93. 93. Straight PD, Willey JM, Kolter R. Interactions between Streptomyces coelicolor and Bacillus subtilis: Role of surfactants in raising aerial structures. J Bacteriol. 2006;188: 4918–4925. pmid:16788200
  94. 94. Gudiña EJ, Rocha V, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR. Antimicrobial and antiadhesive properties of a biosurfactant isolated from Lactobacillus paracasei ssp. paracasei A20. Lett Appl Microbiol. 2010;50: 419–424. pmid:20184670
  95. 95. Gudiña EJ, Teixeira JA, Rodrigues LR. Biosurfactants Produced by Marine Microorganisms with Therapeutic Applications. Mar Drugs. 2016;14: 38. pmid:26901207
  96. 96. Das Ghatak P, Mathew-Steiner SS, Pandey P, Roy S, Sen CK. A surfactant polymer dressing potentiates antimicrobial efficacy in biofilm disruption. Sci Rep. 2018;8: 873. pmid:29343818
  97. 97. Jadon PS, Gajbhiye V, Jadon RS, Gajbhiye KR, Ganesh N. Enhanced oral bioavailability of griseofulvin via niosomes. AAPS PharmSciTech. 2009;10: 1186–1192. pmid:19856107
  98. 98. Kalam MA, Alshamsan A, Aljuffali IA, Mishra AK, Sultana Y. Delivery of gatifloxacin using microemulsion as vehicle: formulation, evaluation, transcorneal permeation and aqueous humor drug determination. Drug Deliv. 2016;23: 886–897. pmid:24865289
  99. 99. Vijay S, Nair RR, Sharan D, Jakkala K, Mukkayyan N, Swaminath S, et al. Mycobacterial Cultures Contain Cell Size and Density Specific Sub-populations of Cells with Significant Differential Susceptibility to Antibiotics, Oxidative and Nitrite Stress. Front Microbiol. 2017;8: 463. pmid:28377757
  100. 100. Silhavy TJ, Kahne D, Walker S. The bacterial cell envelope. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2010;2: a000414. pmid:20452953
  101. 101. Siliakus MF, van der Oost J, Kengen SWM. Adaptations of archaeal and bacterial membranes to variations in temperature, pH and pressure. Extremophiles. 2017;21: 651–70. pmid:28508135
  102. 102. Delcour AH. Outer membrane permeability and antibiotic resistance. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2009;1794: 808–816. pmid:19100346
  103. 103. Nasiri MJ, Haeili M, Ghazi M, Goudarzi H, Pormohammad A, Imani Fooladi AA, et al. New Insights in to the Intrinsic and Acquired Drug Resistance Mechanisms in Mycobacteria. Front Microbiol. 2017;8: 681. pmid:28487675
  104. 104. Fischbach MA. Combination therapies for combating antimicrobial resistance. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2011;14: 519–523. pmid:21900036
  105. 105. Munck C, Gumpert HK, Wallin AIN, Wang HH, Sommer MOA. Prediction of resistance development against drug combinations by collateral responses to component drugs. Sci Transl Med. 2014;6: 262ra156. pmid:25391482
  106. 106. Bollenbach T. Antimicrobial interactions: mechanisms and implications for drug discovery and resistance evolution. Curr Opin Microbiol. 2015;27: 1–9. pmid:26042389
  107. 107. Charlop-Powers Z, Pregitzer CC, Lemetre C, Ternei MA, Maniko J, Hover BM, et al. Urban park soil microbiomes are a rich reservoir of natural product biosynthetic diversity. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016; 201615581. pmid:27911822