Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) may often be painful. Despite the high prevalence of painful DPN (pDPN) among patients with diabetes mellitus (DM), understanding of its clinical and economic burden is limited. This study aimed to describe the clinical and economic burdens faced by patients with pDPN in Japan, and compared them with those experienced by patients with DPN but without painful symptoms (non-pDPN).
This retrospective, observational study used data from a large-scale, hospital-based Japanese claims database collected from April 2008 to June 2015. Comorbidities, clinical departments visited, length of hospital stay, and medical costs for the period of ± 6 months from the diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN were described for each group. Glycemic control status was examined for each group for patients with glycated hemoglobin data.
The data of 8,740 patients with pDPN (mean age 70.0 years, 53.4% male) and 12,592 patients with non-pDPN (mean age 67.7 years, 55.7% male) were analyzed. Patients with pDPN had more comorbidities than patients with non-pDPN; 48.7% and 30.9% of patients in the respective groups had 20 or more comorbidities. The median length of hospital stay was 5 days longer in patients with pDPN. The median total medical costs were higher in patients with pDPN (\517,762) than in patients with non-pDPN (\359,909). Patients with pDPN spent higher median costs for medications, but the costs for glycemic control drugs were similar in both groups. For 3,372 patients with glycated hemoglobin data, glycemic control was similar between the two groups.
Citation: Ebata-Kogure N, Nozawa K, Murakami A, Toyoda T, Haga Y, Fujii K (2017) Clinical and economic burdens experienced by patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: An observational study using a Japanese claims database. PLoS ONE 12(10): e0187250. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0187250
Editor: Rayaz Ahmed Malik, Weill Cornell Medical College in Qatar, QATAR
Received: May 15, 2017; Accepted: October 17, 2017; Published: October 27, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Ebata-Kogure et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: In this study, we used a de-identified data set provided by Medical Data Vision, Co., Ltd. (MDV), a commercial database provider. No personal information could be revealed from the de-identified data. For this reason, no ethical restrictions are imposed on data access by researchers. However, it is difficult to share MDV data set online solely for contractual reasons (due to contractual reasons between MDV and medical facilities). Data can be accessed through the same manner in which the authors obtained the data. For inquiries about access to the data set used in this study, please contact MDV (website, https://www.mdv.co.jp/; e-mail, email@example.com).
Funding: This study was funded by Pfizer Japan Inc. Pfizer Japan Inc. provided support in the form of salaries for authors NE, KN, and KF, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. Clinical Study Support, Inc. provided support in the form of salaries for authors AM, TT, and YH, but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section.
Competing interests: I have read the journal's policy and the authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: NE, KN, KF are employed by Pfizer Japan Inc. AM, TT, and YH are employed by Clinical Study Support, Inc. There are no patents, products in development or marketed products to declare. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) is one of the most common complications of diabetes mellitus (DM). The prevalence of DPN was 22.4–28.5% in patients with DM in the north-west of England and the United States [1,2], and 27.6–36.7% in Japan [3,4]. The prevalence of DPN varied across the studies mainly because of differences in the study designs; however, these studies showed that many patients with DM suffer from DPN, which impairs patients’ quality of life and increases the risks for foot ulcers and lower extremity amputations [3,5,6].
Diabetic peripheral neuropathy is often accompanied by burning pain, electrical shock-like pain, lancinating pain, paresthesia or allodynia , which is known as painful DPN (pDPN). Patients with DM often report foot pain, even if the formal diagnosis of DPN has not been made: an online survey of 1,004 patients with DM in the US found that 83% of respondents reported symptoms of pDPN, but only 41% had been diagnosed with DPN . A Japanese study of 298 patients with DM reported that 22.1% had pDPN, but only 36.4% of these patients’ physicians had recognized their pDPN . The same study also showed that pDPN impaired patients’ quality of life and mental state. These studies suggest that pDPN may be under-diagnosed and under-treated in clinical settings, despite its high prevalence and negative impacts on patients.
The under-diagnosis of pDPN may reflect that physicians infrequently undertake detailed clinical examinations, possibly because of limited knowledge of the disease burden. Outside Japan, several studies of claims databases have separately reported that DPN and pDPN are associated with comorbid conditions and high medical costs [10–13], but a direct comparison of patients with DPN and patients with pDPN has not been made. In Japan, one study has examined the influences of DPN on medical costs using a claims database , but the clinical and economic burdens of pDPN have not been reported in a Japanese population.
The aims of this study were therefore to illuminate the clinical and economic burdens of pDPN using a large-scale claims database in Japan, and to compare the characteristics of patients with pDPN and patients with DPN without painful symptoms (non-pDPN).
This retrospective, observational database study used a hospital-based claims database constructed by Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. (MDV, Tokyo, Japan), which has been available since April 2008. The database included the data of approximately 14 million patients admitted to 238 hospitals across Japan. As of February 2016, these hospitals covered about 15% of all Japanese acute-care hospitals using the Diagnosis Procedure Combination/Per-Diem Payment System (DPC/PDPS). The database contains anonymized data including age, sex, diagnoses according to the 10th revision of the International Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems (ICD-10) codes and Japanese Disease Name Codes , procedures, prescriptions and inpatient/outpatient status. Laboratory data were available from a limited number of hospitals. The database has a similar distribution of age and sex to that of national patient statistics in Japan , and it has been used for various epidemiological studies [17–19]. This study used all data available, which were data collected from April 1, 2008 (when MDV first started to offer this claims database) to June 30, 2015.
In this study, DPN without painful symptoms is referred to as non-pDPN. Thus, DPN was defined as either pDPN or non-pDPN. Patients with pDPN were defined as patients with type 2 DM who had a record of any of the following diseases: peripheral neuropathic pain (Japanese Disease Name Code: 8846220), neuropathic pain (8847489), or diabetic neuropathic pain (8848768). Patients with non-pDPN were defined as patients with type 2 DM who had a record of any of the following diseases: peripheral neuropathy (8840255), diabetic peripheral neuropathy (2505018) or type 2 diabetic peripheral neuropathy (8845100).
Patients with a definite diagnosis of type 2 DM (ICD-10 codes E11‒14) between April 1, 2008 and June 30, 2015 were identified from the database. Of these, patients with a first diagnosis record of pDPN or non-pDPN at age ≥18 years were extracted. Patients with type 1 DM (ICD-10 code E10), cancer (identified with the diagnostic terms of ICD-10 containing “gan [carcinoma]”, “shinseibutsu [neoplasm]” or “shuyô [tumor]”) or cancer pain (Japanese Disease Name Code: 7998003) were excluded. Patients in whom the first diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN was made before the diagnosis of type 2 DM, patients lost to follow-up after the first diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN, and patients lacking data for ≥6 months before or after the first diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN were also excluded.
For patient characteristics, the following data in the month of the first diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN were collected: age, sex, duration of DM, comorbidities, and medications. In addition, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) concentration data were collected for patients in whom HbA1c was measured within 30 days before or after the first diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN. The duration of DM was measured from the earliest date of diagnosis of DM in a patient’s record to the date of the first diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN.
For clinical burden, the following data for the period of ± 6 months from the first diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN were examined for each group: number of comorbidities, comorbid diagnoses, number and type of clinical departments visited, and the length of hospital stay.
For economic burden, the following data for the period of ± 6 months from the first diagnosis of pDPN or non-pDPN were examined for each group: total medical costs, costs of each medical service provided (including drugs), cost breakdown by clinical department and separate breakdown of costs by type of drug. The categories of medical services included outpatient, medications, injections, procedures, examinations, hospitalization, surgery, anesthesia, home medical care and others. In this study, “total medical costs” were the all-cause medical costs that patients paid to the hospitals, regardless of whether they were incurred by pDPN or non-pDPN.
Drugs were categorized as follows: antidiabetic drugs (glycemic control drugs and any other antidiabetic drugs), analgesics (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs [NSAIDs]/acetaminophen, drugs for neuropathic pain and any other analgesics), anesthesia and any other drugs. Glycemic control drugs included insulin, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) receptor agonists, sulfonylurea (SU) agents, biguanides, insulin sensitizers, alpha glucosidase inhibitors, rapid-acting insulinotropic agents, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 (SGLT2) inhibitors and compounding agents (S1 Table).
This was an observational study using de-identified claims data provided by MDV (a commercial database provider), and data did not contain any information allowing identification of a patient. The Japanese Ethical Guidelines for Medical and Health Research Involving Human Subjects do not apply to a study exclusively using de-identified data, thus the study was exempt from the requirement for acquisition of informed consent.
Patient characteristics were summarized descriptively for the pDPN and non-pDPN groups. For patients with HbA1c data, patient characteristics including the HbA1c concentration and the use of antidiabetic drugs were additionally summarized separately from the overall study population. For the clinical and economic burden, basic statistics were calculated for each measure in each group. Continuous variables were expressed as the mean with standard deviation (SD) or the median with interquartile range. Categorical variables were expressed as the number and proportion (%). The two groups were compared using the t-test for continuous variables and the chi-square test for categorical variables. All statistical analyses were performed using SAS release 9.4 (SAS Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA).
We identified 8,740 patients with pDPN and 12,592 patients with non-pDPN (Fig 1); their characteristics were summarized in Table 1. The pDPN group comprised a greater proportion of older patients than the non-pDPN group: the proportions of patients aged ≥70 years were 57.0% and 47.8%, respectively. The sex distributions were similar between the groups. The mean duration of DM was approximately 5 years in both groups. Patients with pDPN had more comorbidities than patients with non-pDPN. Lumbar spinal stenosis was more common in the pDPN group (33.4%) than the non-pDPN group (8.6%). Fewer patients with pDPN received antidiabetic drugs, but more patients received analgesics and anesthesia, compared with patients with non-pDPN.
Abbreviations: pDPN, painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy; non-pDPN, diabetic peripheral neuropathy without painful symptoms; DM, diabetes mellitus. *Identified by the ICD-10 diagnostic term containing “gan [carcinoma]”, “shinseibutsu [neoplasm]” or “shuyô [tumor]”. †Identified by the Japanese Disease Name Code 7998003.
Treatment status was further analyzed for 3,372 patients (939 patients with pDPN and 2,433 patients with non-pDPN) who had HbA1c data (Table 2). The age and sex distributions of the 939 patients with pDPN were similar to those of the overall pDPN cohort. The 2,433 patients with non-pDPN and HbA1c data included fewer older patients (the proportion of patients aged ≥70 years was 36.2%) and more men than the overall non-pDPN cohort. In both groups, the mean duration of DM was 1.7 years longer than that of the corresponding overall patient cohort. The glycemic control status was similar between the groups: the mean (SD) HbA1c concentrations were 6.9 (1.3)% in the pDPN group and 7.0 (1.2)% in the non-pDPN group. Nearly 40% of patients in both groups had a HbA1c concentration ≥7.0%, which was interpreted as poor glycemic control. More patients with non-pDPN (75.6%) received glycemic control drugs (of any kind) than patients with pDPN (55.9%).
Table 3 summarized the clinical burdens experienced by each group. Patients with pDPN had more comorbidities than patients with non-pDPN: the proportions of patients with ≥20 comorbidities were 48.7% and 30.9%, respectively. Among the 10 most commonly observed comorbidities in this study, the proportions of patients who had lumbar spinal stenosis, low back pain, insomnia, constipation or chronic gastritis were >10% higher in patients with pDPN than in patients with non-pDPN. For the clinical departments visited, 70.9% of patients with pDPN visited the department of orthopedic surgery. More patients with non-pDPN (17.5%) visited the department of otorhinolaryngology than patients with pDPN (10.6%). The median length of hospital stay was 5 days longer in patients with pDPN than in patients with non-pDPN.
Table 4 summarized the medical costs per patient for each group. The median total medical costs were higher in patients with pDPN (\517,762) than in patients with non-pDPN (\359,909). The first and second highest median costs by service were those for hospitalization and surgery in both groups: a slightly higher proportion of pDPN group incurred costs for these services compared with the non-pDPN group (hospitalization 39.8% versus 34.1%, surgery 24.9% versus 18.9%, respectively). The first and second largest differences in the median costs by service between the groups were observed for hospitalization and medications, and the median costs for these two services were \112,700 and \66,187 higher in patients with pDPN than in patients with non-pDPN, respectively. Although the median costs for medications were higher in the pDPN group, the breakdown of costs by drug type showed that the median costs for glycemic control drugs were similar (approximately \56,000 in each group).
This was the first study to describe the characteristics of patients with pDPN and those with non-pDPN in Japan using a large-scale claims database. We found that patients with pDPN had more comorbidities and incurred higher medical costs than patients with non-pDPN. The differences in their characteristics may suggest that patients who develop pDPN may be clinically distinct from patients with non-pDPN.
To date, the comorbidity profiles of patients with DPN in relation to the presence or absence of painful symptoms have not been well documented. In this study, patients with pDPN had more orthopedic diseases, constipation, insomnia and gastric diseases than patients with non-pDPN. Identifying the causes of these comorbidities lay outside the scope of the study; however, some possible explanations can be provided. Type 2 DM lowers bone turnover , which may increase the risk for fracture or low back pain, although the underlying mechanisms have not yet been clarified, and constipation may be caused by diabetic autonomic neuropathy. Insomnia may be attributed to pDPN and painful musculoskeletal conditions such as low back pain and lumbar spinal stenosis [21–23], which were observed in >35% of patients with pDPN. Gastric ulcers and chronic gastritis may have developed as adverse effects of NSAIDs, which were prescribed to >60% of patients with pDPN. However, other mechanisms may have been responsible, and the relationships between these comorbidities and pDPN should be examined in more detail.
Although this study was unable to determine the causes of these comorbidities, the different comorbidity profiles suggest that patients with pDPN and patients with non-pDPN may be clinically distinct. Patients with pDPN may be subject not only to the complications of DM and painful symptoms, but also to other comorbid disorders, and the side effects of drugs given to treat pain and comorbid disorders. Despite such a high disease burden, pDPN tends to be under-diagnosed in clinical settings [8,9], possibly because patients tend not to complain about their pain. A study in the United Kingdom reported that 12.5% of patients with pDPN had not told their physician about their pain . There may be a poor understanding of the relationship between pain and DM, as well as difficulty describing symptoms . Physicians may need to be mindful of the characteristics of pDPN regardless of whether patients complain of pain, in order not to overlook this complication.
Glycemic control is important for the management of DPN [25,26]. Good glycemic control can prevent the development of DPN in type 1 DM , although recent reports have suggested that strict glycemic control may not be sufficient to prevent the development or progression of DPN in type 2 DM [28,29]. However, to date, the relationship between poor glycemic control and the development of pDPN has not been clarified. In this study, glycemic control status was similar between patients with pDPN and those with non-pDPN, and around 60% of patients in both groups exhibited satisfactory glycemic control (HbA1c <7%). The results not only support that other factors than hyperglycemia may play a role in the development of DPN in type 2 DM , but also suggest that hyperglycemia may be necessary but not sufficient to cause pDPN. The development of pDPN may not be prevented by glycemic control alone, thus other factors causing or exacerbating pDPN need to be identified in future studies.
We examined the medical costs for a period of one year for each group, and showed that the median total medical costs were higher in patients with pDPN than in patients with non-pDPN (\517,762 versus \359,909). Slightly a higher proportion of patients with pDPN required surgery and hospitalization compared with the non-pDPN group, implying that patients who develop pDPN may be more vulnerable to complications, for which medical costs would be incurred. A review of each patient’s claims data revealed that patients in the pDPN group tended to have more opportunistic infections and bladder problems. These results suggest that satisfactory glycemic control alone may not reduce the medical costs of patients with pDPN. Thus, it is important to establish the pathogenesis of pDPN and identify a therapeutic target. As microvascular complication is one of the factors to develop pDPN, patients may need a treatment targeting the improvement of blood circulation.
This study had several limitations. First, as data contained in the database were collected from acute-care hospitals using the DPC/PDPS, the study population may not represent the overall population of patients with DPN in Japan. In addition, glycemic control status was examined with a relatively small sample size, owing to the limited availability of laboratory data. Thus, the generalizability of our results may be limited. Second, as data were not linked to patients’ medical records, information such as severity and non-pharmacologic therapy (e.g. dietary therapy) could not be obtained. Because this study relied on claims data for disease name for pDPN or non-pDPN, the results of this study may not necessarily reflect the reality of treatment situations in actual patients with pDPN or non-pDPN. In addition, because pDPN tends to be under-diagnosed in clinical settings as discussed above, the possibility of under-reporting pDPN might also be inevitable in this study. Furthermore, as the database was hospital-based, treatment and medical histories recorded at different hospitals could not be obtained, which may have resulted in misclassification. Our results should therefore be interpreted with care. Third, as this was a cross-sectional study, causal relationships between each parameter and pDPN or non-pDPN could not be investigated. Fourth, as hyperglycemia is often asymptomatic—especially in the early stages of DM—relying on the date of diagnosis to calculate the duration of DM may not be accurate . There may also have been discrepancies between the duration of DM obtained from the claims data and the actual duration, due to the characteristics of the database. For example, patients might already have been diagnosed as DM at different hospitals prior to the date of diagnosis recorded in this database. This may explain the relatively short duration of DM in our study cohort, compared with 10–11 years reported in other epidemiologic data on patients with DM in Japan [32,33]. However, as our cohort contained more patients with satisfactory glycemic control (approximately 60%) than other previously reported populations (ranging from 40–45%) [32,33], a proportion of patients in our study may indeed have had a short duration of DM. The influence of the duration and severity of DM on pDPN also requires further study.
We found that patients with pDPN experienced greater clinical and economic burdens than patients with non-pDPN. Patients who develop pDPN may suffer not only from the complications of DM and pain, but also from other comorbid disorders and the side effects of analgesics and other drugs. Our findings will increase awareness among physicians of the need for more attention to this complication, which will facilitate detailed clinical examinations and appropriate management of patients with pDPN.
The authors thank Medical Data Vision Co., Ltd. for technical support regarding the data.
- 1. Abbott CA, Carrington AL, Ashe H, Bath S, Every LC, Griffiths J, et al.; North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study. The North-West Diabetes Foot Care Study: incidence of, and risk factors for, new diabetic foot ulceration in a community-based patient cohort. Diabet Med. 2002;19: 377–384. pmid:12027925
- 2. Gregg EW, Sorlie P, Paulose-Ram R, Gu Q, Eberhardt MS, Wolz M, et al. Prevalence of lower-extremity disease in the US adult population ≥40 years of age with and without diabetes: 1999–2000 national health and nutrition examination survey. Diabetes Care. 2004;27: 1591–1597. pmid:15220233
- 3. Sato J, Baba M, Yagihashi S, Suda T, Tominaga M, Daimon M, et al. Frequency of Diabetic Polyneuropathy (DPN) and Clinical Significance of Achilles Tendon Reflex in Diagnosis of DPN: Survey of 15,000 Patients in Tohoku, Japan. Journal of the Japan Diabetes Society. 2007;50: 799–806. Japanese.
- 4. Goto Y. Study on diabetic neuropathy. The Journal of Japan Physicians Association. 2002;17: 125–138. Japanese.
- 5. Benbow SJ, Wallymahmed ME, MacFarlane IA. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy and quality of life. QJM. 1998;91: 733–737. pmid:10024935
- 6. Mayfield JA, Reiber GE, Sanders LJ, Janisse D, Pogach LM. Preventive foot care in people with diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1998;21: 2161–2177. pmid:9839111
- 7. Tesfaye S, Vileikyte L, Rayman G, Sindrup SH, Perkins BA, Baconja M, et al.; Toronto Expert Panel on Diabetic Neuropathy. Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: consensus recommendations on diagnosis, assessment and management. Diabetes Metab Res Rev. 2011;27: 629–638. pmid:21695762
- 8. Sadosky A, Hopper J, Parsons B. Painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy: results of a survey characterizing the perspectives and misperceptions of patients and healthcare practitioners. Patient. 2014;7: 107–114. pmid:24263740
- 9. Tsuji M, Yasuda T, Kaneto H, Matsuoka TA, Hirose T, Kawamori R, et al. Painful diabetic neuropathy in Japanese diabetic patients is common but underrecognized. Pain Res Treat. 2013;2013: 318352. pmid:24377045
- 10. Mehra M, Merchant S, Gupta S, Potluri RC. Diabetic peripheral neuropathy: resource utilization and burden of illness. J Med Econ. 2014;17: 637–645. pmid:24888404
- 11. Johnston SS, Udall M, Alvir J, McMorrow D, Fowler R, Mullins D. Characteristics, treatment, and health care expenditures of Medicare supplemental-insured patients with painful diabetic peripheral neuropathy, post-herpetic neuralgia, or fibromyalgia. Pain Med. 2014;15: 562–576. pmid:24433487
- 12. Zhao Y, Ye W, Le TK, Boye KS, Holcombe JH, Swindle R. Comparing clinical and economic characteristics between commercially-insured patients with diabetic neuropathy and demographically-matched diabetic controls. Curr Med Res Opin. 2009;25: 585–597. pmid:19232033
- 13. Berger A, Dukes EM, Oster G. Clinical characteristics and economic costs of patients with painful neuropathic disorders. J Pain. 2004;5: 143–149. pmid:15106126
- 14. Suzuki Y, Tsubono Y, Kuriyama S, Houzawa A, Ohmori K, Endo A, et al. Analysis of medical cost of complications in diabetes mellitus. Japanese Journal of Public Health. 2005;52: 652–663. Japanese. pmid:16130891
- 15. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [Internet]. Various Information of Medical Fee (in Japanese). [cited 2016 Dec 13]. Available from: http://www.iryohoken.go.jp/shinryohoshu/searchMenu/doSearchInputBp.
- 16. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare [Internet]. Summary of Patient Survey, 2014 (in Japanese). [cited 2016 Oct 18]. Available from: http://www.mhlw.go.jp/toukei/saikin/hw/kanja/14/index.html.
- 17. Chang CH, Kusama M, Ono S, Sugiyama Y, Orii T, Akazawa M. Assessment of statin-associated muscle toxicity in Japan: a cohort study conducted using claims database and laboratory information. BMJ Open. 2013. pmid:23585384
- 18. Ikeda S, Crawford B, Sato M. Utilization patterns of insulin therapy and healthcare services among Japanese insulin initiators during their first year: a descriptive analysis of administrative hospital data. BMC Health Serv Res. 2016. pmid:26759271
- 19. Ogino M, Kawachi I, Otake K, Ohta H, Otsuka Y, Iwasaki K, et al. Current treatment status and medical cost for multiple sclerosis based on analysis of a Japanese claims database. Clinical and Experimental Neuroimmunology. 2016;7: 158–167. pmid:27818711
- 20. Oz SG, Guven GS, Kilicarslan A, Calik N, Beyazit Y, Sozen T. Evaluation of bone metabolism and bone mass in patients with type-2 diabetes mellitus. J Natl Med Assoc. 2006;98: 1598–604. pmid:17052049
- 21. Galer BS, Gianas A, Jensen MP. Painful diabetic polyneuropathy: epidemiology, pain description, and quality of life. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2000;47: 123–128. pmid:10670912
- 22. Gore M, Brandenburg NA, Dukes E, Hoffman DL, Tai KS, Stacey B. Pain severity in diabetic peripheral neuropathy is associated with patient functioning, symptom levels of anxiety and depression, and sleep. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2005;30: 374–385. pmid:16256902
- 23. Katz DA, McHorney CA. Clinical correlates of insomnia in patients with chronic illness. Arch Intern Med. 1998;158: 1099–1107. pmid:9605781
- 24. Daousi C, MacFarlane IA, Woodward A, Nurmikko TJ, Bundred PE, Benbow SJ. Chronic painful peripheral neuropathy in an urban community: a controlled comparison of people with and without diabetes. Diabet Med. 2004;21: 976–982. pmid:15317601
- 25. Boulton AJ, Vinik AI, Arezzo JC, Bril V, Feldman EL, Freeman R, et al.; American Diabetes Association. Diabetic neuropathies: a statement by the American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2005;28: 956–962. pmid:15793206
- 26. Booya F, Bandarian F, Larijani B, Pajouhi M, Nooraei M, Lotfi J. Potential risk factors for diabetic neuropathy: a case control study. BMC Neurol. 2005;5: 24. pmid:16336693
- 27. The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med. 1993;329: 977–86. pmid:8366922
- 28. Duckworth W, Abraira C, Moritz T, Reda D, Emanuele N, Reaven PD, et al.; VADT Investigators. Glucose control and vascular complications in veterans with type 2 diabetes. N Engl J Med. 2009;360:129–39. Erratum in: N Engl J Med. 2009;361: 1028. N Engl J Med. 2009;361: 1024–5. pmid:19092145
- 29. Callaghan BC, Hur J, Feldman EL. Diabetic neuropathy: one disease or two? Curr Opin Neurol. 2012;25: 536–41. pmid:22892951
- 30. Peltier A, Goutman SA, Callaghan BC. Painful diabetic neuropathy. BMJ. 2014;348: g3440.
- 31. American Diabetes Association. Classification and Diagnosis of Diabetes. Sec.2. In Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2016. Diabetes Care. 2016;39(Suppl. 1): S13–S22.
- 32. Tajima N, Matsushima M, Matsuoka K, Kawamori R, Iwamoto Y, Akanuma Y; the Tokyo Diabetic Complication Research Group. A large-scale, hospital-based survey on diabetic neuropathy in the Tokyo metropolitan area. J Japan Diab Soc. 2003;46: 301–310.
- 33. Tajima N, Nishimura R, Izumi K, Hayashino Y, Orikasa H, Noda M, et al. A large-scale, observational study to investigate the current status of diabetes complications and their prevention in Japan: research outline and baseline data for type 2 diabetes—JDCP study1. J Japan Diab Soc. 2015;58: 346–357.