Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Brief exposure to Swedish snus causes divergent vascular responses in healthy male and female volunteers

  • Lukasz Antoniewicz ,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    lukasz.antoniewicz@ki.se

    Affiliations Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Internal Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden, Umeå University, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine/Respiratory Medicine, Umeå, Sweden

  • Mirza Novo,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Umeå University, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine/Respiratory Medicine, Umeå, Sweden

  • Jenny Bosson ,

    Contributed equally to this work with: Jenny Bosson, Magnus Lundbäck

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Umeå University, Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Division of Medicine/Respiratory Medicine, Umeå, Sweden

  • Magnus Lundbäck

    Contributed equally to this work with: Jenny Bosson, Magnus Lundbäck

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Karolinska Institutet, Department of Clinical Sciences, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Danderyd Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden

Brief exposure to Swedish snus causes divergent vascular responses in healthy male and female volunteers

  • Lukasz Antoniewicz, 
  • Mirza Novo, 
  • Jenny Bosson, 
  • Magnus Lundbäck
PLOS
x

Abstract

Introduction

The use of Swedish oral moist snuff, known as snus, has for a long time been limited to the Scandinavian countries. With declining cigarette sales in the western world, tobacco companies have looked to the development of alternative tobacco products. In 2006 snus products were launched in the US. Even though several studies have demonstrated negative health effects, snus is often depicted as harmless.

The aim of the present study was to investigate acute vascular effects of snus as measured by arterial stiffness as well as blood pressure and heart rate.

Methods

Two separate randomized double-blind crossover studies with the same study design were pooled for analysis. Twenty-nine healthy snus-users (17 females, 12 males) were included. Snus (Göteborgs Rapé) and tobacco free snus (Onico) were administered in a randomized order at two separate visits. Arterial stiffness, blood pressure and heart rate were measured at baseline as well as every five minutes for 40 minutes during exposure. Following snus removal, measurements continued for 30 minutes post exposure. Arterial stiffness was measured using pulse wave velocity (Vicorder) and pulse wave analysis (Sphygmocor).

Results

Compared to placebo, snus significantly increased systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as heart rate, however, only in females (p = 0.004, p = 0.006 and p<0.001 respectively). No changes were seen in arterial stiffness measurements in either gender.

Conclusion

We observed an increase in blood pressure and heart rate only in females, but not in males due to snus usage as compared to placebo. This novel finding was surprising and needs to be further investigated considering most of the earlier studies have mainly focused on male snus users and the increasing usage of snus among females.

Introduction

Cigarette smoking is one of the leading causes of premature death and is associated with increased mortality and morbidity due to cardiovascular disease [1]. The WHO estimates that 6 million people die annually due to cigarette smoke exposure [2]. The firmly established association between cigarette smoking and impaired health in combination with increased public awareness has caused cigarette sales to drop dramatically in western nations. Therefore, large transnational tobacco companies have started to look to alternative tobacco products such as Swedish moist snuff, also known as snus [3]. Since 2007 Marlboro, Skoal and Camel have all launched Swedish style snus in the US, which has been aggressively marketed as a potentially healthier alternative to cigarette smoking with advertisement primarily targeting smokers in situations where smoking is prohibited [4].

Historically, much of the attention from the research community has been focused on the potential adverse effects of snus on the oral mucosa as it is placed between the lip and gums. However, no strong associations between snus usage and oral cancer have been found [5]. Yet, in recent years compelling new evidence of the possible cardiovascular effects of snus has been established. Snus use has been linked to heart failure, development of type 2 diabetes and increased mortality following myocardial infarction and stroke [69]. Furthermore, after myocardial infarction, discontinuation of snus use was associated with an almost fifty percent decreased risk in mortality [9]. These findings are not without controversy and several studies present contradicting results regarding the overall risk for cardiovascular disease [1013].

Swedish Match, the largest snus manufacturing tobacco company in Scandinavia and the second largest in the US, has recently submitted an application for snus to be sold as a modified risk tobacco product (MRTP) to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) [14]. This would allow the company to market their products as a healthier alternative to smoking as well as allow for removal of certain warning labels. Several studies, sponsored by Swedish Match, dismiss the risk and severity of snus use and try to shift the focus of discussion to snus as a smoking cessation aid [1519]. However, no clinical studies to date have demonstrated that snus successfully facilitates smoking cessation [15, 20, 21].

Furthermore, snus has been linked to increased blood pressure, increased heart rate and endothelial dysfunction, the latter demonstrated by ultrasound assessment of the brachial artery [2224]. To our knowledge, no placebo-controlled exposure study investigating the acute effects of Swedish snus on arterial stiffness has been performed to date.

Materials and methods

Study design and subjects

In two randomized, double blind, crossover studies, healthy young volunteers, who use snus on a daily basis, attended on two occasions at least one week apart (Fig 1). On the two study days they were exposed to conventional snus (Göteborgs Rapé™, nicotine content: 8mg/g) and a flavored, plant fiber-based snus pouch free of tobacco and nicotine (ONICO™), which is often used as a snus cessation aid. The volunteers abstained from alcohol for 24 hours and from food, tobacco and caffeine containing drinks for at least 12 hours before both exposures. Following 20 minutes of rest a pouch of snus or non-tobacco/nicotine control was placed under the upper lip of the volunteers. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP respectively), heart rate (HR) as well as arterial stiffness, assessed using pulse wave analysis (PWA) and pulse wave velocity (PWV), were measured every five minutes for 45 minutes and during 30 minutes after exposure.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Study design for study 1 and 2.

Double blinded crossover study. Blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR) as well as pulse wave velocity (PWV) and arterial index (AiX75) were measured every 5 minutes in both studies. Additionally, thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurements with stroke volume index (SI), cardiac index (CI) and systemic vascular resistance (SVR) were performed in study 1.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.g001

Two separate studies were performed with the same study design (Fig 1). Subjects in both studies were recruited in 2010 and 2012 through leaflets on University campus Umeå, advertising in local media and through information on social media. One subject in study 1 participated in only one exposure and was therefore excluded from the study. In the first study six females (mean age ± SD: 27.3 ± 8.2 years, range: 22 years) were included and thoracic electrical bioimpedance (TEB) was also measured at the same time points. In the second study 23 healthy volunteers (males: n = 12, females n = 11, mean age 30.5 ± 5.5 years, range: 19 years) were included.

The exact same study-design was used in both studies and therefore pooled analysis for HR, BP, PWA and PWV could be performed for study 1 and 2. Because of technical reasons thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurements were only obtained in study 1 and were therefore analyzed separately.

The study protocols were approved by the local Human Research Ethics Committee at Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden. All subjects have accepted and signed a written informed consent in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki.

Arterial stiffness

Measurement of arterial stiffness was performed in a quiet, temperature controlled room by a blinded operator with all volunteers resting in a semi-supine position. Following 20 minutes of rest, systolic and diastolic blood pressures were measured in duplicate using a semi-automated non-invasive oscillometric sphygmomanometer (Boso-Medicus, Boso, Jungingen, Germany) at baseline and every five minutes during 40 minutes of exposure and 30 minutes post exposure.

In accordance with manufacturer’s instructions, PWA was assessed with micro manometer applanation tonometry (Millar Instruments, Texas, USA) of the right radial artery at the wrist using the SphygmoCor™ system (AtCor Medical, Sydney, Australia). In brief, via a validated mathematical transfer function, pulse wave analysis obtains an aortic pulse pressure waveform from the radial artery. The arterial pressure waveform constitutes of a forward pressure wave (originated from the ventricular contraction) and a reflected wave caused by the peripheral vascular resistance. From this waveform, augmentation pressure (AP, expressed in mmHg) and augmentation index (AiX), both assessments of central arterial stiffness, are calculated. As AiX is inversely proportional to pulse rate, AiX is normalized for a HR at 75bpm (AiX75). Two independent waveform analyses were obtained from each volunteer. Measurements were accepted according to the SphygmoCor™ quality control criteria.

PWV, considered the “gold-standard” measurement of central arterial stiffness, was assessed using a Vicorder™ system (Skidmore Medical, Bristol, UK). This is a well-validated, non-invasive method of measuring PWV with small inflatable cuffs that are attached around the neck and upper thigh evaluating pulse waves in the carotid and femoral arteries simultaneously. The pulse transit time is assessed and is used along with the distance between the sites to calculate the pulse wave velocity.

Thoracic electrical bioimpedance

Hemodynamic measurements were obtained by placing electrodes on the neck and chest of the volunteers using thoracic electrical bioimpedance (Hotman System, Hemo Sapiens Inc., MN, US). This non-invasive equipment was used to determine systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI), cardiac index (CI) and stroke index (SI).

Statistical analysis

Statistical calculations were performed using SPSS Statistics (22.0, IBM Corporation, NY, US) and GraphPad Prism (7.0, GraphPad Software Inc., CA, US) software. Data was checked for skewness. Two-way ANOVA for repeated measures was performed for all dependent variables. If Mauchly’s test for sphericity was violated, Greenhouse-Geisser or Huynh-Feldt corrected results were presented depending on the highest epsilon value. For comparison of separate time points, paired samples T-test was applied. Independent samples T-test was used to analyze baseline characteristics. P-values of <0.05 were considered to be statistically significant. Blinded investigators performed all analysis.

Results

Pooled analysis of study 1 and 2 was performed for heart rate (HR), systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP), pulse wave analysis (PWA), as well as pulse wave velocity (PWV). A separate analysis for cardiac index (CI), stroke index (SI) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI) was performed for study 1. There was no significant difference in baseline characteristics for females between those two studies (S1 Table).

Six women completed study 1 and 23 subjects (12 men and 11 women) completed study 2. The pooled analysis was performed on the two studies combined (n = 29, 12 men and 17 women, mean age: 29.9 ± 6.2 years). Study participants used snus for an average of 13.1 years ± 6.1 years. Weekly consumption was 5.1 ± 1.8 cans of snus. The portion form of snus was used by 89.7% and 10.3% used the loose type.

Pooled analysis

Men had significantly higher SBP and PWV and lower AiX75 than women at baseline (Table 1). Women and men used approximately the same amount of snus per week and there was no significant difference in mean age or years of snus usage.

There was no difference in baseline values prior to exposure to snus and placebo-control (S2 Table). SBP and DBP increased significantly five minutes following introduction of the snus pouch, when all subjects were analyzed with multiple measures ANOVA (p<0.001, p = 0.003 resp., S1 Fig). However, when analyzing women and men separately this increase in SBP and DBP was only significant for women (Fig 2). Mean changes in SBP and DBP separated for men and women with results from paired samples T-test are presented in S3 Table. For women, the mean increase in SBP/DBP during the last 25 minutes of exposure was 7.6 mmHg and 5.7 mmHg and for men 5.9 mmHg and 4.7 mmHg, respectively.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Mean change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP).

Mean values with standard deviations during 45 minutes of exposure and 30 minutes post exposure to snus or control in males and females. P-values are presented for the interaction of time and exposure in multiple measures ANOVA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.g002

HR increased significantly within 5 minutes following introduction of snus in females, and it remained significantly elevated during the whole post exposure period of 30 minutes (Fig 3). No significant change was seen in males when analyzed with multiple measures ANOVA (Fig 3). Mean changes in HR and paired samples T-test are shown in S3 Table. Mean increase in HR in women during the last 25 minutes of exposure was 11.9 bpm and for men 4.2 bpm.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Mean change in heart rate (HR).

Mean values with standard deviations during 45 minutes of exposure and 30 minutes post exposure to snus or control in males and females. P-values are presented for the interaction of time and exposure in multiple measures ANOVA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.g003

AiX75 and PWV did not significantly change due to snus exposure as compared to placebo (Fig 4). There was no difference when analyzing separately for women and men (S2 Fig). However, when performing single time point analysis with paired samples T-test, women did show a significant increase during the last 25 minutes of exposure for snus (S3 Table). For men we observed a significant increase in AiX75 at the end of exposure and during the post-exposure period for placebo (S3 Table).

thumbnail
Fig 4. Mean change in arterial stiffness.

Mean values for arterial index adjusted for a heart rate at 75 bpm (AiX75) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) with standard deviations during 45 minutes of exposure and 30 minutes post exposure to snus or control. P-values are presented for the interaction of time and exposure in multiple measures ANOVA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.g004

Thoracic electrical bioimpedance results for study 1

Stroke volume index (SI) significantly decreased 35 minutes following introduction of snus and remained significantly altered 10 minutes into the post exposure period (Fig 5). SVRI increased 25 minutes after administrating snus, but this was not significant in multiple measures ANOVA. When analyzing with paired samples T-test, this effect was significant at time points 25, 35, 40 and 45min during exposure and during the first 15 minutes into the post exposure period (p-values ranging from 0.012 to 0.044). All other time points showed no statistical significance. Cardiac index (CI) did not significantly change over time in either exposure.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Mean change in cardiac index (CI), stroke volume index (SI) and systemic vascular resistance index (SVRI).

Mean values with standard deviations during 45 minutes of exposure and 30 minutes post exposure to snus or control. P-values are presented for the interaction of time and exposure in multiple measures ANOVA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.g005

Discussion

Short exposure to one pouch of snus caused an acute increase in systolic and diastolic blood pressure as well as heart rate in female and male volunteers, however to a lesser extent in males. Arterial stiffness measurements did not change following exposure in either gender. In a subgroup of female volunteers, snus caused a decreased stroke index as measured by thoracic electrical bioimpedance. To our knowledge, this is the first study on acute vascular response to Swedish snus assessed using pulse wave velocity, pulse wave analysis and thoracic electrical bioimpedance.

Interestingly, in the current study females showed a deviating response to snus use than males. Snus exposure caused a significantly higher HR and BP elevation as compared to men, even though weekly snus consumption was generally the same in both men and women. Hering et al. have previously shown that smoking one cigarette has similar gender differences, namely a higher HR and SBP in women compared to men [25]. Indeed, there are clear gender differences in cardiovascular risk in smokers, with a fifty per cent increased risk of myocardial infarction for female smokers as compared to male smokers [26].

Nicotine stimulates the release of catecholamines from adrenal glands and has a direct sympathomimetic effect on the central nervous system and endothelial function [27, 28]. In general, women have a lower resting autonomic nerve activity and react more to catecholamines than men [29]. This may suggest that gender responses to nicotine could play an underlying key role in the disparate acute hemodynamic responses demonstrated in the current study.

The present study was not primarily designed to investigate gender differences and therefore the results were somewhat surprising. Nevertheless, the observed discrepancy in acute responses to Swedish snus between men and women is highly interesting, as most of the previous cohort studies for the cardiovascular risk of snus use have been solely performed in male subjects [6, 7, 13]. This may be attributed to the fact that the prevalence of snus use is still lower in women as compared to men, as four percent of Swedish women use snus on a daily basis and 5.8 percent of American women report having ever tried snus [30, 31]. However, in the countries where snus is available, there has been a steady increase among female snus users [32]. More extensive data exists for cigarette use and it has been shown that smoking females have a higher relative risk for myocardial infarction than smoking males [26, 33, 34]. It is important to address this gender difference in future studies to properly assess cardiovascular risk for female snus users.

Usage of a snus pouch in the current study gave immediate effects on HR and BP, which is in line with previous findings (Rohani, Agewall 2004). Similar effects have also been demonstrated following smoking of one cigarette [35, 36]. This increase in HR and BP may be attributed to the nicotine content in these tobacco products. Benowitz et al. demonstrated that nicotine infusion caused a sudden increase in BP and HR [37]. This theory is further supported by Adamopoulos et al. who showed that administration of one tablet of nicotine (2mg) caused similar effects [38]. As mentioned before, nicotine has a direct sympathomimetic effect, which subsequently causes a release of catecholamines [27]. These catecholamines, specifically epinephrine and norepinephrine, are pro-arrhythmogenic and may also have a pro-thrombotic effect [3942]. Taken together, the high and prolonged nicotine exposure in snus users may explain the higher incidence of fatal stroke and fatal myocardial infarctions in habitual snus users [10, 13]. It may also account for that discontinuation of snus following myocardial infarction reduces mortality by almost fifty per cent [9]. On the other hand, nicotine replacement therapy (NRT) does seem to be safe following myocardial infarction and it has not been shown to increase the risk for cardiovascular disease during a follow-up period of 12 months [43, 44]. One possible explanation may be that Swedish snus generally has a pH in the range of 7.8–8.5 (compared to an average pH of 5.3 in cigarette smoke) [45, 46]. Increasing the pH increases the portion of free base (unprotonated) form of nicotine, which accelerates mucosal nicotine absorption. Therefore snus users tend to have higher and more prolonged nicotine absorption than NRT users due to the high pH in snus [47].

In addition to nicotine, there are several other components found in snus that may cause the demonstrated effect, including polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) or aldehydes [48, 49]. PAHs are organic chemicals, many of which are classified as carcinogens, which cause damage in the lung tissue when inhaled. However, PAHs can also be ingested or absorbed following dermal and mucosal exposure [50]. It has been suggested that PAHs may affect the redox balance in favor of reactive oxygen species (ROS). ROS cause oxidative damage to biological structures leading to various diseases including cancer, atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease [51].

In the present study we assessed the acute effects on aortic stiffness and distensibility measured by pulse wave analysis and pulse wave velocity. However, we did not observe any acute changes in AiX75 or PWV. In a similar study, but without placebo-control, AiX75 was shown to increase following exposure to American smokeless tobacco (ASLT) in a group of habitual users [52]. ASLT differs from Swedish snus with higher levels of carcinogens like PAHs and aldehydes due to fire curing during manufacturing [49]. Similar effects with acute increase in arterial stiffness were observed following smoking of one cigarette or administering of one 2mg nicotine tablet [35, 38]. In the present study, we investigated daily snus users following a snus-free period of twelve hours. It may be possible that arterial stiffness is chronically altered in snus users due to differences in nicotine delivery compared to smokers or users of nicotine gum. Snus users tend to have very long exposure times for around 10 hours per day resulting in prolonged high nicotine-levels [47, 53]. Chronic exposure slows down nicotine metabolism as compared to what is seen following occasional exposure [54]. Therefore the prolonged nicotine exposure often seen in snus users may attenuate certain acute effects of nicotine [55].

As demonstrated in the current study, short-term exposure to snus has an immediate impact on cardiac function and systemic vascular resistance measured using thoracic electrical bioimpedance. This non-invasive method is mostly used to quickly assess cardiac function in a critical care setting, yet is also used in outpatient care settings [56, 57]. We observed a sudden decrease in SI and a trend towards increased SVRI following 20 min of snus exposure. This observation was seen at a later time-point than the effects on HR and BP. Sundström et al. have previously shown that acute exposure to Swedish snus caused a decrease in diastolic function as assessed by cardioechography [58]. Similar effects on cardiac function were also found following smoking of one cigarette [59]. As discussed before, it is possible that nicotine exerts these acute effects on cardiac function, but other compounds may play a crucial role.

Even though we did not observe any acute effects on arterial stiffness, we found that women had overall higher AiX75, but slightly lower PWV than men. Similar gender differences have been previously reported in healthy volunteers [6062]. Physiological differences between men and women, like hormonal or constitutional ones have been discussed as possible explanations for this phenomenon [63, 64]. On the other hand, some studies suggest a higher cardiovascular risk for women with elevated arterial index compared to men [65, 66]. Our study participants were habitual snus-users and we observed no differences in snus consumption between males and females. Accordingly, differences in snus consumption cannot explain this finding. The fact that women had overall higher arterial stiffness and a higher acute hemodynamic response to acute snus exposure suggests strongly that the cardiovascular risk for snus using women needs to be further elucidated.

Limitations

This study was not designed to investigate gender differences. Therefore results have to be interpreted with caution.

Data from two studies was pooled for analysis. Even though we had identical study designs, two separate investigators performed arterial stiffness measurements.

Thoracic electrical bioimpedance measurements were only performed in the six female subjects in study 1. A study involving more study participants including male volunteers would strengthen our thoracic electrical bioimpedance results.

Conclusions

Brief exposure to Swedish snus causes acute changes in blood pressure and heart rate, however this change is more pronounced in females. The novel finding that snus may have different gender related vascular effects needs to be further investigated, especially as prior health effect studies have mostly focused on males.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Mean change in systolic and diastolic blood pressure (SBP, DBP).

Mean values with standard deviations during 45 minutes of exposure and 30 minutes post exposure to snus or control. P-values are presented for the interaction of time and exposure in multiple measures ANOVA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.s001

(TIFF)

S2 Fig. Mean change in arterial stiffness.

Mean values for arterial index adjusted for a heart rate at 75 bpm (AiX75) and pulse wave velocity (PWV) with standard deviations during 45 minutes of exposure and 30 minutes post exposure to snus or control, separated for males and females. P-values are presented for the interaction of time and exposure in multiple measures ANOVA.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.s002

(TIFF)

S1 Table. Baseline characteristics for females in study 1 and 2.

SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HR = heart rate, AiX75 = arterial index for a heart rate at 75bpm, PWV = pulse wave velocity. Expressed as mean values ± SD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.s003

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Baseline values prior to exposure.

SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HR = heart rate, AiX75 = arterial index for a heart rate at 75bpm, PWV = pulse wave velocity. Expressed as mean values ± SD.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.s004

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Mean values ± SD, (mean changes ± SD from baseline) separated by gender.

SBP = systolic blood pressure, DBP = diastolic blood pressure, HR = heart rate, AiX75 = arterial index for a heart rate at 75bpm, PWV = pulse wave velocity. Early exposure = 0–20 minutes of exposure, late exposure = 20–45 minutes of exposure, post exposure = 0–30 minutes post exposure. P-values for mean change from baseline: *<0.001, †<0.01, ††<0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0195493.s005

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank research nurses Annika Johansson and Frida Holmström at the Respiratory Medicine Research Facility, Umeå University Hospital, for their technical assistance. We would like to thank lab engineers Dr. Gregory Rankin and Dr. Jamshid Pourazar for cotinine analysis. We would like to thank Dr. Alexis Milton for performing the measurements in study 1.

References

  1. 1. Jacobs DR Jr., Adachi H, Mulder I, Kromhout D, Menotti A, Nissinen A, et al. Cigarette smoking and mortality risk: twenty-five-year follow-up of the Seven Countries Study. Archives of internal medicine. 1999;159(7):733–40. Epub 1999/04/28. pmid:10218754.
  2. 2. WHO. WHO Report on the Global Tobacco Epidemic. 2013.
  3. 3. Peeters S, Gilmore AB. Transnational tobacco company interests in smokeless tobacco in Europe: analysis of internal industry documents and contemporary industry materials. PLoS medicine. 2013;10(9):e1001506. Epub 2013/09/24. pmid:24058299; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3769209.
  4. 4. Delnevo CD, Wackowski OA, Giovenco DP, Manderski MT, Hrywna M, Ling PM. Examining market trends in the United States smokeless tobacco use: 2005–2011. Tob Control. 2012. Epub 2012/11/03. pmid:23117999; PubMed Central PMCID: PMC3604094.
  5. 5. Andersson G, Bjornberg G, Curvall M. Oral mucosal changes and nicotine disposition in users of Swedish smokeless tobacco products: a comparative study. Journal of oral pathology & medicine: official publication of the International Association of Oral Pathologists and the American Academy of Oral Pathology. 1994;23(4):161–7. Epub 1994/04/01. pmid:8046653.
  6. 6. Boffetta P, Straif K. Use of smokeless tobacco and risk of myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review with meta-analysis. Bmj. 2009;339:b3060. Epub 2009/08/20. pmid:19690343; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2728803.
  7. 7. Ostenson CG, Hilding A, Grill V, Efendic S. High consumption of smokeless tobacco ("snus") predicts increased risk of type 2 diabetes in a 10-year prospective study of middle-aged Swedish men. Scand J Public Health. 2012;40(8):730–7. Epub 2012/11/03. pmid:23117209.
  8. 8. Arefalk G, Hergens MP, Ingelsson E, Arnlov J, Michaelsson K, Lind L, et al. Smokeless tobacco (snus) and risk of heart failure: results from two Swedish cohorts. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2012;19(5):1120–7. Epub 2011/08/11. pmid:21828223.
  9. 9. Arefalk G, Hambraeus K, Lind L, Michaelsson K, Lindahl B, Sundstrom J. Discontinuation of smokeless tobacco and mortality risk after myocardial infarction. Circulation. 2014;130(4):325–32. pmid:24958793.
  10. 10. Hansson J, Galanti MR, Hergens MP, Fredlund P, Ahlbom A, Alfredsson L, et al. Use of snus and acute myocardial infarction: pooled analysis of eight prospective observational studies. Eur J Epidemiol. 2012;27(10):771–9. Epub 2012/06/23. pmid:22722951.
  11. 11. Hansson J, Pedersen NL, Galanti MR, Andersson T, Ahlbom A, Hallqvist J, et al. Use of snus and risk for cardiovascular disease: results from the Swedish Twin Registry. J Intern Med. 2009;265(6):717–24. Epub 2009/06/09. pmid:19504754.
  12. 12. Johansson SE, Sundquist K, Qvist J, Sundquist J. Smokeless tobacco and coronary heart disease: a 12-year follow-up study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2005;12(4):387–92. Epub 2005/08/05. doi: 00149831-200508000-00013 [pii]. pmid:16079648.
  13. 13. Hansson J, Galanti MR, Hergens MP, Fredlund P, Ahlbom A, Alfredsson L, et al. Snus (Swedish smokeless tobacco) use and risk of stroke: pooled analyses of incidence and survival. J Intern Med. 2014;276(1):87–95. Epub 2014/02/20. pmid:24548296.
  14. 14. F.D.A. Swedish Match North America MRTP Applications 2014 [05/01/2015]. Available from: http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/Static/widgets/tobacco/SMNA_MRTPA_FDA-2014-N-1051.html.
  15. 15. Joksic G, Spasojevic-Tisma V, Antic R, Nilsson R, Rutqvist LE. Randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial of Swedish snus for smoking reduction and cessation. Harm Reduct J. 2011;8(1):25. Epub 2011/09/15. pmid:21914165; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3186733.
  16. 16. Rutqvist LE. Population-based survey of cessation aids used by Swedish smokers. Harm Reduct J. 2012;9:38. Epub 2012/12/05. pmid:23206988; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3539856.
  17. 17. Lee PN. The effect on health of switching from cigarettes to snus—a review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013;66(1):1–5. Epub 2013/03/05. pmid:23454227.
  18. 18. Lee PN. Epidemiological evidence relating snus to health—an updated review based on recent publications. Harm Reduct J. 2013;10:36. Epub 2013/12/10. pmid:24314326; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4029226.
  19. 19. Lee PN. Health risks related to dual use of cigarettes and snus—a systematic review. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2014;69(1):125–34. Epub 2013/11/05. pmid:24184647.
  20. 20. Popova L, Ling PM. Alternative tobacco product use and smoking cessation: a national study. Am J Public Health. 2013;103(5):923–30. Epub 2013/03/16. pmid:23488521; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3661190.
  21. 21. Gilljam H, Galanti MR. Role of snus (oral moist snuff) in smoking cessation and smoking reduction in Sweden. Addiction. 2003;98(9):1183–9. Epub 2003/08/22. pmid:12930201.
  22. 22. Bolinder G, de Faire U. Ambulatory 24-h blood pressure monitoring in healthy, middle-aged smokeless tobacco users, smokers, and nontobacco users. Am J Hypertens. 1998;11(10):1153–63. Epub 1998/11/03. doi: S0895-7061(98)00137-X [pii]. pmid:9799031.
  23. 23. Bolinder G, Alfredsson L, Englund A, de Faire U. Smokeless tobacco use and increased cardiovascular mortality among Swedish construction workers. Am J Public Health. 1994;84(3):399–404. Epub 1994/03/01. PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPmc1614817. pmid:8129055
  24. 24. Rohani M, Agewall S. Oral snuff impairs endothelial function in healthy snuff users. J Intern Med. 2004;255(3):379–83. Epub 2004/02/12. doi: 1279 [pii]. pmid:14871462.
  25. 25. Hering D, Somers VK, Kara T, Jazdzewski K, Jurak P, Kucharska W, et al. Heightened acute circulatory responses to smoking in women. Blood Press. 2008;17(3):141–6. Epub 2008/07/09. pmid:18608198.
  26. 26. Prescott E, Hippe M, Schnohr P, Hein HO, Vestbo J. Smoking and risk of myocardial infarction in women and men: longitudinal population study. Bmj. 1998;316(7137):1043–7. Epub 1998/04/29. pmid:9552903; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC28505.
  27. 27. Adamopoulos D, van de Borne P, Argacha JF. New insights into the sympathetic, endothelial and coronary effects of nicotine. Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology. 2008;35(4):458–63. pmid:18307741.
  28. 28. Leone A. Toxics of Tobacco Smoke and Cardiovascular System: From Functional to Cellular Damage. Current pharmaceutical design. 2015;21(30):4370–9. Epub 2015/08/04. pmid:26234797.
  29. 29. Christou DD, Jones PP, Jordan J, Diedrich A, Robertson D, Seals DR. Women have lower tonic autonomic support of arterial blood pressure and less effective baroreflex buffering than men. Circulation. 2005;111(4):494–8. Epub 2005/02/03. pmid:15687139.
  30. 30. SCB. Statistics Sweden 2014. Available from: http://www.statistikdatabasen.scb.se/.
  31. 31. Zhu SH, Gamst A, Lee M, Cummins S, Yin L, Zoref L. The use and perception of electronic cigarettes and snus among the U.S. population. PloS one. 2013;8(10):e79332. Epub 2013/11/20. pmid:24250756; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3824062.
  32. 32. Stegmayr B, Eliasson M, Rodu B. The decline of smoking in northern Sweden. Scand J Public Health. 2005;33(4):321–4; discussion 243. Epub 2005/08/10. pmid:16087495.
  33. 33. Njolstad I, Arnesen E, Lund-Larsen PG. Smoking, serum lipids, blood pressure, and sex differences in myocardial infarction. A 12-year follow-up of the Finnmark Study. Circulation. 1996;93(3):450–6. Epub 1996/02/01. pmid:8565161.
  34. 34. Tverdal A, Thelle D, Stensvold I, Leren P, Bjartveit K. Mortality in relation to smoking history: 13 years' follow-up of 68,000 Norwegian men and women 35–49 years. Journal of clinical epidemiology. 1993;46(5):475–87. pmid:8501474.
  35. 35. Mahmud A, Feely J. Effect of smoking on arterial stiffness and pulse pressure amplification. Hypertension. 2003;41(1):183–7. Epub 2003/01/04. pmid:12511550.
  36. 36. Kubozono T, Miyata M, Ueyama K, Hamasaki S, Kusano K, Kubozono O, et al. Acute and chronic effects of smoking on arterial stiffness. Circulation journal: official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2011;75(3):698–702. Epub 2010/12/29. pmid:21187657.
  37. 37. Benowitz NL, Jacob P 3rd, Jones RT, Rosenberg J. Interindividual variability in the metabolism and cardiovascular effects of nicotine in man. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1982;221(2):368–72. Epub 1982/05/01. pmid:7077531.
  38. 38. Adamopoulos D, Argacha JF, Gujic M, Preumont N, Degaute JP, van de Borne P. Acute effects of nicotine on arterial stiffness and wave reflection in healthy young non-smokers. Clinical and experimental pharmacology & physiology. 2009;36(8):784–9. Epub 2009/02/12. pmid:19207722.
  39. 39. Du XJ, Cox HS, Dart AM, Esler MD. Sympathetic activation triggers ventricular arrhythmias in rat heart with chronic infarction and failure. Cardiovascular research. 1999;43(4):919–29. pmid:10615419.
  40. 40. Tisdale JE, Patel RV, Webb CR, Borzak S, Zarowitz BJ. Proarrhythmic effects of intravenous vasopressors. The Annals of pharmacotherapy. 1995;29(3):269–81. Epub 1995/03/01. pmid:7606074.
  41. 41. Ikarugi H, Taka T, Nakajima S, Noguchi T, Watanabe S, Sasaki Y, et al. Norepinephrine, but not epinephrine, enhances platelet reactivity and coagulation after exercise in humans. Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md: 1985). 1999;86(1):133–8. Epub 1999/01/14. pmid:9887123.
  42. 42. Badimon L, Martinez-Gonzalez J, Royo T, Lassila R, Badimon JJ. A sudden increase in plasma epinephrine levels transiently enhances platelet deposition on severely damaged arterial wall—studies in a porcine model. Thrombosis and haemostasis. 1999;82(6):1736–42. Epub 1999/12/29. pmid:10613663.
  43. 43. Tzivoni D, Keren A, Meyler S, Khoury Z, Lerer T, Brunel P. Cardiovascular safety of transdermal nicotine patches in patients with coronary artery disease who try to quit smoking. Cardiovascular drugs and therapy / sponsored by the International Society of Cardiovascular Pharmacotherapy. 1998;12(3):239–44. pmid:9784902.
  44. 44. Hubbard R, Lewis S, Smith C, Godfrey C, Smeeth L, Farrington P, et al. Use of nicotine replacement therapy and the risk of acute myocardial infarction, stroke, and death. Tob Control. 2005;14(6):416–21. Epub 2005/12/02. pmid:16319366; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1748112.
  45. 45. Idris AM, Ibrahim SO, Vasstrand EN, Johannessen AC, Lillehaug JR, Magnusson B, et al. The Swedish snus and the Sudanese toombak: are they different? Oral Oncol. 1998;34(6):558–66. pmid:9930371.
  46. 46. Turner JA, Sillett RW, McNicol MW. Effect of cigar smoking on carboxyhaemoglobin and plasma nicotine concentrations in primary pipe and cigar smokers and ex-cigarette smokers. Br Med J. 1977;2(6099):1387–9. pmid:589225; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1632361.
  47. 47. Digard H, Errington G, Richter A, McAdam K. Patterns and behaviors of snus consumption in Sweden. Nicotine Tob Res. 2009;11(10):1175–81. Epub 2009/08/19. pmid:19687306; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2746836.
  48. 48. McAdam KG, Faizi A, Kimpton H, Porter A, Rodu B. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in US and Swedish smokeless tobacco products. Chemistry Central journal. 2013;7(1):151. Epub 2013/09/10. pmid:24011230; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3874832.
  49. 49. Stepanov I, Jensen J, Hatsukami D, Hecht SS. New and traditional smokeless tobacco: comparison of toxicant and carcinogen levels. Nicotine Tob Res. 2008;10(12):1773–82. Epub 2008/11/22. pmid:19023828; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2892835.
  50. 50. VanRooij JG, Bodelier-Bade MM, Jongeneelen FJ. Estimation of individual dermal and respiratory uptake of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in 12 coke oven workers. Br J Ind Med. 1993;50(7):623–32. pmid:8343423; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC1035498.
  51. 51. Yang Q, Qiu X, Li R, Ma J, Li K, Li G. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) exposure and oxidative stress for a rural population from the North China Plain. Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2015;22(3):1760–9. pmid:25015715.
  52. 52. Martin JS, Beck DT, Gurovich AN, Braith RW. The acute effects of smokeless tobacco on central aortic blood pressure and wave reflection characteristics. Exp Biol Med (Maywood). 2010;235(10):1263–8. Epub 2010/08/20. pmid:20719817; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2971534.
  53. 53. Digard H, Proctor C, Kulasekaran A, Malmqvist U, Richter A. Determination of nicotine absorption from multiple tobacco products and nicotine gum. Nicotine Tob Res. 2013;15(1):255–61. Epub 2012/05/16. pmid:22585541; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3524070.
  54. 54. Lee BL, Benowitz NL, Jacob P 3rd. Influence of tobacco abstinence on the disposition kinetics and effects of nicotine. Clinical pharmacology and therapeutics. 1987;41(4):474–9. Epub 1987/04/01. pmid:3829584.
  55. 55. Fattinger K, Verotta D, Benowitz NL. Pharmacodynamics of acute tolerance to multiple nicotinic effects in humans. The Journal of pharmacology and experimental therapeutics. 1997;281(3):1238–46. Epub 1997/06/01. pmid:9190859.
  56. 56. Tanino Y, Shite J, Paredes OL, Shinke T, Ogasawara D, Sawada T, et al. Whole body bioimpedance monitoring for outpatient chronic heart failure follow up. Circulation journal: official journal of the Japanese Circulation Society. 2009;73(6):1074–9. pmid:19372625.
  57. 57. Raaijmakers E, Faes TJ, Scholten RJ, Goovaerts HG, Heethaar RM. A meta-analysis of three decades of validating thoracic impedance cardiography. Critical care medicine. 1999;27(6):1203–13. pmid:10397230.
  58. 58. Sundstrom D, Waldenborg M, Emilsson K. Acute effects on the ventricular function in Swedish snuffers: an echocardiographic study. Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2012;32(2):106–13. Epub 2012/02/03. pmid:22296630.
  59. 59. Alam M, Samad BA, Wardell J, Andersson E, Hoglund C, Nordlander R. Acute effects of smoking on diastolic function in healthy participants: studies by conventional doppler echocardiography and doppler tissue imaging. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2002;15(10 Pt 2):1232–7. pmid:12411910.
  60. 60. Janner JH, Godtfredsen NS, Ladelund S, Vestbo J, Prescott E. Aortic augmentation index: reference values in a large unselected population by means of the SphygmoCor device. Am J Hypertens. 2010;23(2):180–5. pmid:19959999.
  61. 61. Koskinen J, Magnussen CG, Viikari JS, Kahonen M, Laitinen T, Hutri-Kahonen N, et al. Effect of age, gender and cardiovascular risk factors on carotid distensibility during 6-year follow-up. The cardiovascular risk in Young Finns study. Atherosclerosis. 2012;224(2):474–9. Epub 2012/05/26. pmid:22624989.
  62. 62. Hayward CS, Kelly RP. Gender-related differences in the central arterial pressure waveform. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1997;30(7):1863–71. Epub 1997/12/31. pmid:9385920.
  63. 63. Gatzka CD, Kingwell BA, Cameron JD, Berry KL, Liang YL, Dewar EM, et al. Gender differences in the timing of arterial wave reflection beyond differences in body height. J Hypertens. 2001;19(12):2197–203. pmid:11725164.
  64. 64. Mitchell GF, Parise H, Benjamin EJ, Larson MG, Keyes MJ, Vita JA, et al. Changes in arterial stiffness and wave reflection with advancing age in healthy men and women: the Framingham Heart Study. Hypertension. 2004;43(6):1239–45. Epub 2004/05/05. pmid:15123572.
  65. 65. Russo C, Jin Z, Palmieri V, Homma S, Rundek T, Elkind MS, et al. Arterial stiffness and wave reflection: sex differences and relationship with left ventricular diastolic function. Hypertension. 2012;60(2):362–8. pmid:22753223; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3402954.
  66. 66. Mitchell GF, Gudnason V, Launer LJ, Aspelund T, Harris TB. Hemodynamics of increased pulse pressure in older women in the community-based Age, Gene/Environment Susceptibility-Reykjavik Study. Hypertension. 2008;51(4):1123–8. pmid:18259005.