Sepsis continues to be a major problem for hospitalized patients. Opioids are widely used medications for pain management despite recent evidence revealing their adverse effects. The present study evaluates survival differences between opioid-treated patients and non-opioid-treated patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of sepsis. Clinical data was extracted from the University of Minnesota’s Clinical Data Repository, which includes Electronic Health Records (EHRs) of the patients seen at 8 hospitals. Among 5,994 patients diagnosed with sepsis, 4,540 opioid-treated patients and 1,454 non-opioid patients were included based on whether they are exposed to prescription opioids during their hospitalization. Cox proportional hazards regression showed that after adjustments for demographics, clinical comorbidities, severity of illness, and types of infection, opioid-treated patients had a significantly higher risk of death at 28 days.
Citation: Zhang R, Meng J, Lian Q, Chen X, Bauman B, Chu H, et al. (2018) Prescription opioids are associated with higher mortality in patients diagnosed with sepsis: A retrospective cohort study using electronic health records. PLoS ONE 13(1): e0190362. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190362
Editor: Prasun K. Datta, Temple University, UNITED STATES
Received: August 26, 2017; Accepted: December 13, 2017; Published: January 2, 2018
Copyright: © 2018 Zhang et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Due to ethical and legal restrictions, some access restrictions apply to the data that supports the findings reported in this article. This data is monitored by the University of Minnesota’s Academic Health Center Information Exchange (AHC-IE), and due to its relationship to patient care and clinical decision-making, access is restricted to authorized researchers within a secure data shelter. However, access can be granted to external researchers subject to approval of the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board (email@example.com) and AHC-IE (firstname.lastname@example.org).
Funding: The clinical data used in the present study was provided by the University of Minnesota’s Informatics Consulting Service. The research is supported in part by grant number UL1TR000114 from the National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences of the National Institutes of Health. Dr. Rui Zhang is supported by the grant from NIH 1R01AT009457. Dr. Sabita Roy received grants from NIH R01 DA043252, NIH R01 DA037843, NIH R01 DA034582, NIH R01DA044582, and NIH K05 DA033881. There was no additional external funding received for this study. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: All the authors have no conflict of interest.
Sepsis is a major global healthcare problem, associated with high mortality rates and significant health-care cost burdens. Sepsis is defined as having evidence of the systemic inflammatory response syndrome along with presence or presumed presence of an infection; together, sepsis and septic shock remain the leading cause of death among hospital patients in the United States . Despite advances in modern western medicine, the number of patients hospitalized with a diagnosis of sepsis continues to increase and sepsis remains as a common reason for admission to the intensive care unit. Mortality rates continue to worsen as well; from 2000 to 2007, the number of deaths from sepsis in the U.S increased from 154,159 to 207,427 . The clinical manifestation and outcome of sepsis is highly variable and influenced by several factors including age, sex, the health and immune status of the patient, medications, and the infectious agent involved. Identification of clinical variables predictive of the risk of sepsis may lead to improved preventive and therapeutic strategies for at risk patients.
Currently, prescription opioids are being used to treat patients in virtually any ward of the hospital from general care to the intensive care unit . Unfortunately, the negative side effects of opioid use are numerous and more recently the immunosuppressive effects of opioids are emerging as a significant safety issue in hospitalized patients . Both clinical and laboratory studies suggest that sepsis and sepsis-related mortality are associated with opioid exposure. In humans, higher circulating morphine levels are observed in patients with sepsis, severe sepsis, and septic shock . Furthermore, several murine sepsis models demonstrate that morphine treatment promotes sepsis progression by impairing gut barrier integrity, which allows bacterial translocation from the gut lumen into the peritoneal organs and circulatory system [6,7]. In addition, opioid treatment has been shown to accelerate the progression of sepsis by impairing immune function and modulation of the gut microbiota [4,8–10].
Despite their increasing usage and known detrimental side effects, knowledge is lacking of the clinical outcomes of sepsis in patients on opioids. The present study evaluates the effects of prescription opioid use in hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of sepsis on mortality by analyzing data obtained from Electronic Health Records (EHRs) of a multi-institutional health system in the Minnesota. We used the Charlson comorbidity index to control for confounding variables and also adjusted for factors which may pre-dispose to infection including age, body mass index (BMI), white blood cell (WBC) count, and the presence of fungal or bacterial infection [11–14]. Our study provides the clinical evidence that opioid treatment is associated with worse outcome of sepsis in hospitalized patients.
Sites and patient selection
Patient cohort data in the Epic EHR were extracted from the University of Minnesota’s Clinical Data Repository (CDR) housed by the Academic Health Center-Information Services (AHC-IS) exchange platform and supported through the Clinical and Translational Science Institute (CTSI) at the University of Minnesota. All patient data used in this study was approved for research purposes at the point of care. Patients give written consent for their data to be used for research purposes, so no direct consent was required for this study. Patients who did not give affirmation for their data to be used in research were not used in this study. This retrospective cohort study was approved by the University of Minnesota (UMN) institutional review board. The CDR also links records from the Minnesota death records database which includes complete records issued from 2011 to present for deceased individuals who were born in Minnesota, have died in Minnesota, or have ever had a permanent address in the state. Patients with a diagnosis of sepsis or severe sepsis between January 2011 and March 2015, in the CDR were included.
The patients are classified as opioid-treated group if their records of medication administration include Alfentanil, Butorphanol, Codeine, Dezocine, Dihydrocodeine, Fentanyl, Hydrocodeone, Hydromorphone, Oxycodone, Levorphanol, Meperidine, Methadone, Morphine, Nalbuphine, Oxymorphone, Pentazocine, Propoxyphene, Remifentanil, Sufentanil, Tapentadol, Buprenotphine, and Opium during the hospitalization.
To select a patient cohort for this study from the CDR, the International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes for sepsis (i.e., 995.91 and 995.92) were used as inclusion criteria. Clinical data during outpatient visits were not considered in this study. The patients were excluded if their records of administrated medication include glucocorticoids (such as betamethasone, budesonide, cortisone, dexamethasone, hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, prednisolone, paramethasone, and triamcinolone), or other immunosuppressive agents (such as azathioprine, basiliximab, belatacept, canakinumab, cyclosporine, daclizumab, infliximab, muromonab, mycophenolate, mycophenolic, omalizumb, rilonacept, secukinumab, sirolimus, tacrolimus, and ustekinumab). The patients who took the opioids before the first diagnosis of sepsis were also excluded. The total number of patients with diagnosis of sepsis within our search criteria from EHR through UMN Academic Health Center-Information Exchange (AHC-IE) system was 5,994. Continuous variables collected were age, BMI, pulse, WBC, platelet counts, temperature, respiration, and comorbidity score . Categorical variables collected were sex, ethnicity, presence of specific pathogens in culture test (i.e. gram-positive bacteria, gram-negative bacteria, and fungus) and 28-day patient survival. We also included the hospital sites where the health care service was delivered. There is no missing and loss to follow-up data.
To evaluate whether prescription opioid exposure in hospitalized patients is a risk factor of sepsis-related mortality, the septic patient cohort was divided into two groups: opioid-treated group vs. non-opioid group. Opioid exposure was considered as a time-varying variable, i.e., opioids were prescribed at different time since hospitalization for patients in the opioid-treated group. Continuous variables approximately normally distributed were compared by student t tests; otherwise were analyzed by Mann–Whitney U test. Additionally, a Chi-square test was used to analyze category variables, and fisher exact test is used when the Chi-square approximation is questionable. To evaluate if mortality as the outcome is specifically associated with the status of opioid exposure, Cox proportional hazards models with the time-varying opioid exposure variable were used, with and without adjusting for confounding variables. Several papers suggested that confounding variables should not be selected solely based on observed associations with exposure from baseline analyses [15–18]. Residual confounding due to the omission of baseline-balanced confounding variables may induce bias. Therefore, in this paper, all clinical relevant variables were considered in the adjustment models regardless of their baseline significance in order to better control for confounding. When sample size is small or moderate, this approach may lead to unstable estimates and large standard errors in some situation. However, it is very unlikely to be a problem here given the sufficient large sample size. We applied three models with: (1) unadjusted variables; (2) adjusted by basic demographics; and (3) adjusted by basic demographical variables plus clinical influential variables. In addition, we conducted sensitivity analyses to assess the potential impacts of different hospital sites on the estimates via a stratified proportional hazard model with hospital sites as strata. All statistical significance tests were 2-sided, and were defined as P-value < 0.05. Statistical analysis was performed using the SAS statistical program (SAS-PC, version 9.3; SAS Institute Inc., Cary, North Carolina).
Among 5,994 septic patients included in the present study, 4,540 patients received opioids while 1,454 patients did not receive opioids during hospitalization. Baseline characteristics are described in Table 1, which demonstrates that there were some systemic differences between opioid-treated patients and non-opioid-treated patients. Specifically, the mean BMI, the mean WBC count, the mean respiratory rate, the Charlson comorbidity score, the positive microbiological culture, sepsis diagnosis and sex are statistically significantly different between the opioid-treated and non-opioid-treated patients.
Among all septic patients, both gram-positive (39.32% vs. 20.43%, P-value < 0.0001) and gram-negative bacterial infections (31.26% vs. 26.96%, P-value < 0.001) were more common in opioid-treated patients (Table 2). Interestingly, fungal infection was more prevalent in opioid-treated patients compared with non-opioid-treated patients as well (11.85% vs. 2.20%, P-value < 0.0001).
The most prevalent microorganisms detected in microbial culture tests are described in Table 3. The most prevalent gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus and the most prevalent gram-negative bacteria were Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter. Candida was the most prevalent fungus.
The crude 28-day mortality for opioids-treated patients was 10.35%, while those for non-opioids patients were 2.40%. In order to account for the differences in prescription opioids exposure time on 28-day mortality, an unadjusted univariate Cox proportional hazards model and two adjusted multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression models with time-varying opioids exposure were applied. As shown in Table 4, the results indicated that opioid use in hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of sepsis is associated with increased mortality after adjusting for various confounders including demographics, clinical comorbidities, severity of illness, and types of infection. Sensitivity analyses using stratified proportional hazards model with hospital sites as strata also show similar conclusions in Table 4.
Sepsis and severe sepsis affects over 750,000 patients each year and the incidence has been steadily increasing . Known factors that predispose to sepsis include cancer, immunodeficiency, and chronic organ dysfunction . Currently, there are over 80 biomarkers used to diagnose, determine the severity of sepsis, and predict patient outcomes. However, clinical risk factors predictive of its development are less well understood . In our study, we sought to determine if there is an association between opioid use during hospitalization and mortality in patients diagnosed with sepsis.
Opioids are now widely prescribed in general medical settings and their use is increasing although recent studies have demonstrated an association between long-term opioid use and increased all-cause mortality . Our analysis reveals that opioid-treated patients with sepsis have substantially increased mortality rates compared to non-opioid-treated patients. Accumulative studies have shown that opioid treatment is associated with many negative pathophysiologic consequences including respiratory suppression, immunosuppression, constipation, as well as loss of gut homeostasis and loss of gut barrier integrity [4,22,23]. Consistent with the previous laboratory studies [4, 6–9], our analysis provides direct clinical evidence that inpatient opioid use is associated with increased severity and worse outcomes of sepsis in hospitalized patients, implying that opioid therapy should be limited in patients with sepsis.
Additionally, our results demonstrate that prescription opioid exposure is associated with higher incidence of positive microbial culture. This is consistent with the previous studies, which have shown that opioids modulate multiple immune pathways responsible for host defense against pathogens [4,24] and compromise intestinal barrier function leading to increased bacterial dissemination . We further analyzed the most prevalent microorganisms detected in culture tests. The most prevalent gram-positive bacteria were Staphylococcus, Streptococcus, and Enterococcus and the most prevalent gram-negative bacteria were Escherichia coli, Salmonella, and Campylobacter. Interestingly, recent animal studies suggest that opioids can induce enrichment of the Firmicutes phylum and specifically the Gram-positive bacteria Staphylococcus and Enterococcus in the gut microbiome [7–10]. These studies may provide the potential mechanisms underlying increased incidence of gram-positive infections in opioid-treated patients. Also, recent studies demonstrated that changes in composition or density of the microbiota may lead to higher susceptibility to a variety of pathogens and abnormal mucosal immune responses . Therefore, the present study also implies that clinicians should consider medication-induced gut microbiota dysbiosis as a risk factor in infectious diseases such as sepsis.
Our study suggests that opioid use in hospitalized patients with a diagnosis of sepsis is associated with increased mortality. The possible mechanisms by which opioids increase mortality in septic patients are numerous. Higher incidence of positive microbial culture in opioid-treated patients implies that the immunosuppressive effects of opioids might contribute to the worse outcome of sepsis. Some other important variables that might be incompletely stored in EHRs need to be considered as well. For example, the level of pain might be related to the severity of sepsis and dosage of opioid use. Multiple antibiotics use can also affect the outcome of sepsis. Therefore, randomized clinical studies are warranted to determine the mortality rates comparing alternate opioid regimens (synthetic vs. non-synthetic), the severity of sepsis in chronic opioid users, and antibiotics use in the patients with sepsis. Also, further studies should analyze whether there is a dose dependent relationship between opioid use and mortality. We suggest that judicious use of opioids is warranted given their associated increased mortality in septic patients and alternate analgesic strategies should be considered.
Compliance with ethical standards
The work presented in this paper was approved by the University of Minnesota Institutional Review Board (study number 1412M58981). Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- 1. Nguyen HB, Rivers EP, Abrahamian FM, Moran GJ, Abraham E, Trzeciak S, et al. Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock: Review of the Literature and Emergency Department Management Guidelines. Annals of Emergency Medicine 2006; 48(1): 54. e1
- 2. Raghavan M, & Marik PE. Management of sepsis during the early “golden hours”. The Journal of emergency medicine 2006; 31(2): 185–199. pmid:17044583
- 3. Devlin JW. & Roberts RJ. Pharmacology of commonly used analgesics and sedatives in the ICU: benzodiazepines, propofol, and opioids. Crit. Care Clin. 2009; 25: 431–49. pmid:19576523
- 4. Roy S, Ninkovic J, Banerjee S, Charboneau RG, Das S, Dutta R, et al. Opioid drug abuse and modulation of immune function: consequences in the susceptibility to opportunistic infections. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2011; 6: 442–65 pmid:21789507
- 5. Glattard E, Welters ID, Lavaux T, Muller AH, Laux A, Zhang D, et al. Endogenous morphine levels are increased in sepsis: a partial implication of neutrophils. PLoS One 2010; 5. e8791 pmid:20098709
- 6. Hilburger ME, Adler MW, Truant AL, Meissler JJ Jr, Satishchandran V, Rogers TJ, et al. Morphine induces sepsis in mice. J. Infect. Dis. 1997; 176: 183–8. pmid:9207365
- 7. Meng J, Yu H, Ma J, Wang J, Banerjee S, Charboneau R, et al. Morphine Induces Bacterial Translocation in Mice by Compromising Intestinal Barrier Function in a TLR- Dependent Manner. PLoS One 2013; 8. e54040 pmid:23349783
- 8. Meng J, Banerjee S, Li D, Sindberg GM, Wang F, Ma J, et al. Opioid Exacerbation of Gram-Positive Sepsis, Induced by Gut Microbial Modulation, Is Rescued by IL-17A Neutralization.” Scientific Reports. 2015; 5: 10918. pmid:26039416
- 9. Banerjee S. Meng J, Das S, Krishnan A, Haworth J, Charboneau R, et al. Morphine induced exacerbation of sepsis is mediated by tempering endotoxin tolerance through modulation of miR-146a. Sci. Rep. 2013; 3: 1977. pmid:23756365
- 10. Banerjee S. Sindberg G, Wang F, Meng J, Sharma U, Zhang L, et al. Opioid-induced gut microbial disruption and bile dysregulation leads to gut barrier compromise and sustained systemic inflammation. Mucosal Immunol. 2016;
- 11. Vincent J. (2016). The Clinical Challenge of Sepsis Identification and Monitoring. PLOS Medicine, 13(5).
- 12. Borloz MP., & Hamden KE. (2017). Sepsis in Special Populations. Emergency Medicine Clinics of North America, 35(1), 139–158. pmid:27908330
- 13. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR. A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. Journal of chronic diseases. 1987; 40(5):373–83. pmid:3558716
- 14. Charlson M., Szatrowski TP, Peterson J., & Gold J. (1994). Validation of a Combined Comorbidity Index. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology, 47(11), 1245–1251. pmid:7722560
- 15. Groenwold RHH, Klungel OH, Grobbee DE, Hoes AW. Selection of confounding variables should not be based on observed associations with exposure. European Journal of Epidemiology. 2011;26(8):589–593. pmid:21796419
- 16. Senn SJ. Covariate imbalance and random allocation in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1989; 8:467–475. pmid:2727470
- 17. Senn S. Testing for baseline balance in clinical trials. Stat Med. 1994; 13:1715–1726. pmid:7997705
- 18. Altman DG & Doré CJ. Baseline comparisons in randomized clinical trials. Stat Med. 1991;10:797–802. pmid:2068432
- 19. Angus DC., & Poll TV. Severe Sepsis and Septic Shock. N Engl J Med. 2013; 369(9), 840–851. pmid:23984731
- 20. Annane D, Bellissant E, & Cavaillon J. Septic shock. The Lancet. 2005; (9453): 63–78
- 21. Gaither JR, Goulet JL, Becker WC, Crystal S, Edelman EJ, Gordon K, et al. The Association Between Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Long-Term Opioid Therapy and All-Cause Mortality. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2016: 31 (5), 492–501 pmid:26847447
- 22. Oderda GM, Evans RS, Lloyd J, Lipman A, Chen C, Ashburn M, et al. Cost of Opioid-Related Adverse Drug Events in Surgical Patients. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management. 2003; 25(3): 276–283. pmid:12614962
- 23. Chou R. 2009 Clinical Guidelines from the American Pain Society and the American Academy of Pain Medicine on the use of chronic opioid therapy in chronic noncancer pain. POLSKIE ARCHIWUM MEDYCYNY WEWNĘTRZNEJ. 2009; (7–8): 469–477. pmid:19776687
- 24. Ocasio F. Chronic morphine accelerates the progression of lipopolysaccharide-induced sepsis to septic shock. Journal of Neuroimmunology. 2004; 149(1–2): 90–100. pmid:15020069
- 25. Belkaid Y & Hand T. Role of the Microbiota in Immunity and inflammation. Cell. 2014;157(1):121–141. pmid:24679531