Conditional ablation of the RFX4 isoform 1 transcription factor: Allele dosage effects on brain phenotype

Ping Xu; James P. Morrison; Julie F. Foley; Deborah J. Stumpo; Toni Ward; Darryl C. Zeldin; Perry J. Blackshear

doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0190561

Abstract

Regulatory factor X4 (RFX4) isoform 1 is a recently discovered isoform of the winged helix transcription factor RFX4, which can bind to X-box consensus sequences that are enriched in the promoters of cilia-related genes. Early insertional mutagenesis studies in mice first identified this isoform, and demonstrated that it was crucial for mouse brain development. RFX4 isoform 1 is the only RFX4 isoform significantly expressed in the mouse fetal and adult brain. In this study, we evaluated conditional knock-out (KO) mice in which one or two floxed alleles of Rfx4 were deleted early in development through the use of a Sox2-Cre transgene. Heterozygous deletion of Rfx4 resulted in severe, non-communicating congenital hydrocephalus associated with hypoplasia of the subcommissural organ. Homozygous deletion of Rfx4 resulted in formation of a single ventricle in the forebrain, and severe dorsoventral patterning defects in the telencephalon and midbrain at embryonic day 12.5, a collection of phenotypes that resembled human holoprosencephaly. No anatomical abnormalities were noted outside the brain in either case. At the molecular level, transcripts encoded by the cilia-related gene Foxj1 were significantly decreased, and Foxj1 was identified as a direct gene target of RFX4 isoform 1. The phenotypes were similar to those observed in the previous Rfx4 insertional mutagenesis studies. Thus, we provide a novel conditional KO animal model in which to investigate the downstream genes directly and/or indirectly regulated by RFX4 isoform 1. This model could provide new insights into the pathogenesis of obstructive hydrocephalus and holoprosencephaly in humans, both relatively common and disabling birth defects.

Citation: Xu P, Morrison JP, Foley JF, Stumpo DJ, Ward T, Zeldin DC, et al. (2018) Conditional ablation of the RFX4 isoform 1 transcription factor: Allele dosage effects on brain phenotype. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0190561. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190561

Editor: Bruce B. Riley, Texas A&M University, UNITED STATES

Received: October 12, 2017; Accepted: November 21, 2017; Published: January 3, 2018

This is an open access article, free of all copyright, and may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. The work is made available under the Creative Commons CC0 public domain dedication.

Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper.

Funding: This study was supported by theIntramural Research Program of the NIH, National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. We acknowledge that the author James P. Morrison is employed by Charles River Laboratories. Charles River Laboratories provided support in the form of salary for author JPM, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific role of this author is articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.

Competing interests: James P. Morrison is employed by Charles River Laboratories. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter our adherence to all the PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Introduction

Hydrocephalus, excessive accumulation of fluid in the brain, is a common birth defect, with the prevalence of congenital hydrocephalus in the United States and Europe between 0.5 and 0.8 per 1000 births [1]. Hydrocephalus may result from inherited genetic abnormalities or developmental disorders such as folic acid deficiency. To date, only four gene mutations have been identified in patients with severe congenital hydrocephalus, mapping to MPDZ [2], L1CAM [3], AP1S2 [4], and CCDC88C [5]. More than a hundred genes have been implicated in different models of rodent hydrocephalus [6]; however, the genetic causes of hydrocephalus are far from understood in either mice or humans.

Regulatory factor X (RFX) proteins are helix-turn-helix transcription factors, and are encoded by seven RFX genes (1–7) in humans [7, 8]. Rfx genes have been found in many eukaryotic species, including yeast, fruit flies, mice and humans [7, 8]. Aberrations in Rfx3 and Rfx4 have been linked to hydrocephalus in mice [9, 10]. RFX family proteins share a conserved DNA binding domain, and bind to “X-box” consensus sequences in the promoter regions of target genes, an observation first noted in MHC class II gene promoters [11].

We first identified the transcript encoding what is now known as RFX4 isoform 1 in mice expressing a transgene encoding a cardiac-specific cytochrome P450 epoxygenase that developed hydrocephalus; we demonstrated that the transgene had disrupted the Rfx4 gene, leading to the absence of RFX4 isoform 1 expression [10]. In current nomenclature, mouse RFX4 isoform 1 (GenBank accession number NP_001020089) is encoded by Rfx4 transcript variant 1 (NM_001024918); this was referred to as RFX4 transcript variant 3 in our original publication [10]. Mouse RFX4 isoform 1 is orthologous to human RFX4 isoform c (NP_998759), and the two proteins are 97% identical. The transcript encoding RFX4 isoform 1 is the only Rfx4 gene product significantly expressed in the mouse brain, spinal cord, and eye (our unpublished data).

In our earlier study, heterozygous insertional mutant mice developed obstructive hydrocephalus with severe hypoplasia of the subcommissural organ (SCO), whereas homozygous insertional mutant mice exhibited more severe brain malformations [10] and death in the early perinatal period. To begin to address the contributions of Rfx4 in specific cell types, we generated mice with a floxed Rfx4 allele that removed the DNA binding domain encoded by exon 4. In these initial experiments, we bred these mice to Sox2-Cre mice, so that Cre-recombinase would be expressed in epiblast cells after embryonic day (E) 6.5, effectively driving Cre-recombinase activity in the whole organism during development [12]. We found that mice heterozygous for this Rfx4 deletion developed congenital hydrocephalus, whereas the mice with the homozygous deletion in E12.5 embryos exhibited a condition that resembles human holoprosencephaly, a disease in which the forebrain of the embryo fails to develop into two hemispheres. Our data suggest that this may be due, at least in part, to the dysregulation of RFX4 isoform 1-regulated expression of the cilia-related gene Foxj1.

Methods

Generation of floxed Rfx4 mice and breeding with Sox2-Cre mice

Heterozygous mice with a floxed Rfx4 allele were generated by gene targeting in C57BL/6 embryonic stem (ES) cells. Since it contains the DNA binding domain, exon 4 (0.9 kb) of Rfx4 (bases 615–738 of GenBank accession number NM_001024918) was chosen for the floxed KO region, and was flanked by loxP sites; the vector included a 2.2 kb 5’ homology arm and a 5.0 kb 3’ homology arm. For positive ES cell selection, the Neo expression cassette flanked by FRT sequences (for the subsequent removal of the Neo cassette) (Fig 1A), and a diptheria toxin-A gene fragment (DTA) expression cassette (for negative selection of the ES cells), were cloned into LoxFtNwCD vectors. Flp sites were removed before injection into blastocysts. Heterozygous mice were obtained by breeding the chimeras with C57BL/6Tac wild type (WT) females. The mice were generated by Caliper Discovery Alliances & Services Company (Hanover, MD). Sox2-Cre mice on a C57BL/6 background were purchased from Jackson Laboratory (Stock 008454, Bar Harbor, Maine), and Rfx4^flox/flox mice were bred with the Sox2- cre mice. Rfx4^+/- mice were generated when Cre recombinase was transmitted [13]. In these mice, Cre- recombinase driven by the Sox2 promoter should be expressed in embryonic tissues but not in extraembryonic tissues [12, 14].

Animals were genotyped at 3–4 weeks of age by performing PCR on genomic DNA prepared from tail biopsies. The genotyping primers were targeted to the flanking site as GO1F sequence 5'- AGTATTTTGTTCCCCTTTCT-3’ and GO1R sequence 5'-TTATAACGGTGTGAGGGTT-3'. Cre- recombinase primers were used as follows: Cre1 forward 5'- GGACATGTTCAGGGATCGCCAGGCG-3' and reverse 5'- GCATAACCAGTGAAACAGCATTGCTG-3'.

Download:

Fig 1. Conditional knockout and genotyping strategies.

(A) Schematic version of the strategy used for the generation of the floxed Rfx4 KO mice. In the WT allele, exon 4 was chosen for deletion. In the floxed allele, two loxP sites flanked exon 4, and a neomycin (neo) cassette with two Frt sites was inserted. Cre recombinase causes deletion of exon 4. “G1F”, on the 5’ arm, and “G1R”, on the 3’ arm, are genotyping PCR primers which produce WT, flox or KO bands. (B) Genotyping PCR: Lane +/- refers to a Rfx4^+/- mouse, and the two bands were from floxed and KO alleles from a KO mouse; lane f/+ refers to a control mouse, and the two bands were from floxed and WT alleles from a Rfx4^f/+mouse. (C) RT-PCR demonstrated a lower band in Rfx4^+/- brain and spinal cord, representing the transcript produced by the KO allele. (D) As determined by qPCR, Rfx4 mRNA levels were decreased by approximately 50% (P< 0.01, n = 4) in the brains of Rfx4^+/- mice, as determined by fold changes after normalizing with Gapdh mRNA. (E) Image of the domed head of a mouse at 4 weeks of age (left) that was heterozygous for the Rfx4 KO.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190561.g001

Creation of homozygous Rfx4 KO Mice

To generate Rfx4 KO embryos, male heterozygous mice (flox/wt (+) Cre positive (+)) were bred to flox/+ or +/- mice to generate homozygous floxed mice (flox/flox) that were Cre-positive or Cre-negative (controls). Pregnant females were euthanized with CO2 prior to embryo removal at specified times during gestation, and embryos were harvested. All studies were approved by the NIEHS Animal Care and Use Committee.

Perfusion and fixation of the adult brains, histology, and immunostaining

For collection of brains from adult mice, age-matched KO and control mice were perfused under anesthesia using 50 mg/kg sodium pentobarbital. Briefly, a needle was inserted into the left ventricle, and the right atrium was cut to provide drainage. A steady flow of approximately 20 ml/min of 0.9% saline solution with 10 U/ml heparin (Sigma H0777) was maintained until the perfusate was clear. The mice were then perfused with a 4% paraformaldehyde solution until fixation was achieved.

For routine histology, embryos and tissues from neonatal or adult mice were immersion fixed in 4% paraformaldehyde for 24–48 hours, depending on the tissue size. They were then embedded in paraffin, sectioned into 5–8 μm sections and stained with hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) by standard methods.

For immunostaining, sections were incubated in 3% H2O2 to inactivate endogenous peroxidases, followed by antigen retrieval with heat and pressure in citrate buffer (Biocare Medical, Concord, CA). Endogenous biotin was blocked with Avidin-Biotin blocking reagents (Vector Laboratories, Burlingame, CA). Sections were then incubated with Reissner's fiber [15] antibody (1:1000) [16] (a generous gift from Dr. E. M. Rodriguez, Instituto de Histologia Patologia, Universidad Austral de Chile, Valdivia, Chile). Consecutive sections (5 μm/section) from the whole brain were stained, and the length of SCO from anterior to posterior was considered to be five times the number of positive sections. Ki67 staining used anti-Ki67 antibody (1:500, ab16667, Abcam, Cambridge, United Kingdom) for 60 min, followed by peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin labeling (Biogenex Laboratories, San Ramon, CA) for 30 min. Immunolabeled antigen-antibody complexes were visualized using diaminobenzidine. The sections were lightly counterstained with hematoxylin before analysis. Cilia were stained with acetylated-alpha tubulin antibody (1:200, T7451, Sigma Aldrich, St. Louis, MO), followed by Alexa Fluor 594 anti-mouse antibody (1:1000, Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) incubation for 1 hour, counterstained with DAPI, and fluorescent images were taken with a Zeiss 710 microscope (Carl Zeiss AG, Oberkochen, Germany).

Total RNA extraction and quantitative real time PCR (qPCR)

Total brain RNA was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA), and was reverse- transcribed into first-strand cDNA using the SuperScript® III First-Strand Synthesis System (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) according to the manufacturer’s instructions. Real-time RT-PCR reactions used the SYBR master mix (Applied System, Foster City, CA), and the amplifications were performed as follows: 2 min at 50°C, 10 min at 95°C, then 40 cycles each at 95°C for 15 s and 60°C for 60 s in the ABI/Prism 7900 HT Sequence Detector System. The primer sets used are listed 5' to 3', with the forward primer listed first. Results were normalized to glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (Gapdh) mRNA as a reference control transcript, and calculated using the relative quantification method 2^ΔΔCq [17]. Primer sequences were:

RT, GATGTCTCAATGAAAGCGAG and CCCGAGTCTTCTGGTGG;

Rfx4 (flanking exon 4–5), TGTCAATGCTGCCAGCTTT and CCCGAGTCTTCTGGTGGTTA;

Gapdh, GCACAGTCAAGGCCGAGAAT and GCCTTCTCCATGGTGGTGAA;

Foxj1, GCTACTTCCGCCATGCAGAC and CTTCTCCCGAGGCACTTGA;

Rfx3, TCCGACCCAGTCTCTGATGT and AAGGCCACTTGGTCATTCTG;

Rfx2, CTCGGAATTCTGCATGCTC and TTACTTACCAACGGGGACCA;

Dync2li1, GGTGAGCCGGAATACAGAGAA and TGTTTGGTAGGATCTGGGACA;

Thbn, GAAGCAACAAGTGGTGTCAGT and ACAGTCTATGTAGAGTTGAGCCC.

Plasmids

The full-length mouse Rfx4_ isoform 1cDNA was amplified by PCR using the following primers: 5′- aaatttGGTACCAAGAGCATGCATTGTGGGTTACTG-3′ and 5′- aaattCTCGAGTCACTTGTCATCGTCGTCCTTGTAATCCTTAGCCCATCCAGTGGAGGCCTC-3′. PCR products were gel-purified, digested with Asp781 and XhoI (NEB, Ipswich, MA) and ligated into the vector CMV-Flag-BGH3’/BS+ cut with the same enzymes [18].

To clone the 5′-upstream region containing the putative X-box of the mouse Foxj1 gene, PCR was carried out with mouse genomic DNA using the forward primer 5′- ATCTGAGCTCAAGGGCACGGTTCCCCG -3′ (corresponding to bases 19821580–92 of GenBank accession number NT_078575.2) and the reverse primer 5′- TCAATAAGATCTGACGCTCGGAAGGCTTCTTCT -3′ (bases 19822565–77). The 5′-upstream region outside of the X-box fragment was amplified by using the forward primer 5′- AGTAATGAGCTCTGGGGAACTAGTCCTGTC-3’, and the reverse primer 5′- GAACCCCAAAGCTGATGGCAACTCGAGTATT-3’. All of the PCR products were digested with SacI and XhoI, purified, and then cloned into the pGL4.23 promoter vector (Promega, Madison, WI). All constructs were confirmed by sequencing.

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

ChIP experiments were performed using the ChIP Assay Kit (Millipore, Billerica, Massachusetts, USA) according to the manufacturer's instructions. Adult brains were cut into pieces and fixed in 1% formaldehyde, and DNA was isolated and sheared into 500–1000 bp fragments using a Bioruptor TM sonicator (Diagenode, NY, USA). Sheared chromatin was pre-cleared with protein G beads (sc-2027, Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas), and 10 μl of supernatant was saved as ‘input DNA’. Half of the remaining supernatant was incubated with 2 μg rabbit serum IgG (sc-2027, Santa Cruz, Dallas, Texas) at 4°C overnight, and another half of the supernatant was incubated with 2 μg of anti-RFX4 polyclonal antibody (Aviva Systems Biology, San Diego, CA). The chromatin-antibody mixture was then incubated with protein G beads for 1 hour at 4°C. After the reverse cross-linking step, immunoprecipitated DNA was treated with RNase A and proteinase K and eluted from the beads, then purified from the mini-columns. The eluted DNA was amplified with the primers for the Foxj1 promoter: X-box2, 5’-TGAGGGCAAAGACTTCAAGG-3’ and 5’-GATCCGACTCTGTGCATTCC-3’; X-box3, 5’-AGAGAGTTGCCGCCAGAGG-3’ and 5’-AGACGCTCGGAAGGCTTCTT-3’.

Transient transfection and luciferase reporter assays

The mouse neuroblastoma/rat glioma hybrid cell line NG108-15 (American Type Culture Collection, Manassas, VA, USA) was maintained in Dulbecco's modified Eagle's medium supplemented with 10% (v/v) fetal bovine serum and 100 units/ml penicillin/streptomycin. For reporter assays, cells were grown in 24-well plates to 60% confluence, and then transiently co-transfected with the Rfx4 cDNA expression vector or the control vector (0.1 μg), along with a luciferase reporter containing the Foxj1 promoter that included putative X-box sequences in the pGL4.23 vector (0.3 μg), using Lipofectimine 2000 reagent (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA) for transfection. Plasmid pRL-CMV40 (5 ng) was also co-transfected to normalize transfection efficiency. Transfection assays were performed in duplicate. Eighteen hours after transfection, the cells were washed once with phosphate-buffered saline, and lysed in Passive Lysis Buffer (provided by the Dual-Luciferase Reporter Assay Systems (Promega, Madison, WI). Luciferase activities in the lysates were measured by the TECAN infinite 2000 (Tecan, Männedorf, Switzerland), according to the manufacturer's protocol.

Statistical analysis

All the statistical analyses were performed using GraphPad Prism 6.02 (GraphPad Software, San Diego California). All data are expressed as mean +/- SEM; a p-value <0.05 was considered statistically significant. * p<0.05, ** p<0.01, *** p<0.001, **** p<0.0001.

Results

Generation of Rfx4 KO mice

For this study, we chose exon 4 of Rfx4, encoding the DNA binding domain of the RFX4 isoform 1 protein, to be floxed (Fig 1A). This contrasts with our previous model, which involved a random insertion that interrupted the intron between exon 17 and 18 of Rfx4 [10]. In the current study, heterozygous and homozygous floxed Rfx4 mice were healthy and fertile. The genotypes of the mice were determined by PCR, using primers that flanked the Rfx4 exon 4 sequences. The largest band of 1420 bp (Fig 1B) can be attributed to the floxed allele, the middle band of 1380 bp to the WT allele, and the lowest band of approximately 300 bp to the KO allele. A separate 300 bp PCR band was used as a positive control for the Cre-recombinase genotype, using a generic Cre primer pair (Fig 1B).

In order to confirm that the Cre-recombinase produced the desired deletion in transcripts expressed in the brain, primers flanking exons 2 to 5, as reflected in the Rfx4 mRNA, were used to detect transcript differences between the WT and KO alleles. A 178 bp band was detected by RT-PCR only in the Rfx4^+/- mice, in contrast to the 302 bp band from the control mice (Fig 1C). Moreover, the levels of mutant transcripts in the brain of Rfx4^+/- mice were decreased by approximately 50% when compared to the control mice, as quantified by qPCR (p<0.01) (Fig 1D). Sequencing the gel-extracted PCR band from the heterozygous mice revealed the complete deletion of exon 4 sequences.

Hydrocephalus, dysplasia of the SCO and patchy motile cilia in Rfx4^+/- mice

Within the first 8 weeks of life, almost half of the heterozygous mice (83 of 186) developed domed heads, an external sign of hydrocephalus (Fig 1E). This appeared as early as 3 weeks of age. By 4 weeks, 24% of mice had developed domed heads, an additional 19% occurred by 8 weeks, and only 3 additional mice developed domed heads after 8 weeks. There was no difference in the incidence of hydrocephalus occurrence between the males and females. When hydrocephalus was present in mice at 4 weeks of age, enlarged lateral and third ventricles were present, along with large ‘false’ ventricles in the cerebral hemispheres between the caudate, putamen and the cerebral cortex, as shown in H&E stained sections (Fig 2A). Small bundles of stretched white matter often spanned the false ventricles, and there was considerable atrophy of the cerebral cortex and compression of the brainstem. The ependyma was partially absent over a large portion of the ventricular surface. The mesencephalic aqueduct and fourth ventricle appeared normal. This phenotype resembled, but was less severe than, that of heterozygous mice in the Rfx4-insertional mutagenesis model [10], in which there was a 100% frequency of congenital hydrocephalus that was also characterized by enlarged olfactory ventricles, not seen in the current floxed KO model.

Download:

Fig 2. Characterization of Rfx4^+/- mice with hydrocephalus.

(A) H&E staining. The left panels are representative slides from a control mouse at 4 weeks of age (Rfx^f/+), and the right panels were from a Rfx4^+/- mouse, with roughly equivalent sections shown descending from rostral to caudal. The sections demonstrate the enlarged lateral and third ventricles, as indicated by the arrows, but not fourth ventricle enlargement, in the Rfx4^+/- mouse (representative of 6 Rfx4^{^+/-} mice and 4 controls). The middle right panel shows the emergence of false ventricles, and the white matter appeared to be compressed from the severe hydrocephalus. Scale bar = 20 μm. (B) SCO hypoplasia in Rfx4^+/- mice. The left panels of B showed the SCO stained with H&E, with a section from a control mouse (Rfx^f/+) on top, and from an Rfx4^+/- KO mouse on the bottom. Neighboring sections were stained with an antibody to Reissner’s fibers, and the resulting immunohistochemistry is shown on the right. Scale bar = 10 μm. (C) IHC quantitation. SCO length was measured by counting positively stained Reissner’s fibers slides from 3 controls and 3 Rfx4^+/- mice, using adjacent sections cut 5 μm apart. These measurements showed that SCO length in Rfx4^+/- KO mice was decreased when compared to controls (p<0.01). (D) Immunofluorescence staining. Acetylated alpha-tubulin labeled cilia (red fluorescence, blue is DAPI) were detached, patchy or missing from the walls of the ventricles in Rfx4^+/- mice (lower five panels). Scale bar = 5 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190561.g002

Two main types of hydrocephalus can be defined by the location of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) accumulation in the brain. Communicating hydrocephalus (non-obstructive hydrocephalus) is caused by inadequate absorption of CSF by the subarachnoid cisternae, whereas non-communicating hydrocephalus–also called "obstructive" hydrocephalus–occurs when the flow of CSF is blocked at the aqueduct, with CSF accumulating in the ventricles. Since no excess CSF was present in the subarachnoid spaces of these Rfx4^+/- mice, this represents a model of non-communicating hydrocephalus, as was true in the insertional mutation model.

The subcommissural organ (SCO), an ependymal gland located in the dorsocaudal region of the third ventricle at the entrance of the Sylvian aqueduct, a structure that secretes Reissner’s fibers, has been shown to be critical for the patency of the aqueduct [19], and malformations of the SCO can cause hydrocephalus in rodents [20]. In the developing SCO, Rfx4 transcripts are strongly expressed from E12.5 to birth [10]. Using an antibody specific to Reissner's fibers, we detected SCOs (Fig 2B) that were approximately 300 μm long on average (as seen in coronal serial sections) in the control mice, but they were only approximately 75 μm long on average in the Rfx4^+/- mice with hydrocephalus (Fig 2C) (P< 0.01, n = 3). Thus, the SCO was hypoplastic in the Rfx4^+/- adult mice with hydrocephalus. This lesion was also less severe than that seen in the Rfx4-insertional model, in which the SCO was barely detectable or undetectable. Interestingly, it has previously been observed that mutated Rfx3 hydrocephalic mice also exhibited SCO agenesis, as well as ependymal cell differentiation defects [9].

The cerebral ventricles are lined by ependymal cells, a cell type that has motile cilia, thought to facilitate CSF circulation. We labeled these motile cilia with antibodies to acetylated-alpha tubulin (a marker for cilia) [21]. In the control mice, cilia were present in cells lining the lateral and third ventricles (Fig 2D, upper 3 images), but, in the Rfx4^+/- mice with hydrocephalus, cilia were apparently detached in some areas from the cells lining the walls of the ventricles, or they were patchy or missing in some areas (Fig 2D, lower 5 images). Neither the cilia length, nor their thickness (as measured by the stacking images), were different from those of the control mice (data not shown).

A dorsal-ventral patterning defect in homozygous Rfx4^-/- mice at E12.5 resembles that of human holoprosencephaly

The breeding of heterozygous Rfx4^+/- mice resulted in only two live homozygous Rfx4^-/- pups out of 38 born dead (5%), suggesting that homozygosity was largely embryonic lethal. At E16.5, there were two apparently viable homozygotes out of 36 embryos (5.5%), and three out of 25 apparently viable embryos at E14.5 (12%). These values are well below the expected frequency of 25%, suggesting that Rfx4^-/- embryos had difficulty surviving to E14.5 and beyond.

Our previous studies using the homozygous Rfx4 insertional mutation embryos showed that a single ventricle was present in the forebrain at E12.5 [10]. In the present experiments, the Rfx4^-/- embryos exhibited severe changes in the developing central nervous system. The following pathological description is based on an analysis of KO embryos at E12.5 days of age, and represents the most severe phenotypes observed, as well as the common phenotype. The volume of the vesicles was moderately decreased, as was the size of the entire developing brain (Fig 3A–3F, lower panel). This embryo exhibited extensive hypoplasia throughout the developing brain. From anterior to posterior, in the most severe embryos, there was no histologic evidence of the telencephalic vesicles (developing cerebral hemispheres) in any section (cerebral aplasia). In addition, dorsal structures were fused and lacked an obvious midline (Fig 3A and 3B), a defect that can be observed in the E14.5 sections (Fig 3H). In contrast, ventral structures were better separated (Fig 3C). This striking alteration represents a dorsoventral patterning defect. Normally, this process develops in such a way that the telencephalon becomes specified into dorsal (pallial) and ventral (subpallial) regions. These defects were similar to those seen in our previous insertional mutation model, as well as in the point mutation Rfx4 ^L298P model generated with ENU mutagenesis [22]. This forebrain defect partially mimics human holoprosencephaly, where there is incomplete separation of the anterior portion of the forebrain. It is more similar to semilobar holoprosencephaly, in which the left and right frontal and parietal lobes are fused and the interhemispheric fissure is only present posteriorly. The diencephalon was hypoplastic, but the cellular organization appeared fairly normal (Fig 3D). The developing cerebellum was markedly dysplastic, and contained numerous neuroepithelial rosettes and a lack of overall organization (Fig 3E), also shown by extensive staining with antibodies to the proliferation marker Ki67 (Fig 3G). These rosettes suggested hyperproliferative but underdeveloped cells compare to the littermate controls. Overall, Ki67 stained with less intensity in the mutant mice than the control (Fig 3G, lower right). The roof plate of the fourth ventricle was absent and the neuroepithelium was moderately dysplastic in the caudal brainstem (Fig 3F) and cranial spinal cord.

Download:

Fig 3. Rfx4^-/- embryos at E12.5 and E14.5 exhibit holoprosencephaly.

Note the complete absence of the developing cerebral hemispheres (CH) in the KO embryo seen in A-C. There was a striking decrease in size of all regions of the brain, but especially the developing midbrain in (D). In addition, the developing mesencephalic aqueduct was absent, and marked neuroepithelial dysplasia was present in the caudal brainstem in (E), characterized by generalized disorganized growth and numerous rosettes. The 4^th ventricle was nearly absent in the KO embryo seen in (E-F). Scale bar = 20 μm. (G) The neuroepithelial cells of embryos at E 12.5 were labeled with the Ki67 antibody; the KO embryos (lower right panels) showed less staining overall. However, rosettes representing underdeveloped sites were extensively stained. Scale bar = 10 μm. (H) In representative staining of the brain sections with H&E at E14.5, there was a single ventricle without cerebral hemispheres in the forebrain (lower left panels). LV, lateral ventricle; BG, basal ganglia; Mb, midbrain; Th, thalamus; MA, mesencephalic aqueduct; 3^rd V, 3^rd ventricle; 4^th V, 4^th ventricle; BS, brain stem. Scale bar = 10 μm.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190561.g003

Foxj1 is trans-activated by RFX4 isoform 1 in NG108-15 cells

In previous studies, Zhang et al showed that RFX4 isoform 1 could bind directly to the X-box of the human C-X3-C Motif Chemokine Ligand 1 (CX3CL1) gene promoter and stimulate its expression [23]. Using a yeast two-hybrid screening approach, nine potential RFX4 isoform 1 interacting partners were identified, including the G-protein pathway suppressor 2 (GPS2) [24]. In the point mutation Rfx4 ^L298P model, intra-flagellar protein 172 (Ift172) was identified as an RFX4-regulated gene by ChIP-seq sequencing [22]. In the current study, first we measured the expression of transcripts encoding several cilia-related genes by qPCR from control and Rfx4^-/- embryo brain extracts. We found that Foxj1 transcripts were decreased significantly by approximately 4-fold in the Rfx4^-/- embryos (p< 0.001) (Fig 4A), but dynein cytoplasmic 2 light intermediate chain 1 (Dync2li1), Ift172, and thrombospondin 1 (Thbs) mRNAs remained unchanged. As expected, Rfx4 transcripts were not detectable in the KO embryos (p<0.0001). We therefore attempted to test the direct binding of RFX4 isoform 1 to the Foxj1 promoter using a ChIP assay.

Download:

Fig 4. Foxj1 as a target gene for RFX4.

(A) qPCR. Foxj1 mRNA levels were decreased in E12.5 KO brains, whereas there were no significant differences in Ift172, Thbs, Dync2li1, Rfx2, Rfx3 mRNAs, and almost undetectable Rfx4 transcripts compared to the controls (P< 0.0001, n = 5). (B) ChIP Assay. Fragmented DNA from adult brain was enriched by RFX4 antibody in the Foxj1 promoter; the PCR bands shown were from flanking X-box1 and X-box2 primers (upper panel). In the Dync2li1 and Ift 172 promoter X-box regions, PCR bands were detected from samples immunoprecipitated with RFX4 antibodies (lower panel). Lane f/+: the PCR band was from control mouse DNA as a positive control; lane IgG: mouse IgG as a negative control; lane IP: RFX4 antibody was used to immunoprecipitate DNA. (C) Schematic diagram of the Foxj1 X-box constructs, each representing where the putative X box is located on the genomic region. There are two putative X-boxes in the Foxj1 proximal promoter region. The lowest illustrated construct contains no X-box and served as a negative control. (D) Luciferase reporter assay. The Dync2li1 X-box sequence cloned into the luciferase reporter vector was trans-activated to the greatest extent by Rfx4 cDNA overexpression in the cellular system (p< 0.0001), whereas there was relatively less trans-activation by X-boxes from Foxj1 and Ift172 promoters (p< 0.01). Fold changes were calculated by normalization to the expression of the pGL4.23 vector. The assay was carried out in triplicate, and the results were presented as fold change, with the values representing the means from three independent transfection experiments.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190561.g004

The consensus sequence for RFX protein binding to DNA is 5′-GTNRCC(0–3 N)RGYAAC-3′ (where N is any nucleotide, R is a purine, Y is a pyrimidine, and the two half sites GTNRCC and RGYAAC are separated by 0–3 base pairs) [25]. This so-called X-box has been used as a DNA binding site in searches for RFX (1–5) activated genes in several studies. In order to test whether Foxj1 was a direct target gene of RFX4 isoform 1, two pairs of primers were designed to produce two fragments of approximately 100 bp that spanned 2 putative X-box sequences in the Foxj1 promoter. These two PCR fragments were enriched by immunoprecipitation of DNA with the RFX4 isoform 1 protein from lysates of whole mouse brain (Fig 4B). In order to confirm this result, a cDNA that expressed RFX4 isoform 1 was co-transfected with a luciferase reporter construct that contained sequences corresponding to the above PCR fragments (Fig 4C). Transactivation was observed by RFX4 isoform 1 expression in the NG 108–15 neuroblastoma cell line, after normalizing with an empty cDNA vector co-transfected with the same luciferase reporter (Fig 4D). Vectors containing each of the two putative Foxj 1 X boxes were trans-activated by RFX4 (p< 0.01); however, a vector containing both X box sequences was not activated to a greater extent than the vectors containing single X box sequences (Fig 4D). Vector Foxj1N contained the promoter sequence without an X box, and served as a negative control; this exhibited minimal luciferase activity (Fig 4D).

We found that Dync2li1 and Ift172 gene promoter fragments were also enriched by the ChIP assay, and PCR fragments were amplified that contained the putative X-box sequences in their respective promoters (Fig 4B lower panel). The fragment containing the Dync2li1 X-box was trans-activated to a high level by RFX4 isoform 1 expression in the luciferase reporter system, (p< 0.0001) (Fig 4D), whereas relatively less trans-activation was seen with the Ift172 promoter sequence (p< 0.01) (Fig 4D). Interestingly, Foxj1 and Dync2li1 have been reported to be RFX3 target genes as well [26], and another study showed that RFX4 could form heterodimers with RFX2 and 3 [27]. Our data suggested that these genes are also likely to be direct targets of RFX4 isoform 1. However, Ift172 and Dync2li1 mRNA levels remained unchanged in the Rfx4 KO brains, possibly due to compensation of other Rfx gene family members in the brain, since Rfx3 and Rfx2 transcript levels were unchanged in the Rfx4^-/- embryos (Fig 4A).

Discussion

We report here that heterozygous inactivation of Rfx4 led to apparent hypoplasia of the SCO, and that acetylated tubulin-labeled cilia were detached, both of which could lead to non-communicating congenital hydrocephalus. Homozygous inactivation of Rfx4 resulted in severe brain midline defects and failure of hemisphere formation, representing a form of holoprosencephaly, and demonstrated that RFX4 isoform 1 is crucial for early brain development. Although more detailed studies need to be performed, it is highly likely that RFX4 isoform 1 has a major function within ependymal cells. In support of this, preliminary data from Rfx4^flox/+ mice expressing a GFAP-Cre transgene, in which Cre recombinase expression was directed by the mouse glial fibrillary acidic protein (GFAP) promoter, targeting astrocytes and ependyma in the brain, revealed that they were also hydrocephalic. Further studies of these mice confirmed that GFAP Cre Rfx4^flox/+ mice exhibited hydrocephalus with SCO dysplasia [28]. Several earlier studies have demonstrated that Rfx genes can regulate the function of cilia in C. elegans, D. melanogaster, and mammals [29]. For example, the Rfx gene daf-19 was shown to regulate ciliogenesis in C. elegans [30], and Rfx was also found to play a role in ciliated sensory neuron differentiation in D. melanogaster [31]. A large number of diseases have been linked to problems of cilia structure and function, and these have been collectively termed ciliopathies [32]. RFX1 controls ALMS1 gene expression by binding to X-boxes [33], and mutation of ALMS1 causes Alstrom syndrome, a primary ciliopathy [34]. RFX2 was found to control ciliogenesis in the zebrafish pronephros [35], as well as left-right patterning in Xenopus [36]. Rfx3 KO mice exhibited abnormal cilia development in the nodal cilium [37], truncated cilia on immature β-cells of the pancreas [38], and hydrocephalus [9]. We have shown here that the mutant Rfx4 mice represent another ciliopathy disease model. It has been demonstrated that cilia-related gene deletion of Foxj1 (Hfh4), Mdnah5 (dynein heavy chain), Polaris (Ift188), Hydin, Spag6 (central pair-dynein adaptor), and Tg737 (component of the intraflagellar transport particles) in mice all exhibited ependymal cilia structural and/or functional defects associated with hydrocephalus [39–43]. Although cilia defects are often associated with hydrocephalus, it is still not known whether the cilia defects are primary, or are secondary effects of the hydrocephalus. In contrast to motile cilia, primary cilia are thought to be non-motile. Primary cilia are present on almost every cell during vertebrate embryogenesis, where they play major roles in signal transduction. In the homozygous Rfx4 ^L298P model, reduced Shh signaling with primary cilia defects in telencephalon and spinal cord were demonstrated [22]. Although we did not characterize primary cilia in the current studies, the Rfx4^-/- mice described here exhibited hypoplasia of the entire brain at E12.5, the forebrain formed a single structure at E14.5, and there was no bilateral hemisphere formation. This partially mimics human holoprosencephaly, in which there is often fusion of the lobes of the forebrain. To date, the most commonly observed genetic defect in holoprosencephaly in mice and humans is mutation in Shh [44]. It will be interesting to investigate whether Rfx4 is an important target gene for Shh, and if deletion of Rfx4 interrupts normal Shh response signaling pathways.

Overall, the three available mouse mutation models involving different mutations of the Rfx4 gene all exhibited similar phenotypes, demonstrating RFX4’s important functions in normal brain and spinal cord development. One advantage of the current model is that can be used to create a specific gene deletion at various developmental times and cell types.

Phylogenetic X-box motif analysis has shown that X-box DNA footprints typically exist in ciliary gene promoters of RFX-expressing organisms within the unikonts [45]. RFX3, operating through X-boxes, was shown to regulate cilia-related genes in mice [26], including Foxj1, Dync2li1, Dnahc5, Dnahc11, and Dnahc. In the current experiments, we have demonstrated that Foxj1 expression levels were significantly decreased in the KO embryos, and Foxj1 was a direct target gene of RFX4 isoform 1 in transfection studies. The Foxj1 promoter contains two putative X-box sequences, which were enriched by the RFX4 antibody. Furthermore, Foxj1 expression can be trans-activated by Rfx4 cDNA overexpression in cultured cells. FOXJ1 (formerly HFH-4) is a member of the forkhead box family of transcription factors [46], and it is expressed in ciliated cells of the respiratory, reproductive, and central nervous systems [15, 47–49]. FOXJ1 and RFX3 have been shown to co-regulate some common target genes [29]; in particular, they can cooperate to govern a specific motile ciliogenic program [26, 50, 51]. Our experiments indicate that both RFX4 and RFX3 proteins can trans-activate Foxj1, but apparently not synergistically (data not shown).

On the other hand, a recent study found that ectopic expression of Foxj1 in Xenopus laevis suppressed the expression of Rfx4, suggesting that Rfx4 can be controlled by Foxj1 [52]. It will be interesting to test this direction of regulation in an in vitro model, which should increase our understanding of potential molecular crosstalk among regulators of primary and motile ciliogenesis. Since Rfx4 KO embryos exhibited different phenotypes from those with Rfx3 and Foxj1 mutations, RFX4 appears to regulate different genes than RFX3.

It is worth mentioning that Mushashi1, a neural stem cell marker, was recently identified as an Rfx4 target gene [53]. Mushashi1 knock out mouse exhibited hydrocephalus, and mutations of Mushashi1 in patients were associated with microcephaly [54]. It is possible that aberrant Mushashi1 expression in the current Rfx4 KO model might account for some aspects of the phenotype described here.

In conclusion, we have identified Foxj1 as an RFX4-regulated gene. In addition, our conditional KO mice provide a novel animal model in which to investigate downstream genes regulated by the RFX4 isoform 1 transcription factor in specific cell types and during specific periods of brain development. These studies may eventually provide insights into the pathogenesis of obstructive hydrocephalus and holoprosencephaly in humans, both relatively common and disabling birth defects. These studies should also lead to greater understanding of fundamental aspects of brain development, when brain-specific transcription factors like RFX4 isoform 1 are turned on and regulate downstream effector genes.

Acknowledgments

We thank Drs. Robert Oakley and Sivapriya Ramamoorthy for their gifts of plasmids and generous technical help, Wi-Sheung Lai for the Rfx4 cDNA clone, and Timothy Gingerich for many discussions. We are grateful to Drs. Shannon Farris and Patricia Jensen for helpful comments on the manuscript. We also thank Drs. Mark Hoenerhoff and Gordon Flake for help with analysis of the histological slides, Agnes Janoshazi and Jeff Tucker for confocal microscopy support, Dee Wenzel, Laura Miller, Luis Moreno, Alyce Bradbury, Lee Hong, and Cathy Oakley for animal husbandry support, and the NIEHS histology facility for tissue processing, immunostaining, and photography, especially Natasha Clayton, Tiwanda Masinde and Elisabeth Ney.

References

1. Garne E, Loane M, Addor MC, Boyd PA, Barisic I, Dolk H. Congenital hydrocephalus—prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in four European regions. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010;14(2):150–5. pmid:19410489
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
2. Al-Dosari MS, Al-Owain M, Tulbah M, Kurdi W, Adly N, Al-Hemidan A, et al. Mutation in MPDZ causes severe congenital hydrocephalus. J Med Genet. 2013;50(1):54–8. pmid:23240096
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
3. Weller S, Gartner J. Genetic and clinical aspects of X-linked hydrocephalus (L1 disease): Mutations in the L1CAM gene. Hum Mutat. 2001;18(1):1–12. pmid:11438988
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
4. Saillour Y, Zanni G, Des Portes V, Heron D, Guibaud L, Iba-Zizen MT, et al. Mutations in the AP1S2 gene encoding the sigma 2 subunit of the adaptor protein 1 complex are associated with syndromic X-linked mental retardation with hydrocephalus and calcifications in basal ganglia. J Med Genet. 2007;44(11):739–44. Epub 2007/07/10. pmid:17617514
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
5. Ekici AB, Hilfinger D, Jatzwauk M, Thiel CT, Wenzel D, Lorenz I, et al. Disturbed Wnt Signalling due to a Mutation in CCDC88C Causes an Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hydrocephalus with Medial Diverticulum. Molecular syndromology. 2010;1(3):99–112. Epub 2010/10/30. pmid:21031079
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
6. Kousi M, Katsanis N. The Genetic Basis of Hydrocephalus. Annual review of neuroscience. 2016;39:409–35. Epub 2016/05/06. pmid:27145913
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
7. Aftab S, Semenec L, Chu JS, Chen N. Identification and characterization of novel human tissue- specific RFX transcription factors. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:226. Epub 2008/08/05. pmid:18673564
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
8. Emery P, Durand B, Mach B, Reith W. RFX proteins, a novel family of DNA binding proteins conserved in the eukaryotic kingdom. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(5):803–7. Epub 1996/03/01. pmid:8600444
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
9. Baas D, Meiniel A, Benadiba C, Bonnafe E, Meiniel O, Reith W, et al. A deficiency in RFX3 causes hydrocephalus associated with abnormal differentiation of ependymal cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24(4):1020–30. Epub 2006/08/26. pmid:16930429
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
10. Blackshear PJ, Graves JP, Stumpo DJ, Cobos I, Rubenstein JL, Zeldin DC. Graded phenotypic response to partial and complete deficiency of a brain-specific transcript variant of the winged helix transcription factor RFX4. Development. 2003;130(19):4539–52. Epub 2003/08/20. pmid:12925582
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
11. Reith W, Herrero-Sanchez C, Kobr M, Silacci P, Berte C, Barras E, et al. MHC class II regulatory factor RFX has a novel DNA-binding domain and a functionally independent dimerization domain. Genes Dev. 1990;4(9):1528–40. Epub 1990/09/01. pmid:2253877
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
12. Moore R, Cai KQ, Tao W, Smith ER, Xu XX. Differential requirement for Dab2 in the development of embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues. BMC Dev Biol. 2013;13:39. Epub 2013/10/31. pmid:24168030
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
13. Hayashi S, Lewis P, Pevny L, McMahon AP. Efficient gene modulation in mouse epiblast using a Sox2Cre transgenic mouse strain. Mech Dev. 2002;119 Suppl 1:S97–S101.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
14. Vincent SD, Robertson EJ. Highly efficient transgene-independent recombination directed by a maternally derived SOX2CRE transgene. Genesis. 2003;37(2):54–6. Epub 2003/11/05. pmid:14595840
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
15. Blatt EN, Yan XH, Wuerffel MK, Hamilos DL, Brody SL. Forkhead transcription factor HFH-4 expression is temporally related to ciliogenesis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999;21(2):168–76. Epub 1999/07/29. pmid:10423398
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
16. Rodriguez EM, Oksche A, Hein S, Rodriguez S, Yulis R. Spatial and structural interrelationships between secretory cells of the subcommissural organ and blood vessels. An immunocytochemical study. Cell Tissue Res. 1984;237(3):443–9. Epub 1984/01/01. pmid:6435877
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
17. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. Epub 2002/02/16. pmid:11846609
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
18. Carballo E, Lai WS, Blackshear PJ. Feedback inhibition of macrophage tumor necrosis factor- alpha production by tristetraprolin. Science. 1998;281(5379):1001–5. Epub 1998/08/14. pmid:9703499
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
19. Rodriguez EM, Oksche A, Montecinos H. Human subcommissural organ, with particular emphasis on its secretory activity during the fetal life. Microsc Res Tech. 2001;52(5):573–90. Epub 2001/03/10. pmid:11241867
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
20. Takeuchi IK, Kimura R, Matsuda M, Shoji R. Absence of subcommissural organ in the cerebral aqueduct of congenital hydrocephalus spontaneously occurring in MT/HokIdr mice. Acta neuropathologica. 1987;73(4):320–2. Epub 1987/01/01. pmid:3618124
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
21. Piperno G, LeDizet M, Chang XJ. Microtubules containing acetylated alpha-tubulin in mammalian cells in culture. The Journal of cell biology. 1987;104(2):289–302. Epub 1987/02/01. pmid:2879846
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
22. Ashique AM, Choe Y, Karlen M, May SR, Phamluong K, Solloway MJ, et al. The Rfx4 transcription factor modulates Shh signaling by regional control of ciliogenesis. Sci Signal. 2009;2(95):ra70. Epub 2009/11/06. pmid:19887680
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
23. Zhang D, Stumpo DJ, Graves JP, DeGraff LM, Grissom SF, Collins JB, et al. Identification of potential target genes for RFX4_v3, a transcription factor critical for brain development. J Neurochem. 2006;98(3):860–75. pmid:16893423
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
24. Zhang D, Harry GJ, Blackshear PJ, Zeldin DC. G-protein pathway suppressor 2 (GPS2) interacts with the regulatory factor X4 variant 3 (RFX4_v3) and functions as a transcriptional co- activator. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(13):8580–90. pmid:18218630
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
25. Gajiwala KS, Chen H, Cornille F, Roques BP, Reith W, Mach B, et al. Structure of the winged- helix protein hRFX1 reveals a new mode of DNA binding. Nature. 2000;403(6772):916–21. Epub 2000/03/08. pmid:10706293
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
26. El Zein L, Ait-Lounis A, Morle L, Thomas J, Chhin B, Spassky N, et al. RFX3 governs growth and beating efficiency of motile cilia in mouse and controls the expression of genes involved in human ciliopathies. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 17):3180–9. Epub 2009/08/13. pmid:19671664
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
27. Morotomi-Yano K, Yano K, Saito H, Sun Z, Iwama A, Miki Y. Human regulatory factor X 4 (RFX4) is a testis-specific dimeric DNA-binding protein that cooperates with other human RFX members. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277(1):836–42. Epub 2001/10/30. pmid:11682486
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
28. Paap F. The role of astrocytic RFX4_v3 in demyelination. Georg-August University School of Science Georg-August-University Goettingen; 2015-05-11.
29. Thomas J, Morle L, Soulavie F, Laurencon A, Sagnol S, Durand B. Transcriptional control of genes involved in ciliogenesis: a first step in making cilia. Biol Cell. 2010;102(9):499–513. Epub 2010/08/10. pmid:20690903
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
30. Swoboda P, Adler HT, Thomas JH. The RFX-type transcription factor DAF-19 regulates sensory neuron cilium formation in C. elegans. Mol Cell. 2000;5(3):411–21. Epub 2000/07/06. pmid:10882127
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
31. Dubruille R, Laurencon A, Vandaele C, Shishido E, Coulon-Bublex M, Swoboda P, et al. Drosophila regulatory factor X is necessary for ciliated sensory neuron differentiation. Development. 2002;129(23):5487–98. Epub 2002/10/31. pmid:12403718
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
32. Badano JL, Mitsuma N, Beales PL, Katsanis N. The ciliopathies: an emerging class of human genetic disorders. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2006;7:125–48. Epub 2006/05/26. pmid:16722803
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
33. Purvis TL, Hearn T, Spalluto C, Knorz VJ, Hanley KP, Sanchez-Elsner T, et al. Transcriptional regulation of the Alstrom syndrome gene ALMS1 by members of the RFX family and Sp1. Gene. 2010;460(1–2):20–9. Epub 2010/04/13. pmid:20381594
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
34. Collin GB, Cyr E, Bronson R, Marshall JD, Gifford EJ, Hicks W, et al. Alms1-disrupted mice recapitulate human Alstrom syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(16):2323–33. Epub 2005/07/08. pmid:16000322
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
35. Liu Y, Pathak N, Kramer-Zucker A, Drummond IA. Notch signaling controls the differentiation of transporting epithelia and multiciliated cells in the zebrafish pronephros. Development. 2007;134(6):1111–22. Epub 2007/02/09. pmid:17287248
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
36. Chung MI, Peyrot SM, LeBoeuf S, Park TJ, McGary KL, Marcotte EM, et al. RFX2 is broadly required for ciliogenesis during vertebrate development. Dev Biol. 2012;363(1):155–65. pmid:22227339
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
37. Bonnafe E, Touka M, AitLounis A, Baas D, Barras E, Ucla C, et al. The transcription factor RFX3 directs nodal cilium development and left-right asymmetry specification. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(10):4417–27. pmid:15121860
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
38. Ait-Lounis A, Bonal C, Seguin-Estevez Q, Schmid CD, Bucher P, Herrera PL, et al. The transcription factor Rfx3 regulates beta-cell differentiation, function, and glucokinase expression. Diabetes. 2010;59(7):1674–85. pmid:20413507
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
39. Banizs B, Pike MM, Millican CL, Ferguson WB, Komlosi P, Sheetz J, et al. Dysfunctional cilia lead to altered ependyma and choroid plexus function, and result in the formation of hydrocephalus. Development. 2005;132(23):5329–39. Epub 2005/11/15. pmid:16284123
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
40. Sapiro R, Kostetskii I, Olds-Clarke P, Gerton GL, Radice GL, Strauss IJ. Male infertility, impaired sperm motility, and hydrocephalus in mice deficient in sperm-associated antigen 6. Molecular and cellular biology. 2002;22(17):6298–305. Epub 2002/08/09. pmid:12167721
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
41. Davy BE, Robinson ML. Congenital hydrocephalus in hy3 mice is caused by a frameshift mutation in Hydin, a large novel gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(10):1163–70. Epub 2003/04/30. pmid:12719380
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
42. Ibanez-Tallon I, Pagenstecher A, Fliegauf M, Olbrich H, Kispert A, Ketelsen UP, et al. Dysfunction of axonemal dynein heavy chain Mdnah5 inhibits ependymal flow and reveals a novel mechanism for hydrocephalus formation. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(18):2133–41. Epub 2004/07/23. pmid:15269178
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
43. Swetloff A, Ferretti P. Changes in E2F5 intracellular localization in mouse and human choroid plexus epithelium with development. Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49(7):859–65. Epub 2005/09/21. pmid:16172982
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
44. Roessler E, Belloni E, Gaudenz K, Jay P, Berta P, Scherer SW, et al. Mutations in the human Sonic Hedgehog gene cause holoprosencephaly. Nat Genet. 1996;14(3):357–60. Epub 1996/11/01. pmid:8896572
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
45. Piasecki BP, Burghoorn J, Swoboda P. Regulatory Factor X (RFX)-mediated transcriptional rewiring of ciliary genes in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(29):12969–74. Epub 2010/07/10. pmid:20615967
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
46. Hackett BP, Brody SL, Liang M, Zeitz ID, Bruns LA, Gitlin JD. Primary structure of hepatocyte nuclear factor/forkhead homologue 4 and characterization of gene expression in the developing respiratory and reproductive epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(10):4249–53. Epub 1995/05/09. pmid:7753791
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
47. Lim L, Zhou H, Costa RH. The winged helix transcription factor HFH-4 is expressed during choroid plexus epithelial development in the mouse embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(7):3094–9. Epub 1997/04/01. pmid:9096351
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
48. Pelletier GJ, Brody SL, Liapis H, White RA, Hackett BP. A human forkhead/winged-helix transcription factor expressed in developing pulmonary and renal epithelium. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(3 Pt 1):L351–9. Epub 1998/04/08.
- View Article
- Google Scholar
49. Tichelaar JW, Wert SE, Costa RH, Kimura S, Whitsett JA. HNF-3/forkhead homologue-4 (HFH-4) is expressed in ciliated epithelial cells in the developing mouse lung. J Histochem Cytochem. 1999;47(6):823–32. Epub 1999/05/20. pmid:10330459
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
50. Stubbs JL, Oishi I, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Kintner C. The forkhead protein Foxj1 specifies node- like cilia in Xenopus and zebrafish embryos. Nat Genet. 2008;40(12):1454–60. Epub 2008/11/18. pmid:19011629
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
51. Yu X, Ng CP, Habacher H, Roy S. Foxj1 transcription factors are master regulators of the motile ciliogenic program. Nat Genet. 2008;40(12):1445–53. Epub 2008/11/18. pmid:19011630
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
52. Manojlovic Z, Earwood R, Kato A, Stefanovic B, Kato Y. RFX7 is required for the formation of cilia in the neural tube. Mech Dev. 2014;132:28–37. pmid:24530844
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
53. Kawase S, Kuwako K, Imai T, Renault-Mihara F, Yaguchi K, Itohara S, et al. Regulatory factor X transcription factors control Musashi1 transcription in mouse neural stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2014 Sep 15;23(18):2250–61. pmid:25058468
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar
54. Chavali PL, Stojic L, Meredith LW, Joseph N, Nahorski MS, Sanford TJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental protein Musashi-1 interacts with the Zika genome and promotes viral replication. Science. 2017 Jul 7;357(6346):83–88. pmid:28572454
- View Article
- PubMed/NCBI
- Google Scholar

[ref1] 1. Garne E, Loane M, Addor MC, Boyd PA, Barisic I, Dolk H. Congenital hydrocephalus—prevalence, prenatal diagnosis and outcome of pregnancy in four European regions. Eur J Paediatr Neurol. 2010;14(2):150–5. pmid:19410489
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[2] View Article

[3] PubMed/NCBI

[4] Google Scholar

[ref2] 2. Al-Dosari MS, Al-Owain M, Tulbah M, Kurdi W, Adly N, Al-Hemidan A, et al. Mutation in MPDZ causes severe congenital hydrocephalus. J Med Genet. 2013;50(1):54–8. pmid:23240096
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[6] View Article

[7] PubMed/NCBI

[8] Google Scholar

[ref3] 3. Weller S, Gartner J. Genetic and clinical aspects of X-linked hydrocephalus (L1 disease): Mutations in the L1CAM gene. Hum Mutat. 2001;18(1):1–12. pmid:11438988
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[10] View Article

[11] PubMed/NCBI

[12] Google Scholar

[ref4] 4. Saillour Y, Zanni G, Des Portes V, Heron D, Guibaud L, Iba-Zizen MT, et al. Mutations in the AP1S2 gene encoding the sigma 2 subunit of the adaptor protein 1 complex are associated with syndromic X-linked mental retardation with hydrocephalus and calcifications in basal ganglia. J Med Genet. 2007;44(11):739–44. Epub 2007/07/10. pmid:17617514
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[14] View Article

[15] PubMed/NCBI

[16] Google Scholar

[ref5] 5. Ekici AB, Hilfinger D, Jatzwauk M, Thiel CT, Wenzel D, Lorenz I, et al. Disturbed Wnt Signalling due to a Mutation in CCDC88C Causes an Autosomal Recessive Non-Syndromic Hydrocephalus with Medial Diverticulum. Molecular syndromology. 2010;1(3):99–112. Epub 2010/10/30. pmid:21031079
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[18] View Article

[19] PubMed/NCBI

[20] Google Scholar

[ref6] 6. Kousi M, Katsanis N. The Genetic Basis of Hydrocephalus. Annual review of neuroscience. 2016;39:409–35. Epub 2016/05/06. pmid:27145913
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[22] View Article

[23] PubMed/NCBI

[24] Google Scholar

[ref7] 7. Aftab S, Semenec L, Chu JS, Chen N. Identification and characterization of novel human tissue- specific RFX transcription factors. BMC Evol Biol. 2008;8:226. Epub 2008/08/05. pmid:18673564
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[26] View Article

[27] PubMed/NCBI

[28] Google Scholar

[ref8] 8. Emery P, Durand B, Mach B, Reith W. RFX proteins, a novel family of DNA binding proteins conserved in the eukaryotic kingdom. Nucleic Acids Res. 1996;24(5):803–7. Epub 1996/03/01. pmid:8600444
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[30] View Article

[31] PubMed/NCBI

[32] Google Scholar

[ref9] 9. Baas D, Meiniel A, Benadiba C, Bonnafe E, Meiniel O, Reith W, et al. A deficiency in RFX3 causes hydrocephalus associated with abnormal differentiation of ependymal cells. Eur J Neurosci. 2006;24(4):1020–30. Epub 2006/08/26. pmid:16930429
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[34] View Article

[35] PubMed/NCBI

[36] Google Scholar

[ref10] 10. Blackshear PJ, Graves JP, Stumpo DJ, Cobos I, Rubenstein JL, Zeldin DC. Graded phenotypic response to partial and complete deficiency of a brain-specific transcript variant of the winged helix transcription factor RFX4. Development. 2003;130(19):4539–52. Epub 2003/08/20. pmid:12925582
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[38] View Article

[39] PubMed/NCBI

[40] Google Scholar

[ref11] 11. Reith W, Herrero-Sanchez C, Kobr M, Silacci P, Berte C, Barras E, et al. MHC class II regulatory factor RFX has a novel DNA-binding domain and a functionally independent dimerization domain. Genes Dev. 1990;4(9):1528–40. Epub 1990/09/01. pmid:2253877
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[42] View Article

[43] PubMed/NCBI

[44] Google Scholar

[ref12] 12. Moore R, Cai KQ, Tao W, Smith ER, Xu XX. Differential requirement for Dab2 in the development of embryonic and extra-embryonic tissues. BMC Dev Biol. 2013;13:39. Epub 2013/10/31. pmid:24168030
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[46] View Article

[47] PubMed/NCBI

[48] Google Scholar

[ref13] 13. Hayashi S, Lewis P, Pevny L, McMahon AP. Efficient gene modulation in mouse epiblast using a Sox2Cre transgenic mouse strain. Mech Dev. 2002;119 Suppl 1:S97–S101.
View Article
Google Scholar

[50] View Article

[51] Google Scholar

[ref14] 14. Vincent SD, Robertson EJ. Highly efficient transgene-independent recombination directed by a maternally derived SOX2CRE transgene. Genesis. 2003;37(2):54–6. Epub 2003/11/05. pmid:14595840
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[53] View Article

[54] PubMed/NCBI

[55] Google Scholar

[ref15] 15. Blatt EN, Yan XH, Wuerffel MK, Hamilos DL, Brody SL. Forkhead transcription factor HFH-4 expression is temporally related to ciliogenesis. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. 1999;21(2):168–76. Epub 1999/07/29. pmid:10423398
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[57] View Article

[58] PubMed/NCBI

[59] Google Scholar

[ref16] 16. Rodriguez EM, Oksche A, Hein S, Rodriguez S, Yulis R. Spatial and structural interrelationships between secretory cells of the subcommissural organ and blood vessels. An immunocytochemical study. Cell Tissue Res. 1984;237(3):443–9. Epub 1984/01/01. pmid:6435877
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[61] View Article

[62] PubMed/NCBI

[63] Google Scholar

[ref17] 17. Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 2001;25(4):402–8. Epub 2002/02/16. pmid:11846609
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[65] View Article

[66] PubMed/NCBI

[67] Google Scholar

[ref18] 18. Carballo E, Lai WS, Blackshear PJ. Feedback inhibition of macrophage tumor necrosis factor- alpha production by tristetraprolin. Science. 1998;281(5379):1001–5. Epub 1998/08/14. pmid:9703499
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[69] View Article

[70] PubMed/NCBI

[71] Google Scholar

[ref19] 19. Rodriguez EM, Oksche A, Montecinos H. Human subcommissural organ, with particular emphasis on its secretory activity during the fetal life. Microsc Res Tech. 2001;52(5):573–90. Epub 2001/03/10. pmid:11241867
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[73] View Article

[74] PubMed/NCBI

[75] Google Scholar

[ref20] 20. Takeuchi IK, Kimura R, Matsuda M, Shoji R. Absence of subcommissural organ in the cerebral aqueduct of congenital hydrocephalus spontaneously occurring in MT/HokIdr mice. Acta neuropathologica. 1987;73(4):320–2. Epub 1987/01/01. pmid:3618124
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[77] View Article

[78] PubMed/NCBI

[79] Google Scholar

[ref21] 21. Piperno G, LeDizet M, Chang XJ. Microtubules containing acetylated alpha-tubulin in mammalian cells in culture. The Journal of cell biology. 1987;104(2):289–302. Epub 1987/02/01. pmid:2879846
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[81] View Article

[82] PubMed/NCBI

[83] Google Scholar

[ref22] 22. Ashique AM, Choe Y, Karlen M, May SR, Phamluong K, Solloway MJ, et al. The Rfx4 transcription factor modulates Shh signaling by regional control of ciliogenesis. Sci Signal. 2009;2(95):ra70. Epub 2009/11/06. pmid:19887680
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[85] View Article

[86] PubMed/NCBI

[87] Google Scholar

[ref23] 23. Zhang D, Stumpo DJ, Graves JP, DeGraff LM, Grissom SF, Collins JB, et al. Identification of potential target genes for RFX4_v3, a transcription factor critical for brain development. J Neurochem. 2006;98(3):860–75. pmid:16893423
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[89] View Article

[90] PubMed/NCBI

[91] Google Scholar

[ref24] 24. Zhang D, Harry GJ, Blackshear PJ, Zeldin DC. G-protein pathway suppressor 2 (GPS2) interacts with the regulatory factor X4 variant 3 (RFX4_v3) and functions as a transcriptional co- activator. J Biol Chem. 2008;283(13):8580–90. pmid:18218630
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[93] View Article

[94] PubMed/NCBI

[95] Google Scholar

[ref25] 25. Gajiwala KS, Chen H, Cornille F, Roques BP, Reith W, Mach B, et al. Structure of the winged- helix protein hRFX1 reveals a new mode of DNA binding. Nature. 2000;403(6772):916–21. Epub 2000/03/08. pmid:10706293
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[97] View Article

[98] PubMed/NCBI

[99] Google Scholar

[ref26] 26. El Zein L, Ait-Lounis A, Morle L, Thomas J, Chhin B, Spassky N, et al. RFX3 governs growth and beating efficiency of motile cilia in mouse and controls the expression of genes involved in human ciliopathies. J Cell Sci. 2009;122(Pt 17):3180–9. Epub 2009/08/13. pmid:19671664
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[101] View Article

[102] PubMed/NCBI

[103] Google Scholar

[ref27] 27. Morotomi-Yano K, Yano K, Saito H, Sun Z, Iwama A, Miki Y. Human regulatory factor X 4 (RFX4) is a testis-specific dimeric DNA-binding protein that cooperates with other human RFX members. The Journal of biological chemistry. 2002;277(1):836–42. Epub 2001/10/30. pmid:11682486
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[105] View Article

[106] PubMed/NCBI

[107] Google Scholar

[ref28] 28. Paap F. The role of astrocytic RFX4_v3 in demyelination. Georg-August University School of Science Georg-August-University Goettingen; 2015-05-11.

[ref29] 29. Thomas J, Morle L, Soulavie F, Laurencon A, Sagnol S, Durand B. Transcriptional control of genes involved in ciliogenesis: a first step in making cilia. Biol Cell. 2010;102(9):499–513. Epub 2010/08/10. pmid:20690903
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[110] View Article

[111] PubMed/NCBI

[112] Google Scholar

[ref30] 30. Swoboda P, Adler HT, Thomas JH. The RFX-type transcription factor DAF-19 regulates sensory neuron cilium formation in C. elegans. Mol Cell. 2000;5(3):411–21. Epub 2000/07/06. pmid:10882127
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[114] View Article

[115] PubMed/NCBI

[116] Google Scholar

[ref31] 31. Dubruille R, Laurencon A, Vandaele C, Shishido E, Coulon-Bublex M, Swoboda P, et al. Drosophila regulatory factor X is necessary for ciliated sensory neuron differentiation. Development. 2002;129(23):5487–98. Epub 2002/10/31. pmid:12403718
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[118] View Article

[119] PubMed/NCBI

[120] Google Scholar

[ref32] 32. Badano JL, Mitsuma N, Beales PL, Katsanis N. The ciliopathies: an emerging class of human genetic disorders. Annu Rev Genomics Hum Genet. 2006;7:125–48. Epub 2006/05/26. pmid:16722803
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[122] View Article

[123] PubMed/NCBI

[124] Google Scholar

[ref33] 33. Purvis TL, Hearn T, Spalluto C, Knorz VJ, Hanley KP, Sanchez-Elsner T, et al. Transcriptional regulation of the Alstrom syndrome gene ALMS1 by members of the RFX family and Sp1. Gene. 2010;460(1–2):20–9. Epub 2010/04/13. pmid:20381594
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[126] View Article

[127] PubMed/NCBI

[128] Google Scholar

[ref34] 34. Collin GB, Cyr E, Bronson R, Marshall JD, Gifford EJ, Hicks W, et al. Alms1-disrupted mice recapitulate human Alstrom syndrome. Hum Mol Genet. 2005;14(16):2323–33. Epub 2005/07/08. pmid:16000322
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[130] View Article

[131] PubMed/NCBI

[132] Google Scholar

[ref35] 35. Liu Y, Pathak N, Kramer-Zucker A, Drummond IA. Notch signaling controls the differentiation of transporting epithelia and multiciliated cells in the zebrafish pronephros. Development. 2007;134(6):1111–22. Epub 2007/02/09. pmid:17287248
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[134] View Article

[135] PubMed/NCBI

[136] Google Scholar

[ref36] 36. Chung MI, Peyrot SM, LeBoeuf S, Park TJ, McGary KL, Marcotte EM, et al. RFX2 is broadly required for ciliogenesis during vertebrate development. Dev Biol. 2012;363(1):155–65. pmid:22227339
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[138] View Article

[139] PubMed/NCBI

[140] Google Scholar

[ref37] 37. Bonnafe E, Touka M, AitLounis A, Baas D, Barras E, Ucla C, et al. The transcription factor RFX3 directs nodal cilium development and left-right asymmetry specification. Mol Cell Biol. 2004;24(10):4417–27. pmid:15121860
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[142] View Article

[143] PubMed/NCBI

[144] Google Scholar

[ref38] 38. Ait-Lounis A, Bonal C, Seguin-Estevez Q, Schmid CD, Bucher P, Herrera PL, et al. The transcription factor Rfx3 regulates beta-cell differentiation, function, and glucokinase expression. Diabetes. 2010;59(7):1674–85. pmid:20413507
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[146] View Article

[147] PubMed/NCBI

[148] Google Scholar

[ref39] 39. Banizs B, Pike MM, Millican CL, Ferguson WB, Komlosi P, Sheetz J, et al. Dysfunctional cilia lead to altered ependyma and choroid plexus function, and result in the formation of hydrocephalus. Development. 2005;132(23):5329–39. Epub 2005/11/15. pmid:16284123
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[150] View Article

[151] PubMed/NCBI

[152] Google Scholar

[ref40] 40. Sapiro R, Kostetskii I, Olds-Clarke P, Gerton GL, Radice GL, Strauss IJ. Male infertility, impaired sperm motility, and hydrocephalus in mice deficient in sperm-associated antigen 6. Molecular and cellular biology. 2002;22(17):6298–305. Epub 2002/08/09. pmid:12167721
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[154] View Article

[155] PubMed/NCBI

[156] Google Scholar

[ref41] 41. Davy BE, Robinson ML. Congenital hydrocephalus in hy3 mice is caused by a frameshift mutation in Hydin, a large novel gene. Hum Mol Genet. 2003;12(10):1163–70. Epub 2003/04/30. pmid:12719380
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[158] View Article

[159] PubMed/NCBI

[160] Google Scholar

[ref42] 42. Ibanez-Tallon I, Pagenstecher A, Fliegauf M, Olbrich H, Kispert A, Ketelsen UP, et al. Dysfunction of axonemal dynein heavy chain Mdnah5 inhibits ependymal flow and reveals a novel mechanism for hydrocephalus formation. Hum Mol Genet. 2004;13(18):2133–41. Epub 2004/07/23. pmid:15269178
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[162] View Article

[163] PubMed/NCBI

[164] Google Scholar

[ref43] 43. Swetloff A, Ferretti P. Changes in E2F5 intracellular localization in mouse and human choroid plexus epithelium with development. Int J Dev Biol. 2005;49(7):859–65. Epub 2005/09/21. pmid:16172982
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[166] View Article

[167] PubMed/NCBI

[168] Google Scholar

[ref44] 44. Roessler E, Belloni E, Gaudenz K, Jay P, Berta P, Scherer SW, et al. Mutations in the human Sonic Hedgehog gene cause holoprosencephaly. Nat Genet. 1996;14(3):357–60. Epub 1996/11/01. pmid:8896572
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[170] View Article

[171] PubMed/NCBI

[172] Google Scholar

[ref45] 45. Piasecki BP, Burghoorn J, Swoboda P. Regulatory Factor X (RFX)-mediated transcriptional rewiring of ciliary genes in animals. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(29):12969–74. Epub 2010/07/10. pmid:20615967
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[174] View Article

[175] PubMed/NCBI

[176] Google Scholar

[ref46] 46. Hackett BP, Brody SL, Liang M, Zeitz ID, Bruns LA, Gitlin JD. Primary structure of hepatocyte nuclear factor/forkhead homologue 4 and characterization of gene expression in the developing respiratory and reproductive epithelium. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995;92(10):4249–53. Epub 1995/05/09. pmid:7753791
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[178] View Article

[179] PubMed/NCBI

[180] Google Scholar

[ref47] 47. Lim L, Zhou H, Costa RH. The winged helix transcription factor HFH-4 is expressed during choroid plexus epithelial development in the mouse embryo. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1997;94(7):3094–9. Epub 1997/04/01. pmid:9096351
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[182] View Article

[183] PubMed/NCBI

[184] Google Scholar

[ref48] 48. Pelletier GJ, Brody SL, Liapis H, White RA, Hackett BP. A human forkhead/winged-helix transcription factor expressed in developing pulmonary and renal epithelium. Am J Physiol. 1998;274(3 Pt 1):L351–9. Epub 1998/04/08.
View Article
Google Scholar

[186] View Article

[187] Google Scholar

[ref49] 49. Tichelaar JW, Wert SE, Costa RH, Kimura S, Whitsett JA. HNF-3/forkhead homologue-4 (HFH-4) is expressed in ciliated epithelial cells in the developing mouse lung. J Histochem Cytochem. 1999;47(6):823–32. Epub 1999/05/20. pmid:10330459
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[189] View Article

[190] PubMed/NCBI

[191] Google Scholar

[ref50] 50. Stubbs JL, Oishi I, Izpisua Belmonte JC, Kintner C. The forkhead protein Foxj1 specifies node- like cilia in Xenopus and zebrafish embryos. Nat Genet. 2008;40(12):1454–60. Epub 2008/11/18. pmid:19011629
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[193] View Article

[194] PubMed/NCBI

[195] Google Scholar

[ref51] 51. Yu X, Ng CP, Habacher H, Roy S. Foxj1 transcription factors are master regulators of the motile ciliogenic program. Nat Genet. 2008;40(12):1445–53. Epub 2008/11/18. pmid:19011630
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[197] View Article

[198] PubMed/NCBI

[199] Google Scholar

[ref52] 52. Manojlovic Z, Earwood R, Kato A, Stefanovic B, Kato Y. RFX7 is required for the formation of cilia in the neural tube. Mech Dev. 2014;132:28–37. pmid:24530844
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[201] View Article

[202] PubMed/NCBI

[203] Google Scholar

[ref53] 53. Kawase S, Kuwako K, Imai T, Renault-Mihara F, Yaguchi K, Itohara S, et al. Regulatory factor X transcription factors control Musashi1 transcription in mouse neural stem/progenitor cells. Stem Cells Dev. 2014 Sep 15;23(18):2250–61. pmid:25058468
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[205] View Article

[206] PubMed/NCBI

[207] Google Scholar

[ref54] 54. Chavali PL, Stojic L, Meredith LW, Joseph N, Nahorski MS, Sanford TJ, et al. Neurodevelopmental protein Musashi-1 interacts with the Zika genome and promotes viral replication. Science. 2017 Jul 7;357(6346):83–88. pmid:28572454
View Article
PubMed/NCBI
Google Scholar

[209] View Article

[210] PubMed/NCBI

[211] Google Scholar

Figures

Abstract

Introduction

Methods

Generation of floxed Rfx4 mice and breeding with Sox2-Cre mice

Creation of homozygous Rfx4 KO Mice

Perfusion and fixation of the adult brains, histology, and immunostaining

Total RNA extraction and quantitative real time PCR (qPCR)

Plasmids

Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) assay

Transient transfection and luciferase reporter assays

Statistical analysis

Results

Generation of Rfx4 KO mice

Hydrocephalus, dysplasia of the SCO and patchy motile cilia in Rfx4+/- mice

A dorsal-ventral patterning defect in homozygous Rfx4-/- mice at E12.5 resembles that of human holoprosencephaly

Foxj1 is trans-activated by RFX4 isoform 1 in NG108-15 cells

Discussion

Acknowledgments

References

Hydrocephalus, dysplasia of the SCO and patchy motile cilia in Rfx4^+/- mice

A dorsal-ventral patterning defect in homozygous Rfx4^-/- mice at E12.5 resembles that of human holoprosencephaly