Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Bioinformatics: A rational combine approach used for the identification and in-vitro activity evaluation of potent β-Glucuronidase inhibitors

  • Maria Yousuf ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan

  • Nimra Naveed Shaikh,

    Roles Validation

    Affiliation H. E. J. Research Institute of Chemistry, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan

  • Zaheer Ul-Haq,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Investigation, Resources, Software, Supervision

    Affiliation Dr. Panjwani Center for Molecular Medicine and Drug Research, International Center for Chemical and Biological Sciences, University of Karachi, Karachi, Pakistan

  • M. Iqbal Choudhary

    Roles Funding acquisition, Resources

    Affiliation Department of Biochemistry, Faculty of Science, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, Saudi Arabia


Identification of hotspot drug-receptor interactions through in-silico prediction methods (Pharmacophore mapping, virtual screening, 3DQSAR, etc), is considered as a key approach in drug designing and development process. In the current design study, advanced in-silico based computational techniques were used for the identification of lead-like molecules against the targeted receptor β-glucuronidase. The binding pattern of a potent inhibitor in the ligand-receptor X-ray co-crystallize complex was used to identify and extract the structure-base Pharmacophore features. Based on these observations; five structure-based pharmacophore models were derived to conduct the virtual screening of ICCBS in-house data-base. Top-ranked identified Hits (33 compounds) were selected to subject for in-vitro biological activity evaluation against β-glucuronidase enzyme; out of them, twenty compounds (61% of screened compounds) evaluated as actives, however eleven compounds were found to have significantly higher inhibitory activity, including compounds 1, 58, 10, 1213, and 1719 with IC50 values ranging from 1.2 μM to 34.9 μM. Out of the eleven potent inhibitors, seven compounds 1, 5, 6, 7, 8, 13, and 19 were found new, and evaluated first time for the β-glucuronidase inhibitory activity. Compounds 1, 5 and 19 exhibited a highly potent inhibition in uM of β-glucuronidase enzyme with non-cytotoxic behavior against the mouse fibroblast (3T3) cell line. Our combined in-silico and in-vitro results revealed that the binding pattern analysis of the eleven potent inhibitors, showed almost similar non-covalent interactions, as observed in case of our validated pharmacophore model. The obtained results thus demonstrated that the virtual screening minimizes false positives, and provide a template for the identification and development of new and more potent β-glucuronidase inhibitors with non-toxic effects.


β-Glucuronidase belongs to the glycosidase family of enzymes, which catalyze the hydrolysis of complex carbohydrates. The active site of the enzyme consists of a large cleft at the interface of two monomeric units. Two acidic amino acids, i.e., Glu 540 and Glu 451, and one aromatic amino acid, i.e., Tyr 504, have been proposed to be important for catalysis [12]. Human β-glucuronidase is homologous to the Escherichia coli enzyme β-glucuronidase. It catalyzes the hydrolysis of carbohydrates using two acidic a.a residues, Glu 540 and Glu 451. Additionally, the a.a residue Tyr 504 is involved in this catalytic event [3]. The catalytic mechanism involves three steps, as follows (1) Nucleophilic attack of the carboxylate anion on the anomeric carbon of sugar, (2) Hydrolysis of glucuronyl enzyme intermediate, and (3) De-glucuronidation [45].

Over-expression of β-glucuronidase enzyme activity is associated with several disorders, including various types of cancers, particularly hormone-dependent cancers, such as breast, prostate, and colon cancers. For the treatment of disorders associated with increased β-glucuronidase activity, d-saccharic acid 1, 4-lactone (DSL; saccharo lactone), silymarin, and silybin (crude drugs) are commercially available [67]. However, these drugs decreases immunity, and cause adverse effects. Therefore, there is a strong need to develop new β-glucuronidase inhibitors with improved potency and fewer adverse effects.

Structure-based pharmacophore mapping considered as a useful tool for medicinal chemists to identify novel ligands that have a high probability of being biologically active. This method utilizes the following steps: (I) Protein structure preparation, (II) Binding site detection, (III) Pharmacophore features identification, and (IV) Pharmacophore features selection.

Structure-based Pharmacophore can be efficiently used for virtual screening, ligand-receptor binding pose prediction, and binding site similarity search. Therefore, this method is a valuable tool for Hit and lead optimization, compounds library design, scaffold hopping, virtual screening, and multi-target drug design [810]. A successful virtual screening can identify molecules with novel chemical structural features that bind to the target receptor of interest in a large chemical space (e.g. the needle in a haystack concept).

The main purpose of our entire designed study was to develop structure-based Pharmacophore models, extracted with appropriate chemical structural features information, and use of those models to conduct the virtual screening of an in-house data-base in search of new lead candidates as inhibitors of β-glucuronidase with more potency [Fig 1]. For this purpose, we used advance in-silico techniques of computer-aided drug design (CADD) to reduce the large chemical space, and to increase the focus on more promising candidates towards lead discovery and optimization.

Fig 1. Overall schematic work flow representation.

The structure-based Pharmacophore mapping, Virtual screening and in-vitro biological activity evaluation of ICCBS in-house data-base against β-Glucuronidase enzyme.


Pharmacophore-based virtual screening

Pharmacophore-based virtual screening provides a comprehensive and sophisticated method to screen millions of compounds data-base within a manageable time frame. In this way, virtual screening is expected to play a vital role in future rational drug design processes. In the present study, software derived models [11] were used to search the chemical data-base of ICCBS, which consisted of 8,262 filtered structurally diverse molecules, by using the software Molecular Operating Environment MOE (2010–212)[12], [S1 Appendix ].

The software used Pharmacophore models and searched the query editor in the provided data-base. Pharmacophore-based virtual screening identified 999 Hits through shared and merged feature Pharmacophore models, 65 Hits were obtained by using 3LPF individual model, 85 Hits were obtained by using 3LPG individual Pharmacophore model, and finally 100 Hits were obtained through the individual 3K4D Pharmacophore model; thus a total of 1,249 Pharmacophore-based Hits were identified [Fig 2].

Fig 2. Graphical representation of Pharmacophore-based Hits / non-Hits with decoys.

The X-axis (blue bar-graph) represents total number of Pharmacophore-based Hits (1,249) compounds redundancy of in-house data-base, while the red bar-graph depicting total number of compounds non-redundancy in decoys. The Y-axis represents total number of screened compounds in the decoy-set (8,262) of in-house data-base.

Molecular docking results of Pharmacophore-based Hits

Molecular docking studies of pharmacophore-based Hits was carried out along with 66 previously reported inhibitors from literature (belonging to different classes of compounds) [13] [S1 Data-set] by using Fast Rigid Exhaustive Docking (FRED) software [1417]. Rescoring of the chemgauss-4 scoring function of FRED software was performed by using GOLD docking software. Enrichment factors were calculated for 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% of screened data-base for each scoring function chemgauss-4, chem score, gold score, and ASP score, respectively [Fig 3A–3D] to examine the potential strength of all scoring functions for identifying drug-like candidates (redundancy of the in-house data-base), and to ultimately remove the non-binders (non-redundancy of the decoy set) [18], [S1 Appendix].

Fig 3.

(A)The bar-graph illustrated the enrichment factors, for 5% of data-base in which chemgauss-4 scoring function of FRED software is dominant represented with (blue bar), (B-D) For the remaining 10%, 15% and 20% of data-base scoring function chem score of GOLD software is dominant showed with (orange bar).

Enrichment factors of FRED and GOLD scoring functions.

The enrichment factors of screened data-base by software FRED and GOLD with scoring functions chemgauss-4, gold score, chem score, and ASP score [1920], were calculated for 5% (4.96%), 10% (10.60), 15% (15.15%), and 20% (20.09%) respectively, [Table 1, Fig 3A–3D], [S1 Appendix].

Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves.

ROC curves are used to validate the docking software performance, which differentiates between the true binders (true positives) and non-binders (false positives). ROC curves are the plots between sensitivity and (1-specificity), sensitivity defines the presence of true actives in a data-base. Higher the sensitivity values represent an increase number of true positives in the data-base, whereas specificity defines the presence of true-negatives (non-actives) in the data-base. The higher number of actives in the data-set represented the increased sensitivity and decreased probability of specificity (presence of non-binders). This statistical test is used in high-throughput computational-based virtual screening (HTS) for quick and efficient differentiation between the actives and non-actives in a decoy set of compounds. Based on this, we can consider an optimal model (true-binders) and reject (discard) sub-optimal model for data that is not required (comprised of non-binders).

Accuracy can be measured by using area under the curve (AUC). An area of 1 represents a perfect test, whereas an area of 0.5 is supposed to be worthless; however, an area of 0.7–0.9 is considered as an acceptable value.

In our case study, the AUC value calculated as 0.76, which was a quite acceptable value, demonstrating that our data-set was considerably enriched with true binders (actives). Additionally, as we increased the cut off value of the data-base (small-subsets) in which true positives were present, the probability of finding TP increased, which ultimately raised the sensitivity [2122], [Fig 4].

Fig 4. ROC curve between sensitivity and 1-specificity.

Where, X-axis (1-specificity) represents the false positives in decoys. Y-axis (sensitivity) represents the (true +ves in the decoys).

Out of the sixty eight compounds (top 5% enrichment of the virtually screened data-set), thirty three (33) compounds were selected for in-vitro bioassay screening to evaluate the hidden therapeutic potential against β-glucuronidase enzyme. Twenty compounds showed a good inhibitory potential. Whereas, eleven compounds were found to be more potent actives comparative to the standard (d-saccharic acid 1, 4-lactone; half-maximal inhibitory concentration [IC50] = 45.75 ± 2.16 μM). [Fig 5A–5K, Tables 2 and 3] (SAR).

Fig 5. Binding pattern analysis of ligand-protein interactions with respect to IC50 values.

For descriptions of figure parts A-K, see Table 2.

Table 2. Binding pattern analysis of ligand-protein interactions with respect to IC50 values.

Bio-assay screening results against β-Glucuronidase enzyme.

For the biological activity evaluation of the top ranked 5% enriched compounds, identified by structure-based virtual screening of the in-house data-base using FRED software, 33 compounds were made available and subjected for in-vitro bio-assay screening against β-glucuronidase enzyme [S1 Appendix], [23]. Compounds 8, (IC50 = 1.2 ± 1.03 μM) and 17, (IC50 = 1.3 ± 0.64 μM) showed excellent potent inhibitory activity, whereas compounds 1, 58, 10, 12–13, 1719, with IC50 ranges in between 4.5 μM to 34.9 μM, were also showed remarkably potent inhibitory effect.

Compounds 11 and 15 showed a moderate inhibition, while compounds 24, 9,11, 1416 and 20 showed weak inhibitory activity comparative to the standard (d-saccharic acid, 1,4-lactone; half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC50 = 45.75 ± 2.16 μM) [Table 3], [S1 Appendix].

Cytotoxicity screening results.

Eleven potent inhibitors of β-glucuronidase enzyme were also subjected for cytotoxicity assays [24] in 3T3 mouse fibroblasts cell line [S1 Appendix]. Out of the eleven screened compounds, three tested compounds were evaluated as completely non-cytotoxic [1, 5 and 19], whereas the remaining eight compounds 68, 10, 12–13, and 17–18, showed moderate cytotoxicity comparative to the standard inhibitor (cycloheximide; IC50: 0.26 ± 0.1 μM), [Table 4].

Structure-activity relationship (SAR)

SAR of halo (Cl, Br)-substituted indol derivatives.

Halo-substituted bis-indols possess tremendous medicinal importance, [25] the docked pose interaction analysis of compound 8 demonstrated that H-bonding between the NH of indol and phenylalanine (Phe161) was responsible for its highly potent activity (44 folds higher than the standard d-saccharic acid 1, 4-lactone), along with π-π stacking interactions between the active site amino acid Tyr 472 and the phenyl ring of indol. The presence of di-hydroxy substituted phenyl in compound 8, one hydroxy group formed H-bonding with amino acid Lys 568. It was also responsible for the potent activity as compared to the activity of compound 17. This could be explained by the absence of one OH group, which was replaced with one OMe (methoxy) group, exhibited H-arene interaction, a comparatively weaker interaction than the H-bonding. A decrease in the activity of compound 10 was observed due to the absence of one OH group, which was replaced with one OMe group, although this provided an electron donating group but it was not involved in H-bonding, as it was observed in compound 8. Glu 413 a.a also acted as a hydrogen bond acceptor for compound 9 within the binding pocket region of 5 Å. The decrease in the activity of compound 18 was also observed due to the absence of H-bonding of one OH substituent in the phenyl ring [Tables 2 and 3].

SAR of cyclic thioimidazole derivatives.

Docked pose interaction analysis of phenyl sulfone-substituted cyclic thiourea derivatives provided an insight into the most active compound 7, from thioimidazole class which showed 78.1% inhibition,(IC50 = 11.41 ± 0.04 μM). In this compound, NH formed H-bonding with the active site amino acid residues Glu 413 and Phe 161, whereas the di-methoxy phenyl substituent showed π-π stacking interactions with Tyr 472. On the other hand, compound 6 with 81.0% inhibition, and (IC50 = 11.8 ± 0.86 μM), was slightly less potent than compound 7. This decrease in activity was likely due to the absence of H-bonding between NH and Phe 161 and π-π stacking interactions with Tyr 472 in compound 6. Compound 5 showed 95.1% inhibition, (IC50 = 14.7 ± 1.88 μM) in comparison to the above two compounds. A lower activity was observed due to the absence of the di-methoxy substituent on the phenyl ring therefore the π-π stacking interactions did not exist. A decrease in the activity of compound 19 was also observed due to the absence of one OMe substituent on the phenyl ring; thus, the only phenyl ring possess less electron donating effect comparatively substituted with OMe, as a consequence the strength of the existing π-π stacking interactions becomes weaker, resulting to decrease in the biological activity [Tables 2 and 3].

SAR of pyranose-substituted coumarin derivatives.

The docked pose analysis of pyranose-substituted coumarin derivatives exhibited the binding pattern of the most active compound, among the three actives from coumarin class. Compound 1 showed 96.9% inhibition (IC50 = 4.5 ± 0.44 μM). The increase in activity showed due to H-bonding between the 5-β-H pyranose moieties with the active site amino acid residue Glu 413. This interaction was missing in compound 2 and 3, which exhibited 67.2% inhibition, (IC50 = 261.7 ± 7.02 μM), and 54.5% inhibition, (IC50 = 318.5 ± 4.41 μM) respectively [Tables 2 and 3].


β-Glucuronidase is an important glycosidase enzyme with great biological importance, which provides space towards the libraries of small organic inhibitors designing [2627]. It’s over expression is associated with several cancers [28]. Therefore to overcome the adverse effects associated with the available drugs, there is a strong need to search and identify lead candidates which possesses the therapeutic potential against this target receptor with less adverse effects. For this purpose we first derived structure-based pharmacophore models using Ligand Scout software 3.0 version. These developed models were furthermore used to search and identify the drug-like candidates from in-house data-base by using MOE software. The Pharmacophore based features exist at similar distances in the respective screened compounds of data-base, to picked up (query editor) searched for those compounds which have possibly the similar Pharmacophore match with our derived models, (Pharmacophore search on the bases of distances b/w the respective features of functional-groups). For conducting the virtual screening, ICCBS in-house data-base was used as decoy set, which comprises over 9,000 structurally diversified molecules data-base was initially filtered to obtain drug-like candidates by using MOE software filter, removed all of those compounds which deviate from “Lipinski rule of five” and follow drug ability criteria, initially unwanted, highly reactive, toxic and those compounds which deviate from (ROF), and possess poor bio-availability, were removed from the data-base, the filters ultimately selected those compounds which possess good ADME / Tox properties. Software Omega (Open Eye Scientific Software) was used for energy minimization through its MM2 Molecular Mechanics force field parameters for each compound of data-base, atom types were corrected and molecular charges were also added through SYBYL software [2930]. Virtual screening of filtered compounds identified small organic molecules, which follows drug-ability criteria described by Rule of five (ROF). Therefore, computational based high-throughput screening (HTS) helped out to remove or eliminate toxic, larger, unstable and non-drug-like candidates from data-base, in the way restrict to identify drug-like candidates. As a result it prevents to identify higher molecular weight compounds (usually transition metal complexes, peptides etc) which sometimes appear active at the in-vitro level but suffer with bio-availability issues at the in-vivo level [3132].

The major purpose of in-silico based analyses is to examine the existing non-covalent interactions with catalytic amino acid residues through molecular docking binding poses which showed a good efficiency by using the software and good enrichment in the data-base with sufficient active compounds [33]. These knowledge-based research findings were furthermore validated with the help of statistical methods, including ROC curves, AUC values, and enrichment factors, which have been successfully applied to identify true positives (true-binders), and efficiently remove the false positives (non-binders) in the data-base. Therefore, structure-based Pharmacophore model can be efficiently used to quick search and identify the Pharmacophore features in various diverse classes of compounds and considered as an alternative tool of molecular docking, however this cannot be observed in the ligand-base Pharmacophore model which lacks the interaction with active site a.a residues, and usually Hits the similar type of compounds.

After in-silico based screening the top-ranked candidates were also examined using an in-vitro bio-assay screening for the evaluation of β-glucuronidase inhibitory activity [34]. Twenty compounds were selected, in which compounds 8 and 17 showed significantly higher inhibitory potential, whereas compounds 1, 57, 10, 1213, 1819, were also exhibited good inhibitory effect however compounds 11, and 15 showed moderate inhibitory activity against β-glucuronidase enzyme, as compared to the standard, (D-saccharic acid 1, 4-lactone).

Eleven potent compounds were further subjected to cytotoxicity assay against the mouse fibroblasts (3T3) cell line, to map their preliminary toxicity profile. The standard inhibitor used for 3T3 mouse fibroblasts cell line was cycloheximide. The potent leads of β-glucuronidase inhibitors 1, 5, and 19 exhibited completely non-cytotoxic behavior. Whereas compounds 68, 10, 12–13 and 17–18 showed a moderate cytotoxicity.

The obtained results revealed that our potent inhibitors contained functional groups NH, sulfur, and thiourea. This observation was further supported from a recently published U.S. Patent [2012 / 0322797] December 20/2012 [35], which also included urea derivatives, sulfur-containing compounds, methoxy-substituted quinoline derivatives, and halo-substituted phenyl-thiophene compounds. Moreover, we observed the presence of the phenyl ring, hetero-atoms (sulfur and oxygen), NH (in case of urea), amide nitrogen, and oxygen atoms, which were all have important chemical structural features of the Pharmacophore, and have interacted with the amino acid residues of binding region, to establish important non-covalent interactions b/w ligand and receptor, including, H-bonding, H-arene, arene-arene, π-π stacking interactions, Van der waal forces of attraction and dipole-dipole interactions, these all contributed towards the best fit ligand-receptor binding pose and ultimately for potent biological activity.

In the way, bioinformatics computational based techniques have proved to be a useful rational approach towards drug designing and discovery process with improved potency and reduce toxic effects.

Material and methods

Structure-based individual pharmacophore mapping of PDB 3LPF

Two and three-dimensional (2D and 3D, respectively) structure-based Pharmacophore models were derived from PDB I.d 3LPF using Ligand Scout 3.0 version. The software was used to illustrate the following pharmacophore features (Fig 6A and 6B).

Fig 6.

(A) The 2D and (B) The 3D structure-based Pharmacophore models were derived from PDB I.d 3LPF highlighted with active site surface groove depicted the features. Yellow sphere showed hydrophobic aromatic substituent. Green vector (arrow head) showed the hydrogen bonding of NH with a conserved water molecule HOH 680, another green vector (arrow head) showed the H-bonding of hydroxyl group with amino acid Glu 413A. Two red vectors (arrow heads) showed the H-bonding of HOH 731, and HOH 733 with the hydroxyl group, along with the calculated distances in Å b/w the respective Pharmacophore features.

Two yellow spheres represented the hydrophobic methyl substituent;

One yellow sphere showed one hydrophobic region due to aromatic substituent;

One green vector (arrow head) depicted the H-bonding of NH with a conserved water molecule HOH 680; another green vector (arrow head) depicted the H-bonding of the hydroxyl group with Glu 413A.

Red vectors (arrow heads) showed the H-bonding of HOH 731 and HOH 733 with the hydroxyl group.

Structure-based individual pharmacophore mapping of PDB 3LPG

The 2D and 3D structure-based pharmacophore models were derived from PDB I.d 3LPG using Ligand Scout 3.0 version. The software depicted the following pharmacophore features (Fig 7A and 7B).

Fig 7.

(A)The 2D and (B)The 3D structure-based pharmacophore models derived from PDB I.d 3LPG highlighted with active site surface groove, depicted the features, two yellow spheres for the hydrophobic methyl benzene ring interacting with the amino acid Val 473A, MSE 447A, PHE 448A. Another two yellow spheres represent the presence of one hydrophobic aromatic ring and hydrophobic fluorine. One green vector (arrow head) showed the H-bonding donor NH to the acceptor HOH 667. One red vector (arrow head) showed the hydrogen donor to the carbonyl oxygen of aldehyde group; along with the calculated distances in Å b/w the respective Pharmacophore features.

Two yellow spheres represented the hydrophobic region of methyl benzene ring interacting with the amino acids Val 473A, Mse 447A, and Phe 448A;

Another yellow sphere showed hydrophobic aromatic ring and hydrophobic fluorine; the green vector (arrow head) depicted the H-bond donor NH for the acceptor HOH 667;

The red vector (arrow head) represented the hydrogen acceptor of the carbonyl oxygen of aldehyde group from HB-donor HOH677.

Structure-based individual pharmacophore mapping of PDB 3K4D

The 2D and 3D structure-based pharmacophore models were derived from PDB I.d 3K4D using Ligand Scout software 3.0 versions. The software illustrated the following pharmacophore features (Fig 8A and 8B).

Fig 8.

(A)The 2Dand (B)The 3D structure-based pharmacophore models were derived from PDB I.d 3K4D, highlighted with surface active site groove, depicted the features, two red vectors (arrow heads) for H-acceptors, one for the carboxylate anion, and one for the lactam carbonyl keto group. Three red-green vectors (arrow heads) showed the 3HB-donor / 3HB-acceptor of three OH substituent’s group. One red pointed sphere depicted the negative ionizable area of carboxylate anion; along with the calculated distances in Å b/w the respective pharmacophore features.

Two red vectors (arrow heads) represented HB-donor from a.a Tyr 472A, Arg 562A to HB-acceptors, one is carboxylate anion (negative ionizable area), while another is lactam carbonyl keto group; three red-green vectors (arrow heads) depicted the 3HB-donor / 3HB-acceptor of three OH groups.

Generation of structure-based shared and merged feature pharmacophore models

A five-element structure-based shared feature pharmacophore model was also derived. For this purpose, we selected the PDB I.d 3LPF as a reference, to extract the keen binding pattern information’s due to its potent inhibitor bound with IC50 value of 326 nM. The remaining two individual derived Pharmacophore models were aligned over it in the alignment pane; finally a shared featured structure-based five element pharmacophore model was generated. Similarly, a merged feature model was also derived by extracting all the Pharmacophore features together. [Fig 9A and 9B].

Fig 9.

(A) It depicts five element based shared feature pharmacophore model derived from PDB I.d, 3LPF, 3LPG and 3K4D by using Ligand Scout, three green vectors showed H-donors, five red vectors showed H-acceptors, four yellow spheres depicted lipophilicity with hydrophobic surface regions grey spheres showed the excluded volume, along with reference point set with a.a residues from active site contour.(B): It depicts a merged feature pharmacophore derived model, from PDB I.d 3LPF, 3LPG and 3K4D by using Ligand Scout, it comprised of the features, six red vectors showed the H-acceptors, four green vectors showed the H-donors, one red pointed sphere represented the negative ionizable area, six spheres showed the hydrophobic region, grey spheres depicted excluded volume along with reference point set with amino acid residues within active site contour.


In conclusion, our combined methodology of in-silico pharmacophore mapping and virtual screening established that computational virtual screening could provide a cost-effective and time saving approach for the selection of drug-like candidates. After experimental evaluation of the top ranked identified Hits, we obtained eleven potent inhibitors, three compounds with non-cytotoxic behavior while eight compounds with moderate cytotoxicity against the 3T3 mouse fibroblast cell line. In our designed case study virtual screening Hit results, (scaffold hopping) has been successfully performed, and we identified top 5% enriched data-base, contained new classes of compounds with potent biological inhibitory activity against the β-Glucuronidase enzyme.

Supporting information

S1 Data-set. It consists of reported inhibitors data-set.


S1 Appendix. The in-silico screening protocol, software’s information, in-vitro β-glucuronidase bio-assay screening, and cytotoxicity protocols are included in the supporting appendix, DOI ([]


S2 Appendix. Contains supplementary information document of binding curves.



  1. 1. Wong A. W., He S., Grubb J.H.J. Identification of Glu 540 as the catalytic nucleophile of human beta-glucuronidase using electrospray mass spectrometry. J. Biol. Chem. 1998; 237(51): 34057–34062.
  2. 2. Walaszek Z., Szemraj J., Narog M. Metabolism, uptake, and excretion of a D-glucaric acid salt and its potential use in cancer prevention. Cancer. Detect Prev. 1997; 21: 178–190. pmid:9101079
  3. 3. Ahmad M. High throughput assay for discovery of bacterial β-glucuronidase inhibitors. Curr. Chem. Genom. 2011; 5: 13–20.
  4. 4. Oleson L.C.M. Effect of the beta-glucuronidase inhibitor saccharolactone on glucuronidation by human tissue microsomes and recombinant UDP-glucuronosyl transferases. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2008; 60 (9):1175–82. pmid:18718121
  5. 5. Ahmad S., Mark A., Hughes , Li-An , Yeh and JES . Potential repurposing of known drugs as potent bacterial β–glucuronidase inhibitors. J. Biomol. Screen. 2012; 11:958–965
  6. 6. Kim D.H., Jin Y.H., Park J.B. K.K. Silymarin and its components are inhibitors of beta-glucuronidase. Biol. Pharm. Bull. 1994;17 (3):443–445. pmid:8019514
  7. 7. Walters W., Stahl M., Murcko M. Virtual screening—an overview. Drug. Discov. Today. 1998; 3:160–178.
  8. 8. Wermuth C.G., Ganellin C.R., Lindberg P, Mitscher LA. Glossary of terms used in medi chem (IUPAC Recommendations). Pure and App Chem. 1998; 70: 1129–1143
  9. 9. Thangapandian S., John S., Sakkiah S., Lee K.W. Potential virtual lead identification in the discovery of renin inhibitors application of ligand and structure-based pharmacophore modeling approaches. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2011; 46: 2469–2476. pmid:21497958
  10. 10. Qingzhi G., Lulu Y., and Yongqiang Z. Pharmacophore based drug design approach as a practical process in drug discovery. Curr. Comput-Aided Drug Des. 2010; 6: 37–49. pmid:20370694
  11. 11. Gerhard, W, and Thierry L. Automated structure-based pharmacophore model generation by using inteligand; Ligand Scout 3.0 user guide manual.
  12. 12. Molecular Operating Environment (MOE), 2013.08; Chemical Computing Group ULC, 1010 Sherbrook St. West, Suite #910, Montreal, QC, Canada, H3A 2R7, 2013.
  13. 13. Khan K.M., Saad S.M., Shaikh N.N., Hussain S., Fakhri M.I., Perveen S., et al,Synthesis and β-glucuronidase inhibitory activity of 2-arylquinazolin-4(3H)-ones. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014; 22. 3449–3454.
  14. 14. Ooms F., FacultesUniversitaires Notre-Dame de la Paix. ChimieMoléculaireStructurale, Namur, Belgium. Molecular modeling and computer aided drug design. Examples of their applications in medicinal chemistry current medicinal chemistry. Curr. Med. Chem. 2000; 7:141–158. pmid:10637360
  15. 15. Marijn P. A., Sanders R.M. From the protein’s perspective. The benefits and challenges of protein structure-based Pharmacophore modeling, J. Med. Chem. Commun. 2012; 3:28–38.
  16. 16. FRED docking software manual user guide.
  17. 17. Gann Mc. M., J.; FRED pose prediction and virtual screening accuracy, Chem. Inf. Model., 2011; 51: 578–596.
  18. 18. Khan K.M., Rahim F., Halim S.A., Taha M., Khan M., Perveen S., et al,. Synthesis of novel inhibitors of β-glucuronidase based on benzothiazole skeleton and study of their binding affinity by molecular docking, Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2011;19:4286–4294. pmid:21684753
  19. 19. Andreas B., Robert C. and Glen A. Discussion of measures of enrichment in virtual screening: Comparing the information content of descriptors with increasing levels of sophistication, J. Chem. Inf. Model., 2005; 45, 1369–1375. pmid:16180913
  20. 20. GOLD docking software manual user guide. A component of the GOLD suite
  21. 21. Swets, J. A. Signal detection theory and ROC analysis in psychology and diagnostics: collected papers, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Mahwah, NJ, 1996.
  22. 22. Triballeau N., Acher F., Brabet I., Philippe , Pin J., and Olivier B.H. Virtual screening workflow development guided by the “Receiver Operating Characteristic” curve approach. Application to high-throughput docking on metabotropic glutamate receptor subtype 4, J. Med. Chem. 2005; 48, 2534–2547. pmid:15801843
  23. 23. Collins RA, Ng TB, Fong WP, Wan CC, Yeung HW, Inhibition of glycohydrolase enzymes by aqueous extracts of Chinese medicinal herbs in a microplate format. Biochem Mol Biol Int, 1997;42:1163–1169. pmid:9305534
  24. 24. Mosmann T. Rapid colorimetric assay for cellular growth and survival: application to proliferation and cytotoxicity assays, J. Immunol Methods, 1983; 65:55–63. pmid:6606682
  25. 25. Taha M., Hayat-ullah , Al Muqarrabun L.M.R., Khan M.N., Rahim F., et al;. Synthesis of bis-indolylmethanes as new potential inhibitors of β-glucuronidase and their molecular docking studies, Eur. J. Med. Chem, 2018;143, 1757–1767. pmid:29133042
  26. 26. Taha M.,Arbin M., Ahmat N., Imran S., Rahim F. Synthesis: Small library of hybrid scaffolds of benzothiazole having hydrazone and evaluation of their β-glucuronidase activity, Bioorg. Chem.2018; 77, 47–55. pmid:29331764
  27. 27. Taha M., Baharudin M.S., Ismail N.H., Selvaraj M., Salar U., Alkadi K.A., et al;.Synthesis and in-silico studies of novel sulfonamides having oxadiazole ring: As β-glucuronidase inhibitors, Bioorg. Chem, 2017, 71:86–96. pmid:28160943
  28. 28. Wallace B. D., Wang H., Lane K.T., Scott J.E., Orans J., Koo J.S., et al; Alleviating cancer drug toxicity by inhibiting a bacterial enzyme, Science. 2010; 5; 330(6005): 831–835. pmid:21051639
  29. 29. SYBYL software Tutorial: Minimizing small molecules.
  30. 30. Hawkins P.C.D., Skillman G.A., Warren G.L., Ellingson B.A. and Stahl M.T. Conformer generation with OMEGA: Algorithm and validation using high quality structures from the protein databank and Cambridge structural database, J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2010; 50, 572–584. pmid:20235588
  31. 31. Chenzhong L., Markus S., Angelo P., and Marc C. N. Software and resources for computational medicinal chemistry. Future Med. Chem. 2011; 3(8): 1057–1085. pmid:21707404
  32. 32. Christopher A., Lipinski Drug-like properties and the causes of poor solubility and poor permeability, J. of Pharmacol and Toxicol Methods, 2000; 44: 235–249.
  33. 33. Perola E., and Charifson P.S.Conformational analysis of drug-like molecules bound to proteins: an extensive study of ligand reorganization upon binding, J. Med. Chem. 2004; 47, 2499–2510. pmid:15115393
  34. 34. Khan K.M., Saad S.M., Shaikh N.N., Hussain S., Fakhri M.I., et al;. Synthesis and β-glucuronidase inhibitory activity of 2-arylquinazolin-4(3H)-ones. J. Bioorg. Med. Chem. 2014; 22. 3449–3454.
  35. 35. Matthew R., Redinbo , Mani S., Alfred W., Scott J., Li-An Yeh,et al;. Selective beta-glucuronidase inhibitors as a treatment for side effects of camptothecin antineoplastic agents, U.S. Patents [2012/0322797] December 20/2012.