Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Objective measurement of subjective tinnitus using the acoustic change complex

  • Ji-Hye Han,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Laboratory of Brain & Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

  • Joong Yeon Won,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Project administration, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Department of Otolaryngology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

  • Sung Kwang Hong,

    Roles Methodology, Project administration, Resources

    Affiliations Laboratory of Brain & Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea, Department of Otolaryngology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

  • Ja Hee Kim,

    Roles Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Visualization

    Affiliation Laboratory of Brain & Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

  • Eun Soo Kim,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Software, Supervision

    Affiliation Department of Neuroradiology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

  • Hyung-Jong Kim,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Project administration, Supervision

    Affiliations Laboratory of Brain & Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea, Department of Otolaryngology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

  • Hyo-Jeong Lee

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Software, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations Laboratory of Brain & Cognitive Sciences for Convergence Medicine, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea, Department of Otolaryngology, Hallym University College of Medicine, Chuncheon, Republic of Korea

Objective measurement of subjective tinnitus using the acoustic change complex

  • Ji-Hye Han, 
  • Joong Yeon Won, 
  • Sung Kwang Hong, 
  • Ja Hee Kim, 
  • Eun Soo Kim, 
  • Hyung-Jong Kim, 
  • Hyo-Jeong Lee


At present, there is no objective method for diagnosing subjective sensorineural tinnitus. Recently, the acoustic change complex (ACC) has been used to evaluate neural detection of sounds. Thus, the present study aimed to examine whether the ACC can reflect cortical detection and discrimination of sounds matched with tinnitus frequencies. We hypothesized that the ACC to change stimuli matched with tinnitus frequencies would be decreased in tinnitus patients because the tinnitus interferes with the perception of acoustic changes. To test the hypothesis, 96 ears of normal-hearing (NH) tinnitus patients and controls were tested. Among the tinnitus patients, 33 ears with a tinnitus frequency of 8 kHz constituted the tinnitus group, and the remaining 63 ears with no experience of tinnitus were allocated to the control group. For the 4 kHz non-tinnitus matched frequency, a subset of tinnitus (n = 17) and NH (n = 47) subjects was tested. The acoustic stimuli were pure tones with a total duration of 500 ms consisting of a 1 kHz tone in the first 250 ms and a second tone of either 8 kHz or 4 kHz in the latter 250 ms. The normalized amplitude of the ACC (naACC) was calculated separately for the amplitude of the N1’-P2’ complex evoked by an 8 kHz or 4 kHz change stimulus and for the amplitude of the N1-P2 complex elicited by the initial 1 kHz background stimulus. Our results showed that the naACC to an 8 kHz stimulus in the tinnitus group was significantly smaller than those to 4 kHz and 8 kHz in normal controls. Additionally, in the tinnitus group, the naACC to 4 kHz was greater compared to 8 kHz. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis conducted for naACC to 8 kHz at UCL revealed a fair degree of diagnostic efficacy. Overall, our results indicated that the ACC to a change stimulus matched with the tinnitus frequency can provide an objective measure of frequency-specific tinnitus.


Tinnitus is the subjective perception of sound without an external acoustic stimulation. Tinnitus is a common hearing disorder, with a prevalence ranging from 10% to 20%, and approximately 40% of people with tinnitus report severe impairments in their quality of life [14]. Due to its subjective nature, a verification of tinnitus depends solely on a subjective report from the patient.

In animal models of tinnitus, a modification of the acoustic startle reflex (ASR) has been used as an objective measure of tinnitus [58]. For example, in normal rats, a silent gap inserted into background noise decreased the ASR in response to a loud startling stimulus, while in the animals with tinnitus, the background noise with a frequency close to the tinnitus frequency did not decrease the ASR [5]. To explain this lack of inhibition, it was suggested that the tinnitus sound fills the silent gap inserted into the background noise, which is close to the tinnitus frequency. Thus, animals with tinnitus perceived the stimulus as noise with no gap. This objective measure of tinnitus in animals was recently applied to tinnitus patients in an attempt to develop a clinical diagnostic tool [9]. Although a hypothesis that a tinnitus sound fills in a gap appears highly plausible, previous studies have shown that the decreased magnitude of a startle reflex in tinnitus patients was not specific to the tinnitus frequency, and the studies attributed the disinhibition of ASR to other central auditory circuits involved in gap processing. However, a psychoacoustic study paradoxically reported that tinnitus patients did not show a perceptual deficit in a gap detection task [10].

Recently, the auditory change complex (ACC) comprised of the cortical N1-P2 responses evoked by stimuli with acoustic changes has been used to assess neural detection of sounds in normal-hearing people [11,12], as well as people with cochlear implants [13]. Following the onset responses (N1-P2) to an initial acoustic stimulus, the ACC (N1’-P2’) develops when the change stimulus is presented. The ACC has been evoked by frequency and amplitude modulations and different speech tokens [1113]. These previous studies have shown that the change in ACC as a function of various stimulus features was related to behavioral performances [11,12]. Taken together, these findings suggested that the ACC to acoustic changes could be used as an objective measurement of auditory perceptual skills.

To confirm a hypothesis suggested by previous behavioral results that a sound with a tinnitus frequency fills in silent gaps in background noise, the present study examined the change in ACC as functions of tinnitus frequency and stimulus intensity level. We hypothesized that tinnitus patients cannot clearly perceive acoustic changes in stimuli that result in decreased ACC responses. In the current study, we measured the ACC in normal-hearing (NH) subjects with tinnitus at 8 kHz using a tinnitus frequency matched stimulus (8 kHz) and an unmatched stimulus (4 kHz). We assumed that the ACC would exhibit distinctive cortical responses to a tinnitus matched stimulus in tinnitus patients because of the inhibition function for the tinnitus frequency.

Materials and methods

Study design and participants

In total, 96 ears (males = 34) of tinnitus patients with normal hearing were included in this study. Among these ears, 33 ears (males = 0, right handers = 19, age mean ± s.d. = 38.70 ± 14.72 years) showed tinnitus with a frequency equal to a pure tone of 8 kHz. The tinnitus patients were consecutively enrolled from our tinnitus clinic. Control subjects were recruited from the region near the hospital using a posted advertisement and community newsletter. The control subjects were not informed about a condition of the study since the gold standard of tinnitus diagnosis depends solely on self-reporting. The subjects completed self-reporting regarding otological and general medical histories, as well as a tinnitus experience. Only subjects who had never experienced tinnitus were included as controls (n = 63, males = 24, right handers = 30, mean age ± s.d. = 37.70 ± 12.24 years). All tested ears had a normal pure tone average threshold ≤ 25 dB HL at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz, and a hearing threshold ≤ 40 dB HL at all frequencies. Before measuring the ACC, an auditory brainstem response test was performed, and those showing an abnormal waveform or a delayed latency were excluded. Other exclusion criteria included a history of previous middle ear surgery, tinnitus with the vascular or muscular origin, and a history of neurological or psychological disease. The study protocol was approved by the Institutional Review Board of Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital (Anyang, South Korea) (IRB No. 2013-I018).

Tinnitus pitch and loudness matching

In the tinnitus matching process, all subjects underwent pure tone audiometry, and in subjects with tinnitus, a tinnitus test was applied to the tinnitus ears. The audiometry and tinnitus frequency matching were administered with a GSI 61 Audiometer (Grason-Stadler, Eden Prairie, MN, USA). The hearing thresholds for eight frequencies (0.125, 0.25, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 8 kHz) were determined by the standard Hughson-Westlake procedure. The pulsed tones were used to match approximately with the tinnitus frequency, and the subjects were asked whether the tinnitus sound was similar to the pure tone perceived during audiometry or to a broad/narrow-band noise. For tinnitus pitch matching in tinnitus patients, different types of sounds, including a pure tone, speech noise, white noise and narrow-band noise, were presented at the 10 dB SL for each testing frequency. Among the sounds, pure tone and narrow band noise with octave frequencies ranging from 125 Hz to 12 kHz (125 Hz, 0.5, 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, and 12 kHz) were presented to match the tinnitus pitch for each subject. After pulsed pairs of tone were alternatively presented, a subject was asked to choose which one most closely matched their tinnitus. These procedures were repeated several times to ensure correct matching. To avoid octave confusion, a two alternative forced choice procedure was employed with the matched tone and the octave above and below it. Only subjects who had their tinnitus at either a 4 kHz or 8 kHz pure tone participated in the current study. In addition, the most comfortable level (MCL) and uncomfortable level (UCL) were assessed with a 1 kHz tone in steps of 5 dB HL for all ears using a psychoacoustical approach [14]. In most tinnitus subjects, tinnitus loudness levels were approximately 3–5 dB SL, and the loudness levels of all subjects were below 10 dB SL.

Stimuli and procedure

The acoustic stimulus was a 1 kHz pure tone with a 500 ms duration with the addition of the second frequency, which was either an 8 kHz or 4 kHz pure tone with a 250 ms duration. Thus, the first 250 ms was a 1 kHz tone followed by 250 ms of the change stimuli. Stimuli were generated using Adobe Audition 4 (Adobe Systems Co., San Jose, CA, USA). The stimuli were monaurally delivered with a rate of 0.3 per second via an ER-3A insert earphone. The sound intensity of the 1 kHz ongoing stimulus and 4 kHz or 8 kHz change stimulus were equal. For each subject, the stimulus was presented at either MCL or UCL measured at a 1 kHz to measure the ACC separately for two different loudness levels. The subjects were awake and supine during the recording. Two channel AgCI electrodes were placed at Cz as a reference and at A1 and A2 as the active and ground, respectively (Natus Medical Corp., San Carlos, CA, USA). Electrode impedances were maintained at less than or equal to 5 kΩ with an interelectrode impedance difference of less than 2 kΩ. A total of 50 trials were presented to subjects for each condition. The ACCs evoked by the 8 kHz change stimulus were measured in all 96 ears, while only 64 ears (17 tinnitus ears and 47 control ears) were used for the 4 kHz change stimulus since 12 subjects did not return to a clinic for 4 kHz testing. Electrophysiological recording was administered a week after tinnitus evaluation for all subjects.

EEG recording and processing

Electrophysiological data were collected using a Bio-logic Navigator Pro System (Natus Medical Corp.) and analyzed by AEP version 7.0.0 (Natus Medical Corp.). Data were bandpass filtered (1–30 Hz) and were amplified with a gain of 30000 with an epoch duration of 500 ms. Artifacts were rejected during the test if located at 95 mV or above. The analyzer automatically picked the N1 and P2 peaks, and visual inspection of the artifact and peak detections was also administered. The N1 and P2 were defined as the most negative and positive points within a latency ranging from 80 to 200 ms for the onset response (N1-P2) and from 330 to 450 ms for the change response (N1’-P2’). The N1-P2 and N1’-P2’ were labeled used for the onset and change responses, respectively. To compute the normalized amplitude of the ACC (naACCs), the N1’-P2’ amplitudes were measured separately from the N1-P2 responses. The stimulus paradigm and the representative waveforms in a tinnitus patient and a control are depicted in Fig 1.

Fig 1. Stimulus paradigm and the representative waveforms in one tinnitus patient and a control.

The stimuli were 1 kHz pure tones with a 500 ms duration in addition to either an 8 kHz or 4 kHz pure tone during the latter half. Note that the auditory change complex was evoked by the change stimuli (either an 8 kHz or 4 kHz tone), which were followed by a 1 kHz onset response.

Statistical analysis

A statistical analysis was performed using MedCalc Version (MedCalc Software, Ostend, Belgium). An independent samples t-test was performed to assess the differences in mean age, as well as hearing thresholds at frequency regions ranging from 125 Hz to 8 kHz between the groups. Chi-square tests were used to determine whether the frequency distributions of sex and ear side differed between the groups.

For EEG recording, repeated measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedures were performed to examine the effects of subject group (tinnitus vs. control), stimulus frequency (4 vs. 8 kHz), and stimulus intensity level (MCL vs. UCL) on the naACC. Post hoc comparisons were conducted using Fisher’s least significant difference (LSD) test. In addition, a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis, including all 96 ears, was performed to evaluate the diagnostic efficacy of the naACC in response to 8 kHz change stimuli presented at UCL. The criterion used for statistical significance was p < 0.05.


Demographic data, hearing thresholds, and stimulus intensity levels

Demographic data showed that age, sex, and ear side were not significantly different between the tinnitus and control groups (all p > 0.05), (Table 1, left pane). The four-tone average threshold and hearing threshold at all frequencies tested (from 125 Hz to 8 kHz) were not significantly different between the two groups (all p > 0.05) (Table 1, left pane, and Fig 2). Since the stimulus intensity level was set at the MCL and UCL for a 1 kHz background stimulus, we also measured the MCL and UCL for an 8 kHz change stimulus to examine whether the loudness perception presented at the tinnitus frequency was different between tinnitus patients and controls. According to independent t-test results, there were no differences between the groups for both MCL and UCL measured at 8 kHz (both p > 0.05, Table 1, left pane).

Fig 2. Hearing thresholds from 0.125 to 8 kHz for the tinnitus and control groups.

Table 1. Demographic data, hearing thresholds, and stimulus intensity levels.

Effect of tinnitus frequency and stimulus intensity level on naACC

Fig 3 shows a comparison of naACCs to 4 kHz and 8 kHz change stimuli at the MCL and UCL for the tinnitus and control groups. The general trend was that in the control group, the naACCs were almost identical between 4 kHz and 8 kHz, regardless of the stimulus intensity level, while the naACCs were decreased with 8 kHz change stimuli for both MCL and UCL in the tinnitus group. Table 2 summarizes the naACC to 4 kHz (n = 17) and 8 kHz (n = 47) change stimuli for ears tested with both stimuli. A repeated measures ANOVA on the naACC (tinnitus/control x 4 kHz/8 kHz x MCL/UCL) revealed a significant group x stimulus frequency interaction [F(1, 62) = 4.74, p < 0.05]. A posthoc test showed that in the tinnitus group, the naACC to 8 kHz was smaller than those to 4 kHz (p < 0.05). Additionally, the naACCs to both 4 kHz and 8 kHz in the control group were greater compared to 8 kHz in the tinnitus group (both p < 0.05). No differences were observed between 4 kHz and 8 kHz in the control group or between the tinnitus and control groups at 4 kHz.

Fig 3. Pair-wise comparison of the naACC in ears tested with both 4 kHz and 8 kHz change stimuli in the control (n = 47) and tinnitus (n = 17) groups.

The naACCs evoked by an 8 kHz frequency matched stimuli in the tinnitus group were significantly decreased compared to 4 kHz non-frequency matched stimuli in the tinnitus group as well as the control group for all conditions.

Table 2. Normalized amplitudes of the ACC to 4 kHz and 8 kHz change stimuli for ears tested with both stimuli.

For the naACC in ears tested with only 8 kHz (n = 96), a separate statistical analysis was conducted to examine the group effect and stimulus intensity level effect. Fig 4 shows a comparison of naACCs to 8 kHz at the MCL and UCL between the tinnitus and control groups. The figure showed that the naACCs to 8 kHz in the tinnitus group were decreased compared to the control group at both MCL and UCL (Table 3). Similarly, analysis revealed a significant main effect for group [F(1, 94) = 9.66, p < 0.01], indicating that the naACCs were significantly smaller in the tinnitus group compared to the control group (p < 0.05). No significant difference was observed for the stimulus intensity level.

Fig 4. naACCs in response to 8 kHz at the MCL and UCL in the tinnitus and control groups.

Note that the naACCs in the control group were significantly greater compared to the tinnitus group.

Table 3. Normalized amplitude of the ACC to 8 kHz change stimuli (mean ± s.d.).

Diagnostic efficacy of the naACC

An ROC curve analysis was performed for naACCs in response to 8 kHz at the UCL (Fig 5). The area under the ROC curve was 0.732 (95% CI: 0.632‒0.817, p < 0.0001), indicating a fair degree of diagnostic efficacy. When applying the suggested optimal criterion of 0.372 or less, the sensitivity was 48.48%, and the specificity was 85.71%.

Fig 5. ROC curve analysis using the naACC in response to the 8 kHz change stimulus at the UCL.

The area under the ROC curve was 0.732 (p < 0.0001).


This study aimed to describe the characteristics of the acoustic change complex in tinnitus patients to assess the potential of ACC as an objective measure for tinnitus. The naACCs were recorded using the tinnitus matched frequency at different intensity levels in tinnitus patients, as well as in normal controls. Overall, the naACCs to change stimuli were decreased in tinnitus patients compared to controls especially for the 8 kHz change stimulus. Additionally, in the tinnitus group, the naACC to 8 kHz stimulus was significantly smaller than to the 4 kHz stimulus, while no difference was found in normal controls.

In the clinic, although several audiological tests evaluating abnormalities in peripheral and central auditory organs of sensorineural tinnitus are available, an objective measure to detect subjective tinnitus does not exist. The diagnosis of tinnitus heavily relies on subjective methods, such as self-reporting, questionnaires, and visual analog rating scales. Given that the tinnitus frequency matching is associated with the frequency spectrum of hearing loss, indicating the relevance of hearing impairment to the generation of tinnitus, proper medical examination, audiological tests, and evaluation of tinnitus are required for successful management of tinnitus. However, the relationship between hearing loss and tinnitus is not straightforward in that not all patients with hearing loss have tinnitus, and a normal audiogram can be observed in people with tinnitus [1].

Previous studies have attempted to develop behavioral and electrophysiological methods for assessing tinnitus using animal models [5,15,16]. One efficient and inexpensive paradigm applied in the animal models is the gap pre-pulse inhibition of the ASR (GPIAS) [5,6,1719]. The underlying concept of GPIAS is that tinnitus-induced animals consistently perceive the tinnitus sound in moments of silence and that the continuing tinnitus sound disturbs the perception of gaps or pre-pulses and inhibits the ASR. Although the GPIAS paradigm is widely accepted in animal studies, a recent trial in humans failed to show frequency-specific disinhibition [9].

In this study, we used a different method to identify tinnitus based on the concept of tinnitus filling in for moments of silence from the previous animal studies. We measured the change of ACC as a function of stimulus frequency and intensity level to examine whether the ACC can reflect the detection of acoustic change in tinnitus patients. The ACC is a cortical response evoked by a change in an ongoing acoustic stimulus, such as timbre, frequency, loudness, and speech sounds. The ACC has also been successfully recorded in normal hearing adults and children, as well as people with CI, to compare with their speech perception ability [1113,20]. In tinnitus patients, a mismatch negativity study using the 8 kHz tinnitus frequency as a target stimulus showed that the N1 responses were smaller and earlier in response to the target stimuli, indicating tinnitus-induced neurophysiological changes in the tinnitus patients [21]. Furthermore, studies recording the ACC in response to frequency-specific stimuli in tinnitus patients have demonstrated that the magnitude changes in the ACC decreased when a stimulus contained the frequency corresponding to the tinnitus frequency [21,22]. The underlying theory for this finding is that if an acoustic change occurs with the frequency at which the patient hears the tinnitus sound constantly, the tinnitus sound may interfere with detection of the change.

In the present study, we found that the ACCs changed with stimulus frequency but not with stimulus intensity. Similarly, the previous electrophysiological studies examining frequency/intensity functions in tinnitus patients have reported a greater effect of frequency than the intensity. For example, Kadner and colleagues (2002) reported the intensity dependency of the N1 decreased when tinnitus frequency tones were used to evoke the N1 [22]. Weisz et al. (2005) also showed that the N1 amplitudes were increased with tinnitus-related frequencies [23]. The above findings indicated that changes of the ACC with tinnitus frequency could be due to the maladaptive plasticity of cortical tonotopic maps in tinnitus patients. The theory behind the maladaptive plasticity is that tinnitus may not be solely explained by peripheral damage, rather than by the imbalance of inhibition and exhibition of the neuronal coding. The imbalance may result from the increased activation of neurons with characteristic frequencies (CF) to the frequency range of the hearing loss. In the primary auditory cortex, neurons coding hearing loss are not able to inhibit neurons nearby, and it triggers the neurons to favorably respond to the frequency region of hearing impairment [2426]. Consequently, the reduced inhibition of neurons with CF to the edge frequency of hearing impairment results in the phantom sensation of hearing without acoustic stimulation in tinnitus patients. A study that measured the 40 Hz steady-state response using the amplitude-modulated change paradigm also reported increased neural synchrony accompanied by tonotopic map reorganization that was similar to that shown in animal studies [27].

Another finding of our study was that in tinnitus patients, the tinnitus frequency (8 kHz) evoked significantly decreased naACCs compared to a non-tinnitus frequency (4 kHz). In addition, the naACCs to 8 kHz in tinnitus subjects were significantly smaller than those in normal controls. One possible explanation for decreased naACC amplitudes in tinnitus subjects is degraded temporal processing associated with the decreased number of phase-locked neurons for the tinnitus frequency [28]. Previous studies investigating the tinnitus-related neural change with data from cortical and subcortical recordings have reported that the decreased neural responses to stimuli with the tinnitus frequency were attributed to the poor temporal resolution, which is related to the decreased number of phase-locking neurons in the area of the auditory cortex corresponding to the tinnitus frequency [29,30].

This study has several limitations. First, the hypothesis tested in this study should be investigated with additional frequencies as well as 8 kHz for tinnitus matching. Indeed, patients sometimes fail to match their tinnitus sound to any presented sound during the frequency-matching procedure. For these patients, a participant-oriented method employed in the psychoacoustic measure may be helpful [9]. In addition, considering the diverse range of tinnitus quality, various types of change stimuli should be used to verify the potential of the ACC as a diagnostic tool. Second, although we recruited tinnitus subjects with normal audiograms at 0.5, 1, 2, and 3 kHz, a number of them (n = 14) had increased thresholds at the tinnitus frequency. It is known that sensorineural type of tinnitus is frequently accompanied by a hearing impairment, and approximately 90% of tinnitus patients have a degree of hearing loss. In addition, the remaining 10% patients could show the decreased hearing sensation at the frequencies, which are outside a typical audiogram [31,32]. Therefore, a future study should include tinnitus subjects who are free of hearing loss for all frequency ranges in the audiogram to clarify the neural correlates of tinnitus.


This study determined that the ACC changed as a function of the tinnitus frequency. Additionally, a tinnitus-related neural change measured using the ACC amplitude indicated that the ACC cortical response was sensitive to subjective perception of tinnitus. Moreover, the ROC curve analysis showed a fair degree of diagnostic efficacy of the ACC. Overall, this study suggests to both clinicians and researchers that the ACC can be used as an objective measurement for tinnitus patients with a careful tinnitus frequency matching process.

Supporting information

S1 Dataset. Raw dataset of ACC for normal hearing participants and tinnitus patients.



The authors are grateful to Eunoak Kim, Yeonsook Ji, Sangwon Park, and Hyun-wook Shin for their technical assistance and to all patients and volunteers for their participation.


  1. 1. Langguth B, Kreuzer PM, Kleinjung T, De Ridder D. Tinnitus: Causes and clinical management. The Lancet Neurology. 2013. pp. 920–930. pmid:23948178
  2. 2. Park RJ, Moon JD. Prevalence and risk factors of tinnitus: The Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2010–2011, a cross-sectional study. Clin Otolaryngol. 2014;39: 89–94. pmid:24612912
  3. 3. Langguth B. A review of tinnitus symptoms beyond “ringing in the ears”: a call to action. Curr Med Res Opin. 2011;27: 1635–1643. pmid:21699365
  4. 4. Shargorodsky J, Curhan GC, Farwell WR. Prevalence and characteristics of tinnitus among US adults. Am J Med. 2010;123: 711–718. pmid:20670725
  5. 5. Turner JG, Brozoski TJ, Bauer C a, Parrish JL, Myers K, Hughes LF, et al. Gap detection deficits in rats with tinnitus: a potential novel screening tool. Behav Neurosci. 2006;120: 188–195. pmid:16492129
  6. 6. Turner JG, Parrish J. Gap detection methods for assessing salicylate-induced tinnitus and hyperacusis in rats. American Journal of Audiology. 2008.
  7. 7. Middleton JW, Kiritani T, Pedersen C, Turner JG, Shepherd GMG, Tzounopoulos T. Mice with behavioral evidence of tinnitus exhibit dorsal cochlear nucleus hyperactivity because of decreased GABAergic inhibition. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108: 7601–6. pmid:21502491
  8. 8. Lobarinas E, Hayes SH, Allman BL. The gap-startle paradigm for tinnitus screening in animal models: Limitations and optimization. Hear Res. 2013;295: 150–160. pmid:22728305
  9. 9. Fournier P, Hébert S. Gap detection deficits in humans with tinnitus as assessed with the acoustic startle paradigm: Does tinnitus fill in the gap? Hear Res. 2013;295: 16–23. pmid:22688322
  10. 10. Campolo J, Lobarinas E, Salvi R. Does tinnitus "fill in” the silent gaps? Noise Health. 2013;15: 398–405. pmid:24231418
  11. 11. Martin BA, Boothroyd A. Cortical, auditory, evoked potentials in response to changes of spectrum and amplitude. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000;107: 2155–2161. pmid:10790041
  12. 12. Han JH, Dimitrijevic A. Acoustic change responses to amplitude modulation: A method to quantify cortical temporal processing and hemispheric asymmetry. Front Neurosci. 2015;9. pmid:25717291
  13. 13. Brown CJ, Etler C, He S, O’Brien S, Erenberg S, Kim J-R, et al. The electrically evoked auditory change complex: preliminary results from nucleus cochlear implant users. Ear Hear. 2008;29: 704–717. pmid:18596644
  14. 14. Hawkins DB, Walden BE, Montgomery A, Prosek RA. Description and validation of an LDL procedure designed to select SSPL90. Ear Hear. 1987;8: 162–9. pmid:3609512
  15. 15. Jastreboff PJ, Brennan JF, Coleman JK, Sasaki CT. Phantom auditory sensation in rats: an animal model for tinnitus. Behav Neurosci. 1988;102: 811–822. pmid:3214530
  16. 16. Liu XP, Chen L. Auditory brainstem response as a possible objective indicator for salicylate-induced tinnitus in rats. Brain Res. 2012;1485: 88–94. pmid:22607819
  17. 17. Yang G, Lobarinas E, Zhang L, Turner J, Stolzberg D, Salvi R, et al. Salicylate induced tinnitus: Behavioral measures and neural activity in auditory cortex of awake rats. Hear Res. 2007;226: 244–253. pmid:16904853
  18. 18. Dehmel S, Eisinger D, Shore SE. Gap prepulse inhibition and auditory brainstem-evoked potentials as objective measures for tinnitus in guinea pigs. Front Syst Neurosci. 2012;6: 1–15.
  19. 19. Longenecker RJ, Galazyuk A V. Methodological optimization of tinnitus assessment using prepulse inhibition of the acoustic startle reflex. Brain Res. 2012;1485: 54–62. pmid:22513102
  20. 20. Small SA, Werker JF. Does the acc Have Potential as an Index of Early Speech-Discrimination Ability? a Preliminary Study in 4-Month-Old Infants With Normal Hearing. Ear Hear. 2012;33: e59–e69. pmid:22785572
  21. 21. Hong SK, Park S, Ahn M-H, Min B-K. Top-down and bottom-up neurodynamic evidence in patients with tinnitus. Hear Res. 2016;342: 86–100. pmid:27725178
  22. 22. Kadner A, Viirre E, Wester DC, Walsh SF, Hestenes J, Vankov A, et al. Lateral inhibition in the auditory cortex: an EEG index of tinnitus? Neuroreport. 2002;13: 443–446. pmid:11930157
  23. 23. Weisz N, Wienbruch C, Dohrmann K, Elbert T. Neuromagnetic indicators of auditory cortical reorganization of tinnitus. Brain. 2005;128: 2722–2731. pmid:16014655
  24. 24. Eggermont JJ, Komiya H. Moderate noise trauma in juvenile cats results in profound cortical topographic map changes in adulthood. Hear Res. 2000;142: 89–101. pmid:10748332
  25. 25. Eggermont Roberts L.E.b JJ., Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE, Eggermont Roberts,L.E.b JJ., Eggermont JJ, Roberts LE. The neuroscience of tinnitus. Trends Neurosci. 2004;27: 676–682. pmid:15474168
  26. 26. Pantev C, Okamoto H, Teismann H. Tinnitus: The dark side of the auditory cortex plasticity. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2012;1252: 253–258. pmid:22524367
  27. 27. Wienbruch C, Paul I, Weisz N, Elbert T, Roberts LE. Frequency organization of the 40-Hz auditory steady-state response in normal hearing and in tinnitus. Neuroimage. 2006;33: 180–94. pmid:16901722
  28. 28. Gabriel D, Veuillet E, Ragot R, Schwartz D, Ducorps A, Noreña AJ, et al. Effect of stimulus frequency and stimulation site on the N1m response of the human auditory cortex. Hear Res. 2004;197: 55–64. pmid:15504604
  29. 29. Bharadwaj HM, Verhulst S, Shaheen L, Liberman MC, Shinn-Cunningham BG. Cochlear neuropathy and the coding of supra-threshold sound. Front Syst Neurosci. 2014;8: 26. pmid:24600357
  30. 30. Paul BT, Bruce IC, Roberts LE. Evidence that hidden hearing loss underlies amplitude modulation encoding deficits in individuals with and without tinnitus. Hear Res. 2017;344: 170–182. pmid:27888040
  31. 31. Schaette R, McAlpine D. Tinnitus with a Normal Audiogram: Physiological Evidence for Hidden Hearing Loss and Computational Model. J Neurosci. 2011;31: 13452–13457. pmid:21940438
  32. 32. Plack CJ, Barker D, Prendergast G. Perceptual consequences of “hidden” hearing loss. Trends Hear. 2014;18: 1–11. pmid:25204468