Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Open Access

Peer-reviewed

Research Article

Core signaling pathways in ovarian cancer stem cell revealed by integrative analysis of multi-marker genomics data

  • Tianyu Zhang,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of BioMedical Informatics (BMI), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America, School of Mathematical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

    ⨯
  • Jielin Xu,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of BioMedical Informatics (BMI), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Siyuan Deng,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of BioMedical Informatics (BMI), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Fengqi Zhou,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of BioMedical Informatics (BMI), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Jin Li,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of BioMedical Informatics (BMI), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Liwei Zhang,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation School of Mathematical Sciences, Dalian University of Technology, Dalian, China

    ⨯
  • Lang Li,

    Roles Methodology

    Affiliation Department of BioMedical Informatics (BMI), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Qi-En Wang,

    Roles Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Radiology, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

    ⨯
  • Fuhai Li

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Methodology, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Fuhai.Li@osumc.edu

    Affiliation Department of BioMedical Informatics (BMI), The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio, United States of America

    ⨯

Abstract

Tumor recurrence occurs in more than 70% of ovarian cancer patients, and the majority eventually becomes refractory to treatments. Ovarian Cancer Stem Cells (OCSCs) are believed to be responsible for the tumor relapse and drug resistance. Therefore, eliminating ovarian CSCs is important to improve the prognosis of ovarian cancer patients. However, there is a lack of effective drugs to eliminate OCSCs because the core signaling pathways regulating OCSCs remain unclear. Also it is often hard for biologists to identify a few testable targets and infer driver signaling pathways regulating CSCs from a large number of differentially expression genes in an unbiased manner. In this study, we propose a straightforward and integrative analysis to identify potential core signaling pathways of OCSCs by integrating transcriptome data of OCSCs isolated based on two distinctive markers, ALDH and side population, with regulatory network (Transcription Factor (TF) and Target Interactome) and signaling pathways. We first identify the common activated TFs in two OCSC populations integrating the gene expression and TF-target Interactome; and then uncover up-stream signaling cascades regulating the activated TFs. In specific, 22 activated TFs are identified. Through literature search validation, 15 of them have been reported in association with cancer stem cells. Additionally, 10 TFs are found in the KEGG signaling pathways, and their up-stream signaling cascades are extracted, which also provide potential treatment targets. Moreover, 40 FDA approved drugs are identified to target on the up-stream signaling cascades, and 15 of them have been reported in literatures in cancer stem cell treatment. In conclusion, the proposed approach can uncover the activated up-stream signaling, activated TFs and up-regulated target genes that constitute the potential core signaling pathways of ovarian CSC. Also drugs and drug combinations targeting on the core signaling pathways might be able to eliminate OCSCs. The proposed approach can also be applied for identifying potential activated signaling pathways of other types of cancers.

Citation: Zhang T, Xu J, Deng S, Zhou F, Li J, Zhang L, et al. (2018) Core signaling pathways in ovarian cancer stem cell revealed by integrative analysis of multi-marker genomics data. PLoS ONE 13(5): e0196351. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196351

Editor: Gianpaolo Papaccio, Università degli Studi della Campania, ITALY

Received: March 19, 2018; Accepted: April 11, 2018; Published: May 3, 2018

Copyright: © 2018 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

Data Availability: Part of the data underlying this study are accessible using the following accession numbers: GSE33874 and GSE82304, in the NCBI GEO database. The TF-Target interactions, derived from TRANSFAC database, are third party data and are available using the following link: https://genome.cshlp.org/content/24/11/1869/suppl/DC1. The authors did not have special access privileges.

Funding: This work is supported in part by the startup fund from Department of Biomedical Informatics, Translational Data Analytics, The Ohio State University to FL. The funder had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Introduction

Over 90% of ovarian cancers are epithelial in origin, and epithelial ovarian cancer, especially the most aggressive subtype high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC), accounts for the majority of ovarian cancer deaths [1, 2]. Most tumors are initially responsive to the conventional chemotherapy, and the patients enter into clinical remission after initial treatment. However, tumor recurrence occurs in more than 70% of patients despite treatment, and the majority eventually becomes refractory to treatments [3]. Recent research evidences show that tumor is a mixture of heterogeneous populations of cells with different levels of malignity. A subpopulation of tumor cells characterized by the capacity of self‐renewing, differentiation, and tumor‐initiating are called cancer stem cells (CSCs) or tumor initiating cells (TICs) [4]. CSCs play important roles in tumor initiation, progression, metastasis, recurrence and drug resistance [4–7]. Thus, elimination of CSCs is important to overcome drug resistance to improve the prognosis of cancer patients. The knowledge about CSCs is limited, and one major challenge is that it is difficult to identify and isolate CSCs with few biomarkers because CSCs are heterogeneous and could exist a specific hierarchy [8–10]. Ovarian cancer stem cells (OCSCs) have been successfully identified and isolated based on their expression of distinctive cell surface markers CD44, CD117, MyD88, and CD133 [11, 12], as well as the activity of ALDH [13]. These CSCs harbor enhanced tumorigenicity and chemoresistance [14]) and are thought to drive the universal recurrence of ovarian cancer, as well as responsible for the development of therapeutic resistance [15]. Though studies with these markers show evidence in support of OCSCs [16], there is still a lack of effective drugs to differentiate and eliminate them [17].

Though common signaling pathways, e.g., WNT, NOTCH, SHH, JAK/STAT, have been associated with all types of CSCs [18, 19], the core signaling mechanism regulating Ovarian CSCs remain unclear. The differential gene expression analysis often fails to identify genes regulate CSCs because it is difficult to identify a few testable targets from a large number of differentially expressed genes mixed with many passenger genes. Additionally, important proteins regulating CSCs might be missed because either the fold change is small or the gene expression data is not available. Therefore, it is necessary to integrate multi-datasets with prior knowledge, e.g., regulatory network and signaling pathways, to increase the possibility of identifying the true CSC driver genes in the systems biology perspective. Thus, in this study, we propose an approach to identify potential core signaling pathways of OCSCs by integrating transcriptome data of OCSCs isolated based on two distinctive markers, ALDH and side population (Hoechst 33342 stain), with the prior knowledge of regulatory network and KEGG signaling pathways. Our hypothesis is that the integrative analysis of multi-genomics data sets of OCSCs with distinct markers could infer more accurate driver-signaling network regulating CSC to generate a small number of testable biomarkers and drugs. In specific, we first identify the common activated transcription factors (TFs) in two OCSC populations; and then construct the core signaling pathways by uncovering the up-stream signaling cascades of the activated TFs, which constitute the potential core signaling pathways of ovarian CSC. Drugs targeting on the up-stream signaling cascades of activated TFs are selected as potential treatments to eliminate ovarian cancer stem cells. The details of methodology and datasets are introduced in Section 2; and analysis results are shown in Section 3, followed by the discussions and conclusion.

Materials and methodology

Transcriptome datasets of OCSCs

In this study, we manually searched the ovarian CSC gene expression datasets in NCBI GEO (Gene Expression Omnibus) using the aforementioned markers and “Ovarian” as the keywords, e.g., “CD44, Ovarian”, and only two datasets were found, i.e., GSE33874 and GSE82304. The dataset GSE33874 is the gene expression profile of isolated side population (SP-Hoechst Blue High and Hoechst Red Low, Ovarian CSCs) and main population (MP) of fresh ascites obtained from women with high-grade advanced stage papillary serous ovarian adenocarcinoma [20]. Gene expression profiles (in triplicate) of SKOV3 human ovarian cancer cells of Aldefluor high (ALDH+, Ovarian CSCs) and Aldefluor low (ALDH-) populations were available in dataset GSE82304 [16]. The GEO2R was employed to get the fold change data of individual genes.

KEGG signaling pathways and regulatory network

To obtain the KEGG signaling pathways, the “Pathview” R package was employed to download KGMLs of humans pathways [21]. Then the “KEGGgraph” R package was used to extract nodes and edges of KEGG signaling pathways from KGMLs [22]. In total, 282 signaling pathways were collected from seven categories: metabolism, genetic information processing, environmental information processing, cellular processes, organismal systems, human diseases, and drug development. The TF-Target regulatory network was downloaded from the supplemental material of reference [23], which was derived from the TF binding site predictions for all target genes from TRANSFAC (v7.4) [24]. In summary, the TF-target regulatory network consists of 230 TFs, 12733 target genes, and 79100 TF-Target interactions.

Signaling pathway construction

First, the Fisher’s exact test (using hypo-geometric distribution) [25] was used to identify the activated TFs by comparing the number of up-regulated targets vs. the number of all target genes, with the number of all the up-regulated genes vs. the number of all the genes tested. The p-value threshold, 0.05, was used to select the activated TFs. Second, all 282 signaling pathways from KEGG were examined, and all the signaling cascades from the starting nodes to the activated TFs were extracted, and then the top 3 signaling paths were kept to construct the signaling pathway regulating the given TFs. The python package, NetworkX, was used to screen all the 282 KEGG signaling pathways to extract signaling cascades starting from the beginning genes of individual signaling pathways to the given TFs. Then we score each signaling cascades using the average expression fold change of genes (on the signaling cascades and with fold change > 0). To control the size of up-stream signaling network of given TFs, the top 3 signaling cascades are kept. The up-regulated target genes (Fold change > = 2) in both datasets are linked to the given TFs.

Results

Twenty-two activated TFs

In the two gene expression datasets, there are 1988 and 2528 up-regulated genes (fold change > = 2); and 883 and 2821 down-regulated genes (fold change < = 0.5) respectively. It is difficult for biologists to identify potential targets associated with Ovarian CSCs from such large number of differentially expressed genes. With the aim of discovering testable regulatory signaling networks that maintain Ovarian CSCs, we identify the activated TFs (whose target genes are up-regulated) in both datasets (CSCs isolated from ALDH+ marker and side-population) using the Fisher’s exact test by integrating the up-regulated genes (Fold_Change > = 2) and the TF-target interactome (gene regulation network) data. In total, 22 TFs are identified (see Table 1). As can be seen, some TFs will be missed using only gene expression fold change because either there is no gene expression data available (NA) or the fold change is small. We conducted the literature search to evaluate these TFs, and surprisingly 15 TFs have been reported to play important roles in cancer stem cell regulation (see Table 2). For example, FOXO3 is essential for maintenance of CSC properties in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma [26]; FOXO4 is related to stem cell-like properties of large B-cell lymphoma cells [27]. LEF1 is able to regulate glioblastoma stem-like cell self-renewal [28]; NFATc2 enhances tumor-initiating phenotypes in lung adenocarcinoma [29].

thumbnail
Download:
Table 1. Twenty-two activated TFs (with p_value < = 0.05 in Fisher’s exact test).

The p_value is obtained from Fisher’s exact test in dataset_1 and dataset_2; and Log_FC denotes the log scaled gene expression fold change (CSC vs. non-CSC) in two datasets; and Within_KEGG indicates if the given transcription factor is on some signaling cascades from KEGG signaling pathways.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196351.t001

thumbnail
Download:
Table 2. Literature reports of the Twenty-two TFs.

Fifteen TFs have been reported to play important roles in cancer stem cells.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196351.t002

Up-stream signaling cascades regulating activated TFs

We further uncover the up-stream signaling cascades regulating these activated TFs using KEGG signaling pathways. Out of 22 activated TFs, 10 TFs (ELK1, NRF1, FOXO4, LEF1, MEF2A, FOXO3, NFATC2, SPI1, TEAD1 and E2F1) are found in KEGG signaling pathways with up-stream signaling cascades link to them (see Table 1 and red color nodes in Fig 1). As can be seen in Fig 1, many target genes (cyan color nodes) of transcription factors, FOXO4, LEF1, NFATC2, SPI1 and TEAD1, are up-regulated (fold_change > = 2) in both datasets. The yellow color nodes represent the starting proteins activating the signaling cascades in KEGG, e.g., the MAP kinases that are often activated by mitogenic and environmental stress, the EGF growth factor, and FLT3 that encodes a class III receptor tyrosine kinase that regulates hematopoiesis, and PPP3R2 that is related to the calcium signaling. These signaling cascades provide potential testable biomarkers of Ovarian CSCs for experimental design.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 1. Activated signaling pathways of ovarian CSCs.

The color of yellow, green, red and cyan represents signaling starting genes, signaling transduction genes, TFs and target genes respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196351.g001

FDA approved drugs targeting on up-stream signaling of activated TFs

To investigate potential drugs that can perturb the Ovarian CSCs, we mapped the FDA approved drugs on the integrative signaling network (see Fig 2). The target information obtained from DrugBank (version 5.0.11) [41]. In total, 40 drugs (pink nodes in Fig 2) were selected targeting on different signaling cascades. Through the literature search, we found that 15 drugs have been reported to treat cancer stem cells (see Table 3). For example, Palbociclib can block the propagation of lung, ovarian and breast cancer stem cells by targeting on CDK4 [42]. Bosutinib and Trametinib targeting on the MAP2K1/2 were used for cancer stem cell and multi-drug resistance treatment [43, 44]. Celecoxib was used in colon cancer stem cell related treatment by targeting on PDPK1 [45]. Metformin and Phenformin (targeting on PRKAA1/PRKAB1 were used for eliminate prostate cancer stem cells [46, 47]. Moreover, Metformin has been shown to be able to overcome drug resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) of EGF receptor (EGFR) in lung cancer [48]. Table 3 shows more details. In addition to the single drug treatment, combinations of drugs targeting on the different signaling cascades might have better effects to eliminate cancer stem cells. In summary, this analysis can provide testable hypothesis and potential drug candidates to eliminate OCSCs.

thumbnail
Download:
Fig 2. FDA approved drugs targeting on up-stream signaling of activated TFs of ovarian CSCs.

The color of yellow, green, red, cyan and pink represents signaling starting genes, signaling transduction genes, TFs, target genes, drugs respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196351.g002

thumbnail
Download:
Table 3. FDA approved drugs targeting on upstream signaling of TFs.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0196351.t003

Discussion and conclusion

Most ovarian cancer tumors are initially responsive to the conventional chemotherapy. Whereas, more than 70% of patients will experience tumor recurrence, and the majority eventually becomes treatment resistant. Ovarian cancer stem cells (CSCs) are thought to drive the universal recurrence of ovarian cancer, as well as responsible for the development of therapeutic resistance. However, the core signaling pathways regulating Ovarian CSCs remain unclear, and there is still a lack of effective drugs and drug combinations to differentiate and eliminate them to improve cancer survival.

In this study, we propose to identify potential core signaling pathways of OCSCs in a data-driven manner by integrating transcriptome data of OCSCs isolated based on two distinctive cell surface markers, ALDH and side population, with prior knowledge, e.g., regulatory network and signaling pathways, to increase the possibility of identifying the true CSC driver genes and signaling pathways. We identified 22 activated transcription factors, and 15 of them have been reported in the association with cancer stem cells. In addition, 10 transcription factors were found in the KEGG signaling pathways, and we extracted the up-stream signaling cascades regulating these transcription factors, which provide potential core signaling mechanism of ovarian CSC regulation. Moreover, we mapped the FDA approved drugs on these up-stream signaling cascades. Forty FDA approved drugs were identified and 15 of these drugs have been reported in cancer stem cell treatment. Combinations of these drugs targeting on different up-stream signaling cascades might be effective to eliminate ovarian cancer stem cells.

The proposed approach can be helpful for discovering synergistic and effective drug combinations. It is well known that inhibiting a single target does not ensure the success of effective treatment due to the complicated interplay of multiple signaling pathways [4]. For example, the activation of Sonic Hedgehog (SHH) signaling and evolution through a mesenchymal phenotype have been uncovered as a novel mechanism of drug resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) of EGF receptor (EGFR) in lung cancer [48], and play important roles in regulating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) [58]. Also, it was reported that the number of CSCs can be increased by MSCs [59], which could be produced by the activation of SHH signaling [60] in ovarian cancer. Thus drug combinations blocking the signaling interplay have high possibility to be synergistic and effective in cancer treatment. For example, Metformin (widely used as anti-diabetic drug, also identified in this study) and MEK-inhibitors (Selumetinib/Pimasertib targeting on the RAF/RAS/MAPK signaling) were discovered to effectively inhibit the proliferation and metastasis of LKB1 positive Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) cancer cells [61]. The synergism of the combination is the down-regulation of GLI1, which is the mediator of epithelia-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) signaling, and can be affected by SHH signaling [61]. Moreover, the drug combination, Metformin and Erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor), is used in a phase II study for the treatment of stage IV NSCLC [62, 63].

There are also some limitations of this integrative data analysis. First, the current TF-target interactome data might not be complete and accurate. In the future work, we will integrate new TF-target interaction data resources, e.g., TRUST (text mining) [64] and GTRD (Chip-Seq data) [65], to improve the quality and completeness [66]. Moreover, the tissue specific regulatory network data might be useful to further refine the TF-target interactome data [66, 67]. Second, 12 activated TFs are still missed in the up-stream signaling network analysis. Additional signaling pathway database, e.g., BioGRID [68], STRING [69], Reactome [70], could be integrated to identify more up-stream signaling cascades of additional active TFs. Thirdly, other pharmacological data resources, e.g., LINCS (reverse gene signature based data) [71], can be integrated to identify more drugs or prioritize drugs to eliminate the Ovarian CSCs. Also, the drug repositioning [72–74] and drug combination prediction [75–77] are not trivial tasks. In the future work, we will integrate additional data resources to prioritize targets and drug combinations to block multiple TF and signaling interplays to eliminate ovarian CSCs.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank colleagues in Biomedical Informatics Department for the helpful discussions.

References

  1. 1. Seidman JD, Horkayne-Szakaly I, Haiba M, Boice CR, Kurman RJ, Ronnett BM. The histologic type and stage distribution of ovarian carcinomas of surface epithelial origin. Int J Gynecol Pathol. 2004;23(1):41–4. pmid:14668549.
  2. 2. Bowtell DD. The genesis and evolution of high-grade serous ovarian cancer. Nat Rev Cancer. 2010;10(11):803–8. pmid:20944665.
  3. 3. Hennessy BT, Coleman RL, Markman M. Ovarian cancer. Lancet. 2009;374(9698):1371–82. pmid:19793610
  4. 4. Papaccio F, Paino F, Regad T, Papaccio G, Desiderio V, Tirino V. Concise Review: Cancer Cells, Cancer Stem Cells, and Mesenchymal Stem Cells: Influence in Cancer Development. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2017;6(12):2115–25. pmid:29072369; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5702541.
  5. 5. Tirino V, Desiderio V, Paino F, De Rosa A, Papaccio F, Fazioli F, et al. Human primary bone sarcomas contain CD133+ cancer stem cells displaying high tumorigenicity in vivo. FASEB J. 2011;25(6):2022–30. pmid:21385990.
  6. 6. Hanahan D, Weinberg RA. Hallmarks of cancer: the next generation. Cell. 2011;144(5):646–74. pmid:21376230.
  7. 7. Zhang M, Lee AV, Rosen JM. The Cellular Origin and Evolution of Breast Cancer. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2017;7(3). pmid:28062556; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5334246.
  8. 8. Brabletz T, Jung A, Spaderna S, Hlubek F, Kirchner T. Opinion: migrating cancer stem cells—an integrated concept of malignant tumour progression. Nat Rev Cancer. 2005;5(9):744–9. pmid:16148886.
  9. 9. Shmelkov SV, Butler JM, Hooper AT, Hormigo A, Kushner J, Milde T, et al. CD133 expression is not restricted to stem cells, and both CD133(+) and CD133(–) metastatic colon cancer cells initiate tumors. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2008;118(6):2111–20. pmid:18497886.
  10. 10. Ren F, Sheng WQ, Du X. CD133: a cancer stem cells marker, is used in colorectal cancers. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19(17):2603–11. pmid:23674867; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3645378.
  11. 11. Alvero AB, Chen R, Fu HH, Montagna M, Schwartz PE, Rutherford T, et al. Molecular phenotyping of human ovarian cancer stem cells unravels the mechanisms for repair and chemoresistance. Cell Cycle. 2009;8(1):158–66. pmid:19158483; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3041590.
  12. 12. Zhang S, Balch C, Chan MW, Lai HC, Matei D, Schilder JM, et al. Identification and characterization of ovarian cancer-initiating cells from primary human tumors. Cancer Res. 2008;68(11):4311–20. pmid:18519691; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2553722.
  13. 13. Silva IA, Bai S, McLean K, Yang K, Griffith K, Thomas D, et al. Aldehyde dehydrogenase in combination with CD133 defines angiogenic ovarian cancer stem cells that portend poor patient survival. Cancer Res. 2011;71(11):3991–4001. pmid:21498635; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3107359.
  14. 14. Shah MM, Landen CN. Ovarian cancer stem cells: Are they real and why are they important? Gynecologic Oncology. 2014;132(2):483–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.12.001. pmid:24321398
  15. 15. Bapat SA, Mali AM, Koppikar CB, Kurrey NK. Stem and progenitor-like cells contribute to the aggressive behavior of human epithelial ovarian cancer. Cancer Res. 2005;65(8):3025–9. pmid:15833827.
  16. 16. Sharrow AC, Perkins B, Collector MI, Yu W, Simons BW, Jones RJ. Characterization of aldehyde dehydrogenase 1 high ovarian cancer cells: Towards targeted stem cell therapy. Gynecol Oncol. 2016;142(2):341–8. pmid:27017984.
  17. 17. Gil J, Stembalska A, Pesz KA, Sasiadek MM. Cancer stem cells: the theory and perspectives in cancer therapy. J Appl Genet. 2008;49(2):193–9. pmid:18436993.
  18. 18. Karamboulas C, Ailles L. Developmental signaling pathways in cancer stem cells of solid tumors. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1830(2):2481–95. pmid:23196196.
  19. 19. Jin X, Jin X, Kim H. Cancer stem cells and differentiation therapy. Tumour Biol. 2017;39(10):1010428317729933. pmid:29072131.
  20. 20. Vathipadiekal V, Saxena D, Mok SC, Hauschka PV, Ozbun L, Birrer MJ. Identification of a potential ovarian cancer stem cell gene expression profile from advanced stage papillary serous ovarian cancer. PLoS One. 2012;7(1):e29079. pmid:22272227; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3260150.
  21. 21. Luo W, Brouwer C. Pathview: an R/Bioconductor package for pathway-based data integration and visualization. Bioinformatics. 2013;29(14):1830–1. Epub 2013/06/07. pmid:23740750; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3702256.
  22. 22. Zhang JD, Wiemann S. KEGGgraph: a graph approach to KEGG PATHWAY in R and bioconductor. Bioinformatics. 2009;25(11):1470–1. Epub 2009/03/25. pmid:19307239; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2682514.
  23. 23. Osmanbeyoglu HU, Pelossof R, Bromberg JF, Leslie CS. Linking signaling pathways to transcriptional programs in breast cancer. Genome Res. 2014;24(11):1869–80. pmid:25183703; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4216927.
  24. 24. Liberzon A, Subramanian A, Pinchback R, Thorvaldsdottir H, Tamayo P, Mesirov JP. Molecular signatures database (MSigDB) 3.0. Bioinformatics. 2011;27(12):1739–40. pmid:21546393; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3106198.
  25. 25. Fisher RA. On the interpretation of χ2 from contingency tables, and the calculation of P. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society. 1992;85(1):87–94.
  26. 26. Kumazoe M, Takai M, Hiroi S, Takeuchi C, Kadomatsu M, Nojiri T, et al. FOXO3/PGC-1β signaling axis is essential for cancer stem cell properties of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma. Journal of Biological Chemistry. 2017. pmid:28507102
  27. 27. Ryu KJ, Park C, Hong M, Ko YH, Kim WS, Kim SJ. FOXO4 expression is related to stem cell-like properties and resistance to treatment in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. Oncotarget. 2017;8(2):2466–76. PMC5356816. pmid:27911272
  28. 28. Gao X, Mi Y, Ma Y, Jin W. LEF1 regulates glioblastoma cell proliferation, migration, invasion, and cancer stem-like cell self-renewal. Tumour Biol. 2014;35(11):11505–11. pmid:25128061.
  29. 29. Xiao Z-J, Liu J, Wang S-Q, Zhu Y, Gao X-Y, Tin VP-C, et al. NFATc2 enhances tumor-initiating phenotypes through the NFATc2/SOX2/ALDH axis in lung adenocarcinoma. eLife. 2017;6:e26733. pmid:28737489
  30. 30. Lee C-J, Hsu L-S, Yue C-H, Lin H, Chiu Y-W, Lin Y-Y, et al. MZF-1/Elk-1 interaction domain as therapeutic target for protein kinase Cα-based triple-negative breast cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(37):59845–59. PMC5312353. pmid:27542222
  31. 31. Tachi K, Shiraishi A, Bando H, Yamashita T, Tsuboi I, Kato T, et al. FOXA1 expression affects the proliferation activity of luminal breast cancer stem cell populations. Cancer Sci. 2016;107(3):281–9. pmid:26708273; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4814260.
  32. 32. Das JK, Roy D. Abstract 3312: Transcriptional regulation of chemokine receptor 4 (CXCR4) by nuclear respiratory factor 1 (NRF1) controls estrogen-induced malignant transformation of breast epithelial cells to breast cancer stem cells. Cancer Research. 2016;76(14 Supplement):3312–.
  33. 33. Emadali A, Hoghoughi N, Duley S, Hajmirza A, Verhoeyen E, Cosset FL, et al. Haploinsufficiency for NR3C1, the gene encoding the glucocorticoid receptor, in blastic plasmacytoid dendritic cell neoplasms. Blood. 2016;127(24):3040–53. pmid:27060168; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5043425.
  34. 34. Fodde R, Brabletz T. Wnt/beta-catenin signaling in cancer stemness and malignant behavior. Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2007;19(2):150–8. pmid:17306971.
  35. 35. Fang L, Zhu Q, Neuenschwander M, Specker E, Wulf-Goldenberg A, Weis WI, et al. A Small-Molecule Antagonist of the β-Catenin/TCF4 Interaction Blocks the Self-Renewal of Cancer Stem Cells and Suppresses Tumorigenesis. Cancer Research. 2016;76(4):891. pmid:26645562
  36. 36. Galardi S, Savino M, Scagnoli F, Pellegatta S, Pisati F, Zambelli F, et al. Resetting cancer stem cell regulatory nodes upon MYC inhibition. EMBO Reports. 2016;17(12):1872–89. PMC5283599. pmid:27852622
  37. 37. Zhao Y, Zhang W, Guo Z, Ma F, Wu Y, Bai Y, et al. Inhibition of the transcription factor Sp1 suppresses colon cancer stem cell growth and induces apoptosis in vitro and in nude mouse xenografts. Oncol Rep. 2013;30(4):1782–92. pmid:23877322.
  38. 38. Xia Y, Zhang YL, Yu C, Chang T, Fan HY. YAP/TEAD co-activator regulated pluripotency and chemoresistance in ovarian cancer initiated cells. PLoS One. 2014;9(11):e109575. pmid:25369529; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4219672.
  39. 39. Hardy K, Wu F, Tu W, Zafar A, Boulding T, McCuaig R, et al. Identification of chromatin accessibility domains in human breast cancer stem cells. Nucleus. 2016;7(1):50–67. pmid:26962893; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4916893.
  40. 40. Julian LM, Blais A. Transcriptional control of stem cell fate by E2Fs and pocket proteins. Front Genet. 2015;6:161. pmid:25972892; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4412126.
  41. 41. Wishart DS, Knox C, Guo AC, Cheng D, Shrivastava S, Tzur D, et al. DrugBank: a knowledgebase for drugs, drug actions and drug targets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2008;36(Database issue):D901–6. Epub 2007/12/01. gkm958 [pii] pmid:18048412; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC2238889.
  42. 42. Bonuccelli G, Peiris-Pages M, Ozsvari B, Martinez-Outschoorn UE, Sotgia F, Lisanti MP. Targeting cancer stem cell propagation with palbociclib, a CDK4/6 inhibitor: Telomerase drives tumor cell heterogeneity. Oncotarget. 2017;8(6):9868–84. pmid:28039467; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5354777.
  43. 43. Bugde P, Biswas R, Merien F, Lu J, Liu DX, Chen M, et al. The therapeutic potential of targeting ABC transporters to combat multi-drug resistance. Expert Opin Ther Targets. 2017;21(5):511–30. pmid:28335655.
  44. 44. Fitzgerald TL, Lertpiriyapong K, Cocco L, Martelli AM, Libra M, Candido S, et al. Roles of EGFR and KRAS and their downstream signaling pathways in pancreatic cancer and pancreatic cancer stem cells. Advances in Biological Regulation. 2015;59:65–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbior.2015.06.003. pmid:26257206
  45. 45. Salim EI, Hegazi MM, Kang JS, Helmy HM. Expression Patterns of Cancer Stem Cell Markers During Specific Celecoxib Therapy in Multistep Rat Colon Carcinogenesis Bioassays. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2016;17(3):1023–35. pmid:27039721.
  46. 46. Janzer A, German NJ, Gonzalez-Herrera KN, Asara JM, Haigis MC, Struhl K. Metformin and phenformin deplete tricarboxylic acid cycle and glycolytic intermediates during cell transformation and NTPs in cancer stem cells. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(29):10574–9. pmid:25002509; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4115496.
  47. 47. Mayer MJ, Klotz LH, Venkateswaran V. Metformin and prostate cancer stem cells: a novel therapeutic target. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis. 2015;18(4):303–9. pmid:26215782.
  48. 48. Della Corte CM, Bellevicine C, Vicidomini G, Vitagliano D, Malapelle U, Accardo M, et al. SMO Gene Amplification and Activation of the Hedgehog Pathway as Novel Mechanisms of Resistance to Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Drugs in Human Lung Cancer. Clin Cancer Res. 2015;21(20):4686–97. pmid:26124204.
  49. 49. Tomuleasa C, Soritau O, Kacso G, Fischer-Fodor E, Cocis A, Ioani H, et al. Arsenic trioxide sensitizes cancer stem cells to chemoradiotherapy. A new approach in the treatment of inoperable glioblastoma multiforme. J BUON. 2010;15(4):758–62. pmid:21229642.
  50. 50. Tanei T, Choi DS, Rodriguez AA, Liang DH, Dobrolecki L, Ghosh M, et al. Antitumor activity of Cetuximab in combination with Ixabepilone on triple negative breast cancer stem cells. Breast Cancer Research. 2016;18(1):6. pmid:26757880
  51. 51. Martin-Castillo B, Lopez-Bonet E, Cuyas E, Vinas G, Pernas S, Dorca J, et al. Cancer stem cell-driven efficacy of trastuzumab (Herceptin): towards a reclassification of clinically HER2-positive breast carcinomas. Oncotarget. 2015;6(32):32317–38. pmid:26474458; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4741696.
  52. 52. Sette G, Salvati V, Mottolese M, Visca P, Gallo E, Fecchi K, et al. Tyr1068-phosphorylated epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) predicts cancer stem cell targeting by erlotinib in preclinical models of wild-type EGFR lung cancer. Cell Death Dis. 2015;6:e1850. pmid:26247735; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4558509.
  53. 53. De Angelis ML, Zeuner A, Policicchio E, Russo G, Bruselles A, Signore M, et al. Cancer Stem Cell-Based Models of Colorectal Cancer Reveal Molecular Determinants of Therapy Resistance. Stem Cells Transl Med. 2016;5(4):511–23. pmid:26956206; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4798739.
  54. 54. Macha MA, Rachagani S, Qazi AK, Jahan R, Gupta S, Patel A, et al. Afatinib radiosensitizes head and neck squamous cell carcinoma cells by targeting cancer stem cells. Oncotarget. 2017;8(13):20961–73. pmid:28423495; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5400558.
  55. 55. Parenti S, Ferrarini F, Zini R, Montanari M, Losi L, Canovi B, et al. Mesalazine inhibits the β-catenin signalling pathway acting through the upregulation of μ-protocadherin gene in colo-rectal cancer cells. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics. 2010;31(1):108–19. pmid:19785626
  56. 56. Leão R, Domingos C, Figueiredo A, Hamilton R, Tabori U, Castelo-Branco P. Cancer Stem Cells in Prostate Cancer: Implications for Targeted Therapy. Urologia Internationalis. 2017;99(2):125–36. pmid:28142149
  57. 57. Ledur PF, Villodre ES, Paulus R, Cruz LA, Flores DG, Lenz G. Extracellular ATP reduces tumor sphere growth and cancer stem cell population in glioblastoma cells. Purinergic Signalling. 2012;8(1):39–48. pmid:21818572.
  58. 58. Della Corte CM, Viscardi G, Papaccio F, Esposito G, Martini G, Ciardiello D, et al. Implication of the Hedgehog pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. World J Gastroenterol. 2017;23(24):4330–40. pmid:28706416; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5487497.
  59. 59. McLean K, Gong Y, Choi Y, Deng N, Yang K, Bai S, et al. Human ovarian carcinoma–associated mesenchymal stem cells regulate cancer stem cells and tumorigenesis via altered BMP production. The Journal of Clinical Investigation. 2011;121(8):3206–19. PMC3148732. pmid:21737876
  60. 60. Coffman LG, Choi Y-J, McLean K, Allen BL, di Magliano MP, Buckanovich RJ. Human carcinoma-associated mesenchymal stem cells promote ovarian cancer chemotherapy resistance via a BMP4/HH signaling loop. Oncotarget. 2016;7(6):6916–32. PMC4872758. pmid:26755648
  61. 61. Della Corte CM, Ciaramella V, Di Mauro C, Castellone MD, Papaccio F, Fasano M, et al. Metformin increases antitumor activity of MEK inhibitors through GLI1 downregulation in LKB1 positive human NSCLC cancer cells. Oncotarget. 2016;7(4):4265–78. pmid:26673006; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4826204.
  62. 62. Morgillo F, Fasano M, Della Corte CM, Sasso FC, Papaccio F, Viscardi G, et al. Results of the safety run-in part of the METAL (METformin in Advanced Lung cancer) study: a multicentre, open-label phase I-II study of metformin with erlotinib in second-line therapy of patients with stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer. ESMO Open. 2017;2(2):e000132. pmid:28761738; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5519802.
  63. 63. Fasano M, Della Corte CM, Capuano A, Sasso FC, Papaccio F, Berrino L, et al. A multicenter, open-label phase II study of metformin with erlotinib in second-line therapy of stage IV non-small-cell lung cancer patients: treatment rationale and protocol dynamics of the METAL trial. Clin Lung Cancer. 2015;16(1):57–9. pmid:25242667.
  64. 64. Han H, Cho JW, Lee S, Yun A, Kim H, Bae D, et al. TRRUST v2: an expanded reference database of human and mouse transcriptional regulatory interactions. Nucleic Acids Res. 2018;46(D1):D380–D6. pmid:29087512; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5753191.
  65. 65. Yevshin I, Sharipov R, Valeev T, Kel A, Kolpakov F. GTRD: a database of transcription factor binding sites identified by ChIP-seq experiments. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D61–D7. pmid:27924024; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5210645.
  66. 66. Marbach D, Lamparter D, Quon G, Kellis M, Kutalik Z, Bergmann S. Tissue-specific regulatory circuits reveal variable modular perturbations across complex diseases. Nat Methods. 2016;13(4):366–70. pmid:26950747; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4967716.
  67. 67. Consortium GT. Human genomics. The Genotype-Tissue Expression (GTEx) pilot analysis: multitissue gene regulation in humans. Science. 2015;348(6235):648–60. pmid:25954001; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4547484.
  68. 68. Stark C, Breitkreutz BJ, Reguly T, Boucher L, Breitkreutz A, Tyers M. BioGRID: a general repository for interaction datasets. Nucleic Acids Res. 2006;34(Database issue):D535–9. Epub 2005/12/31. 34/suppl_1/D535 [pii] pmid:16381927; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1347471.
  69. 69. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, et al. STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life. Nucleic Acids Res. 2015;43(Database issue):D447–52. pmid:25352553; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4383874.
  70. 70. Croft D, O'Kelly G, Wu G, Haw R, Gillespie M, Matthews L, et al. Reactome: a database of reactions, pathways and biological processes. Nucleic Acids Res. 2011;39(Database issue):D691–7. pmid:21067998; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3013646.
  71. 71. Lamb J, Crawford ED, Peck D, Modell JW, Blat IC, Wrobel MJ, et al. The Connectivity Map: using gene-expression signatures to connect small molecules, genes, and disease. Science. 2006;313(5795):1929–35. pmid:17008526.
  72. 72. Wu H, Miller E, Wijegunawardana D, Regan K, Payne PRO, Li F. MD-Miner: a network-based approach for personalized drug repositioning. BMC Systems Biology. 2017;11(Suppl 5):86. PMC5629618. pmid:28984195
  73. 73. Li F, Wang L, Kong R, Sheng J, Cao H, Mancuso J, et al., editors. DrugMoaMiner: A computational tool for mechanism of action discovery and personalized drug sensitivity prediction. 2016 IEEE-EMBS International Conference on Biomedical and Health Informatics (BHI); 2016 24–27 Feb. 2016.
    • 74. Li F. Computational Approaches and Pharmacogenomics Data Resources for Drug Repositioning. Medical Research Archives; Vol 5 No 6 (2017): Vol5 Issue 6, June, 2017. 2017.
    • 75. Xu J, Regan-Fendt K, Deng S, Carson WE, Payne PRO, Li F. Diffusion mapping of drug targets on disease signaling network elements reveals drug combination strategies. Biocomputing 2018: WORLD SCIENTIFIC; 2018. p. 92–103.
    • 76. Regan KE, Payne PRO, Li F. Integrative network and transcriptomics-based approach predicts genotype- specific drug combinations for melanoma. AMIA Summits on Translational Science Proceedings. 2017;2017:247–56. PMC5543336.
    • 77. Huang L, Li F, Sheng J, Xia X, Ma J, Zhan M, et al. DrugComboRanker: drug combination discovery based on target network analysis. Bioinformatics. 2014;30(12):i228–i36. PMC4058933. pmid:24931988