Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Complete chloroplast genome of Tetragonia tetragonioides: Molecular phylogenetic relationships and evolution in Caryophyllales

  • Kyoung Su Choi,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Division of Forest Biodiversity, Korea National Arboretum of the Korea Forest Service, Pochen, Republic of Korea

  • Myounghai Kwak,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Plant Resources Division, National Institute of Biological Resources of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea

  • Byoungyoon Lee,

    Roles Conceptualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Plant Resources Division, National Institute of Biological Resources of Korea, Incheon, Republic of Korea

  • SeonJoo Park

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Writing – review & editing

    sjpark01@ynu.ac.kr

    Affiliation Department of Life Sciences, Yeungnam University, Gyeongsan, Gyeongbuk, Republic of Korea

Complete chloroplast genome of Tetragonia tetragonioides: Molecular phylogenetic relationships and evolution in Caryophyllales

  • Kyoung Su Choi, 
  • Myounghai Kwak, 
  • Byoungyoon Lee, 
  • SeonJoo Park
PLOS
x

Abstract

The chloroplast genome of Tetragonia tetragonioides (Aizoaceae; Caryophyllales) was sequenced to provide information for studies on phylogeny and evolution within Caryophyllales. The chloroplast genome of Tetragonia tetragonioides is 149,506 bp in length and includes a pair of inverted repeats (IRs) of 24,769 bp that separate a large single copy (LSC) region of 82,780 bp and a small single copy (SSC) region of 17,188 bp. Comparative analysis of the chloroplast genome showed that Caryphyllales species have lost many genes. In particular, the rpl2 intron and infA gene were not found in T. tetragonioides, and core Caryophyllales lack the rpl2 intron. Phylogenetic analyses were conducted using 55 genes in 16 complete chloroplast genomes. Caryophyllales was found to divide into two clades; core Caryophyllales and noncore Caryophyllales. The genus Tetragonia is closely related to Mesembryanthemum. Comparisons of the synonymous (Ks), nonsynonymous (Ka), and Ka/Ks substitution rates revealed that nonsynonymous substitution rates were lower than synonymous substitution rates and that Ka/Ks rates were less than 1. The findings of the present study suggest that most genes are a purified selection.

Introduction

Caryophyllales contains 37 families, 749 genera, and 11,600 species [1]. This order is divided into two main clades: core Caryophyllales and noncore Caryophyllales. Previous studies have used molecular phylogenetic analyses based on restriction site data from nuclear and plastid markers [24]. DNA sequence data show that the nuclear maker is the ITS (internal transcribed spacer) and the plastid markers are atpB, matK, ndhF, psbB, rbcL, rpoC2, rps4, rpl16 intron, rpoC1, IR (inverted repeat) region, and IR junction. Molecular data for Caryophyllales showed this order to be a monophyletic group. However, several molecular studies have shown the phylogenetic position of the Aizoaceae (Tetragonioideae, Aizooideae and Sesuvioideae) within core Caryophyllales [3, 4], and some molecular studies have indicated that Aizoaceae was not included in the core Caryophyllales and was a paraphyletic group [2, 5].

Tetragonia tetragonioides (New Zealand spinach) belongs to Tetragonioideae, which is a subfamily of Aizoaceae. T. tetragonioides is 30–140 cm tall, and its leaves are 3–15 cm long, triangular in shape and thick. It is native to New Zealand, Australia, Chile, Japan, and Korea.

Chloroplast genomes are circular and are typically 120–170 kilobase pairs long. They typically contain a long single copy (LSC) region, a small single copy (SSC) region, and two inverted repeat (IR) regions that typically include ~79 coding genes, 30 tRNA genes, and 4 rRNA genes [6, 7]. Several recent phylogenetic studies have used many chloroplast genes or chloroplast noncoding regions from completely sequenced chloroplast genomes [811].

Here, we report for the first time the chloroplast genome of Tetragonia tetragonioides. The goals of this study were to (1) present the complete chloroplast genome sequence of Tetragonia tetragonioides, (2) compare this sequence with those of other Caryophyllales species, and (3) confirm the phylogenetic and evolutionary relationships within Caryophyllales.

Materials & methods

The National Institute of Biological Resources (Korea) approved this study. T. tetragonioides leaves were obtained from Dokdo Island in Korea (37°14′20.97˝, 131° 52′ 6.64˝).

DNA extraction and sequencing

Total DNA was extracted using a DNeasy Plant Mini Kit (Qiagen Inc., Valencia, CA, USA) and quantified using a HiGenTM Gel & PCR Purification Kit (Biofact Inc., Daejeon, Korea). Genomic DNA was sequenced using Illumina Hiseq 2500 (Illumina Inc., San Diego, CA, USA). A total of 666,785 pair-end sequences read were generated using the DISCOVAR Denovo program, and a total of 863,871 pair-end sequence reads were generated using the Platanus program. A total of 4,142 final contigs were pair-end sequenced at Theragen Co. (Suwon, Korea), and the K-mer length was 17. The resulting contigs were aligned to the Mesembryanthemum crystallinum (KM016695) cp genome, which was used for reference purposes. Working primers and additional Sanger sequencing were then used to confirm the four junctions (S1 Table).

Chloroplast genome annotation and mapping

The complete chloroplast genome sequence was annotated using a DOGMA [Dual Organellar Genome Annotator] [12]. All tRNA genes were verified using corresponding structures predicted by tRNAscan-SE [13]. A circle cp genome map was drawn using OGDRAW [14].

Repeat structure

REPuter [15] was used to identify the presence of repeat sequences (forward, reverse, palindromic and complementary repeats) in the chloroplast genome of T. tetragonioides. The following conditions were used to identify repeats in REPtuer: Hamming distance 3, minimum sequence identity of 90% and a repeat size of more than 30 bp. The simple sequence repeats (SSRs) in T. tetragonioides were detected using Phobos v. 3.3.12 (http://www.ruhr-uni-bochum.de/ecoevo/cm/cm_phobos.htm). Repeats were ≥10 sequence lengths, with three repeat units for mono-, di-, tetra-, and penta-.

Phylogenetic analysis and substitution rates

Fifty-five gene sequences of 16 species (S2 Table) were aligned using MAFFT [16]. Phylogenetic analysis was conducted by maximum likelihood (ML) using the GTR+R+I model in RAxML v. 7.2.6 [17] and 1,000 bootstrap replicates. To examine the potential link between synonymous substitutions (Ka) and nonsynonymous substitution (Ks), we estimated Ka and Ks rates using alignments of coding genes in Geneious v.6 [18] and analyzed them in DnaSp [19].

Results

Chloroplast genome of Tetragonia tetragonioides

The cp genome length of T. tetragonioides was 149,506 bp and contained 82,780 bp in the LSC (large single copy) region, 17,188 bp in the SSC (small single copy) region and 24,769 bp in the IR (inverted repeat) region (Fig 1). The overall AT content of the T. tetragonioides chloroplast genome was 62.7%, and the AT contents of the LSC, SSC, and IR regions were 64.8%, 69.2%, and 56.9%, respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Chloroplast genome of Tetragonia tetragonioides.

Genes inside the circle are transcribed clockwise, and genes outside are transcribed counterclockwise. The dark gray inner circle corresponds to the GC content, and the light-gray circle corresponds to the AT content.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199626.g001

We identified 110 unique genes in T. tetragonioides: 77 protein-coding genes, 29 tRNA genes and four rRNA genes. Of the 110 genes, 16 genes contained introns among unique genes of T. tetragonioides, of which three genes (clpP, ycf3 and rps12) included two introns. Seventeen genes in most angiosperm chloroplast genomes have one intron [9, 10, 20]. However, the rpl2 gene in T. tetragonioides had no introns.

We analyzed the comprehensive chloroplast genomes of the 17 Caryophyllales species (S2 Table). The cpDNA size of T. tetragonioides was 149,506 bp, and that of Carnegiea (113,064 bp) was shorter than those of other Caryophyllales because Carnegiea has lost one IR region and Drosera has long IR regions (23,513 bp). The chloroplast genome length of Tetragonia (149,506 bp) was shorter than those of other Caryophyllales.

SSRs and tandem repeats in T. tetragonioides

We found forward and palindrome repeats of at least 30 bp long per repeat unit with a sequence identity of ≥ 90%. The results showed that the following were present: 19 forward repeats, 1 reverse repeat, 5 palindromic repeats and 1 complementary repeat (Fig 2). Eighteen repeats were in the LSC region, 6 repeats were in the IR, and two repeats were in the SSC region. Most of the repeats (17) were in intergenic spacers, 4 were in intron region, and 5 were in genes. The longest repeat had a length of 67 bp. Seventeen were 30–40 bp long, 5 were 40–50 bp long, and 4 were 50–67 bp long.

thumbnail
Fig 2. The distribution, types and length of repeats in T. tetragonioides.

A: Number of types of repeats. B: Presence of repeats in the LSC, SSC and IR regions. C: Presence of repeats in protein coding regions, intergenic spacers and intron regions. D: Numbers and length of repeats.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199626.g002

SSRs are highly polymorphic and therefore useful for population genetics. We detected SSRs longer than 10 bp in T. tetragonioides (Fig 3). The total number of SSRs was 90, and the majority of SSRs were A/T mononucleotides. Most of the SSRs are in the LSC (80%) and are located in intergenic regions (71%).

thumbnail
Fig 3. The distribution, types and length of SSRs in T. tetragonioides.

A: Presence of repeats in the LSC, SSC and IR regions. B: Presence of repeats in protein coding regions, intergenic spacers and intron regions. C: Numbers and length of SSRs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199626.g003

Phylogenetic position of Tetragonia and Caryophyllales species

Maximum likelihood phylogeny based on 55 chloroplast genes strongly supported the presence of a monophyletic group in Caryophyllales (Fig 4). The two large clades (core and noncore Caryophyllales) were each supported by 100% bootstrap values. Core Caryophyllales (100% bootstrap values) were separated into two groups: the first included Beta, Spinacia, Bienertia, Salicornia, Haloxylon, Agrostmma, Dianthus and Colobanthus, and the second included Carnegiea, Mesembryanthemum and Tetragonia. Tetragonia is sister to the Mesembryanthemum. The noncore Caryophyllales group was found to be composed of Rheum, Oxyria, Fagopyrum and Drosera.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of 55 protein-coding genes of Caryophyllales.

The stability of each tree node was tested by bootstrap analysis with 1,000 replicates. Arabidopsis was used as the outgroup.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199626.g004

infA gene and rpl2 intron loss in Tetragonia tetragonioides

Comparisons of Caryophyllales genes revealed many genes that have been lost. Several genes were absent, including matK, psbZ, rbcL, ycf3, accD, psbL, rps19 and ndhD (Fig 4).

The loss of genes in T. tetragonioides was then analyzed in detail. The infA gene was analyzed for 15 species (including 14 Caryophyllales species and Arabidopsis thaliana) and found to be a pseudogene or missing in five species, including T. tetragonioides (Fig 5A). Previous studies indicated that the infA gene has been lost in many angiosperms [21]

thumbnail
Fig 5. Comparison of infA gene and intron of rpl2 sequences among Caryophyllales.

A: infA gene region, B: rpl2 intron region, C: lack of rpl2 intron. The red word indicates T. tetragonioides.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199626.g005

The chloroplast gene rpl2, encoding the large subunit ribosomal protein L2, has one intron (Fig 5B). This study showed that the rpl2 intron of T. tetragonioides was absent. Comparisons of Caryophyllales genes revealed many genes that have been lost. In particular, the rpl2 intron was absent in Tetragonia and most Caryophyllales, except three species, that is, Rheum, Oxyria and Fagopyrum, which have been shown to be noncore Caryophyllales in previous studies [3, 4].

Comparison of substitution rates in Caryophyllales species

The rates of Ka, Ks and Ka/Ks were compared between Caryophyllales and the Swida (Cornaceae, Cornales) to reveal patterns of functional gene evolution (Fig 6 and S3 Table). The Ka values (nonsynonymous substitution) of the cytochrome group, ATP synthase group, photosystem I group, photosystem II group, ribosomal large units group, ribosomal small unit group and RNA polymerase group in Caryophyllales species were approximately 0.018, 0.020, 0.012, 0.012, 0.043, 0.074 and 0.048, respectively. The Ks values (synonymous substitution) of the cytochrome group, ATP synthase group, photosystem I group, photosystem II group, ribosomal large units group, ribosomal small unit group and RNA polymerase group in Caryophyllales were approximately 0.323, 0.339, 0.287, 0.273, 0.152, 0.232 and 0.339, respectively. Average Ka/Ks values ranged from 0.042 to 0.316. The ribosomal protein small unit group had the highest Ka/Ks values, and the cytochrome group had the lowest.

thumbnail
Fig 6. Comparison of nonsynonymous (Ka), synonymous (Ks), and Ka/Ks substitution rates of functional gene groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199626.g006

Discussion

The chloroplast genomes of angiosperms have highly conserved structures and gene orders [10, 19]. However, some angiosperms have lost many genes, and ndh genes are pseudogenized in Erodium [22] and Orobanchaceae [23, 24], and infA and rpl22 genes are pseudogenized in Rosids [9, 25]. In the present study, comparative analyses of Caryophyllales species chloroplast genomes showed that many genes have been pseudogenized or lost and that some Caryophyllales species (Drosera and Carnegiea) have lost or exhibited expansion of IR regions.

Downie and Palmer [2] studied the chloroplast genome within Caryophyllales and observed some different gene orders. Caryophyllales demonstrated the loss of the intron of rpl2 and rpl16. Loss of the rpl2 intron is useful for determining relationships within Caryophyllales [26]. However, our results showed that Polygonaceae, including T. tetragonioides, has not lost the rpl2 intron, though our results show that the rpl2 intron in Caryophyllales has been independently lost multiple times (Fig 4). Moreover, our results regarding the comparative chloroplast genome within Caryophyllales reveal that many have been lost in the chloroplast genome. Previous studies have revealed that many chloroplast genes, such as infA, rpl22, rps19, rpl2 intron and rpl23, are transferred to the nucleus or lost [21, 26, 27]. Our results also revealed several chloroplast gene losses; for example, Drosera and Carnegiea have lost the ndh genes. The chloroplast structures of these two species are quite different, Drosera has a long IR region, whereas Carnegiea has lost one IR region loss [28].

Previous studies discovered two large subclades within Caryophyllales (core and noncore Caryophyllales) [3, 4]. The present study on 55 combined gene data sets also shows that Caryophyllales is monophyletic and divides into these two large subclades.

According to our analysis, the taxa formerly included in the core Caryophyllales (Beta, Spinacia, Bienertia, Salicornia, Haloxylon, Agrostemma, Dianthus, Colobanthus, Mesembryanthemum, Carnegiea and Tetragonia) form a monophyletic group. The genus Tetragonia sisters Mesembryanthemum based on our combined data (Fig 4).

Synonymous and nonsynonymous substitution patterns are valuable in gene evolution studies [29, 30]. Previous studies have shown nonsynonymous substitutions (Ka), which are less common than synonymous substitutions (Ks). Some plants, such as Silene [31] and Cotton [32], have Ka/Ks ratios > 1 in some genes, which indicates that some genes suggest a positive selection. Our results demonstrate substitution rates (Ka/Ks) in all cases that were substantially < 1 and Ka values that were far lower than the Ks values. Nucleotide substitution rates in chloroplast genes are generally lower than those in mitochondrial, nuclear, and plastid genes, which are under strong purifying selection [32, 33]. The average Ka/Ks values of the groups of cytochrome genes (0.057), ATP synthase genes (0.062), photosystem I genes (0.041), and photosystem II genes (0.043) were close to zero, suggesting that these groups of functional genes have been subjected to purifying selection. In contrast, the average values of the groups of ribosomal large unit genes (0.279), ribosomal small unit genes (0.316) and RNA polymerase (0.165) were higher than those of the groups of other functional genes (Fig 6 and S3 Table).

Supporting information

S2 Table. Studied taxa, GenBank accession numbers of reference and chloroplast genome characters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199626.s002

(XLSX)

S3 Table. Nonsynonymous (Ka), synonymous (Ks) and Ka/Ks substitution rates of functional gene groups.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0199626.s003

(CSV)

Acknowledgments

We thank Kyu Tae Park for providing sample material and technical assistance.

References

  1. 1. Angiosperm Phylogeny Group (APG). Angiosperm Phylogeny Website. Version 12. 2001; http://www.mobot.org/MOBOT/research/APweb/
  2. 2. Downie SR, Palmer JD. A chloroplast DNA phylogeny of the Caryophyllales based on structural and inverted repeat restriction site variation. Syst Bot. 1994; 19(2): 236–252.
  3. 3. Cuénous P, Savolainen V, Chatrou LW, Powell M, Grayer RJ, Chase MW. Molecular phylogenetics of Caryophyllales based on nuclear 18S rDNA and plastid rbcL, atpB, and matK DNA sequences. Am J Bot. 2002; 89(1): 132–144 pmid:21669721
  4. 4. Brockington SF, Alexandre R, Ramdial J, Moore MJ, Crawley S, Dhinga A, et al. Phylogeny of the Caryophyllales sensu lato: revisiting hypotheses on pollination biology and perianth differentiation in the core Caryophyllales. Int J Plant Sci. 2009; 170(5): 627–643.
  5. 5. Klak C, Khunou A, Reeves G, Hedderson T. A phylogenetic hypothesis for the Aizoaceae (Caryophyllales) based on four plastid DNA regions. Am J Bot. 2003; 90(10): 1433–1445. pmid:21659095
  6. 6. Clegg MT, Gaut BS, Learn GH Jr, Morton BR. Rates and patterns of chloroplast DNA evolution. PNAS. 1994; 91(15): 6795–6801. pmid:8041699
  7. 7. Wicke S, Schneeweiss GM, dePamphilis CW, Müller KF, Quandt D. The evolution of the plastid chromosome in land plants: gene content, gene order, gene function. Plant Mol Biol. 2011; 76: 273–297. pmid:21424877
  8. 8. Jansen RK, Cai Z, Raubeson LA, Daniell H, dePamphilis CW, Leebens-Mack J, et al. Analysis of 81 genes from 64 plastid genomes resolves relationships in angiosperms and identifies genome-scale evolutionary patterns. PNAS. 2007; 104(49): 19369–19374. pmid:18048330
  9. 9. Choi KS, Son O, Park S. The chloroplast genome of Elaeagnus macrophylla and trnH duplication event in Elaeagnaceae. PLoS ONE. 2015; 10: e0138727. pmid:26394223
  10. 10. Choi KS, Chung MG, Park S. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of three Veroniceae species (Plantaginaceae): comparative analysis and highly divergent regions. Front Plant Sci. 2016; 7: 355. pmid:27047524
  11. 11. Zeng S, Zhou T, Han K, Yang Y, Zhao J, Liu Z-L. The complete chloroplast genome sequences of six Rehmannia species. Genes. 2017; 8(3): 103.
  12. 12. Wyman SK, Jansen RK, Boore HL. Automatic annotation of organellar genomes with DOGMA. Bioinformatics. 2004; 20: 3252–3255. pmid:15180927
  13. 13. Schattner P, Brooks AN, Lowe TM. The tRNAscan-SE, snoscan and snoGPS web servers for the detection of tRNAs and snoRNAs. Nuclec Acids Res. 2005; 33(2): W686–W689.
  14. 14. Lohse M, Drechsel O, Bock R. OrganellarGenomeDRAW(OGDRAW): a tool for the easy generation of high-quality custom graphical maps of plastid and mitochondrial genomes. Curr Genet. 2007; 52: 267–274. pmid:17957369
  15. 15. Kurtz S, Choudhuri JV, Ohlebusch E, Schleiermacher C, Stoye J, Giegerich R. REPuter: the manifold applications of repeat analysis on a genomic scale. Nuleic Acids Res. 2001; 29: 4633–4642.
  16. 16. Katoh K, Misawa K, Kuma K, Miyata T. MAFFT: a novel method for rapid multiple sequence alignment based on fast Fourier transform. Nucleic Acids Res. 2002; 30: 3059–3066. pmid:12136088
  17. 17. Stamatakis A, Hoover P, Rougemont J. A rapid bootstrap algorithm for the RAxML web-server. Syst Biol. 2008; 75: 758–771.
  18. 18. Drummond AJ, Ashton B, Buxton S, Cheung M, Cooper A, Heled J, et al. Geneious v.5.5. 2011; Available from http://www.geneious.com.
  19. 19. Librado P, Rozas J. DnaSP v5: software for comprehensive analysis of DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics. 2009; 25(11): 1451–1452. pmid:19346325
  20. 20. Choi KS, Park S. The complete chloroplast genome sequence of Aster spathulifolius (Asteraceae); genomic features and relationship with Asteraceae. Gene. 2015; 572(2): 214–221. pmid:26164759
  21. 21. Millen RS, Olmstead RG, Admas KL, Palmer JD, Lao NT, Heggie L, et al. Many parallel losses of infA from chloroplast DNA during angiosperm evolution with multiple independent transfers to the nucleus. The Plant Cell. 2001; 13:645–658 pmid:11251102
  22. 22. Blazer JC, Gusinger MM, Jansen RK. Recent loss of plastid-encoded ndh genes within Erodium (Geraniaceae). Plant Mol Biol. 2011; 76:263–272. pmid:21327834
  23. 23. Wicke S, Müller KF, dePamphilis CW, Quandt D, Wickett NJ, Zhang Y, et al. Mechanisms of functional and physical genome reduction in photosynthetic and nonphotosynthetic parasitic plants of the Broomrape family. The Plant Cell. 2103; 25: 3711–3725. pmid:24143802
  24. 24. Samigullin TH, Logacheva MD, Penin AA, Vallejo-Roman CM. Complete plastid genome of the recent holoparasite Lathraea squamaria reveals earliest stages of plastome reduction in Orobanchaceae. PLoS ONE. 2016; 11(3): e0150718. pmid:26934745
  25. 25. Jansen RK, Saski C, Hansen AK, Daniell H. Complete plastid genome sequences of three Rosids (Castanea, Prunus, Theobroma): evidence for at least two independent transfers of rpl22 to the nucleus. Mol Biol Evol. 2011; 28(1): 835–847. pmid:20935065
  26. 26. Downie SR, Olmstead RG, Zurawski G, Soltis DE, Soltis PS, Watson JC, Palmer JD. Six independent loss of the chloroplast DNA rpl2 intron in Dicotyledons: molecular and phylogenetic implications. Evolution. 1991; 45(5): 1245–1259. pmid:28564183
  27. 27. Thomas F, Massenet O, Dorne AM, Briat JF, Mache R. Expression of the rpl23, rpl2 and rps19 genes in spinach chloroplasts. Nucleic Acids Res. 1988; 165: 2461–2472.
  28. 28. Sanderson MJ, Copetti D, Búrqzuez A, Bustamante E, Charboneau JLM, Eguiarte LE, et al. Exceptional reduction of the plastid genome of saguaro cactus (Carnegiea gigantea): loss of the ndh gene suite and inverted repeat. Am J Bot. 2015; 102(7): 1115–1127. pmid:26199368
  29. 29. Ivanova Z, Sablok G, Daskalova E, Zahmanova G, Apostolova E, Yahubyan G, Vaev V. Chloroplast genome analysis of resurrection tertiary relict Haberlea rhodopensis highlights genes important for desiccation stress response. Front Plant Sci. 2017; 8: 204. pmid:28265281
  30. 30. Chen Z, Grover CE, Li P, Wang Y, Nie H, Zhao Y, et al. Molecular evolution of the plastid genome during diversification of the cotton genus. Mol Phylogenetic Evol. 2017; 112: 268–276.
  31. 31. Sloan DB, Triant DA, Forrester NJ, Bergner LM, Wu M, Tayler DR. A recurring syndrome of accelerated plastid genome evolution in the angiosperm tribe Sileneae (Caryphyllaceae). Mol Phylo Evol. 2014; 72: 82–89.
  32. 32. Wolfe KG, Li WH, Sharp PM. Rate of nucleotide substitution vary greatly among plant mitochondrial, chloroplast, and nuclear DNAs. Proc Batl Acad Sci. 1987; 84: 9054–9058.
  33. 33. Guisinger MM, Kuehl JV, Boore JL, Jansen RK. Genome-wide analyses of Geraniaceae plastid DNA reveal unprecedented patterns of increased nucleotide substitutions. PNAS. 2008; 105: 47.