Bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) have a nearly circumpolar distribution, and occasionally occupy warmer shallow coastal areas during summertime that may facilitate molting. However, relatively little is known about the occurrence of molting and associated behaviors in bowhead whales. We opportunistically observed whales in Cumberland Sound, Nunavut, Canada with skin irregularities consistent with molting during August 2014, and collected a skin sample from a biopsied whale that revealed loose epidermis and sloughing. During August 2016, we flew a small unmanned aerial system (sUAS) over whales to take video and still images to: 1) determine unique individuals; 2) estimate the proportion of the body of unique individuals that exhibited sloughing skin; 3) determine the presence or absence of superficial lines representative of rock-rubbing behavior; and 4) measure body lengths to infer age-class. The still images revealed that all individuals (n = 81 whales) were sloughing skin, and that nearly 40% of them had mottled skin over more than two-thirds of their bodies. The video images captured bowhead whales rubbing on large rocks in shallow, coastal areas—likely to facilitate molting. Molting and rock rubbing appears to be pervasive during late summer for whales in the eastern Canadian Arctic.
Citation: Fortune SME, Koski WR, Higdon JW, Trites AW, Baumgartner MF, Ferguson SH (2017) Evidence of molting and the function of “rock-nosing” behavior in bowhead whales in the eastern Canadian Arctic. PLoS ONE 12(11): e0186156. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0186156
Editor: Songhai Li, Institute of Deep-sea Science and Engineering, Chinese Academy of Sciences, CHINA
Received: July 6, 2017; Accepted: September 26, 2017; Published: November 22, 2017
Copyright: © 2017 Fortune et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Data Availability: All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.
Funding: Fieldwork was funded by: Fisheries and Oceans Canada (Emerging Fisheries 41436-810-120-4D875), Nunavut Wildlife Research Trust Fund (project 3-13-29 Bowhead Whale Movement's and Ecology), Molson Foundation (318366), Ocean Tracking Network (NSERC NETGP 375118-08), and ArcticNet Centre of Excellence (317588) awarded to S.H. Ferguson and World Wildlife Fund Canada (Arctic Species Conservation Fund) awarded to W.R. Koski and S.M.E. Fortune. Additional field work support was provided by: U.S. Department of the Interior, Minerals Management Service (MMS; now Bureau of Ocean Energy Management), through Inter-agency Agreement No. M08PG20021 with the U.S. Department of Commerce, National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, as part of the MMS Alaska Environmental Studies Program awarded to M.F. Baumgartner. Personnel support was provided by: Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council Canadian Graduate Scholarship, the W. Garfield Weston Award for Northern Research, University of British Columbia Affiliated Fellowship and Northern Scientific Training Program (Canadian Polar Commission) awarded to S.M.E. Fortune.
Competing interests: Two co-authors (WRK & JWH) have commercial affiliations (LGL Limited & Higdon Wildlife Consulting). The commercial affiliations of our co-authors has not altered our adherence to all PLOS ONE policies on data sharing and materials.
The skin (epidermis) and hair (keratinized epidermal cells) of marine mammals are specially adapted for life in an aquatic environment. The periodic shedding of part or all of their outer layer of epidermal covering, which is then replaced by new growth  has been well studied for seals and sea lions—which molt annually to repair and renew their skin and pelt [2–8]. In contrast, whales, dolphins and porpoises are generally thought to continuously shed and replace their epidermis [9,10]. However, this may not be the case for Arctic species that experience pronounced changes in environmental conditions by seasonally occupying uncharacteristically warmer areas such as estuaries and fiords .
Beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) and most likely narwhal (Monodon monoceros) (e.g., Inuit hunter observation ) undergo a seasonal epidermal molt during summer. The beluga whale molt appears to be facilitated in part by the warm and low salinity environmental conditions found in seasonally occupied estuaries [11,13]. The elevated water temperatures are postulated to influence the growth and turnover of epidermis by increasing metabolic activities  or provide an evolved physiological cue (e.g., daylight ). Furthermore, physical features of estuaries such as gravel bottoms provide an abrasive surface to rub against and expedite exfoliation .
In contrast to what is known about molting for beluga whales, little is known about this phenomenon in bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus). It is known, for example, that the structure of epidermal, dermal and hypodermal layers of balaenid whales (bowhead and right whale, Eubalaena sp.), closely resembles that of odontocete species that are known to slough skin (e.g., beluga whales) and differs from the more closely related balaenopterids (e.g., fin, blue, and sei whale) . Furthermore, southern right whale (Eubalaena australis) calves are known to shed multiple layers of their epidermis , which is similar to beluga calves that conduct a multilayered molt to remove fetal epidermis . Histological analysis has revealed that bowhead whales belonging to the Okhotsk Sea population molt during summer months while occupying a warm, shallow bay in the Shantar Achipelago . However, it is not known whether other populations of bowhead whales, such as the Eastern Canada-West Greenland (EC-WG) population, undergo a seasonal molt or whether they molt continuously and whether the molting process is similar for all age classes of whales.
Materials and methods
We opportunistically made boat-based sightings of EC-WG bowhead whales in Cumberland Sound, Nunavut, Canada—specifically in Kingnait Fiord (located on the northeast side of Cumberland Sound Fig 1)—on five days from 13–21 August, 2014. As a result of these preliminary observations, a directed study to test the hypothesis that bowhead whales use Cumberland Sound in part for molting during summer months was carried out in August 2016.
The inset map of Cumberland Sound shows where bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus) observations were made in a small bay in Kingnait Fiord (blue ●) in 2014 from a vessel and from sUAS in Brown Harbour (blue ■), Pangnirtung Fiord and Kingnait Fiord in 2016. The polygon shapefiles and polyline shapefile used to generate this map were accessed through Esri Canada and were licensed through Natural Resources Canada for free distribution.
Zooplankton samples were opportunistically collected during August 2014 from surface waters (0.5 m) near bowhead whales, and also following an unusual observation of bowhead whales in shallow, coastal waters in Kingnait Fiord. All samples were collected using 333-micrometer (μm) conical mesh net (30 cm in diameter) fitted with a General Oceanics helical flow meter. The zooplankton net was sprayed down with a hose using seawater to collect the sampled organisms in an attached cod-end bucket once it was brought onboard the boat. Once organisms were no longer visible in the zooplankton net, the cod-end bucket samples were filtered through a 333 μm mesh sieve and transferred to a 250 mL sample jar and preserved in 5% buffered formalin solution for identification.
Boat-based and aerial sightings of bowhead whales were made in Pangnirtung Fiord, Brown Harbour (located between Pangnirtung Fiord and Kingnait Fiord, Fig 1) and Kingnait Fiord from 7–31 August 2016. High-resolution aerial images (n = 1143) and video were obtained of encountered whales using a small unmanned aerial system (sUAS), the DJI Phantom 3 Professional. The sUAS was equipped with a global positioning system (GPS) and altimeter that allowed for the whale’s position and the sUAS altitude to be automatically recorded when each image was captured. The sUAS was flown at an average altitude of 12.9 m (±5.4 SD) with a maximum distance of 1000 m from the survey vessel, and was hand-deployed and hand-retrieved from the ~8 m aluminum vessel. Flight times lasted ~8–12 min. The sUAS data were collected under Special Flight Operation Certificate File Number 5812-11-682, ATS 16-17-00014027, RDIMS 12044419 and approved by the University of British Columbia Animal Care Committee (Animal Care Amendment A14-0064-A002). Bowhead whale behavioral data were collected under permit Department of Fisheries and Oceans License to Fish for Scientific Purposes S-16/17 1005-NU and Animal Use Protocol FWI-ACC-2016-09.
Still sUAS images of bowhead whales were used to determine unique animals during August 2016 as well as their body lengths and skin conditions. Individual animals were identified using well-established permanent black and white dorsal patterns . The markings used to identify unique individuals included: 1) white scars on their body attributed to breaking sea ice, encounters with fishing gear or from interactions with killer whales (Orcinus orca) (i.e., killer whale rake marks ; and 2) white pigmentation found on the dorsal flukes, caudal peduncle and lower jaw. Body length measurements (distance between snout and fluke notch) were made for animals that were photographed with the vessel (an object of known size used for calibration) in the same frame or another animal of known size (i.e., previously photographed with the vessel). The measuring tool in Adobe Photoshop CS6 extended was used to measure body length. Skin condition was also assessed from still images to determine: 1) proportion of the body that contained sloughing skin (0 = none, 1 = <33%, 2 = 33–66%, 3 = >66% and <100% and 4 = 100%; Fig 2); and 2) the type of sloughing (0 = none, 1 = light gray lines across the body likely caused by rock rubbing, 2 = irregular patches of gray sloughed skin, 3 = smooth gray body attributed to complete or near complete sloughing; Fig 3). The presence of gray tissue is indicative of new skin growth—based on our observations and those of bowheads molting in the Okhotsk Sea . Three people independently scored each animal, and agreement between at least two people was required to obtain a final score.
Example of an animal with nearly no sloughing skin (i.e., proportion of body with sloughing skin = <33%) (A) and another bowhead whale with a high degree of sloughing (>66% of body) and a blotchy skin type (B).
Example of (A) a bowhead whale with thin and sharp light gray lines and (B) of a whale with shorter and wider gray lines, that both likely reflect prior rock-rubbing behavior.
We opportunistically collected oceanographic data during August 2016 to evaluate the physical properties of Kingnait Fiord. Vertical profiles of the water column were made using a seabird SBE19Plus conductivity, temperature, and depth (CTD) profiler. CTD data were corrected using Seabird software and temperature and salinity plots were generated using the downcast data for each cast (n = 86).
Results and discussion
Unusual behaviors of bowhead whales in shallow coastal-waters were first noted on 21 August 2014 in Kingnait Fiord when 8–10 bowhead whales were observed frequently rolling onto their sides and backs and lifting their pectoral flippers out of the water (Fig 4). The small, shallow bay was marked with large boulders (65° 55’15.2”N and 65° 17’50.8” W, Figs 4 & 5) and the whales were in ~8 m of water. The animals did not appear to be associated with one another as they were widely distributed throughout the bay and exhibited individually specific behaviors. Several audible vocalizations were heard without a hydrophone from the vessel over the course of the sighting. Net sampling revealed very low zooplankton biomass, particularly for species that are known bowhead whale prey (e.g., calanoid copepods, euphausiids, amphipods), indicating that the whales were not feeding in the bay. There was little likelihood that the whales were feeding because subsequent zooplankton sampling failed to capture bowhead whale prey.
Example of observed behavior and relative distribution of three individual bowhead whales (A-C) inside the bay in Kingnait Fiord (2014). Whale (A) is resting close to shore with its head out of the water, (B) is on its back with pectoral flippers extended, and (C) is breaking the surface of the water in the distance.
Irregularities in bowhead whale skin condition were observed from animals visiting the bay. Photographs taken of two whales before they reached the bay revealed large pieces of loose epidermis. The sloughing epidermis was predominately located posterior to the whale’s blowholes (Fig 6). Animals also presented mottled skin consisting of light gray irregular patches on their heads near the blowholes and on their backs (Fig 6). Furthermore, histological analysis of a sample of loose epidermis from one whale obtained using a crossbow and biopsy dart was consistent with molting. These documented skin irregularities were similar to the histology of biopsy and opportunistic skin collected from bowhead whales in the Okhotsk Sea , and provide support that molting occurs during summer based on the timing of collection and histological properties of our bowhead samples .
Following our initial observations in 2014, we used the sUAS to document four bowhead whales rubbing on large boulders in shallow coastal waters on 7 August 2016 in Brown Harbour (65° 58’31.0” N and 65° 57’19.0” W, Fig 1). While simultaneously filming this rubbing behavior, we made boat-based observations of whales rolling onto their sides with pectoral flippers extended out of the water similar to our prior observations (during summer 2014). The aerial video and high-resolution still images of the animals displaying surface behaviors confirmed that they were rubbing their bodies against rocks (Fig 7 & S1 Movie). The whales were seen rubbing their chins, head, back and sides on a cluster of boulders and had mottled skin with what appeared to be long superficial scratches that ran lengthwise and widthwise along their bodies (e.g., Fig 7 animal C). This rubbing behavior was consistent with previous observations and supported our hypothesis that bowhead whales engage in exfoliation activities during the summer in Cumberland Sound. We presume that rubbing activities caused the linear markings. One animal was observed rock rubbing for a minimum of 8 minutes based on aerial imagery (S1 Movie).
Animal (A) pictured rubbing the right side of its head on a boulder (S1 Movie) and animal (D) is using the rocks to exfoliate its chin. Evidence of prior rock-rubbing is apparent for animal (C) with long, thin lines running length and width-wise across the body.
Previous observations of bowhead rock-rubbing behavior have been documented during late summer and early fall in Isabella Bay (Baffin Bay), whereby bowhead whales engaged in “grooming” activities by rubbing on the bottom [22,23]. Similarly, whaling records  provide historical support for bowhead rubbing behavior dating back to ~1845, whereby whales found in the bays and inlets of Davis Strait (such as Cape Searl) were referred to as “rock-nose” whales because they would place their head or “nose” close to the shore on a rock . More recently, similar “rock-nose” behavior was observed during an aerial survey of Isabella Bay on 13 September 1979 .
Recent Inuit observations of bowhead whales with molting skin during summer were made near Clyde River (nearest community to Isabella Bay) . Whales were also observed circling around a large rock off the coast of Clyde River , and were hypothesized to use the rocks for resting purposes . However, the association between EC-WG bowhead whales with molting skin and their physical environment suggests otherwise. The whaling data provide further evidence that they have engaged in rock-rubbing behavior off the coast of Baffin Island for at least hundreds of years.
Aerial image analysis.
Our analysis of high-resolution images from the sUAS indicates pervasive molting for individuals occupying Cumberland Sound during summer. Overall, image quality was sufficient to assess molting extent and type for 97.6% (n = 81) of the uniquely identified individuals (n = 83), and revealed that 100% of the individuals had skin irregularities consistent with molting (Fig 8A & S1 Data). We found that molting was extensive for 37.4% of the identified whales, whereby sloughing skin represented >66% of their body. We also found that 37.04% of animals had sloughing skin over 33 to 66% of their body and 25.93% had molting skin on <33% of their body. Over half (58.02%) of the photographed animals had the mottled skin pattern without evidence of rubbing, while 40.74% showed signs of rock-rubbing behavior (Fig 8B).
Percentage of photographically identified bowhead whales with sufficient image quality to quantify the amount of the body containing sloughing skin (n = 81) (A). Overall, all animals showed signs of molting in late August, and no animals had bodies with 100% new skin cover. Also shown is type of sloughing skin (B) whereby ‘none’ represents animals with no skin irregularities, ‘rock rubbing’ is indicated by animals with both sharp, thin light gray lines and/or wider, less pronounced light gray lines which are likely a result of prior rock rubbing, ‘blotchy’ comprises animals with irregular patches of new epidermis and ‘covered’ includes animals with extensive new skin growth.
Our estimated occurrence of rock rubbing from our photographs is likely underestimated due to: 1) limited image quality, particularly when whales were photographed below ~10 m depth; and 2) limited perspective of individual’s body whereby evidence of rock rubbing (i.e., light gray lines) may be on the ventral side of the animal and thus excluded from our analysis. As a consequence, our estimate of the proportion (40.74%) of unique individuals bearing marks from probable rock-rubbing behavior is a minimum estimate.
Overall, we measured body lengths for 16 unique whales ranging from 6.3–14.2 m, with a mean length of 10.60 m (± 2.01 SD) (Fig 9). Age-class was broadly inferred based on previous studies [23,28,29] that found calves (i.e., young-of-the year) are ~4–7.5 m in August and September, young juveniles (1 to 8–10 y) are 5.8–10 m , sexually immature sub-adults (8–10 to ~25 y) are 10–13 m, and sexually mature adult (25+ y) males exceed 12.5 m  and females exceed 13 m . We used the threshold of 13 m for assigning individuals adult status. Of the animals measured, none were calves based on the morphological differences between calves and yearlings . However, we did observe one small yearling measuring 6.26 m. Consequently, we concluded that 38% (n = 6) of the measured animals were young juveniles (8.59 m, ± 1.33 SD), 56% (n = 9) were sub-adults (11.54 m, ± 0.91 SD), and only one animal was an adult (6%) with a body length of 14.22 m. Overall, our measurements of total body length demonstrated that both juvenile and adult animals occupied Cumberland Sound, and that all animals had sloughing skin.
Energetic implications of molting.
Although we were unable to quantify the proportion of time allocated to molting activities, whales were routinely observed, during daylight hours, resting in addition to actively rubbing against the rocks suggesting that individuals allocate considerable time to these two activities. On numerous occasions, our sUAS deployments documented molting individuals resting in nearshore waters where rock rubbing was previously observed.
Molting is energetically costly for pinniped species that elevate their resting metabolism while increasing blood flow to the epidermis and generating new hair [32–35]. Seals and sea lions have behavioral adaptations to partially offset the metabolic costs associated with molting, such as increasing the time spent on land (i.e., reduced energy expenditure due to thermoregulation and activity costs associated with swimming). Similarly, bowhead whales may adjust their daily activity costs by increasing the proportion of time spent resting. This may be simultaneously beneficial as warmer water may expedite the molting process  and taking refuge in shallow, protected bays may mitigate predation from killer whales.
Unlike seals and sea lions that reportedly experience thermoregulatory benefits by hauling out while molting, bowhead whales may overheat while molting in warmer water because they are too well-insulated (bowheads have the thickest blubber of any marine mammal, ranging from 20–35 cm) [36–40] and have small surface area to volume ratios that favor retention of metabolic heat. Maximum daily surface water temperatures ranged from ~4 to 9.5° C in Kingnait Fiord based on the CTD data collected during August 2016, and appeared to be highest near the rock-rubbing habitat with surface temperatures ranging from ~8 to 9.5° C. However, maximum water temperatures encountered by bowhead whales may be even warmer in shallower (~8 m) areas compared with our measurements, which were made in comparatively deep (~100 m) areas of the bay just outside of where rock rubbing occurred. Consequently, bowheads may have to use vascular adaptations to dissipate excess heat while rock rubbing in the warmer, coastal waters.
One way for bowhead whales to dump excess heat may be to use their intraoral thermoregulatory organ located in the root of the tongue (i.e., counter current retial vessels)  and at the center of the hard palate stretching to the tip of the rostral palate (i.e., palate rete or corpus cavernosum maxillaris) . They could effectively use this organ by slightly opening their mouths to permit cooling seawater to enter their mouth and flow over the retial vessels in the tongue and the palate rete. We observed several bowhead whales in the aerial images with their mouths slightly agape (S1 Image) near rock rubbing areas (i.e., Brown Harbour). While it is possible that they were feeding, prior prey sampling in similar shallow habitats in Kingnait Fiord found very few zooplankton and their baleen was not visibly extended. It therefore seems more plausible that the whales opened their mouths to cool themselves because they were thermally stressed in the warmer, shallow rock-rubbing habitat while actively swimming during exfoliation activities. They may have thus regulated their body temperature by exchanging heat from enlarged blood vessels in their tongues and palates with the comparatively cooler seawater [36–41].
Biological significance of molting.
There are biological factors affecting skin condition that may explain why bowhead whales molt. One is that they may slough their skin to shed ectoparasites such as cyamids (i.e., whale lice) [42,43] and accumulated diatoms (i.e., phytoplankton)  that may damage their epidermis and potentially impede thermoregulation. Another possibility is that bowhead whales are shedding solar damaged skin . Annual replacement of skin may reduce the risk of extended exposure to ultraviolet radiation during summer in high-latitude habitats , and may be particularly important for long-lived species such as bowhead whales because skin damage accumulates with age . Regularly sloughing skin damaged by the accumulation of parasites, diatoms and solar radiation may thus allow bowhead whales to maintain epidermal function and integrity over time.
Overall, our observation of skin irregularities (e.g., mottled skin pattern, sharp light gray lines, loose epidermis) of various age-classes (juveniles, sub-adults and adults) provides strong evidence that molting is pervasive for bowhead whales during summer in Cumberland Sound. In Cumberland Sound, molting occurred in shallow, warm coastal areas that had low-salinity surface waters (characteristic of sub-Arctic fiords), and appeared to be facilitated by rubbing on large rocks. The elevated water temperature in rock-rubbing habitat may stimulate epidermal growth [11,48], whereby increased water temperature elevates skin temperature and enhances the rate of cutaneous metabolic processes . Furthermore, increased ambient temperatures promotes cutaneous blood flow, bringing nutrients and hormones (e.g., thyroid hormone) known to stimulate epidermal proliferation . Such habitat is comparable to areas where beluga whales rub on rocky substrate in estuaries [24,25], and where bowheads belonging to the Okhotsk Sea population were observed molting [11,15,48].
Our findings lend support to previous hypotheses that molting is facilitated by pronounced changes in oceanographic conditions such as water temperature , and suggest that rock-rubbing behavior is used to facilitate the molting process through exfoliation. Additional research needs to address questions regarding the seasonality of the molt (i.e., is molting more pronounced during summer months or does it occur uniformly and continuously throughout the year?) by collecting year-round aerial imagery (excluding winter months with 24 hour darkness), and monitoring the skin condition of bowhead whales over time. Finally, our observations provide evidence that the function of “rock-nosing” observed by whalers, scientists, and northern community members is related to exfoliation to facilitate molting.
S1 Movie. sUAS video of one bowhead whale rubbing on a large rock in Brown Harbour on 7 August 2016.
This individual (A) was observed with three other individuals that subsequently engaged in rubbing behavior (Fig 6).
S1 Data. sUAS data for 83 unique bowhead whales used to determine body length (m), sloughing amount (0 = none, 1 = <33%, 2 = 33–66%, 3 = >66% and <100% and 4 = 100%), sloughing type (0 = none, 1 = light gray lines from probable rock-rubbing behavior, 3 = covered) and whether the mouth was closed (e.g., 0), slightly open (1), wide open (2), or indeterminable (9).
We are appreciative of the aerial imagery and video collected and generously provided by Thomas Seitz (VDOS Global LLC) and the boat-based images collected by Maha Ghazal. We are grateful for the logistical support provided by our community partners, Ricky and Peter Kilabuk, who were responsible for vessel operations. Histological analysis of sloughing bowhead whale epidermis was graciously conducted by Stephen Raverty. This manuscript was improved by the helpful comments and edits provided by Julie Mocklin and an anonymous reviewer.
- 1. Reeb D, Best PB, Kidson SH (2007) Structure of the integument of southern right whales, Eubalaena australis. The Anatomical Record 290: 596–613. pmid:17516424
- 2. Kovacs KM, Lydersen C, Gjertz I (1996) Birth-site characteristics and prenatal molting in bearded seals (Erignathus barbatus). Journal of Mammalogy 77: 1085–1091.
- 3. Smith TG, Hammill MO (1981) Ecology of the ringed seal, Phoca hispida, in its fast ice breeding habitat. Canadian Journal of Zoology 59: 966–981.
- 4. Boily P (1995) Theoretical heat flux in water and habitat selection of phocid seals and beluga whales during the annual molt. Journal of Theoretical Biology 172: 235–244.
- 5. Ling JK (1970) Pelage and molting in wild mammals with special reference to aquatic forms. The Quarterly Review of Biology 45: 16–54. pmid:5446769
- 6. McConkey S, Lalas C, Dawson S (2002) Moult and changes in body shape and pelage in known‐age male New Zealand sea lions (Phocarctos hookeri). New Zealand Journal of Zoology 29: 53–61.
- 7. Ling JK (1978) Pelage characteristics and systematic relationships in the Pinnipedia. Mammalia. pp. 305.
- 8. Scheffer VB (1962) Pelage and surface topography of the northern fur seal, Califorhinus ursinus. U.S. Department of the Interior, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. North American Fauna No. 64. 206 p.
- 9. Ling JK (1974) The integument of marine mammals. In: Harrison RJ, editor. Functional anatomy of marine mamamls. New York: Academic Press. pp. 1–44.
- 10. Ling JK (1984) Epidermal cycles and moulting in marine mammals. Acta Zoologica Fennica 171: 23–26.
- 11. Aubin DJS, Smith TG, Geraci JR (1990) Seasonal epidermal molt in beluga whales, Delphinapterus leucas. Canadian Journal of Zoology 68: 359–367.
- 12. Wagemann R, Kozlowska H (2005) Mercury distribution in the skin of beluga (Delphinapterus leucas) and narwhal (Monodon monoceros) from the Canadian Arctic and mercury burdens and excretion by moulting. Science of the Total Environment 351: 333–343. pmid:16271747
- 13. Frost KJ, Lloyd LF, Carroll G (1993) Beluga whale and spotted seal use of a coastal lagoon system in the Northeastern Chukchi Sea. Arctic 46: 8–16.
- 14. Martinet L, Allain D, Meunier M (1983) Regulation in pregnant Mink (Mustela vison) of plasma progesterone and prolactin concentrations and regulation of onset of the spring molt by daylight by daylight ratio and melatonin injections. Canadian Journal of Zoology-Revue Canadienne De Zoologie 61: 1959–1963.
- 15. Finley KJ (1982) The estuarine habitat of the beluga or white whale Delphinapterus leucas. CETUS 42 4: 4–5.
- 16. Reeb D, Duffield M, Best PB (2005) Evidence of Postnatal Ecdysis in Southern Right Whales, Eubalaena australis. Journal of Mammalogy 86: 131–138.
- 17. Yablokov AV, Bel'kovich VM, Borisov VI (1974) Whales and dolphins, part I and II. Translation of "Kity I Del'finy" 1972. Izd-vo Nauka, Moscow (JPRS-62150-1). Arlington, VA: Joint Publications Research Service.
- 18. Chernova OF, Shpak OV, Kiladze AB, Azarova VS, Rozhnov VV (2016) Summer molting of bowhead whales Balaena mysticetus Linnaeus, 1758, of the Okhotsk Sea population. Doklady Biological Sciences 471: 261–265. pmid:28058605
- 19. Rugh DJ, Braham HW, Miller GW (1992) Methods for photographic identification of bowhead whales, Balaena mysticetus. Canadian Journal of Zoology 70: 617–624.
- 20. Reinhart NR, Ferguson SH, Koski WR, Higdon JW, LeBlanc B, et al. (2013) Occurrence of killer whale Orcinus orca rake marks on Eastern Canada-West Greenland bowhead whales Balaena mysticetus. Polar Biology 36: 1133–1146.
- 21. Braham HW (1984) The bowhead whale, balaena mysticetus Marine Fisheries Review 46: 45–53.
- 22. Cosens SE, Blouw A (2003) Size- and age-class segregation of bowhead whales summering in northern Foxe Basin: A photogrammetric analysis. Marine Mammal Science 19: 284–296.
- 23. Koski WR, Davis RA, Miller GW, Withrow DE (1993) Reproduction. In: Burns JJ, Montague JJ, Cowles CJ, editors. The bowhead whale: Special Publication Number 2. The Society of Marine Mammalogy, Lawrence, KS. pp. 239–274.
- 24. Guerin AH (1845) On the rock-nose of the whaler, a variety of the Baleana mysticetus. Edinburgh New Philosophical Journal 39: 266–269.
- 25. Reeves R, Mitchell E, Mansfield A, McLaughlin M (1983) Distribution and migration of the bowhead whale, Balaena mysticetus, in the Eastern North American Arctic. 1983 36: 60.
- 26. Koski WR, George JC, Zeh J, Brandon JR (2010) Preliminary analyses on identification of yearling bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in aerial photographs. Paper SC/62/BRG29 presented to the International Whaling Commission Scientific Committee. Agadir, Morocco. pp. 13.
- 27. NWMB (2000) Final report of the Inuit bowhead whale study, Nunavut, Canada. Iqaluit, NU. 1–90 p.
- 28. Higdon JW, Ferguson SH (2010) Past, present, and future for bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) in Northwest Hudson Bay. In: Ferguson SH, Loseto LL, Mallory ML, editors. A little less Arctic: top predators in the world’s largest northern inland sea, Hudson Bay. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. pp. 159–177.
- 29. George JC, Follmann E, Zeh J, Sousa M, Tarpley R, et al. (2004) Inferences from bowhead whale ovarian and pregnancy data: age estimates, length at sexual maturity and ovulation rates. Paper SC/56/BRG8 presented to the International Whaling Commission Scientific Committee.
- 30. O'Hara TM (2002) Sexual maturation in male bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) of the Bering-Chukchi-Beaufort Seas stock. The journal of cetacean research and management 4: 143.
- 31. George JC, Follmann E, Zeh J, Sousa M, Tarpley R, et al. (2011) A new way to estimate the age of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) using ovarian corpora counts. Canadian Journal of Zoology 89: 840–852.
- 32. Boily P (1996) Metabolic and hormonal changes during the molt of captive gray seals (Halichoerus grypus). American Journal of Physiology-Regulatory Integrative and Comparative Physiology 270: R1051–R1058.
- 33. Boyd I, Arnbom T, Fedak M (1993) Water flux, body composition, and metabolic rate during molt in female Southern elephant seals (Mirounga leonina). Physiological Zoology 66: 43–60.
- 34. Paterson W, Sparling CE, Thompson D, Pomeroy PP, Currie JI, et al. (2012) Seals like it hot: Changes in surface temperature of harbour seals (Phoca vitulina) from late pregnancy to moult. Journal of Thermal Biology 37: 454–461.
- 35. Williams TM, Rutishauser M, Long B, Fink T, Gafney J, et al. (2007) Seasonal variability in otariid energetics: Implications for the effects of predators on localized prey resources. Physiological and Biochemical Zoology 80: 433–443. pmid:17508338
- 36. Ford TJ, Werth AJ, George JC (2013) An intraoral thermoregulatory organ in the bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus), the corpus cavernosum maxillaris. The Anatomical Record 296: 701–708. pmid:23450839
- 37. George JC (2009) Growth, morphology and energetics of bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus) [PhD]. Fairbanks, Alaska: University of Alaska Fairbanks. 168 p.
- 38. Fetter AW, Everitt JI (1982) Determination of the gross and microscopic structures of selected tissues and organs of the bowhead whale, Balaena mysticetus, with emphasis on bone, blubber, and the lymphoimmune and cardiovascular systems (RU 480). In: Albert TF, editor. Tissue structural studies and other investigations on the biology of endangered species in the Beaufort Sea, Vol 1 Final Report to the Bureau of Land Management from the Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Maryland. NTIS No. PB86-153582/AS.
- 39. Haldiman JT (1993) Anatomy and physiology. In: Burns JJ, Montague JJ, Cowles CJ, editors. The bowhead whale Lawrence, KS: Society for Marine Mammology. pp. 71–156.
- 40. Haldiman JT, Abdelbaki YZ, Al-Bagdadi FK, Duffield DW, Henk WG, et al. (1981) Determination of the gross and microscopic structure of the lung, kidney, brain and skin of the bowhead whale, Balaena mysticetus (RU 380). In: Albert TF, editor. Tissue structural studies and other investigations on the biology of endangered species in the Beaufort Sea, Vol 1 Final Report to the Bureau of Land Management from the Department of Veterinary Sciences, University of Maryland. NTIS No. PB86-153582/AS.
- 41. Werth AJ (2007) Adaptations of the cetacean hyolingual apparatus for aquatic feeding and thermoregulation. The Anatomical Record: Advances in Integrative Anatomy and Evolutionary Biology 290: 546–568.
- 42. Von Duyke AL, Stimmelmayr R, Sheffield G, Sformo T, Givens GH, et al. (2016) Prevalence and abundance of cyamid “whale lice” (Cyamus ceti) on subsistence harvested bowhead whales (Balaena mysticetus). 2016 69: 10.
- 43. Haldiman JT, Henk WG, Henry RW, Albert TF, Abdelbaki YZ, et al. (1985) Epidermal and papillary dermal characteristics of the bowhead whale (Balaena mysticetus). The Anatomical Record 211: 391–402. pmid:3993987
- 44. Heckmann RA, Jensen LA, Warnock RG, Coleman B (1987) Parasites of the bowhead whale, Balaena mysticetus. The Great Basin Naturalist 47: 355–372.
- 45. Martinez-Levasseur LM, Gendron D, Knell RJ, O'Toole EA, Singh M, et al. (2011) Acute sun damage and photoprotective responses in whales. Proceedings: Biological Sciences 278: 1581–1586. pmid:21068035
- 46. de Gruijl FR, Longstreth J, Norval M, Cullen AP, Slaper H, et al. (2003) Health effects from stratospheric ozone depletion and interactions with climate change. Photochemical & Photobiological Sciences 2: 16–28.
- 47. Martinez-Levasseur LM, Birch-Machin MA, Bowman A, Gendron D, Weatherhead E, et al. (2013) Whales Use Distinct Strategies to Counteract Solar Ultraviolet Radiation. 3: 2386. pmid:23989080
- 48. Watts PD, Draper BA, Henrico J (1991) Preferential use of warm water habitat by adult beluga whales. Journal of Thermal Biology 16: 57–60.