Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Highly-sensitive detection of Salmonella typhi in clinical blood samples by magnetic nanoparticle-based enrichment and in-situ measurement of isothermal amplification of nucleic acids

  • Avinash Kaur,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India

  • Arti Kapil,

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision

    Affiliation Department of Microbiology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • Ravikrishnan Elangovan,

    Roles Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Biochemical Engineering and Biotechnology, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India

  • Sandeep Jha,

    Roles Formal analysis, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India, Department of Biomedical Engineering, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

  • Dinesh Kalyanasundaram

    Roles Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    dineshk@cbme.iitd.ac.in, dineshk.iitdelhi@gmail.com

    Affiliations Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, India, Department of Biomedical Engineering, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi, India

Highly-sensitive detection of Salmonella typhi in clinical blood samples by magnetic nanoparticle-based enrichment and in-situ measurement of isothermal amplification of nucleic acids

  • Avinash Kaur, 
  • Arti Kapil, 
  • Ravikrishnan Elangovan, 
  • Sandeep Jha, 
  • Dinesh Kalyanasundaram
PLOS
x

Correction

11 Sep 2018: Kaur A, Kapil A, Elangovan R, Jha S, Kalyanasundaram D (2018) Correction: Highly-sensitive detection of Salmonella typhi in clinical blood samples by magnetic nanoparticle-based enrichment and in-situ measurement of isothermal amplification of nucleic acids. PLOS ONE 13(9): e0203982. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0203982 View correction

Abstract

Enteric fever continues to be a major cause of mortality and morbidity globally, particularly in poor resource settings. Lack of rapid diagnostic assays is a major driving factor for the empirical treatment of enteric fever. In this work, a rapid and sensitive method ‘Miod ‘has been developed. Miod includes a magnetic nanoparticle-based enrichment of target bacterial cells, followed by cell lysis and loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) of nucleic acids for signal augmentation along with concurrent measurement of signal via an insitu optical detection system. To identify positive/negative enteric fever infections in clinical blood samples, the samples were processed using Miod at time = 0 hours and time = 4 hours post-incubation in blood culture media. Primers specific for the STY2879 gene were used to amplify the nucleic acids isolated from S. typhi cells. A limit of detection of 5 CFU/mL was achieved. No cross-reactivity of the primers were observed against 106 CFU/mL of common pathogenic bacterial species found in blood such as E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus, A. baumanni, E. faecalis, S. Paratyphi A and K. pneumonia. Miod was tested on 28 human clinical blood samples. The detection of both pre-and post-four-hours incubation confirmed the presence of viable S. typhi cells and allowed clinical correlation of infection. The positive and negative samples were successfully detected in less than 6 hours with 100% sensitivity and specificity.

Introduction

Salmonella typhi causes the enteric fever that is a major public health problem, both in developing as well as developed economies [1,2]. About 21 million cases and 222,000 deaths per year are caused worldwide by Salmonella typhi [3]. Antibiotics such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, fluoroquinolones and 3rd generation cephalosporin are the antibiotics of choice for the treatment of enteric fever. However, typhoidal Salmonella species have increasingly become resistant to conventional antibiotics such as ampicillin, chloramphenicol, cotrimoxazole, and fluoroquinolones in developing countries [4]. The death rate in enteric fever is expected to increase by 30% without appropriate diagnosis and effective antibiotic therapy [5].

Blood culture remains the gold standard test for diagnosis of enteric fever till today. The organism once isolated from culture assay is further identified by biochemical tests [6,7]. Serological methods such as Widal test are regularly employed in many healthcare settings [8]. However, these serological methods have low sensitivity and specificity and are inconclusive [9]. So far, confirmation of enteric fever depends on isolation of Salmonella typhi from the clinical specimens such as urine, bone marrow, rose spot extracts, duodenal aspirates and stool [10]. Blood culture based diagnosis of enteric fever demands (a) multiple time-consuming protocols (b) skilled labour and (c) numerous instruments and related infrastructure. Further, only 45 to 70% of true positive cases are identified by this method [11]. These challenges in S. typhi diagnosis are amplified multifold especially in resource-poor settings. Also, the lack of specific, rapid and affordable diagnostic assays lead to inappropriate use of antibiotics in all fevers cases, majority of which are viral or malaria. In addition to the above facts, approximately 20 to 30 mL of blood is required for detection of blood-related infections (both aerobic and anaerobic bacterial cultures). Requirement of such volumes of blood pose a challenge for geriatric and neonatal patients [12]. A diagnostic method requiring minimal blood volumes with rapid and accurate detection is therefore required.

Some of the recently published methods for the detection of S. typhi in blood, water samples, and food are, lateral flow immunoassay (LFIA) using antibody-coated gold nanoparticles [13], uniplex and, multiplex PCR [14], reverse transcriptase multiplex PCR (RT-MPCR) [15] and gel electrophoresis [16]. The limit of detection (LOD) of these above methods ranges between 500 to 104 CFU/mL. Besides, these methods are time-consuming, require numerous equipments including expensive thermocyclers and trained labour. Henceforth, there is a necessity for new methods that offer rapid, specific, and sensitive detection.

Isothermal amplification of nucleic acids is a promising option for quick and effective amplification eliminating the need for multiple cycles of rapid heating and cooling as demanded in thermocycling PCR [17]. This feature greatly reduces the complexity of the device and therefore the cost. Hence, isothermal based techniques have the potential for easy implementation in developing economies. Various isothermal amplification methods have been introduced over the last decade, such as, nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (NASBA) [18], loop-mediated amplification (LAMP) [19,20], strand displacement amplification [21], helicase-dependent amplification (HDA) [17], rolling circle amplification (RCA) [22], recombinase polymerase amplification (RPA) [23], and multiple displacement amplification (MDA) [24]. Of the above techniques, LAMP assay utilizes four to six primers along with strand displacing DNA polymerase and amplifies target sequences in a rapid manner besides achieving high specificity. LAMP assay can be utilized for many applications including detection of pathogens in food products, environmental samples, genetic testing, and point-of-care testing [25]. Cost-effective devices have been intended to enhance the portability of the LAMP assay for field applications.

Ravan and Yazdanparast reported LAMP–ELISA assay for the detection of enteric fever in spiked samples. The spiked samples were incubated up to 24 hours. The hybridization of probe and amplification were performed simultaneously. The spiked samples were detected in 2 hours 40 minutes by measuring absorbance at 450 nm using microplate ELISA reader. The LOD of this assay was reported as 10 CFU/mL [26]. Bozorgmehr et al. used LAMP based non-crosslinking gold nanoprobes for the detection of S. typhi DNA. The team used surface plasmon resonance (SPR) for end point-detection [27]. However, in the two methods described above, no clinical blood samples were reported. Abdullah et al. developed an in-house LAMP assay for the detection of S. typhi using three sets of primers designed for PapD gene. LAMP reaction was performed using heating block (at 63°C for 60 minutes) followed by detection using colorimetry. The LAMP method was compared against the gold standard of culture method and polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The team reported a LOD of 104 CFU/mL or 20 CFU/reaction while that of PCR was 200 CFU/reaction [28].

The sensitivity of LAMP assay can be improved considerably by an enrichment protocol. Immunomagnetic concentration and separation of target bacteria offers an advantage over labour- intensive conventional pathogen enrichment methods (such as biological or serological confirmation, plating and enrichment methods) [29]. Though LAMP is sensitive at lower copies of nucleic acids, however, it is prone to inhibition and contaminants that are often found in clinical samples. Immunomagnetic isolation helps to remove contaminants that might interfere with the subsequent LAMP amplification detection assay [30,31]. In other words, the enrichment protocol enhances the LAMP process by (a) eliminating of the contaminants (thereby reducing the incidence of false positive and false negative test results [29]) and by (b) concentrating the target cells in a smaller volume. The utilization of 100 nm magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) enhances the binding kinetics in a diffusion-limited process [32]. Likewise, a higher surface to volume proportion enhances the signal by bringing down the steric obstruction during ligand-receptor binding due to bigger molecule surface curvature [33]. Miod was developed in the present study that employs a magnetic nanoparticle-based enrichment protocol followed by isothermal amplification of S. typhi nucleic acids and encompasses an in-situ optical detection system with high specificity. In the preceding work, the protocol for magnetic nanoparticle-based enrichment of S. typhi was optimized. The capture efficiency of S. typhi cells using antibody coated MNPs was found to be above 65% [29]. In the current work, isothermal amplification and detection were augmented to create a stand-alone system. For isothermal amplification or signal augmentation, the STY2879 gene was amplified using 4 primary primers (pair of inner primers (FIP and BIP) and pair of outer primers (F3 and B3)) along with 2 additional loop primers (LF and LB). Gene STY2879 encodes for reverse transcriptase protein in all S. typhi isolates. The specificity and cross-reactivity were tested against other bacterial isolates such as Escherichia coli, Staphylococcus aureus, Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Acinetobacter baumanni, Enterococcus faecalis, Salmonella Paratyphi A and Klebsiella pneumonia. Miod was evaluated against 28 human clinical blood samples of suspected enteric fever patients.

Materials and methods

Institute ethical approval

This study was approved by ethics committee of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi (document number IEC-307 dated 07th June 2016). Blood samples were obtained from all participants with a written consent form, at the department of microbiology of All India Institute of Medical Sciences, New Delhi. The blood samples were spiked in blood culture media immediately.

Materials used

Dextran-coated magnetic nanoparticles (MNPs) of 100 nm with free carboxyl groups at the surface (FluidMAG-CMX, Chemicell, Germany) conjugated with the polyclonal antibody against Salmonella spp. (Rabbit antisera, Difco™, BD) were used for the enrichment of S. typhi cells. Isothermal LAMP master mix (Optigene, UK), and primers (Integrated DNA Technologies, US) were used for the nucleic acid amplification. Reagents such as phosphate buffer saline (PBS), tryptone soy broth (TSB), bovine serum albumin (BSA), tween 20, 100X Tris-EDTA (TE) buffer, N-(3-dimethylaminopropyl)-N′-ethylcarbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC), N-hydroxysuccinimide (NHS) were obtained from Sigma-Aldrich, USA. Neodymium magnets with approximately 300 mT surface field were procured from a local hardware store. S. typhi Ty2 (ATCC 19430) strain, available with the department of microbiology at All India Institute of Medical Sciences was used for standardization.

Bacterial culture for standardization

S. typhi was grown on TSB for 12 hours at 37°C. The cells were collected in the mid-log phase of the culture (O.D. ~ 0.6, approximately corresponding to 5×108 CFU/mL). The correlation between optical density and CFU/mL was obtained via serial dilution and plating method. The cells were spiked in sterile blood culture media and diluted serially to obtain 500, 400, 300, 200, 100, 50, 10 and 5 CFU/mL. All serial dilutions were carried out using sterile blood culture media. The mixtures were vortexed for 30 seconds for homogenous mixing. The sterile blood culture media without spiking of S. typhi was used as negative control. One milliliter solution of each concentration was used for obtaining the first standardization curve. The spiked blood cultures were incubated for 4 hours at 37°C for growth of the S. typhi cells. Post incubation, one milliliter of a solution of each concentration was used for obtaining the second standardization curve. To obtain the concentration of S. typhi for pre- and post-four-hour incubation, 20 μL of each dilution was plated on MacConkey® agar plates followed by colony counts after 24 hours.

Conjugation of magnetic nanoparticles with S. typhi specific antibodies

Antibody conjugated magnetic nanoparticles (MNP-Ab) were prepared as described elsewhere [29]. In brief, MNPs were washed twice with 10 mM PBS, followed by incubation with 20 mg/mL of EDC and NHS for 15 minutes at room temperature (25°C). MNPs were washed again twice with PBS and then incubated with 50 μg of antibodies (Rabbit antisera, Difco™, BD) for 12 hours at room temperature. To remove non-specifically bound antibodies, the MNPs were washed with 1% BSA and 0.1% Tween 20 for 1 hour at room temperature and stored at 4°C.

MNP based enrichment, cell lysis and DNA isolation

S. typhi cells were enriched using MNPs-Ab in the ratio of 20:1 (i.e. 1 mL of solution to 50 μL of MNPs-Ab). After 30 minutes of incubation at room temperature, target bacteria from the blood culture media bound to the MNPs via the antibodies, were isolated using magnets held on the outside of the vial. The remaining contents in the samples were eliminated by washing twice with nuclease-free water (NFW). The enrichment process helps to eliminate the contaminants that hinder the LAMP amplification process. The concentrated cells were finally resuspended in 50 μL of NFW. The suspension was heated at 65°C for 45 minutes, to allow detachment of MNPs from target S. typhi cells. The supernatant containing the cells were heat-treated at 100°C for 5 minutes for cell lysis. Post cell lysis, the suspension was centrifuged at 12,000 RPM for 5 minutes. Five microlitres of the supernatant were collected and used for the LAMP assay. The protocol is shown in Fig 1.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Flowchart showing detail protocol for conventional method and DNA based detection using LAMP.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.g001

Nucleic acid amplification

LAMP based amplification mandates four primers; forward outer primer (F3), backward outer primer (B3), forward inner primer (FIP), backward inner primer (BIP) along with two additional primers; loop forward (LF) and loop backward (LB) primers. Loop primers enhance the rate of amplification. Detailed LAMP method of amplification is described elsewhere [34]. LAMP assay reaction was performed in 25 μL (total volume) reaction mixture containing 15 μL of LAMP master mix, 5 μL of primer mix (0.2 μM of F3 and B3 primers, 0.8 μM of FIP and BIP, 0.4 μM of LF and LB primers) and 5 μL of target or template DNA. The LAMP master mix contains Geobacillus species DNA polymerase (Optigene, UK), optimized reaction buffer containing Mg2Cl2, deoxynucleotide triphosphates and ds-DNA binding dye (Optigene, UK). The FIP, BIP, F3 and B3 primers for the STY2879 gene were obtained from Fan et al.[35]. The loop primers LF and LB were designed using a commercial software LAMP designer software version 1.10 (Optigene, UK).

Standardization of concentration versus intensity

LAMP reactions were carried out for different dilutions of S. typhi cells spiked in sterile blood culture media from 500 CFU/mL down to 5 CFU/mL, pre—and post-incubation (4 hours). DNA from each dilution was pre-concentrated using MNPs-Ab and lysed using heat treatment method. Five microlitres of the supernatant were collected and used for the LAMP assay. LAMP reaction was carried out at 65°C for 15 minutes. The fluorescence intensity during LAMP reaction mix increased over time, as detected by the fiber optic reflectance probe and a fiber optic spectrometer (HR 2000+ES, Ocean optics, USA). The intensity corresponding to each concentration was measured at different time intervals of 5, 10, 15, 20, 25 and 30 minutes. The intensity grew clearly distinguishable between various concentrations at 15 minutes. An increase in the intensity between pre—and post incubated samples confirms cell viability. The intensity at 520 nm of wavelength was obtained for the pre-and post—incubated samples for various concentration at 15 minutes to plot the calibration curve (or standard curve). All experiments were carried out in triplicates.

Cross-reactivity and specificity with common pathogens/nuclei acids

Common pathogenic bacterial species including E. coli, S. aureus, P. aeruginosa, A. baumanni, E. faecalis, S. paratyphi A and K. pneumonia are also typically found in blood samples of enteric fever patients. Hence, experiments on the cross-reactivity of the primers along with master mix and 106 CFU/mL concentration of the above bacterial species were carried out. DNA was isolated using the protocol as described earlier. All experiments were carried out in triplicates.

LAMP assay from clinical samples

Human clinical blood samples from 28 suspected enteric fever patients were collected at the medical institute. Upon collection of blood from the patient, the blood is immediately mixed with culture media in the blood culture bottles. The blood collection was carried out using standard protocol as described elsewhere [36,37]. Briefly, the site of venipuncture was disinfected using 70% alcohol, 10% povidone iodine and again 70% alcohol. Five milliliters of blood were drawn from the patient. It was then spiked in blood culture bottles containing 45 mL of brain heart infusion (BHI) media (BD Difco, USA). The bottle was incubated at 37°C for culture. DNA was isolated after enrichment of cells using MNPs-Ab from 1 mL of media before and incubation. The cells were then lysed using heat treatment method as described in the MNP based Enrichment, cell lysis and DNA isolation section. Five microlitres of the supernatant were collected and used for the LAMP assay. LAMP assay was run for both pre- and post-four hour incubated samples.

Comparison with conventional method

The results of Miod were validated by conventional methods. First, the blood culture bottle samples were incubated at 37°C for the culture of the bacterial organisms for 24 hours and 48 hours until observation of turbidity. The samples were further sub-cultured on a MacConkey agar plates (BioMesrieux, France) at 37°C for 24 hours. The formation of pale transparent colonies indicates the possible presence of S. typhi as per the standard protocol discussed elsewhere [36,37]. Confirmatory biochemical test such as motility test, triple sugar iron (TSI) test, urease test, citrate test and slide agglutination test were performed post sub-culturing on agar plate. Motility test was used to determine the motility of S. typhi cells. Triple sugar iron agar test was used to determine whether S. typhi cells utilize glucose, lactose or sucrose and produce hydrogen sulfide (H2S) gas. Citrate utilization test was used to determine the ability of S. typhi cells to utilize sodium citrate as a carbon source and inorganic NH4H2PO4 as a source of nitrogen. Urease test was used to determine whether S. typhi cells produce urease enzyme, an indication of viable cells. A slide agglutination test using Antisera (Statens serum institute, Copenhagen) was used to detect S. typhi O9, poly O and H antigens in blood. A brief description of each of the biochemical tests are included in the supplementary section S1.2 and shown in S1 Fig. The conventional method in total consumes a minimum of 72 hours as compared to Miod’s protocol of less than 6 hours, as given in S1 Table.

Statistical analysis.

Based on the outcomes, the clinical sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were calculated to estimate the effectiveness and efficiency of Miod [38].

Results and discussions

Design of device

An aluminum heating block of dimensions (length 5 cm, breadth 3 cm, height 2.5 cm) was machined with three wells to accommodate conical PCR tubes of 200 μL. The depth and diameter of the well was 10 mm and 5.5 mm. Three horizontal bores of diameters 6 mm and length 50 mm were drilled to seat two cartridge type heaters (Pratik heat products Pvt. Ltd., Mumbai, India) and one thermocouple (Pixsys electronics, Italy). The thermocouple was placed underneath the wells of PCR tubes to monitor the temperature of the wells during the reaction. The cartridge heaters were placed parallel to both sides of the wells. Electrical power to the heaters and thermocouple were supplied by two 1-Ampere transformers connected in parallel. Thermocouple was linked to corresponding integral derivative (PID) controller (Selec, Mumbai) through solid state relay (SSR) (FUTEK, USA) to control the temperature of the heating block. LAMP assay was carried out at 65° C for 15 minutes. The reaction was then terminated by denaturing the polymerase in the master mix (Optigene, UK) by heating to 80° C for 2 minutes. The setup along with the instrumentation is shown in Fig 2. The current dimension of the device is 30 cm × 30 cm × 8 cm. Y-type optical probes were placed on top of the vials in the heating block. The optical fiber transmits white light from the source (Ocean optics, USA) into the vials. The fluorescence light intensity (at a shorter band of wavelength) was observed at the flip side of the optic fiber utilizing a spectrometer (HR 2000+ES, Ocean optics, USA) and spectra suite software.

thumbnail
Fig 2.

(a) Schematic and (b) actual view: isothermal amplification and detection assembly (c) signal at detector at various bacterial concentrations.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.g002

Standardization of intensity versus concentration

The intensity of fluorescence was measured in-situ during LAMP reaction. At 15 minutes and at 520 nm of wavelength, the intensity for pre-incubation and post-four-hour incubation are shown in Fig 3(A) and 3(B) respectively. The R2 value for pre-incubation was 0.948 and for post-incubation (4 hours) was 0.983. The response of the detector for the negative control was found to be 45 counts and 57 counts for pre-incubation and post-four-hour incubation respectively. The theoretical limit of detection (LOD) calculated at 3 times the sensor reading of negative control are 135 counts (for pre-incubation), and 171 counts (for post-four incubation) for reliable detection of the signal. Hence, based on S/N ratio ≥3, the LOD of pre-incubated samples was 200 CFU/mL (corresponding to 327 counts) while in the case of post-four-hour incubation, the LOD was 5 CFU/mL (corresponding to 221 counts). The response of the detector was linear at lower concentrations (5 to 500 CFU/mL) and non-linear at higher concentrations as shown in Fig 3(A) and 3(B) respectively. Linear curve fitting was used to fit the response for pre-incubated samples. The equation of best-line-fit was x = [(y-38.20)/1.331] where, x represents the concentration in CFU/mL and y represents the intensity in number of counts. The Boltzmann equation for post-four-hour incubated samples was [x = 39.70 ln ((y+5.28E6)/ (754.84-y))–354.20] respectively. This represents nonlinear curve fitting. An unknown concentration of the cells in a given sample can be determined by using the equation of the standard curve. The results of the bacterial count were obtained by plating (S2 Table and S2 Fig).

thumbnail
Fig 3.

Calibration curve: Intensity at 15 minutes (a) LAMP assay versus initial concentration from 5 to 500 CFU/mL along with (b) post-four-hour incubation. For post-incubated samples, the approximate CFU/mL count was obtained by a count of cultured bacteria on agar plates as shown by red lines. The linear regime is shown by the dotted lines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.g003

Our protocol involves experimenting both pre-incubated and post-incubated samples to ascertain the viability of the cells in addition to high sensitivity. The initial concentration of 5 CFU/mL, yielded an intensity of 221 counts post-four-hour incubation. Hence, we conclude that our theoretical LOD is 5 CFU/mL. The saturation for the post-incubation curve is due to the limited number of fluorescent molecules. Since the experiment is designed to detect one lakh S. typhi cells as a limit of detection shown in Fig 3. In the linear regime, the slope of the calibration curve for pre-incubation sample was 1.331 counts per CFU/mL which, represents the sensitivity of the sensor.

Cross-reactivity tests for primers

The cross-reactivity of the primers for the STY2879 gene was examined against K. pneumonia, E. faecalis, A. baumanni, E. coli, P. aeruginosa, S. aureus and S. paratyphi A. Five microlitres of the DNA template was used for LAMP reaction. The intensity was measured using optical detection system at 520 nm wavelength and 15 minutes. Fig 4(A) represents the cross-reactivity reactions against the other bacterial species as mentioned above. It can be observed that no cross-reactivity was observed even at high concentration of 106 CFU/mL of the pathogenic bacterial species. Fig 4(B) depicts both pre-and post-four-hour incubation of S. typhi at various concentrations. Though 5 and 50 CFU/mL of S. typhi shows equivalent signal to negative control and 106 CFU/mL of other bacterial species at pre-incubation, there is a significant increase in the signal for S. typhi at post-four-hour incubation. In other words, the S. typhi signals are higher than thrice the signal of negative control post-four-hour incubation.

thumbnail
Fig 4.

(a) Cross-reactivity of primers against other bacterial species spiked in sterile blood culture media (final concentration of 106 CFU/mL) (b) positive (S. typhi) and negative control at pre-and post-four-hour incubation.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.g004

Evaluation of clinical samples by Miod and conventional method

Assessment of 28 clinical samples by Miod and cross-validation with conventional method were performed. In the conventional method, the blood culture bottles were incubated for 24 hours for the given clinical samples at 37°C followed by sub-culture on MacConkey® agar. S. typhi was confirmed by standard bacteriology methods as shown in S1 Table. The minimum time taken for the conventional method was 72 hours.

Six representative samples including three number of positive and negative samples were identified by Miod is shown in Fig 5. The same samples were tested by the conventional method and the detailed observations along with results are given in Table 1. It can be seen that there is a 100% concurrence between the two methods. For the remaining 22 samples, the results of the tests conducted by both Miod and the conventional method are given in the S3 Table of the supplementary section. Compared with the conventional method, Miod’s clinical sensitivity, clinical specificity, PPV and NPV was 100% (Table 2). Hence, it can be concluded that Miod is quite efficient at prediction given its reduced time for diagnosis and at lower LOD. Miod confirms the presence of a viable pathogen in the patient within 6 hours as compared to the conventional method of 72 hours that many nuclei acid based devices fail to confirm.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Detection of S. typhi by Miod from human blood samples in the medical institute.

The corresponding data are shown only for representative six clinical samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.g005

thumbnail
Table 1. Results of culture and biochemical tests of the representative six clinical samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.t001

thumbnail
Table 2. A comparative analysis of conventional method and Miod detection of S. typhi.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.t002

Recently, a few techniques have been published on using either optical or colorimetric detection of S. typhi from spiked blood culture media and human blood samples, after amplification of nucleic acids by LAMP methods. A comparison with of Miod with these recently published methods in the literature is given in Table 3. It can be noticed that Miod has the lowest LOD of 5 CFU/mL in clinical samples and has comparable processing time. The synergetic effects of magnetic enrichment combined with four-hour incubation and LAMP based amplification protocol helps us in achieving the lowest LOD possible for the given sample. The enrichment using MNP-Ab removes many inhibiting materials and thereby reduces the incidence of false positive and false negative test results. In Table 3, many of the referenced techniques have neither commented on the detection from clinical samples nor on the detection of cell viability. Therefore, it can be observed that Miod has the potential for clinical use due to its low LOD, ability to detect viable cells and in a quicker turnaround time. The current device is a proof-of-concept for establishing the ‘Miod” protocol. Miod has the potential to further be developed into a hand-held, portable and an economical device, however not in the current form. The miniaturization of the device to suit resource-poor settings is the future scope of work.

thumbnail
Table 3. Comparison of Miod with newly developed LAMP based amplification techniques.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.t003

Conclusions

In this work, a rapid and highly sensitive detection of S. typhi was demonstrated. Miod employs a magnetic nanoparticle-based pathogen enrichment protocol, followed by loop-mediated nucleic acid amplification and simultaneous detection by an in-situ optical system. The system detected the presence of S. typhi pre-and post-four-hour incubation in culture media that confirmed cell viability. LOD of the proposed Miod was 5 CFU/mL in spiked samples. In the evaluation of human clinical blood samples, Miod detected all 28 clinical samples including both positive and negative samples with 100% sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV against the conventional methods. The Miod protocol including detection was completed in less than 6 hours while the conventional method involving cell culture followed by biochemical confirmatory tests demanded 72 hours or more (S1 Table). Hence, Miod has the potential for clinical use due to its low LOD, ability to detect viable cells and in a quicker turnaround time, a combination of significant factors that are not provided by other nucleic acid-based methods. The proposed system be used to detect other pathogens with modification of the primers and minimal modification of the lysis protocol. An offshoot application for the proposed system is the food industry where rapid, on-site testing is necessary to rapidly detect potential sources of contamination and infection. Miod shall be miniaturized into a hand-held form factor to adapt to requirements of resource-poor settings. As dehydrated polymerase and primers are stable at room temperature [39], Miod platform can be made into a field test device. Due to isothermal amplification, power requirements are minimal and shall be met with portable batteries.

Supporting information

S1 Fig.

Typical results observed in biochemical tests: (a) motility test, (b) TSI test, (c) citrate test, (d) urease test. Shown only for comparison between clinical samples (indicated by ‘+’) and control samples (indicated by ‘-‘).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.s001

(TIF)

S2 Fig. Calibration curve of cell concentration (CFU/mL) versus optical density for S. typhi bacteria.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.s002

(TIF)

S1 Table. Protocol of conventional method.

^^ indicates tests run in parallel to each other.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.s003

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Plating of different dilutions of S. typhi cells spiked in blood culture bottles.

20 μL volume of inoculum was used for the plating.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.s004

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Results from conventional and proposed Miod for 28 clinical samples.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0194817.s005

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Kumar S, Balakrishna K, Singh GP, Batra H V. Rapid detection of Salmonella typhi in foods by combination of immunomagnetic separation and polymerase chain reaction. World J Microbiol Biotechnol. 2005;21: 625–628.
  2. 2. Alba S, Bakker MI, Hatta M, Scheelbeek PFD, Dwiyanti R, Usman R, et al. Risk factors of typhoid infection in the Indonesian archipelago. PLoS One. 2016;11. pmid:27281311
  3. 3. WHO. Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals Typhoid. World Heal Organ. 2015; 1–2.
  4. 4. Dahiya S, Sharma P, Kumari B, Pandey S, Malik R, Manral N, et al. Characterisation of antimicrobial resistance in Salmonellae during 2014–2015 from four centres across India: An ICMR antimicrobial resistance surveillance network report. Indian J Med Microbiol. Medknow; 2017;35: 61. pmid:28303820
  5. 5. Dutta S, Das S, Mitra U, Jain P, Roy I, Ganguly SS, et al. Antimicrobial Resistance, Virulence Profiles and Molecular Subtypes of Salmonella enterica Serovars Typhi and Paratyphi A Blood Isolates from Kolkata, India during 2009–2013. PLoS One. 2014;9. pmid:25098613
  6. 6. Martiny D, Debaugnies F, Gateff D, Gérard M, Aoun M, Martin C, et al. Impact of rapid microbial identification directly from positive blood cultures using matrix-assisted laser desorption/ionization time-of-flight mass spectrometry on patient management. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2013;19: E568–E581. pmid:23890423
  7. 7. Paolucci M, Landini MP, Sambri V. Conventional and molecular techniques for the early diagnosis of bacteraemia. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2010;36: S6–S16. pmid:21129933
  8. 8. Mogasale V, Ramani E, Mogasale V V, Park J. What proportion of Salmonella Typhi cases are detected by blood culture? A systematic literature review. Ann Clin Microbiol Antimicrob. BioMed Central; 2016;15: 32. pmid:27188991
  9. 9. Darton TC, Zhou L, Blohmke CJ, Jones C, Waddington CS, Baker S, et al. Blood culture-PCR to optimise typhoid fever diagnosis after controlled human infection identifies frequent asymptomatic cases and evidence of primary bacteraemia. J Infect. 2017;74: 358–366. pmid:28130144
  10. 10. Bhutta Z. Current concepts in the diagnosis and treatment of typhoid fever. BMJ. 2006;333: 78–82. pmid:16825230
  11. 11. Parry CM, Wijedoru L, Arjyal A, Baker S. The utility of diagnostic tests for enteric fever in endemic locations. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2011;9: 711–725. pmid:21692675
  12. 12. Mancini N, Carletti S, Ghidoli N, Cichero P, Burioni R, Clementi M. The Era of Molecular and Other Non-Culture-Based Methods in Diagnosis of Sepsis. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2010;23: 235–251. pmid:20065332
  13. 13. Singh J, Sharma S, Nara S. Nanogold based lateral flow assay for the detection of Salmonella typhi in environmental water samples. Anal Methods. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015;7: 9281–9288.
  14. 14. Ranjbar R, Mortazavi SM, Mehrabi Tavana A, Sarshar M, Najafi A, Soruri Zanjani R. Simultaneous Molecular Detection of Salmonella enterica Serovars Typhi, Enteritidis, Infantis, and Typhimurium. Iran J Public Health. Iran; 2017;46: 103–111. pmid:28451535
  15. 15. Maan S, Maan NS, Belaganahalli MN, Potgieter AC, Kumar V, Batra K, et al. Development and evaluation of real time RT-PCR assays for detection and typing of bluetongue virus. PLoS One. 2016;11. pmid:27661614
  16. 16. Phumkhachorn P, Rattanachaikunsopon P. Detection of viable Salmonella Typhi by reverse transcription-multiplex polymerase chain reaction. Emirates J Food Agric. 2017;29: 1.
  17. 17. Kivlehan F, Mavré F, Talini L, Limoges B, Marchal D. Real-time electrochemical monitoring of isothermal helicase-dependent amplification of nucleic acids. Analyst. 2011;136: 3635–3642. pmid:21792448
  18. 18. Kim J, Easley CJ. Isothermal DNA amplification in bioanalysis: strategies and applications. Bioanalysis. 2011;3: 227–39. pmid:21250850
  19. 19. Perera RS, Ding XC, Tully F, Oliver J, Bright N, Bell D, et al. Development and clinical performance of high throughput loop-mediated isothermal amplification for detection of malaria. PLoS One. 2017;12. pmid:28166235
  20. 20. Kokkinos PA, Ziros PG, Bellou M, Vantarakis A. Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) for the Detection of Salmonella in Food. Food Analytical Methods. 2014. pp. 512–526.
  21. 21. Toley BJ, Covelli I, Belousov Y, Ramachandran S, Kline E, Scarr N, et al. Isothermal strand displacement amplification (iSDA): a rapid and sensitive method of nucleic acid amplification for point-of-care diagnosis. Analyst. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015;140: 7540–7549. pmid:26393240
  22. 22. Da Silva FRC, Cibulski SP, Daudt C, Weber MN, Guimarães LLB, Streck AF, et al. Novel bovine papillomavirus type discovered by rolling-circle amplification coupled with next-generation sequencing. PLoS One. 2016;11. pmid:27606703
  23. 23. Wang J, Liu L, Wang J, Sun X, Yuan W. Recombinase polymerase amplification assay-a simple, fast and cost-effective alternative to real time PCR for specific detection of feline herpesvirus-1. PLoS One. 2017;12. pmid:28045956
  24. 24. Yan L, Zhou J, Zheng Y, Gamson AS, Roembke BT, Nakayama S, et al. Isothermal amplified detection of DNA and RNA. Mol Biosyst. 2014;10: 970. pmid:24643211
  25. 25. Notomi T, Mori Y, Tomita N, Kanda H. Loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP): principle, features, and future prospects. Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea). 2015. pp. 1–5. pmid:25557475
  26. 26. Ravan H, Yazdanparast R. Loop region-specific oligonucleotide probes for loop-mediated isothermal amplification-enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay truly minimize the instrument needed for detection process. Anal Biochem. Elsevier Inc.; 2013;439: 102–108. pmid:23624347
  27. 27. Bozorgmehr A, Yazdanparast R, Hamidreza M. Non-crosslinking gold nanoprobe-LAMP for simple, colorimetric, and specific detection of Salmonella typhi. J Nanoparticle Res. 2016; 351.
  28. 28. Abdullah J, Saffie N, Sjasri FAR, Husin A, Abdul-Rahman Z, Ismail A, et al. Rapid detection of Salmonella Typhi by loop-mediated isothermal amplification (LAMP) method. Brazilian J Microbiol. 2014;45: 1385–1391.
  29. 29. Singh S, Upadhyay M, Sharma J, Gupta S, Vivekanandan P, Elangovan R. A portable immunomagnetic cell capture system to accelerate culture diagnosis of bacterial infections. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2016; 3358–3366. pmid:27118505
  30. 30. Cudjoe K. Immunomagnetic separation of Salmonella from foods and their detection using immunomagnetic particle (IMP)-ELISA. Int J Food Microbiol. 1995;27: 11–25. pmid:8527325
  31. 31. Liu Y, Che Y, Li Y. Rapid detection of Salmonella typhimurium using immunomagnetic separation and immuno-optical sensing method. Sensors Actuators B Chem. 2001;72: 214–218.
  32. 32. Kang JH, Um E, Diaz A, Driscoll H, Rodas MJ, Domansky K, et al. Optimization of pathogen capture in flowing fluids with magnetic nanoparticles. Small. Wiley Online Library; 2015;11: 5657–5666. pmid:26389806
  33. 33. Hejazian M, Li W, Nguyen N-T. Lab on a chip for continuous-flow magnetic cell separation. Lab Chip. Royal Society of Chemistry; 2015;15: 959–970.
  34. 34. Nagamine K, Hase T, Notomi T. Accelerated reaction by loop-mediated isothermal amplification using loop primers. Mol Cell Probes. 2002;16: 223–229. pmid:12144774
  35. 35. Fan F, Du P, Kan B, Yan M. The development and evaluation of a loop-mediated isothermal amplification method for the rapid detection of Salmonella enterica serovar Typhi. PLoS One. 2015;10. pmid:25910059
  36. 36. Crichton PB. Enterobacteriaceae: Escherichia, Klebsiella, proteus and other genera. Mackie McCartney Pract Med Microbiol. Churchill Livingston, New York; 1996;14: 361–384.
  37. 37. DL K, PH G. Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 9th editio. Murray PR, Baron EJ, Jorgensen JH, Pfaller MA YR, editor. American Society for Microbiology Press; 2007.
  38. 38. Lee D, Kim EJ, Kilgore PE, Kim SA, Takahashi H, Ohnishi M, et al. Clinical Evaluation of a Loop-Mediated Isothermal Amplification (LAMP) Assay for Rapid Detection of Neisseria meningitidis in Cerebrospinal Fluid. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0122922. pmid:25853422
  39. 39. Carter C, Akrami K, Hall D, Smith D, Aronoff-Spencer E. Lyophilized visually readable loop-mediated isothermal reverse transcriptase nucleic acid amplification test for detection Ebola Zaire RNA. J Virol Methods. 2017;244: 32–38. pmid:28242293