Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Analysis of a conditional gene trap reveals that tbx5a is required for heart regeneration in zebrafish

  • Viktorija Grajevskaja,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America, Department of Zoology, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Vilnius University, Vilnius, Lithuania

  • Diana Camerota,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America

  • Gianfranco Bellipanni,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America

  • Jorune Balciuniene,

    Roles Formal analysis, Investigation

    Affiliation Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America

  • Darius Balciunas

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biology, College of Science and Technology, Temple University, Philadelphia, PA, United States of America


The ability to conditionally inactivate genes is instrumental for fine genetic analysis of all biological processes, but is especially important for studies of biological events, such as regeneration, which occur late in ontogenesis or in adult life. We have constructed and tested a fully conditional gene trap vector, and used it to inactivate tbx5a in the cardiomyocytes of larval and adult zebrafish. We observe that loss of tbx5a function significantly impairs the ability of zebrafish hearts to regenerate after ventricular resection, indicating that Tbx5a plays an essential role in the transcriptional program of heart regeneration.


Conditional induction of loss-of-function mutations using the Cre-lox system has enabled thorough mechanistic studies of all biological processes, from development to organ homeostasis and behavior, in the mouse model system [1,2,3,4]. Inability to reliably insert loxP sites into desired locations in the genome, despite recent progress [5,6], has hampered conditional loss-of-function studies in zebrafish. Instead, scientists have to rely on inducible overexpression of active and dominant negative proteins to study development and regeneration [7,8,9].

Organisms vary greatly in their regenerative capacity. Among vertebrates, many anamniotes, including the axolotl and the zebrafish, can regenerate a variety of organs, tissues and cell types (reviewed in[10]). Humans are on the other end of the regenerative spectrum, as injury typically results in scar formation. Until recently it was thought that laboratory mice also have limited regenerative capacity. Two recent findings challenge that notion: observation that newborn mice can heal ventricular injury [11], and that a related mouse species, the African spiny mouse, can regenerate skin lesions [12]. These observations suggest that with detailed mechanistic knowledge of the process, it may be possible to re-activate dormant regenerative programs in other mammals as well.

Signaling through classical developmental pathways including Wnt, Sonic Hedgehog, BMP, Retinoic Acid, and TGF is essential during regeneration ([10,13,14,15] and references therein). These observations support the notion of a significant overlap between genetic mechanisms governing development and regeneration, necessitating the use of conditional mutants to study regeneration. However, conditional loss of function mutants can only be robustly generated in the laboratory mouse, which has poor regenerative capacity. Conversely, in vertebrate model systems with extensive regenerative capacity such as the salamander or the zebrafish only inducible dominant negative approaches in conjunction with small molecule exposure and morpholino knockdowns have been used to study regeneration [15].

In this report, we have constructed and tested fully conditional, highly mutagenic gene trap vectors. They combine high mutagenicity of GBT vectors [16,17,18,19] with the ability to conditionally revert and re-induce gene inactivation by turning the gene trap cassette around. In further contrast to other conditional gene trap vectors [20,21,22], we employ simple +10/-10 mutant loxP and FRT sites instead of using the more cumbersome FLEx switch (reviewed in [23]). Using tbx5atpl58 as the model gene trap locus, we demonstrate that these +10/-10 loxP and FRT sites can be readily used to stably invert the gene trap cassette in larval and adult zebrafish, and observe that tbx5a is required for cardiac regeneration.

Results and discussion

To facilitate genetic analysis of pleiotropic genes and biological processes which occur late in ontogenesis, we have developed a highly mutagenic and fully conditional 5’ gene trap with Gal4-VP16 as the primary gene trap reporter. Our approach is similar to the one employed by the mouse gene trap consortium [24] and previous reports in zebrafish [21,25] with two key differences. First, while previous reports used the FLEx switch based on linker mutant site-specific recombinase (SSR) sites, we took advantage of the much more compact nature of LE/RE mutant SSR sites to achieve the same goal. Second, we used components which have been previously validated to be very effective at inducing null mutations upon integration into introns of genes [16,17,18,19,26,27].

We constructed a miniTol2 vector, GBT-S1, with the Gal4-VP16 gene trap cassette flanked by LE/RE modified loxP (lox66, lox72) and FRT (FRT+10, FRT-10) SSR sites (Fig 1A). Since overexpression of Gal4-VP16 has been shown to lead to toxicity [28,29], we considered using a less transcriptionally potent derivative Gal4-FF. We tested Gal4-FF [28] in the context of GBT-B1 gene trap vector [19] but failed to recover any gene trap lines (Balciunas et al., unpublished). Even though this negative observation is insufficient to draw firm conclusions, we implied that Gal4-FF may be insufficiently potent to function in a highly stringent gene trap and elected to continue using Gal4-VP16. A lens-specific BFP expression cassette was added to expedite identification of embryos which inherit the gene trap. Plasmid containing the gene trap (25 pg) was injected along with 25 pg of Tol2 transposase mRNA into the yolks of zebrafish embryos at 1-cell stage. Lens BFP-positive embryos were raised and screened by crossing to the Tg(UAS:mRFP)tpl2 reporter line [19,30].

Fig 1. Tol2-based On/Off/On (“Switchblade”, GBT-S1/S8) vectors for insertional mutagenesis and characterized gene trap lines.

A. Diagram of the vector and conditional regulation. The gene trap cassette is flanked by lox71, FRT-10, FRT+10 and lox66 sites. Components responsible for high degree of mutagenicity are shown in red. SA, carp beta actin splice acceptor, ^Gal-VP16, AUG-less Gal4-VP16, zp(A), zebrafish beta actin 3’ UTR and transcriptional termination sequences, cry, X. laevis gamma crystalline promoter, p(A), SV40 poly(A). The gene trap cassette is identical to that used in GBT-B1 gene trap vector (Balciuniene et al., 2013). Expression Flp recombinase will result in inversion of the gene trap cassette and one wild type (FRT) and one double mutant, inactive (FRT+10/-10, two red dots) site. Expression of the Cre recombinase will result in second inversion of the cassette conditionally mutating the gene. B. GBT-S1 and GBT-S8 gene trap lines. First column, gene trap line. Second column, sequence adjacent to the 3’ end of the gene trap integration. The capital CTG are the last three nucleotides of Tol2. Third column, location of the gene trap integration on the GRCz10 zebrafish genome assembly. Fourth column, insertionally mutated gene (IMG). Fifth column, sequence of the IMG-Gal4-VP16 fusion protein, IMG sequence is highlighted in aqua, Gal4 sequence is highlighted in magenta. The “linker” sequence is encoded by the linker between splice acceptor and Gal4 in GBT-S1 and GBT-S8. C. Diagram of gene trap loci. Gene trap integration site is shown as a triangle, with mutated gene’s exons depicted as squares: grey for non-coding, black for 5’ of integration site and white for 3’ of integration site. D. Assessment of transcript levels by quantitative RT-PCR. Three non-phenotypic lines were chosen for analysis. Quantitative RT PCR was performed on pools of RNA from wild type and homozygous mutant 5 dpf embryos, and normalized to beta actin. Error bars represent standard deviation.

Out of 115 potential F0 fish screened, twelve produced RFP-positive progeny. We focused on seven lines with the most distinct mRFP expression patterns and identified insertionally mutated genes in six of them: crip2, dnah5, lztfl1, ankrd12, tbx5a and sybp. We observed that in many gene trap lines, BFP expression was too weak to reliably identify trap-positive fish, and therefore constructed a second vector, GBT-S8, with a longer gamma-crystalline promoter driving BFP, and with the marker cassette cloned in reverse orientation. A small screen focused on the cardiovascular system produced two additional gene trap lines, rbpms2b and fli1b (Fig 1B and 1C).

Incrosses of fish heterozygous for six gene traps (crip2, dnahc5, lztfl1, ankrd12, sybp and fli1b) resulted in phenotypically normal embryos. Crossing fish heterozygous for rbpms2b gene trap resulted in approximately 25% of progeny developing pericardial edema at 3 days post fertilization (data not shown). We performed quantitative RT-PCR to assess levels of read-through transcripts crip2, ankrd12 and sybp homozygotes (Fig 1D). Transcript levels in all three lines were below 1%, indicating that mutagenicity of pGBT-S1, similarly to that of parental vector pGBT-B1 [19], is close to that of the extremely mutagenic GBT-RP2 [18] and higher than that of other previously published conditional gene traps [21,25].

We chose to focus our attention on the tbx5atpl58 gene trap line. Tbx5 is a highly conserved transcription factor known to be required for heart and upper limb development in different vertebrate species, and TBX5 haploinsufficiency causes Holt-Oram syndrome in humans [31,32,33,34,35]. Accordingly, we noted that embryos heterozygous for tbx5atpl58 have abnormal pectoral fins (n = 241) (Fig 2). The majority (60%) of examined tbx5atpl58/+ embryos had equally affected pectoral fins. One third of the tbx5atpl58/+ (29%) had the left pectoral fin more affected than a right. Only 11% of the tbx5atpl58/+ showed more affected right pectoral fin. We noticed that similarly to observations in human patients with Holt-Oram syndrome, the left upper limb was more likely to be more severely affected than the right (compare Figs 2A–2D to 1 in [36]). We observed poor and highly variable survival of tbx5atpl58/+ embryos to adulthood. All examined adults (n = 48) lacked pectoral fins. We also noted that all hearts dissected from tbx5atpl58/+ fish (n = 13) had enlarged atria and bluntly shaped ventricles (Fig 2G and 2H), similar to the hearts of mice heterozygous for tbx5 deletion [33]. Crosses of fin-less males and females heterozygous for tbx5atpl58 failed to produce embryos. We therefore used the sperm of tbx5atpl58/+ males to in vitro fertilize the eggs of tbx5atpl58/+ females, and observed 25% of embryos with linear heart phenotype (Fig 2E, n = 7 genotyped). This phenotype closely resembles the more severe version of the heartstrings phenotype caused by the hst allele of tbx5a [35]. Notably, our gene trap truncates the Tbx5a protein after the first 50 amino acids while tbx5ahst introduces a stop codon in the second to last exon, at the amino acid 316, after the T-box DNA binding domain. The observations that amino acids 1–239 are sufficient to bind DNA and form a structural dimer with Nkx2.5 [37], suggest that the protein encoded by tbx5ahst may be a hypomorph. Other explanations such as alternative splicing or nonsense read-through of tbx5ahst are possible as well [38,39]. A particularly intriguing possibility would be that point mutant tbx5ahst but not gene trap mutant tbx5atpl58 may induce genetic compensation [40,41]. Alternatively, the more severe phenotypes of tbx5atpl58, despite striking similarity to the mouse and human Tbx5 haploinsufficiency phenotypes, could be attributed to toxicity of Gal4-VP16 [28,29].

Fig 2.

tbx5atpl58 mutant phenotypes. A-D. Larvae heterozygous for tbx5atpl58 gene trap allele display severe but variable fin defects at 5 days post fertilization. Compared to wild type siblings (a), heterozygous mutants display bilaterally equal fin truncation (b), or unequal fin truncation with left (c) or right (d) pectoral fin more severely affected. E. Gene trap homozygotes display a phenotype similar to the more severe version of heartstrings phenotype described previously (Fig 1D and 1E in Garrity et al., 2002). F-H. All adults heterozygous for the gene trap had hearts with enlarged atria and mis-shapen (blunt) ventricles (n = 13). a, atrium, v, ventricle, ba, bulbus arteriosus.

Tbx5 is an essential component of transcription factor cocktails capable of trans-differentiating fibroblasts into cardiomyocytes [42,43,44]. Together with the fact that Tbx5 is essential for heart development, this suggests that Tbx5 may be required for cardiac regeneration. On the other hand, de novo differentiation of cardiomyocytes from stem cells does not appear to play a major role in cardiac regeneration in zebrafish or neonatal mice [9,11,45]. It is also not clear if tbx5a is upregulated in response to cardiac injury in adult zebrafish [7,45,46], although it is induced in injured embryonic hearts [47]. We therefore decided to use our gene trap mutant to test if tbx5a may be required for cardiac regeneration in adult zebrafish.

We first tested if fish heterozygous for the tbx5atpl58 gene trap are able to regenerate their hearts after ventricular resection. We found that while the hearts of wild type fish were completely healed 30 days after ventricular resection (n = 6), the hearts of tbx5atpl58 heterozygotes retained a significant amount of scar tissue (n = 3) (data not shown), which indicates a regeneration defect. However, the observed regeneration defect may be an indirect consequence of morphological abnormalities described above (Fig 2G and 2H).

To determine if tbx5a is directly involved in regeneration we took advantage of the conditional inversion components built into our gene trap vector. We first tested if inversion of the gene trap cassette using Flp recombinase will result in abrogation of all mutant phenotypes. Embryos obtained from a cross between tbx5atpl58 heterozygotes and (UAS:mRFP)tpl2 homozygotes and were injected with in vitro transcribed Flpo recombinase mRNA. Embryos with reduced mRFP expression were selected and raised to adulthood. One of the adult fish was outcrossed and in the first clutch produced three RFP-positive and 13 RFP-negative embryos. We analyzed all 16 embryos by PCR and confirmed that all three RFP-positive embryos have non-inverted gene trap, and of the 13 RFP-negative embryos, three were positive for the inverted gene trap (S1 Fig). Siblings of the tested embryos were raised to adulthood and the reverted gene trap line tbx5atpl58R was established. Presence of inverted gene trap was confirmed by PCR and sequencing (S2 Fig). Most importantly, tbx5atpl58R/tbx5atpl58R homozygotes are viable and do not display any overt phenotypes. Thus, presence of the inverted gene trap cassette and gamma-crystalline-BFP expression cassette in the intron does not appear to significantly negatively impact the expression of tbx5a.

Two experiments were performed to test if the gene trap cassette flanked by LE/RE mutant loxP sites can be inverted again to re-trap the gene in larval zebrafish. First, tbx5atpl58R/+; UAS:mRFP heterozygotes were outcrossed and embryos were injected with Cre mRNA, resulting in mosaic mRFP expression in the hearts, pectoral fins and dorsal retina (data not shown). Second, to ascertain feasibility of conditional re-trapping, tbx5atpl58R/+; UAS:mRFP heterozygotes were crossed to a line expressing the tamoxifen-inducible Cre under the control of a ubiquitous promoter, Tg(-3.5ubb:CreERT2, myl7:EGFP)cz1702 transgenic line [48]. Two-day old embryos were incubated in embryo water containing 0.5 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HT hereafter) for 24 hours as described previously [48,49]. Embryos were scored for mosaic mRFP expression, and DNA was prepared from 5 dpf RFP-positive embryos. Inversion of the gene trap cassette was confirmed by sequencing of PCR fragments (S2 Fig).

For cardiomyocyte-specific expression of CreERT2, we established a Tg(-3.6tnnt2:CreERT2, gcrygc:RFP)tpl48 (tnnt2:CreERT2 henceforth) transgenic line and demonstrated that Cre activity in this line is both tamoxifen-inducible and heart-specific (S3 Fig). We generated fish heterozygous for tnnt2:CreERT2, UAS:mRFP and tbx5atpl58R. Embryos were exposed to 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HT) for 24 hours starting at 2 days post-fertilization. Mosaic heart-specific mRFP expression (from Tg(UAS:mRFP)tpl2 reporter transgene) was observed in the hearts of 3 dpf embryos, indicating successful inversion of the tbx5a gene trap into its mutant form (S3 Fig). Embryos exposed to 4-HT and vehicle-exposed controls were raised to adulthood. Three adult fish were sacrificed to test if cardiomyocytes made heterozygous for the re-trapped gene trap (tbx5atpl58RT) at 2–3 dpf are able to successfully contribute to the adult myocardium using fluorescence from UAS:mRFP as the readout. Examined hearts had variable numbers of RFP-positive cells, indicating that heterozygous cells indeed are able to contribute to the adult heart. Importantly, all examined hearts were morphologically normal (S3 Fig). We then performed ventricular resection on siblings of these mosaic fish (n = 7). One month after injury, only 2/7 examined hearts appeared to have undergone normal regeneration while 3/7 hearts and 2/7 hearts had medium and large amount of collagen deposition, respectively. Adjacent sections were stained for DAPI and visualized for RFP fluorescence. We noted very few RFP-positive cells (and thus heterozygous for tbx5atpl58RM) in the regenerated myocardium (tip of the ventricle). Further experiments are needed to determine if expression tbx5a is switched off in the regenerated myocardium, or if cardiomyocytes with reduced tbx5a dosage are less capable of contributing to the regenerating myocardium (Fig 3).

Fig 3. Cardiomyocytes heterozygous for tbx5atpl58 contribute to the adult heart but lead to impaired regeneration.

Top, experimental outline. A-F. Representative images of adjacent sections (A and B, C and D, E and F) of hearts (n = 7) stained for DAPI (A, C, E) and by Pico-Mallory stain (B, D, F).

Although the experiment described above did indicate that tbx5a is likely to play a direct role in cardiac regeneration, we could not exclude the possibility that there are subtle developmental, physiological or cellular defects in hearts mosaic for tbx5atpl58RT mutation starting during development. Also, since Tbx5a is required for heart development, it was not feasible to generate homozygous mutant cells and test the ability of hearts containing such cells to regenerate.

To overcome these limitations, loss of function mutation had to be induced in the hearts of adult zebrafish. To achieve this goal, we generated adult fish homozygous or heterozygous for tbx5atpl58R in heterozygous tnnt2:CreERT2, UAS:mRFP background. To re-trap the tbx5a locus, 2.5 month old fish were incubated in 5 μM 4-HT three times for 24 h with a one-day resting period between each incubation (Fig 4). We then performed ventricular resection. As expected, control fish incubated in vehicle displayed normal regeneration (n = 7), with only one heart showing mild scarring (Fig 4A–4G). In contrast, tbx5atpl58R/+ incubated in 4-HT displayed mild regeneration defects (n = 2) (Fig 4H and 4I), while all tbx5atpl58R/tpl58R fish failed to regenerate their hearts (n = 8) (Fig 4J–4Q). Apart from observing induction of mRFP fluorescence in whole hearts (data not shown), we did not assess the efficiency of re-trapping. It therefore remains to be determined if variable severity of the regeneration defect (compare Fig 4J, 4K and 4Q) can be attributed to different efficiencies of re-trapping, physical proximity of re-trapped cardiomyocytes to injury site, or if it is entirely stochastic. Nonetheless, our data clearly show that Tbx5a function is required for cardiac regeneration in zebrafish.

Fig 4. Loss of tbx5a in adult zebrafish leads to severe regeneration defects.

Top, experimental outline. Bottom, sections of zebrafish hearts stained by Picro-Mallory stain. A-G. Hearts of zebrafish (n = 7) homozygous for the reverted tbx5a allele, and heterozygous for tnnt2:CreERT2, treated with ethanol (solvent for 4-HT). H, I. Hearts of zebrafish (n = 2) heterozygous for the reverted tbx5a allele, and heterozygous for tnnt2:CreERT2, treated with 4-HT. J-Q. Hearts of zebrafish (n = 8) homozygous for the reverted tbx5a allele, and heterozygous for tnnt2:CreERT2, treated with 4-HT.

In summary, we demonstrated that a gene trap vector employing lox66/lox72 variant loxP sites in conjunction with tissue specific, tamoxifen-inducible Cre recombinase can be used to inactivate gene expression not only in embryonic, but also in adult zebrafish. We recovered the tbx5atpl58 mutant from a gene trap screen, which is a random forward genetic approach. However, several recent publications clearly establish the feasibility of integrating transgenes, including fluorescent reporters and a Cre-inducible gene trap cassette, into double strand breaks induced by targeted nucleases [6,50,51,52,53,54]. Non-repetitive nature of lox66/72 sites, in contrast to repetitive nature of the FLeX system, makes our gene trap especially suitable for one-step generation of conditional mutants using reverse genetic approaches.

Materials and methods

Animal experiments

All experiments described in this manuscript were approved by Temple University's Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC). Anesthesia was performed by immersion into fish water containing tricaine (MS-222, Sigma-Aldrich). Euthanasia was performed either by tricaine overdose or by rapid chilling.

Gene trap mutagenesis

Plasmids containing gene trap constructs GBT-S1 and GBT-S8 were purified using the Qiagen miniprep protocol. Plasmid DNA was co-injected with Tol2 mRNA into 1-cell wildtype zebrafish embryos as described [55]. At 3 dpf, embryos were screened for high levels of BFP fluorescence using Zeiss Axioscope, and positive embryos were raised to adulthood. Adult F0 founders were crossed to tg(UAS:mRFP)tpl2 reporter line [19,30]. The F1 progeny was screened for mRFP and BFP expression at 1 and 3 dpf. Adult F1 fish were again outcrossed to establish gene trap lines and to obtain embryos for molecular identification of gene trap events.

Sequences of conditional gene trap vectors have been submitted to GenBank and are available under accession numbers MH450095 (GBT-S1) and MH450096 (GBT-S8).

Identification of insertionally mutated genes

For inverse PCR, genomic DNA was prepared from batches of 20 RFP-positive and 20 RFP negative embryos, collected at 3–5 dpf. Genomic DNA was then digested with NlaIII, TaqI, NheI/SpeI/XbaI/XmaJI or BamHI/BclI/BglII, then diluted and ligated overnight as described in [56]. Nested inverse PCR reactions were performed with primers Tol2-F8 and S1/5’No1, then Tol2-F10 and S1/3’No2a for the 5’ end of the gene trap, and primers Tol2-R4 and S1/3’No3, then Tol2-R5 then S1/3’No4 for the 3’ end of the gene trap (see S1 Table for primer sequences). Bands unique to RFP-positive batches were excised from agarose gel and sequenced with appropriate Tol2 primer (Tol2-F10 for 5’ end, Tol2-R5 for 3’ end). Sequences of PCR fragments were used to perform BLAST searches in NCBI, UCSC and Ensembl databases.

Based on sequencing results, we designed primers in the adjacent genomic DNA and performed PCRs on additional batches of 20 embryos to confirm presence of a particular integration in RFP-positive and but not in RFP-negative embryos.

To further confirm gene trap events, RT PCR was performed using reverse primers in Gal4 and forward primers in an exon 5’ to gene trap integration, on batches of 10–20 RFP-positive and RFP-negative embryos, as described previously [19]. Bands were excised from an agarose gel and sequenced.

Quantitative RT-PCR

Gene trap heterozygotes were incrossed and embryos with no/high RFP expression were sorted at 1–3 dpf. At 5 dpf, DNA and RNA was prepared from single embryos using the Trizol reagent as previously described [19]. Three-primer PCR (two genomic primers and one gene trap-specific primer) was performed on genomic DNA to identify embryos homozygous for either wild type or the gene trap allele. mRNA from at 3–5 homozygous embryos was pooled, and cDNA was synthesized using Invitrogen Superscript II cDNA synthesis kit. Quantitative PCR was performed in triplicates using Roche LightCycler 480 SYBR Green I kit, with beta-Actin as the reference mRNA. Results of the qPCR were recorded and analyzed using LightCycler 480 software.

Ventricular resection

Three months old fish were anesthetized in 0.9 mM tricaine (MS222) solution. After exactly 3 min fish were removed from tricaine solution, placed on a wet sponge ventral side up, and ventricular resection was performed as described by Poss and colleagues [57]. A small incision in the area of the heart was made using a pair of small fine scissors. Pericardial sac was opened with fine forceps. About 20% of ventricular apex was carefully removed with small scissors. Upon injury fish was transferred to a recovery tank that was filled with fresh fish system water and had an additional air supply. Recovering fish were maintained at low density (1–5 fish in a 2L tank) on the main water system. All fish were sacrificed at 30 dpa by tricaine overdose or chilling in ice water.


Hearts were fixed in 4% PFA, washed in 1x PBS, dehydrated and embedded in paraffin. Eight nm heart sections were made using Leitz 1512 Rotary Microtome. To stain nuclei of the cells, sections were incubated in standard DAPI solution for 10 min, and mounted with water-based mounting media. To detect collagen deposition, sections were rehydrated, stained using Picro-Mallory procedure [58], dehydrated and covered with Vectashield mounting medium.

Reversion of tbx5atpl58 gene trap allele using Flpo mRNA

The plasmid coding for Flpo recombinase was a kind gift of Dr. Philippe Soriano [59]. Recombinase coding sequence was cloned into the pT3TS vector [60] to generate pDC50. In vitro transcription was performed as described for pT3TS-Tol2 [55]. 75pg of Flpo mRNA was injected into the yolks of embryos obtained from tbx5atpl58/+, Tg(UAS:mRFP)tpl2 fish. F0 embryos were screened for mosaic mRFP expression and raised. Mosaic adults were outcrossed to Tg(UAS:mRFP)tpl2 homozygotes, and F1 (R1) embryos were screened for mRFP expression. The batch that showed the lowest number of mRFP-positive embryos (13%) as compared to the number of mRFP-negative siblings (87%) was used for genotyping. Successful recombination events in F1 embryos and adults were detected via three-primer PCR with tbx5a-F1, tbx5a-R1 and zpa-F2, and confirmed by sequencing. Sequence of pT3TS-Flpo plasmid will be deposited in GenBank.

Re-trapping of tbx5atpl58R locus

Cre mRNA was in vitro transcribed and prepared as described previously [17,19] was injected into one-cell embryos from tbx5atpl58R/+; UAS:mRFP heterozygous outcross. Embryos were scored for mosaic mRFP expression in the hearts, pectoral fins and dorsal retina (data not shown).

For temporally-controlled re-trapping, tbx5atpl58R/+; UAS:mRFP heterozygotes were crossed to the Ubi:CreERT2 ubiquitous CreERT2 driver line [48]. At 2 dpf, embryos were transferred into 0.5 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen (4-HT hereafter) solution and incubated in the dark for 24 h. At 5 dpf, DNA was prepared from embryos and PCR was performed using primer pairs tbx5aEx1-F1/Gal4-R1 (5’ end) and zpA-F2/eGBYFP-R (3’ end) (S1 Table). Obtained bands were excised from agarose gel, purified and sequenced.

For conditional re-trapping in larvae, tbx5atpl58R/+; UAS:mRFP heterozygotes were crossed to Tg(tnnt2a:CreERT2, crygc:mRFP)tpl48. At 2 dpf, embryos were transferred into embryo water containing 0.5 μM 4-hydroxytamoxifen and incubated in the dark for 24 h. At 3 dpf, embryos were scored for heart-specific mRFP expression.

To re- trap tbx5atpl58R locus specifically in the adult heart, 2.5 months old tbx5atpl58R/+; tnnt2a:CreERT2 and tbx5atpl58R/tpl58R; tnnt2a:CreERT2 fish were incubated in 5 μM 4-HT solution three times for 24 h with one-day recovery period between treatments. One week after the last incubation, hearts were dissected and screened for mRFP expression. Ventricular resections were performed one week after the last incubation in 4-HT.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Reversion of tbx5atpl58 mutant phenotypes by inverting the gene trap cassette.

A, B. Embryos injected with Flpo mRNA (A) highly reduced mRFP expression (left) and/or recovery of pectoral fins (right) compared to un-injected siblings (B). C. Screening of R1 (F1) embryos for a reverted allele (tbx5atpl58R) by three primer PCR. Embryos in the first three lanes were RFP positive and therefore were expected to carry the non-modified allele (tbx5atpl58). Embryos in lanes 4–16 were RFP negative and therefore were expected to be either wild-type (tbx5a+) or positive for the inverted allele (tbx5atpl58R). D. Fish homozygous for the reverted allele have normal hearts, compared to fish heterozygous for the gene trap. E. Enlarged atrium and blunt, mis-shapen ventricle comparable to the one shown in Fig 2 are indicated by red arrows.


S2 Fig. Sequence analysis of the tbx5atpl58 gene trap locus (A), Flp-reverted tbx5atpl58R locus (B), and re-mutation after cross to Tg(ubb:CreERT2) (C).

A. Sequencing of PCR fragments obtained using primer pairs tbx5aEx1-F1/Gal4-R1 (left) and zpA-F2/eGBYFP-R (right) on 5 dpf embryos heterozygous for tbx5atpl58. B. Sequencing of PCR fragments obtained using primer pairs tbx5aEx1-F1/zpA-F2 (left) and Gal4-R1/tbx5aGen-R (right) on a tail clip of a stably reverted tbx5atpl58R heterozygote. C. Sequencing of PCR fragments obtained using primer pairs tbx5aEx1-F1/Gal4-R1 (left) and zpA-F2/eGBYFP-R (right) on 5 dpf embryos heterozygous for tbx5atpl58R and Tg(ubb:CreERT2), incubated in 0.5 mM 4-HT for 24 hours starting at 2 dpf.


S3 Fig. Tamoxifen-dependent and heart-specific tg(tnnt2:CreERT2)tpl48 driver can re-mutate tbx5atpl58R cardiomyocytes, which are then retained in adult hearts.

Top, diagram of the miniTol2/tnnt2:CreERT2; crygc:mRFP) transgene. Left, diagram of a Cre-inducible mRFP (flox-mRFP) reporter and heart-specific mRFP expression in 4-HT-treated double transgenic fish. Middle panel, Cre-inducible GFP reporter (flox-GFP) and heart-specific GFP expression in double transgenic fish treated with 4-HT. Right, re-mutation of the gene trap in the cardiomyocytes at 3 dpf. Right bottom, heart of an adult fish which was treated with 4-HT between 2–3 dpf displays mosaic mRFP expression in the atrium and the ventricle, indicating mosaicism for tbx5atpl58 gene trap re-mutation.


S1 Table. Primer sequences.

Sequences of primers mentioned in the text of the manuscript.



We thank Drs. Leonard Zon, Christian Mosimann, Pierre Chambon and Philippe Soriano for sharing fish strains and recombinase-encoding plasmids. We thank Dr. Didier Stainier for critical reading of the manuscript. The research has been supported by NIH R01 grant HD061749 to DB, funds from Temple University College of Science and Technology, and Temple University Creative Arts, Research and Scholarship (CARAS) Program.


  1. 1. Rossant J, McMahon A (1999) "Cre"-ating mouse mutants-a meeting review on conditional mouse genetics. Genes Dev 13: 142–145. pmid:9925637
  2. 2. Shen T, Aneas I, Sakabe N, Dirschinger RJ, Wang G, Smemo S, et al. (2011) Tbx20 regulates a genetic program essential to adult mouse cardiomyocyte function. J Clin Invest 121: 4640–4654. pmid:22080862
  3. 3. Barrionuevo FJ, Hurtado A, Kim GJ, Real FM, Bakkali M, Kopp JL, et al. (2016) Sox9 and Sox8 protect the adult testis from male-to-female genetic reprogramming and complete degeneration. Elife 5.
  4. 4. Bello EP, Casas-Cordero R, Galinanes GL, Casey E, Belluscio MA, Rodriguez V, et al. (2016) Inducible ablation of dopamine D2 receptors in adult mice impairs locomotion, motor skill learning and leads to severe parkinsonism. Mol Psychiatry.
  5. 5. Bedell VM, Wang Y, Campbell JM, Poshusta TL, Starker CG, Krug RG 2nd, et al. (2012) In vivo genome editing using a high-efficiency TALEN system. Nature 491: 114–118. pmid:23000899
  6. 6. Hoshijima K, Jurynec MJ, Grunwald DJ (2016) Precise Editing of the Zebrafish Genome Made Simple and Efficient. Dev Cell 36: 654–667. pmid:27003937
  7. 7. Lepilina A, Coon AN, Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Roberts RW, Burns CG, et al. (2006) A dynamic epicardial injury response supports progenitor cell activity during zebrafish heart regeneration. Cell 127: 607–619. pmid:17081981
  8. 8. Stoick-Cooper CL, Weidinger G, Riehle KJ, Hubbert C, Major MB, Fausto N, et al. (2007) Distinct Wnt signaling pathways have opposing roles in appendage regeneration. Development 134: 479–489. pmid:17185322
  9. 9. Kikuchi K, Holdway JE, Werdich AA, Anderson RM, Fang Y, Egnaczyk GF, et al. (2010) Primary contribution to zebrafish heart regeneration by gata4(+) cardiomyocytes. Nature 464: 601–605. pmid:20336144
  10. 10. Gemberling M, Bailey TJ, Hyde DR, Poss KD (2013) The zebrafish as a model for complex tissue regeneration. Trends Genet.
  11. 11. Porrello ER, Mahmoud AI, Simpson E, Hill JA, Richardson JA, Olson EN, et al. (2011) Transient regenerative potential of the neonatal mouse heart. Science 331: 1078–1080. pmid:21350179
  12. 12. Seifert AW, Maden M (2014) New insights into vertebrate skin regeneration. Int Rev Cell Mol Biol 310: 129–169. pmid:24725426
  13. 13. Porrello ER, Olson EN (2014) A neonatal blueprint for cardiac regeneration. Stem Cell Res 13: 556–570. pmid:25108892
  14. 14. Maden M (2007) Retinoic acid in the development, regeneration and maintenance of the nervous system. Nat Rev Neurosci 8: 755–765. pmid:17882253
  15. 15. Poss KD (2010) Advances in understanding tissue regenerative capacity and mechanisms in animals. Nat Rev Genet 11: 710–722. pmid:20838411
  16. 16. Sivasubbu S, Balciunas D, Davidson AE, Pickart MA, Hermanson SB, Wangensteen KJ, et al. (2006) Gene-breaking transposon mutagenesis reveals an essential role for histone H2afza in zebrafish larval development. Mech Dev 123: 513–529. pmid:16859902
  17. 17. Petzold AM, Balciunas D, Sivasubbu S, Clark KJ, Bedell VM, Westcot SE, et al. (2009) Nicotine response genetics in the zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 18662–18667. pmid:19858493
  18. 18. Clark KJ, Balciunas D, Pogoda HM, Ding Y, Westcot SE, Bedell VM, et al. (2011) In vivo protein trapping produces a functional expression codex of the vertebrate proteome. Nat Methods 8: 506–515. pmid:21552255
  19. 19. Balciuniene J, Nagelberg D, Walsh K, Camerota D, Georlette D, Biemar F, et al. (2013) Efficient disruption of Zebrafish genes using a Gal4-containing gene trap. BMC Genomics 14: 619. pmid:24034702
  20. 20. Boniface EJ, Lu J, Victoroff T, Zhu M, Chen W (2009) FlEx-based transgenic reporter lines for visualization of Cre and Flp activity in live zebrafish. Genesis 47: 484–491. pmid:19415631
  21. 21. Ni TT, Lu J, Zhu M, Maddison LA, Boyd KL, Huskey L, et al. (2012) Conditional control of gene function by an invertible gene trap in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 109: 15389–15394. pmid:22908272
  22. 22. Trinh le A, Fraser SE (2013) Enhancer and gene traps for molecular imaging and genetic analysis in zebrafish. Dev Growth Differ 55: 434–445. pmid:23565993
  23. 23. Branda CS, Dymecki SM (2004) Talking about a revolution: The impact of site-specific recombinases on genetic analyses in mice. Dev Cell 6: 7–28. pmid:14723844
  24. 24. Skarnes WC, von Melchner H, Wurst W, Hicks G, Nord AS, Cox T, et al. (2004) A public gene trap resource for mouse functional genomics. Nat Genet 36: 543–544. pmid:15167922
  25. 25. Trinh le A, Hochgreb T, Graham M, Wu D, Ruf-Zamojski F, Jayasena CS, et al. (2011) A versatile gene trap to visualize and interrogate the function of the vertebrate proteome. Genes Dev 25: 2306–2320. pmid:22056673
  26. 26. Craig MP, Grajevskaja V, Liao HK, Balciuniene J, Ekker SC, Park JS, et al. (2015) Etv2 and fli1b function together as key regulators of vasculogenesis and angiogenesis. Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol 35: 865–876. pmid:25722433
  27. 27. Seiler C, Gebhart N, Zhang Y, Shinton SA, Li YS, Ross NL, et al. (2015) Mutagenesis Screen Identifies agtpbp1 and eps15L1 as Essential for T lymphocyte Development in Zebrafish. PLoS One 10: e0131908. pmid:26161877
  28. 28. Asakawa K, Suster ML, Mizusawa K, Nagayoshi S, Kotani T, Urasaki A, et al. (2008) Genetic dissection of neural circuits by Tol2 transposon-mediated Gal4 gene and enhancer trapping in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 105: 1255–1260. pmid:18202183
  29. 29. Distel M, Wullimann MF, Koster RW (2009) Optimized Gal4 genetics for permanent gene expression mapping in zebrafish. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 106: 13365–13370. pmid:19628697
  30. 30. Balciuniene J, Balciunas D (2013) Gene trapping using gal4 in zebrafish. J Vis Exp: e50113. pmid:24121167
  31. 31. Basson CT, Bachinsky DR, Lin RC, Levi T, Elkins JA, Soults J, et al. (1997) Mutations in human TBX5 [corrected] cause limb and cardiac malformation in Holt-Oram syndrome. Nat Genet 15: 30–35. pmid:8988165
  32. 32. Li QY, Newbury-Ecob RA, Terrett JA, Wilson DI, Curtis AR, Yi CH, et al. (1997) Holt-Oram syndrome is caused by mutations in TBX5, a member of the Brachyury (T) gene family. Nat Genet 15: 21–29. pmid:8988164
  33. 33. Bruneau BG, Nemer G, Schmitt JP, Charron F, Robitaille L, Caron S, et al. (2001) A murine model of Holt-Oram syndrome defines roles of the T-box transcription factor Tbx5 in cardiogenesis and disease. Cell 106: 709–721. pmid:11572777
  34. 34. Ahn DG, Kourakis MJ, Rohde LA, Silver LM, Ho RK (2002) T-box gene tbx5 is essential for formation of the pectoral limb bud. Nature 417: 754–758. pmid:12066188
  35. 35. Garrity DM, Childs S, Fishman MC (2002) The heartstrings mutation in zebrafish causes heart/fin Tbx5 deficiency syndrome. Development 129: 4635–4645. pmid:12223419
  36. 36. Smith AT, Sack GH Jr., Taylor GJ (1979) Holt-Oram syndrome. J Pediatr 95: 538–543. pmid:480027
  37. 37. Pradhan L, Gopal S, Li S, Ashur S, Suryanarayanan S, Kasahara H, et al. (2016) Intermolecular Interactions of Cardiac Transcription Factors NKX2.5 and TBX5. Biochemistry 55: 1702–1710. pmid:26926761
  38. 38. Anderson JL, Mulligan TS, Shen MC, Wang H, Scahill CM, Tan FJ, et al. (2017) mRNA processing in mutant zebrafish lines generated by chemical and CRISPR-mediated mutagenesis produces unexpected transcripts that escape nonsense-mediated decay. PLoS Genet 13: e1007105. pmid:29161261
  39. 39. Balciunas D (2018) Fish mutant, where is thy phenotype? PLoS Genet 14: e1007197. pmid:29470494
  40. 40. Rossi A, Kontarakis Z, Gerri C, Nolte H, Holper S, Kruger M, et al. (2015) Genetic compensation induced by deleterious mutations but not gene knockdowns. Nature 524: 230–233. pmid:26168398
  41. 41. El-Brolosy MA, Stainier DYR (2017) Genetic compensation: A phenomenon in search of mechanisms. PLoS Genet 13: e1006780. pmid:28704371
  42. 42. Ieda M, Fu JD, Delgado-Olguin P, Vedantham V, Hayashi Y, Bruneau BG, et al. (2010) Direct reprogramming of fibroblasts into functional cardiomyocytes by defined factors. Cell 142: 375–386. pmid:20691899
  43. 43. Fu JD, Stone NR, Liu L, Spencer IC, Qian L, Hayashi Y, et al. (2013) Direct Reprogramming of Human Fibroblasts Toward the Cardiomyocyte Lineage. Circulation 128.
  44. 44. Nam YJ, Lubczyk C, Bhakta M, Zang T, Fernandez-Perez A, McAnally J, et al. (2014) Induction of diverse cardiac cell types by reprogramming fibroblasts with cardiac transcription factors. Development 141: 4267–4278. pmid:25344074
  45. 45. Jopling C, Sleep E, Raya M, Marti M, Raya A, Izpisua Belmonte JC (2010) Zebrafish heart regeneration occurs by cardiomyocyte dedifferentiation and proliferation. Nature 464: 606–609. pmid:20336145
  46. 46. Sleep E, Boue S, Jopling C, Raya M, Raya A, Izpisua Belmonte JC (2010) Transcriptomics approach to investigate zebrafish heart regeneration. J Cardiovasc Med (Hagerstown) 11: 369–380.
  47. 47. Zhang R, Han P, Yang H, Ouyang K, Lee D, Lin YF, et al. (2013) In vivo cardiac reprogramming contributes to zebrafish heart regeneration. Nature 498: 497–501. pmid:23783515
  48. 48. Mosimann C, Kaufman CK, Li P, Pugach EK, Tamplin OJ, Zon LI (2011) Ubiquitous transgene expression and Cre-based recombination driven by the ubiquitin promoter in zebrafish. Development 138: 169–177. pmid:21138979
  49. 49. Hans S, Kaslin J, Freudenreich D, Brand M (2009) Temporally-controlled site-specific recombination in zebrafish. PLoS ONE 4: e4640. pmid:19247481
  50. 50. Shin J, Chen J, Solnica-Krezel L (2014) Efficient homologous recombination-mediated genome engineering in zebrafish using TALE nucleases. Development 141: 3807–3818. pmid:25249466
  51. 51. Li J, Zhang BB, Ren YG, Gu SY, Xiang YH, Du JL (2015) Intron targeting-mediated and endogenous gene integrity-maintaining knockin in zebrafish using the CRISPR/Cas9 system. Cell Res 25: 634–637. pmid:25849248
  52. 52. Auer TO, Duroure K, De Cian A, Concordet JP, Del Bene F (2014) Highly efficient CRISPR/Cas9-mediated knock-in in zebrafish by homology-independent DNA repair. Genome Res 24: 142–153. pmid:24179142
  53. 53. Auer TO, Del Bene F (2016) Homology-Independent Integration of Plasmid DNA into the Zebrafish Genome. Methods Mol Biol 1451: 31–51. pmid:27464799
  54. 54. Sugimoto K, Hui SP, Sheng DZ, Kikuchi K (2017) Dissection of zebrafish shha function using site-specific targeting with a Cre-dependent genetic switch. Elife 6.
  55. 55. Balciunas D, Wangensteen KJ, Wilber A, Bell J, Geurts A, Sivasubbu S, et al. (2006) Harnessing a high cargo-capacity transposon for genetic applications in vertebrates. PLoS Genet 2: e169. pmid:17096595
  56. 56. Hermanson S, Davidson AE, Sivasubbu S, Balciunas D, Ekker SC (2004) Sleeping Beauty transposon for efficient gene delivery. Methods Cell Biol 77: 349–362. pmid:15602921
  57. 57. Poss KD, Wilson LG, Keating MT (2002) Heart regeneration in zebrafish. Science 298: 2188–2190. pmid:12481136
  58. 58. Gonzalez-Rosa JM, Martin V, Peralta M, Torres M, Mercader N (2011) Extensive scar formation and regression during heart regeneration after cryoinjury in zebrafish. Development 138: 1663–1674. pmid:21429987
  59. 59. Raymond CS, Soriano P (2007) High-efficiency FLP and PhiC31 site-specific recombination in mammalian cells. PLoS ONE 2: e162. pmid:17225864
  60. 60. Hyatt TM, Ekker SC (1999) Vectors and techniques for ectopic gene expression in zebrafish. Methods Cell Biol 59: 117–126. pmid:9891358