Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Microgeographic population structuring of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)

  • André Barretto Bruno Wilke ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Funding acquisition, Investigation, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    andrewilke@usp.br

    Affiliation Departamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Ramon Wilk-da-Silva,

    Roles Investigation, Methodology

    Affiliation Departamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil

  • Mauro Toledo Marrelli

    Roles Conceptualization, Funding acquisition, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Validation, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Departamento de Epidemiologia, Faculdade de Saúde Pública, Universidade de São Paulo, São Paulo, Brasil

Microgeographic population structuring of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae)

  • André Barretto Bruno Wilke, 
  • Ramon Wilk-da-Silva, 
  • Mauro Toledo Marrelli
PLOS
x

Abstract

Aedes aegypti is one of the species most favored by changes in the environment caused by urbanization. Its abundance increases rapidly in the face of such changes, increasing the risk of disease transmission. Previous studies have shown that mosquito species that have adapted to anthropogenic environmental changes benefit from urbanization and undergo population expansion. In light of this, we used microsatellite markers to explore how urbanization processes may be modulating Ae. aegypti populations collected from three areas with different levels of urbanization in the city of São Paulo, Brazil. Specimens were collected at eleven sites in three areas with different degrees of urbanization in the city of São Paulo: conserved, intermediate and urbanized. Ten microsatellite loci were used to characterize the populations from these areas genetically. Our findings suggest that as urbanized areas grow and the human population density in these areas increases, Ae. aegypti populations undergo a major population expansion, which can probably be attributed to the species’ adaptability to anthropogenic environmental changes. Our findings reveal a robust association between, on the one hand, urbanization processes and densification of the human population and, on the other, Ae. aegypti population structure patterns and population expansion. This indicates that this species benefits from anthropogenic effects, which are intensified by migration of the human population from rural to urban areas, increasing the risk of epidemics and disease transmission to an ever-increasing number of people.

Background

Urbanization continues to increase as more and more people migrate from rural to urban areas. Indeed, there are now more people living in cities than in rural areas. This phenomenon is responsible for the extinction of species that are not adapted to the urban environment and is especially important for the epidemiology of vector-borne diseases, as there is a clear association between reduced species richness in urban areas and an increased incidence of these diseases [1,2]. This decrease in species richness can in turn be a result of human changes to the environment and the consequent increase in abundance of the few mosquito species that are adapted to the urbanized environment, very often with epidemiological consequences [24]. Mosquito surveys performed in urban parks in the metropolitan region of São Paulo, Brazil, indicated high abundance of species with epidemiological relevance, including the dengue vector, Aedes aegypti [57].

Dengue is a tropical disease caused by a flavivirus transmitted by Aedes mosquitoes. It endangers over 2 billion people of the world's population, causing approximately 390 million infections a year [8]. Ae. aegypti [9], which can be found in tropical and subtropical regions, is the main vector of dengue and also one of the mosquitoes that is best adapted to the urban environment; it can complete its entire life cycle within a human domicile, laying eggs in artificial breeding sites and blood feeding on human hosts [10].

For these reasons, Ae. aegypti is one of the most favored species when a rural area is urbanized. In this situation there is a rapid increase in its abundance and a consequent increase in the risk of dengue transmission [1113]. The dynamics of dengue epidemics are fueled by several factors that are usually present in developing countries, such as unplanned urbanization, chaotic population growth and ineffective public health systems and vector surveillance [2,12,14,15].

Also, Ae. aegypti is considered the primary vector for the Zika and chikungunya viruses, as well as several other arboviruses, and is responsible for numerous outbreaks of insect-borne diseases worldwide [16,17]. Identifying the genetic structure of urban populations of Ae. aegypti, especially on a microgeographic scale, can lead to a better understanding of how human modifications to the physical environment are modulating population structure in this mosquito and the implications of this modulation for disease transmission and vector control.

Microsatellites are highly polymorphic neutral markers often used in genetic population studies [18]. Recently, their use has provided valuable information on microgeographic population structures of insects in urbanized areas [1921]. Using DNA microsatellite loci, Multini et al. [19] found that Aedes fluviatilis populations in São Paulo, Brazil, had undergone population expansion primarily as a result of urban growth, highlighting the epidemiological significance of the association between urbanization processes and population structuring in vector mosquitoes.

In light of the high abundance of Ae. aegypti in the city of São Paulo and the major role played by this species in the transmission of the dengue, Zika and chikungunya viruses, this study used microsatellite markers to explore how urbanization processes can modulate populations of Ae. aegypti collected in three areas with different levels of urbanization in the city of São Paulo.

Methods

Specimen collection

Ae. aegypti mosquitoes were collected from eleven sites, no more than 30 km apart, in three areas with different levels of urbanization in the city of São Paulo, Brazil.

Conserved areas (CON): five municipal parks consisting of large green areas (with more than 97% of vegetal cover) open to the public from 5:00 am to 8:00 pm. No biological or chemical measures are used to control mosquitoes in the parks, which are home to wild birds, reptiles and mammals. Intermediate areas (INT): four collection sites on the University of São Paulo Armando de Salles Oliveira campus (with 80% of vegetal cover). The campus extends over 3,648,944.40 m2, of which some 800,000 m2 has been built on. Over 100,000 people travel through, visit or work or study on the campus every day. Urbanized areas (URB): two collection sites on the University of São Paulo health sciences campus, which is in a highly urbanized, densely populated area extending over 83,050.82 m2 (with less than 3% of vegetation cover). Much of this area (79.923,72 m2) has been built on (Table 1).

Mosquito collections were performed monthly from 2012 to 2015. Adult mosquitoes were collected outdoors with portable battery-powered aspirators [22], and immature mosquitoes were collected with dippers and randomly selected for further analysis to avoid testing siblings. Immature specimens were kept under laboratory conditions and fed with fish food (Tetra BettaMin) until they developed into adults. Specimens were identified with the aid of taxonomic keys [23] and stored at -20°C until DNA was extracted.

The study was approved by the University of São Paulo Research Ethics Committee, and collection permits were provided by the City of São Paulo Department of the Environment and Green Areas.

DNA extraction and polymerase chain reaction

DNA extractions were performed with the DNEasy Blood and Tissue Kit (Qiagen, Hilden, Germany) following the manufacturer’s instructions. Polymerase chain reactions (PCRs) were carried out individually with ten microsatellite primers originally designed by Chambers et al. [24] and Slotman et al. [25] (Table 2) using the SuperMix PCR kit (Invitrogen, Carlsbad, CA, USA).

Ten microsatellite primers were labeled with a fluorescent dye (FAM, HEX or NED) (Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA), and the PCRs were carried out according to the manufacture’s protocol using an E6331000025 Eppendorf Thermocycler (Mastercycler Nexus Gradient, Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany). PCR products were visualized on a 1% agarose gel stained with GelRed™ (Biotium, Hayward, CA, USA).

PCR products were diluted 1:7 by mixing 3 μL of each product labeled with a different dye with 21 μL of Ultra-Pure Water (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to a final volume of 30 μL. Next, 2 μL of the diluted PCR products were mixed with 8.925 μL of Hi-Di formamide (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) and 0.075 μL of the size standard GeneScan-500 ROX (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA) to a final volume of 11 μL. The samples were submitted to the University of São Paulo Center for Human Genome Studies and size-sorted in an ABI 3730 automatic sequencer (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA, USA). Fragments were sized with GeneMarker (v1.85 SoftGenetics, State College, PA, USA).

Genetic analysis

Allele frequency, observed heterozygosity (HO) and expected heterozygosity (HE), deviations from the Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium, inbreeding coefficient (FIS) and pairwise FST with significance values (after 10,000 permutations) were calculated with Arlequin (v3.5) [26]. Linkage disequilibrium (using Bonferroni-corrected P-values) and number of migrants (Nm) were calculated using Genepop (v4.2 http://genepop.curtin.edu.au/) [27]. Allelic richness and private allelic richness were calculated using HP-Rare (v1.0) [28].

The probability of null alleles, genetic heterogeneity (FST) and Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards chord distance (taking into account the null allele bias) were calculated per locus per population with FreeNa [29]. A Mantel test was used to compare both FST values using Past (v2.17c) [30].

A dendrogram based on the Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards chord distance was constructed using Statistica (v7.0) [31]. A linear correlation analyses between FST/(1-FST) and geographic distance (km) was performed using Past (v2.17c).

Bayesian analysis was performed with Structure (v2.3.3) [32], and the number of clusters (K) representing the best fit for the data was calculated with Structure Harvester (Web v0.6.94) [33]. Bottleneck (v1.2.2) was used to test for heterozygosity deficiency using the Stepwise Mutation Model (SMM) [3436], a signature of population expansion (HE<HEQ), or heterozygosity excess, a signature of a bottleneck event (HE>HEQ), where HE = the expected heterozygosity based on allele frequencies and HEQ = the expected heterozygosity based on observed alleles.

Results

Marker assessment

Linkage disequilibrium for the 495 possible tests, per locus per population, was found only between loci A10 and AC7, AG2 and AC5, AT1 and B07, AT1 and AG2 and AT1 and AG7 after Bonferroni correction (P = 0.0001). These results are not considered significant because there were no repetitions of pairs of loci combinations across the populations tested.

The estimate for the probability of null alleles was high (>0.2) for locus AC1 in five populations, AC5 in three, AC7 in two, AG1 in seven, AG2 in two, AG5 in one, AG7 in one, AT1 in two and B07 in one. Locus A10 had a low probability of null alleles (<0.2) (S1 Table). Allelic richness ranged from 4.8 (CON-1) to 6.38 (CON-4), and private allelic richness from 0.13 (CON-1) to 0.43 (CON-5) (S2 Table). Hardy-Weinberg equilibrium tests were performed for each locus and population. HE was higher than HO in 103 of 110 possible tests, and average FIS was 0.35 (S3 Table).

Genetic differentiation

The results for FST indicated significant genetic structure between populations. Values ranged from 0.00629 to 0.11169, and only 7% of the values (4 out of 55) were not significant. When the potential bias due to null alleles was taken into account, the results ranged from 0.002133 to 0.093649. There were no statistically significant differences between the corrected and uncorrected FST values (r = 0.986, P <0.0001) (Table 3).

Number of migrants between the populations was 3.94766 per population per generation based on 30 specimens per population, showing a low degree of allelic similarity. There was no correlation between genetic and geographical distances (r = 0,18; r2 = 0,03; P = 0,18) between populations.

Genetic distance

The dendrogram based on Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards chord distance was consistent with the level of urbanization in the areas where the specimens were collected. All eleven populations from the three urban areas grouped separately with no overlapping between populations from different areas. The two populations from highly urbanized areas, URB-1 and URB-2, were the most distinct, followed by two from the conserved area (CON-2 and CON-1, in that order). The CON-3, CON-4 and CON-5 populations segregated close to each other, as did the INT-1, INT-2, INT-3 and INT-4 populations (Fig 1).

thumbnail
Fig 1. Genetic-distance dendrogram for Aedes aegypti based on Cavalli-Sforza and Edwards chord distance.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185150.g001

Bayesian cluster analysis

The method described by Evanno et al. [33] was used with the results of the Bayesian analysis to identify the K value that best represents the number of genetic groups in the populations tested. The K value found in this way was 4 (S1 Fig). Two subsequent analyses with different K values were performed. K = 3 indicated that the segregation of the populations depended on the area where the specimens were collected. For the CON populations, the color green predominated; for the INT populations, blue; and for the URB populations, red (Fig 2A). K = 4 showed that the URB-2 population belongs to a different genetic group than the remaining populations; this group is represented by the color yellow. The CON and INT populations formed a distinct genetic cluster in which green and red, respectively, predominated (Fig 2B).

thumbnail
Fig 2. Bayesian analysis of population structure for all Aedes aegypti populations showing the subdivision of individuals for K = 3 (A) and K = 4 (B).

Each of the 311 individuals from eleven populations is represented by a vertical line divided into different colored segments. The length of each segment represents the probability of the individual belonging to the genetic cluster represented by that color.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185150.g002

Population expansion analysis

Tests to assess heterozygosity deficiency using the SMM showed that there was a significant degree of deficiency in 5 of the 11 populations tested (P<0.05). Although not observed in any of the CON populations, heterozygosity deficiency was detected in all the INT and URB populations (except for INT-4), indicating a recent population expansion (Table 4) in the more urbanized areas. In a further analysis in which all 310 specimens were considered a metapopulation, all 10 loci displayed heterozygosity deficiency (HE<HEQ) with a highly significant P-value (0.00015). This result supports the hypothesis that the Ae. aegypti populations in this study have suffered a major recent population expansion.

Discussion

The global distribution of Ae. aegypti is intimately connected with man-made changes to the physical environment. While urbanization modifies the ecosystem to create an environment that is more suitable for one particular species, Homo sapiens [1], the mosquito Ae. aegypti also benefits from these changes. This situation, allied to the lack of sanitation and sewage treatment and inadequate epidemiologic surveillance common in developing countries, results in ideal conditions for a major increase in the abundance of this species, increasing the risk of disease transmission.

Our findings suggest that the Ae. aegypti populations in this study have undergone a major population expansion, probably as a result of increased urbanization and human population density as well as the species’ adaptability to anthropogenic changes in the physical environment. When urbanized areas expand and human population density increases, the availability of human hosts and breeding sites increases, while larval competition and the number of natural predators decrease. This agrees with the findings of Multini et al. [19] for Ae. fluviatilis, Donnelly et al. [36] for Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles gambiae, Michel [37] for Anopheles funestus and Mirabello & Conn [38] for Anopheles darlingi.

The Ae. aegypti populations from more preserved ecosystems (CON) did not show signs of population expansion, unlike the INT and URB populations, corroborating the hypothesis that the urban environment benefits this species and that it is highly adapted to human changes to the landscape.

Bayesian analysis showed that structuring has been occurring in Ae. aegypti populations and is correlated with the level of urbanization, supported by the lack of correlation between genetic and geographic distances. This can be explained by the fact that this species is well adapted to the urban environment and therefore does not have to actively seek new areas in order to find hosts or breeding sites as these are widely available in cities regardless of the level of urbanization and are plentiful even in the more conserved environments, such as urban parks.

A possible hypothesis to explain this situation is that after Ae. aegypti was reintroduced in Brazil in the 1970’s [39], the growth of the city favored its expansion, preventing the genetic structuring of its populations. However, once urbanization in a given area was complete and these populations reached their peak abundance, genetic structuring restarted, resulting in the population structures observed here. This hypothesis is corroborated by the low Nm between populations despite their geographic proximity as revealed by the dendrogram in Fig 1 and the Bayesian analysis.

Further, the domiciliation of Ae. aegypti, which resulted from anthropogenic impacts on its evolution may be closely associated with microevolutionary processes [40], such as the structuring found in this study. The results for allelic and private allelic richness for Ae. aegypti were consistent with the results of previous studies of this species [20,39,41], indicating that the loci used here revealed the genuine allelic richness for the populations in this study.

Our finding of urbanization-dependent structuring is of great significance for the dynamics of disease transmission, particularly because there appears to be low Nm between the populations collected in areas with different levels of urbanization in this study. Furthermore, with increasing urbanization the demographic expansion of Ae. aegypti populations tends to intensify since this species is favored by urbanization. As a result, there is an increase in diseases transmission indirectly caused by human effects on the environment, such as the development of urban heat islands [42], and a consequent increase in the incidence of dengue [13].

The findings of this study indicate a robust association between, on the one hand, urbanization and increasing human population density and, on the other, Ae. aegypti population structure patterns and population expansion. This suggests that Ae. aegypti benefits from human changes to the environment, which increase in intensity as the human population migrates from rural to urban areas, increasing the risk of disease transmission and epidemics for an ever-increasing number of people.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Graph of ΔK against K showing K = 4 as the most probable number of genetic clusters.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185150.s001

(TIF)

S1 Table. Null allele frequency estimates per locus per Aedes aegypti population.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185150.s002

(DOCX)

S2 Table. Allele frequencies for the ten loci analyzed in Aedes aegypti populations.

Allelic richness (Na) and private allelic richness (Np).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185150.s003

(DOCX)

S3 Table. Characterization of microsatellite loci in Aedes aegypti.

Significant P-values in bold.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0185150.s004

(DOCX)

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Walter Ceretti-Junior, Paulo Roberto Urbinatti, Antônio Ralph Medeiros-Sousa and the City of São Paulo Zoonosis Control Center for helping us with field collections and Aristides Fernandes and Marcia Bicudo de Paula for identifying the specimens.

References

  1. 1. McKinney ML. Urbanization as a major cause of biotic homogenization. Biol Conserv. 2006;127: 247–260.
  2. 2. Ferraguti M, Martínez-de la Puente J, Roiz D, Ruiz S, Soriguer R, Figuerola J. Effects of landscape anthropization on mosquito community composition and abundance. Sci Rep. Nature Publishing Group; 2016;6: 29002. pmid:27373794
  3. 3. Thongsripong P, Green A, Kittayapong P, Kapan D, Wilcox B, Bennett S. Mosquito vector diversity across habitats in central thailand endemic for dengue and other arthropod-borne diseases. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7: e2507. pmid:24205420
  4. 4. Kraemer MUG, Sinka ME, Duda KA, Mylne AQN, Shearer FM, Barker CM, et al. The global distribution of the arbovirus vectors Aedes aegypti and Ae. Albopictus. Elife. 2015;4: 1–18. pmid:26126267
  5. 5. Medeiros-Sousa AR, Ceretti W, Urbinatti PR, de Carvalho GC, de Paula MB, Fernandes A, et al. Mosquito fauna in municipal parks of São Paulo City, Brazil: a preliminary survey. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2013;29: 275–9. pmid:24199502
  6. 6. Ceretti-Júnior W, Medeiros-Sousa AR, Multini LC, Urbinatti PR, Vendrami DP, Natal D, et al. Immature mosquitoes in bamboo internodes in municipal parks, City of São Paulo, Brazil. J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 2014;30: 268–274. pmid:25843132
  7. 7. Ceretti-Junior W, de Oliveira Christe R, Rizzo M, Strobel RC, de Matos Junior MO, de Mello MHSH, et al. Species composition and ecological aspects of immature mosquitoes (Diptera: Culicidae) in bromeliads in urban parks in the city of Sao Paulo, Brazil. J Arthropod Borne Dis. 2016;10: 102–112. pmid:27047978
  8. 8. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW, Moyes CL, et al. The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature. 2013;496: 504–7. pmid:23563266
  9. 9. Wilkerson RC, Linton Y-M, Fonseca DM, Schultz TR, Price DC, Strickman DA. Making mosquito taxonomy useful: a stable classification of tribe Aedini that balances utility with current knowledge of evolutionary relationships. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0133602. pmid:26226613
  10. 10. World Health Organization. Dengue and severe dengue. WHO Fact Sheet. 2012. Available: www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs117/en/index.htm
  11. 11. Descloux E, Mangeas M, Menkes CE, Lengaigne M, Leroy A, Tehei T, et al. Climate-based models for understanding and forecasting dengue epidemics. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2012;6: e1470. pmid:22348154
  12. 12. Rodrigues MDM, Marques GRAM, Serpa LLN, Arduino MDB, Voltolini JC, Barbosa GL, et al. Density of Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus and its association with number of residents and meteorological variables in the home environment of dengue endemic area, São Paulo, Brazil. Parasit Vectors. 2015;8: 1–9.
  13. 13. Araujo RV, Albertini MR, Costa-da-Silva AL, Suesdek L, Franceschi NCS, Bastos NM, et al. São Paulo urban heat islands have a higher incidence of dengue than other urban areas. Brazilian J Infect Dis. 2015;19: 146–155. pmid:25523076
  14. 14. Buhaug H, Urdal H. An urbanization bomb? Population growth and social disorder in cities. Glob Environ Chang. Elsevier Ltd; 2013;23: 1–10.
  15. 15. Gubler DJ. Epidemic dengue/dengue hemorrhagic fever as a public health, social and economic problem in the 21st century. Trends Microbiol. 2002;10: 100–3. pmid:11827812
  16. 16. Staples JE, Breiman RF, Powers AM. Chikungunya fever: an epidemiological review of a re-emerging infectious disease. Clin Infect Dis. 2009;49: 942–8. pmid:19663604
  17. 17. WHO. Zika situation report. 2016; 1–15. Available: http://www.who.int/emergencies/zika-virus/situation-report/4-march-2016/en/
  18. 18. Oliveira EJ, Pádua JG, Zucchi MI, Vencovsky R, Vieira MLC. Origin, evolution and genome distribution of microsatellites. Genet Mol Biol. 2006;29: 294–307.
  19. 19. Multini LC, Wilke ABB, Suesdek L, Marrelli MT. Population genetic structure of Aedes fluviatilis (Diptera: Culicidae). PLoS One. 2016;11: e0162328. pmid:27598889
  20. 20. Olanratmanee P, Kittayapong P, Chansang C, Hoffmann A a., Weeks AR, Endersby NM. Population genetic structure of Aedes (Stegomyia) aegypti (L.) at a micro-spatial scale in thailand: implications for a dengue suppression strategy. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2013;7. pmid:23326609
  21. 21. Piccinali RV, Gürtler RE. Fine-scale genetic structure of Triatoma infestans in the Argentine Chaco. Infect Genet Evol. Elsevier B.V.; 2015;34: 143–52. pmid:26027923
  22. 22. Natal D, Marucci D. Aparelho de sucção tipo aspirador para captura de mosquitos. Rev Saude Publica. 1984;18: 418–420. pmid:6531645
  23. 23. Forattini OP. Culicidologia Médica. Vol. 2. EDUSP, Editora da universidade de São Paulo; 2002.
  24. 24. Chambers EW, Meece JK, McGowan J a., Lovin DD, Hemme RR, Chadee DD, et al. Microsatellite isolation and linkage group identification in the yellow fever mosquito Aedes aegypti. J Hered. 2007;98: 202–210. pmid:17420178
  25. 25. Slotman MA, Kelly NB, Harrington LC, Kitthawee S, Jones JW, Scott TW, et al. Polymorphic microsatellite markers for studies of Aedes aegypti (Diptera: Culicidae), the vector of dengue and yellow fever. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7: 168–171.
  26. 26. Excoffier L, Laval G, Schneider S. Arlequin (version 3. 0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evol Bioinform Online. 2005;1: 47–50.
  27. 27. Rousset F. GENEPOP’007: A complete re-implementation of the GENEPOP software for Windows and Linux. Mol Ecol Resour. 2008;8: 103–106. pmid:21585727
  28. 28. Kalinowski ST. HP-RARE 1.0: A computer program for performing rarefaction on measures of allelic richness. Mol Ecol Notes. 2005;5: 187–189.
  29. 29. Chapuis M-P, Estoup A. Microsatellite null alleles and estimation of population differentiation. Mol Biol Evol. 2006;24: 621–631. pmid:17150975
  30. 30. Hammer Ø, Harper DATT, Ryan PD. PAST: paleontological statistics software package for education and data analysis. Palaeontol Electron. 2001;4: 9.
  31. 31. StatSoft I. STATISTICA (data analysis software system). 2012. Available: www.statsoft.com
  32. 32. Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: Dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7: 574–578. pmid:18784791
  33. 33. Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14: 2611–2620. pmid:15969739
  34. 34. Cornuet JM, Luikart G, Cornuet J.M, LUikartt G, Cornuet JM, Luikart G. Description and power analysis of two tests for detecting recent population bottlenecks from allele frequency data. Genetics. 1996;144: 2001–2014. Article pmid:8978083
  35. 35. Conn JE, Vineis JH, Bollback JP, Onyabe DY, Wilkerson RC, Póvoa MM. Population structure of the malaria vector Anopheles darlingi in a malaria-endemic region of eastern Amazonian Brazil. Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2006;74: 798–806. 74/5/798 pmid:16687683
  36. 36. Donnelly MJ, Licht MC, Lehmann T. Evidence for recent population expansion in the evolutionary history of the malaria vectors Anopheles arabiensis and Anopheles gambiae. Mol Biol Evol. 2001;18: 1353–1364. pmid:11420373
  37. 37. Michel AP, Grushko O, Guelbeogo WM, Lobo NF, Sagnon N, Costantini C, et al. Divergence with gene flow in Anopheles funestus from the Sudan Savanna of Burkina Faso, West Africa. Genetics. 2006;173: 1389–1395. pmid:16648581
  38. 38. Mirabello L, Conn JE. Molecular population genetics of the malaria vector Anopheles darlingi in central and South America. Heredity (Edinb). 2006;97: 438–438.
  39. 39. Monteiro FA, Shama R, Martins AJ, Gloria-Soria A, Brown JE, Powell JR. Genetic diversity of Brazilian Aedes aegypti: patterns following an eradication program. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2014;8: e3167. pmid:25233218
  40. 40. Brown JE, Evans BR, Zheng W, Obas V, Barrera-Martinez L, Egizi A, et al. Human impacts have shaped historical and recent evolution in Aedes aegypti, the dengue and yellow fever mosquito. Evolution. 2014;68: 514–525. pmid:24111703
  41. 41. Louise C, Vidal PO, Suesdek L. Microevolution of Aedes aegypti. PLoS One. 2015;10: e0137851. pmid:26360876
  42. 42. Rosenthal JK, Sclar ED, Kinney PL, Knowlton K, Crauderueff R, Brandt-Rauf PW. Links between the built environment, climate and population health: Interdisciplinary environmental change research in New York City. Ann Acad Med Singapore. 2007;36: 834–846. pmid:17987235