Advertisement
Browse Subject Areas
?

Click through the PLOS taxonomy to find articles in your field.

For more information about PLOS Subject Areas, click here.

  • Loading metrics

Relationships between sleep duration, physical activity and body mass index in young New Zealanders: An isotemporal substitution analysis

  • Borja del Pozo-Cruz ,

    Roles Conceptualization, Formal analysis, Writing – original draft, Writing – review & editing

    b.delpozocruz@auckland.ac.nz

    Affiliation Department of Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland (Auckland, New Zealand). TAMAKI BUILDING 731 -, Level 3, Tamaki Campus Gate 1,St Johns, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Nicholas Gant,

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Exercise Sciences, Faculty of Science, University of Auckland (Auckland, New Zealand). TAMAKI BUILDING 731 -, Level 3, Tamaki Campus Gate 1,St Johns, Auckland, New Zealand

  • Jesús del Pozo-Cruz,

    Roles Formal analysis, Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation Department of Physical Education and Sports, University of Seville (Seville, Spain), Pirotecnia s/n, Seville, Spain

  • Ralph Maddison

    Roles Writing – review & editing

    Affiliation School of Exercise and Nutrition, Faculty of Health Sciences, Deakin University (Geelong, Australia), Burwood, Victoria, Australia

Relationships between sleep duration, physical activity and body mass index in young New Zealanders: An isotemporal substitution analysis

  • Borja del Pozo-Cruz, 
  • Nicholas Gant, 
  • Jesús del Pozo-Cruz, 
  • Ralph Maddison
PLOS
x

Abstract

Background

The evidence regarding the unique effect of sedentary behaviour on obesity among children is unclear. Moreover, the effect of substituting sedentary behaviour with physical activity of different intensities on the body composition of children has received limited empirical study.

Objective

To examine the mathematical effects on Body Mass Index (BMI) of substituting sedentary behaviours with physical activities of different intensities on children and youth aged 5–14 years old in New Zealand.

Methods

Secondary analysis of accelerometer data from the National Survey of Children and Young People’s Physical Activity and Dietary Behaviours in New Zealand (2008/09) was conducted. A total of 1812 children and youth aged 5–24 years provided accelerometer-derived data on daily sedentary time (SB), light intensity physical activity (LPA) and moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA). Sleep time was assessed with a validated computerised use-of-time tool. BMI was assessed using anthropometric measurements. Multiple linear regression models were used to examine the independent associations of SB, Sleep time, LPA, and MVPA on BMI. The isotemporal substitution approach was used to ascertain the mathematical effect of substituting each of the other behaviours on BMI. Analyses were stratified by age groups.

Results

SB showed a unique (inverse) association with BMI across all age groups (p<0.05) but 20–24 years (p>0.05). Similarly, MVPA was positively associated (p<0.001) across all age groups. Among age groups 5–9 years, 10–14 years and 15–19 years, the estimated impact of replacing 60 min/day of SB with the same amount of MVPA time resulted in decreased BMI for all age groups (p<0.001), ranging from -1.26 (5–9 years) to -1.43 units (15–19 years). Similar results were achieved when SB was replaced with LPA or sleeping time for children (5–19 years). In young people (age group 20–24), the impact of replacing 30 min/day of SB with MVPA resulted in an estimated -1 BMI units decrease (p<0.001).

Conclusion

MVPA and SB have a unique effect on BMI. Further, substituting SB with LPA or MVPA was associated with a favourable effect on BMI across all age groups; with MVPA having the strongest association.

Introduction

Globally, childhood obesity is a significant health issue with increasing prevalence worldwide, including New Zealand where 11% of children are obese. Obesity persists into adulthood, increasing children’s risk of chronic diseases later in life. Managing childhood obesity is therefore a public health priority.

Along with nutrition, physical activity (PA) plays a critical role in children and adolescents’ health and development [1, 2], including maintaining healthy weight [3]. There is now accumulating evidence showing an inverse relationship between moderate-to-vigorous intensity physical activity (MVPA) and body mass index (BMI) [4]. Therefore, intensity of PA seems to be a key component of programs to reduce weight among this population group. It has been also suggested that light intensity physical activity (LPA) contributes to weight loss reduction by exclusively increasing energy expenditure [5]; however it is unclear if LPA has a unique effect on obesity markers among this population group.

Sedentary behaviour (SB) is considered to be an independent cardiovascular and mental health risk factor among adults and elderly [6]. However, this relationship is yet to be confirmed among children and adolescents. A number of studies have shown a relationship between self-reported SB and adiposity markers in children and youth [7]. Nevertheless, research investigating this relationship using objectively measured SB are scarce [8]. Further, only a few studies [912] have taken into account the deleterious effects of SB on total energy expenditure, resulting from displacing time that could be spent in alternative energy-consuming activities. To address this issue, the isotemporal substitution paradigm has recently been proposed [13]. This paradigm assumes that activity time in a day is finite and that performing one activity involves substitution for another. Depending on the kind of activity that is replaced, the effects on health might be different. This analytical approach has been recommended for epidemiological research [13] involving PA and SB. A deeper understanding on how sleep, SB, and PA interact with BMI in children and young is highly relevant to public health professionals for identifying research-informed strategies for prevention and management of overweight and obesity. The first study to apply the isotemporal substitution paradigm to PA and SB to better understand obesity involved analysis of the US National Health And Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES), and included 5607 participants with objectively measured physical activity. Loprinzi et al. showed that MVPA, but not LPA or SB, uniquely contributed to adiposity biomarkers among children and adolescents (aged 6–17 years) within the US. Since then several studies have applied this approach in relatively small cohorts (i.e. n<400) of children to determine the effects of substituting SB with PA on a diverse range of obesity markers [10, 11, 14]. Similar effects to those observed by Loprinzi et al., have been found in 10-yr old British children [15]. However, other studies have suggested that SB might have a harmful impact on various adiposity outcomes and cardio-metabolic biomarkers [8]. Thus, the evidence on the unique effect of SB on obesity among children is unclear.

Previous studies involving the isotemporal substitution paradigm were constrained to analysis of PA and SB activity types. However, in children, sleep is an activity that constitutes a considerable proportion of daily time and sleep duration is associated with BMI. Research has shown that screen-based sedentary time dominates the presleep period in children and young people and is associated with a later sleep onset [16]. Thus, there is likely an interaction between sleep duration, SB and PA; but studies that have analysed the unique and interactive effects of sleep duration on BMI among children and youth are rather scarce.

By applying traditional and novel regression analysis approaches (i.e. isotemporal substitution paradigm) we aimed to model the impact of sleep, SB and PA on BMI among children and youth (5–24 years) using data from a nationally representative survey from New Zealand.

Methods

Research design

Data from the cross-sectional National Survey of Children and Young People’s Physical Activity and Dietary Behaviours in New Zealand (2008/09) were used in this study. A representative sample of children and young people from New Zealand (n = 2,503 aged 5 to 24 years) were selected using meshblocks (i.e. a defined geographic area, varying in size from part of a city block to large areas of rural land). Within each meshblock, eligible households were identified and asked to participate in the survey. One child or young person was randomly chosen from each eligible household. Population weights were calculated for each surveyed participant and applied during all analyses. Data were collected from September 2008 to May 2009. The survey design was managed using R software for statistical computing.

Data were collected during a face-to-face home visit (computer-assisted personal interview, CAPI) and a subsequent telephone interview (computer-assisted telephone interview, CATI) conducted 7 to 14 days after the CAPI. Socio-demographic characteristics and self-reported dietary habits were collected during the face-to-face home visit. Height and weight were also measured during the home visit. Accelerometers were administered to participants to provide an objective measure of time spent in LPA, MVPA, and SB over a seven-day period. The Multi-media Activity Recall for Children and Adolescents (MARCA), a validated [17] computerised 24-hour recall time use questionnaire was used to collect information on self-reported sleeping behaviour and was administered during the CAPI and CATI (see below).

The National Survey of Children and Young People’s Physical Activity and Dietary Behaviours in New Zealand (2008/09) procedures were approved by the Multi-region Human and Disability Ethics Committee review board. Inform consent was obtained for all participants prior to any data collection.

Variables of the study

Covariates (demographics).

The following demographic information was collected for all survey participants and included as covariates in statistical analysis: age, sex and ethnic group (European or other). Based on age, participants were assigned to the following age groups: 5 to 9 years; 10 to 14 years; 15 to 19 years; 20 to 24 years.

Body mass index.

Height and weight were measured in participants’ homes using standard anthropometric methods [18] and body mass index was then calculated as weight in kilograms divided by the squared of height in meters (kg/m2).

Sleep duration.

The Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adults (MARCA) [17] was utilised to obtain information on use-of-time behaviours including sleep duration. Two different versions of MARCA were used, one for children (5–17 years of age) and one for young (18–24 years of age). The MARCA is a computerised use-of-time questionnaire that takes participants through their previous day (24 hours) in segments of a minimum of five minutes duration. For discrete periods of the day (e.g., morning, afternoon and evening) the person chooses an activity from a list available and the duration of the activity, which is then recorded on the MARCA. Each participant recalled a total of three days (72 hours) of activity. During the face-to-face interview (CAPI), participants were asked to recall their activities during the previous day (24 hours). During the CATI (7 to 14 days after the CAPI), participants were asked to recall their activities during the previous two days (48 hours). In this study, only sleep duration was used for analysis.

Sedentary behaviour and physical activity.

SB and PA were measured objectively with Actigraph accelerometers (GT1M). These devices have been validated as a measure of physical activity in children [19], adolescents, and young adults [20, 21]. The Actigraph has demonstrated acceptable validity against criterion measures with coefficients ranging from 0.50–0.89 [19, 22]. Participants were asked to wear the Actigraph in their waist during waking hours for seven consecutive days (including two weekend days). SAS version 9.2 (SAS Institute, Inc, Cary, NC) was used to reduce accelerometry data to those with ≥ 3 days of 10 h/day of monitored data using 10-sec epochs [23]. Non-wear time was defined as a sequence of ≥20 minutes of missing activity counts, with no tolerance of activity counts [24]. Freedson validated age-specific cut-points [25] were used to derive the time spent in SB, LPA, and MVPA. For each valid recorded minute, the following equation was used to convert activity counts into equivalent MET values [MET = 2.757+(0.0015*counts/min)–(0.08957*age)–(0.000038*counts/min*age)]. The obtained MET value was then converted into the corresponding level of physical activity using the defined cut-off points. For each valid participant record, total time spent in sedentary/light/moderate/vigorous-intensity activities for each valid day was averaged across the total number of days to calculate average daily time spent in each type of activity. The following cut-off points [26] for METs were used to define light-intensity, moderate-intensity and vigorous-intensity physical activity using the Actigraph accelerometer: Sedentary: <1.5 MET (0–149 counts/min); Light: 1.5 ≤ MET < 3 (150–499 counts/min); Moderate: 3 ≤ MET < 6 (500–3999 counts/min); Vigorous: ≤ 6 MET (400 or more counts/min). Total wear time was recorded and averaged per day.

Statistical analysis

Only participants with valid accelerometer data (n = 1,812) were included in the final analysis. All statistical analyses were performed using the Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS) version 22. Statistical significance was determined using a p value <0.05 throughout all analyses performed. Descriptive data are presented as Mean (95% Confidence Interval) unless otherwise stated. Multiple linear regression analysis was used to examine the associations between sleep duration, SB, LPA, MVPA and BMI. All models were adjusted for relevant covariates in each case and presented separately for each age group. Three different models were run:

Single-factor models.

Single-factor models depict the association of each physical activity intensity category with the different outcomes of the study without mutual adjustment for other categories of activities. For instance, in a single-factor model examining the effect on BMI of 60 minutes of MVPA, the model would include MVPA and confounder variables. The exemplified model would take the form of: BMI = (b1) MVPA + (b2) confounder variables.

Partition model.

In partition models, the coefficient for each activity intensity category represents the effect on the outcomes of the study of increasing this activity intensity category while holding other categories constant but without holding total wear time constant. Therefore, it represents the effect of ‘‘adding” an activity intensity category. Thus, all physical activity intensity categories are entered simultaneously into the model. For instance, in a partition model examining the effect on BMI of adding 60-minutes of MVPA, the model would include sedentary time, light, moderate and vigorous physical activity and other confounder variables. The exemplified model would take the form of: BMI = (b1) MVPA + (b2) LPA + (b3) sedentary time + (b4) confounder variables.

Isotemporal substitution model: Isotemporal substitution models, by definition, estimate the effect of replacing one physical activity intensity with another physical activity intensity for the same amount of time (60-minutes in our study for age groups 5 to 19 and 30-minutes for the 20–24 age group). One of the PA intensities was removed from the model, while wear time and the other PA intensities remained. Thus, coefficients represent the estimated effects on the outcomes of the study of substituting a specified intensity category for the category dropped while holding total (activity) time constant. For instance, in an isotemporal substitution model examining the effect on BMI of replacing 60-min of sedentary time with LPA, the model would include light, moderate and vigorous physical activity, total wear time, and other confounder variables. By eliminating one activity component from the model (e.g., sedentary time), the coefficient for total wear time represents the omitted activity component (sedentary time). The remaining coefficients represent the consequence of substituting 60 minutes of that activity instead of sedentary activity while holding other activity types constant. The exemplified model would take the form of: BMI = (b1) LPA + (b2) MVPA + (b4) total wear time + (b5) confounder variables.

Results

There were no statistically significant differences in demographics or exposure variables between the different age groups of study (p>0.05). Table 1 and Table 2 present the participant demographics characteristics and accelerometer derived variables respectively according to the respective age groups.

Table 3 presents the single behaviour, partition, and isotemporal substitution models for BMI across the different age groups. In the single behaviour models, SB was proportionally (positively) associated with BMI in all four age groups (p<0.001 for all age groups), whereas sleep time (p<0.001 for the 10–14 years and 15–19 years age groups and p<0.05 for the 5–9 years and 20–24 years age groups), LPA (p<0.001 for all age groups) and MVPA (p<0.001 for all age groups) were inversely associated with BMI.

thumbnail
Table 3. Single behaviour models for BMI among children and adolescents by age group (n = 1,812).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184472.t003

When all behaviours were entered simultaneously in the partition models (Table 4), SB showed a unique (inverse) association with BMI across all age groups (p<0.05) but 20–24 years (p>0.05). Similarly, MVPA was positively statistically significant (p<0.001) in the partition models across all age groups.

thumbnail
Table 4. Partition models for BMI among children and adolescents by age group (n = 1,812).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184472.t004

Results from the isotemporal substitution models (models 6–8) were consistent across the different age groups of the study (Table 5).

thumbnail
Table 5. Isotemporal substitution models for BMI among children and adolescents by age group (n = 1,812).

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0184472.t005

Replacing SB

In age groups 5–9 years, 10–14 years and 15–19 years, the impact of replacing 60 min/day of SB with the same amount of MVPA time resulted in an estimated decrease in BMI across the different age groups (p<0.001), ranging from -1.26 (5–9 years) to -1.43 units (15–19 years). Similar results were achieved when replacing SB with LPA or sleeping time among age groups 5–19 years. In the age group 20–24, the impact of replacing 30 min/day of SB with MVPA resulted in an estimated decrease of 1 BMI unit (p<0.001). However, replacing SB with LPA or sleeping time resulted in no significant association with BMI in young people.

Replacing LPA

Replacing LPA with SB resulted in an estimated increase in BMI of 0.27 kg/m2 (p<0.001) for the 5–9 years age group and 0.17 and 0.21, p<0.05 for the 10–14 years and 15–19 years age groups respectively) of BMI. In contrast, replacing LPA with MVPA resulted in an estimated decrease (-0.98 BMI units, p<0.001 for the 5–9 years age group and 120 BMI units, p<0.05 for both, the 10–14 years and the 15–19 years age groups respectively) in BMI. In the age group 20–24, a significant association with BMI was found (-1 BMI units, p<0.001) only when LPA was replaced with MVPA.

Replacing MVPA

In5-9 years, 10–14 years and 15–19 years age groups, replacing 60 min/day of MVPA with SB was associated with an estimated increase in BMI (p<0.001), ranging from 1.25 units in the 5–9 years group to 1.45 units in the 15–19 years group. Similarly, replacing MVPA with LPA or sleeping time resulted in a systematic increase in BMI across the different age groups. This was consistent with the results in the 20–24 years age group, where replacing 30 min/day of MVPA with any of the other three behaviours (sleeping time, SB or LPA) was associated with a decrease in BMI (p<0.001).

Discussion

In this paper, we used nationally representative data and a combination of traditional and novel regression analytical approaches to model the relationship between sleep time, SB, PA and BMI in children and youth. After controlling for each of the respective categories of physical activity, the main findings were that MVPA and SB time were significantly associated with BMI. Also, replacing SB with PA of any intensity (i.e. LPA or MVPA) mathematically reduced BMI. Our study expands the literature in this area in the following ways: 1) we extended age groups from previous studies involving nationally representative samples to include adolescents and young adults. Using these data we were able to conduct subgroup analysis by age; 2) we used objective measures of PA, SB and BMI; 3) we included sleep duration, an important component of the day that has potential to influence BMI.

Supporting results from smaller studies [10, 11, 14], our isotemporal substitution models revealed unambiguous cross-sectional reductions of BMI after SB was replaced with MVPA, and replacing SB with MVPA produced greater BMI reductions compared to LPA. Interestingly, our results suggest that when SB is replaced with LPA a reduction in BMI could be achieved. These results contrast with those found in smaller studies by Sardinha et al. in 386 children age 9–12 years old [12] and Leppanen et al. in 307 children age 4 years old [14] where this effect was not reported. Not surprisingly, replacing MVPA with LPA results in adverse BMI outcomes in our study sample. In sum, our findings suggest that promoting MVPA and reducing SB is associated with lower body mass and highlighted the potential positive effects that LPA on BMI.

Not surprisingly, in single models MVPA and LPA were associated with lower BMI across all age groups. This supports traditional thinking that PA, regardless of intensity, is associated with increased energy expenditure and can contribute to energy related behaviours such as obesity. On the other hand, greater SB was associated with higher BMI among the population sample. However, after controlling for each of the other behaviours (partition models) only SB and MVPA remained statistically significant, demonstrating the unique effect of these behaviours on BMI. Our results align with previous work suggesting that higher-intensity PA is more strongly associated with lower BMI among 10-year old British children [15].

Contrary to previous work [12, 15] our data suggest that SB was associated with BMI across all ages under study. The context in which SB occurs may partly explain the former observations. A systematic review concluded that watching television for 2 h per day was associated with unfavourable body composition and reduced fitness among children and youth [27]. Watching TV was high (>2h/day) among our sample [23] and TV watching may also increase energy intake among children and adolescents [25]. However, longitudinal studies are necessary to demonstrate whether SB contributes independently of MVPA to obesity among children and youth.

In recent time, sleep has been considered to have an impact on weight status among children and adolescents [2830]. It has thus been highlighted as a potential target in obesity interventions [31]. However, our data do not support an effect of sleep time on BMI in our sample. More research is needed to clarify the impact of sleeping time, SB and PA on obesity among children and youth.

Strengths of the study include the large nationally representative sample, objective measures of PA and SB, the different age-groups, and inclusion of time use behaviour, as well as the novel analytical approach (isotemporal substitution modelling). Nevertheless, the following limitations need to be considered when interpreting these findings. First, the cross-sectional nature of the research does not allow causal inferences to be drawn. Second, there are some inherent issues with SB and PA being derived from accelerometers, such as the use of <100 counts/minute as a threshold to determine sedentary activities or epoch length that may impact the generalization of the results [26]. Similarly, the use of self-reported measures to obtain data on sleeping behaviour of participants is associated with issues of recall bias. Longitudinal designs are necessary to overcome some of the research-design inherent limitations of this study and confirm the results reported here.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this secondary data analysis of children and adolescents from New Zealand showed that MVPA and SB have uniques effect on body composition. Substituting SB with LPA or MVPA is associated with a favourable effect on BMI across all age groups, with MVPA having the strongest association. These findings support the potential value of reducing SB time and possible substitution with PA in children and youth to control weight. More research is required to determine the potential effects of LPA to control weight in this population group.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

This national survey was voluntary and relied on the goodwill of participants. Parental consent was obtained for participants 15 years and under, while older participants provided consent themselves. Data were collected directly from children aged 10 years and older, whereas parents provided proxy responses for children 9 years and under. The University of Auckland Human Participants Ethics Committee approved the study.

References

  1. 1. Strong WB, Malina RM, Blimkie CJR, Daniels SR, Dishman RK, Gutin B, et al. Evidence Based Physical Activity for School-age Youth. J Pediatr. 2005;146:732–7. pmid:15973308
  2. 2. Janssen I, LeBlanc AG. Systematic review of the health benefits of physical activity and fitness in school-aged children and youth. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2010;7:40. pmid:20459784
  3. 3. Waleh MQ. Impacts of Physical Activity on the Obese. Prim Care Clin Off Pract. 2016;43:97–107. pmid:26896203
  4. 4. Poitras VJ, Gray CE, Borghese MM, Carson V, Chaput J-P, Janssen I, et al. Systematic review of the relationships between objectively measured physical activity and health indicators in school-aged children and youth 1. Appl Physiol Nutr Metab. 2016;41 6 (Suppl. 3):S197–239.
  5. 5. Herzig K-H, Ahola R, Leppäluoto J, Jokelainen J, Jämsä T, Keinänen-Kiukaanniemi S. Light physical activity determined by a motion sensor decreases insulin resistance, improves lipid homeostasis and reduces visceral fat in high-risk subjects: PreDiabEx study RCT. Int J Obes. 2014;38:1089–96. pmid:24285336
  6. 6. Dempsey PC, Owen N, Biddle SJH, Dunstan DW. Managing Sedentary Behavior to Reduce the Risk of Diabetes and Cardiovascular Disease. Curr Diab Rep. 2014;14:522. pmid:25052856
  7. 7. Saunders TJ, Chaput J-P, Tremblay MS. Sedentary Behaviour as an Emerging Risk Factor for Cardiometabolic Diseases in Children and Youth. Can J Diabetes. 2014;38:53–61. pmid:24485214
  8. 8. Cliff DP, Hesketh KD, Vella SA, Hinkley T, Tsiros MD, Ridgers ND, et al. Objectively measured sedentary behaviour and health and development in children and adolescents: systematic review and meta-analysis. Obes Rev. 2016;17:330–44. pmid:26914664
  9. 9. Sardinha LB, Andersen LB, Anderssen SA, Quiterio AL, Ornelas R, Froberg K, et al. Objectively Measured Time Spent Sedentary Is Associated With Insulin Resistance Independent of Overall and Central Body Fat in 9- to 10-Year-Old Portuguese Children. Diabetes Care. 2008;31:569–75. pmid:18070991
  10. 10. Leppänen MH, Nyström CD, Henriksson P, Pomeroy J, Ruiz JR, Ortega FB, et al. Physical activity intensity, sedentary behavior, body composition and physical fitness in 4-year-old children: results from the ministop trial. Int J Obes. 2016;40:1126–33. pmid:27087109
  11. 11. Aggio D, Smith L, Hamer M. Effects of reallocating time in different activity intensities on health and fitness: a cross sectional study. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015;12:83. pmid:26104041
  12. 12. Loprinzi PD, Cardinal BJ, Lee H, Tudor-Locke C. Markers of adiposity among children and adolescents: implications of the isotemporal substitution paradigm with sedentary behavior and physical activity patterns. J Diabetes Metab Disord. 2015;14:46. pmid:26034720
  13. 13. Mekary RA, Willett WC, Hu FB, Ding EL. Isotemporal Substitution Paradigm for Physical Activity Epidemiology and Weight Change. Am J Epidemiol. 2009;170:519–27. pmid:19584129
  14. 14. Sardinha LB, Marques A, Minderico C, Ekelund U. Cross-sectional and prospective impact of reallocating sedentary time to physical activity on children’s body composition. Pediatr Obes. 2016. pmid:27256488
  15. 15. Steele RM, van Sluijs EM, Cassidy A, Griffin SJ, Ekelund U. Targeting sedentary time or moderate- and vigorous-intensity activity: independent relations with adiposity in a population-based sample of 10-y-old British children. Am J Clin Nutr. 2009;90:1185–92. pmid:19776141
  16. 16. Foley LS, Maddison R, Jiang Y, Marsh S, Olds TS, Ridley K. Presleep activities and time of sleep onset in children. Pediatrics. 2013;131:276–82. pmid:23319532
  17. 17. Ridley K, Olds TS, Hill A. The Multimedia Activity Recall for Children and Adolescents (MARCA): development and evaluation. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2006;3:10. pmid:16725055
  18. 18. Norton K, Olds T, Australian Sports Commission. Anthropometrica: a textbook of body measurement for sports and health courses. UNSW Press; 1996.
  19. 19. Rowlands A V. Accelerometer assessment of physical activity in children: an update. Pediatr Exerc Sci. 2007;19:252–66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18019585. Accessed 22 Jan 2017. pmid:18019585
  20. 20. Treuth MS, Schmitz K, Catellier DJ, McMurray RG, Murray DM, Almeida MJ, et al. Defining accelerometer thresholds for activity intensities in adolescent girls. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2004;36:1259–66. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15235335. Accessed 22 Jan 2017. pmid:15235335
  21. 21. Trost SG, Ward DS, Moorehead SM, Watson PD, Riner W, Burke JR. Validity of the computer science and applications (CSA) activity monitor in children. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1998;30:629–33. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9565947. Accessed 22 Jan 2017. pmid:9565947
  22. 22. Welk G. Physical activity assessments for health-related research. Human Kine. 2002.
  23. 23. Foley LS, Maddison R, Jiang Y, Olds T, Ridley K. It’s not just the television: survey analysis of sedentary behaviour in New Zealand young people. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2011;8:132. pmid:22133039
  24. 24. Mâsse LC, Fuemmeler BF, Anderson CB, Matthews CE, Trost SG, Catellier DJ, et al. Accelerometer data reduction: a comparison of four reduction algorithms on select outcome variables. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2005;37 11 Suppl:S544–54. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16294117. Accessed 22 Jan 2017. pmid:16294117
  25. 25. Freedson P., Pober D., and Janz K.F., Calibration of accelerometer output for children. Med Sci Sports Exerc, 2005. 37(11 Suppl): p. S523–30. pmid:16294115
  26. 26. Banda JA, Haydel KF, Davila T, Desai M, Bryson S, Haskell WL, et al. Effects of Varying Epoch Lengths, Wear Time Algorithms, and Activity Cut-Points on Estimates of Child Sedentary Behavior and Physical Activity from Accelerometer Data. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0150534. pmid:26938240
  27. 27. Edelson LR, Mathias KC, Fulgoni VL, Karagounis LG. Screen-based sedentary behavior and associations with functional strength in 6–15 year-old children in the United States. BMC Public Health. 2015;16:116. pmid:26846277
  28. 28. Sluggett L, Wagner SL, Hardy C, Harris RL. Associations between Sleep Duration and Indicators of Cardiometabolic Disease in Canadian Children and Adolescents: Analyses of the 2007–2009 Canadian Health Measures Survey. Child Obes. 2016;12:325–33. pmid:27195991
  29. 29. Thompson DR, Obarzanek E, Franko DL, Barton BA, Morrison J, Biro FM, et al. Childhood overweight and cardiovascular disease risk factors: the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Growth and Health Study. J Pediatr. 2007;150:18–25. pmid:17188606
  30. 30. Morrissey B, Malakellis M, Whelan J, Millar L, Swinburn B, Allender S, et al. Sleep duration and risk of obesity among a sample of Victorian school children. BMC Public Health. 2016;16:245. pmid:26961765
  31. 31. Taveras EM, McDonald J, O’Brien A, Haines J, Sherry B, Bottino CJ, et al. Healthy Habits, Happy Homes: Methods and baseline data of a randomized controlled trial to improve household routines for obesity prevention. Prev Med (Baltim). 2012;55:418–26.