Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Mobile direct observation of therapy (MDOT) - A rapid systematic review and pilot study in children with asthma

  • Michael D. Shields,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Centre for Infection and Immunity. School of Medicine, Dentistry and Biomedical Sciences, Queen’s University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

  • Fahad ALQahtani,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Clinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

  • Michael P. Rivey,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Clinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom, Department of Pharmacy Practice, College of Health Professions and Biomedical Sciences, University of Montana, Missoula, Montana, United States of America

  • James C. McElnay

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    j.mcelnay@qub.ac.uk

    Affiliation Clinical and Practice Research Group, School of Pharmacy, Queen’s University of Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom

Mobile direct observation of therapy (MDOT) - A rapid systematic review and pilot study in children with asthma

  • Michael D. Shields, 
  • Fahad ALQahtani, 
  • Michael P. Rivey, 
  • James C. McElnay
PLOS
x

Abstract

We describe, for the first time, the use of a mobile device platform for remote direct observation of inhaler use and technique. The research programme commenced with a rapid systematic review of mobile device (or videophone) use for direct observation of therapy (MDOT). Ten studies (mainly pilots) were identified involving patients with tuberculosis, sickle cell disease and Alzheimer's disease. New studies are ongoing (ClinicalTrials.gov website) in TB, stroke, sickle cell disease, HIV and opioid dependence. Having identified no prior use of MDOT in inhaler monitoring, we implemented a feasibility study in 12 healthy volunteer children (2–12 years; 8 females and 4 males) over a period of 14 days, with twice daily video upload of their 'dummy' inhaler use. Two children uploaded 100% of the requested videos, with only one child having an inhaler upload rate of <75%. The quality of uploaded videos was generally good (only 1.7% of unacceptable quality for evaluation). The final aspect of the research was a pilot study using MDOT (6 weeks) in 22 children with difficult to treat asthma. Healthcare professionals evaluated inhaler technique using uploaded videos and provided telephone instruction on improving inhaler use. The main outcomes were assessed at week 12 post initiation of MDOT. By week 5, all children still engaging in MDOT (n = 18) were judged to have effective inhaler technique. Spirometry values did not vary to a significantly significant degree between baseline and 12 weeks (P>0.05), however, mean fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO) values normalised (mean 38.7 to 19.3ppm) and mean Asthma Control Test values improved (13.1 to mean 17.8). Feedback from participants was positive. Overall the findings open up a new paradigm in device independent (can be used for any type of inhaler device) monitoring, providing a platform for evaluating / improving inhaler use at home.

Introduction

Asthma is a health problem affecting approximately 253 million people worldwide and it is the most common non-communicable illness in children [1]. Many studies have reported that the majority of patients (50%-80%) fail to use effective inhaler technique and this inadequate inhaler use is one of the reasons for the high prevalence of uncontrolled asthma [24]. Moreover, it has been noted that most patients overestimate their inhaler use capability and are not aware of making mistakes during inhaler use [5,6]. Although inhaled corticosteroid therapy (ICS) is central to asthma management, some patients do not use their treatment as prescribed and indeed the average medication adherence to inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) in children is documented to be around 50% [7,8]. To achieve optimal outcomes, it is not only imperative that children adhere to the regular use of their ICS (normally twice per day) but that they adhere to correct inhaler technique, allowing the medicine to penetrate into, and be deposited deep within, the lungs [5].

Non-adherence to medication in children with asthma can have various negative consequences such as frequent clinic visits, disease exacerbation and hospital admission, all of which lead to an increased cost of care [4,9]. Indeed, a review of childhood asthma deaths in SE England showed that medication non-adherence was a contributing factor in more than 50% of cases, including patients with milder disease [9]. A multicentre clinical trial in the USA was designed to determine what medication was best to add in children with severe asthma already receiving ICS and long acting beta agonist (LABA) treatment. In this latter study the run-in period was not fixed and children were only randomised to therapy after they had demonstrated good adherence, including good inhaler technique. Interestingly, the trial was cut short due to an inability to recruit an adequate number of children. Patient improvement while under close supervision during the run in period was the main reason for the lack of patient recruitment [10] showing that intense monitoring and improved adherence led to the asthma becoming better controlled.

New therapies for children with uncontrolled asthma such as anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab) are very expensive and thus in the UK most large paediatric respiratory centres have set up specific ‘problem, severe asthma’ clinics. These regional centres should have the ability to confirm the asthma diagnosis, ensure that concomitant conditions are treated and, most importantly, confirm that the children still have symptoms after a period of optimised therapy (including good adherence to ICS and good inhaler technique). With the exception of directly observing therapy, there is currently no adequate generalizable method or tool to determine whether the therapy has been optimised i.e. that enables the doctor to know that the child has used his/her inhaler regularly and correctly. This involves a healthcare professional regularly visiting the patient at home or school for a period of 6 to 12 weeks which is very costly and labour intensive. There is a pressing need for a convenient, simple tool that could mimic this direct observation of therapy (DOT) without the staff and travel costs.

DOT has been promoted by the WHO to enhance the adherence of patients with tuberculosis (TB) [11,12]. A new development within the DOT arena, linked to the trend of the increased use of mobile IT devices within the healthcare field, has been the introduction of mobile DOT (MDOT). This emerging approach to assessing treatment adherence, involves a patient recording a video of their treatment administration at home on a mobile device (e.g. on their mobile phone, tablet or videophone) and then sending it electronically for observation by a healthcare provider [13,14]. MDOT has the potential to significantly reduce the cost associated with traditional DOT and has been shown to be effective in TB patients [14] and in patients with sickle cell disease [13] in whom good medication adherence is imperative. For example, a smartphone application was developed specifically for applying a MDOT approach to enhance paediatric hydroxyurea medication adherence in children with sickle cell disease [13]. This latter approach resulted in a median adherence of 93.3% over a six month period.

The aim of the present study was threefold: (a) to carry out a rapid systematic review of the use of MDOT within healthcare, and in particular its prior use in asthma management, (b) to carry out a healthy volunteer study to assess the feasibility of using MDOT to monitor / evaluate inhaler use in children and (c) perform a pilot study of the use of MDOT in children with difficult to control asthma.

Methods

Rapid systematic review

The methodological protocol for this rapid review followed the guidance outlined by Khangura et al. [15]. The literature search was carried out in April / June 2015.

All the published studies (English language) which utilised a MDOT technique were included regardless of the age or disease condition of the participants. For the purposes of this review, any study which used a video phone, smartphone or other mobile device to record a video of treatment administration at home, in which the video could be remotely observed by a healthcare provider, was included.

Six different databases i.e. MEDLINE; Scopus; Web of Science; International Pharmaceutical Abstracts (IPA); PubMed and EMBASE were rigorously searched using the following subject headings (MeSH terms) and keywords:

("video recording" OR smartphone /or handheld device OR Telemedicine / or mobile video OR Social media /or mobile applications) AND (directly observed therapy / or "direct observed" OR "directly observed" OR "direct observation"). The reference lists in each study identified were also searched for relevant studies.

In addition, an electronic online search was carried out via Google® in order to search more widely for undiscovered studies, grey literature and conference abstracts. The ClinicalTrail.gov website was also searched for new / ongoing clinical trials that were relevant to the review.

Having removed duplicates, full-text versions of the research articles were obtained. Studies that were not available in full-text version format were excluded (n = 2). The quality of the articles were assessed by three of the authors (FA, JM and MR) using the Downs and Black [16] instrument (as modified by Eng et al.) [17]. This tool has been shown to be valid and reliable in assessing randomised and non-randomised studies and contains 27 items arranged in four sub-scales, i.e. reporting, external validity, internal validity and power (score range 0–28; excellent 26–28; good 20–25; fair 15–19; poor <14). The outcome of the review is presented in the results section of this paper. No prior use of MDOT approach in asthma management was identified.

Feasibility study–healthy volunteer children

The aim of this aspect of the research programme was to evaluate the feasibility of using the MDOT approach to capture the use of ‘dummy’ inhalers in a small cohort of healthy volunteer children (n = 12) ahead of carrying out a pilot clinical study in paediatric patients with difficult to control asthma. A simple MDOT platform was developed which was compatible with all brands of smartphone, tablets or other devices that could be connected to the internet, and allowed video recording and encrypted transmission to a secure, password protected University server.

The study protocol was approved by the School of Pharmacy Ethics Committee (School Ref: 014PMY2014). A convenience sample involving children of staff working in health and social science departments in Queen’s University was recruited, i.e. via an email invitation, staff members were invited to take part in the study if they had children between the ages of 2 and 12 years old who did not suffer from asthma and who did not use an inhaler for any other condition. In addition, to be enrolled on to the study, parents (i) had to have a smartphone, tablet or other mobile device that could capture video clips and connect to the internet, (ii) had to have internet access at home and (iii) were required to provide written informed consent to their child’s participation. Children over 6 years old were required to provide their assent to join the study. Once enrolled in the study, the MDOT platform was set up on each parent’s /guardian’s smartphone, tablet (or other mobile device) to allow video capture and encrypted transmission. Parents/ guardians (and their children) were instructed in correct inhaler use and were asked to facilitate the capture and upload of two video recordings daily (morning and evening) of the use of the dummy inhaler by their child over a period of two weeks. For children up to the age 6 years old, a mask and holding chamber was used with the dummy inhaler. In general the parents/guardians ‘administered’ the inhaler for children up to 6 years old while children 6 years old and above were asked to use the dummy inhaler by themselves. A member of the research team (FA) reviewed video uploads on a daily basis, through password protected access to the repository and followed up with the parent/guardian by telephone if two consecutive days of video uploads were missed.

When the two week period of video collection was completed, parents/guardians and children over 6 years old were invited to take part in a joint interview to provide their views and experience regarding the use of the technology. A topic guide was developed to guide the interviews. During interviews with children, simplified language appropriate to their ages was used. All interviews were audio recorded and transcribed in full. The software package NVivo (IQSR international, version 10) was used to store and manage / analyse interview transcripts.

Having completed all video collections, an assessment of video quality was undertaken to determine whether the videos were of good enough quality to assess inhaler use. Five videos were randomly selected (random number generation; www.random.org) for each child i.e. 60 videos in total for the 12 participating children. The video quality was categorised as: (i) acceptable video quality, when the video had good clarity, framing, image stability and would be suitable for assessing the various steps required for scoring inhaler technique, (ii) marginally acceptable video quality was recorded when there was some aspect that affected video clarity or resolution but a general assessment of inhaler technique would still be possible and (iii) Unacceptable video quality was recorded when the video image was not clear and it would not be possible to score the inhaler steps (e.g. poor lighting) or when two or more steps in inhaler use were not clearly visible in the video recording. This evaluation was performed independently by each member of the research team (n = 4)

The primary outcome measures for this feasibility study related to the connectivity and usability of the MDOT system and therefore primarily related to (a) the number of days in which videos were loaded and (b) the quality of uploaded videos. Barriers to using the MDOT platform and to loading the videos on to the repository developed specifically for the study were determined via the interviews.

All numerical and categorical data collected during the study were analysed using descriptive approaches while the interview transcripts were analysed qualitatively (thematic analysis) [18,19].

Pilot study in children with asthma

Having achieved encouraging results in the feasibility study, attention turned to a pilot study in children with difficult to manage asthma. The study protocol was granted a favourable ethical opinion (reference number: 14/NI/1099) from the Research Ethics Committees Northern Ireland (ORECNI) and is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov PRS (reference number: NCT03248895). Parents / guardians and their children were recruited at outpatient appointments at two sites in the Belfast Health & Social Care Trust i.e. Royal Belfast Hospital for Sick Children (RBHSC) and the Trust’s Community Asthma Clinic.

Study design.

A randomised intervention trial design was used in which participants were randomised to receive either an immediate (IM) or a delayed (DE) MDOT intervention. Randomisation was restricted [20] based on two factors i.e. age (categorised as ‘young children’ aged 2 to 5 years; ‘children’ aged 5 to 12 years; ‘young people’ aged 12 to 16 years) and patient gender.

Participants allocated to the IM group participated in the MDOT intervention for the first 6 weeks of the study. Those participants allocated to the DE group commenced the MDOT intervention after a 6 week “intervention-free” period, with usual Asthma Clinic care up to that point. The original plan was to recruit 72 children (36 per group). Although the MDOT approach was well accepted by clinicians (including asthma nurses), parents and patients, due to research staffing pressures a lower sample size was achieved (n = 24). The main focus was therefore on combined data at study baseline and endpoint, i.e. baseline and 12 weeks post initiation of the MDOT intervention.

Recruitment of participants.

The parents/guardians of children and young people with asthma (aged from 2 to16 years) who had continuing symptoms of partially controlled or uncontrolled asthma, despite receiving specialist asthma clinic care, were invited to participate in the research i.e. children who had asthma symptoms despite being prescribed ICS (> 400 mcg/day budesonide equivalent for children < 5 years, or 800 mcg/day budesonide equivalent for children > 5 years) and a second line therapy such as a long acting beta agonist (LABA), leukotriene receptor antagonist (LTRA) or theophylline [21]. Access to a suitable mobile device and internet connection at home, as for the feasibility study, was also required. Subjects were only included in the study after obtaining written informed consent from their parents/guardians and assent from children older than 6 years. Recruitment of participants began in August 2015 and follow-up completed by the end of September 2016.

All subjects (parents and children as appropriate) were trained, on proper inhaler technique (by a respiratory nurse) using the Teach-to-Goal (TTG) approach [22] and received standard-of-practice asthma education and management in the Asthma Clinic prior to study enrolment i.e. educated about the role of medications in asthma management, the importance of regular preventer therapy and were able to demonstrate good inhaler technique.

Intervention and data collection.

Before the study intervention period was initiated in a given subject, the participant and/or parents/guardians were trained in use of the MDOT platform. Children aged ≥ 8 years were asked to use the MDOT approach independently while parent/guardian assistance was recommended for younger children. Usual asthma treatment for each participant was used throughout the study. Regarding inhaler use, in general children aged 5 years or older administered the medication themselves while a parent/guardian was responsible for inhaler administration in patients 2 to 5 years of age, however, parent/guardian administration was acceptable if that was usual asthma care in any age of child.

Participants (or parents/guardians of participants) were asked to capture a MDOT video twice daily as in the feasibility study. A member of the research team evaluated the MDOT uploads daily through password protected access to the University based digital repository and followed up with parents/guardians and/or participants by telephone if two consecutive days of video uploads were missed. The asthma clinical team (consultant/nurse) was notified about children identified with poor inhaler technique; they viewed the videos and contacted the participants by telephone to provide advice on improving inhaler technique.

Outcome measurements.

The range of measures at baseline were as follows:

  1. Participant demographics and relevant clinical data including laboratory data and comorbid conditions.
  2. Clinician assessment of asthma severity and degree of disease control i.e. controlled, partially controlled, or uncontrolled [23].
  3. Asthma medication profile and any changes made at the clinic visit.
  4. Number of asthma attacks, oral corticosteroids courses, and emergency attendances over the previous year.
  5. Spirometry measurements (FEV1, FVC, FEV1/ FVC)
  6. Fraction of exhaled nitric oxide (FeNO)
  7. Self-reported Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS)–appropriate scales for parent/guardian and child if 9 years of age or greater [2426].
  8. Interview-administered Pediatric Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (PAQLQ) if child >9 years of age, and the Pediatric Asthma Caregiver Quality of Life Questionnaire (PACQLQ) [27].
  9. Interview-administered Asthma Control Test (ACT) or Childhood Asthma Control Test (C-ACT) [28, 29] for children aged to 12 to 16 and 4 to 11 years respectively.

At six weeks and 12 weeks post commencement of the MDOT intervention, outcome measures ii to ix were repeated during return visits to the clinic.

Assessment of adherence.

In addition to the MARS questionnaire approach to assess adherence to ICS (see above), GP prescribing records for the 12 months prior to study commencement were collected and analysed using the medication refill adherence (MRA) approach described by Hess et al. [30] to ascertain baseline adherence. Adherence to MDOT video uploads was also assessed during the 6 week MDOT intervention in all participants. A patient was classified as adherent if the MRA value was ≥80% to <120% and non-adherent if MRA< 80%. If the MRA was found to be >120% this was considered as oversupply. This classification method was utilised by previous researchers [3134]. Patients were classified as adherent if the MARS (parent; child) score was ≥ 80% of the maximum score achievable in the respective versions (parent and child) of the MARS questionnaire.

Assessment of asthma severity and inhaler technique.

Clinician assessment of participant asthma severity was defined according to accepted guidelines and asthma control was categorised as uncontrolled, partially controlled, or controlled [23]. Patient inhaler technique was evaluated by reviewing each video uploaded in the first 2 days of the intervention period and then via a weekly review of videos uploaded to the repository. Inhaler technique was categorised on a three-point scale as effective, partially effective or poor [35]. Inhaler technique evaluation was based on the individual steps relevant to the type of inhaler being used by individual children (manufacturer administration directions). Effective technique was recorded when the participant met all relevant criteria for their inhaler type. Partially effective technique was recorded when errors in technique were observed but it was thought that the participant would receive some medication. Poor inhaler technique was recorded when critical errors in technique occurred and it was considered unlikely that any medication would be inhaled [35,36]. Sample videos was reviewed and scored by two members of the research team (FA; JM).

Feedback questionnaire.

Parents/guardians were asked to complete an ‘open question’ feedback questionnaire to provide their views and experience with the use of the technology at the end of intervention period. Feedback questionnaires were sent to each participant by post and each participant was contacted by telephone as a reminder if the questionnaire was not returned within a two week period. Two feedback questionnaires were used: one for participants who completed the 6 week period of using MDOT and the second for participants who consented to take part but did not upload videos or who uploaded videos for a shorter period that the 6 weeks requested.

Data management and analysis.

All data were coded as appropriate and entered into a study database (SPSS® version, 21, USA). All categorical data collected during the pilot study were analysed using percentages and proportions. Continuous variables were described using mean and standard deviation (SD) or if skewed median and interquartile range (IQR). Standard statistical methodology (t-test and Mann-Whitney U test) were used to compare outcome data.

Results and discussion

Rapid systematic review (RSR)

The methodological approach used in this review mirrored the approach used by Khangura et al. [15]. Several published RSRs have used this latter methodology [3739]. This review technique provides a quick approach to evaluate current evidence on a selected topic [40].

Fig 1 presents the number of studies at each stage of the selection process, including reasons for study exclusion. A total of only10 studies remained for inclusion in the main aspect of the review. Only non-randomised studies on the subject had been published. The highest score achieved for any of the studies, using the modified Downs and Black instrument [16,17], was 20 (out of a maximum possible score of 28), and the lowest score was 5. The median score for all the articles was 11.3 which equates to poor quality. It can be concluded that MDOT studies performed to date have suboptimal design / reporting and therefore results need to be considered with caution.

thumbnail
Fig 1. Study extraction and selection process in rapid systematic review (RSR).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190031.g001

All the published studies were conducted to assess treatment adherence in tuberculosis, with the exception of two studies: one involving in the treatment of children with sickle cell disease and the second involving dementia. The majority of the research was carried out in the USA (six studies), while two studies were performed in Australia. Single studies were performed in several other countries: Kenya, Mexico and Canada. Relevant information from the studies were systematically extracted and are summarised Table 1. Six of the studies were described by their authors as pilot studies. All these pilot studies demonstrated that utilising technology for monitoring adherence via a MDOT approach was feasible, economical and practical, including in one study when used by patients with mild dementia [13,41,45,47,49]. The majority of the studies reported that the IT supported approach has the potential to improve treatment adherence, with rates of adherence of over 80% reached. Two of the pilot studies involved paediatric patients (hydroxyurea treatment and tuberculosis treatment).

thumbnail
Table 1. Summary of the characteristics of the study included in the rapid systematic review (RSR).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190031.t001

Four retrospective studies reported on the cost effectiveness of MDOT use compared with regular direct observation of patients at the clinic (DOT) [42,44,46,49].

Numerous advantages and several barriers were identified in published studies from a patient perspective and from a healthcare system perspective (Table 2). The majority of the studies revealed that video recording via mobile phone / videophone was straightforward and patients were highly satisfied with using such an approach.

thumbnail
Table 2. Benefits and implementation barriers of using MDOT compared with standard DOT at home or in the clinic.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190031.t002

Furthermore, most patients believed that the MDOT approach provided a flexible and convenient method of ensuring medication adherence, compared with the inconvenience of attending a clinic [44]. In general, the time taken to record each video was less than five minutes and this did not affect the daily routine of the patients [13,49]. Moreover, healthcare providers were generally satisfied with the MDOT approach [44,45].

Despite the benefits of using the MDOT approach in monitoring medicine adherence at home, some barriers were reported (Table 2). The main impediment to using the MDOT approach at home was poor mobile network or internet coverage. However, ongoing mobile network upgrades and the burgeoning number of patients who have access to broad band internet within their home will help overcome these obstacles. A further barrier was a degree of patient concern regarding confidentiality (specifically mentioned in 4 of the 10 studies). A number of studies highlighted the fact that that they used a protocol to encrypt videos as part of collection and transmission process to reduce the possibility of unauthorised access. A further issue highlighted by Garfein et al. [41] was that the MDOT approach may not be suitable for some types of patients, e.g. individuals with severe arthritis or poor vision may be unable to join a MDOT programme unless they have a partner or helper who can assist with the process.

As a supplementary aspect of this RSR of published studies, several ongoing planned clinical trials were identified in the ClinicalTrails.gov website. These clinical studies will evaluate to use the MDOT approach in TB, stoke, sickle cell disease, HIV patients and in opioid dependence (Table 3).

thumbnail
Table 3. Ongoing or planned clinical trials using the MDOT approach in assessing treatment administration (information obtained from ClinicalTrial.gov website, accessed on Feb 2016).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190031.t003

Furthermore, four conference abstracts were discovered during further manual searches for relevant studies, all of which discussed TB adherence. Three abstracts were preliminary reports of main studies while the fourth [50] reported ≥80% adherence in 34 patients. Finally a search of the internet indicated new developments within the field, e.g. facial recognition in a new Aicure® smartphone app in which video review is carried out automatically [51].

Although there is a scarcity of research on the MDOT approach, the work to date suggests that the approach provides a promising tool to encourage and monitor patient adherence to prescribed medication. As is customary with the RSR methodology, the main findings of the review have been summarised in a short statement for ease of reference. This statement is included in Box 1. As mentioned previously there were no studies which used mobile technology in inhaler assessment.

Box 1. RSR report—MDOT in treatment adherence

Research question

- What is the current evidence in the published literature concerning the effectiveness of the mobile direct observation therapy (MDOT) approach in treatment adherence?

The main purpose of this rapid review

The purpose of the review was to gather evidence about the feasibility and effectiveness of the MDOT approach in monitoring medicine adherence.

The key messages of this rapid review

  1. ▪. The MDOT approach is feasible and promising for observing treatment remotely
  2. ▪. Although several studies have demonstrated the feasibility of recording videos of treatment administration via a mobile device and sharing this with healthcare providers (or real time viewing of treatment administration using a videophone), no robust, randomised studies have been published to date. Several ongoing studies were reported in the ClinicalTrail.gov website in which randomised recruitment is ongoing to larger studies.
  3. ▪. The MDOT approach can provide multiple benefits for patients and the healthcare system. The flexible and convenient approach, reduces the burden for patients and saves public resources.
  4. ▪. The approach has been used to date mainly in the treatment of TB and Sickle cell disease.
  5. ▪. There was a lack of methodological rigor and overall quality in the studies published to date in assessing the effectiveness of MDOT in treatment adherence.
  6. ▪. Evidence of the effectiveness of MDOT in assessing and promoting treatment adherence is currently insufficient and, therefore, further research should be conducted in this evolving area.

Feasibility study–healthy volunteer children

A total of 12 healthy children and 9 parents participated in this study, i.e. three parents had two participating children (Table 4). The mean age of children was 7.1 years (age range 2–12 years). Two thirds of the children were female (n = 8). The majority of participating parents also were female (n = 8). All participants completed recording and submitting videos using the mobile DOT approach for the entire period of the study (14 days).

thumbnail
Table 4. Demographics of participating children, MDOT adherence rate and the mobile devices used in the feasibility study.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190031.t004

A total of 284 video clips were uploaded during the study period. The overall adherence rate of submitting videos was 84.5% (Fig 2). Two children (aged > 8 years old) completed the study without missing any video uploads (100% upload adherence; Table 4). Only one participant had an upload adherence rate of less than 75%. The latter was attributed to arrangements at weekends as the child visited a second parent’s home (father) and this parent was not participating in the study. A study which examined adherence to renal medication in children is consistent with our finding that change of routine at weekends can result in a drop in adherence rate [52]. A range of different mobile devices (using either Apple or Android operating systems) were used by the participants in the study (Table 4).

The majority (87.1%) of uploaded videos via the MDOT system were judged to be of acceptable quality, 11.25% marginally acceptable and 1.65% of unacceptable video quality (due to poor lighting at home or improper framing of the video capture).

A total of eight children and nine parents were interviewed after they completed the video upload aspect of the study. The vast majority of children were satisfied with the MDOT system. Parents reported that their children were enthusiastic and interested in the use of the MDOT approach in this project, particularly older children. Older children themselves mentioned that twice daily recoding of their use of the inhaler was fun and enjoyable. In the case of only one child, the parent stated that he got somewhat bored by the end of the two week study. The present findings are consistent with a study carried out in children with sickle cell disease in which children accepted and were satisfied with daily recoding of their medication use, in this latter case over a prolonged period of six months [13]. Participants in the pilot study provided a variety of different suggestions to improve the use of the MDOT methodology, despite most children and parents finding the use of the MDOT system to be very easy and straightforward. The main improvement suggested was to have a more colourful interface and the provision of feedback to the parent/child that the video had been uploaded successfully. Multiple studies have shown that the use of mobile phone apps are acceptable to patients in assisting in the management of HIV, TB and diabetes management [45,53,54] and this was certainly the case in the present study. The training time for each participant on how to capture videos and upload them using the MDOT platform was short, i.e. the session for software installation, MDOT demonstration and training took approximately 30 minutes. With regard to the time required to use the MDOT approach, approximately five minutes was required for the complete MDOT process, including preparation time. These times are consistent with other MDOT studies that reported time requirements of less than 5 minutes [13,42,49].

In general, there were no major technical problems with the current MDOT system during the study. One parent living in a rural location reported some difficulty with a slow internet connection. Another parent had some difficulty with the size of the video clips, however, this was easily overcome by downgrading of the resolution in the mobile phone camera. It was observed, based on the videos submitted, that poor lighting in the room used to prepare videos or the participant being too far away from the mobile phone affected video clarity. This point was also highlighted by Hoffman et al. [45]. It was noted that the mobile device stand provided to each participant helped participants in the self-capture of the video clips without any assistance from others. In addition, it enabled participants to control the framing themselves and facilitated video stability. One parent reported the benefit of the mobile stand, as follows: “Not at all complicated. We had to adjust the little device for propping up the iPad with. She knew when the angle is correct. She is pretty good checking it. She will be keeping an eye to see that it was at the right angle” (parent of child aged 11 years). The results of this feasibility study confirm that this monitoring system for inhaler use is feasible and could be suitable to monitor child inhaler use within a clinical setting. Furthermore, it has the potential to monitor the correct steps of inhaler use and in monitoring adherence in children.

Pilot study in children with asthma

A total of 34 eligible patients were approached across the two study sites. Twenty two children and their parents completed the study (Fig 3). Reasons for non-participation and withdrawals from the study are reported within Fig 3. For the purpose of this pilot study analysis, due to the small numbers of patients involved, data sets from the IM and DE groups were combined and data were compared between baseline and 12 weeks post the initiation of DOT.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Number of children who participated in the pilot study in children with asthma.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190031.g003

Patient demographics.

The gender distribution of children was 17 male and 5 female. The age range of children entering the study was 2–16 (mean 9.4 + 3.7 years). The mean (+ SD) ACT scores in the participating patients were 13.1+ 5.7 at baseline while the mean (+ SD) FeNO levels at baseline were 38.7 + 28.8 PPM. Over 50% of the cohort (12/22) had been prescribed oral steroids in the year prior to study entry and approximately 40% (9/22) had used ‘out of hours’ GP services in the previous year. The majority (13/22) had a comorbid illness, primarily hay fever and eczema.

Inhaler technique.

Despite all children being able to demonstrate good inhaler technique during study enrolment at the clinic, a total of 77% (17/22) of the participants had partially effective or poor inhaler technique in the first week of MDOT assessment. This is an important finding indicating that satisfactory technique at the clinic is not carried forward to home use. By week 4 of MDOT engagement, approximately 90% (17/19) of the children had inhaler technique which was judged as effective (Table 5). At this stage, 3 patients had stopped recording their inhaler use and were not responding to phone calls or text messages. By week 5 all children still enrolled in the study (n = 18) were judged to have effective inhaler technique, i.e. inhaler technique improved after tailored inhalation instructions over the telephone by a member of clinical team. From inhaler observation, slow inspiration was found to be the most common mistake related to the use of dry power inhalers while forgetting to shake the inhaler before use and poor sealing of lips around the mouthpiece were common with pressured aerosol inhalers.

thumbnail
Table 5. Classification of inhaler technique in children during the 6 week use of the MDOT approach in the pilot study in children with asthma.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190031.t005

Influence of MDOT on outcomes.

A summary of the data on impact of the MDOT intervention on asthma outcomes, 12 weeks post the initiation of the intervention is presented in Table 6. The two main markers of asthma control (ACT and FeNO) were improved significantly (P<0.05) at the 12 week assessment; the minimum clinical difference required (i.e. 3 points in the ACT) to mark improved asthma control was achieved [55]. The MDOT approach also led to a reduction in the mean FeNO value (PPM) to normal levels, i.e. 38.7+28.8 (n = 22) to 19.3 + 14.4 (n = 16) (Table 6). Within this small pilot sample spirometry values did not vary to a statistically significant degree between baseline and 12 weeks (P>0.05).

thumbnail
Table 6. Summary data on impact of MDOT intervention on asthma outcomes (at 12 weeks post initiation of MDOT) in the pilot study in children with asthma.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0190031.t006

All parents/guardians (n = 22) completed the QOL questionnaires (PACQLQ) at baseline while 19 parents completed the questionnaire at 12 weeks post initiation of DOT. The results demonstrated improved QOL at 12 weeks compared with baseline (P< 0.001). A mean score of > 4 (moderate to excellent QOL) was achieved by participants at week 12. A total of 12 children > 9 years old completed the QOL questionnaire (PAQLQ) at baseline and at 12 weeks post initiation of MDOT. An improvement in the mean score of greater than one unit was achieved, however, this did not reach statistical significance (p = 0.079; Table 6). A statistically significant correlation were found between ACT scores and parent QOL scores at baseline (r = 0.55; p<0.001) and at 12 weeks post MDOT initiation (r = 0.74; p<0.001). Similarly, statistically significant correlations were found between ACT scores and child QOL scores at baseline (r = 0.75; p<0.001), and at 12 weeks post MDOT initiation (r = 0.65; p<0.001). Clinician assessment of asthma control indicated that at 12 weeks post initiation of the intervention, patients were moving towards the partially controlled or controlled categories, with a marked reduction in the patients deemed uncontrolled i.e. 14 at baseline vs 4 at 12 weeks (Table 6).

Adherence to video upload.

A total of 1083 video clips were recorded and uploaded during the six week MDOT period by participants. Using the video upload approach, 72.7% of the children (16/22) achieved moderate adherence to video uploads (≥ 50%) for the intervention period. The frequency / reasons for not uploading videos were as follows: busy schedule (e.g. school exam)– 6; child visits father’s home at weekend and father not trained in MDOT process– 3; forget to take video– 3; large video file size -3 (corrected by decreasing video resolution on mobile phone); lost phone– 2; no space on mobile phone storage– 2; child was unwell (e.g. gastroenteritis)– 2; mother was admitted to hospital– 2; travelling outside the country– 1. A total of four participants had a video upload adherence rate of less than 30%. There is clear scope for significant improvement in this aspect of MDOT including automated reminders, video compression (to reduce memory requirements on the mobile device), familiarisation of more than one family member with MDOT and perhaps a reduced frequency of monitoring (e.g. one upload each evening, with a tick box to confirm whether the inhaler has been used in the morning).

Adherence to inhaler use (GP records and MARS).

All of the GP prescribing data requested were received. Using the cut point of 80%, 10 children (45.4%) were deemed adherent and 12 children (54.6%) were classified as non-adherent in the 12 months prior to enrolment in the present study.

All 22 parents/guardians of the children who participated in the study completed the MARS questionnaires at baseline. Using a cut point of ≥ 80% of the maximum score achievable to represent adherence, the level of non-adherence reported for the participants was 18.2% at baseline. Nineteen parents completed the questionnaire at 12 weeks with 0% non-adherence reported. Regarding the child MARS, 12 children (≥ 9 years) completed the questionnaire at baseline with a reported non-adherence rate of 61.5%. By 12 weeks post MDOT initiation, again 100% adherence was reported by those children. Although the numbers within the pilot are small, the strong trend towards improvement in self-reported adherence is clear.

Parent feedback on use of MDOT.

Feedback from parents was very positive. They found the MDOT approach: ‘Very easy to access with patient ID, take a video and simply upload’. There was general support for loading videos twice per day e.g. ‘I think loading videos twice daily was worthwhile as it drew emphasis to the need to take medication’. Another parent commented ‘It seems normal to do it twice because it only lasts for a few minutes and does not take up any time’. Parents were asked whether 6 weeks was an appropriate duration for use of the MDOT intervention. The responses here were generally supportive of a 6 week intervention, however, some parents thought the intervention could be longer or indeed shorter. A period of 4–6 weeks seems ideal. Variable answers were provided to the question regarding what age a child could use the MDOT independently. The most pertinent answer was that: ‘If a child is able to use a smartphone, they would not find any problems’ and indeed one parent reported: ‘My child of 5 years old was able to use it’. Other parents suggested ages of 8–13 years old as being appropriate for self-use of MDOT.

The main barrier reported by parents was slow uploading of videos when internet / mobile network speeds were slow and on a few occasions videos did not upload. Parents were asked to suggest improvements to the MDOT platform. One suggested: ‘Maybe a little alarm would be useful’ while another suggested that there ‘could be a place to upload comments along with the video of inhaler use to help the doctor know how the child is getting on’. Both those suggestions are being incorporated into a redeveloped MDOT platform (www.continga.co.uk).

Advantages of using the MDOT proffered by parents were focused on (i) observing inhaler technique, (ii) monitoring / improving treatment and (iii) working as a reminder. Typical comments within these three areas respectively were: (i) ‘I think it is a great idea because the doctor is able to see how the child is using the inhaler’; ‘It has been a great help in finding out faults’, (ii) ‘I think it is great as [it] showed children are getting [the] correct treatment’; ‘I think 6 weeks was ideal because it got my son into a routine and he still is on it’; ‘It is good to learn how to control your child’s asthma’; ‘It gives parent peace of mind to know that the child with asthma is controlled right’, (iii) ‘It helped my son remember to take his inhalers twice daily’. Our findings support the views of other users (with other chronic illness) that the MDOT approach is convenient, not time consuming and with minimal disruption can be integrated into routine daily activities (Table 1).

As detailed earlier a small number of parents agreed to use the MDOT but either did not get started with the MDOT monitoring or discontinued early. Reasons for this were generally related to practical matters e.g. parking difficulties at hospital (parent did not have mobile phone at clinic visit and did not return to get the MDOT software uploaded; not being at home when child was using inhaler due to shift work; difficulty getting up in the mornings to help child. Approaches to overcome some of these logistical challenges are currently being developed by the research team.

The overall assessment of the pilot study by the researchers is that all aspects of study ran very much as planned. Although this is a small pilot study, the clinical outcome improvements at 12 weeks post MDOT initiation were encouraging as was the acceptability of the MDOT approach to parents and children. The focus of the pilot study was on improvements from baseline when the MDOT intervention was in place. It was noted, however, that there were improvements in the DE group outcome measures (particularly FeNO) at the end of the 6 week period at the start of the study i.e. before the MDOT intervention was initiated in that group. This was likely due to their enrolment in a clinical trial and becoming better engaged in their therapy because of this (Hawthorne effect). These aspects will be explored further in a larger study that is being planned by members of the research team. The MDOT approach has been used successfully for prolonged periods in TB management. However, since medication adherence is known to drop off over time in children [56] future research is required to ascertain if adherence to MDOT deteriorates over longer term use in inhaler management. Further work is also required to ascertain exactly how long MDOT is needed for to give rise to sustained improvement in inhaler technique and if further specific interventions are required to give rise to sustained adherence to the MDOT intervention.

Conclusions

MDOT is a technology that has the potential to be a cost effective approach (patient does not have to attend clinic or observer does not have to visit patient) to direct observation of therapy administration, the latter being one of the most accurate methods of evaluating adherence. It could also be potentially useful for children whose caregivers have busy schedules and find it difficult to attend scheduled clinics. Use to date, as confirmed by the rapid systematic review, has been limited mainly to TB and sickle cell disease and there have been no published reports on the use of MDOT to monitor inhaled therapy. Due to the increasing incidence of childhood asthma worldwide, there is a need for new innovative approaches to support children and their parents with asthma management, especially since national and international guidelines have advised healthcare providers to periodically assess inhaler use as part of asthma management [57,58].

After successful testing of the feasibility of using MDOT to assess inhaler technique and adherence in healthy volunteer children, the present programme of work went on to assess, in a pilot study, the impact of the approach in children with poorly controlled asthma. The results from the pilot study were also very encouraging, with children who received the MDOT intervention showing significant improvement in the two main markers of successful asthma management, i.e. the ACT and FeNO. It is perhaps worthwhile restating that all patients enrolled were receiving care from a specialist asthma clinic and had received best practice education ahead of joining the study.

Checking the uploaded videos allowed patients to be contacted if their inhaler technique was deteriorating (which it often did during the early phase of the intervention) or if videos had not been uploaded. This approach is obviously much more cost efficient when compared with DOT. Although it can be used to monitor inhaler adherence, a potential issue is that a patient may use the inhaler but forget or not bother to make and upload the video of the administration. This aspect of the overall intervention requires some further thought, perhaps an inbuilt reward system to encourage full engagement would be helpful. Also it could be the case that once per day uploading of inhaler use would be sufficient to engage patients / parents and check on inhaler use, with a simple tick box to be completed to record the second daily use of the inhaler. It was noted in the feasibility and pilot studies that the MDOT approach and the IT platform employed was easy to use and with the exception of a few instances where internet connectivity was poor, good quality videos (including the sound of inhaler activation and patient inspiration) could be easily captured and transmitted. It was also noted that the approach allowed the development of a bilateral partnership and communication between the treatment team and the parent / guardian of the child or indeed older children themselves.

This is the first research study which has examined adherence technique and inhaler use in children using the MDOT approach. The approach could be particularly useful in ensuring asthma patients are adherent to low cost standard therapies ahead of being prescribed expensive biological treatments. It also has the economic advantage that adherence can be monitored A major advantage of the approach is that individual steps in inhaler use can be easily followed, regardless of inhaler type. The very positive results should promote further adoption of, and research on, this approach in children with asthma and in other conditions across the wider population in an attempt to overcome the scourge of non-adherence which has plagued pharmacotherapy over many years.

Acknowledgments

We gratefully acknowledge the valuable input of Dr. Kate Jackson (MB BCH BAO), Queen's University Belfast & Belfast HSC Trust and Dr. Karen Keown (MB BCH BAO), Belfast HSC Trust together with Ms. Barbara Maxwell and Ms. Louise Kirk, Asthma Nurses, Belfast HSC Trust in the delivery of the pilot study in children with asthma. We also wish to thank all children and their parents/guardians who participated in the feasibility study and the pilot study. We also wish to thank Information Services, Queen’s University Belfast for assistance with the development of the MDOT platform utilised in the feasibility and pilot studies and Professor Rob Horne for allowing use of the MARS questionnaire.

References

  1. 1. World Health Organization (2013). Mediacentre, asthma. Available at: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs307/en/ (accessed Feb 2017)
  2. 2. Molimard M, Raherison C, Lignot S, Depont F, Abouelfath A, Moore N. Assessment of handling of inhaler devices in real life: an observational study in 3811 patients in primary care. Journal of Aerosol Medicine. 2003; 16:249–254. pmid:14572322
  3. 3. Hammerlein A, Muller U, Schulz M. Pharmacist-led intervention study to improve inhalation technique in asthma and COPD patients. Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice. 2010; 17:61–67. pmid:20807295
  4. 4. Bryant L, Bang C, Chew C, Baik SH, Wiseman D. Adequacy of inhaler technique used by people with asthma or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Journal Primary Health Care. 2013; 5: 191–198.
  5. 5. Machira EPM,Obimbo EM, Wamalwa D, Gachare LN.2011 Assessment of inhalation technique among asthmatic children and their carers at the Kenyatta National Hospital, Kenya. African Journal of Respiratory Medicine. 2011; 7: 19–22.
  6. 6. Inhaler Error Steering Committee, Price D, Bosnic-Anticevich S, Briggs A, Chrystyn H, Rand C, et al. Inhaler competence in asthma: common errors, barriers to use and recommended solutions. Respiratory Medicine. 2013; 107: 37–46. pmid:23098685
  7. 7. Fish L, Lung CL. Adherence to asthma therapy. Annals of Allergy, Asthma and Immunology. 2001; 68: 24–30.
  8. 8. Osterberg L, Blaschke T. Adherence to Medication. New England Journal of Medicine. 2005; 353: 487–497. pmid:16079372
  9. 9. Anagnostoua K, Harrison B, Ilesc R, Nasse S. Risk factors for childhood asthma deaths from the UK Eastern Region Confidential Enquiry 2001–2006. Primary Care Respiratory Journal. 2012; 21: 71–77. pmid:22218820
  10. 10. Strunk RC, Bacharier LB, Phillips BR, Szefler SJ, Zeiger RS, Chinchilli VM, et al. Azithromycin or montelukast as inhaled corticosteroid–sparing agents in moderate-to-severe childhood asthma study. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2008; 122: 1138–1144. pmid:18951618
  11. 11. Otu A. Is the directly observed therapy short course (DOTS) an effective strategy for tuberculosis control in a developing country? Asian Pacific Journal of Tropical Disease. 2013; 3: 227–231.
  12. 12. World Health Organisation. (2010) treatment of tuberculosis guideline 4th edition. [Online] Available at: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/2010/9789241547833/en, [Accessed May, 2015].
  13. 13. Creary SE, Gladwin MT, Byrne M, Hildesheim M, Krishnamurti L. A pilot study of electronic directly observed therapy to improve hydroxyurea adherence in pediatric patients with sickle-cell disease. Pediatric Blood and Cancer. 2014; 61: 1068–1073. pmid:24436121
  14. 14. Munoz F, Collins K, Moser K, Cerecer-Callú P, Sullivan M, Chockalingam G, et al. (2012) Video-Directly Observed Therapy: a promising solution for monitoring TB and HIV treatment adherence for binational patients in the U.S.-Mexico border region. Sixth annual CFAR international HIV/AIDS research day San Diego. Available at: http://www.slideshare.net/UCSDCFAR/munoz-presentation, [Accessed June, 2015].
  15. 15. Khangura S, Konnyu K, Cushman R, Grimshaw J, Moher D. Evidence summaries: the evolution of a rapid review approach. Systematic reviews. 2012; 1:10. pmid:22587960
  16. 16. Downs SH, Black N. The feasibility of creating a checklist for the assessment of the methodological quality both of randomised and non-randomised studies of health care interventions. Journal of Epidemiology and Community Health. 1998; 52: 377–384. pmid:9764259
  17. 17. Eng JJ, Teasell R, Miller WC, Wolfe DL, Townson AF, et al. Spinal cord injury rehabilitation evidence: Methods of the SCIRE systematic review. Topics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation. 2007;13: 1–10. pmid:22767989.
  18. 18. Braun V, Clarke V. Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology. 2006; 3: 77–101.
  19. 19. Burnard P, Gill P, Stewart K, Treasure E, Chadwick B. Analysing and presenting qualitative data. British Dental Journal. 2008; 204: 429–432. pmid:18438371
  20. 20. Gore SM. Assessing clinical trials- restricted randomisation. British Medical Journal (Clinical Research Ed.). 1981; 282: 2114–2117.
  21. 21. Nagakuma P, Thomas H. Management of severe asthma in children. Paediatrics and Child Health. 2013; 23: 291–295.
  22. 22. Press VG, Arora VM, Shah L M, Lewis S L, Charbeneau J, Naureckas E T, et al. Teaching the use of respiratory inhalers to hospitalized patients with asthma or COPD: a randomized trial. Journal of General Internal Medicine. 2012; 27: 1317–1325. pmid:22592354
  23. 23. Hamill L, Ferris K, Kapande K, McConaghy l, Douglas I, McGovern V, et al. Exhaled breath temperature measurement and asthma control in children prescribed inhaled corticosteroids: a cross sectional study. Paediatric Pulmonology. 2016; 51:13–21.
  24. 24. Horne R, Hankins M. The medication adherence report scale (MARS): a new measurement tool for eliciting patients’ reports of non-adherence. The School of Pharmacy, University of London, London, UK.
  25. 25. Goodfellow N, Hawwa A, Reid J, Horne R, Shields M, McElnay J. Adherence to treatment in children and adolescents with cystic fibrosis: a cross-sectional, multi-method study investigating the influence of beliefs about treatment and parental depressive symptoms. BMC Pulmonary Medicine. 2015; 15:43. pmid:25927329
  26. 26. Alsous M, Alhalaiqa F, Abu Farha R, Abdel Jalil M, McElnay J, Horne R. Reliability and validity or Arabic translation of Medication Adherence Report Scale (MARS) and Beliefs about Medication Questionnaire (BMQ)-specific for use in children and their parents. PLOS ONE. 2017;12(2):e0171863. pmid:28192467
  27. 27. Juniper EF, Guyatt GH, Feeny DH, Ferrie PJ, Griffith LE, Townsend M. Measuring quality of life in children with asthma. Quality of Life Research. 1996; 5: 35–46. pmid:8901365
  28. 28. Nathan RA, Sorkness CA, Kosinski M, Schatz M, Li JT, Marcus P, et al. Development of the asthma control test: a survey for assessing asthma control. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2004; 113: 59–65. pmid:14713908
  29. 29. Liu AH, Zeiger R, Sorkness C, Mahr T, Ostrom N, Burgess S, et al. Development and cross-sectional validation of the Childhood Asthma Control Test. Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology. 2007; 119: 817–825. pmid:17353040
  30. 30. Hess LM, Raebel MA, Conner DA, Malone DC. Measurement of adherence in pharmacy administrative databases: A proposal for standard definitions and preferred measures. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2006; 40: 1280–8. pmid:16868217
  31. 31. Andersson K, Melander A, Svensson C, Lind O, Nilsson JG. Repeat prescriptions: Refill adherence in relation to patient and prescriber characteristics, reimbursement level and type of medication. The European Journal of Public Health. 2005; 15: 621–626. pmid:16126746
  32. 32. Davis KL, Candrilli SD, Edin HM. Prevalence and cost of non-adherence with antiepileptic drugs in an adult managed care population. Epilepsia. 2008; 49: 446–54. pmid:18031549
  33. 33. Zeber JE, Copeland LA, Pugh MJ. Variation in antiepileptic drug adherence among older patients with new-onset epilepsy. Annals of Pharmacotherapy. 2010; 44: 1896–904. pmid:21045168
  34. 34. Shah NM, Hawwa AF, Millership JS, Collier PS, Ho P, Tan ML, et al. Adherence to antiepileptic medicines in children: a multiple-methods assessment involving dried blood spot sampling. Epilepsia. 2013; 54: 1020–1027. pmid:23448146
  35. 35. Patterson EE, Brennan MP, Linskey KM, Webb DC, Shields MD, Patterson CC. A cluster randomised intervention trial of asthma clubs to improve quality of life in primary school children: the School Care and Asthma Management Project (SCAMP). Archives of Disease in Childhood. 2005; 90: 786–791. pmid:16040874
  36. 36. Melani AS, Bonavia M, Cilenti V, Cinti C, Lodi M, Martucci P, et al. Inhaler mishandling remains common in real life and is associated with reduced disease control. Respiratory Medicine. 2011; 1059: 930–938.
  37. 37. Konnyu KJ, Kwok E, Skidmore B, Moher D. The effectiveness and safety of emergency department short stay units: a rapid review. Open Medicine. 2012; 6: e10–6. pmid:22567078
  38. 38. Lal S, Adair C. E-Mental Health: a rapid review of the literature. Psychiatric Services; 2014; 65: 24–32. pmid:24081188
  39. 39. Hind J, Sibbald LS. Smartphone applications for mental health–a rapid review, Western Undergraduate Research Journal, Health and Natural Sciences. 2015; 5: 1–9.
  40. 40. Schünemann H, Moja L. Reviews: Rapid! Rapid! Rapid and systematic. Systematic Reviews. 2015; 4, 4. pmid:25589399
  41. 41. Garfein RS, Collins K, Muñoz F, Moser K, Cerecer-Callu P, Raab F, et al. Feasibility of tuberculosis treatment monitoring by video directly observed therapy: a binational pilot study. International Journal Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases. 2015; 19: 1057–1064.
  42. 42. Mirsaeidi M, Farshidpour M, Banks-Tripp D, Hashmi S, Kujoth C, Schraufnagel D. Video directly observed therapy for treatment of tuberculosis is patient-oriented and cost-effective. European Respiratory Journal. 2015; 46: 871–874. pmid:25792632
  43. 43. Gassanov M A, Feldman LJ, Sebastian A, Kraguljac M J, Rea E, Yaffe B. The use of videophone for directly observed therapy for the treatment of tuberculosis. Canadian Journal of Public Health. 2013; 104, 3.
  44. 44. Wade VA, Karnon J, Eliott JA, Hiller JE. Home videophones improve direct observation in tuberculosis treatment: A mixed methods evaluation. PLOS ONE. 2012; 7: e50155. pmid:23226243
  45. 45. Hoffman JA, Cunningham J R, Suleh A J. Mobile direct observation treatment for tuberculosis patients: a technical feasibility pilot using mobile phones in Nairobi, Kenya. American Journal of Preventive Medicine. 2010; 39: 78–80. pmid:20537846
  46. 46. Krueger K, Ruby D, Cooley P, Montoya B, Exarchos A, Djojonegoro BM, et alhttp://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=Field%20K%5BAuthor%5D&cauthor=true&cauthor_uid=20487619. Videophone utilization as an alternative to directly observed therapy for tuberculosis. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease; 2010; 14, S. 779–781. pmid:20487619
  47. 47. Wade V, Izzo J, Hamlyn J. Videophone delivery of medication management in community nursing. Electronic Journal of Health Informatics. 2009; 4,e1.
  48. 48. Smith GE, Lunde AM, Hathaway JC, Vickers KS. Telehealth home monitoring of solitary person with mild dementia. American Journal Alzheimers Disease and Other Dementia. 2007; 22: 20–6.
  49. 49. DeMaio J, Schwartz L, Cooley P, Tice A. The application of telemedicine technology to a directly observed therapy program for tuberculosis: a pilot project. Clinical Infectious Disease. 2001; 33: 2082–2084.
  50. 50. Chuck C, Robinson E, Alexander M, Somma J, Mitropoulos N, Barroso E, et al. (2014) Use of live video directly observed therapy (LVDOT) in New York City: A six month review, September 2013 –March 2014. Available at: http://www.tbcontrollers.org/docs/posters-2014-national-tb-conference/Chuck_LVDOT%20_June2014NTC, [Accessed June, 2015].
  51. 51. Aicure–AiCure’s clinically validated artificial intelligence platform visually confirms medication ingestion. https://aicure.com/ (accessed June 2015)
  52. 52. Vasylyeva T, Singh R, Sheehan C,Chennasamudram S, Hernandez A. Self-Reported Adherence to Medications in a Pediatric Renal Clinic: Psychological Aspects: PLOS ONE. 2013; 8: 7. e69060. pmid:23874868
  53. 53. Miller WT, Himelhoch S. Acceptability of mobile phone technology for medication adherence interventions among HIV-positive patients at an urban clinic. AIDS Research and Treatment. 2013; 670525.
  54. 54. Kim YJ, Rhee SY, Byun JK, Park SY, Hong SM1, Chin SO, et al. A smartphone application significantly improved diabetes self-care activities with high user satisfaction. Diabetes Metabolism Journal. 2015; 39: 207–217. pmid:26124991
  55. 55. Schatz M, Kosinski M, Yarlas AS, Hanlon J, Watson ME, Jhingran P. The minimally important difference of the Asthma Control Test. Journal Allergy Clinical Immunology. 2009; 124: 719–723.
  56. 56. Aylward BS, Rausch JR, Modi AC. An examination of 1-year adherence and persistence rates to antiepileptic medication in children with newly diagnosed epilepsy. Journal of Pediatric Psychology. 2015; 40:66–74. pmid:24648257
  57. 57. Global initiative for asthma (GINA 2015). Pocket Guide for Asthma Management and Prevention in Children and adult older than 5 Years. Available at: http://www.ginasthma.org/, [Accessed March, 2015].
  58. 58. Task force ERA/ATA guideline on severe asthma, International ERS/ATS guidelines on definition, evaluation and treatment of severe asthma. European Respiratory Journal. 2014; 43: 343–373. pmid:24337046