Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Biofeedback effect of hybrid assistive limb in stroke rehabilitation: A proof of concept study using functional near infrared spectroscopy

  • Kazuya Saita,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

  • Takashi Morishita ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    tmorishita@fukuoka-u.ac.jp

    Affiliation Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan

  • Hisatomi Arima,

    Roles Formal analysis, Software

    Affiliation Department of Preventive Medicine and Public Health, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan

  • Koichi Hyakutake,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliations Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

  • Toshiyasu Ogata,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Department of Neurology, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan

  • Kenji Yagi,

    Roles Project administration, Resources, Validation

    Affiliation Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan

  • Etsuji Shiota,

    Roles Supervision

    Affiliation Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Fukuoka University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan

  • Tooru Inoue

    Roles Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Neurosurgery, Faculty of Medicine, Fukuoka University, Fukuoka, Japan

Biofeedback effect of hybrid assistive limb in stroke rehabilitation: A proof of concept study using functional near infrared spectroscopy

  • Kazuya Saita, 
  • Takashi Morishita, 
  • Hisatomi Arima, 
  • Koichi Hyakutake, 
  • Toshiyasu Ogata, 
  • Kenji Yagi, 
  • Etsuji Shiota, 
  • Tooru Inoue
PLOS
x

Abstract

Introduction

Robot-assisted rehabilitation has been increasingly drawing attention in the field of neurorehabilitation. The hybrid assistive limb (HAL) is an exoskeleton robot developed based on the “interactive biofeedback” theory, and several studies have shown its efficacy for patients with stroke. We aimed to investigate the mechanisms of the facilitative effect of neurorehabilitation using a single-joint HAL (HAL-SJ) and functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS).

Materials and methods

Subacute stroke patients admitted to our hospital were assessed in this study for HAL eligibility. We evaluated motor-related cortical activity using an fNIRS system at baseline and immediately after HAL-SJ treatment on the same day. Cortical activity was determined through the relative changes in the hemoglobin concentrations. For statistical analysis, we compared the number of flexion/extension movements before and immediately after HAL-SJ treatment using paired t-test. fNIRS used both the methods of statistical parametric mapping and random effect analysis.

Results

We finally included 10 patients (eight men, two women; mean age: 66.8 ± 12.0 years). The mean number of flexion/extension movements within 15 s increased significantly from 4.2 ± 3.1 to 5.3 ± 4.1 immediately after training. fNIRS showed increased cortical activation in the primary motor cortex of the ipsilesional hemisphere immediately after HAL-SJ treatment compared to the baseline condition.

Conclusions

This study is the first to support the concept of the biofeedback effect from the perspective of changes in cortical activity measured with an fNIRS system. The biofeedback effect of HAL immediately increased the task-related cortical activity, and this may address the functional recovery. Further studies are warranted to support our findings.

Introduction

Stroke is a debilitating, severe disorder potentially resulting in severe impairment, and it is an important issue for patients with stroke to improve the motor function of the paretic limbs to preserve their social activity and quality of life [1]. Previous study has shown that prognosis of motor function is determined within four to five weeks after stroke [1, 2]. Hence, it is important for therapists to provide an effective treatment from the early stage after stroke onset. Robotic therapy is considered to be able to generate high intensity training and its efficacy has been investigated in the field of neurorehabilitation [36].

Among various types of rehabilitation robots, the hybrid assistive limb (HAL; Cyberdyne Inc., Ibaraki, Japan) is a unique wearable exoskeleton robot developed based on the "interactive biofeedback" theory [7], and several studies have shown its efficacy for stroke patients with motor disability [812]. The movements of the HAL robot are triggered by the bioelectrical signal (BES) detected from the muscle. HAL supports the voluntary movements of the impaired limb, and generates the sensory feedback of the successful movements to the brain [13]. The brain is, therefore, activated by the sensory feedback, and the signal of the motor network is strengthened. Thus, the HAL treatment forms a closed-loop eliciting improvement of performance and potentially promotes neuroplasticity. In subacute stroke rehabilitation, it is desirable to perform effective treatment to promote neuroplasticity in the damaged brain, and in this context HAL-assisted treatment is considered an effective approach. However, no studies have investigated the interactive biofeedback effects of rehabilitation using HAL for patients with subacute stroke.

In functional neuroimaging studies for clinical rehabilitation, non-invasive modalities such as electroencephalography (EEG), magnetoencephalography (MEG), functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI), and functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) have been applied [1416]. Among these imaging modalities, fNIRS has advantage in that less physical restriction is required for the subjects compared with other modalities. Especially, the fNIRS system has been widely applied to rehabilitation studies in stroke patients [17, 18]. The fNIRS measures neuronal activities based on neurovascular coupling by detecting changes in oxygenated hemoglobin (HbO2) and deoxygenated hemoglobin (HHb) concentration in the target cerebral cortices [19]. This system enables the investigation of the trajectory of the chronological changes in the neural activities. We, therefore, aimed to evaluate the mechanisms of the facilitative effect of HAL-assisted rehabilitation using an fNIRS system.

Materials and methods

Study design

A total of consecutive 343 patients with subacute stroke admitted to our hospital were assessed in this study during the period between January 2016 and March 2017. We included patients between 20 and 80 years old (excluded, n = 72). We excluded patients with severe systemic conditions (n = 66), severe cognitive impairment and/or altered consciousness who were unable to follow instructions (n = 41), and severe pain in the affected limb (n = 5). In addition, we excluded patients who were neurologically intact (n = 97) or had mild disturbance (n = 19), and nine patients for miscellaneous reasons such as social issues. Finally, 10 patients were included in the study (Fig 1). As the baseline clinical evaluation, the mean National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS; range 0–42) score [20], Fugl-Meyer Assessment for upper extremities (FMA; range 0–66) score [21], Action Research Arm Test (ARAT; range 0–57) [22], and Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE; range 0–30) [23] were administered. Written informed consent was obtained from each patient, and this study was conducted with approval from the institutional review board of our institution (IRB) named Fukuoka University-Medical Ethics Review Board. Our IRB approved this study protocol.

Once vital signs were stabilized after two weeks from onset, we evaluated the motor-related cortical activity of these patients using an fNIRS system under two conditions: prior to and immediately after single-joint HAL (HAL-SJ) treatment on the same day. For the task of the experiment, we instructed patients to repeat elbow flexion and extension movements without HAL-SJ.

HAL-SJ

The HAL-SJ has a power unit, and two attachments for the forearm and upper arm. This robot is small enough to be wearable as the weight is only 1.5 kg, and the range of motion of the joint is 120°. BES detected from the biceps and triceps muscles triggers the movement of HAL-SJ. A light-emitting diode (LED) is internalized in the joint of the robot suit to give visual feedback to the patient and the therapist. The LED shows different colors depending on the movement (Fig 2). Assist-gain has different levels, from 0 (no assist) to 100, to assist joint movement, and a therapist may adjust the flexion/extension balance for each training level using the controller. The controller mounts a monitor showing the BES from flexor and extensor muscles.

thumbnail
Fig 2. Overview of HAL-SJ.

(A) HAL-SJ attached to upper limb. (B) The location of electrode detecting BES from the biceps and triceps muscles. (C) The controller showing the BES. Red and green waves on the monitor indicate flexor and extensor muscles, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361.g002

NIRS study

A continuous-wave NIRS system (FOIRE-3000, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) was used for this experiment. The infrared light wavelengths were 780, 805, and 830 nm, and the time resolution was 0.13 s. Similar to our previous studies [10, 24], we arranged the 48 channels with 32 optodes (16 emitters and 16 detectors) over the frontal and parietal areas. Based on the modified Beer-Lambert law, we acquired HbO2 and HHb levels by following changes in levels of cortical concentration. We used a block design for the experiment. Each cycle consisted of three periods of 15 seconds (rest–task–recovery), and the study subjects were instructed to repeat seven cycles.

Six right-handed healthy volunteers (two women and four men) were also enrolled to obtain control data to identify the location of the normal task-related cortical activation during the elbow flexion/extension movements. The mean age was 58.7±7.1. Regarding the fNIRS measurement, they carried out right elbow flexion/extension movements 15 times during 15 seconds in each task cycle, and they repeated seven task cycles as stroke subjects performed.

To visualize the fNIRS data as a t-statistical map, we used NIRS-SPM (KAIST, Daejeon, South Korea) [25], which is a MATLAB (Mathworks, Natick, MA)-based software package. With the information of non-invasive 3-D digitizer, we estimated the spatial position of the fNIRS channel locations on the Montreal Neurological Institute (MNI) coordinate system. The cerebral cortices were mapped on the basis of MNI brain coordinate and Brodmann areas (BA) (S1 Table).

Statistical analysis

First, we compared the number of flexion/extension movements before and immediately after HAL-SJ treatment to clinically evaluate its facilitative effect. We performed paired t-tests for comparisons and p < 0.05 was set as the statistical threshold in the analysis.

To prove the facilitative effect of HAL-assisted rehabilitation for stroke cases shown by fNIRS, we used both the methods of SPM and random effect analysis to determine which channel of the fNIRS system shows statistically significant changes in the activity of the areas of interest comparing the pre- versus post-treatment conditions. For the analysis we used the NIRS-SPM software as a mass-univariate approach based on the generalized linear model (GLM) to analyze the fNIRS data. We selected the Wavelet-MDL for detruding methods and modeled the hemodynamic response function. In the group analysis, the SPM t-statistic maps were superimposed on the standardized brain according to the MNI coordinate system. HbO2 and HHb levels were considered significant at an uncorrected threshold of p < 0.01.

To corroborate the NIRS-SPM findings, the amplitude of the change in HbO2 level between the rest and on-task periods at each channel was compared before and immediately after HAL-SJ treatment using hierarchical mixed models with fixed intervention (before or immediately after HAL-SJ), fixed period (rest or on-task), and random individual effects. To control the false discovery rate (FDR) in multi-channel testing, we used the Benjamin and Hochberg methods [26]. We controlled the FDR at q-value < 0.01.

We classified 10 cases into two groups based on the amount of changes in the HbO2 with the task performance at the baseline fNIRS measurement: group 1 (5 cases with small cortical activity changes (< median)) and group 2 (5 cases with large cortical activity changes (≥ median)). Differences in effects of HAL training between subgroups defined by baseline value were tested by adding interaction terms to the statistical models. We used the SAS software, version 9.4 (SAS institute Inc., Cary., NC) for these statistical analyses.

Results

We included 10 patients (two women and eight men; mean age: 66.8 ± 12.0 years). All study participants were right handed. Of the 10 patients, eight and two had ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke, respectively. Stroke lesions were detected in the left and right hemispheres in eight and two patients, respectively. All of eight ischemic stroke cases had an ischemic lesion in the corona radiata, and one of two hemorrhagic stroke patients had a lesion in the thalamus and the other had a lesion in the putamen. Representative brain images are presented for each case in Fig 3. HAL-SJ treatment was initiated a mean 23.9 ± 15.2 days from stroke onset. The mean NIHSS score was 5.0 ± 3.0. The mean FMA and ARAT scores were 36.9 ± 24.2 and 21.5 ± 24.7, respectively. The mean MMSE score was 26.3 ± 3.0. The mean numbers of flexion and extension movements within 15 s were 4.2 ± 3.1 to 5.3 ± 4.1 at baseline and immediately after training, respectively (p < 0.05, r = 0.65). These demographics are summarized in Table 1.

thumbnail
Fig 3. MRI/CT images presenting the stroke lesion of 10 study subjects.

Diffusion-weighted images and CT images are presented to demonstrate the stroke lesions of ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke cases, respectively.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361.g003

thumbnail
Table 1. Patient demographics.

ARAT = Action Research Arm Test, FMA = Fugl-Meyer Assessment, MMSE = Mini-Mental State Examination, NIHSS = National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361.t001

On the t-statistical map of the NIRS-SPM group analysis, the HbO2 level changes in the hand bump area of the ipsilesional primary motor cortex (M1) were not significant compared to those in other cortical areas prior to treatment; however, the same area showed significant increase of the activation level after treatment (uncorrected, p < 0.01) (Fig 4). However, the HHb level changes were not significant in either condition.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Results of group analysis for NIRS-SPM.

The averaged cortical activities from all patients are depicted on the above view of the standardized brain models. Cortical activity was increased immediately after training on the same day. The upper and lower represents the cortical activation in HbO2 and HHb level, respectively. Each performing status was also significantly improved compared to other regions (uncorrected, p < 0.01). Dotted lines indicate central sulcus (CS) on the normalized brain images.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361.g004

The NIRS-SPM group analysis of healthy volunteers showed that the cortical activity during the task was increased in the left sensorimotor cortex as shown by HbO2 data (uncorrected, p < 0.01), and this finding was similar to the status of post-HAL training in the study subjects.

The random effect analysis revealed that the amplitude of increase in the HbO2 levels was more pronounced immediately after HAL treatment especially in the motor areas of the lesioned hemisphere (S2 Table). Among all channels, the Ch17 (corresponding to the premotor cortex and M1 of ipsilesional hemisphere) was the most increased immediately after training compared to the baseline (ΔHbO2 (difference in change) = 0.0128, confidence interval (CI): 0.0117 to 0.0139, p < 0.0001). Fig 5 shows the changes in the amplitude of the HbO2 levels during the task at each channel.

thumbnail
Fig 5. Results of group analysis comparing pre-versus post-HAL treatment.

The cortical activity of change represents the comparing pre-and post-HAL treatments. For the left image, the numbers of NIRS channels were superimposed on the standardized brain according to the MNI coordinate system. For the right image, red and blue indicate increase and decrease in the HbO2 level, respectively (FDR corrected, p < 0.01). Gray indicates that the channels were not significantly changed following HAL-assisted rehabilitation. The mean number of flexion/extension movements within 15 seconds is indicated as a graph on the right of the figure. Motor performance was statistically significantly improved compared to the baseline status. * p-value was set 0.05.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361.g005

A sub-analysis concerning four regions of interest (channels 13, 16, 17, and 20 located over hand/arm area of the ipsilesional M1) showed there are significant differences between group 1 and group 2 (Table 2). This result implicates that cases with larger increase in HbO2 levels at baseline with motor tasks are likely to respond to HAL-assisted rehabilitation.

thumbnail
Table 2. Comparison between Group 1 (smaller changes) and Group 2 (larger changes) based on the amount of changes in the HbO2 during task performance at the baseline fNIRS evaluation CI = Confidence Interval.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361.t002

Discussion

Our study possibly demonstrated that HAL-assisted rehabilitation immediately induced task-related neuroplasticity for upper limb motor function in patients with stroke. In addition, the two different statistical approaches in this study both showed more activation of the motor cortex in the lesioned hemisphere. The present fNIRS finding may implicate that HAL treatment enhanced cortical activity in the ipsilesional M1 in response to significant improvement of performance status in patients with subacute stroke. Our previous study of the acute stroke cases suggested that the HAL-SJ might have accelerated the functional recovery compared with conventional rehabilitation [9], and the present study may indicate the possible mechanism.

A recent study addressed the importance of motor skill learning by subsequent practice and acquisition of new motor skills in the ipsilesional M1 [27]. Several studies have shown the efficacy of neurorehabilitation programs addressing use-dependent neuroplasticity, such as constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) and robot rehabilitation [2831]. Repetitive training eliciting voluntary movement has been considered to produce more effective functional recovery than passive exercise training [32]. In this context, HAL-assisted treatment may facilitate neuroplasticity associated with motor skill learning in patients with stroke in the early stage.

Concerning the mechanisms of HAL treatment, the robot assists the voluntary movements generating a strong proprioceptive sensation, which is sent back to the brain to generate stronger motor output signals [7]. In this process, we speculate that the sensory signals pass through the thalamus to the fronto-parietal networks, involving the primary sensory cortex, and the network connections are strengthened to exert a robust signal from the motor cortex down to the muscle. We also consider that the basal ganglia and the cerebellar circuits play a crucial role in the process of motor skill learning using HAL. Here, we propose a brain network model potentially activated by the biofeedback effect of HAL rehabilitation (Fig 6). Therapists and clinicians, however, should be aware that HAL therapy requires BES. As previous studies have shown that functional recovery was correlated to corticospinal tract (CST) integrity [28, 33], the clinical effect of HAL therapy may depend on CST integrity. This point should be addressed by future studies.

There are several important limitations in this study. It included a small sample size and there was no control. As we did not include a follow-up, this study does not demonstrate the efficacy of HAL treatment for stroke survivors. It should be mentioned that the evaluation timings ranged from 14 to 65 days from the stroke onset, and this issue may have affected the results as previous fMRI studies showed that the amount of the ipsilesional cortical activity is reportedly different between acute and chronic stages [34]. Additionally, even though results of this study positively support the biofeedback effect of the HAL, we are unable to exclude the influence of the learning by repetition as the control subjects were not evaluated in this study. Furthermore, as a limitation of the imaging analysis, fNIRS is unable to measure the activities of deep brain areas, such as the cerebellum and basal ganglia. Although the HAL is a well-manufactured robot, it is still in development, and the potential of HAL-assisted rehabilitation depends on robot engineering technology. Our study showed the current status of HAL-assisted rehabilitation, and we consider the future development of the robot will address the remaining issues.

Conclusions

This study is the first to support the concept of the interactive biofeedback effect from the perspective of changes in cortical activity measured with an fNIRS system. The biofeedback effect of HAL immediately increased the task-related cortical activity, and this may address the functional recovery. Further studies are warranted to corroborate our findings.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Cortical mapping based on the MNI coordination and brodmann area.

DLPFC: Dorsal lateral prefrontal cortex, VLPFC: Ventral lateral prefrontal cortex, M1: primary motor cortex, PMC: premotor cortex, PPC: posterior parietal cortex, S1: primary somatosensory cortex, SM1: primary sensorimotor cortex, SMA: supplemental motor area.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361.s001

(DOCX)

S2 Table. HbO2 level for fNIRS.

Values are mean (95% confidence interval).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0191361.s002

(DOCX)

References

  1. 1. Winstein CJ, Stein J, Arena R, Bates B, Cherney LR, Cramer SC, et al. Guidelines for adult stroke rehabilitation and recovery: A guideline for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke. 2016;47(6):e98–e169. pmid:27145936.
  2. 2. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, van der Grond J, Prevo AJ. Probability of regaining dexterity in the flaccid upper limb: impact of severity of paresis and time since onset in acute stroke. Stroke. 2003;34(9):2181–6. pmid:12907818.
  3. 3. Basteris A, Nijenhuis SM, Stienen AH, Buurke JH, Prange GB, Amirabdollahian F. Training modalities in robot-mediated upper limb rehabilitation in stroke: a framework for classification based on a systematic review. J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2014;11:111. pmid:25012864; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4108977.
  4. 4. Kwakkel G, Kollen BJ, Krebs HI. Effects of robot-assisted therapy on upper limb recovery after stroke: a systematic review. Neurorehabil Neural Repair. 2008;22(2):111–21. pmid:17876068; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2730506.
  5. 5. Lo AC, Guarino PD, Richards LG, Haselkorn JK, Wittenberg GF, Federman DG, et al. Robot-assisted therapy for long-term upper-limb impairment after stroke. N Engl J Med. 2010;362(19):1772–83. pmid:20400552.
  6. 6. Takahashi K, Domen K, Sakamoto T, Toshima M, Otaka Y, Seto M, et al. Efficacy of upper extremity robotic therapy in subacute poststroke hemiplegia: an exploratory randomized trial. Stroke. 2016;47(5):1385–8. pmid:27006452.
  7. 7. Morishita T, Inoue T. Interactive bio-feedback therapy using hybrid assistive limbs for motor recovery after stroke: Current Practice and Future Perspectives. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2016. pmid:27616320.
  8. 8. Wall A, Borg J, Palmcrantz S. Clinical application of the Hybrid Assistive Limb (HAL) for gait training-a systematic review. Front Syst Neurosci. 2015;9:48. pmid:25859191; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4373251.
  9. 9. Fukuda H, Morishita T, Ogata T, Saita K, Hyakutake K, Watanabe J, et al. Tailor-made rehabilitation approach using multiple types of hybrid assistive limb robots for acute stroke patients: A pilot study. Assist Technol. 2016;28(1):53–6. pmid:26478988.
  10. 10. Saita K, Morishita T, Hyakutake K, Fukuda H, Shiota E, Sankai Y, et al. Combined therapy using botulinum toxin A and single-joint hybrid assistive limb for upper-limb disability due to spastic hemiplegia. J Neurol Sci. 2017;373:182–7. pmid:28131185.
  11. 11. Ueba T, Hamada O, Ogata T, Inoue T, Shiota E, Sankai Y. Feasibility and safety of acute phase rehabilitation after stroke using the hybrid assistive limb robot suit. Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo). 2013;53(5):287–90. pmid:23708218.
  12. 12. Watanabe H, Tanaka N, Inuta T, Saitou H, Yanagi H. Locomotion improvement using a hybrid assistive limb in recovery phase stroke patients: a randomized controlled pilot study. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2014;95(11):2006–12. pmid:25010538.
  13. 13. Kawamoto H, Taal S, Niniss H, Hayashi T, Kamibayashi K, Eguchi K, et al. Voluntary motion support control of Robot Suit HAL triggered by bioelectrical signal for hemiplegia. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc. 2010;2010:462–6. pmid:21095652.
  14. 14. Sitaram R, Ros T, Stoeckel L, Haller S, Scharnowski F, Lewis-Peacock J, et al. Closed-loop brain training: the science of neurofeedback. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2017;18(2):86–100. pmid:28003656.
  15. 15. Obrig H. NIRS in clinical neurology—a 'promising' tool? Neuroimage. 2014;85 Pt 1:535–46. pmid:23558099.
  16. 16. Leff DR, Orihuela-Espina F, Elwell CE, Athanasiou T, Delpy DT, Darzi AW, et al. Assessment of the cerebral cortex during motor task behaviours in adults: a systematic review of functional near infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) studies. Neuroimage. 2011;54(4):2922–36. pmid:21029781.
  17. 17. Mihara M, Miyai I, Hattori N, Hatakenaka M, Yagura H, Kawano T, et al. Neurofeedback using real-time near-infrared spectroscopy enhances motor imagery related cortical activation. PLoS One. 2012;7(3):e32234. pmid:22396753; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3292558.
  18. 18. Fujimoto H, Mihara M, Hattori N, Hatakenaka M, Kawano T, Yagura H, et al. Cortical changes underlying balance recovery in patients with hemiplegic stroke. Neuroimage. 2014;85 Pt 1:547–54. pmid:23684871.
  19. 19. Tak S, Jang J, Lee K, Ye JC. Quantification of CMRO(2) without hypercapnia using simultaneous near-infrared spectroscopy and fMRI measurements. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55(11):3249–69. pmid:20479515.
  20. 20. Lyden P, Brott T, Tilley B, Welch KM, Mascha EJ, Levine S, et al. Improved reliability of the NIH Stroke Scale using video training. NINDS TPA Stroke Study Group. Stroke. 1994;25(11):2220–6. pmid:7974549.
  21. 21. Fugl-Meyer AR, Jaasko L, Leyman I, Olsson S, Steglind S. The post-stroke hemiplegic patient. 1. a method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med. 1975;7(1):13–31. pmid:1135616.
  22. 22. Lyle RC. A performance test for assessment of upper limb function in physical rehabilitation treatment and research. Int J Rehab Research. 1981;4(4):483–92. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC7333761.
  23. 23. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR. Mini-mental state: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res. 1975;12(3):189–98. PubMed Central PMCID: PMC1202204. pmid:1202204
  24. 24. Morishita T, Higuchi MA, Saita K, Tsuboi Y, Abe H, Inoue T. Changes in motor-related cortical activity following deep brain stimulation for parkinson's disease detected by functional near infrared spectroscopy: A Pilot Study. Front Hum Neurosci. 2016;10:629. pmid:28018196; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC5149535.
  25. 25. Ye JC, Tak S, Jang KE, Jung J, Jang J. NIRS-SPM: statistical parametric mapping for near-infrared spectroscopy. Neuroimage. 2009;44(2):428–47. pmid:18848897.
  26. 26. Benjamini YH, Y. Controlling the false discovery rate: a practical and powerful approach to multiple testing. J Roy Statist Soc Ser1995. p. 289–300.
  27. 27. Calautti C, Baron JC. Functional neuroimaging studies of motor recovery after stroke in adults: a review. Stroke. 2003;34(6):1553–66. pmid:12738893.
  28. 28. Wahl AS, Schwab ME. Finding an optimal rehabilitation paradigm after stroke: enhancing fiber growth and training of the brain at the right moment. Front Hum Neurosci. 2014;8:381. pmid:25018717; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4072965.
  29. 29. Taub E, Uswatte G, Elbert T. New treatments in neurorehabilitation founded on basic research. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2002;3(3):228–36. pmid:11994754.
  30. 30. Wolf SL, Winstein CJ, Miller JP, Thompson PA, Taub E, Uswatte G, et al. Retention of upper limb function in stroke survivors who have received constraint-induced movement therapy: the EXCITE randomised trial. Lancet Neurol. 2008;7(1):33–40. pmid:18077218; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC2329576.
  31. 31. Takebayashi T, Amano S, Hanada K, Umeji A, Takahashi K, Marumoto K, et al. A one-year follow-up after modified constraint-induced movement therapy for chronic stroke patients with paretic arm: a prospective case series study. Top Stroke Rehabil. 2015;22(1):18–25. pmid:25776117.
  32. 32. Lotze M, Braun C, Birbaumer N, Anders S, Cohen LG. Motor learning elicited by voluntary drive. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 4):866–72. pmid:12615644.
  33. 33. Stinear CM, Barber PA, Smale PR, Coxon JP, Fleming MK, Byblow WD. Functional potential in chronic stroke patients depends on corticospinal tract integrity. Brain. 2007;130(Pt 1):170–80. pmid:17148468.
  34. 34. Ward NS, Brown MM, Thompson AJ, Frackowiak RS. Neural correlates of motor recovery after stroke: a longitudinal fMRI study. Brain. 2003;126(Pt 11):2476–96. pmid:12937084; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC3717457.