Freezing is a defensive response to acute stress that is associated with coping and alterations in attentional processing. However, it remains unclear whether individuals in high risk professions, who are skilled at making rapid decisions in emergency situations, show altered threat-induced freezing. Here we investigated the effect of incident experience in a high risk profession on freezing. Additionally, we explored whether any effect of incident experience on freezing would be different for profession-related and -unrelated threat. Forty experienced and inexperienced firefighters were presented neutral, pleasant, related-unpleasant, and unrelated-unpleasant pictures in a passive viewing task. Postural sway and heart rate were assessed to determine freezing. Both postural and heart rate data evidenced reduced freezing upon unpleasant pictures in the experienced versus the inexperienced group. Relatedness of the unpleasant pictures did not modulate these effects. These findings indicate that higher incident experience relates to decreased threat-induced freezing, at least in a passive task context. This might suggest that primary defense responses are malleable through experience. Finally, these findings demonstrate the potential of using animal to human translational approaches to investigate defensive behaviors in relation to incident experience in high risk professions and stimulate future research on the role of freezing in resilience and coping.
Citation: Ly V, Roijendijk L, Hazebroek H, Tonnaer C, Hagenaars MA (2017) Incident experience predicts freezing-like responses in firefighters. PLoS ONE 12(10): e0186648. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186648
Editor: Simon Dymond, Swansea University, UNITED KINGDOM
Received: August 18, 2017; Accepted: October 4, 2017; Published: October 18, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Ly et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: Data is fully available without any restrictions from DANS: https://doi.org/10.17026/dans-xrv-vgze.
Funding: M. A. Hagenaars was supported by VENI Grant (#451-09-018) from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO). This project was further financed with an NWO (Dutch Scientific Organization) VENI-grant awarded to Muriel Hagenaars (#451-09-018). The funder provided support in the form of salaries for authors M. A. H. and L. R., but did not have any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript. The specific roles of these authors are articulated in the ‘author contributions’ section. L. R. is currently employed at TNO, an independent non-profit organisation. The study was conducted while she was working at her previous employer, the Radboud University. TNO has no financial or any additional role in the study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Competing interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist. The involved funder and affiliations do not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.
Freezing is a major defensive response to threat in animals, which is characterized by heart rate deceleration (bradycardia) and immobility [1–5]. In general, freezing is considered adaptive as it optimizes attentional processes and prepares the organism to actively cope with acute stress [5–7]. Accumulative evidence suggests that freezing, as measured via reductions in postural sway and heart rate, can be induced in human subjects in a laboratory setting using aversive stimuli in a passive viewing task [8–13].These findings are robust; passively viewing aversive stimuli consistently elicits a decrease in heart rate and/or postural sway relative to neutral or pleasant stimuli. Additionally, a recent study has shown that bradycardia during passively viewing aversive pictures was associated with activation of the human periaquaductal grey and the amygdala, which overlaps with the neurocircuitry involved in rodent freeze behavior . Altogether, these findings suggest that threat-induced freezing is a phenomenon that is preserved in humans.
Recent human studies have also demonstrated the adaptive nature of freezing. For instance, freezing in terms of heart rate deceleration was associated with enhanced detection of coarse versus detailed visual information, suggesting that freezing is accompanied by perceptual changes aimed to promote threat-coping . Additionally, recent evidence indicates that freezing reflects an active state rather than a passive state . Specifically, it was found that freezing, as reflected by reductions in heart rate and postural sway, was more pronounced under threat when an opportunity to counter the threat was anticipated compared to a helpless condition without such opportunity. Thus, this finding suggests that freezing plays an important role in action preparation. In line with this, using mental imagery to prepare participants for subsequent negative stimuli also increased freezing upon these aversive pictures, possibly reflecting action preparation after mental imagery of the anticipated aversive pictures . Although these findings indicate that threat elicits freezing, and that this response is important for active coping, the ability to (down)regulate this primary defense response might also be crucial for adaptive responding [18–19].
Despite the relevant link between freezing and threat-coping, it remains unknown how threat-induced freezing manifests itself in individuals engaged in high risk professions. These individuals are trained to deal with emergency situations, such as is the case for firefighters. More often than the general population, firefighters are exposed to life-threatening events, such as when risking their own life to enter a burning building and witnessing the suffering of others. At the same time, firefighters are required to actively cope and make optimal instant decisions under these extreme situations. Investigating the relationship between incident experience in firefighters and threat-induced freezing is important as it could advance our understanding in the role of freezing in performance in high risk professions. More generally, it could help us better understand the role of freezing in resilience and coping.
In the present study, we took a first step to investigate the relation between incident experience and threat-induced freezing in individuals in a high risk profession. To this end, we compared experienced versus inexperienced firefighters on a well-established paradigm to determine human freezing-like responses [8–9, 20]. Specifically, we employed a passive viewing task involving neutral, pleasant, related-unpleasant, and unrelated-unpleasant pictures. Posturography and heart rate recordings were assessed during this task to determine freezing responses. The passive context of this task allows us to optimally assess freezing as a spontaneous response to unpleasant pictures rather than freezing as a preparatory response for action as would be the case in a context where actions are required. Additionally, we included both profession-related and –unrelated stimuli to explore whether any effects of incident experience on freezing would be specific for profession-related (versus profession-unrelated) threat or whether incident experience would have a general effect on threat-induced freezing.
We recruited male firefighters from the Dutch fire brigade, who were working as a battalion chief or junior incident commander. The main role of these fire officers is to direct and coordinate fires, and other rescue and emergency activities located in a specific region. Thus, we chose this population as the target group for the current study given their experience with directing emergency activities, which requires rapid decision making in emergency situations. Twenty experienced and 20 inexperienced fire officers were preselected based on the number of big fires they have coordinated in their current rank (≥ 4 for the experienced firefighters, and ≤ 3 for the inexperienced firefighters). A big fire was defined as involving more than three fire engines. Thus, the initial total sample consisted of 40 fire officers. However, five fire officers who were tested had to be excluded because of technical errors (n = 3), or poor signal quality of the heart rate data (n = 2). Accordingly, data are reported from thirty-five firefighters consisting of experienced (n = 19) and inexperienced (n = 16) fire officers. For a description of the characteristics of the sample, see Table 1.
As firefighters are regularly screened for physical and mental health, we only included healthy firefighters. Fire officers with a bodyweight above 120 kilograms were excluded from participation due to the limits of the stabilometric platform for accurate measurements. Furthermore, we excluded fire officers who experienced a big fire in the three weeks before the assessment to avoid acute effects of an incident. All participants received information about the experiment and gave written informed consent. The study was approved by the Institutional Review Board: the Ethical Committee Behavioural Sciences (Ethische Commissie Gedragswetenschappen in Dutch).
Apparatus and material
Equipment for postural sway and heart rate measurements.
A valid and reliable way to assess freezing-like behavior is by means of a stabilometric force plate, which quantifies spontaneous fluctuations in postural sway during threat exposure [8–9, 21]. Participants performed a passive viewing task on a custom-made strain gauge force plate (dimensions: 500 mm x 500 mm; sample frequency: 200 Hz), which consisted of four sensors measuring forces in the vertical direction. The signals from these sensors were used to derive time series of the center of pressure (COP) in the anterior-posterior (AP) and the mediolateral (ML) direction. Python 2.7.8 was used for posturographic data recording. Simultaneously, heart rate data was acquired during the passive viewing task using an Arduino pulse sensor attached to the fingertip of the right index finger. The signal was registered at a sample frequency of 200 Hz using Python 2.7.8 and LabVIEW. The visual stimuli of the passive viewing task were presented 1 m in front of the participants at eye level on a 22-inch height adjustable screen using PsychoPy v1.81 software.
Passive viewing task.
Participants were instructed to stand upright and remain stationary on the board, barefooted with their feet next to each other approximately 30 cm apart. We instructed them to equally distribute their body weight on both legs with their arms hanging relaxed beside their body. At the same time, they were asked to focus on the screen to watch a sequence of stimuli on the screen. Before the actual task, participants viewed a sequence of six trials in which letters instead of pictures were presented in order to get familiar with the task. The passive viewing task was presented subsequently, in which four blocks with 20 pictures of one type of stimulus category (neutral, pleasant, related-unpleasant, unrelated-unpleasant) were presented consecutively for three seconds without inter trial interval. The order of blocks and stimuli was counterbalanced. Blocks were separated by a black screen (five seconds) followed by a white fixation cross (two seconds).
As visual stimuli, four sets of pictures (neutral, pleasant, related-unpleasant, unrelated-unpleasant) were used from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS; Center for the Study of Emotion and Attention, 1999). Every set consisted of 20 pictures. The neutral pictures consisted of pictures of objects, such as clothespins and a mug. The pleasant pictures consisted of pictures of sports, such as waterskiing and skydiving. The related-unpleasant set included pictures that were related to the work of firefighters, such as burnt bodies and fires; whereas the unrelated-unpleasant pictures depicted threatening scenarios unrelated to the work of firefighters, such as weapons and snakes. The categorization of relatedness was confirmed in an independent sample of firefighters (n = 5 experienced; n = 5 inexperienced; coordinated more or less than 3 big fires respectively), that rated the related-unpleasant and unrelated-unpleasant stimuli on a scale ranging from 0 = unrelated to 10 = related to their profession as indicated by a main effect of relatedness (F(1,9) = 20.0, p = .002, η2p = .690; Mrelated = 4.86, SEMrelated = 1.06; Munrelated = 1.22, SEMunrelated = 0.35).
We included several self-report questionnaires to assess individual differences in trait anxiety, tonic immobility, and optimism, because these factors have been related to individual differences in automatic stress responses [22–26]. We included these measures to test whether any group differences in freezing would be due to differences on these measures rather than differences in incident experience. Trait anxiety was assessed using the Spielberger State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) . The STAI demonstrated good reliability and validity . Participants responded to 20 self-reported items on a four point scale to indicate how anxious they feel in general. The Tonic Immobility Scale (TIS) was used to retrospectively assess reactions during a previous, most frightening, event . Ten self-report items were scored on a seven point scale. Factor analyses have demonstrated that the TIS comprises two subscales: Fear (TIS-Fear; three items) and Tonic Immobility (TIS-TI; seven items) . In the current study, we focused on the TIS-TI only, as we have previously shown that this subscale is a more valid measure of threat-related responses .Optimism was assessed with the Life Orientation Test-Revised . This is a brief questionnaire consisting of ten items. Participants had to indicate to what extent the items applied to them on a five point scale. Of the ten items, four items serve as fillers. The questionnaire demonstrates acceptable reliability .
Subjective immobility was assessed by asking the participants to rate the extent to which they felt paralyzed when watching the picture on a scale ranging from 0–10 (0 = not paralyzed at all to 10 = extremely paralyzed). Furthermore, participants rated all picture stimuli on a scale ranging from 0–10 in terms of valence and arousal (0 = extremely unpleasant to 10 = extremely pleasant; and 0 = not arousing at all to 10 = extremely arousing respectively).
Prior to testing, we attached the fingertip pulse sensor to assess heart rate throughout the experiment. Participants were then instructed to sit down in front of a computer screen to watch a three-minute neutral film depicting nature scenes, in order to normalize heart rate. Participants were then instructed to remove their shoes and take their position on the center of the stabilometric platform (with their feet 30 cm apart) to perform the passive viewing task. Before the start of the task, standardized instructions were displayed on the monitor. After the passive viewing task, participants completed the questionnaires and stimulus ratings.
Data- and statistical analyses
The analyses for posturographic and heart rate data were conducted using MATLAB R2009b (The MathWorks, Natick, MA). Statistical analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics 23 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY).
We used analyses of variance (ANOVA) to test for any differences on the group characteristics.
Following previous work, freezing was defined as a reduction in postural sway and heart rate [8–9, 21, 26]. Posturographic data were bandpass filtered using a 3rd order Butterworth filter with 0.01–10 Hz as a cutoff frequency. The standard deviation in anterior-posterior direction (SD-AP) was then determined for each stimulus, after which a mean SD-AP was calculated per stimulus category, with lower values representing increased freezing to the relevant stimulus-type. To calculate the heart rate per stimulus category for each participant, we analyzed the plethysmography data in the frequency domain using Welch’s periodogram method for each stimulus category condition separately . The power spectral density distributions of the plethysmography data were calculated using a range from 0.7–2.4 Hz. Next, for each stimulus category, beats per minute (BPM) were calculated via the peak frequency multiplied by 60. Following previous work [21, 26], these mean SD-AP and BPM per stimulus category were used as variables in the following statistical analyses.
Two separate mixed design ANOVAs of postural sway (SD-AP) and heart rate (BPM) data were run to test the effects of stimulus category and incident experience on freezing. Stimulus category (neutral, pleasant, related-unpleasant, unrelated-unpleasant) was entered as a within-subject factor, group (experienced, inexperienced) as a between-subject factor, and SD-AP and BPM as dependent variables.
We ran three separate mixed design ANOVAs with stimulus category (neutral, pleasant, related-unpleasant, unrelated-unpleasant) as a within-subject factor, and group (experienced, inexperienced) as a between-subject factor to test the effects of stimulus category and incident experience on the subjective picture ratings in terms of immobility, valence, and arousal.
Importantly, threat-induced freezing was operationalized as freezing in response to unpleasant stimuli relative to neutral or pleasant stimuli in order to control for individual differences in postural sway and heart rate [8–9, 12, 21, 31–33]. Moreover, the pleasant stimulus category allows to control for arousal. Therefore, the crucial test is the group (experienced, inexperienced) x stimulus category interaction with pleasant versus (un)related pictures as the most relevant contrast for testing freezing behavior in experienced versus inexperienced firefighters. The crucial test for exploring the effects of profession-relatedness is the group (experienced, inexperienced) x stimulus category (related-unpleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant) interaction. For all analyses, significant interaction effects were followed up by simple (interaction) effects analyses. Multivariate test statistics were used in case of violation of sphericity. Alpha was set at .05.
Table 1 presents the demographic data. Apart from incident experience (number of big fires), the groups did not differ on age and measures related to trait anxiety, tonic immobility, and optimism (all Fs < 3.0).
Table 2 shows the mean data of the freezing measures in terms of postural sway (SD-AP) and heart rate (BPM). Both postural sway and heart rate data evidence a difference in freezing between the experienced and the inexperienced group as described below.
ANOVA of SD-AP revealed a main effect of stimulus category (F(3,31) = 3.1, p = .043, η2p = .229), but no main effect of group (F(1,33) = 0.30, p = .586, η2p = .009). Crucially, we found a significant group x stimulus category interaction effect (F(3,31) = 3.1, p = .040, η2p = .233). Follow-up analyses demonstrated a group x stimulus category interaction effect for the pleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant comparison (F(1,33) = 8.6, p = .006, η2p = .206), but not for the pleasant versus related-unpleasant comparison (F(1,33) = 0.18, p = .677, η2p = .005). The neutral versus (un)related comparison yielded a similar pattern (neutral versus unrelated-unpleasant: F(1,33) = 3.9, p = .056, η2p = .107; neutral versus related-unpleasant: F(1,33) = 0.07, p = .794, η2p = .002). Thus, experienced and inexperienced fire officers differed for the critical pleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant comparison, but not for the pleasant versus related-unpleasant comparison. The group x stimulus category interaction was not significant for related-unpleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant pictures (F(1,33) = 3.1, p = .087, η2p = .086), indicating that profession-relatedness of the pictures did not affect postural sway of experienced and inexperienced fire officers differently.
ANOVAs of SD-AP within each group separately suggested that the interaction effect was due to threat-induced reductions of postural sway in the inexperienced group (F(3,13) = 5.5, p = .012, η2p = .558), but not in the experienced group (F(3,16) = 1.4, p = .273, η2p = .211). Follow-up analyses in the inexperienced group demonstrated reductions in postural sway induced by the unrelated-unpleasant stimulus category (pleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant: F(1,15) = 5.9, p = .028, η2p = .283; and neutral versus unrelated-unpleasant: F(1,15) = 7.1, p = .018, η2p = .320), but not induced by the related-unpleasant stimulus category (Fs < 2.0).
Similarly, an ANOVA of BPM revealed a main effect of stimulus category (F(3,99) = 10.8, p < .001, η2p = .247), but no main effect of group (F(1,33) = 0.13, p = .718, η2p = .004). Importantly, we also found a group x stimulus category interaction effect (F(3,99) = 2.9, p = .040, η2p = .080). Follow-up analyses demonstrated a significant group x stimulus category interaction for the pleasant versus related-unpleasant comparison (F(1,33) = 6.6, p = .015, η2p = .167), and a near-significant effect for the pleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant comparison (F(1,33) = 3.8, p = .059, η2p = .104). Neutral versus (un)related group x stimulus category interaction did not reach significance (neutral versus related-unpleasant: F(1,33) = 3.0, p = .091, η2p = .084; neutral versus unrelated-unpleasant: F(1,33) = 1.7, p = .205, η2p = .048). Thus, experienced and inexperienced fire officers differed for the critical pleasant versus related-unpleasant comparison. The group x stimulus category interaction was not significant for related-unpleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant pictures (F(1,33) = 0.46, p = .503, η2p = .014), indicating that, like in postural sway, profession-relatedness of the pictures did not affect heart rate of experienced and inexperienced fire officers differently.
ANOVAs of BPM within each group separately suggested that the interaction effect was due to the presence of threat-induced reductions of heart rate in the inexperienced group (F(3,45) = 8.6, p < .001, η2p = .365), but not in the experienced group (F(3,54) = 2.4, p = .080, η2p = .117). Follow-up analyses in the inexperienced group demonstrated heart rate reductions induced by both the related- and unrelated-unpleasant stimulus category for the critical comparison with pleasant pictures (pleasant versus related-unpleasant: F(1,15) = 16.2, p = .001, η2p = .519; pleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant: F(1,15) = 7.0, p = .018, η2p = .319), but also for the comparison with neutral pictures (neutral versus related-unpleasant: F(1,15) = 22.4, p < .001, η2p = .598; neutral versus unrelated-unpleasant: F(1,15) = 9.7, p = .007, η2p = .392).
Taken together, the postural sway and heart rate data evidence that threat-induced freezing was present in the inexperienced group but not in the experienced group. Specifically, the group difference in threat-induced freezing in terms of postural sway was mainly driven by the unrelated-unpleasant (versus pleasant/neutral) stimulus category, whereas the group difference in terms of heart rate was mainly driven by the related-unpleasant (versus pleasant) stimulus category. Crucially, the groups did not differ on the comparisons between related- versus unrelated-unpleasant pictures, indicating that relatedness of the unpleasant stimulus category did not modulate the effects of incident experience on threat-induced freezing. Fig 1 shows the group differences in freezing in terms of postural sway and heart rate for the most relevant contrasts (pleasant versus related- and unrelated-unpleasant pictures).
Positive bars reflect reduced sway or heart rate for (un)related-unpleasant pictures relative to pleasant pictures. (A) Inexperienced versus experienced firefighters show reduced postural sway (mm SD-AP) as induced by unrelated-unpleasant pictures. (B) Inexperienced versus experienced firefighters show reduced heart rate (BPM) as induced by related-unpleasant pictures. Error bars represent standard error of the mean.
Subjective ratings of stimuli
Table 2 shows the mean data of the subjective ratings with respect to immobility, valence and arousal.
An ANOVA showed a significant main effect of stimulus category on immobility ratings (F(3,31) = 10.7, p < .001, η2p = .508). Follow-up comparisons demonstrated significant differences between all stimulus categories (neutral < pleasant < [unrelated-unpleasant, related-unpleasant]; all Fs > 10.5, p < .003, η2p > .241), except for the related-unpleasant versus unrelated-unpleasant comparison (F(1,33) = 3.2, p = .082, η2p = .089). A significant main effect of group indicated that inexperienced firefighters showed increased immobility ratings relative to the experienced firefighters (F(1,33) = 5.6, p = .024, η2p = .145). There was no significant group x stimulus category interaction (F(3,31) = 2.7, p = .064, η2p = .206).
Valence ratings differed across the stimulus categories (F(3,31) = 65.2, p < .001, η2p = .863). Post hoc comparisons demonstrated significant differences between all stimulus categories (pleasant > neutral > unrelated-unpleasant > related-unpleasant; all Fs > 64.0, p < .001, η2p > .660). There were no other main or interaction effects (all Fs < 2.2).
Also arousal ratings differed across the stimulus categories (F(3,31) = 34.8, p < .001, η2p = .771). Post hoc comparisons demonstrated significant differences between neutral versus all other three stimulus categories (neutral < [pleasant, unrelated-unpleasant, related-unpleasant]; all Fs > 29.3, p < .001, η2p > .471). No other comparisons reached significance (all Fs < 2.8). A significant main effect of group indicated that the inexperienced firefighters rated all stimuli as more arousing than the experienced firefighters (F(1,33) = 5.1, p = .031, η2p = .134). There was no significant group x stimulus category interaction (F(3,31) = 1.8, p = .164, η2p = .150).
We found that inexperienced firefighters showed more freezing relative to experienced firefighters. Specifically, inexperienced firefighters demonstrated threat-induced freezing as reflected by reduced postural sway and heart rate in response to unpleasant pictures (relative to pleasant and neutral pictures), whereas the experienced firefighters did not show such response. Additionally, we did not observe any modulation by the profession-relatedness of the unpleasant pictures. These findings indicate that incident experience in firefighters was associated with reduced threat-induced freezing. Moreover, this reduction of freezing may not be restricted to profession-related threats, but possibly generalizes to other threats. Taken together, our findings may suggest that primary defense responses are malleable by training and experience.
Compared to inexperienced firefighters, our current experienced firefighters have received more education and training within their profession. Additionally, experienced firefighters have more experience with aversive events and experience in dealing with emergency situations relative to inexperienced firefighters. There are at least two mechanisms that could explain a reduction of threat-induced freezing through experience in firefighters.
First, experienced compared to inexperienced firefighters might show reduced threat-induced freezing due to an enhanced ability to control this primary defensive response. Although freezing to acute stress is adaptive, the ability to switch from immobility to active coping is important for adaptive responding [18–19]. This flexibility could be particularly important in high-risk professions, where optimal planning and decision making are necessary in emergency situations. Literature on controllability suggests that the ability to exert behavioral control over adverse events may enhance the ability to control this primary defensive response in future events [34–37]. In other words, experience of behavioral control has been shown to promote stress resilience that extends to other situations: even when one encounters an uncontrollable stressor later in time, the behavioral and neurochemical impact of the stressor is reduced via top-down inhibitory control [34, 36]. Such ability to control primary defensive responses could be accompanied by the recruitment of the instrumental system, which allow flexible behavior in a dynamic environment [18–19, 38]. By analogy, firefighters who are more experienced, have exercised behavioral control in stressful situations more frequently, and might therefore have more (perceived) capability of making rapid decisions under acute stress compared to inexperienced firefighters. Thus, one possibility is that experienced firefighters might have an enhanced ability to control primary defensive response, resulting in reduced threat-induced freezing. Future studies and more detailed time series analyses are needed to study effects of incident experience on inhibitory control on automatic defense behavior, as well as on the ability to switch between freezing and action.
Alternatively, experienced firefighters might show reduced threat-induced freezing due to faster processing of threatening stimuli. Rather than a passive state, freezing has been suggested to reflect an active state that promotes risk assessment in potentially threatening situations (5). Recent work has shown that under acute stress, freezing serves as a preparatory state for action [16,39]. Despite the use of a passive task context in the current study, in which active responses are not required, inexperienced firefighters might still demonstrate automatic preparatory responses upon the threatening stimuli. This is in line with the model of situational awareness, which suggests that automatically scanning for relevant clues in the environment plays an important role in gaining appropriate awareness of a situation in high-risk professions . Thus, freezing in inexperienced firefighters could be crucial in real life situations as it facilitates adaptive responding to emergency situations. On the other hand, experienced firefighters might have developed an improved ability to process and integrate perceived information into decision making, which is reflected by reduced freezing in a passive task context that does not require action preparation. Future research is needed to disentangle the different hypotheses regarding the underlying processes of our observed effect of incident experience on threat-induced freezing. For instance, a worthwhile pursuit is to examine the effects of incident experience on freezing in passive versus active contexts.
Note that reduced threat-induced freezing was also found in patients with PTSD [26, 41] and borderline personality disorder  using passive viewing paradigms. In these groups, reduced freezing was assumed to reflect increased hyperarousal and vigilance and increased automatic fight-flight responses, which might attenuate adaptive freezing behavior. In other words, reduced threat-induced freezing might indicate impaired risk assessment and increased active responsivity to potential threatening stimuli, mediating cognitive distortions and exacerbated threat perception. However, it is unlikely that reduced freezing in our experienced firefighters is the result of a similar mechanism. First, we have tested healthy firefighters only, who are regularly screened for physical and mental health. Second, inexperienced firefighters reported higher arousal levels than experienced firefighters during picture viewing. Third, patients with threat-related psychopathology appear to suffer from impeded “downregulation”, as reflected by increased baseline or overall heart rate [42–44]. Our current heart rate data suggest that this was not the case for the experienced firefighters, as their overall heart rate was similar to (or if anything lower than) their inexperienced counterparts, rendering the inability to downregulate an unlikely explanation.
Our data did not provide any evidence for a modulatory effect of relatedness on freezing, although the profession-related pictures were rated as more related and also more aversive compared to the unrelated pictures across the whole sample. However, subjective ratings are more vulnerable to influences from awareness of experimenters’ demands and do not have to correspond with implicit and objective measures per se. Although it has been suggested that appraisal of relevance plays a crucial role in affective processing , the observed effect of incident experience on freezing might relate to alterations of other, perhaps more fundamental defense mechanisms. Therefore, rather than a specific group difference in freezing for profession-related (versus -unrelated) threat, the observed effect of incident experience was general to threat that is relevant to survival. In any case, we need to be careful with drawing conclusions based on a nonsignificant effect of relatedness, and further research on the relevance of relatedness in experience and freezing is warranted.
One could argue that our finding of increased freezing in the inexperienced versus experienced firefighters reflects an alteration in the degree of freezing in the inexperienced (rather than the experienced) group. However, findings with affective picture viewing typically found freezing in response to unpleasant pictures in healthy participants without high risk professions [8–9], suggesting that our observed effect of incident experience reflects alterations of freezing in the experienced firefighters. However, the question remains whether the inexperienced firefighters would resemble healthy participants without high-risk profession in terms of the degree of freezing. Future studies should include healthy participants without being involved in high risk professions as a control group to establish that incident experience indeed reduces freezing. Also, it is important to note that our sample consisted of battalion chiefs and incident commanders, who coordinate rescue activities and are responsible for their team. Although the experienced and inexperienced firefighters differed in their experience with the coordination of big fires, they have all built up substantial experience with firefighting-related tasks during their career. It is possible that experience with firefighting-related tasks from earlier ranks might also alter threat-induced freezing, contributing to a smaller difference between the groups in terms of threat-induced freezing in the current study. Future studies are needed to examine the effects of incident experience on spontaneous automatic defense responses in firefighters with lower ranks and thus less responsibility over the success of an operation.
The difference in freezing between experienced and inexperienced firefighters might be explained by an a priori difference between the groups in terms of trait and resilience rather than by incident experience or training, and that self-selection (through career switches) could have played a role in our findings. However, our questionnaire data do not suggest that this is the case as there were no differences between the experienced and inexperienced firefighters in terms of trait anxiety, tonic immobility, and optimism. To account for such interpretational limitations, we suggest that prospective studies are needed to elucidate more rigorously the effect of incident experience on defensive reactions to threat.
In sum, we have shown that higher incident experience in firefighters is associated with reduced threat-induced freezing. We did not find a modulatory effect of profession-related (versus –unrelated) threat on freezing. Although further research is needed to elucidate the mechanisms underlying our current findings, and replications are warranted given our small sample size, these findings help to bridge animal and human studies on defensive behaviors and indicate that primary defense responses are malleable by experience or training. Accordingly, the present findings represent an important step in inspiring future research into defensive reactions in high risk professions. The current findings demonstrate the potential of adopting animal to human translational approaches to assess defensive responses in relation to incident experience in high risk professions. Finally, these findings could stimulate the development of new (translational) procedures to test and train risk assessment abilities, which is particularly relevant in high risk professions.
The authors kindly thank Désirée Kleverwal, Stijn de Vries, Annika Fleschenberg, Anja Calaminus and Myrthe Morskieft or their help during the data collection. We also thank the Dutch Firebrigade, especially Jelle Groenendaal for his valuable input and fruitful cooperation.
- 1. Hagenaars MA, Oitzl M, Roelofs K. Updating freeze: aligning animal and human research. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2014 Nov;47:165–76. pmid:25108035
- 2. Marx BP, Forsyth JP, Gallup GG, Fusé T, Lexington JM. Tonic Immobility as an Evolved Predator Defense: Implications for Sexual Assault Survivors. Clin Psychol Sci Pract. 2008;15(1):74–90. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2850.2008.00112.x
- 3. Mobbs D, Marchant JL, Hassabis D, Seymour B, Tan G, Gray M, et al. From threat to fear: the neural organization of defensive fear systems in humans. J Neurosci. 2009;29(39):12236–43. pmid:19793982
- 4. Lang PJ, Davis M, Ohman A. Fear and anxiety: animal models and human cognitive psychophysiology. J Affect Disord. 2000 Dec;61(3):137–59. pmid:11163418
- 5. Blanchard DC, Griebel G, Pobbe R, Blanchard RJ. Risk assessment as an evolved threat detection and analysis process. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011;35(4):991–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.10.016 pmid:21056591
- 6. Volchan E, Rocha-Rego V, Bastos AF, Oliveira JM, Franklin C, Gleiser S, et al. Immobility Reactions Under Threat: A Contribution to Human Defensive Cascade and PTSD. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2017;79(Pt A):29–38.
- 7. Lang PJ, Bradley MM, Cuthbert BN. Motivated attention: Affect, activation, and action. In: Attention and orienting: Sensory and motivational processes. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum; 1997. p. 97–135.
- 8. Azevedo TM, Volchan E, Imbiriba L a., Rodrigues EC, Oliveira JM, Oliveira LF, et al. A freezing-like posture to pictures of mutilation. Psychophysiology. 2005;42(3):255–60. pmid:15943678
- 9. Hagenaars MA, Stins JF, Roelofs K. Aversive life events enhance human freezing responses. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2012;141(1):98–105. pmid:21767043
- 10. Hagenaars MA, Roelofs K, Stins JF. Human freezing in response to affective films. Anxiety, Stress Coping. 2014;27(1):27–37. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10615806.2013.809420
- 11. Arnaudova I, Hagenaars MA. Behaviour Research and Therapy Lights … action: Comparison of trauma fi lms for use in the trauma fi lm paradigm. 2017;93.
- 12. Facchinetti LD, Imbiriba LA, Azevedo TM, Vargas CD, Volchan E. Postural modulation induced by pictures depicting prosocial or dangerous contexts. Neurosci Lett. 2006;410(1):52–6. Available from: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0304394006010391 pmid:17056179
- 13. Ly V, von Borries AKL, Brazil IA, Bulten BH, Cools R, Roelofs K. Reduced transfer of affective value to instrumental behavior in violent offenders. J Abnorm Psychol. 2016;125(5).
- 14. Hermans EJ, Henckens MJAG, Roelofs K, Fernández G. Fear bradycardia and activation of the human periaqueductal grey. Neuroimage. 2013;66:278–87. pmid:23110885
- 15. Lojowska M, Gladwin TE, Hermans EJ, Roelofs K. Freezing promotes perception of coarse visual features. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2015;144:1080–1088. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/xge0000117. pmid:26595839
- 16. Gladwin TE, Hashemi MM, van Ast V, Roelofs K. Ready and waiting: Freezing as active action preparation under threat. Neurosci Lett. 2016;619:182–8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.neulet.2016.03.027 pmid:26994781
- 17. Hagenaars MA, Mesbah R, Cremers H. Mental imagery affects subsequent automatic defense responses. Front Psychiatry. 2015;6. Available from: pmid:26089801
- 18. Collins XKA, Mendelsohn A, Cain CK, Schiller D. Taking Action in the Face of Threat: Neural Synchronization Predicts Adaptive Coping. J Neurosci. 2014;34(44):14733–8. pmid:25355225
- 19. Moscarello JM, LeDoux JE. Active avoidance learning requires pre- frontal suppression of amygdala-mediated defensive reactions. J Neurosci. 2013;33:3815–3823. pmid:23447593
- 20. Niermann HCM, Ly V, Smeekens S, Figner B, Marianne Riksen-Walraven J, Roelofs K. Infant attachment predicts bodily freezing in adolescence: Evidence from a prospective longitudinal study. Front Behav Neurosci. 2015;9(OCT).
- 21. Roelofs K, Hagenaars MA, Stins J. Facing freeze: social threat induces bodily freeze in humans. Psychol Sci a J Am Psychol Soc / APS. 2010;21(11):1575–81.
- 22. Chida Y, Hamer M. Chronic Psychosocial Factors and Acute Physiological Responses to Laboratory-Induced Stress in Healthy Populations: A Quantitative Review of 30 Years of Investigations. 2009;134(6):829–85.
- 23. Puig-perez S, Villada C, Pulopulos MM, Almela M, Hidalgo V, Salvador A. Optimism and pessimism are related to different components of the stress response in healthy older people. Int J Psychophysiol. 2015;98(2):213–21. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpsycho.2015.09.002
- 24. Hagenaars MA, Putman P. Attentional control affects the relationship between tonic immobility and intrusive memories. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2011;42(3):379–83. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbtep.2011.02.013 pmid:21450263
- 25. Scheier MF, Carver CS, Bridges MW. Distinguishing optimism from neuroticism (and trait anxiety, self-mastery, and self-esteem): A reevaluation of the Life Orientation Test. Vol. 67, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. US: American Psychological Association; 1994. p. 1063–78.
- 26. Fragkaki I, Roelofs K, Stins J, Jongedijk RA, Hagenaars MA. Reduced Freezing in Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Patients while Watching Affective Pictures. 2017;8(March):1–9.
- 27. Spielberger CD, Gorsuch RL, Lushene RD, Vagg PR, Jacobs GA. Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press. 1983.
- 28. Forsyth JP, Marx B, Fusé TMK, Heidt J, Gallup GG Jr. The tonic immobility scale. Albany, NY: Authors. 2000.
- 29. Fusé T, Forsyth JP, Marx BP, Gallup GG, Weaver S. Factor structure of the tonic immobility scale in female survivors of sexual assault: an exploratory and confirmatory factor analysis. J Anxiety Disord. 2007;21:265e283.
- 30. Welch P D. The use of fast fourier transform for the estimation of power spectra: A method based on time averaging over short, modified periodograms. IEEE Transactions on Audio and Electroacoustics. 1967;15:70–73.
- 31. Ly V, Huys QJM, Stins JF, Roelofs K, Cools R. Individual differences in bodily freezing predict emotional biases in decision making. Front Behav Neurosci. 2014;8(July):1–9. Available from: http://www.frontiersin.org/Behavioral_Neuroscience/10.3389/fnbeh.2014.00237/abstract
- 32. Stins JF, Beek PJ. Effects of affective picture viewing on postural control. 2007;7:2–8.
- 33. Lopes FL, Azevedo TM, Sc M, Imbiriba LA, Sc M, Freire RC, et al. ASSOCIATED WITH ANTICIPATORY ANXIETY. 2009;921(March):917–21.
- 34. Amat J, Baratta M V, Paul E, Bland ST, Watkins LR, Maier SF. Medial prefrontal cortex determines how stressor controllability affects behavior and dorsal raphe nucleus. Nat Neurosci. 2005;8(3):365–71. pmid:15696163
- 35. Maier SF. Behavioral control blunts reactions to contemporaneous and future adverse events: Medial prefrontal cortex plasticity and a corticostriatal network. Neurobiol Stress. 2015;1(1):12–22. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ynstr.2014.09.003
- 36. Maier SF, Watkins LR. Role of the medial prefrontal cortex in coping and resilience. Brain Res. 2010;1355:52–60. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.brainres.2010.08.039 pmid:20727864
- 37. Kerr DL, McLaren DG, Mathy RM, Nitschke JB. Controllability Modulates the Anticipatory Response in the Human Ventromedial Prefrontal Cortex. Front Psychol. 2012 Dec 14;3:557. Available from: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3582324/ pmid:23550176
- 38. Maier SF, Seligman MEP. Learned helplessness at fifty: Insights from neuroscience. Psychol Rev. 2016;123:349–367. pmid:27337390
- 39. Roelofs K. Freeze for action: neurobiological mechanisms in animal and human freezing. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017;372:1718.
- 40. Stanton NA, Chambers PRG, Piggott J. Situational awareness and safety. Safety Science. 2001;39:189–204.
- 41. Adenauer H, Catani C, Keil J, Aichinger H, Neuner F. Is freezing an adaptive reaction to threat? Evidence from heart rate reactivity to emotional pictures in victims of war and torture. Psychophysiol. 2010;47(2):315e322.
- 42. Stoffels M, Nijs M, Spinhoven P, Mesbah R, Hagenaars MA. Emotion avoidance and fear bradycardia in patients with borderline personality disorder and healthy controls. J Behav Therap Exp Psychiatry. 2017;57:6–13. pmid:28235636
- 43. Blechert J, Michael T, Grossman P, Lajtman M, Wilhelm FH. Autonomic and Respiratory Characteristics of Posttraumatic Stress Disorder and Panic Disorder. Psychosomatic Medicine. 2007;69:935–943. pmid:17991823
- 44. Zoladz PR, Diamond DM. Current status on behavioral and biological markers of PTSD: A search for clarity in a conflicting literature. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2013;37:860–895. pmid:23567521
- 45. Mazzietti A, Sellem V, Koenig O, Mazzietti A, Sellem V, Koenig O. From stimulus-driven to appraisal-driven attention: Towards differential effects of goal relevance and goal relatedness on attention? From stimulus-driven to appraisal-driven attention: Towards differential effects of goal relevance and goal relatedness on attention? Cogn Emot. 2017;28(8):1483–92. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2014.884488