Skip to main content
Browse Subject Areas

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Daily rhythms and enrichment patterns in the transcriptome of the behavior-manipulating parasite Ophiocordyceps kimflemingiae

  • Charissa de Bekker ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Data curation, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Methodology, Resources, Visualization, Writing – original draft

    Affiliations University of Central Florida, Department of Biology, Orlando, Florida, United States of America, LMU Munich, Institute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Munich, Germany, LMU Munich, Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany

  • Ian Will,

    Roles Data curation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Visualization, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliations University of Central Florida, Department of Biology, Orlando, Florida, United States of America, LMU Munich, Institute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Munich, Germany

  • David P. Hughes,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Pennsylvania State University, Departments of Biology and Entomology, University Park, Pennsylvania, United States of America

  • Andreas Brachmann,

    Roles Software, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation LMU Munich, Genetics, Faculty of Biology, Planegg-Martinsried, Germany

  • Martha Merrow

    Roles Conceptualization, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation LMU Munich, Institute of Medical Psychology, Faculty of Medicine, Munich, Germany


Various parasite-host interactions that involve adaptive manipulation of host behavior display time-of-day synchronization of certain events. One example is the manipulated biting behavior observed in Carpenter ants infected with Ophiocordyceps unilateralis sensu lato. We hypothesized that biological clocks play an important role in this and other parasite-host interactions. In order to identify candidate molecular clock components, we used two general strategies: bioinformatics and transcriptional profiling. The bioinformatics approach was used to identify putative homologs of known clock genes. For transcriptional profiling, RNA-Seq was performed on 48 h time courses of Ophiocordyceps kimflemingiae (a recently named species of the O. unilateralis complex), whose genome has recently been sequenced. Fungal blastospores were entrained in liquid media under 24 h light-dark (LD) cycles and were harvested at 4 h intervals either under LD or continuous darkness. Of all O. kimflemingiae genes, 5.3% had rhythmic mRNAs under these conditions (JTK Cycle, ≤ 0.057 statistical cutoff). Our data further indicates that a significant number of transcription factors have a peaked activity during the light phase (day time). The expression levels of a significant number of secreted enzymes, proteases, toxins and small bioactive compounds peaked during the dark phase or subjective night. These findings support a model whereby this fungal parasite uses its biological clock for phase-specific activity. We further suggest that this may be a general mechanism involved in parasite-host interactions.


Endogenous temporal programs, which anticipate daily changes in e.g. temperature and light, have evolved in organisms from all phyla [14]. These programs function as circadian clocks, organizing physiology and behavior to specific times of day (phases). Circadian clocks share several properties, most notably a free-running rhythm of about 24 h in constant conditions and entrainment or synchronization of these rhythms to exactly 24 h in the presence of highly predictable, regular signals from the environment (zeitgebers, e.g. light and temperature cycles). Various insect behaviors, such as foraging, flight and oviposition show phase-characteristic daily rhythms under entrainment conditions [5, 6]. Daily rhythms in immune systems have also been reported in insects, as well as in plants [7, 8], an observation that has consequences for timing of inter-species interactions with respect to parasites. For example, it has been proposed that fungi invade plants such that they circumvent rhythms in host immune systems [9]. Moreover, it has been shown for the plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea that its virulence is regulated by the circadian clock [10]. Adaptive timing of infection could thus enable a parasite’s life cycle by increasing infection rates, virulence and, eventually, transmission. In vertebrate-infecting parasites, circadian clocks also appear to play a role. For example, circadian rhythms were shown to contribute to fitness in the malaria parasite Plasmodium chabaudi and metabolism in the sleeping sickness parasite Trypanosoma brucei, is under clock control [1113]. Biological clocks could, therefore, be an important aspect of parasite-host interactions in general.

In this work, we wish to learn more about how the circadian clock is used in parasitic behavioral manipulation, specifically in stages past the initial host invasion and immune system evasion. Such a behavioral manipulation can be observed in Formica ants infected with the lancet fluke that are manipulated to bite grass. This behavior appears regulated by daily temperature fluctuations [1416] and its phase-specific activity facilitates parasite transmission from the intermediate ant host to the gut of the ultimate, herbivore host. Another example of daily synchronization of manipulated behaviors is seen in soldier beetles infected with Eryniopsis lampyridarum. Here, infected beetles are thought to grip flower heads with their mandibles in the early morning immediately prior to death. Emergence of conidiophores and conidia (spores; transmission agents) and post-mortem spreading of the wings occurs pre-dawn the following day. This timing is thought to protect the spores via optimal humidity levels [17]. Another time-of-day specific fungal manipulation of insect behavior is that of fungi of the Ophiocordyceps unilateralis complex as they infect Carpenter ants. Workers foraging for food are infected when they encounter fungal spores [18]. Infected ants then abandon their tasks as the fungus slowly expands throughout the body [19]. This behavioral change may represent a disruption of the ant circadian clock, as foraging, and other behaviors, are typically under clock control [20, 21]. Ultimately, like in the examples above, the ant displays manipulated biting behavior followed by death at a certain time of day. In field studies in Thailand, Ophiocordyceps camponoti-leonardi induced Carpenter ants to bite vegetation around solar noon [22]. Laboratory studies with Ophiocordyceps kimflemingiae demonstrated synchronized biting in the early morning [23]. In both unilateralis species’ interactions, the timing of death after biting is also synchronous. Moreover, mixed transcriptomics data revealed differentially expressed clock gene homologs in O. kimflemingiae-infected ants versus healthy individuals sampled at the same time of day [23]. This suggests that the fungal infection works at some level through the host circadian clock.

Fungal clocks have mainly been studied in the nonpathogenic fungus Neurospora crassa, revealing a negative feedback loop based on transcriptional regulation that is essential for circadian clock function [24]. In Neurospora, the activation arm of this molecular clock gene mechanism consists of the White Collar Complex (WCC). This complex is made up of the transcription factors White Collar-1 (WC-1) and White Collar-2 (WC-2), which have a second role, namely blue-light perception (important for entraining the clock [2527]) and regulation of light-induced genes (including many clock-controlled genes, ccgs) [28, 29]. As such, the WCC promotes transcription of the frequency (frq) gene. FRQ forms a complex with FRQ-interacting RNA helicase (FRH), which then functions as the repression arm in the transcriptional feedback loop as it inhibits the activity of WCC. After FRQ is synthesized it is post-translationally modified and degraded. As FRQ levels drop, the WCC is reactivated and the cycle can start anew (reviewed in more detail in e.g. [3032]). Recent genome-wide gene expression studies in N. crassa, performed under constant darkness (free-running) conditions, show that the rhythmic expression of the many ccgs peak in time-of-day-related clusters [33, 34]. Catabolic processes appear to be dawn-phased, while anabolic processes are dusk-phased [34]). Additionally, among the circadian clock-regulated genes, processes such as metabolism, protein synthesis, DNA processing and stress response are highly enriched. and phase-specific, with metabolism primarily peaking in the subjective late night and early morning, and protein synthesis activity rising in the subjective afternoon and early night. Expression levels of DNA processing genes also peaked during the subjective late day/evening [33]. Unfortunately, little is known about the molecular mechanism and clock-driven processes in other fungi. Saccharomyces cerevisiae shows typical circadian entrainment but no obvious homologs of clock genes are found in its genome [35]. For Aspergillus spp. the presence of a circadian clock was also shown, though these ascomycetes have different clock components since no homolog for frq was found [36]. Homologs of the N. crassa “clock genes” have been identified in the basal ascomycete Pyronema confluens and rhythmic expression of the P.c. frq has been observed [37]. Furthermore, studies have presented phenotypic and molecular evidence for the presence of a functional molecular clock in the phytopathogenic fungus B. cinerea, where it appears to contribute to virulence [9, 10]. To a lesser extent, evidence for biological clocks in phytopathogens Cercospora kikuchii and Magnporthe oryzae have also been reported [38, 39]. To our knowledge, fungal entomopathogens have not yet been studied from a circadian biology perspective.

Circadian rhythms in ants have been reported [20, 21, 40]. To investigate if parasite circadian clocks could contribute to the observed patterns of manipulated ant behavior, we wished to characterize the temporal program in the parasite, Ophiocordyceps. To this end, we performed RNA-Seq on two-day long time courses of O. kimflemingiae. Rhythmic signals were paired with homology searches against N. crassa to detect candidate core clock genes in the genome. We report rhythmic candidate clock and clock-controlled genes with activity patterns that appear to be synchronized to certain times of day.

Materials and methods

Fungal culture conditions

The fungal parasite used in this study, O. kimflemingiae [41], was isolated from an infected and manipulated Camponotus castaneus ant [42]. This species resides within the O. unilateralis s.l. complex and was recently named [41]. Previous data for this species’ interaction with C. castaneus suggests that biological clocks could be involved in the observed manipulation [23, 42]. Cultures were maintained in Grace’s insect medium (Sigma) supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (Invitrogen). For time course studies, cultures were grown as fungal blastospores (Fig 1A) in 25m2 tissue culture flasks in 20 mL media and shaken at 60 rpm at 28 oC. Fungal hyphae (Fig 1B) were grown in a 250 mL Erlenmeyer flask holding 100 mL media shaken at the same speed. To synchronize fungal cells, cultures were kept in constant light (light intensity 300 Lux) for 48 h and then transferred to 24 h LD (12 h:12 h) cycles for 5 days at 28 oC. To avoid starvation conditions during sampling, on the fourth day at the end of the light phase, cultures were briefly spun down in a swing-out rotor (3000 rpm for 5 min), and old media was removed and replaced with fresh media. Each culture was subsequently split in two 20 mL cultures: one to keep in LD during sampling, and one to be transferred to DD. After an additional 24 h under LD conditions, half of the cultures were transferred to constant darkness (DD samples). The other half of the flasks were maintained under LD conditions (LD samples) (Fig 1C). During this time, fungal cultures had reached an OD600 of ~ 1 and material was collected every 4 h under red light in a climate controlled room set to 28 oC. Cultures were kept in incubators running zeitgeber cycles in antiphase, which allowed harvesting 48 h time courses over 12 h. Fungal cells were pelleted by spinning down 2 mL of the culture for 3 min at 10,000 rpm. The supernatant was removed and the samples were snap frozen in liquid nitrogen and stored at -80 oC until processing for RNA extraction.

Fig 1.

Ophiocordyceps kimflemingiae growth conditions O. kimflemingiae was grown in its blastospore state (A), rather than in its vegetative growth state (B). Blastospores were synchronized under constant light, followed by entrainment in 24 h LD (12 h:12 h) cycles before harvesting samples under either cycling or free-running conditions (C).

RNA extraction, library construction and sequencing

Total RNA was extracted as previously reported [43]. Sample quality and quantity were checked with a Bioanalyzer and RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent Technologies), and a Qubit with the RNA BR Assay Kit (Invitrogen). Sequence libraries were constructed using the NEBNext Ultra Directional RNA Library Prep Kit for Illumina (New England BioLabs) and manufacturer’s instructions. Library quality and quantity were checked with a Bioanalyzer and the High Sensitivity DNA Analysis Kit (Agilent Technologies) and a Qubit with the ds DNA HS Assay Kit (Invitrogen). Samples were sequenced on a HiSeq1500 (Illumina) using 50 bp single-end sequencing in rapid-run mode. The dataset is available at the NCBI’s Gene Expression Omnibus under the accession code GSE101312.

Biostatistical analyses

RNA reads were mapped to the latest version of the O. kimflemingiae genome [44] with CLC Genomics Workbench 9. Reads were also mapped to inter-genic regions and other parameters were kept at default. Expression levels were calculated for all genes and normalized to Reads Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads (RPKM).

Cycling transcripts were identified with JTK_CYCLEv3.1 [45]. Normalized expression levels from 4 h-interval time points were used as input data. Defined period length was set at 20–28 hour for the LD time course and at 16–28 hour for the DD time course.

Functional annotation enrichment was determined with a Fisher Exact test with the Benjamini-Hochberg procedure and a corrected p-value cutoff of 0.05 to correct for multiple testing. Hierarchical clustering was performed with Cluster 3.0 and resulting heat maps were visualized with Java TreeView 1.16r4 [46]. For hierarchical clustering, normalized gene expression values were increased by 1 prior to log2-transformation to avoid negative values, and scaled per gene by centering around the mean. Next, genes were hierarchically clustered using the average linkage method.

Real-time quantitative PCR verification

RNA-Seq results were verified through RT-QPCR by determining the relative expression of five clock gene homologs. Two biological replicates from independently performed time courses and technical triplicates for each time point and amplified gene were used. Primers were designed to span exon-exon boundaries when possible (Table 1). Efficiencies were calculated from a standard curve of serial dilutions. RNA was converted to cDNA with the QuantiTect Reverse Transcription Kit (Qiagen). RT-QPCR reactions were performed on a ViiA 7 (Applied Biosystems) running in Fast Cycling Mode followed by a melt curve analysis, with 10 ng cDNA per 10 μL reaction and PowerUp SYBR Green Master Mix (Applied Biosystems). Amplification data was analyzed using the Relative Quantification and the Design and Analysis Application Apps of the ThermoFisher Cloud Software.

To normalize samples within a time course, candidate reference genes were selected from genes displaying non-cycling expression patterns in the same RNA-Seq dataset, as well as low variation expression patterns in the RNA-Seq dataset from [23]. The pool of non-cycling genes (JTK-CYCLE p >0.057) was first restricted by selecting for genes with a low fold-change, as done in [47] and by setting a cutoff for the coefficient of variation, as described in [48]. Reference candidates displayed a <2-fold-change between the maximum and minimum RPKM expression values under both LD and DD conditions. In addition, log2-transformed expression values displayed a coefficient of variation ≤5%. Reference candidates were further restricted to genes that lacked differential expression in a previously published transcriptomics dataset that compared stages of the fungal parasite in culture, inside the manipulated host and inside the dead host [23]. From this restricted pool, five genes were amplified using RT-QPCR after which the two most stable ones were selected with RefFinder [49] (Table 1).

Results and discussion

O. kimflemingiae blastospores: Growth and sampling conditions

Fungal entomopathogens have a yeast-like (blastospores) and a vegetative (hyphae) growth state. Daily foraging behavior is disrupted and phase-specific biting behavior is induced when the infecting fungus is in a blastospore state (Fig 1A). When secured in the biting position, the host dies and the fungus quickly switches to a vegetative, hyphal growth (Fig 1B). For this study, we identified conditions for O. kimflemingiae that would induce morphological growth resembling that in situ (blastopores in an infected, live C. castaneus ant).

Culturing O. kimflemingiae on solid media results in vegetative (hyphal) growth. Hyphae are also formed in liquid shaking cultures grown in Erlenmeyer flasks. In order to trigger blastospore growth in liquid cultures, we tried several media compositions (S1 Table). Vegetative growth persisted in all conditions. We next cultured fungi in tissue culture flasks with rectangular edges shaken gently at 60 rpm. In the presence of Grace’s medium with 10% FBS, the fungi switched to a yeast-like growth and started forming blastospores. Blastospores reverted back to hyphal growth when they were placed into Erlenmeyer flasks. We do not quite understand the reason for this but speculate that this could be due to different aeration rates. The greater turbulence in tissue culture flasks might also decrease flocculation and, therefore, lead to favored blastospore growth. For the experiments in this study, fungal cells were grown in tissue culture flasks throughout time course experiments. Experiments were performed as described in the Materials and methods section and in Fig 1C.

Mining the O. kimflemingiae genome for clock gene homologs

Clock and clock-controlled genes of fungi, cyanobacteria, plants, insects and mammals have been reported [1]. We surveyed the O. kimflemingiae genome for homologs by searching for protein family (Pfam) domains [50] that are encoded in those genes. Per Arnt Sim (PAS) domains (PF00989) are found in all kingdoms of life [51] and have been shown to be involved in eukaryotic circadian clocks [52]. A frequency (FRQ) domain (PF09421) has been identified in the clock gene frequency of the fungal model organism N. crassa [53] as well as other fungi [10, 37]. PHY domains (PF00360) are found in phytochrome photoreceptors that can sense (far-)red light. Phytochromes have been mainly studied in plants where they regulate development via photoperiodism. To a lesser extent, they have been reported for (cyano)bacteria and fungi as well. In Aspergillus nidulans this receptor was shown to repress sexual spore formation [54] as it forms a light-regulator complex with receptors similar to the white collar proteins in N. crassa [55]. In N. crassa, however, phy transcripts are not regulated by light. There, phytochrome-1 mRNAs levels appear under the control of the circadian clock [56]. We mined the O. kimflemingiae genome for the presence of these functional domains and found eight candidate homolog genes (Table 2). The Pfam search was followed by BlastP alignments against the N. crassa OR74A genome [57]. These alignments confirmed O. kimflemingiae homologs of the N. crassa clock genes frequency (frq), white collar 1 and 2 (wc-1 and wc-2), and vivid (vvd). In Neurospora, VVD is only expressed in the light and regulates gating of light input to the circadian clock [58]. Four additional homologs of PAS domain-containing genes were found through alignment, one of which was a putative phytochrome 1 (phy-1) (Table 2).

Detection of candidate genes with cycling transcripts

The identification of clock gene homologs suggests that O. kimflemingiae may have clock-controlled daily oscillations in gene expression. To detect genes that oscillate under LD and DD conditions, we generated genome wide gene expression profiles of samples collected over a 48 h time course using RNA-Seq. Reads were mapped to the latest version of the O. kimflemingiae genome, which is 23.92 Mb in size and has been annotated to encode 8,629 genes [44]. Sequencing yielded an average of 20.5 million single-end reads per sample with an average mean quality score of 38. This read depth is around the maximum read depth that was tested for D. melanogaster [59]. It should thus be sufficient to detect cycling transcripts in our fungal model since its genome is about five times smaller. An average of 95.9% of the reads mapped uniquely to this genome. Resulting expression profiles were normalized to Reads Per Kilobase of exon model per Million mapped reads (RPKM).

Normalized expression profiles were analyzed with the JTK_CYCLE algorithm [45]. Our sampling method (single samples at 4 h intervals) did not allow us to assign false discovery rates. We, therefore, ranked genes based on the Bonferroni-adjusted p-values. In our ranking approach, we relaxed the p = 0.05 threshold, which has been the topic of debate for many years now [60, 61]. We set the threshold for rhythmicity at the p-value of an Ophiocordyceps homolog of a rhythmically expressed Neurospora clock gene. In N. crassa, ca. 24 h rhythmic expression levels have been observed for frq under both LD and DD conditions. Under LD conditions, vvd is rhythmic, but when transferred to DD, vvd oscillation is only seen in the first 24 h. For wc-1, rhythmicity has been observed in LD and though its promoter shows rhythms in DD, its mRNA levels are not predicted to be highly rhythmic [26, 33, 58, 62, 63]. In addition, we used the expression patterns from fungal tissue cultured in LD conditions. JTK_CYCLE returned Bonferroni-adjusted p-values of 0.002, 0.057, and 0.009, respectively, for the above-mentioned homologs under LD conditions. As such, we set our threshold for rhythmicity at the adjusted p-value for wc-1 under these conditions (i.e. rhythmic candidates p ≤ 0.057). This led to the detection of 333 candidate genes with oscillating transcripts under LD conditions with a median period of 24 h (S1 Fig and S1 Data File). Under DD conditions, adjusted p-values for these genes were markedly higher (0.30, 0.46, and 1 for frq, wc-1, vvd, respectively). This suggests either that endogenous rhythmicity at the mRNA level damps over 48 h in DD and constant temperature conditions or that rhythms detected in LD are simply driven by the zeitgeber cycle. To minimize false discovery, we set the threshold for rhythmicity in DD to the same adjusted p-value as for the LD samples. This led to the detection of 154 genes with suggested circadian rhythms with a median period of 26 h (S1 Fig and S2 Data File). Studies using other model organisms also report fewer rhythmic genes under DD than under LD conditions [6468]. In addition, lower numbers of cycling transcripts for cells taken out of their natural context and grown under laboratory cell culture conditions have previously been shown [69]. Moreover, a decreased amplitude under DD conditions for the significantly rhythmic gene frq is observed in B. cinerea [10]. Similarly, a decreased amplitude in O. kimflemingiae under DD conditions, combined with single 4h-interval data points could have resulted in poor detection of endogenously rhythmic genes in this study.

Among the rhythmic candidate genes in LD, we identified 14 transcription factors (TFs). One of these TFs, as identified above, is the O. kimflemingiae homolog of wc-1. Two of these TFs appear to be involved in regulation of Neurospora conidiation (homologs of N. crassa znf-21; NCU02671 and csp-2; NCU06095) and one regulates ascus development (N. crassa homolog asd-4; NCU20921). ChIP sequencing revealed that N. crassa TFs znf-21 and csp-2 are among the direct targets of the White Collar Complex (WCC, formed by WC1 and WC2) [70], a blue-light photoreceptor that is the key transcriptional activator of the circadian oscillator in this fungus. Additionally, we identified a putative blue-light photoreceptor cryptochrome DASH homolog (cry; NCU00582) (S1 Data File). In Neurospora, CRY was shown to be an essential photoreceptor for the correct functioning of a novel frq-less-oscillator (FLO) named the CRY-dependent oscillator [71].

We performed enrichment analyses on the rhythmic genes. For both LD and DD conditions, secreted proteins (SPs) and small secreted proteins (SSPs) were significantly over-represented (i.e. LD: 41 SPs and 25 SSPs, Fisher-exact corrected p-value 3.88E-07 and 0.0029, respectively; and DD: 15 SPs and 15 SSPs, Fisher-exact corrected p-value 0.0008 and 0.00160, respectively). One of the SSPs was homologous to clock-controlled gene-6 of N. crassa (ccg-6; NCU01418). Rhythmic expression has been demonstrated for this conidiation-related gene in N. crassa, which also appears to be photoinducible and developmentally regulated [72]. Among the rhythmic SPs under LD conditions were five genes encoding enterotoxins and six encoding predicted proteases. These, as well as the potentially bioactive SSPs, could be involved in O. kimflemingiae interactions with its ant host. Moreover, we found rhythmicity in genes encoding secreted enzymes that have previously been identified as candidate manipulation genes: tyrosinase and protein tyrosine phosphatase, [23].

Twenty-six genes had rhythmic transcripts under both cycling and free-running conditions (S1A Fig). A relatively low overlap between LD and DD rhythmic transcripts has previously been observed [6568, 73]. To obtain insight into the biological processes that were rhythmic regardless of LD or DD conditions, we again performed an enrichment analysis. Despite the small number of endogenously cycling genes (26), we again found an over-representation of SPs (six genes) and SSPs (five genes; Fisher-exact corrected p-value 1.95E-05 and 0.0030, respectively). Nine out of the eleven genes with encoded secretion signals appeared to peak during the dark phase in LD and in the subjective night in DD (Fig 2A). These comprised four unknown SSPs that appear unique to O. kimflemingiae since they only aligned with deposited sequences of this species in the NCBI Database. Night-active SPs comprised a chloroperoxidase, an exo-beta-D-glucosaminidase, a metallocarboxypeptidase, an enterotoxin, and a tyrosinase. The other two genes peaked during the (anticipated) light phase and comprised another unique SSP with unknown function and a homolog of the Aspergillus fumigatus allergen Asp f9, which is a cell wall glucanase (Fig 2A). Two fungal transcription factors (TFs) were also among the endogenously rhythmic genes. We additionally identified a rhythmically expressed histidine phosphotransferase, a gene encoding a predicted two-component regulatory system protein, which would facilitate responses to changing stimuli in the environment [74]. This histidine phosphotransferase, as well as one of the fungal TFs appeared to peak during the (subjective) day, while the other TF showed peaks in expression during the (subjective) night (Fig 2B).

Fig 2. Expression patterns of endogenously cycling genes.

(A) Rhythmic mRNA levels of secreted proteins (SPs) and small secreted proteins (SSPs) under cycling (LD) and free-run (DD) conditions. (B) Rhythmic mRNA levels of genes involved in regulatory systems under cycling (LD) and free-run (DD) conditions. Normalized expression levels are plotted as their standard scores (Z-scores) and represent the amplitude of the gene expression observed at that time point versus the mean expression measured over the entire time course of 48 h.

RT-QPCR verification of rhythmicity

To verify the rhythmic gene expression in our samples, we measured expression of a small subset of genes through RT-QPCR. As target genes, we chose the four clock gene homologs for which experimental evidence in N. crassa has been reported [63, 7578]: frq, vvd, wc-1 and wc-2 (Table 2). We added the O. kimflemingiae homolog for cry as a fifth candidate gene (Table 1). All of the genes tested by RT-QPCR were rhythmic in the RNA-Seq data in LD except for wc-2, which is constitutively expressed in Neurospora [79].

For normalization purposes, we selected candidate reference genes that showed non-rhythmic expression according to the RNA-Seq data. These reference genes were chosen from a pool of 177 genes that did not have cycling transcripts and showed the least expression variations in the RNA-Seq datasets produced in this study and in a previous behavioral manipulation study in O. kimflemingiae [23] (see Materials and methods section for details). An enrichment analysis using these genes revealed that annotations such as nucleotide, ribonucleoside and ion binding functions, as well as genes with an RNA recognition motif, were over-represented. In addition, (small) secreted proteins were under-represented. After performing RT-QPCR on five of these genes, we used RefFinder [49] to select the two genes that showed the most consistent gene expression across all samples: Ophio5|2167 and Ophio5|2393 (Table 1). Both genes have been functionally predicted to be involved in nucleic acid binding (GO term), and more specifically in RNA binding (Pfam domains). The Genorm score, according to ThermoFisher’s Relative Quantification Cloud Software, for both genes was 0.401.

We generated RT-QPCR data from the biological samples that were used to obtain the RNA-Seq dataset (Time Course 1; TC1). In addition, we conducted RT-QPCR on an independently obtained biological replicate for both LD and DD conditions (Time Course 2; TC2). The Z-scores for the normalized RT-QPCR data (RT-QPCR TC1 and RT-QPCR TC2) are plotted together with those for the RNA-Seq profiles (RNASeq TC1) in Fig 3. The means of these three curves and the Standard Error of the Mean (SEM) have been calculated for each time point as well (S2 Fig). Rhythmic genes that were highly expressed (RPKM values) and that displayed a high amplitude (Amp), generally returned lower SEMs. As such, frq (average 61.2 RPKM with Amp 35.0), vvd (average 73.3 RPKM with Amp 106.4) and cry (average 25.0 RPKM with Amp 17.8) under LD conditions (Fig 3 and S2A–S2C Fig) returned average SEMs between 0.19 and 0.22. For wc-1, a rhythmic gene with a lower amplitude under LD conditions (average 39.9 RPKM with Amp 8.3), the SEM was higher (average SEM = 0.48; Fig 3 and S2D Fig). The dispersion in the data for this gene, therefore, makes the claim for rhythmicity unwarranted at this time. Expression patterns under DD conditions generally returned higher SEMs as well (average SEMs: 0.33–0.54). The low amplitudes for frq, vvd, cry, and wc-1 (Amp 2.6–9.3 RPKM) also resulted in expression patterns that displayed more variation across time course experiments (Fig 3 and S2F–S2I Fig).

Fig 3. Expression of candidate genes involved in circadian regulation.

Expression profiles of four O. kimflemingiae clock gene homologs and cryptochrome over the course of 48 h under LD (A-E) and DD (F-J) conditions. Black lines and blue lines represent RNA-Seq expression levels and RT-QPCR data, respectively, obtained from the same biological replicate (Time Course 1, i.e. TC1). Red lines represent RT-QPCR data obtained from an independently obtained biological replicate (Time Course 2, i.e. TC2). Normalized expression levels are plotted as Z-scores and represent the amplitude of the gene expression observed at that time point versus the mean expression measured over the entire time course of 48 h.

Cluster analysis reveals predominantly day- or night-active genes

Concentrations of expression to specific times of day have been observed in Neurospora, where circadian transcripts generally peak at different times depending on their function [33, 34]. Here, we performed cluster analyses on rhythmic genes in O. kimflemingiae (JTK_CYCLE at p≤0.057) to determine time-of-day (phase) expression. The majority of genes with rhythmic transcripts cluster into either the light or the dark phase (as opposed to dawn/dusk [34]; Fig 4). In LD, 52% of the cycling genes were up-regulated in the light phase and down-regulated in the dark. The opposite expression pattern was observed in 40% of the genes: up-regulation during the dark phase and down-regulation during the light phase (Fig 4A). We observed a similar pattern under DD conditions, where 25% of rhythmic genes were up-regulated during the subjective day and down-regulated during subjective night. For 64%, the peak expression was in the subjective night (Fig 4B). The majority of rhythmic genes in DD thus had peak expression during the subjective night. Indeed, when we looked at the 26 genes that are cycling in both LD and DD, nineteen (73%) of them peaked during the dark or subjective night phase. We again did another cluster analysis on all rhythmic genes found under LD conditions with concatenation of their expression levels in DD (Fig 5). The resulting heat map visualizes how rhythmicity of many genes that peaked in the light phase damp after 24 h in DD. Conversely, many genes that are up-regulated during the dark phase remained rhythmic in DD. This suggests that the majority of the rhythmic day-active genes are probably light-driven rather than endogenously rhythmic. Among the night-active genes, endogenous rhythmicity seems more likely to be found.

Fig 4. Clustering of genes with rhythmic transcripts.

(A) A heat map representation of the clustering of genes found to have rhythmic transcripts based on their expression profiles over a time course of 48 h in LD. (B) A heat map representation of the clustering of genes found to have rhythmic transcripts based on their expression profiles over a time course of 48 h in DD. The squares indicate two clusters: genes showing up-regulation during the light phase (light grey squares), and genes showing up-regulation during the dark phase (dark grey squares).

Fig 5. Heat map of gene expression patterns in LD and DD cultures.

A heat map representation of genes found to oscillate in their expression over 48 h in LD conditions is concatenated with their expression profiles over 48 h in DD conditions.

To obtain insight into the biological processes that are represented during the (subjective) light and dark phases, we performed enrichment analyses on the functional annotations of the genes within these clusters. Information about annotations and clustered activity for each rhythmic gene can be found in S1 and S2 Data Files. Among the genes that peak in the light phase, TFs were significantly over-represented (11 genes, corrected p-value 0.003). During the dark phase, under cycling conditions, a significant over-representation for SPs and SSPs was found (50 genes total, corrected p-values 1.13E-16 and 4E-07, respectively). In fact, they comprised 37% of all genes that peaked in the dark. Among these genes were five annotated enterotoxins with secretion signals, and four annotated proteases, as well as the above-mentioned tyrosinase, predicted to be secreted, protein tyrosine phosphatase, and homolog of N. crassa ccg-6. In DD, enrichments were only found among the genes that peaked during the subjective night. Again, SPs and SSPs were over-represented (23 genes total, corrected p-values 0.0002 and 0.0006, respectively), as well as genes encoding for secondary metabolites from annotated Cluster 8 (2 out of a total of 5 genes within the cluster, corrected p-value 0.0012). These secondary metabolites are both annotated to be involved in oxidation-reduction processes (a predicted P450 monooxygenase and a FAD dependent monooxygenase). Among the genes with secretion signals were the genes that appeared to be expressed in the (subjective) night in Fig 2. We also identified another endopeptidase, predicted to be secreted, a glycosyl hydrolase, and various SPs and SSPs with unknown function. This suggests that while a significant number of TFs are expressed during the light phase, the rhythmic O. kimflemingiae genes encoding enzymes and small bioactive compounds that may interact with the ant host are predominantly expressed during the dark phase.


In this study, we have provided the first evidence that the behavior manipulating fungus O. kimflemingiae has a circadian clock. Using a culture method that allows for the performance of time course experiments in LD and in DD, we have demonstrated that O. kimflemingiae cultures exhibit daily oscillations in their mRNA levels. We identified homologs of fungal clock genes in the genome of O. kimflemingiae and confirmed their rhythmicity in LD with RNA-Seq and RT-QPCR. Among the other rhythmic, likely clock-controlled, genes (ccg’s), a significant number are predicted to be involved in parasite-host interactions. These could thus be important in establishing behavioral manipulation. Our finding that the activity patterns of these ccg’s are seemingly synchronized to a certain time of day additionally indicates that daily timing could be involved in insect infection and manipulation. Our data thus sets the stage for further detailed investigations of the involvement of biological clocks in the mechanisms of infection and manipulation. At this time, clock knock-outs can not yet be made for O. kimflemingiae. The development of the molecular tools to facilitate this will aid in the true characterization of the core clock homologs in this fungus and how they potentially regulate effector genes. This will lead to a better understanding of the pathways and timing that lead to key parasite-host interactions that are taking place. Such an understanding may eventually support development of more effective strategies for the biological control of insect pests.

Supporting information

S1 Table. Culturing conditions trials.

Media compositions and culturing conditions tested to induce O. kimflemingiae blastospore growth.


S1 Fig. Summary of JTK_CYCLE results.

(A) Venn diagram of all rhythmic candidates found in this study under LD and DD conditions. (B) Histogram visualizing the frequency of the periods found for all rhythmic candidates under LD and DD conditions. The median period under LD conditions was 24 h, while under DD conditions we found a median period of 26 h.


S2 Fig. Expression of candidate genes involved in circadian regulation.

Expression profiles of four O. kimflemingiae clock gene homologs and cryptochrome over the course of 48 h under LD (A-E) and DD (F-J) conditions. Normalized expression levels from RNA-Seq and RT-QPCR data obtained from the same biological replicate (Time Course 1), and RT-QPCR data obtained from an independently obtained biological replicate (Time Course 2) have been plotted as mean Z-scores. Error bars indicate Standard Error of the Mean.


S1 Data File. Rhythmic genes under LD conditions.

All genes found to be cycling with a likelihood of p≤0.057 (p-value wc-1 set as threshold) under LD conditions in the 4h-interval dataset. For each gene the ProteinID is given, as well as its functional annotation, the NCBI blast result, the JTK_CYCLE output, the expression values (RPKM) of each time course sample under LD and DD conditions, and the clustered day or night-activity.


S2 Data File. Rhythmic genes under DD conditions.

All genes found to be cycling with a likelihood of p≤0.057 under DD conditions in the 4h-interval dataset. For each gene the ProteinID is given, as well as its functional annotation, the NCBI blast result, the JTK_CYCLE output, the expression values (RPKM) of each time course sample under DD conditions, and the clustered day or night-activity.



This work was supported by Marie Curie Actions IOF Project 299501, the Alexander von Humboldt Foundation and funds from the Friedrich-Baur-Stiftung of LMU Munich. We would like to thank Michael Hughes for taking the time to discuss our data with us and his invaluable advice on how to analyze the JTK_CYCLE output.


  1. 1. Bell-Pedersen D, Cassone VM, Earnest DJ, Golden SS, Hardin PE, Thomas TL, et al. Circadian rhythms from multiple oscillators: Lessons from diverse organisms. Nat Rev Genet. 2005;6(7):544–56. pmid:15951747
  2. 2. Buhr ED, Takahashi JS. Molecular components of the mammalian circadian clock. Handb Exp Pharmacol. 2013;(217):3–27. pmid:23604473
  3. 3. Johnson CH, Stewart PL, Egli M. The cyanobacterial circadian system: from biophysics to bioevolution. Annu Rev Biophys. 2011;40:143–67. pmid:21332358
  4. 4. Wager-Smith K, Kay SA. Circadian rhythm genetics: from flies to mice to humans. Nat Genet. 2000;26(1):23–7. pmid:10973243
  5. 5. Page TL. Clocks and circadian rhythms. In: Gilbert LI, Kerkut GA, editors. Comprehensive insect physiology, biochemistry, and pharmacology. 6. 1st ed. Oxford Oxfordshire; New York: Pergamon Press; 1985. p. 577–652.
  6. 6. Saunders DS. Insect clocks. 3rd ed. Amsterdam; Boston: Elsevier; 2002. xv,560 p. p.
  7. 7. Lee JE, Edery I. Circadian regulation in the ability of Drosophila to combat pathogenic infections. Curr Biol. 2008;18(3):195–9. pmid:18261909
  8. 8. Wang W, Barnaby JY, Tada Y, Li H, Tor M, Caldelari D, et al. Timing of plant immune responses by a central circadian regulator. Nature. 2011;470(7332):110–4. pmid:21293378
  9. 9. Canessa P, Schumacher J, Hevia MA, Tudzynski P, Larrondo LF. Assessing the effects of light on differentiation and virulence of the plant pathogen Botrytis cinerea: characterization of the White Collar Complex. PloS one. 2013;8(12):e84223. pmid:24391918
  10. 10. Hevia MA, Canessa P, Muller-Esparza H, Larrondo LF. A circadian oscillator in the fungus Botrytis cinerea regulates virulence when infecting Arabidopsis thaliana. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015;112(28):8744–9. pmid:26124115
  11. 11. O'Donnell AJ, Mideo N, Reece SE. Disrupting rhythms in Plasmodium chabaudi: costs accrue quickly and independently of how infections are initiated. Malaria J. 2013;12. Artn 372 pmid:24160251
  12. 12. O'Donnell AJ, Schneider P, McWatters HG, Reece SE. Fitness costs of disrupting circadian rhythms in malaria parasites. Proc Biol Sci. 2011;278(1717):2429–36. pmid:21208950
  13. 13. Rijo-Ferreira F, Pinto-Neves D, Barbosa-Morais NL, Takahashi JS, Figueiredo LM. Trypanosoma brucei metabolism is under circadian control. Nature Microbiology. 2017;2. pmid:28288095
  14. 14. Badie A, Vincent M, Morel-Vareille C, Rondelaud D. Cycle de Dicrocoelium dendriticum (Rudolphi, 1819) en Limousin. Ethologie des fourmis parasitées par les métacercaires. C R Séances Soc Biol. 1973;167:3.
  15. 15. Botnevik CF, Malagocka J, Jensen AB, Fredensborg BL. Relative effects of temperature, light, and humidity on clinging behavior of Metacercariae-infected ants. J Parasitol. 2016;102(5):495–500. pmid:27391362
  16. 16. Manga-González MY, Gonzalez-Lanza C, Cabanas E, Campo R. Contributions to and review of dicrocoeliosis, with special reference to the intermediate hosts of Dicrocoelium dendriticum. Parasitology. 2001;123:S91–S114. pmid:11769295
  17. 17. Steinkraus DC, Hajek AE, Liebherr JK. Zombie soldier beetles: Epizootics in the goldenrod soldier beetle, Chauliognathus pensylvanicus (Coleoptera: Cantharidae) caused by Eryniopsis lampyridarum (Entomophthoromycotina: Entomophthoraceae). J Invertebr Pathol. 2017;148:51–9. pmid:28535871
  18. 18. Andersen SB, Gerritsma S, Yusah KM, Mayntz D, Hywel-Jones NL, Billen J, et al. The life of a dead ant: The expression of an adaptive extended phenotype. American Naturalist. 2009;174:424–33. pmid:19627240
  19. 19. de Bekker C, Merrow M, Hughes DP. From behavior to mechanisms: an integrative approach to the manipulation by a parasitic fungus (Ophiocordyceps unilateralis s.l.) of its host ants (Camponotus spp.). Integrative and comparative biology. 2014;54(2):166–76. pmid:24907198
  20. 20. Lone SR, Ilangovan V, Murugan M, Sharma VK. Circadian resonance in the development of two sympatric species of Camponotus ants. J Insect Physiol. 2010;56(11):1611–6. pmid:20570678
  21. 21. Sharma VK, Lone SR, Goel A, Chandrashekaran MK. Circadian consequences of social organization in the ant species Camponotus compressus. Naturwissenschaften. 2004;91(8):386–90. pmid:15278218
  22. 22. Hughes DP, Andersen SB, Hywel-Jones NL, Himaman W, Billen J, Boomsma JJ. Behavioral mechanisms and morphological symptoms of zombie ants dying from fungal infection. BMC ecology. 2011;11:13. pmid:21554670
  23. 23. de Bekker C, Ohm RA, Loreto RG, Sebastian A, Albert I, Merrow M, et al. Gene expression during zombie ant biting behavior reflects the complexity underlying fungal parasitic behavioral manipulation. BMC genomics. 2015;16:620. pmid:26285697
  24. 24. Aronson BD, Johnson KA, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. Negative feedback defining a circadian clock: autoregulation of the clock gene frequency. Science. 1994;263(5153):1578–84. pmid:8128244
  25. 25. Crosthwaite SK, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. Light-induced resetting of a circadian clock is mediated by a rapid increase in frequency transcript. Cell. 1995;81(7):1003–12. pmid:7600569
  26. 26. Lee K, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. Interconnected feedback loops in the Neurospora circadian system. Science. 2000;289(5476):107–10. pmid:10884222
  27. 27. Merrow M, Franchi L, Dragovic Z, Gorl M, Johnson J, Brunner M, et al. Circadian regulation of the light input pathway in Neurospora crassa. EMBO J. 2001;20(3):307–15. pmid:11157738; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC133466.
  28. 28. Bell-Pedersen D, Lewis ZA, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. The Neurospora circadian clock regulates a transcription factor that controls rhythmic expression of the output eas(ccg-2) gene. Mol Microbiol. 2001;41(4):897–909. pmid:11532152
  29. 29. Talora C, Franchi L, Linden H, Ballario P, Macino G. Role of a white collar-1-white collar-2 complex in blue-light signal transduction. EMBO J. 1999;18(18):4961–8. pmid:10487748
  30. 30. Cha J, Zhou M, Liu Y. Mechanism of the Neurospora circadian clock, a FREQUENCY-centric view. Biochemistry. 2015;54(2):150–6. pmid:25302868
  31. 31. Hurley JM, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. The circadian system as an organizer of metabolism. Fungal Genet Biol. 2016;90:39–43. pmid:26498192
  32. 32. Montenegro-Montero A, Canessa P, Larrondo LF. Around the fungal clock: Recent advances in the molecular study of circadian clocks in Neurospora and other fungi. Adv Genet. 2015;92:107–84. pmid:26639917
  33. 33. Hurley JM, Dasgupta A, Emerson JM, Zhou X, Ringelberg CS, Knabe N, et al. Analysis of clock-regulated genes in Neurospora reveals widespread posttranscriptional control of metabolic potential. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014;111(48):16995–7002. pmid:25362047
  34. 34. Sancar C, Sancar G, Ha N, Cesbron F, Brunner M. Dawn- and dusk-phased circadian transcription rhythms coordinate anabolic and catabolic functions in Neurospora. BMC Biol. 2015;13:17. pmid:25762222
  35. 35. Eelderink-Chen Z, Mazzotta G, Sturre M, Bosman J, Roenneberg T, Merrow M. A circadian clock in Saccharomyces cerevisiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010;107(5):2043–7. pmid:20133849
  36. 36. Greene AV, Keller N, Haas H, Bell-Pedersen D. A circadian oscillator in Aspergillus spp. regulates daily development and gene expression. Eukaryot Cell. 2003;2(2):231–7. pmid:12684372
  37. 37. Traeger S, Nowrousian M. Analysis of circadian rhythms in the basal filamentous ascomycete Pyronema confluens. G3 (Bethesda). 2015;5(10):2061–71. pmid:26254031; PubMed Central PMCID: PMCPMC4592989.
  38. 38. Bluhm BH, Burnham AM, Dunkle LD. A circadian rhythm regulating hyphal melanization in Cercospora kikuchii. Mycologia. 2010;102(6):1221–8. pmid:20943572
  39. 39. Deng YZ, Qu Z, Naqvi NI. Twilight, a novel circadian-regulated gene, integrates phototropism with nutrient and redox homeostasis during fungal development. PLoS Pathog. 2015;11(6):e1004972. pmid:26102503
  40. 40. Ingram KK, Kutowoi A, Wurm Y, Shoemaker D, Meier R, Bloch G. The molecular clockwork of the fire ant Solenopsis invicta. PloS one. 2012;7(11):e45715. pmid:23152747
  41. 41. Araújo JP, Evans HC, Kepler RM, Hughes DP. Zombie-ant fungi across continents: 14 new species and new combinations within Ophiocordyceps. I. Myrmecophilous Hirsutelloid species. Studies in Mycology. In press.
  42. 42. de Bekker C, Quevillon LE, Smith PB, Fleming KR, Ghosh D, Patterson AD, et al. Species-specific ant brain manipulation by a specialized fungal parasite. BMC Evol Biol. 2014;14:166. pmid:25085339
  43. 43. de Bekker C, Bruning O, Jonker MJ, Breit TM, Wosten HA. Single cell transcriptomics of neighboring hyphae of Aspergillus niger. Genome biology. 2011;12(8):R71. pmid:21816052
  44. 44. de Bekker C, Ohm RA, Evans HC, Brachmann A, Hughes DP. Ant-infecting Ophiocordyceps genomes reveal a high diversity of potential behavioral manipulation genes and a possible major role for enterotoxins. Sci Rep. 2017;SREP-17-25243. pmid:28970504
  45. 45. Hughes ME, Hogenesch JB, Kornacker K. JTK_CYCLE: an efficient nonparametric algorithm for detecting rhythmic components in genome-scale data sets. J Biol Rhythms. 2010;25(5):372–80. pmid:20876817
  46. 46. Eisen MB, Spellman PT, Brown PO, Botstein D. Cluster analysis and display of genome-wide expression patterns. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998;95(25):14863–8. pmid:9843981
  47. 47. Llanos A, Francois JM, Parrou JL. Tracking the best reference genes for RT-qPCR data normalization in filamentous fungi. BMC genomics. 2015;16:71. pmid:25757610
  48. 48. Marcolino-Gomes J, Rodrigues FA, Fuganti-Pagliarini R, Nakayama TJ, Ribeiro Reis R, Boucas Farias JR, et al. Transcriptome-wide identification of reference genes for expression analysis of soybean responses to drought stress along the day. PloS one. 2015;10(9):e0139051. pmid:26407065
  49. 49. Xie F, Xiao P, Chen D, Xu L, Zhang B. miRDeepFinder: a miRNA analysis tool for deep sequencing of plant small RNAs. Plant Mol Biol. 2012. pmid:22290409
  50. 50. Finn RD, Coggill P, Eberhardt RY, Eddy SR, Mistry J, Mitchell AL, et al. The Pfam protein families database: towards a more sustainable future. Nucleic Acids Res. 2016;44(D1):D279–85. pmid:26673716
  51. 51. Henry JT, Crosson S. Ligand binding PAS domains in a genomic, cellular, and structural context. Annu Rev Microbiol. 2011;65:261–86. pmid:21663441
  52. 52. Ponting CP, Aravind L. PAS: a multifunctional domain family comes to light. Curr Biol. 1997;7(11):R674–7. pmid:9382818
  53. 53. Cheng P, Yang Y, Heintzen C, Liu Y. Coiled-coil domain-mediated FRQ-FRQ interaction is essential for its circadian clock function in Neurospora. EMBO J. 2001;20(1–2):101–8. pmid:11226160
  54. 54. Blumenstein A, Vienken K, Tasler R, Purschwitz J, Veith D, Frankenberg-Dinkel N, et al. The Aspergillus nidulans phytochrome FphA represses sexual development in red light. Curr Biol. 2005;15(20):1833–8. pmid:16243030
  55. 55. Purschwitz J, Muller S, Kastner C, Schoser M, Haas H, Espeso EA, et al. Functional and physical interaction of blue- and red-light sensors in Aspergillus nidulans. Curr Biol. 2008;18(4):255–9. pmid:18291652
  56. 56. Froehlich AC, Noh B, Vierstra RD, Loros J, Dunlap JC. Genetic and molecular analysis of phytochromes from the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Eukaryot Cell. 2005;4(12):2140–52. pmid:16339731
  57. 57. Galagan JE, Calvo SE, Borkovich KA, Selker EU, Read ND, Jaffe D, et al. The genome sequence of the filamentous fungus Neurospora crassa. Nature. 2003;422(6934):859–68. pmid:12712197
  58. 58. Heintzen C, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. The PAS protein VIVID defines a clock-associated feedback loop that represses light input, modulates gating, and regulates clock resetting. Cell. 2001;104(3):453–64. pmid:11239402
  59. 59. Li J, Grant GR, Hogenesch JB, Hughes ME. Considerations for RNA-seq analysis of circadian rhythms. Methods Enzymol. 2015;551:349–67. pmid:25662464
  60. 60. Lakens D, Evers ERK. Sailing from the seas of chaos into the corridor of stability practical recommendations to increase the informational value of studies. Perspect Psychol Sci. 2014;9(3):278–92. pmid:26173264
  61. 61. Sellke T, Bayarri MJ, Berger JO. Calibration of p values for testing precise null hypotheses. Am Stat. 2001;55(1):62–71.
  62. 62. Dunlap JC, Loros JJ, Colot HV, Mehra A, Belden WJ, Shi M, et al. A circadian clock in Neurospora: how genes and proteins cooperate to produce a sustained, entrainable, and compensated biological oscillator with a period of about a day. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol. 2007;72:57–68. pmid:18522516
  63. 63. Tan Y, Dragovic Z, Roenneberg T, Merrow M. Entrainment dissociates transcription and translation of a circadian clock gene in Neurospora. Current Biology. 2004;14(5):433–8. pmid:15028220
  64. 64. Ceriani MF, Hogenesch JB, Yanovsky M, Panda S, Straume M, Kay SA. Genome-wide expression analysis in Drosophila reveals genes controlling circadian behavior. J Neurosci. 2002;22(21):9305–19. pmid:12417656
  65. 65. Duffield GE. DNA microarray analyses of circadian timing: the genomic basis of biological time. J Neuroendocrinol. 2003;15(10):991–1002. pmid:12969245
  66. 66. Leming MT, Rund SS, Behura SK, Duffield GE, O'Tousa JE. A database of circadian and diel rhythmic gene expression in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. BMC genomics. 2014;15:1128. pmid:25516260
  67. 67. Rund SS, Hou TY, Ward SM, Collins FH, Duffield GE. Genome-wide profiling of diel and circadian gene expression in the malaria vector Anopheles gambiae. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2011;108(32):E421–30. pmid:21715657
  68. 68. Wijnen H, Naef F, Boothroyd C, Claridge-Chang A, Young MW. Control of daily transcript oscillations in Drosophila by light and the circadian clock. Plos Genet. 2006;2(3):e39. pmid:16565745
  69. 69. Hughes ME, DiTacchio L, Hayes KR, Vollmers C, Pulivarthy S, Baggs JE, et al. Harmonics of circadian gene transcription in mammals. Plos Genet. 2009;5(4):e1000442. pmid:19343201
  70. 70. Smith KM, Sancar G, Dekhang R, Sullivan CM, Li S, Tag AG, et al. Transcription factors in light and circadian clock signaling networks revealed by genomewide mapping of direct targets for Neurospora White Collar Complex. Eukaryot Cell. 2010;9(10):1549–56. pmid:20675579
  71. 71. Nsa IY, Karunarathna N, Liu X, Huang H, Boetteger B, Bell-Pedersen D. A novel cryptochrome-dependent oscillator in Neurospora crassa. Genetics. 2015;199(1):233–45. pmid:25361899
  72. 72. Bell-Pedersen D, Shinohara ML, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. Circadian clock-controlled genes isolated from Neurospora crassa are late night- to early morning-specific. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1996;93(23):13096–101. pmid:8917550
  73. 73. Lin JM, Kilman VL, Keegan K, Paddock B, Emery-Le M, Rosbash M, et al. A role for casein kinase 2alpha in the Drosophila circadian clock. Nature. 2002;420(6917):816–20. pmid:12447397
  74. 74. Stock AM, Robinson VL, Goudreau PN. Two-component signal transduction. Annu Rev Biochem. 2000;69:183–215. pmid:10966457
  75. 75. The UniProt C. UniProt: the universal protein knowledgebase. Nucleic Acids Res. 2017;45(D1):D158–D69. pmid:27899622
  76. 76. Baker CL, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. The circadian clock of Neurospora crassa. FEMS Microbiol Rev. 2012;36(1):95–110. pmid:21707668
  77. 77. Dunlap JC. Molecular bases for circadian clocks. Cell. 1999;96(2):271–90. pmid:9988221
  78. 78. Dasgupta A, Chen CH, Lee CH, Gladfelter AS, Dunlap JC, Loros JJ. Biological significance of photoreceptor photocycle length: VIVID photocycle governs the dynamic VIVID-White Collar complex pool mediating photo-adaptation and response to changes in light intensity. Plos Genet. 2015;11(5). ARTN e1005215 pmid:25978382
  79. 79. Denault DL, Loros JJ, Dunlap JC. WC-2 mediates WC-1-FRQ interaction within the PAS protein-linked circadian feedback loop of Neurospora. EMBO J. 2001;20(1–2):109–17. pmid:11226161