Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Structure and function of a CE4 deacetylase isolated from a marine environment

  • Tina Rise Tuveng,

    Roles Data curation, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliation Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway

  • Ulli Rothweiler,

    Roles Data curation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation The Norwegian Structural Biology Centre, Department of Chemistry, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

  • Gupta Udatha,

    Roles Data curation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation The Norwegian Structural Biology Centre, Department of Chemistry, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

  • Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad,

    Roles Conceptualization, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway

  • Arne Smalås,

    Roles Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation The Norwegian Structural Biology Centre, Department of Chemistry, The Arctic University of Norway, Tromsø, Norway

  • Vincent G. H. Eijsink

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Supervision, Writing – review & editing

    vincent.eijsink@nmbu.no

    Affiliation Faculty of Chemistry, Biotechnology and Food Science, Norwegian University of Life Sciences (NMBU), Ås, Norway

Structure and function of a CE4 deacetylase isolated from a marine environment

  • Tina Rise Tuveng, 
  • Ulli Rothweiler, 
  • Gupta Udatha, 
  • Gustav Vaaje-Kolstad, 
  • Arne Smalås, 
  • Vincent G. H. Eijsink
PLOS
x

Abstract

Chitin, a polymer of β(1–4)-linked N-acetylglucosamine found in e.g. arthropods, is a valuable resource that may be used to produce chitosan and chitooligosaccharides, two compounds with considerable industrial and biomedical potential. Deacetylating enzymes may be used to tailor the properties of chitin and its derived products. Here, we describe a novel CE4 enzyme originating from a marine Arthrobacter species (ArCE4A). Crystal structures of this novel deacetylase were determined, with and without bound chitobiose [(GlcNAc)2], and refined to 2.1 Å and 1.6 Å, respectively. In-depth biochemical characterization showed that ArCE4A has broad substrate specificity, with higher activity against longer oligosaccharides. Mass spectrometry-based sequencing of reaction products generated from a fully acetylated pentamer showed that internal sugars are more prone to deacetylation than the ends. These enzyme properties are discussed in the light of the structure of the enzyme-ligand complex, which adds valuable information to our still rather limited knowledge on enzyme-substrate interactions in the CE4 family.

1. Introduction

Today there is a focus on the shift from a fossil-based economy to a greener economy based on renewable resources such as biomass. Chitin, an insoluble polymer of β-1,4 linked N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc), is considered as the second most abundant biomass on earth, and occurs in large amounts in different ecosystems, for example in the exoskeleton of crustaceans and insects. Many microorganisms can utilize chitin as an energy source and exploration of metagenomics information from chitin-rich ecosystems is thus likely to reveal enzymes with activity against chitin.

The production of chitosan [partially deacetylated chitin consisting of GlcNAc and glucosamine (GlcN)] and chitooligosaccharides (CHOS, i.e. homo- or hetero-oligosaccharides of GlcN and GlcNAc) from chitin is of considerable industrial interest. However, the extraction of chitin from e.g. shrimp shells and the subsequent production of chitosan and CHOS involves the use of harsh chemicals that are not environmentally friendly [1, 2]. Therefore, it is desirable to replace one or more of the chemical processing steps used today with enzymatic processes. The degree of polymerization (DP) and the fraction of acetylation (FA) are well known determinants of the physicochemical and biological properties of chitosan and CHOS. In addition, the pattern of acetylation (PA) is believed to have impact on the properties of chitosan and CHOS [3]. The potential applications of chitosan and CHOS are numerous (reviewed in e.g. [4] and [5]), which is in part due to their biocompatibility.

Deacetylases acting on chitin (CDAs) occur in carbohydrate esterase family 4 (CE4) of the CAZy database (www.cazy.org) [6]. CE4 enzymes are capable of removing acetyl groups in chitin, chitosan, and CHOS, thus converting GlcNAc (or A) units to GlcN (or D) units. Enzymes in the CE4 family may also act on peptidoglycan [7, 8] and acetyl xylan [9]. The use of CDAs could in principle allow tailoring of both the fraction and pattern of acetylation in chitosan and CHOS [1012]. For example, Hamer et al. used two different deacetylases (NodB from Rhizobium sp. GRH2 and VcCDA from Vibrio cholerae) to produce CHOS containing two deacetylated sugars in their non-reducing ends [12]. They could do so because NodB specifically deacetylates the non-reducing end, while VcCDA specifically deacetylates the sugar next to the non-reducing end [12]. Notably, most characterized CE4 deacetylases show a broader substrate specificity [1315], deacetylating several positions in CHOS, chitin, chitosan, and acetyl xylan.

Despite their abundance in Nature and a plethora of (potential) roles in biology and industry, available structural information for CE4 enzymes remains limited, and information on enzyme-substrate interactions is scarce. In 2014, Andrés et al. described structures of VcCDA in complex with chitobiose and chitotriose. Based on this landmark study, these authors proposed that the pattern of acetylation in the products of different CE4 enzymes is determined by variable loops near the catalytic center that affect the accessibility of subsites in the binding cleft [16].

In an attempt to discover novel CDAs, we have searched a collection of bacterial genomes and metagenomes for members of the CE4 family starting from existing annotations based on the Enzyme Commission classification system [17]. Bioinformatic tools were utilized to select the most promising candidates, resulting in one candidate for cloning, expression and in-depth characterization. X-ray crystallography yielded two structures, one for the substrate free protein and one for a complex with (GlcNAc)2 bound in the active site. This novel CDA has an open active site (in contrast to VcCDA) and the structure with substrate is the first structure of a complex for this type of deacetylase. We also elucidated the substrate specificities of this deacetylase to gain insight into its potential use for tailoring patterns of acetylation in CHOS.

2. Materials and methods

2.1 Selection of candidates

An internal collection of annotated bacterial genomes and metagenomes (~300 Mb of sequence data), supplemented with metagenomics data from an Intestinal Microbiota Project [18] and from the HOTS vertical ocean depth project, was searched for potential chitin deacetylases, i.e. enzymes annotated with E.C. number 3.5.1.41. The resulting candidate proteins (64 in total) were subjected to further bioinformatic investigations to select the most promising candidates, as described in the Results and Discussion section.

2.2 Cloning and protein production

Synthetic gene encoding the selected protein (without signal peptide) with an N-terminal His6-Ala-Gly-tag and sequence optimized for expression in E.coli, were ordered from GenScript (NJ, USA), amplified by PCR and cloned into the pNIC-CH [19] vector utilizing Ligation Independent Cloning [20]. The synthetic gene encoded an N-terminal His-tag and contained its normal stop codon (meaning the C-terminal His-tag encoded by this vector was not exploited). The plasmid containing the gene of interest was transformed into chemically competent BL21 Star cells by heat shock. Transformants were cultured in 2 ml LB medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml) and a colony PCR type of method was performed to check for correct plasmid size. Cultures for strains containing plasmids with correct sizes were further cultivated by adding more LB medium and kanamycin, after which plasmids were isolated using the plasmid purification kit from Macherey-Nagel GmbH & Co (Düren, Germany), followed by sequencing of the inserted gene at GATC Biotech (Constance, Germany) using Sanger sequencing.

Protein expression was started by growing a 5 ml pre-culture (LB with 50 μg/ml kanamycin, overnight, 37 oC) which was used to inoculate 0.5 L TB-medium supplemented with kanamycin (50 μg/ml) and containing 0.011% Antifoam 204 (Sigma, Steinheim, Germany), followed by incubation at 37°C in a Harbinger system (LEX-48 Bioreactor, Harbinger biotech, Markham, Canada). At OD600 = 0.6, the culture was induced with IPTG (final concentration 0.2 mM) and incubation was continued over night at 30°C before harvesting the cells by centrifugation. The cell pellet was resuspended in 20 ml 20 mM Tris-HCl, 150 mM NaCl, 10 mM imidazole, pH 8.0. Before sonication (28% amplitude with a pulse of 5 seconds on, 10 seconds off for 10 minutes), DNAseI (final concentration 1.4 μg/ml) and PMSF (final concentration 0.1 mM) were added. The sonicated sample was centrifuged and the supernatant was filtered (0.45 μm), before protein purification by nickel affinity chromatography using a HisTrap HP 5 ml column (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden) connected to an Äkta pure system (GE Healthcare Life Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden). A stepwise imidazole gradient ending at 500 mM imidazole was used to elute bound protein. After checking the presence and purity of the protein by SDS-PAGE, relevant fractions were pooled and the protein solution was concentrated, with concomitant buffer exchange to 20 mM Tris-HCl, 100 mM NaCl, pH 8.0, using Amicon Ultra-15 centrifugal filters with 10 000 NMWL (Merck Millipore, Cork, Ireland). The protein concentration was measured with the Bradford micro assay (Bio-Rad, CA, USA).

2.3 Structure determination

The protein solution (10 mg/ml) was mixed (1:1) with the crystallization solution (100 mM MES pH6.5 15–18% PEG 3350) for a final drop size of 4 μl. Crystallization was done in 24 well hanging drop plates. Rod shaped crystals appeared within 1–2 days at room temperature. For the cocrystallization experiments the protein solution (10 mg/ml) was treated with 1 mM EDTA (to prevent the catalysis) prior to the addition of (GlcNAc)4. Crystals were cryo-protected in the crystallization solution modified to include 30% ethylene glycol and flash cooled in liquid nitrogen.

X-ray diffraction data were collected at the European Synchrotron Radiation Facility ESRF Grenoble, France (collection statistics are summarized in Table 1). The images were integrated using the XDS [21] and XDSapp [22] software. The structures were solved by molecular replacement with Phaser [23] using the structure of SpPgdA, a peptidoglycan deacetylase from Streptococcus pneumoniae (PDB id: 2C1G; [24]) as search model for 5LFZ and, subsequently, using 5LFZ as search model for 5LGC. The structures were refined by iterative cycles of PHENIX [25] and the CCP4 program REFMAC5 [26, 27] followed by the manual refitting of residues and ligands into the electron-density between the refinement cycles and placement of water molecules using Coot v.0.7.2 [28]. PRODRG [29] was used to generate the cif file for chitobiose.

thumbnail
Table 1. Crystallographic data and model statistics for the two structures.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187544.t001

2.4 Activity assays

Reaction mixtures for determination of enzyme activity contained 2 mM or 5 mg/ml substrate, 10 μM CoCl2 and 300 nM enzyme in 50 mM Tris-HCl, pH 8.0. Reaction mixtures were incubated at 37°C, using a thermomixer with shaking at 600 rpm. Reactions were quenched by adding acetonitrile to a final concentration of 50% (v/v). N-acetylglucosamine (GlcNAc) was purchased from Sigma- Aldrich (Steinheim, Germany), while acetylated oligomers [(GlcNAc)2-6] were purchased from MegaZyme (Bray, Ireland). Alpha-chitin extracted from Pandalus borealis was from Seagarden (Avaldsnes, Norway) and β-chitin extracted from squid pen was purchased from France Chitin (Batch 20140101, Orange, France). Aspen acetyl xylan and chitosan (FA = 0.64) were a kind gifts from Bjørge Westereng and BioCHOS AS (Ås, Norway), respectively. Quantification of released acetate was done by ion chromatography using a Dionex ICS3000 system with suppressed conductivity detection and equipped with a Dionex IonPac AS11 organic acid column, using the following gradient: 0–8 min, 1 mM KOH; 8–9 min, from 1 to 60 mM KOH; 9–16 min, 60 mM KOH; 16–16.1 min, from 60 to 1 mM KOH; 16.1–22 min, 1 mM KOH. The flow rate was 0.375 ml/min. The amount of released acetate was quantified using acetic acid [glacial, anhydrous (Merck, Damstadt, Germany)] as standard. Operation of the Dionex ICS3000 system and processing of chromatograms were performed using the Chromeleon 7 software (Dionex Corp.).

2.5 AMAC labeling and sequencing of chito-oligomers

Products generated by the deacetylase from (GlcNAc)5 were labeled with 2-aminoacridone (AMAC) (Sigma- Aldrich, Steinheim, Germany) as previously described by Bahrke et al. [30] and labeled products were purified using a C18 column (Starata C18E, Phenomenex, CA, US) as described by Morelle et al. [31], with one deviation: instead of lyophilizing the labeled samples, the reaction products were dried by vacuum centrifugation. The labeled products were re-dissolved in 50 μl 50% MeOH and analyzed using a LTQ-Velos Pro ion trap mass spectrometer (Thermo Scientific, Bremen, Germany) connected to an Ultimate 3000 RS HPLC (Dionex, CA, USA). This setup was used for direct injection without a column. The pump delivered 200 μl/min of 0.03 μM formic acid in 70% acetonitrile and data was acquired for 24 seconds after injection. For the MS, the capillary voltage was set to 3.5 kV and the scan range was m/z 150–2000 using two micro scans. The automatic gain control was set to 10,000 charges and a maximum injection time of 20 milliseconds. For fragmentation of desired precursor masses by MS2, the normalized collision energy was set to 37 and three micro scans were used. The data were recorded with Xcalibur version 2.2.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Selection of candidate CDAs from metagenome data

Deacetylases in CAZy family CE4 contain five conserved motifs containing residues that are important for the catalytic activity [24, 32]: motif 1, T(F/Y)DD; motif 2, H(S/T)xxH; motif 3, R(P/x)PY; motif 4, DxxD(W/Y); motif 5, LxH. The second aspartate in motif 1 coordinates a metal ion, preferably Co2+ [24, 33], together with two histidines in motif 2. The first aspartate in motif 1 is believed to act as a base during catalysis, activating a water molecule to carry out a nucleophilic attack on the carbon in the scissile C-N bond. The histidine in motif 5, thought to be protonated, could promote C-N breaking by acting as an acid protonating the leaving amino-sugar. The backbone of motif 3, in particular of the tyrosine, is involved in stabilizing the oxyanion intermediate that is formed during catalysis [16, 24, 34]. Motif 3 and 4 each form one side of a shallow active site groove (Blair et al., 2005). Notably, proteins may receive a CE4 annotation without possessing all these five motifs and such CE4 enzymes are not likely to be active [35].

The initial search of the annotated bacterial genomes and metagenomes yielded 64 protein sequences (annotated as EC 3.5.1.41), 48 of which belonged to CAZy family CE4. Each sequence was manually inspected to check for the presence of all five sequence motifs, leaving 24 proteins. The genes for 8 of these 24 proteins did not seem complete, leaving 16 candidates. Considering that chitin would occur extracellularly, the next filter applied was the presence of a clear signal peptide, as predicted by SignalP 4.1 [36]. This filtering step left 5 candidates. At this point, probable multi-domain proteins (4 candidates) were excluded to increase the chances of successful expression. This left one candidate protein, for which a structural model was built using Swiss-Model [3739] to verify for potential anomalies in or near the catalytic center. This novel CDA is the subject of the remaining part of this report. It is interesting to note that, after using this rather straightforward approach, 48 CE4 sequences only yielded one candidate CDA. Obviously, the discarded CE4s, without signal peptide and/or containing multi-domain proteins, could include active CDAs.

The selected CDA is 246 amino acids long, with a predicted signal peptide running from amino acid number 1 to 31. The protein originates from the Gram-positive bacterium Arthrobacter sp. AW19M34-1, which was isolated from a Tunicate located at 77 meters depth in Vestfjorden, Norway. Tunicates secrete a chitinous perithrophic membrane [40, 41] and Arthrobacter species are known for their ability to grow on chitin and for secretion of chitinases [42]. In line with commonly used nomenclature for CAZymes the CDA was named ArCE4A. The gene sequence has been deposited in the European Nucleotide Archive under Accession number LT630322 (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/ena/data/view/LT630322).

3.2 Structure determination

Two structures of ArCE4A were obtained by x-ray crystallography, one with (PDB id: 5LGC) and one without (PDB id: 5LFZ) a (GlcNAc)2 ligand, at 2.1 Å and 1.6 Å resolution, respectively (Table 1). The protein has a somewhat deformed (β/α)8 barrel topology (Fig 1) that is characteristic for CE4 proteins [15, 16, 24, 33, 34]. The structure of ArCE4A without (GlcNAc)2 comprises residues 42–241, meaning that no structural information was obtained for ten N-terminal residues (32–41) and five C-terminal residues (242–246). Note that both the N- and the C-terminus are located on the opposite side of the protein, relative to the catalytic center (Fig 1). The structure contains a Ni2+ ion coordinated by Asp56, His105 and His109 (Fig 2A), which comprise the metal binding triad that is conserved in CE4 proteins. The Ni2+ most likely originates from the protein purification by nickel affinity chromatography. The Ni2+ ion is in an octahedral arrangement, involving three water ligands and the metal binding Asp-His-His triad. It has been proposed that one of these water molecules, coordinated by Asp55, is the catalytic water acting as a nucleophile during catalysis [24].

thumbnail
Fig 1. Cartoon representation of the ArCE4A showing the disrupted (β/α)8 barrel topology.

The N- and C-terminus of the protein are marked and the metal ion in the active site is shown as a brown sphere, with the metal coordinating triad in sticks.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187544.g001

thumbnail
Fig 2. Structure of ArCE4A determined by X-ray crystallography.

(a) The His-His-Asp metal binding triad and the catalytic base (in sticks, PDB id: 5LFZ) with the Ni2+ ion as brown sphere. The Ni2+ ion shows octahedral coordination involving three amino acids and three water molecules (red spheres); interactions are shown as black dashed lines with distances in Å. The water molecule interacting with Asp55 is proposed to act as a nucleophile attacking the carbonyl carbon in the acetyl group. (b) Electron density map of the (GlcNAc)2 ligand. This illustrates the lack of electron density for the remainder of the tetramer used in the co-crystallization. (c) ArCE4A in complex with (GlcNAc)2 (PDB id: 5LCG) showing active site with the ligand bound in subsites 0 and +1 (grey carbons). Residues involved in substrate binding and catalysis are shown as sticks (purple carbons). Interactions between the protein and the substrate are shown as dashed lines in pink with distances in Å. (d) Superposition of ArCE4A (purple carbons) and ClCDA (green carbons; PDB id: 2IW0 [34]), showing the extra loop containing Trp79 and nearby Phe53 (in sticks) in ClCDA in what could be subsite -2. Subsites occupied by the ligand are labeled 0 and +1. (e) Cross-eyed stereo view of a superposition of the two structures (5LFZ in teal, 5LCG in purple) showing the active site cleft, and how the Ni2+ ion (brown sphere) and the three water molecules (red spheres) in 5LFZ are located relative to (GlcNAc)2 in 5LCG. Interactions involving the Ni2+ ion are shown as dashed black lines. Interactions between the proposed nucleophilic water and Asp55 and the carbonyl carbon in the acetyl group are shown as pink dashed lines.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187544.g002

The structure with a bound ligand covers amino acids 41 to 239 and the ligand density (Fig 2B) was refined as a GlcNAc dimer, occupying subsite 0 and +1 (Fig 2C). From the four sugars of the (GlcNAc)4 that was used in the co-crystallization experiments, only two could be modeled into the electron density. Apparently, the other two sugars are not stabilized by any protein-substrate interactions and adopt multiple orientations/conformations that cannot be resolved in the electron density map at this resolution. Fig 2C shows that Trp171 in motif 4 stacks with the sugar bound in subsite +1 forming one side of a shallow substrate-binding groove. Binding of the sugar in the +1 subsite seems to be dominated by this stacking interaction, whereas the acetyl group of this sugar is not involved in interactions with the enzyme (Fig 2C). The sugar bound in subsite 0 has multiple interactions with the enzyme. The hydroxyl-group at C3 makes a hydrogen bond with Asp56 (Fig 2C and 2E), while the hydroxyl-group at C4 of the sugar bound in subsite 0 seems to have an indirect interaction with the backbone carbonyl of Trp171 through a water molecule (Fig 2C). Based on the superposition of the two structures it is likely that the hydroxyl-group at C3 also interacts with the metal ion (Fig 2E). The backbone amide of Tyr146, thought to stabilize the oxyanion intermediate by interacting with the oxygen atom of the acetyl group is located at 3.3 Å of this oxygen (Fig 2C). The Nε nitrogen of His196 in motif 5, thought to facilitate departure of the sugar, is located at 3.5 Å from the nitrogen atom in the acetamido group (Fig 2C), a distance not unlike the distances proposed in previous docking studies (3.7 Å; [24, 34]). Asp55 in motif 1, expected to activate the nucleophilic water is not making any direct interactions with the sugar in subsite 0. No water molecules could be refined in the active site cleft in the structure with the (GlcNAc)2 ligand, probably due to the lack of a metal ion. Superposition of the two ArCE4A structures (Fig 2E) reveals that the water molecule coordinated by Asp55 in the substrate-free structure (Fig 2A) indeed has a position that could allow it acting as a nucleophile during catalysis. The other two water molecules, which coordinate the metal ion in the substrate-free enzyme (Fig 2A), occupy the same position as the oxygens of the acetyl group and the hydroxyl on carbon 3 in of the sugar bound in subsite 0. It is worth noting that the superposition (Fig 2E) shows little difference in the conformation of the above-mentioned amino acids.

A structure based sequence alignment with other known deacetylases (Fig 3) shows that there is high sequence similarity in the conserved motifs that are characteristic for deacetylases in family CE4. However, there is some variation, which could correlate with differences in substrate specificity, which are not all mapped yet, but are known to exist and be considerable. For example, BsPdaA is an N-acetylmuramic acid deacetylase with no activity against CHOS [7], whereas VcCDA only deacetylates CHOS on the sugar next to the non-reducing end. The structure of VcCDA so far was the only available structure of a CE4 CDA in complex with its true substrate [16]. As shown in Fig 3, VcCDA is special in that it contains several long insertions, which are loops that cover the active site and tailor this enzyme’s ability to interact with its substrate [16]. ArCE4A and other CE4s proteins acting on CHOS have active sites that are more open. Based on biochemical data, Hekmat et al. (2003) proposed that ClCDA, having an open active site similar to ArCE4A, has four subsites, -2, -1, 0, and +1 [13]. The structure of ClCDA was solved by Blair et al. [34] and based on in silico docking of (GlcNAc)3 they concluded that the sugar in subsite -1 has no interactions with the protein. Blair et al. further pointed out that a tryptophan (Trp79) located in an insertion in loop 1 that is absent in ArCE4A (Figs 2D and 3) could create a -2 subsite [34]. A phenylalanine (Phe53, Fig 2D) located near the flexible loop with Trp79 could possibly also be involved in substrate binding in subsite -2 of ClCDA. ArCE4A is more open in the potential subsite -2 region (Fig 2D) without any obvious residues to make interactions with a bound sugar. Interestingly, while the protein was co-crystallized with (GlcNAc)4 only two GlcNAc units were observed. This suggests high flexibility of the rest of the ligand, which is in line with the notion that ArCE4A has only two clear subsites, 0 and +1. Another noteworthy difference is the tyrosine in ClCDA (Tyr173) in stead of a tryptophan in ArCE4A (Trp171) in motif 4 [DxxD(W/Y), Fig 2D]. Of the 54 CE4 proteins listed in CAZy as characterized only ClCDA [34] and AnCDA [15] have a tyrosine in motif 4.

thumbnail
Fig 3. Structure-based sequence alignment of CE4 deacetylases.

The structure-based sequence alignment was obtained using PyMod 1.0 [43]. Fully conserved residues are shown on a green background. The asterisks indicate residues involved in metal binding (blue) and in catalysis (pink). MT1-5 indicate the five conserved motifs in CE4 deacetylases. Colored horizontal bars indicate the different loops described by Andrés et al. [16]. The deacetylases included in the alignment are: SpPgdA, PDB id 2C1G [24]; ClCDA, PDB id 2IW0 [34]; AnCDA, PDB id 2Y8U [15]; SlCE4, PDB id 2CC0 [33]; BsPdaA, PDB id 1W17 [44]; VcCDA, PDB id 4NY2 [16]. For clarity, the alignment only shows the sequence area of the five motifs and the loops. Sequence numbering is based on the primary gene product, including the signal peptide for the proteins harboring a signal peptide.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187544.g003

3.3 Enzymatic activity and substrate specificity

Functional features of ArCE4A were investigated by testing the enzyme’s activity against different substrates and by sequence analysis of generated products. Table 2 shows the deacetylating activity of ArCE4A for different substrates. For CHOS substrates, the apparent rate constant increased with increasing DP up to (GlcNAc)5, for which ArCE4A has a higher apparent rate against (0.18 s-1) compared to (GlcNAc)6 (0.07 s-1). A similar pattern of activity against CHOS was observed for AnCDA [15]. ArCE4A did not deacetylate GlcNAc, and the activity against (GlcNAc)2 was very low. Next to CHOS, ArCE4A deacetylates chitosan, chitin and acetyl xylan (Table 2).

It is well known that CE4 enzymes tend to have broad substrate specificities. For example, enzymes classified as peptidoglycan deacetylases can deacetylate chito-oligomers [24, 32]. Likewise, CE4 enzymes known as acetylxylan esterases can deacetylate chitosan and CHOS [32, 45]. However, comparative information on rates is scarce. A recently described putative fungal CDA (AnCDA) showed in general higher rates for various substrates [15], compared to ArCE4A. Both AnCDA and ArCE4A are clearly most active towards acetylxylan and should thus perhaps, based on the available data, be classified as acetylxylan esterases [33, 45]. A further quantitative comparison of the activity of known CDAs towards chitinous substrates and acetylated plant polysaccharides such as acetylxylan would be of interest and could perhaps yield more insight into the true biological function of these enzymes.

Of the CHOS tested, ArCE4A showed highest activity against (GlcNAc)5, and, therefore, this substrate was used for investigation of the position of deacetylation. The reducing ends of reaction products were labeled with AMAC and the resulting samples were analyzed using mass spectroscopy. MS1 spectra of AMAC-labeled products obtained at different reaction times (Fig 4A) show the initial appearance of mono-deacetylated products (m/z 1186.6) and the subsequent appearance of products with two deacetylations (m/z 1144.6) after 24 hours. The peaks for mono- and di-deacetylated products were isolated and subjected to fractionation in MS2 experiments (Fig 4B and 4C). Although a signal corresponding to GlcN-AMAC (m/z 374) is visible, a signal at m/z 416, corresponding to GlcNAc-AMAC, dominates in the MS2 spectra, indicating that the reducing end was hardly deacetylated. The MS2 spectrum for the mono-deacetylated product (Fig 4B) shows no signal that would indicate deacetylation of the non-reducing end (i.e. no A4-AMAC signal), indicating that the non-reducing end is not preferred for deacetylation. This may seem contradictory to the binding mode of the (GlcNAc)2 ligand seen in the structure where the non-reducing end is bound in subsite 0. It should be noted, however that the structure only shows part of the used substrate, (GlcNAc)4, and that it is thus not certain whether the chain “end” seen in the structure really is a chain end. The fact that no non-reducing end deacetylation is observed in Fig 4B may be taken to indicate that there must be some substrate affinity beyond subsites 0 and +1, in particular in what would be -1 and -2 subsites. Notably, the presence of a weak signal for A3D1 in Fig 4C, showing MS2 data for the double deacetylated product, shows that deacetylation of the non-reducing end did occur. The relative intensity of this signal is low, indicating that the non-reducing end is less preferred for deacetylation compared to the middle sugars of the pentamer.

thumbnail
Fig 4. Mass spectrometric analysis of products generated from (GlcNAc)5.

Reaction products generated upon treating (GlcNAc)5 with ArCE4A were labeled with AMAC and analyzed by MS. (a) MS1 spectra of AMAC labeled reaction products at different reaction time points, showing appearance of mono- and di-deacetylated products. (b) Representative MS2 spectrum for the A4D1 peak at m/z 1186 from MS1 spectra (1h reaction time). (c) Representative MS2 spectrum for the A3D2 peak at m/z 1144 from MS1 spectra (24h reaction time). Bold signals in (b) and (c) correspond to the mass of the indicated CHOS plus AMAC and hydrogen. Reaction mixtures contained 2 mM A5 and 300 nM ArCE4A and were incubated at 37°C.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187544.g004

The signals in Fig 4B show that the first deacetylation happens at all three internal positions. Although quantitative interpretation of the MS spectra is not very reliable, the data do seem to suggest that deacetylation near the reducing end is most frequent (suggested by the strong A1D1 signal). The products with two deacetylations seem to be dominated by deacetylation of the sugar next to the reducing end and of either of the two other internal sugars. The active site of ClCDA bears resemblance to that of ArCE4A (see Fig 2D) and the kinetics of this enzyme have been studied in detail. For ClCDA acting on (GlcNAc)4, the first deacetylation is fast, while the subsequent deacetylations are slower [13]. It was also shown that ClCDA deacetylates the reducing much more slowly than all other positions [13]. Our results indicate that, like in the case of ClCDA, the reducing end is less preferred by ArCE4A. This conclusion coincides with the structural data for the enzyme-substrate complex, showing a strong binding interaction in the +1 subsite. This suggests that ArCE4A prefers a sugar bound in the +1 subsite for optimal activity, and thus will not be very active on reducing ends.

It should be noted that ArCE4A showed very low activity against (GlcNAc)2 (Table 1), which suggests that occupation of more than two subsites, i.e. beyond subsite 0 and +1, is beneficial for activity. Currently available data do not allow a prediction of what additional interactions could benefit catalysis. Studies with VcCDA, which, notably, has a very differently shaped catalytic center (see above), suggested that substrate-binding could lead to conformational changes, which in the case of ArCE4A could lead to interactions that we cannot detect in the current data.

4. Concluding remarks

In this study, we present structural and functional data for ArCE4A, including the first structural data for a complex between a low-specificity CE4 enzyme with an open active site and a substrate. While our motivation for this work was to develop enzymes for chitin processing, it is not certain that deacetylation of GlcNAc is the true biological function of ArCE4A. If chitin were the natural substrate one would perhaps expect a higher activity against chitin, chitosan and CHOS compared to acetyl xylan (Table 2). A similar trend in substrate specificity was observed for AnCDA, which is thought to be a fungal chitin deacetylase [15]. Interestingly, xylan is found in the cell wall of some marine algae [46], and it is therefore conceivable that certain marine bacteria may benefit from the ability to deacetylate this substrate. The broad substrate specificity observed for ArCE4A and other CE4s [15, 45] is intriguing, and more comparable studies are needed to fully understand the substrate specificity.

The crystal structure of ArCE4A in complex with (GlcNAc)2 provides a deeper understanding of how CE4 enzymes interact with their substrates, especially CE4s with an open active site, which are common in Nature. The structural data suggest that there are relatively few interactions between the substrate and the enzyme beyond subsites 0 and +1. The interaction in subsite +1 involves a tryptophan and is thus not very sugar specific, whereas more specific interactions in the form of hydrogen bonds occur in subsite 0. This interaction pattern is compatible with the observed broad specificity of the enzyme. It should be noted, however, that the activity of ArCE4A against (GlcNAc)2 is low compared to other (longer) substrates, suggesting that unknown interactions, perhaps involving conformational changes, take place upon substrate binding (e.g. loop rearrangements [16]). Still, it is conceivable that a seemingly short and open substrate binding groove is an intentional feature of these enzymes in order to fit different substrates in the active site. Structural data for ArCE4A in complex with longer substrate and different substrates would be of great interest and will be useful for better understanding the functionality of the CE4s. Such additional information may eventually also create possibilities for using these enzymes, or engineered variants thereof, to produce chitosans and CHOS with defined patterns of acetylation.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank Dr. Jane W. Agger and Dr. Magnus Øverlie Arntzen for technical assistance with HPLC and MS analysis.

References

  1. 1. Hackman R. Studies on chitin I. Enzymic degradation of chitin and chitin esters. Aust J Biol Sci. 1954;7(2):168–78. pmid:13189822
  2. 2. Vårum KM, Ottøy MH, Smidsrød O. Acid hydrolysis of chitosans. Carbohydr Polym. 2001;46(1):89–98.
  3. 3. Rinaudo M. Chitin and chitosan: Properties and applications. Prog Polym Sci. 2006;31(7):603–32.
  4. 4. Aam BB, Heggset EB, Norberg AL, Sørlie M, Vårum KM, Eijsink VGH. Production of chitooligosaccharides and their potential applications in medicine. Mar Drugs. 2010;8(5):1482–517. pmid:20559485
  5. 5. Xia W, Liu P, Zhang J, Chen J. Biological activities of chitosan and chitooligosaccharides. Food Hydrocolloids. 2011;25(2):170–9.
  6. 6. Lombard V, Golaconda Ramulu H, Drula E, Coutinho PM, Henrissat B. The carbohydrate-active enzymes database (CAZy) in 2013. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(D1):D490–5. Epub 2013/11/26. pmid:24270786
  7. 7. Fukushima T, Kitajima T, Sekiguchi J. A polysaccharide deacetylase homologue, PdaA, in Bacillus subtilis acts as an N-acetylmuramic acid deacetylase in vitro. J Bacteriol. 2005;187(4):1287–92. pmid:15687192
  8. 8. Bui NK, Turk S, Buckenmaier S, Stevenson-Jones F, Zeuch B, Gobec S, et al. Development of screening assays and discovery of initial inhibitors of pneumococcal peptidoglycan deacetylase PgdA. Biochem Pharmacol. 2011;82(1):43–52. pmid:21501597
  9. 9. Biely P, Côté GL, Kremnický L, Greene RV, Dupont C, Kluepfel D. Substrate specificity and mode of action of acetylxylan esterase from Streptomyces lividans. FEBS Lett. 1996;396(2–3):257–60. pmid:8914998
  10. 10. Cord-Landwehr S, Melcher RLJ, Kolkenbrock S, Moerschbacher BM. A chitin deacetylase from the endophytic fungus Pestalotiopsis sp. efficiently inactivates the elicitor activity of chitin oligomers in rice cells. Sci Rep. 2016;6:38018. pmid:27901067
  11. 11. Naqvi S, Cord-Landwehr S, Singh R, Bernard F, Kolkenbrock S, El Gueddari NE, et al. A recombinant fungal chitin deacetylase produces fully defined chitosan oligomers with novel patterns of acetylation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2016;82(22):6645–55. pmid:27590819
  12. 12. Hamer SN, Cord-Landwehr S, Biarnes X, Planas A, Waegeman H, Moerschbacher BM, et al. Enzymatic production of defined chitosan oligomers with a specific pattern of acetylation using a combination of chitin oligosaccharide deacetylases. Sci Rep. 2015;5:8716. pmid:25732514
  13. 13. Hekmat O, Tokuyasu K, Withers SG. Subsite structure of the endo-type chitin deacetylase from a Deuteromycete, Colletotrichum lindemuthianum: an investigation using steady-state kinetic analysis and MS. Biochem J. 2003;374(2):369–80. pmid:12775215
  14. 14. Tang M-C, Nisole A, Dupont C, Pelletier JN, Waldron KC. Chemical profiling of the deacetylase activity of acetyl xylan esterase A (AxeA) variants on chitooligosaccharides using hydrophilic interaction chromatography–mass spectrometry. J Biotechnol. 2011;155(2):257–65. pmid:21767585
  15. 15. Liu Z, Gay LM, Tuveng TR, Agger JW, Westereng B, Mathiesen G, et al. Structure and function of a broad-specificity chitin deacetylase from Aspergillus nidulans FGSC A4. Sci Rep. 2017;7(1):1746. pmid:28496100
  16. 16. Andrés E, Albesa-Jové D, Biarnés X, Moerschbacher BM, Guerin ME, Planas A. Structural basis of chitin oligosaccharide deacetylation. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2014;53(27):6882–7. pmid:24810719
  17. 17. Webb EC. Enzyme nomenclature 1992. Recommendations of the Nomenclature Committee of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology on the Nomenclature and Classification of Enzymes: Academic Press; 1992.
  18. 18. Ni Y, Li J, Panagiotou G. A molecular-level landscape of diet-gut microbiome interactions: toward dietary interventions targeting bacterial genes. MBio. 2015;6(6):e01263–15. pmid:26507230
  19. 19. Savitsky P, Bray J, Cooper CD, Marsden BD, Mahajan P, Burgess-Brown NA, et al. High-throughput production of human proteins for crystallization: the SGC experience. J Struct Biol. 2010;172(1):3–13. pmid:20541610
  20. 20. Aslanidis C, de Jong PJ. Ligation-independent cloning of PCR products (LIC-PCR). Nucleic Acids Res. 1990;18(20):6069–74. pmid:2235490
  21. 21. Kabsch W. Xds. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(2):125–32. pmid:20124692
  22. 22. Krug M, Weiss MS, Heinemann U, Mueller U. XDSAPP: a graphical user interface for the convenient processing of diffraction data using XDS. J Appl Crystallogr. 2012;45(3):568–72.
  23. 23. McCoy AJ, Grosse-Kunstleve RW, Adams PD, Winn MD, Storoni LC, Read RJ. Phaser crystallographic software. J Appl Crystallogr. 2007;40(4):658–74. pmid:19461840
  24. 24. Blair DE, Schuttelkopf AW, MacRae JI, van Aalten DM. Structure and metal-dependent mechanism of peptidoglycan deacetylase, a streptococcal virulence factor. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(43):15429–34. pmid:16221761
  25. 25. Adams PD, Afonine PV, Bunkóczi G, Chen VB, Davis IW, Echols N, et al. PHENIX: a comprehensive Python-based system for macromolecular structure solution. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(2):213–21. pmid:20124702
  26. 26. Murshudov GN, Skubák P, Lebedev AA, Pannu NS, Steiner RA, Nicholls RA, et al. REFMAC5 for the refinement of macromolecular crystal structures. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr. 2011;67(4):355–67. pmid:21460454
  27. 27. Winn MD, Ballard CC, Cowtan KD, Dodson EJ, Emsley P, Evans PR, et al. Overview of the CCP4 suite and current developments. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr. 2011;67(4):235–42. pmid:21460441
  28. 28. Emsley P, Lohkamp B, Scott WG, Cowtan K. Features and development of Coot. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr. 2010;66(4):486–501. pmid:20383002
  29. 29. Schüttelkopf AW, Van Aalten DM. PRODRG: a tool for high-throughput crystallography of protein–ligand complexes. Acta Crystallogr Sect D Biol Crystallogr. 2004;60(8):1355–63.
  30. 30. Bahrke S, Einarsson JM, Gislason J, Haebel S, Letzel MC, Peter-Katalinic J, et al. Sequence analysis of chitooligosaccharides by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization postsource decay mass spectrometry. Biomacromolecules. 2002;3(4):696–704. pmid:12099813
  31. 31. Morelle W, Page A, Michalski JC. Electrospray ionization ion trap mass spectrometry for structural characterization of oligosaccharides derivatized with 2‐aminobenzamide. Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2005;19(9):1145–58. pmid:15803514
  32. 32. Caufrier F, Martinou A, Dupont C, Bouriotis V. Carbohydrate esterase family 4 enzymes: substrate specificity. Carbohydr Res. 2003;338(7):687–92. pmid:12644381
  33. 33. Taylor EJ, Gloster TM, Turkenburg JP, Vincent F, Brzozowski AM, Dupont C, et al. Structure and activity of two metal ion-dependent acetylxylan esterases involved in plant cell wall degradation reveals a close similarity to peptidoglycan deacetylases. J Biol Chem. 2006;281(16):10968–75. pmid:16431911
  34. 34. Blair DE, Hekmat O, Schüttelkopf AW, Shrestha B, Tokuyasu K, Withers SG, et al. Structure and mechanism of chitin deacetylase from the fungal pathogen Colletotrichum lindemuthianum. Biochemistry. 2006;45(31):9416–26. pmid:16878976
  35. 35. Urch JE, Hurtado-Guerrero R, Brosson D, Liu Z, Eijsink VG, Texier C, et al. Structural and functional characterization of a putative polysaccharide deacetylase of the human parasite Encephalitozoon cuniculi. Protein Sci. 2009;18(6):1197–209. pmid:19472335
  36. 36. Petersen TN, Brunak S, von Heijne G, Nielsen H. SignalP 4.0: discriminating signal peptides from transmembrane regions. Nat Methods. 2011;8(10):785–6. pmid:21959131
  37. 37. Arnold K, Bordoli L, Kopp J, Schwede T. The SWISS-MODEL workspace: a web-based environment for protein structure homology modelling. Bioinformatics. 2006;22(2):195–201. Epub 2005/11/23. pmid:16301204
  38. 38. Biasini M, Bienert S, Waterhouse A, Arnold K, Studer G, Schmidt T, et al. SWISS-MODEL: modelling protein tertiary and quaternary structure using evolutionary information. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014;42(Web Server issue):W252–8. pmid:24782522
  39. 39. Bordoli L, Kiefer F, Arnold K, Benkert P, Battey J, Schwede T. Protein structure homology modeling using SWISS-MODEL workspace. Nat Protocols. 2009;4(1):1–13. pmid:19131951
  40. 40. Peters W. Chitin in tunicata. Experientia. 1966;22(12):820–1.
  41. 41. Jeuniaux C, editor Distribution and quantitative importance of chitin in animals. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Chitin/Chitosan; 1978; Cambridge (Massachusetts) USA, 1978.
  42. 42. Manucharova N, Vlasenko A, Zenova G, Dobrovol’skaya T, Stepanov A. Methodological aspects of assessing chitin utilization by soil microorganisms. Biol Bull. 2008;35(5):549–53. pmid:18956744.
  43. 43. Bramucci E, Paiardini A, Bossa F, Pascarella S. PyMod: sequence similarity searches, multiple sequence-structure alignments, and homology modeling within PyMOL. BMC Bioinformatics. 2012;13(4):S2. pmid:22536966
  44. 44. Blair DE, van Aalten DMF. Structures of Bacillus subtilis PdaA, a family 4 carbohydrate esterase, and a complex with N-acetyl-glucosamine. FEBS Lett. 2004;570(1–3):13–9. pmid:15251431
  45. 45. Puchart V, Gariépy M-C, Shareck F, Dupont C. Identification of catalytically important amino acid residues of Streptomyces lividans acetylxylan esterase A from carbohydrate esterase family 4. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006;1764(2):263–74. pmid:16434244
  46. 46. Popper ZA, Tuohy MG. Beyond the green: Understanding the evolutionary puzzle of plant and algal cell walls. Plant Physiol. 2010;153(2):373–83. pmid:20421458